HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 10/25/2005CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 25, 2005
Corpus Christi
AIi-klmdca City
AGI::Nr
CrTY OF CORPU8 CHRISTI, TEXAS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
CITY HALL - COUNCL CHAMBER8
1201 LEOPARD
OCTOBER 25, 2OO5
10:00 A.M.
13. Invocation to be given by ~ F'hllilp Phlbr, Trinity lutheran Chun:h.
C. Pbdge of Allegiance t~ the R~g of the Unlt~l ~.
Mark Scot~
CKy Mermgm' ~ K. Noe
E. M{NU'TI:W:
1. Approval of Reguhar ~ of ~ lC, 2c)o5. (,,edIachmerlt # 1)
F. IN)APr~ & COMMI'R'm=I= ~ (,ad~ct~mnt # 2)
G. ~ 'M~TION OF COUNCIl ACTION:
Hm
Nc~4~ to ~ Pu~m~-
tms been ,-'a~.ueeed at a pm~Jaua meetlng. A~ lenm w~ be actacl t~an by one
Motion approving a Murddl:ml Lease Une of Credit vath Banc of
Anmrlca Leealng and Capital, LLC, of Chicago, lib'mia In
accordance ~ Bid Invitation No. B1-0025-06 baaed on Iow bk:l
fm an ~tb,,al~l annual expenditure of $154,854. The term of
up t~ two addlllonal twelve-month pmk~ subject to t~ approval
~ um contmcax and the City ~ or h~. deeiOnee.
(Aaachrnent # 3)
Into Warehou~ Irrventoty and charged out to Ihe Water and
Wa~mval~ ~ (~h,.-:l'.,~t # 4)
hundred a~3W--mme (~63) aut~noba~ and light bud. in
acccxTMnc~ wflh Bid Invttatk)n No. BI-0143-05, bmod on only bid
for an mlllfma~ed annual ex13ef~ltum of $108,350. The lmm of
for up to bvo m:ldltlonal twelve rr~,U, pedoda aubJec~ to the
Fire I:)epmtment In FY 05-06. (Atta~rnen~ # 5)
2006 Capital OuUay Budget In the Oeneml Fund. (Aaactvn(mt
# 6)
CITY COUNCIL
PR]r~I~TY 188UF=
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Ordinance approprlallng $5,930 In the No. 4720 Commun~
Pa~,. (Altaci'~mt # 9)
(Atladvrmm # ~0)
Motion auttx)r~ng the CI~ Manager or hi. deetgnee to a~te
a co~.trucUon contract ~ DMB Cormtmctk~t. LLC, of Burne~.,
Texas In the amount of $125,389.71 for Ihe ~ Lined
Chan~ Rehabaaatlon-Cmma We~t ~ protect.
#11)
Wm~ewator Gra~ty Int3m'ce~oe Line. (Attachme~ # 12)
a co~zact wflh the Untvemlty of Texas Madne ~ Inaffiu'm
In an amount no~ to exceed $264.247 for biok~lca] monitoring
2006-2006. (Attachrnent# 13)
Molion authorizing the City Manager or hla deaigrme k3 approve
an aid to conatnJctlon In the amount o~ $198.540 wNh Nuecae
Elecbtc Cooperative Io extem:l ele_121cal power Io the C~;~, F.
Valenzuela landfill Site Deve~ Project. (A,nchmer~ # 14)
CITY COUNCIL
15.a. Motion aul~ the City Manager or hi~ designee ~ ~
a Change Order No. 5 w~h Be~ry Co,[mctem LP. dba Bay, Ltd.,
of Corp~ ~ Texas In ~ amount of $188,536 for removal
Chrldi Int~'naUond ~ (Aaachment # ~5)
15.b. MoUon ~ fl'm City Manager o~ hi~ deMgnee k3 execute
a Change Order No. 6 w~h Ber~ Coatmck3m L.P., dl~ Bay, Ltd.,
of Coqxm Chrl~d, Tex~ In the amount o~ $56,010 for an
addlUorml 18,870 linear ~ of crack grouting, cleaning and
and Shouldem, Airfield Drainage ImlXc. c,,~.mt~ - Phme 4, and
Chd.a ~~ NmorL (Attachment # ~5)
16.
Center. (Attachment # lO)
I. I)IJRLI N: HI=A.mNGS: (NONE)
17.
for a term of one year with an aulomatk= (me year renewal unlmm
terminalx~d ~ ~ m~. (Attachme~ # 17)
18.a. Motion a~ the City Manager o~ hie designee to ex~=Jte
(Ba.e Bk~ ~). (Attachment # ~8)
cn'Y COUI~L
PRIORITY 1884JI=~l
Agl~la
Regular C~un¢l Maeting
18.b. MolJon ~ the City Manager or his designee to execute
a PmJect M~n~ Contract wflh Andemon Gmup
CormtruclJon Manag~ Inc., of~ Chrbtl, Texas I~the
c~~~~ O,t~ment # 18)
18.c. Mo~lon ~ tt~ City Man~ o~ hM d~gn~ m e0eecut~
a ~ Matedde Englneedng L.~)onW)fy'~ I~ mxl
Project. (AUad'.,,~t# 18)
19.
Amendment No. 4 Io the ~ for Pt ufeeelonal ~'icee wflh
Urban Englnemtng, oi' Corpu. ChrMtl, Texas k't the arrmunt of
$1,411,.580 for a tolal re-staled fee o~ $3,879,342 for the
Southaide ~ Tranemlaalon Main, Phase 6. (Attachmmff# 19)
a conabucaon contract wflh Akerman Conabuc[k)n. of Pumell,
Oklahoma In the amount o~ $2,883,588 for the Corpus Cta'lati
Ship Channel Water and Wall~Wylltl~ Ul~lty ~ Revilad
and Re-Bid for Uae In.~talaflon of a New Utilty CmesJr~ (Base Bk:l
One). (Attachment # 20)
21.
Municipal League for ~ Fled, Airport Liabiity
Insurance for the Co~mlxm Sh~aeum. AddlUonaly,
only offi~ad ~mugh the Texaa VVindakxm Ina~mnce AaaodaUon,
(I;lair k) Iaommd i I~ end d !~
NalmdB Imlwy)
CITY COUNCIL
Exceaa Flood Insurance. The tm'm o~ theee agmeme,~[i ia
November 4, 2005 Ihrough ~ 3, 2007 wflh two one-year
mnewala. (Attachment # 21)
(Attach~ # 22)
23.
a pedeatrlan aafe area. (Attachrne~ # 23)
PRESENTA'IIONS:
24. New Vo6ng Equipment, Nuec~e County Clerk's Office
(~ # 24)
25. Coq3~ Christi Regional Economic Development Coqx3mtl~
Quarl~ty Report (Atlachme~ # 25)
27
Pmeentatk)n of 4"~ Quarter FY 2004-2005 Bl~Iget~3e~mlence ~,,~1~
Relxxt. (Attachment # 27)
on Tranaitlon from Reer~Ine~tng to Ci~
Program. (Attachment # 28)
Four~ Quar~r Report of the Hea~ Benems/R~k ~
Fund (Attachme~ # 29)
L
NB
PUAI ~ GOIM~FNT FROM THF AUDrdJGF ON ~TTERS
NOT 8CHFnUI FD ON THF AGFNnA Wll I B= HF'qn AT
APPROX]lJlATFI Y 1~.'00 PJL OR AT THF FND OF THF
GOUNCll MFFT'iN~. W141GHFV~R 18 F~m ~:R. Pi P'~l~
~ATION8 TO THI~:K MINUTFn IF YOU PLAN
TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURJNG THIS TIME PERK~,
PLEA,SE SIGN THE FOFU, I A T THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL
~ GIVING YOUR NAME, ADDRE,,~S AND TOPIC. (A
Jocek~d M the pgx~ md-MM y~X~ neme Mx/m~imlL /(~Du he~ e pM~bn
~J
J ~ :~-tDl efl M mun~ de k JunlJ p~m m
STAFF, COUNCIL ~ OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY
~ MEETIN~ THIS POI. JCY 18 NOT MEANT TO
RE87RAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST--RIGHTS.
I~FPORTS:
CITY COUNCIL
~ 188UFA
Agerlda
31.
32.
O.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
' Upcoming Items
MAYOR'S UPDATE
COUNCIL AND OTHER REPORTS
~n-KXIRNMFNT:
EQ~]]Nta 8TATIZMFNT:
to Cay Hdl, 120'1L.~ol~ almM., M ~,:~21,2~
probls:,,- occur, the Igendl MI be ul31o=d~d oct IM
1
MINUTES
CI [~ OF CORPUS CHRISTI.
Regular Meeting
(~.'tober IlL 2005 - 10:00 a.m.
PRE$1~'i'
,Mayor Hem'y G'arr~
Mayor Pro Tern J~,,y Crarcia
Coulgil
Bmm Chesney
Me. lady Cool~'r (~ m 10:24 ~.)
R~ Ki~
Bill ~Uy
Jo~ E. M~
J~ No~la
CRy Stsff:
City Mamg~ George IC Noe
City Attorney Mary Kay Fischer
city Armando Cha
Mayor Garr~ called the m~-ting m ordrr in the Council C"am~bers of City Hall.
Thc invoc~don was delivered by Pastor Bubl~ Stahl and the Pledge of Allegimme to tl~
Smt~ flag was 1~ by Mayor Oarrett.
Mayor C, arr~ called for approval of the minutes of the regulm' Council meofin8 of
October I1. 2005. A molion was made. seconded, and l~szed to gplxove the mimm~ m~
Mayor (}awya called for consideration of the consent agenda (It~m~ 2-11). City
.Sccr~u) Chq~ announced that Council Member Kelly was ~ from tl~ vo~ and
discussion on It~n 6. ]Sir. Kirmison .st~_~l thru he would b~ nl~ninit~g ~ tt~ vOt~ ~
discussion on Itg-m I 0.
Mr. John Adma~ 307 Kathenne, requested th~ lt~rn 6 be pulled for individual
consideration. Council rm.~bers required ~ lt~a 9 be pulled for individual cormidrmtion. A
motion was made, s~oded, and passed to approve [t~nz 2 tixrou~h I 1, oomfiiufing th~ com~t
agenda, exc~'pt for ll~ns 6, 9. and I1. which were pulled for individual comid~mfion. City
· "~xxc~ao C~h~m~ polled thc Council for their ~ as follows:
Min,a,'s-. R~gular Council Me~ing
C~ober I 8, 2005 Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 026513
Resolution autho~rin.o, the City Mana?r or his clemgnce to submit a gnmt ~pl~ication in
the ~mount of $35.000 to the Texas Depanmem of Public Sm%-ty, Division of ~
Mamlgemo~ H~:Ious .Materials Emergency ~ G'nmt Program for public
awareness brochurc~ school book covers, newspaoer ada, production and Inoadca~ of
infomercials, and to conduct emergency response drill~, with a City soft matnh of $7,000.
Chesney. (;atom. Kelly. Kinnisom Marez, Noyola, and Scott. Votln2 "Aye"; Cooper was
'absent.
3 a. ~IOTION NO. 2005-~$~
Motion authorizing ti~ City Manager or biz de~i~ to cn/rr imo nn Inlrrl~
Ag~nm-m b,mm~-n thc City of Coqms Christi Police I)egnmm~ and the City of Dallas
Intem~ Crim~ Against Childx~n Trak Fon:e undex ~ Intm'n~ Crim~ Al~finst ~
(ICAC) Task Force Pmgxam. Uniled Stmes Dqmrtment of Ju~ti~ mad to exe~-~ all
Chesnry. Oarcia. Kelly. Kinnison. Maro~ Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye";
absent.
'~.b ORDINANCE NO. 026514
Ordinance ~ppmprimlng $15.000 from the City of Dallm inthe No. 1061 Police
Fund for thc Intemet Crimes Againzt Children Tacit Fon~ Program.
4.a. RESOLUTION NO. 026515
Resolution allthorixinE the City Matra? or bin cl{~igl:lee to II~ a grant from the Texaa
E)epattmem of State Health Servicea in the amount of $642,000 for th~ Womm, Irrrnnta.
and Children Program for I:Y2006. based on a $10.70 reimbursemem for e~c,h parficil~nt
The foregoing r~olulaon was paas~ and approved with the followln2 vo~: Oarr,~,
Che~mey. (iarcm. Kelly. Kirmison, Mm'cz, Noyola, and Scott, Votln~o "Aye"; Coopex wm
absent.
