HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 02/17/2004CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 17, 2004
Corpus Christi
JUl-Ame '_'. City
20O3
AGENDA
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1201 LEOPARD
FEBRUARY 17, 2004
9:00 A.M.
PUBLIC NOTICE- THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE
PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 12:00 p.m. or at the end
of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name
and address. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your
subject, please present it to the City Secretary.
Si Usted desea didgirse al Concilio y cree que su ingl~s es limitado, habr~ un int~rprete ingl~s-espa~ol en todas las juntas
del Concilio para ayudarle.
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to
contact the City Secretary's office (at 361-880-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be
made.
A. Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr. to call the meeting to order.
B. Invocation to be given by Pastor Kevin Jennings, Mt. Olive Lutheran Church.
C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States.
D. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers.
Mayor Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor Pro Tem Mark Scott
Council Members:
Bront Chesney
Melody Cooper
Javier D. Colmenero
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
City Manager George K. Noe
City Attorney Mary Kay Fischer
City Secretary Armando Chapa __
E. MINUTES:
1. Approval of Regular Meeting of February 10, 2004. (Attachment #1)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February17,2004
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
F. BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE)
G. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION:
For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as
motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City
Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed; may
finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather
than a two reading ordinance; er may modify the action specified. A
motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last
regular, or a subsequent special meeting; such agendas are incorporated
herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item.
CONSENT AGENDA
Notice to the Public
The following items are of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has
been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has
been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote
without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a
citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for
individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring
separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted
by one vote.
CONSENT MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES AND ORDINANCES
FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
(At this point the Council will vote on all motions, resolutions and ordinances not
removed for individual consideration)
Motion approving the lease purchase of one (1) 2000 GPM pumper
fire truck from the Houston-Galveston Area Council of Govemments
(H-GAC) for the total amount of $386,676. The award is based on
the cooperative purchasing agreement with H-GAC. This unit is a
replacement. Financing will be provided through the City's
lease/purchase financing program. (Attachment #2)
Motion approving a supply agreement for approximately 118,000
pounds of drop-on type glass spheres, in accordance with Bid
Invitation No. BI-0048-04 from Swarco Reflex, Inc., of Mexia, Texas
based on Iow bid for an estimated annual amount of $26,078. This
item will be used by Street Services. The term of the contract is for
twelve months with options to extend for up to two additional twelve-
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 17, 2004
Page 3
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
month periods, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City
Manager or his designee. Funds have been budgeted by the using
department in FY 2003-2004. (Attachment #3)
Motion approving a supply agreement with National Meters, Inc., of
Lancaster, Ohio, for approximately 2,000 gas service regulators in
accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0036-04, based on Iow bid, for
an estimated annual expenditure of $25,900. The term of the
agreement shall be for twelve months with an option to extend for up
to two additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of
the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have
been budgeted by the Gas Department in FY 2003-2004.
(Attachment #4)
Motion approving the lease of a wheel loader with Crescent
Machinery Company, of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the total amount
of $86,184 of which $17,955 is budgeted in FY2003-2004. The
award is in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0054-04 and is
based on best value. The term of the lease is for twenty-four
months with an option to extend the lease for up to twelve additional
months, subject to the approval of the City Manager or his designee.
The wheel loader will be used by the Park and Recreation
Department. (Attachment #5)
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a
Gift Agreement with the Friends of the Corpus Christi Public
Libraries which provides the City with a gift of $7,000 for the
expansion and remodeling of the Mary and Jeff Bell Children's
Library at the Central Library. (Attachment #6)
6,b.
Ordinance appropriating $7,000 from the Friends of the Corpus
Christi Public Libraries in the Library Capital improvement Program
Fund No. 3210 for improvements to the Mary and Jeff Bell
Children's Library at the Central Library; amending FY 2004 Capital
Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 025647 by increasing
appropriations by $7,000. (Attachment #6)
7.a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a
grant in the amount of $14,771 and to execute a contract and all
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 17,2004
Page 4
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
related documents with the Texas State Library and Amhives
Commission for the Lone Star Libraries Grant to be used for the
preservation and cataloging of local history materials. (Attachment
#7)
Ordinance appropriating a $14,771 grant from the Texas State
Library and Archives Commission in the No. 1068 Library Grants
Fund for preservation and cataloging of local history materials.
(Attachment #7)
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Amendment No. 1 with Shiner, Moseley and Associates, Inc., of
Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $30,000 for consulting
services associated with Pro-Planning of Emergency Recovery
Operations. (Attachment #8)
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Amendment No. 1 for ArchitectJEngineer Consultant Services
Agreement with Morgan Spear Associates, Inc., of Corpus Christi,
Texas in an amount not to exceed $3,800 for the Gas Department
Building Remodeling, Phase 1 Project for the construction inspection
services. (Attachment #9)
10.
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a
construction contract with Berry Contracting, L.P. dba Bay, Ltd., of
Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $309,591.20 for the Corpus
Christi International Airport Runways 13, 31, and 35 End
Drainage/Grading Modifications. (Attachment #10)
11.
Motion authorizing the City of Corpus Christi's proportional
contribution of the local share of administrative expenses for
regional water planning activities during FY 2003, required by
Senate Bill 1, 75th Texas Legislature, in accordance with the
Interlocal Agreement for Water Planning Activities approved by
Motion M98-034, with the City's remaining share according to the
formula adopted by the Regional Water Planning Group, to be
$44,309.51. (Attachment #11)
12.a. Motion approving the reimbursement application submitted by Island
in the Son United Methodist Church, Owner and Developer
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
Febmary17,2004
Page 5
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
of Lot 1, Block 1, out of Tracts B and C, Mustang Island for the
installation of 350 linear feet of an 8-inch PVC water distribution
main. (Attachment #12)
12.b.
Ordinance appropriating $66,010.53 from the Water Distribution
Main Trust Fund No. 4030-540450 to pay developer reimbursement
request for the installation of 350 linear feet of an 8-inch PVC water
distribution main to develop Lot 1, Block 1, out of Tracts B and C,
Mustang Island. (Attachment #12)
13.
14.
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to approve a
Letter of Agreement between the City and the Beautify Corpus
Christi Association (BCCA) and providing a $25,000 grant to BCCA
for executing environmentally sustainable tasks like anti-litter
campaigns and recycling education throughout the city, particularly
in the Neighborhood Initiative Programs' communities. The grant
funding duration is from February 15, 2004 to February 14, 2005.
(Attachment #13
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
a revised reimbursement agreement between the Transportation
Security Administration and Corpus Christi International Airport to
provide law enforcement personnel at security checkpoints at the
airport in consideration of reimbursement or partial reimbursement
effective August 5, 2003, until September 30, 2004, with the option
to extend for up to four (4) years. (Attachment #14)
15.
First Reading Ordinance - Amending the Code of Ordinances, City
of Corpus Christi, Chapter 29 regarding Municipal Court Building
Security Fund and Security Fee; by amending Section 29-48 to
reflect changes in State Law pertaining to the use of the Municipal
Court Building Security Fund; and providing for penalties.
(Attachment #15)
16.
Second Reading Ordinance - Authorizing the City Manager or his
designee to execute a thirteen-year Renewal and Extension Lease
with the Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc. to continue
maintaining and operating a facility for deaf persons on a portion of
Mt. Vernon Park; providing for one, ten-year automatic extension of
the lease; and providing for termination upon one (1) year written
notice by either party. (First Reading 01/13/04) (Attachment #16)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 17, 2004
Page 6
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
17.
Second Reading Ordinance - Clarifying the Definition of Well in
Section 35-24, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi.
(First Reading 02/10/04) (Attachment #17)
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
ZONING CASES:
18.
Case No. 0104-01, Hossein Mostaghasi: A change of zoning from
a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "B-4" General Business District on
Tract 1 and "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2. The
property consists of 18.566 acres out of Lot 1, Block 2, Nueces
River Irrigation Park, located on the southwest comer of Northwest
Boulevard (F.M. 624) and Hazel Bazemore Road (County Road 69).
(Attachment #18)
Planninq Commission and Staff's Recommendation: Approval of a
"B-4" General Business District on Tract 1 and "R-lB" One-family
Dwelling District on Tract 2.
ORDINANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by Hossein
Mostaghasi by changing the zoning map in reference to 18.566
acres out of Nueces River Irrigation Park, Block 2, Lot 1 from "F-R"
Farm-Rural Distdct to "B-4" General Business Distdct on Tract 1 and
"R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2; and amending the
Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing
Comprehensive Plan.
PRESENTATIONS: (NONE)
Public comment will not be solicited on Presentation items.
K=
REGULAR AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES:
19.a.
Motion to amend prior to Second Reading by amending Policy
Statements B-2, B-4, and E-1 of the South Central Development
Plan. (Attachment #19)
19.b. Second Reading Ordinance- Amending the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Corpus Christi ("the City") by adopting the revised South
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
Febmary 17,2004
Page 7
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Central Area Development Plan; establishing the City's
Comprehensive Plan Policies on the downtown, uptown, bayfront,
bayfront arts and science park and surrounding areas for protection
of the environment, future land use, transportation, public services,
and capital improvements; rescinding the South Central Area
Development Plan previously approved by Resolution 021169, May
21, 1991 and amended by Ordinance 022166, February 28, 1995;
and amending related elements of the Comprehensive Plan
including the Urban Transportation Plan. (First Reading 02/10/04)
(Attachment #19)
20.
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Amendment No. 15 to the Engineering Services Contract with
Shiner, Moseley and Associates, Inc., of Corpus Christi, Texas in
an amount not to exceed $1,181,100 for the design and
construction phase services for the Seawall South Reach Project.
(Attachment #20)
21.
Resolution supporting the use of Padre Island for training in
conjunction with the Navy's Mine Warfare Center Excellence and the
Department of Defense's Gulf of Mexico Joint National Training
Capability. (Attachment #21)
L=
PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT
SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT
APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. OR AT THE END OF THE
COUNCIL MEETING, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. PLEASE LIMIT
PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. IF YOU PLAN TO
ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURING THIS TIME PERIOD, PLEASE
SIGN THE FORMAT THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBER,
GIVING YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND TOPIC. (A recording is made
of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium
and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information
pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary.)
Si usted se dirige a la junta y cree que su ingl6s es limitado, habr6 un int&rprete
ingl~s-espat~ol en la reunion de la junta para ayudade.
PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF
PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE,
EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL
DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL
Agenda
Regular Council Me~ing
Febma~ 17,2004
Page 8
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC A T ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS
POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST
AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into
executive session at any time dudng the meeting in order to discuss any
matters listed on the agenda, when authorfzed by the provisions of the
Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that
the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the
following matters. In the event the Council elects to go into executive
session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open
Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced
by the presiding office.
N. REPORTS:
The following reports include questions by Council to Staff regarding City
policies or activities; request by Council for information or reports from
Staff; reports of activities of individual Council members and Staff;
constituent concerns; current topics raised by media; follow-up on Staff
assignments; scheduling of future Council meetings end activities; and
other brief discussions regarding city-related matters.
22. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
* Upcoming Items
23. MAYOR'S UPDATE
24. COUNCIL AND OTHER REPORTS
O. ADJOURNMENT:
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
Febmary 17,2004
Page 9
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
POSTING STATEMENT:
This agenda was posted on the City's official bulletin board at the
front entrance to City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, at 2:00 p.m.,
February 13, 2004.
Armando Chapa /~
City Secretary
NOTE:
The City Council Agenda can be found on the City's Home
Page at www.cctexas.com after 7:00 p.m. on the Friday before
regularly scheduled council meetings. If technical problems
occur, the agenda will be uploaded on the Internet by Monday
morning.
Symbols used to highlight action item that implement council
priority issues.
PRESENT
Mayor
Mayor
MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - 9:05 a.m.
Samuel L. Neal Jr.
Pro Tem Mark Scott
Council Members:
Brant Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper (Arrived at 10:18 a.m.)
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
City Staff:
City Manager George K. Noe
City Attorney Mary Kay Fischer
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Mayor Neal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The
invocation was delivered by Ms. Kay Dunlap of First Baptist Church and the Pledge of Allegiance
to the United States flag was led by Council Member Scott. City Secretary Chapa called the roll and
verified that the necessary quorum of the Council and the required charter officers were present to
conduct the meeting. Mayor Neal called for approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting
of January 27, 2004. A motion was made and passed to approve the minutes as presented.
Mayor Neal referred to Item 2 and the following board appointments were made:
Civil Service Board/Commission
Leonides G. Bazar (Appointed)
Committee for Persons with Disabilities
Crystal Lyons (Reappointed)
Linda Falwell-Stover (Reappointed)
Billy Ray Sayles (Reappointed)
Toni Padilla (Reappointed)
Leadership Committee for Senior Services
H. Rex Amick (Reappointed)
Apolonia Cantu (Reappointed)
Anna Gonzales (Reappointed)
Pauline Johnson (Reappointed)
Donna Cisneros (Appointed)
Juan Del Bosque (Appointed)
Lou Trlica (Appointed)
Curtis Ford (Appointed)
Barbara Deguzis (Appointed)
Hope Franklin (Appointed)
Mayor Neal called for consideration of the consent agenda (Items 3-18). City Secretary
Chapa announced that Item 11 was being withdrawn by staff. Council members requested that Items
4, 5, and 8 be discussed. There were no comments from the audience. A motion was made and
passed to approve Items 3 through 18, constituting the consent agenda, except for Items 4, 5 and 8
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 2
which were pulled for individual consideration. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their
votes as follows:
3. MOTION NO. 2004-039
Motion approving the purchase of two (2) tractors and seven (7) rotary weed cutters from
Gulf Tractor, of Corpus Christi, Texas in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0024-04
based on low bid and low bid meeting specifications in the amount of $109,248. This
equipment will be used by the Storm Water and Water Department. Funds have been
budgeted by the Maintenance Service Department and the Water Department in FY 2003-
2004. One item is an addition to the fleet, the remainder are replacement units.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
6.a. RESOLUTION NO. 025642
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant from the Coastal
Bend Regional Advisory Council in the amount of $17,300 to be used for the purchase of
Crisis Information Management System for the Corpus Christi Fire Department.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
6.b. ORDINANCE NO. 025643
Ordinance appropriating a $17,300 grant from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council
into the No. 1062 Fire Grants Fund for the pumhase of Crisis Information Management
System for the Corpus Christi Fire Department.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the
following vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott,
voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
7. MOTION NO. 2004-042
Motion authorizing the purchase of WebEOC, a crisis information management software
package, from ESi as a sole soume purchase, in the amount of $41,524 with funds coming
from a $17,300 grant from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council and $24,224 from
the proceeds of the Metropolitan Medical Response System contract with the United States
Department of Homeland Security.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kiunison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 3
10.
MOTION NO. 2004-044
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with
Elite Construction Company, of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $309,320 for the Gas
Department Building Remodeling, Phase 1 Project.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
MOTION NO. 2004-045
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with
Progressive Structures, of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $211,750 for the New Ben
Garza Park Sports Pavilion and Ben Garza Gym Locker Room Improvements.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
11. WITHDRAWN
12. MOTION NO. 2004-046
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Warranty Deed and a
Utility Easement with D.H. Braman, et al in the amount of $40,439 for Parcels 5 and 5UE,
both parcels being out of Lots 49, 50, 51, and 52 of the Artemus Roberts Subdivision and
the Adams, Beaty, and Moulton Survey No. 411, Abstract 554, located along the west side
of McKinzie Road, south of Haven Drive, in connection with the McKinzie Road Street
Improvement Project, Haven Drive to South City Limits, Phase 2, Bond Issue 2000.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
13. MOTION NO. 2004-047
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order No. 1 with
Rycon E & C, LLC, of Kingsville, Texas, in the amount of $82,280 for the Wastewater
Clean-Out Installation Program FY 2002-2003.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 4
14.
15.
ORDINANCE NO. 025644
Ordinance appropriating $20,000 from the Port of Corpus Christi into Park Capital
Improvement Program Fund No. 3280 for the Bayfront Master Plan; and amending the FY
2002-2003 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 025144 by increasing appropriations
by $20,000.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the
following vote: Neal, Cbesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott,
voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Clarifying the Definition of Well in Section 35-24, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus
Christi.
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following
vote Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, K~nmson, Noyola and Scott, voting ye ,
Cooper was absent.
16. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
17.
Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a First Amendment to the Lease
Agreement with Great Western Soccer League, a non-profit organization, for the use of
Terry and Bobby Labonte Park for its soccer program in consideration of Great Western
Soccer League maintaining the premises and improvements.
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following
vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting
"Aye".
ORDINANCE NO. 025645
Amending Article V, Code of Ethics, Chapter 2, Code of Ordinance, relating to outside
employment; and providing for penalties. (First Reading 01/27/04)
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its second reading with the following
vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye";
Cooper was absent.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 5
18. RESOLUTION NO. 025646
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application to the
United States Bureau of Reclamation in the amount of $12,100 for technical and financial
assistance to develop and implement a Water Management and Conservation Plan, with a
City match of $12,100 in the No. 4010 Water Fund, for a total project cost of $24,200.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 4 regarding the purchase of an ambulance for the Fire
Department. Mr. Kinnison asked about the disposal of older equipment that was being replaced.
He asked what process was used to dispose of this equipment, asking if staffwas using the Internet
to sell this type of equipment. Mr. Jim Davis, Director of General Services, replied that staffdid use
the Intemet to auction off heavy equipment because it was the a good way to widely publicize the
sale to potential out-of-town buyers.
4. MOTION NO. 2004-040
Motion approving the lease purchase of one (1) ambulance from Wheeled Coach of Orlando,
Florida based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Texas Local Government
Purchasing Cooperative (TLGPC) and the lease purchase of Ericsson radios and fire eom
system from Dailey Wells Communications, Inc., of San Antonio, Texas based on sole
source for a total amount of $150,364, of which $16,000 has been budgeted in FY 2003-
2004. The ambulance will be used by the Fire Department. This unit is a replacement.
Financing will be provided through the City's lease/purchase financing program.
Wheeled Coach
Orlando, Florida
Ambulance - $131,945
Dailey-Wells Communications, Inc.
San Antonio, Texas
Ericsson Radios and Fire Com
System - $18,419
Grand Total: $150,364
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, and Noyola, voting "Aye"; Cooper and Scott were
absent.
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 5 regarding the Baseball Stadium "Percent for Art"
Project. Mr. Colmenero asked how this item was related to Item 23, an overview on the "Percent
for Art" program in general. City Manager Noe responded that Item 23 was placed on the agenda
by Council request to consider whether the "Percent for Art" ordinance should be amended or
revised in anticipation of Bond 2004. He stated that Item 5 strictly followed the ordinance as it was
currently written.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 6
5. MOTION NO. 2004-041
Motion authorizing the appointmem for an ad hoc peer panel to the Arts and Cultural
Commission, consisting o farts professionals and community peers to make recommendation
for Baseball Stadium "Pement for Art" Project.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Gm'rea, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was absent.
Mayor Neal opened discussion on Item 8 regarding a professional services contract for the
Downtown Drainage Improvements Project. In response to Mr. Colmenero's question, City
Engineer .&ngel Escobar replied that the amendment to the contract with Urban Engineering would
complete the plans and specifications for Phase 2 of the Downtown Drainage Improvements Project,
including the Agnes Street box, the balustrade and the relief lines that lead to the Kinney Street
substation.
8. MOTION NO. 2004-043
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to a
Contract for Professional Services with Urban Engineering, of Corpus Christi, Texas in the
amount of $374,813 for the Downtown Drainage Improvements Project.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper and Garrett were
absent.
Mayor Neal called a recess to hold the Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation
meeting.
The Council returned from recess, and Mayor Neal referred to Item 20, a special
consideration item regarding the City/County jail contract. City Manager Noe commented that at
their last meeting, the Council had indicated that they wanted to present the city's proposal directly
to Commissioners Court for their consideration, in hopes of resolving this issue. He also said the
Council had indicated that if the city were to offer enhanced magistration services in combination
with the contract, this may present an opportunity to potentially increase efficiencies for both
entities. In response, the Council had directed staff to develop a number of options with cost
estimates for the Council's consideration. He said the purpose of the presentation was to develop
a recommendation that would be included in the letter to Commissioners Court for their
consideration.
Police Chief Pete Alvarez Jr. reviewed staff's initial recommendations regarding the jail
contract. He said their recommendation was to establish a central magistration center and a
temporary detention facility. He said the detention facility would be located on the first floor of the
Police Department in the existing property room. The central magistration center would be
incorporated in the same facility. He said the estimated cost for the first year was $1.8 million, and
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 7
for the second year was $1.2 million.
As a follow-up to the discussion held at the last meeting, Chief Alvarez stated that Judge
Tamez would discuss the several options staff had developed for the Council's consideration. Out
of the four proposals that had been developed, Judge Tamez discussed Proposal lA and Proposal
3 in more detail. He said Proposal lA assumed that the county would want the city to assume
responsibility for all magistrate hearings, to be done at the county jail either in jail orby video. He
said the magistration would take place Monday through Friday, 24 hours a day, and once a day on
Saturdays and Sundays. To accommodate this schedule, Judge Tamez requested the appointment
of the current part-time judge to a full-time position, at a net cost of $99,707 including benefits. He
said a judge would be on call do the magistration by video from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday. He said one of five judges would handle hearings from home from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00
a.m. each night on Monday through Friday, including holidays. He also proposed increasing the
responsibilities and salary for the present judges assistant and the addition of another clerical person
at a cost of $28,000.
Judge Tamez said the present judges would receive a $25,000 increase in basic salary to
compensate for the additional work and responsibilities related to the magistration duties, totaling
$119,410 (including benefits). Finally, he said that the cost to purchase and install the necessary
video equipment was $34,415 in the first year, and the recurring cost would be $9,590. Council
Member Garrett commented that the county had some video equipment already in place at the jail
that the city could possibly use to reduce costs.
Judge Tamez reviewed Proposal 3, which assumed that the city would have to build a
detention center. He said in this scenario, the object would be to magistrate prisoners as quickly as
possible (no longer than 12 hours), except on weekends and holidays. He compared the costs to
Proposal IA, saying that the costs were basically the same, except that the city would need to hire
three part-time judges to cover the magistration once every 8 hours from midnight on Friday through
midnight to Sunday, at a net cost of $16,047. He said the total cost for Proposal 3 in the first year
would be $297,578, and the recurring cost would be $272,754.
City Manager stated that the Municipal Court Committee was recommending Proposal lA
as the city's best offer to present to the county. He said Proposal 3 related was staff's response to
the Council's discussion about the potential for reducing the cost ora magistration center. He said
it was important to keep in mind that the focus of the discussion should be on what the Council
wants to offer to the county, not the city's cost for running the detention facility.
Council Member Chesney asked for more information on Proposal lB. Mr. Noe answered
that Proposal lB assumed a lower level of service for magistration in the city's facility, at a
frequency of once a day by our magistrates. Mr. Chesney replied that he and Mr. Scott had
discussed a possible hybrid of Proposal lB, adding part-time help on the weekends. Mr. Scott
elaborated that the city could continue to pay the full-time judges their regular salary, and hire part-
time judges at a cost of approximately $78,000. Judge Tamez stated that the cost may be more than
$78,000 if the part-timers were required to work more hours.
City Manager Noe presented the Council with two options for the county's consideration.
He said Option 1 would increase the current contract to $500,000 plus the CPI and maintain all other
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 8
aspects of the contract. He said Option 2 would offer $275,000 plus CPI and maintain all other
aspects of the contract, but add county jail magistration (Proposal lA) as recommended by the
Municipal Court Committee. For either option, he also suggested that the city ask the county to
extend the drop-dead date for the expiration of the jail contract by four months to allow the city
sufficient time to work through their options. Finally, Mr. Noe briefly mentioned a number of other
more remote options.
Mr. Kinnison asked what the estimated additional annual cost incurred would be over the
current contract if the city were to operate a detention center. Ms. Pat Eldridge, Management
Assistant for the Police Department, replied that the recurring cost would be $347,000. Mr.
Kinnison said he did not believe the city really wanted to build and operate its own detention center
because it wasn't in the city's best interest. Thus, he said he was willing to make any offer to the
county up to the amount of the additional cost the city would incur if it were to operate its own
facility. He added that he hoped the city would ask the county to extend the drop-dead date for the
contract by six to 12 months to allow for more discussion so the right decision could be made.
* Ms. Cooper arrived at 10:18 a.m.
Mr. Scott commented that both entities would incur costs if the city were to take over
operations. He asked if there was any sense of what the county's cost would be. Mr. Noe replied
that the county would have to replace the identification work the city was currently providing, and
possibly provide magistration services on the weekend. He added that there was no set number, but
the $500,000 offer was a way of recognizing that both sides incur expenses if the negotiations were
to fail. Mr. Scott concluded that he was not opposed to Option 1, but did not support Option 2.
Mr. Garrett stated that during the 1991 j ail consolidation negotiations, the community made
it clear that they did not support duplication of jail services. He hoped that the county would enter
into good faith negotiations and offer the city an extension to the drop-dead date for the jail contract.
Mr. Kelly agreed with Mr. Kinnison that the realistic cap for the offer needed to be what the
city's additional costs would be. He said this was why he proposed that the city take over the
magistration system because the city could provide the service more efficiently. He said he was not
opposed to offering the county both options at the same time for their consideration. He expressed
his concern that the taxpayers would ultimately bear the burden if the negotiations failed.
Mr. Chesney stated he could not support either option because they were not in the best
interest of the community. He said he respected the committee's recommendation, but he blamed
the county for their failure to negotiate, putting the city in this position.
Mr. Noyola stated that the city needed to provide the county with options, emphasizing the
financial consequences if they refused to negotiate. He agreed with Mr. Kinnison's idea of putting
a cap on the offer equivalent to the city's additional costs if they were to take over operations.
Ms. Cooper stated that the county had done nothing to further the negotiations in this
process. She believed that the county was going to refuse the city's offer anyway, so the city might
as well implement their plan to construct and operate their own facilities.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 9
Mr. Colmenero agreed with Ms. Cooper, saying that the city had taken the only initiative in
the negotiations. He said it was unfortunate that the county had decided to balance its budget at the
expense of the taxpayers. He encouraged the county to enter into a true dialogue with the city on
this issue.
Mr. Scott reiterated that he did not support Proposal lA, so he did not support Option 2
because it included Proposal 1A. He also stated that he did not want the county to be given specifics
on how the city would pay for the services. Mayor Neal requested that Mr. Garrett take Mr. Scott's
concern into consideration when making his motion.
Mr. Garrett made a motion directing the City Manager to offer the following final proposals
regarding the City-County Jail contract to the Nueces County Commissioners Court for their
consideration: 1 - Increase the current annual payment by the City to the County of $275,000 to
$500,000 and allow for an annual increase per the Consumer Price Index; and 2 - Maintain the
current annual payment of $275,000 and allow for an annual increase per the Consumer Price Index,
and the city will continue to provide a full complement of identification technicians and, in addition,
the city will provide magistration services sufficient to magistrate prisoners at the County Jail on
a more frequent, daily basis. He also requested an extension of the termination date of the current
contract for four months. The motion was seconded by Mr. Colmenero. Mr. Kinnison made a
motion to amend Mr. Garrett's motion by requesting an extension of the contract for twelve (12)
months until September 12, 2005 to allow the City and County to fully consider all details relating
to the agreement, seconded by Mr. Scott. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes
on the amendment, and it passed with the following vote: Chesney, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and
Scott, voting "Aye"; Neal, Colmenero, Cooper and Garrett, voting "No". City Secretary Chapa
polled the Council for their votes on the motion as amended as follows: Neal, Colmenero, Cooper,
Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Chesney voting "No".
Mayor Neal stated that the city would draft their offer to the county providing as much detail
as necessary, and he and the City Manager would ask for an agenda presentation to the County
Commissioners' Court as soon as possible.
Mayor Neal announced that he was moving Item 30 regarding the Non-Discrimination
Ordinance up for discussion in one hour at approximately 12 noon, after public comment.
Mayor Neal referred to Item 21, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the
public hearing on the following item:
21.a.
Public hearing to consider adopting the revised South Central Area Development Plan;
establishing the City's Comprehensive Plan Policies on the downtown, uptown, bayfront,
bayfront arts and science park and surrounding areas for protection of the environment,
future land use, transportation, public services, and capital improvements; and amending
related elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the Urban Transportation Plan.
City Manager Noe noted that there was excellent turnout for the public meetings on the plan.
He said Mr. Michael Gunning, Assistant Director of Development Services, would present a number
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 10
of minor changes to the plan.
Based on the input obtained from the public meeting, Mr. Gunning presented a number of
recommendations. First, Mr. Gunning stated that the Planning Commission recommended the
insertion of a new policy statement, Policy Statement B.2, in the Land Use Section of the plan which
placed "the highest priority on the creation of activities on the bayfront that benefit the citizens of
Corpus Christi and that take advantage of the unique natural amenities of the bayfront, including
wind, water and temperate climate". The second recommendation was to reword Policy Statement
B.4 in the Land Use Section to "create economically viable incentives for promoting development
of new tourist oriented uses on private properties fronting Shoreline Boulevard, within 90 days of
adoption of this plan". The third recommendation was to insert a new policy statement in the
Transportation Section, Policy Statement C. 13, to "promote multi-modal transportation including
bike paths and bike parking". The fourth recommendation was to insert a new policy statement in
the Economic Development Section to state that "the expanded Convention Center and new Arena
will be a major economic stimulus to the regional economy by bringing in revenue from outside the
region. The primary goal for the Convention Center and Arena is to operate continuously to host
conventions or other goals".
The fifth recommendation was to insert a new policy statement in the Economic
Development section, Policy Statement D. 11, stating that "the city will explore renovation and
adaptive reuse of the coliseum". The sixth recommendation was to insert another new policy
statement in the Economic Development section, Policy Statement D. 12, stating the goal to
"coordinate with Texas A&M University to create a new off-site campus with student housing in
or in close proximity to the South Central Area". The seventh recommendation was to revise Policy
Statement E. 1 in the Public Services Bayfront Park Section, Policy Statement E. 1, which states that
"the City, in parmership with the Downtown Management District, the Port of Corpus Christi, the
Regional Transit Authority and the Metropolitan Planning Organization will conduct a special
community wide planning process to determine the most acceptable manner in which to create a
bayfront park. A fixed rail trolley with overhead electrical lines should not be located on the
bayfront".
The eighth recommendation was to revise Policy Statement E. 15 in the Public Services
Marina Section to read "protect and promote the Marina primarily for marina uses. Enhanced
marina facilities will include expansion and improvement of existing Marina facilities". Finally, the
ninth recommendation was to insert a new policy Statement in the Public Services Marina Section
to read "extend the marina breakwater southward to create a protected sailing area in front of McGee
Beach, Emerald Beach and Cole Park". Mr. Gunning concluded by saying that the Commission felt
strongly about their recommendations on the marina and on economic incentives. He also said the
plan draft would include a narrative to explain how the policy would be applied.
Mr. Scott asked for clarification of the first recommendation. Mr. Bob Payne, Senior
Planner, stated that the Planning Commission wanted to ensure that the plan emphasized
development that would benefit the citizens as well as the tourists. Ms. Barbara Bailey, Director of
Development Services, added that the plan also encouraged water-related activities because they
were unique to the area (e.g. windsurfing).
Mr. Scott expressed his concern that the plan wasn't specific enough in some areas, relying
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 11
on "case-by-case" determinations. He said the developers in the area were looking for more
certainty in the plan. Mr. Noe replied that the plan was specific but also allowed for flexibility.
Mayor Neal asked that members of the Planning Commission attend the second reading of
the plan so the Council could ask them questions directly about their recommendations.
Regarding the second recommendation, Mr. Kinnison stated that he thought there were
enough economic incentives in the downtown area. Mr. Noe replied that in most communities, it
takes some level of effort on the parts of the business community and the municipalities to stimulate
redevelopment of declining areas.
Mr. Gunning provided a brief history on the South Central Plan, including the history of
downtown planning, background and progress of the plan, and highlighted sections of the plans for
the Council's review.
Mayor Neal asked if the Planning Commission's recommendations included the comments
made by Mr. Leon Loeb. Mr. Payne answered that one of suggestions Mr. Loeb felt most strongly
about was that the plan was too aggressive on those select blocks on the bayfront. In response, the
Planning Commission's second recommendation addressed this concern by deleting the wording
about establishing a new zoning district for the rezoning of properties along Shoreline Boulevard.
Mr. Payne said Mr. Loeb was also strongly in favor of conducting a market analysis to determine
what the area's growth potential was. Mayor Neal remarked that he thought Mr. Loeb's idea that
the plan should be designed for lifestyle rather than attractions, and he thought sections of plan
reflected this thought.
Mayor Neal asked about the commission's concerns about the fixed rail trolley. Mr.
Gunning replied that the commission was mainly concerned that the overhead electrical lines would
be unaesthetic.
Mr. Colmenero noted that the baseball stadium was not included in the plan, and thought it
should be added to the section regarding the convention center and new arena.
Mr. Scott asked if the R.T.A.'s plan was to run the trolley on Shoreline Drive, and he
requested a copy of their plan. City Manager Noe replied that Shoreline Drive was one of the
options the R.T.A. was considering, and said he provide him with the plan. He said the charette also
included a trolley route, but down Water Street instead of Shoreline Drive. Mr. Scott asked if the
R.T.A. was aware of the plan's position on the trolley. Assistant City Manager Massey replied
affirmatively. City Manager Noe remarked that the plan was not opposed to the trolley itself; rather,
the opposition was to the overhead lines because they were unaesthetic.
Mr. Garrett asked why Corpus Christi Beach was not included in the plan. Mr. Noe
responded that Corpus Christi Beach was not in the South Central planning area; rather, it was in
the Northside planning area.
Mr. Kinnison stated that he was not in favor of creating new economic incentives. He said
he would rather increase the promotion the existing economic incentives. Regarding the trolley
system, he said the Council needed to move forward quickly on their direction to staffbecause the
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 12
route would create different capital projects. He said his personal preference was not to have the
trolley run on Shoreline Boulevard but on Water Street instead.
Mr. Kinnison also asked if Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi was interested in having
an off-site campus with student housing. City Manager Noe replied that the university was
interested in having a presence downtown, but did not say they wanted a "campus" per se.
A motion was made, seconded and passed to close the public hearing. Mayor Neal asked
when the item would be scheduled for a second reading. Mr. Gunning replied that the plan was
scheduled for a second reading on February 17. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their
votes as follows: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott,
voting "Aye".
Mayor Neal called for a recess to present proclamations.
The Council returned from recess, and Mayor Neal called for petitions from the audience.
There were no comments from the audience.
Mayor Neal deviated from the agenda, and opened discussion on Item 30 regarding the non-
discrimination ordinance. Mr. David Ramos, Director of Human Relations, stated that when staff
first presented the proposed non-discrimination ordinance to the Council in July 2003, the Council
issued a number of directives regarding the ordinance. First, he said the Council requested that staff
seek more public input from potentially impacted parties and interested organizations/associations.
Second, the Council wanted more information from other cities. Third, the Council asked for more
information on the City of Austin's experience with their ordinance since it was used as a model by
the Committee for Persons with Disabilities. Fourth, staff was to report on the "unknown" issues.
Fifth, staff was to further assess the necessary resources and implementation of the ordinance if
approved. Finally, staff was to provide funding option(s) if approved for implementation.
Regarding the first directive, Mr. Ramos reported that the Committee for Persons with
Disabilities held four monthly public meetings between August 2003 and November 2003. He said
the proposed ordinance was available for viewing at City Hall, the city's public libraries, and on the
city's website. He said staffcontacted 29 associations/organizations, 19 of which met with staff to
discuss the ordinance. He said the associations were invited to learn of recent revisions to the draft
ordinance on January 7, 2004. In total, Mr. Ramos stated that approximately 388 public comments
were received. While the consensus was that persons with disabilities should not be discriminated
against, the proposed ordinance itself received comments in support and in opposition.
Regarding the information fi.om other cities, the top 25 U.S. cities, based on population, were
surveyed. Of the 25 cities contacted, 12 cities responded that they did have a non-discrimination
ordinance, whether having a separate ordinance, having multiple ordinances or contract language
provision(s) for accessibility. Six cities responded that they did not have this type of ordinance, and
7 cities did not return a response.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 13
Regarding the Council's request for more information on the City of Austin's experience
regarding the ordinance, Mr. Ramos stated that in addition to their ordinance, Austin included
contract language and contract assurance for ADA compliance by contractors. He said the ADA
Coordinator conducts annual mandatory meetings on contract compliance requirements for
contractors. He said the City of Austin addresses non-compliance issues through complaints only.
He said Austin's ADA Coordinator said the city had not experienced any formal complaints under
Austin's ordinance, only inquiries.
Regarding the Council's request for more information on the "unknowns" of the ordinance,
Mr. Ramos stated that it is unknown which businesses and entities would comply with accessibility
requirements. He said the potential costs to business and entities was also an unknown, as well as
the volume of inquiries and complaints based on disability. Finally, Mr. Ramos cited that the
potential liability costs and possible litigation costs to complainants and respondents was unknown.
Mr. Ramos said the resources for the initial implementation costs would come out of the
general fund. He said the projected resources to begin implementation of the proposed ordinance
amendment would initially consist of two additional staff members in the Human Relations
department, a compliance officer and one staffassistant. Mr. Ramos said the current estimated cost
to fund these positions was $63,244. He noted that this was a substantial change from the first
reading of the ordinance, which included $300,000 in funding from the Park and Recreation
department. Mr. Chesney asked how this reduction came about. Mr. Ramos replied that the
ordinance had been broadly interpreted to go beyond the ADA requirements. He said, for example,
the assumption bad been that the Park and Recreation department would be required to modify every
city pool to meet ADA standards. Mr. Jay Reining, First Assistant City Attorney, explained that the
revised ordinance was now worded to make it clear that the interpretations in the ordinance would
apply the standards of the federal ADA regulations and policies. He said that they limited the scope
of the ordinance so that it matched the federal standards for what it required. Thus, Mr. Ramos said
that instead of having all the city pools be ADA-accessible, now the ordinance would simply require
that one pool be accessible.
