Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet City Council - 06/10/2003
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Corpus Christi June 10, 2003 1:45 p.m. Swearing in of Municipal Court Judges Extraterritorial Jurisdictian Agreement signing ceremony between the City of Corpus Christi and Nueces County Certificate of Commend~ [ion for HEB for support to the City of Corpus Christi AGENDA CI~ ¥ OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS ! 1201 LEOPARD ! JUNE 10, 2003 ! 2:00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE - THE USE OF PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUI~ Members of the audience will be provided the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. address. Your presentation will be #mite subject, please present it to the City Secl Si ud. Desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree qu Concilio para ayudarle. '~ELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE 'CIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. ~n opportunity to address the Council at approximately 5:30 p.m. of at the end of ~lease speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and ~ to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your ~tary. =, su ingl~s es limitado, habr~ un int~rprete ingl~s-espaRol es todas las juntas del Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office (at 361-~80-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr. to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Father Victor, St. Cyril and Methodius Church. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag to the United States. D. City Secretary Armando C~hapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor Pro Tern Henry Garrett Council Members: Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Bill Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott City Manager George K. Noe Acting City Attorney R. Jay Reining .__ City Secretary Armando Chapa __ E. MINUTES: 1. Approval of Joint and Regular Meetings of May 27, 2003. (Attachment # 1) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10,2003 Page 2 BOARDS & COMMITTEE Corpus Christi Down Ethics Commission Food Service Adviso Mechanical/Plumbin( Sister City Committe~ Water Shore Advisor EXPLANATION OF COUNi ,PPOINTMENTS: (Attachment # 2) own Management District ¥ Committee Advisory Board Committee ;IL ACTION: For administrative convenienc, as motions, resolutions, or ordi Council will use a different met, finally pass an ordinance by. ratherthan a two reading ordin~ A motion to reconsider may b~ last regular, or a subsequen incorporated herein for reconsi item. ;, certain of the agenda items are listed lances. If deemed appropdate, the City ~od of adoption from the one listed; may ~dopting it as an emergency measure ,nce; or may modify the action specified. ~ made at this meeting of a vote at the special meeting; such agendas are eration and action on any reconsidered CONSENt' AGENDA Notice to, he Public The following items are of a routine oriadministrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and ~upport matedal on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous me~ting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed sepa/fately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which eventl the item or items will immediately by withdrawn for individual consideration ih its normal sequence afterthe items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. CONSENT MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES AND ORDINANCES FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETINGS: (At this point the Council will vote oN all motions, resolutions and ordinances not removed for individual consideration) Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with i Sechdst- Hall Company of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amoudt of $39,690.80 for the Fire Station No. 2 Re-Roof Project. (Attachment # 3) CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10, 2003 Page 3 .ao Ordinance appropriating $! from Water Capital Improve Revenue Bond); for Wes amending the FY2002 - Ordinance No. 025144 to i~ ;21,165 in Unappropriated Interest ~ent Program Fund No. 4081 (1994 ley Seale Dam damage repairs; 2003 Capital Budget adopted by crease appropriations by $521,165. (Attachment # 4) / Motion authorizing the City ~anager or his designee to execute a construction contract with ~.owman Services, Inc. of Robstown, Texas, in the amount of $~521,164.80 for Wesley Seale Dam Damage Repairs. (Attachrqent # 4) Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with Holioman Corporation of Converse, Texas in the amount of $1,841,249.88 for the Kostoryz Lift Station and Force Mains. (Attachment # 5) Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with R.S. Parker Construction of Portland, Texas in the amount of $104,550 for the Kinney Street Bridge Repairs. (Attachment # 6) Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Real Estate Sales ContraCt with Thomas W. Stewart and Nina Kathleen Russo, Independent Executrix of the Estate of John B. Russo, in the amount of $371,000 plus $1,500 in closing costs for the purchase of fee simple property rights for .882 acres out of Block 53, Beach Additioh, necessary for the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant Lift Station & Diversion to Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant/Nueces River Delta, Project #7110. (Attachmenl # 7) Ordinance appropriating $2i339 in unappropriated interest from Fire Station Capital Improvement Fund No. 3190 for the Mustang Island Fire Sub-Station project; Closing Fund No. 3190; amending Capital Budget adopted by ,Ordinance No. 025144 to increase appropriations by $2,339. (Attachment # 8) Resolution authorizing the C~ty Manager or his designee to accept a reimbursement grant fi'om the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality in the amount of $19,003 for mitigation measures at Fire Station No. 10. (Attachment # 9) CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to iegend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10,2003 Page 4 9.b. Ordinance appropriating $1~9,003 reimbursement grant from the Texas Commission for EnVironmental Quality in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for the mitigation measures at Fire Station No. 10. (Attachmer~t # 9) 10.a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a renewal grant in the amoun~ of $271,525 and execute a contract with the Corporation for Natlonal and Community Service for the continuation of the Senior Companion Program. (Attachment # 10) 10.b. 11.a. 11.b. 12.a. Ordinance appropriating ai grant in the amount of $271,525 awarded by the Corporation for National and Community Service in the No. 1050 Federal/~tate Grants Fund for the Senior Companion Program. (AttaChment # 10) Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Attachment No. 06A to Conlract No. 7460005741-2003 with the Texas Department of Health increasing the administrative funds at the rate of $9.95, which r~places the previous $9.45, for each participant served to provide for funding of group nutrition education, and individual cbunseling. The program shall also distribute food vouchers dUdng the period of October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2003 as part of the Women, Infants and Children (WlC) Federal Pro~lram. (Attachment # 11) Ordinance appropriating an increase in the Texas Department of Health Grant for Women, Idfants, and Children (WIC) Program from $9.45 to $9.95 per pa~r/icipant served, for total estimated grant increase of $31,000, irl the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund. (Attachment # 11) Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant from the Texas Department of Public Safety Division on Emergency Management in the amount of $1,000 for television public service announcerrlents dudng the 2003 Hurricane Season. (Attachment # 12) CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10, 2003 Page 5 12.b. 13.a. Ordinance appropriating $1 Public Safety Division on I 1050 Federal/State Grant.' announcements dudng the # 12) Ordinance authorizing the execute an agreement witl space containing appmxim lower level of the terminal aeronautical communicatior communications to aircraft c nautical miles from Corpus applicable federal, state, consideration of payment of basis for a term of up to twE ,000 from the Texas Department of mergency Management, in the No. Fund for television public service 003 Hurricane Season. (Attachment City Manager or his designee to i Aeronautical Radio, Inc. to lease ately 56 square-feet located in the the maintenance and operation of equipment providing air/ground data n the ground and en mute within 200 ;hristi, subject to compliance with all tnd local laws and regulations in $39.85 per square foot on a monthly lye months. (Attachment # 13) 13.b. First Reading Ordinance - ~,uthorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an agr( ,ement with Aeronautical Radio, Inc. to lease space containing a )proximately 56 square feet located in the lower level of the .:erminal for the maintenance and operation of aeronautical c~mmunication equipment providing air/ground data communicat ons to aircraft on the ground and en route within 200 nautical m compliance with all applica[ regulations in consideration, on a monthly basis for a ten 13) lies from Corpus Christi, subject to le federal, state and local laws and payment of $39.85 per square foot of up to five years. (Attachment # PRESENTATIONS: Public comment will not be so,cited on Presentation items. 14. Preview Presentation for the All America Cities Award (Attachment # 14) 15. Presentation by Corpus ChriSti Regional Economic Development Corporation (Attachment # '15) 16. Solid Waste Services, Quarterly Update (Attachment # 16) CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10,2003 Page 6 17. 18. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ZONING CASES: Case No. 0503-02, Robert zoning from a "FR" Farm-F Estate District on 2.00 acre., to Richard Hesse, Docum{ Texas and also out of Lots ' and Encinal Farm and Ga~ Road and approximately 65 (Attachment # 17) Planninq Commission's and of the "RE" District. ORDll Amending the Zoning Ordin~ Eadene B. Jones by chan(. 2.00 acres recorded in D, County, Texas and Flour Tracts, Lots 15 and 16, Secti, to "R-E" Residential Estate Di Plan to account for a~ Comprehensive Plan. · & Eadene B. Jones: A change of ',ural District to a "RE" Residential out of a 28.9767 acre tract deeded ,nt #2002036700, Nueces County, 5 and 16, Section 25 on Flour Bluff den Tracts, located east of Aidine ) feet north of Yorktown Boulevard. StafFs Recommendation: Approval lANCE ince upon application by Robert I & ng the zoning map in reference to cument No. 2002036700 Nueces uff and Encinal Farm and Garden )n 25, from "F-R" Farm-Rural District strict; amending the Comprehensive deviations from the existing Case No. 0403-05, B&EC P~rtnership, Ltd.: A change of zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 1 and "R-lC" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2 on Flour Bluff and En¢inal Farm and Garden Tracts, being 36.631 acres out of Lots 21 ~nd 22, Section 19, located south of Wooldridge Road and Wind Hollow Drive Intersection. (Attachment # 18) Planning Commission's andiStaff's Recommendation: Approval of the "R-1 B" District on TraCt 1 and "R-lC" District on Tract 2. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10,2003 Page 7 19. 20. ORDI Amending the Zoning Ordi Partnership, Ltd., by chan~. Flour Bluff and Encinal Fan acres out of Lots 21 and 22 District to "R-1 B" One-famil~ lC" One-family Dwelling i Comprehensive Plan to a( existing Comprehensive PI~ Case No. 0503-01, J. Patri¢ from a "R-1 B" One-family D House Distdct to a "B-4" Ge and Encinal Farm and Gard Lots 1, 2, and 3, Sectio Boulevard, approximately 81 (Attachment # 19) qANCE ~ance upon application by B & EC lng the zoning map in reference to 1 and Garden Tra.c,ts, .b, eing 36.631 Section 19, from F-R Farm-Rural Dwelling District on Tract 1 and "R- )istdct on Tract 2; amending the :count for any deviations from the n. Moran, MD: A change of zoning ~velling District and "A-2" Apartment leral Business District on Flour Bluff ~n Tracts, being 32.521 acres out of 11, located south of Saratoga )0 feet east of South Staples Street. Planninq Commission's an(~ Staff's Recommendation: Approval of the "B-4" District. ORDINANCE Amending the Zoning Ordir~ance upon application by J. Patdck Moran, M.D. by changing thff zoning map in reference to 32.521 acres out of Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Section 11 from "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District and "A-2" Apartmept House District to "B-4" General Business District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan. Ca,,s,e ,N,o. 0403-01, Albert Rt Villarreal: A change of zoning from a AB Professional Office District to a "B-l" Neighborhood Business District on Southlwood Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 7, located on the south side df Gollihar Road, approximately 280 feet west of Kostoryz Road. (Attachment # 20) CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10,2003 Page 8 21. Planning Commission's Re'commendation: Denial of the "B-1" District, and in lieu thereofI approval of a Special Permit for a mattress retail/clearance sales business and enclosed storage of mattresses subject to nineS9) conditions. Staffs Recommendation: Denial. ORDI~NANCE Amending the Zoning Ordir Villarreal by changing the zo Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 7, Office District) by grantin retail/clearance sales stor~ amending the Comprehensi' from the existing Comprehe ance upon application by Albert R. wing map in reference to Southwood (currently zoned "AB" Professional a Special Permit for mattress subject to nine (9) conditions; ~e Plan to account for any deviations 3sive Plan. Case No. 0403-06, F & S Fqod Inc.: A change of zoning from a "R-B" One-family DwellinglDistdct to a "B-I" Neighborhood Business District on Gardendale Unit 2, Block 5, Lots 14 and 15, located south of Curtis Clar~k Drive and 220 feet west of South Staples Street. (Attachment# 21) Planninq Commission's Re(~ommendation: Denial. Staffs Recommendation: Dffnial of the "B-I" District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a Special Permit for a parking lot subject to six (6) conditions. ORDINANCE Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by F & S Food, Inc., by changing the zoning map in reference to Gardendale Unit 2, Block 5, Lots 14 and 15, (currently zoned "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District) by granting a Special Permit for a parking lot subject to six (6) conditions;amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10, 2003 Page 9 22. Case No. 0403-03, Las Villa from a "1-2" Light Industrial Distdct on Mid-Town Indust~ 64, located south of Bear l South Navigation Boulevarc Planning Commission's Re¢ District. Staff's Recommendation: D ORDII s De Corte Real: A change of zoning District to a "R-2" Multiple Dwelling iai District, Block 1, Lots 62, 63 and .ane between Cliff Maus Drive and (Attachment # 22) )mmendation: Approval of the "R-2" ;nial. lANCE Amending the Zoning Ordin de Corte Real by changing ~ Town Industrial District, Bio Light Industrial District to amending the ComprehensiVe Plan to account for from the existing Comprehensive Plan. ~nce upon application by Las Villas he zoning map in reference to Mid- ;k 1, Lots 62, 63 and 64, from "1-2" "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District; any deviations K. SPECIAL DISCUSSION ITEM: 23. Update of the Five-Year General Fund Financial Forecast, Overview of 2003-2004 (~eneral Fund Proposed Budget, Distribution of FY2002-2003 Third Quarter Financial Performance Report (Attachment # 23) L. REGULAE AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS, RE, SOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES: 24. Motion authorizing the development of a three-year contract with two one-year renewal option,s between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and Humana Health!to administer the City's self-funded health, dental, and vision benefits plans; to provide and administer a health service8 network; and to provide pharmacy benefits management through Advance PCS. (Attachment # 24) PUBLIC COMMENT FROMTHE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY ~ OR AT THE END OF THE COUNCIL MEETING, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIO~ ~S To I'HREE MINUTES. IF YOUPLAN CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10,2003 Page10 N= 25. 26. TO ADDRESS THE COU^ PLEASE SIGN THE FOR/~ CHAMBER, GIVING YOUR recording is made of the meeting; located at the podium and state yc of other information pertaining tc Secretary.) Si usted se dirige a la junta y cree ~ ingl~s-espa~ol en la reuni6n de CIL DURING THIS TIME PER/OD, AT THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL NAME, ADDRESS AND TOPIC. (A 'herefore, please speak into the microphone urname and address. Ifyou have a petition your subject, please present it to the City ~ue su ingl~s es limitado, habr~ un int6rprete junta para ayudarle. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBER~ OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS~ ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PUBLIC NOTICE is given th~ the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time dudng the meeting in order to discuss matters listed on the agenda, When authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Govemment Code. In the event the Council elects to g~ into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding office. Executive session under Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding CCMCA, ,Inc. a Texas Corporation, vs. City of Corpus Chdsti, Case No. C-D3-170, in the United States District Court for the Southern Distribt of Texas, Corpus Christi Division, with possible discussion and action in open session. Executive session under Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding AVE, Inc. vs. City of Corpus Christi and Peter Alvarez, in his official capacity as Chief of the Corpus Chdsti Police Department, Case No. c-03-216, in the United States Distdct Court for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division, with possible discussion and action in open session. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 10, 2003 Page 11 O. REPORTS: The following reports include CiO/policies or activities; reque from Staff; reports of activities constituent concerns; current t assignments; scheduling of ful other brief discussions regard, 27. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: Consideration of resolution,~ the City Council as to legisl Legislature. ~uestions by Council to Staff regarding ted by Council for information or reports )f individual Council members and Staff; )pics raised by media; follow-up on Staff ,~re Council meetings and activities; and r~g city-related matters. and actions deemed appropriate by ative issues before the 78 th Texas 28. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT * Upcoming Items 29. MAYOR'S UPDATE 30. COUNCIL AND OTHER REPORTS P. ADJOURNMENT: POSTING STATEMENT: This agenda was posted on the Ci~s official bulletin board_at the front,entrance to City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, At ~: ~ 0 p.m~fL~_ ~:~, 2003. Armando Chapa City Secretary ~ NOTE: The City Council Agenda can be found on the City's Home Page at www.cctexas.com after 7:00 p.m. on the Friday before regularly scheduled council mefftings. If technical problems occur, the agenda will be uploade{I on the Internet by Monday morning. Symbols used to highlight action item that implement council priority issues. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) 2001-2002 PRIORITY ISSUES ] ~'WCO~G PRIORY ?Y ISSUES A~rport / Seawall / Conv~nfl0n C~nter [ Arena * Continue quarterly reporting process for these initiatives. '86 Bond,Issue Improvements Update status on Senior Center~. · provide communication on conlplction oftbese projects (e.g. "Report to the Community"). · Continue community involvement on issues such as Leopard Street improvements. Priva~l~zatlOn / Re-Eneineerin~ · Clearly define '~4vatization" and "re-engineerings" · Make decisions regarding privatizatinn and re-engineering in the next 12-24 months, with disenssions within 90 days. · Establish process to identify what services can and cannot be privatized. · Continue foens on park maintenance. Finance · ' Maintain the 5-year forecast model. · Review the August 1 budget adoption deadline. Crime ,Control and Prevention · Cominue implementation of th~ Community Policing initiative. · Establish date for Crime Contrbl and Provcntion District election. Continue City participation in Youth Opportunities United and other youth crime initiatives. Employee Health Care · Address concerns related to emPloyee compensation and benefits, including health insurance. · Work to coordinate Police and Fire health benefits with those of other City employees Economic Development Sales TaX · Establish election date. Storm water Utility · Reconsider implementation plah for a Storm Water Utility. 1 Packery. Chanuel 1 · Contraue quarterly reports on ~e progress of the TIF and Beach Restoration Project. L~ndflll · Continue to evaluate the efficie * Examine alternatives for solid Intemet · Continue regular updates and member web pages. · Establish target date for onlim · Communicate brush pickup via CDBG · Continue active role. ~cy and effectiveness of operations. ~aste management system, including privatization. mnsion of the City's web site, including individual council ~rmitting process. e-malL Frost Baok BuildiPg 1 · Lease and complete renovatio~ Annexation Plan * Implemem currem island annexation plan ADA Transition Pln~ · Develop and approve ADA Trgnsition Plan within 90 days. Redistricting * Develop Council-approved redistricting plan for the city of Corpus Christi Indu~trinl Distrie$ Contr#et · Review Industrial District contracts and determine date for approval ComleH Aefiou Items * Staff completes action request~ in a timely manner. City / County Health Issues * Continue discussions with CoUnty to determine structure and process for the most effective and efficient delivery of beal~ services MarkefiUg of cc Museum nn.d (~0!umbus Ships Continue to develop marketmgplans for the Museum of Science and History and the Columbus Fleet t Relationships with Other Governments Development Initiative Packagqs *Park Rehabilitation *Leopard Street Curbs and Gul~ Economic Development Sumn~ t and Post-Summit Meetings Agnes-Laredo Corridor Market (sindies, plans) *Solid waste / Pickup Base Closures **Northwest Library Northside Development Plan Traffic Controls (channeling, st xdying on/offramps on SPID) *Five Points Ambulance Effluent Plan for Leopard Medians RTA--Publie Improvements Arts and Sciences Park Plan Budget Item ** Capital Improvement Program Item City staff will develop and present to ~ity Council action/implementation plans for the following priority Desalination Pilot Project *Code Enforcement in Tras ~y Neighborhoods *Employee Classification Study Ma stet Drainage Plan Garwood Water *New Golf Course *Charter Revision with Spe~cific Charge(s) *More Funding for Economic Development *Fire and Police Contracts New Funding Sources / Plan for Inner City Improvements Improve Permitting Process (online / customer service) Padre Island Development Plan Downtown / South Centrali Development Plan (marina, t-heads, breakwater) Housing Emphasis / ProceSs (older neighborhoods, working class neighborhoods) ~ **Road Projects I Southside Traffic Plan 1 MINUTES JOINT MEETING OF THE CORPUS CHRISTI CITY COUNCIL AND THE DOWNTOWN MANAGI~vlENT DISTRICT (DMD) BOARD OF DIRECTORS May 27, 2003 - 12:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS Mayor Loyd Neal 1 Mayor Pro Tem Henry G~eu Brent Chesney 1 Jay;er D. Colmenero / Melody Cooper / Bill Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott City Staff City Manager George K. Nge Acting City Attorney R. Ja24 Reining Assistant City Secretary Mary Juarez Recording Secretary RebecCa Huerta DMD BOARD MEMBERS Wayne Lundquist, Chairman Mark Adame Willard Hammonds Sr. Ted Stephens Gordon Landreth Manuel Ugues Brad Lomax Chuck Thomasson Buz Maxwell Wes Hos~ns Leon Loeb Ted Pucker Mayor Neal called the joint meeting to order in the Sixth Floor Conference Room of City Hall. Assistant City Secretary Juar~z and Chairman Wayne Lundquist verified that the necessary quorums of the Council and the DoWntown Management District board were present to conduct the meeting. Chairman Lundquist opened the meeting by thanking the Council for the joint meeting and explaining that he would have to leaqe early to attend to an important personal matter. He especially thanked the Council for their commitment to the Renewable Community program, which has promoted development in the downtown area. Ms. Norma Urban, Presiderlt of the DMD, gave a brief presentation on the history and mission of the Downtown Management District. She thanked the city for their support and assistance in furthering the DMD's!goals. Ms. Urban also presented information on completed, ongoing and future projects. With regards to completed projects, she highlighted the following projects: DazzleDowntown, the Inflow and Infiltration Study and the Housing study. Under ongoing projects, she outlined the Bannerama, Sidewalk Ambassador, and the downtown flooding problem. Ms. Urban then provided a summary of the DMD's goals for the following years. Highest on the list were the following goals: mitigate storm water drainage and sewer problems; support for housing/residential opportunities; and to adapt and advance a master plan for open space and parks along Shoreline Boulevard. Finally; Ms. Urban informed the Council about the following future projects: creation ofa Bayfi'ont Parl~vay; Downtown Transportation Study; Renewal Community tax incentives; and the Dances with Dolphins sculpture. Council Member Scott asked about the status of the Doubletree Hotel deal. Mr. Gordon -1- Minutes - Regular Council Meetirlg January, 2003 - Page 2 Landreth commented that he had spoken with the potential buyer who said he was still very interested in the project but did not have the matching funds at this time. Council Member Scott also commented on the importance of public art to a city's well being. In addition, Ms. Urban said that an Art Walk was being held this Thursday from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at four downtown businesses to highlight the work of local artists. Finally, Ms. Urban announced that board member Mr. Ted Puckett had agreed to chair the Strategic Downtown Planning COmmittee. The committee was charged with reviewing old downtown development plans, choosing the best ideas and then making recommendations. Mr. Puckett stated that the committee Should complete its work by late Fall 2003. Council Member Scott asked what else the DMD thought the city could do to improve the downtown area. Mr. Leon Loeb replied that the drainage issues in the downtown must be resolved before any additional development can take place. Mr. Loeb also cited the importance of realigning Shoreline Boulevard to make room for a Bayfi'ont Park and creating more useful space for developers along the bayfront area. Council Member Chesney stated that he wanted to ensure that the Council's priorities were in line with the goals of the Downtown Management District. Mr. Ted Stephens provided specific information on the extent of the storm water system repairs needed downtown, based on his conversations with City Engineer J~ngel Escobar. Council Member Chesney commented that the Council has identified storm water drainage issues in the downtown area as a council priority. Council Member Colmenero suggested that the Strategic Downtown Planning Committee meet with the city's engineering department to discuss their needs. Council Member Noyola pointed out that he recognized the need for storm water improvements downtown but that his district was only budgeted $800,000 for storm water improvements. Mr. Brad Lomax spoke in support of the Renewable Communities initiative. Mr. Landreth emphasized the importance of the realignment of Shoreline Boulevard to make room for the Bayfi'ont Park, saying that the park would be the binding element for the entire bayfront area. Mayor Neal asked Mr. Landreth what would differentiate this proposed realignment from the Gateway Project, a similar project which was shelved for lack of public support. Mr. Landreth said that a lack of public education on the Gateway project primarily led to its demise. He also said that the Strategic Downtown Planning Committee may make other recommendations or find other options to implement the project. Finally, Mr. Landreth said that funding was a factor as well. Council Member Scott suggested that the realignment of Shoreline Boulevard might be considered for inclusion in Bond 2004 since it would allow the voters to decide whether to approve the project. Mayor Neal commented that the city's Capital Improvement Project budget would be reviewed in November 2004. Thus, he said that the Strategic Downtown Planning Committee's report would be well timed if it was completed by Fall 2004 as planned. He also said that the city may need to consider a storm water utility district or raising taxes to help pay for these infrastructure improvements. He asked for the DMD's help in informing the citizens about the need for these improvements. There being no further business, Mayor Neal adjourned the joint meeting at 1:10 p.m. on May 27, 2003. --2-- ~INUTES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - 1:24 p.m. PRESENT Mayor Samuel L. Neal Jr. Mayor Pro Tem Henry Garrett Council Members: Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Bill Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott City Staff.' City Manager George K. Noe Acting City Attorney R. Jay Reining Assistant City Secretary Mary Juarez Recording Secretary Rebecca Huerta Mayor Neal called the m~eting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The invocation was delivered by Mini~ster Napoleon Johnson of Faith Ministries and the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States fla~ was led by Mayor Loyd Neal. Assistant City Secretary Juarez called the roll and verified that the n~cessary quorum of the Council and the required charter officers were present to conduct the meeting. Mayor Neal called for approval of the minutes of the council retreat on May 6, 2003 and the regtllar Council meeting of May 20, 2003. A motion was made and passed to approve the minutes as presented. Mayor Neal called for comideration of the consent agenda (Items 2-17). Assistant City Secretary Juarez stated that Council Member Noyola would be abstaining from discussion or vote on Items 7 and 15. Council members requested that Items 4 and 8 be discussed. There were no comments from the audience. A motion was made and passed to approve Items 2 through 17, constituting the consent agenda, except for Items 4 and 8, which were pulled for individual consideration. Assistant City Secr~ary Juarez polled the Council for their votes and the following items passed by the following vote:: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye" (NOTE: Noyola abstained on items 7 and 15; an emergency was declared for items 6a, 10b, 13, 14a, and 15). 2. MOTION NO. 2003-193 Motion approving a supply iagreement with Cintas Corporation, of Corpus Christi, Texas, for work uniforms which includes approximately 1,777 work pants, 2,439 work shirts, 59 coveralls, 1,243 T-shirts, 6118 jersey knit shirts, 1,778 denim jeans, and 250 jackets, in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0068-03 based on best bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $102,219.86 of which $25,554.96 is for FY2002-2003. The term of the contract shall be for twelve months with an option to extend for up two additional twelve month periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have been budgeted By the using departments in FY2002-2003. -3- Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 2 MOTION NO. 2003-194 Motion approving a suppiy agreement with Gajeske Inc., of San Antonio, Texas, for approximately 143,000 feet of polyethylene pipe and 5,080 fittings in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0096-0! $138,828.94 of which $34, twelve months with an oi: subject to the approval ofl been budgeted by the Gas i MOTION NO. 2003-196 based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of 707.21 is for FY2002-2003. The term of the contract will be for Iion to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods he supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have )epartment in FY2002-2003. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order No. 3 to the construction contract with W.T. Young Construction Company of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount orS 115,822 for Wastewater and stormwater improvements along Annaville Road and Starlite Lane. (BONIi ISSUE 2000) 6.a. ORDiNANCE NO. 0253 Ordinance appropriating $ ~,298,163 in unappropriated interest from the following funds for the Laguna Madre Service Collection System Rehabilitation Phase 1:$33,291.40 from Wastewater Fund No. 3433 (1990 GO/CO CIP Fund); $198,048.36 fi'om Wastewater Fund No. 4241 (1995 Revenue Bond); $71,885.35 from Wastewater Fund No. 4244 (2002 Revenue Bond); $196,122.04 from Wastewater Fund No. 4500 (Commercial Paper Fund); and $798,815.85 from Wastewater Fund No. 3430 (Wastewater CIP Fund); amending Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 025144 to increase appropriations by $1,298,163. 6.b. MOTION NO. 2003-197 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with Insituform of Chesterfield, Missouri, in the amount of $1,298,163 for the Laguna Madre Service Area Collection System Rehabilitation, Phase 1. MOTION NO. 2003-198 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order No. 45 with Fulton/Coastcon, Inc., A Joint Venture, in the net amount of $425,410.87 for Corpus Christi International Airport New Terminal Building for concrete and structural steel for the retail and Transportation Security Administration lease areas and an exterior finish system for the Air Cargo Building. 9.a. MOTION NO. 2003-200 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Attachment No. 07A to Contract No. 746000574142003. This is contract change notice No. 05 with the Texas Department of Health in the amount of $7,542 to update technology needed for a Level B Laboratory. This additional $7,542 will b. ring the grant total to $136,104. ! Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 3 / 9.b. ORDINANCE NO. 0253 Ordinance appropriating a Health in the No. 1050 Fe technology needed in a Lex 10.a. MOTIONNO. 2003-201 grant in the amount of $7,542 from the Texas Department of fleral/State Grants Fund for equipment to assist in upgrading el B Laboratory. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept grant in the amount of $10,000 from the Coastal Bend Community Foundation for the Elderly Nutrition/Home Delivered Meals Program. 10.b. ORDINANCE NO. 02531~ 11. 12. 13. Ordinance appropriating a grant in the amount of $10,000 from the Coastal Bend Community Foundation irt the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for the Elderly Nutrition/Home Delivered Meals Program. RESOLUTION NO. 0253 Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application to the National Endowment for thc Arts Fast-Track Review Grant for a Cultural Tourism Program in the amount of $10,000 ~for marketing the Festival of the Arts, with a City match of $10,000 in the No. 1030, Hbtel Occupancy Tax Fund, and a total project cost of $20,000. RESOLUTION NO. 025317 Resolution amending Resolution Nos. 025160, 025159, 025123, and 025110 which authorized submission ofgr0nt applications to the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division, to authorize the City Manager or his designee to accept, reject, alter or terminate the grants. ORDINANCE NO. 025318 Ordinance authorizing the igsuance of an Outdoor Music Festival Permit to Clear Channel Radio for "C-Sculptures", On the Gulf Beach at Newport Pass County Park. 14.a. ORDINANCE NO. 025319 Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an eleven-month lease with Texas A & M University - Corpus Christi for the use of the area located adjacent to the northern most hobie cat launching ramp on North Beach and the area located on the north side of Ocean Drive right-o f. way on Ward Island to extend the term of the lease to five years following the effective date, of the lease and to include the use ora part of the area east of the public parking lot described as Padre Island - Corpus Christi, Section A, a subdivision of Padre Island, Nueces County, Texas as shown by map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 33, page 97, in consideratior~ for the installation and operation of two CODAR Radio Towers and providing for the maintenance ofthepremises. -5- Minutes - Regular Council Meetiflg May 27, 2003 ~ Page 4 14.b. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to amend an existing five-year lease with Texas A & M University, Corpus Christi for the use of the area located adjacent to the northern most hobie cat launching ramp on North Beach and the area located on the north side of Ocean Drive right-cfi-way on Ward Island to extend the term of the lease to five years following the effective dal~e of the lease and to include the use of a part of the area east of the public parking lot described as Padre Island - Corpus Christi, Section A, a subdivision of Padre Island, Nueces Cclunty, Texas as shown by map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 33, page 97, in consideration for the installation and operation of two CODARRadio Towers and providing for the maifltenance of the premises. 15. ORDINANCE NO. 025320 Second Reading OrdinanCe - Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to the lease agreement with DTG Operations, Inc. f/Fda Dollar Rent A Car Systems, Inc. at the Corpu~ Christi International Airport, to hold harmless DTG Operation, Inc. for any environmental]contamination occurring prior to occupancy of the premises for the term of the long term llase. (First Reading - 4/29/03) 16. ORDINANCE NO. 02532! Second Reading Ordinance~ - Amending Sections 23-70 and 23-71 of the Code of Ordinances relating to notice and obtaibing liens for City expenses to remedy violations; providing for an effective date. (First Reading - 5/20/03) 17. ORDINANCE NO. 02532~ Second Reading Ordinance - Amending the Zoning Ordinance by revising Article 13, "B- 2A" Barrier Island BusineSs District. (First Reading - 5/20/03) Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 4 regarding a supply agreement with Mueller Company for fire hydrants. Counclil Member Noyola asked why the bids by local companies were so much higher than the bid from Mueller Company. Michael Barrera, Director of Materials Management, replied that since Mueller Company is the actual manufacturer of the product, it is able to offer a lower price. The local companies were merely distributors of the product. Council Member Noyola emphasized that the city should try to use local companies as much as possible. Assistant City Secretary Juarez po!led the council for their votes, and the following motion passed with the following vote: Neal, Ch~ney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye". 4. MOTION NO. 2003-195 Motion approving a supply agreement with Mueller Company of Decatur, Illinois, for fire hydrants in accordance with Bid Invitation No BI-0066-03 based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $61,335 of which $15,334 is for FY2002-2003. The term of the supply agreement will be for twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional --6-- Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 5 twelve-month periods, sub designee. Funds are avail~ Mayor Neal opened disct International, Inc. (CSII) to collect if this was a reputable company. indicates that the company was municipalities and was committed aback when there were no response cities on how they handled delinqu with anumber of them. Inresponse delinquency rate was 4% to 5%. ~ct to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his >lc from Warehouse Inventory for FY 2002-2003. ssion on item 8 regarding a contract with Credit Systems :lelinquent utility accounts. Council Member Colmenero asked Ms. Lee Dumbauld, Director of Finance, said their research :ollecting significant levels of delinquent accounts in other ~ good customer service. She added that staffwas initially taken ~ to the city's RFP for this service. However, after polling other ~nt accounts, staff found that CSII had successfully contracted to Mr. Colmenero's question, Ms. Dumbauld said that the city's 2ouncil Member Kinnison asked when the new company was scheduled to take over. Ms. Dumbhuld responded that the company was scheduled to take over in June 2003. Assistant City Secretary Juarez polled the Council for their votes, and the following ordinance passed with the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye". 8. MOTION NO. 2003-199 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract with Credit Systems International Inc., iof Dallas, Texas to collect delinquent utility accounts handled by the Financial Services Department. Mayor Neal recessed the meeting a 1:40 p.m. to read proclamations. The Council returned from recess. Mayor Neal referred to the presentations on the day's agenda. The first presentation was a quarterly update from the Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB). Mr. Bert Quintanilla, Chairman of the Convention and Visitors Bureau Board of Directors, provided an update on the tourismi industry in Corpus Christi. Mr. Dave Prewitt, member of the CVB board, provided an update onlthe convention business. Mr. Dan Viola, CVB board member, informed the Council on upcomingievents in the area of sports and entertainment. Finally, Mr. Bill Pettus, marketing consultant, provi~led an update on the successful targeted marketing program to Monterrey, Mexico, headed by the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Finally, Mr. Quintanilla apprised the Council on developments in the city's national television exposure and improvements to the CVB's website. Mayor Neal commented that the Council stood ready to assist the CVB as spokesmen in their marketing efforts. Council Member Scott asked for data on hotel occupancy vs. revenues, which Mr. Quintanilla said would be provided. Mr. Scott also asked staffto dispel the rumor that the new arena will not be large enough to aCcommodate the rodeo. City Manager Noe confirmed that the rodeo would in fact fit in the new arena. Finally, Council Member Scott asked if arrangements could be made to bring the San Antonio Spurs to the city for an exhibition game or basketball clinic. Mr. Dan Viola replied that he has met with the Vice-President of the San Antonio Spurs and it may be possible in Fall 2005. Council Member Noyola added that baseball exhibition games would also --7-- Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 6 be welcome. Council Member Chesney and Council Member Colmenero spoke in support of the CVB's progress. Council Member Cooper also spoke in support of their progress, but asked if the CVB was still partnering with San Antonio in their marketing campaign. Mr. Quintanilla said that they were not at this time, but would look into it. Council Member Kelly commented that he had seen a article on Corpus Christi in Southern Living magazine and thought it was very positive. The last presentation on the agenda was the Risk Management Services quarterly update. Ms. Lee Dumbauld, Director of Finance, gave an update on the status of the risk management funds for Fiscal Year 2003. She said that the presentation was divided into four sections: financial summaries, Workers' Compensation, General Liabilities and Health Benefits. Under the detailed historic financial statement information, she pointed out that current assets have increased by $7.8 million since 1993, totaling $14 million in 2002. She said that although a deficit is shown in the risk management fund at the close of business on July 31,2002, the deficit includes long-term liabilities that will not be paid out for many years to come. Ms. Dumbauld stated that the budget document was prepared on a cash-flow basis, and in that respect the risk management fund was in very good condition. Both Mayor Neal and Council Member Kinnison observed, however, that the deficit was comprised of unfunded liabilities that would eventually have to be paid. Council Member Kinnison stated that he would like to see the city begin to fund these types of liabilities more effectively so there was not a deficit balance shown. He said that at one time the city had almost reached that point in 2001 with a deficit of approximately $600,000, but now the deficit was $3 million. Ms. Dumbauld replied that the city had been in much worse shape in the past. To address this concern, Ms. Dumbauld said that staff would budget using a higher expected value to remove the deficits over time. City Manager Noe added that staff was using more conservative figures than in the past, accounting for more liabilities than might be anticipated. Ms. Dumbauld then reviewed the Workers' Compensation fund. She said that most importantly, the city has been reducing the number of claims that are occurring and being reported over the past several years. She reminded the Council that all incidents must reported, according to state law, which was not an indication that all of the incidents were serious. However, she stated that although the number of claims filed has decreased, the incurred cost was increasing. She commented that this same trend can be seen in general liabilities and health benefits. Council Member Scott observed that the increase was dramatic, and asked what the city was doing to address this problem. Ms. Dumbauld said that the city has hired a new safety coordinator in the current budget year. She reported that staffwas in the process of reviewing the city's safety policies and was developing detailed safety plans in conjunction with each department. Ms. Dumbauld also referred to a graph on the Consumers Price Index (CPI) to demonstrate that medical inflation has increased significantly on a nationwide basis. Regarding general liabilities, Ms. Dumbauld said that the same trend can be observed. She reported that while the number of claims has decreased significantly, the cost per claim has increased. Council Member Kinnison noted that the Police Department had the largest number of claims. Ms. Dumbauld confirmed this, saying that the largest number of claims occurred in the general property damage category. Turning to the health benefits section of the presentation, Ms. Dumbauld said that staff Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 7 completed a detailed analysis at di problem areas. The first area ofan~ Thus, she concluded that the im participants, but rather by the cost whether the increases were driven concluded that the number of clain said that the highest costs were ex1 participated in this plan. By the san remained consistent. fferent levels (per claim, per participant, and per plan) to find ,lysis was enrollment levels, and staff.found it to be very stable. rease in claims activity was driven not by the number of ffmedical care. Staff also analyzed data per plan to determine by a claim incidence issue or a dollar incidence issue. She ~s and the dollar value of claims are relatively consistent. She ~ended in the Citicare plan because the majority of employees ~e token, the claims count and the claims dollars expended have Having completed this detalled analysis, Ms. Dumbauld said that staff had to consider how to plan for the upcoming fiscal year{ The actuarial report completed in October 2002 recommended an increase of 14.5% for FY 02-03~ However, Ms. Dumbauld said that the city's tax results were so favorable in FY 02 that only a 3?