Minutes- Regular Council Meeting
~ ~ctol~r 18. 2005- Page 3
4.b. ORDINANCE NO. 026516
Ordinance aplxopriafing a grant of ~:~42,000 from the Te. xa~ I)epamne~ of St, n, Health
Services in the No. 1066 Health Csrant~ Fund fm the Women, Infant~ taxi Chilthe~
Program for FY2006, based on a $10.70 reimbumement for each parficil:mnt served.
An emergen~ was declared, and the foregoin~ ordinance was gas~d a~l ~ with
the following vote: C-arr,. Che~ney. Gan:ia. K~lly. ginniaon, Max~z, Noyola, ~ Scott,
votin~ "Aye"; Coop~ ~s al~ent.
MOTION NO. 2005-356
Motion authorizin~ the City Managex o~ his ck~ign~ to ex,'ute sub~Sgieat
for funds provicl~d from the FY2005 Consolidal~ Anmall A~on Plan
reE~ding the Community Develolxneat Block Chant (CDB~) Program ~ HOME
osram.
CDI3G
Nm.ional Amhives and Historical Foundtaion of the Amm4_can GI Forum -
$20.000 for the construction co,ts assoei,,-,~ with the him:a-i~al rd~abil~,,.~;_on of
the Dr. Hector P. Gm'cia Oflic~ faciUty. The City of Corpus Chri~ shall ~
pay the conslrucfion contract.
Senior Housing Assisumce of Nueoes County, lr~. (El Patio ~) -
$132.898 for the constru~don of two ~Ooo~ install~ion of _~c~___nity feaxSng,
re~urfaeing of driveways, and r~habilitafion of sidew~dks ,n the fadlity.
TGI 10. ira'. - $60.000 for the installation of s~urity ~thmx:~m~ ~ the
Northside Maxtor Apartmer~ at its curr~t loe~ion.
HOME Program - For How~ino P'l'o~ms:
Cliff Matt~ Village Apartmeata - $114,000 for construction smtt in~tal~on costa
with a complete r~rom~ and tx'p~ of the sewer a3r~n~
Memed Housing ~exas - $100,000 for l~d acquisition ~ t~qa~exl to the
develol~n~t of the 124-unit Navigation Pointe Ag.atm~uta fo~ low in~xnne
families.
Cheaney. Garcia. Kelly. Kinnison. Marr~ Noyola, m~d Sco~ vo6ng "Aye'; Cooper was
absent.
Minutes- Regular Coum:il Meeting
()cnober ] 8. 2005 Page 4
ORDINANCE NO. 026519
Ordinance al~ndoning and vaesaing a 300-square foot portion of a 123-foot wide utility
easement out of Lo~ 22. Block 4. South Shorm ~ Unit 7, I~oe~t~ ~ of the
intersection of Ocean Drix~ and Paloma S~eet: requiring the own~ to ~mply with the
specified c~titiorts.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordiaan~ was paaaexl and aggax~ with
the following vote: Garrett. Chesney. Gaxcim Kelly. Kirmist~, Mmez, Noyola, m~d S~ott,
v~ng 'AyeS: Cooper was atnent.
a.a. ORDINANCE NO. 026520
Ordinance appwpria6no.. $111.466.27 from Drainage Channel 31 Treat Fund No. 4730 aa
thc developer's conlribution for Bomxlwnlk Unit I Subdiviaion m ~ Ann FL Brsntnn,
lndelmadent Executor of the Estsne of Mm'k Brmton, Trtmee, for the develolxne~ of
Master Plan Drainage Channel 31
An emerl~ncy was d~lm'ed, and the foregoing ordinance was panned and nt:q:n'ov~d with
the followi.E vote: ~ Chesney. Garcia, Kelly. Kinnisom Marez, Noyola, and Scott,
vofin~ "Aye": Cooper was abs~t.
8.b. ~MOTION NO. 2005-358
Motion al:lgro~nE payment orS111,466.27 developer's conlribufion fnma the Bom~twalk
Unit 1 subdivision from the No. 4730 ~ Fund to Ann H. ~ ~
Executor of the E:tate of Mark Bnmon. Truste~ for disbursement to the ~
Funding Owners. in acoordance with tl~ Offside Dra/nnge I)evelolxnem conm~t, MaWr
Plan Drm~ Channel 31. between the City of Corlma Chriati and Tt'u~z~
The foregoing motion was pa~ed and approved with the following vu~: ~
Clza:~. C,~;ia. Kelly. Kinaison. ~ Noyola, and Scott, voting 'Aye'; Coogex was
I O. FIi~RT I~EADING OlZDINANCE
Authorizia8 City M,,,~?r or his cleaignee to execute a 15-year leme ~g~emtat with the
Lady I~.x Museum on the Bay Association amhori~ing the me of a portion of the
submerged lands patented to the City by the Stale of Texas smd adjoining ~ City
property for the berl/ain8 of the t I S.S. I ~xington sa a pier w~tru~t~l by the aasochstion
and the operation ora museum.
An emergency was d_-c_larecL and the foregoing ordinance was paaa~ ~nd approved with
the following vote: Garrett. Chesney. (iarcia, Kelly. Mmz~, Noyola, and Scott, voting
~Aye": Kinnison abatair~d: Coo~'r was absent.
Minmcs R~.lm' Council Meeting
t )clober I lt. 2005 - Page 5
Mayor Garrt~t opened discus.sion on lt~n 6 r,~arding a comm'ug~don ~ for a new
ar~n~ I:~rkinE lot Mr. John Adams. 307 Katherine. Rrged the Council t~ rtquir~ thai Bay Ltd.
complete the Fnnis Joslin Road improvement project before beginning this project. Mr. S~ott
poinmd out that Bay. Ltd. was not working on the Ennis Jo.lin Road project. City Manager Noe
clm'ified ~ Anderson waa the construction c~mpany.
Mayor Garren asked City Enginee~ Angel Es~obar for a report. Mr. E~obar ~
~t two parking lots wer~ being proposed, Parking Lot A in the e~t and Parking Lot B in the
· ,s~st. Parkin8 Lot A would create an additional 210 l:~"kinE spaces, 21 of which would be ADA
accessible. Parking Lot B would create 118 pm'king spaces., sc-we~ of which wvuld be ADA
:~..essible The project was being funded with a combinnfion of ConvcnIion Center funds and
4A Ihnds Mayor ~ clarified thnl the Ennis Joslin Road project was a TxDOT project, not a
c~t~ p~jecL City ~e~-oreu~.' Cb~,~ polled the Council for their votes ~ follows:
n.a. ORDINANCE NO. 026517
Ordinance appropriating $653.050.50 from tmappmp6~l ~ ~rnin? ~
~~m ~ ~m A~ F~ili~ F~ No. 3275 ~ ~ ~ ~
C~ ~i.~ ~t ~; ~ ~ ~ B~ ~ ~ ~ No.
~6188 ~ i~ ~~ ~ ~53,0~.50.
An emergency was declared, and the fomgoin_o ordinance was passed ami ~ with
the following vote: Garrt~ Chesney, Gan:ia, Kinnlson, Mamz, Noyola, ami Scott, voting
"Aye": Coope~ was absent: Kelly ab~ainad.
6.b. ORDINANCE NO. 026518
~ app~prim'ing $2,156.g0 from unappropri~ ~ ~ and
miscellaneous mvem~es from Conve~ion Center 2002 Capital I .mpman~m~ Progrm~
Fund No. 3181 for the ~can BaRk Centre' Parki~ Lot F_,xpm~0~ m~-nding fig
Capilal nudger adopted I~. Ordinance No. 02618S by ~ nt~n~intions by
$2.156.g0.
An emergency wns declared, and the foregoing ordinance wm pnzsed and ~ with
the following vote: Garrctt. Chesm. y, Oa~im Kinni~on, Mamz, Noyota, nnd Scott, voting
'Aye*: Cooper was nbscnt: Kelly abstained.
t, c. MO'EION NO, 2005-357
Mt.RioR ~R/th~4~inE tl~ City Mar~,~r or his d~ignee to execute a commgfion contract
with Berr~ Contracting. LP dba Bay Ltd.. of Corpus ChriS. Texas in the ammmt of
$1.0882.40.60 for the American Bank Center Parking Lot Expa~on Part A and Part B.
I'he foregoing motion was paxsed and approved with the followin~ vo~: Garr~tt,
Chem~y. Gan:ia. Kinninotc Mm'ex_ Noyola. and Sc'oR. voting "Aye"; Cooper waa abarmL;
Kelly abstained.
%hnutes - Regular Council Meeting
~'n:ts,ber 18. 2005 - Page 6
Mayor Garrett open~ discussion on Item q reg~ding an agree:me~ be~n~n the ~
Busine~ and Job I)evelolxnent Corporation (4A Board) and ACCION Tm~s, lm~. Mr. Mm'cz
a_4ted for rrmre info,~on on ACCION's buy=down program. A~sist~lt City ~ O~car
M~riin~z replied the buy=down program provided financial amistan~e to small ~ thru
~ould no~ be able to n:ceix e a traditional business loan, The payment was ~ ugon the ability
.fftbe business to cremo jobs. Mr Martinez stmed the city's contract with ACCION Texaa w~
t'un,t_~ through the 4A fund for an annual amount of $250,000. lie said $50,000 of lhia amount
was placed in a loan loss reserve fund to deft-ay the cost in the event of a failed loma. Last ye~,
~,C('ION '[~xas dislributmi $59.000 in k~ms to small businma~. Mr. Mm'titmz ~ )hia imm
was mtetsded to can')' over the remaining $91,000 fund balance throuEh July 2006. He clarified
Ihat Ihe ACCION 'l'exas corm'acl ~as for a term of thre~ years with an option to nmew for two
,.'cars. this being the second year of their conlxact.
Mayor Gan'~ clarified that Item I i had not be~n palled for discu~iun. He then called
mr the vote on both Items 9 and 1 I. Cit3' Sec~-nary Chaga polled the Cout~il for their vote_ m
Iblh)ws:
'). RY',SOI.UTION NO. 026521
Rx~lmion approving Amendment No. 2 of th~ a~_~=_- ~,,-nt ~ th~
Businm~ and Job I}~n~lo~,,ent Corporation and ACCION Texaa, Inc. m extm~d the low
inten~t buy d~wn program tlu~,ngh July 2006 taxi roll over $'91,000 in un~pem funda
use in curr~t fis(:al y~at.
The fo~goinE rmolulion was ~ and apl~roved with the following vote:
Chemey. Gaxcia, Kelly. Kinnison. ~ Noyola, and Stol/.., votinE "Aye"; Coopor
absent.
II. ORDINANCE NO. 026522
Amending the Code of Ordinances. City of Corpus Christi, Texas, ~ 2,
Cable Communications Commission meeting dales. (Fi~t Reading 10/11/05)
An emergency was ch~ and the foregoing ordinance waa paased and ~ with
the following vote: Gang. Cbemey, Cmn:ia. Kelly. Kinaisom ~ Noyola, and Scott,
voting "Aye": Cooper wan absent.
Mayor Oarr~a dmfia~ from the agenda, and opined ~ on Item 18 p~gn'ding the
proposed ordinance to prohibit vehicular tmiTic on tbe beach seaward of the Pad~ Island
~eawall. Special Assistant to the ('ity Mnnn?r Tom Utter explained thi, ~ would
x eh~cular I]'i~l¢ Oi~ 4.200 linem- feet of beach in front of Ihe seawall. He said the city had a little
.,vet 7q.000 linear feet of beach within ils city limits, the proposed action would ¢limirmt~. tl'm~c
· ,n approximately 5 percent of thc total area.
Minutes- Regular Council Meeting
~ )cloher 18, 2005 - Page 7
Mr. Utto' provided historical ~nfom~tion on today's action, which he ~id was ini6at,-,-I
m 1992 throagh 1094. In the 1990s, city staff, in conjunction with varioua atak~holdex grout~
discuaaexl how to provide Imrking in front oftbe seawul]. The propo~xl ~olufion w~ to lxovide
parking on top ard at bt,th ends of the seawall, with
qubs~luemly, in 1995. state legislation was passed which made th~ following ~ provisiona:
1 ~ a pedestrian easement ~,aa ~,,.~t__~_ over. along, and across the seawall; 2) pea'maxm~ roadway
easements were cr~Ied within 1,000 feet of each end of the seawall; and 3) la'OVirl_nt for a 300
hnear lbot lract oflmad a,-Ijacenl W the seawall with ~lOIl~h
apse tBr eyeD' 15 line~ feet of the s~wall. The third provision wm cmchd ~ th~ Op~
~ches Act required that accessible parking be available as ~pulnt,~! heroin a 8ovea:ning body
could take ~'tio~ to ¢limi.nmt~ tnffi-~c from a Ix~h.