Mr. Ramos explained how the proposed ordinance would be administered to provide
accessibility. He said it would be administered through local education, investigations of complaints
and monitoring of contracts/agreements for compliance within public facilities, services, program
and activities by the city and those operating on behalf of the city. He stated that investigations and
reviews for compliance would be complaint driven.
In conclusion, Mr. Ramos stated that the revised document addressed some of the public's
comments and input, such as incorporating language to clarify the city's jurisdiction in applying and
enforcing the ordinance and clarifying that the ordinance applied to cross-disabilities. He also said
that the ordinance established some discretion in assessing penalties for non-compliance. Mr.
Ramos said he felt the documents was much improved from the initial draft that had submitted.
Mayor Neal called for public comment. The following individuals spoke in support of the
proposed ordinance: Ms. Shea Hales, Ms. Crystal Lyons, Ms. Linda Falwell-Stover; Ms. Viola
Monreal; and Ms. Judy Telge.
Mr. Noyola asked who would be providing professional training to the community. Mr. Noe
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 14
answered that part of the function of the additional staffbeing requested by the ordinance was to
coordinate education and training programs for both inside and outside the city organization.
Mr. Kelly asked about the portion of the ordinance that seemed to say that even if an
individual does not have a disability that impairs their life activities, yet it is perceived to impair
their activities, they would be considered disabled under this ordinance. Mr. Ramos explained that
if someone is perceived to have a disability, even if they don't, discrimination has occurred. Ms.
Lyons provided the example of a person with severe burn marks on their face who tried to use a
public pool but is denied access because their appearance would make the other patrons
uncomfortable. In this instance, the person was discriminated against and would be protected by
this ordinance. Mr. Kelly observed that it seemed the ordinance was subjective.
Mr. Kinnison remarked that the process was going to be complaint-driven. He asked that
once an investigation had taken place and a determination made that discrimination had occurred,
what would be the next step in the process. Mr. Ramos answered that the ordinance did allow for
some penalties, but some of the complaints may be referred to the federal or state government if
deemed appropriate. Mr. Reining added that the ordinance did provide for penalties if the
discrimination involved public accommodations. Mr. Kinnison and Mr. Scott both expressed their
concern that the city's ordinance did not seem to have "teeth". City Manager Noe said the ordinance
did allow for penalties and would help the city rectify problems in the community.
Mayor Neal thanked the staff and the community members for their work in initiating this
ordinance. He said he hoped the ordinance would be used in a positive manner and not be abused.
Mr. Chesney echoed this sentiment. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as
follows:
30.a. MOTION NO. 2004-048
Motion to amend prior to second reading an ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances,
Chapter 24, Human Relations, by adding Article V, Discrimination Against Individuals With
Disabilities, establishing procedure and implementation; providing publication; providing
for penalties, by substituting in its entirety; An ordinance amending Sections 24-2, 24-4, 24-
20, 24-21, 24-22, and 24-25 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, by adding
a member to the Human Relations Commission, adding persons with disabilities to the
classes of persons protected by Chapter 24, Code of Ordinances, and clarifying the penalty
provisions; and by adding Article V, Discrimination Against Individuals With Disabilities,
Chapter 24, Human Relations establishing procedure and implementation; and providing for
penalties.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal, Chesney,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye".
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 15
30.b. ORDINANCE NO. 025650
Amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 24, Human Relations by adding Article V,
Discrimination Against Individuals with Disabilities, establishing procedure and
implementation and providing for penalties. (First Reading - 07/22/03)
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved as amended with the following vote:
Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting
Mayor Neal deviated from the agenda, and referred to the presentations on the day's agenda.
The first presentation was Item 23 regarding the Percent for Art ordinance. Ms. Linda Hodge,
Assistant Director of Programs for the Park and Recreation department, introduced Chairman
Deborah Fullerton and Ms. Linda Avila of the Arts and Cultural Commission. Ms. Avila stated that
the Percent for Art Ordinance was approved by the Council on March 1987. She said the ordinance
expanded opportunities for citizens and cultural tourists to experience art in public places. She also
said it recognized the substantial economic benefits to be gained through the provision of cultural
amenities, and encouraged the inclusion of works of art in private developments in the city.
Chairman Fullerton discussed the city's role in the Percent for Art ordinance. She said the
ordinance includes a 1.25 percent allocation for art in all city construction projects over $50,000.
She said the city also manages artist contracts and all related expenses. She said the role of the Arts
and Cultural Commission in the process is to review all capital improvement projects for eligibility
and practicality; confirm that monies have been allocated to appropriate project accounts; and select
an ad hoc peer panel to review and select art. She said the Arts and Cultural Commission strives to
be realistic with regard to what projects should get art and what projects should not, and will
continue to follow this reasonable approach in the future. She said a permanent art collection had
been created to maintain public art works for future generations.
Chairman Fullerton reported on the current Percent-for-Arts projects. She said six artists
have been selected to provide artwork for the convention center/arena project. The artist for the Fire
Station No. 7 project has also been selected. Ms. Fullerton said the selection process for the airport
project is in progress. Finally, Ms. Fullerton said the ad hoc peer panel members for the baseball
stadium will be recommended to the Council.
Ms. Avila stated that 2004 Bond Program presented an opportunity for the city to
implement a major Public Art Program. She said the Arts and Cultural Commission was dedicated
to working with the community, architects and artists in an effort to beautify Corpus Christi. She
also wanted to remind the Council that the Arts and Cultural Commission also supported performing
arts through their subgrant program. She announced that the 2na Annual Corpus Christi Festival of
the Arts would be held from March 5 through April 4.
Mr. Kinnison stated that the ordinance restricted the placement of art on the capital project
sites. He said he would like to see the ordinance modified to allow the commission to recommend
using percent-for-art funds for projects besides visual arts, such as for programming. He proposed
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 16
putting the percent-for-art monies into a special fund for the arts. Then, the monies could be used
for any number of art-related projects or programs deemed fit by the commission, with Council
approval.
Ms. Avila thanked Mr. Kinnison for his suggestion, and said she would relay the information
to the rest of the commission for their consideration. She remarked that part of the rationale behind
the Percent-for-Art ordinance's requirement that the project be placed at the capital project site was
to make the art accessible to the community. She also said the Arts and Cultural Commission
already provided various programming in the community. Mr. Ronnie Sepulveda, Superintendent
of Recreation, also stated that one of the concerns is that since CDBG funds and bond funds are used
in some cases, the art must be tied back to the building. City Manager Noe commented that the bond
propositions and the ballots have been constructed in specific ways that tie the monies to the sites
to assure the voters that their tax dollars would be applied to specific projects.
Mr. Scott commented that the Council may want to discuss a provision to put more money
into the arts through the Percent-for-Art program as part of Bond 2004. He suggested possibly
increasing the percentage from 1.25 percent to 2 percent. Mr. Chesney stated that he was in favor
of using the funds for visual art only. He was also in favor of a provision to allow for public art
projects to be spread out more evenly in the community.
Ms. Cooper thanked the commission for their hard work and their efforts to beautify the
community. Mr. Noyola agreed with Mr. Chesney that the funds should be used for visual art only,
but was in favor of a provision to spread the art projects more evenly throughout the community.
Mr. Colmenero supported Mr. Kinnison's suggestion to modify the ordinance to allow for more
flexibility.
The next presentation was Item 22, an update on the South Texas Military Facilities Task
Force. Mr. Gary Bushell, Attorney and Government Consultant, began the update by referring to
a chronology of 60 individuals that the South Texas Military Facilities Task Force has briefed on
the joint mining concept. Mr. Bushell also referred to two letters in support of the joint training
concept, one from General Mike Hagee of the U.S. Marine Corps to Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
and one from General Hagee to Governor Rick Perry. Additionally, he referred to a recent article
in Army Aviation magazine that argued in favor of the joint training concept, inclusive of Texas
bases. He said that when he presents the plan, he highlights the assets that the coastal bend area has
to offer.
Mr. Bushell said their plan included amphibious landings on a little-used part of Padre Island
and heavier use of a bombing range in McMullen County, in addition to greater use of the three
bases (Ingleside, Kingsville, and Corpus Christi). He said he has received a letter of support from
the McMullen County commissioners regarding the use of the bombing range in this way. He said
the task force has identified 3,000 acres owned by the General Land Office (GLO) where the
amphibious landings could take place. He said the county commissioners in Kleberg County voted
unanimously yesterday to enter into an agreement with the GLO to make the property available for
mine warfare training and amphibious training.
Mr. Bushell thanked the environmental community for supporting the use of the property on
Padre Island. He also thanked the National Seashore and the Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 17
Program for their support.
Mayor Neal asked Mr. Bushell what the next step was. Mr. Bushell replied that he was
currently working on an appointment with Admiral Bostianni, the commanding officer of the United
States Joint Forces Command. He said that if the Coastal Bend area was going to be a part of one
of the joint national training capability concepts, the determination would have to be made between
now and October. He said he felt the plan was gaining momentum.
The next presentation was Item 24, an update on Animal Care services. Ms. Cherrie Stunz,
Division Manager of Animal Care services, and Dr. Michael Silvers, Director of Health, provided
an update on a number of initiatives that the Animal Care division has implemented to improve
services. Ms. Stunz stated that the mission of the organization was to protect citizens from rabies;
apprehend stray, at-large, unwanted animals; and to enforce city and state laws.
To this end, Ms. Stunz said the priorities of the division were to respond to animal bites;
vicious animals; stray/roaming animals; injured animals; domestic/wildlife emergencies; and cruelty
to animals. She said the Animal Care division has 10 field officers, but only seven are available now
due to injuries. She stated that the division receives 36,000 work orders per year from callers
contacting the Utility Business Office. She said this number did not include those calls directly to
Animal Care services. Ms. Stunz stated that 14,000 domestic and wildlife animals are euthanized
on a yearly basis.
In response to the community's problem with stray and roaming animals and vicious animals,
she said the division has instituted regular sweeps of hot spot neighborhoods. She stated that the
division now holds administrative hearings for animal/animal bites, animal/human bites, and for
frequently impounded animals.
Ms. Stunz said that in 2003, the organization was restructured to include a field supervisor
and a kennel master. In 2004, she said two more new positions would be introduced, a bite case
investigator and a cruelty investigator. She said public education and outreach would be emphasized
to impact the problems in the community.
Dr. Silvers reported on a number of changes in the services and programs in Animal Care
Services. He said the department studied exemplary animal care programs in the state to determine
what changes needed to be made in the city's program. He said their research led to two changes
in ciW program.
The first change was made to the dead animal pick-up service. Previously, the city provided
this service for free primarily to veterinarians in the area. However, Dr. Silvers said the division has
learned that many veterinarians were charging their clients for this service, even though the city was
not collecting any fees. In addition, he said that BFI or Solid Waste can provide this service for a
fee on an on-call basis. Thus, he said staffdetermined that this was a redundant service that was not
impacting the health of the community and was not typically done by other animal control services
free of charge. Dr. Silvers said that the program has been discontinued.
The second change was made to the live traps program. Dr. Silvers said that the city's live
trap program primarily targeted opossums that pose no health risk to the community. He said
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 18
contrary to popular belief, the opossum does not carry rabies. Previously, Animal Care Services
would pick-up trapped opossums free of charge on an on-call basis. In order to complete the task,
a field officer was called from duty to transport them to the animal care facility. He their research
indicated that no other major cities in Texas were providing this service. Dr. Silvers said stafffound
that most cities had a much better educational program than Corpus Christi regarding the opossum.
He said the services were provided to less than one percent of the population. Since there was no
health risk to the community and the service impacted a small portion of the population, Dr. Silvers
said staff decided to discontinue the program to make better use of staff resources. He noted that
for the last seven to eight weeks since the program has been discontinued, staffhas been able to
respond to priority calls much more quickly, responding to 90 percent of the calls. He
acknowledged the decision was unpopular with many residents, but emphasized that staffresources
were needed to address priority needs like vicious animals and animal bites first.
Ms. Stunz provided a brief update on a number of administrative changes to the animal care
services division. She said the division was now accountable for pet licensing, and a new database
would provide information on the licensed animals in the area. She also briefly mentioned the new
animal care services facility and their new website.
A discussion ensued about the discontinuation of the opossum trap service. Ms. Stunz said
that rather than targeting opossums with their live trap program, most of the cities they studied
targeted cats. She said the city could benefit from a program targeting cats because of its mostly
uncontrolled cat population. Mr. Colmenero was concerned that there would be an increase in the
poisoning of opossums if the city discontinued the program. Mr. Noyola and Ms. Cooper were
opposed to the discontinuation of the service, and asked that the city consider allocating more dollars
to the animal care services division in future budget years to continue the service. Mr. Chesney and
Mr. Kelly supported staff's decision to discontinue the program if higher priority issues like vicious
animals would be addressed more quickly.
Mayor Neal deviated from the agenda, and opened discussion on Item 29 regarding a
business incentives agreement between A.C. Distribution and the Corpus Christi Business and Job
Development Corporation (CCBJDC). Assistant City Manager Mark McDaniel explained that the
CCBJDC authorized an agreement between A.C. Distribution Inc. for job training expenses on
February 2, 2004. He said in order to fully execute the agreement, the Council must pass a
resolution approving the contract between the CCBJDC and A.C. Distribution Inc. In addition, Mr.
McDaniel stated that Council action was necessary to enter into a project agreement with
corporation to administer the project. The Council asked questions about the total number of jobs
to be created and the quality of the jobs to be created; and the process if the company was to default
on their agreement. The Council offered the company their congratulations on the venture. There
were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as
follows:
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 19
29.a. RESOLUTION NO. 025648
Resolution approving the execution of the Business Incentives Agreement between the
Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Corporation") and A.C.
Distribution, Inc. to reimburse A.C. Distribution, Inc. for job training expenses up to $3,700
per new job created; and to create at least fifty new jobs primarily employed to serve a
customer base outside a fifty-mile radius of the City.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Chesney was
absent.
29.b. RESOLUTION NO. 025649
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Project Agreement
with the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Corporation")
regarding administration of the Business Incentives Agreement between the Corporation and
A.C. Distribution, Inc.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Neal,
Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott, voting "Aye"; Chesney was
absent.
Mayor Neal deviated from the agenda, and referred to Item 26, a presentation on the results
of the 2003 Citizen Satisfaction Survey. Dr. Dan Jorgensen, Assistant Professor of Public
Administration, presented the results. He said the 2003 survey showed that 65.9 percent of the
residents of Corpus Christi rate the overall quality of services as good to excellent. He said no
significant changes had occurred in this broad-based attitude since last year. He stated that the
survey was designed to report attitudes toward performance in public safety, transportation, parks
and recreation, housing and social services.
Dr. Jorgensen stated that the upper quartile (top 25 percent) of services with the highest
levels of satisfaction included the following: Fire protection (89%); emergency medical services
(88%); providing gas service (86%); garbage collection (84%); and police protection (76%). He
said there had also been some growth in the intensity of low satisfaction toward city services. The
upper quartile of services with the maximal levels of low satisfaction included the following:
attracting new employers to the community (74%); helping existing employers grow (69%); street
repair and maintenance (59%); and new street construction (51%).
Dr. Jorgensen said each response was cross-tabulated with council district, age, income and
ethnicity. He said ethnicity was the variable that has effects on the greatest number of city services.
In general, Hispanic respondents were more likely to be satisfied with utilities, recreational and
economic development services than expected and show lower levels of satisfaction with police
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 20
services than expected. Anglo respondents tended to be less satisfied with utilities and economic
developments services than expected and more satisfied with police and fire services.
Regarding respondents impressions of city employees, the data shows that of those who have
contact with city employees, there are strong positive impressions of city employees (40% were
rated "good" and 34% were rated "excellent").
In looking at preferences, Dr. Jorgensen stated that the respondents favor spending potential
Bond 2004 money on improving existing services at a higher rate than adding new facilities. He
said citizens favored a realignment of Shoreline Drive for a bayfront park and were willing to pay
additional taxes to fund service improvements and new facilities.
Dr. Jorgensen said that new to this year's survey was the assessment of how citizens obtained
information about the city. He said the data demonstrated that the two most common methods
citizens used to receive information about city government was through television (92%) and
newspaper (80%) media.
In conclusion, Dr. Jorgensen stated that when analyzing these findings, it can generally be
said that the residents of Corpus Christi feel good about how their city delivers services to them.
Also, he said residents generally feel very positive about their civil servants, rating them high in
knowledge, responsiveness and courtesy.
Mayor Neal deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 25, a presentation on Bond Issue
2000 projects. City Engineer Angel Escobar provided an update on four specific Bond 2000 projects
- the Seawall Traffic Control plan, Remobilization of South Staples Street, Gollihar/Ayers project,
and Home Road (Ayers to Kostoryz). He said a news conference would be held tomorrow to update
the public as well.
Mr. Escobar reported that the seawall traffic control plan would begin on February 26 and
would divert traffic from the northbound lanes on Shoreline Boulevard to the southbound lanes
between Peoples Street and Power Street. Mr. Escobar said the plan would be completed in three
phases and coincide with the work on the seawall.
Mr. Escobar reported that the Gollihar/Ayers project was under construction and progressing
well. He said several waterlines were being installed, and several bus pads are being installed. He
said the work would continue for the rest of the year. He said much of the utility work has been
completed, but the asphalt work is incomplete. He said several businesses have requested that the
asphalt work be delayed until after tax season.
Mr. Escobar reported the work on the South Staples Street project had been delayed during
the Christmas shopping season, but was now going to be remobilized. He said that the work would
create one lane of traffic in each direction (north and south) at the intersection of South Staples and
South Padre Island Drive. He stated that right-tums would only be allowed onto Staples Street, and
the light at Staples Street out of Moore Plaza would be inactivated. He said the work would last for
approximately three months. He noted that the work was initially estimated to last for five months,
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 21
but staffhas worked to reduce. Mr. Escobar advised the public to avoid the area as much as possible
and to take alternate routes.
Mr. Escobar provided an update on the Home Road project, fi.om Ayers to Kostoryz. He
said all traffic will be cut offon Home Road to complete the work. He said the exits would be on
Brawner Parkway and Gollihar so the contractor could have full access to the first phase of work.
He said the second phase of the work would go from Greengrove to Kostoryz. He said the
construction would begin in the second week in March and continue through May 2005.
Mayor Neal referred to the next presentation on the agenda, Item 27, regarding the review
of proposed FY 2004 Long-Range Street projects and the Bond 2004 process. Assistant City
Manager Mark McDaniel provided a proposed FY 2004 CIP guide. He said the total cost for the
CIP in FY 2004 was $962,315,000.
Mr. McDaniel discussed the various bond sizing considerations - large vs. small,
affordability, project management, market saturation, utility rates, and bond rating/interest rate.
Regarding the size of the bond, he said the city was now pursuing smaller issues every 4 years.
Regarding the affordability of the bonds, he said staff has been studying a scenario in which $70
million in debt would be issued every year for four years, with a voter-approved tax increase of 3
cents up front. He said staff was working on scenarios to reduce the 3-cent increase through short-
term financing options. Mr. Kinnison asked what would happen if it were increased by 4 cents
instead. Mr. McDaniel said the amount would increase to $80 million.
Mayor Neal commented that prioritizing $70 million would be difficult because it was a
relatively small amount for capital projects. Mr. McDaniel stated that staff was asking for direction
on what categories the Council would like to focus on. Mayor Neal stated that he felt streets, the
marina, the bayfi.ont park, and the golf courses were priority categories.
Mr. McDaniel discussed market saturation, saying that the programmed activity for the next
three years was $321.4 million. He said the TxDOT letting schedule included $176.2 million in
work. In addition, Del Mar College, Texas A&M-CC and other entities were also engaging in
construction projects. City Manager Noe remarked that the city did not want to over commit on
projects and then be unable to deliver the projects to the voter. Mr. Escobar said staff was working
on a plan to spread the projects out to deliver them as promised.
Regarding the citizen involvement process, Mr. Kinnison stated that he would like the city
to obtain public input using different methods besides town hall meetings, such as mall kiosks and
the city's website. He and Mr. Scott also said it would be preferable to present the public with a
Council-approved list narrowing down the projects for the public's input. The Council also
concurred that the largest bulk of the projects should be dedicated to streets.
Mr. Kinnison stated that in his district, a new southside library was needed, as well as other
street projects. He commented that the implementation of Proposition 13 could completely change
the projects. Mr. Kinnison stated that it might be preferable not to defer the payments because more
projects could be funded if the amount was larger.
Mr. Colmenero stated that streets needed to be the main priority in the funding. He also felt
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 22
the bayfront park, the marina, and the golf courses needed to be looked at as well.
Mr. Kelly noted that other taxing entities would be raising taxes for their own projects. He
said he felt it would be preferable to defer the payments because they would not require a tax
increase.
Mr. Noyola stated that he felt streets were the priority projects for this bond issue. He listed
the priority projects in his district to be Bear Lane, Navigation Blvd., Dr. Hector Garcia Park and
Greenwood Library.
Mr. Kinnison also stated the city should discuss the trolley project with the R.T.A. since the
recommendation has been made not to run the trolley along Shoreline Boulevard. He said the
decision could affect the CIP budget. City Manager Noe said staff would make sure that all the
projects that needed to be completed within the next four years would be submitted to the Council
for their review.
Mr. Scott stated that the final decision on the CIP budget amount would not take place for
a few more months. He said the $80 million figure would work as a starting point for the discussion,
but was not final. Mr. Chesney stated that he would like to see two scenarios, one including
estimates with Proposition 13 and one without the implementation of Proposition 13.
Mayor Neal deviated from the agenda, and opened discussion on Item 28, the second reading
of the FY 2003-2004 capital budget. Mr. McDaniel said the total budget was $173,624,300,
primarily for utility work. There were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled
the Council for their votes as follows:
28. ORDINANCE NO. 025647
Approving the FY 2003-2004 Capital Budget in the amount of $173,624,300. (First
Reading- 01/27/04)
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its second reading with the following
vote: Neal, Chesney, Colmenero, Cooper, Garrett, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola and Scott,
voting "Aye".
Mayor Neal called for the City Manager's report. City Manager Noe announced that the
community meeting on the Mustang/Padre Island Development Plan would be held this Thursday
at 5:30 p.m. at the Island Presbyterian Church. He also announced that the newly appointed TxDOT
commissioner, Ms. Hope Andrade, would be visiting the city on Thursday, February 12. He said
her visit would include a working meeting to be held at 4:00 p.m. in Watergarden Room of the
Museum of Science and History, followed by a reception at the Town Club at 6:00 p.m.. He also
announced a special tree planting ceremony for the NIP program to be held at Navarro Place Day
Care, 120 19th Street, at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, February 13. Finally, Mr. Noe stated that a press
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 23
release would go out tomorrow announcing the kick-off for the public input process on the bayfront
plan, to take place on Feb. 17 and 18 at various locations.
Mayor Neal called for Council concerns and reports. Mayor Neal asked for a status on a
problem with the O'Malley's club in the downtown area. Mr. Noe replied that code enforcement
was investigating the code violations now. Mayor Neal also said he heard an erroneous report on
the radio this morning stating that the Corps of Engineers was not going to fund Packery Channel,
and saying that the city needed $31.5 million to finish the project. He asked staff that he would like
them to contact that source immediately and provide the correct information.
Ms. Cooper reported that a constituent had notified her about a situation on Judy Court
involving a tent city. City Manager Noe said he would notify the police department about the
problem. Ms. Cooper announced that the next town hall meeting would be Monday, March 1, at
Elliott Grant Middle School in Mr. Kinnison's district.
Mr. Scott asked for a presentation item in March on the Velocity Games. He thanked staff
for responding to issue involving a the sale of a parcel of property in Flour Bluff.
Mr. Garrett inquired about a report that the Information Center in City Hall would be
eliminated. City Manager Noe replied that the position was linked to the Call Center, and would
be moved to the a different location across from the pay stations for Utility Billing. Mr. Garrett
questioned whether the center should be removed because it was helpful for citizens. Mr. Noe
replied that the center was also one of the main points for phone contact, so staff wanted to
coordinate it with the rest of the Call Center. Mr. Noe said he would look into the matter further.
Mr. Garrett asked if there were any plans to purchase additional fire trucks. City Manager Noe said
additional trucks were added only if there was a need for additional stations. He thanked Mr. Noe
for the financial report.
Mr. Noyola asked City Manager Noe to inform Mr. Arturo Garcia on Teresa Street about the
speed hump situation in his area. Mr. Noyola asked the city to issue a commendation for the
individuals who rescued residents in the Casa de Mafiana apartment fire.
Mr. Colmenero spoke regarding a problem with AEP sending citizens bill for multiple
months. He asked Mr. Noe to see if the city could find a way to make AEP more responsive to the
problem. He thanked Mr. Garrett for attending the COG meeting where the city was given a
resolution on the Homeland Security grant. Finally, Mr. Colmenero said he is still receiving
complaints about the Trucks Lounge on McArdle. City Manager Noe replied that the city has
notified the TABC about the problems. He also asked about 18-wheelers parking on Start Street.
City Manager Noe said he would look into it.
Mr. Kinnison thanked Mr. Garrett for going before the County Commissioners yesterday
morning in an effort to discuss the implementation of Proposition 13. He announced that there was
a website on with information Proposition ! 3: reconsiderprop 13.com. He said the implementation
of the proposition would have a dramatic impact on the budget, and most other counties and cities
in the state realize this and have not implemented it.
There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Neal adjoumed the
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
February 10, 2004 - Page 24
Council meeting at 6:15 p.m. on February 10, 2004.
~I' -
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving the lease purchase of one (1) 2000 GPM pumper
fire track from the Houston-Galveston Ama Council of Governments (H-GAC), for the total
amount of $386,676. The award is based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with H~GAC.
This unit is a replacement. Financing will be provided through the City's lease/purchase
financing program.
Purpose: The track will be used by the Fire Department for tim fighting duties.
It will be assigned to Station No. 14. The City currently has twenty-
eight fire fighting units in the fleet with twenty-one operating as front
line units and seven units placed in reserve status. The replaced item
will be disposed of through standard surplus equipment disposal
procedures.
Basis of Award:
The equipment will be purchased through the cooperative purchasing
agreement with Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments. H-
GAC acts as a purchasing agent for participating members through the
Inter-local Cooperation Act and abides by all Texas statutes regarding
competitive bidding requirements. An additional $2,000 will be paid
to H-GAC as an administration and contracting fee.
Price Comparison:
The City purchased a similar pumper fire truck in 2001 for a price of
382,105.89.
Funding:
Fire Department
530190-1020-12010
The equipment will be funded by the City's lease/purchase contractor.
The estimated interest rate is 2.5 % The actual interest rate will be
determined after acceptance of the equipment. The equipment will he
owned by the City at the end of the lease period. The estimated annual
payment is $82,349.76. The five-year total including principal of
$386,676 and interest of $25,072.80 is $411,748.80
Mich:
(~trrera, C~
The delivery lead time of the pumper truck is estimated at eight
months. As such, no funds from the current fiscal year will be
expended for this lease purchase. Funds will be requested in
subsequent fiscal years during the budget process.
Procurement & General Services Manager
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
BID TABULATION
1/20/2004
RESCUE PUMPER TRUCK
QUANTITY: 1
Item
Description
RESCUE PUMPER TRUCK
2004 Pierce Dash Top-Mount
Custom Rescue Pumer
Siddons Fire Appartatus, Inc.
Houston, Texas
Total
~386~676
3
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving a supply agreement for approximately 118,000
lbs. of drop-on type glass spheres, in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0048-04 from
Swarco Reflex, Inc., Mexia, Texas, based on low bid for an estimated annual mount of $26,078.
This item will be used by Street Services. The term of the contract is for twelve months with
options to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of the
supplier and the City Manager, or his designee. Funds have been budgeted by the using
department in FY 03-04.
BACKGROUND:
Purpose:
Previous Contract:
Bid Invitations issued:
Bids Received:
Price Analysis:
Award Basis:
This item will be used by Street Services to mix with traffic
marking paint to make the paint reflective.
The option to extend the previous contract was exercised, requiring
new bids to be received.
Nine
Four
When compared to the previous bid of 2001, pricing has increased
approximately 8 %.
Low bid.
Funding:
Street Services - 520130-1020-12320 $26,078
~era, C. P. M.~ ~
Procurement and General Services Manager
BID INVITATION NO: BI -0048-04
—� GLASS SPHERES
QUANTITY: 118,000 LBS.
BUYER: Maria Garza
DESCRI
DROP -ON TYPE
GLASS SPHERES,
STANDARD
SWARCO REFLEX, INC
MEXIA, TX.
UNIT EXTENDED
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
BID TABULATION
S INDUSTRIES,
FORGE, PA.
EXTENDED
118,0001 0.221 526.078.00 1 0.2296 $27,092.80
lAFFIC SUPPLY, INC. TRANTEX, INC.
)RTH WORTH, TX HOUSTON, TX
UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED
0.25 $29,500.00 1 0.2588 $30,538.40
MFG: SWARCO POTTERS SWARCO POTTERS
MODEL NO: CC SPEC. CC SPEC. A ASHTOM-247-81 M247MP, TEXAS TYPE I
LEAD TIME: 7-14 DAYS ARO 30 DAYS ARO 7-10 DAYS 21 DAYS
MINIMUM ORDER QTY: 20,000 LBS TRUCKLOAD 40,000 LBS 30,000 LBS 44,000 LBS
4
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving a supply agreement with National Meters,
Inc., Lancaster, Ohio, for approximately 2,000 gas service regulators in accordance with
Bid Invitation No. BI-0036-04, based on low bid, for an estimated annual expenditure of
$25,900. The term of thc agreement shall be for twelve months with an option to extend
for up to two additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of the supplier and
the City Manager or his designee. Funds have been budgeted by thc Gas Department in
FY 03/04.
BACKGROUND:
Purpose:
These regulators will be purchased and used by the Gas
Department. They are used to reduce the pressure of
natural gas from the main line to the required level for
residential customers.
Bid Invitations Issued: Seventeen
Bids Received: Four
Previous Contract:
Option to extend was exercised, requiring new bids to be
received.
Pricing Analysis:
When compared to previous contract, pricing is stable.
Award Basis: Low Bid
Funding f~ ~ "~ Gas 520150-4130-34130
Micha~ ~xera,
Procurement and Gefferal Services Manager
$58,000
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
BID TABULATION
BID INVITATION NO. BI -0036-04
GAS SERVICE REGULATORS
BUYER: GABRIEL MALDONADO
TOTAL $25,900.00 $27,420.00 $30,440.00 $47,440.00
NATIONAL METER, INC
ACTARIS
GAJESKE, INC.
SECOR
LANCASTER, OH
OWENTON, KY
HELOTES, TX
HOUSTON, TX
UNIT TOTAL
UNIT TOTAL
UNIT TOTAL
UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT
PRICE PRICE
PRICE PRICE
PRICE PRICE
PRICE PRICE
1 1" X V HOUSE TYPE GAS 2,000 EACH
$12.95 $25,900.00
$13.71 $27,420.00
$15.22 $30,440.00
$23.72 $47,440.00
SERVICE REGULATORS
TOTAL $25,900.00 $27,420.00 $30,440.00 $47,440.00
5
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving the lease of a wheel loader with Crescent
Machinery Company, Corpus Christi, Texas for the total amount of $86,184, of which $17,955 is
budgeted in FY03-04. The award is in accordance with Bid Invitation No. B1-0054-04 and is
based on best value. The term of the lease is for twenty-four months with an option to extend the
lease for up to twelve additional months subject to the approval of the City Manager or his
designee. The wheel loader will be used by the Park & Recreation Department.
******************************************************************************
Background
Purpose:
The wheel loader will be used by the beach operations division of
the Park & Recreation Department for maintaining the beach and
beach roadways. In January of 2002, the City assumed beach
maintenance responsibilities of the newly annexed beach front
property. Since that time, the City has been leasing a wheel loader
on the open market.
The decision to lease the wheel loader in lieu of purchasing the
equipment was made due to the harsh conditions present at the
beach. The lease provides for a full maintenance contract that will
keep the unit operational throughout the term of the lease. At the
end of the two year lease, the City will either exercise its option to
extend the lease or establish a new lease for replacement
equipment.
Number of bids Issued: Ten
Number of bids received: Four
Award Basis:
Best Value
The evaluation team, comprised of team members from Park and
Recreation and Purchasing, developed a matrix of the evaluation
criteria. The evaluation criteria components set forth in the
proposal included: (1) Rental Agreement 25%, (2) Full
Maintenance Agreement 25%, (3) Age of Unit and Hours of Use
10%, (4) Bidders Profile and Qualifications 10%, and (5) Cost
30%. The evaluation team reviewed each RFP Proposal response
and completed the evaluation matrix. The resulting matrix
prioritized each vendor based on the point value assigned for each
criterion component in the evaluation matrix. Vendor rankings
based on this scoring method are shown in the attached evaluation
matrix.
As a result of the evaluation, the team has selected Crescent
Machinery Company, as the best valued supplier for this
opportunity.
H & V Equipment, Corpus Christi, Texas submitted a bid, however
their offer took exception to the scheduled delivery date. Holt-
CAT, Corpus Christi, Texas submitted a bid, however their offer
does not meet bid specifications. Both bidders submitted higher
lease rates than the recommended award.
Price History:
The open market monthly lease rate for the equipment is $4,235.
The recommended monthly lease rate is $3,591.
Funding:
Park & Recreation
530160-1020-12940
$17,955
Annual funding will be requested during each of the following
budget years. The ongoing contract is contingent upon all future
budget appropriations.
Procurement & General Services Manager
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
SUMMARY EVALUATION MATRIX
RENTAL OF WHEEL LOADER
Crescent Machinery Hertz
Corpus Chdsti, Tx Oo~us Chdsti, Tx
Maximum Points Points
Evaluation Criteria Points Awarded Awarded
Rental Agreement 25 points 23 23
Full Maintenance 25 points 25 25
Agreement
Age of unit & Hours 10 points 7.9 0.5
of use
Bidder's Profile & 10 points 8 1(]
Qualifications
Pricing 30 points 3C 2(~
SCORE 93.9 78.5
Annual Cost $43,092 $64,714
Two Year Total 86,184 129,428
Note:
H & V Equipment, Corpus Christi, Texas submitted a bid, however their offer took exception to delivery schedule date.
Holt-CAT, Corpus Christi, Texas submitted a bid, however their offer does not meet bid specifications.
6
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 17, 2004
SUBJECT: ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING A $7,000 GIFT FROM THE FRIENDS
OF THE CORPUS CHRISTI PUBLIC LIBRARIES
AGENDAITEMS:
a)
Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Girl Agreement
with the Friends of the Corpus Christi Public Libraries which provides the City
with a girl of $7,000 for the expansion and remodeling of the Mary and Jeff Bell
Children's Library at the Central Library.
b)
Appropriating $7,000 from the Friends of the Corpus Christi Public Libraries in
the Library CIP Fund no. 3210 for Improvements to the Mary and Jeff Bell
Children's Library at the Central Library; amending FY 2004 Capital Budget
adopted by Ordinance 025647 by increasing appropriations by $7,000; and
declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: The Friends of the Corpus Christi Public Libraries has undertaken a campaign to raise a
minimum of $250,000 for the expansion and remodeling of the Mary and Jeff Bell Children's
Library at the Central Library. The library will double in size to 3,000 sq. ft. To date over
$137,000 has been raised. Included in this $7,000 transfer to the City is a $5,000 from the
Coastal Bend Community Foundation plus other contributions. The Charity League has selected
this project as this year's charity and will complete fundraising in May.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Execution of agreements and appropriation of funds
require Council approval.
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: $61,344 received from the Friends of the Corpus Christi Public
Libraries and appropriated March 25, 2003; $15,000 received from the Corpus Christi Public
Library Foundation, Inc. and appropriated May 20, 2003; $54,000 received from the Friends of
the Corpus Christi Public Libraries and appropriated November 11, 2003.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Additional contributions will be received next year requiring
appropriation. A construction contract will be awarded next year as well.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends gift acceptance and appropriation of funds.
Herb Canales
Director of Libraries
ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $7,000 FROM THE FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC
LIBRARIES IN THE LIBRARY CIP FUND NO. 3210 FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MARY AND JEFF BELL CHILDREN'S
LIBRARY AT THE CENTRAL LIBRARY; AMENDING FY 2004
CAPITAL BUDGET ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 025647 BY
INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS BY $7,000; AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY
BE IT ORDAINED By THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That $7,000 from the Friends of the Public Libraries is appropriated
in the Library CIP Fund No. 3210 for improvements to the Mary and Jeff Bell
Children's Library at the Central Library.
SECTION 2. That the FY 2004 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No.
025647 is amended by increasing appropriations by $7,000.
SECTION 3. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members,
copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the
need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration
of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of
and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is
passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the
__ day of ,2004.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
APPROVED: ~-~,~. II, Poo4-
Lisa Ag uil~[r.P
Assistant City Attorney
for City Attorney
Corpus Christi, Texas
__ day of ~, 2004
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully, Respectfully,
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Javier D. Colmenem
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 17, 2004
SUBJECT: ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING A $14,771 GRANT FROM THE
TEXAS STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEMS:
a)
b)
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant in the
amount of $14,771 and to execute a contract and all related documents with the
Texas State Library and Archives Commission for the Lone Star Libraries Grant
to be used for the preservation and cataloging of local history materials.