/0 increase was recommended for FY 02-03. But beginning in Oct. 2002, the city's claims began to increase dramatically, as forecast in the aforementioned actuarial report. The report had thetl recommended a 16.9% increase at that time. After doing some additional calculations, they came ~own to 14.5% for the current year. For this reason, in the 2004 budget, staff was recommending a.~0% increase overall (23% in public safety) to co_m_,p_ensate for this FY and to be properly funded for FY 04. In response to Council Member Kinnison s question, Ms. Dumbauld responded that the lactuary had only projected to FY 2004, but that claims were increasing about 12% annually nationwide. Beyond this time fi'ame, Ms. Dumbauld said that she wouldn't speculate. Council Men~ber Kinnison was concerned that the proposed 20% increase would not cover expenses because !staff appeared to be assuming that costs were going to remain stable. City Manager Noe replied that staff would be proposing a number of changes to the plans that should result in lower costs an/t changes in utilization patterns. Mayor Neal opened discussion on item 20 regarding the city's prospective health insurance program. City Manager Noe prefaced the discussion for this item by saying that he was recently informed that the Request for Prol~osal (RFP) called for a five-day commentary period to allow proposers an oppommity to respond to the ratings generated. Since this procedure had not been followed, City Manager Noe recommended that the Council receive the presentation today and delay action until the first week in June. Ms. Dumbauld introduced Mr. Keith McNeely, Vice-President ofMcGriff, Siebels and Williams, Inc., the city's health consultant. Ms. Dumbauld briefly described the RFP process, saying that staff.reviewed the written proposals submitted by the proposers and used follow-up telephone calls for additional clarification. She said that both in-house and outside legal counsel reviewed the plan docUments to ensure that they were in compliance with HIPAA and COBRA. Ms. Dumbauld reported that the team was recommending the elimination of the Citicare Q-Plus plan because there were only two remaining participants. Mr. McNeely made a presenhation explaining the recommendations by the evaluation team. He said that his firm was retained i, Spring 2002 to evaluate the city's health insurance program, primarily by developing the RFP process for obtaining proposals. The health care program would consist of network services, pharmacy benefit management services, third party administrator services and stop loss coverage (with bundled and/or unbundled options). Mr. McNeely said the response was very good overall. Mr. McNeely said that the evaluation team was cross-functional, including himself, senior staff fi.om Human Resources, Finance, MIS, Risk Management and Purchasing. The team reviewed all the RFP responses using a "Best Value" team process. They --9-- Minutes - Regular Council Meeti~g May 27, 2003 - Page 8 developed evaluation criteria for each component of the insurance program, documented all the results based on this criteria, and then ranked the results. He said that the scoring was based on the proposer's experience within the public sector (10%), customer service (20%), technology and reporting (30%) and cost (40%). Mr. McNeely stated that the third party administrator (TPA) was the first component of the health care program evaluated. T~e evaluation team determined that, on a 100-point scale, Boon Chapman (85.4), Benefit Planners iLTD (82.6) and Humana (77.5) scored the highest. He said that in a TPA fixed cost comparison, all three plans provided substantial savings in the first year over the city's current TPA, Entrust. The second component evaluated was the network services provider. The team determined that Humana (95.0), Chrisms Spolm (88.8) and Texas True Choice (74.1) scored the highest on a scale of 100 points. Mr. McNeely explained that the Humana network is established both on a local basis, including both the Chrisms Spohn system and the HCA system, and on a national basis. He said that Humana has a broad base 0fphysicians who support both hospital systems. He emphasized that the biggest key to the networks was their discount levels because the biggest expense the city will have as an employer is the claims paid out, approximately 85% of total costs. He stated that Humana has guaranteed discounts at 60% on hospital and 40% on physician, noting that historically they have achieved greater discounts. Council Member Garrett asked how long Chrisms Spohn would be part of the Humana network. Mr. McNeely answered that he understood there were approximately 18-24 months left on their contract. Council Member Gaiter asked City Manager Noe if there was a way to include a provision in the city's contract to require Humana to include Chrisms Spohn in their network for the length of the contract. City Manager Noe said he would discuss the matter with both parties to see if it was acceptable to them. Mr. McNeely provided an analysis of network savings between the Chrisms Spohn and Humana networks, concluding that the Humana network would provide projected savings of approximately $1,019,000 in FY 03-04. The third component evaluated was the pharmacy benefit management service (PBM). The team determined that Humana-Advance PCS (97.6), Catalyst Rx (76.6) and Rx West (75.0) scored the highest on a 100-point scale. Now that each component of the health services plan had been rated using an unbundled approach, Mr. McNeely said that the next step in the process would be to determine how to bundle these elements together to provide a complete health plan. He stated that the city could either purchase health care from a major insurance company that possessed all the necessary components, or purchase each element separately and then combine them into a package. The team developed a package evaluation matrix for comparison. Based on the "best value" methodology used by the team, they determined that the "best value" option was to purchase a bundled package from Humana, Inc. versus an unbundled package of Boon Chapman (TPA), Chrisms Spohn (network) and Catalyst RX (pharmacy). Mr. McNeely stated that they used the following weightings in their evaluation, based on actual percentage of costs: TPA (6%), network (76%) and pharmacy (18%). He also noted that the cost analysis of the packages assumed an annual trend rate of 16% on in- network claims. He reported that the projected cost savings using Humana, Inc. was $5.4 million over a five-year period. Council Member Chesney asked Mr. McNeely how he would advise the Council on Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 9 accepting the staff recommendatior of Spohn and Humana. He asked Iv stay together yet not give one an ur had a large block of business in tl Humana was the high volume that ] more than likely that the two entiti, because of the volatility of the heal~ shared the Council's concern about the attractiveness of the Humana pr{ as its national power. Mr. Noe said a lower cost. He said that staffhad ~ He stated that staff would look into of Humana, Inc., but also address concerns about the breakup ir. McNeely how the Council could ensure that the two entities equal advantage. Mr. McNeely responded that Humana, Inc. tis area and what drove the relationship between Spohn and tumana pumped into their hospital system. He felt that it was :s would stay together. However, he could not guarantee this h care market as this time. City Manager Noe added that staff the status of the network in the long run. He said that part of .posal was that it brought both Spohn and HCA together as well that Humana would provide more options for the employees at n interest in maintaining these advantages for their employees. the issue and report back to council in June. Mr. McNeely added that th~ cost differential was actually more on the physician discounts, not the hospital discounts. In conglusion, Mr. McNeely stated that Humana, Inc. would be the team's recommendation for TPA, network services and pharmacy services. He reiterated the following reasons for their recommeCdation: service capabilities; providing a local office; additional network provider access; discount~; and projected five-year cost savings of approximately $5.4 million. Mayor Neal stated that one otfthe biggest concerns voiced by employees was that when there was a change in the insurance carrier, they would have to change physicians. Mr. McNeely replied that under the Humana plan, the employees would probably not have to do this. Regarding the physician discount, Mayor Neal asl{ed Mr. McNeely if the Council was being asked to assume that the physicians in Spohn's network ~vould be willing to accept an additional 10% less money with the Humana plan. Mr. McNeely rel~lied affirmatively. In response to Mayor Neal's question, Mr. McNeely said that if at the end of the two-year period, Spohn and Humana were not able to stay together, then the Spohn physician~ would be considered out-of-network. Mr. Mark Taylor with McGriff et al commented that manylphysicians are not exclusive to one network; rather, many have contracts with both networks. Council Member Scott asked Mr. McNeely to provide information in writing on his company's credentials as a consulting firm. Mr. McNeely said that he would, adding that no broker commissions were built into the _n¢mbers and that his company did not have any preconceived relationships with any of the vendors. Council Member Scott asked why Entrust was scored low on governmental experience. He also asked for more information on why Humana and Boon Chapman scored higher on governmental experience. Mr. McNeely said he would provide that documentation. Council Member Chesney asked Mr. McNeely for more information on the nature of his company's business relationship with Humana. Mr. McNeely said that they had evaluated Humana as a bidder in an objective RFP pr6cess with other public entities in the past. Mr. Chesney also asked why Entrust scored low on experience with public entities. Mr. McNeely said one of the main reasons was that Entrust listed no fOrmer clients with greater than 1,226 employees. Council Member Noyola expressed his concern about changing the health insurance plan because the employees seem to be content with the current coverage. He also expressed concern Minutes - Regular Council Meeti/lg May 27, 2003 - Page 10 that Chrisms Spohn and Humana would not stay together, forcing some employees to change physicians. Council Member Kelly asked Mr. McNeely if he was confident that there were no hidden costs or potential for escalation that had not been discussed. Mr. McNeely replied affirmatively. Mr. Kelly asked how often Mr. McNeely's firm had recommended Humana to its clients within the last two years. Mr. Taylor responded that less than 15% of their clients as large as Corpus Christi used Humana. Mayor Neal asked for public comment on item 20. Mr. Anthony Heep, Executive Vice- President and Chief Financial Officer with Spohn Health Systems, said that he had understood, in an earlier conversation with City Manager Noe, that a recommendation was not going to be made today. He asked for more time to respond, because he had issues with many of the ratings. Mr. Tomas Duran with Duran Insurance Brokerage questioned the accuracy of the numbers provided during the presentation, and also asked for more time to refute the results. Mr. David Jacobson with Entrust disagreed with the results of the evaluation and said he was not contacted to review any of his company's responses to the RFP. Mr. Steve Warner, CEO of the Corpus Christi Medical Center, spoke in support of the professional consulting process used by staff this year because it de- politicized the process. At this point, Mayor Neal stated that public comment for items not on the agenda was scheduled for 5:30 p.m., and asked to briefly postpone the public comment on item 20 so that it could take place. Mayor Neal called for petitions from the audience. Mr. Michael J. Stevens, 7418 Sky King, spoke regarding the proposed amendment to the sexually oriented business ordinance and a possible conflict of interest concerning Council Member Javier Colmenero. Mr. Juan Vela, owner of Tuxedo's, an adult entertainment club, asked if the Council had received a letter claiming that he intended to sue the city regarding the sexually oriented business ordinance. Mayor Neal replied that he had not received such a letter. Mayor Neal reopened public comment on item 20. Mr. Andrew Grove, Director of Sales for Humana in South Texas, pointed out the benefits that his insurance company could provide to the city. Mr. Rob Hitchcock, President of Humana, spoke in support of the professional consulting process used this year. City Manager Noe said that staff would honor the five-day response period called for in the RFP and provide information as requested. He said staff would also provide information on the Council's concern about the relationship between Spohn and Humana. In response to Council Member Chesney's question, he said that the Council would need to make a decision on the health insurance plan by June 10 in order to have open enrollment on a timely basis. Council Member Garrett asked staff if they thought that the numbers presented were correct. Cynthia Garcia, Director of Human Resources, and Mike Barrera, Director of Materials Management, both defended the integrity of the numbers. Mayor Neal made a motion to table a decision on item 20 until June 10, seconded by Council Member Scoa. The moti_op~._assed unanimously. Minutes - Regular Council Meetin May 27, 2003 - Page 11 20. · ,~o."~'° TABLED UNTIL JU Mayor Neal opened discus: beverage establishment. Mr. Augus introduced James DeBerry, a corpor to Section 4-5(a) of the city code,' within the city within 300 feet o department had determined that G Graham Central Station, was less th~ that the city was using a different m~ ~qE 10, 2003 ion on item 21 regarding a variance request for an alcoholic :in Rivera, representing Graham Brothers Entertainment (GBE), ~te representative for the Graham Brothers. Mr. Rivera referred vhich limits the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages ~ a public school. He said that the Development Services BE's proposed project, an multi-entertainment venue called .n 300 feet from King High School. However, Mr. Rivera noted asurement standard now than in years past. Two years ago, the city approved the issuance ofa liqu~)r license at the same proposed location. Section 4-5(0 allows for the applicant to request a varian~:e to the regulation. Mr. Rivera said that pursuant to Section 4- 5(0, GBE was requesting that the Cbuncil grant its request for a variance to allow it to proceed with its project. He contended that the project would be in the best interest of the public and that it would constitute a waste or inefficient us{ of the land if GBE did not develop it. Council Member Garrett asked about the hours of operation for the venue. Mr. DeBerry replied that the hours of operation would be from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., with major traffic occurring between 10:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. He asked if they anticipated any fi'iction between the individuals with different tastes in music who would patronize the club. Mr. DeBerry said that in their company's experience, the individuals who patronized their clubs were typically people who enjoyed different types of music a~d were more tolerant. Council Members Cooper and Noyola spoke in support of the project. City Manager Noe asked ifGBE had spoken with the school district or the principal of King High SchOol about their plans. Mr. Rivera said that they had not, but a public notice period would be required under TABC requirements. Council Member Colmener0 made a motion to adopt the following resolution and Council Member Cooper seconded the motion. Assistant City Secretary Juarez polled the council for their votes, and the resolution passed asi follows: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye". 21. RESOLUTION NO. 025323 Granting a variance, under Section 4-5(0 of the Code of Ordinances, to Graham Brothers Entertainment to operate an ~on-premises alcoholic beverage establishment located at 4701 South Staples Street. Mayor Neal deviated from ~he agenda and referred to Item 23, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the public hearing on the following zoning case: 23. Case No. 0403-02, Debbie Glass: A change of zoning from a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling -13- Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 12 District to a "B-1" Neighborhood Business District on Yarbrough Addition, Lots 8 and 9, located on the west side o~'Airline Road, approximately 1,000 feet south of Holly Road. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. A motion was made, seconded and passed to close the public heating. Ms. Juarez polled the Council for their votes, and the following ordinance passed with the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye". ORDINANCE NO. 025320 Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Debbie Glass by changing the zoning map in reference to Lots 8 and 9, Yarbrough Addition, from "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Neal referred to item 24, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the public hearing on the following zoning case: 24. Case No. 0403-04, Shell Ieand Management: A change of zoning from a "B-4" General Business District to a "I-2" Light Industrial District on Bohemian Colony Lands, being 1.72 acres out of Lot 1, Section 12, located south of Saratoga Boulevard and approximately 1,550 feet west of Weber Road. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. A motion was made, seconded and passed to close the public hearing. Ms. Juarez polled the Council for their votes, and the following ordinance passed with the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye". ORDINANCE NO. 025325 Amending the Zoning Ordinance upon application by Shell Land Management Company, Inc., by changing the zoning map in reference to Bohemian Colony Lands, being 1.72 acres out of Lot 1, Section 12, (currently zoned "B-4" General Business District) by granting a Special Permit for a distribution facility, subject to a site plan and five (5) conditions; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Neal announced that the Council would take a 30-minute recess. The Council returned from recess. Mayor Neal deviated from the agenda and opened discussion on item 22 regarding the Dr. Hector P. Garcia Park Master Plan. Mr. Dan Whitworth, Director of Park and Recreation, introduced Mr. Jim Cardllo with Halff Associates, the park planning consulting firm selected for this project. Mr. Carrillo described the steps in the master planning process. He noted that the Dr. Hector P. Garcia Park was located between the North Area and the Central Area of the city, as identified _b~4t_he citywide parks Master Plan. The citywide Minutes - Regular Council Meetin May 27, 2003 - Page 13 Master Plan identified significant ~eficiencies in those areas that development of the Dr. Hector P. Garcia Park would address. He re~ninded the Council that a citywide survey determined that the citizens preferred renovating and upgrading existing parks over other options. Mr. Carrillo referred to the saying that the plan called for upg larger, newer parks. Council Mem to be preselected for the Bond 2004 considered. Mr. Whitworth replied additional funding through the time to make improvements to mo~ Park, the city's premier park, was Garcia Park was lacking the most b* Garrett and Council Member Kelly Guth Park. action plan developed from the citywide parks Master Plan, 'ading the existing large "district" parks before proceeding to >er Kinnison asked why the Dr. Hector P. Garcia Park seemed >ver the other district parks, and why more parks were not being that one of the reasons was that the Gareia park was eligible for 5G program. He said that there were insufficient funds at this e district parks. Council Member Scott commented that Cole cking adequate irrigation. Mr. Carrillo agreed, but said that the sic development compared to the other parks. Council Member >ressed their concern about the deteriorating condition of West Mr. Carrillo said that the second recommendation from the citywide parks master plan was the need to develop additional athletic facilities, including the State School facility. The Garcia Park master plan development would hemp fulfill this goal. IVlr. Carrillo illustrated the! deteriorating condition of the Garcia Park and provided the estimated costs and proposed phasirag of the development. He reminded the Council that the Garcia Park Master Plan was only a "roadmap" for the future, and was subject to changes over time based on budget considerations. He repOrted that the initial phase was to add a playground on the west side of the park at an approximate icost of $200,000 to $250,000. Phase 2 would develop a park access road and a north play area at a cost of approximately $2 million. Phase 3a would develop central practice fields and drainage area aesthetic improvements at a cost of $1,500,000. Finally, Phase 3b would implement south l~arking and access area improvements for approximately $1.1 million. Council Member Kiunisor~ asked if the cost of the improvements for the other larger parks was consistent with the cost for this park, approximately $4 to 6 million. Mr. Carrillo replied affirmatively with the exception of Cole Park, which would cost about $1 million. In conclusion, Mr. Carrillo said that staff was recommending the approval of the overall master plan for the Garcia Park today. Future recommendations would be to approve the funding for the initial phase of the park improvements, include major funding for the park in the next bond issue and pursue additional grant funds to renovate the park. Assistant City Secretary Juarez polled the Council for their votes, and the fbllowing motion passed with the following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye". 22. MOTION NO. 2003-202 Motion to approve the Hector P. Garcia Park Master Plan. Mayor Neal deviated from the agenda and referred to item 25 regarding a public hearing on the FY 2003-2004 Crime Control and Prevention District Budget. Council Member Garrett made a motion to open the public hearing, seconded by Council Member Chesney. The motion passed unanimously. Commander Bryan Smith highlighted the points of interest in the budget regarding -15- Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 14 the pawn shop detail, technical support of the officers, street lighting and the juvenile assessment center. There was no public comment. A motion was made, seconded and passed to close the public hearing. Mayor Neal opened discussion on item 26, a special budget presentation on the proposed FY 2003-2004 Operating Budget. Cit7 Manager Noe said that there were five focus areas in the budget: livable neighborhoods, support fo~ economic development, employee teamwork and involvement, .customer service and intergovernmental relations. He described how staff was addressing each issue. Mr. Mark McDaniel, Direc!or of Management and Budget, provided a general overview of the operating budget. He noted some format changes, including a new "Best Practices" section and additional supplemental information for reference. Mr. McDaniel then provided a status on the city's revenues, including property taxes, sales tax, and franchise fees. He reviewed the revenue and fee adjustments, including changes to public safety, municipal court, park and recreation, health and permits and licensing. He discussed the status of the city's expenditures. He said that the major general fund expenditures were related to salary adjustments, benefit adjustments, the continuation of "drag up" reserve and new programs/program enhancements. To summarize, Mr. McDaniel cited the following additions to the general fund: salary adjustments and new programs/program enhancements. He listed the following reductions: movement of expenses to the new development fund and direct charge of formerly reimbursed expenses. He said that the total proposed decrease in the general fund would be $1,184,647. In the utility system fund, Mr. McDaniel discussed expenditures for salaries and wages, specifically for the implementation of the compensation and classification plan and skill-based pay. The re-engineering effort was also a major expenditure since it was being implemented in all utility operations. Finally, Mr. McDaniel discussed the status of other funds, including the marina, the golf center, and airport funds. Mayor Neal commented that a public improvement district may be an option to fund the downtown area improvements. He also commented that it was a tribute to the city and staff that the general fund has increased $500,000 over the last three budget years, yet the city still managed to live within its means. Council Member Scott expressed his concern that although the downtown initiatives program was on the budget priority list, he has not seen a cohesive plan for development from the Downtown Management District and felt that the city should take the lead. City Manager Noe said there was a great deal of planning currently taking place and a dialogue was needed with all interested parties. Council Member Scott spoke in support of the skate park, saying it was good to see the partnerships taking place. In response to Council Member Scott, City Manager Noe said that staffwas considering modular units in Flour Bluff and Hilltop. Mr. Scott asked staffto speak with the City of Portland about their experience with their skate park. Mr. Scott asked if there would be enough volume to justify an environmental court. Mr. Noe said that it worked in other places. Mr. Scott asked when the 4A board was expected to provide a program for affordable housing. City Manager Noe replied that the board should complete their study before the Council adopts the budget. Finally, Mr. Scott complimented staff for the success of the e-government program. Council Member Garrett asked for a status report on the Semtech site at the airport. City Manager Noe said that staff was negotiating with Semtech to determine how much they would compensate the city. Council Member KellY_la6s._ked when the environmental court would be Minutes - Regular Council Meetin: May 27, 2003 - Page 15 implemented. City Manager Noe s~ new fiscal year. Mr. Kelly asked v project. Mr. Noe said that the Cour~ Kelly asked staffto revisit the Ave reinvigorate the neighborhoods in mosquito machines. Finally, he as negotiations. City Manager Noe council wished. Mr. Kelly asked Mayor Neal announced the id that the court could be implemented within 30-60 days of the 'hen the Council would receive a status report on the Landry's cji should receive a report by the end of June. Council Member aue of Americas project on Agnes and Laredo Streets to try to that area. He also asked for information on propane-driven ~ed for an update on the sexually oriented business ordinance dd he would schedule an update in an executive session if the an interim report by the next Council meeting. ,'xecutive sessions, which were listed on the agenda as follows: 27. Executive session under TeXas Govemment Code Section 551.071, regarding Jon Harwood, et al vs. City of Corpus Ghristi, Cause No. 00-4149-G, 319th Judicial District Court, Nueces County, Texas, witll possible discussion and action in open session. 28. Executive Session under Te[as Government Code Section 551.071 regarding disclosure of records protected by Healtl~ Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, with possible discussion and action in open session. The Council went into execlutive session. The Council returned ~'omi executive session. Mayor Neal called for the City Manager's report. City Manager Noe reported !hat staff was continuing to advocate for the adoption of SB 315 regarding the expansion of the area govered by Del Mar Junior College District. Apparently, there has been some level of opposition. He asked Assistant City Manager Massey to provide a report on the water main break and the effect 9n water pressure. Mr. Massey reported that the line was being capped and they were estimating that the system would be up by 9:00 p.m. The water pressure issue would be relatively resolved by midnight but staff was still encouraging citizens to conserve water because it would take a few days to fill the water tanks. Mayor Neal called for CounCil concerns and reports. Mayor Neal asked staff to respond to the claims by Mr. Michael Stevens regarding the sexually oriented business ordinance by the June 10 meeting. Council Member Colmenero asked staff to provide additional information to residents near the new post office and housing authority projects. Mr. Colmenero announced the town hall meeting at 6:00 p.m. in Lindale Senior Center next Monday. He said that he had received staff's response regarding Brentwood. Finally, Mr. Colmenero said that the Kennedy Foundation was willing to work with the city to remove junk cars. Council Member Noyola reported on a proposed meeting with neighbors in the West Oso area for clarification on an upcoming zoning case for two proposed affordable apartments. He asked staff to attend. He also asked staff to speak to a constituent about problems with the holiday schedule for trash pick-up. -17- Minutes - Regular Council Meeting May 27, 2003 - Page 16 Council Member Scott noted that the God's Gym program had received national recognition from the Weed and Seed Program. He spoke in support of the Velocity Games, but asked that the residents in the area be included in any future discussions for a transportation plan for this event. Mr. Scott asked that staff encourage dialogue about including the realignment of the Shoreline Boulevard in Bond 2004. City Malaager Noe said this was a major decision and it would require a process to be in place to allow for l~roper debate and consideration before a decision is made, if the Council would like to pursue it. Council Member Garrett asked Assistant City Manager Massey if he had addressed a problem in Lindale Senior Center regarding their parking lot. Mr. Massey said that he had reported the problem to Mr. V~itworth in the Park and Recreation department, and that the Street Department had been notified. There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Neal adjourned the Council meeting at 8:40 p.m. on May 27, 2003. -18- 2 CORPUS CHRISTI DO'~ ~NTOWN MANAGEMENT DISTRICT - One (1) vacancy with term to 7-04 represe~ ~ting the category of agent, employee or tenant of district. (Directors are chosen through the recommendation of the board and the approval of the City CounciL) i DUTIES: The district will ~rovide maintenance, security, marketing, and the promotion and improvement of prop ,~rty and facilities within the district; the district has the authority to levy taxes or as: :essments for improvements in the downtown area. COMPOSITION: The b6ard is composed of at least nine but not more than twenty directors, serving four-year !staggered terms. A director must be one of the following: 1) a resident of the district, 2) an owner of property in the district, 3) an owner of stock, whether beneficial or otherwise, of a corporate owner of property in the district, 4) an owner of a beneficial interest in a trust that owns property in the district, or 5) an agent, employee or tenant of one :of the above. Succeeding directors are chosen through the recommendation of the board and the approval of the City Council. MEMBERS Wayne Lundquist (A/E/T), Chairman Mark Adame (A/E/T), Vice-Chairman Dottie Clower (A/E/T), Treasurer George Placke (A/E/T) Willard Hammonds, Sr. (PO) Ted Stephens (PO) Gordon E. Landreth (PO) Manuel Ugues (A/E/T) Richard King, III (A/E/T) Brad Lomax (PO) Charles W. Thomasson (PO) Buz Maxwell (PO) *Ertl< Ward (A/E/T) Wes Hoskins (PO) Jennifer Quick (PO) Dan Richter (PO) Raymond Gignac (PO) Leon Loeb (PO) Ted Puckett (A/E/T) ORIGINAL TERM APPTD.DATE 08-04 08-22-00 07-06 08-22-00 07-06 07-06 06-09-98 08-04 10-12-99 07-06 07-06 11-05 11-09-99 07-06 12-16-94 07-06 05-14-02 07-06 06-04 06-25-96 07-04 06-09-98 08-04 08-22-00 08-04 08-22-00 07-06 09-11-01 08-05 08-21-01 08-05 08-21-01 08-05 08-21-01 R PO SO A/E/T - Resident of District Owner of Property within the District Owner of Stock or Corporate owner of Property within the District Agent, Employee or Tenant of one of the above *Resigned NOTE: The Corpus Christi Downtown Management District Board of Directors has recommended Bill Durill for appointmena -21- Bill Dun'ill General Manager, Durrill Properties (DP). Business and Marketing Degree fi.om Texas A & M University - College Station. Director of the Devary Darrill Foundation which objective is capital improvement projects for the Downtown area. (6-05-03) -22- ETHICS COMMISSIONi - Four (4) vacancies with three-year terms to 10-01-03, 10-01- 04 and 10-01-05. (Appointed by two-thirds vote of the full Council) DUTIES: In addition to lJaving jurisdiction of complaints involving any "city official", the duties of this commission are to prepare and publish pamphlets and other materials explaining the duties of individuals subject to the code of ethics; review all statements and reports filed with the ~ity; annually review the code of ethics and make appropriate recommendations to the c~ty council; review all public opinions related to the code of ethics that are issued by t~e city attomey; prepare and disseminate a report listing all campaign conlributions anc~ expenditures for each candidate within 30 days following the deadline for filing the last campaign finance reports for each city council election. The commission shall have such meetings as may be necessary to fulfill its responsibilities. The chairperson or any three (3) members may call a meeting provided that reasonable notice is given to each member. COMPOSITION: Nine members appointed by a two-thirds vote of the full council. Nominations are to be solicited fi.om a wide variety of professional and community organizations in the city but interested individuals may also submit their names for consideration. Initially, the terms of three members shall be one year, and the initial terms of another three terms shall be two years. The persons having such shorter terms shall be determined by lot. No holding over is permitted except as expressly provided in the code of ethics. The commission shall elect a chairperson and a vice-chairperson. MEMBERS TERM ORIGINAL APPTD. DATE Gloria Perez, Chairperson Rev. Dr. Raymond Kiser Rev. Derrick Reaves Fred Haley *Harold R. Fredrickson *Eduardo Hinojosa Captain Craig Reynolds **Herbie Garcia, Jr. **Michelle Thomas 10-01-03 11-09-99 10-01-03 11-09-99 10-01-05 10-12-99 10-01-05 11-14-00 10-01-04 10-09-01 10-01-03 8-12-97 10-01-04 6-13-00 10-01-04 3-13-01 10-01-05 10-22-02 *Automatic termination for failure to timely submit annual Ethics Report **Resigned (Note: Harold R. Fredrickson has submitted his report and is requesting reinstatement to this board/commission.) -23- OTHER INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST Kevin Betts Executive Director, Trinity Towers Retirement Community. Associate's degree from Columbus State College. Certified Assisted Living Manager in Texas. (6-15-01) Haysam Dawod, D.D.S. Dentist. D.D.S., U.T. Health Science Center, Houston, TX; B.S. from Corpus Christi State University. Community activities include: C.C. Evening Rotary Club (Past President), volunteer Dentist for Clinica Corpus Christi - Guatemala, graduate of Leadership Corpus Christi XXIX and member of the Leadership Alumni Coordinating Board. (10-14-02) Jack Gordy Retired military. High school graduate plus one year at Del Mar College. (5-22-01) Charles Irwin Retired Professor of Management, Texas A&M- Corpus Christi. Ed.D., Business Administration. Served as the Campus Ethics Advisor for TAMU- CC. Volunteer activities include serving as Civic Club President and former President of Pharaoh Valley Neighborhood Association. (7-03-01) Roy Martinez Letter Carder, U.S. Postal Service. Member of American Legion, G.I. Forum, Disabled American Veterans, and National Association of Letter Carriers. Has been recognized by the Postal Service for customer service. (11-02-99) Z. Paul Reynolds Assistant Director of the University Center, Texas A & M University - Corpus Christi. Received B.Ed., University of Texas and M.S. Ed. and Ed.D., University of Pennsylvania. Activities include: Association of College Unions International, National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Paths of Courage and GLSEN Finance Committee Member. (5-11-03) Sharlene Sexton Deputy Executive Director, Corpus Christi Housing Authority. M.A. in Human Resource Development and Business Management, Webster University. Has 25 years of military service. Member of Leadership Class XX. (2-26-03) -24- Elaine A. Yellen Assistant Professor of Nursing, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. Ph.D. in Nursing. Active volunteer with St. Bartholomew's Church. Member of Texas Nurses Association - local chapter. (9-20-01) -25- FOOD SERVICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Three (3) vacancies with term to 6- 24-06 for the following categories: 2 - Food Industry and 1 - Community at Large. DUTIES: The function~ will be to advise the Director of Health on application of ordinances regarding fooc~ and food establishments, review the permit fees annually to ensure the cost of the program is returned to the City, and to conduct hearings pursuant to the sections of the o~dinance relating to revocations and to make written recommendations to the City health officer whether to revoke or suspend a food manager's permit, pursuan~ to Art. 19-84. COMPOSITION: Seveni (7) members. The membership shall consist of four (4) local food managers fi-om the fdod service or food processing industries and three (3) persons fi-om the community at large. Members of the committee shall be appointed by the City Council for staggered terms so that at least one industry representative, and one community member are reappointed each year. No voting member may serve more than two terms of three years each with the exception of those initially appointed for less than a full three-year term. MEMBERS TERM ORIGINAL APPTD. DATE John Denson (Food Industry) *Carlos Moreno (Food Industry) **Bob Ard (Food Industry) William Schroeder (Comnmnity at Large) ***Dovie Jordan (Community at Large) Suzanne Greene Gilliam (Food Industry) Gabriel Hernandez (Comrmmity at Large) 6-24-05 8-20-02 6-24-03 7-08-97 6-24-03 9-12-00 6-24-05 6-08-99 6-24-03 11-12-02 6-24-04 9-12-00 6-24-04 3-10-98 *Has met six-year limitation and is ineligible for reappointment **Seeking reappointment ***Not seeking reappointment ATTENDANCE RECORD OF MEMBERS SEEKING REAPPOINTMENT NAME Bob Ard (Food Industry) NO. OF MTGS. NO. THIS TERM PRESENT % OF ATTENDANCE LAST TERM YEAR 6 5 83% -26- OTHER INDIVIDUALS ~XPRESSING INTEREST D.W. Haven Owner, Dee Haven & Associates. B.S. from Texas A & M University and M.S. from Texas A & I University. Professor Emeritus at Del Mar College. Serves as Director of Public Affairs for Coastal Bend Restaurant Association, Executive Vice President of Coastal Bend Hotel Motel Condominium Association, and State Director of the Texas Restaurant Association. (Food Industry) (6-05-03) JodyHouston Director, CCISD Foodservice. M.B.A. from Corpus Christi State University and B.S. in Nutrition and Dietetics from the University of Texas at Austin. Community and professional activities include the following: Vestry member of St. Bartholomew's Episcopal Church and State Secretary of the Texas School Food Service Association. (Food industry) (7-25-02) Napoleon Johnson Evangelist, Jesus Street Ministries. High School graduate and some college. Member of Beautify Corpus Christi. Received Laymen's Certificate of Bible School of the Victory Outreach Church. (Community at large) (1-10-03) Lisa B. Pollakis Co-owner, Vick's Famous Hamburgers. B.S. in Hotel, Restaurant & Institutional Management, The Pennsylvania State University. Served as the Nutrition Coordinator for Senior Community Services with the City of Corpus Christi for ten years. (Food lndustry) (8-30-00) James Robbins Retired pilot and air traffic controller. Certification in Ministry, Howard Payne University; A.A.S. in Mid-management and Communications, North Lake College, Irving, Texas. Activities include: Volunteer chaplain at Bay Area Hospital, and church missions (Brazil, Costa Rica, Turkey, Viet Nam, Peru and E1 Salvador). (Community at large) (54O-O2) -27- MECHANICAL/PLUM.BING ADVISORY BOARD - Two (2) vacancies with terms to 1-02-05 representing the following categories: 1 - Air Conditioning and 1 - Master Plumber. (Note: Staff has recommt nded that the .~ir Conditioning position be postponed until recruitment of more applR ations.) COMPOSITION Eleven (1 I) persons appm~ted by the City Council: 3 - persons with at least five years active experience as a plutmber licensed in the State of Texas, at least three years of which shall have been in Corpus Christi, and currently active in the plumbing trade; at least 2 of whom shall hold Master Plumbers licenses; 1- person with at least years of active experience as a professional mechanical engineer licensed in the State of Texas and knowledgeable in the plumbing trade; 1- person with at least 5 years experience in the home building industr3¢ 1- person with at least 5 years experience in the commercial building industry; 3 - persons with at least 5 years experience in heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration contracting business; 1 - person not connected with the building industry; and 1 - person who shall have at least 5 years of active experience in landscape irrigation and is licensed as an Irrigator by the State of Texas. Five members constitute a quorum, and the concurring vote of not less than 5 members of the Board is necessary to constitute an otfficial action of the Board. MEMBERS TERM Robert Knowles (Not conn. bldg. ind.), Vice-Chair 1-02-05 VACANT (Air Conditioning), 1-02-05 Mody K. Boatright (Mechanical Eng.) 1-02-04 Patrick Scarpulla (Master Plumber) 1-02-04 Sam Beecroft (Commercial Builder) 1-02-05 VACANT (Master Plumber) 1-02-05 Daniel Graf (Master Plumber) 1-02-04 Red Akin (Air Conditioning) 1-02-04 Scott Corliss (Air Conditioning) 1-02-05 John Tucker (Home Builder) 1-02-04 H. Ray Johnson, Jr. (Irrigator) 1-02-05 ORIGINAL APPTD. DATE 5-18-99 1-08-02 8-11-98 5-18-99 1-08-02 1-08-02 1-14-03 1-08-02 3-19-02 INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST James M. Horman Jr. President and CEO, Custom Filtration and Plumbing. Local Member of the Builders Association. (Master Plumber) (5-09-03) Kevin A. Kemp Estimator, Larson Plumbing and Utility. Received Citizens Certificate of Merit in 1991 and active as a high school football official. (Master Plumber) (5- 2S-03) -28- eo SISTER CITY COMMII~TEE - One (1) vacancy with term to 9-04. DUTIES: To study wayS and means of improving relations with the Corpus Christi sister cities and to advise and consult with and assist the Mayor, the City Council, the City Manager and all other City agencies, boards and officials in accomplishing the purposes of the Sister City program. COMPOSITION: It shalt consist of a Steering Committee &twenty-one members and various subcommittees, n~embers who shall be broadly representative of the racial, religious and ethnic group~ in the community. The members shall be appointed by the City Council and shall ser~e three-year terms or until their successors are appointed and qualified. The Steering Committee shall be responsible for the overall administration and implementation of the City,s Sister City program. There shall be a subcommittee for each sister city authorized by Resolution of the City Council. Each subcommittee shall be responsible, under the direction of the Steering Committee, for primary study, liaison and recommendations for each sister city. The offices of the committee shall consist of a General Chairman, V-Chairman for each of the Sister City subcoinmittees. ORIGINAL MEMBERS TERM APPTD. DATE Ann Jaime, Chairperson 9-05 6-13-00 Sue Dulaney 9-04 9-8-98 Yalee Shih 9-05 10-21-97 Edna Balboa 9-04 9-11-01 Mufid A. Abudiab 9-05 10-10-00 Ellen Murry 9-05 4-16-02 Valerie Vargas Ballesteros 9-05 9-09-02 Gary Hansen 9-04 9-10-96 Regis Barber 9-04 12-10-02 *George A. Garcia 9-04 9-09-02 Randy Farrar 9-04 6-11-02 Rose Gunji 9-04 9-09-97 Wayne Bennett 9-04 9-I 1-01 Raquel Madrigal 9-04 6-13-00 Sarah Hicks 9-05 4-22-03 Judy Benkendorfer 9-03 10-10-00 Cruz Colomo 9-03 12-10-02 Elizabeth R. Iglesias 9-03 4-22-03 Nancy Glenn Reynolds 9-03 12-10-02 Mary H. "Bebe" Morris 9-03 9-09-02 Sharon L. Phillips 9-03 9-09-02 *Resigned -29- INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST Kent Byus, Ph.D. Associate Professor in the College of Business, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi. Ph.D. from New Mexico State University and M.B.A. form Texas Tech University. Recipient of the Volunteer of the Year Award in 2000 from the Greater Muskegee Area Chamber of Commerce, Muskogee, Oklahama. Strategic planning consultant to Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, Oklahoma. (10-18-02) Peter Kuntu-Mensah Assistant Professor of Computer & Math Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. Ph.D. from University of Maine; M.S. from Ohio State University. Member of the Texas Society of Professional Surveyors and the American Society of Photogram. (12-04-02) Elaine A. Yellen Assistant Professor of Nursing, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi. Ph.D. in Nursing. Active volunteer with St. Bartholomew's Church. Member of Texas Nurses Association- local chapter. (1-23-01) -30- WATER SHORE ADVIqORy COMMITTEE - Four (4) vacancies with two-year terms to 5-10-05, one EnvirOnmentalist and one Engineer. DUTIES: To advise and nc Waterfront, the Water Area COMPOSITION: Nine m The membership must inclu Environmentalist. The Cha advisory to the Park and Ro ake recommendations regarding development and use of the and the Marina. ~rnbers appointed by the City Council for two-year terms. ~e one Scientist, i.e. Marine Biologist, one Engineer, and one rman of the Water Shore Advisory Committee shall act as an :reation Advisory Committee and vice versa. MEMBERS *Roy L. Pell, Chairman Tom Anderson, Vice-Chairman Alan F. Dinn Steven Moody *Terri Nicolau (Environmenthlist) *Dr. Oscar Garcia William Grant Fergeson Dr. JoAnna Mott (Scientist) *Dan S. Leyendecker (Enginber) ORIGINAL TERM APPTD.DATE 5-10-03 9-28-99 5-10-04 11-13-01 5-10-04 5-19-98 5-10-04 5-19-98 5-10-03 7-11-00 5 - 10-03 3-07-00 5-10-04 5-21-02 5-10-04 5-19-98 5-10-03 6-12-01 *Seeking reappointment ATTENDANCE R~CORD OF MEMBERS SEEKING REAPPOINTMENT NO. OF MTGS. NAME THIS TERM NO. % OF ATTENDANCE PRESENT LAST TERM YEAR Roy Pell 10 Terd Nicolau (Environmentalist) 10 Dr. Oscar Garcia 10 Dan S. Leyendecker (Engineer) 10 9 90% 7 70% 9 90% 8 80% OTHER INDIVIDUALS I~XPRESSING INTERESTED David Barganski Financial Consultant. B.A. in Business Administration from Texas A & M University- College Station. (3-23-00) William J. Green Project Manager, Goldston Engineering. Received B.S. at Rice University. Member of T.S.P.E., A.S.C.E., S.A.M.E. and a former member of the City Manager's Career Development Center. (Engineer) (6-01-01) -31- Paul Lara PhillipLara Marc A. McAllister Victor A. Menard James Robbins John S. Taylor Susan R. Veatch Shrimper of the Boats and Waterways. Graduate of W.B. Ray High School. 