Mr. Utlex sm~ed the city based a number of future declaions on thi, le~i~'nl~6on, including
the ~ amd Dune Rules the city adopted in Februm'y 1995, the ~ Ctnmm~ TIF, mad th~
2004 Muta~-g/Padm Isled D~vei~t Plan, E~h of these cl~um~nla in~udexl ~ for
~knding a pm'king lot on top of the seav.~ll with the ultimsm- goal of elimins6ng traffic. While
acknowled~n_.a that the condition of the b~eh had improved thamka to the Pae, lmry Charnel
dredging. Mr. Utter said the city did not fe~l they should remt~ on the agr~ment they made to
the community in the 1990s. He displayed a photo of the secfio~ of the ~ ~ pmpoa~ for
closu~ to traffic
Mr. ginnim & Mr. Utter t~ expt~n the ~ ~ in the tnoo~ [fl:he ~ w~
~o 8pgnme the ~ ordimmce. Mr. Utter exphdmxl tt~ d~'~ ~ ~ a ~
~ t~ ~ ~d m go i~ e~ ~1 ~ ~i~ lot ~ ~y ~ ~
t~ ~ to ~ GLO for 30 ~ys of p~lic m ~ a ~lic ~ ff ~
n~ ~ ~ ~blic ~t ~ ~ GI.O ~d ~e ~ ~ ~~ ~
t~e ~t.
Mr. Kinnison a~axl whether the GLO's ~tance on the ism~c wm known, and if the GLO
.had a deadline to make their ru]ino~ Mr. Utter replied he thou~aht the GLO would make ti
decision in about 90 days. Senior Assistant City Attorney Jay Reining added that lhe GLO had
60 days to decide whether they were going to forwn~ ~ ordinance for a tmblic hc~ing. Then,
~he GLO would publish a Notice of Proposed Rule Mnking in the Texas ReEi.'~er with a 30-day
public comment period. After the Imblic comment period, the GLO ,nmld tmdew the comm~nt~
:md decide whedaer or not to adopt the ordinance as originally sulanim.,a Ifthry Omo~ to ~lopt
~he ordinaa~ fl~ prepare another Notice of Adopfon of an O~l~-, which would be tvImblislmt
m the Totas Register. The ordinancc would take effect 30 day~ ~ publica~tion. In summary,
Mr. Reining explaln~l it was about a six-month procesa. Mr. Ullrr ~ staff belim~l tl~
~hJs time whether they would approve the ~nt.
Mr. Kinnison asked when the parking lot construction was mhedul~! for compl~ion.
\Ir. Escohar replied the parking lot constmctioa ahould be completed in ,m'ly 21X)6.
* (Cour~ll Mernbex Cooper arrived at 10'24 a.m.)
~mutea - R¢8-1~' Council
( ~ctober ) 8, 2005 · Page 8
Mayor Gan~ calh:d for public comment. ~ followin~ individuals spoke in
~o th~ proposed beach clo~u'~ to vehicular traffic: Mark Roach. 130 Chilttqm~ Portlmxl TX;
Mike Murphy with the Corpus Chri,~d Windsurfln~ Association, 13521 Camino de ~ Vicki
tl¢,,ihy. 2705 Lnguna Slxn~s: Johnny French. 4417 Carlton; David Ryan, 14010 R-n~- Court;
Nell McQumm with the Surfi'iders Foundation 4213 Es~,'; Sen. Carlos Trua~ who ~ if the
~rdinancc wm approved, h~ would i'~gin a r~fermdum petition; Carolyn Moon, 4902 Calvin;
I-atomy 'l ilXm~ 237 Mullet: Jo~ I,ynch, 262 Corpus: Emily Olivar~z, 4205 Dody; Jim Needham,
14202 San Felipe: Ken Hawkins. 2802 Ciman'on: John Aristas 207 Kmherine; J.E, O'Bri~,
4130 Pompano; Michael McKutchen. 203 Jm:kson: and Lois Huff with the League of Womea
Votcn's- 5818 SL Andrews.
In response to Mr. Roach's comments. Mr. Scott asked whether tim Coumil could
include a provision in the Inopuaxl trrdinance to prevent any futura Conmila from closing any
other aexnions of the ar~ b~ehes. City Attorney FiscAx'r x~'plied negatively, but mid the Coun~
could include wording in the ordinance to clearly stale theh' legisl~ve imem n~ to close any
,.~thcr, _~n_~ians of the area beaches. Mr. Roach spoke in favor of including thim wozding in the
.~rdinancc.
Thc following individuals spoke in favor of the pmtnnmd beach clozum to v~himzlar
waftic: Cliff Zzrsky, 5202 Wooldridge; Gail Hoffinam 3442 Pmadi~e; Cmn'y and C_rail Boymrm,
247 Rosebud; Nancy Slzauzs 5540 Oao Parkway; Steve F, dsm', 14 Chm~aiona Court Trail,
Housatm, TX; Art Schrailiff with the Portofino Board of Co-Owne~ 15002 Windwmxl Drive;
C'hrryl and Doyle Gnmdy; 13978 Windjmmnen. Lisa Hanzon, 1709 Wallm~ Ave.; Toay
I.anm~a; John Trice. 13706 Tajanm~. Alex Harris. 2138 Hwy. 286; Gabby Heill~t; Gene
Guernsey, 6133 Yarafaya: and ,C~ndy Billish, 15885 Ptmta F~-mth,
Ms. I~t Sk-~. 1002 Chamherlai~ spoke in favor of the ixopoaed beach clo~ure as long as
the city kept its commilmeat to provide a parkin~o lot, ame~itie~ m~d ac~m~ for pca'~om~ with
di,mhilities. Sl~ stated she would like these Imn4sions included in the Language of flae
ordinance.
In rmpona~ To Ma. Suter's comments, Mr. Che~ney mh:l he kad asked the C~ ~
to pm~& ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~a a ~hc ~ He ~ ~ k ~ ~ m ~
f~ Co--ils m ~n ~s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Co~l ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~fi~ (e.~ ~ ~ mb~ ~.), ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
from ~ ~1, ~ a ~8 lot ~ ~~ ~ng ~ Co~I ~.
Mayor Gan~ called for a brief rece~ to ixesent proclamations.
The Co~n~l retmwa~ from r~.~, a~l Mayor Garr~ caviled for pctitiorm from the
audi~mce. Mr. J E. {')'Plrie~.. 4130 Pompano. spuk~ in favor of r~-inslating the city's Inlea'nal
· Xudit~r poaitiom and ~ok¢ a~inst the incr~a~a in th~ cost of service for natural ~a tl~ the
cit~, adopted during the last budget cycle.
Minutes - Regular Council M~ting
t ~ober 18. 2005 Page 0
Mr. Bill Kopecky. 3609 Topeka. commented ~ th~ Council had appmv~ a chan~
artier r~lated to the ball park afte~ a closed se~ssion. Since the posting fo~ the ~ ~ yam
an.specific, he smd the public was unaware of it. and thua did not have an oplxa'toni~ to
comment He suggested that the Council &lay voting on actions resulting from cloaed seasiona
until the ~bllowing Council meeting. In ,~difion. he stated fl'~at lhe Caller-Tirtma had relxa't~d
~hm d~ funds for the $5~R).000 b~llp~k change order waa tak~ from the seRieammt fumta
recewed from the bonding company for City Hall repairs. He asked wtmiber it wa~ allowable t~
take momes out of the g~n~mil fund to pay for ballpark eXlXatses. City Manager Noe replied ttm
settlt.-~ne~t fiznds ~ taken from a number of litigation settlements beaiclea the City Hall repair&
I lc said the funds w~re not emsmzrked for any specific iXZrl:x~e.
Mr. Domingo Ibarra with the Corptm Christi Police O~cers A~ocimin~. 3122 ~
cL~memed them we~ a number of outstanding issues mlm,-d to the C. oumy ~ ~
,('DC). tlc stmed the. police offic,:,: v,~-e asked to substitute for CDC employees when they
called ~n sick. He aaked wheth~ this would be the sta~l_ m'd pragtice, or wa.a it a one-time
,~ccurrence. Mr. Noe replied this ,,sas the first time he had heard of thi~ occun4ng, ami he ~
~ok into it. Mr. Iban'a also aaked for clarification on the protocol for tmmfe~n~ aick ~
Mr. Ncc replied the city was working on a written protocol and would lmavide it to Mr. ~
aport completion, lie said that after discusain8 the matter wiLh Sheriff Olivarez, a ~ of
,:hangs had been implemented to grimly minimize the number of ~ prisotmra tim city pol_'_,ee
~ould need to tranaport for medical treatmem. Thus~ he did not forame thla to be a problem.
'Vlr. Ibaz'ra replied he was .still com.',:.,ed that police officers w~e being laken offduty to ~
~his service.
Mr. Michaml McKutchom asked the city m fred a way to permammtly rename, traffic in
front of McOee Beach.
Mr. K~ llawldmt 2902 ('imama~ advo,-,m-d the use of public transportation, raying it
w~mld help lower the demand for en~oline.
Mayor Oarrett reopened the discussion on Item 18 ~ the propoaed closure of the
beach in front ofthe seawall on Packery Clum~l. tie said him tally of today's qae~ wm 16
· 'for" ami 17 ~'against", which was indicative of how comrova~aial tbe iasue had become. He
reiterated that the Council had no intention of the closh~ the beach to the public; mth~,
proposed ordinance w~ limited to prohibjtln~ v~cular accesa to the beach to emure the mfety
of visitors.
Coumql Member Scott a~ed staff to confirm that there would be acx:emibil~ from the
seawall to the beach. Mr. Utter replied City Engineer Eseobar wa~ working on deaiL2ning thin
tbamm. Mr. Scolt pointed out that this ama would have more acco~ for people with di~hilitie$
than Mc(he Beach cun'~tly had. He spoke in support of the proposed clo~'e of the beach to
~ehicular tra~c because it ~ good public polic.~ in keeping with the commitn~nl ttm Council
had made to Ibc property owners and the public, lie hoped the corrtmtmity wxmld sut~ort the
;~ctioll al:id moYe forward.
Minut~ · Regular Council Meeting
( )ctober I & 2005 - Page 10
Mr. Cheaney armed the cit) waa trying to rrmke the m of the beach more accea~'ble to
other ~gmem, s of the population. Although ~ome of the commeuta he had he~ud ~ hostile
,md uncompromising, he said the argument~ brought forwm'd by Dr. Me.,Kulr. ben mad othea'a
n.~atding preceden~ were compelling, and he appreciated that tbey willing t~ find co ...... an
.,t~und. I le atated that his initial comments on the issue may have b~:ome a lighl~,~i~ rod for
criticism, and for this he w~s sort3.. He aiso felt the argument that amenitiea ~ to be in
place v'as ~ persuasive. Thus. Mr. Chesney w~le a motion to amend the o~linance aa adopted
,~n first reading b3 adding the following -whenm,s- ClmL~UeS. _%~eO_ nded by Mr. ~
-WHER.F~S, with ~ exception of the beach seaward of the seawall, it is the policy of
the City of Corpus Christi. as adopted in Policy Staxemem B.33, and C.13 MUSTANO-
PADRE AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN. adopted by City Council Ordinance #025725
ot~ April 20, 2004. an element of the City's Com.rx'ehemfive pIsm. to maiulain vehicle
accem along the Gulf heach unless nec__essary for an overwhelming public safety concern;
-WHERF. AS, the City Council cloea not intend to clo~ any other ~ of beamh
within its juri~iction to vehicular tndiic, other than the ~ public mf~ clomir~
authorized by. §10-81. Code or'Ordinances, for periods ofexlnmaely high wa~r,
-WHEREAS. by adoption of this ordinance the City Council is directing the City
Manager not to process any rcque~ for the closure of the beach to vehicular traffic that
maybe submitted by a littoral property owner:.