Ordinance appropriating $14,771 grant from the Texas State and Archives
Commission in the No. 1068 Library Grants Fund for preservation and cataloging
of local history materials; and declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: The state has made available $14,771 to the library as part of its Lone Star Libraries
Grant program. The library will use these funds to preserve and catalog valuable local history
materials collected over the past several decades. It has been estimated that the library owns
over 50,000 individual items of historical significance, including family papers, documents,
maps, photographs, newspapers, and other ephemera. The Friends of the Corpus Christi Public
Libraries has supported the acquisition of historical documents and preservation materials. The
library has also been the recipient of two National Endowment of the Humanities grants totaling
$10,000 for storage and preservation supplies. These Lone Star Grant funds will be used to hire
part-time temporary employees, mainly students at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Execution of agreements and appropriation of funds
require City Council approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of grant and appropriation of funds.
Herb Canales
Director of Libraries
ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $14,77t GRANT FROM THE TEXAS STATE
LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES COMMISSION IN THE NO. 1068
LIBRARY GRANTS FUND FOR PRESERVATION AND
CATALOGING OF LOCAL HISTORY MATERIALS; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That a $14,771 grant from the Texas State Library and Amhives
Commission is appropriated in the No. 1068 Library Grants Fund for preservation
and cataloging of local history materials.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members,
copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the
need for immediate ac{ion necessary for the efficient and effective administration
of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of
and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is
passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the
day of ,2004.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
APPROVED: January 30, 2004
Lisa Aguilar ~
Assistant City Attorney
for City Attomey
Corpus Christi, Texas
Day of
,2004
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Samuel L. Neal, Jr., Mayor
City of Corpus Christi
Council Membem
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
8
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 17, 2004
SUBJECT: Emergency Recovery Operations - Pre-Positioned Contract Development
(Project No. 90043)
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. I with
Shiner, Moseley and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $30,000 for consulting services
associated with Pre-Planning of Emergency Recovery Operations.
ISSUE: In order to expedite post-hurricane recovery operations and maximize
reimbursement from various disaster relief funds, it is essential that necessary plans and
contracts be developed and in place for rapid recovery response and to provide proper
documentation to support reimbursement requests from emergency funds.
FUNDING: Funding is available from the FY2003-2004 Operating Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the ordinance and motion as presented.
~. g~l R. Escobar, P. E.
Director of Engineering Services
Director of Water Services
Foster Crowell
Director of Wastewater Services
Jeffrey' ~ ~-~
Director of Solid Waste Services
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Exhibit A.
Exhibit B.
Background Information
Contract Summary
H:~IOME~KEVINS\GEN~HU RRICAN~04Mgmt\^AwdMemo.doc
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
BACKGROUND: In order to expedite post-hurricane recovery operations and maximize
reimbursement from various disaster relief funds, it is essential that necessary plans and
contracts be developed and in place for rapid recovery response and to provide proper
documentation to support reimbursement requests from emergency funds.
A hurricane or other major disaster will result in a dramatic increase in City workloads. The
City will be required to continue normal operations while mobilizing all available resources
to conduct an effective and efficient disaster recovery operation. Therefore, it was found to
be to the City's advantage to identify, contract and pre-position the contract services that
will be required to undertake recovery efforts. This resulted in several pre-positioned
contracts being in place since the 1998 hurricane seasons.
Vadous pre-positioned recovery and damage assessment contracts were activated in 1999
as a result of Hurricane Bret. While the City suffered only limited damage, the recovery
actions were well coordinated. The pre-positioned contracts functioned as intended and
there was satisfaction with the contractors' responsiveness and the speed of recovery.
Council originally initiated pre-positioned contracts for hurricane and emergency recovery
operations in 1997. The contracts covered the 1998 through 2002 hurricane seasons. In
2003, a new contract was issued for contract management services, debds removal and
reduction, and hazardous materials collection and disposal.
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS:
January 28, 2003 - Motion to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a
contract with Shiner, Moseley and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $80,000 for consulting
services associated with Pre-Planning of Emergency Recovery Operations (M2003-038).
June 16, 2003 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a
contract to be activated only in the event of a hurricane or other disaster with D&J
Enterprises, Inc. of Auburn, Alabama for Debris Management: Clearing, Removal and
Disposal for Post Hurricane/Disaster Recovery Operations.
June 24, 2003 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a
contract, to be activated only in the event of a hurricane or other disaster, with Ash Britt
Environmental of Pompano Beach, Flodda in the amount of $1,151,892 for the Collection,
Characterization, and Disposal of Hazardous Waste during Post Hurricane/Disaster
Recovery Operations.
CONSULTANT: Shiner, Moseley and Associates, Inc. successfully completed the Pre-
Planning for the odginal contract (1997) and the management/training contracts for the
1998 through 2003 Hurricane Seasons.
CONTRACT: The new contract provided for revisions in the current pre-positioned contract
documents to reflect experiences of other jurisdictions and changes in FEMA regulations.
Shiner Moseley will also coordinate with NAS Corpus Christi, the Corpus Christi
l EXHIBITA J
C:~DOCUME~I~Use~_OCALS~I\TernpV,AWD~KG.EXA.doc Page 1 of 2
International Airport, FAA, FEMA Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and other
agencies to determine if any modifications to the Debris Reduction and Storage Site
Agreements are necessary. The contract also provided for a future phase to implement
preparedness services including the pre-positioned contracts and annual contract
management services associated with hurricane/disaster preparedness. These annual
management services are addressed through amendments for each hurricane season.
ALTERNATIVES: Maintenance of pre-positioning contracts is the only viable method of
minimizing recovery time and assudng maximum recovery of expenditures from FEMA and
other reimbursements.
FUNDING: Funding is available from the FY2003-2004 Annual Operating Budget.
Funding is being allocated to the Street, Solid Waste, Wastewater, and Water
Departments' based upon an estimate of the benefit that will accrue to the Departments.
Activation (Hurricane Approach Preparations) and Recovery Operations would be
authorized as an amendment only in the event of a hurricane or other disaster with the fee
being provided at that time.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The implementation schedule provides for all pre-
positioned contracts, all training sessions/exercises, and other tasks for the 2004 Hurricane
Season to be complete by June 1, 2004.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the ordinance and motion as presented.
C:~DOCUME~I~JSERILOCALS~ I\TEMP~'AWDBKG.EXA.DOC
I EXHIBIT A ]
Page 2 of 2
CONTRACT SUMMARY
AMENDMENT No. 1
Article I, Section B. Additional Services is amended to mad:
Additional Services
1. Contract Management- 2003 Hurricane Season Implementation;
2. Contract Management- 2004 Hurricane Season Implementation;
3. Contract Management- Futura Hurricane Seasons Implementation;
4. Annual Contract Review - Review pm-positioned contracts, provide training and exercises, and
coordinate with the City to ensure that all information is current.
5. Restoration Contract Management - Subject to specific activation by City, manage the
execution of pre-positioned contracts.
The Engineer will use sub-consultants experienced with post-event operations and FEMA policies to
supplement their workforce dudng major post-event operations.
Article III- Fees Authorized is amended to read:
ARTICLE III - FEES AUTHORIZED
The City will pay the Consultant a total not to exceed fee of $110,000. This fee will be full and total
compensation for all services provided and expenses incurred in performing the tasks specified.
The odginal contract fee totals $80,000.00 for 2003 services; and
The fee for Amendment No. 1 totals $30,000 for 2004 services.
Summar~ of Fees:
Tasks J Description J Fee
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
BASIC SERVICES
A I Contract Development $65,000
BASIC SERVICES SUBTOTAL $65~000
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
B1 Contract Mana~lement - 2003 Hurricane Season $15,000
B2 Annual Hurricane Season Implementation To Be Ne~lotiated/Authorized
B3 Annual Contract Review To I~e Ne~lotiated/Authodzed
B4 Management of Contractor Services To Be Negotiated/Authorized
ADDITIONAL SERVICES SUBTOTAL $15~000
ORGINAL CONTRACT TOTAL $80~000
AMENDMENt No. 1
B2a I Contract Management - 2004 Hurricane Season $30,000
AMENDMENT No. I TOTAL $30,000
TOTAL $110,000
Exhibit B I
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 17, 2004
SUBJECT: Gas Department Building Remodeling, Phase 1 (Project No. 1555)
AGENDAITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to an
amhitectural services in an amount not to exceed $3,800.00 with Morgan Spear
Associates, Inc. of Corpus Chdsti, Texas for the Gas Department Building Remodeling,
Phase 1 Project for Construction Inspection Services.
ISSUE: The odginal architectural contract was issued administratively. Any amendment
which causes the total contract to exceed $25,000 requires Council approval.
FUNDING: Funds to finance the proposed project are available in the Gas Operating
Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Motion as presented.
Debbie Marroquin,[P E
Director of Gas Department
~--.Angel R. Escobar, P. E.,
Director of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "A" Background Information
Exhibit "B" Location Map
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJI:CT: Gas Department Building Remodeling, Phase I (Project No. 1555)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1. July 22, 2003 - Ordinance approving the FY 2003-2004 Capital Operating Budget
(Ordinance No. 025394).
2. February 1712004 -Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to award
a construction contract to Elite Construction Company of Corpus Christi, Texas in
the amount of $309,320 for the Gas Department Building Remodeling, Phase 1
Project.
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
1. September 29, 2003 - Executed Small Agreement for ArchitectJEngineer
Consultant Services with Morgan Spear Associates, Inc. in the amount of $25,000
for the Gas Department Building Remodeling, Phase 1.
3. October 30, 2003 - Executed Small Agreement for ArohitectJEngineer Consultant
Services with Health & Safety Management, Inc. in the amount of $350 for the Gas
Department Building Remodeling, Phase 1.
4. October 30, 2003 - Executed Testing Agreement with Rock Engineering & Testing
Laboratory, Inc. in the amount of $1,100 for the Gas Department Building
Remodeling, Phase 1.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: The Gas Department Building is located at 4225 South Port
Avenue. The facility was constructed in approximately 1950; and no significant remodeling
has taken place since then. The proposed project enhances the Gas Department re-
engineering and training efforts. The Meter Shop was re-engineered several years ago
and resulted in available floor space. This extra floor space will be utilized to
accommodate fifty-two (52) department employees and provide a more serviceable training
room. To continue the quality of service to our citizens, training is essential to the
operation of the Gas Department. As mandated by the Texas Railroad Commission, we
must also continue the Operator Qualification Program in which a training room will be
incorporated into the design.
CONTRACT SUMMARY: The original contract provided only for normal construction
phase services. A recent resignation in the Engineering Construction Inspection Division
and heavy workload requires construction inspection be outsourced.
The architect will provide daily inspection of the construction work and weekend
inspections as required. The additional fee to provide this service is $3,800.00.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the FY 2003-2004 Gas Operating
Budget.
EXHIBIT "A" 1
Page 1 of 1
\ Mproject \ councilexhibits \ exh1555.dwg
IH
N
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
PROJECT LOCATION
4225 S. PORT AVE.
F.M. 43
PROJECT # 1555
EXHZBZ T "B"
GAS DEPARTMENT BUILDING
REMODELING, PHASE I
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE: I of 1
DATE: 2- 10-2004
-~
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 17, 2004
SUBJECT: Corpus Christi International Airport Runways 13, 31 and 35 End Drainage /
Grading Modifications (Project #1089)
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to award a construction contract to
Berry Contracting, L.P. dba Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of
$309,591.20 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Runways 13, 31, and 35 End
Drainage/Grading Modifications.
ISSUE: This project is necessary to correct the existing drainage system at the Corpus
Christi International Airport and bring it in compliance with current FAA regulations.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the Airport's FY 2003-2004 Capital
Improvement Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented so a
construction contract may be issued and necessary improvements may begin.
Dave Hamrick
Director of Aviation
Date
~D[~.~_A. ngel R. Escobar, P.E. Date
Director of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "A" Background Information
Exhibit "B" Project Budget
Exhibit"C" Bid Tab Summary
Exhibit "D" Location Map
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Corpus Christi International Airport Runways 13, 31, and 35 End Drainage /
Grading Modifications (City Project #1089)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1. February 10, 2004 - Approval of the FY 2003 - 2004 Capital Improvement Budget
for $173,624,300. (Ordinance No. 025647)
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
1. September 25, 2003 - Administrative approval of Amendment No. 12 to a Contract
for Engineering Services for the Corpus Chdsti International Airport Airfield
Improvement Project in the amount to RVE, Inc. in the amount of $5,000 for Airfield
Drainage Improvements - Runways 13, 31, and 35 Eng Drainage / Grading
Modifications.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Nothing anticipated to complete this project.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: The existing drainage system configuration at the end of
Runways 13, 31 and 35 does confirm to federal regulations and has therefore has been
deemed a safety hazard. This project will correct system deficiencies and ensure
compliance to meet current FAA regulations.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of: · Grading,
· Drainage,
· Seeding,
· Storm Water Pollution Prevention,
· Miscellaneous pavement marking's
· Threshold relocations,
· Barricading, and
· Other related work items required to complete the project.
BID INFORMATION: The project solely consists of one base bid. The City received
proposals from three (3) bidders on February 4, 2004. (See Exhibit "C") The total bid
prices ranged from: $ 309,591.20 to $349,545. The Engineer's estimated construction cost
for the project is $323,700.
City staff, and the City's consultant RVI, Inc., recommend that based on Iow bid and past
satisfactory experience with projects of this type, that a construction contract be awarded to
Berry Contracting, L/P. dba Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of
$309,591.20 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Runways 13,31, and 35 Drainage /
Grading Modifications.
EXHIBIT "A"
H\HOME~LYNDP. S\GEN~Aia~O.\I089 RunwayGradlng/Bacl~grounddoc Page 1 of 2
CONTRACT TERMS: The contract specifies that the project will be completed in 45
calendar days after the notice to proceed, with completion anticipated by late April 2004.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available in the Airport Capital Improvement Budget..
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 2
CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
RUNWAY 13, 31 AND 35 END DRAINAGE / GRADING MODIFICATIONS
PROJECT BUDGET
February 17, 20074
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
IFiscal Year 2003 - 2004 Airport Capital Improvement Bud~let
FUNDS REQUIRED:
ESTIMATED
BUDGET
378,050.20
Construction Cost (Berry Contracting dba Bay, Ltd.) $ 309,591.20
Construction Contingencies 30,959.00
AE Consultant (RVI, Inc.) 5,000.00
Construction Inspection 12,500.00
i Testing 9,000.00
iEngineering Reimbursements 6,000.00
Administrative Reimbursements 3,000.00
Incidental Expenses (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 2,000.00
Total ..................................................................................................... $ 378,050.20
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 1 of I
TABULATION OF BIDS
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
TABULATED BY: 'Angel R. Escobar, P.E., Director of Engineering Services
DATE: Wednesday, February 4, 2004 TIME OF COMPLETION: 45 Calendar Days
Corpus Christi International Airport
Runways 13, 31, and 35 End Drainage/
Grading Modifications - Project No. 1089
Bay, Ltd.
PO Box 9908
Corpus Christi, TX 78469
HMT Tank Service, Inc.
9225 Leopard St.
Corpus Christi, TX 78409
Nuway International
PC Box 270898
Corpus Christi, TX 78427
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
GTI.
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
GE.01
Mobilization/
1
LS
$14,110.00
$14,110.00
$16,150.00
$16,150.00
$58,000.00
$58,000.00
Demobilization
GE.02
Bonds
1
IS
$4,500.00
$4,500.00
$8,075.00
$8,075.00
$10,500.00
$10,500.00
GE.03
Runway 6 Taxiway
1
LS
$39,620.00
$39,620.00
$83,455.00
$83,455.00
$23,800.00
$23,800.00
Barricading 5 Marking
GE.04
Storm Water Pollution
1
IS
$16,150.00
$16,150.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$35,853.00
$35,853.00
Prevention
G.01
Clearing and Grubbing
12.64
AC
$1,580.00
$19,971.20
$8,000.00
$101,120.00
$5,300.00
$66,992.00'
G.02
Grading
61,200
SY
$2.98
$182,376.00
$1.60
$97,920.00
$1.80
$110,160.00I
G.03
Seeding
12.64
AC
$2,600.00
$32,864.00
$2,000.00
$25,280.00
$3,500.00
$44,240.00
TOTAL BASE BID
$309,591.20
$333,000.00
$349,545.00
X
7'
Q
,r
n
File : \Mproject\councilexhibits\exh1089.dwg
~ San Patricio County
PROJECT LOCATION ~ ~ ~ ~-' X~X~
~OCATION ~AP
NOT TO SCALE
CE~R CHAVEZ BLVD. H~ 4~ AGNES RD.
..... - N
SITE kOCATION
NOT TO SCALE
CITY PROJECT No. 1089 EXHIBIT "D"
CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CITY COUNCZL EXHIBIT ~
RUNWAYS 13, 31, AND 35 END DRAINAGE/ aga~g~ o~ ~ s~uc~s
G~DING ~ODIFICATIONS PAGE: I of 1
Cl~ OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DATE: 02-~2-2004 ~
-T-~
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 17, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City of Corpus Christi's proportional contribution of the local share
of administrative expenses for regional water planning activities during FY 2003, required by Senate Bill 1,
75th Texas Legislature, in accordance with the Inteflocal Agreement for Water Planning Activities approved
by Motion M98-034, with the City's remaining share according to the formula adopted by the Regional Water
Planning Group, to be $44,309.51.
ISSUE: Senate Bill 1 in 1997 comprehensively changed Texas water laws. One aspect of the bill provided for
a comprehensive long range planning process through the creation of Regional Water Planning Groups
(RWPG). With input from Corpus Christi and other entities from this area, the Texas Water Development
Board appointed a RWPG for this are,~ The law required that the RWPG appoim a political subdivision as its
administrative representative in the planning process. In February 1998, the City and the Nueces River
Authority (NRA) executed an agreement proposing NRA as the administrative representative. The RWPG
subsequently approved NRA.
The agreement also anticipated that, pursuant to the statute, an equitable plan would be developed for sharing
of costs, which had to be borne locally in order to receive State planning funds. On August 25, 1998, the City
Council approved $115,000 for the City's share of local costs for that year (M98-304). Subsequently on August
24, 1999, the Council approved $45,300 in additional funds due to a revision of the formula for participating
entities for the period of March 1998 through December 2000 CM99-280). The City's share was $45,529.65
(approved by M2001-140) and $45,309.51 (approved by M2002-050) for years 2001 and 2002, respectively.
For 2004, the RWPG has approved $60,000 as the interim budget. Allocation was based on the interim budget
divided by 541,184, (the total regional population based on the 2000 census). The resulting per capita cost of
$.1109 was then aggregated to political subdivisions on the basis of the actual 2000 population.
During the initial planning period, the City agreed to pay on behalf of all the political subdivisions receiving
water from the City. Based on the above interim budget and allocation calculation, the City has been allocated
$44,309.51 as their portion of the administrative cost for the interim planning period, which is the same amount
as 2003.
FUNDING: Funds are budgeted in Water Supply Development organization (530000-4010-30230) of the
Water Fund for a total available of $44,309.51.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the proposed motion be approved, which will approve the
formula and cost allocation adopted by the Regional Water Planning Group.
Eduardo Garafia, P. E.
Water Director
12
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Janua~ 14,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion approving the reimbursement application submitted by Island in the Son United
Methodist Church, Owner and Developer of Lot 1, block 1, out of Tracts B and C
Mustang Island, for the installation of 350 linear feet of a 8-inch PVC water distribution
main; and
Ordinance appropriating $66,010.53 Eom the Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main
Trust Fund No. 4030-540450 to pay developer reimbursement request for the installation
of 350 linear feet of a 8-inch PVC water distribution main to develop Lot 1, Block1, out
of Tracts B and C Mustang Island; and declaring an emergency
ISSUE: Island in the Son United Methodist Chumh, owner and developer of Lot 1, Block1,
out of Tracts B and C, Mustang Island, has completed construction of public improvements
required to plat and is requesting reimbursement of the installation of a water distribution
main in accordance with the Platting Ordinance prior to the enactment of City Ordinance
#25424, August 19, 2003.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion and ordinance as
presented.
Director of Development Services
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A,
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Background Information
Location Map
Reimbursement Application
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
BACKGROUND: The platting of Island in the Son United Methodist Church Lot 1, Block 1, out of
Tracts B and C Mustang Island, required the extension of 350 linear feet of a 8-inch PVC water
distribution main from the existing 20-inch water main located on the east side of State Highway 361
crossing the State Highway to the church building located in the west side of State highway 361.
(See Exhibit B - Location Map)
The Island in the Son United Methodist Church initiated the processing of this application for
reimbursement from the Water Distribution Line Trust Fund pdor to the adoption of the new trust
fund reimbursement procedures by the City Council. The City Council by Ordinance ~25424,
adopted the new procedures on August 19, 2003. However, the Church's engineer submitted the
construction estimate on August 8, 2003, and this application was processed under the former
provisions of the Platting Ordinance. The application satisfied the reimbumement criteria in the
Platting Ordinance at the time the initial submission was made and is eligible for reimbursement.
The total cost, submitted by the Son in the Island United Methodist Church for the installation of 350-
feet of 8-inch PVC distribution main is $ 68,308.53. Because the Island in the Son United Methodist
Church has not paid the City of Corpus Chdsti assessed acreage fee of $ 2,298.00 the reimbursed
amount due to the owner-developer is the difference between the cost of installation of the 8-inch
PVC water distribution main and the acreage fee assessed. Therefore, the total reimbursement
owed to the Island in the Son United Methodist Church is $ 66,010.53
CITY ACCEPTANCE: All work is completed; the water distribution main improvements have been
inspected and accepted by the City for operation and maintenance.
Page 1 of 1
MUSTANG ISLAND
STATE PARK
8"x8" CROSS
HYDRANT (TYP.)
8" GATE VALVE
SUBJECT
PARCEL
STEEL CASINO FOR
FULL WIDTH OF R.O,W.
RISER ASSEMBLY
GATE VALVE
TEST RISER
ASSEMB
HYDRANT
MUSTANG
BLOCK (TYP.)
TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE
PIT
8" D.I.P.
WATER MNN, CL52
ISLAND STATE PARK
PLAN
SCALE: 1"= 200'
0 200' 400'
EXHIBIT B
APPLICATION FOR WATER LINE REIMBURSEMENT
We, l,.sl~and in the Son United Methodist Church; owner and developer of Lot 1, Block 1,
out oxiracts B and C, Mustang Island, Texas, hereby request reimbursement of
$66,010.53 for the installation of the 8" water grid main in conjunction with said lot, as
provided for by City Ordinance No. 17092. Said $66,010.53 is the construction cost,
including 7.5% Engineering Fee in excess of the acreage fee as shown by the cost
supporting documenta attached herewith.
bevelol~r
Date
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF NUECES
This instrument was acknowledged before me on / q,~~L-, 2004
by x~/~) ~- ~rno~p~,j~ onbehaifofThelslami,n~fiegonUnited~ethodist
Church.
No~aT Public irg~md for The State of Texas
The information submitted with this application for reimbursement has been reviewed
and determined to be correct. Reimbursement is subject to:
(a) Sufficiency of funds in the Grid and arterial Main Trust Fund, a~d
(b) Appropriation and approval by the Corpus Christi City Council
Ci~r of Engineering
gi~eer)
EXHIBIT C
AN ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $66,010.53 FROM THE WATER
DISTRIBUTION MAIN TRUST FUND NO. 4030-540450 TO PAY
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST FOR THE
INSTALLATION OF 350 LINEAR FEET OF AN 8-INCH PVC
WATER DISTRIBUTION MAIN TO DEVELOP LOT 1, BLOCK 1,
OUT OF TRACTS B AND C, MUSTANG ISLAND; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That $66,010.53 from the Water Distribution Main Trust Fund No.
4030-540450 is appropriated to pay developer's (Island in the Son United
Methodist Church) reimbursement request for the installation of 350 linear feet of
an 8-inch PVC water distribution main to develop Lot 1, Block 1, out of Tracts B
and C Mustang Island.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five council members,
copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the
need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration
of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of
and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is
passed and shall take effect upon first reading as an emergency this the 17th day
of February, 2004.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
APPROVED
By:
Joseph~arney ~
Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
,2004.
Corpus Christi, Texas
day of ,2004
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration
and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: INVe, therefore, request that
you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is
introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Samuel L Neal, Jr., Mayor
City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
~ --
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 10, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to approve a Letter
of Agreement between the City and the Beautify Corpus Christi Association (BCCA) and
providing a $25,000.00 grant to BCCA for executing environmentally sustainable tasks like
anti-litter campaigns and recycling education throughout the city, particularly in the
Neighborhood Initiative Programs' communities. The grant funding duration is from
February 15, 2004 to February 14, 2005.
ISSUE: This Letter of Agreement formalizes a joint mission between OEP,
Neighborhood Initiatives Program (NIP), and BCCA to coordinate efforts including, but
not limited to, leadership for city-wide anti-litter and beautification projects,
neighborhood clean-ups, recycling, events to promote sustainable environmental-friendly
community, promotion of city-wide enviromental programs, and distribution of
information and educational materials to the public regarding environmental subject
matters.
BACKGROUND: The City and BCCA work closely together on mutually beneficial
envkonmental based projects. The City's Office of Environmental Programs' currem
annual agreement with BCCA expires on February 14, 2004. For project year 2004, OEP
will provide a $25,000 grant fi.om its operating budget to BCCA in order to continue,
improve, create, and lead environmental projects that will benefit both BCCA and the
City. One of the new main focus areas will be to assist with the sustainability activities in
the Neighborhood Initiative Program communities. This effort is delineated in the Scope
of Work and Budget that is part of the Letter of Agreement. The BCCA will designate
the Director of OEP, the Director of SWS, and the Director of Parks and Recreation as
Ex-Officio (voting) members of its Board of Directors. The term of the agreement is
from February 15, 2004 through February 14, 2005.
C. Kim McGuire, CHMM
Director of Enviromental Programs
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
Background Information []
Contract Summmy ·
Ordinance/Resolution []
Maps []
Lc i i ER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
AND
THE BEAUTIFY CORPUS CHRISTI ASSOCIATION
This letter of agreement between the City of Corpus Christi ("City") and the Beautify
Corpus Chdsti Association ("BCCA") formalizes our joint mission to lead for a cleaner
and more beautiful environment for the enjoyment of residents and visitors to the City.
The purpose of this letter of agreement is to solidify our coordinated efforts in the areas
of:
BCCA will take a proactive role in helping to sustain a line of communication with
the people in the City's Neighborhood Initiative Programs' (NIP) communities in
an effort to sustain the achievements created by the NIP programs.
Increasing communication throughout the communities regarding anti-litter and
beautification activities.
· Encouraging neighborhood cleanup campaigns.
· Improving attitudes about recycling and increase participation in the recycling
program.
· Providing leadership dudng community events for maintaining a sustainable
environment.
· Distribution of information and educational materials regarding environmental
subject matters.
· Promotion of City-wide environmental programs.
This letter of agreement is effective from February 15, 2004 through February 14, 2005.
BCCA will designate the following City officials as Ex-Officio (voting) members of its
Board of Directors - Director of Office of Environmental Programs ("OEP"), the Director
of Solid Waste Services, and the Director of Parks and Recreation.
The City will provide a grant of $25,000 to BCCA in return for BCCA's efforts to
implement the scope of work, described in Attachment A. The budget for this letter of
agreement is established in Attachment B.
R43203A2
A-1
CONTACT INFORMATION:
City of Corpus Christi
Office of Environmental Programs
Attn: Mr. Chul Klm McGuire, Director
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Chdsti, Texas 78469-9277
(361) 826-4064
Beautify Corpus Christi Association
Attn: Ms. Daiquiri Richard
545 N. Upper Broadway, Suite 300E
Corpus Christi, Texas 78476
(361) 855-2888
Beautify Corpus Christi Association
Daiqui~.Rich~rd
Executive Director
City of Corpus Christi
George K. Noe
City Manager
Approved as Legal Form:
R. Ja~ ~;~ihing~n~
First A~sistant City Attorney
For City Attomey
R43203A2
A-2
Attachment A
SCOPE OF WORK
· Neighborhood Initiative Program (NIP)
BCCA will assist the City of Corpus Christi by taking a proactive role in sustaining
the efforts created by the City's Neighborhood Initiative Programs within the
designated communities. The BCCA's Executive Director is responsible for
proactively maintaining an open line of communication with neighborhood
residents and continue to help them improve and sustain their communities. This
includes providing the residents with the tools and knowledge to maintain their
neighborhoods in a clean status, improve recycling participation, and protect the
environment. BCCA will work with applicable City departments and their
programs, and then will speak with the residents to promote environmental
sustainability, such as anti-litter campaigns, water conservation, storm water inlet
protection, energy and eco-conservation, and basic information on City codes
that may affect the residents (e.g., property maintenance). For the NIP scope of
work under this grant, BCCA will report directly to the Director of Environmental
Programs. BCCA will provide the Director with a quarterly executive report on
the activities conducted, any milestones, successes or concerns, and any other
pertinent information dealing with sustainability for the communities.
· Community Communication On Anti-Litter and Beautification Activities
BCCA will proactively cultivate and carryout anti-litter and city beautification
efforts by communicating to current and future leaders of organizations and
citizens about City's anti-litter and beautification activities at both formal and
informal public events.
· Neighborhood Cleanup Campaigns
BCCA will help cultivate city-wide leadership and encourage and foster other
leaders (businesses, non-protits, citizen's groups, governmental bodies) to take
charge within their own organizations, communities, and surroundings to cleanup
and beautify to attain ~sustainable community" status. From BCCA's solicitation
of additional grants, donations, funds, supplies, and in-kind assistance from other
entities, BCCA will provide dean up kits with trash bags and gloves to citizens
involved in cleanup events. BCCA will communicate the availability ofthe
cleanup kits to the community.
BCCA will schedule, coordinate, and participate in at least four (4) community-
wide 'STOP Trashing Corpus Christi" cleanup events and two (2) Adopt-A-Beach
cleanup events. In scheduling "STOP Trashing Corpus Christi" cleanup events,
BCCA must coordinate the dates with the City's staff to ensure that adequate
resources will be available to support the events. BCCA will assist in scheduling,
promoting, coordinating, and supervising the cleanup events.
R43203A2 (021204) A-1
BCCA will take a lead role in coordinating the recognition of participating
organizations and individuals at ceremonies by coordinating with the City's Public
Information Department, Council Members, and the Mayor's staff.
· Recycling
As a part of the anti-litter and beautification efforts, BCCA's Executive Director
will serve on the Mayor's Waste Reduction and Recycling Committee and help
cultivate efforts to increase community's recycling participation. BCCA will
educate the public about the value of recycling.
· Community Events
BCCA will provide clean up assistance at community events by distributing trash
bags to participants in order educate people about containerizing and disposing
of waste properly.
BCCA will continue to take on a leadership role speaking to civic groups, dubs,
students at area schools, and participants at fairs and other venues to promote
environmental excellence and sustainability throughout the community in efforts
to improve the City's visual image.
· Promotion of City of Corpus Chrisfi's City-wide Environmental Programs
BCCA will help communicate to the public about the City's various environmental
programs (i.e., Water, Storm Water, Office of Environmental Programs, Solid
Waste Services Household Hazardous Waste Projects, Wastewater, Code
Enforcement) in an effort to educate people about the City's organization and
services in order to achieve a higher level of environmental excellence for the
community.
"Cash-for-Trash"
BCCA will continue to communicate to area groups and associations about the
Solid Waste Services' "Cash-for-Trash" program in an effort to increase
participation, and thereby reduce the amount of large debris left out on curbs
and/or illegally disposed.
R43203A2 (021204)
A-2
BEAUTIFY CORPUS CHRISTI ASSOCIATION
545 N. Upper Broadway, Suite 300E
Corpus Christi, Texas 78476
Phone (361) 855-2888 Fax (361) 289-2060
PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 2004
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Monthly Annual
Budget Budget
Internet/Website 41.67 $ 500.00
Meals 41.67 500.00
Mileage 100.00 1,200.00
Miscellaneous 41.67 500.00
Office Supplies 90.00 1,080.00
Payroll for Executive Director 3333.33 40,000.00
Postage & Delivery 30.00 360.00
Rent $ 833.33 10,000.00
Taxes - Payroll 255.00 3,060.00
Telephone
US Cellular 82.00 984.00
Birch Telecom 78.00 936.00
Travel 41.67 500.00
PROPOSED PROJECTS
TOTAL EXPENSES PROJECTED
$ 4,946.67
$ 59,360.00
PROJECTEDiNCOME
Membership Income
Rent (In-Kind Donation)
Special Event (La Noche Bonita)
City Grant
Texas Forest Service Grant
Weed & Seed Grant (North Side Art)
$ 1,000.00
10,000~00
15,000.00
25,000.00
7,500.00
6,000.00
TOTALINCOME PROJECTED
$64,500.00
R43203B1
14
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: February 17, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a revised reimbursement
agreement between the Transportation Security Administration and Corpus Christi International Airport
to provide Law Enforcement Personnel at security checkpoints at the Airport in consideration of
reimbursement or partial reimbursement effective August 5, 2003, until September 30, 2004, with the
option to extend for up to four (4) years.
ISSUE:
This will allow for the reimbursement of services for Law Enforcement Officers at the Airport providing
services to TSA at the security checkpoint at the Airport. The Reimbursement Agreement provides for
reimbursement from August 5, 2003 through September 30, 2004 with the option to extend it each year
through September 30, 2008. The reimbursement amount is up to a maximum of $34,123.40 for fiscal
year 2003 and the annual reimbursement for the next four years is $105,44'! to $129,568. This is
provided for under Secudty Directive SD 1542-01-07 which requires airports to establish an air
transportation security program that provides a law enforcement presence and capability at the airport
that is adequate to ensure the safety of passengers.
The previous agreement that was approved by City Council in October 2003 is no longer valid and has
been replaced with this agreement due to revisions to the agreement that were made by TSA.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
All Resolutions and Ordinances require Council approval.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
January 14, 2003: A resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a
memorandum of agreement between the United States Government and Corpus Chdsti International
Airport to provide law enforcement officers at security checkpoints at the Airport in consideration of
reimbursement or partial reimbursement effective through December 1, 2003; and declaring an
emergency. Resolution #025167
October 2003: A resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a reimbursement
agreement between the Transportation Security Administration and Corpus Christi International Airport
to provide Law Enforcement Officers at Security Checkpoint at the Airport in consideration of
reimbursement; effective through September 20, 2003 with options to extend annually for up to five
years; and declaring an emergency. Resolution # 25510
FUNDING:
N/A
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance as presented.
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Background
Department Head Signature
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) requested that the Airport provide law enforcement
officers at security checkpoints after the National Guard was removed from the Airport. A
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was provided by the US Government requesting this service and
providing for reimbursement or partial reimbursement of this service. We have been receiving full
reimbursement for this service from May 10, 2002 until the MOA was terminated as of May 31, 2003.
This Reimbursement Agreement provides for the same service beginning June 1, 2003 through
September 30, 2003 with the option to extend it each year through September 30, 2007. Public Safety
Officers at the Airport will continue to provide these services.
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE
A REVISED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AND CORPUS
CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TO PROVIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT
PERSONNEL AT SECURITY CHECKPOINTS AT THE AIRPORT IN
CONSIDERATION OF REIMBURSEMENT OR PARTIAL
REIMBURSEMENT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 5, 2003, UNTIL SEPTEMBER
30, 2004, WITH THE OPTION TO EXTEND FOR UP TO FOUR (4) YEARS.
Whereas, on September 25, 2003 Resolution 25510 was approved authorizing execution
of a reimbursement agreement between the Transportation Security Administration and
Corpus Christi International Airport; and
Whereas, the Transportation Security Administration has required that the agreement be
amended to change provisions regarding liability, workman's compensation and other
minor changes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute a
Revised Reimbursement Agreement between the Transportation Security
Administration and Corpus Christi International Airport to provide law enfomement
personnel at security checkpoints at the airport in consideration of reimbursement or
partial reimbursement effective August 5, 2003, until September 30, 2004, with the
option to extend for up to four (4) years.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Samuel L Neal, Jr.
Mayor
APPROVED: ~,~ day of F,,~r~A_.~
City Attorney
istant City Attorney
for City Attorney
,2004.
H:kLEG-DIR~S HARED~BURKE-2003 ~F_SOLUTIONS\TS A-AIRPORT 2D REVSD AGMT.DOC
Corpus Christi, Texas
of ,2004
The above resolution was passed and approved by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
H:kLEG-DIR~SHARED~BURKE-2003 ~RESOLUTIONS\TSA-A1RPORT 2D REVSD AGMT.DOC 2
15
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: 02/17/04
AGENDA ITEM:
A. First Reading Ordinance - Amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 29
regarding Municipal Court Building Security Fund and Security Fee; by amending
Section 29-48 to reflect changes in State law_pertaining to use of the Municipal
Court Building Security Fund.
ISSUE: Under Section 29-48 of the City Code of Ordinances, the City collects a $3.00
Municipal Court building security fee from defendants convicted in the City's Municipal
Courts. The Texas Legislature made changes broadening the uses of the Municipal Court
the Building Security Fund. It is necessary to amend Section 29-48 of the City Code of
Ordinances to reflect the changes in State law.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval Amending the Code of Ordinances
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
FUNDING:
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented.
(Department Head Signature)
Attachments:
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
On November 21, 1995, the City adopted an ordinance to begin collection of a $3.00
Municipal Court building security fee in accordance with Section 102.017 of the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure. The City collects $3.00 from every defendant convicted in
Municipal Court and deposits the money in the Municipal Court Building Security Fund.