0-06-00) Seafood Industry. Graduate of W.B. Ray High School and attended Del Mar College. Independent lobbyist for shrimping and fishing laws and regulations at the Capital. ($-06-00) President, McAllister Marine Surveying Co. A.A.S. in Marine Technology. Member of the National Association of Marine Surveyors, National Fire Protection Association and Boat and Yacht Council. (6-0&01) Taxpayer Liaison Officer, Nueces County Appraisal District. Former member of the Park and Recreation Advisory Committee. Activities include: AARP, Mayor's Fourth of July Committee, Bayfest, Youth Sports Network of the Coastal Bend, Boys and Girls Club, Habitat for Humanity, Neighborhood Visions, and Flint Hills Community Advisory Council. (8-01-02) Retired pilot and air traffic controller. Certification in Ministry, Howard Payne University; A.A.S. in Mid-management and Communications, North Lake College, Irving, Texas. Activities include: Volunteer chaplain at Bay Area Hospital, and church missions (Brazil, Costa Rica, Turkey, Viet Nam, Peru and E1 Salvador). (5-10-02) Director of Business Development, Zachry Construction Corporation. Master of Architecture fi.om Texas A & M - University. Director of the AGC and ABC, Rotary Club and Corpus Christi Mustangs. Has volunteered with C.C. Windsurfing Association and the Plumeria Society/Botanical Gardens. (1-23-03) Environmental Compliance Specialist. B.S. in Chemistry and Environmental Science. Community activities include: Sea Scouts, Past Vision 2000 and Vision 2000 Water Supply Task Force member. Active sailor, fisherman and bird watcher. Received award for Army Environmental Conference in 1991. Excellent consensus builder - skilled in group decision making. (EnvironmentalisO (5-10-02) -32- Marie Schad~-Wood Retired registered nurse. Activities include: Co- Founder & Secretary of Columbus Ships Preservation Fund, Six Points Optimist Club member, Vice-President of Coastal Bend Shell Club and member of St. Cyril & Methodius Church. (11- 3o-oo) -33- 3 AGI SUBJECT: Fire Station No. 2 F AGENDA ITEM: Motion to authorize the City Maria! Sechrist-Hall Company of Corpus Station No. 2 Re-roof project. -'NDA MEMORANDUM June 10, 2003 e-roof (Project No. 5153) er, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with Christi, Texas, in the amount of $39,690.80 for the Fire ISSUE: The roof is approach ng the end of its economic life. The roof must be replaced to prevent water incursi)n into the building and resulting damage. FUNDING: Funds for are available in the Fire Department's Annual Operating Budget. RECOMMENDATION: ApproVal of the motion as presented. AF'~el R. Escobar, P.E. ' Director of Engineering Services Attachments: Exhibit A: Background Exhibit B: Budget Exhibit C: Bid Tabulation Exhibit D: Location Map Page 1 of 1 H:XHOME\KEVINS\G EN\FIRE\STA#2 Awdmemo,doc --37-- BACKGROUND INFORMATION BACKGROUND: Fire Station No. 2 is located at 13421 Up River Road. Funding for the project was included in the Fire Department's FY2002-2003 Annual Budget. The current roof is a metal panel roof that h~s reached the end of its economic life. PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: July 27, 2000 - Adoption of theFY2002-2003 Annual Budget, Ord. No. 024974. PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: April 2, 2003 - Award of an architectural services contract in the amount of $6,835 to Roots Foster Associates. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of removing an existing metal "R" panel roof and existing roll reinforced White vinyl faced glass fiber insulation and installation of new standing seam metal roofing and new.single roll batt insulation with vinyl reinforced polyester facing totaling approximately 4~500 square feet. The project will include replacement of flashing and plumbing vents, reinstallation of metal gutters when removal is required and replacement of all gravity vents. BID INFORMATION: A total of two bids were received on May 21,2003, with bids ranging between $39,690.00 to $48,600;00 (see Exhibit C - Bid Tabulation). The qualified Iow bidder is Sechrist-Hall Co. of Corpus Christi, Texas with a bid of $39,690.00. The architect's estimate was $44,000. BID RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented. CONTRACT TERMS: The contract allows u p to 70 calendar days to complete construction after the notice to proceed is issued. -38- Exhibit "A" J Page 1 of 1 PRELIMINARY BUDGET FI =.E STATION No. 2 RE-ROOF FUNDS AVAILABLE: Fire Department FY2002-20 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Project No. 5153 )3 Budget PRELIMINARY BUDGET FUNDS REQUIRED: 52,295 Total I 52,295 Construction I 39,690 Construction Contingencies 10%) 3,970 Design Consultant (Arch./En ~ineer) 6,835 Engineering Reimbursemeni 800 Survey Reimbursements I 0 Construction Inspection 0 Testing (Geotech & Quality ontrol) 0 Admin. Reimbursements 0 I Art (1.25%) 0 Elimination of Architectural E~arrier Review 0 I Miscellaneous Expenses (Prlnting, Advertising, 1,000 Express, etc.) TotalI 52,295 Exhibit B Page I of 1 -39- TABULATION OF BIDS Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TABULATED BL Angel R.Escobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services DATE: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 TIME OF COMPLETION: 70 Calendar Days ENGINEER'S ESTIATE: $44,000 FIRE STATION NO.2 RE-P.00F 2003 PROTECT N0. 5153 Sechriat-sial} C 4mpany P.O, TX 5207 C.C., TX 78465 tor Roofing 6 Construction Co. 1616 E. Commerce L __...- _.— San Antonio, TX 78205 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT A To furnish all labor and O materials, tools, and $0.00 $0.00 necessary equipment, to perform the wort, required at the locations set out by the plans and specifications and in strict accordance with the rontract documents LJTOTALBASE BID: $39,690.00 $48,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 \ Mp roject \ councilexhibits \ exh5153, dwg FIRE STATION # 2 13421 UP RZVER RD N NUECES BAY CORPUS CHRISTI BAY LAGUNA MADRE GULF OF MEXICO LOCATZON MAP N©T TO 5'CAL£ PROJECT No. 5153 EXHT_B~TT "D" 4 AG~ENDA MEMORANDUM June 10, 2003 SUBJECT: Wesley Seale Floo, AGENDA ITEM: a. Ordinance appropriating $52 WaterCIP Fund No. 4081 (1994 Ordinance No. 025144 to incr~ emergency. Damage Repairs (Project No. 8462) 1,165.00 in unappropriated interest earnings from the ~,evenue Bond); amending the Capital Budget adopted by ase appropriations by $521,165.00; and declaring an b. Motion to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with Lowman Services, I!nc. of Robstown, Texas, in the amount of $521,164.80 for Wesley Seale Dam Damage Repairs. ISSUE: Water Department facillties located below Wesley Seale Dam incurred damage due to the heavy water releasets associated with flood events during the fall of 2002. Award of a construction contract~ is required to complete the necessary repairs. FUNDING: Funds for are available in the Water CIP Fund upon approval of the appropriation of interest earningS. RECOMM,~I~DATION: Approval of the ordinance and motion as presented. Eduar¢o/~_~la, p.E. ¢' "' /~e(R. Escobar, P.E. ' WaterUSuperintendent Director of Engineering Services Attachments: Exhibit A: Background Exhibit B: Budget Exhibit C: Bid Tabulation Exhibit D: Location Map Page 1 of 1 H:',HOME~KE~rlNS~GEN,WATEI2,SEALE,8462 Flood Repairs'tG.~f-uctio~Awdrnemo.doc AGENDA MEMORANDUM ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Wesley Seale Flo�d Damage Repairs (Prof #8462) PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: I 1. November 19, 2002 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment Nol 1 to a professional services contract with Freese and Nichols, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for engineering design services related to Wesley Seale Dam Flood Damage Repairs (Motion No. 2002-385) 2. December 17, 2002 - Approval of the FY 2002 - 2003 Capital Improvement Budget (Ordinance No. 025144)' PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: August 26, 2002 - Execution of an administrative agreement for Architectural/Engineer Consultant Services with Freese and Nichols, Inc. for a fee not to exceed Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($25,000) for flood damage assessment. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Heavy rainfall events during the fall of 2002, required the release ofwaterthrough the crest gates at Wesley Seale Dam. The rate of release was dependent on the rate of inflow which resulted in the highest release rates recently experienced. During these events, Wesley Seale Dam performed well and incurred no damage. However, a number of City facilities associated with Wesley Seale Dam by necessity are located below the dam in the floodway. A number of downstream facilities incurred damage that must be repaired now. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project repairs include: • Repair on one-half mile of earthen access roadways; • Replacement of 41,000 CY of 48 -inch riprap and bedding; • 400 LF of 8 -inch PVC drain line; • 700 LF of chain link of 8 -foot security fence replacement; • 380 CY of reinforced concrete; and • Other miscellaneous repairs FI \HOME\LYNDAS\GEN\W Ai ER\WESLEY SEALE DAM\8462 - FLOOD DAMAGE REPAIRS\BAOKGROUND. DOC EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 -46- BID INFORMATION: The proje~ (6) proposals on May 14, 2003. $1,125,110.00. The Engineer's Lowman Services, was the Io~ Nichols, Inc. and city staff, re( experience a construction contn Services, Inc. of Robstown, Te× FUNDING: Based on the Em, :t consists exclusively of a base bid. The City received six (See Exhibit "C") Bids ranged between $521,164.80 and estimate of probable cost was $567,000. est responsive bidder. The City's Consultant, Freese- ommend that based on Iow bid and past satisfactory ~ct in the amount of $521,164.80 be awarded to Lowman as for the Wesley Seale Dam Flood Damage Repairs. ;rgency Disaster Declarations, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) ~ ill reimburse the City for up to 75% of the incurred repair costs. Funding is available fro~ unappropriated Water Capital Improvement Program interest reserves. -47- EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 PRELIMINARY BUDGET WESLEY SEALE FLOOD DAMAGE REPAIRS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Project No. 8462 PRELIMINARY FUNDS AVAILABLE: BUDGET Water C.I.P. Fund No. 4081 642,424.80 , Total I 642,424.80 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction 521,164.80 Construction Contingencies (10%) 52,160.00 Design Consultant (Arch./Engineer) 40,000.00 Engineering Reimbursements 22,000.00 Survey Reimbursements 0.00 Construction Inspection 0.00 Testing (Geotech & Quality Control) 2,500.00 Admin. Reimbursements 2,600.00 Art (1.25%) 0.00 Elimination of Architectural Barrier Review 0.00 Miscellaneous Expenses (Printing, Advertising, 2,000.00 Express, etc.) TotalI 642,424.80 Exhibit B Page I of 1 -48- A f� TABULATED' etEESE AND NICHOLS, INC. RID DATE: ;003 PAGE 1 OF 4 TABULI P3I03 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING- CORPUS CHRISTI COMPLETION TIME: W CALENDAR DAYS FOR ALL ENGINEERS EADIMATE; SW.B00_ne WESLEY SEALE DAM 41 FLOOD DAMAGE REPAIRS Low an Sea S e n Lowmarvices, Inc. T.D.M., Ltd, 4233 F 8 P.O. a. a n ERS, Ino Jlypw.a CpnebONon Ti ]6J60 Tx 70391 4620 Ok Park Dr., Me. MM 4An.tl. Uescn 361.387.1487 J.pluOn, Ms. 30x06 Cwp0a 1pn I "Mobilvatlon and oemplklon-m accordance with Ouanll Drift UHK Frlw TMai ]et'JAds63 Duahk Unit ' unk Pride TOfal 801 -Bu -nee plrbtl,Tt a0rpealm 8 TeH1 (Iles eifw0ans eom Isle antl in lace per tum sum Ou Ust unit Prlw TOW Gu Unit unk Pik. Teal 1 LS 53605].011 516057.00 1 Lb bOp0.00 S{l Opp,Op 2 "car. alwater Dunne ConsWc+ion"n r.,d.nce 1 Lb 5,10.0)Wpm 1 L] Op0" OW" with the plana and specifications P mm plelo and place ° or turn sum - 1 LS 32400.00 2.0..00 1 LS 10 0.00 18420.00 1 -IS J "Clean Out 14-nc 24-mch RCP' wmplele antl 6i plaza per hum s um 000.00 " 1 l8 1 " 1 000" f L$ 51300.00 ft 00,00 1 LS 4'pebria Removal South $pillway-complete and In 4441.00 µ.W 1 LS 1735.W 111 de 1 13 10000" 10 .W place.•.'CuSic vara• 2120 CY $3.40 11 In. n. 3120 CY 11.83 3q BBL00 3120 CY 5'Rorrow For Roadway Fill -complete and in place per 14.W W)40.W 3110DY 10" 1 AO -publc 3rd' 513.00 $i W0,00 130 CY B.q 40 PVC Omin Lina' cpmpl I,. and In 6'lace 115).00 1]0 CY 14.W 118x00 r'linear lace er 'linear fop(- 40a LF 130.00 $13000.00 400 LF fti.46 8814.00 c P 'Gravel Inc meM of B�incM1 Dann npletP and in qW LF 6.50 ] 800.00 q00 LF SW 2000" 140 CY 5170.19 S2J 036.60 1__ LY Ip $3,2411.0 e-J,00opsi F.inforrd Concrete- in a -dare. wttb - UO' CY ).W 030040 140 Cf WW OW" the specifications, complete and In place per %mal, ard-. 290 LY SJ47.10 597109.30 360 CY JgiW 95]80.00 9 -48-Inch RI n m n Inc --c° par dlel. antl I '' 300 CY SW.pO i 000.00 LO CY " 11 000" ]St0 566.)3 3M 107.30 55H CY Net 7136.00 ]SW CY 10 •g.lncb TM1lck Riprap Redtlln8 temple+• and in place -cubic 02W vxW 5510 C 116" bW" er aN' 600 LY 561.00 137200.00 80o CY 33 11 'Caliche Roatl Basi turn late In 95W.W Epp CY W,W 0W� antl lace er cubic tl 1320 CY]OO,W f3LT4 $26 5U.80 1330 CY 'W " 13 -New 6'Cyclone Fencing complete and in place per A.ib 3303.W H2O CY W -W 10.W 1330 C4 10" 1 " Iineartoot' >00 LF S14.J5 I10 045.00 ip0 lF 13.00 itfliD0 700 LF 1l -Cyclone Fenclne Cleamtl and Repaired" complete and 1a.W 'Po 7W W 161W" In Fire, er'llkwartoot- lea. LF $1.20 3360.00 3000 LF 3.T! T 700.W IM LF Safety Ladders for Spillway 1 -rill and cb Ma'compbte W 11 00.00 3000 LF f0" m and In lisp. par"turnsum" 1 LS SI100.00 $7200.00 1 Lb $5170.0 170.00 15 Y3 -Inch RCP Culvert" wmplele and In place per-Ilnear foot' t LS OW.00 OW.W 1 LS t " 10000" 14 LF $100.011 2 400.00 11 LF 16"24 -Inch RCP Culvert- cum leb and in law fent• p p ver'enear .00 10]200 34 LF W.W 1 1140 36 LF 5200.00 )300.W a6 LF BJ.W 380.00 1]"turn cb culvert End Wells -complete and In place per ]0 LF M.W HZW >B LF .W t O.W s -tumsum- + Ls si zoo.W S73pp.00 1 Ls 480.00 sx 4.0.00 1 LS tW.00 1W.W 1 Ls 600.W .W X (D �a o_ A C.) 4. PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGE 3 OF WESLEY SEALE DAM J.M.Davldson Inc. FLOOD DAMAGE REPAIRS Bax 46391 Comus Christ. Tx. 79469 918thild Lake DNve HOlualoly Tx.TT094 + DescastimaIf 361-307498Jd993 ]10<995395 'MoblllptlOn and pemolitlon"In acwrdance with puanti Unit Unit Price TOW pua Unit Unit Prlu Tested1 thee i0catione com Tete and in lace per lump sum t LS $T 296.00 1. T399.00 1 LS 50 000.0 W0u.0 2 -Gre callWalar Derina Congructlon' In seeplence wXn the plans and specifications complete and In place er linear sum 1 LS $10 93.00 10293.00 1 LS $12000.00 1 000.00 3 -Clean Out 24 -Inch RCP' complete and In place per to. sme 1 LS 199.00 54199.00 1 LS T W0.00 ji 599.89 4'Osm. Re m;aval South Spillway- cumplele and In lace .,-cubic ard' 2120 CY 56.00 12]20.00 2120 CY $25.00 SS 000.00 5'6ortow br Roadway FIII" cumplele and In place per 'cubic amp- 13o OY S21 8]4.00 .9a 130 CY 5.00 850.00 6 '9 -Inco Schedule 40 PVC DNn Linecumplele antl In lace er 9lnear lour Coo LF 526.30 11310.00 400 LF t2S00 50 000.00 ] "Gravel In casement of BAncn DabY complete and in lace .1 'cublc attl' 140 CY Sex as $11 620.00 140 CY 2]S00 5 W0.0 PST Once carpe mean with the specifications, complete and In niece per ernme aW. xe0 CY $102.00 1e9580.0 230 CY 7so.00 t0 No." 9'43 Inch RI ra om late and In lace a -nlbic d^ JstO cr 114.00 01]0.00 ]510 cr 79.00 :n 90.00 10 "9 -inch Thick Rlprap Bedding" complete antl In place "cubic aid- 600 CY 591.00 51600.00 600 CY 190.00 000.00 11 'Callcha Roatl Base' com lets and In lace ercublc of 1220 CY $35.00 "1 ID0.00 1320 CY 3,00 TOM 12 -New 9 CYUone Pricing' complete and In place per 'linear foot' 700 LF 53.0 12100.00 ]00 LF ,00 500.00 13 "GYclana Fencing Cleaned and pepalreJ' complete antl In of... Pwunea. fear 2600 LF Wall $25 00.00 2800 LF $24.00 97200.00 14 Laddersfor Spillway Hearth ane Chute"complete and In and n lace er'lum sum' 1 LS 53394.00 $8384.00 1 LS 20000.00 0000.00 15 "124nch RCP CUNerI' eompble antl In plan per linear foot 24 LF 33.00 79200 24 LF 0.00 520.00 16 -24-Inch ROP CUIV9N- complete and in place per "linear foot" 36 LF $56.0 2016.00 36 LF 239.00 0 0.0 17 "241nch Culvert End WaIIV Complete and In place per 'lum s 1 L9 $10039.00 S10039.00 1 LS so 590.0 30.00 16 'pR-25 OI4n Clean-0vP wmpleb and In place per 'lum 5 1 LS 1 I $995400 9959.00 1 LS 4 50000 300 PAGE 4 OF 4 File : \Mpro/ecf\councilexhibits\exh8462.dw~ [ CHOKE CANYON RESERVOIR THREE RIVERS N LAKE TEXANA 59 / / / / / IINGTON / SEADRIFT - GEORGE CORPUS CHRISTI IWESLEY SEALE DAIVl NUECES RIVER ON WATER PLANT 7~ CORPUS CHRISTI MARY RHODES PIPELINE BORO CZTY PROJECT NO. 8462 L OCA T T_ ON MAP NTS IWESLEY SEALE FLOOD CITY OF CORPUS CHRIC~TI, TEX,~$ DAMAGE REPA T_RS -53- EXHr_BIT "O" CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT DEPARTMENTOFENCINEERINC£ERWCES PAGEt 1 of 1 DATE: 06 10-200~ ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $521~165 IN UNAPPROPRIATED INTEREST FROM WATER ClP FUND NOI 4081 (1994 REVENUE BOND) FOR WESLEY SEALE DAM DAMAGE REPAIRS; AMENDING FY 2002-2003 CAPITAL BUDGET ADOPTED ElY ORDINANCE NO. 025144 TO INCREASE APPROPRIATIONS BY ~521,165; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY i BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: / SECTION 1. That $521,165 is ;~ppropriated from the unappropriated interest from Water CIP Fund No. 4081 (1994 Revenue Bond) for Wesley Seale Dam damage repairs. SECTION 2. That the FY 200242003 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 025144 is amended to increase appropriations by $521,165. SECTION 3. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) fir~ds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for ~the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rL~le that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetipgs so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of ,2003. ATTEST: THE CITYOFCORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa, City Secretary APPROVED: June 5, 2003 Lisa Aguilar ~ Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor -54- 5 AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 3, 2003 SUBJECT: Kostoryz Lift Station and Force Mains (Project No. 7109) AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to award a construction contract in the amount of $1,841,249.88 with Holloman Corporation for the Kostoryz Lift Station and Force Mains. ISSUE: The proposed project is one part of a large project known as Lift Station Improvements and Carolyn Heights Diversion to Greenwood Plant. This large project will be accomplished in three (3) construction contracts as follows: 1. Project No. 1 - Kostoryz Lift Station and Force Mains Improvements 2. Project No. 2 - 30-Inch Gravity Sewer Line Greenwood to Richter (Under construction.) 3. Project No. 3 - 30-Inch and 18-Inch Gravity Sewer Lines Kostoryz to Waterloo (Scheduled to bid in June-July 2003.) The proposed project includes the construction of the lift station at Kostoryz and the installation of a dual 16-inch force main from the lift station towards Ayers Street. FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2002-2003 Wastewater Capital Improvement Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. '-----~< (~ c,_~ ~gbl R. Escobar, P. E., Foster Crowell, ' " ' Director of Wastewater Department 'Director of Engineering Services Additional Support Material: Exhibit "A" Background Information Exhibit "B" Project Budget Exhibit"C" Bid Tabulation Exhibit "D" Location Map H /U S E RS2\HOM E/VE LMAR/GE N/WASTEWAT~7109iC ON STR UC TIO N/AGE NDA MEMO -5'/- BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Kostoryz Lift StatiOn and Force Mains (Project No. 7109) PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Auqust 18, 1998 - Motion ~authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Contract for Engineerin~l Services with Goldston Engineering, Inc. for a total fee not to exceed $187,800 for the (a) Kostoryz Road Utilities Adjustments from Holly Road to Saratoga Boulevard; (b) Kostoryz Road from South Padre Island Drive to Holly Road Drainage Improvements Study; and (c) Lift Station Improvements and Carolyn Heights Diversion to Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant (Motion No. M98-284). 2. October 17, 2000 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 for Stage 2 services to the Contract for Engineering Services in the amount of $565,865, for a total re-stated fee of $753,665, with Goldston Engineering, inc. for Lift Station Improvements and Carolyn Heights Diversion to Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant (Motion No. M2000-373). 3. December 17, 2002 - Approval of the FY 2002-2003 Capital Improvement Budget (Ordinance No. 025144). PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. July 16, 2001 - Executed Amendment No. 2 to the Contract for Engineering Services with Goldston Engineering, Inc. for a total fee of $2,000, for a total re- stated fee of $755,665. 2. May 13, 2003 - Executed Amendment No. 3 to the Contract for Engineering Services with Goldston Engineering, Inc. for a total fee or $8,100, for a total re- stated fee of $763,765. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of one (1) required construction contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A number of Storm Water and Wastewater projects were approved by the City Council in the 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program. These projects address needed improvements and enhancements to the City's basic infrastructure components. Several of these interrelated projects involve work in the same general area of the City; therefore, they were grouped together into one overall project. This project area generally includes Kostoryz Road from South Padre Island Drive to Saratoga Boufevard and also utility improvements from the Carolyn Heights area eton9 Saratoga Boulevard to the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant. The projects involve coordination with the reconstruction of Kostoryz Road improvements from Holly Road to Saratoga Boulevard to be undertaken by the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT). EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 3 The projects are as follows: Ao Kostoryz Road Utillties Adjustments - Holly Road to Saratoqa Blvd. (SH 357) These utility adjuslJments are necessary to accommodate the reconstruction of Kostoryz Road in this area. They include the extension of water lines and sanitary sewer lines; relocation of an existing force main from Cabaniss Acres lift station; and installation of casings under Kostoryz for future utility lines and the elimination of one lift station (Crestmont). Kostoryz Road - ~PID to Holly Road Drainaqe Improvement Study - The Storm Water part Of this project includes evaluation of the hydraulic Capacity of the existing trunk line from SPID to Holly Road; definition of drainage boundary areas served; identification of deficiencies; cost estimates; prioritization of storm sewer improvements; and need for additional capacity in the existing trunk line. Lift Station Improvements & Carolyn Heiqhts Diversion to Greenwood Plant This portion of the project includes the elimination of two lift stations (Carolyn Heights and Saratoga Place) and the construction of gravity lines to the Kostoryz lift station. The project also includes construction of a new lift station at Kostoryz, installation of a force main from the lift station towards Ayers Street, and construction of a gravity line from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant to Ayers Street along Saratoga to intercept flows and provide future gravity service for property along Saratoga. This gravity line will eliminate the lift station at Saratoga Place. This work needs to be performed prior to the reconstruction of Kostoryz Road. The Lift Station Improvements and Carolyn Heights Diversion to Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant will be accomplished in three (3) construction contracts: 1. Project No. 1 - Kostoryz Lift Station and Force Main Improvements 2. Project No. 2 ~ 30-inch Gravity Line Greenwood Drive to Richter- under construction. 3. Project No. 3 - 30-inch Gravity Line Kostoryz Road to Waterloo - scheduled to bid September 2003. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project, Project No. 1 Kostoryz Lift Station and Force Mains, consists of construction of a new lift station and valve pit, pumps, piping, electrical components, an emergency generator, an odor control system, grading and site work; and construction of approximately 2,800 linear feet of dual 16-inch diameter PVC force main, demolition of the existing lift station and its pumps, piping, and electrical components, and related appurtenances; in accordance with the plans, specifications and contract documents. EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 3 BID INFORMATION: Bids were received on May 14, 2003 with seven (7) bidders submitting proposals. The bid proposal was set up with a Base Bid only; and the estimated cost of construction is $1,500,000. The bids range from $1,515,434 to $2,278,390, with Laughlin-Thyssen, Ltd. of Hous~n, Texas submitting the Iow Bid. On May 15, 2003 Laughlin-Thys be withdrawn from any conside proposal. Laughlin-Thyssen, L' concluded that accepting a cor requested that their Bid Bond be Inc., and City staff recommend t sen, Ltd. submitted a letter requesting their bid proposal 'ation due to substantial mathematical errors in the bid d. reports that after a careful review of their bid, they tract would cause the company irreparable harm; and released. The City's consultant, Goldston Engineering, le Bid Bond be released to Laughlin-Thyssen, Ltd. The second Iow bid was submitted by Holloman Corporation from Converse, Texas. Their bid is $1,841,249.88, approxima~tely $340,000 over th, e estimated cost of construction of $1,500,000. In reviewing thebid prices, Holloman s bid prices came in higher than anticipated in the following items: · Excavation · Mobilization · Lift Station Structure The bids submitted by Ramos Industries, Inc. and Jalco, Inc. are within 4% of Holloman Corporation's bid proposal; and the bids are within the actual work being performed. The references of Holloman Corporation were reviewed; and the City's consultant, Goldston Engineering, Inc., and City staff recommend a contract be awarded to Holloman Corporation in the amount of $1,841,249.88. CONTRACT TERMS: The contract for Project No. 1 Kostoryz Lift Station and Force Mains specifies that the project will be completed in 364 calendar days, with completion anticipated by June 2004. Project No. 2 30-inch Gravity Line Greenwood Drive to Richter is currently under construction and will be complete in February 2004. Project No. 3 30-inch Gravity Line Kostoryz Road to Waterloo is scheduled to bid September 2003 and it is anticipated construction will be complete October 2004. FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2002-2003 Wastewater Capital Improvement Budget. EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 3 KOSTORYZ LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAINS (PROJECT NO. 7109) PROJECT BUDGET June 3, 2003 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Wastewater CIP ........................................................................ $2,305,254.88 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Contract (Holloman Corporation) ................................. $1,841,249.88 Contingencies (10%) .................................................................. Consultant (Goldston Engineering) ................................................ Major Projects Activity ............................................................... Construction Inspection Activity ................................................... Miscellaneous (Printing, Advertising) ............................................. Total ....................................................................................... 184,125.00 232,350.00 15,650.00 30,380.00 1,500.00 $2,305,254.88 H/U SERS2/HO M E~¥ELMAR/GEN',WAST EWA 1~7109/CONSTRUCTIO N%P RO J ECT BUDGET EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 of 1 Tabulatlan Of Bids De udernnt of Enpinsering -Clly of Conduct CM1tletL T% Tabulated By: Steve $ynovll; P.F. Cs01d51on Euylneeriog Bid Date: Mav 14.2003 Time of CoOn.fid n: SN C.I.N., Oava Enelnaaea Million W C.- S1.500d00 Pepe 1 OI3 K-la,z 1,1151,Pon and Fmce'.talnz Praecl No. ]los Lamnlln-TM1yssm, Ltd 1320 Bayle. Nousbn T%T)020 Holloman COninaraon Bamoe lnlN6Mee,Inc. 137301.10 Past 96.6 Pasadena Blvd. Converse7X78109 Pasadan 7X]7503 Joel, Inc.RS 5148 Lotus Strait Houfbn U77.5 Black P.O. B..8385 Co ua Christ. UTNN T 6 C Concondemn, LOS 8611 KIIbupb Hwe T%T7O86 W.T. Youaq Cost R0, So. 919) C.0 T%IN68 L item Oescnptinn 1puanlilyl drd unit Price Amount Unit ones Anwunt Unit Pdee Annount Unit Prke Nnounl Unit Pdee Amwurt UnKPdee NneuM Unfil Amount Baze old I $i¢l eaeing and Strippm J ACRE S 2901100 5 6,00000 5 35662 S 142640 S 4,346.30 3 17,381.20 $ 2,00.00 $ 1.00000 3 2,00000 $ 8,0000 $ 2,0000 $ B.W300 S 2.47500 S 175000 A -z SiIc G,inb., Excavaeonend Fll 1,00u 0 5 500 $ 5,0000 f 10191 3 101,940.00 S 450 f 4,930.0 S 9.0 5 9,0000 $ 10.0 $ 10,000 3 400 $ 4,000 , f 7.0 $ ),0000 IL 3 Eza-, Llo Station Demolition I Le $ 13000.00 $ 130000 f 15.27211 5 15.272.11 S 4,470d0 $ 4,00.10 $ 1],0000 $ 13,0000 S 7,50,00 $ 7.500 Of S 10,00 .00 $ M.L. S 1210.0 $ 12,10,0 i.:4 Rend,,D, .Abandootd St-,,.- i 1 LS 5 300000 5 3000.00 3 11,560.32 f 11.568.32 $ 7.353 10 $ 7.353.10 $ 000,0 f 8.0000 $ 72,0300 f 72.00.0 f 5,0000 f 5,PA100 S 11,730.0 $ 11)]000 d-5 Flohilizalion 1 LS S 5000006 $ 500000 $ 93,92353 5 93,92353 $107,67000 S 10,8700 $ 600000 3 000000 3 30,00.00 f XOW.W $ 20.000 3 20ONOn !175.00000 $ 175.03000 R .PPPDF, C.6 n I $ 320 $ 11,05500 $ 165 S 5,52750 IS 93 1 S 6.355110 . 200 $ 67.-00 S Don f MON GO $ 2. $ 67.00 S 2o. $ 1,375 On ' 5V.21216 ID I 2,000 LY $ 330 £ 9,900.0 1 165 $ 4,9000 S 240 f 7.M0. $ 2. 5 6000. $ ]Po $ 9000 f 20 $ BONDSf 250 f S LOOO 1.o--' STpp EE ]JO LF $ 3 .50 6 1,190 S 011 192 $ 65200 $ 2.10 $ 71400 $ 150 S 51000 5 3 _. S 1,020. $ 0 5,00 $ 1,70.0 $ 7. $ 2.W of A.9_ Allollan, Fol Undoncipnled Adlusmlents I LS $ 75.000. $ 75,0000 S 75.110000 f 7500.00 f 75,00000 S 75.00.0 $ 75,000 f 75,ON 00 S 75,OPo_. 5 75.00.0 S )5.000 S MON S 75031.b $ 75..0.. Su61o1al A"Items'. $ 1)6,145.00 S 310,260.74 f 231,253.40 S 166,210,86 $ 222570.00 $ 138,400.00 f 310,585.00 P -I L ltSUti,s STlchne I [i $ 363000/10 312.0. 337380243 13)2.8024] $9650. S 490,5..00 $ 54000000 5)26 2% DONO. $ 729200 $605..""m S 685,0. 00 !450.\1.00 $ 525.000 112 C-3 \'aP-e Pi51mc11ue � pue"1 - 1 E\ Pi 5 520e0 oC E $ 5 11000 $ 5200000 E4i 01022 f 7900000 $ 25,10931 S 4101022 700.0 a 75]2]93 529943.10 $ Q.00a $1 ...a $ tIo 000.00 $ W,ppo. f $1 ...aDO 0982930 S 35,.0 00 $ 105,000. S 2700000 3 860000 3100,0000 f tO0.Po0.Po 5100,0..00 S 61,000.00 S 25,.000 S 75 ON $ 33,00000 f 10,0000 Do 00000 B-1 F5 Pa sire Ealln Filtu PLn q nM1lc L$ 5 °, OOo 00 $ 79,000.40 3133,)4655 E 133,74655 6132,80920 $ 13280910 f1p000oL0 $ 100,00000 S1.,000 On 3 1.,.0,. $IOO.O,. $ 1.,0._. 5132.0.49 $ 14,ON. LS 5 25,00000 3 25.00.0 S 10,0000 S 60000c b DMOW 5 7.Su 42 $ 751142 524,72500 f 24,72500 f 20,00000 5 DOOM 00 $ 5.00000 f Soon ]8..0. Sunlolal"B"Items: f 570,000.00 3 06]98.55 $ 792,¢63.50 f 675,000.00 f - 9)6251160 f 905,000.00 $ S 886.00.0 1 .1 WWI 19N5 loot 21 WC i- 5 338Bu f IM, to as 2107¢ ! N, 481.58 Ce C".442210-3o;fSLIP Y ( (,r,, it, 2' li 5 145 00 $ ],625,00 S 10035 $ 2,508.75 f 160.10 S 4,0250 $ 4000 $ 10 ON 5 22500 $ 5,625. S 2N. f 5,.000 $ 320.00 3 86000 6-D FlbDi..h,,], L PM1 51 2 E $ 650000 3 13.000. 5 7,13943 $ 1127886 $ 6,69300 $ 13.38600 $ 15.000 $ 3000. S 200... S 40,0.. S 15 ON on S 30.000 5 ),100. S 14,200. E, 1. D OIM1 F 6 D. 1 Jl \F f .Oo $ 11 20. 5 599.82 3 2399280 3 5310 $ 21.27600 $ 45000 $ 18.00.00 f 55000 f 28,.0 00 $ Rom I 16.00. $ ND DO f 35.0. 5 Pla Fberglms Dlanl,lc r De;0 $ `, $ 1 I od $ 661824 $ fi61024 $.,%3779,.5 04,1,40 5,452)0 S 140..00 $ 1400000 $ 1?5.00 S 13,500 00 5 6,000 00 $ 6.0.. 3 5.75600 $ SSW DO L6 F_clla l,,dh for 5' Ilia AI3nM1ole - I_ \F $ 24000 $ 1.12000 $ 86307 $ ],05991 { $ 5,21020 $ 45000 5 5,0.00 $ 250,00 f 3.250.. I 400 OD $ 5,2➢OAD S IIWOD $ it loom N D, . An Release\'els FI -1 I - to 5 770000 5 5?.000 $ 532265 $ 37,25855 $ 7452. S 52,16400 S 8,.000 $ 56 NO of S 6,0.00 f 42.0..00 5 $,0._. $ 350._. $ GROW $ 42.000 C-6 24"P\(0905 DR IBC J'nLninl (� LF $ 28006 5 7.000 3 ))Ifi 5 1,92900 $ 10290 $ 2.5)250 $ ]5060 $ 9,00060 f Spp. 3 7.5... S 30000 $ 7500_. f 9.,. $ to?. DO IB"P"(.1190$022 PI' '\1 M1'n: f. 'er) I P'ULPomc Dtain (J ' -f [Cosrn 61 IJ LP $ 29.00 $ 1452.. S 1500 S 175,35000 3 S9. $ 199,89900 S 68,00 1340,680. $ 3900 S 195,393.. $ 865) S 32S.4. 70 S 44 DO 3 26,4100 S ei,00 $ 56550 3 79.86 3 5.1890 I 112. S 7,93850 f 130,00 S SABOM $ 10000 S 65OJ 00 S SO DO f 5.2... $ 105. 5 6825. 111' 1?"PYC 1500 DR IB Fmcc Alam 1135'. l lo, crl LC $ O $ 1520,. S 24,39 S 975 So I 61110 $ 2440110 5 B0. $ 3.200. S 90Po $ Dean. $ .. f 2 )DO $ 70. $ 2,.0. C-12 12" U I Yo¢e Lou, 41, n1 Coeea LF E 900 5 1575.00 S 6175 $ 2,043,75 S 11790 3 294500 $ 12000 S ?.0.00 $ 1000 5 2, 5.. S ... f 1,50.. i INN $ 2.50.0 C-11 12 P\C 0900 UR IP \' II U,gel Well, p. 'rF 5 6611 $ ]96000 $ 6030 I ]fits Oo S 4120 I 2A72.. $ 100. 5 6,00. $ 4000 $ 2.4.. S .. I 3,0... $ 14000 S SA... C-14 B" P\C 1900 DR IB Ni. 'a Ine U LP $ 500 S 741000 $ 2983 $ ],07790 $ 6070 S 6.591 Do $ 78 00 $ 10,1400 I 3250 3 4,225.. $ 20. $ 2220. 3 5900 $ 7,6)0. 1,-15 2"SM1dlEe90YVC Wat,flinc IFIL LF S 1900 $ 304000 $ 9.59 $ 1,5344. $ 6. $ 1,10400 $ 1600 S 2,5.00 S 20. $ V.00 $ 1000 $ I,630 00 3 ]1. f 4,96060 C-16 T,Ldl S,f,1,, COI E,C, al,,. 5.15_' IF 5 100 $ 5,18500 $ 011 $ 5b615 S 0.31 $ 1549.. $ 0,50 f 25B2 So $ 4DO S 20,660.00 $ 1.. $ 5,165,. $ 5. $ 25,S25 DO 10 ED... Ell E{ S 230000 S 690000 $ 70029 $ 2,124.87 $ 162.20 $ 486.60 $ 210DO $ SON 00 S 3,00000 3 9,0.,00 S 2,0000 5 6,03W 3 3.1.. $ 9,30000 -10 I 1" D. I. E ... ft,c F, 6\ E 450 n' $ 1,470. $ 107977 $ 3,23931 $ 1,09993 $ 3,299.70 f 40.00 S 1,200.. $ 530.00 $ 1590.00 $ 50000 5 1,500 $ 9800 S 3860.00 C-19 I2 "D. I. Spool E4 330011 $ 99000 $ 910.11 f 3,73033 f 90640 E 271920 $ 47060 $ 1A1000 $ 350. $ I'D%. S Sono $ 1.8... $ IND. $ 3,ISO. C-20 12" -OO DCtnCC D -I Btnd L\ $ 5K O1 3 17400 $ 119 So f 2,21098 f 71600 $ 2360.40 $ 53000 $ 150.00 $ 500 S 1,650. 5 60O S 0 D 1000. 5 11... $ S30GO C-2, 12"a 1114 p.5poo1 - E 5 1310011 b fi5000 $ 1,21177 5 5133.85 $ 1,263.90 $ 6,319% S IMott $ 5,0..0 $ 54000 5 270000 S NO 0 L- _DWI S 1,0300 5 9,15000 C-] 12" D. I. El ill d Elan, I:A 5 SCO Oo $ 500 DO 5 33943 S 5)686 $ 31350 $ 627. $ 250. $ 5... $ 200.00 5 4.. 5 250. 5 5..00 3 460. S 920.00 1121 I="CM1ecA\al.e E\ b 3,700 o0 S 15$00. S 2,605,19 $ 13.02595 S 2.569]0 3 12.86650 $ ?00000 $ 150... S 3,20000 S 16.00000 $ 3.500.. 5 17,SPo 00 $ 4,.0,00 5 20.0. Q4 12"x l'-"01.Sp1nl EA 5 390.00 $ 1,950,. S 46898 S 2.344.0 1 $ 86830 $ 2.73160 5 ]5000 f 1)50.0 S 3]0.00 3 1,850.0 3 SOODO 5 2,SW,. I 8600 5 27000 Pepe 1 OI3 -nnvm,r un sraron aiW snr:z moms P,a sot 13_09 urea _ Item pescrlption -- G25 12"- 45 Depce D. 1, Rend -26 12 Dresser Coupling _C'28 12 plug _ G28 24"x 12'D.L Wee G29 2J "x l2"D.1. RWucer C-30 12".0VI) -I. Reduce[ C-31 5'Plug Valve 032 G" D.1, Blind Flange C33 2J"DI. Sport puanlie II 5 5 fi 1 1 1 I S lint EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA Eq Lzuanlm.]nr:aen 1320 Boyle: Nnustnn rx Unit Pir. $ 45000 $ $ ]6000 $ } 150000 S S ?60000 E $ 100000 § $ 340.00 S S 70000 1 E 15000 8 E 135000 5 $ 3300.00 $ f 3,05000 S f 1,15000 S E 90000 5 E 150000 3 § 200000 f E 300000 S S 150 00 E S 1. i0000 S 3 0000 E 41..00 S 5 24000 S 5 56000 S S t30. S 5 130000 f E 1300 S f 400 $ $ 600 3 f 40.00 f f 55.00 S 5 43000 S ua. A,-4 Amount 4950.00 f 3,900.00 E ],500.00 f 15,600.00 $ 1OMM S 340.00 S ]00.00 5 15000 5 12400m $ 6,000.00 5 ],3M,00 f 2.300.00 $ 3,60000 5 -3.. n0 5 S,6N.W 2 1800000 1 300.00 E 23=.00 S BX.N 3 7.00 a 24000 S NOW 3 130 S 12..00 f 3900 1 8 $ 2100 S 24.. 3 11000 $ 21.5.00 E Nnnnman coryor.0on 1371. 1.10 converse rx]6111 11nit Pries ]02]6 E ]1123 $ 212de E 5,81190 f 293468 f 659,07 1 $ [012.13 $ 1]]41 f 1,0]520 S fi016.JJ $ 5,]]].50 S [)6919 S 90658 S 158959 3 30Pfi0 S 055].10 5 276.93 f 76297 $ fiB69 f 601 42 f 32301 2 9243 S 211.00 1 92431 $ 5]01 5 45.83 f 1669 f ]548 S 12759 5 ]5583 3 .mo. mdueMn.r lest 1e36 P.,aeam Pleadav Amount Unit Price ].]30.36 f 661.50 S ],556.15 $ ]15.00 $ 13,59).05 S 2]2310 S 34,00918 f 8,081.90 f 2,93490 5 3,10410 f 659.07 $ iti S 1012.13 f 9Mm $ qlb f 116.00 3 6,00221 1 1.7SO [2,02668 f 6.31120 $ 11,475.00 $ 5X4.10 S 3.930.98 $ 1417.M $ 3,91652 S 1,009]0 $ 3.608.]4 f 1.311 ,W f 6043]0 f ],083.50 $ 1],31880 f 5,01430 5 553.94 3 2"S425Mf 1523.]1 j 3$ 1,3]251 f 1S 48142 S 4f 31]01 S 2S 917.43 3 Wt?.80 $ 2111.8 S 1+1PJ1 S R1.J1 f .75. $ 159.0] S 551. 5 91316 1 4610 S 194]6 1 9140 f 3.f28.. f 2180 f 255.10 $ 131.10 S 17]9,50 f 527% S Jaen. live. ]148 Lonu rx T7503 Houston rx]ro45 Amount Unll Pricy ],4%00 S 360.00 f 3,579.00 S 00.00 f 1361)03 f 1AWW 3 M, 50940 $ 2,400,00 $ 3,101.10 2 900.00 S 83570 f 2.,, 1 93600 $ SM'. 3 11500 2 H0.00 f f 1.000.00 f 12,6MAO f ],iNW 3 1100020 $ 3,00000 S 2934.00 3 I,IOO.N f 4,038.80 f 000.00 5 ],950.40 f 1,50000 S 6,tfi]00 3 ],0.:W S 30,06520 1 3,200.00 S [00.00 f Mr. $ 2-M 5 2001. f 1009 $ 962.. 1 700.00 2 SSIEL S 0191 i .7. S [0900 f 167.]0 1 1500 S %10 f Sm f 32560 f 600 S 1,30600 1 70.00 S 268.20 f 5 . f Inc. sin« Amount 4,18000 $ JANDO $ ],200.00 f 14.000.00 S 9001. f 200no S Sweet $ II0.00 f II,NJW i 6,2Wm S ],000.00 $ 2.XgW 5 ],.0300 5 4500.00 i 6,000.00 2 15200.00 E 2001. f 1,X0.00 $ 4060 5 1•A. 3 1... S 7110.00 S 4 1,OMM f 4500 f 10. 2 J2.. 3 4.2..00 3 ION 1 0.8 elect P.O. Box co mCntl.a Unit once 41000 $ )Wm S 1,20.00 3 2100.00 $ 59[00.00 2 3Wm S 6MM S IW.N 1 WO.N f 310000 S 4.)00.00 S 1]00,00 f 935.00 f NO f 2,)001. f 1I'man f 300.00 f ..M 5 an 2.M S 125. f 35000 f 650. $ ! 5..00 f 1500 S 15.. 3 is.Po S 16.00 3 17.00 S III( Amount 1,84000 3 3,]WW S 6,000.00 i 14,400.00 3 1.100.00 f 3931. 2 6N.W S 100.00 f 6.)0000 S leNN 3 8,2MM $ 1.&M.N 5 3,)401. $ 2)03.00 S U20N $ 19,100.00 3 60000 f IW.N S SW.N 5 425.. 3 ]N.. f 600. $ SNW 1 45.. f Wm S 60.. 9001. S J1.N S r3e conWUNon. aso INbo9n Nouemn rx Unit Pa.. SOe.OJ 3 )00.00 f $000.00 i 3.0W.BU S 1.00000 f SOO.W f 1,000.00 f INm 1 1.000.00 i J.5N.N S 4,900.00 f 1,X0.00 S 1,000.00 f 1,0.tl,pJ j 2500,00 f 3,OM.00 1 3501. f 25n00 $ 200.00 1 3.00 S 2to f mewls BN.N S Wm S in on f 401. f 10.. 3 Ltd. noel Muurrt S,SWW f 3,500.00 $ ID,CW.00 S 1BOMM f 1.000-00 S 50000 5 1,000.00 $ iN.W i H.4N.N S ],WOm S GMW S ].000.00 S 4,0001. 1 J.NO.N S 5.003.00 f 10,000.00 f im.7 S W S SN.N 2 J..N S $ MCM $ BN,. f IW.. f 2➢.. $ 2,1.00 S ZU.. f T. runn, P.o.u.91q a It rx ern Price 60000 5 LOJ0.00 f S.1W.W f 3,1WOO $ 1.2]000 f SW.W f 9001. $ 12500 $ 2.)00.00 f 3,841 On S 4,3W. $ 1.TN.00 $ 1520W f 1.810.00 f J.6W.N 2 4000.00 S 300W j 9301. 1 6909. f RO.. f 37000 S Sb.N f WW f WN f ]65ee Amosnt ).200.00 S.WOm 10,]001. 18.9M.W 19000 SWm BOOM 235.00 16,000.00 7,mon 4620.00 S,SW.N 6000.00 552111. ].300,00 N.M.W ]W N 1,9001.C4J 1,301 ]20.Cis 37000 541. 3.000-. 120. C]n _J"x 16"D.L Wyc 2 CA C-35 16'Gate Valve 2 EA C-Jfi 12r Gale Vay< 2 EA f: J] 6"-4S Deg)Ce D.I. Bend 4 EA 030 .qll Releaze Valve Single A55nnh1"t'�Z"Vetii<a Rt.Set J FA 039 Air RekaSe Valve Stogie 2 EA C<0 Ai 4'DeReleasVahe-Dual \ssemMv a^_""i"Riser 5 EA 041 5" - 45 Degree D.I. Brnd _ E:\ 42 I:"D1i:oM<Cling Pie EA 4"D.I. Connecting pipe-_- - ' _EA 12"xP"U1.TeeIF.4$ 'x$"DITee 1 E4 746 rest, V.1- I EA CJS, 1-x2"D.I Reduur 1 EA C<a T'Reduced lTessurc Hadalo,a Fro: en¢f _ F{ t:49 SebedW<80 PVC Tec J EA G50 2" SehedWegOPVC PA'C 911 n Bend 2 EA CSf 4 PVCSh,Con POP VC prCPlvg_ J_E\ C-52 4"PVCCootluit fos Biofilter lrtkFuture Cnev�l cd 60 LF J 053 "Pt'C Plug 2 EA CSa IA"HL]PE Air Dncl AssemFlc 11. rludmg Finings) LF - Suoloial"C"l erne'. f 44,1]1. S 504,-5.11 26395.00 f SIGN 3 j 512,845.00 S ]31,859.50 S 539,100.. 2 24dy05. p -I D-2 63 0.4 Uh D5 Di O6 D 1 Pn ( mvirce Driveway CwM1 Concrete LendScapc Cwb Conc F Curb l 4pmn Conc Dfl C'dt lat'eV nl _ PCR Slab itnnsfo,mer $IaF Gcneram]$lab Blmc $Ib Cna SJ -Ik$laba di<n. PCR end Trans. Con<r 1 call Garver COvcrc(c Acres mea& 1$4 ISF 'J6 ]II ( J 4 7 4 251 LF LF LF 5} iJY Cti ,:l CV C\ SY Sl' S 9. S 1,38600 S S 900 S 1595.00 f E 900 f ],10000 5 $ 3900 3 2],)29. $ f 40000 f 2.520.00 5 S :03000 5 6,120. 1 E 54000 E 2.160.. E 5 fii000 E ?010. § 3 2,fi6000 f6<T_16t63 S E 5.. S 20.. 5 E 4000 E 10,120. $ S 14. E 3,01400 E E 65000 E V00.00 S 5 SdO. S 610. S 1 1317 IS 6IB 1 ]436 f fi969 f fi5645 § 10]54] f 56243f 1.81 2 9919 $ 6036 S 69.69 E 1127 1 6230] 2 63550 3 2,028.10 S 1.3Wm $ 265].]0 S 1951959 $ 3,950.]0 f 4.301.80 S 2,21973 S 140152 $ 2]4.33 $ 24144 2 17,001.6] 4,93112 S 1.616.14 f 63fi.. S 0.20 f 15.10 3 1920. S ]1.10 343.40 5 32620 f 3]740 S Ms. E 3220 2 5150 S 5 16.10 S 862.50 f 66I. E 1,262.80 f 9MIS 2341. $ TOO j 6.N3ID $ ,41.0 3 1 6l. S 2,00010 1 I60.N f 1.312.. 3 600.. f 1,349. f I60.N S 1.650 S 400. 2 2,25540 2 3.1. S 20e. $ .. S 619120 S ..N f 5,5)0.60 2 2200 S 1]25. j 2.000. f 661. S 1.1.00 3 1.386.00 f 10651. S 1,&4. 3 45001. 5 2.]0000 $ 2,9)000 f ).BION f 1300.. f 262000 $ 320.. $ 16192.00 f ],612. S 4.0... E 11.. f 1500 S 2.310. 1 20. S 1,10000 S 161. f 3 .,. 3 58.600.. f WO.N f J.oN 00 f WON S ;400,. 3 SN.00 $ 2,000.. f `AO.. S 1,50000 f 1501.0 3 3,I W.N S UmN $ .0.00 3 00.. f 20.0001. f 23. S ],956.00 S 7999 3 1,500.. 3 550.. § SWm 5 f0.. f 1,510.00 f 10. S 1.SW.N S 20. f 6,920.. 1 fi0,. 1 420001. 1 ),0.V.. S 6,0.,. f 1,000,00 S 4.000.00 f 1-000 S 1,931. 3 I,.JW S 3,00000 S 500.. S 0.5... 3 10.00 $ 4000.. $ Wm 3 15,1 W.. 1 25.. 1 6.6501. f 290-9. f I,fiM.N f 15031. $ 150000 23].. f 31.9001. 123)0 S Ilium IB.. $ 6,Yt6m I6.. f 61,.8,. NOW f 3.&0. BION f 2,500.00 gW00 2 3560 OJ 610.. 1 1,920. NOm f 4-700 110. 3 440.00 78.. 1 Utv.an 15. S S,1X.N 93].. f 1,90000 97.. $ 7.0 3.000- 14200.00 D -II Chain Link l'en lJn LF 0-13 2)'Uoubk Galcc 2 EA_ D_1d !J'Uouble Gale _ _ 1 EA D-15 Seeding - ems: 2 4CR Sdo,al Page 2 cf3 - E—rs bj Coolaclor in enlensm n u 1. rr 1re 1l Page 3 o13 Knsmryz Lit: Station and Pone Mains 1,,,-1 No. 71. Lav9M1IIroTM1yszon, Ltd 1320 BOVles Houston T% 0020 Holloman Corponllnn 10]301-00 East Convert. 7%70108 Bamoe Industries, Inc. 3636 Pasadena Blvd. Pasadena T T7503 lake, Inc. $148 Lotus Street Hauetoo ]%PMS P.S Black P.O. Baa 6505 C ue CMLLd TX 79466 T I C ConeWtllon Ltd. WS. Young Const, Sa11 KHlwg11 PO. Bax 9197 Houebn 7%77086 C C U T., It.. Oes[r prion Ouanllty Vnll Vnll Price Amount Unit Price I Amount Unit Price Amount Unit PACs PmeuM Unit Prke Amount Bnll Prke aerosol, Unft Pelee AmaunS E-1 —Il Conditions- L,-1 1,111 OO $ 155000 5 IDD 11 { $0634 S 1,61000 $ 1610Po $ I.I. S 100.00 $ 1,SPo,00 S 16... S 5,000.00 $ 5,00160 $ 195010 $ 1.95000 E2 E-3 F leclncal Demolition T p an'POwol Il I 11 LS 8 36000 S 0 1,3]000 5 360Po S 136776 S 1,36176 $ 46400 S 40000 1370.00 $ 80972 S 009.72 $ 1,42600 S 1,42600 S 30000 $ $ 1, WOW $ 300W S 1,000.00 $ 4M S 4W.W 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 S SON. S 5.000.00 S 62000 S $ SNOOD $ 5.0WJDO S 1660.00 S 620.00 1,W,00 [-1 Tcmpumo: Pouxr la B--Pass'.S:il LS $ 350000 5 3500. $ 9311. S 831600 S 3657,00 $ 365200 S 500.00 S IN 00 S 3,50000 S 3,50D 00 S 0,00000 S 4000.00 S 4.12000 $ 4, 120W ES L, d mound Candut t�7ni I'� 3 1100600 5 11,00000 E 39T6-96 E 307090 511,454.00 S 11 <54.00 E B,o.,00 f 8,00000 S 10,90000 f 10,90000 5 300000 3 ].WOW 5 12000.00 $ 12,60000 E6 l ro,cund Conduit m L,:1 11,, 1 L.l b 1900000 S 1900000 5 44,71]10 5 44,]1]10 51978000 $ 1970000 514,0.00 5 140.00 S I6,SW 00 S 105.00 $ IO,.OW 5 10,003.00 $ 22,100.. S 22.1..00 I P1: If ISuildin¢ and Nil l i L: 3IC4,00000 $ 104,00000 1146,97871 $ 145,97071 $150,42000 S 150,42000 1WNODO $ WON 00 51410.00 S 141600. 31.,.000 S 100.000 $149,50000 $ 149,50000 EB Generaiol I LS 5 4F,000OC $ 4600000 E 4685976 $ 48.859 78 S3956000 3 39.560.00 539.0..00 S 39 ON. 3 45,.0 00 S 45,.000 $ 40.00000 S 40,.0.00 S 51.000.00 S 510.00 L :b Ground Cond . IS P'.1n11` I LS 3 '.00000 1 13, U. 00 $ 11,78355 5 1]]8355 51377700 S 1377200 5 6500-00 $ 0,50000 S 13000 U0 $ 1300000 $ 16.000 S 16NOW S ISO.,. S 15.D. DO -P, or,llnstnmle!11 1 1 11 1 1 - 6,'5000 5 115020 S 5.15920 E 7.03000 $ 7,03600 3 6,.000 5 6,00000 $ 6,60000 3 6,60000 3 1.000AO 5 1,000,00 5 B.I90,. $ 8.190.00 PL_lonuo Panel 1 L1 4 0000 E 6,]0000 E 6,0457] $ 60457] $ 9,08500 5 9,08500 3P.000AO 5 27,000. E 650000 5 B,SWW 3 50,000. 5 $O,SW O3 S 10.230.. S 10.23000 E-12 PLC I4oplammin5 I LS e00000 5 9.00000 $ 10,0295] 5 10,02953 5 939550 f 939550 S 9,00000 5 9.00000 5 9,0. 3 9.00000 1 1$00000 5 12,0.00 $ 10.550-. S Ic.Iw 0 E-13 ImLvmenialion L.1 1.]]C 00 5 1]3000 5 ],14585 S ],14565 S 1905.00 1 1905.00 S ]50000 5 ]511000 $ 300000 S 2,00000 $ 16.0.00 3 16.00000 3 2.950 G0 S 3u01olal "E" Vern:.l E 225900.00 { 293395.25 { 269,460.00 $ 211,200.00 S 2M,]00.00 $311000.00) 5 047000 29047000 ( .nV B SE 9IU II EAS. S1515M4.00 {LM1,248.80 31(9141269:50 S2, 100552.50 52,113,142.00 1ST.1lY,1 4_ 52,2>e,]90.00 - E—rs bj Coolaclor in enlensm n u 1. rr 1re 1l Page 3 o13 \ Mproject ~ councilexhibits \ exh T f Og.dw¢ Greenwood W /TP PROJECT 2 PROJECT 31 G --.