· 'WHERF. AS, the ('ity staff is directed to take action neceamvj to m~um ttmm is mcem
for ~ with disabilities from the imrking lot down the sem~t~l to the ~ m~l
-WHEREAS, the City stuff is directed m develop a definitive plan to add amexfitiea to the
~eaw~ll parkirm~ lot. including nma'oom-~ ligbfinff: etc., thea~ actiona would need to be
developed for action wiflain this Council tema: and
Mr. ~ ~ thai this ordirmocc would not bind fimn'c Coum:ils; bow~mr, it
did provide the legislative irmmt that Dr. Needham and others had requested.
Mr. Om'cia ztmed while he was a r~al eztat,- developer mad homebuilder, he w~ not
biased ~ the development conununity. He apoke in firvor of the bmc, h ~ to vehicular
rrat:fi¢ ber,~use he felt it would bring in job~ m~l infr~auctm'e im~ fur the community.
I le said the ¢losur~ would only increase the populm'i~ of the ~
Ms. Cooper apoke in favor of closing the beach m vehicu~' tm.~e,, n~l abe auppot'ted
Mr. ~'s amendment. Altl~ough ahe had no comml over the actioos of futu~ Counoil~ aim
promised that no other section of the beach would be closed aa long aa abe ~n'ved on Council.
She felt clo~__'ng the beach to vehicles to cr,'m,' a pedex'Mn bem:h would an amenity m~d would
.~idreas safety issue.
M~. Noyola commented that at las~ week's ~ he said he had mR trc~ved any oalla
ti'nm his cotmitueats regarding the issue. As a result, he was besi~gM with calla this w~ek, but
noted thai only two people bm-I contacted him who lived in his district. ~ ~tid the e-mails he
~4inutes · Regular Co.oil Meeting
~ )ctober 18. 2005 · Page 1 !
nad r~ivcd ~ 55 "for" and 45 "against. indJc.~ting how ¢o~t~Itiou~ tl~ ~ ~ ~
~upport~d Mi'. Cl~taty's alx'~Jn~'nL bul i1~ wished to add a prov~io~ ~l.~n~ fl~t ~ woukl
r~vcr b~ parking n~y~-rs in th~ paxking Io{ b~a~c it might privet tl~ poor fxom mx~mlng t~
~h. He said h~ did not want anyon~ to ~v~ lave to pay to pa-k at tl~ beach. Mr. ~
and ML (mrei~ aecep~d Mr. Noyola's amendment.
Mr. Marez tlmnked Mr. Che~'y for his amendment as a good 6dth effort to Ctm~gomi,,e
on the ~ue. However. be was concerned that the Council would not be 8.hie to ~ ~ flm,~
('oumil's with their action today. Thus. he said he would not support about not being able to
bind o~er Coul:lcils to ~hi~ decision, however. The -slippery slope" argument w~ gon~lin~_ to
h~m. and thu~ h¢ .,~id I~ could no{ ~uppon th~ ordinance.
Mr. Kinnison ttumked the l~blic for their comments. Although some ~ of the
public stated the~' felt this wv.s -donc deal", he said the Council would nM have lXOpo~xl thi~
,ummdmem if that vms truly the case. He said the Council trod Ihmmed to their (:om:m~L Mr.
Kinni~m spoke in support of the amendment.
Mayor Crarrett called for 8 vo~e on Mr. Chesrmy's motion to amend the ordixmnce, ~nd it
passed unanimously (Kelly abstained). City Secretary Ompa polled the Council for their vot~
on the ordinance az amended as follow~:
18. ORDINANCE NO. 026526
Amending the Code of Ordinancca, City of Corpu~ ~ Ch3p0~ 10, B,~-hfront
Manll~Tmxt taxi Commuctiom reg~lin~ the eliminmion of vchiculJr traffic o~ the beach
s~avnu'd of thc Padre Island Seawall, the dixcction of lloyd between Whitec~ Boulcsqud
providing a delayed effective dine. (First Reading 10/11/05)
An ~ was d~l~-d, and the for~oin~ ~ w~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~l]o~ng ~e: O~ ~, C~, G~ ~ N~ ~ ~
vofinE "Aye": ~ ~ng 'No": Kelly ~.
Mayor Crart~ called for a brief recess.
l'he Council matured from recess. Mayor Oan'~tl refeal~d to Item 12.a., and a motion
was made. segond~L and paaaed to open the public hearing on the following item:
Public _l~4ng on a pn~osed I gO-day mormorium on Ibc i~m~ee of permim for the
erection or conmxu~on of attached ami detm:h~d on-premim~ mad off-pmaai~ aigrm over
100 square feet in area or exceeding 25 feet in height that are 1 _oc~.d~ m:lj~cent to the
Saratoga Boulevard street fight-of-way (SH357) in thc City of Corpus ~
Assistant ~tm' of De,,elopmem Services Michael Omi:ting reported that staff had
pmr, osexl this I80-day moratorium which would be effective today if apgnoved umil April 2006
Mm-ws - Regular Council Me~ing
~ x:tober 18. 2005 - Page 12
Ibr the entire length of ~ Boulevard. The mormnrium would eliminate permi~ i~med for
attached ~a' detached signs over 100 sqtmrc feet in sign area of 25 feet in height along Sa~loga
Boulevard only. During the motalorium, ea~.h fn:estanding building along ~ Boulevard is
allowed one on-premise (attached or detached) sign up to 100 square feet pet ~'eet from. One
~luare feet in area o~ 25 fo.'t in height.
Mr. Gunning explained ~ Saratoga Boulevard was a desi? conido~ that served a
major growth area on the city's s~mth side. Over rccem years, currem and fuatre develoixnent
w'ill resull in an incre~.se of commercial signage. The prolifemton of Silp~? was further
~x~mmetcml and industrial zoning districts. Thus. suflT was proponin5 a mopmsdum to prepsxe
.tmcndments to the sign regulations, elimi~ng tl~ unlirnit~ sign allowance and ul~y
reducing the visual clutter. Staff would work with stakehold~ grout~ including b.~im.,me~ to
develop the sign regulR6ons. He ,,aid the m:exl to move forward with thi~ effort in ~dv~m:e of the
~'nitied I)evelopmem Code was imperative because of the rapid growth in the ~ Mr.
(iunning displayed a number of photos illusm~ing the types of si? ~y in tl~ ~ ~
Mr. Kirmison asked what Ibc height n:stric~ions were in the existing ~ Mr.
Gunning replied if the sign~? was located within the front yard, defmnd a~ 20 feet
from the ~a~-t right-of-way, it was limited to 25 fee~ height and no mor~ ~ 40 squar~ f~t in
~ign ares. In additiom only one sign per front was allowed. However, he said iftl~ ~_o~n?
hnr. ated behind the f~ont yard. then the signage was unlimited in height, size, ami number.
Mr. Gan:ia asked why staff was limiting the mormmium to Saratoga Boulevard, noting
that vi.mai sign clutter was also becoming a problem on Yorktown Boulevan:L Mr. ~
replied the o~dinance___ amerahuents that slaff would bring back for the Coumfil's cormld,.x~o~
would address sign issues on arterials throughout the city. He added the develotxne~ pre,sums
on Yorkh,wn went m:R nearly as se, vete as t.bose on .Sam~__oga Bouleve_~l.
Mr. Gunning smwd within the Sa~','~a Boulevard corridor, there were 41 aisn pemfit~
~ssu~! this past year, 11 of which were over 100 ~uarc feet in area, amountil~ to 26.8 pm:e~ of
the total signage. On a citywide basis, he said approxmmmly 90 ~ of the aigna w~e lma
than I O0 square feet in area. He noted thal 1 i siles were cummtly under comlruction in the
· ,'tudy mca. two of which would 1~ affected by the moralorium, namely The Steaklxam: on 5409
.~a~mga and the Valero Corner Store at 6401 Sm~tog~
Mr. Gunning reported that staff met with sign industry ,~p~,.a,.,dafivea several
ago. and they made ~ commenls about tt~ amounl of signage thst vn:mld be a:ng'l~ble, lie
recalled I~IR non~ of the repreaentatives thought that a property needed mo~e ttum oee sign ttm
was unlimited in height or sign re'ea. They recommended a number of,~ign atea~ del:eadertt upon
whether a business from_ed a freeway or an arterial. They ~ thst if a busineas had a
corner fixmtage of an arterml and a collector sm:et, th~n the signage on th~ collector street ahould
be limited to ~l~ allowed in a "13-1' Neighborhood Business Dislxict. that being 40 square
,n sign area and 20 feet in height.
~,tinuu..'s - Regular Council Meeting
(.~tober 18. 2005 - Page I ~
In conclusion, Mr Gunning stated that those ~ that had bx:ortnn,m'a~ ~
s~gnagc in their building permit the city would honor their permits. In addition, any ~i~,~ thst
e,~c_~4__ these standards that are allowed must be erected within 30 dayli of tbe ~ of th~
ordinance Mr. Garcia asked whether it was possible to erect si?n wihhin ~ 30-day la~riod-
Mr. Ourming stated this provision could be discus.ned and amended.
Mr. Kinnis~m asked what effect if any the proposed moratorium have on billho~rd~ Mr.
Otmrling replied thai a nnmber of permits for Larnitr Advertising wmfld be ~ by the
ordinm~. Thc permits werc for signage to be erected near the intersection of Sm~toga
I~w. ate the signs on was not plalted: thus. they did no! have an at~lieation in plam~ for tl~
,il~.q~~t''. Mi'. Noe added the moratorium agplied to both on-l:n'~nine
;ncluding billboarcl~ on this stre~:h. The area subject to billboard erection was vnet of~
Road because then: were no sites east of Kostory,, with the appmInSme zorling.
Mr. Kinnison asked how staff decided on the 100 squm'e foot limit for signag~ Mr. No~
n.-plied that 90 percent of the existing signage in the city was 100 square ~
Mr. Kinnison nsked if staff had cotmidered how the ordinance would affect fimm. hi~d
comlamies with ~ signage. Mr. Gunning replied thnI fnmc_hi,~ez have lem'ned to ndjunt
~heir sign standards to tbe c~munity's ordinatw~.
In ~ to Mr. Kelly's question. Mr. Gunning said ~atT wished to mow ~ with
~be sign ordimmce amendments because it would put all businesses a~o~s the city o~ notie~ that
~he tit)' ,.~m eliminating the unlimited sign provisions. He said the city ~ to a~t quieldy
there would be those ~ that want~ to come in and beat the cleMline~ by Imlling flxir
s~gn permits before the new ordinance passed.
Mayor Garrett called for public co,~aent. Ms. Cmnm Doughm% 2306 Mewury, ~
she ~ ~ involved in staff m~tings re~Ln~ling signnge In the Jamutry 2005 m~'fix~ ah~
~id the sign industry agreed on that the unlimited square footage taxi number of si? waa
unnecessary.. She took exception, howm~er, to being notified on Friday nflm'noon thnt an
emergency meeting would be taking place today aflx-r a 10-month Iw-~k Sho waa nlno
concerned _be~_ ,~.e other stakeholdem suc, h as businesses ~md develotmrs, had not been
c,mu~n~l. She asked whm the eanergency was. She also stated thttt abe felt the City was overly
regulming the signage industr) Finall.~. abe asked the Council to fable thia item to allow for
mtm: discusaior~.
X4mutr_s Regular Council Meeting
, k'l,)ber 18. 2005 - Page 14
D~rector of D~elopment Servieea Barbara Holly replied staff had met with aign industry
~-l:m.',se~atives a number of month~ ago. and came to an agreeme~nt on r~n:nnnw~-~,6nna. Al
that time. staff considc-rexl including the siglxag~ limit~alons in the Unif'~d ~ Code,.
Ilowever. she said staff felt they had to move ahead with the signage limit~ion~ gmlak~ oftbe
~.~nili~d Develol~ncnt Code process. She aaid it made more s~nse to he very r~trictive in the
moratnrium m'ea .Mr. Scott added the Council N,d clearly directed ~aff to addreas tbe l:~oblem
with unlimited signage. Mr. Kinnison stat.~ he was sm ps ised ~ ~ had not ~ ongoing
mec~ings with the sign indu,~y regarding the ordinance arnendrrmat. He said Oti, would happon
Mr. Chesnc) expressed concern tim staff had not Im:l ongoing meetings with the ~
,ndu.~-y. abouI the issue. 1 lc was also concerned thai staff'had not raked far mo,~ i .-put fix~n the
public, l-lc asa, ed if staffwould consider a 30-day mor~orium tlmt could be renewed ,~ needed.