State law originally limited a governing body's use of the Fund to a specific list of items.
The Texas Legislature amended Section 102.017 and removed the restriction that the
fund be used only for specific items. Section 102.017 (d) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure currently provides that the Fund may be used only for the purpose of
providing security services to buildings housing a Municipal Court. The City's ordinance
should be amended to correspond with the changes in State law.
ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, CHAPTER 29 REGARDING MUNICIPAL COURT BUILDING
SECURITY FUND AND SECURITY FEE; BY AMENDING SECTION 29-
48 TO REFLECT CHANGES IN STATE LAW PERTAINING TO THE
USE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT BUILDING SECURITY FUND;
PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 29-48 of the Code of Ordinances is amended by revising it to read
as follows:
"Sec. 29-48. Municipal court building security fund and security fee as cost of
court.
"(d) The municipal court building security fund may be used only to flnance~eJellewiag
items when used for the purpose of providing security services for buildings housing a
municipal court, including:
"(1) The purchase or repair of X-ray machines and conveying systems;
"(2) Hand held metal detectors;
"(3) Walk-through metal detectors;
"(4) Identification cards and systems;
"(5) Electronic locking and surveillance equipment;
"(6) Bailiffs or contract security personnel during times when they are providing
appropriate security services;
"(7) Signage;
"(8) Confiscated weapon inventory and tracking systems;
"(9) Locks, chains, or other security hardware devices; e¢
"(10) The purchase or repair of bullet-proof glass; and
"(11) Continuing education on security issues for court personnel and security
personnel."
29~18.DOC
SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase,
word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final
judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section,
paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the
definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause,
phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose.
SECTION 3. A violation of this ordinance or requirements implemented hereunder shall
constitute an offense, punishable as provided in Section 1-6 of the City Code of
Ordinances.
SECTION 4. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus
Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 5. This ordinance takes effect upon publication.
29~8.DOC
Samuel L. Neal, ,Ir.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading on this the day of ,2004, by the following vote:
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this
the day of
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
,2004 by the following vote:
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
3
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the
ATTEST:
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED:
Lisa Aguila~_~
Assistant City Attorney
for City Attorney
2004
__ day of
,2004.
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
29-48.DOC
16
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: January 13, 2003
AGENDA ITEM: Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a thirteen-year
renewal and extension lease with Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc., to
continue maintaining and operating a facility for deaf persons on a portion of Mt. Vernon
Pa~; providing for one ten year automatic extension of the lease; providing for termination
upon one (1) year written notice by either party; and providing for publication.
ISSUE: Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc. is requesting a ten-year lease
renewal for the purpose of providing services to persons who are deaf or who are hard of
hearing.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council must approve all multi-year leases.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council previously approved a ten-year lease
with Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc.
FUNDING: No funding involved.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council
approve the ten-year lease to Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc. for the use of
the portion of Mt. Vernon Park, a substantial copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A".
David Ondrias, Acting Director
Park and Recreation Department
Attachments:
Background Information
Map
Leases
Ordinance
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc. (the Council) entered into a lease agreement
with the City in the early 1980's for the use of approximately .4 acres of park property
located in the northeast comer of Mt. Vernon Park. This lease was executed for the
purpose of constructing an educational and recreational service center for persons who
are deaf or are hard of hearing. The center was constructed, equipped, and staffed entirely
through the fund raising efforts of the organization, and has been highly successful
regarding services provided to the community.
A part of the first ten-year lease renewal in 1992, the Council also requested that they be
allowed to expand its building by 2000 square feet and added 10 more parking spaces.
That construction was completed in 1992. In 2002, construction for ADA, parking and roof
improvements were completed.
The Corpus Christi proper population who are deaf or hard of hearing is 20,069. Last year,
the Council provided direct services to over 8,000 people.
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO
EXECUTE A THIRTEEN YEAR RENEWAL AND EXTENSION LEASE
WITH CORPUS CHRISTI AREA COUNCIL FOR THE DEAF, INC. TO
CONTINUE MAINTAINING AND OPERATING A FACILITY FOR DEAF
PERSONS ON A PORTION OF MT. VERNON PARK; PROVIDING FOR
ONE TEN YEAR AUTOMATIC EXTENSION OF THE LEASE;
PROVIDING FOR TERMINATION UPON ONE (1) YEAR WRITTEN
NOTICE BY EITHER PARTY; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
Whereas, the Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc. ("Council for the Deaf"),
a Texas nonprofit corporation, is organized exclusively for the charitable purpose of
providing services to deaf persons;
Whereas, the City originally leased a portion of Mt. Vernon Park ("the land") to the
Council for the Deaf for a ten (10) year term beginning March 1, 1983, by lease dated
February 4, 1983 ("1983 Lease");
Whereas, in 1991 the Council for the Deaf requested a revision of its 1983 Lease
agreement in order to incorporate Housing and Urban Development's (HUD)
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) regulations;
Whereas, the City by "Lease Agreement Amendment" dated December 29,1991 ("1991
Lease") (authorized by City Council Ordinance No. 021272 dated October 29,1991),
revised and extended the 1983 Lease for a period of ten (10) years beginning
December 29, 1991, and ending on July 14, 2001;
Whereas, the City found and determined that the lease amendment dated December
29, 1991, would further the popular enjoyment of the land as a park and was consistent
with the goal established by the City to extend public recreation services to a broad
spectrum of the population;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public under Chapter 26 Tx Parks and Wildlife
Code, a public hearing was held on the 13th day of January 2004, during a meeting of
the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi,
during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard regarding the
proposed renewal and extension of the lease to Council for the Deaf of a portion of Mt.
Vernon Park ("the land");
WHEREAS, the City Council under Chapter 26 Tx Parks and Wildlife Code finds that
there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the lease of the land to the Council for the
Deaf and the lease authorized by this ordinance includes all reasonable planning to
minimize harm to the land as a park and as a recreational facility; and
Whereas, the City finds and determines that the 1991 Lease should be renewed and
extended by the lease authorized by this ordinance; and the land shall be considered to
have been continuously leased to Lessee under the terms of the 1991 Lease from the
· l:\LEG-DIR\DoyleD.Curtis\MYDOCS~2003\LEASE.ORD\CCCounclDeaf. Lease.111803DC.Oral.doc
Page 2 of 3
beginning of the 1991 Lease until the beginning of the lease authorized by this
ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute a renewal
and extension lease of approximately thirteen years with Corpus Christi Area Council
for the Deaf, Inc., a non-profit corporation, to maintain and operate a facility on a
portion of Mt. Vernon Park. A copy of the lease is attached as Exhibit A and a copy of
the lease shall be filed with the City Secretary.
SECTION 2. The lease begins on the 61st day after final City Council approval of this
ordinance and will have a primary term of ten (10) years. The lease recites that the land
shall be considered to have been continuously leased to Lessee under the terms of the
1991 Lease from the beginning of the 1991 Lease until the beginning of the lease
authorized by this ordinance. The lease shall automatically extend for an additional term
of ten (10) years. The lease may be terminated at any time by either party giving the
other party a one (1) year written notice of termination.
SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus
Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
4:\LEG-DIR\DoyleD,Curtis~MYDOCS~2003\LEASE.ORD\CCCouncI.Deaf. Lease. 111803DC.Ord.doc
Page 3 of 3
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garret
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading on this the 13th day of January, 2004, by the following vote:
William KeLly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garret
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this
the 10th day of February, 2004, by the following vote:
William Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 10th day of February, 2004.
ATTEST:
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
A/~~November 2003
Doyle I~. ~urtis
Chief, A~ministrative Law Section
Senior Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
~:\LEG-D~R\D~y~eD~urtis~MYD~2~3\LEA~E.~RD\~unc~.Deaf.Lease.1118~3D~.~rd.d~c
Page 1 of 7
LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
§ KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OFNUECES §
This Lease Agreement is by and between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a
municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), and the Corpus Christi Area Council for the
Deaf, Inc., a non-profit corporation (hereinafter "Lessee").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Lessee is organized exclusively for the charitable purpose of providing
services to deaf persons;
WHEREAS, in 1991 Lessee requested a revision of its 1983 Lease agreement in order
to incorporate Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) regulations;
WHEREAS, the City originally leased the Premises to Lessee for a ten (10) year term
beginning March 1, 1983, by lease dated February 4, 1983 ("1983 Lease");
WHEREAS, the City by "Lease Agreement Amendment" dated December 29,1991
("1991 Lease") (authorized by City Council Ordinance No. 021272 dated October 29,
1991), revised and extended the 1983 Lease for a period of ten (10) years beginning
December 29, 1991, and ending on July 14, 2001;
WHEREAS, the City found and determined that the lease amendment dated December
29, 1991, would further the popular enjoyment of the park property and was consistent
with the goals for public recreation established by the City to extend these services to a
broad spectrum of the population;
WHEREAS, the City has found and determined in the ordinance authorizing this lease
that the 1991 Lease should be extended by this lease; and the Premises shall be
considered to have been continuously leased to Lessee under the terms of the 1991
Lease from the beginning of the 1991 Lease until the beginning of this lease; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the 13th day of January 2004, and
complied with the requirements of Chapter 26 of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code
regarding the use of park lands.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants and conditions in this
Lease, the City and Lessee mutually agree as follows:
{:\LEG-DIR\DoyleD.Curtis\MYDOCS~2003\LEASES~111803DC.CCCouncI.Deaf. doc
Page 2 of 7
Section I.
The City grants, leases and demises unto Lessee and Lessee rents and leases from the
City the following parcel of real property located in Corpus Christi, Nueces County,
Texas ("Premises"):
A site having the dimensions of 157.3 feet by 121.5 feet, consisting of .44 acres, more
or less, located on the north and east portion of a tract known as Mt. Vernon Park. The
site and park are more fully described in the attached Exhibit "A".
Section 2.
a. The primary term of this Lease shall be ten (10) years beginning sixty one (61) days
after final adoption by City Council of the ordinance authorizing this Lease and ending
on the ___day of ,2014; and when the primary term begins the
Premises shall be deemed continuously leased under the 1991 Lease from the
beginning of the 1991 Lease until the beginning of this lease.
b. At the end of the primary term, this Lease shall be automatically extended for an
additional ten (10) year term; provided, however, that either party may terminate this
Lease at any time upon giving the other party one year's written notice in advance of
intention to terminate.
Section 3.
Lessee shall operate the Premises exclusively for the following purpose and uses
incidental thereto: To further the primary objective of the Act as outlined in Federal
Register 24CFR 570.200 and to provide safe and sanitary public facilities for
handicapped individuals; and to further provide additional services to help the deaf and
hearing impaired person to live as independently as possible in the hearing world and at
all times in accordance with Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) regulations.
Section 4.
Lessee constructed the building on the Premises in 1983. Lessee constructed
improvements to the building in 1991 and 2001 using CDBG funds allocated to Lessee.
Section 5.
Lessee shall be responsible for furnishing and equipping the building and City has no
obligation to furnish any equipment or furnishings for Lessee. All personal property
furnished by Lessee or donated by others on behalf of Lessee shall remain the property
of Lessee unless specifically donated to City.
-I:\LEG-DIR\DoyleD.Curtis\MYDOCS~2003\LEASES\I 11803DC.CCCouncI.Deaf,doc
Page 3 of 7
Section 6.
Lessee agrees to maintain the Premises during the term of this Lease in a clean and
attractive appearance. Lessee shall be responsible for all costs of maintenance, utilities
and the collection and removal of any trash or rubbish from the Leased Premises. At
the expiration of the term of this Lease, or any extension thereof, Lessee shall release
and deliver unto the City the Premises and all facilities included thereon in reasonably
sound condition, normal wear and tear excepted. Lessee may remove at its own
expense any supplies, furniture or equipment which are not classified as fixtures and
which may be removed without damaging the remaining improvements.
Section 7.
a. Operation Records. Lessee will provide access to the documentation of clientele
being benefited by the Facilities and the activities being carried out in the Facilities
which pertain to the operations of the Facilities and all obligations pursuant to this
Agreement, including all information on matching funds, if any, during regular business
hours for the purpose of City and/or HUD conducted audits or monitoring.
b. Equal Participation Documentation. Lessee shall also keep and provide access to
records documenting compliance with Section 109 of the Housing and Community Act
which requires that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex,
be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under, any program or activity funded in whole or in part with community
development funds made available pursuant to the Act.
c. Information and Reports. Lessee shall provide any information, reports, data and/or
forms pertinent to this Agreement as the Director of Housing and Community
Development for the City may from time to time request for the proper administration of
this Agreement.
d. OMB Circular A-110. Lessee shall comply with the following attachment to OMB
Circular number A-110:
Attachment C, "Retention and Custodial Requirements for Records", except, in lieu
of the provisions in paragraph 4, the retention period for records pertaining to
individual CDBG activities starts from the date of submission of the annual
performance and evaluation report, as prescribed in Section 570.507, in which the
specific activity is reported on for the final time;
e. Compliance Documentation. Lessee shall keep and provide access to records
documenting compliance with the following sections of the Housing and Community Act
24 CFR 570, et seq: 5770.610 Uniform Administrative Requirements and Cost
Principles; and 570.611 Conflict of Interest. tf there is a conflict of interest with any
employee, agent, consultant, officer or member of the Board of Directors of lessee,
identify by name and title the person with the conflict and the nature of the conflict.
I:\LEG-DIR\DoyleD.Curtis\MYDOCS~2003\LEASES\111803DC.CCCouncI.Deaf. doc
Page 4 of 7
Section 8.
Lessee agrees that in operation of the Premises and all programs offered by Lessee at
the Premises it will promptly comply with and fulfill all laws, ordinances, regulations and
codes of Federal, State, County, City and other governmental agencies applicable to
the Premises and all programs offered by Lessee at the Leased Premises, and all
ordinances or regulations imposed by the City for the correction, prevention and
abatement of nuisances or code violations in or connected with the Premises during the
term of this Lease Agreement, at Lessee's sole expense and cost.
Section 9.
Lessee agrees that in the conduct of programs a non-discrimination policy will apply,
and that the Premises may be utilized by the public in accordance with reasonable
scheduling requirements on a first come, first served basis. Lessee may charge fees for
rooms and use of the Premises facilities and may conduct instructional classes for fees.
All of the fees and charges shall be reasonable in keeping with charges and fees
assessed at other recreation centers within the City and must be first approved by the
city.
Section 10.
Lessee shall be reimbursed for the fair market value of Lessee's improvements if Mt.
Vernon Park is sold or conveyed during the ten (10) year lease term, or extension
thereof.
Section
Lessee agrees that no changes in programs, plans or fee schedules may be
implemented without first obtaining the prior approval of the City Manager.
Section 12.
Lessee agrees to secure and maintain throughout the term of this Lease, or any
extension, at Lessee's expense, the following policies of insurance:
(1) Workers' Compensation insurance, orthe approved equivalent, covering all
employees of Lessee engaged in any work at or on the Leased Premises.
(2) Insurance policies providing fire, vandalism, malicious mischief and flood
coverage for all improvements constructed on the Premises in an amount sufficient
to replace said improvements.
(3) Comprehensive general liability insurance in the amount of Three Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($300,000) for bodily injury or death to any one person, Five
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for bodily injury or death for any one
occurrence, and One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for property damages.
{:\LEG-DIR\DoyleD.Curtis\MYDOCS~003\LEASES\111803DC.CCCouncI.Deaf,doc
Page 5 of 7
The policies of insurance shall name the City as an additional insured by their terms and
shall contain provisions that they cannot be cancelled, allowed to lapse, or materially
changed unless ten (10) days' notice of shall first have been served upon the Director of
Park and Recreation. Lessee shall promptly provide copies of all insurance policies
upon City's written request.
Certificates of insurance for all policies shall be furnished to the Director of Park and
Recreation prior to any construction activities pursuant to this Lease Agreement and
maintained at all times throughout the term of this Lease Agreement,
Section 13.
Lessee shall indemnify the City of Corpus Christi against any and all losses, claims,
demands, and defend any suit or action for damage of every kind and character made
against the City of Corpus Christi based on personal injury of any person, including
death and for loss of or damage to property of any person, whether caused by the City
of Corpus Christi and Lessee or however same may be caused, growing out of any act,
occurrence or omission, or incident to or resulting from the performance, or failure to
perform the work or the provisions of this Agreement.
Section 14.
Lessee shall not sublet or assign this Lease, or any part thereof, without the prior written
consent from Lessor.
Section 15.
Lessee agrees to pay the costs of newspaper publication of this Agreement and related
ordinance as required by the City Charter.
Section 16.
Lessee shall pay any ad valorem taxes associated with the Improvements or the
Premises which may be levied during the term of this Lease Agreement or any
extension hereof. Lessee shall not voluntarily create, cause, or allow to be created, any
debts, liens, mortgages, charges, or other encumbrances against the Leased Premises.
Lessee shall from time to time, duly pay and discharge or cause to be discharged or to
be paid, when the sum becomes due, all taxes, assessments, and other government
charges which are lawfully imposed upon the Premises and which, if unpaid, may by
law, become a lien or encumbrance upon such Premises and thereby impair or
otherwise adversely affect the holding such Premises for the use set out in this Lease
Agreement.
This Lease Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties.
EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE, each of which shall be considered an original, on the
day of ,2004.
t:\LEG-DIR\DoyleD.CurIis\MYDOCS~2003\LEASES\111803DC.CCCouncI,Deaf, doc
Page 6 of 7
LESSEE: Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc.
By:
Susan S. Tiller
Executive Director
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF NUECES
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ,2004, by
Susan S. Tiller, Executive Director of Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf, Inc., a
Texas nonprofit corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public, State of Texas
Printed Name:
Seal:
Expiration Date:
~:\LEG-DIR\DoyleD.Curtis\MYDOCS~OO3\LEASES\111803DC.CCCouncI.Deaf. doc
Page 7 of 7
ATTEST:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
George K. Noe
City Manager
A/~(~~~~ORM: 18 November, 2003.
boyle ~Curtis
Chief, Administrative Law Section
Senior Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF NUECES§
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ,2004, by
George K. Noe, City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule
Municipal Corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public, State of Texas
Printed Name:
Seal:
Expiration Date:
~ :\LEG-DIR\DoyleD.Curtis~vlYDOC S~003~LEAS ES\I 11803DC.CCCouncI.Deaf. dcc
'17'
-7''
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 10, 2004
SUBJECT: Desalination Projects
AGENDA ITEM:
Ordinance Clarifying the Definition of Well in Section 35-24, Code Of Ordinances, City of
Corpus Christi; Providing for Severance; and Providing for Publication.
FUNDING: This item requires no expenditure of funds.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the ordin~i'nce as preser ted.
,~,~eI~P,. Escobar, P.E. - 7' ~~ara~a,'P [
Director of Engineering Services Director of Water Services ~ ~[- --
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Additional Information
H:\HOM E~KEVINS\GE N\WATER~DESALINA\WellOrdinanceMemo.doc
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Well Ordinance
BACKGROUND: The City is preparing to drill a number of test wells associated with
desalination initiatives. The wells will be used to determine the quality, quantity and
sustainability of groundwater use for desalination. The wells will also help determine the
economic viability of aquifer storage and recovery.
During the course of preparing to drill the wells, it was determined that the City Code of
Ordinances regulating hydrocarbon production (oil and gas wells) addressed water wells
with a depth of greater than 350 feet. The intent of the code as set forth by Section Sec.
35-1 cleady sets forth "...that chapter shall govern the exploration, drilling and production
of hydrocarbons and matters incident thereto...." However, Section 35-24 ofthe ordinance
specifically mentions water. Water is a common by product of hydrocarbon extraction, with
injection wells being used for disposal.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT: The ordinance clarifies that the term well does not include a
municipal water supply well or a well used as part of a municipal aquifer storage and
recovery system.
J EXHIBIT "A" I
Page 1 of 1
H:~HOMESKEVINS\GEN~WATER~DESALINA\WeIIOrdinanceBkgExhA doc
AN ORDINANCE
CLARIFYING THE DEFINITION OF WELL IN SECTION 35-24, CODE
OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. Section 35-24, Code of Ordinances, is revised to read as follows:
"Sec. 35-24. "Well."
"The term "well" means any hole, excavation or bore downward from the surface,
intended to extend three hundred fifty (350) feet or more into the subsurface, made by
any means or manner, for the purpose of exploring for, discovering, producing, or
injecting hydrocarbons, water or other mineral, and which has not been officially
plugged and abandoned. As used in this Chapter, the term '~vell" does not include a
municipal water supply well or a well used as part of a municipal aquifer stora.qe and
recovery system."
SECTION. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word
or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment
of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph,
subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite
intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase,
word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose.
SECTION. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus
Chdsti as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
R43803A2.doc
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading on this the day of ,2004, by the following vote:
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this
the day of
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the
ATTEST:
,2004 by the following vote:
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
__ day of
.,2004.
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED: 4th day of February, 2004:
R. J'~ning J
First A~sistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
2
R43803A2.doc
18
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING (City Council Action Date: February 17, 2004)
Case No.: 0104-01, Hossein Mostaghasi: A change of zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a
"B-4" General Business District on Tract 1 and "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2. The property
consists of 18.566 acres out of Lot 1, Block 2, Nueces River Irrigation Park, located on the southwest comer of
Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and Hazel Bazemore Road (County Road 69).
Planning Commission and Staff's Recommendation (01/14/04): Approval.
Requested Council Action: Approval of the "B4" District on Tract 1 and "R-lB" District on Tract 2 and
adoption of the attached ordinance.
Purpose of Request: Development of a retail/office center on Tract 1 and a single-family residential subdivision
on Tract 2.
Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to a "B-4" General
Business District on Tract 1 and a "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2, totaling 18.56 acres.
Tract 1 is proposed as a speculative retail shopping center with office facilities. The subject property consists of 4.88
acres with access provided along Northwest Boulevard an arterial and along Hazel Bazemore Road (County Road
69), a rural road section. North of Tract 1, across Northwest Boulevard, is undeveloped "F-R" District property, as
well as commercial and office property zoned a "B-I' District and a "B4" District. To the east is commercial
property and undeveloped land zoned a "B4" District. West of Tract 1 is a "B4" District developed commercially.
Tract 2 is proposed as a speculative single-family subdivision consisting of 60 to 70 lots. The 13.68 acre area has
access along Hazel Bazemore Road (County Road 69), a rural road section that intersects with Northwest
Boulevard. Traffic flow is regulated by a signal at the intersection of Northwest Boulevard and Hazel Bazemore
Road. Residential traffic generated by the proposed subdivision along Hazel Bazemore Road is projected between
219 to 256 vehicle trip ends per day. Property south of Tract 2 is undeveloped and zoned with a "F-R" District. East
of Tract 2 is River Ridge Subdivision, a large lot single-family development, zoned "R-lA" One-family Dwelling
District. Riverway Drive and River Rock Drive within River Ridge Subdivision are barricaded to the west. Traffic
from this subdivision is not placed onto Hazel Bazemore Road, but rather Northwest Boulevard. To the west is a
"B-4" District area developed commercially.
Approval of the "B-4" District for Tract 1 is an expansion of the "B-4" District east and west of the subject property.
The approval of the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2 is compatible with the "R-lA" One-family
Dwelling District to the east. The requested zoning is consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the
Northwest Area Development Plan.
Applicant's Position: The applicant concurs with Planning Commission and Staff's recommendation.
Notification: O f t he t wenty-four (24) notices mailed t o t he surrounding property owners, n one were remmed in
favor and one (1) was returned in opposition. The 20% rule is not invoked. This case is considered
noncontroversial.
Director of Development Services
BAB/FGM/er
Agenda Memorandum
Case No. 0104-01 (Hossein Mostaghasi)
Page 2
Attachments:
1) Zoning Report
2) Comments Received
3) Planning cornrmssion Minutes
4) Ordinance
H:XPLN-DIR\ERMA\WORD~AGEN DM EM~2004\0104-01 AGENDAM EMO.DOC
CZTY COUNCTL
ZONTNG REPORT
Case No.: 0104-01
Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 14, 2004
Applicant: Hossein Mostaghasi
Owner: Frost National Bank, Trustee
Agent: Steve Dean
Property Address/Area: Southwest comer of Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and
Hazel Bazemore Road (County Road 69)
From: "F-R" Farm-Rural District
To: Tract 1 -"B-4" General Business District and Tract 2 - "R-lB" One-family
Dwelling District
Area: Tract 1 -4.88 acres Tract 2 - 13.68 acres Total Area- 18.56
Purpose of Request: Tract 1 - Speculative Retail/Office Center and Tract 2 -
Speculative Single-Family Residential Subdivision
Zoning Land Use
Site "F-R" District Undeveloped
North "F-R .... B-I" & "B-4" Undeveloped, Cancer Center & Auto Service
Districts
South "F-R" District Undeveloped
East "R-lA" & "B-4" Single-family Subdivision & Carwash
Districts
West "B-4" District Athletic Club & Tree Service
Zoning Report
Case No. 0104-01 (H. Mostaghasi)
Page 2
Staff's Summary: The applicant has requested a change of zoning fi.om a "F-R" Farm-
Rural District to a "B-4" General Business District on Tract 1 and a "R-lB" One-family
Dwelling District on Tract 2, totaling 18.56 acres.
Tract 1 i s proposed a s a speculative retail s hopping c enter with office facilities. T he
subject property consists of 4.88 acres with access provided along Northwest Boulevard
an arterial and along Hazel Bazemore Road (County Road 69), a rural road section.
North of Tract 1, across Northwest Boulevard, is undeveloped "F-R" District property,
as well as commercial and office property zoned a "B-I" District and a "B-4" District.
To the east is commercial property and undeveloped land zoned a "B-4" District. West
of Tract 1 is a "B-4" District developed commercially.
Tract 2 is proposed a s a speculative single-family subdivision consisting of 60 to 70
lots. The 13.68 acre area has access along Hazel Bazemore Road (County Road 69), a
rural road section that intersects with Northwest Boulevard. Traffic flow is regulated by
a signal at the intersection of Northwest Boulevard and Hazel Bazemore Road.
Residential traffic generated by the proposed subdivision along Hazel Bazemore Road
is projected between 219 to 256 vehicle trip ends per day. Property south of Tract 2 is
undeveloped and zoned with a "F-R" District. East of Tract 2 is River Ridge
Subdivision, a large lot single-family development, zoned "R-lA" One-family Dwelling
District. R iverway D rive a nd River Rock D five within River Ridge Subdivision a re
barricaded to the west. Traffic fi.om this subdivision is not placed onto Hazel Bazemore
Road, but rather Northwest Boulevard. To the west is a "B-4" District area developed
commercially.
Approval of the "B-4" District for Tract 1 is an expansion of the "B-4" District east and
west of the subject property. The approval of the "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District
on Tract 2 is compatible with the "R-lA" One-family Dwelling District to the east. The
requested zoning is consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the
Northwest Area Development Plan.
Area Development Plan: Northwest ADP
Map: M9C & L9A
Zoning Violations: None
Street Type Paved Section Volume
Northwest Boulevard Arterial 120' ROW w/ 76 Bk. To 18,854
Bk. v.t.e.
(Planned - Same)
Hazel Bazemore Road Rural 50" ROW w/21 'rural sec. 759 v.t.e.
(County Road 69) (Planned 80' ROW w/ 62'
Bk to Bk)
Zoning Repom
Case No. 0104-01 (H. Mos~ghasi)
Page 3
The Comprehensive Plan policy statements can generally support business development
on Tract 1 since the property has adjacency to an arterial and is bounded by "B-4"
District property to the east and west. The Northwest Area Development Plan future land
use map recommends residential development along Tract 2.
Approval of the "B-4" General Business District on Tract 1.
Approval of the "R-1B" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2.
Approval of the "B-4" General Business District on
Dwelling District on Tract 2.
Tract 1 and "R-lB" One-family
Attachments: Zoning map
H :~p LN-DIR~ERMA\WORD~ZON RPTS~2004\0104431 CCREPORTDOC
Case Z0104-01
12-30-03/AS
Ownership Map
Subject Property
Owners within 200 feet listed on attached ownership list
NORTH
COMMENTS RECEIVED
FROM NOTICES MAILED
Case No. 0104-01
Hossein Mostaghasi
· - FAVOR
X - OPPOSED
(Note: The listed numbers correspond to the attached map.)
I. Notices returned fi.om within the 200-foot notification area:
Favor: None.
Opposition:
5) Guy Butler, 14117 Riverway Dr.
No written comment.
II. Responses received from outside the 200-foot notification area:
IlL
Favor: None.
Opposition: None.
Responses received from owners/applicants of subject area:
Favor: None.
Opposition: None.
H 5P LN -DIRXERMA\WORD\COMMDATA~ 004\0104-01 COMMENTS .DOC
Planning Cormmssion Minutes
January 14, 2004
0104-01 - Hossein Mostaghasi
REQUEST:
"F-R" to "B4" on Tract 1 and "F-R" to "R-lB" on Tract 2 on property located on the
southwest comer of Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and Hazel Bazemore Road (County
Road 69).
Faryce Goode-Macon presented a computerized slide illustration of the subject property and the
surrounding area. She stated the uses were proposed as business and residential uses. There were 24 notices mailed
to property owners within a 200-foot radius of which none were returned in favor or opposition.
cormmssioner Salazar stated that there was a previous case near the subject property requesting similar
zoning. Commissioner Pnsley explained that the Northwest Estates Subdivision opposed the previous zoning case
due to the adjacency of the proposed "B-4" District. Staff added that the previous case did not have adjoining "B4"
District zoning as in the current case.
Commissioner Pusley and Vice Chan'man Mires expressed concern regarding drainage in the proposed
subdivision. Mr. Gunning stated that the Special Services Section of Development Services would be addressing
drainage issues during the platting process.
Public hearing opened.
Steven Dean, 11753 Jacob Street, represented the applicant. He distributed an informational packet which
contained the plans for the proposed subdivision and retail center.
Vice Chairman Mims referred Ivh:. Dean to the proposed temporary detention basin on the subject property
and asked whether Staff has presented the proposed plan to City staff. Staff answered in the negative. Mr. Dean
stated that he would need to address concerns regarding drainage with their engineer, Bass and Welch.
Mr. Gunmng explained that zoning of a parcel of property regulates the use of the land and added that
drainage issues are addressed during the platting process.
Public heating was closed.
Motion by Salazar, seconded by Stone, to forward a recommendation for approval. Motion passed with
Amsler and Smith being absent.
Page 1 of 3
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION
BY HOSSEIN MOSTAGHASI BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO 18.566 ACRES OUT OF NUECES RIVER IRRIGATION
PARK, BLOCK 2, LOT '1 FROM "F-R" FARM-RURAL DISTRICT
TO "B-4" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ON TRACT 1 AND "R-lB"
ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT ON TRACT 2; AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS
FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of Hossein Mostaghasi for amendment to
the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
January 21, 2004, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday,
February 17, 2004, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at
City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed
to appear and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION '1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by changing the zoning on 18.566 acres out of Nueces River Irrigation Park,
Lot 1, Block 2, located on the southwest corner of Northwest Boulevard (F.M. 624) and
Hazel Bazemore Road (County Road 69), from "F-R" Farm-Rural District to "B-4"
General Business District on Tract 1 and "R-lB" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 2,
as shown on Exhibits A, B, and C. (Metes and Bounds) & (Map - M9C)
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
H:\LEG-DIR~JOSEPH~ZONING-04\0104-01REGULAR.DOC
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (l) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this 17th day of February, 2004.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED
Joseph a/~rney
Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
2004
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
H:kLEG-DIR~JOSEPH~ZONING-04\0104-01REGULAR.DOC
Page 3 of 3
Corpus Christi, Texas
day of ,2004
TO THE MEMBERS QF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Samuel L. Neai, Jr.
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
William Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
H:\LEG-DIR~JOSEPH~ZONING*04\0104-01 REGULAR.DOC
TAN-2S-2004 12127 FROM:CITY OF CORPUS CHRIS ~lB26~56p~, TO:9BBO323g p.2/4
County of Nuec~ §
BASS & WELSH ENGINEERING
P.O. BOX 11397
B4 Zonln~ 'Ira. ]~
December 10, 2003
03106M&B
Description of a 4.886 ac~c tract of land. mor~ of l~s,s, a portion of Lot 1, Block 2, Nueces River Irrigation Pa~'k,
a map cf which is recorded in Volume "A', Pag~ 54, Map R~r~, Nu~s Count, T~ said 4.886 a~e ~cl
~ ~ther d~ibed ~ met~ ~d bounds as fo~;
BEGINNING at ~e ~e~nt point of in~on of t~ ~r~ right-of~y line of ~un~ Road ~9 (Hazel
B~emore Road) ~ ~uthcrfy ~ght~f-~y line of~ 624 (N~wcst ~ul~d) f~ the fl~c~t ~mcr of
the ~a~ botch d~;
~en~ S10~'~W ~.~ along aaid ~terJy ~ght~f-w~v I~e of Coun~ Road 69 to a point for thc/outh~t
~cr of ~c ~ct here~ d~cd;
~cn~ 840900~53~.~ toa~mtfor~e~l~n~of~e~d~bed;
~en~ NI~ E~' - ·
the ~ herein d~ibe~; lo a ~i n
~n~ ~9'0O'E 333.~' alang s~ sou~rly
~etch sho~ng ~id 4.886 a~e ~a~ for ~
Case 0104-01
Exhibit "A"
J~lS-~-~wuq ]W:~cS b~bH:CiTf OF CORPULJ , HRIS 3618~6356~d
TO:gSs83a59
BASS 8¢ WELSH ENGINEERING
R-lB Zonln~Trn~ 2
Stale of Texas §
County of Nucces §
p,3x4
Decemberl0,2003
03106M&B2
Description of a 13.680 acre tract of land, mom of less, a portion of Lot 1, Block 2, Nuece~ River Irrigation Park,
a map of which is recorded in Volume "A', Pag~ 5~, Map Records, Nucces County, Texas, said 13.680 acre tract
as fuxther described by metes and bounds as follow~;
BEOINNING at the point in thc westerly right-of-way linc of County Road 69 (Hazel Bazcmor¢ Road) for thc
northeast corner of the ~'act herein de$~i'oed, said notthemt corner bca~ S10~0'00"W 400.00' fi.om thc prescn~
point of intersection of said westerly rJght-of.w~y I~n~ of County Road 69 and thc sou thcrly right-of-way linc of
b"M 624 (Northwest Boulevard);
Thence along said westerly righl-of.-way line of County Road 69 SI0"00'00'W 1120.00' tO a point/or the pr~ent
COmmon southeast corner of said Lot 1 and northe.~st comer of Lot g, said Block 2, Nueee~ Riwr Irrigation
Park;
Thence along thc common southerly boundary linc of sa~d Lot I and northerly boundaz7 line of satd Lot
Ng4*09'00"W 533.44' 1o a point for the southwest corner of the tract herein described;
Thence NI0*00'00"E 1120.00' to a point for the northwest corer of the tract herein descr/bed;
Thence S84'09'00"E 533.44' to the POINT OF BEGINNING, a sketch showing said 13,680 acre KI-B Zoning
Tract being attached hereto as F~t,~bit
'
Case 0104-01
E~ibit "B"
............ CITY OF CORPUS CHRIS G61826556D T0:98805239 p.4x4
JAN-~-~004.1~: ~9 FROI4: .............. ~
ZONIN~ T;~.CT 1
AC.
LOT BLOCK Z I
NUECES I~IGA~ON PARK
R-lB ZONING TRa, CT 2
LOT 8. 8LOCK 2
EXHIBIT "C"
5KETCH TO ACCOMPANY
_METEs AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
Case 0104-01
19
'T
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
February 12, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
B.A. Bailey, AICP, Director of Development Services ~
Michael N. Gunning, AICP, Assistant Director of Development
Services
2nd Reading of the Draft South Central Area Development Plan
On February 10, 2004 the City Council passed the 1st Reading of the Draft South Central
Area Development Plan and continued the public hearing to February 17, 2004. During
discussion of the draft Plan, City Council requested that the Planning Commission be
requested to attend the Council meeting on February 17, 2004 to clarify several proposed
policy statements. Staff has communicated with the Planning Commission to request their
attendance at that Council meeting. The Chair of the Planning Commission and several
other Commissioners have indicated that they will attend the February 17, 2004 City
Council meeting.
In addition, City Council requested that several policy statements be revised or additional
clarification be provided. These revisions and additional information are summarized
below.
1) Policy Statement B.2
(Added by the Planning Commission)
The highest priority for creation of activities on the Bayfront are
activities that benefit the citizens of Corpus Christi and that take
advantage of the unique natural amenities of the Bayfront, including
wind, water and temperate climate.
Staff Comments: This statement addresses the need to strike a sensitive
balance between creating economic development opportunities on the
bayfront and the need to protect and enhance public parks and marina
facilities and assuring public access to a majodty of the bayfront. Several
other policy statements clarify the need to create new economic
development on the Bayfront, e.g.B.3, D.2 and D. 5.
2) Policy Statement B.4
(City Council revised this policy statement: Additions are underlined and deletions are
struck thru)
~'-""*" Promote economically viable incentives for ~. .......... u development of
new tourist oriented uses on private properties fronting Shoreline Boulevard~
,,,;,k;,, on ,~ ..... ~ "'~""*;"" cf *h;~ ,,~.,,, The ~'~'"~* ""'~ best use of these prime
South Central Area Development Plan
February 12, 2004
properties is tourist-related and residential uses - not office or non-tourism related
business uses. These prime properties should be developed with high-rise hotels and
residential uses with tourist-related retail uses occupying a majority of the ground floor.