% ~ /d. 45 LEOEN2: PROJECT ~] CURRENT' PROJECT [] EXISZ LIFT STATION ?0 £EIdA/N STAtiON TO BE ABANDONED EX/SI LIFT [] NEVI LIFT STAtiON FM .........PROP. FO£CE~CA/N SAN. LINES C PROP. CRAVITY SAN. L/NES CITY PROJECT No. 7109 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Lift Station Improvements and Carolyn Heights Diversion to Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant CITY OF CORPUS C,-'R,ISTI, TEXAS -8,5- N EXHIBIT "O" CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: 1 of 1 DATE' 06-04 2003 6 AGIENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 4, 2003 SUBJECT: Kinney Street Brid~e Repairs (Project No. 2161) AGENDA ITEM: 1 Motion authorizing the City Man ger, or his designee, to award a construction contract to R. S. Parker Construction of Pc~rtland, Texas in the amount of $104,550 for the Kinney Street Bridge Repairs. ISSUE: The sidewalk section along the south side of the Kinney Street Bridge was observed to have a severe area pf washout as a result of heavy rains in 2002. This same area was previously repaired three (3) times by the Storm Water Department. As a result a closer engineering observation was indicated. Due to the age of the bridge structure dating back to approximately 1912, a phased approach was taken to do short term repairs to the bridge structure and to al~o look at a longer term repair. FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2002-2003 Storm Water Capital Improvement Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recDmmends approval of the motion as presented. Angel R. Escobar, P.E., / Director of Engineering Services Additional Support Material: Exhibit "A" Background Information Exhibit "B" Project Budget Exhibit "C" Bid Tabulation Exhibit "D" Location Map -69- BACKGROUNDINFORMATION SUBJECT: Kinney Street Bridge Repairs (Project No. 2161) PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. December 17, 2002 - Approval of the Fiscal Year 2002-03 Capital Improvement Budget for $299,913,200 (Ordinance No. 025144). PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. December 4, 2002 - Executed Agreement For Construction Materials Engineering Laboratory's Inspection and Materials Testing Services in the amount of $4,700 with Rock Engineering & Testing Laboratory, Inc. for Kinney Street Bridge Repairs. 2. December 9, 2002 - Executed Agreement For Architect/Engineer Consultant Services in the amount of $14,000 with MEI-Govind in the short-term repair of Kinney Street Bridge. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The sidewalk section along the south side of the Kinney Street Bridge was observed to have a severe area of washout as a result of heavy rains in 2002. This same area was previously repaired three (3) times by the Storm Water Department. As a result a closer engineering observation was indicated. Due to the age of the bridge structure dating back to approximately 1912, a phased approach was taken to do short term repairs to the bridge structure and to also look at a longer term repair. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project is for short-term repairs and consists of a base bid only. The base bid requires the contractor to install 25 helical anchors and associated steel walers along the existing Kinney Street Bridge. The work consists of stabilizing 194 liner feet of existing concrete retaining walls on Kinney Street between North Carrizo Street and North Tancahua Street. The project also includes the infilling of existing voids along the concrete walls using flowable fill, removal of existing vegetation along the walls, repairs to the concrete wall, and removal of a portion of the wall to allow for storm water ovedlow drainage, in accordance with the plans, specifications and contract documents. Long-term repairs will be addressed in the $20 million Storm Water CIP Projects. BID INFORMATION: Bids were received on May 28, 2003 with two (2) bidders submitting proposals. The bid proposal was set up with a Base Bid only. The bids range from $104,550 to $110,133, with R. S. Parker Construction submitting the Iow Bid. R. S. Parker of Portland, Texas has satisfactorily performed work for the City on other contracts. The City's consultant, MEI Govind. and City staff recommend a contract be awarded to R. S. Parker in the amount of $104,550. -70- EXHIBIT"A' l Page 1 of 2 CONTRACT TERMS: The con!ract specifies that the project will be completed in 60 calendar days, with completion anticipated by mid-September 2003. FUNDING: Funds for this projedt are available in the FY 2002-2003 Storm Water Capital Improvement Budget. H:~U SERS2\H OME/VELMAR GEN/DRAINAGE~2161',AGE N DA BACKGROUND -71- EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 KINNEY STREET BRIDGE REPAIRS (PROJECT NO. 2161) PROJECT BUDGET June 3, 2003 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Storm Water ClP ........................................................................ $143,705.00 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Contract (R. S. Parker Construction) ........................... Contingencies (10%) .................................................................. Consultant (MEI-Govind) ............................................................ Major Projects Activity ............................................................... Construction Inspection Activity ................................................... Testing (Rock Engineering & Testing Laboratory) ........................... Miscellaneous (Printing, Advertising) ............................................. Total ....................................................................................... $104,550.00 10,455.00 14,000.00 3,500.00 5,500.00 4,700.00 1,000.00 $143,705.00 -72- EXHIBIT "B' Page 1 of 1 TABULATION OF BIDS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING ~ C~C¢ OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS '~ .ATED BY: 'AngM R. E$cObar, p.E., Director of Engineering Servloes ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $104,940,00 DATE: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 TIME OF COMPLETION: 60 Cal. Days R. S. Parker Construction DMB Construction KINNEY STREET BRIDGE REPAIRS (Project No. 216t ) 1 t0 Magnolia P.O. Box 71118 -73- EXHIBIT "C" Page 1 of 1 ~ Mproject \ councilexhibits \ exh2 1 51.dwg San Patricio County Nueces County NUECES BAY PROJECT LOCATION CORPUS CHRISTI BAY N LOOATZON MAP NTh CZTY PROJECT # 2161 KZNNEY STREET BRZDGE REPAZRS CiTY OF 74 EXHZBZT "D" CZTY COUNCZL EXHZBZT DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERWCES PAGE: I of 1 DA~: 06/04J200Z 7 AGENDA MEMORANDUM June 10, 2003 SUBJECT: Broadway WWTP Eift Station & Diversion to Greenwood WWTP (#7110) Acquisition of 0.882J acres, Block 53, Beach Addition AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Real Estate Sales Contract with Thomas W. Stewart and Nina Kathleen Russo, Independent Executrix of the Estate of John B. Russo, in the amount of $37,000 plus $1,500 in closing costs for the purchase of fee simple property rights for .882 acres out of Block 53, Beach Addition, necessary for the Broadway VWVTP Lift Station & Diversion to Greenwood WVVTP/Nueces River Delta, Project #7110. ISSUE: The future closing of t~he Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant will require acquisition of a site for a lift statien. City staff has located a 0.882-acre site adjacent to the Broadway Plant suitable for the lift station and has entered into negotiations with the landowners. A real estate salles contract for $37,000 has been executed with the landowners, which requires City Council approval. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Contracts with expenditures in excess of $25,000 require City Council approval. FUNDS: Funding available from the CPP Wastewater CIP Fund RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented. Cgel 'R. Escobar, P. E. Director of Engineering Services Attachments: Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Background Information Council Exhibit Contract Summary H:\HOME\EUSEBIOG\GEN~Agenda Items\Street Yard Acquisition.doc~Agenda Memorandum.doc -77- BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Broadway WWTP Lift Station & Diversion to Greenwood VVWTP (#7110) Acquisition of 0.882 acres, Block 53, Beach Addition PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: Auqust 18, 1998 - Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract for engineering services with Govind & Associates, Inc. for a total fee not to exceed $329,853 for the Airport Ditch Outfall Improvements and Broadway Plant Lift Station and Diversion to Greenwood PlantJNueces River Delta Project. (Motion No. 98-285) February 26, 2002 - Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract amendment granting permission for Govind E.C. to assume all obligations and duties of engineering contracts between the City of Corpus Christi and Govind & Associates, Inc. (Motion No. 2002-059) June 11, 2002 - Motion authorizing the City Manager of his designee to execute a contract amendment granting permission for MEI Govind, Inc. to assume all the obligations and duties of engineering contracts between the City of Corpus Christi and Govind E.C.,Inc. (M[~tion No. 2002-163) FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Council will be required to: authorize the award of future construction contracts and amendments; and authorize the approval of any other parcels in the project where acquisition cost exceeds $25,000 OVERVIEW: Backqround: In 1997, City Council approved the Facilities Implementation Plan, which recommended diversion of wastewater from the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant to the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant and the Nueces River Delta. A subsequent analysis indicated a cost, which far exceeded the 1997 estimate. On January 29, 2002, staff presented an updated study of the project and provided three new options. Staff was instructed to proceed with diverting wastewater to a new site presently owned by Citgo Refinery. Negotiations are currently underway for acquisition of the 12.4-acre site. In preparation to close and abandon the Broadway WWTP, it is necessary t construct a new lift/pump station and force main. A tract suitable for a lift station, containing 0.882 acres, has been located adjacent to the Broadway Plant. Land Acquisition staff has appraised the tract and entered into negotiations with the owners for acquisition of fee simple rights to the property. Exhibit A 1 of 2 -'/8- Parcel Information: This trian§ular shaped parcel, containin§ 0.882 acres, is located adjacent to and west of the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant. The tract of land has fronta§e on Resaca Street as shown on the attached Exhibit "B". The City has been leasing this tract of land since 1987 for a material storage yard, which is used by the Street Department. The last lease expired on December 31, 2002 and is currently on a month to month basis at $315 per month~ The tract was appraised by Pamela Teel of Corpus Christi Appraisal Service, Inc. and appraised at $21,130 using comparable sales in the area. However, since the property had a history of being under a commercial lease, the property been re-evaluated using the Income Approach and warranted a value of $35,750. City staff initially offered $35,000, which was rejected. Negotiations resumed and an administrative offer of $37,000 was presented. The landowners accepted this offer and executed a real estate sale contract, a summary of which is included on Exhibit "C". The contract will be escrowed and closed at Stewart Title Company. \\ENGINEERING\DATAI\HOME\EUSEBIOG\GIEN~Agenda Items\McArdle Rd St. Monfis\Background.doc Exhibit A 2 of 2 -79- ~le : ~Mproject\Londacq\exh71105. dwg AGNES WIORGAN PARCEL LOCATION N N City O~ CoPpus ChPiati BPoadway Sewage TPeatment Plant VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE '882 ACRES OUT OF BLOCK 53, BEACH ADDITION BROADWAY ~NTP LIFT STATION & DIVERSION # 7110S CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS _~_ EXHIBIT "B" CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT DEPARTMENT OF ENOINEERINO SERVICES PAGE: 1 o'i: 1 DATE: 06-03-2005 CONTRACT SUMMARY Project #71'10: Broadway WWTP Lift Station & Diversion to Greenwood WWTP Acquisition o¢0.882 acres, Block 53, Beach Addition This Contract is entered into by ~'homas W. Stewart, of 411 Catalina Place, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas and Nina I~athleen Russo, Independent Executrix of the Estate of John B. Russo, of 3210 Casa Bonita,, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78411 "SELLER", COLLECTIVELY and the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277, "BUYER" Terms: Seller for the consideration and under the terms set out in the contract, agrees to convey fee simple rights to Buyer for the following described property: 0.882 Acres out of Block 53, Beach Addition. 2. Purchase Price - $37,000 3. Seller to provide title insurance at Buyer's expense. 4. Seller will deliver, at Buyer's expense, a good and sufficient General Warranty Deed. All taxes to be paid by Seller, up to and including 2002. Taxes for 2003 will be prorated between Buyer and Seller. Buyer agrees to deposit $500 Earnest Money at the Title Company, which Seller may keep as liquidated damages should Buyer fail to consummate contract as specified, or Seller may seek to enforce specific performance of contract. Buyer accepts title subject to all outstanding restrictive covenants, use restrictions and zoning and regulatory ordinances. Transaction to be closed on or before 90 days from the date of the contract. Seller acknowledges that Seller has read the agreement, and it is not binding until approved by the City Council and signed by the City Manager or his designee within 60 days of the contract date. The contract will survive the closing of the sale and delivery of the General Warranty Deed and other conveyance documents. 10. Acquisition is under the threat of eminent domain proceedings. 11. Time is of the essence in closing this transaction. H:\HOME\EUSEBIOG\GEN~Agenda Items\McArdle Rd St. Montis\Contract Summary.doc -81- Exhibit C 8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM June 10,2003 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance appropriating $2,339 in unappropriated interest from fire station capital improvement fund 3190 for the mustang island fire sub-station project; closing fund 3190; amending capital budget adopted by ordinance no. 025144 to increase appropriations by $2,339; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: Proceeds from bond sales are placed in project-specific funds which earn interest and are subsequently used for project completion or debt service. Revenue must be appropriated prior to expenditure. This item will allow for the efficient use of City funds and permit the Finance Department to close a ~lund that is no longer active. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Interest earnings must be appropriated prior to being used and requires Council approval. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Ordinance as submitted. Le6~n n Dumbauld Director of Finance Director of Engineerin9 Services H:\HOME\LYNDAS\GEN\Interest App\Fund 3190~Agenda. DOC -85- ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $2,3~9 IN UNAPPROPRIATED INTEREST FROM FIRE STATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 3190 FOR THE MUSTANG ISLAND FIRE SUB-STATION PROJECT; CLOSING FUND 3190; AMENDING CAPITAL BUDGET ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 025144 TO INCREASE APPROPRIATIONS BY $2,339; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $2,339 is appropriated from the unappropriated interest from the Fire Station Capital Improvement Fund 3190 for the Mustang Fire Sub-Station Project. SECTION 2. That Fund 3190 is closed after payment of the next scheduled invoice. SECTION 3. That the FY 2002-2003 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 025144 is amended to increase appropriations by $2,339. SECTION 4. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the __ day of ,2003. ATTEST: THE CITYOFCORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa, City Secretary APPROVED: June 5, 2003 Lisa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor -86- 9 AGENDA MEMORANDUM June 10, 2003 SUBJECT: Appropriation Ordir)ance - Fire Station No. 10 Mitigation AGENDA ITEM: a. Resolution Authorizing the Cily Manager, orthe City Manager's Designee, to Accept a Reimbursement Grant from the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality In the Amount of $19,003 for Mitigation Measures at Fire Station No. 10. b4 Ordinance appropriating a $19,003.00 reimbursement grant from the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality for mitigation measures at Fire Station No. 10 into the Federal/State Grants Fund No. 1050; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: The Texas Commission for Environmental Quality has awarded a reimbursement grant to the City which must be appropriated before Amendment No. 8 to the mitigation contract can be administratively awarded. FUNDING: ~. Funds will be available from the Federal/State Grants Fund No. 1050 upon appropriation. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the ordinance as presented. 'Angel R. Escobar, P.E. Date Director - Engineering Services Attachments: Exhibit A: Background Exhibit B: Location Map H:\HOME\KEV[NS\GEN\MITIGATI\UST~96UST#2\^APPROPRIATIONAMDSMEMO.WPD -89- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BACKGROUND: Fire Station No. 10 is located a[ 1550 Horne Road. The site had a leaking petroleum storage tank (LPST) on site that has been removed. Work to mitigate this and nine other sites began in 1996 with the award of two mitigation contracts. The mitigation at eight of the other sites has been compl~ed and the cases closed by the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality (TCEQ - f0rmedy TNRCC). Additional work to complete mitigation on the two remaining sites is necessary. The approval of the appropriation ordinance provides funding to undertake mi[igation efforts pre-approved by TCEQ for Fire Station No. 10. An appropriation ordinance for, additional mitigation work at the old RTA Facility at 1024 Sam Rankin will be ready ~r Council consideration in the near future. Mitigation is reimbursed by the state provided the work is pre-approved by the TCEQ. Mitigation efforts for non-enterprise departments were supported by the Liability and Employee Benefits Fund as part of a risk mitigation program. Reimbursements were then posted to the Liability and Employments Benefits Fund as revenue. Reimbursements from TCEQ are now treated as a grant requiring appropriation prior to expenditure. Prior Council Action: 1. March 5, 1996 - Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract in the amount of $50,700 with Applied Earth Sciences, Inc. for consultant services at six sites provided through Underground Fuel Storage Tank Mitigation - Project No. 2 (M1996-061). 2. Sept. 24, 1996 -Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract in the amount of $46,870.50 with Professional Services Industries, Inc. monitor well installation at six sites for the Underground Fuel Storage Tank Mitigation - Project No. 2 (M1996-290). 3. Sept. 24, 1996 -Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract in the amount of $20,543 with Core Laboratories, Inc. for laboratory services at six sites for the Underground Fuel Storage Tank Mitigation - Project No. 2 (M1996-291). Prior Administrative Action: 1. Aug.11, 1997 - Award of Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $12,675 with Applied Earth Sciences for remediation and closure actions. 2. Mar. 27, 1998 - Award of Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $4,778 with Applied Earth Sciences for remediation and closure actions. 3. May 29, 1998 - Award of Amendment No. 3 in the amount of $619 with Applied Earth Sciences for product removal, TNRCC notification, and documentation. 4. Dec. 21, 1998 - Award of Amendment No. 4 in the amount of $4,258 with Applied Exhibit A Page 1 of 2 -90- Earth Sciences for additional non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL) removal. 5. Sept. 14, 1999 - Award of Amendment No. 5 in the amount of $8,899 with Applied Earth Sciences for four quarters of additional NAPL removal and monitoring. 6. Feb. 22, 2000 - Award of Amendment No. 6 in the amount of $1,595 with Applied Earth Sciences for two additional months of bi-weekly NAPL removal. 7. Jan. 16, 2002 - Award of Amendment No. 7 in the amount of $5,863 with Applied Earth Sciences for three months of NAPL removal by hand bailing and product reports. Future Council Action: · Ordinance to appropriate $29,126 for TCEQ pre-approved mitigation measures at the old RTA Facility located at 1024 Sam Rankin; · Motion to authorize execution of mitigation contract Amendment No. 9 in the amount of $29,126 with Applied EaCh Sciences, Inc.; Council appropriation of a future reimbursement grant for any additional mitigation measures and closure. Amendment Description: ~ The amendment is for $19,003 which will be awarded administratively after appropriation of the grant. The tasks being addressed by the amendment were pre-approved by TCEQ in 2002, but a contract amendment was not prepared or executed at that time. Applied Earth Sciences prepared a new proposal which has now been received by the City. There are three tasks associated with amendment. The tasks are: · Installation of two additional monitoring wells and submission of an updated Assessment Report Form · Four (4) additional quarters of groundwater monitoring · One 8~hour Mobile Dual Phase Extraction (MDPE) event and product recovery report upon completion of the MDRE event. Exhibit A Page 2 of 2 -91- \ Mproject \ councilexh ibifs \ exh 515 3o, dwg N NUECES BAY FIRE STATION if 10 1550 HORNE RD CORPUS CHRIST BAY 2444 LAGUNA MADRE GULF OF MEXICO LOOATION MAP FT_RE STATT_ON NO. 10 Mr. TT_GATZON CITY OF CORPUS CHRIST/, T£XAS -92- EXHT_BZT "B" CZTY COUNCZL EXHZBZT DEPARTMEHT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: I o1' 1 DATE'06/f O/200L~ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR THE CITY MANAGER'S DESIGNEE, TO ACCEPT A REIMBURSEMENT GRANT FROM THE TEXAS COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,003 FOR MITIGATION MEASURES AT FIRE STATION NO. 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS; SECTION 1. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, is authorized to accept a reimbursement grant from the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality in the amount of $19,003 for mitigation measures at Fire Station No. 10. A-I-I-EST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved: June 6, 2003 Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor Lisa Aguilar ~ Assistant City Attorney for City Attorney -93- ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $'~9,003 REIMBURSEMENT GRANT FROM THE TEXAS COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN THE NO. 1050 ~EDERAI./STATE GRANTS FUND FOR MITIGATION MEAS~JRES AT FIRE STATION NO. 10; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That a reimbursement grant of $19,003 from the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality is appropriated in the No. 1050 Federal/State grants fund for mitigation measures at Fire Station No. 10. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the __ day of ., 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa, City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor APPROVED: June 5, 2003 For City Attorney -94- 10 : CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: ,, 6/10/03 AGENDA ITEM: Item A: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a renewal grant in the amount of $271,525 and e~ecute a contract with the Corporation for National and Community Service for the contihuation of the Senior Companion Program. Item B: Ordinance appropriating !a grant in the amount of $271,525 awarded by the Corporation for National and Cemmunity Service in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for the Senior Companion Program; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: The City of Corpus Christi provides specialized in home services to elderly and/or disabled persons through the Park and Recreation/Senior Community Services/Senior Companion Program. Funding for this program is made available through a contract with the Corporation for National and Community Service and must be renewed annually. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Council action is required to accept and appropriate federal grant funds from the Corporation for National and Community Service for the continuation of the Senior Companion Program. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council has granted authorization to execute a contract with the Corporation for National and Community Service for the Senior Companion Program for the past fourteen years. FUNDING: The Corporation for National and Community Service is issuing a grant in the amount of $271,525 in Federal Funds to the City of Corpus Christi and will be deposited into the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Funds. Matching funds have been approved in the FY' 03 City Budget. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Council authorization is requested to accept and appropriate $271,525 in federal funds from the Corporation for National and Community Service and execute a contract for the continuation of the FY '04 Senior Companion Program. Dani'el L. Whitw~)rth, Dire~or Park and Recreation Department -97- Attachments: BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Senior Companion Program (SCP) assists Iow-income volunteers 60 years and over who are willing to serve as coml~anions to homebound elderly and/or disabled persons in the community. The Companions assist homebound individuals with daily living tasks, such as meal preparation, respiie care, grocery shopping and light housekeeping. Their assistance allows homebound clients to remain in their homes, delaying institutionalization. Companions receive a stipend af $2.65 an hour, a $1.50 meal reimbursement and either mileage reimbursement or bus tokens. These benefits assist approximately 90 Companions financially and allow them to become more involved in the community. -98- ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING .~ GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $271,525 AWARDED BY THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND FOR THE SENIOR COMPANION PROGRAM; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That a grant in the amount of $271,525 awarded by the Corporation for National and Community Service is appropriated in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for the Senior Companion Program. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of ,2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa, City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor APPROVED: June 4, 2003 Lisa Aguilar (~ Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney -99- 11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: June 10, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: ITEM A: Motion authorizing the City Manager or ~s designee to execute Attachment No. 06A to Contract No. 7460005741-2003 wi~ the Texas Depm tment of Health whereas the Corpus Christi- Nueces County Public Health Dist~ct shall earn administrative funds at the rate of $9.95, which replaces the previous $9.45, for eac~ participant served to provide for funding of group nutrition education, and individual counseling. The program shall also distribute food vouchers at no cost to individuals identified as having nutritional deficiencies and/or nutritional risk during the period October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2003 as part of the Women Infants and Children (WIC) federal program. ITEM B: An ordinance appropriating an increase in the Texas Department of Health Grant for Women, Infants, and Children Prqgram from $9.45 to $9.95 per participant served, for total estimated Grant increase of $31,000, in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: The Bureau of Clinical and Nutrition Services, Texas Department of Health (TDH) provides funding for supplemental food vouchers, and nutrition education at no cost to low income pregnant and postpartum women, infants, and children. Services are performed in accordance with the terms and specifications of the TDH and/or the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). This amended contract is to allow the Corpus Christi - Nueces County, Public Health District to earn administrative funds at the rate of $9.95 for each participant served by the WIC program for fiscal year 02-03. This is a non competitive grant with neutral budget impact. There is no city match requirement. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize execution of the attachment to the public health contract and appropriation of funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: This granl was approved b) City Council October. 2002 m a rme of $9.45 ibr each participant served. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff reconm~ends that the motion m~d ordinance be approved to prox idea continuation of nutritional and individual counseling services to low income x~ Olnell, il]f~tnls, and childre~ Ardys B~sti:om, M.D.. M.P.H Acting Director of Public Health -103- STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1~00 WEST 49TH STREET AI~STIN, TEXAS 78756-3199 TDH Document No. 7460005741 2003 Contract Change Notice No. 0_27 The Texas Department of Health, hereinafter referrqd to as RECEIVING AGENCY, did heretofore enter into a contract in writing with CORPUS CHRISTI-NUECES COUNTY PUI~IC HEALTH DISTRICT (C1TY/hereinafter referred to as PERFORMING AGENCY. The parties thereto now desire to amenc] such contract attachment(s) as follows: SUMMARY OF TRANSACTION: ATT NO. 06A: BNS - WIC CARD PARTICIPATION All terms and conditions not hereby amended ren~ain in full force and effect. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE ORIGINALS ON THE DATES SHOWN. CORPUS CHRISTI (CITY OF) Authorized Contracting Entity (type above if different from PERPORMING AGENCY) for and in behalf of: PERFORMING AGENCY: CORPUS CHRISTI-NUECES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT (CITY) By: (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Name and Title) tEECOMMI:,NDED: t35: (PERFORMING AGENCY Directoi. if different RECEIVING AGENCY: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH By: ~ (Signature of person authorized to sign) Bob Burnette, Director Procurement and Contracting Services Division (Name and Title) Co\reI- Page I -104- LF PCSD Rcx DETAIL~ OF A,TTACHMENTS ~ I TDH Program ID/ Term Financial Assistance Direct Total Amounl t TDH Purchase Order Assistance (TDH Share) N~,. Number Begin End Source of Amount Funds* 01 BRLHO/INNOV 000C009646 09/01/01 08/31/03 State 150,000.00 0.00 150,000.00 02 TB/PC 000C010399 01/01/02 12/31/02 93.116 87,979.00 0.00 87,979.00 03A TB,'PC 000(2011047 09/01/02 08/31/03 State 160,442.00 0.00 160,442.00 04 IMM/LOCALS 000C011573 09/01/02 08/31/03 State93.268 124,223.00 0.00 124,223.00 05 OPHP/LPHS 000C011625 09/01/02 08/31/03 State93.991 117,975.00 18,696.00 136,671.00 06A BNS/WIC-CARD 000C011993 10/01/02 09/30/03 10.557 0.00 0.00 0.00 07A LAB/B IOTERJ?, 000C011955 09/01/02 08/31/03 93.283 136,104.00 0.00 136,104.00 TDH Document No.7460005741 2003 Totals Change No. 07 $776,723.00 $18,696.00 $795,419.00 *Federal funds are indicated by a number from the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA), if applicable. REFER TO BUDGET SECTION OF ANY ZERO AMOUNT ATTACHMENT FOR DETAILS. Cover Page 2 -105- DOCUN~NT NO. 7460005741-2003 ATI'ACHMENT NO. 06A PURCHASE ORDER NO. 000C011993 PERFORMING AGENCY: CORpI~s CHRISTI-NUECES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT (CITY) RECEIVING AGENCY PROGRAM! BUREAU OF NUTRITION SERVICES TERM: October 01, 2002 THRU: ~eptember 30, 2003 It is mutually agreed by and between the contracting parties to amend the conditions of Document No. 7460005741 2003-06 as written below. All other conditions not hereby amended are to remain in full force and effect. SECTION II. SPECIAL PROVISIONS, first paragraph under section titled PARTICIPANTS SERVED PER MONTH MAXIMUM REIMBURSEMENT, is replaced with the following: PARTICIPANTS SERVED PER MQNTH MAXIMUM REIMBURSEMENT: During the term of the Attachment, PERFORMING AGENCY shall earn administrative funds at the rate of $9.95 for each participant Served as defined above. ATTACI IMENT - Page 1 -106- ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING INC~REASE IN THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH GRANT FQR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN PROGRAM FROM $9J45 TO $9.95 PER PARTICIPANT SERVED, FOR TOTAL ESTIM.,NI'ED GRANT INCREASE OF $31,000, IN THE NO. t050 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That an estimated $31,000 increase in renewal grant from Texas Department of Health is appropriated in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants fund for the Women, Infants and Children program. This amount is based on an increase from $9.45 to $9.95 per participant served and estimated number of participants served. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspendls the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the __ day of ,2003. ATTEST: THECITYOFCORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa, City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor APPROVED: May 29, 2003 Lisa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney -107- 12 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM June 10, 2003 SUBJECT: Hurricane Preparedness PSA Local Government Grant AGENDA ITEM: Item A. Motion authorizing City Manager to accept a grant of $1,000 from the Texas Division of Emergency Management for television public service announcements during the 2003 Hurricane Season Item B. Ordinance appropriating $1,000 from Texas Division of Emergency Management, in the Federal/State Grant Fund No.1050 for television public service announcements during the 2003 Hurricane Season. ISSUE: The City has received funding to purchase television broadcast time for hurricane awareness public service announcements for the 2003 Hurricane Season. The grant will assist in broadcasting public service announcements on hurricane preparedness and evacuation routes. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: accept the grant and appropriate the funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None FUNDING: The state grant will provide $1,000 in the Federal/State Grant Fund No.1050 with no local match required. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting the grant and appropriate the funds. -111- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE C~TY MANAGER, OR THE CITY MANAGER'S DESIGNEE, TO ACCEP[T A GRANT FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ~IVlSlON ON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $~,000 FOR TELEVISION PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS DURING THE 2003 HURRICANE SEASON NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE~SOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: ; SECTION 1. The City Manage~, or the City Manager's designee, is authorized to accept a grant from the Texas Department of Public Safety Division on Emergency Management in the amount of~1,000 for television public service announcements during the 2003 Hurricane Sea~on. SECTION 2. The City Manager~, or the City Manager's designee, may reject, alter or terminate the grant. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED: 22nd day of May, 2003. R. Ja~ Rc~ining / Acting City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor R31107Al.doc -112- ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $1,~00 FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION ON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN THE NO. 1050 FEDERAL/iSTATE GRANTS FUND FOR TELEVISION PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS DURING THE 2003 HURRICANE SEASON; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CI'I/Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $1,000 from the Texas Department of Public Safety Division on Emergency Management is appropriated in the No. 1050 Federal/State Grants Fund for television public service announcements during the 2003 Hurricane Season. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure on this the __ day of ., 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED: 22nd day of May, 2003: R. J~ I~ining/ Acting City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor R31107B1 .doc -113- 13 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: AGENDA ITEM: a) Recommendation of an Ordinal a lease agreement for approximately 5. purpose of maintaining and operating, communications to aircraft within 200 r June 10, 2003 ~ce authorizing the Acting City Manager, or designee, to execute 3 sq. ft. of space at C.C.I.A. with Aeronautical Radio, Inc. for the eronautical communication equipment providing air/ground data autical miles of Corpus Christi International Airport in consideration of an annual rental of $2.231.60 ($39.85 per sq. ft.), payments prorated and paid on a monthly basis, for a term of up to twelv months; and declaring an emergency. b) Recommendation of an Ordina~nce authorizing the Acting City Manager, or designee, to execute a lease agreement for the pu~ose of maintaining and operating aeronautical communication equipment providing air/ground data c~mmunications to aircraft within 200 nautical miles of Corpus Chdsti International Airport in consideration of an annual rental of $2,231.60 ($39.85 per sq. ft.), payments prorated and paid on a monthly basis, for a term of f'~ty-four months. ISSUE: Aeronautical Radio, Inc. (ARINC) has been providing communications services for airlines at CClA for several years and is now providing sen/ices for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Their current lease has expired and they are relocating their equipment downstairs to a non-public area of the new terminal. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Council approval as requested. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: June 15, 1982 - Ordinance authorizing a lease agreement with Aeronautical Radio, Inc. for two-way radio system at the Corpus Chdsti International Airport (Ordinance 17183) FUNDING: N/A CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: On Apdl 9, 2003, the Airport Board recommended approval of this item. Attachments: Exhibit A - Background Information Exhibit B - Lease Summary -117- BACKGROUND INFORMATION Aeronautical Radio, Inc. (ARINC) has been providing communications services to airlines operation within 200 nautical miles of the Corpu~s Christi International Airport for several years. They are currently operating on a month to month exten,~i, on of an expired lease. They have agreed to locate their equipment to a non-public area of the[new terminal and pay the now current rental rate. The rental rate is subject to change on an annual basis basis in accordance with the A r nes A rport Use and Lease Agreement. Exhibit -118- Lease Summary This is a standard short and long tgrm lease as required by Charter for leases over one year in duration. The short term lease will ~3e effective upon Council approval and their declaring an emergency. The long term lease w~ill be effective upon the 615~ day following approval at the second reading, which must follow[the first reading by at least 28 days. The lease is for 56 square feet of ~pace. The annual square foot rental rate is $39.85 or $2,231.60 per year. The airport will provide heating, air conditioning, and standard e ectr c ty The lease is for one-year with five ¢~dditional one-year terms to be approved by the City Manager or his designee. -119- Exhibit B ] AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH AERONAUTICAL RADIO, INC. TO LEASE SPACE CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 56 SQUARE FEET LOCATED IN THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE TERMINAL FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF AERONAUTICAL COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT PROVIDING AIR/GROUND DATA COMMUNICATIONS TO AIRCRAFT ON THE GROUND AND EN ROUTE WITHIN 200 NAUTICAL MILES FROM CORPUS CHRISTI, SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN CONSIDERATION OF PAYMENT OF $39.85 PER SQUARE FOOT ON A MDNTHLY BASIS FOR A TERM OF UP TO TVVELVE MONTHS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. That the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with Aeronautical Radio, Inc. to lease space containing approximately 56 square feet located in the lower level of the terminal for the maintenance and operation of aeronautical communication equipment providing air/ground data communications to aircraft on the ground and en route within 200 nautical miles from Corpus Christi, subject to compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations in consideration of payment of $39.85 per square foot on a monthly basis for a term of up to twelve months. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, to find and declare an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs, such finding of an emergency is made and declared requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and shall take effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of , 2003. Attest: The City of Corpus Christi Armando Chapa City Secretary d: __~ day of John P. Burke, Jr. Assistant City Attorney for City Attorney Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor ,2003. -120- AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH AERONAUTICAL RADIO, INC. TO LEASE SPACE CONTAINING APl ~ROXIMATELY 56 SQUARE FEET LOCATED IN THE LOWER LEVEL OF 1 OPERATION OF AERO PROVIDING AIR/GROUNI THE GROUND AND EN I CORPUS CHRISTI, SUBJI HE TERMINAL FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND NAUTICAL COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ) DATA COMMUNICATIONS TO AIRCRAFT ON rOUTE WITHIN 200 NAUTICAL MILES FROM [CT TO COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN CONSIDERATION OF P/~YMENT OF $39.85 PER SQUARE FOOT ON A MONTHLY BASIS FOR ATERM OF UP TO FIVE YEARS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE Irt' ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. That the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with Aeronautical Radio, Inc. to lease space containing approximately 56 square feet located in the lower level of the terminal for the maintenance and operation of aeronautical communication equipment providing air/ground data communications to aircraft on the ground and en route within 200 nautical miles from Corpus Christi, subject to compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations in consideration of payment of $39.85 per square foot on a monthly basis for a term of up to five years. -121- 14 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM PRESENTATION AGENDA ITEM: (Caption/Titl~e of Presentation as it should appear on the agenda) Preview of the Presentation for the All America City Award PRESENTER(S): The All America City Award Delflgation, consisting of City elected officials, Nueces County officials, city staff members, and Irepresentatives from various agencies and sectors of our community, have been invited to participate in the final phase of the All America City Award Competition. ISSUE: The council presentation is a preview of the presentation that has been developed for the final phase of the All America City Award, hosted by the National Civic League in Washington, D.C., June 12-15. The City of Corpus Christi has been selected as an All America City Finalist in the 2003, basing its application on how effectively our community has worked together to meet some of our major Challenges. The application highlights the Forward Corpus Christi Campaign, the Air Quality Program and the Juvenile Assessment Center. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: No action required, for presentation purposes only. Additional Background X Exhibits E~ City Manager -125- ALL-AMERICA CITY AWARDS FACT SHEET What are the Ali-America Cit~ Awards? The Ail-America City AW~ards were first established in 1949 by the National Municipal League (now known as the National Civic League), as a way of recognizing cities where actions taken by citizens working together have helped make those communities better places to live. Each year, 10 communities are recognized as Ali-AmeriCa Cities. During the past 54 years, more than 4,000 locales have applied, and nearly 500 have actually received the award. What are the criteria used in Selecting a city for the Ali-America City Award? The Award is based on how effectively different segments of a community have worked together to meel some of the major challenges it has faced. In Corpus Christi's case, the targeted challenges were economic development and developing an educatedi, skilled workforce. The following community-driven programs have been identified in the city's application for helping deal with those challenges: Forward Corpus Christi, which spearheaded the effort that led to voter approval of the bond issue held in November of 2000. Air Quality Program, which has been instrumental in Corpus Christi having the distinction of being the only major city in Texas that is still in attainment of state and federal air quality standards. The city has attracted considerable positive national attention as a result of its attainment status. Juvenile Assessment Center, which has had a major impact in keeping local kids in school and off the streets. The end result will be increased numbers of young people receiving their high school diplomas, which in turn will help make for a better-educated workforce with the skills necessary to meet the area's needs in the future. 