Mr. Gunning replied that the Council can set the mormndm period; howm~, be felt ~ the
oroce~ could nol be completed in 30 days. He mid six months was th~ ~ lm~gh oftinm
for u moratorium, at'sd wm~ a limited amount of time. Mr. Kinnison rt'91ied what rmmvin~ tbe
moratorium ever}' 30 days was not practical.
Mr. Dan Conn, 5914 Woodmere Drive, and Mr. Hal Burgem, a Bern Ttx~ aulzliviaion
nzsid~nL .,,~oke in favor of instituting .,,ignage lirnjtnfions and recommmded the us~ of~
Mr. Mark R~'~nolds. 5310 St. Andtt-w~ tq~,,.,tlng Lamar Advertising, ~ ffMr.
Kinnison if billboards would be climi~m,~l from the momtorimn. Mr. ginninon agren~! to ~
lie asked if the city would consider a cap and r~place system for billbomxl~, which would r~luire
that to erect a new billboard, a comrnmy would have to take two other Nllbom'dz down. Attbe
end of ten years, the number of billboard aiSns would be halved. Thc Coun~ mClm~nd ~m
,m~ in his suggestion.
Ms. Cooper made a motion to close the public hearing_ aeconded by Mr. Scott,
pas.~'d.
Mr. Scott commented what it was obvious the city's sigrm? otdinanc~ wm ~
as indicaled ~ several ztming change requeala based solely on signage m:lUiremm~ In
addition, the Council ahared the co~":ern ofa si~ificam segm~ eat oftbe _community What waa
conc~xied with sig~age l~lifcr~ion.
Mr. Tim Voork~,,p, 6238 Stxau~berg, stmed tl~ be owned tnopexty w~t of Ommwond
on .~a'amga, and had applied for building petmita for signage. He naid th~ at~licmion wm
turned down because be did not have a physical addxem for th~ ~'nmg~. Mr. No~ clm'ified what
Mr. Voo~.p was ereaing billboards. Mr. Scott eommemed that the muendus~t Mr. Kinni~:m
planned on making to eliminate off-prernisr signage would add~"ss bis concern.
Mr. Kinnison made a motion to amend the ordinance as follows: 1) to delete off--tnt'mine
~lgns; 2) to eliminate the ~:luirement in Section 3 that any signs that have ~ permitted but
have not ~ baill be erected within 30 day~ of ihe approval a, te; and 3) to add a mquimmem
tl~ s~affl:Weaem ~ proposed set of regulationa to Ibc City Council m~! the Plarming C. nmmi~
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
~, ~ctober 18. 2005 - Page 15
within 90 d~ys. Mr. Chcsncy rrmde a motion to amc-nd Mr. Kivni~on's ~ to clmnge thc
mor~.orium period of 180 to 90 chris. Fbg motion died for lm:k of a seared. Mr. ~'s
rnolion to nrta-nd was seconded, and it passexi unanimously (Noyola was absc~t). City Scctclm'y
( 'turpa polled thc Council for their voles on thc ordinance as amcmimi as follows:
12.b ORFIlNANCE NO. 026523
Ordinance imposing a ] 80-day mormorium onthe is~mm:~ of pexm;~ for tl~ ~'tio~ or
cons~u~on of attached and detaeh~ on-premi.e and off-lar~a~ .i?- over 100 ~
feet in ar~a or exceeding 9.25 feet in height and lo.ted adjacent m tim ,%rm~ga Botflenngd
,street right-of-way (SH357) in the City of Corlms Christi.
An emergency was deelm'~L and the foregoin~ ordinance ~ lmSsexl m~l ~aproved with
I~. following vote: Garrett. Cooper, ~ Kelly, K.innison, Mm~z, mad 8~ott, voting
"Aye": C~ voting -No-: Noyoh was ab~nt.
Mr. Chcsney citified that he voted ,~nin~t tl:z ordinan~ ~ of lm:k of public
knowledge r~Lzigcling lhe issue, and the Mek of ~pproprim~- notice to the ~ffeO~_ ~
Mayor Cmrrett referred to lmm 13.a., and a motion w~ nmde, seconded, ~! pruned to
open the public hearing on thc following item:
Public hearin~ m receive public comment~ rel~gding tl~ matmfimtion f~rn tl~ ~
Christi Housing Finance Corporation for the isamnce, ~ mad ~ of Multifiunily
Homing Revenue Bonds (The Villm m Costa Tmmgona I), Scrim 2005
Mayor Garrett asked for Imblic comment. Mr. Brian McCool (834 Onmlm) taxi M~
Yolands Cm'p~nter with the Leopard Strut Coerichar A~oci~tion, ~ in fnvor of the ~
ran-agora development. Ms. Deborah Gtmxcro with thc NRP Group slated tl~ M~ Linda
Cavazos with the Lcopard Slxeet C~gridor Association had written a ~ in support of the
projecl thru ~ submiUed to the City Secretary. She thanked the city for their support.
Mr. Gan:ia asked if the NRP Group was plan~in~o on ~chievin_q the same suc~s~s ~
had achieved in tim El Paso ama. She r~pond~ ,lTtrmalively, saying they wislmt to lagmfid~ the
.same quality of work in all their projects.
A motion was made. seconded, a~l passed to close the public tmuing. City Secmary
polled the Council for lheir vme~ as follows'.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
c~ctoher 18. 2005 - Page I 0
I ~.b RESOLUTION NO. 026524
Resolution authorizing and approving the issuance, ~le, mad delivery of Multifimsily
Housing Revenue Bonds (The Vdl~ at Costa Tarmgona I), Series 2005; and containing
other provisions relating to the aubj~'t.
]'he foregoing resolution was pn~l and approved with the following vo~: ~
Chemey. Gm'cia. Kelly. Kinnison, Marez. and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper and Noyola
were absent.
Mayor (Mrrett ret-eased the meeting to hold the Corpus Christi Htmsing Fimum~
Corporation meeting.
The Council returned from rece~, ~ May~ C_nm~ opened discamion on Item 14, a
resolution regardin_,o the rev~rsionaO, to Nav~l Station Ingle:fide.
Mayor C-armtt called for public comment. Mr. Brian McConl, 834 Omaha,
that the NAS Ingleside :rite could be converted into a coUcge on thc ~ Oulf. City
Cha~ polled the Cotmeil fo~ their votes as follows:
14. R~LUTION NO. 026525
I~.-solution _r%m~ rding the reversionm'y fights to N~I Station Ingleaide.
The foregoin~ resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: ~
C'hema~, C'ool~r, Cmx~i~, Kelly. Kirmi~an. M~ur.~ m~d Scott, vorin2 "Aye"; No}oM was
Mayor Garrett opt.-n~l diacu~ion on lt~., 15, a motion to aplmave the 2005 Imf levy.
Director of Financial Services Cindy O'Brien reported the tnx levy was $65,9-'~7,253, ba~ed
General Fund to suIsport thc city's maintenm~ and operations ~ the ~ity's debt service The
city saw an imrease of $4,105,562 compa~ to the 2004 tax levy of $61,131,691, despite
imphmaenting ii tax ___~. in addition. Dis. O'Bricn reported the city would incur a $396,701
loss or' ad valorem taxes du~ to thc first-time implemenm6on of the ovet..65/di~eahled
tax frga~ze. To off-act this amount, the 2004 net taxable v~luea of propea'fim m:ldgl' prot~t for
2005 i'mve be~m incl~led in the certified levy rtmdfing in an addifiomd $59,423 in rt~zam~a. The
rm effe~l of these two adjustments will impm't the General Fund by low, lng the ad valorem
rew.'a~e by $231.471 and will imp~t the Deb{ Servic~ Fund by low~ri.ng th~ ad v~lor~n t~t
revenue by' $108.065. City stM'f will prment a budget m~--ndment to the City Cotm~l for
.q:~artn/~ al thc atlb~a~luenl Ci~. Council meeting,
Mr Kirmison noted that the amount for the over 65/cYmtbled homestead ~ ~ was
much larger than ,~nff hsd previously provided in the $26.000 rnnEe. ~t City Mmmg~
M~nutes · Regular Council Meeting
~' kctober I 8. 200.5 - Page 17
Martin,.v. replied that the estirnme staff had received from the Nueces County Tax ~
District re?,'cling the ce~ifted mil was ,;,,oaeous. omitting · significam numiz~ of ~:~:.o~,~
elig,ble fi~r the freeze. The County Tax Assessor's O~ce and the Tax ~ District ~
~t on the ,,,me page. and staff had discussed the maUer with them ~o they could nmeive
· w. Cmlte information in the future. ]hey memioned a problem with a new com?__a_et_ program_
('it.~ Secretary Chape polled the Council for their votes as follows:
MOTION NO. 2005-359
Motion approving the 2005 ]'ax [_--vy of $65,237,253 based on the adopt,-d tax rate of
$0.625799 per $100 valuation in accordance with Section 26.09 (e) of the Texaa
Property I'ax Code
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with th~ following vote: Oazrett,
~. Cool,r, Cm~cia. Kelly. Kinni~on. ~ and Scott, voting "Aye"; Noyola was
absent.
Mayor C, arr~ opt-ned discussion on Item 16 regarding the DowntnWll Dmillage Projegl~.
City En~neer Angel Escobar ,aid Items 16 and 17 were related to the Downtr, wu Drainage
Projeta. Item 16 involved the couaU'ucfion of a 5x8 com:zete box on Kirmey Street to Willimmm,~
Drive to alleviale the flooding along Peoples ~ The Phase 1. Project B pump ~tation would
,no'case the capacity of tl~ pump station by 2-1/2 times. ~ not~ it would bo built m:xt to
hear flood eve~L Staff was re~ammending award m the T&C ~ C. ofl~m~ny of
Houston. 'ri(. They also r~axnmended that Additive Alternates No. 2 ,and 3, totaling $85,000,
be held until ~ eonstru~on was finished to ensure a~ fum~ ~ said th~tu was a
$500,000 cnnting~my fund, so staff felt confident the additives would be comple~d. ~ w~
no comments from the public. City Secretary Chapa poll-'d the Coum:il for limit volza aa
follows:
16. MOTION NO. 2005-360
Motion _~mhorizin£ li~ City Marm~oer or his design~ to ~m~cut~ a communion coutragt
with T & C Constngtion Company Ltd., of Houston. Teu~s in tbo amoum of $.5,608,420
for the Bas~ Bid ami Additive Altumat~ No. 1 for the Downtown Dmina~ I .ml~avommIs
Pha~e i Project B-Kinqey Streei Pump Station.
Chemey. Conp~r. C~rcia. Kelly. KL-mi,~an. Marez, and S~ott, voting "Ayu"; Noyoh, was
absent_
Mayor Garmtt oper~d discussion on Item 17 r,.~.urding the Agnes Cmmt box culvert. City
I. nt~lnt.~n' Escobar explained th,s was a rebid of the downtown druiru,~e work. He aoted th,t the
~rk would begin on Asnes 5;tr~ through Blucher Park. installing a 6x6 coigrete box. The
-'tmirmse would be intercepted betbre going to the park. and tran~orted by gravity through the
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
~ ktober 18. 2005 -. P~e I 8
~awall without going to the pump station. He recommended that Additive Altexn~ 2 and 3 be
rt.-served as clumge orde~ after project corr., letion funded thm-~ the con~ fund. lie
~id this would ensure 100--year flood protection for this area.
Mayor Garrctt aaked when thc pmjcc~ would be completed. Mr. F_zcobar tvpli~l the
0reject completion dam was October 2006.
Mr. Mat~zask~il'hun-icanc were considered 10(}-year cvcnta~ Mr. ~r~pli,~d th,~t
a Category 3 or 4 hurricane would p~obably quali~ aa a 100-year event. Tbe pum~. would be
able to handle a large storm surge.
There were no comment~ from the public City Secretary Cha~ poll~ the Coumil for
:heir votes as follows:
17. MOTION NO. 2005-361
Motion authori~dn~ tbe City Ma~a? or his cl~igne~ to ~rgu~ a co~a-u~m contm~t
with Jalco. Inc., of Houston. Texas in th~ ~mount of $3,166,399 fo~ the Down~wn
I)caim*? I~ Pha~ 2 - Ago~ Str~'t Box C~ and Diwa~on
B~d.