Drive-throughs and similar non-tourist uses should not be permitted on Shoreline
Boulevard or the half block nearest the bay along side streets.
3) Policy Statement E.1
(The Planning Commission recommends the addition of the underlined statement and
deletion of the fourth objective of the special study.)
The City, in partnership with the Downtown Management District, the Port of
Corpus Christi, the Regional Transit Authority and the Metropolitan Planning
Organization will conduct a special communitywide planning process to
determine the most acceptable manner in which to create a bayfront park. A
fixed rail trolley with overhead electrical lines should not be located on the
Bayfront. Shoreline Boulevard is a formidable barrier to pedestrians attempting to
cross the six travel lanes from downtown to the bayfront especially during times of large
festival events. In addition, large festival events either block through traffic or reduce
the City's ability to operate large convention and arena events.
The special study objectives are:
Identify the best location for a permanent festival site;
Determine the feasibility of reducing Shoreline Boulevard from six travel lanes to four
taking into account existing and future traffic levels and street improvement projects;
Determine if traffic calming devices including reduced speed limits and demarcated
pedestrian crossings on the travel lanes should be planned on shoreline Boulevard;
D ........... .., , ........ a fixed ,'";'~,, *""",, .~,,~· .....
pc .................................. ~' .................................. ~ ............
..... ~ ..................... · O.~.C ............................... · ...............
thc u,-,~,. ,-,+,- -
Address the possibility of using Water Street as a relief route for downtown commuter
traffic;
Make signalized pedestrian crossings one cycle;
Illustrate the visual impact of views from Shoreline Boulevard to the bay;
Consider the AIA's 2003 concept plan to create a bayfront park, as well as other plans
which have been considered over the last twenty years, e.g. Bayfront Activities
South Central Area Development Plan
February 12, 2004
Committee (1985), the Gateway Project of 1996-97, etc.;
Implement a community consensus building process to determine the most acceptable
bayfront park design.
NOTE:
RTA staff met with the Planning Commission Chairman and Development Services staff
to see ff the Planning Commission would recommend more flexible language for the
location of a fixed raft trolley on the bayfront. After considerable discussion, the
Chairman indicated that the current policy is reflective of the public input on this matter
and the Planning Commission's views. Copies of public comments on this issue from
the January 22, 2004 public meeting are attached.
SOUTH CENTRAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SUGGESTIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Use rubber tire trolleys - much greater flexibility and huge cost savings over fixed
track trolleys.
2. Keep Lawrence St. stem - provide additional 24 large boat slips, Keep water access
between T-heads for boat safety.
3. Relocate Columbus ships - create a Columbus Pavilion and sailing center at existing
Memorial Coliseum_ Provide day sailing on Columbus ships. Create a sailing school
4. Keep two way traffic around Art Center - avoids narrow right of way behind Art
Center. Provides better traffic handling around Marina.
5. Remove parking lot between Coliseum and Sherril Park - provides the only large
green space available.
6. Protect and enhance the integrity of Heritage Park.
Trian Serbu
14310 Playa del Rey
Corpus Christi, 78418
h~ooert Hayne - (..;omments on Draft SCADP . _ Page 6~
why the excessive use of lots for surface parking is a problem wo~,
addressing directly. The presence of surface parking in the D~;)W~town
area is a consequence (not a cause) of the n, eed for red~.v~opment and
indicates several things. First, that there isn t suffic, c~demand for
either land or parking to justify the cost of parki~'~tructures.
Parking structures become economically fe.~,~ffble only when land prices
(per parking stall) exceed the cost of p..c.,~ng structures, and when
shortage of land and parking com~fiicate the need Surface par~mg may
well be the highest and best uj~that is, the use that affords the
owner,the prospect of the~c~Jhest long-term economic return3 It
doesnt seem likely th...~e construc[~on of additional parldng
structures would.j,~e more land available for development at lower
prices, becau~'t'he ufllizatio~lue) of surface parldng
already d~.s~'t support owners' notions of value~l:hose notion~ are
relate~ the pro)drmty of downtown to the bay, and not to any rational
in. ration of the economics of downtown real estate.
The Draft Plan implies that the use of Mass Transit is an independent
goal, and not a tool in the redevelopment process:
Other things being equal, mass transit is a good thing. Where it makes
sense for folks to use it, they do. If it increases their convenience or
significantly reduces cost, they might get on board. In the new cities
of the American West, designed and built (like Corpus Christi) in the
image of the automobile, mass transit remains the crutch of the
mobility-impaired and the mobility-deprived, and few others. In the
redeveloped Downtown we envision, there may be a need or desire for
short-trip transit within the immediate neighborhood; after all, Corpus
Christi isn't really a great place to be outside on all but about 75
days per year. But a number of policy statements begin to sound as
though transit is a solution looking for a problem. For example, there
is not much evidence that shod-transit-trip park-and-ride finds much
favor outside the environs of major amusement parks. Remember, the goal
is to plan for the success of the redevelopment as a whole, and not for ~
the success of transit within it. By making the use of transit a
priority, we may be sacrificing the success of the redevelopment program
in the interest of a political cause. In Downtown Corpus Christi we are
not going to create or support transit demand by limiting parking and
increasing its cost. More likely, the effect will be to reduce
parking-dependent activity.
The Draft Plan proposes a disturbing rezoning:
I'm not a Shoreline Boulevard landowner, but I'm s~ed by
Policy Statement B.A.1. which proposes to e~C.~qish a new zoning
,,district along Shoreline Boulevard, exc~g office buildings and other
no,n,-tourism related business ~ The concept of"high_est and best
use is an economic on~m~ation fo..r the, City of Corpus
Christi to make. "Most~rable use" is another matter, but even so,
given the current~ation patterns, one would be hard-put to explain
how more d~ble tourism and residentially oriented uses are being
s~~t land between Shoreline Boulevard and Water
South Central Area Development Plan
Public Meeting (January 22, 2004)
Comment Form
Please provide your written commenl and submit to City Slaffat any information table.
South Central Area Development Plan
Public Meeting (January 22, 2004)
Comment Form
Please provide y~ur~t~cn( c°mmcnt and submit to City Sta~ff any ,nfo~a~o/n~ab] .
.South ~Central Area DevelOpment Plan
PUblic Meeting (January 22, 2004)
Comment Form
comment:
Please provide your written comment and submit lo City Staffat any information table,
South Central Area Development Plan
Public Meeting (January 22, 2004)
Comment Form
Name: ]'00~O, ~
Comment:
Please provide your written comment and submit to City Staff at any information table.
South Central Area Development Plan
Public Meeting (January 22, 2004)
Comment Form
Name: '~. ~/~-/~,- ~--n~7~Address:
Comment:
Please provide your written comment and submit to City Staffat any information table.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: 02-17-04
AGENDA ITEM:
SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ("THE
CITY") BY ADOPTING THE REVISED SOUTH CENTRAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN; ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN POLICIES ON THE DOWNTOWN, UPTOWN, BAYFRONT,
BAYFRONT ARTS AND SCIENCE PARK AND SURROUNDING AREAS
FOR PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, FUTURE LAND USE,
TRANSPORTATION, PUBLIC SERVICES, AND CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS; RESCINDING THE SOUTH CENTRAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY RESOLUTION
021169, MAY 21, 1991, AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 022166,
FEBRUARY 28, 1995; AMENDING RELATED ELEMENTS OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCLUDING THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION
PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION.
ISSUE:
The City Charter requires the City to maintain a Comprehensive Plan for all areas of the
City and its five-mile Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. The South Central Area Development
Plan was originally adopted by City Council in 1991 and its transportation element updated
in 1995. An update to the Plan is needed as a number of significant changes are occurring
in the South Central Area (downtown, bayfront, uptown and surrounding areas) and the
City Charter requires that Comprehensive Plans be periodically updated. The purpose of
the Plan is to assure a coordinated and comprehensive approach to city actions consistent
with the City's vision for development and redevelopment of the area. The overall goal of
the South Central Area Development Plan is to encourage redevelopment of the central
city in the most efficient and comprehensive manner for the benefit of the citizens of
Corpus Christi.
Draft South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approval of an Ordinance on second reading.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
City Council passed the 1st Reading of the updated South Central Area Development Plan
on February 10, 2004.
City Council adopted the South Central Area Development Plan on May 21, 1991;
Amended the Plan on February 28, 1995 (See Attachment I: Background Information)
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the Planning Commission recommended Plan.
~P
Director of D"e~'elopment Services
Michael N. G~unning, AICP -/
Assistant Director of Development
Services
Attachments:
Attachment h
Attachment I1:
Attachment IIh
Attachment IV:
Attachment V:
Background Information
List of Meetings which Addressed the Draft Plan
Advisory Committee Minutes
Draft South Central Area Development Plan - February 10, 2004
Ordinance Adopting the South Central Area Development Plan: an
Element of the Comprehensive Plan
ATTACHMENT I
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
Subject:
South Central Area Development Plan: an Element of the Corpus Christi
Comprehensive Plan
History: The 1986 revisions to the City Charter requires the City to maintain an up-to-date
Comprehensive Plan. The Charter also requires the Planning Commission and City
Council to hold a public hearing prior to adoption of any element of the Comprehensive
Plan. On May 21, 1991 the City Council adopted the first development plan for the South
Central Area. Several significant features of the 1991 Plan have been implemented since
its adoption, most notably the realignment and beautification of IH-37 between Shoreline
Boulevard and Mesquite Street, the restoration of the Historic 1914 County Courthouse,
the realignment of Lawrence Street at Shoreline Boulevard, and the location of the new
arena in the central area.
Planning Process: The planning process approved by the City Council in January 2003
called for an updated Plan to be ready for City Council approval before the end of 2003. A
key element of the planning process was the formulation of a detailed list of issues
(Appendix A of the Plan) to be addressed by residents, business owners, and developers
in the South Central area. The ad hoc South Central Stakeholders Group was formed to
provide feedback to issues and initial drafts of the Plan. Staff met with the Stakeholders
Group on seven occasions between May and September (See Attachment II - List of
Meetings held on the Plan).
In addition, the draft South Central Plan was presented for review, comment and
endorsement to the City's Transportation, Park, Museum, and Watershore Advisory
Committees. On November 19th, the Planning Commission conducted the second public
hearing on the Plan and recommended City Council adoption with a number of revisions to
the draft Plan.
On December 9, 2003, Staff presented the draft South Central Plan to City Council. City
Council made two revisions to the Plan (See Attachment III). In addition, the City Council
recommended that a public meeting be conducted to get more community input on the
draft Plan.
On January 22, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a special community meeting
at the Bayfront Convention Center. The meeting was attended by approximately 150
citizens. In addition to Development Services Department staff, a number of other
Departments were represented at the public meeting including Engineering Services, Park
Draft South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
and Recreation, Budget and Management, Museum, and Public Relations. All citizens who
attended the meeting were invited to speak to the group and or visit with individual staff
members concerning their comments on the South Central Area Development Plan.
Attendees were also invited to submit written comments on prepared note cards.
Public notices for the meeting included direct mailings to over 150 individuals and groups
and posting of notices in numerous public facilities including City Hall, all city libraries,
CCISD lobby, CC Museum of Science and History, and all Senior Centers. Several
organizations e-mailed notices to their members including the Downtown Management
District, the local American Institute of Architects, the League of Women Voters, and the
Livable Communities Initiative. In addition all tenants of the City Marina received e-mail
notices. The meeting was covered in advance and well reported by the Caller Times,
several radio and TV stations and posted on the City's website.
A follow up public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission at their regularly
scheduled meeting of January 28, 2004. At the meeting, the commission reviewed public
comments, suggested several changes to the draft Plan (See Attachement III) and
recommended City Council adoption. The Planning Commission lauded stafffor its efforts
in formulating the Plan.
Plan Mission Statement
The mission of the South Central Area Development Plan is to facilitate redevelopment of
the South Central Area over the next 25 years for creating a thriving central area
community in which to live, work, play, raise a family, invest and visit. The City will focus on
implementing the City's South Central Area Development Plan in order to promote a
vibrant central business district, revitalized inner city residential neighborhoods, and
expanded economic opportunities, more choices for recreation activities, and cultural
entertainment within the area.
Draft South Centra~ Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Attachment II
List of Meetings which Addressed
the Draft South Central Area Development Plan
1. Stakeholder Group Meetings
May 8, 2003
May 22, 2003
June 12, 2003
July 10, 2003
July 31, 2003
September 11,2003
September 25, 2003
2. Water-Shore Advisory Committee
October 2, 2003
October 15, 2003
November 6, 2003
3. Park Advisory Committee
October 8, 2003
October 15, 2003
4. Transportation Advisory Committee
October 27, 2003
5. Museum Advisory Committee
January 8, 2004
6. Planning Commission
October 22, 2003
November 5, 2003
November 19, 2003
January 22, 2004
January 28, 2004
7. City Council
December 9, 2003
February 10, 2004
Draft South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
ATTACHMENT III
Advisory Committee Minutes:
Planning Commission
Park and Recreation
Watershore
Transportation
Museum
Minutes of
Planning Commission Public Hearing
South Central Area Development Plan
Bayfront Plaza Convention Center, Room 203B
January 22, 2004
CALL TO ORDER
The public meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. A quorum was declared with Commissioners
Berlanga, Mims, Pusley, Salazar, Stone and Zamora being present; Commissioners Amsler, Richter, and
Smith being absent.
Chairman Berlanga informed those in attendance that the Draft South Central Area Development
Plan has been presented to several City committees and recognized the stakeholder group which was
instrumental in the creation of the plan. Chairman Berlanga added that the plan would be presented to City
Council on February 10, 2004.
With regard to the public meeting, Chairman Berlanga explained that the public would be able to
discuss specific topics with City Staff during a breakout session. He introduced Michael N. Gunning,
Assistant Director of Development Services/Planning who presented a computerized slide illustration of the
plan and explained its components. Mr. Gunning stated that the plan is a policy plan for development in
the downtown area.
After the presentation by Staff, the public was invited to meet with city Staff at the rear of the
room to ask questions and provide comments. Meeting reconvened at 7:17 p.m.
The public was invited to provide comment for the record.
Johnny Cotlon, 410 Peoples, stated that he was excited about the overall concept, but addressed
certain issues such as the Coliseum being preserved. He expressed concern about demolishing old
buildings. He stated that he was interested in the bayfi-ont area which would support the design. Mr.
Cotton also added the trolley idea needs to be examined and overhead lines for the trolley should be
clarified and aesthetically reviewed.
Michael McCutchon, 203 Jackson, stated he has brought regattas to the town. Mr. McCutchon
referenced Policy Statement D-2 as a concern. He stated "residential and hotel" uses are not appropriate in
the area. There is other vacant land that could be used. Mr. McCutchon stated the other uses would be
appropriate as long as the marina uses are preserved.
Marcie Taylor, 5 Hewitl Drive, expressed similar concerns as Michael McCuthon. She added that
she was also concerned about the lack of parkland. With regard to the seawall, Ms. Taylor was concerned
about the benches on the seawall which block the view of the water. Traffic around the arena is another
concern. She stated she would like access to the Art museum.
Leon Loeb, 924 N. Chaparral, provided written comments. Mr. Loeb stated he has been in the
downtown area since 1978. He referenced Area C emphasizing rehabilitated buildings and suggested the
City research the feasibility of modular housing for infill development. Mr. Loeb stated developers do not
believe the downtown area is profitable and expressed concerned that the plan did not address the urban
residential and general tourism industry.
Kevin Latone, General Manager of Omni Hotel/T. R. Tare Development, stated his concerns were
based on the limitation or lack of use proposed for office development as being non-tourism. One
Shoreline Plaza offers opportunity for hotels, i.e. revenue. Mr. Latone suggested expansion of McGee
beach to the downtown area could be catalyst for economic development~ He added he was opposed to the
hotel-mote] tax which being maintained once the new arena and Convention Center expansion are
completed.
Planning Commission Public Meeting
January 22, 2004
Page 2
Gretchen Arnold stated she was glad to see that the plan focused on multi-modal traffic. The plan
should identify specific improvements for bicycling in the area.
Tmcy Carrillo, Executive Director of the Coastal Bend Bays Foundation, stated the plan needed to
address protection of bay waters. Ms. Carrillo states she appreciated the Storm Water language in the plan,
and that the language also needed to be in the Storm Water Master Plan. She added that the Shoreline
Boulevard realignment needed to accommodate the traffic issue and parkland should be identified as
conservation easement.
Brooke Sween-McGloin, participant in the South Central Area Development Plan stakeholder
group, stated she was supportive of the plan. Ms. Sween-McGloin addressed the Cnlisuem issue and
requested that the arena should focus on outside conventions, not local. She suggested smaller functions,
such as family parties and weddings, could be held at the coliseum. The trolley is an important issue, and
location is critical because there are safety issues and the trolley should serve a double loaded corridor.
Ms. Sween-McGIoin stated she was in favor of the trolley line along Chaparral and Water Street not
Shoreline Boulevard.
Vince Denais, 4501 Gollihar Road, stated that water is the most valuable asset. Another asset is
the wind which is valuable to sailors. He stated $4 million was received fi.om three regattas last year and
presented a proposal for the breakwater to be extended to Cole Park creating a day-sailing area and
bayfi.ont park expansion.
Johnny French, 44t7 Carlton, stated that breakwater could be extended south to protect McGee
Beach. He also suggested that the marina be treated as a park for the landmasses and opposed theme park
development.
Jose Flores, 717 Mohawk, addressed Policy C. 11 and expressed concern that the grass park being
proposed in fi.ont of seawall would be dangerous to pedestrians and requested that it be relocated.
Bill Grady, 330 Aberdeen, requested that City Staff preserve the bayfi.ont and marina. He
expressed concern with Chaparral Street area was being abandoned. Mr. Grady stated that the City of
Baltimore provided incentives for developers to move downtown. The attraction was mainly to college
students and affluent persons.
Frank Hankins, 721 Cresrview, stated that thc marina landmasses does not need anything else put
on them.
Connie Vallri, 302 Waverly, agreed with previous speakers, Mr. French, Ms. Sween-McGloin,
Mr. Flores, and Mr. Hankins. She added she was opposed to overdone landscape and added that the cun-ent
bike paths are dangerous.
Rick McCabe, 3706 Panama, stated Texas A & M University was considering extending it's
location to the central area for dorms or university village. He requested that the bayfi-ont and skyline be
protected.
Van Hnseman, 600 Building, stated city staff should consider moving small businesses to thc
waterfront. He stated the plan has too much of everything, lacks a simple theme and funding sources. The
plan should address the needs of local citizens.
Roy Pell, 5022 Rasputen Court, stated that if a consensus is needed behind the central theme, it
will not happen. He asked the Commission to focus on long range and forward a recommendation to
approve the plan to City Council.
Chairman Berianga thanked the public for parlicipating in Ihe public meeting and expressing their
comments to City Staffregarding their concerns. He reiterated thai the City Council would be acting on the
plan on Febrnary 10, 2004.
Planning Commission Public Meeting
J anuai~, 2:2, 2004
Pa~¢ 3
With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Assistant Director of Development' ' ' Recording Secretary
Services/Planning
PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Special Called Meeting
October 15, 2003, 5:00 p.m.
City Hall - Basement Training Room
1201 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, TX
Members Present
Members Absent
Staff Present
Gloria Aguilar
Anne Baker
Sandra Billish
Clifford Bost
Davie Cissna
Gregory Perkes
Maria Ramos
Megan Welch
Karen Woodard
Dordnda Garza
Rome Gregorio
Margie Rose
David Ondrias
Linda Hodge
K Chute
II.
III.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair, Sandra Billish called the meeting of the Park and Recreation
Advisory Committee to order at 5:05 p.m.
Because of lack of quorum Roy Pell, Chairman of the Water/Shore Advisory Committee, did
not call their portion of the meeting to order.
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS: The recording secretary called the membership roll for the Park
& Recreation Advisory Committee and announced that a quorum was present.
PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE SOUTH CENTRAL
AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN by Robert Payne and Mic Raasch of the City's Planning
Department.
(Greg Perkes arrived at 5:15 pm.)
At 5:42 p.m. Roy Pell, Chairman of the Water/Shore Advisory Committee announced that due
to a lack of quorum the Water/Shore Advisory Committee portion of the meeting would not be
held.
The Park & Recreation Advisory Committee received the PowerPoint presentation and
handout titled, Discussion of the South Central Area Development Plan Capital Improvements.
Discussion was held with questions asked and answered.
(Maria Ramos left at 6:03 pm. Anne Baker left at 6:10 pm. Megan Welch left at 6:12 pm.)
Greg Perkes made a motion to endorse the concepts pertinent to the Park & Recreation
Department of the South Central Area Development Plan with the following considerations
made to the handout dated October 15, 2003, titled Discussion of the South Central Area
Development Plan Capital Improvements:
>delete the Long Term Projects suggestion of joining the T-heads and eliminating the stem of
the Lawrence St. T-head.
>delete item #1, regarding traffic control, of the Long Term Projects from the Park &
Recreation section.
>In the same section, item #4, strike the word 'passive' from the recreation park improvements
for Blucher and South Bluff Parks.
>In the same section, item #5, strike the word 'purchase' and use the following, 'possible
expansion of land and connection of' Blucher Park to South Bluff Park emphasizing ADA
compliance and overall maintenance of the area'.
IV.
>The South Bluff Park area could host a small Festival Site.
>Concern is expressed regarding the McGee Beach Amphitheatre.
Clifford Bost seconded. The motion passed.
Michael Gunning, Director of the Planning Department, along with Robert Payne and Mic
Raasch expressed their appreciation for the committee's efforts toward their recent project
presentations.
Clifford Bost expressed concern with the ADA requirements and the City's accommodations.
He requested an agenda item to discuss this topic.
ADJOURNMENT:
Davie Cissna made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:04 p.m. Gloria Aguilar seconded.
The motion passed.
David Ondrias, Acting Director
Park and Recreation
Draft South Centrai Area Development Plan
City Council Public Headng 02-10-04
Februar~ 10. 2004
Minutes
Reqular MeetinR
Water/Shore Advisory Committee
Thursday~ October 2~ 2003
Members Present: Tom Anderson (Vice Chairman) (1), Alan Dinn, Dr. Oscar Garcia, Dan
Leyendecker, Dr. Joanna Mott and Roy Pell (Chairman)
Members Absent: Grant Fergeson (1), Steve Moody (1) and Terri Nicolau (1)
Staff Present: Margie Rose, Assistant City Manager, David Ondrias, Acting Director of
Park & Recreation, Peter M. Davidson, Marina Superintendent, Rene Garza, Marina Field
Supervisor and Benita Brunner, Management Aide
South Central Area Development Plan - Mr. Payne requested the Committee's endorsement of the
South Central Area Development Plan which is used to guide other aspects of Capital Improvements,
maximize market opportunities, ensure adequate public facilities, remove barriers to redevelopment,
infrastructure, etc. He reported that in keeping with the established timetable, the Planning
Commission will receive public input at other public hearings scheduled in October, November and
December. Mickey Raasch, Project Planner, commented with regard to the executive summary and
draft plan which address key issues (provision of adequate infrastructure; Marina redevelopment;
fostering downtown residential re-development; Capital Improvements Program; creation ofbayfront
park; improvement projects; beautification of Coopers Alley L-Head; and policy statements
including appropriate use of landmasses. Discussion followed regarding addressing an architectural
theme; making policy statements stronger by using "will" instead of "should"; need for stronger
overall economic development to attract visitors/citizens to downtown/Marina area; need to address
promotion of boating events and acquiring required amenities to do so e.g. convenience stores; TIF
District; need to embellish section in order to address how relocation of the Corps of Engineers
offices and issues relative to the Nueces County Courthouse are considered economic development;
revising the existing (South/North Basin) list to distinguish between what will be
maintenance/upgrade to current facilities and development required to attract more tourism, boating
events, etc.; need for statement(s) requiring promotion/support for national/international boating
events; having a separate Marina economic development package to include additional slips, sailing
facilities, and expanded work/haul out area that is privately operated, expanded fuel station to
include a ship store, pump out facilities, restaurantJgrill, convenience store; seeking a restaurant for
the L-Head; and omitting the need for a swimming pool. Discussion followed regarding the
Committee wanting to delay further action in order to see the further revised plan, established
timelines and having a special called/joint meeting in order to further address the plan. Chairman
Pell suggested that members should submit their comments regarding the plan to Mr. Payne as soon
as possible.
~N :TRf~cFIC E?,IGI~=~=~llqG FRX ~. :~1~35~5 Feb. ~ ~ 12:1"~:~ P2
TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMM& I lee
MINUTES
(MeeUng of October 27, 2003)
Members present
Stuart Sher, MAC Karl~ Benne~ Israel Ybar~,
Robb~e Foster, D~vld Seilet arid Paul Torres and Don Davenpor~
Members Hot Pre~ent
Anthony Alejandro and Grace Marie Gonzales
CALL TO ORDER - ~r~e Chairperson Sher, in the absence of Chairper~3n Alejandm, caned me~h-~l to
order at :1:35 p.m.
APPROVAL OF 'MINUTES' - Vice Chaiq~ofl Slier c~lled for approval of minutes for n
September 22, 2003. Hotlc~ nlacie and secer~ed to approve minutes as presenbed,
MONTHLY TRAFI~C PATALrI'Y REPORT~
been a total of twenty-two (22) fatalities to date.
MONTHLY TRAFFIC ACC3[DENT EXPERIENCE REPORT for ,~eptember~
'B') - Total accidents were up 3%; Alcohol/Drug Related Accidents
Total injuries up 4; Fatal Accidents up 18% with Fatalities up
- 12 out of 22- 55% as of September, 2003.
(ATTACHMENT
, A~cidents up 3%;
elated statistics
In response to Hr. Sher's request for DW/laws that have gone
2003;
Capt. MacDonald stated that fines for first offense
(3) years; 2~ offense Is $200O/year for driver's
$3000 for the next three years. Capt. MacDonald
DUL Nlnor profile for DUI Is 19 - 20 yeats
surrounding counties.
for the next three
the next three (3) years and third offense;
that there is a definite increase In minor
This a major problem throughout the cJty and
RECOGN/T~ON of Audience/Public
STAFF RECOMMEN
not scheduled on AgencY.
If4~t'TE E REVIEW
A#
Mr, Brent Moore
proposed traffic
The Gener~
In eaU'
Phase 2 ~
Boulevard Traffic Re-routing o~ Seawall -
Shiner MoseJey and Assodates, Thc. gave a brief presentation an the
construction schedule for the Seawall Rec0nstrucUon RoJect,
:he overall seawall projed schedule which began In la~er 2000 and ends
g~ven. Existing condlUons were shown and Phase ! of the Traffic Control Plan.
al Schedule was shown along wlU3 the Phase 3 Trafrg
In summary, the current version of' the TCP recommended; the three phases to
entire seawall reconstruction project; time/cost and safety Issues incorporated into
Control Plan and finally the acceptance of overall TCP enables final deslgrt and
remain on schedule.
Notion made by Nr. Foster, seconded by Hr. Seller to endorse the Seawall ProJect. Motion
passed,
'1 :TR~qF~IC EN~INE~IN~
FAX NO. : 56188~5545
Feb. 82 2~ 12:I-ZF'H P3
~taff recommendation to appro~a Harbin Bridge Bicycle Event for S~pt~mb~r,
if all c~n~lt~ons are met.
Ms. Gretchen Arnold repn~nUng the Coq~s C:hr~ Chamber i Texas A~M
University Tarpo~ FoundaUon Bio/de Event stated that the place Satorday,
September 25, 2004 in canjunction with Bayfest. The end at Bayfront
Plaza/Visitor Center area with two rides: 3=; mile Ocean ride and 65 mile Bay Tour
blcyde dde. The foaowing is a list of requirements part of the Parade Permit for this
event: Complete Implementation of the Traffic Control Plan; Hire an approved
contractor to set our the tra~ ~ two bridges - Nueces Bay Causeway and .1FK
Causeway and SH 3&1; prohibit suppOr[ vehicles (chase vehicles)
stopping or delaying traffic on t or causeway except to pick up injured bicyclist or non-
vehicles to e of participants to be 16 years of cdder to paftidpate
in the 65 and General Liability Insurance $1,000,00 minimum limit, Cib/to be
Waivers are required to be signed by each partidpant~ Waiver
, and TxDOI' are to be held harmless.
made by Mr. Torres, seconded by Hr. Seller to approve Harbor Bridge Bicycle Event vall
Endoreement of Sout~ Central Development Plan (Downtow~ A~ea) -
t~e Comprehen~ee Plan
Mr. Bob Payne, Planner with the City's manning Department stated that the inf~ planning and
design should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Promote a uniquely attracl~e atmosphere
for small and large-scale tourist attractions. Emphasize conflict-free pedestrian ~ and pathways
to enhance connections between downtown and uptown, the bayfront and the Bayfroet Art~ and Sclellce
Parks and maximize use of public areas, Design transportati~ netwerk and services to serve existing
and future land uses with empllasis on unifying the downtown, ul:~o~ bayl'rontt the Bayfront A~ts and
Science Park (BAS,°), Texas S't~ AquarlLml CI'SA), and the expanding Oo~lmerclal/publlc complex at the
Port of Corpus Christi. preserve and enhance public acx:ess and recreational opportunrdes along the
Bayfront. Maximize redevelopment opportunRles for the Central Business District, the BASP, and the
Port. Encourage a high level of urban design consistency and a3nst3-dctlon standards for public s paces
and facilities to promote reside~Ua{ and tourist-~tiont, ed development. Recugnlze the unique role of the
Downtown Management District and the Regioflal Transportation Authonty In promoting developing and
enhancing the economy of the Downtown and ef~ourage a dynamic process giving great latitude in
managing Its area of resl~l~lity.
Motion made by Mr. Seiler, seconded by MAC Bennett to endorse drat~ plan for Downtown Area w~h
inclusions suggested by Committee.
D]~$CUSS~ON ZTEMS -
None scheduled For this month
¢.~ TRAFF:~(: ENGINEER'S REPORT-
Curtis Clark Drive/South Staples Street PetlUon - Des'~.ng. ln~ Ma_.ry ..... Fran_ce? .Ten. t:ie~l~, stated
Staff received said petition handed out to ~ttee durlug meeting. Residents/Businesses.
relayed their frustrations to Staff, ~ traffic engineering to_a~nd, uct studies
which expect to be a~nduded I~, 0023. She ~rther stated South Staples is
presently under con~u¢lfe~4~ ~ ~~nd Is part of future subdivision
developrnenL. ~
Mr. Sell~a ~ Co~ml~ findings of the 5out~ Staples/CurtJs
~¢~affve .
study.
cl'P street prlorlUe5 - Follow-up orr expressed interest to Involve and Include the TAC Input in CIb/s
City of Corpus Christi
January 20, 2003
To~
David Berlanga
Planning Commission
From:
Rick Stryker
Museum of Science and History
Subject: Feedback on the South Central Development Plan
Michael Gunning, Director of City Planning and Senior Planner Bob Payne presented
the South Central Development Plan to the Museum Advisory Committee on January
8, 2004. The Committee asked that 1 forward their concerns and input to Mr.
Gunning and the Planning Commission.
A. Parking
1- Parking for the Museum is inadequate. Of greatest concern is the need to replace
bus parking which was largely eliminated by the Ortiz Center Development.
2- The Committee expressed the concern that parking capacity on the Barge Dock
was sharply reduced due to the access provided for RTA buses connecting to the
Water Taxi stop. This further erosion of parking in the area is not good.
B. Street Access
1- The Port of Corpus Christi has developed a plan that would eliminate the traffic
circle in front of the Museum. This elimination would make bus access to the
Museum more difficult, especially school buses whose final destination is the
Museum.
2- Vehicular access to the Museum was further reduced with the elimination of traffic
under the convention center. Vehicular access from Shoreline through the
Watergarden and two-way traffic on Mesquite east of the old courthouse should be
restored. Also, improvements to Port are needed to allow better access.
3- The plan calls for placing greater emphasis on Brewster (over Resaca) as the
connection between Shoreline and Chaparral. Without careful planning including
signage, street reconfiguration, etc, route changes will make it even more difficult for
tourists to find the museums.
C. Connection to Corpus Christi Beach
Consideration ought tobe given; long term, to changing the Port entrance to Nueces
Bay, making it possible for there to again be a land connection to Corpns'Chri~i~- -
Beach.
Draft South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
ATTACHMENT IV
DRAFT SOUTH CENTRAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN -
FEBRUARY 17, 2004
SOUTH CENTRAL
AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN
An Element of the
Comprehensive Plan
Draft Update
February 17, 2004
South Central Area Development Pla~t Update
February 17, 2004
Page H
South Central A rea Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 111
SOUTH CENTRAL
AREADEVELOPMENTPLAN
Supersedes the Plan
approved by City Council
Ordinance #22166, February 28, 1995, which amended the original Plan adopted by
City Council Resolution #021169, on May 21, 1991
The preparation of this document was financed in part by a Community Development Block Grant from the
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and a Metropolitan Planning Organization
grant from the Federal Highway Administration.
Corpus Christi City Council
2003
Mayor Loyd Neal
Brent Chesney Bill Kelly Mark Scott
At Large District 1 District 4
Henry Garrett Javier Colmenero Rex Kinnison
At Large District 2 District 5
Melody Cooper Jessie Noyola
At Large District 3
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page IV
Shirley Mims, Vice chair
Robert Zamora
Corpus Christi Planning Commission
November 19, 2003
David Berlanga, Chairman
Elizabeth Chu Richter Eloy Salazar
Richard Smith Bryan Stone
Neill F. Amsler
Michael Pusley
South Central Area Stakeholders Group
Norma Urban
Bunny Arnim
Brad Lomax
Gordon Landreth
Tim Clower
Wayne Lundquist
Dusty Durrill
Larry Urban
Elizabeth Chu Richter
Brooke Sween-McGloin
David Seller
Tom Niskala
Greg Brubeck
Bert Quintanilla
Roy Pell
Linda Hodge
Neill Amsler
Mohammad Farhan
CONTENTS
$outb Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 2
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 4
POPULATION AND EXISTING LAND USE ......................................................................... 5
PLANNING PROCESS ............................................................................................................. 8
STAKEHOLDER AND CITIZEN INPUT ................................................................................ 8
PLANNING ISSUES ................................................................................................................. 9
MISSION STATEMENT. .......................................................................................................... 9
PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................... 9
A. ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................. 12
B. LAND USE ............................................................................................................................ 13
AREA A: BAYFRONT AND DOWNTOWN LAND USE POLICIES ................................. 14
AREA B: UPTOWN OFFICE AND GOVERNMENTAL CENTER ..................................... 20
AREA C: SOUTH BLUFF AREA ........................................................................................... 21
C. TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................................ 24
D. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................ 28
E. PUBLIC SERVICES .............................................................................................................. 30
PARKS ..................................................................................................................................... 30
BAYFRONT PARK .............................................................................................................. 30
FESTIVAL PARK ................................................................................................................ 30
BLUCHER AND SOUTH BLUFF PARKS ......................................................................... 31
BLUFF BALUSTRADE ....................................................................................................... 32
DOWNTOWN PARKS ......................................................................................................... 32
MARINA ............................................................................................................................... 32
PUBLIC FACILITIES .............................................................................................................. 33
UTILITIES ............................................................................................................................ 34
WATER SYSTEM ............................................................................................................. 34
WASTEWATER SYSTEM ............................................................................................... 34
STORMWATER SYSTEM ............................................................................................... 34
OTHER PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES ........................................................... 35
F. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS ................................................................................... 36
UTILITIES ............................................................................................................................... 36
MARINA .................................................................................................................................. 36
SHORT RANGE NEEDS ..................................................................................................... 36
MEDIUM RANGE PROJECTS ........................................................................................... 37
LONG RANGE PROJECTS ................................................................................................. 38
NORTH BASIN .................................................................................................................... 38
BAYFRONT ............................................................................................................................. 38
PARK AND RECREATION .................................................................................................... 39
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................. 39
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ...................................................................................... 40
TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT ................................................................................... 40
G. PI.AN IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................ 42
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 3
FIGURES
FIGURE 1: SOUTH CENTRAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN STUDY AREA ................... 5
FIGURE 2: EXISTING LAND USES 1N THE SOUTH CENTRAL AREA ............................... 6
FIGURE 3: SUB-AREA BOUNDARY MAP ............................................................................ 11
FIGURE 4: FUTURE LAND USE .............................................................................................. 13
FIGURE 5: PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN .......................................... 19
FIGURE 6: FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PLAN .................................................................. 25
TABLES
TABLE 1: 2000 CENSUS POPULATION AND HOUSING ......................................................5
TABLE 2:2002 EXISTING LAND USE ACREAGE ................................................................. 7
Soutb Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 4
South Central Area Development Plan
INTRODUCTION
The Comprehensive Plan is mandated by the City Charter.
It requires the City Council to "...establish comprehensive
planning as a continuous governmenta[ function in order to
guide, regulate, and manage future development..." and,
that "all city improvements, ordinances, and regulations
shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan."
The Comprehensive Plan is a product of various plan titles
such as Policy Statements, Area Development Plans,
Capital Improvement Programs, and Master Utility Plans.
The comprehensive planning process is a means whereby
citizens and community leaders guide community
development. The Comprehensive Plan, by definition, is
general, long range, and broad in scope. To help formulate
the Comprehensive Plan, City Council divided the city and
its environs into 10 Area Development Plan (ADP) study
areas.
.," CENTP&L
PORT
AIRPO~: FLOUR
¥10LET BLUFF
'~EST
SIDE
SOUTH$1DE
~USTANG
ISLAI'tO
Development plans for these areas will help resolve basic issues such as zoning and platting of properties,
allocation of public services and facilities contained in the Capital Improvement Programs, and other area
specific issues. In any case, follow-up programs are needed to implement the many policies in the Plan.