26- ALL AMERICA CITY AWARDS - 2 What difference can the selpc'don as an Ali-America City make to a community? The experience of som~ previous winners indicate that receiving the Ail-America City Award, or even belng selected as a finalist, could help produce a number of benefits for the winning communities. They include: Being sought oUt by businesses and individuals interested in relocating to an area that is recognized as a good place to work and live. Increase in visitors to the area. Increase in grants. An enhanced tax base. What is the deadline for applying, and when will we know if we have been selected for the award? Applications for the competition must be submitted no later than Wednesday, Mamh 26, 2003. The winners will be announced in Washington, D.C. on June 14, 2003. Winners will be invited to attend a ceremony at the White House in autumn of this year. -127- 15 CorpusChristi Regional Economic Development Corporation One Shoreline Plaza 800 N Shoreline Suite 1300 South Corpus Christi q~ 78401 Phone 361~82-7448 Fax 361-882-9930 v~.ccredc.com TO: Skip Noe, City Manager FR: Ron Kitchens, Presidenti DT: 6/4/03 RE: New Markets Tax Credits Dear Skip: Thank your for agreeing to ailow me to make this presentation to the City Council. As we have discussed, the opportL~nity to provide 39% Federal Tax Credits to investors in our community would give us a significant advantage in recruiting new investment. I have noted below a very brief sl~mmary of the New Markets Tax Credit Program. Under the program a community, non governmental group is allowed to apply to receive tax credits that are granted to cerporations or partnerships whose investment in federally designated Iow-income areas produce economic opportunity. Annually the program has Two-Billion Dollars in credits to be distributed, through a highly competitive application process. The deadlir~e for the application is September 1. It is our plan to include in the application, areas of the City and Port that meet the federal guidelines. The application itself is very intensive and will build on the work already prepared by the City and the Port in past projects including the LaQuinta Terminal and the Renewal Community. If our application is successful, ~ve will have an incredible tool to encourage directed investment into areas which may not see investment otherwise. I would welcome any questions or comments you have on this matter and hope that this is a program that you and the City Council can support. Respectfully, Ronald R. Kitchens, CEcD President/CEO -131- 16 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM - PRESENTATION June 10, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Waste Services. Presentation by Solid Waste Services Staff for an update of Solid CITY STAFF PRESENTER(Si: Jeffrey D. Kaplan, DireCtor, Solid Waste Services Lawrence Mikolajczyk, Assistant Director Solid Waste Services John Sendejar, Superintendent of Administration, Solid Waste Services ISSUE: Identify status of current services and discuss distribution plans for the second phase of the automated garbage services program, review recycling operations, re-engineering of brush collections and special collection programs and departmental initiatives. BACKGROUND: * January 1999, Solid Waste Services initiated an Automated Garbage Collection Pilot Program to 3400 households in the community. * March, 2001 Council approved the purchase of 13 automated collection vehicles to be used, commencing in FY 01-02. * July 10, 2001 Council approved the purchase of 75,000 automated collection carts to be purchased over a three year period. * September 7, 2001 new vehicles began arriving and the first batch of carts arrived the week of September 3, 2001. * Phase I of the Automated Garbage Collection Service began November 2001. * January 2003 to present, Solid Waste Services has reviewed the recycling program. * January 2003 to present, Solid Waste Services has reviewed the brush collection operations. ~/~?~y ~ Kaplan /' ~)irector, Solid Waste Services H/Home/Lorilie/council memos/auto pIesenta status 6-10 03.doc -135- SWS UPDATED POSITION P~PER FOR COUNCIL PRESENTATION JUNE 10TH, 2003 NARRATIVE: The City of Corpus Christi four years ago decided to change the way garbage was collected ia the city. With the assistance of an indcpenden~ consulting firm, Gershman, Briclmer, & Bratton, Inc. (GBB), a study was performed on the existing garbage collection operalions and a recommendation was made to automate the garbage collection service. It w~s decided to implement this service in three different phases. Each phase would automate about one thild of the city until all of the city residents received an automated cart for garbage collection service. It is also to be noted that not all areas of the city could become serviced by a fully automated truck, due to the co~d'iguration of the streets, narrow alleys, trees, and manmade barriers. These restrictions will cause a percentage of residents to receive carts but, be serviced by send-automated trucks when the program is fully iml~lemented. The first phase of the automated service was implemented in October and November, 2001. That second phase is schedule to be implemented in September, 2003. The last phase (Phase III) is scheduled for late summer/early fall of 2004. CURRENT AREAS: The City of Corpus Christi is presen~y divided into three areas for collection: North and South and Central areas. AREA CHANGES: The automation system will change Ihe configuration of the routes, keeping twice a week collection for all residents. Each one of the three areas North, Central and South will be serviced by the existing 13 automated garbage vehicles and 5 more to be purchased by appro.,dmately July, 2003. The remaining 21,000 residential routes of the North, Central, and South areas will continue to be collected manually until phase III is implemented at which point they will receive a new container but serviced with semi-automated vehicles. AUTOMATED COLLECT~NROUTES Each automated collection route service will consist of 900 to 950 homes each. The outermost routes from the J. C. Elliott Landfill will service approximately 900 homes wlfile the irmer-city routes, nearer to the landfill will service approximately 950 homes. Route growth has been taken into consideration in the design of the routes and will be adjusted slightly for Phase I1 implementation. 6-DAY WORK SCHEDULE GBB. in it's rcview of the Solid Wastc Departmeut operations recouuuendcd a six-day work schedule capturing greatest operational efficiencies and maximizing operational expenses. With this in mind and following thc City Council recommendation or providing sane level of sep/ice, automated routes and the remaining manual routes are designed working six (6) day weeks. A total of forly-seven (47) Heav~, Equipmenl Opcrators will participate iii tiffs program. ThLrly-five (35) on Iht automalcd syslcm a~d twelve (12) on thc remaining manual system. Each will xvork a four day, 10-hour ~cck on a rotating schedule YARD WASTE As the aulomatcd service was dcsigncd for intplcmcnlation it was discussed and recoinmendcd by GBB dial the Wednesday yard waste collection would cease iii all thc areas of the city serviced by thc new automaled system The carts which residents will receive will be large enough to sustain this added im~tcrial The vehicles used for the new automated garbage collection routes have the eapabilities to collect lind unload die coulainer This added fcalure of the ucx~ vehicles will make it easier for residents to dispose of their.yard waste Residents nu~' place bags of grass leaves, or small yard material, which was prcvioasl_',, collcctcd cvcry olhcr Wednesday in their aulonlatcd collection cart on regnlar colIcction days This additio~al sc~vicc xxill assist residents in ~cmoving yard waslc from thcir homes twice a week iustead 1 -137- of every other week. Those remaining[manual routes that are serviced will also be asked to commingle yard waste on their regular collection days Rs there will no longer bca Wednesday yard waste pick-up day as we now will be on a six day/week schedule system wide. CARTS: Schaeffer Systems International, our ~ollection cart supplier will be providing two sizes, 96-gallon and 65- gallon collection carts. Phase 11 Residents will begin to receive the collection 96-gallon collection carts beginning on August, 2003. The[department will continue to offer smaller containers for special downsizing requests. [ The collection cart received by each cart will remain the property of the C which will be assigned to the resid, collection cart will remmn at the orit resident, and if the resident then bell offer an exchange for a mailer col Department office. This also applies purchase an additional collection cart. fee, an additional 65-gallnn cart will residents by a Solid Waste Service [ utility bill. It will be the resident's responsibility individual basis will deal with each i~ 'esident will be at no additimml cost to the resident. The collection ty of Corpus Christi. Each collection cart has a registration number, :nt's address. Should a resident relocate to another residence the inal residence. After the 96-gallon collection cart is received by a wes the collection cart is too large for their individual use, we will tection cart. They may do so by calling the Solid Waste Service to residents who don't feel they have sufficient capacity and wish to Cost of an additional 95-gallon cart is $40.00, plus a $10.00 delivery be $36.00 plus a $10.00 delivery fee. All cm'-ts will be delivered to eparm~ent employee and the fee for the cart ~vill be attached to the [o report stolen and or broken collection carts. The department on an :ident. The resident could be held liable for replacement costs due to negligence resulting in theft or 'damage. IMPLEMENTATION: At the start of Phase II and continuing for approximately ninety days, the automated route driver will have assistance. The additional ride along route collector person will assist in placement, education, and service of the automated collection system. Solid Waste Services will help thc resident become acclimated with their new collection carl nmking a sn~°oth transition to the new collection system. TRUCKS The city purchased thirteen (13) aulolnaled collection vehicles which arrived oa 9/18/01. 5 new autmnated collection vehicles are expccted to nrfivc by July, 2003 Local vendors will provide warranty support scrvicc. Thc newly purchased automalcd vehicles will be equipped with extcm~d cameras to assisl the driver in extending the arm to engage iii the tipping process In preparation for this service and since these vehicles will be operating six days a ¢'eek, we will have 8 existing rear load vehicles equipped with tippers to support the automated trucks should it be necessary EMPLOYEES/SELECTION OF D~RIVERS Drivers for I)h~sc II c>f lhc autoinatcd collcctiou progrmn will be selected £~om among thc present ColIcction Division Equipmeal Operators Selection process for drivers x~ill be based ou seniority, years operating,, attendance and driving record for the past twelve months CUSTOMER COMMUNICATION Cuslomer communications iuclude mail oats. newspaper advertisements. PSA's. door hangers, informational packets lell xvilh carls m~d ulilily bill messaging notification, fbr all Phase 1l ~fffected residents -138- RECYCLING The Solid Waste Services Departmer~t is preliminarily budgeting the current curbside program at a cost of $982K for FY03-04. Currently, the program services residents once every two weeks. The current fleet ofg vehicles is approximately 12 years old and will need to be put on a replacement schedule starting next year. 23 full time employees are ii~ the existing program which is made up of 1 foreman. 8 equipment operators and 14 refuse collectors. The City is still operating in recycle drop off centers located at 3 different local HEB's. Some alternative options have been developed for consideration based on current industry trends and other municipal governments' changes to tlleh- programs. "REDUCED SERVICE LEVEL" (OPTION 1) Once a month Recycling. This optior~ is similar to the current program but is considered a "reduction in service levels". This option would cover the entire community realizing a reduction of 7 personnel. Operational expenses would also be realized as a saving to the general fund. Total saving would be approximately $287,832. Pros- Reduction in expenses to the CaF, fewer vehicles to replace in the future. Cons- Reduced service level, participation would decrease even fuflher, residents would have to wait an entire month to dispose of recyclable$. "ENHANCED SERVICE LEVEL" (OPTION 2) Once a week collection. This option would be an "enhanced level of service" which would require residential garbage collections to be reduced to once per week in pilot areas and provide for once per week recycling pick-up. A pilot program would test the market for 3000 homes in three different areas of our community. The three sections of the community would consist of one area with a current high recycling participation level, one ama with a current low recycling ~articipafion level and one with a current mid-range recycling participation levek The pilot would run for 6 months and would consist of a co-mingled recycling stream. Residents in lhe pilot area would use a 95 or 65 gal container serviced by our automalcd vehiclcs. Recycling containers would have a different color lid differentiating it from their waste container If we elect to utilize our current vcudor the existing sorting facility would be partially modified to allow for siugle strevan delivery. This program would bc an additional cost of $127,445. Regular curbside recycliug would continue for those not in the pilot area. Pros- Participation levels are expected It) increase; recycling would be more convenient, easily rcmembcred pick tip schedules, diversion of waste would iucroase, Cons- Rcsidcnti~d waste collection would be reduced to once a week. less convenient for those who do not want to p~nticipate, uon-complitmt residents could contanlinate recycling load. "NEW PROGRAM" (OPTION 3) Trausition from Curbside to Trash & Recycle Drop-off Ceuters This option would be a new program allowing for citizens to conveuiently drop off trash, brash, honsehold h~m-dous waste, and recyclables at 5 slratcgically localions around the City Each year over a five year period, a new center would come on line each year allowing for the tnmsition from curbsidc recycling to the T&R centers A $3 nfillion investment would be needed which would be facilitated by issuance of new bond debt and paid out over a 20 )'ear term q[&R Ccntcrs would bca 7 day a week/12 hour day operation making it as convcnieut as possible for the commuml) As each center is added, that ~gmcnt of thc conmmnily would be phased ont 3 -130- of the curbside program. At the[end Of thc five year transition, the Recycling budget would be approximately 100K less than today~'s proposed budget. Pros- T&R Centers would allow for other Solid Wasle Services to be incorporated into program, Citizens could drop off items 7 days a week, potentially less illegal dumping, enhanced daily HHW and brush services, administratively more cost effective. Con~- Not as convenient as curbside,[ Citizens make not like handling of recyclables, Citizens may choose not to participate in program affectin~ diversion rate. ' BRUSH COLLECTION The Brush Division is re-engineering is being added consisting of a Senior hour day, five days a week. Overti: The 6 day work week will basicall working ten hour days. Overtime wil Funding for the added crew will be consistently use the five week cycle of the added brush crew will also schedule will be a 5 week schedule 'rom a 5 day work week to a 6 day work week. One additional crew Equipment Operator and 4 drivers. Crews currently work an eight ne is used consistently to maintain efficiency and stay on schedule. ~ have available resources Monday through Saturday with crews [ be reserved for special events, short weeks and personnel vacancies. From the current Overtime expenditure budget. Brush Crews will move through each of the five areas of the commumty. The addition thance our operations in the event of an emergency or storm. The her than the current 4 weeld6 week schedule. CASH FOR TRASH PROGRAM The implementation of the Cash for illegal dumping and bulky items. T year, we have experienced consisten advantageously collected and stored Trash program was an enhanced serviced to rid the commuaity of te original program was effective and served its' purpose: This last ly large cash pay outs for carpet alone. Some of the participants used carpet to take advantage of the maximum allowable payouts throughout the year. This has becom{: an increasing concern to us and possibly a safety hazard. Carpet is now approxin~ately over 50% of the[items received during our events. At our last event approximately 60% was carpet at a cost of $12,000. Prior to this program, carpet ',,,'as not a problem and usually resulted in revenues to the City by private vendors disposing of this waste through conh'actual waste collection agreements. Proposed for FY03-04, we arc reco~qmending the elimination of the cash payouts for carpet, but allowing for free disposal for castomers. Thils will still give participants the opportunity to dispose of this product properly and also realize increase rev6nues from vendors who wish to use a conlmctual compauy to dispose of their waste. AIl other Cash for Trash items that have a puy out value will still be in effect. SWS SPECIAL SERVICES Thc Solid Waste Serviccs partnership x~ith Stonu ~ater ~md thc Household Huzardous Waste events will conhnue with four more events plamted for FY03-04 The Brush Divisiou will continue their April and October bulky item pickups Lhrough the community ,a hich assisl in Ihe removal of Bulky ilems froln residential propcrties twice a year and also assists the Cash fur Trash program These t~ice/? car pickups will utilize thc udditionul two calendtu catch-up weeks built into tim five week schedule described lhc p;tst with one cxccpliou. This 3'cam an added benefit of acccpfing and removal of used tires as defined in thc SWS Ordinance from residentinl propcriv - 140- 4 I Ot J�� 0 R P IJS Solid Waste Services Update City Council Presentation -dune 1@& 203 • 21 K households added to automated routes, for a total of 54K • 5 automated vehicles added to fleet • 18 more positions eliminated, total Automation savings of 54 FTE's Positions eliminated through attrition. • Automated routes increase from 11 to 18 daily • Manual service routes reduced from 20 to 8 daily • All routes will be on a 6 day schedule (M-Th,T-F,W-S) • Separate yard waste collection eliminated, yard waste will be co - mingled with residential waste N I Proposed Schedule SOLID WASTE SERVICES COLLECTION AUTOMATION I Community Campaign • Mail -out to customers with service changes • Utility bill message for affected customers • Door Hangers to all affected areas • Ca11�-rlTimeS 9 • Televised Public Service Announcements • Informational packets with new cart delivery Phase III- Automation FY 04 (6 • 21 K remaining customers will receive carts • motes will continue to be serviced by semi -automated equipment f Recycling Options • Existing Program- Every two Weeks • Reduced Program- Once a Month • Pilot Program- Once a week • Drop-off Centers only Existing Recycling Program • FY08 O413udget is $982K • Frequency every two weeks • Fleet of 8 vehicles is currently 12 years old • Operations include 4 fireman, 8 equipment operators and 14 refuse collectors • Currently approximately 17K customers participate or 23% • 3 Recycling Drop off centers @ HEB Landfill Diversion Year Annual Curbside Drop Clean Metals HHW Total % City Recycling Off Brush Diversion Landfill Centers Tonnage 00-01 127,500 5,171 799 10,638 702 0 17,310 13.6% 01-02 1289500 5,236 664 12,303 722 62 18,987 14.8% 02-03 1309000 4,392 598 11,831 683 69 17,573 13.5% FY02-03 was forecasted for remainder of the year co "Reduced Service Level" (Option 1) • Curbside program • Reduced frequency- once a month — Reduced staff: 1 foreman, 5 equipment operators and 10 refuse collectors (7 FTE reduction) — 100% of budgeted replacement bins • P-ro�ecte-6Annuai Cost 694,273 (55% of current) • Savings from 03 Otbudget $287,832 9 Equipment replacement not included I "Enhanced Service Level" (Option 2) • Once a week Recycling & Garbage pick Lp — Pilot Program — Pilot would include 3000 homes in 3 areas of the community — Automated vehicles and a recycling container (65 or 95gal) — Co rngled recycling stream with an enhanced sortin facilit • New Cost — Additional $127,445 for Pilot (Not Programmed) — Regular curbside collection would continue during pilot "New Program" (Option 3) • Transition from Curbside to Drop off Center Trash & Recycling Centers — Build 5 centers over a 5 year period (1 per year) — Curbside service transitioned to drop-off as T&R centers became available — Trash, Brush and HHW would be accepted at all locations Operating Costs Center Curbside Total Yr 1- $3887049 $993,326 193815375 Yr 2- $525,098 $7942661 153193759 Yr 3- $651,648 $595,996 1,247,644 Yr 4- $8587330 $397,330 192555660 Yr 5- $914,246 $198,665 11125911 Yr 6- $883,246 $ -0- 8839246 Capital - $3 MIL Other SW Services • Brush Collections - 6 day work week - Five week cycle through City • Cash for Trash • Special Services Brush Collection — 1 Brush Crew added — 6 crews total — 6 day work week schedule — Extended work day M — Crews will work more efficiently and stay on schedule — Reduction in overtime expenses will fund new schedule — The additional crew will reduce overtime as well as enhance services during emergencies and storm operations I • Modified Cash for Trash Program — Original program served its purpose —Adjustments Needed —4 Events (1 per quarter) — Last event yielded 60% carpet at a cost of $12,000 — In FY03-04, no cash for carpet, but free disposal Saecial Services J • 4 Household Hazardous Waste Events (1 /QTR) I L0 Lr) • April & October curbside bulky item collection • Litter Critter Program expanded to include tires cr. LO -ZOO Questions & Concerns 17 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: June 10, 2003) Case No.: 0_5,,03-02~ Robert I. ~ Earlene B. Jones: A change of zoning from a "FR" Farm-Rural Dislrict to a "RE Residential Estate DiStrict on 2.00 acres out of a 28.9767 acre tract deeded to Richard Hesse, Document #2002036700, Nueces Count~, Texas and also out of Lots 15 and 16, Section 25 of Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located east of Airline Road and approximately 650 feet north of Yorktown Boulevard. Planning Commission and Staft~s Recommendation (05/07/03): Approval. Requested Council Action: Approval of the "PIE" District and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: To develop a one (1) single-family residence. Summary: The applicants have requested a change of zoning from "F~R" Farm-Rural District to "RE" Residential Estate District in order to develop one residential structure on a 2-acre lot. The "RE" District permits a rural street cross section without curbs, gutters and sidewalks. In the "F-R" District a mimmum lot area of 5-acres is required in order to plat. The owner wants to maintain the rural atmosphere of the area by developing.a 2-acre lot without the visual appearance of City improvements. The subject property is surrounded by "F-R" District property to the north, east, and south that is in an agriculture state. To the west is a triangle shape property that is zoned with a "B-4" District and is undeveloped. Three (3) rural arterial street systems are adjacent or in proximity to the subject property, i.e, Airline Road, Rodd Field Road and Yorktown Road. The Transportation Plan recommends that each street system be improved with additional pavement width. The subject property is located within the Southside Area Development Plan. The future land use map recommends the subject property to develop as general conunercial, however, the proposed use is consistent with the surrounding agricultural land use and scattered home sites. Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with the Planning Commission and Staff's recommendation. Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, five (5) notices were mailed to the property owners within a 200-foot radius, of which none were returned in favor or in opposition. The applicant submitted a notice in favor. This case is considered noncontroversial. The 20% rule is not in effect at the City Council hearing. Michael N. Gumfing, AICP Assistant Director of Development Services/ Director o£ Plam~ing MG/FGM/er Attachments: 1 ) Zoning Report 2) Conm~ents Received 3) Ordinance H:\PI~N-DIR~EILMA\WO RD'~AG ENDM EM\0503 -02AG ENDAM EMO DOC -159- Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: Legal Description/Location: CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT 0503-02 May 7,2003 F16B Robea Land Earlene B. Jones Being 2.00 acres out of a 28.9767 acre tract deeded to Richard Hesse, Document #200203600, Nueces County, Texas and also out of Lots 15 and 16, Section 25 of Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located east of Airline Road and approximately 650 feet north of Yorktown Boulevard. Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zoning: Request: Current Use of Property: Purpose of Request: Zoning Change Requested Due to Notice of Violation: Not applicable. Adjacent Zoning: Norlh, Sout]] and East - "F-R" Farm-Rural District West .... Farm-Rural Distric! and "B-4" General Business District Adiaceut Land Use: North, South, East and West Farmland. 2.0 acres Same as above. "F-R" Farm-Rural District "RE" Residential Estate District Farmland. To develop one (1) single-family residence. -160- Zoning Report Case No. 0503-02 (Robert I. & Earlene B. ~ones) Page 2 Number of Residential Units AIIo~ved: "F-R" - 0 units (1 dwelling unit l~er 5 acres - subject property less than 5 acres) "RE" 2 units (2 dwelling unil per acre) Estimated Traffic Generation: Single-family residence (detached) ~- 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 2 dwelling units = 20 average weekd:~y vehicle trip ends. Adiacent Streets/Classification: a) Airline Road - rural arterial b) Rodd Field Road- rural artexial c) Yorktown Boulevard- rural arterial RiRht-of-Wa¥ Design Current: a) 60-foot right-of-way with a 18-foot rural paved section. b) 100-foot right-of-way with a 22-foot rural paved section. c) 100-foot right-of-way with a 22-foot wide paved section. Plmmed: a) 95-foot right-of-way with a 64-foot back-lo-back paved section including continuous left b) 130-foot fight-of-way with a 95-foot back-lo-back paved section including median. c) 130-foot right-of-way with a 95-foot back-to-back paved section including median. 2003 Traffic Count (24-hour, weekday, non-directional): a) None available. b) 5,020 vehicles per day. c) 8,500 vehicles per day. Zonin~ History of Property: Recent Surrounding Zoning Cas~s: None. None, Planning Staff Analysis: -161- Zoning Repo~ Case No. 0503-02 (Robert I. & Earlene B.~ones) Page 3 General Characteristics and Back.m-ound: The applicants have requested a change of zoning from "F-R" Farm-Rural District to "RE" Residential Estate District in order to develop one residential structure on a 2-acre lot. The "RE" District permits a rural street cross section without curbs, gutters and sidewalks. In the "F-R" District a minimum lot area of 5-acres is required in order to plat. The owner wants to maintain the rural atmosphere of the area by developing a 2-acre lot with[~ut the visual appearance of City improvements. The subject property is surrounded by "F-R" District property to the north, east, and south that is in an agriculture state. To the weSt is a triangle shape property that is zoned with a "B-4" District and is undeveloped. Three (3) rural arterial streel systems are adjacent or in proximity to the subject property, i.e., Airlline Road, Rodd Field Road and Yorktown Road. The Transportation Plan recommends that each street system be improved with additional pavement width. The subject property is located within the Southside Area Development Plan. The future land use map recommends the subject property to develop as general commercial, however, the pt>posed use is consistent with the surrounding agricultural land use and scattered home sites. Potential Housing Density: The current "F-R" District permits one dwelling unit for each five (5) acres or no units on the two acre subject property. The proposed "R-E" District allows one dwelling unit pet acre or 2 units on the subject property. Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: There are no required building setbacks or building height limitations in the "F-R" District. The requested District requires a fifty (50) foot front yard setback and a side and rear yard of twenty-five (25) feet. Building heights are limited to thirty-five (35) feet or three (3) stories in the "R-E" District. SJ~mage: The "F-R" District pennits signs that advertise the sale of crops raised on the property. The signs are limited lo an area not to exceed forty (40) square feet and a height of thirty-five (35) feet. The "RE" District pemfits one wall sign with an area not to exceed one square foot. Freeslanding signs are not permitted. Traffic: The proposed residential p~operty will not gene~ ale a large volume of traffic that will adversely impact the area. Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.) The Soull~side Area Development Plan's fulurc land rise map supports commercial nses, however the proposed ]ow-densily residential use is acceptable. Cons: (]de~s in support o£maintaii~ing the culrent zoning.) a) None. -162- Zoning Report I Case No. 0503-02 (Robert I. & Earlene B. ~ones) Page 4 Slaff Recommendation: Attachments: Approval. Zoning Map lt: PLN DIR ERMAX,\VO RD'~ZONRPTS~2003\0503 -02CCR EPO RT DOC -163- F-R I-2 F-R SUBJECT PARCEL Fq F-R Apr 28, 2C03 - RP CASE g0503-02 ~ Subject property J~ C~ners within 200 feet listed on attached ownership list -164- COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0503-02 Robert I. & Earlene B. Jones · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED (Note: The listed numbers correspond to the attached map.) Notices returned from w~th]lt the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. II. III. Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area: Favor: Robert 1. and Earlene B. Jones, 4402 Lake Superior Dr. No written comment. Qpposition: None. H:,,iq_N.Dii~.\EiLM A,AVOILIO~COM M DATA\0503-02COM MEN TS doc -165- Planning comnUssion Meeting May 7, 2003 Robert I. & Earlene B. Jones: 0503-02 REQUEST: "F-R" Farm-Rural District to "RE" Residential Estate District on property described as beinl~ 2.00 acres Out of a 28.9767 acre tract deeded to Richard Hesse, Document #200203600, Nueces County, Texas and also out of Lots 15 and 16, Section 25 of Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located east of A~t~llne Road and approximately 650 feet north of Yorktown Boulevard. Ms. Goode-Macon provide~d a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The applicants have requested a change of zoning from "F-R" Farm-Rural District to "RE" Residential Estale District in order to develop one residential structure on a 2- acre lot. The "RE" District permits a rural street cross section without curbs, gutters and sidewalks. In the "F-R" District a minimum lot area of 5-acres is required in order to plat. The owner wants to maintain the rural atmosphere of the area by developing a 2-acre lot without the visual appearance of City improvements. The subject property is surrounded by "F-R" District property to the north, east, and south that is in an agriculture state. To the west is a triangle shape property that is zoned with a "B-4" District and is undeveloped. Three (3) rural arterial street systems are adjacent or in proximity to the subject property, i.e., Airline Road, Rodd Field Road and Yorktown Road. The Transportation Plan recommends that each street system be improved with additional pavement width. The subject property is located within the Southside Area Development Plan. The future land use map recommends the subject property to develop as general commercial, however, the proposed use is consistent with the surrounding agricultural land use and scattered home sites. Therefore, Staff recommends al3proval. There were five (5) notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of the subject property of which (1) was return in favor and none were returned in opposition. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Robert Jones, 4402 Lake Superior, stated that he owns the 28-acres surrounding the subject property and explained that he is only rezoning a portion because of high fee cost associated for platting. Mr. Jones addressed concerns regarding what type of sewer system he would use by stating that he would use an aero-type septic system. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Salazar, seconded by Smith, to fo~,ard a recommendation for approval. Motion passed with Pusley and Zamora being absent. -166- Page 1 of 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONI~IG ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY ROBERT I. & EARLENEI B. JONES BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO 2.00 ACRES RECORDED IN DOCUMENT #2002036700, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS AND FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACT, LOTS 15 AND 16, SECTION 25, FROM "F-R" FARN ESTATE DISTRICT; A~ ACCOUNT FOR AN' COMPREHENSIVE PL~ DECLARING AN EMER( -RURAL DISTRICT TO "R-E" RESIDENTIAL lENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING N; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND ENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of Robert I. & Earlene B. Jones for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice tO the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, May 7, 2003, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June 10, 2003, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on 2.00 acres recorded in Document #2002036700, Nueces County, Texas and Lots 15 and 16, Section 25, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tract, located east of Airline Road and approximately 650 feet north of Yorktown Boulevard, "F-R" Farm-Rural D'str'ct to "R-E' Res denhal Estate District, as described on the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ONING\0503-O2REG ULAR DOC -167- Page 2 of 3 SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION $. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 10th' day of June, 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED 2003 Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Joseph Harney Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0503-02REGULAR DOC -168- Page 3 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas __ day of ,2003 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE clrrY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the E emergency exists requiring susp voting upon ordinances at two rE suspend said Charter rule and p at the present meeting of the Cit mergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an 9nsion of the Charter rule as to consideration and gular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you ]ss this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Henry Garrett William Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\O503-O2REGULAR DOC -169- FROM PLAHNING 512 SSe 359~ STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUEClgS § Robert Jones 2.0-Acre Tract CASE, ~0503-02 c. ~ REZONING FIELD NOTES to describe the bomadary of a 2.00 acre travt of land out of a 28.9767 acre tract deeded to Richard Hessee as recorded in Docuraent g'2002036700, Official Public Records, Nueces County, Texas and also out of Lots 15 and 16, Section 25, Flour Bluff& Encinal Farm & Garden Tracts as recorded in Volu~e A, Pages 41 through 43, Map Records, .N,.u, eces County, Texas, said 2.00 acre tract being m~re parfcularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8" steel rod set in the east right-of-way of Airline Road, County Road 11 (60' ROW) and thc west linc of said Hesaee tract for the lower southwest corner of this tract from which a 5/8" steel rod found in the aorth right-of-way of Yorl,:town Blvd. (80' ROW) and the east right-of-way of said Airline Road bears S-02°-26'-06"-W, 607.00'; THENCE, N-02°-26'-06"-E, along !said Airline Road right-of-way, a distance of 30.00' to a 5/8" steel rod set for the upper southwest comer of this ~-aet; TIIENCE,' S-87°-33'-54"-E, a distance of 143.00' to a 5/8" steel rod set for an interior comer of this tract; THENCE, N-02°-26'-06"-E, a distance of 252.00' to a 5/8" steel rod set for the northwest comer of this tract; TttENCE, S-$7°-33'-54"-E, a distance of 293.72' to a 5/8" steel rod set for the northeast comer of this tract; THENCE, S-02°-26'-06"-W, a distance of 282.00' to a 5/8" steel rod set for the southeast comer of this tract; THENCE, N-S7°-33'-54"-W, a distance of 436.72' to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 2.00 acres of land, more or less. I do hereby certify that these field notes represent a survey made upon thc ground under my direction and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. David L. Ne~bitt, R_P.L.S. No_ 5302 Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering, Inc. -170- Job No. 9440c Page 1 of l Attachment 1 18 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: June 10, 2003) Case No.:, 04.0.3-05, B & EC Partnership~ Ltd.: A chan~,e of zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural Districttoa'R-1B One-family Dwelli~g District on Tract 1 and"R-lC One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2 on Flour Bluff and EncinaI Farm and Garden Tracts, being 36.631 acres out of Lots 21 and 22, section 19, located south of Wooldridge Road and Wind Hollow Drive intersection. Planning Commission and Staff, s Recommendation {04/23/03): Approval. Requested Council Action: Apl$:oval of the "R-lB" District on Tract I and "R-lC" District on Tract 2 and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: To develop a 184-1ot single-family subdivision. Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from "F-R" Farm Rural District to "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 1 and "R-lC" Dne-family Dwelling Dis~ct on Tract 2, in order to develop a future unit of the Windsong single-family subdivisioa. Tract 1 is comprised of 28.602 acres and is proposed as a 130 lot sthgle- family area. Tract 2 consists of 8.029 acres and is proposed with 54 single-family lots. Ultimately, the development of the subject property will result as a J84 lot single-family subdivision. The "R-lB" District provides for a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet with a minimum lot width of fifty (50) feet and front setback of twenty-five (25) feet. The "R-lC" District requires a minimum lot area of 4,500 square feet with a minimum lot width of forty- five (45) feet and front setback of twenty (20) feet. Maximum height of structures in the "R-lB" Dislrict is three (3) stories or thirty-five (35) feet and in the "R-lC' District two (2) stories or twenty-six (26) feet. Both tracts have direct access to Wooldridge Road, a rural arterial. The proposed residential development is projected to generate 2,840 vehicle trip ends per day. With a change of zoning to a "R-lB" District and a "R-lC" District traffic possibly could be impeded along the Wooldridge Road corridor. However, the Transportation Plan recommends that Wooldridge Road be improved as an arterial roadway with a full pavement section. The development of single-family residences along Wooldridge Road is an extension of the existing residential properties to the north and west. Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "R-lB" District and "R-lC" District. The Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop with low-density residential nses. The "R-lB" District and "R-lC" District are consistent with the Plan's reconamended land use. Applicaut's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning Conmfission and StafCs reconm]eudation. Notification: Prior 1o the date of this memorandum, twenty-eight (28) notices were mailed to the property owners within a 200-foot radius, of which one was returned in favor and two iu opposition. This case is considered noncontroversial. The 20% rule is not in effect at the City Couucil heariug. Assistant D irecto~ of Development ~vices/ Di~ ector of Plamfing -173- Agenda Memorandum Case No. 0403-05 (B & EC Partnership, ~Ltd.) Page 2 MGm'GM/er Attachments: 1) Zoning Report 2) Comments Received 3) Ordinance H \PLN -DIR',ERMA'/WORD ~.GENDM EM\0403 -05AGENDAMEM O DOC -174- CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: Legal Description/Location: 0403-05 Ap~123,2003 G16B B & EC Pa~nership, Ltd. Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, being 36.631 acres out of Lots 21 and 22, Section 19, located south of Wooldridge Road and Wind Hollow Drive intersection. Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zoning: Request: 36.63 acres Same as above. "F-R" Farm-Rural District Tract I -"R- 1B" One-family Dwelling District Tract 2 -"R-1C" One-family Dwelling District Farmland. To develop a 184 -lot single-family subdivision. Not applicable. Current Use of Property: Purpose of Request: Zoning Change Requested Due to Notice of Violation: Adjacent Zoning: North (across Wooldridge Road) "FR" Fa~ln-Rural District and "R-lB" One-l~amily Dwelling District South "FR" Farm-Rural District East - "R-lB" Oim-family D,,velli~g District and "A-I" ApaTq. ment House District West - "F-R" Farm Rural District -175- Zomng Report Case No. 0403-05 (B & EC Partnership, L~.) Page 2 Adjacent Laud Use: North - (across Wooldridge Road)Single-family residence and undeveloped land. South - Undeveloped land. East - Undeveloped land and sini~le-family residences. West Undeveloped land and ho: ~ital. Number of Residential Units Allo' red: "F-R" - 7 units (1 unit per 5 acre s - Tracts 1 and 2) "R-lB"- 207 units (7.26 dwelling u fits per acre - Tract 1) "R-lC"- 77 units (9.68 dwelling nits per acre - Tract 2) Estimated Traffic Generation: Single-family residential (detached)~- 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 7 dwelling units = 70 average wcekda~y vehicle trip ends. (Tracts 1 and 2) Single-family residential (detached) - 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 207 dwelling units = 2,070 average weekday vehicle trip ends. (Tract 1) Single-family residential (detached)- 10 average weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 77 dwelling units = 770 average weekday vehicle trip ends. (Tract 2) Adiacent Streets/Classification: a) Wooldridge Road - arterial Right-of-Way Design Current: a) 60-foot right-of-x~ ay xxilh a 20-foot wide rural paved section. Planned: a) 80-foot right-of-way with a 62-foot back-to-back paved section. February 2003 Traffic Count (24-hour~ weekdav, non-directional): a) None available. -176- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-05 (B & EC Parmership, Lid.) Page 3 Zoning History of Properl3,: There has been no rezoning activity within the past five (5) years. Recent Surrounding Zoning Casqs: In November 2002, 27.896 acres of ~Ikot 13 and 14, located on the north side of Wooldridge Road and west of the subject property was grahted a change of zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "R- 1C" One-family Dwelling District for development of a single-family subdivision. In June 2002, 17.953 acres of Lot 19, located on the south side of Wooldridge Road and west of the subject properly was granted a change of zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "R-lB" One- family Dwelling District for development of a single-family subdivision. In March 2002, 7.5 acres of Lots 11 and a portion of Lot 12, located on the north side of Wooldridge Road and north of the subject property was granted a change of zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District for the purpose of a 54- lot single-family subdivision. In September 2000, 4.773 acres of a portion of Lot 12 located between Tracts 1 and 2 of the subject property was granted a change of zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District for the purpose ora 21-lot single-family subdivision. Planning Staff Analysis: General Characteristics and Backm'ound: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from "F-R" Farm Rural District to "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 1 and "R-lC" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2, in order to develop a future unit of the Windsong single-family subdivision. Tract 1 is comprised of 28.602 acres and is proposed as a 130 lot single-family area. Tract 2 consists of 8.029 acres and is proposed with 54 single-family lots. Ultimately, the development of the subject property will result as a 184 1ot single-family subdivision. The "R-lB" District provides for a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet with a miuJmum lot width of fifty (50) feel and front setback of twenty-five (25) feet. The "R-1C" District requires a lninm]um lot area of 4,500 square feet with a minimmn lot width of forly-five (45) feet and fi-om setback of twenty (20) feet. Maximum height of struclures in the "R-I B" District is tkree (3) stories or thi~w-five (35) feet and in the "R-lC" District two (2) stories or twenty-six (26) feet. Both tracts have direct access to Wool&idg¢ Road, a rural alterial. The p~oposed residential devclopn-ient is projected to generate 2,840 vehicle trip ends per day. With a change of zoning to a "R-lB" District and a "R-lC" District traffic possibly could be impeded along the Woo]dridge Road corridor. However, the Transportation Plan recommends that ~Vooldridge Road be improved as an arlerial roadway with a full pavement section. -177- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-05 (B & EC Parmership, Ljtd.) Page 4 The development of single-family residences along Wooldridge Road is an extension of the existing residential properties to the north and west. Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "R-lB" District and "R-lC" District. The Southside Area Developmept Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop with low-density r~sJdential uses. The "R-lB" District and "R-lC" District are consislent with the Plan's r4commended land use. Potential Housing Density: 4k "F-R" District permits a density of one dwelling unit for each five (5) acres or seven (7) un, ts on Tracts I and 2. Tract 1- "R-lB" District permits a density of 7.26 dwelling units per a~re or 207 units. Tract 2- "R-lC" District permits a density of 9.68 dwelling units per acr, or 77 units. The proposed 184-1ot subdivision is within the density limit of the "R-lB" ]District and R-lC" D'strict. Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: The are no setback requirements or building height limitations in the "F-R" District. The "R-lB" District requires a front yard setback of 25 feet with a side and rear yard setback of five (5) feet each. Buildings in the "R-lB" District are limited to a height of 35 feet not to exceed three (3) stories. The "R-I C" District requires a front yard setback of 20 feet with a side and rear yard setback of five (5) feet each. Buildings in the "R-lC" District are limited lo a height of 26 feet not to exceed (2) stories. Signage: The "F-R" District does not permit any signs unless to advertise products grown on the property. Signs in the "R-lB" and "R-lC" Districts are limited to one wall sign not to exceed one square foot. Traffic: The proposed 184-1ot residential subdivision is estimated to generate approximately 2,840 daily vehicle trip ends. This traffic will access directly to an arterial, Wooldridge Road. The amount of traffic generated from the proposed subdivision could possibly impede traffic along Wooldridge Road. Parking/Screening: Residential development is required to provide 1.5 off-street parking spaces for each one bedroom dwelling unit or two (2) off-street parking spaces for each dwelling unit containing two (2) bedrooms or more. Compliance with the off-street parking regulations will be required during the permitting phase. A slandard screening fence is not required for residential development. Costs to City: Development of the infrastructure within the proposed subdivision will be at Ire developer's expense, ltowever, tl~e hnprovement of \Vooldridge Road to its ultimate p:lx emenl width may ~equire City participation. Platling: The subject p~opei%' is portions of lots and will require platting before a building permit can be issued. A residential subdivision plat has been submitled to the staff for pwcessi~]g. -178- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-05 (B & EC Partnership, Ltd.) Page 5 Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.) a) The requested "R-lB" and "R-lC" Districts are consistent with the Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map. Cons: (Ideas in support ofmaintainting the current zoning.) a) None. Staff Recommendation: Mtachments: Approval. Zoning Map iq ...PLN _DiR, i~ RM A.~\& © RD ~Z©N RpTS'x2t~03x0403 -05CCR EPORT DOC -179- R-lC Apr 18, 2003 - RP CASE Z0403-05 Subject property O~ners within 200 feet listed on ottoched ownership list -180- COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0403-05 B & EC Partnership, Ltd. · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED (Note: The listed numbers correspogd to the attached map.) II. Ill. Notices returned from within the 200-foot notification area: Favor: 9) Ted M. Anderson, 519 Everhart No written comment. Opposition: 13) Mary Mae Miras, 2425 Woodway Dr. No written comment. 19) Amy & Wilson Cifuentes, 2437 Windsong Dr. No written comment. Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. H:,PI N.D IR ~ERM &','WO RD\COM M DATA\0403 -05COM M ENTS DOC -181- Planning Coffmmssion Minutes April 23, 2003 B & EC Partnership, Ltd.: 0403-05 REQUEST: "F-R" Farm-Rural District to "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 1 and "R-lC" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2 on property described as Flour Bluff and Eneinal Farm and Garden Tracts, being 36.631 acres out of Lots 21 and 22, Section ~ 9, located south of Wooldridge Road and Wind Hollow Drive intersection. Ms. Goode-Macon presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The applicaat has requested a change of zoning from "F-R" Farm Rural District to "R-lB" One-family D{velling District on Tract 1 and "R-IC" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2, in order to develop a future unit of the Windsong single-family subdivision. Tract 1 is comprised of 28.602 acres and is proposed as a 130 lot single-family area. Tract 2 consists of 8.029 acres and is proposed with 54 single-family lots. Ultimately, the development of the subject property will result as a 184 lot single-family subdivision. The "R-lB" District provides for a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet with a minimum lot width of fifty (50) feet and front setback of twenty-five (25) feet. The "R-lC" District requires a minimum lot area of 4,500 square feet with a minimum lot width of forty-five (45) feet and front setback of twenty (20) feet. Maximum height of structures in the "R-lB" District is three (3) stories or thirty-five (35) feet and in the "R-lC" District two (2) stories or twenty-six (26) feet. Both tracts have direct access to Wooldridge Road, a rural arterial. The proposed residential development is projected to generate 2,840 vehicle trip ends per day. With a change of zoning to a "R-1B" District and a "R-1C" District traffic possibly could be impeded along the Wooldridge Road corridor. However, the Transportation Plan recommends that Wooldridge Road be improved as an arterial roadway with a full pavement section. The development of single-family residences along Wooldridge Road is an extension of the existing residential properties to the north and west. Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "R-1B" District and "R-1C" District. The Southside Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop with Iow-density residential uses. The "R-lB" District and "R-lC" District are consistent with the Plan's recommended land use. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. There were 28 notices mailcd to property owners within a 200-foot radius of the subject property of wbJcla one (1) was returned in favor and one (1) was returned in opposition. Public hearing was opened. Nixon Welch, 438 Pee~nan, represenled the applicanl and stated that the proposed dex elopment xvou]d be a two (2) unit subdivision. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Salazar, seconded by Amsler, to for~vard a recommendation for approval. Motion passed with Richter being abseut. -182- Page 1 of 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING~ ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY B & EC PARTNERSHIP, L'ITD., CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO FLOUR !BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS, BEING 36.631 ACRES OUT OF LOTS 21 AND 22, SECTION 19, FROM "F-R" FARM4~URAL DISTRICT TO "R-lB" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT (pN TRACT I AND "R-lC" ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT ON TRACT 2; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAI~ TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING qOMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECILARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of B & EC Padnership, Ltd. for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 23,2003, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June 10, 2003, during a meeting of the City' Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during whiclh all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on 36.631 acres (Tract One- 28.602 acres and Tract Two- 8.029 acres) out of Lots 21 and 22, Section 19, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located south of Wooldridge Road and Wind Hollow Drive intersection from "F-R" Farm-Rural District to "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 1 and "R- 1C" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2, as shown and described on the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. H:\LEG DIR\JQSEPH~ONING\0403 05REGULAR.DOC -183- Page 2 of 3 SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zonir~g Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION $. That all ordinances or pads of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. That publication sh~ll be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by th~ City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION ?. That upon written r~quest of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (l) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rqle as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that thislordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 10th [day of June, 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED 2003 Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Joseph Harney Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403-05REGULAR.DOC -184- Page 3 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas __ day of ., 2003 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CI]h' COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the e~ergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two re~lular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and p~ss this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, at the present meeting of the Ci~ Council. or Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Henry Garrett William Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONtNG\0403-05REGULAR DOC -185- BASS ~ WELSH ENGINEERING g-HAiL: ~ixmweaoI.com /~- 1 B Zoning Tract St.ate of Texa.~ § ~ April 3, 2003 03010.M&B County of IXlueces § Beg~nrsin8 at ~ point in the northeast figh bof-w~y line o~a ~ ~e d~t~ f-~y d~b~ ~ P~ecl 8 in Judgment ~ Vol~ 191 O, P~e 372, ~ R~rds, Nu~ Co~, Tc~, ~d ~n~ng ~int for ~ w~t~m~ e~ of ~= ~t h~in d~fi~ ~d sou~m~t com~ d~fi~; ZNixon M. Welsh, R.P.L.S. -186- FROb~ PLANNINQ 512 ~8~ LI~T 1, ~LI~ 1,' Vl~W P~¥CHIATRIC HOSPITAl. TRA~T, N29°D4' O0'E 547. 41' LOT 81, SECT 19 DO' 00' E W N~.9' 00' nO" E 75, O0 $~9' DO' 00' g ~:~9'00' O0"W 784, 19' P. 3 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY METES AND BOUND$ DESCRIPTION FOR R-lB ZONING TRACT 1' = 200' OORPUS CHRISTI, TX COMP. NO,EXB-ZONING-R- 1B JOB NO, 03010 PLOT DA~; -187- BASS & WELSH ENGINEERING R-lC Zoning Tract Stat~ of Texas § April 1, 2003 03010.M&B County of Nucces § Description of an 8.029 ac~ ea~ of 1~ [mor~ or 1~, ~ ~rflon of ~t 2~' ~on 19, no~ BI~ and ~ N~on M. Wdsh, R.P.~S. SKETCH, TO ACCOMPANY METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR R-lC ZONING APPLICATION -188- 5-SB-2QB B: 1 FROM PLANNING 512 8BQ BBg~ ,~"~CL WDOLDRIDGE RD. S61'O0'O0'E 540, 00' S45o30' 17'~ R-IC ZONING TRACT AN I~. OE'~ AC. TRACT rlF LAND, A PORTI]I~[ I~' LOT ~1, ~ECTI~ N61' 00' 00' V 500. 80' 140. 80' '~ SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR R-lC ZONING APPLICATZON 1' = [00' DASD AND WELSH ENGINEERING CO~PUS CHRISTI, TX COMP. NO. EXB-ZQNING-RIC JOl~ NO. 05010 SCALE: 1' ~ 100' PLOT SCALE: ~AME PLOT DATE: 4/1/05 SHEET 1 OF 1 - 1 19 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Act/on Date: June 10, 2003) Case No.: 0503-,0,1, .,J,. Patricki Moran, M. D.:, A ,c, hange of zoning from a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District and 'A-2 Apartment]House District to a ' B-4 General Business District on Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, being }2.521 acres out of Lots I, 2, and 3, Section 11, located south of Saratoga Boulevard, approximately 800 feet east ~f South Staples Street. Planning Commission and Stafl]'s Recommendation (05/07/03): Approval. Requested Council Action: Approval of the "B-4" District and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: For commercial development. Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District and a "A-2" Apartment House District to a "B,4" General Business District for commercial development. The subject property consists of 32.51 acres and is uadeveloped. The applicant proposes to conslruct a 75,000 square foot 2- story building. Additional pad sites for retail development will be available along Saratoga Boulevard and South Staples Street. The construction date for tltis project is unknown at tiffs time. Development of this property with commercial uses could generate approximately 3,050 vehicle trip ends per day. The subject property is located along two (2) arterial roadways, Saratoga Boulevard and South Staples Street, that are designed to accommodate large volume of traffic. Traffic generated from this project would have direct access to the arterial roadways without traversing the residential neighborhood to the south and east. The subject property is located within an area that has experienced a considerable amount of growth over the last 2-5 years. Such growth has resulted in the development of Huntington Square Shopping Center, a pharmacy, several fast food restaurants and an auto repair use to the west, all of which are zoned a "B-4" District. To the east is a bank building and undeveloped land within a "B~I" District. North of the subject property, across Saratoga Boulevard, is a restaurant, hospital and a commercial use under construct/on. To the south is a church and single-family residences with no access to the subject site. The Southside future land use map recommends that the majority of the area develop with general commercial uses along Saratoga Boulevard and South Staples Street, with low to medimn density residential uses near the south and east boundary line of the request. The Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "B-4" General Business District since the subject property has direct access to an arterial and will not traverse the residential area to the south. Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Plarming Commission and Stafffs reconnnendation. Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, thirty-three notices were mailed to the property owners within a 200-foot radius, of which four (4) were returned in favor and one (1) in opposition. The owner of the subject property submitted a notice in favor~ One (1) notice was submitted in favor from outside the notification area. This case is considered noncontrmersial. The 20% rule is nol in effect at the City Council hearing, Assistant Director of Development Services/ Director of Plmming MG/FGM/er -193- Agenda Memorandum Case No. 0503-01 (J. Patrick Moran, M. 1~.) Page 2 Attachments: 1) Zoning Report 2) Comments Received 3) Ordinance H \PLN-DIR~,ERMAWx;ORD\AGENDM EM'~0503 -01AGENDAMEMO DOC -194- CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: Legal Description/Location: 0503-01 May 7, 2003 G18A J. Patrick Moran, M.D. Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Section 11, being 32.521 acres out of Lots 1,2, and 3, located south of South StapNs Street, approximately 800 feet east of Saratoga Boulevard. 32.521 acres Same as above "R-l B" One-family Dwelling District and "A-2" Apartment House District Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zoning: Request: Current Use of Property: Purpose of Request: Zoning Change Requested Due to Notice of Violation: Adiacent Zoning: "B-4" General Business District Undeveloped. Commercial development Not applicable North and West - "B-4" General Business District Easl "R-1C" One-family Dwelling District and B-I" Neighborhood Business District South "R 1C" One family I)welling Disnict, "R 2" Multiple Dwelling District and "B-4" General Business Districl Zoning Repo~ Case No. 0503-01 (J. Pa~ickMoran, M.D.) Page 2 Adiacent Land Use: North - Retail shopping center under construction. South - Church East - Undeveloped. West - Restaurants, auto related use! pharmacy and retail uses. Number of Residential Units Allo~i'ed: "R-lB" - 236 units (7.26 units per acre) "B-4" 1,180 units (36.30 units per acre ) "A-2" 1,180 units (36.30 units per acre) Estimated Traffic Generation: General Commercial 40.67 average weekday vehicle trip ends per 1000 square feet of gross floor area x 75,000 = 3,050 average weekl:lay vehicle trip ends. Adjacent Streets/Classification: a) Saratoga Boulevard - arterial b) South Staples Street - arteri~ Right-of-Way Design Current: a) 120-foot right-of-x~ ay with a 100-foot back-to-back paved section. b) 80-foot right-of-way with a 62-foot back-to-back paved section. Planned: a,b) Same as currenl 2001 Traffic Counl (24-hour~ wee,kdav~ non-directional}: a) 22,785 vehicles per day. b) 20,9?0 vehicles pc~ day. Zoning History of Propert.y: IJ~ Augt~st 1996, a poltion of the subject p~ operly, 15 ac~es, was gq anted a change of zoning from a "R-lB" District aud a "B 4" District lo an "A-2" Disl~icl for an apai~.ment complex. -196- Zoning Report Case No. 0503-01 (J. Palrick Moran, M.D.) Page 3 Recent Surroundinl~ Zoninl~ Cases: In July 1999, a tract of land east of S; Staples Street and south of Saratoga Boulevard was granted a change of zoning from a "R-lB" District to a "B-4" District for a mini-storage use. In January 1995, Lot 5, located on thelsouth side of Sarato,~a B,oulevard, east of S. Staples Street was granted a change of zoning from a "R-lB" District to a B-4' District for a restaurant. Planning Staff Analysis: General Characteristics and ~3ack~ound: The applic,,ant ,h,,as requested a change of zoning flora a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District and a A-2 Apartment House District t.o a "B-4" General Business District for commercial development. The subject property consists of 32.51 acres and is undeveloped. The applicant proposes to construct a 75,000 square foot 2-story building. Additional 1}ad sites for retail development will be available along Saratoga Boulevard and South Staples Street. The construction date for this project is unknown at this time. Development of this property with commercial uses could generate approximately 3,050 vehicle trip ends per day. The subject property is located along two (2) arterial roadways, Saratoga Boulevard and South Staples Street, that are designed to accommodate large volume of traffic. Traffic generated from this project would have direct access to the arterial roadways without traversing the residential neighborhood to the south and east. The subject property is located wilhin an area that has experienced a considerable amount of growth over the last 2-5 years. Such growth has resulted in the development of Huntington Square Shopping Center, a pharmacy, several fast food restaurants and an auto repair use to the west, all of which are zoned a "B-4" District. To the east is a bank building and undcveloped land within a "B-I" District. North of the subject property, across Saratoga Boulevard, is a restamant, hospital and a conmmrcial use under construction. To the south is a church and single-family residences with no access lo the subject site. The Southside future land use map recommends that the majority of the area develop with gcnc':al commercial uses along Salatoga Boulevard and South Staples Street, with low to medium density ~esidential uses near the south and east botmdary line of the request. The Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "B-4" General Business District since the st~bjecl property has direct access to an al~erial and will not traverse the ~esidcnlial a~ea lo the sot~th. Polential iq ousin~ Density: The "R-lB' District permits a density of 7.26 units per acre, while the "B-4" and "A-2" Districts permit a density of 36.30 units per acre. -197- Zoning Report Case No. 0503-01 (J. Patrick Moran, M.D.) Page 4 HeiqhffBulk~Setbacks/Etc.: Tile "R-lB" District requires a front yard setback of 25 feet with a side and rear yard setback of 5 feet. A maximum height of 35 feet, not to exceed 3 stories is allowed in the "R-lB" District. The front setback for an A-2" District is 20 feet. Side and rear yard setbacks are 10 feet for one-story buildings and an additional 5 feet for each floor above the first, with a maximum setback of 30 feet. The "B-4" District requires a fi'ont yard setback of 20 feet and no iside or rear yard setbacks unless adjacent to residential zoning. On the south is residential adj[acency where a 10-foot setback is required. A "B-4" District has no height limitations. Si2:na~e: In an "R-lB" DistriCt, signs are limiled to 1 sign fiat against the wall and not to exceed I square foot. ChurCh bulletin signs are limited to a 30 square foot area in the "R-lB" District. The" A-2" District permits one (1) thirty (30) foot wall identification sign for properties consisting of less than one hundred (100) feet of street frontage. A multi- family use with ten (10) units or more located on a lot with less than one hundred (100) feet of street frontage is permitted one (1) ground or monument freestanding sign in lieu of a wall sign. Such sign is required to maintain a ten- (10) feet setback from the property line and shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height or m~enty (20) square feet in area. Properties consisting of more than one hundred (100) feet of street frontage in the "A-2" District are permitted either one (1) forty (40) square foot wall identification sign or one (1) forty (40) square foot ground or monument freestanding sign per premise per street frontage. A front yard sign setback often (10) feet in height. The "B-4" District permits unlimited sign area and height ',,hen such sign is placed behind the 20-foot front yard setback. Traffic: Traffic would have direct access to S. Staples Street and Saratoga Boulevard that are ~rterial roadways which can accommodate the proposed trip ends. The development of the commercial use along both arterials will not traverse the residential area to the south. Screening: The proposed development would be required to place a screening fence to the south. Pros: (]deas in support of the request.) The subjecl p~opclqy has direct access to lwo arterial, S. Staples Street aud Saratoga Boulevm d. b) The requested "B-4" District is an expansion of the existing "B-4" District adjacent to the ,,',est. Cons: (Ideas in St~lOl)Ort ofm:dnlaining the curreut zoning.) a) The "B-4" District will boarder a "R-1C" District aud "R-2" District lo the south. -198- Zoning Reporl Case No. 0503-01 (J. Patrick Moran, M.D.) Page 5 Staff Recommendation: Approval. Attach merits: Zoning Map H: i>LN.DiP,,,Ei?,MA \VORD\ZONRPTS,,2(!03\0503 OlCCREPORT DOC -] 99- A-I/SP A-I UFF&[ GARDEN B-4 t3-4 B-4 SUBJECI A_2 I-T R-2 A-I AT 0 Apr 28, 2005 -- RP 200 400 600 CASE Z0503-01 Subject p~oper t¥ O*r, ers within 200 feet listed on ottoched ownership I[st -200- FC~OMMENTS RECEIVED OM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0503-01 J. Patrick Moran, M. D. · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED (Note: The listed numbers correspobd to the attached map.) 1. Notices returned from withir~ the 200-foot notification area: Favor: 4) · ' 5 Dnscoll Foundatmn ~61 N. Upper Broadway 78477 No written comment, 15) U-Stor of Corpus Chjristi L.L.C., 8100 E. 22nd St., North Ste. 1900, Wichita, KS No written comment; 20) Jason Mazour, 6709 Sadbury Dr. 78414 "I have no problem with business development along Saratoga Boulevard. I d___o no~t want to see businesses on Patt~ Stree. 22) Timothy R. Bly, 5902 Regency Dr. No written commenL Opposition: 8) Braselton Homes, Inc., 5337 Yorktown Blvd., #10-D 78413 No written comment. ll. Responses received from oulside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: W. W. Sanderfer, Jr., 710l Ginge~berry 78414 No written comment. _Opposition: None. til. Responses ~cceivcd flora owncrs/apl~licants of subject mca: Fflvor: J. Patrick Moran, M. D., 3401-C Ocean Dr. (Applicant/owner) No writlt'n commcnl. Opposition: None. -201- Plmming Commission Meeting May 7, 2003 New Zoning J. Patrick Moran, M.D.: 0503~-01 REQUEST: "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District and "A-2" Apartment House District to "B-4" General BuSiness District on p.roperty described as Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm andlGarden Tracts, Section 11, being 32.521 acres out of Lots 1, 2, and 3, locate{ south of South Staples Street, approximately 800 feet east of Saratoga Bouleqard. The applicant has request4d a change of zoning from a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District and a "A-2" Apartment: House District to a "B-4" General Business District for commercial development. The sul4ject property consists of 32.51 acres and is undeveloped. The applicant proposes to construct a ?5,000 square foot 2-story building. Additional pad sites for retail development will be availal~le along Saratoga Boulevard and South Staples Street. The construction date for this project is !'.unknown at this time Development of this property with commercial uses could generate approximately 3,050 vehicle trip ends per day. The subject property is located along two (2) arterial roadways, Saratoga Boulevard and South Staples Street, that are designed to accommodate large volume of traffic. Traffic generated from this project would have direct access to the arterial roadways without traversing the residential neighborhood to the south and east. The subject property is localed within an area that has experienced a considerable amount of growth over the last 2-5 years. Such growth has resulted in the development of Huntington Square Shopping Center, a pharmacy, several fast food restaurants and an auto repair use to the xvest, all of which are zoned a "B4" District. To thc east is a bank building and undeveloped land within a "B-I" District. North of the subject property, across Saratoga Boulevard, is a restaurant, hospital and a commercial use under construction. To the south is a church and single-family residences with no access to the subject site. The Southside future land use map recommends that the majority of the area develop with general commercial uses along Saratoga Boulevard and South Staples Street, with low to medium density residential uses near the south and east boundary line of the request. The Comprehensive Plan Elements can be supportive of the requested "B-4" General Business District since the subject property has direct access to an arlerial and will not traverse the residential area to the south. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. There xvere 33 notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of the subject property of which four (4) were returned in favor and one (l) was returned in opposition. Chaimmn Berlanga opened the public hearing. Ralph Cobb, 700 Everhart, Suite F11, represented the applicant, asked the Commission to approve the rezoning request and added that dcvelopmeut for the subject property was unkmowu at this time. -202- Planning Commission Meeting May 7, 2003 Case No. 0503-01 (J. Pa0'ick Moran, M. II).) Page 2 Public heating was closed. Motion by Amsler, seconded by Salazar, to forward a recommendation for approval the rezoning request. Motion passed with Pusley and Zamora being absent. -203- Page 1 of 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY J. PATRICK MORAN, M.~. BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO 32.52~ ACRES OUT OF FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN TRACTS, LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, SECTION 11 FROM "R-lB" ONE,FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT AND "A-2" APARTMENT HOUSE DISTRICT TO "B-4" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; AMENDING ~HE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATION~ FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the; application of J. Patrick Moran, M.D. for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, May 7, 2003, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June10, 2003, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on 32.521 acres of Lots 1,2 and 3, Section 11, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located approximately 800 feet east of South Staples Street, from "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District and "A-2" Apartment House District to "B-4" General Business District, as shown on the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance. as amended by this ordinance. H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ONING\0503-01 REGULAR.DOC -204- Page 2 of 3 SECTION $. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. That publication sh~ll be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by thei City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) fi~ds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for tl~e efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rL~le as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that thiTSH,lordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 10 day of June, 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED 2003 Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Joseph Harney Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0503-01 REGULAR.DOC -205- Page 3 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas __ day of ,2003 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CI~Y COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the drnergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two re~lular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Henry Garrett William Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:\LEG-DiR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0503-01 REGULAR.DOC -206- F ON PLANNING S12 3S 8 P. 2 (361 )8.54-& I0! URBAN P.O. BOX 63~k5 · CORPUS CHRIST1. TEXAS 78466-6355 CASE #0503-01 Job No. 24264_A3.00 Alxll 2, 2003 FAX (361)864-6001 STATE OF TEXA~ COUNTY OF NUF. CE$ ;. th~ wesl nghI-ot-way of Patti Driv?,p.$O too~ wi~? publi~ msdway, for th~ east comer ofLoi I. The ark at Dtulbar, o~ Oaks, a map of,~vhtc~ I$ r~¢ord~t m ¥olume 61. l~e 206, Map Re.~ords o f Hu~'coz County, T~'as, a~d a comer Of thls mmn~ oT.~o.~/zeet ~o a :~ ~ iroq.roa wire t~l plaz'dc cap stamped URBAN ElqOR. C C TX" found fortfienortltcomerofsaidThcP~k~tDunbaxtonOaks, axulacomerof- ltgslrag;' ' ' THENCE South 29000'24" W~ along the u~r~hwest boundary of said ,l'lie [~aldc at Dullbartoa Oaks, a _d. i_~.~ce of 95.00 feet to a 5f~ ~ ;rrm md found for the Acvr~:~::asl comer of L~ 5, Block 1, 6600 So¥~. l!~'apleil, a m~.p?f which is ro:ordlkHn Volume 57, Pa~ 63, Map Re~:ordz of Nuece$ County, Total, THENCE Nor~ 61~0~'59'' We~ ilong the no~e~'~ ~ound~y ofs~d ~t 5, BI~ l, at 60 ~ p~s a 51g inch ir~ ~ ~und f~ a ~ of said ~t 5, Bl~k 1, in ail a to~l dis~ce of l 349.7~ ~t to a poinl on ~c c:~l~e of South S~[es $~t ~.M. ~ 2444), a 1~ f~t wide public m~y, for ~c w~t c~r of~ ~ TI-tk'~CE Hor~h 28,$3+11" t~as~, along the cenlz-rlme of ~.aid ~out~ Staples SWeet, a difita~Ice of 554.72 f~et f~ a comer of this THENCE Sou~h 61°04'36" ~ at 50.00 fi~el ~5~ a 5/~ inch ~ rod w'~ ~d ptast,c :p s~ "U~AN ENOR C.C. TX" found ~ ~e eas~ riCe. f-way or,aid So~ S~les Sm~ for Om we~ ~m~ of L~ 9, BIo~ l, ~toga C~, a m~p of which is r~o~ in Volume 62~ Page 66. Map ~o~ ofNueces C~n~, Te~ ~ MI a total d~t~ of gfS,g0 f~ ~ a 5/8 ~ch ~ r~ with ~ pl~tic ~p s~*d "U~AN ~ C.C. ~" f~nd for ~ s~ufll ccaer or.id ~t 9, BIo~ I, ~d a Com~ of~is THENCE Nca~ 2g°59'24' F-~t, a~ 216.63 feet pass a 5/8 inca iron r~ wi~ ~ p~fic c~ ~mp~d "~AN ENGR C~G, TX~ fo~d for the east ~g of said ~i 9, gl~ I, ~e ~uth c~ of L~ 5, Bilk 1, So--ga C~n~, a m~ ofwhkh ~ ~co~od ~ Volume 59, P~ 1, Map ~co~s of Nuo~ C~n~, Texas, ~d along thc so~ast ~ of~id ~t 5. Block l, S~ C~ter. a ~cc of 349.93 f~t to a 5~ ~h ~ ~d found ~ ~ son& ri~-way ofS~to~ B~l~v~ (S~ H~way 357L a I~ ~ wi~ p~bl~ ~y, in .all a t~al dis~n~ of 626.56 ~t to a ~t on ~= c~t~lta~ of 2725 SWANTN~R DR, * CORPUS CH~Tr, TEXAS moil@urbanen~/,oom -207- Attachment 1 FROM PLANNING 512 880 3590 P 3 820.46 £ec! to - --= ...... "'T" ' ~ ~r~ .m.e otsam S~'atoga ~,oUleVan~ a d~cc or' UREAN ENGJ~EERING License No. 4909 -208- A*~l:~chment 1 20 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING- ZONING (City Council Action Date: June 10, 2003) Case No.: 0403-01~ Albert R. V~llarreal: A change ofzoinng from a "AB" Professional Office District to a "B-I" Neighborhood Business Dis~ict on Southwood Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 7, located on the south side of Gollihar Road, approximately 280 feet west of Kostoryz Road. Planning Commission's Recommendation (05/07/03): Denial of the "B-I" District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a Special Permit Itor a mattress retail/clearance sales business and enclosed storage of mam-esses subject to nme (9) conditions. Staff's Recommendation: Denial. Requested Council Action: Denial of the "B-I" Dislxict, and in lieu thereof, approval of a Special Permit for a mattress retail/clearance sales business and enclosed storage of ma~a-esses subject to nine (9) conditions and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: To bring mattress retail/clearance sales store into zoning compliance. Summary: The applicant has submitted a request for a change of zoning from an "AB" Professional Office District to a "B-I" Neighborhood Business District, in order to bfflng an existing ma~ress retail/clearance sales use into compliance. The owner of the property was initially cited by the City's Code Enforcement Division on December 5, 2002 for a zoning violation. Such violation pertained to the retail/clearance sales of matlresses in a nonretail sales area, an "AB" Professional Office District. The subject property is an 8,100 square foot comer lot with a 930- square foot primary building on the site and a 200-square foot detached garage, per the applicant's application. The 930-square foot building will operate as the mattress retail/clearance sales use and the 200-square foot detached garage as an enclosed storage facility for mattresses. Hours of operation are Monday through Saturday from 8am to 7pm. On Sunday's the use is open for appointments only, schedule between lpm and 5pm. Employees will consist of the applicant and possibly two (2) part-time persons. North of the subject property, across Golld~ar Road, there is a parking lot for a restaurant in a "R-1B"/SP District and a restaurant in a "B-I' District. To the south and west is the Southwood Subdivision developed with single- family residences within a "R-lB" District. East of the subject properly, across Sonthwood Street, is a "B-I" District developed as a strip retail shopping center and a pharmacy. The subject property has frontage along Gollihar Road, an arterial, with a driveway cut on Southwood Street, a local roadway. Access and parking is provided from the Southwood Street entrance along the side and rear of the subject property. Conunercial traffic could traverse the Southwood residential area. An "AB" District generally permits offices, medical offices, and residential uses. The requested "B-1' District permits "AB" District nses plus retail uses, including a mattress retail/clearance sales store. The ovq~er and applicant are receptive Io a Special Pcrn~it fm a mattress retail/clearance sales store in the event the "B-I" District is not recon:m~ended for approval. Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements are not supportive of the requested "B-I' District. The Southeast Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop as a Iow-density residential use App:oval ora "lg-l" District or Special Pemrit for a retail use that has access only to a local street wotdd extend the comme~ cial use into a uc:ghbod~ood. The Planuing Connnission mconnnended denial of the "B-I" District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a Special Permit for a mam'ess retail/clearance sales business and enclosed storage of mattresses subject to the following nine (9) conditions: -211- Agenda Memorandum Case No. 0403-01 (Albert R. Villarreal) Page 2 Uses.'. The only uses permitted b[y tins Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "AB" Professional Office District is ~ mattress retail/clearance sales business located in the existing primary structure with storage of mattresses in the existing enclosed detached garage. Driveway Access: Driveway access to Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision is proinbited along the lot frontage adjacent to Gollthar Road. 3. Parking: An asphalt paved or qoncrete parking lot for the use shall be constructed and located along the rear of the primary structure. No ~Varking or parking lot shall occur in the front or side yards. 4. Si~naee: The sign allowance shrill be as pemfitted under the "AB" Professional Office District. Fencing: A six (6) foot screenJl~g fence shall be located along the south and west property lines of Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision. 6. Dumpster Location: Any dumpster placed on the property shall be placed behind the primary structure. Hours of Operation: Hours of operation are limited to Monday through Saturday fi.om 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. and on Sunday from lp.m. to 6 p~m. Delivery Vehicles and Schedu¥: Delivery vehicles shall be limited to a one-ton veincle and shall not make deliveries to the use after 6: p.m., Monday through Sunday. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one (1) year of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning Commission's recommendation. Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, twenty-two (22) notices were mailed to the proper~y owners within a 200-foot radius, of which seventeen were returned in favor and none in opposition. The owner of the subject property submitted a notice in favor plus four (4) notices in favor from outside the notification area. This case is considered controversial. The 20% rule is not in effect at the City Council hearing. Michael N~3uPming, AICP Assistant Director of Development Services MG/FGM/er Attaclnuents: 1 ) Zoning Repm~t 2) Conunents Received 3) Ordinances H:\P LN-DIR ERMA\WOILD'~_GEN DMIEM\0403-01AGENDAM EM O DOC -212- CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: · Legal Description/Location: 0403-01 April 23, 2003 II5A Albert R.Villarreal Southwood Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 7, located on the south side of Gollihar Road, approximately 280 feet west of Kostoryz Road. Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zoning: Request: Current Use of Property: Purpose of Request: Zoning Change Requested Due io Notice of Violation: 0.191 acre (8,324 square feet) Same as above. "AB" Professional Office District "B-1" Neighborhood Business District Mattress retail/clearance sales store. Bring mattress retail/clearance sales store into zoning compliance. Code enforcement initially cited the owner of the p~opcrty on December 5, 2002 for a zoning violation. Adiacent Zoning: No~th (across Gollilaar Road) "R-1B"/SP Ol~e-f:n'nily Dwelling District with a Special Pemait for parking lot South, West - "R-lB" O~e-fan:ily Dx~ e]ling District East "B-I" Neighborhood Business District -213- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-01 (Albert R. Villarreal) Page 2 Adiacent Land Use: North - Restaurant and church South - Residential East - (across Southwood Street) Pt~armacy, beauty and barber shop, and retail sales West - Single-family residences of Residential Units Allo{ved: Number "AB" - 6 units (36.30 dwelling unitS per acre) "B-I" - 6 units (36.30 dwelling uni!s per acre) Estimated Traffic Generation: Specialty retail - 40.67 average weekday vehicle trip ends per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area x 930 square feet = 38 average weekday vehicle trip ends. Ad]acent Streets/Classification: a) b) Gollihar Road - arterial. Southwood Street - local. Right-of-Way Design Current: a) b) 80-foot right-of-way with a 48-foot back-to-back paved section. 50-foot righl-of-way with at 28-foot back-to-back paved section. Planned: a, b) Same as current. 2002 Traffic Connt (24-hour, weqkdav, non-directional): a) 15,449 vehicles per day. b) Not available. Zoning ltistorv of Prol)ertv: There has been no rezoning activity within the past five (5) years. -214- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-01 (Albert R. Villarreal) Page 3 Recent Surroundin~ Zoning Casqs: There has not been any surrounding zoning cases within the past five- (5) years. Planninl~ Staff Analysis: General Characteristics and ]3ackground: The owner has authorized the applicant to submit a request for a change of Zoning from an "AB" Professional Office District to a "B-I" Neighborhood Business District, in order to bring an existing mattress retail/clearance sales use into zoning compliance. The owner of the property was initially cited by the City's Code Enforcement Division on December 5, 2002 for a zoning violation. Such violation pertained to the retail/clearance sales of mattresses in a nonretail sales area, an "AB" Professional Office District. The subject property is an 8,100 square foot comer lot with a 930-square foot primary building on the site and a 200-square foot detached garage, per the applicant's application. The 930-square foot building will operate as the mattress retail/clearance sales use and the 200-square foot detached garage as an enclosed storage facility for mattresses. Hours of operation are Monday through Saturday from 8am to 7pm. On Sunday's the use is open for appointments only, schedule between lpm and 5pm. Employees will consist of the applicant and possibly two (2) part-time persons. North of the subject property, across Gollihar Road, there is a parking lot for a restaurant in a "R-IB"/SP District and a restaurant in a "B-I" District. To the south and west is the Southwood Subdivision developed with single-family residences within a "R-lB" District. East of the subject property, across Southwood Street, is a "B-I" District developed as a strip retail shopping center and a pharlnacy. The subject property has frontage along Gollihar Road, an arterial, with a driveway cut on Southwood Street, a local roadway. Access and parking is provided fiom the Southwood Street entrance along the side and rear of the subject properly. Commercial traffic could traverse the Southwood residential area. However, driveway access and paved parking for a commercial use is not preferred along the front of the subject property, due to the residenfial characler of the properties to the west. Commercial appearance along the Gollihar Road corridor in proximity to residential uses is ~ot acceptable. An "AB" District generally pem~its offices, medical offices, and reside~tia] uses. Tile requested "B-I" District pcn]~Jts "AB" District uses plus retail uses, including a mattress relail/clearance sales store. The owner and applictmt are receptix e 1o a Special Pem~it for a matlress retail/clearance sales store ii] the event the "B-I" District is not recommended for approval. Overall, the Compicl~ensi'~'e Plan Elements ale nol supportive of the ~cqucsled "B-I" District. The Soutlueast ,~'ea Dex elopment Plan's adopled future land t~se n~ap recon~nei~ds the area to develop as a low-density residential use. Approval of a "B-I" District or Special Permit for a retail use that has access only to a local street would extend the commercial use into a neighborhood. -215- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-01 (Albert R. Villaneal) Page 4 Pros: Cons: a) b) Potential Housing Density: Both the "AB" and "B-I" District permit a density of 36.30 dwelling units per acre or 6 units on the subject property. The change of zoning will not affect the overall density of~the area. Height/Bulk/Setbacks/Etc.: [Bolh the "AB" and "B-I" Districts require a front yard setback of twenty (20) feet with the !'AB" District requiring a side and rear yard setback often (10) feet each. The "B-1" DistriCt does not require a side or rear yard setback unless adjacent to a residential district where ~ setback often (10) feet each would be required. The subject property has residential adjacency to the rear and side lot line to the west. Both the "AB" and "B-I" Districts limit buildinl~ heights to three (3) stories with the "AB" District allowing 45 feet and the "B-I" allowingi35 feet. Si.~mage: An "AB" District[ permits wall signage at four (4) square feet per tenant not to exceed twenty (20) square feet and a freestanding sign with a sign area of 20 square feet with a height of six (6) feet. The "B-I" District permits unlimited wall signs and one freestanding sign per premise with a sign area not to exceed forty (40) square feet and a height of twenty (20) feet. Traffic: The subject properly fronts, Gollihar Road, and arterial roadway that is carrying approximately 15,449 vehicles per day. However, access to the properly is provided along Southwood Street, a local street. Traffic generated from the proposed commemial use could traverse the residential area by utilizing Southwood Street. Parking/Screening: A retail establishment is required to provide at least one off-street parking space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area. The existing 930 square feet of total gross floor area would require that at least five (5) off-street parking spaces be provided. A standard screening fence with a height of not less than six (6) feet is required when a business or industrial use locates adjacent to a residential district. A screening fence would be required along the west and south property lines of the subject property with a change of zoning. __ (Ideas in support of the request.) Tile subject propel~y fl-onts Gollihar Road, an arterial. __ (Ideas in support ofmainlaining tile current zoning.) Commercial traffic could lravcJse tile residential neighborhood. The existing "AB" District off'rs mo~e use protection to tile abutting residential tllal~ the "B-I" Districts. -216- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-01 (Albert R. Villarreal) Page 5 c) The requested "B-I" Distriot is inconsistent with the Southeast Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map. d) Approving a "B~I" District sets the precedent of a neighborhood business zoning being an acceptable classification along this portion of Goltihar Road. Staff Recommendation: Denial. Planning Commission Recommeqdation: Denial of the "B-I" District and in lieu thereof, grant a Special Permit for the mattress retail/clearance sales business and enclosed storage of mattresses subject to the following nine (9) conditions: Uses: The only uses permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "AB" Professional Office District is a mattress retail/clearance sales business located in the existing primary structure with storage of mattresses in the existing enclosed detached garage. 2. Driveway Access: Driveway access to Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision is prohibited along the lot frontage adjacent to Gollihar Road. Parking: An asphalt paved parking lot for the use shall be constructed and located along the rear of the primary structure. No parking or parking lot shall occur in the fi-ont or side yards. 4. Signage: The sign allowance shall be as permitted under the "AB" Professional Office District. 5. Fencing: A six (6) foot screening fence shall be located along the south and west property lines of Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision. 6. Dumpster Location: Aaay dmnpsler placed on the property shall be placed behind the primary structm'e. 7. ltours of Operation: Hours of operation are limited 1o Monday tlnough Satmday fi-om 9 a.m. to 7 pm. and on Sunday fi'om lp.m. to 6 pm. 8. Delivery Vehicles and Schedule: Delive~v vehicles shall be limited to a one-ton vehicle and shall not make deliveries to tl-~e use afic~ 6 p.m, Monday through Sunday. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expiled wilhin one (1) year of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. -217- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-0I (Albert R. Villarreal) Page 6 Attachments: Zoning Map H3PLN DIRE R MA~,V, ORD ZONRPTS~2003\0403-01CCR EPOI~.T DOC -218- 4 28 2 0 lO0 200 300 CASE Z0403-01 ~ Subject property [--~ O~ners within 200 feet listed on otteched ownership list -219- · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED GOMMENTS RECEIVED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0403-01 Albert R. Villarreal (Note: The listed numbers correspopd to the attached map.) Notices returned from withif~ the 200-foot notification area: Favor: 3) 4, 5) 6) 7, 8) 9) 10) ~1) 13) 14) 15) ~6) Bobby Dwain Harrisi 4417 Ivy Lane No written comment; Church's Chicken, 3140 Gollihar Road No written commenti E. V. Bonner, Jr., SS[P Partners, 4433 Baldwin No written comment, Larry Stuever, 3113 Gollihar Road No written comment: Berta Perez, 3121 Gollihar Road No written comment. Esmeralda Villarreal, 3125 Gollihar Road No written comment. Lorenzo Garza, 3130 Ross No written conm]ent. Page Sacky, 13934 River Rock No written comment. Lucille Seifert, 3110 Ross No written comment. Nlc lo s Soulhs~de I ~annacy, .