Thc foo~goi%o motion was pazscd and al~mved with the following vo~: ~
Chemey. Cool,r, Garda. Kelly. Kinninon. Mat~z. and Sco~t, vo~n8 'Aye'; Noyola w~
absent.
Mayor Garretl receascd thc meeting to bold a Corpua Community
('orporafion Meeting.
The Council ~-turned from recess, and Mayor Cnlrrett referred to the po.,,,.alafunm on the
day's agenda. The first present'on was Item 21 regarding the long-mm tnocutemem of cost-
baaed pow~, ~ by Mr. C~offr~ Gay with Lloyd and G-ozadink. Mr. (lay said he
rcprcacnt~l thc South Texas Aggre~aeion Proj~ ~STAP), of whic, h the City of~ Christi
w~ a primary member, comtitutin8 one-third of the load no.%o~-g~tod in South T~xa~ ~ saki
cl~regul~on of electric iml,,~y in Texas waa predicat~ on ab~m~ hintorically stabl~ and low
natural gas prices ~ 1997 to 2001. Gas prices h~acc r~'ncd to tl~ir historically vol~'l¢
ruma~, and now thc city has historically high r~tm-al gas pric~s.
Mr. Ga~ said .staff envisioned breaking the link between turn-al gaa pricing and
¢lectricit?' price, and reinstating a cost of service basis, and to moderate thc hiL2h electricity pri~
experienced by municipalities. Staff was proposing to go directly to an owner of a coal-fired
plant willing to sell the city their facility's capacity for ten years at a freed price to serve the
baaeload needs of ali the SI'AP members. He said this was roughly 55 to 60 txax:ent ofall the
cner~ consumed on an annual basis by each ofthe city members oftbe STAP. To achieve this
Mm~_n~s Regular Council Meeting
(~ctober ]8.200~- Page lq
r~efiL it was necessary to have a pre-paymo~t of the capacity piece__ of that coal plato for the
coal comracL STAP would issue debt that would then be supporl~ by tbe con~'a~s betwet~
<;TAP and thc cities. The re,ail electric provider STAP contracts with wtmld collect thr rnnnies
on each account from each bill and d~licat¢ the debt so'vice payment portion to a ~ to pay
Mr. Gay said all public debt in the Stat,- of Texas had to be aplXOVed by the Public
Finance divi~on ofthr Attorney Caeneml's Office. He said they have appmvod ~ oaocept. He
,~id this w~s a unique ~immJon in which i~aing deb~ would actually lower cost~ a~ opposed to
,ncrcase them. He ~aid STAP's financial coun~l, Fir,st Somhw~., su~gnP~l___ ~ thgm ~
nothing about this arran~-rr~-nt that would undermine any member's ability to issue futu~ debt
· .~r jeopardize a bond ralins.
Mr. Gay displayed a number of graphs illusm~ng the volalility of tbe ga~¢lcctricity
correlation. Hc said the coal-power contract wonld not becom~ available,, depoxling upoa which
~ plant STAP comracted with. until ~ 2007 or early 2008. ~ said STAP waa aaking for
t~lay was a stawment from thc City. Council thnt this was a good idea worth punnin~ He
ernphaaiz~ this was not a commitment a~ thi~ point: mfl~r, h~ would cor~ back to ~ th~
~pecific lerms and condifiom. He said this was a vote of comqd~me to tbe STAP Board and
gempm, which had ~ the Colcto Creek plarn or the Twin Oak~ pl~t being consid~g~
for the coal-power contract.
Mr. Gay s~ged the only way the coal-power corroact would
was if gas pries dropped below $3.50 per MM/BTU on a suamin~l am-ymr avenge.. He said
this was hj_ohly unlikely based on world conditions, noting tha~ mo~t ~conomi~ w~ aaying
the price of nzXural gas floor bas $5.00 per MM/BTU. Currently. prices wc~ we. Il over $11.00
Mr. Gay norad that tbe Sempra Twin Oaks and Colleto Cre~k coal plm~ w~re conzider~l
some of the cleane~ in the State of Texas regardin~ emi~ion~ He ~fid it wm a uniqu~
OppO~[Inl~y ~ [J'lCy ~ to ~ ~ quickly. He said ron~hly Cffle-thlrd of hi~ clients in tl~
gTAP in thc compm-ablc Cili~ Aggre?fion Fh'o. icct (CAP') in the north ~ IXL~CC[ tho
r~olmion.
In respon~ to Mr. grUy's question, Mr. Gay r~plied that Scmpra was asking f~ ~58
million prc-paymem in kate 2007. STAP would borrow mon~ to relay the debt. Mr. Kelly
asked what ~m~Fs opinion was reo~arding th~ project. City Mmda?r_ Noe ~ thru sta:ffhmtn't
had a chance to evalume the proposal, but was optimistic ttmt the numbera loola:d good.
The next proo~ladon wns It=,,, 22~ a quarterly report from the Crime Control and
Prevention District. Board President Butch Pool reported that the Crime Control District was
$15.000 in the bMck for the first time. thanks to nggrcszive coat..omlnE and ~nmmble tax
,:olh.-ctions. tie .,aid tbe.~ were on trm't to repeal this fe~t for the U:l:~o~in~ ~ yl~r. ~
mmgtuced Commander Bryan Smith to provide an update on the lmwn zhop d~fil.
Vlmutes - l~'gular Council Meetinl~
,. ~toher 1 g. 2005 - Pa~¢ 20
C,~ Smith reported thai one manager and org staff mi~mt had beu~ ~elect~
and were in place for the pawn shop detail. Two additional staff asaiatama glegl~d and will he
,n plage within the next two weeks, comprising the full comp. ~ for thin milt. I-~ aaid
compmers had been installed, and the software installed The pawn shop dmail ahould b~ fully
operational within the next two or three weeks.
Mayor Garrett called for the City Manager's report. City Manager No¢ reported th~ uliy
had received an intonational award for our WiFi project at the Wiml~aa ~ I~[~[l[t[l~ ]'n ~
I-mncisco. ~yceiving the first Wireless Communities Beat Practices Award. He aaid ~aiffhoped
~ Mier. Mexico.
Mayor Gan~ asked the City Mmmg~ to ensure that Solid wa~m wa~ following tkmugh
with heavy brush pick-up and picking up debris. He aaked staff to let the Coumfil know fi.they
s~rc behind schedule. In addition, he atdr~l staff to look into a storm ~ ditch at W~
.md Rodd Field Roada ttmt was no~ hein8 maimaimxk acco, ding to citizerm.
The~ being no furrier business to come heroin I~ Council, Mnyor Gat'mR nd'journed the
¢'ouncil meeting at 3:43 p.m. on October 18. 2005
2
D~: la ~ to hsvin8 jurisdiet~ of complaints involving my 'city offa:ial', tho ~ of
~3) ~ ~y~l a ~nE~ ~~~ ~ ~m ~~. ~
COMI~OSmON: Nine tn~nbers .,po~tod by a two=thirds vo~ oftl~ fan count. N~n~.
ar~ m be solicitni fi~,,,, a ~ variety of professimml and c~,~tuu~ty ml~'~:.~k*.- in tho c~ty
providedm~of~ Thec~mmfiaaionshallelecta~m4 avic~r'- ' I~-- -
*****Has mot the six-ymr limitation allowed by ordiname
Frei Haley
l~ne~ Rict~d Cramer
NO. OF MTG8. NO. % OF A~'ENDANC~
I0 10 100%
lO 9 (I ~tca~l) 90~
OTmZU ~WqVmU,~-q ~'~P~g-~NG
Self-empkry~d, Adn~Chhol~ ti~ Omtnatnof
Patiar Co~ of~. Cmxmliy Krvm --
Pmsidmt of LULAC Cotm~ No. 1. (~=2~-~)
sh,~,y Fm~o
Jack Oo.Jy
Elizaboth Tinnoy Wil~on
M~ Colk~ Volt.al ~ and vaxious
txa~n~ ^~v~ ~ t~ ~ ~ lsd
Ptmidm~ mxl Cum~ ~ mm]b(z of CBAHU.
(2-2]-~$)
R~ir~d, C.C. F~ ~ Atm~led D~I Mst
Colle~ Artivifim ~
lui~ive, O~ Cu~k C~ ~ T,~ I-h~alih
~Shte~ t~-~ ~-~S)
b P~r.(~ION,AL I:~m~At.T~:l AW,4.~v..q8 ~ARJ) - One (1) vnc~ncy with hn-m to 10-01-.0~.
TSmtM A~X'TP DX*ri'-
I~IIIIVll~U,AI,,q ~,lfl,llli{{ilNO IN'rI'.RKST
Cun~ Bo~l m~uber of ~. ('~-21..~)
Oomb~
Meml~ of the ~ B~d ~ ~n~i~
M'"a8,"~'" ~ .nd Prmid~I ofli~ 8ou~ Tm~s
^m~8o~ de Mmxico. t~-~-~)
Atico Wom~k
A~mivi'dm i~clud~: Cal~k~ Wr~ldlo Sc, tmol PTA Pr~idm~
c.c. c~,,~mi~ ~ ~ ~
T~rm H~lth.
3
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Ri~.COMMENDATION: Motion approving a Municipal lxa~e Line of Credit with Bane of
atrnerica l.easing ,e, Capital LI.C. Chicago, Illinois in accordmx:e with Bid Invitation No. B1-
0025416 based on loss' bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $154,854. TI~ t~rm oftl~
contrm:t ~s for twenty four month,, with options to extend for up to two additional twelve-month
rnwiods. ,~ubject ti) the approval of the contractor and the City Manager, or his de, ghee.
BACKGROUND
The (-'it3' uses municipal loase pm'cim~ ~ to fund
equipmem and rolling stock ~-pl~ceme~t noe~ A~ equitmmm is
requisitioned to be I:mrv..lm2~, the eXl~Fme~ i~ ~ ~ ~
the purch~e is provided through thi~ ~ li~ of credit
agreement. An estimated $5. I million dollars worth of equipmmxt
t,~ projected to be purchased over the initial twelve moath period of
Ibis agreement.
Pm'bus Co,~tr~ct:
The options to extend the current eontm~t Imve been exercised,
requiring the City to ism~e new bid invit~tiot~
Bid llvitltioas baued: 'l'went)
A~ard Basis:
Lox,,' Bid
Bidders ~r~ instructed to bid a marimp fi'om a deai~
financial inde~ in order to dem'mir~ the interest ram that would b~
ch~ged tbr meh partio,lar piece__ of equitmaenI Ian'cJum~ The
actual interest rate will flt~ume throughout the term of the
contract based on thc index rotc at the time of the ~ Ba~ed
on thc index rate un September 13, 2005, the intezeat mt~ c, baZlg~
m the City for a 60 month lease is 3.293%.
Funding: Van(ms City Departments
Procut~rnenl and ~ Services Marmoer
$154,854
4
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
R~COMMI~NDATION: Motion gp~uving a mapply ~ with Nalio~l
Inc., Corlxm Chris~ Texas for at~mxima~ely 6,495 pipe ~ ¢~_*mpa ranging in ~ fixan 2' to
30" in ~:ordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0022-06 b~m~d o~ low bid for ~ ,-~m-~-I
uxpe~ditu~ of $231,520.90. The term of the contra~t is f-re' tw~lv~ ~ with option~ to
cxtcaxl fur up to two ~ddifiomJ tw~~ pcrioa~ subject to th~ ~ of tho
~cl thc City ~, of hia demgncc.
charged uut to thc Water a~d W~tewatcT E)cpertmcnt~.
to the ve~k~-'a i~bili~y to m~inmin priein~ ~quir~S ~ City to
issue new bid invitations.
Bid lnvilations tssued: Thirt~o~
Bicl~ Received: S~x
Pri~ ,~udy~is'
When compm~ to the previous bid of 2004, pricing baa im::n~aod
apfa'uxi~y 11%. Acc~rdinS t~ v~u~r, the iu~r~aao ia du~ to
thc riei~ a:,~ in meIerial and ehippin~.