Implementation of these plans will help assure the most appropriate land development and provision of public
services.
Coordination of the Capital tmprovement Plan, various Area Development Plans, and day-to-day actions of
line agencies responsible for implementing the Comprehensive Plan, will result in more cost effective
development and tax dollar savings.
The South Central Development Plan Area, located south of the ship channel, was originally part of a larger
Central ADP area which included the Corpus Christi Beach area north of the ship channel. The "Central Area"
was separated into "north" and "south" study areas to expedite formulation of a plan for the Corpus Christi
Beach area when the Texas State Aquarium was being planned for developmenL
The South Central study area embraces the downtown, uptown, waterfront, and is bordered by the Ship
Channel to the north; Corpus Christi Bay to the east; Morgan Avenue to the south; and Crosstown
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 5
Expressway/West Broadway to the west. (Figure 1). Historically, this area has been the most planned area of
the City. A bibliography of many of these plans is available from the Development Services Department.
FIGURE 1: SOUTH CENTRAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN STUDY AREA
Corpus Christi ~hip Channel
Corpus
Christi
;,.\ Bag
Studg Area
Boundarg Map
POPULATION AND EXISTING LAND USE
According to the 2000 Census, the South Central area contains 7,270 residents and 3,111 housing units. The
South Central area has experienced a significant decline in population over the last 40 years. In addition, the
area has experienced a major exodus of retail businesses since the 1970s. The original South Central Area
Development Plan (1991) identified the decline in resident population and retail businesses as major areas of
TABLE 1:2000 CENSUS POPULATION AND HOUSING
IPopulation
Housing Units
1960
12,567
5,072
1970 1980 1990 2000
9,020 8,312 7,906 7,270
3,895 3,591 2,941 3,111
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 6
FIGURE 2: EXISTING LAND USES IN THE SOUTH CENTRAL AREA
South CentralArea Development Plan
February 1~ 2004
Page 7
TABLE 2:2002 EXISTING LAND USE ACREAGE
Land Use Acreage %
Low Density Residential 127.0( 11%
Medium Density Residential 78.3: 7%
High Density Residential 8.23 1%
Professional Office 65.27 6%
Commercial 165.60 15%
Light Industrial 153.75 14°A
Heavy Industrial 4.91 O°A
~ark 36.86 3°A
~ublic Semi Public 199.93 18°/<
:)rainage Corridor 4.1¢
~ight of Way 17.72 2°/,
Cacant 243.6.' 22°/,
fotal 1,105.3~ 100%
Over the last 10 to 15 years the
downtown has emerged from a period
of deterioration and loss of downtown
residential and commercial usage to a
healthy and attractive area for new
entertainment, commercial, hotel and
office businesses. In the last five
years, the downtown has experienced
several new residential
redevelopments that are now in high
demand. A series of proactive City
Councils, the Downtown Management
District and aggressive downtown
property owners are largely
responsible for the resurgence of the
Downtown. Some of the small and
large successes over that last 15 years
which are now building the
momentum for redevelopment in the
downtown include:
· Several major public projects approved by voters in 2001 include:
o Convention Center Expansion
o New Multi-purpose Arena
O New Baseball Stadium
O Seawall Repairs
O Marina Improvements includes renovation of bulk heading, slip repair and additional large boat
slips
· Night life entertainment, i.e. restaurant and night club development in Downtown
· Small retail shops development primarily located on Chaparral Street
· Concrete Street Amphitheater
· Recreational Development of McCaughn Park and old City Hall Site
· Miradores on Seawall
· Selena Memorial
· New Federal Courthouse
· Gateway realignment and landscaping at 1-37 and Shoreline Boulevard.
· Downtown Lighting with retro style lighting standards
Corpus Christi Art Center Expansion
· South Texas Art Museum Expansion
· Solomon Ortiz International Center
· Asian Cultures Museum
· Museum of Natural History expansions including the Columbus Fleet exhibit
· Regional Transportation Authority's Downtown Trolley Circulator and Harbor Ferry Systems
· Renourishment of McGee Beach
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 8
Other significant projects that may come to fruition are economic development of the marina landmasses,
the South Wharf Project proposal, relocation of the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant, and the
replacement of Harbor Bridge.
PLANNING PROCESS
The planning process for the South Central Area Development ?lan consists of the following steps:
1. Staff formulates planning process and schedule for plan update and begins inventory of land use,
infrastructure, etc.
2. Creation of South Central Plan Stakeholder Group consisting of Downtown Management District,
business and property owners and private and public entities with significant interests in Central
Area and City Staff.
3. Staff and Stakeholders Group identifies issues of concern in the South Central area and produces
Issues Report.
4.Staff drafts Plan to address issues of concern.
5. Staff presents draft Plan to Stakeholder Group and respective City Committees and other
interested organizations for input.
6.Staff revises draft Plan based on input received.
7. Staff presents draft Plan to Stakeholder Group for review and comment. Staff revises draft Plan
based on Stakeholder Group input.
8. The draft Plan presented to Planning Commission for public hearing input. The Planning
Commission may recommend revisions to draft and then recommends City Council approval of
Plan.
9. The revised draft Plan presented to City Council for public hearing input. The draft Plan revised
based on recommendation by Council and Plan is approved.
STAKEHOLDER AND CITIZEN INPUT
A primary goal of the planning process is to obtain input from citizens interested in the South Central Area and
from stakeholder groups. Stakeholder groups and professions that have been involved in the planning process
include:
Downtown Management District
Chamber of Commerce
Regional Transportation Authority
Convention and Visitors Bureau
Port of Corpus Christi
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Landmark Commission
Water Shore Advisory Committee
Architects
Engineers
Commercial Realtors
Restaurateurs
Property Owners
Residents
City Staffe.g. Engineering Services, Park and Recreation, Marina, Public Works (Utilities),
and Development Services.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 9
PLANNING ISSUES
The identification of the major issues related to the South Central Area was primarily derived from several
meetings with the Stakeholders Group. An Issues Report was prepared to identify the major issues determined
by the Stakeholders Group. Staff used those issues as a primary basis in formulating the draft South Central
Area Development Plan.
MISS1ON STATEMENT
The mission of the South Central Area Development Plan is to facilitate redevelopment of the South Central
Area over the next 20 years for creating a thriving central area neighborhood community in which to live,
work, play, raise a family, invest and visit. The City will focus on implementing the City's South Central Area
Development Plan in order to promote an exciting central business district, revitalized inner neighborhoods,
expanded economic opportunities, and many more choices for recreation and entertainment, from outdoor
activities ranging from sports to cultural events with in the area.
PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The guiding goals and objectives for the entire City, ETJ, and all Area Development Plans including the South
Central Area are contained in the Policy Statements adopted by the City Council in 1987.
The policies encompassed by this Plan address not only current issues, but needs that the City and South
Central residents, property owners, and businesses perceive will become pressing in future years. Recognizing
that not all suggested implementations will take place immediate[y, it is important to foresee and note problems
and opportunities, and develop a long term strategy to address them.
The goals, objectives, and policies of this plan are consistent with the Bayfront Plan adopted in 1982 and
amended in 1984, and the Project Plan for Reinvestment Zone No. I adopted in 1983. This plan supersedes all
previous City plans for this area except for the Reinvestment Zone Project Plan which shall remain in force
until State law provides for the termination of Reinvestment Zone No. 1. In addition, this plan is an update to
the original South Central Area Development Plan adopted May 21, 1991 and later updated in February
28,1995.
Key goals, objectives, or policies of the Plan are printed in bold print. However, for a full understanding of
each policy statement, refer to the entire text of that policy statement.
The specific goal of the City and South Central Area Development Plan is to promote the South Central Area
as a place of great vitality, with a mix of educational, residential, retail, office, service, government, arts and
cultural, and entertainment development. The health and vitality of the area can contribute in a major way to
the city, its local and regional image, and quality of life. It is a place where residents can live, work, learn, and
play in the same neighborhood. A fully revitalized South Central Area will need a resurgence of residential
and retail development activity. While a resurgence of retail activity has occurred during the last decade,
resident population growth is needed to sustain and fu}ly realize the retail commercial development potential in
the central business district.
Principal objectives of the Plan include:
· Sufficient Infrastructure Capacity - Infrastructure planning and design should be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan. Foremost of the principal objectives determined during the planning
process was the critical need to continue immediate and short term improvements to the downtown
stormwater system to prevent a repeat of the damages to businesses which occurred during several
rain events in 2002. Other critical infrastructure needs include significant improvenaents to the
wastewater and street systems.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 10
24/7 Neighborhoods - Promote a uniquely attractive atmosphere for small and large-scale tourist
attractions. Propose appropriate land use, with emphasis on increasing residential density and business
intensity in the Central Business District.
Pedestrian Friendly District - Emphasize conflict-free, ADA accessible pedestrian district to
enhance connections between downtown and uptown, the bayfront, the Bayfront Arts and Science
Park, and outlying areas, and maximize use of public areas. Create shade from sun and shelter from
wind through structures, trees and palm plantings, and landscaping on private property and in public
right of way.
Transportation network - Design transportation network and services to serve existing and future
land uses with emphasis on unifying the downtown, uptown, bayfront, the Bayfront Arts and Science
Park, Texas State Aquarium, and the expanding commercial/public complex at the Port of Corpus
Christi. Promote efficient use of existing parking facilities balanced and coordinated with enhanced
transit services and other intermodal choices in the Central Business District, Bayfront Arts and
Science Park, and the Bayfront.
Parks and Recreation - Preserve and enhance public access and recreational opportunities along the
Bayfront. Enhance public spaces and pedestrian movement in the area between 1-37 and the ship
channel, and establish a clear and functional entryway to the Bayfront Arts and Science Park (BASP).
Develop a Festival Park (or Parks). Expand Heritage Park to the east and west and promote pedestrian
movement to, and through, the park grounds free from vehicular conflict.
Economic Development - Maximize redevelopment opportunities for the Central Business District,
the BASP and the Port. Provide for economic development and expansion of the existing Marina
possibly including a public beach, cruise ship berths, anchorages, and commercial development in the
North Marina.
Unique Quality of District - Encourage a high level of urban design consistency and construction
standards for public spaces and facilities to promote residential and tourist-oriented development.
Incorporate urban design elements which are sensitive to the large number of historic structures and
districts in the CBD (e.g. Bluff Balustrade, the historic 1914 County Courthouse, Furman Avenue,
and Downtown) and the Bayfront.
Downtown Management District - Recognize the unique role of the Downtown Management
District, Regional Transportation Authority and Port of Corpus Christi in promoting development and
enhancing the economy of the Downtown and encourage a dynamic process giving great latitude for
these entities in managing their areas of responsibility.
Since the late 1980s the Central Business District has experienced a revival that is continuing today. The City
is committed to continuing this revival and making the Central Business District of the future a place of major
public and private facilities of the highest quality.
This Plan is a proactive redevelopment strategy, to maximize market opportunities, assure adequate public
facilities, and remove barriers to redevelopment. Capitalizing on the market potential of the Central Area, the
City's role must not be only one of regulator, but one of partner and active participant. The key to this role is to
achieve community consensus on what should occur in the area, then to aggressively pursue this common
vision.
Many of the detailed policies in the following sections related to the entire study area while some of the policy
statements pertain to one of the sub Areas illustrated on Figure 3.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 11
FIGURE 3: SUB-AREA BOUNDARY MAP
A
South Centrol A rea Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 12
A. ENVIRONMENT
POLICY STATEMENT A.I
Pollution prevention devices should be incorporated into stormwater outfalls to capture
floating debris, sediments and other pollutants before entering the Bay system. Dozens of
stormwater out£alls are located along the bayfront which deposit large volumes of floating debris
and other urban pollutants along the seawall, beaches and shoreline areas.
POLICY STATEMENT A.2
All public and private construction should be in accordance with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA). Compliance with these standards will ensure continued availability
of flood insurance to the community through the National Flood Insurance Program.
POLICY STATEMENT A.3
While preserving or increasing drainage capacity, the City will protect the flowing stream in
Blucher Park which is overwhelmed during major rain events. Stormwater retention or
detention facilities will be needed for drainage improvements in this area. They will not cause higher
water levels in the park than presently experienced and will shorten the time of flooding. Where
ever possible, the perennially flowing stream should be retained in its natural state and any
channetization should be minimized.
POLICY STATEMENT A.4
Maintain the one-mile minimum distance from the shoreline for any petroleum drilling
operations.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 13
B. LAND USE
POLICY STATEMENT B.1
The City Council hereby adopts the Future Land Use Plan map and the accompanying text
as a guide for future land use decisions (see Figure 4). The intent of the ~ture land use and
development plan is to encourage high intensity mixed use development and civic oriented
development of the highest order within the South Central Area. The plan provides guidance for
future land use including rezoning, platting, fiscal management, and capital improvement planning.
Specific policies for the various South Central Areas are grouped into sub-areas as illustrated in
Figure 3.
FIGURE 4: FUTURE LAND USE
Illll
South Central Area Development Platt
February l 7, 2004
Page 14
AREA A: BAYFRONT AND DOWNTOWN LAND USE POLICIES
POLICY STATEMENT B.2 - PLANNING AREA A
The highest priority for creation of activities on the bayfront are activities that benefit the citizens of
Corpus Christi and that take advantage of the unique natural amenities of the bayfronk including wind~
water and temperate climate.
POLICY STATEMENT B.3 - PLANNING AREA A
Promote a mix of tourist, retail, entertainment, residential, and civic uses in the Bayfront and
Downtown Business District. The City should encourage a much higher density and intensity of uses than
currently exists in Planning Area A. Development potential for Area A, will depend on a mutually supportive,
planned, and coordinated effort between private development and public service entities, of which the
provision of adequate utility infrastructure has become of paramount importance (See Public Service Section).
Special lighting, signage, landscaping, and street furniture should be used to help visually and functionally
integrate public and private development projects.
POLICY STATEMENT B.4 - Planning Area A
Esta~ll:~ a ne;:' z~n~.ng a;s?e° ~'~- ,u ...... :-~ ~f ~r~ertle: ~'~ cu~,:.~ ~..~ ..... a Promote
create economically viable incentives for promoting development of new tourist oriented uses on private
properties fronting Shoreline Boulevard, ,.,~+h;..,.,......~nn a~ao ..... ~.~ -~r-.~..~a~-*:~- ~.-e .~:~....~ r~ ..... The ~ig,~.ezt an~ best
use of these prime properties is tourist-related and residential uses not office or non-tourism related business
uses. These prime properties should be developed with high-rise hotels and residential uses with touris~
related retail uses occupying a majority of the ground floor. Drive-throughs and similar non-tourist uses
should not be permitted on Shoreline Boulevard nor the half block nearest the bay along side streets.
POLICY STATEMENT B.5 - Planning Area A
Increase the number of housing units and achieve higher housing densities in the Downtown Area.
Incentives should be established, including financial and regulatory, to promote significant increases of quality
residential development and compatible mixed uses in the CBD and surrounding residential neighborhoods
e.g. conversions to loft apartments, specialty grocery stores, "liveaboard" facilities in the marina, and other
residential serving uses and to create a sense of community in the Central Area.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 15
POLICY STATEMENT B.6 - Planning Area A
Pursue designation of Downtown as a targeted area within the Corpus Christi Housing Finance
Corporation's Mortgage Credit Certificate Program if Federal requirements can be met. This would
eliminate the first time buyer requirement and increase the home purchase price limitations.
POLICY STATEMENT B.7 - Planning Area A
Encourage the Downtown Management District and City Staff to develop residential loan guarantee
program proposal. The proposal should include possible foundations that could provide seed money and
guidelines for guaranteed loans.
POLICY STATEMENT B.8 - Planning Area A
In order to create a significant resident population in the area, the City should consider incentive
programs making residential development and redevelopment more attractive to property owners. Such
program might provide Community Block Grant Funds (CDBG) for low interest loans, tax credits, etc. where a
property owner agrees to rehabilitate a vacant building, with 25% percent of the building rehabilitation devoted
to new downtown residential units.
POLICY STATEMENT B.9 - Planning Area A
The 1-37 corridor from the Crosstown Interchange to Shoreline Boulevard is the most important
entrance to the City and should be as aesthetically appealing as possible. Recent improvements including
the construction of the new federal Courthouse and the landscaping of the realigned 1-37 boulevard have begun
the process to visually improve this important gateway entrance to the City, the Bayfront, and the Central
Business District. However, remaining improvements which should be targeted for implementation include
the following.
· Deteriorating buildings along this entryway should be repaired, rehabilitated, or removed in order to
make way for redevelopment (the restoration of the historical 1914 county courthouse is certainly a
significant improvement);
· Billboards should be removed;
· The City's organization seals should be more tastefully presented or removed; and
· Heavy landscaping should be added within the 1-37 right-of-way and existing landscaping should be
properly maintained.
POLICY STATEMENT B.10 - Planning Area A
Expand Convention Center grounds and take advantage of its bayfront location by creating a bayfront
public park and plaza south of the Convention Center on Shoreline Boulevard medians and the Barge
Dock. Creation of this public park plaza will complement the Convention Center expansion, the arena,
enhance new hotel development on adjacent vacant lands and create a location for small festivals.
POLICY STATEMENT B.11 - Planning Area A
Trees and landscaping will be designed as a critical component of all roadway projects in Area A. Trees
and other plantings will be properly coordinated with utilities to avoid conflicts and competition for limited
underground space on city-owned properties and right-of-ways. The city will fully consider the significant
value of trees for shading pedestrians when resolving infrastructure conflicts; and plant appropriate tree species
on public rights-of-way that maximize planting potential while protecting the safety of the public.
POLICY STATEMENT B.12 - Planning Area A
Establish grand entrance features, i.e., special signage, landscaping, sculpture, fountains, etc., at key
entrances to the BASP and improve the entranceway$ leading to Resaca and Chaparral Streets. Grand
entrance features are similar to "gateways" except gateways will use more land and be larger in scale.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 13 - Planning Area A
Develop a pedestrian walkway along the bayfront between the barge dock and the Solomon Ortiz
International Center. The walkway would provide a special pedestrian way, or linkage, between barge dock
South Central A rea Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 16
and sea wall, to Solomon Ortiz International Center. Other special pedestrian ways should connect the bayfront
with Heritage Park, festivaI areas, the BASP, and Solomon Ortiz International Center. These pedestrian ways
would be constructed with attractively designed and consistent pavement, lighting, landscaping, and public
signage.
POLICY STATEMENT B.14 - Planning Area A
Enhance the seawall with special pavers or concrete imprinting, landscaping, increased lighting on
steps, and creation of shade.
POLICY STATEMENT B.15 - Planning Area A
Expand Heritage Park to the east side of Chaparral Street and to the west, up to the U.S. 181 right-of-
way, between Fitzgerald and Hughes Streets with similar historic structures that exist in Heritage Park.
This expansion will buffer Heritage Park fi.om any thture multilevel developments on the remaining portion of
those blocks to the east. This will also create a more attractive entrance to the Bayfront Arts and Science Park.
llowever, care should be taken that historic structures are not removed from original sites unless the structure
is threatened by demolition.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 16- Planning Area A
Promote visitor-oriented commercial activities including bed and breakfast uses, restaurants, coffee
shops, gift shops, art galleries, and artisan working areas in Heritage Park. Activities that generate
significant amounts of traffic and activity both from out of town visitors and residents are most desirable for
this strategic location so that a high level of liveliness and interest is generated.
· The first priority for obtaining greater use within the area should be to encourage high-quality local
cultural restaurants (Mexican, Greek, German, lrish, etc.).
· The City should aggressively encourage leases for gift shops, art galleries, artisan working areas and
studios, and art and handicraft, sales, etc.
· Rental monies from Heritage Park activities should be used for the improvement of Heritage Park.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 17 - Planning Area A
To promote views of Heritage Park and the Arena from Shoreline Boulevard plant palm trees on thirty foot
centers along both sides of Resaca Street between Chaparral Street and Shoreline Boulevard.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 18 Planning Area A
Encourage development of parking structures to avoid costly surface parking lots on high value
downtown properties. Outright prohibition of surface parking or monies in lieu of required parking are two
options that should be considered. Monies in lieu of should be used for creation of parking structures. In all
cases in the Central Business District, the first floor of any parking garage should be constructed to ultimately
provide mixed commercial/office uses. In addition, a balance must be achieved between pemonal use vehicle
parking, pricing controls, and a public transit system designed to minimize congestion and provide flexible
movement of people to multiple destinations and attractions on the same trip.
POLICY STATEMENT B.19 - Planning Area A
Consistent, high quality, metal halide and pedestrian-scaled lighting should be standardized along the
Bayfront areas to tie the public waterfront and central business district together and provide high
quality illumination. The "peach" colored lighting used in much of the marina does not emit a quality light
conducive to the tourist oriented marina and bayfront, nor is it consistent with the new lighting downtown.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 20 - Planning Area A
The City will encourage pedestrian friendly retail, restaurant, and entertainment uses along street
frontages combined with multi-family residential, hotel, office uses and parking garages on
aboveground levels.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 21 - Planning Area A
Public and private signage requirements should promote a coordinated and cohesive design theme.
South Central Area Development Plun
February 17, 2004
Page 17
Consideration should be given to minimizing the number and size of allowable signs and allowing limited-
sized monument-type signs within the required setbacks. Where no setback is required, signs overhanging the
sidewalk are permissible. Billboards and portable signs should be prohibited.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 22 - Planning Area A
Replacing existing non-landscaped parking areas with public/private plazas and seating areas will be
encouraged in combination with a reduction of required parking. Public/private plazas and seating shall
contain landscaping, special light standards, fountains, and decorative paving materials.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 23 -Planning Area A
Urban Design guidelines will be developed for the following areas of the Central Business District:
· Primary Entryways to the Bayfront Business District, the Bayfront, the Bayfront Arts and Science
Park (i.e. IH-37, Twigg Street, Leopard Street, Agnes/Kinney Street, Chaparral Street and Port
Avenue).
· Along Shoreline Boulevard and Ocean Drive.
· All development and improvements in the Marina and on the Bayfront.
· Along the Bluff Balustrade.
· Bayfront Arts and Science Park.
· Central Business District (Downtown and Uptown)
POLICY STATEMENT B. 24 - Planning Area A
Elements that will be considered for inclusion in any urban design guidelines for the CBD:
· Higher density mixed-use development
· Mixed-use compatibility
· Pedestrian/cyclist amenities including bike racks, lighting, shade trees, landscaping, street furniture,
sidewalk widening and texturing, grating, etc. for private and public development for pedestrian
comfort
· Architectural and design controls including greater signage control, site plan review, etc.
· Public and private parking lots
· "Compact" parking spaces and shared parking uses/sites for multi-modal transit facilities to
accommodate parking and transfer people to multiple destinations
· Prohibition of street closures and skywalks affecting the original grid street network in the downtown,
uptown, Old lrishtown, BASP, and the area to the west of Shoreline Boulevard in the general vicinity
of the Coliseum and Sherrill Park in order to promote a healthy pedestrian environment
· View corridors maximizing views to the Bay
· Great Streets Program
· Requirements for provision of retail/restaurant uses for ama. iority of street level frontages of new and
restored buildings
· Restrictions or prohibitions on dumpsters, chainlink fencing, utility units, and other unsightly,
utilitarian facilities along ground floor street frontages.
· Relocation of traffic control boxes/panels to underground or to less visible locations.
· Develop a master plan for public art
POLICY STATEMENT B. 25 - Planning Area A
The City will create a special zoning district for the area north of 1-37 and east of U.S. 181, to encourage
high-density visitor/tourist related uses.
Objectives for the area include:
· Reduction in the amount of parking required for preferred uses and pedestrian amenities and public
plazas;
· Preferred uses will include bed and breakfast, tourist shops, handy craft shops, hotels, motels,
restaurants, museums, art galleries, sidewalk cafes, arenas, convention centers, festival areas, etc.
$outlt Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 18
Minimum and maximum setbacks to create storefronts along the street.
Signage controlled, lowlevel
Reduction of billboards in the South Central Area especially the primary gateway into the CBD and
the bayfront, that is, 1-37.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 26 - Planning Area A
The City, in conjunction with the Downtown Management District, will propose changes to the sign
ordinance in "B-5" and "B-6" zoning districts. The sign requirements for these districts should be carefully
reviewed and changed to conform with the intent of the South Central Area Development Plan. The sign
changes should help ensure development of an attractive and appealing atmosphere in the downtown area. At a
minimum City regulations for the area should:
a. Prohibit off-premises signs (billboards).
b. Require signs to be oriented and scaled for pedestrian traffic.
Allowed signage should be calculated in proportion to linear feet of lot frontage, total building or site
size.
Allowing projecting or fin signs located in the public right-of-way, provided they do not extend
beyond the curb.
e. Allow wall signs.
f. Prohibit portable signs.
Control banner signs according to a standardized design and restrict to a temporary time period
related to special events.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 27 - Planning Area A
The highest priorities for installation of new public art projects are at:
a. 1-37 at Shoreline Boulevard;
b. La Retama Park;
c. Shoreline Boulevard in front of the Arena;
d. L Heads and T Heads;
e. Artesian Park; and
f. Bayfront Park.
These are very important gateways/entrances to the downtown area. Prominent, enlivening art should be made
at these locations with the help of grant money and private donations.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 28 - Planning Area A
Relocation of the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant is a high capital improvement priority. Once
the Plant is relocated out of the area, and any remediation completed, the site should be redeveloped with a
public use supportive of the City's downtown redevelopment goals. Potential uses include, but are not limited
to, parking, festival park, executive mini golf course, etc. The Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant serves
the Downtown Area, surrounding neighborhoods, and provides an essential function for development in the
area. However, the Broadway Treatment Plant, in it current location, and as the downtown redevelops will
become a detriment to reinvestment of surround properties.
POLICY STATEMENT B.29 - Planning Area A
The City will pursue construction of strategic pedestrian linkages in the downtown, the marina,
bayfront, the BASP, the Port's Cruise Ship Terminal. Pedestrian linkages will be heavily landscaped and
include sidewalk widening, special sidewalk pavers or concrete imprinting, festive lighting, street furniture,
public art, fountains, and small plaza areas along tbe routes. See Figure 5: Pedestrian Corridor Improvement
Plan.
South Central A rea Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 19
FIGURE 5: PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN
and proposed
LQ - La Quinta Tnn
W$ - Water St.
I~W- Best Western
CO ~ COlise~lrn
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 20
POLICY STATEMENT B. 30 - Planning Area A
The City will encourage the long-term conversion of industrial business uses between the Broadway
Wastewater Treatment Plant and US 181 to convert to visitor oriented or public uses.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 31 - Planning Area A
The City will work with the Port of Corpus Christi and the Union Pacific Rail Road to restrict storage of
tank cars along West Broadway Street (between Port Avenue and Tancahua Street). Trackage in this
area is used for storage of box and tank cars and is an incompatible use and potential safety hazard with the
future use of the Wastewater Treatment Plant site, the Washington-Coles neighborhood and Concrete Street
Amphitheater.
AREA B: UPTOWN OFFICE AND GOVERNMENTAL CENTER
POLICY STATEMENT B.32 - Planning Area B
Promote the Uptown Office Area as the City's premier location for mid- to high-rise office development.
The existing concentration of high-rise office towers, between the bluff and Tancahua Street, and the extensive
governmental and quasi-public complex adjacent to the Nueces County Courthouse and City Hall, could
efficiently serve as the nucleus of a more expansive regional office district.
Within this Uptown Office District there are a number of historic or potentially historic properties located on
Leopard Street. Preservation of meritorious properties on Leopard should be pursued and efforts taken to
minimize negative impacts of non-historical properties which are immediately adjacent.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 21
AREA C:SOUTH BLUFF AREA
POLICY STATEMENT B.33 - Planning Area C
Redevelopment within the Low- to Mid-Rise Professional Office and Residential areas of Area C, (see
the Land Use and Development Plan, Figure 2) should be encouraged as long as the redevelopment does
not detract from the residential neighborhood. Much of this area is used for single-family or multi-family
residential or for professional offices. Professional office uses are generally compatible with single- and
multi-family development in this area. Neighborhood serving commercial uses of low intensity may be
considered for the area however, 24-hour commercial uses, bars or clubs should not be allowed.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 34 - Planning Area C
The existing industrial development in Planning Area C, should not be expanded in area.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 35 - Planning Area C
The commercial strips on Staples Street and on Morgan Avenue should not extend any farther into the
adjacent residential areas than displayed on the Future Land Use Plan.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 36 - Planning Area C
Continue to protect the residential neighborhoods from encroachment of non-residential uses.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 37 - Planning Area C
The Landmark Commission should evaluate areas in the South Central area for "historic district"
designation and a property owner incentive program for areas to be designated historic. An incentive
program encouraging property owners to preserve and restore designated structures should be developed.
Restoration should allow for contemporary use and emphasize restoration of property exteriors.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 38 - Planning Area C
The City should establish historic preservation incentive programs to encourage property owners who
are willing to restore historic structures. Such programs may include tax abatements, freezes on taxes, low
interest loans for restoration, etc. These incentive programs create a greater public awareness of historic
properties and provide a modest reward for property owners who wish to participate. Some cities have used
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 22
annual events/tours of historic homes and dis~-icts and historic plaques to educate the public and generate
interest in historic preservation. Examples of historic districts which could be focused on include Furman
Avenue, Upper Broadway, Leopard Street between Port Avenue and the Bluff, Downtown, and Old lrishtown.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 39 - Planning Area C
Establish development regulations to protect designated views from public rights-of-way and, to
enhance scenic corridors and gateways. View corridors are defined as streets where the City wishes to
preserve clear site to a natural or man-made feature. Those features might include the bay, harbor bridge, or an
historic home, etc. Primary emphasis is on the view from the corridor to the point of interest with secondary
emphasis on the attractiveness of the corridor.
Scenic corridors are defined as streets where the City wishes to enhance highly traveled streets or entryways.
The primary emphasis is on providing an attractive view from a vehicle or pedestrian passing.
Gateways give a sense of place marking passage from one area to another, hnportant gateways in the South
Central area include:
1-37 and the Crosstown Expressway;
1-37 and Shoreline Boulevard,
Shoreline Boulevard and Kinney Street;
Shoreline Boulevard and Furman Avenue;
Shoreline Boulevard and Resaca;
· 1-37 and Chaparral/Mesquite Streets; and
Agnes/Laredo and Tancahua/Carancahua Streets.
Major landscaping, sculpture, and lighting are appropriate at gateways. When these improvements are made
they create a distinct and memorable place.
Design
objectives along view and scenic corridors include:
Development adjacent to these scenic corridors will be required to provide a higher standard of
landscaping than for non-scenic corridor streets. The City's Landscaping requirements in the Zoning
Ordinance should be changed m require all street yards for multi-family, public-semi public, business
and industrial uses to provide a minimum of 0.04 points of landscaping per square foot where
property is developed adjacent to a designated scenic corridor. Note: street yards are areas between
structures and the street right-of-way.
Along the seawall creation of shade either through plant massing or shade structures is a high priority;
Private and public signage of all types should have stringent design controls consistent with the
tourist and recreational theme of the Bayfront. Public signage should be standardized and billboards
and portable signs should be eliminated;
Utilities should be placed underground;
The City should establish a facade restoration program for designated corridors; and
Public art projects could be placed at gateways and strategically located in scenic corridors, consistent
with the Municipal Arts Commission's public art guidelines/plan.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 40 - Planning Area C
Promote pedestrian activity at street level throughout the South Central Area (see Figure 5.) The highest
priority pedestrian corridors include the following. See Section F - Capital Improvements for more detail.
Shoreline Boulevard from the Solomon Ortiz International Center to Cole Park;
Water Street between 1-37 and Coopers Alley;
Peoples Street, Lawrence Street, and Coopers Alley between the Bluff and the marina landmasses;
Resaca Street between Shoreline Blvd. and Chaparral Street;
Chaparral Street from the Ship Channel to Coopers Alley;
Twigg Street between Shoreline Blvd. and Mesquite Street;
Concrete/Belden Street, between Water Street and its dead-end west of North Tancahua Street; and
South Central Area Development Plan
February l 7, 2004
Page 23
· Leopard Street between the Bluffand the Crosstown Expressway;
POLICY STATEMENT B. 41 -Planning Area C
Pedestrian corridors should link points of interest in the area, such as tourist destination points,
historical, recreational, cultural, and retail activities. The Park and Recreation Department should have
jurisdiction over public amenities and maintenance in these corridors. Design objectives for these corridors
should include:
· Functional and attractive paving materials required on all pedestrian corridors. The City should
determine the types of paving materials that would comply with this policy.
· Coordinate mass transit services with pedestrian corridor improvements (i.e., assure corridor
improvements are placed at bus stop locations and lead up to any water taxi, or high speed water
terminals).
· Coostruct greater pedestrian amenities such as sidewalk widening, unified lighting and street
furniture, drinking fountains, storefront awnings, and shade structures, pedestrian "bump-outs", and
public informational signage especially for the pedestrian.
,, Make all pedestrian improvements in the CBD compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act
POLICY STATEMENT B. 42 - Planning Area C
Pedestrian improvements such as "bump-outs" at street intersections, sidewalk widening, street trees,
etc. (See Policy Statements B.40 and B.41) should be prioritized for construction in the Central Business
District. The construction of these pedestrian improvements will address the core of needed pedestrian
connections along the Bayfrnnt, from Uptown through Downtown to the marina landmasses, along Water and
Chaparral Streets, and on Resaca Street at the Arena and Heritage Park.
POLICY STATEMENT B. 43 - Planning Area C
The City's Zoning Ordinance and Codes should continue to prohibit sexually oriented businesses from
operating in the South Central Area.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 24
C. TRANSPORTATION
POLICY STATEMENT C.I
The City Council adopts Figure 6 as the guide for future transportation decisions in the South
Central area. The transportation network of this Plan constitutes an amendment to the City
Transportation Plan. Those changes requiring state or federal funding will be submitted for review
and included in the Metropolitan Planning Organization Urban Transportation Plan. Changes to the
City Transportation Plan include the following.
a) Extend North Staples Street as a collector street (CI) between West Broadway and Fitzgerald
Street
b) Designate Fitzgerald Street as a collector street (C1) between North Shoreline Boulevard and US
181
c) Extend Mesquite Street as a collector street (C 1) between Brewster Street and Port Avenue
d) Delete Brewster Street as a collector street between Chaparral Street and Tancahua Street
e) Designate Cooper's Alley as a collector street (CI) between Tancahua Street and Shoreline
Boulevard
POLICY STATEMENT C.2
A parking control policy with pricing controls recognizing the real costs of parking in the area
and an equitable balance with transit services should be established. The underlying premise that
the more economical parking is provided the less likely that transit services can be prudently
provided.
POLICY STATEMENT C.3
To ensure pedestrian safety, create a Shoreline Boulevard operations plan for temporary
closure of travel lanes during large festival events such as Buccaneer Days and Bayfest.
POLICY STATEMENT C.4
The City will pursue with TxDOT the relocation of the Power Street off-ramp from US 181
directly to Belden Street. As presently configured this off-rmnp has a very short deceleration lane
and a dangerous 90 degree turn onto Tancahua Street. TxDOT should evaluate the feasibility of
extending this ramp to Belden Street and closing the current ramp at Power Street.
POLICY STATEMENT C.5
Public signage for East Port Avenue and the U.S. 181 on-ramp north of Belden Street should be
improved to make the public better aware of these streets as secondary routes to and from the
Bayfront Arts and Science Park (BASP).
POLICY STATEMENT C.6
Policy objectives in descending order of priority for street improvements should be projects
which will:
a) Facilitate pedestrian and multimodal access.
b) Facilitate access to and along the bayfront;
c) Minimize right-of-way to promote high intensity downtown uses and provide for flexible and innovative
redevelopment opportunities;
d) Facilitate access to the Bayfront Arts and Science Park area including Solomon Ortiz International
Center; and
Facilitate creation of a traffic control center to better manage traffic during high use events.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 25
FIGURE 6: FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 26
POLICY STATEMENT C.7
The following is a prioritized list of transportation improvement projects which meet policy objectives:
Improve traffic control throughout the plan area with "real-time" traffic responsive signal and
pedestrian activated controls.
· Shoreline Boulevard See Bayfront Park Policy (E.1) in Public Services section.
Creation of designated park and ride locations in the downtown and uptown areas for shuttling to
the BASP, Marina, and other downtown attractions and the Port of Corpus Christi.
Extension of Shoreline Boulevard as a controlled access drive (for transit vehicles, etc.) to connect
with Chaparral Street in the BASP. The conceptual master plan for the Bayfront Arts and Science
Park envisions the extension of Shoreline Boulevard northward into the Water Garden area and
terminating at Chaparral Street. This design would have a positive resolution to the dead end of the
existing North Shoreline Boulevard and provide vital access to the future economic development of the
Corps of Engineers site.
However, the design comes with several issues which would need to be resolved. The running water
"brook" which connects the Art Museum to the Water Garden should not be broken. Since the Water
Garden and its "brook" connection was paid for by the Museum, any extension of Shoreline Boulevard
should include participation in the planning and design by the museum.
· Street improvements necessary for baseball stadium, arena and BASP access.
Enhanced public transportation system, including but not limited to a fixed alignment streetcar
system. This system will provide improved opportunities for park and ride services to various
destinations to the downtown, marina, BASP, and Port and city connectivity via the RTA's Staples
Street Station. A fixed alignment streetcar system will provide an economic stimulus and, with its
unique features, a regional attraction.
Extend Tancahua Street northward to Harbor Drive. This extension is needed to provide enhanced
access to the Port's Solomon Ortiz International Center and proposed new baseball Stadium.