>141 Gollihar Road "Best neighbor that has ever been there." Kieu Ho Lu, 5110 Wooldridge Road No wrillen cotlul]el]t. -220- Conmaents Received Case No. 0403-01 (Albert R. Villarreal) Page 2 19) 20) 2l) 22) Opposition: Manuel Bafiuelos, 4507 Kostoryz Road No written comment. Paula M. Martinez, 4522 Southwood No written comment. Celso C. Rodriguez, 2~634 Gollihar Road No written comment. Gilbert Perez, 4526 Ross No written comment. Gary W. Dupont, 4525 Southwood No written comment. None. II. IlL Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: Sheila Justice/Marcus Archer, 3126 Covington No written comment. America Flores, 4537 Southwood No written comment. · Mrs. A. L. Labahn See attached letter. Ricardo Rcsendez, 3126 Gollihar No written comment. Opposition: None. Responses reccived from owners/applicants of subject area: Favor: Albert R. Huerta, 924 Leopard See attached letter. .QpposJlion: None. Iq d>IN DiR',EF, M,~,\WORD\COMMDAFA\(J403-OICOMMENTSDOC -221- -222- CorF_~ Christi: 924 Leopard PO. Box 23080 Corpus Christi, Texas 78403-3080 Telephone: (361) 884-1632 Fax: (361) 884-7013 tolI Free: 1-877-779-5421 Email: Huertalawfirm.com H The Huerta Law Firm, L.L.E Alberto R. Huerta · Luis A. Elizondo A. Jos~eph Huerta · David A. Huerta Rgsendo Almaraz, Jr. (Weslaco April 23, 2003 Weslaco: Villa de Cortez 260 South Texas Blvd. Suite 404 Weslaco, Texas 78596 Telephone: (956) 96%4000 Fax: (956) 969-4004 Toll Free: 1-866-620-8800 Re~ Southwood Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 7, located on the south side of Gollihar Road, approximately 28 feet west of Kostoryz Road. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I fully support Albert R. Villarreal's bid for B-1 zoning. Mr. Villarreal has always maintained this property in good condition. He has done nothing but good things to this property. A~RJq: ot g Vel~ -223- Planmng Commission Minutes April 23, 2003 Albert R. Villarreal: 0403-01 REQUEST: "AB" Professional Office District to "B-I" Neighborhood Business District on property described as Southwood Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 7, and located on the south side 0f Gollihar Road, approximately 280 feet west of Kostoryz Road. Ms. Goode-Macon provide the surrounding area;,The owner h: zoning from an "AB Professional order to bring an existing mattress of the property was initially cited 2002 for a zoning violation. Such a nonretail sales area, an "AB" P t a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and s authorized the app2ic ,an, t' to submit a request for a change of Office District to a B-1 Neighborhood Business District, in retail/clearance sales use into zoning compliance. The owner by the City's Code Enforcement Division on December 5, iolation pertained to the retail/clearance sales of mattresses in :ofessional Office District. The subject property is an 8,100 square foot comer lot with a 930-8quare foot primary building on the site and a 200-square foot detached garage, per the applicant'~ application. The 930-square foot building will operate as the mattress retail/clearance sales us? and the 200-square foot detached garage as an enclosed storage facility for mattresses. Holurs of operation are Monday tt~rough Saturday from 8am to 7 p.m. On Sunday's the use is open for appointments only, schedule between lpm and 5pm. Employees will consist of the applicant and possibly two (2) part-time persons. North of the subject property, across Gollihar Road, there is a parking lot for a restaurant in a "R-1B"/SP District and a rel~taurant in a "B-I" District. To the south and west is the Southwood Subdivision developed; with single-family residences within a "R-lB" District. East of the subject property, across Southwood Street, is a "B-I" District with a Special Permit and a "B-I" District. The "B-I" District area is developed as a strip retail shopping center and a pharmacy. The subject property has frontage along Gollihar Road, an arterial, with a driveway cut on Southwood Street, a local roadway. Access and parking is provided from the Southwood Street entrance along the side and mar of the subject property. Commercial traffic could traverse the Southwood residential area. However, driveway access and paved parking for a commercial use is not preferred along the front of the subject property, due to the residential character of the properties to the west. Commercial appearance along the Gollihar Road corridor in proximity to residential uses is not acceptable. An "AB" District generally permits offices, medical offices, and residential uses. The requested "B-I" District permits "AB" District uses plus retail uses, including a mattress retail/clearance sales store. The owner and applicant are receptive to a Special Permit for a mattress retail/clearance sales store in the event the "B-I' District is not recomnrended for approval. Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements are not supportive of the requested "B-I" District. The Southeast Area Development Plan's adopted future land use map recommends the area to develop as a low- density residential use. The requested "B-I" District is inconsistent with the Plan's adopted future land use map. Theret'ore, Staff recommends denial of the rezoning request. There were 22 notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of which 16 were returned in favor and none were returned in opposition. Public hearing was opened. -224- Planning Cornnmssion Minutes April 23, 2003 Case No. 0403-01 (Albert R. Villarreal) Page 2 Albert Villarreal, 3129 Gollihar, stated that he has been in operation for approximately 1.5 years. He provided the Commission with a letter from the property owner asking that the property be rezoned along with three (3) out of the area. Mr. Villarreal added that the subject property used to be used as a car lot and a pottery shop. He stated that he has kept the property in good shape and has been a good neighbor and asked the Conunission to either grant him the rezoning to allow him to continue his operation or approve a Special Permit for the use. Mr. Villarreal addressed COmmission concerns regarding parking by stating that he has a site plan outlining the necessary parking spaces and a cost estimate for the parking upgrade. Charles A. Nichols, 1547 Lee Lane, stated that he has been the owner of Nichol's Pharmacy for 50 years and that he has not had a renter who has taken good care of the property as Mr. Villarreal has. Mr. Nichols offered Mr. Villarreal the use of his parking area behind the pharmacy if necessary. He added that there have not been any additional traffic problems since Mr. Villarreal's business has been in operation. Public heating was closed. Mr. Gunning stated that there needed to be a line drawn on encroachment. He also stated that there is a concern about the trucks that deliver mattresses to the business. After discussion regarding language for a Special Permit, Chairman Berlanga requested that case be continued in order to provide staff an opportunity to develop language for a Special Permit. Motion by Salazar, seconded by Pusley, to continue the zoning case to the May 7, 2003 Planning Commission meeting. Motion passed with Amsler being out of the room and Richter being absent. -225- Plamfing Commission Meeting May 7, 2003 Albert R. Villarreal: 0403-01 REQUEST: "AB" Professionall Office District to "B-I" Neighborhood Business District Southwood Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 7, located on the south side of Gollihar Road, approximatrly 280 feet west of Kostoryz Road. The owner has authorized an "AB" Professional Office Dist bring an existing mattress retail/el, property was initially cited by the zoning violation. Such violation pe sales area, an "AB" Professional he applicant to submit a request for a change of zoning from 'ict to a "B-I" Neighborhood Business District, in order to :arance sales use into zoning compliance. The owner of the ~'ity's Code Enforcement Division on December 5, 2002 for a 'rained to the retail/clearance sales of mattresses in a nonretail )ffice District. The subject property is an 8,100 square foot comer lot with a 930-sq,uare footprimary building on the site and a 200-square foot detached garage, per the applicant s application. The 930-square foot building will operate as the mattress retail/clearance sales use and the 200-square foot detached garage as an enclosed storage facility for mattresses. Hours of operation are Monday through Saturday from 8am to 7pm. On Sunday's the use is open for appointments only, schedule between lpm and 5pm. Employees will consist of the applicant and pol;sibly two (2) part-time persons. North of the subject properly, across Gollihar Road, there is a parking lot for a restaurant in a "R-1B"/SP District and a restaurant in a "B-I" District. To the south and west is the Southwood Subdivision developed with single-family residences within a "R-lB" District. East of the subject property, across Southwood Street, is a "B-I" District with a Special Permit and a "B-I" District. The "B-I" DistriOt area is developed as a strip retail shopping center and a pharmacy. The subject property has frontage along Gollihar Road, an arterial, with a driveway cut on Southwood Street, a local roadway. Access and parking is provided from the Southwood Street entrance along the side and rear of the subject property. Commercial traffic could traverse the Southwood residential area. Hoxvever, driveway access and paved parking for a commercial use is not preferred along the front of the subject property, due to the residential character of the properties to the west. Commercial appearance along the Gollihar Road corridor in proximity to residential uses is not acceptable. An "AB" District generally permits offices, medical offices, and residential uses. The requested "B-I" District permits "AB" District uses plus retail uses, including a mattress retail/clearance sales store. The owner and applicant are receptive to a Special Permit for a mattress retail/clearance sales store in the event tim "B-I" District is not recommended for approval. Overall, the Comprehensive Plan Elements are not suppol~tive of the requested "B-1" District. The Southeast Area Development Plan's adopted fl~ture land use map l-ecommends the area to develop as a low- density residential use. Thc requested "B-I" District is inconsistent with the Plan's adopted future land use map. Staff' recommends denial of thc "B-I" District and in lieu thereof, grant a Special Permit for the mattress retail/clearance sales business and enclosed storage of mattresses subject to the following nine (9) conditions: -226- Planmng Cornn~ssion Meeting May 7, 2003 Uses: The only uses permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "AB" Professional Office District is a mattress retail/clearance sales business located in the existing primary structure with storage of mattresses in the existing enclosed detached garage. 2. Driveway Access: Driveway access to Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision is prohibited along the lot frontage adjacent to Gollihar Road. Parking: An asphalt paved parking lot for the use shall be constructed and located along the rear of the primary stmcture. No parking or parking lot shall occur in the front or side yards. 4. Signage: The sign allowance shall be as permitted under the "AB" Professional Office District. 5. Fencing: A six (6) foot screening fence shall be located along the south and west property lines of Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision. 6. Dumpster Location: Any dumpster placed on the property shall be placed behind the primary structure. 7. Hours of Operation: Hours of operation are limited to Monday through Saturday from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. and on Sunday from lp.m. to 6 p.m. 8. Delivery Vehicles ant} Schedule: Delivery vehicles shall be limited to a one-ton vehicle and shall not make deliveries to the use after 6 p.m., Monday through Sunday. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one (1) year of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. Chairman Berlanga opened the public hearing. Albe~t Villarreal, 3129 Gollihar, addressed deliveries to his establishment. He stated that he receives deliveries twice a xveek fi-om a truck that weighs approximately 3 tons. Mr. Villarreal asked that the Delivery Condition be removed to allow his delivery trucks. He also addressed issues regarding hours of operation and requested that the Hours of Operation be changed from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. to 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Mr. Haruey staled that the ordinance is somewhat vague and it is possible that the driver could be ticketed. Mi-. Gunning added that there were cases in the past that have allowed for commercial vehicles to travel on local streets. However, Ms. Goode-Macon referenced the Code of Ordinance regarding deliveries to residences not to a commercial use. Mr. Hamey directed the Commission not lo create a Special Permit that could possibly violate the ordinance. -227- Planning Commission Meeting May 7, 2003 Chairman Berlanga closed the public heating. Motion by Richter, seconded by Stone, to approve the Special Permit as amended. Motion passed with Pusley and Zamora being absent. -228- Page I of 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY ALBERT R. VILLARREAL BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO SOUTHWOOD SUBDIVISION, BLOCK 1, LOT 7, FROM "AB" PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT TO "B-I" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION;AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of Albert R. Villarreal for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 23, 2003 and May 7, 2003, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June10, 2003, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning of Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision, located on the south side of Gollihar Road, approximately 280 feet west of Kostoryz Road, from "AB" Professional Office District to "B-I" Neighborhood Business District. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances or pads of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403-01 REGULAR.DOC -229- Page 2 of 3 SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) fif~ds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for tile efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this brdinance is passed upon first reading as an measure on this 10th ~lay of June, 2003. emergency / ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED 3003 Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Joseph Harney Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403-01 REGULAR.DOC -230- Page 3 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas day of ,2003 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Henry Garrett William Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403-O1REGULAR DOC -231- Page 1 of 4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY ALBERT R. VlLLARREkL, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO SOUT~WOOD SUBDIVISION, BLOCK 1, LOT 7, (CURRENTLY ZONED"AB"PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT) BY GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR MATTRESS RETAlUCLEARANCE ~ALES STORE SUBJECT TO NINE (9) CONDITIONS; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR AN'~T DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLA~; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commi~ssion has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the~ application of Albert R. Villarreal, for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning !Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to, the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 23, 2003 and May 7, 2003, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June 10, 2003, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by granting a Special Permit for a mattress retail/clearance sales store on Lot 7, Block 1 ,Southwood Subdivision, (currently zoned "AB" Professional Office District), located on the south side of Gollihar Road, approximately 280 feet west of Kostoryz Road. SECTION 2. That the Special Permit granted in Section 1 of this Ordinance is subject to the following nine (9) conditions: 1 . Uses: The only uses permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "AB" Professional Office District is a mattress retail/clearance sales business located in the existing primary structure with storage of mattresses in the existing enclosed detached garage. 2. Driveway Access: Driveway access to Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision is prohibited along the lot frontage adjacent to Gollihar Road. H:\LEG*DIRdOS EPH~ZONING~0403-01SPECiALPERMIT DOC -232- Page 2 of 4 Parking: An asphalt or concrete paved parking lot for the use shall be constructed and located along the rear of the primary structure. No parking or parking lot shall occur in the front or side yards. 4. Siena_cie: The sign allowance shall be as permitted under the "AB" Professional Office District. Fencing: A six (6) foot screening fence shall be located along the south and west property lines of Lot 7, Block 1, Southwood Subdivision. Dumpster Location: Any dumpster placed on the property shall be placed behind the primary structure. Hours of Operation:, Hours of operation are limited to Monday through Saturday from 9 a.m. tO 7 p.m. and on Sunday from 1p.m. to 6 p.m. Delivery Vehicles an~l Schedule: Delivery vehicles shall be limited to a one- ton vehicle and shall not make deliveries to the use affer 6 p.m., Monday through Sunday. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within one (1) year of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. SECTION 3. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 8. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for H \LEG-DIRtJOSEPH~ZONING\0403-01 SPECtALPERMIT DOC -233- Page 3 of 4 immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter ruCe as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ;ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 10th day of June, 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED ;2003 Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Joseph Harney Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney H :\LEG-DIRLIOSE PH~.ONING\0403-01SPECIALP ERMIT DOC -234- Page 4 of 4 Corpus Christi, Texas __ day of ,2003 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Henry Garrett William Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:\LEG-DiR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403 01SPECiALPERMIT DOC -235- 21 AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: June I0, 2003) Cas,e, N,o,,.: 0403-06~ F & S Food~ Inc.: A change of zoning from a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a B-I Neighborhood Business Dislrict on Gardendale Unit 2, Block 5, Lots 14 and 15, located south of Curtis Clark Drive and 220 feet west of South Staples Street. Planning Commission's Recom4nendation (04/23/03): Denial. (04/23~03): Denial of the "B-I" District, and in lieu thereof, approval ora Staff's Recommendation Special Permit for a parking lot subject tb six (6) conditions. Requested Council Action: Dental of the "B-I" District, and in lieu thereof, approval of a Special Permit for a parking lot subject to six (6) conditions and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: To develop a parking lot. Summary: On April 23, 2003, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on F & S Food, Inc. rezoning request for a change of zoning from "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to a "B-I" Neighborhood Business District in order to develop a shopping center. At the public heating, Staffand the Planning Commission recommended denial of the "B-I" Disu-ict. Since that time, the representative for the rezoning case has received additional information from the owner who is out of the country pertaining to the case. Immediate plans for the property have changed from a shopping center to a parking lot. The owner has purchased the business properties on South Staples Street that are adjacent to the subject property. The proposed parking lot will serve as additional parking spaces for the South Staples Street business uses. With this new information, Staffis agreeable to a Special Permit for a parking lot. Staff's Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the requested "B-I" Neighborhood Business District, and in lieu thereof, recommends a Special Permit for a parking lot with the following six (6) conditions: USES: The only use permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District is a parking lot. 2. DRIVEWAY ACCESS: Vehicular driveway access is prohibited to Lot 14, Block 5, Gardendale Unit 2. FENCING: A six (6) foot screening fence shall be located along the west and south property liues of Lots 14 and 15, Block 5, Gardendale Unit 2. LANDSCAPING: Lots 14 and 15 shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements contained in Article 27B, Landscape Requirements, as in the "B-I" Neighborhood Business District. Ali plant material nmst be maintained in a healthy growing condition at all times. All landscaping must be installed as part of any building and parking tot construction. LIGItTING: All security ligbting must be di~ectioaal and shielded. Lighting must be directed away from the surrouuding residences and public rights-of-way. TINIE LIMIT: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within two (2) years of the date of this o~dinance, unless thc property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. -239- Agenda Memorandum Case No. 0403-05 (B & EC Partnership, I~td.) Page 2 Applicant's Position: The applicant conaurs with Staff's recommendation. Notification: Prior to the date of this memorandum, nineteen (19) notices were mailed to the property owners within a 200-foot radius, of which one was returned in favor and none in opposition. The owner of the subject property submitted a not/ce in favor. This case is considered controversial. The 20% rule is not in effect at the City Council hearing. Assistant Director of Development Services/ Director of Planning MG/FGM/er Attachments: 1) Zoning Report 2) Conm~enls Received 3) Ordinances H :\I)I.N-DIR\ERM A\W©RD\AG EN DM E M 0403 06AGENDAM EMO -240- CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: Legal Description/Location: O4O3-O6 April23,2003 H16A & H16C F & S Food, ~c. Gardendale Unit 2, Block 5, Lots 14 and 15, localed on the south side of Curtis Clark Drive and approximately 220 feet west of South Staples Street. Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zoning: Request: Cnrrent Use of Property,: Purpose of Request Zoning Change Requested Due ~o Notice of ViolaHon: Adiaceut Zoning: 0.90 acre (39,600 square feet) Same as above. "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District "B-I" Neighborhood Business District Vacant lots. Construct a shopping center. Nofxh "R-1B/SP" One-family Dwelling District NoBe. South -- "R-I B" One-family Dwelling District and "B-4" General Business District East - "B-1" Neighborhood Business District and "B-4" General Business District West "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District -241- Zordng Report Case No.0403-06 (F&S Food) Page 2 Adjacent Land Use: North - (across Curtis Clark Drive} - Vacant lots. South - Vacant lot and residences. East - Parking lot and a welding ~hop. West - Single-familyresidences. Number of Residential Units Allo~ved: "R-lB" - 6 units (7.26 dwelling udits per acre) "AB" - 32 units (36.30 dwelling t~nits per acre) Estimated Traffic Generation: Shopping Center- 91.25 average weekday vehicle trip ends per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area x 16,000 average building square feet of gross floor area = 1,466 average weekday vehicle trip ends. Ad[acent Streets/Classification: a) Curtis Clark Drive - local b) South Staples Street - arterial Right-of-Way Design Current: a) b) 60-foot right-of-way with a 40-foot back-to-back paved section. 120-foot right-of-way with a 76-fool back-to-back paved section. Planned: a, b) Same as current. 2001 Traffic Count (24-hour~ weekday, non-directional): a) 1,612 vehicles per day b) 38,481 vehicles per day Zonin~ History of Property: There has been no rezoning activity within the past five (5) years. -242- Zoning Report Case No.0403-06 (F&S Food) Page 3 Recent Surroundin~ Zonin~ Casqs: Lot 22 and 23 across from the subjlect property was granted a "R-1B"/SP One-family Dwelling District for two (2) office buildings on Lot 23 and a parking lot on Lot 22 on April 15, 2003. In September 2,00,2, a 0.07 acre out ~)f Gardendale No. 1, Block 6, Lot 7~A was denied a change of zoning to ' B-1 Neighborhood BuSiness District, and in lieu thereof, was granted a "R-lB" One- family Dwelling District with a Slpecial Permit for a parking lot as part of the Enclave office complex. In May 2002, Gardendale Unit 2, Bl~ck 4, Lot 19B, located on the west side of South Staples Street, was rezoned from a "B-I" District 4o a "B-4" District for a retail paint store. In July 2000, as part of a compreheJ~sive rezoning, properties along Williams Drive were rezoned from "R-lB", "R-2", and "AB" Districts to a "B-lA" District. In December 1998, Lots 14 and 15, located on the south side of Williams Drive, west of South Staples Street, were granted a change of zoning from a "R-lB" District to a "R-2" District. The rear 200 feet of Lot 15 received a Special Permit for an office and storage associated with the tire store adjacent to the east. In July 2000, as part of the comprehensive rezoning of Williams Drive, these lots were rezoned to a "B-1A" District and the Special Permit modified for storage uses associated with the tire store to the east. In March 1996 Lots 16A, 16B, and 17, located on the southwest comer of Curtis Clark Drive and South Staples Street, were granted a change of zomng fro ~n a B-I D~str~ct to a "B-4" District. In August 1995, Lots 18 tl~ough 20, located on the northwest comer of Williams Drive and South Stap]es Street were granted a change of zoning from a "B-I" District to a "B-4" District. Lot 17 was granted a change of zoning rom a "R-lB" District to a B-I" District. In September 1994, Lot lB, Block 1, Glen Arbor Uuit 3, located on the east side of South Staples Street, south of Cu~is Clark Drixe, was granted a change of zoning from a "R-lB" District to a "B-I" District. Planning Staff Analysis: General Characleristics aod Backm'ound: The applicant has requested a change of zoning to ~m "AB" Professional O£15c¢ Distlict, in orde~ to conslr~.lct a neighborhood strip shopping center on tx~o (2) vacant lots. Each lot l~as an axca of 19,800 square feet, totaling 39,600 square f¢el fo~ bollq lots. 'Plqe shopping ccnteJ is p~ oposed as a one-story building comprised of 16,000 square feet. The fi~st please of development will be the construction of the pm'king -243- Zoning Report Case No.0403-06 (F&S Food) Page 4 lot with 64 parking spaces. A single driveway is planned along Lot 15 f~onting Curtis Clark Drive with no access from Curtis Clark Drive to Lot 14. Once sufficient tenants are atlained then the construction of the building will occur. Each lot has frontage and access along Curtis Clark Drive, a local roadway that connects directly to South Staples Street, an arterial street. Approximately 1,466 vehicles per day could be generated by the pr{>posed strip shopping center [h,.at co,u!d traverse the Gardendale residential subdivision. North of the subject property is a R-lB /SP District proposed for ~o (2!,office buildings. Squth of Lot 14,, alon,,g, Bonner Drive, is a vacant lot zoned with a R-lB District and south o[fLot 15 is a B-4 District developed with a retail use. To the east is a welding shop, a p~rking lot and a business use within a "B-4" District. Single- family residences are develqped west of the subject properly. The Gardendale Plan adopte~t in February 2000 states: "Preserve and protect the residential nature of the Gardendale ne!ghborhood from Curtis Clark (fronting lots) south to Cain Drive (fronting lots) and from Eveirhart east to Staples. Prevent the developr0ent of non-residential uses into the interior of the neighborhood; and Limit intrusion of neW commercial or expansion of existing commercial development along the western arid eastern edges of the neighborhood parallel to Everhart and South Staples Street; and ·.. Conmaercial retail driveway access shall be restricted to Staples Street or Everhart Road." The Southside Area Development Plan's future land use map recommends the subject property to retain its low-dertsity single-family character. The representative for the applicant has indicated to staffthat a Special Permit is not acceptable for the subject property. A "B-I" Neighborhood Business Dis~ricl is prefe~-ed for d~e development of the property. Polential IJousin~ Density: Residential dex e]opment in the "R-lB" District is limited Io 7.26 dwelling unils per acre or six (6) units on the subjecl property. A "B-I" District permits a density of 36.30 dwelling ullits or tbirty-tx~ o (32) units on the subject property. Heiizht/Bulk/Selbacks/Elc.: The "R~I B" District requires a fiont yard setback of 25 feet and side and rear yard setbacks of five (5) feet each. A "B-I' Dislrict ~equires a front yard setback of lwenty (20) feel and a len (10)-foot side and/or rear yard setback. The "R-lB" District limits building heighls to 35 feet, not to exceed three (3) stories. Building heiglat in the "B-1" District is limited to 45 fcet, not to exceed tin-ce (3) stories. Si~]age: The "R lB" Dist~Sct pennHs one wail siam ~ot to exceed one square foot. A "B-I" Dislrict permits wall signage at fi)ur (4) squ:ne feet ~er tcnan( not to exceed twenty (20) -244- Zoning Report Case I'4o.0403-06 (F&S Food) Page 5 square feet and a freestanding sign with a sign area of 20 square feet with a height of six (6) feet. Traffic: The proposed shopping center is estimated to generate approximately 1,466 daily tr/p ends on Curtis Clark Dri,~e. Traffic generated from this development could traverse the residential area and could adversely impact the neighborhood. Parking/Screerdng: A shopping center is required to provide one parking space for each 220 square feet of gross floor area or seventy-two (72) parking spaces for a 16,000 square foot building. Proof of compliance with the parking regulations will be required before a certificate of occupancy will be issued. A standard screening fence with a height of six (6) feet must be provided when a business or industrial use locates adjacent to a residential district. A screening fence would be required along the west and south property lines of Lot 14 of the subject property for a change of zoning to a "B-I" District. The owner of the property has installed a fence along the south and west property lines of the subject property. Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.) a) A special permit could be considered along vacant lots that border existing business districts fronting South Staples Street. Cons: (Ideas in support of maintaining the current zoning.) a) The requested "B-I" District is not consislent with the Southside Area Development Plan's recommended land use. b) The subject property is bordered by single-fmnily residences south of Lot 14 and to the west. c) Traffic from the proposed use could Il-averse the residential neighborhood. Staff Recommendation: Denial of the "B-I" Neighbolhood Business District, and in lieu theTeof, approval of a Special Pem~it for a parking lot with Ire following six (6) conditions: USES: Tile only uses pc~mitled by tl~is Spec/al Pc]qnit other ~han those uses permitted by right in the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District is a parking lot. I)RIVEWAY ACCESS: Vchicul:tr diivttxxay access is p~ohibited lo Lot 14, Block 5, ©ardenda]e Unit 2. FENCING: A six (6) foot screening fence shall be located along the west and south property lines of Lots 14 and 15, Block 5, Gardendale Unit 2. -245- Zoning Report Case No.0403-06 (F&S Food) Page 6 LANDSCAPING: Lots 14 and 15 shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements contained in Article 27B, Laf~dscape Requirements, as in the "B-I" Neighborhood Business District. All plant material a)ust be maintained in a healthy growing condition at all times. All landscaping must be installed as part of any building and parking lot construction. LIGHTING: All securing lighting must be directional and shielded. Lighting must be directed away from the surrounding residences and public rights-of-way. TIME LIMIT: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within two (2) years of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all olher conditions. Attachments: Zoning Map H p LN.DIR\E RM A~\VORD'/ZON[LPTS\2003\0zi03 06CCREPORT DOC -246- B4 Apr ~?, 2003 - RP CASE Z0403-06 Subject property O~ners within 200 feet listed on ottoched ownership list -247- · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED CDMMENTS RECEIVED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0403-06 F & S Food, Inc. (Note: The listed numbers correspor~d to the attached map.) Notices returned from withinithe 200-foot notification area: Favor: 10) II. Ill. 12) Beverly Smith, 5401 $. Staples No written comment. Calvin F. Wallace, D.V.M., 5425 S. Staples No written comment. Opposition: None. Responses received from oullside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. Responscs received fiom owners/applicanls of subject area: Favor: Beverly Smith, F & S Food, Inc., 5413 S. Staples St. No written comment. _C)pA~silio_n: None. -248- Planmng Commission Minutes April 23, 2003 F&S Food, Inc.: 0403-06 REQUEST: "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District to "B-I" Neighborhood Business District on property described as Gardendale Unit 2, Block 5, Lots 14 and 15, located on the south side of Curtis Clark Drive and approximately 220 feet west of South Staples Street. Ms. Goode-Macon provide~l a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The applica,t has requested a change of zoning to an "AB" Professional Office District, in order to construct a neighborhood strip shopping center on two (2) vacant lots. Each lot has an area of 19,800 Square feet, totaling 39,600 square feet for both lots. The shopping center is proposed as a one-story building comprised of 16,000 square feet. The first phase of development will be the[ construction of the parking lot with 64 parking spaces. A single driveway is planned along l~ot 15 fronting Curtis Clark Drive with no access from Curtis Clark Drive to Lot 14. Once suffii:ient tenants are attained then the construction of the building will occur. Each lot has frontage and abcess along Curtis Clark Drive, a local roadway that connects directly to South Staples Street, aa arterial street. Approximately 1,466 vehicles per day could be generated by the proposed strip shopping center that could traverse the Gardendale residential subdivision. North of the subject property is a "R-1B"/SP District proposed for two (2) office buildings. South of Lot 14 along Bonner Drive, is a vacant lot zoned with a "R-lB" District and south of Lot 15 is a "B-4" District developed with a retail use. To the east is a welding shop, a parking lot and a business use within a "B-4" District. Single-family residences are developed west of the subject property. The Gardendale Plan adopted in February 2000 states: "Preserve and protect the residential nature of the Gardendale neighborhood from Curtis Clark (fronting lots) south to Cain Drive (fronting lots) and from Everhart east to Staples. · Prevent the development of non-residential uses into the interior of the neighborhood; and Limit intrusion of new commercial or expansion of existing commercial development along the western and eastern edges of the neighborhood parallel to Everhart and South Staples Street; and · ... Commercial retail driveway access shall be restricted to Staples Street or Everhart Road." The Southside Area Developtnent Plan's fiiture land use map recommends the subject property to retain its low-density single-family character. The representative for the applicant has indicated to staff that a Special Pemfit is not acceptable for the subject property. A "B-I" Neighborhood Business District is prefected for the development of the property. Therefore, Staffrecommends denial of the rezoning request. -249- Plaxming ComnUssion Minutes April 23, 2003 Case No. 0403-06 (F & S Food, Inc.) Page 2 There were 19 notices mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of which one (1) was retumed in favor and none were returned in opposition. Public heating was opened. Clark Flato, 3421 Floyd, represented F & S foods and described the development proposed for the subject property. !He referred to photographs presented by City Staff and stated that the owner of the property has *een caring for the property and is ready to develop the subject lots into a parking lot to serve the ~roperties adjacent to the east along South Staples Street. The original development plan for a shopping center has been changed since the owner owns the properties to the east. No building is planned on the subject property. The development of the property would eliminate parking Concerns of the adjacent business properties. At this time, the owner has not authorized the representative to accept a Special Permit for parking. Public hearing was closed. Motion by Zamora, seconded by Amsler, to forward a recommendation for denial since a Special Permit for parking could not be considered at this time. Motion passed with Richter being absent. -250- Page 1 of 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THEZONINq;ORDINANCE, UPONAPPLICATION BYF& SFOOD, INC., BYCHANGINGTHEZONINGMAPINREFERE~ET~ GARDENDALE UNIT 2, BLOCK 5, LOTS I~,AN? 15, FROM R-lB ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO B-J NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT;AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY' DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING PLA~I; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND COMPREHENSIVE DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning CommiSsion has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of F & S Foods, Inc. for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 23, 2003, during a meeting Of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June 10, 2003, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on Lots 14 and 15, Block 5, Gardendale Unit 2, located on the south side of Curtis Clark Drive and approximately 220 feet west of South Staples Street, from "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403 06REGULAR.DOC -251- Page 2 of 3 SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. That publication sha I be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the iC ty Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written r~quest of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for tl~e efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this~rdinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 10th ~ay of June, 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED 21003 Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Joseph Harney Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403-06REGULAR DOC -252- Page 3 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas __day of ,2003 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr, Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Henry Garrett William Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:\LEG DiR\JOSEPH~ONING\0403-06REGULAR.DOC -253- Page 1 of 4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONINC S FOOD, INC, BY CHANI GARDENDALE UNIT 2, ZONED"R-IB"ONE-FA~ SPECIAL PERMIT FOR CONDITIONS; AMENDI ACCOUNT FOR ANY COMPREHENSIVE PLAI DECLARING AN EMERGI ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY F & }ING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO 3LOCK 5, LOTS 14 AND 15, (CURRENTLY lILY DWELLING DISTRICT) BY GRANTING A A PARKING LOT SUBJECT TO SIX (6) ~IG THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING l; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND "NCY. WHEREAS, the Planning CommiJ~sion has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning thelapplication of F & S Food, Inc. for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice tolthe public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 23,2003, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June 10, 2003, during a meeting of the Cit~ Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by granting a Special Permit for a parking lot on Lots 14 and 15, Block 5, Gardendale Unit 2, (currently zoned "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District), located on the south side of Curtis Clark Drive and approximately 220 feet west of South Staples Street. SECTION 2. That the Special Permit granted in Section 1 of this Ordinance is subject to the following six (6) conditions: 1. Uses: The only uses permitted by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District is a parking lot. 2. Driveway Access: Vehicular driveway access is prohibited to Lot 14, Block 5 Gardendale Unit 2. 3. Fencing: A six (6) foot screening fence shall be located along the west and south property lines of Lots 14 and 15, Block 5, Gardendale Unit 2. H:\LE G-DIR\JOS EPH~ZON1N G\0403-06S PECIALPERMIT DOC -254- Page 2 of 4 LandscapinR: Lots 14 and 15 shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements contained in Article 27B, Landscape Requirements, as in the "B-I" Neighborhood BUsiness District. All plant material must be maintained in a healthy growing condition at all times. All landscaping must be installed as part of any building and parking lot construction. Liqhtin_q: All security lighting must be directional and shielded. Lighting must be directed away from the surrounding residences and public rights-of-way. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within two years of the date of Ibis ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. SECTION 3. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 7. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 8. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (I) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 10th day of June, 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi H:\LEG DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403-O6SPECIALPERMIT DOC -255- Page 3 of 4 APPROVED 2003 Joseph Harney Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney H:\LEG-DIR~JOSEPH~ZONING\0403-O6SPECIALPERMIT DOC -256- Page 4 of 4 Corpus Christi, Texas __day of ,2003 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two re~lular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respec~ully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Colmenero Melody Cooper Henry Garrett William Kelly Rex A. Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H \LEG-DIR\JOS EPH~ZONING\0403-06SPECIALPE RMIT DOC -257- 22 FROM PLANNING ~12 889 3B90 P. 2 JOHN C. TAMEZ 8~23 KINNEY AVE. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 ¢361) 85:~-850s / (361) 879-0o88 FAX June 2, 2003 · Ms. Fa~yee G-ood~-Macon Senior Planner - Development Services City of Corpos Christi 2406 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78408 Subject: Application for Rezo~ Case No. 04034)3 Dear Ms. Goode-Manon: This letter is a formal reques~ for postponement of CRy Council action on our rezonin8 application for the subj~t case. This request is prompted by unforeseen needs for additional time in the final p~rchase of this land. This request is prompted by our plan not to change ~he rezoning Of the site's current designation as "light industrial" until the developers are ready to finalize their purchase. Accordingly, we hereby request postponement of City Council action until October 14, 2003. I.n the even tilat you need ~lrthcr information or documentation in order to postpone this application, pl~aso feel free to call both (1) the undersigned at 361-gg3-6505 and (2) Mr. Rogelio R. Santos of The M & S Group aI 281-359-5038, as soon as possible. Thank you for your assistance in this matter, Very tmly, 3T:mst -261- AGENDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: June 10, 2003) Case No.: ,, 04 ,0,3-03~ Las VillaslDe Corte Real: A change of zoning from a "I-2" Light Industrial District to a R-2 Multiple Dwelling District on Mid-Town Indusa-ial District, Block 1, Lots 62, 63, and 64, located south of Bear Lane between Cliff Mans Drive and South Navigation Boulevard. Planning Commission's Recom~nendation (04/23/03): Approval. Staff's Recommendation (04/23(03): Denial. Requested Council Action: Approval of the "R-2" District and adoption of the attached ordinance. Purpose of Request: To develop an apa,zaraent complex with 140 units. Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from an "1-2" Light Industrial District to a "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District to allow for an 140 unit multi-family complex. The "I~2" District does not allow for dwellings other than for a caretaker facility. The subject site is a 9.9-acre tract that is presently in an agriculture state. The applicant has indicated that the proposed complex would be developed under the housing tax-credit program for working families. Amenities within the complex would include a secured access, a swimming pool, a hospitality room, a playground area, mailbox kiosks, a laundry area, and a daycare center. To the north, across Bear Lane is Village on the Green, a single-family and multi-family development zoned with an "A-I"/CUP District. The "A~I"/CUP District is an apartment house classification with a commurdty unit plan overlay designation that is no longer available within the current zoning ordinance. Additionally, to the north is an undeveloped "B-I" District and "I-2" District. Along the south area of the subject property is undeveloped land and distribution companies within an "I-2" D/strict. East of the subject property, across South Navigation Boulevard is undeveloped "I-2" District property and west of the subject property, across Cliff Mans Drive, is undeveloped "I-2" District property. The subject property is bounded to the north, east and west by two rural arterial roadways, Bear Lane and South Navigation Boulevard, and one rural local roadway, Cliff Mans Drive. Traffic generated from the proposed multi- fanfily use is estimated at 905 average weekday vehicles trip ends per day. Such traffic could be accon:unodated by the adjacent street systems. However, the comprehensive plan does not support residential development in proximity to industrial zoning and/or uses. The subject property is surrounding by industrial zoning on three (3) predonfinate sides of the site. The Westside Area Development Plan's fl~mre land use map reconm~ends the area to n~aintain its industrial classification. The requested "R-2" District is inconsistent with the Plan. However, Staff is supportive of the "R-2" District p~ovided a buffer can be created to protect thc residences. Applicant's Position: The applicaot concm's with Platming Co]131]}issioll'S :econ~ancndation. Notification: Prior Io the date of this memorandum, seventeen (17) notices were mailed to the property owners within a 200-foot radius, of which one was Icturned in favor and one in opposition This case is considered controversial The 20'70 rule is not in effect at the City Council hearing. Assistant ~irect:~ervices/ Diiector of Plmming -262- Agenda Memorandum l Case No. 0403-03 (Las Villas De Corte R~al) Page 2 MG/FGM/er Attachments: 1) Zoning Report 2) Comments Received 3) Ordinance H:,,PLN-DIR\ERMA\WORD~AGEN DMEM\0403 -03AGENDAM EMO DOC -263- CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Map No.: Applicant: Legal Description/Location: 0403-03 April 23, 2003 J14C Las Villas De Corte Real Mid-Town Industrial District, Block t, Lots 62, 63, and 64, located south of Bear Lane between Cliff 9.9 acres Same as above. "1-2" Light Industrial District "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District Undeveloped land. Apartment complex with 140 units. Not applicable. Maus Drive and South Navigation 13oulevard. Area of Request: Lot(s) Area: Current Zoning: Request: Current Use of Property: Purpose of Request: Zoning Change Requested Due to Notice of Violation: Adjacent Zoning: North "A-1/CU?" Apailmenl flouse District/Commtmity Unit Plan and "B-I" Neighborhood Business District South, East, Wesl - "I-2" Light Industrial District Adiacent Land Use: North (across Bear Lane) Dnplexes and Undeveloped land. South - Undeveloped, distributor companies and convenience slore. East, West - (across CliffMaus Drive and South Navigation Boulevard) Undeveloped land. -264- Zorfing Repor~ Case No. 0403-03 (Las Villas De Cone Rehl) Page 2 Number of Residential Units Allolved: "I-2" - Permanent or temporary housing or lodging is not permitted except for caretaker's quarters. "R-2" - 143 units (14.52 dwelling Units per acre on 9.9 acres) Estimated Traffic Generation: Multiple Dwellings - 6.47 average Weekday vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit x 140 units -- 905 average weekday vehicle trip ends. General light industrial - 51.80 average weekday vehicle trip ends per acre x 9.9 acres = 512 average weekday vehicle trip ends. Adiacent Streets/Classification: a) Bear Lane - rural arterial. b) CliffMaus Drive - rural local. c) South Navigation Boulevard - rural arterial. Right-of-Way Design Current: a) 70-foot right-of-way with a 21-foot paved section. b) 70-foot right-of-way with a :21-foot paved section. c) 70-foot right-of-way with a 21-foot paved section. Planned: a) 95-foot right-of-way with a 50-foot back-to-back paved section and a 14-foot wide median. b) 60-foot right-of-way with a 40-foot back-to-back section. c) 130-foG! fight-of-way with a 79-foot back-to-back paved section and a 16-foot wide median. 2001 Traffic Count (24-hour~ weekday, non-directional): a) Not available. b) 4,459 vehicles per day. c) 10,080 velficles per day. Zonin~ ltistory of Property: There has not been any rezoning of the property within the past five- (5) years. -265- Zoning Report i Case No. 0403-03 (Las Villas De Corte RES1) Page 3 Recent Surroundine Zoning Cases: In July 2002, a portion of Block 1 s~uthwest of the subject property, located in 100 South Padre Subdivision and abutting South Ent~rprize Parkway, was rezoned from "I-2" to "B-4" for group housing. Plannin~ Staff Analysis: General Ch,a,r, acteristics and ~3ack~ound: ~he a,,p. plicant has requested a change of zoning from an "I-2 Light Industria[l District to a R-2 Multiple Dwelling District to allow for an 140 unit multi-family compleyx. The "I-2" District does not allow for dwellings other than for a caretaker facility. The subjOct site is a 9.9-acre tract that is presently in an agriculture state. The applicant has indicated that the proposed complex would be developed under the housing tax-credit program ifor working families. Amenities within the complex would include a secured access, a swimming pool, a hospitality room, a playground area, mailbox kiosks, a laundry area, and ai daycare center. To the north, across Bear L~ne is Village on the Green, a single-family and multi-family development zoned with an ~'A-I"/CUP District. The "A-I"/CUP District is an apartment house classification with a community unit plan overlay designation that is no longer available within the current Zoning ordinance. Additionally, to the north is an undeveloped "B-I" District and "I-2" District. Along the south area of the subject property is undeveloped land and distribution companies within an "I-2" District. East of the subject property, across South Navigation Boulevard is undeveloped "I-2" District property and west of the subject property, across Cliff Maus Drive, is undeveloped "I-2" District property. The subject property is bounded lo the north, east and west by two rural arlerial roadways, Bear Lane and South Navigation Boulevard, and one rural local roadway, CliffMaus Drive. Traffic generated from the proposed multi-family use is estimated at 905 average weekday vehicles trip ends per day. Such t~affic could be accommodated by the adjacent street systems. Howevcr, the comprehensixe plan does not support residential development in proximity Io industrial zoning and/or uses. The subject property is surrounding by industrial zoning on three (3) predominale sides of thc site. The Westside Area Development Plan's future land use map rccommcnds the area to maintain its industrial classification. The requested "R-2" District is inconsistent with the Plan. Polential Housing Density: The "I-2" District does not pem~it any permanent or temporary housing or lodging, except fi~r a carctaker's quarlers. A "R-2" District permits a density of 14.52 dxx clling units pet acre or 143 mails on 9.9 acres on the subject property. Itel 2hz/Bulk/S etback s/Etc.: TI~ e "1-2" D i strict requires a fi-out yard setback of twenty (20) feet and no required side or rcar yard setback unless adjacent to a residential district where a setback oftcn (10) feel is rcquiled rom that residential adjacency. The subject property does not hax¢ residential adjacency. The "I-2" District do not limit building heights. Building -266- Zoning Report Case No. 0403-03 (Las Villas De Cone Re~l) Page 4 heights in the "R-2" District are limited to 45 feet not to exceed three (3) stories. A "R-2" District requires a front yard qetback of twenty (20) feet with a side and rear yard setback five (5) feet each for single-family, and duplex uses and ten (10) feet each for the first floor plus five (5) feet for each addition)al floor for multiple-family uses. Si~nage: Wall and f~eestand~ng signs in the "I-2" District are unlimited provided the signs are located behind the front j, ard. Ifa freestanding sign is located within the required fi'ont yard of twenty (20) feet, the dign is limited to one sign per street fi-ontage with a sign area of forty (40) square feet and a t~eight of 25 feet. The "I-2" District also permits off-premise signs (billboards). The "R~2" District is limited to one (1) thirty (30) square feet identification sign. Traffic: The subject property has direct access to three rural arterial roadways. The amount of traffic generated by the multiple dwelling complex is estimated at 905 vehicle trip ends per day. Such traffic could ll)e accommodated by the existing street systems and would be less of an impact than an industrial use. A general light industrial use would generate approximately 512 daily trip ends. Parkine/Screening: One and one-half parking spaces are required for every unit with one (1) bedroom. Units with two (2) or more bedrooms are required two (2) parking spaces. An industrial use is required to provide off-street parking at a rate of one parking space for every three- (3) employees. A standard screening fence is not required for residential development. Pros: (Ideas in support of the request.) a) The subject property has direct access to two (2) rural arterial roadways. b) Multi-family development exists north of the subject property. Cons: (Ideas in support of maintaining the cun-ent zoning.) a) The Westside Area Development Plan's fllture ]and use map recommends the area develop as light industrial. b) The Comprehensive Plan docs not support residential development in proximity to industrial zoning/uses. ~qtat'f Recommendation: Denial Planninl4 Commission Recommendation: Approval Atlachments: Zoning Map lq PLN D] R \ER M A WI )I~,D'ZON R PTSx20(~3\0403 -03CCR EPORT DOC -267- ON THE GREEN PARK DRI CENTER LANE I-2 I-2 MIDTOWN DMIMUNITY SETTLEMEh CENTER TRACT B-I SOUTHBR I DGE UNIT 4 RIVERTON DRIVE Apr 18. 2003 - RP . ,oo CASE Z0~I03-03 ~ Subject property I~ O~r, ers within 200 feet listed on attoched ownership list -268- COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM NOTICES MAILED Case No. 0403-03 Las Villas De Corte Real · - FAVOR X - OPPOSED (Note: The listed numbers correspo*d to the attached map.) I1. Notices returned from within the 200-foot notification area: .Favor: 4) E. V. Bonnet, Jr., P. O. Box 9036 No written comment. Opposition: 5) Ernest Salazar, Sr., 1442 CliffMaus Dr. "It would devalue property. Security concerns. Industrial and businesses would increase value of properties. Government housing or free housing would not pay taxes and the schools would probably get hosed. Keep it industrial and business will move here and pay taxes. West Oso I.S.D. is out taxes because of this, churches coming in, etc." Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area: Favor: None. Opposition: None. Ili. Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area: Favor: None. _Opposition: None. -269- Planmng comrmssion Minutes April 23, 2003 Las Villas De Corte Real: 0403-03 REQUEST: "1-2" Light InduStrial District to "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District on property describefl as Mid-Town Industrial District, Block 1, Lots 62, 63, and 64, and Iocateg south of Bear Lane between Cliff Maus Drive and South Navigation Boulev~ard. Ms. Goode-Macon provided a slide illustration of the subject property and the surrounding area. The applicant h~s requested a change of zoning from an "I-2" Light Industrial District to a "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District to allow for a 140 unit multi-family complex. The 1-2 D~stnct does not allow for dWelhngs other than for a caretaker facd~ty. The subject s~te ~s a 9.9-acre tract that is presently ia an agriculture state. The applicant has indicated that the proposed complex would be de'~eloped under the housing tax-credit program for working families. Amenities within the complex would include a secured access, a swimming pool, a hospitality room, a playground area, mailbox kiosks, a laundry area, and a daycare center. To the north, across Bear Lane is Village on the Green, a single-family and multi-family development zoned with an "A-I"/CUP District. The "A-I"/CUP District is an apartment house classification with a community unit plan overlay designation that is no longer available within the current zoning ordinance. Additionally, to the north is an undeveloped "B-I" District and "I- 2" District. Along the south area of the subject property is undeveloped land and distribution companies within an "I-2" District. East of the subject property, across South Navigation Boulevard is undeveloped "I-2" District property and west of the subject property, across Cliff Maus Drive, is undeveloped "I-2" District property. The subject property is bounded to the north, east and west by two rural arterial roadways, Bear Lane and South Navigation Boulevard, and one rural local roadway, CliffMaus Drive. Traffic generated from the proposed multi-family use is estimated at 905 average weekday vehicles trip ends per day. Such traffic could be accommodated by the adjacent street systems. However, the comprehensive plan does not support residential development in proximity to industrial zoning and/or uses. The subject property is surrounding by industrial zoning on tltrcc (3) predominate sides of the site. The Westside Area Development Plan's future land use map rcconmrends the area to maintain its industrial classification. The requested "R-2" District is inconsistent with the Plan. Therefore Staff recommends denial of the rezoning request. There x~ere 17 notices were mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of which one (1) was returned in favor and none were returned in opposition. Mr. Gunning infomaod the Commission that the "R-2" District rezoning is contingent on state rinds. He explained that thc applicant is applying for state funds which requires that criteria be in place; one of which is zoning. Public hearing was opened. -270- planmng Comrmssion Minutes April 23, 2003 Case No. 0403-03 (Las Villas De Corte Real) Page 2 Tim Clower, representing the applicant, reiterated Mr. Gunning's statement and provided a site plan for the property. Roy Santos, applicant, exp!ained the concept for the development and also explained the requirements for state funding. Mr. Martinez, 323 Barrera!, San Antonio, Texas, stated that he has been involved with other developments using state funJ:ls. Commissioner Salazar stated that he needed to abstain due to the fact that he believed a relative might be involved in the c0nstmction of the project. There was discussion regarding the adjacent property being zoned "1-2" District and abutting a potentially residential zoned area. Public heating was closed. Motion by Amsler, seconded by Pusley, to forward a recommendation for approval. Motion passed with Salazar abstaining, Mims being out of the room, and Richter being absent. Motion by Amsler, seconded by Pusley, to review surrounding "I-2" District areas if the project is developed to create a buffer. Motion passed with Richter being absent. -271- Page 1 of 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY LAS VILLAS DE CORTE R~AL, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO MID-T(~WN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, BLOCK1, LOTS 62, 63 AND 64, FROM '~1-2" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO "R-2" MULTIPLE DWELLING qlSTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT F(~R ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PL/~N; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERG~ENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commlssion has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning th~ application of Las Villas De Corte Real for amendment to the City of Corpu~ Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice t~ the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 23, 2003, during a meeting ~)f the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, June 10, 2003, during a meeting ofth~ City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and conivenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on Lots 62, 63 and 64, Block 1, Mid-Town Industrial District, located south of Bear Lane between Cliff Maus Drive and South Navigation Boulevard, from "1-2" Light Industrial District to "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District. SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended fr~m time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ONiNG\0403-03REGULAR DOC -272- Page 2 of 3 SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) fihds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rdle as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this 10th day of June, 2003. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED 2003 Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Joseph Harney Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\O403-O3REGULAR.DOC -273- Page 3 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas day of ,2003 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CI~Y COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the e~ergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two reCular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City' Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Samuel L. Neal, Jr. Brent Chesney Javier D. Coimenero Melody Cooper Henry Garrett William Kelly Rex A Kinnison Jesse Noyola Mark Scott H:\LEG-DIR\JOSEPH~ZONING\0403-03REGULAR DOC -274- 23 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM PRESENTATION June 10. 2003 AGENDA ITEM: This preseniation item is comprised of three related components: · Update of Five-Year General Fund Financial Forecast · Overview of FY 2003-04 General Fund Proposed Budget · Distribution of FY 2002-03 3rd Quarter Financial Performance Report STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position Mark L. McDaniel DireCtor of Management and Budget Department ISSUE: As part of the Council review of the FY 2003-04 Proposed Budget, this second budget presentation will focus on General Fund revenues, expenditures and the General Fund Five-Year Financial Forecast. The FY 02-03 3rd Quarter Performance Report has also been distributed to the Council under separate cover for informational purposes. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: No formal action is required at this time. r~a~k L. Uc~an[~l Director of Management and Budget Attachments: PowerPoint Presentation 3rd Quarter Report (under separate cover) -277- FY2003-04 General Fund Proposed Budget Focus on the Horizon I Focus on the Horizon N Co Financial Forecast Assumptions Revenues . Property Tax Revenue: 3% growth . Industrial District Payments: 3% growth 'N .� . Sales Tax Revenue: 3 % growth on current year end estimate V . Other: U• Franchise Fee Revenue - only slight growth • Solid Waste Revenues - flat U • Most Other Revenue Growth - 2% 3 N W N Financial Forecast Assumptions L Expenditures . Salary Adjustments - • Years 2-5 of Compensation Plan Implementation • Skill Based Pay/ Merit Allocations • Projected Sworn Personnel Salary V Adjustments Pending Fire Negotiations • Continuation of Drag Up Reserve • Continuation of Salary Savings o • No New Positions in Future Years V . Health Insurance Premiums - + 20 % / 23 % in Year 1,10 % / Year Thereafter V M Financial Forecast Assumptions Expenditures (Continued) ■ Regular Capital Items: ■ 35 Patrol Car Replacements Each Year ■ One Fire Engine/ Year ■ One Ambulance Replacement/ Year ■ One Garbage Truck Replacement/ Year (FY2004-05 forward) ■ New Capital Items: ■ Equipment for Phase III Automated Garbage Collection (late FY2003-04) ■ Replacement of Recycling Trucks (over 2 years) 5 N co Financial Forecast Assumptions Expenditures (Continued) . Program Costs f or Full Year: • 8th New Ambulance Staffing & Equipment • Staffing for New Island Fire Samson • Economic Development Office V . Pending Items (Not Accounted For): • O & M Costs Related to Bond 2004 Projects 47 • Landfill Expansion/ Development Options j• Increase in TMRS for 6 % Match - Jan. '05 Re Engineering -� • First Phase Implementation of CMMS N V 6 N 00 cn ! General Fund Five Year Financial Forecast IV Proposed Forecast Forecast Forecast i Forecast 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 1 2006-07 2007-08 Estimated Unreserved Fund Balance - 8l1 $ 11,140,728 $ 11,840,728 $ 12,640,728 $ 13,290,728 $ 14,090,728 Total Revenues 146,358,206 149,599,212 152,925,754 156,352,489 ! 159,873,156 Total Expenditures 146,358,206 153,391,334 159,334,333 165,891,533 172,214,136 Adjustment to Balance 3,792,122 2,616,458 6,922,587 Subtotal 146,358,206 153,391,334 155,542,212 163,275,076 165,291,550 Adjust. to Balance CY Rev. to Exp. 0 3,792,122 2,616,458 6,922,587 5,418,394 Req. Surplus to Meet Fund Bal. Goal 700,000 800,000 650,000800,000 725,000 % of Total Expenditures 0.55% 0.42% 0.51%, 0.44% ! 0.50% Estimated Unreserved Fund Balance - 7131 $ 11,840,728 $ 12,640,728 $ 13,290,728 $ 14,090,728 $ 14,815,728 Closing Balance as % Operating Expenditures 8.09% 8.24% 8.54% 8.63% 8.96% % After Reimbursements & Transfers Out 8.98% 9.14% 9.51% 9.60% 10.00% Focus on the Horizon Revenues - operty Taxes $12,000,000,000 $10,000,000,000 00 $8,000,000,000 $61000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $0 At New Values, l Cent = $825,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Fiscal Year Revenues — Indust 1 District Payments Payment History mAM nn IQ 4% Q^% 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Fiscal Year 2002 2003 2004 gm $35 W Revenues Sales Tax Historical Collections W M. 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 PROPOSED N 0 Revenues 0% Sales Tax Sales Tax Collections - Change from Prior Year 0 N M eM iA %D L� 00 C1 O r -I N IV .O a1 O1 01 a1 41 61 d1 O1 O O O C1 0 41 d1 01 d1 01 O� ON O O O M V" r -i N N N O O O O O C4 N O Fiscal Year w �' 12 Revenues - Francho and Related Fees Historical Receipts - Utility Franchise and Related Fees $12 $2 $0 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Est. Prop. ■ CABLE ■ CPL ■ TELECOM 13 $2090005000 $1590009000 $1090009000 $5,000,000 Revenues - Sol ante Services 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Est. Prop. ■ COLLECTION M DISPOSAL ■ OTHER 14 Home Rule Cities Farmers Branch Sherman Ennis Sunnyvale Denison Desoto Mesquite Lancaster Dallas Addison Richardson Duncanville Garland Coppell Plano Kilgore Rowlett Hutchins Aransas Pass Wylie Portland Revenue- Home evenue- djustments e911 Wireline for Call Takers — 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 Revenue - F Adjustments - Parking Meter Rates: - Current Maximum Rate/2 Hours - 50 cents - Proposed Maximum Rate,/2 Hours - 75 cents 16 $2.00 N $1.50 $1.00 E $0.50 $0.00 - Proposed Maximum Rate,/2 Hours - 75 cents 16 Revenue - Fe `' Adjustments - Municipal Court • Environmental Court - $165,000 (General Fines) - Park & Recreation • Latchkey Adjustments - $206,091 N • Pool Admissions- $26,659 - Health • Re inspections/Food Handling Permits- $19,081 - Permits & Licenses • Pipeline License Agreements- $262,301 17 Sales T 24% Reven -Other Revenues - % Distribution by Type Reimb. 5% Property Tax 6% 16% Indust. Dist. Solid Waste 4% 14% ranchises 11% im Focus on the Horizon 19 Expenditures- Odget Reductions (Elimination of Layers/Re-Engineering) Positions Eliminated: Savings = $1.2 Million - CMO/ACM's - 3 - Office of Management & Budget - 2 - W Streets - 7 N CO - Solid Waste - 21 (Net) - Finance - 6 (Net) - Engineering -1 - Park Operations - 4 - Municipal Court - 2 20 $2 Expenditures - lodget Reductions (Salary Savings) $0 2001-02 Actual 2002-03 Budgeted 2003-04 Budgeted 21 Major General And Expenditures - Salary Adjustments - • Compensation Plan Adjustments- $1.6 Million • Police & Fire Pay Adjustments • Merit & Skill Based Pay- $150,000 - New Programs/Program Enhancements • Livable Neighborhoods Initiative- $765,000 • Downtown Initiatives - $50,000 • Streets & Solid Waste/Parks Re Egineering - $180,000 • ADA Transition Plan Compliance- $124,300 • New 911 Call Takers/Skill %ed Pay- $157,439 22 General Fu M Summary . Proposed Decrease of $1,184,647 • No Tac Rate Increase w • Elimination of 46 Positions 0 • Phase II of Compensation Plan Implementation • New Programs Primarily Supported by Revenue Offsets 23 W 0 N $121000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 Historical Unres "-ed Fund Balance 1999 1 2000 1 2001 1 2002 1 2003 M Unreserved $1,164,854 $3,316,997 $7,616,420 $10,944,746 I $11,140,728 Fiscal Year 24 3rd Quarter Financial Performance Report • Included in Council agenda packets under w separate cover 0 W • Revenues and expenditures to date are generally consistent with year end estimates in FY2003-04 Proposed Budget - June 171h • Enterprise Funds Overview - June 241h • Special Revenue & Internal Service Funds Overview W _ July gth • Public Hearing - July 151h & July 22nd • 1St & 2nd Reading of Adoption Ordinance 26 Focus on the Horizon 27 II FISCAL YEAR 2003 - 2004 OENERALFUND PROPOSED RATE ADJUSTMENTS -306- account name Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic Laboratory Fees Laboratory Fees Laboratory Fees Child Care Facilities Fees Child Care Facilities Fees Vital Statistics Fees Vital Statistics Fees Food service permits Food service permits General Nursing Fees City of Corpus Christi Health Department - Proposed Revenue Increases Fiscal Year 2003-2004 descrlption of revenue generating activit~ Clinic visit {exam/labwork/treatment) Clinic HIV/Syphilis testing (Blood draw oory) analysis of drinking(private, corporate, municipal) analysis of seawater(seafood safety - TDH) anysis of recreational beach water current proposed rate rate difference $5 $15 $10 $5 $10 $5 $10 $12 $2 $15 $20 $5 $10 $13 $3 Day Care Facility Inspections Foster Home Inspections Plastic Covers for Birth Cert Preserv-wallet size Plastic Covem for Birth Ced Preserv-letter size reinspection fees Food Handler's Permit communicable disease-free verification for cosmotologist license $35 $50 $15 $0 $50 $50 $0 $1 $1 $0 $1 $1 $0 $50 $50 $6 $7 $1 $0 $50 $50 New Revenue - General Fund Less: cost to implement Net New Revenue - General Fund generated $8,550 $285 $10,584 $4,585 $3,114 $945 $4,200 $6,000 $7,000 $6,300 $12,781 $1,750 $66,094 ($3,750) $62,344 -307- City of Corpus Christi Police Department ~ Proposed Revenue Increases Fiscal Year 2003-2004 account name description of rev~enue ~eneratin9 activity Parking Meter Colrections rateper 12 minute~-uptown(1 hourmax) rate per 24 minute~~uptown (1 hour max) rate per lhour-uptc~wn (1hour max) effective rate: per~2 hours uptown (1 hour max) Parking Meter Collections rate per 30 minute~-downtown (2 hour max) rate per 1 hour-doWntown (2 hour max) rate per 2 hours-ddwntown (2 hour max) Parking Meter Collections rateper 1 hour (10ihour max) rate per 2 hours (1~) hour max) rate per 10 hours (~0 hour max) Parking Meter Collections rate per 2.5 hours ~10 hour max) rate per 10 hours (10 hour max) effective rate: per 2 hours (10 hour max) annual new current proposed revenue rate rate difference generated $0.05 $0.10 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.05 $0.25 $0.40 $0.15 $0.50 $0.75 $0.25 $0.05 $0.10 $0.05 $0.10 $0.25 $0.15 $0.25 $0.50 $0.25 $0.25 $0.40 $0.15 $0.50 $0.75 $0.25 $1.50 $2.75 $1.25 $0.25 $0.55 $0.30 $1.00 $2.25 $1.25 $0.20 $0.45 $0.25 New Revenue - General Fund $96,936 Less: cost to implement ($41.500) Net New Revenue - General Fund $55,436 911 Wireline Residential Business Business Trunks $0.40 $0.50 $0.10 $112,055 $0.40 $0.50 $0.10 $38,814 $0.40 $0.50 $0.10 $6,570 New Revenue-GeneraIFund $157,439 -308- City of Corpus Christi Solid Waste Services - Proposed Revenue Increases Fiscal Year 2003-2004 account name MSWSSC description of revenue geqeratin~l activity Put or Pay Credit- Tonnage Rate Put or Pay Collection Chg- Tonnage Rate Cubic Yard Credit Cubic Yard Charge current proposed revenue rate rate difference ~lenerated $6.42 $8.35 $1.93 $5.00 $6.50 $1.50 $0.16 $0.21 $0.05 $0.30 $0.39 $0.09 Cash and Credit Customers- Tonnage rate incl in Tipping Fee Cash and Credit Customers-Collection Chg CY Cash and Credit Customers incl in Tipping Fee CY Cash and Credit Customers- Collection Chg Residential Rate Can Accounts $10.25 $13.33 $3.08 $1.17 $1.52 $0.35 $0.41 $0.54 $0.13 $O.O5 $O.O7 $O.O2 $1.43 $1,86 $0.43 $3.00 $3.90 $0.90 New Revenue - General Fund $601,554 -309- account name HEB Tennis Center Al Kruse Tennis Center Swimming Pools City of Corpus Christi Park end Recreation - Proposed Revenue Increases Fiscal Year 2003-2004 description pf revenue generating activity annual new current proposed revenue rate rate difference generated Tennis (ann~al/semi-annual fees) Adult ann~Jal $150 Adult sen~i-annual $80 Youth aneual $70 Youth ser~i-annual $40 Civic & Corp,~rate tournaments HEB maxi22 couds (1/2 day) $160 HEB Covere~l Court Pavilion Fees Per perso~n Men - Fd 8:00 am - 5:00 pm SingleJ~ (pilot program) $0 Doubles (pilot program) $0 Per perso~n Men - Fd 5:00 pm - 9:30 pm Single~ (pilot program) $0 Doubles (pilot program) $0 Per perso~ weekend-Saturday 9:00 am - 2:00 pm Singles (pilot program) $0 Doubles (pilot program) $0 Per pers°n weekend-Sunday 1:00 pm - 6:00 pm Singles (pilot program) $0 Doubles (pilot program) $0 Tennis LessOns (per person) Pdvate & semi-private lesson court fee $1.25 Group leSSon court fee $0.75 HEB Covered Court Pavilion Lesson Fees Pdvate (pilot program) $0.00 Semi-private (pilot program) $0.00 Group (pilot program) $0.00 $2,250 $160 $10 $580 $9O $10 $75 $5 $45 $5 $175 $15 $7 $7 $5 $5 $8 $8 $5 $5 $8 $8 $5 $5 $8 $1.5o $1.oo $4.50 $2.25 $2.00 General Admission Youth 17 & under (outdoor pools) Annual Swim Passes Youth Senior U.S. Swim Team Member (per season) Youth Adult City Swim Leagues City TAAF Swim League (per season) Scholarship fee per session per child Visiting Leagues Red & Green league/season/team Blue & Geld league/season/team TAAF Registration/insurance/person Family Night Swim (five person family) $0.50 $100 $175 $0 $45 $20 $200 $250 $6 $0 $0.75 $120 $180 $75 $125 $50 $25 $250 $300 $7 $2 $8 $0.25 $0.25 $4.50 $2.25 $2.00 $26,659 $0.25 $20 $5 $75 $125 $5 $5 $50 $50 $2 -310- City of Corpus Christi Park and Recreation - Proposed Revenue Increases Fiscal Year 2003-2004 account name description ?f revenue generating activity Splash Parties - 2 hours annual new current proposed revenue rate rate difference generated I - 50 (number of persons) $125 $150 $25 51 - 100 $175 $200 $25 101 - 150 $225 $250 $25 151 - 200 $275 $300 $25 201 - 250 $325 $350 $25 251 & up $375 $400 $25 Natatorium 251 - 300 (number of persons) $0 $450 $450 301 & up $0 $500 $500 Total Pool Rdntal not to exceed/day $400 $500 $100 Swimming Instruction Fees Swimming Pqol Instruction Fees Swim lessi)ns (outdoor pools)/person Scholarshlp fee per session per child Red Cmsd Classes Lifeguard Classes/class Water .Safety Instruction Training $3O $35 $5 $15 $20 $5 $100 $125 $25 $125 $150 $25 Athletic Events Recreational Adult Basketball League/team $0 $325 Basketball Regular Season Athletics age 6 to 18/player $50 $55 Scholarship 1st child $20 $25 Scholarship each additional child $15 $20 $2,000 $325 $8,868 Athletic Rentals Youth Rental fee per field (per hour) $0 $20 Adult ToumarnentJCamp Rentals fee per day With lightS, add (per hour/field) $7.50 $8 Gymnasiums (10 hr. max) Youth basketball tournament rental $175 $250 Facility rental fees below incl staff sprvsn/clean-up Additional :hour rate to all facilities/hr $25 $35 Non-profit Organizations 501(C)(3) or other Community organizations $25 $35 $5 $5 $5 Recreation Center Rentals T.C. Ayers Recreation Center Social Hall (4 hrs.) Game Room / Kitchen (4 hrs.) Entire Facility (4 hrs.) Oak Park Recreation Centers Social Hail (4 hrs.) Entire Facility (4 hrs.) Joe Garza Recreation Center Game Room (4 hrs.) Entire Facility (4 hrs.) Oso Recreation Center Social Hall (4 hrs.) Entire Facility (4 hrs.) Lindale Recreation Center Social Hall #2 (4 hrs.) Entire Facility (4 hrs.) $45 $48 $45 $48 $85 $90 $80 $62 $125 $127 $2O $0.50 $75.00 $1o.oo $10.00 $3 $3 $5 $2 $90 $95 $5 $290 $135 ($155) $160 $165 $24O $24O $5 $5 $190 $195 $400 $4O5 $662 $7,500 -311- account name Recreation instruction Fees Latchkey Summer Program Reg Fees City of Corpus Christi Park end Recreation - Proposed Revenue Increases Fiscal Year 2003-2004 current proposed description pf revenue generating activity rate rate difference Multicultural Center Room Rentals (Galvan House) First Floor or Courtyard (Sun - Thu)/3hrs. $0 $200 $200 First Floor and Kitchen/5 hrs. $300 $325 $25 Courtyard and Kitchen/5 hrs. $360 $375 $15 Full pack~ge (First floor, Courtyard, Rose Gardfln Plaza & Kitchen)/7 hrs. $650 $700 $50 Partial pabkage (Courtyard, Rose Garden & Kitchen)/5 hrs. $430 $450 $20 Partial package (Courtyard, First Floor & Kitchen)/5 hrs. $520 $550 $30 Partial package (First Floor, Rose Garden & Kitchen)/5 hrs. $370 $400 $30 Festival Fees Hedtage Park cultural festivals/day $485 $400 ($85) Commercial Photographic Session/hr $15 $25 $10 Non-refundable reservation deposit $100 $150 $50 Zavala Senior Center Entire Facility (4 hrs.) $460 $430 ($30) Breadmoor Senior Center Entire Facility (4 hrs.) $165 $100 ($65) Northwest Senior Center Entire FaCility (4 hrs.) $500 $460 ($40) Special Services - Rental Special Event Vendor Permit/event $25 $50 $25 Park Use Permit/event $0 $10 $10 Increased enrollment in special classes at recreation centers School Year (from end of school day to 6 pm) Monthly fee, 1st child $80 $87 Monthly fee, each additional child $65 $72 Four months prorated, due to 15 days or less 1st child $67 $75 $8 Each additional child $57 $65 $8 Late registration involving 10 days or less $45 $50 $5 MonthJy fee for child on reduced lunch $35 $42 $7 Monthly fee for child on free lunch $30 $37 $7 Late payment fee (after the 5th) per family $15 $20 $5 Summer LatChkey Program Weekly fee per child $65 $72 $7 Scholarship per child (free and reduced) $35 $42 $7 Vacation Station per child/day $12 $20 $8 Scholarship per child/day $5 $12 $7 Summer Recreation Program (drop in) Monday - Fdday, 11 am ~ 4 pm (8 weeks) $0 $1 annualnew revenue generated $1,000 $135,190 $7 $7 $16,000 $1 New Net New Revenue - General Fund Less: cost to implement Revenue - General Fund $200,709 ($~"~0~) -3! 2- DOV~'NTOV~N AND BAYFRONT ARTS & SCIENCE PARK PARKING STUDY NOVEMBER 27, 2002 PROJECT # 25-1203.OO Table I: Parking Meter Suwey I Ciy I Populam)nnl J Meterl LImil I Ra~ Hou~lon I~ 1,953,631 Yes 1-hr. and 2-hr. $ .40 and $ 1.00 per hour Dallas ~ J, 180,580 Yes 2 ~ur/4 hour $ .25 and $ I .~ per hou~ l~ur $ .10 per hour San Anlonte 1,144,646 Yes hour $ .75 per h~r 2 hour $ ,75 per hour 10 hou~ $ .20 per hour hour $ .75 ~ hour $ .05 per 8 mlnules N ot~s: Ba~cl on y~ar 2000 U.S. Census Minimal number of 2Drain ule melms Minimal number of 15 and 3~minule meters Meters at Po~t Office only J$.25 fo~ 12 minute~, ~tO~5:00 MomFrl) Of the seven cities with populations greater than Corpus Christi's, ali with the exception of Arlington utilize some parking meters in their downtown areas. Of the 13 cities with populations smaller than Corpus Christi's, only four utilize meters. Corpus Christi meter rates are on the Iow end of the continuum; however, with the exception of the four largest cities in the state, only Laredo and Beaumont have significantly higher rates than Corpus ChrislL -313- 5 24 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: May 27, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the development of a three-year contract with two one-year renewal options between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and Humana Health to administer the City's self-funded health, dental, and vision benefits plans; to provide and administer a health services network; and to provide pharmacy benefits management through Advance PCS. ISSUE: The City of Corpus Christi's current contracts for health, dental, and vision benefits administration; health network services; and pharmacy benefits management expire on July 31, 2003. A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued on February 28, 2003. Proposals were received on April 4, 2003. As a result of the evaluation of proposals received, Humana Health is determined to be the best value for the City in providing these services. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Council approval of the motion authorizing the development of a three-year contract with two one-year renewal options between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and Humana Health to administer the City's self-funded health, dental, and vision benefits plans; to provide and administer a healih services network; and to provide pharmacy benefits management through Advance PCS. FUNDING: Funding for this contract has been included in the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2003- 2004. -317- RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. Attachments: ~ Background Information Schedule A - RFP responses ~ Schedule B Flowchart of the eview process Schedule C -TPA Rankings Schedule D - Health Network [ankings Schedule E - PBM Rankings Schedule F - Best Value Rankings Lee/~r{ ~mbauld Director of Financial Services -318- BACKGROUND INFORMATION BACKGROUND In the spring of 2002, the City retained McGriff, Seibels and Williams, Inc. to serve as health consultant to assist in analyzing its health benefits plans, drafting a RFP for health plans administration, health services network, pharmacy benefits management (PBM), and stop loss insurance (with bundled and/or unbundled options). The RFP was issued February 28, 2003, with selection scheduled for City Council for end of May, in time for the June/July annual re-enrollment process; all according to the schedule presented to City Council several times during 2002. Responses to the RFP were received on April 4, 2003 in the Procurement Division. Schedule A shows the total of responses received by company and by specific category in which they responded. Respondents were allowed to propose on any combination of categories or for individual categories. A total of 31 responses were received (included within TPA responses were other PBM, network and stop loss providers which were also reviewed as shown in Schedule A): 17 responses were received from TPAs, four of which were Carriers (all services included). Two vendors responded for health network services. Three vendors responded for PBM, and four vendors responded for stop loss insurance. With most responses, the TPA responded that stop loss canfers could be selected at the City's discretion. Two vendors responded to dental plan administration only, and one vendor responded to vision plan administration only. One vendor responded to dental and vision plan administration only. One vendor proposed to manage COBRA and HIPAA compliance services only. EVALUATION Initially, a core team comprised of Keith McNeely, Vice President of McGriff; the Senior Purchasing Analyst; and the Risk Manager, reviewed the 31 responses received and categorized them according to the evaluation criteria established in the RFP. The responses were then separated into the services provided, such as TPA (including dental and vision providers), health services network, stop-loss insurance, and PBM. The core team then developed screening criteria for a "TPA Short List" which was presented to a cross-functional evaluation team. Team members included those from the core team, as well as the Human Resources Director, Assistant Finance Director, MIS Assistant Director, and Risk Management Financial Analyst. The evaluation team met over a 4-week period and held nine meetings. A flowchart of the review process is included as Schedule B. During the initial evaluation meeting, proposals were reviewed for responsiveness. The evaluation team eliminated several proposals for non-responsiveness to RFP requirements. The remaining proposals were presented to the evaluation team and evaluated individually and then in a variety of "packaged" combinations. The "packages" were comprised of the highest scores of TPAs, health networks and PBMs. Finally, each "package" was then individually scored to determine the best value. Stop loss proposals can be more sufficiently reviewed after City Council selects the TPA, health network, and PBM. -319- For each type of individual servic~ requested, a matrix of the evaluation criteria was developed by the evaluation team. The evalu[ation criteria components set forth in the RFP included: (1) experience with public entities 10%, (2) customer service 20%, (3) technology and management reporting 30%, and (4) cost 40%. The evaluation team reviewed each proposal individually for TPA services (including dental and vis!on providers), health services network, stop-loss insurance, and pharmacy benefits management [and completed the evaluation matrix. The resulting matrix prioritized each vendor based or~ the point value assigned for each criterion component in the evaluation matrix. Vendor rankings based on this scoring method are shown in Schedules C, D, and E. The evaluation team then created a~matrix of evaluation criteria for packaged options, using the same evaluation criteria components as {for the individual evaluation: (1) experience with public entities 10%, (2) customer service 20%, (~) technology and management reporting 30%, and (4) cost 40%. The distribution of weighting among the TPA services, health service networks, and PBMs were 6%, 76%, and 18%, respectively. This ~econdary ,distribution was based solely on the contribution to cost that each service component has fpr the City s total cost for the health plans. Once this second matrix was co,,m~leted, the evaluation team reviewed the results of the packaged options for the top four TPAs. Thet proposals for these TPAs indicated the health service networks and PBMs in which they participa!e. This resulted in the top two health service network providers and the top two PBMs being bundled with the TPAs. This "best value" matrix is shown in Schedule F. RECOMMENDATION As a result of this evaluation, Humana is the highest ranking £or TPAs, health service network, and PBMs in the evaluation matrix. The Humana health services network provides access to 662 physicians and nine hospitals in the area, representing an expansion in health service options available to employees, as shown ia Schedule F. Including our estimate of the value o£discounts as annualized in network claims levels, this recommendation is $757,460 lower than the next best proposal. Schedule F depicts the costing comparisons. -320- ;Cit~ of Corpus Christi, TX Finance Department Health Plan Services RFP Responses April 2OO3 SCHEDULE A ~ Health Stop Loss COBRA/ Company TPA Network Insurance PBM Dental Vision HIPAA Advance PCS (Quoted throush various TP^s) X ' American Stop Loss/Standard Socurity Life X Boncfit Planners X X X X X X BC/BS of Toxas/Hi~hmark X X X X X X X ~ Chapman X X X X X X X Business Administrators & Consultan~g X X X X X X X Catalyst Rx X Centcrpriso Advisors X X X X X X Chrisms Spohn Health Network X Cigna X X X X X X X Comp Link X DoRal Dental X Eckerd Health Services (Quoto:l through various TPAs) X '~ Entrust X X X X X X X F.A. Richard X X X X Fisorv Health Tanncssce X X X X X X Group & Pension Administrators, Inc. X X X X X Guardian X X Harrington Benefit $~rvices X X X X X X X Health Administration S~'vice~, Inc. X X X X X X X HealthFirst X X X X X X X Humana X X X X X X X ING Employe~ Benefits X Int~q (Quoted throu~,h various TPAs) X" JI Companies X X X X X X MedEx X Met Life X Pharmacare (Quoted through various TPAs) X Rx West X Scott & White X Spectera, Inc. X Sun Life X Texas Mtmicipal League X X X X X X X Texas True Choice X United Healthcare X X X X X X X Walgreens Pharmacy Services (Quoted through various TlaA$) X -321 - SCHEDULE F City of Corpus Christi "Best Value" Health Insurance Team Based Process Flow Core Team Reviews all RFP Responses and • Categorizes Responses • Defines Buckets of Opportunities • Develops 'TPA Short List" Screening Criteria Evaluation Team Reviews, provides changes, and then approves Core Team Process Approach Third Party Admin Network Provider • Evaluation Team Develops • Evaluation Team Evaluation Criteria Develops Evaluation • Agrees to procure Vision Criteria and Dental through TPA Evaluation Team • Reviews Proposals Completes Evaluation Matrix Documents Results Pharmacy • Evaluation Team Develops Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Team Evaluation Team Determines process to evaluate TPA, then Network Provider, then Pharmacy, and finally Stop Loss Providers as separate evaluations with possible bundling of suppliers across opportunities into 'Best Value Bundles' Stop Loss • Evaluation Team Develops Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Team • Reviews Proposals • Develops and Completes Evaluation Matrix • Documents Results • Cannot award until later • Leaves option open to bundle or award • Reviews results from all 'Bundled Opportunities • Examines common "Best Value" suppliers across all opportunities • Develops "Best Value" Bundled suppliers list (referred to as Options) • Develops "Best Value Bundled Evaluation Matrix" for Comparisons • Determines by "consensus" "Best Value Bundled" tiered list of suppliers • Contacts top two (2) suppliers to confirm and clarify speck supplier RFP Response deficiencies compared to City 'RFP Minimum Requirements" • Completes Evaluation Process • Documents Process • Documents Recommendations • Documents Projected Annualized Savings to Budget with Specific Assumptions and Guidelines I N N M Ci:y of Corpus Chrhti, Texts Benefit Business Boon- Planners, Jl Administrators ~nd Chapman· LTD Humana HeallhFirst Companies TML Entrust Hat,in,on Copzultants, Inc. ExPen~ace with Public Entiti~ 10 5.9 7.5 79 3.2 6.2 8.0 6.0 5.0 Customer Service 20 17.6 19.0 16.8 16.4 13,2 13.4 15.8 11.8 7.2 T0¢hnologyandRepo~ing 30 25.5 26.1 30.0 25.5 19.5 13.5 21.0 24.0 13.5 Cost 40 36.4 30.0 22.8 28.8 34.0 35.6 19.6 21.2 40.0 Total 85.4 82.6 77.5 73.9 72.9 70.5 62.4 62.0 61.7 $621,317 $755,815 $990,647 $788,748 $665,142 $631,895 $1,161,235 $1,074,721 $564,410 -323- Schedule D City of Corpus Christi, Texas Department of Financial Services Eval~atlon Matrix - Health Network Rankings I Christus Texas True ~um Humana Spohn Choice, Inc~ TML Points Points Points Points ~valuation Criteria I Points Awarded Awarded Awarded Awarded Experience with Public Entities Customer Service 10 20 10.0 5.0 6.5 4.0 20.0 17.0 15.6 16.0 25.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 40.0 36.8 32.0 27.2 Technology and Reporting 30 Cost 40 Total 95.0 88.8 74.1 $12,387,357 $14,407,305 $15,556,391 57.2; $18,122,90~ -324- EXpenenee with PubliC Entiti~ 10 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 I0.1 Cttstom~ S~rvioc 20 1,8.8 15.8 15.4 8.8 8.0 10.8 8.0 14.1 Tet:hnology and R~porOng 30 30.0 30.0 30.0 24.0 28.5 24.0 28.5 24.1 Cost 40 55.8 20.8 19.6 28.4 23.2 23.2 19.6 10A Total 9q.6 76.6 75.0 71.2 69.7 68.0 66.1 59.1 -325- ScheduleF City of Corpus Christi, Texas Department of Financial Services Evaluation Matrix - Best Value Rankings Option I~ Option I Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 TPA Humana Boon-Chapman Benefit Planners Healthfirst Network Provider [ Ilumana Christus Spohn Christus Spohn Christus Spohn PBM [ Humana Cat Ra Cat Rx Cat Rx Maximum I Points Points Points Points Evaluation Criteria Points [ Awarded Awarded Awarded Awarded Experience with Public Entities 10 9.9 6.( 6.] 5.~ Customer Service 20 19.¢ 16.~ 16.5 16.~ Technology and Reporting 30 26.~ 29.J 29.3 29.3 Cost 40 40.{ 38 37.¢ 37.~ Total 95.3 90.5 90.3 89.8 $13,391,142 $14,148,602 $14,265,601 $14,298,532 Health Network Services Comparison Spohn Humana Physicians 513 662 Hospitals 5 9 Packaged Non Cost Contribution Weightings of 6% +76% Network +l 8% Pharmacy -326- City of Corpus Christi -328-