Award Basis: Low Bid
Fundins:
119010-5010-00000
$231,520.90
Procurement and Ge~ Service~ M~nsi~r
5
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
RECOMMRNDATION: Motion approving a supply agreemeet with Clteatsta~
~'orpus ChristL Texas for automntlc traa~u~ssion ovedmul & repair s~'vice fi~r appro~imat,-Jy
163 autom4:~iles m~l light trucks in nccordnnce with Bid lnvitaticm No. BI-0143=05, based on
.n]y b~d ~ ~n estimated anmml expello~tu~ of $108,350. TI~ term of the core.ct ~l~ll b~ ."o~
twelve months with an option to extend for up to two a~litional twelve month perk~ subject to
tl~ at~rovnJ of the supplicr ~ the City IVlnnz~r or hi. designee. Funds have be~n bud~ by
Maintenance Services nnd the Fire Department in I-~' 05--~.
BACKGROUND:
'Ibis service provid~ the City an oved~uled Imzsmis~m,
installed on the most common typen of City owned ~ntntnobiles
and light truct~ within twenty-four hours of h-..--,,Ps'on f~ilute.
I'r~,.ious Conmlcr
Thc option to extend the previous contract tuts been ~xemised,
requiring the City to issue new bid
B~d Invitations ].~ued: 'l'wcnty-thn.,c
Bids R_~_fivecl: ()nc
PT'icing ha.,; remn~ed .stable since the I~t bid of 2002.
Basis:
OM,,' Bid
Funding:
MaJ~ Services
530100--5116-40170
$83,3S0
Fire Depm'tmmt
530100-1020- ! 2050
Totnl
Sms~so
Pr~nmre~emt & C~crviu'c~ Manag~
· d T~bu~k~
Bid InCiSion No. BI-01~(~
~ Tmm~l~on Ov~h~JI ~
1 I ,a~04,/AS04,AWD (44'TE/41AE)
1 2 A~O4 (30RE)Torque Fight
'~ 3 A727 (36f~) Torque Fight (LockUp)
14 AEK)0
~ 5 A~KXISE (42RE)
'~ 6 A~18 (46RH)
~. 7 A~lSSE (46RE)
!8 45RFE
2 0 Fro'd: ~1
21 A4LD
22 ~ (4R44E/4R66E) 4 Speed
23 A,4LD-E (SR44E/61~r~) 5 ~
2 4 AXODE (AX4S)
2 5 .a~OE- (AOOE-W) (4RTOW)
26 C-6
2 7 E40D
2 8 4R100
2 9 F-IO~
30 (~tteml Iiobxt: E~I
3 1 4T60E
32 200
3 3 TH125C
3 4 T'H350
35 TH400
3 6 TH325
3 7 TH440-T4 (41_60)
38 4LSOE
?, 9 200--4R
3 1C~ ~
3 1 *. THTOOR
Gm/at~a T~
2 ea. 1,000.00 2,000.00
6 ea. 8~.00 5,100.00
I ea. 150.00 IlKI.00
6 ea. ~0.00 3,250.00
2 ea. 200.00 400.00
7 ea. 350.00 2,4~0.g0
1 ea. 150.00 150.00
10 ea. 350.00 3,500.00
2 ea. 1,000.00 2,000.00
1 ea. 150.00 160.00
10 ea. g00.00 9,000.00
6 ea. 260.00 I
$106,360.00
6
COUNCn, M~IORANDUM
~inn of School Bom'da (TASB) and OO-s~, ~1 by th~ Texan
Municipal Lea[ue (TML) sad the T~as Amociation of (~mtias ('rAc').
TLGPC acts as an ~ agmcy awarding em:,lmive coo/nntiv~
FUndi~: Park Ma:..~* -~ f~10,868.52
550020-1020-12910
Cn~tal Ch~iay No. 16
CITY OF CORPU~ CHRJ~TI
TABULATION
TLGPC conlmcl # 225-05
RIOING MOW~
BUYER: MARIA GARZA
VE]~E}OR
1 72" nd¥~ rn, o~r 4 $10,217.13 ~40.~6B.52
7
Consultant & Professional Services Contract
(Contract between Grantee and Third Party)
GRANT NUMBER: JB-04-J20-160~O-0~ GRANTEE:
GRANI' PERIOD: 08/01/200~0~/31/2006 ITFI,E:
PROGRAM FUND: JB-Juveaile Accountability Block Gr~nt
Corpu~ C~,rbti Chamber
of Commerce lrO~lldltioo
Compr,-aensive Stretch, -
POSITION TITI,E: N/A (Professional Contract!
SRRVICE PROVIDER: City of Corpus Chrbti
Tins contract is by =nd betw~ Corpus Chris'ti Chamber of Commerce Foundation, Corpus
Ctu~ti, Tr, xas, GRANTI~.F, AGENCY and the City of Corpus Christi, SKRVICE
PROVIDER and in aid of CJ-D Grant No. JB-04--J20-16050-05. It is undorstood by all
of State or Foderal funds appropriated or allocated for the payment of such obli~m~iom. Th~
term of this contract shall cornmence on August I, 2005, and shall end on May 31, 2006,
unica- extended or lerminated as otherwise provided for in this contract.
The GRANTEE AGENCY is responsible for clos¢l~ monitoring the SERVICE
PROVIDER and the exercise of reasonable care to enforce all Ica,,,* az~d condiliom of thc
grant. SERVICE PROVIDER agrees to fully cooperate in the monitoring process.
Reqtfir~ments of the U/tiform (bant Management Standards (UOMS) promulgatod pm,,~at
to Socfion 783. of the Government ('ode are adopted by r~fer~nce aa part of thins contract,
including the contr~ provision aa in Section 36, Common Rule of OMB, of the abov~
s-tmldards. The GRANTEE AGENCY SHALl.: (Check one)
keep all project r~'ords, except those related Io thc service~ to b¢ provided by the
SER~qCE PROVIDER.
at, qst thc SERVICE PROVH}ER to establish a set of records that comply with
the requirements of thc grant and pcriodicall.v inspect such records to ensure that
they are properly kept.
Records shall be retained for at least THRgE (3) YEAR8
following thc closure of the most r~cent audit re:port and
until ~ny outganding lltigalaon, audit or claim baa beon
r~soix'ed. Records are subject to inspection by CID, or a~y
state ,)r federal agency authorized to inspect the samo.
The SERVICE PROVIDER v, qll furnish the following: (D~crib~ in dc-tail)
SERVICE PROVIDER agn:es to provide the lbllowing services in cotmcCd~ with ~.id
Page I q['2
I'rovidc informahon, coordinalion, and computer connectivity Irainin~/faefilitation to
partner agencies lo assist juvenile courls in holding juvenile offendca~ accountable.
' Payment for the above will not cxccL4 $9,955.
Billing for thc above will tlc provided in the same manner as il would be provided to
~nstil~tional purchasers in lhc absence of a grmfl and shall consisl of a brief a~at~mcat of the
· zervi,.c or olher ilem provided ami thc basis for the billing talc.
In thc event of a default of the SERVICE PROVIDER, the GRANTEE AGKNCY may
cancel or suspend thc contract and lite SERVICE PROVIDER shall be eutiflod to recover
t~ all ~n-vices provided or materials delivered prior to thc car~il~ d~te (or unused
mate~iala may be re~tm~l) or shall repay any funds advanced for aervie~ not y~ mnrh..~d.
All licenses, l~gal certifications, or inspecliot~ required for the ~'viem, fadliti~a,
equipment, or mate~als, and all applicable stale ~md federal iaw~ and local ontinatm~ must
be complied with by the SERVICE PROVIDER. Failure to comply with thin r~quir~nent
shall be treated aa a default.
'l~s ~ ontracl shall automatically terminate on the grant expiration date ox any ext~vion date
~h~'e~f granted by CJD or upon lermination of the underlying gnmt by CAD. All s~4ee~
billed h~'eunder must be rendered within the grant period.
If GRANTEE AGENCY fails to pay when due any of the payments required herein, the
SERVICE PROVIDER shall be ,mmediately and automatically releM~l of any obligafiom
under thia c~ntraet.
~vlviaWh~t~,.~.~ ......... J~allv Gavt~ Director. F./-, & Rtenntion
Corpu~ Ch~ti Cham~ of Comn'~n-e
Name ,,f Gra.t~e Agcno'
City of Coti~,, ~
Name of Ser~l~ Provqd~
(street or post o~tce l~x~
P,O. Box 9277
Address ($tr~t or po~t o~ bat)
Corl~ Chrialz. To.. 78401
State Z:?
Cor~n ~ T,,~-- 78469-9'177
State. Zip
361-881-18~
TelelOtone #, include area code)
361-~80-3461
Telephone It (Include ama code)
Page 2 of 2
Page lof2
APPROPRIAItN(I A $0,~ 81J~CONll~,.CT (IRANT FROM THE
CHAII~ OF COMMERCE FOUNDA~ IN THE NO. 1067 PARK
AND RECREAll(~ QRAN'r8 FUND FOR FUNDING DATA
COLLE~ AND ANALY~I8 ACTiVm~ AT THE JUVENILE
A£, roy,id Oclober 6, 2005
~4e D. Curtis
Chief, Administrative Law Section
F~ City .N~omey
H:~LEG-
Page 2 of 2
Rmpectfuly,
Wllern Kelly
John E. Mamz
8
~ The Health DAF'-b,~..'tt receivee funding from the ~BlY' b,,r..'d, of 8ladal ~
Servtca~ (~) f~ var'k:x.m ~ ~ ~ Aa n rem.dt of th~ .q:qxx't, fo# thmt
Program tmme(PI). P[,,,ern~ ~ .'lC St.te..~d ye~'-(Se~r.,,t.,,-'l -Augu.t 3'1)
F_xpendlh. a'~ ha~ irmluded ~ poalflorm in I.al:~ & N~ng, I~-J'~ ;-.,'y land
~' 20o5-20oe Irm~le..ul~i~ tub',or equ~..,r..d, cc. ,b __' ?,l ~ trak'mo..nd
(Dop..b,~.'d. Heed 8~)
are charged must be prorated to de~rmlne the p~c~-~ge of revenuN th~ w~re
{;~ ,enid using St~e,'Fedend fundB The State/Federal ~ revenum ~ deemed
Program Income (PI). PI e~rned dL~ing the ~t~te fl~c~l ymr (~._t~:,~- 1 - August 31)
depml]Tlerlt to m.q:Nx~ the Ii-dmltnJctu~ cd' the dlr- b~.'d.
The 8e0tmlly Tr -~i:,tiLL~ DIioI~ (STD) clinic imy 3,822 plUentm Im/fllcd ymir. Moltd
the program income g~"~it&:l Is umecl for rrNK:Iicml mupp#~, ~ lupp#em, equipmen&
[s ~de to drink ~cl fi~e from r~al ~ger~
LABORATORY AND N~ 8ERVICEB FOR THE ~ OF
~ 1, 2004, THROUQH AUGUBT 3t, 2008; AND DE-
CLARING AN E~5~GENCY.
BE IT ORDAIN:=n BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ CHRJSTI,
'I'EXA~, THAT:
, 200~.
APPROVED: Oclober 18, 2005
~ Chill'd, TmCBI
dm/of
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL:
Corpu~ Chr~tl, Texaa
ar~t Ch~ey
,~y~
Bill Ke~y
Rex A. Kinr~on
John E. Mamz
9
r, im'.~r-~ ~ t~ Sqneymn:lm mul. dNtmlan ~ ~ md Irmmll ~ miuilxm~ ~
ordinance.
,dlpOl::ld into lbo No. 4720 ~ ~ Fund In W ~ for
Page lof2
upo~ flr~ reading aa an emergency rnaa~um fft~ Ihe dayof ,200~.
l~r ,~L~'~Yi d Ocix)b~ 12, 2005
For C~y A. wney
Page 2 of 2
Rex A. K~r, nleon
John E. Mamz
10
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
[~ OciM3er 25, 2005
~JI~-IFGT: ~Id~IITARY SEWER ~UNK ~N ~~A~ P~E~
(~ No. 7~)
B~ ~ ~ ~ H~, T~m In ~ ~ ~ $1.~,~ ~ ~ ~n~
~ M~ R~ ~ B~ ~ I O~ ~.