POLICY STATEMENT C.8
The City's Traffic Engineering Division in cooperation with the RTA shall establish a parking
monitoring and management program to assure sufficient parking availability as the South Central area
becomes more intensively developed. This monitoring program shall apply to all areas zoned B-6 (no
parking is required in B-6 zones) and other areas deemed appropriate by the City. Currently, there is an
oversupply, or "under demand" of available parking in South Central Area due to the high percentage of vacant
buildings. As these vacancies diminish and the need for additional parking arises, Staff will make
recommendations to the City Council regarding specific parking projects and programs to meet the need.
a) Emphasis shall be placed on encouraging the private sector to work out agreements with adjacent uses to
share parking.
b) Improve signage to public parking lots in the South Central area.
c) The City will support the provision of public satellite park and ride lots.
POLICY STATEMENT C.9
The City in partnership with the RTA shall conduct a feasibility study to determine the most effective
combination of on and off-street parking and RTA transit services with regard to serving the Bayfront
Arts and Science Park including the arena and baseball stadium, the Central Business District (CBD),
and marina development (existing and potential). Large increases in public parking in the vicinity of the
South Central A rea Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 27
arena and convention center may have significant negative impacts on enhanced transit services planned to
serve these I3cilities. Any increase of additional public parking in the area should be critically analyzed in
relationship to RTA's proposed enhanced transit services to serve the area. Parking metering expansion and
premium pricing for on-street parking in vicinity of BASP should be considered in conjunction with this
overall scheme to encourage transit usage.
POLICY STATEMENT C.10
The grid arterial system in the CBD should be preserved as much as possible. Street closures should be
minimized in the CBD so that the grid system's efficiencies for serving high intensity land uses will be
maintained.
POLICY STATEMENT C.11
The City will conduct a feasibility study to investigate the feasibility of reverting one-way streets to two-
way streets in the downtown. This study will consider the use of head-in parking to slow traffic and make it
easier for motorists to get out of their cars and enjoy and benefit from the "downtown experience"
POLICY STATEMENT C.12
The City will continue to support and participate in studies that address the need for a new higher
bridge over the ship channel to accommodate larger ships. The City will also ensure that sufficient future
ingress and egress is provided to the CBD from the new Harbor Bridge. Landscaped public rights-of-way at
each ingress and egress points will be required. Reuse of the existing U.S. 181 bridge right-of-way wilt be
considered for a new entrance/exit near the BASP and Baseball Stadium.
POLICY STATEMENT C.13
Promote multi-model transportation, including bike paths and bike parking.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 28
D. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
POLICY STATEMENT D.1
Establish a continuous funding source and foster multiple partnerships for on-going capital
improvements in the Central Business District. Possible funding mechanisms include tax
increment financing, public improvement district, tax abatement / credits, or similar mechanisms.
The T1F funding mechanism has contributed approximately one million dollars annually for the last
20 years to pay for construction of the Texas State Aquarium. If another TIF District is established
these monies would be targeted for improvements in downtown and on the bayfront. If it is not
feasible to establish another TIF District then some other funding mechanism such as a public
improvement district may be appropriate to provide a continuous source of funds for needed
improvements in the Central Business District. In addition, multiple partnerships should include the
Port of Corpus Christi, Regional Transit Authority, Nueces County, Metropolitan Planning
Organization, Corpus Christi Independent School District, Downtown Management District, etc.
POLICY STATEMENT D.2
Promote development of the marina landmasses with public/private joint ventures for retail,
restaurant, entertainment, park, marina, residential, and/or hotel uses to generate monies for
debt retirement of bonds used for construction of public facilities in the marina. It is clear that
the significant demands for public improvements in other areas of the City balanced with scarce
municipal funds available for debt retirement, funding for larger marina improvements may be best
achieved through joint public/private ventures in the marina. This strategy serves at least two
purposes. This funding mechanism provides 1) a mechanism to pay for needed marina
improvements, and 2) new private development which injects renewed life and economic vitality
and appeal into the marina. Such programs have been successful in other waterfi'ont communities
across the country which have found ways of revitalizing their waterfront areas.
POLICY STATEMENT D.3
Marina boat slip rental rates should be assessed at least every two years and should be set at a
level that is at least the median amount charged by gulf coast public and private marinas.
Currently, marina boat slip rental rates are some of the lowest found in comparable marinas on the
gulf coast. Marina slip rentals play a fundamental or even a critical role in paying for marina
operations, marina maintenance, and marina capital improvements.
POLICY STATEMENT D.4
To assure a sufficient supply of revenue producing marina boat slips, begin design for
additional boat slips in the marina when the marina is 75% of capacity. Construction on new
slips should be completed when the existing marina slip rentals are at 95% of slip rental capacity.
POLICY STATEMENT D.5
Public/private ventures and public projects in the South Central Area including the marina
should be designed and located according to the following criteria.
a) Provides a public service or function that directly benefits the general public.
b) Provides recreational, entertainment, retail, and/or other visitor and pedestrian-oriented
types of activities available to the general public. A majority of ground floor uses should
be of these visitor and pedestrian-oriented uses. These public uses should be accessible to
the general public during peak daytime and evening hours and throughout the week.
c) Improves the visual quality of the area.
d) Leverages more private sector investment than public monies invested.
e) Combines disjointed uses to form a cohesive environment where uses can interact and
benefit from their relationship to one another.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 29
POLICY STATEMENT D.6
In order to promote a significant resident population in the area, the City will provide a full range of
incentive programs to make residential redevelopment more attractive to property owners and
developers. Such programs might include Community Block Grant Funds (CDBG), Renewal Community
incentives, tax abatements, etc. and revisions to the Building Code to reduce obstacles and barriers to adaptive
reuse of existing buildings for residential purposes.
POLICY STATEMENT D.7
Promote the arts and cultural resources in the downtown to be engines of economic development
through strategic funding and other forms of assistance. Many cities across the country have established
successful arts and cultural programs and facilities as quality of life resources for the local citizenry as well as
significant tourist attractions. Some of the more successful examples include the Torpedo Factory Art Center
in Alexandria, Virginia; the Louisiana Artworks in New Orleans; the Denver Performing Arts Complex in
Denver; the West End Historic Dislrict and the Deep EIlum entertainment district in Dallas: and the Blue Star
District in San Antonio. These successful programs and projects have created outstanding venues and
incubator programs for the display of local/regional visual art forms and performing artists which otherwise
would not have been available. In many cases older historic buildings and even entire historic districts have
been put into productive use by creating art and cultural districts rich in a variety of entertainment and
educational opportunities. Examples of assistance include limited property tax abatement, CDBG funding, and
historic preservation funding assistance. Areas in downtown which may have potential in the creation of an
arts and cultural district include in the vicinity off
a) Heritage Park/Old Irishtown;
b) the old Frost Bros./Lichtenstein Building;
c) the Ritz Theater;
d) the Kress Building (the emerging "K-Space" visual art project currently operates on the 3ra floor); and
e) the old Montgomery Ward Building on Peoples Street.
POLICY STATEMENT D.8
The City will work closely with the Downtown Management District.to revitalize and redevelop the area
in and adjacent to the District's Boundaries. In order for the Downtown to become more economically
successful and to provide more quality of life experiences for the general public, it is appropriate for a private
non-profit organization to focus on the vision for Downtown and implementation of that vision.
POLICY STATEMENT D.9
Relocate the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers office to a site away from the Bayfront Arts and Science
Park (BASP). This current use does not complement the BASP location and is an inappropriate use of this
strategic site. Promote development on the BASP site with a public/private joint venture for retail, restaurant,
entertainment, and hotel development to capitalize on unique views and prime bayffont and harbor location.
Policy Statement D.10
The expanded Convention Center and new Arena will be a major economic stimulus to the regional
economy by bringing in revenue from outside the region. The primary goal for the Convention Center
and Arena is to operate continuously to host conventions or other events.
Policy Statement D.I 1
The City will explore renovation and adaptive reuse of the coliseum. Renovation appears to be a very cost
effective approach as some cost estimates for renovation have been estimated at $4 to $5 million as opposed to
new construction that could cost $20 million or more.
Policy Statement D.12
Coordinate with Texas A&M University to create a new off-site campus with student housing in or in
close proximity to the South Central Area.
South Central Area Development Plan
February l 7, 2004
Page 30
E. PUBLIC SERVICES
PARKS
BAYFRONTPARK
POLICY STATEMENT E.1
The City, in partnership with the Downtown Management District, the Port of Corpus
Christi, the Regional Transit Authority and the Metropolitan Planning Organization will
conduct a special communitywide planning process to determine the most acceptable
manner in which to create a bayfront park. A fixed rail trolley with overhead electrical lines
must incorporate the highest level of design to minimize the potential for visual clutter on
the bayfront :~ou!~ n~: b: !~:ate~ ~n t~c ~ayfr~nt: Shoreline Boulevard is a formidable
barrier to pedestrians attempting to cross the six travel lanes from downtown to the bayfront
especially during times of large festival events. In addition, large festival events either block
through lraffic or reduce the City's ability to operate large convention and arena events.
The special study objectives are:
· identify the best location for a permanent festival site;
· Determine the feasibility of reducing Shoreline Boulevard from six travel lanes to four taking
into account existing and future traffic levels and street improvement projects;
· Determine if traffic calming devices including reduced speed limits and demarcated
pedestrian crossings on the travel lanes should be planned on shoreline Boulevard;
· Address the possibility of using Water Street as a relief route for downtown commuter traffic;
· Make signalized pedestrian crossings one cycle;
· Illustrate the visual impact of views from Shoreline Boulevard to the bay;
Consider the AIA's 2003 concept plan to create a bayfront park, as well as other plans which
have been considered over the last twenty years, e.g. Bayfront Activities Committee (1985),
the Gateway Project of 1996-97, etc.;
· Implement a community consensus building process to determine the most acceptable
bayfront park design.
FESTIVAL PARK
POLICY STATEMENT E.2
Develop a permanent festival park. The need for a permanent festival park (or parks) is obvious because of
the success of Bayfest and Buccaneer Days carnival and other smaller festivals. However, due to unique
characteristics of these festivals and their current sites several safety and efficiency of use issues have come to
the forefront. The new arena is under construction and scheduled to be completed in late 2004. The arena and
convention center expansion projects are being constructed over the west portion of North Shoreline Boulevard
north of Resaca Street. And the federal courthouse has imposed restrictions on festivals on the Shoreline Blvd.
median in front of it.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 31
With these two portions of Shoreline Blvd. eliminated from effective use for festivals such as Bayfest, the area
along North Shoreline Boulevard between Power Street and the Convention Center may not be large enough to
accommodate large festivals effectively. Alternative sites should be analyzed and a plan devised to develop a
permanent festival site or sites. More than one festival park may be justified. One site could be for low impact
type events and the other could be for high impact festivals. Possible sites include: 1) the medians north oft-
37; 2) the Coliseum and adjoining parking lots and parks; 3) on what will become available land when the
Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plan is relocated in conjunction with the adjacent Concrete Street
Amphitheater; 4) the Kerr-McGee Tract; 5) South Bluff Park, Heritage Park/BASP; or 6) Corpus Christi Beach
Park.
POLICY STATEMENT E.3
Provide a much higher degree of maintenance of the landscaping improvements along IH-37 between
the Crosstown Expressway interchange and the Bayfront. The significant landscaping installed at the
Crosstown/l-37 interchange and the US 181/1-37 interchange in the late 1990's are not receiving proper
maintenance, especially when taken into the context of the highest traveled gateway into the City.
POLICY STATEMENT E.4
Additional shade structures, lighting, trash receptacles, bicycle lanes, informational signage and kiosks,
water fountains, and widened sidewalk should be provided on the seawall and adjoining walkway.
POLICY STATEMENT E.5
The Park and Recreation Department will determine the feasibility for an amphitheater on the steps of
the seawall with a stage floating in the marina or located on McGee Beach.
POLICY STATEMENT E.6
Identify and provide high priority public facilities for McGee Beach e.g. outdoor showers, public toilets
with high frequency of maintenance, shade structures, etc. The reslrooms located at the base of the
breakwater are in need of substantial repair and regular maintenance and additional facilities.
BLUCHER AND SOUTH BLUFF PARKS
POLICY STATEMENT E.7
Improvements to Blucher and South Bluff Parks will be included in the Capital Improvement Program.
Blucher Park is a City-designated wildlife sanctuary which restricts the amount of improvements that can be
placed in the Park. However, environmentally sensitive improvements are needed such as marked birding
trails, selective landscaping, and the old railroad bridge restored as an historic landmark. South Bluff Park has
several recreational facilities serving the surrounding neighborhoods and the City in general. Additional
improvements such as playground equipment and improved lighting are needed.
POLICY STATEMENT E.8
The City will continue to pursue the expansion and connection of Blucher Park to South Bluff Park.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 32
BLUFF BALUSTRADE
POLICY STATEMENT E.9
The City in conjunction with the I)MD will pursue the creation of public plazas along the Bluff
Balustrade, Upper Broadway, "Middle" Broadway at Starr Street, and La Retama Park. The Bluff
Balustrade ("Broadway BluW')is only one of ten National Register properties in the City. This facility needs
to be protected and supported with compatible improvements recognizing the historical integrity of this unique
man-made resource. By the same token, War Memorial Park/Spohn Park due to the sacredness of the
memorial should not be altered by a plaza.
POLICY STATEMENT E.10
The City in conjunction with the DMD will pursue ADA accessibility and retail uses in the Bluff Tunnel.
This unique resource has much potential to provide cost effective ADA accessibility from above to below the
Bluff, as well as opportunities for limited commercial activities since it included commercial uses up until the
time the tunnel was closed in the mid-1970's.
DOWNTOWN PARKS
POLICY STATEMENT E.I 1
Develop a series of highly usable and pedestrian friendly parks in the Central Business District to serve
the resident population's needs. South Bluff, McCaughn, La Retama and Artesian Parks are likely
candidates.
POLICY STATEMENT E.12
Develop along the seawall an amphitheater with a "floating stage" in the marina and/or a permanent
stage on McGee Beach for regular entertainment venues to increase variety of activities on bayfront.
The steps of the seawall would serve as seating area for attendees of performances.
POLICY STATEMENT E.13
The Park and Recreation Department will develop public lighting, signage, landscaping, and street
furniture of a special design theme establishing McGee beach and McCaughn Park as a safe and
uniquely attractive urban beach and park. Any adjacent private development should be required to install
compatible features and lighting to achieve similar lighting levels and types.
MARINA
POLICY STATEMENT E.14
The potential of the marina will be maximized as a major destination to draw more visitors to the
waterfront zone and the downtown area, from the metropolitan area and the City's tourist marketing
area. A diverse and vital marina is key to a revitalized downtown and successful convention center. The
recommendations of this Plan seek to identify and stimulate future growth, vitality, and economic development
in the Marina for a wide spectrum of uses. Redevelopment objectives should include the addition of
restaurants, retail activities, and public park and recreational uses and enhanced marina facilities and services
to attract more people by providing more variety, color, life and activities to choose from.
POLICY STATEMENT E.I 5
Protect and promote the Marina primarily for marina uses. Enhanced marina facilities will include
expansion and improvement of the existing Marina facilities. Improvements should include additional boat
slips, both large and small berths, transient and charter boat slips, restrooms with showers, pump out station
and holding tank, fueling station, a ship's store, laundry, marina offices, etc. A more comprehensive and
detailed capital improvement project list is listed in the Capital hnprovements Chapter F.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 33
POLICY STATEMENT E.16
The area devoted to parking lots on the T and L-heads (landmasses) as permanent uses should be
balanced with the need to provide park and open space uses. It has been observed that the existing
landmasses are the most expensive, in terms of land value, surface parking lots on the Gulf coast. Existing
parking areas on the landmasses should be balanced with the need to provide park and open space for use by
the general public. Additional demand for parking to serve increased retail/restaurant and marina development
should be provided by on-street parking on Shoreline Boulevard and downtown, and parking garages in the
Central Business District with enhanced linkages via transit services and pedestrian corridors.
POLICY STATEMENT E.17
Linkages to the landmasses from remote parking areas in the CBD should be significantly enhanced
with transit service and pedestrian corridors. The landmasses should be used more efficiently for
pedestrian oriented retail/restaurants and public park, recreation and marina uses. Much of the existing parking
on landmasses can be used in the interim until alternative parking/transit service is provided for restaurant and
retail uses. The ultimate use of the landmasses should be predominately for pedestrian friendly uses with
strong transit and pedestrian linkages to downtown parking. Enhanced transit service should be required as a
condition of doing commercial business on the bayftont by any private development.
POLICY STATEMENT E.18
The Cooper's Alley landmass will be improved with more pedestrian friendly amenities and
landscaping. The L-head beyond the stem is totally paved and primarily devoted to automobiles or boat
service areas. It is devoid of any green open space and is visually unappealing. Even though the function of
the L-head landmass is primarily a marina service area, it should be landscaped to visually soften its image and
made more attractive.
The boat storage area located on the L-head would be ideally relocated to an off-site location, however, a less
conspicuous location on the L-head with al~ractive screening may be acceptable. In addition, the boat ramp
and associated parking area devoted to vehicles with boat trailers should be relocated to the north side of the L-
head to reduce congestion at the terminus of the L-head access stem and the bait shop.
POLICY STATEMENT E.19
The City Code will be amended to permit "liveaboards" in the marina only when minimum
improvements and services are provided to serve them. Minimum services needed to serve this population
include a ship's store and a bathhouse with showers and res[rooms. This innovative concept will enhance
security of the marina by adding the presence of people on a 24 hour basis in the marina.
POLICY STATEMENT E.20
Extent t~.c c:nerete eeo anti Add attractive metal halide lighting on the breakwater to the fairway
opening. This will slgn!Ecant!y ex,and an ......... o v ...... J ...................................
~fishing and add a very attractive waterfront feature at night with appropriate lighting.
Policy Statement E.21
Extend the marina breakwater southward to create a protected sailing area in front of McGee Beach~
Emerald Beach and Cole Park.
PUBLIC FACILITIES
POL1CY STATEMENT E.22
Public amenities should be provided throughout the bayfront to make a more attractive and
"people-friendly" activity center. These amenities should include design-integrated shade structures,
street furniture, heavy landscaping, public parking, public restrooms, recreational facilities, drinking fountains,
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 34
water features, attractive metal halide lighting, and pedestrian oriented informational signage. This would
create a much more attractive "front door" to the City and provide needed pedestrian facilities.
POLICY STATEMENT E.23
The Corpus Christi Independent School District should be lobbied to retain the George Evans
Elementary School, and the Corpus Christi Catholic Diocese to retain Central Catholic Elementary
School, to serve existing and future residents' children. Retaining existing schools to serve the South
Central Area is a critical element of fostering residential development in the South Central Area.
UTILITIES
WATER SYSTEM
POLICY STATEMENT E.24
The City will conduct critical analysis and needs assessment of the water distribution system in the Plan
area for potable water and fire protection needs. This assessment should include a long-range
improvement program which addresses not only existing and imminent uses, but projected long-range uses
according to the proposed Land Use and Development Plan.
WASTEWATER SYSTEM
POLICY STATEMENT E.25
The City will conduct critical analysis and needs assessment of the wastewater system in the Plan area.
This assessmentshouldincludealong-range improvement program which addresses not only existing
and eminent uses, but projected long-range uses according to the proposed Land Use and Development Plan,
and specially the redevelopment of the marina.
POLICY STATEMENT E.26
Remove silt and debris in the existing main trunk sewer in Water Street from Resaca to Furman Streets.
This trunk was installed approximately 50 years ago and has never been cleaned.
POLICY STATEMENT E.27
Determine the feasibility of providing treated wastewater (graywater) to the large expanse of (public and
private) landscaped areas in the CBD. If found to be feasible, graywater should be provided to these very
expansive landscaped areas.
STORMWATER SYSTEM
POLICY STATEMENT E.28
Significant stormwater system improvements will be implemented as soon as possible to protect the
downtown area from localized rain event flooding. The City will conduct a critical analysis and needs
assessment of the stormwater system in the plan area. Some of the stormwatcr system problems include
siltation of pipes, inadequate design and sizing of stormwater lines, and deterioration of lines. This issue was
determined by unified consensus of the Stakeholders Group to be the single most important short range issue
for the Downtown area. The Group felt that the City should do everything possible to prevent the reoccurrence
of the damages and loss of business due to the flood events of 2002.
POLICY STATEMENT E.29
The City should establish long-term monitoring and maintenance programs for the stormwater and
wastewater system and establish best management practices to keep the systems in good working order.
South Central A rea Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 35
OTHER PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES
POLICY STATEMENT E.30
Consolidate electrical, fiber-optic, cable TV, telephone, and other compatible utility lines into shared
conduits to minimize the many utility cuts incurred in the Central Business District. This will provide for
a much more efficient and cost effective manner for the provision of these type of services.
POLICY STATEMENT E.31
The City should initiate programs to deal more effectively with the transient and homeless population
and facilities in the South Central Area and adjacent area. The private agencies and organizations which
provide services and facilities to the transient and homeless population are in serious need of governmental
assistance. Innovative programs and services have been provided by other cities to assist in this important
social service.
POLICY STATEMENT E.32
Additional sources of funding should be aggressively pursued for the continuation of restoration and
adaptive reuse of the 1914 Historic Nueces County Courthouse. This prominent public building has sat
vacant and deteriorated at the entrance to the City and Bayfront for over 25 years. The first phase of
restoration began in the fall of 2003.
South Central A rea Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 36
F. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS
UTILITIES
Additional stormwater system improvements are needed as soon as
possible to protect the downtown area from heavy localized rain event
flooding. Some of the stormwater system problems include siltation
of pipes, inadequate capacity of stormwater lines and pump stations,
and deterioration of drainage pipes and boxes.
NOTE: Utilities item 1. was determined by unified consensus of the
Stakeholders Group to be the single most important short-range issue for the
Downtown area.
Critical analysis and needs assessment of the water distribution system
in the Plan area for existing and future potable water and fire
protection demand.
3. Critical analysis and needs assessment of the wastewater system in the
Plan area for existing and future wastewater demand.
4. Relocate, expand and improve the efficiency of the Broadway
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
MARINA
Enhanced marina facilities should include expansion, improvement and
replacement of existing Marina facilities. Improvements should include new
Marina Offices, additional boat slips, both large and small berths, transient boater
slips and restrooms with showers, pump out station and holding tank, fueling
station, a ship's store, laundry, etc. A more comprehensive and detailed capital
improvement project list is listed below.
SHORT RANGE NEEDS
The following projects are grouped by highest priority to produce the highest
quality of services and facilities for the marina. The time frame to implement
these improvements realistically should be within the next two to three years.
These improvements and maintenance of these facilities should be of the highest
quality in order to accommodate large yachts and vessels. Quality facilities and
services will be rewarded with positive referrals. A more comprehensive and
detailed capital improvement project list is listed below.
Relocate and expand boat ramp to northwest quadrant of L-head
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 37
,, Boaters' Facilities and Public Restrooms on all landmasses (including boaters'
restrooms with showers and lounge, laundry facilities, lockers, etc.)
· Four new piers with 240 boat slips and approximately 48 large boat slips on Peoples
Street T-head
· Marina administration office, with public restrooms, conference center, weather and
sailing plan center, meeting facilities with television and satellite systems, and
landscaping and lighting improvements
· Boater's center with fuel station, pump-out facility, snack store and ship's store,
lounge, sail library, internet access, sailing promotion, and education center
· Piling existing slip repair and replacement
· Trash and litter dump sites
· Security cameras and electronic gate controls
· Landscaping entire marina
· Lighting for security and special events
· Sanitary pump-out boat and cart
· Cable and satellite television at slips
· Water toy area
· Shade structures, picnic tables, barbecue grills
· Extend concrete cap on breakwater to the fairway opening and provide attractive
pedestrian-scaled, metal halide lighting.
MEDIUM RANGE PROJECTS
The following projects are needed for the marina, however, are not as urgent as the above
listed projects. They are medium range in timing (3 to 5 years out) and are generally needed
to create more tourism and visitor activity such as national and international boating events,
hosting of "tall sailing ships", and major restaurant and retail development.
· Relocation and berthing of the Columbus Ships in the marina as a tourist
attraction
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 38
Boat sales office and showroom with retail and sailmaker, etc.
Improvements to existing slips
New state of the art boat repair and haul out facility, dry stack storage facility
xvith large boat ramp for large events, and facilities for full service
sailmakers, riggers, electricians, painters, boatwrights, etc.
R-pier replacement, 128 covered slips
Dry boat storage
Parking improvements and asphalt overlay
Sea,hod Market/Fisherman's Wharf and permanent mooring tbr shrimp boats
Anchorage area for visiting boats
LONG RANGE PROJECTS
· Dredging of the marina
NORTH BASIN
Establish a master plan for the ultimate development of the north basin (generally north of
Peoples Street Breakwater). The master plan should be done as soon as possible to
determine if dredge from the ship channel deepening will be needed for Corpus Christi
Marina improvements. Possible improvements could include new land masses, cruise ship
berthing adjacent to the Ship Channel, beaches, anchorage for large water craft, etc.
BAYFRONT
The following projects are proposed for the bayfront. All of these projects should be
compatible with the architectural elements of the seawall i.e. steps, cap, Miradores, and
benches.
Additional shade structures, lighting standards and type of lighting, trash
receptacles, bicycle lanes, informational signage and kiosks, and water
fountains should be provided on the seawall and adjoining walkway.
Provide additional McGee Beach facilities, e.g. public showers, public toilets
with high tYequency of maintenance, shade structures, replacement of
concession building and restrooms
Develop a small amphitheater utilizing the seawall steps with a stage floating
in the marina and/or on McGee Beach for regular musical venues/sports
events to increase variety of activities on bayfront.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 39
PARK AND RECREATION
Expand Convention Center grounds and take advantage of its bayfront location
by creating a bayfront public park and plaza south of the Convention Center on
Shoreline Boulevard medians and the Barge Dock.
2. Recreation park improvements for Blucher and South BluffParks.
3. Possible expansion and connection of Blucher Park to South Bluff Park.
4. Develop public plazas on the Bluff Balustrade and improvements to Upper
Broadway and La Retama Park.
Place public art at:
· 1-37 at Shoreline Boulevard;
· La Retama Park;
· Shoreline Boulevard in front of the Arena and expanded Convention Center;
· Bayfront landmasses;
· Artesian Park; and
· Bayfront Park
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Promote development of the marina landmasses with public/private joint
ventures for retail, restaurant, entertainment, park, marina, residential, and/or
hotel development to capitalize on the unique views and prime bayfront location.
Establish a Tax Increment Financing District or equivalent mechanism to provide
financing for capital improvements in the South Central Area Development Plan.
Relocate the Army Corps of Engineer Offices to a site away from the Bayfront
Arts and Science Park. Promote development with a public/private joint venture
for retail, restaurant, entertainment, and/or hotel development to capitalize on the
unique views and prime bayfront and harbor location.
Additional sources of funding should be aggressively pursued for the restoration
and adaptive reuse of the 1914 Historic Nueces County Courthouse.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 40
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Pollution prevention devices at all stormwater outfalls along the bayffont to
capture stormwater debris and reduce pollution in the bay waters especially at the
Marina.
Drainage improvements within Blucher Park to prevent periodic wash out of the
Blucher Park stream and adjacent wildlife habitat.
AMENITIES AND LANDSCAPING
Contract with a nationally recognized urban designer to provide comprehensive
urban design guidelines for downtown, uptown, the BASP, the bayfront, and the
marina.
2. IH-37 landscaping improvements need a higher degree of maintenance between
the Crosstown Exchange and the Bayfront.
3. Establish grand entrance features to the Bayfront Arts and Science Park at
Resaca Street and Shoreline Boulevard and Chaparral Street and 1-37.
4. Develop a pedestrian walkway along the bayfront between the barge dock and
the Solomon Ortiz International Center.
5. Enhance the seawall with special pavers or concrete imprinting, landscaping,
increased lighting on steps, and creation of shade.
6. Install consistent, high quality, metal halide lighting in the Marina including the
breakwater, to tie the public waterfront and downtown together and provide high
quality illumination.
TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT
to
Create a Shoreline Boulevard operations plan for temporary closure of travel
lanes during large festival events such as Buccaneer Days, etc. to ensure
pedestrian safety.
Construction of pedestrian "bump-outs", sidewalk widening, planting of street
trees, etc per Policy Statements B.C.6, B.C.7, and B.C.8. The construction of
these pedestrian improvements will address the core of needed pedestrian
connections in the Central Business District, on the bayfront, and the Bayfront
Arts and Science Park. Construction of all pedestrian corridors shall be in
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 41
11.
12.
Commission a transportation study to determine the feasibility of changing
one-way streets downtown to two way for the purpose of creating better
interconnectivity and enhanced access to storefront business in the
downtown.
hnprove public si gnage for East Port Avenue and the U.S. 181 on-ramp north
of Belden Street should be improved to make the public better aware of these
streets as secondary routes to and from the Bay Front Arts and Science Park
(BASP).
Improve traffic control throughout thc plan area with "real-time" traffic
responsive signal and pedestrian activated controls.
Creation of designated park and ride locations on the edge of the downtown
for shuttle to the BASP, Marina, and other attractions in the downtown
Extension of Shoreline Boulevard to connect with Chaparral Street in the
BASP.
Improve access from U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) to Padre Street (I-37 frontage
road.)
Street improvements necessary for baseball stadium, arena and BASP access.
Extend Staples Street to Fitzgerald Street after the Broadway Treatment Plant
is relocated.
Enhanced public transportation system, including but not limited to a fixed
alignment streetcar system.
Relocation of the Power Street off-ramp from US 181 to Belden Street.
South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
Page 42
G. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
POLICY STATEMENT G.1
This Plan constitutes the primary guide for the development and
redevelopment of the South Central Area. The Plan provides the overall basis
for which the City makes determinations concerning zoning, capital
improvement projects and programs such as street improvements, park and
marina improvements, and infrastructure improvements, and to a somewhat
lesser degree building code issues.
POLICY STATEMENT G.2
A Strategic Action Committee will be established by the City to implement
this Plan. This group should consist of entrepreneurs and property owners with
businesses or property located within the South Central area, professional
architects and engineers, commercial realtors, at-large citizens who have no
financial interest in the Area, and representatives from governmental agencies
which provide services to the Area, and representatives from the applicable City
advisory committees, e.g. Watershore, Parks, etc. The primary charge to this ad
hoc group is to aggressively pursue the implementation of this Plan. The
committee shall develop specific strategies for implementation of the Plan with
specific timelines to implement the respective strategies and a clear
determination of which agency or individual is responsible to implement specific
projects or programs. The highest priority projects for the Strategic Action
Comxnittee include:
· South Central Area Development Plan projects to be recommended for
inclusion in the next City Bond Program;
· Implementation of sustainable new or additional funding sources for
Central Business District improvements, i.e., Tax Increment Financing
District, Public Improvement District, increase in marina slip rental rates
to upper range of coastal marinas, or other mechanisms to fund projects.
Identified funding sources should be in place within 12 months of
adoption of the South Central Area Plan;
· Final resolution of the "Bayfront Park" including funding for
improvements and construction, if any is required.
· Annual input into the City's Capital Improvements Program.
South CentralArea Development Plan
February 17,2004
Page 43
Draft South Central Area Development Plan
February 17, 2004
ATTACHMENT V
ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE SOUTH CENTRAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN:
AN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI ("THE CITY") BY ADOPTING THE REVISED
SOUTH CENTRAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN;
ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
POLICIES ON THE DOWNTOWN, UPTOWN, BAYFRONT,
BAYFRONT ARTS AND SCIENCE PARK AND SURROUNDING
AREAS FOR PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, FUTURE
LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, PUBLIC SERVICES, AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS; RESCINDING THE SOUTH
CENTRAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED BY RESOLUTION 021169, MAY 21, 1991, AND
AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 022166, FEBRUARY 28, 1995;
AMENDING RELATED ELEMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN INCLUDING THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its
reports and recommendations concerning the amendment of the South Central
Area Development Plan, an element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Corpus Christi;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on
Wednesday, November 19, 2003, during a meeting of the Planning Commission,
and on Tuesday, February 10, 2004, during a meeting of the City Council of the
City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to
appear and be heard;
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that these amendments would best
serve public health, necessity, and convenience, and the general welfare of the
City of Corpus Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the South Central Area Development Plan (a part of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas), including the
Introduction, Policy Statements, Figures, Tables and all other elements and parts
of the South Central Area Development Plan, are hereby adopted as an integral
part of the Comprehensive Plan to read as shown in Exhibit "A" attached and
incorporated by reference.
SECTION 2. That the South Central Area Development Plan adopted by City
Council Resolution 021169, May 21, 1991, and amended by Ordinance 022166,
February 28, 1995, are hereby rescinded.
SECTION 3. That to the extent the amendments made by this Ordinance
represent a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan,
including the Urban Transportation Plan, is amended to conform to the
amendments made by this Ordinance.
SECTION 4. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas
as amended from time to time, except as changed by this Ordinance and any
other ordinances adopted on this date, remains in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. That any ordinance or part of any ordinance in conflict with this
ordinance is expressly repealed by this ordinance.
SECTION 6. The City Council intends that every section, paragraph, subdivision,
clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be given full force and
effect for its purpose. Therefore, if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause,
phrase, word or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by
final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, that judgment shall not affect
any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of
this ordinance.
SECTION 7. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading on this the day of ,2004, by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on
this the day of ,2004, by the following vote
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the
ATTEST:
day of ,2004.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Approved /~./,.,.,._~_~' ,2004
By: Josel~n Harn(ey~
Assistant City AttoYney
For City Attorney
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
L~ST OF
STUDI ES, PLANS, AND REPORTS
CONCEKNING THE CENTRAL STUDY AREA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
JANUARY 4, 1989
1- Bayfront Development Plan, Hare and Hare, 1944-45.
Accepted.
Graphic Design for Bayfront including Shoreline Boulevard, and
fou~ L and T-Heads.
2. .Heliport Location Study,
1953-54. Staff study.
Zoning and Planning Commission
Proposed several alternative sites for the location o~ a
'heliport along the bayfront and in the downtown area. The
study strongly supported the creation of a landmass at the end
of what is now I.H. 37. As an interim heliport location the
study recommended what is now the median of I.H.'37. The
heliport today is located in the median of I.H. 37.
3. Comprehensive Plan for Corpus Christi Area, Harland
Bartholomew and Associates, 1953. Adopted.
The first and only Comprehensive Plan to be approved for
the City of Corpus Christi. Reviews origin of traffic
destined to the central business district (CBD), existing
_traffic patterns in CBD, and existing parking facilitiea.
study placed a'great deal of emphasis on proposed parking.
The Plan reco~ended the following improvements along the
Bayfront.
· Bathhouse at McCaughan Park - Pedestrian tunnel udder
E. Shoreline connecting McCaughan Park to Water.
· Build L-Head - Complete original plan for Marinas.
Off-shore parkway - Original concept.
' Shrimp f]eet- Provide new accommodations at present
harbor entrance.
' Arts Commission - To determine appropriateness and
adequacy of architectural design of buildings facing the
bay.
For Corpus Christi ~each the Plan recommended the
~emcval of 5ascu]e Bridge crossing Proposed to replace
5ascu]e 5r~dge with a gunnel under %he harbor entrance. (The
tunnel la%er plcved tc k,e unfeasible and the Harbor 5ridge was
czea~ed ]n ~ts place.) The study also proposed to construct
highway lB1 west of Timon Blvd, where it now connects with the
Harbor Bridge.
North Beach Study, Price W. Armstrong, 1956. Accepted
* Build a wide and elevated recreational beach and a
protective seawall at North Beach.
* Protect the area by reinforcing and vegetating the
dune wall of Mustang, St. Joseph and Northern Padre
lslands.
5. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Central Business Distr~ct, A Panel
Study by the Urban Land Institute, 1965. Accepted.
The Study includes an examination o2 the existing
physical, economic, and social conditions within the City and
their direct or indirect influences on the Central Business
District. The study also reviews existing conditions within
the Central Area itself, identifying both problem~ and
opportunities. Recommendations pxovided in this study
include:
* Government Center - New office structures for the
County, Federal, City governments and the Department of
Education constructed as a new government center complex
immediately to the north of the retail core.
' Blighted areas - Demolish and redevelop through the
implementation of a Federal Urban Renewal Progra3~. :
* Major retail core - Bounded by Water and Mesquite
Streets
between Schatzel and Laguna Streets. Refu/bish through
removal of parking on a three block section of Chaparral
Street (between Schatzel and Laquna Streets), sidewalk
widening, canopy construction, sign control,
beautification and other face-lifting techniques.
' Future traffic congestion Avoid traffic congestion
in the CBD through the construction of an off-shore
highway or alternative inland route.
6. corpus Christi ~each Plan, corpus Christi Zoning and
Planning Commission, ]966. Adopted.
' 5each access and ~arkJn? ~cv~de at five locations
along the beach.
One-way loop system SurfsJde, T~mon, and North
Shoreline 5ou]evard.
7. Volume I and II, the Comprehensive Plan for CorPUs
christi, Harland Bartholomew and Associates, 19~. Consultant
report, Accepted.
The study identifies existing land uses, evaluates
existing utilities and discusses the overall existing
condition of the central area. It also includes a review of
the traffic conditions, parking facilities, public
transportation and pedestrian circulation. Recommendations of
the plan include:
* Government Center Contains all major public
buildings for Federal State, County and City functions
and is located adjacent to the bluff near Leopard street
providing a connection between the uptown and downtown
areas, office space, small scale retail outlets and
service activities would surround the government center
forming the core of the central area plan.
* North of the central core, from I.H. 37 to the
Bayfront Science Park, a mixed use neighborhood o~ high
density residential, commerce, and controlled industry.
* West of the central core area (above the Bluff)
existing commercial uses along Leopard street would
remain as a secondary commercial center. Redevelop the
residential neighborhood south of the Leopard as a medium
to high density residential area.
* South of the central core area, proposes a
high-density residential area in the neighborhood
surrounding Blucher and South Bluff Parks. In this same
area below the Bluff, a small office and service
commer=ial center is proposed along Carancahua and
Tancahua Streets.
* Improvement of streets Addition of several new
connections, and a solution to the complicated movements
between uptown and downtown. A series of pedestrian
walkways is also proposed in the area opened by the
extension of Leopard Street to shoreline Boulevard.
* Shopping mall Established on Chaparral Street
between Cooper and Schatzel Streets by closing the street
to vehicular movement. Appropriate amenities provided.
, Major tourist facilities - To be located in the
central area: a convention center complex, the marina,
and a new cultural.center.
* Hotel, motel, and tourist complex - along
Shoreline Boulevard. At the end of Shoreline Boulevard,
the present Colisenun would be expanded into a convention
center. Shoreline would be relocated to the west side
- 3
of the Coliseum/Convention Center in order to facilitate
the improved recreational and tourist activities proposed
in the immediate bayfront and marina areas.
Marina - should be enlarged.
Off-shore highway concept.
* Restoration of North Beach - Enlargement of existing
parks, acquisition of additional open space, and the
development of tourist facilities to include sites for
motel or hotel operations, restaurants, cruise boats
fishing piers, etc. '
Residential development - Apartments.
Regional park - North end of Corpus Christi beach.
8. Exploratory Evaluation, An Off-Shore Hiqhwa%~, Harland
Bartholomew, 1967. Accepted.
This study considered the feasibility of an off-shore
highway in the Bayfront area, linking a series of man-made
islands.
9. Corpus Christi Bayfront Study, Sasaki Walker, and
Associates, 1974. Accepted. '
Discusses possibility of reviving downtown by creating a
mall with shops, restaurants, entertainment, small parks,
fountains etc. Recommends a bay to bluff connection via
Peoples Street.
* Shoreline - Phased out as a main arterial to provide
a green park zone. Increase the amount of planting and
create defined pedestrian walkways.
* Ocean Drive - Consider in light of University
expansion and increased tourist activity. An exclusive
bike path interconnecting parks on the shoreline is
highly recommended.
Peoples Street T-Head Developed with bandshell.
* Corpus Christi Beach new development would not
compete with the main downtown area. Low rise, high
density small scale, primarily residential.
' FJshermen's wharf Tourist oriented complex/possible
ports cf call for pleasure crafts at south end.
Beach parking and Boulevard access - Acquire land
- 4 -
along east side of Highway 181 for public parking,
link parking areas to beach by pedestrian sidewalk and
develop old railroad right-of-way as green boulevard.
· Connection of bayfront beach to Nueces Bay across
the northern end of peninsula.
· Marina - At Rincon Point.
10. Choices Facing Corpus Christ%, Goals for Corpus Christi,
1975.--Not Completed.
This goals program was the City's first concerted effort
to determine goals and objectives for the improvement of the
City. Extensive public hearings were held throughout the
conm~unity by a 150 member Goals Committee. The program
produced the above reference booklet which was actually a
questionaire used to determine the ,'choices" facing Corpus
christi- For numerous reasons the program was not completed.
11. Landmark Preservation Plan, Landmark Co~unission of the
City of---Corpus Christi, 1977. Adopted.
Plan establishes criteria for judging historical and
architectural significance. The plan also lists historic
'res which have recognized markers, sites approved for
sl .... ~,, he Nueces County Historical Co~unlsslon, and sites
mar~=~ ~ t ' ' ' '
suggested by various citizens of Corpus Christi. Plan is
implemented through the HC Historic zoning district and
Landmark Commission. It is applicable to Central Area Plan
due to the nun%bet of historic structures concentrated in the
area.
Corpus Christi Beach, A Coastal Management Beach Access
· Department and Texas A&M University,
1p2il~t study, Planning
1977. Accepted.
* Timon and surfside boulevards - Continue the theme of
Ocean Drive.
* Access to beaches - strictly pedestrian. These
walkways would accor~odate necessary beach support
facilities, such as bathhouses, restrooms and concession
stands. Walks complimented with a system of bikeways and
roadways.
* Saltwater pool, or aquarium - At Rincon park.
, Surfside park - Located between high and moderate
density uses, provide passive recreational uses. Connect
to Rincon park via an elevated walkway.
* View corridors Maximize G°od exposure to the
- 5 -
water and a maximum number of potential mites for
development.
13. R/UDAT Corpus Christi American Institute of Architects,
1978. Accepted. '
Study describes existing conditions within the central
business area, explains why these conditions exist, identifies
deficiencies and problems occurring in the central area and
proposes solutions that may help to revive the area. Suggested
solutions include:
' Develop a strong pedestrian connection with a Peoples
Street pedestrian mall from Leopard Street on the Bluff
to the Bay.
' Rehabilitate Lower Broadway, Water Street and other
appropriate locations. Provide a system of parking
structures to in commercial and Bayfront areas.
' Housing should be encouraged in a variety of tlrpes and
at higher densities.
' "Avenida" Widen, improve, and extensively landscape
an "Avenida" from the Downtown core area to the heart of
the Mexican-American community. A connection between the
downtown and west side area.
' Reserve the best mites along Shoreline Boulevard for
hotels, but restrict the size and placement of towers to
preserve the view to the water.
' Expansion of transportation systems along Shoreline
Boulevard.
Expand the marina
water taxi service should be provided.
14. Corpus Christi Beach
Depart3nent, 1978. Accepted.
Assistance Grant.
Redevelopment Study, Planning
Completed for HIrD-701 Planning
Identified three factors that led to the decline of
Corpus Christi 5each as, 1) the erosion of the recreational
beach, 2) the destructive storm surges produced by hurricanes,
and 3) the ]ess of commercial exposure resulting from the
rerouting of U.S. 181 after the construction of Nueces Bay
Causeway and Harbor Bridge. ~econ~nendations include:
Corpus Christi Beach Park - Bath-houses, concessions,
observation decks, fishing piers, an amusement park, salt
water swimming pool and large aquariu~ facility.
* Entertainment District - Southern portion of Corpus
Christi Beach.
* Waterfront shuttle between Corpus Christi Beach and
the Bayfront.
* One way loop boulevard Timon, Surfside and
shoreline Boulevard.
15. Marina Development PlaD, SWA Associates, 1981.
Accepted.
* Bayfront amenities - Including landscape, lighting,
benches, bollard, trash receptacles, signing, pedestrian
plaza/crossing at Peoples Street and a median
closure/crossing at Starr Street along Shoreline
Boulevard.
* Gateway arrival point at Shoreline Boulevard from the
area between I.H. 37 and Mesquite to Water Street zone.
, Development of a public on-the-water activity center
on the Peoples Street T-Head, which includes tour boats,
party boatS, restaurants, waterfront shops, a maritime
museum, and aquariUm-
* City adoption of more efficient standards and
arrangement of boat slip construction and reduction of
area devoted to parking lots on landmasses.
16. Nueces County Historical-Architectural Preservation
Pl_~an, Associated Planners, and Turner, Rome and Boultinghouse,
1982. Accepted by Nueces County Commissioners Court.
Report documents the cultural resources existing in
Nueces County, placing emphasis on those properties or
districts that may qualify for inclusion in the National
Register of HistoriC Places. Numerous sites in the central
area are identified in this report as historically
significant-
17. An Assessment of the A_A_~r~ateneSS and Feasibilit_~__9~
us]_~3_Tax Increment F~nancin__q__to aid i__n the Revitalization of.
the Bay Front Area in Corpus Christi, Texas, Trkla, Pettigrew,
Alle-----n and Payne, 1982. Accepted.
Findings and reconlmendaticns for the feasibility 0f Tax
increment Financing in the bayfront area.
1~. B~a.vfront Plan, Planning Commission, Adopted 1982, a~nended
1984.
This document utilizes together information from past
plans, studies and reports for information on opportunities,
constraints and specific recommendations. It carefully
selects those proposals which work best together along
with existing improvements, to most beneficially utilize
the CBD and the bayfront. Goals, policies and strategies
were developed to accommodate the desired proposals
The goals include: -
* GOAL Encourage and assist high density development
in the Central Business District consisting of a mixture
of professional offices, motels, hotels, housing and
specialty shops.
* GOAL - Monitor and improve pedestrian and vehicular
movement in the Central Business District, including
promotion of parking facilities.
* GOAL Improve appearance and access to Shoreline
Boulevard and Ocean Drive as major entrance to City.
* GOAL - Promote hotels/motels along shoreline
while maintaining visual corridors for property located
west of Shoreline.
GOAL - Encourage additional land masses.
' GOAL - Expand activity in the Marina including boat
slips and commercial activity.
* Goal Encourage and assist in the development of
Corpus Christi Beach primarily for hotel/motel facilities
and high density housing plus attendant public
facilities.
· Goal Improve public access, physically and visually,
to the full length of the beach and provide better
circulation patterns in the beach area, including
stronger transportation links across the ship channel.
19. En~Jneerin~ Study and Recommendation for L-Head an,]
T-Head and 5reakwater Improvements, Goldston Engineering,
/nc., 1982. Accepted and monies included in 1986 CIP.
Two part engineering study to identify the existing
conditions and problems relating to the T-Heads and L-Head
and recommendations for additional breakwater structures north
of Peoples street T-Head.
20. Project Plan for Corpus Christi Reinvestment Zone No. i ,
Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen and Payne, Adopted 1983, amended
1987-
Plan describes existing uses and conditions, the
framework for Reinvestment zone No. 1, Phased public
improvements, and an economic feasibility study.
Plan describes existing uses and conditions, the
framework for Reinvestiment zone No. 1, Phased public
improvements, and an economic feasibility study.
21. Multicultural Center, A Report from Community Unity,
community Uni~y, 1983. Accepted.
Plan identifies the purpose of the Multicul~ural Center
to provide space for cultural or ethnic activities, exchange
cultural viewpoints and recount historical events in Corpus
christi. Lists specific strategies to complete the Center.
22. S~tudy of Erosion at corpus Christi Beach, Goldston
Engineering, Inc., 1983. Accepted
study discusses the pros and cons of an offshore
breakwater or a terminal groin to reduce the erosion problems
at Corpus Christi Beach. The study recommends the offshore
breakwater as the best solution to the erosion problems. The
study states the if money is not available for the breakwater
then the groin should provide satisfactory results. The City
opted for the use of the groin.
23.
1985.
Task
Corpus Christi '90, Final Report~ Corpus christi '90,
~ccepted.
Force I, Cultuxe/AIts/La~dscaping/Paxks/Recreation/M~rina
* Staples Street Staff incorporates the landscaping
of Staples Street into the capital improuement program.
* Design Committee - Areas of existing or potential
scenic value, of historical note, architectural merit, or
of interest to tourist will be placed in the D Zone and
subject to review by the Design Committee. The Committee
has the authority to require changes in appearance of
proposed building, structure, alteration or use of land
and impose conditions of development.
Develop the Marina and Shoreline Boulevard areas with
amenities and people-use areas- The development will change
the shoreline Boulevard and seawall areas to emphasize
people-friendly spaces in lieu of the current thru traffic
usage.
- 9
* Shoreline circulation - Graphic Plan.
* Design Committee - See page 5
* Water/shore commission - Advise and make
recommendations to the City Council and the Planning
Commission regarding the development, use and
preservation of water/shore areas.
* Coordinate I.H. 37 landscape with Shoreline landscape.
Develop the full recreational potential of Corpus Christi
Beach. Put in motion a process that will lead to optimu~
development of public/private recreational and tourism
opportunities on Corpus Christi Beach.
Park on north end of C.C. Beach.
* Recreational vehicle park on the north boundary of
park.
Task Force II, Econ(~mJcs, Business Development and Central
City Deve]op~ent.
* Low interest revolving loan Promote redevelopment
of downtown through construction and rehabilitation of
existing structures by the private sector.
Task Force V~I, Tourism/Conventions.
* Multi-purpose aIena - Initiate action on a feasibility
study of a multi-purpose arena with additional exhibit
space to attract larger conventions.
· Private sector investors and merchants carry out the
expansion of high quality retail development along the
Bayfront and within the downtown area.
Horse and buggy rides on seawall.
24. Bayfrcnt Activities Conx~ittee Final Report, Bayfront
Act/v/ties Com~nittee (ad hoc committee of the Park and
Recreation Board). Accepted 1985, revised 1987.
The committee was established to analyze the bayfront
activity situation and recommends which site or sites are best
suited to hosting such activities as they exist or as may be
expected to exist in the future. Two sites were selected
~ased on accessibility, bayfrcnt location, and acreage. The
sites included Bayfront Arts and Science Park/Shoreline
Medians and McCaughn Park/Coliseum/City Hall/Sherrill
Park Area. The 1987 revision identifies the Bayfront Festival
- ]0
Park at McCaughn Park/Coliseum/City Hall/Sherrill Park Area.
25. The Feasibility of a New Arena and Multi-purpose
~, Kenneth Leventhal and Company 1985. Contracted for
and accepted by the South Texas Chapter of the Associated
General Contractors.
The report analyzed the feasibility of constructing an
arena and a replacement for Exposition Hall. The report
recommended locating the arena at Bayfront Plaza if more
detailed investigations indicate that an arena could be
incorporated satisfactorily with the Exhibit Hall. The report
also stated that "there does not appear to be any reason to
delay the construction" of the arena and the multi-purpose
building-
26. A Planning and Restoration Evaluation study of the Bluff
Bal6st~ade, Retaining wall and Related Facilities Along Upper
~nd Lower Broadway Streets, Govind and Associates, Inc. and
J--ohn wright Architect, 1986. Accepted and monies included in
1986 CIP.
The Report includes the history and a description of
Balustrade and the other bluff facilities, investigation and
analysis on the existing condition of the facilities,
recommended plan for restoration, and cost estimates.
27. Analysis of Market Support for Dock One Market, Economic
Resear--ch Associates, 1987. Contracted for and accepted by the
port of Corpus Christi.
The report analyzed the existing and near term market
support for the proposed Dock One Market. The Dock One Market
concept proposed the conversion of two Inner Harbor cargo
docks into restaurants, shops, galleries, and public areas.
However, the Report found that the proposed project would not
be feasible as envisioned, given the current and near term
market support and sales potential.
28. Historical Evolution of Corpus Christi Bayfront
1900-1~87, (for Downtown Retreat) Corpus Christi Arua
Economic Development Corporation and shiner, Mosley and
AsSociates, May 1987. Accepted.
Document produced as a reference for the May 1987
DowntOWn Retreat. Reviewed major planning issues addressed in
various reports and plans regarding Downtown.
29. project 2001 A StrateGic Planning Process Aimed
at Faci---~itating Decision-making, Port of Corpus Chris, i,
tl
1987. Accepted by the Port.
Represents a formalization of the Port of Corpus
Christi's traditional planning process into a strategic
business plan in identifying new and different businesses,
technologies and markets the Port should create or utilize
its long range plans of development and service.
in
30. Action Agenda 1987-1989, Corpus Christi City Council
1987, reaffirmed 1988. '
31. Downtown/Bayfront Data Collection "Fact Book,"
Parsons Brinkerhoff, 1988. Accepted by RTA.
Discusses historical'evolution of the Bayfront and
CBD from 1900 to 1987. Lists some of the studies and reports
created for this area in the past and the issues they
addressed.
32. Heart of Corpus Christi, Inc. Business Plan, Hyett-Pallna,
Inc., October 1988. Accepted.
The Plan provides a two year action agenda for the
initiation and completion of projects in the area designated
as the Heart of Corpus Christi. It establishes a "focus
area" in which revitalization efforts are to be promoted. It
also prescribes specific actions and a time schedule for the
initiation and completion of these projects. Some of these
proposed actions are listed as follows
* Streetscape improvements throughout the "focus area";
* Developing design guidelines to set the standard of
quality for the rehabilitation and adaptive use of the
Downtown's older buildings in addition to targeted
rehabilitation and demonstration projects.
* Study to determine potential for privatization of
trash collection and street cleaning;
* Study to determine need to continue the one-way street
system in the "focus area"; and
' Designate historically significant buildings on the
National Register.
- 12
20
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 17, 2004
SUBJECT: Seawall Reconstruction Project- Contract D
(Project #3272)
AGENDAITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 15 to the
engineering services contract with Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc., in an amount not
to exceed $1,181,100.00 for design and construction phase services for the Seawall South
Reach project (Contract D - Cooper Alley L-Head to South End of McGee Beach).
FUNDING: Funding is available from the Seawall Capital Improvement Fund.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
r-
,~g~l R. Escobar, P.E. Da{e ~
Director- Engineering Services
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Additional Information
Exhibit B - Prior Actions
Exhibit C - Location Map
Exhibit D - Contract Summary
H:~HOME~KEVINS\GEN\SEAWALL~D-South-McGee Beach\AEAwdMemo.doc
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
PRIOR ACTIONS:
This project has involved a number of complex actions. The most significant Council and
administrative actions are attached. See Exhibit A-1.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION:
· Award of the construction contract for Contract C (Marina Reach).
· Award of materials testing and construction contracts for Contract C (Marina) and
Contract D (McGee Beach).
· Award of two change orders to current construction contracts:
a. Sand restoration/reconstruction for McGee Beach; and
b. New boat ramp.
BACKGROUND:
The Bayfront Protection Structures include a number of improvements. A summary of
those improvements and their condition is attached. See Exhibit A-2.
PROGRAM SCOPE: The project scope is included in the contract summary. (See Exhibit
D) The project will be very similar to the work nearing completion for the Pilot and Contract
BI.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motions as presented.
H:\HOME~KEVINS\GEN\SEAWALL\D-South-McGee Beach~,EAwd Bkg ExhA.doc
Exhibit A I
Page 1 of I
PRIOR ACTIONS
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS:
1. November 25, 1997 - Approval of seawall investigation and use of Gateway proceeds (M97-
347);
2. March 24, 1998-
· Motion authorizing the execution of a contract in the amount of $36,804 with Bracco
Construction Co. for Seawall Inspection at Panels 205 and 206 (M98-084);
· Motion to authorize award of a seawall condition assessment in amount of $386,000 to
Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. (M98-085);
· Motion to authorize execution of a Contract for Geotechnical, Laboratory, and
Petrography Services related to the Seawall Investigation Project with Bacon
Engineering, Inc. for a fee not to exceed $49,000 (M98-086); and
· Motion to authorize execution of a Contract for Non-Destructive/Non-lnvasive
Investigation Services for the Seawall Investigation Project with W. G. Jaques Company
for a fee not to exceed $86,210 (M98-087).
3. May 29, 2001 -
· Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 5 for
engineering services in the amount of $581,000 with Shiner Moseley and Associates,
Inc. for the Pilot Seawall Reconstruction Project (Contract A) and Seawall
Reconstruction Project B-1 (M2001-208); and
· Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a geotechnical and
materials testing contract in an amount not to exceed $79,602 with Fugro South, Inc.
(Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory) for the Pilot Seawall Reconstruction Project (Contract A)
and Seawall Reconstruction Project B-1 (M2001-209).
4. January 15, 2002 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 6 for engineering services in the amount of $87,700 with Shiner Moseley
and Associates, Inc. for the Pilot Seawall Reconstruction Project (Contract A) and Seawall
Reconstruction Project B-1 (M2002-022).
5. April 30~ 2002
· Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract
in the amount of $6,127,099.50 with Laughlin Environmental, Inc. for the Seawall
Reconstruction Project Pilot Program and Contract B-1 (M2002-123).
· Motion authorizing the City Manage~, or his designee, to execute an engineering
materials and construction contract with Fugro South in an amount not to exceed
$49,700 for the Seawall Reconstruction Project Pilot Program and Contract B-I (M2002-
124).
· Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 7 with
Shiner Moseley and Associates, inc. in the amount of $127,100 for additional
construction inspection and management services contract for the Seawall
Reconstruction Project Pilot Program and Contract B-1 (M2002-125).
6. October 29, 2002
· Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 8 in
the amount of $2,214,900 with Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. for the Seawall
Reconstruction Project B-2 (Part A and Part B) - (M2002-360).
· Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a geotechnical services
contract in an amount not to exceed $126,820 with Fugro South, Inc (M2002-361).
7. November 19, 2002 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 9 to an engineering contract with Shiner Moseley & Associates, Inc. of
I ExhibitB I
Page 1 of 3
H:\HOME~KEVINS\GEN~S EAWALL\D-South-McGee Beach~AEAwdPriorActionsExh B.doc
Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $84,748 for the Blucher Arroyo Storm Water
Drainage Structure Condition Assessment (M2002-383).
8. March 4, 2003 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 11 to an engineering contract with Shiner Moseley & Associates, Inc. of
Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $140,400 for the design, negotiation, and
construction administration for:
· Repair of Blucher Arroyo Storm Water Drainage Structure,
· Modification of the Seawall Area, Sidewalk and Curb Re-grading, Storm Water
Collection, Drainage and Outfall for the Seawall Pilot and Contract B-l; and
· Modifications to the Seawall Area Storm Water Outfall System at McGee Beach
(M2003-091).
9. June 24, 2003 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 12 to an engineering contract with Shiner Moseley & Associates, Inc. of
Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $158,154 for Storm Water Collection and Outfall
Lines Condition Assessment (M2003-227).
10. Au.qust 26, 2003 -
a. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction
contract with Laughlin Environmental, Inc. of Houston, Texas, in the amount of
$4,219,200.00 for the Seawall Reconstruction Project Contract B-2, Part A,
Lawrence Street T-Head and Coopers Alley L-Head Repairs. (M2003-302)
b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an engineering
materials testing and inspection contract with Fugro South, Inc., in an amount not
to exceed $37,240.00 for the Seawall Reconstruction Project Contract B-2, Part
A, Lawrence Street T-Head and Coopers Alley L-Head Repairs. (M2003-303)
c. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment
No. 14 to the engineering services contract with Shiner Moseley and Associates,
Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1;950,000.00 for design of Seawall Contract C
(Marina Reach) and post construction underwater survey services for Contract B-
2. (M2003-304)
11. December 16, 2003 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to
execute a construction contract with Gunther-Nash, Inc. of St. Lewis, Missouri, in the
amount of $9,900,080.58 for the Seawall Reconstruction Project Contract B-2, Part
B, Power Street Outfall to Peoples Street (M2003-454).
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS:
1. June 8, 1998 - Award of Amendment NO. 1 (additional testing) in amount of $13,470 to
Bacon Engineering, Inc. for Geotechnical, Laboratory, and Petrography Services related to
the Seawall Investigation Project;
2. February 11, 1999 - Award of Amendment No. 1 (Backwater Levee Gate Report) in amount
of $14,350 of seawall condition assessment contract with Shiner Moseley and Associates,
Inc.;
3. Au,qust 26, 1999 - Award of Amendment No. 2 (Design of Backwater Levee Gate Structures)
in amount of $-0- (change of scope) of seawall condition assessment contract with Shiner
Moseley and Associates, Inc.;
4. December 8, 1999 - Award of Amendment No. 3 (Backwater Levee Gate Structures
Foundation and Railroad coordination)in amount of $14,350 of seawall condition
assessment contract with Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc.; and
5. March 27, 2000 - Award of Amendment No. 4 (Backwater Levee Gate Structures
Construction Phase) in amount of $13,330 of seawall condition assessment contract with
Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. ~
6. December 12, 2002 - Award of Amendmerit No. 10 (Connection Capacity between New and
I Exhibit B
Pa~e 2 of 3
H:\HOM E~KEVIN S\GEN~S EAWALL\D-South-McGee Beach~AEAw~lPdorActJons Exh B.doc
Existing Pile Cap) in amount of $13,000 of seawall condition assessment contract with
Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc.
7. June 10, 2003 - Award of testing contract for concrete evaluation of Pilot Program in the
amount of $5,632.78 to Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. of Northbrook, Illinois.
8. July 3, 2003 - Award of Amendment No. 13 (storm water condition assessment traffic
control) in amount of $24,950 of seawall condition assessment contract with Shiner Moseley
and Associates, Inc.
9. July 10, 2003 - Award of Amendment No. 1 to a testing contract for concrete evaluation of
Pilot Program in the amount of $10,301.73 to Wiss, Janney, EIstner Associates, Inc. of
Northbrook, Illinois.
10. July 31, 2003 - Award of Amendment No.: 2 to a testing contract for concrete evaluation of
Pilot Program in the amount of $9,054.34 to Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. of
Northbrook, Illinois.
H:\HOME~KEVINS\GEN~SEAWALL~D-South-McGee Beach~AEAwdPdorActionsExh B.doc
Exhibit B
Page 3 of 3
File : \Mproject\councilexhibits\exh3272. dwg
NUECES BAY
N
PROJECT
LOCATION
CORPUS CHRIS~ BAY
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
DAY INN
PUBLIC
RESTROOMS
PROJECT
EXTENTS
.... uOPE~
ALLEY
L HEAD
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT NO. 3272 EXHIBIT "C"
CONTRACT SUMMARY
SEAWALL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT - CONTRACT D
SCOPE OF PROJECT - Section 1. Scope of Project is amended by the addition of the
following paragraphs.
The project will involve the fifth and final construction contract of the Seawall
Reconstruction Program. Contract D will involve approximately 3200 linear feet of
Seawall Reconstruction between the stem of the Cooper's Alley L-Head and the South
End of McGee Beach. The project will involve similar techniques and methods of
construction used in the first contract that is under construction (contract B-l). The
construction budget for this project is approximately $12,500,000. In addition, this
agreement will include the design and permitting of a new boat ramp at Cooper's Alley,
along with closure of the existing boat ramp.
The major components will be as follows:
· Design of new front and rear continuous steel sheet pile walls, and their
connections (concrete pile caps) to the existing structure. Geotechnical data
used to design these new walls has been collected/developed by Fugro South,
and supplemented by the work done in the investigation phase. Wave forces
were developed under Amendment No. 5. The new sheet piles (rear wall only for
McGee Beach) will also be designed to accommodate the weight of a new
superstructure (future), for the soil conditions encountered in the section between
Cooper's Alley and the marina breakwater entrance.
For the section of seawall between the marina breakwater entrance and the
south end of McGee Beach, a new rear wall will be designed. A new front wall
will not be provided in this section. However, where the new rear wall is to be
provided in this contract, it will be designed for the weight of a future
superstructure.
Also included in Contract D are:
· Design of repairs for existing expansion joints.
· Design of spall repair techniques and specification of materials.
· Design of crack repair techniques and specification of materials.
· Specification of void filing techniques and materials.
· Design of a hydrostatic pressure relief system that will work in conjunction with
the void grouting program.
· Specification preparation for surface cleaning (i.e., acid etching, and/or
hydroblasting of the existing concrete surface.
· Development of a traffic and pedestrian control plan, but design of the pedestrian
control structure will be the responsibility of the contractor.
· Design of a new apron and permanent curb and gutter section, but with a similar
sawcut pattern and use of colored concrete mixes.
· Design of bus stops and ADA parking areas.
Exhibit I~
Page 1 of 5
· Design of new stormwater collection system (shallow) and seawall penetrations
(outfalls) for Northbound Shoreline.
· Design of stormwater outfall penetrations (for deeper laterals) through the front of
the seawall.
· Design of sliplining (w/HDPE) for stormwater lateral lines from the manholes
along west side of Southbound Shoreline to the face of the seawall.
· This work will involve coordination and planning for lighting (lighting to be
designed by City and installed by AEp).
· Removal and replacement of the existing shade structures along the McGee
beach area.
· Meetings and consultations with RTA, City Engineer, and AEP to collect input
and provide updates on the design as it progresses.
· Provisions for a new pump station outfall and gravity outfall for the future Kinney
Street modifications. Work is to be coordinated with Urban Engineering. The
culverts will be designed by Urban Engineering, but the Engineer will include
modifications to the seawall to get the culvert penetration/outfall constructed.
The limits of the Engineer's work related to these two new outfall structures will
be from the face of the seawall to 60' behind the westedy curb on northbound
Shoreline.
· Provisions for a maintenance equipment ramp (for City Parks & Rec Staff to
access) at the South End of McGee Beach.
Bid Phase. The Engineer will:
a. Participate in the pre-bid conference.
b. Assist the City in solicitation of bids by identification of prospective
bidders, and review of bids by solicited interests.
c. Review all pre-bid questions and submissions concerning the bid
documents and prepare, in the City's format, for the Engineering Services'
approval, any addenda or other revisions necessary to inform contractors
of approved changes prior to bidding.
d. Attend bid opening, analyze bids, evaluate and prepare bid tabulation, and
make recommendations conCeming award of the contract.
Construction
a.
b.
Phase. The Engineer will:
Participate in pre-construction meeting.
Review for conformance to contract documents, shop and working
drawings, materials, and other submittals.
Review field and laboratory tests.
Provide interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the
contractor and authorize minor changes that do not affect the contractor's
price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the
contract.
~Exhibit D{
Page 2 of 5
e. Make visits to the site of the Project to confer with the City Engineer and
contractor to observe the general progress and quality of work, and to
determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance with the
contract documents. This will not be confused with the project
representative observation or continuous monitoring of the progress of
construction.
f. Prepare change orders (coordinate with the City's construction division),
provide interpretations and clarifications of the plans and specifications for
the contractor, and authorize minor changes that do not affect the
contractor's pdce and are not contrary to the general interest of the City
under the contract.
g. Make final project walk-through with City staff and provide the City with a
Certificate of Completion for the project.
h. Review construction "rod-line" drawings, prepare record drawings (in
future contract amendment) of the Project as constructed (from the "red-
line" drawings, inspection, and the contractor provided plans) and deliver
to the Engineering Services a reproducible set and electronic file
(AutoCAD r.2000) of the record drawings. All drawings will be CADD
drawn using dwg format in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf
format with each layer being provided in a separate file. Attribute data will
be provided in ASCII format in tabular form.
The Engineer will, with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, do
the following:
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
· Topographic surveying to allow preparation of plans, and specifications as
outlined above, and to include surveying for the new Cooper's Alley Boat Ramp.
· Project observation services will be provided periodically (as differentiated from
extensive or continuous) for the duration of the construction contract. At this time,
it is estimated that the construction contract will have a duration of 13 months.
For the purposes of the fees as calbulated hereinafter, the assumption has been
made to allow time for 50 hours/week of site representation split between two
engineers for the project duration. The purpose of the site observations will be to
observe the materials and techniques utilized during the performance of the
work, as well as checking for general compliance with the plans and
specifications.
· Crack mapping of 42 panels from the marina breakwater to the south end of
McGee Beach.
Note: Monitoring structure movement will be provided by the construction
contractor based on specifications prepared by Engineer.
[Exhibit I~
Page 3 of 5
· Provide for a TDLR Consultant to advise Engineer on how to make new
improvements ADA compliant and accessible and for the TDLR review fees.
There is no coordination of architecture services anticipated that need to be
provided or interlace with an artist. For purposes of this contract, there is no
structural design or artist/architect interlace allowed for, as it is anticipated that
the architectural work will consist of using colored/sawed concrete.
· Up to eight (8) briefings with council or other entities during the construction
process, along with three (3) public involvement press briefings during key work
elements such as groundbreaking, pile driving and concrete placement, as well
as periodic progress reports.
· Design of two (2) accessible ramps from the seawall to the stems of Peoples (in
Contract B2-B) and Lawrence (in Contract C).
· Obtaining a USACE permit for a new boat ramp at the Cooper's Alley L-Head.
· Design and construction administration of improvements to the McGee Beach
outfall system, and enhancing the beach to provide for the necessary fill
elevation to maintain the required material in front of the seawall to prevent scour
at the face of the front wall. it is anticipated that the construction work will be
negotiated as a change order with the Contractor(s) of contracts B2-A and/or B2-
B.
· Design and construction administration of a new boat ramp at the north end of
the Cooper's Alley L-Head, near the fueling station. In addition, the design will
include provisions for closure of the existing ramp. The design will include
structural work only. Design of utilities and any peripheral structures are
excluded. All work will be coordinated with the Marina Superintendent. It is
anticipated that the construction work will be negotiated as a change order with
the Contractor(s) of contracts B2-A and/or B2-B. At this time, a specific time
table for this work has not been established. The estimate for construction is
approximately $560,000, which includes the cost of closure of the existing ramp.
SCHEDULE
Tentative Project Schedule (Contract D
only)
Date Task
15 December Advertise for Bids
2004
15 February 2005 Pro-Bid Conference
15 February 2005 Receive Bids
01 April 2005 Begin Construction
01 May 2006 Construction
Completion
~[xhibit I~
Page 4 of 5
Summary of Fees
Original Contract with Amendments 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,
13&14 ........... $4,628,182
AMENDMENT No. 15
Seawall - Contract D
Fee for Basic Services
1. Design Phase ................................................................................ $467,000
2. Bid Phase .......................................................................................... 30,000
3. Construction Phase ............................................................................ 41,000
Subtotal Basic Services Fees .................................... $538,000
Fee for Additional Services
1. Topographic Survey
Pre-design (including Cooper's Alley Boat Ramp) ............................. 43,600
2. Crack Mapping ................................................................................... 26,000
3. Construction Observation ................................................................. 340,700
4. Presentations and Meetings ............................................................... 18,200
5. Warranty Phase .................................................................................. 8,400
6. TDLR Consultant and Fees .............................................................. 13,200
7. Accessible Ramps at Peoples (Contract B2-B) and Lawrence(Contract C)
.......................................................................................................... 31,200
8. USCE Permit- Cooper's Boat Ramp .................................................. 15,600
9. Design of new Cooper's Alley Boat Ramp ........................................... 56,000
10. Construction Administration Contract B-1 thru 02-15-04 .................... 40,000
11. Design for McGee Beach Out[all lines and Beach Reconstruction ..... 36,800
12. Construction Admin. for McGee Beach Out[all line & Beach Reconstruction
.......................................................................................................... 13,400
Subtotal Additional Services Fees. $643,100
Amendment No. 15 Total $1,181,100
Contract Total New Fee
........................................................................................................ $5,809,282
~Exhibit 13]
Page 5 of 5
21
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: February 17, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution supporting the use of Padre island for training in conjunction
with the Navy's Mine Warfare Center Excellence and the Department of Defense's Gulf of
Mexico Joint National Training Capability.
ISSUE: The Department of Defense (DOD) is considering the use of the beachfront on
Padre Island for DOD personnel for training in conjunction with the Navy's Mine Warfare
Center Excellence and the DOD's Gulf of Mexico Joint National training Capability.. The
area would include five miles of beachfront on Padre Island within the City's extraterritorial
jurisdiction.
All training activities and use of the beachfront by DOD will only be conducted after
consulting with the appropriate federal and state environmental agencies and
implementation of measures to minimize any ecological impacts. The training would be
conducted annually between October 1 and March 31.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of Resolution.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None.
FUNDING: None.
CONCLUSION: Staff recommends approval of the Resolution.
Ronald F. Massey
Assistant City Manager
RESOLUTION
SUPPORTING THE USE OF PADRE ISLAND FOR TRAINING IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE NAVY'S MINE WARFARE CENTER
EXCELLENCE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE'S GULF OF
MEXICO JOINT NATIONAL TRAINING CAPABILITY
WHEREAS, the citizens of City of Corpus Christi have a long history of supporting
training for the United States Department of Defense (DOD); and
WHEREAS, the citizens of City of Corpus Christi greatly value the ecological resources
of Padre Island and support the efforts of the Texas General Land Office to preserve
those resources in perpetuity for the citizens of Texas;
WHEREAS, the citizens of City of Corpus Christi are seeking additional missions to
become part of a Gulf of Mexico Joint National Training Capability (JNTC); and
WHEREAS, the citizens of City of Corpus Christi are seeking additional missions and
personnel to Naval Air Stations Corpus Christi and Kingsville and Naval Station
Ingleside;
WHEREAS, DOD is considering the use of the beachfront on Padre Island for DOD
personnel for training in conjunction with Navy's Mine Warfare Center Excellence;
WHEREAS, all training activities and use of the beachfront by DOD will only be
conducted after consulting with the appropriate federal and state environmental
agencies and implementation of measures to minimize any ecological impacts;
WHEREAS, the training will be conducted annually only between October 1 and March
31, and would include deep and shallow water mine clearing and amphibious landing
vehicles coming ashore to disembark infantry units;
WHEREAS, the training will include vehicles transiting from the sea up to the dune line,
infantry disembarking, and advancing 250 yards beyond the dune line and
establishment of defensive positions for infantry units in the dune line;
WHEREAS, the training would not include live fire activities, vehicles moving beyond
the seaward side of the dunes, or excavation on the island;
WHEREAS, upon conclusion of the exercise the vehicles would return to the sea and
any impacts to the environment will be addressed;
WHEREAS, the transit of vehicles on the island would be limited to the administrative
needs of conducting the exercise and providing for public safety;
WHEREAS, no change in this training scenario would be made without public notice
and hearing; and
R43003A2.doc
2
WHEREAS, the GLO will make this training site available at no charge to the
Department of Defense.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The City of Corpus Christi supports the use of five miles of beachfmnt on
Padre Island within the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction for training in conjunction with
Navy's Mine Warfare Center Excellence and the Department of Defense Gulf of Mexico
Joint National Training Capability.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED: 10th day of February, 2004.
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Mayor
R43003A2.doc
Corpus Christi, Texas
of ,2004
The above resolution was passed by the following vote:
Samuel L. Neal, Jr.
Brent Chesney
Javier D. Colmenero
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John Longoria
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
3
R43003A2,doc