~ F~r (4) ~ ~ ~n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~ ~
· ~(3) ln~O~B~l~lOm~m~
· ~(1)on~D~
FU~: Fu~s ~ fl~ ~ ~ ~ am ~ ~ ~ W~~ ~
m~ ~ ~
~M~N~N: ~m~ ~~ ~p~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
Ad(ll~xml 8umx)rt Ml~rl-I:
Exhl)it 'A" Bad(ground I.;u,'mabon
Exhi)lt "B" Bid TabulMIon
Exh~t"C" Project Budget
F_xh~lt *D' Location Map
AGENDA BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUFL,FGT:
~NITARY ~-WER TRUNK bLNN REHABILITATION PROJECT
Sanitary Sewer Manhole Replacement Old Brow~sv~e Road / Omaha Drive
(~jec~ ~. ?~5)
~RJOR COUNCIl ACTION:
1 Mmx;h 26. ~ - Motion auttxx~ng the City Manager, or his designee, to ex~ctrm
a Contract Fo~ Profasalonal Services with HDR Engineering, Inc. fora ~u~l fee not
to exceed $396,574 for the Sanitary Sewer Trunk Main Rehab~ltatlon as fo~3ws:
· West ~ Trunk Main Rehabiltatlon
· Stap~ Stn~ Trunk Main Rehablttatlon
· Omaha Street Trunk Une Rehabitation
· Antelope 24--Inch Trunk Main Rehal~ital]o~
an agreement for construction ~le englnem'~ labo,uk.,~'8 k'~tx3cUon and
rnaterlala testing service8 wflfl Trinity Engineering Tastir~ CorporeOon ~ a ~ fee
not to exceed $21,800 for the Sanitary Sewer Trunk Main Rehablltatlon. (Moflon
No. M2000-097)
execute Amendment No. 8 to the Contact For Professional Services w~th HDR
Englr~, Inc. In the amount of $182,436, for a total re-~ated ~ of ~70,~,
for rite Sanitary Sewer Trunk MaIn Rehat~ltatlon Project for manhole reldec~,,e,~
and cast iron p~e rehabar(aUon. (Moeon No. M2005-062)
Ma~b 29. 2005 - Ordinance apflrovlng the FY2004-2005 Caldtal Budg~ In the
amount of $178,074,800. (Ordlrmnce No. 026188)
PRIOR A1~INISl'RATlV~ Ac'rtoN:
1 May 16. 2000 - F_x~:uted Amendment No. 1 wl~ HEiR Engineering, Inc.. for the
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Main Rehabilitation In the amount of $14,412 for a total
restated fee of $410,988.
2. Auoust 7. 2001 - Executed Amendment No. 2 wfltt HDR Englm~erlng, Inc. for the
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Main Rehabilitation in the amount of $7,110 for a total
reu~l~ld fee of $418,096.
3. I:ebruarv 26.290~ - Exe<nJted Amendment No. 3 vdth HDR E. ngineedng, Inc. for the
Sanitary Sewer Trunk MaIn Rehablltatlon In the amount of $10,500 for a total
re~tated fee of $428,596.
4 l~l-r<;h 0. 2002 - Executed Amendment No. 4 ~ HDR Engineering, Inc. for the
Sanlta~/ Sewer Trunk MaIn Rehabilitation In the amount of $3,250 for a total
restated fee of $431,846.
PRIOR/tOMIi181'RATNF ACTION
5. Anrll 10. ~(X)3 - Executed Amendment No. 5 wtth HDR Engineering, Inc. for the
Sanitary Sewer TnJnk Main Rehabllr,-~ofl In lhe amount of $6,5(X) for a total
6. September 5. ~X)3 - ExeoJted Amendment No. 6 with HDR EI'~, Inc. for
ff~e Sanitary Sewer Trunk Main RehablHatlon In the arnc4Jnt of $24,g06 for a
re~ated fee of S483,252.
March 29.2(X)4 - ExeoJtad Amendment No. 7 with HDR Englnesrbg, Inc. for the
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Main Rehabilitation in the amount of $24,954 for a ~u;-;
8. Men;;h 21. 2005 - Executed ~ment No. 9 with HDR Englneerlng, Inc. for the
Sanltmy Sewer Trunk Main Rehabll;;-[;on in rite amount of $5,843 for a total
restated fee of $576,485.
9. June 9. 2005 - Executed Amendment No. 10 with HDR Engineering, Inc. for the
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Main Rehabilitation In fl~ amount of $6,800 for a tola]
restated fee of $883,285.
10 Seotember 16. 2005 - Executed a Te~g Agreement with Fugm Sou~ for the
Sanitary Sewer Madx)le Replacement O~ Brownsville Road I Omaha Drive In the
PROJPCT BACK~UND: The City's Westewater Department has expedenced a
n~mber of cave-In, blockages, and seltlemer~ on several sanlla~ sewer l~unk malna
throoghout the city over lhe years. The (x)ntmct with HDR Engineering Inc. (approved on
March 28, 2000) was first Initiated to address thoM) issues In a vadety of Iocatlo~ and
· West Point/Greenm:md Trunk Main RehabEtation (Project No. 7143)
· Staples Street Trunk Main RehebE4~lon (Project No. 7144)
· Omaha Street Trunk Une Rehabilitation (Project No. 7145)
· Antelope 244nch Trunk Main Rehaldlltatlon (Project No. 7175)
· Inffitratlon~rdlow Related Collection Sy=~rn Enhancement Program at South
Staples, Tlmbergate, Clmmaron, Sycanx]m (Project No. 7182)
· Moore Ptaza Une Sanitary Sewer Rehal~aatlon (Project No. 7251 )
· AlikK)n ~ TnJnk MMn Une 'A' (MH 4975-MH 10921) and Une 'B' (MH 10917-
MH 10916) (Project No. 7252)
· Greerrw~xx:l Trunk Main System (~ No. 7292)
· IH-37, SH 286 (Crosstown ~) and SH 358 (Padre Island Drive) Cleaning
and Televising (Project No. 7304)
PROJFCT DFSCRIPTION: The project conststs of a Base Bid and an ,N:ldltlve AJtemate.
Ba~e Bill - The Base Bid corn of the removal and replacement of fi'tree (3) sanltm7
sewer rnmholes and adjacent sanitary sewer gmvffy mains (app~u~,,ately 40 linear
feet In each direction) In ltm Old Brownsvlle Road / Omaha Drive area that me
connected to each manhole, cleaning and televised Inspection of app, u~,.deiy 3.285
linear fee~ of existing and propoeed sanitary gravity sewer mains, Including all
appurtenances and associated work In accordance w~ the plane, specJflcaticx~, and
co~-,imct doc~m.
.a~dltive AJtefTMite- The Additive AJte~= consists of the removal and replacement of
cxte (1) sanitary sewer manhole and adjacent sanitary sewer gravity mira on Bortner
Ddve, cieanlng and televised inspection of appro)dmately 140 Ilrmr feet of existing and
proposed sanilary gravity sewer maim, Including all appurtenances and associated
work in accordance ~ Itte plans, specifications, and conl]'act documents. This
mnhole Is located o~ Bonner Drtve between Flynn Parkway and Stone C-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-m~ Park.
BID IN~TION: The City received proposals from l~ree (3) bicldem o~ October 12,
2005. See F_xhYolt 'B' Bid Tabulation. The bids range as follows:
Base Bid from $903,730 To $1,173,494.50
Additive AJtemuk, No. 1 from $1g0,000 To $259,100
The Citys consultant, HDR Englneer/tg, and City staff recommend that rite comtnJctk~
contract be awarded In the total amount of $1,093,730 for the Base BM and
Ntemate No. 1.
calendar days for the Base Bid and Additive Alternate. Completlo~ Is anticipated by May
2006.
ifil
SANITARY 8EW'r.R MANHOLE REPLACEMENT
OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD
OMAHA DRIVE
(PROJECT NO. ~
PROJECT BUDGET
October 25. 2005
RJND~ AVAJLABLE:
Waltewater ClP .................................................................. $1,340,419.00
FUND8 REQUIRED:
C, ormm.,:tJon (Big Smt~ F_xcEn'ation) ................................................ $~ ,003,730.00
CordJngenctes (10%) ............................................................. 109,373.00
Consultant (HDR Engineering) .................................................. 106,641.00
Consultant (Fugm South, Inc.) ...................................................... 2,625.00
Engll'medng Reknl:NJmefTmnta ...................................................... 8,000.00
Coiwl]'uc0on II'mpection ~ .................................................... '18,050.00
Misc~laneous (Prlfltlng, ,N:lvertlsing, etc.) .................................... 2,000.00
Total ........................................................................ $1,34C),419.00
~ ~ B~Y
LOCATION MAP
PROJECT SITE
GOLF COUR~
VICINITY MAP
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE REPLACEMENT ~ ~co~s~ ~
OLD BROWNSVILLE RD/OMAHA DR PAGE: I of 2
COl?PUS CHRISTI
FJL 43
LOCA770NMAP
PRO, IECT
SITE VICINITY MAP
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE REPLACEMENT ~m~r ~C~"~s~ ~
OlD BROW~SV~I I F RD/O~AHA DR PAGE: 2 Of 2
11
(Proj(l(~ No. 2213)
dstsrio,, '-.4 nnd r~ rul~r nncl r~-'-"~' "=r~ TI~ ~ W~ ~ I~ ~
amy, P~. ,,~ R. F_.eccee', P.E.
F_xhl:dt"A" Background
Exhl:dt 'B' Bid T~;xdalkxt
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
· C, oacmmUnedCtmnn~Re~ .... : '~.,-,:F~m~(~~.~)
· Drainage Ctmnn~ F_xcav.~: Saratoga aouk~d Badge (Pmt~ No. ~04)
No. M2Oe6-(X~)
· Concretl ~ ~ I~ Van Gakln, Phale 1
· I~FI~'-~I~ ~.~:l.-:'~ltonRoad
$178,074J~00. ((:hd~ca No. 0E~188)
Ilmm ~ Iooal and 14 o~-~).
2. MI'Ch 13. ~ - Addendum No. 1 to lf~ ~ for Q._-~,: "ar- (RFQ) No.
~0~-01 (Avla~n, em~ Wa~r, Wa~m~a~r, (~ ~~ Prolem) to 4~
englnee~ flrml (28 k3oal and 14 oul-o~4ow~).
3. I~-'c~ 15. ~nc~ - ~um No. 2 !o the Fleque~ for Qualicatlom (RI:Q) No.
~o0~1 (Ada~n ~ Wa~, Wmewm~, Ga~ ~mpmvemem Pmlem) = 4~
4. ~q~l ~R ~wm'{- ~ No. 3 lo It~ Reque~ fo~ Qu~ (Ri=Q) I~
a'~Ir~e~ng ~ (28 local and 14 out-o~-Iow~).
5. U"~h sm. ~x~l~ -Addendurn No. 4 to Ihe Requeet for Quaiflc~lo~ (RFQ) No.
m'NainNfk~g I'd'nm (29 iocaJ and 14 out-of...t~).
6. ,Andl 11. ~ - L.etlm Of ~ No. 1 to the F~ lot Qualli:~Uorw (RFQ)
No. 200~-01 (AvMtion, Ghee4, Walm', W'* % :.;'-r, Gee Inq)roveffmnt Project) to 4~
Id'lgkl~edng ~ (~ ~ ~ 14~).
7. ,~'"11 17. ~X)3- Add~ ~. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ rl~ ~ I m h ~
for Qudll~alkma (FU:Q) No. 2002-01 (Avidon, 8tract, Waler, W.- ' .-. '-:,
Irnprovernent Projects) 1o 42 englrwerk~ flrme (28 IocaJ ara:114 out-~).
for Qudll~lana (RI:Q) No. 200201 (AvtmJkm, Street, WO~, W-
ImFxoverrxmt PtoJec~) lo 42 eoginemk~ ~ (29 IoceJ and 14
No. 2002-01 (Avlatk)n, 8trN~ Water, W.- ' :.~er, Gee Irnlxoven~nt ProJecka) Io 42
.ngV.od~ nmi (~ kx~ and 14 0~3~3w.).
~0. Fdx,,-w e. ~04 - LeUm 0~ r~nc.ak3n No. 3 to tho nequ~t
O:FQ) No. 200a-0~ (Storm W.~ Pmi.m) k) ~ .nglneed~ faro. (2e Ioca~ and 14
oul-o~ow~).
I:lequeot for Qu&..%,.dJ~-- (RI=Q) No. ~1 (81o~n Waklr Proklcl~) k3 42
· ~.mklg IVm. (2a local and 14~).
Ditch, Phale 1.
J~l~G~' J%,~-A(~I~. On Febnm~ 6, ~004. t.otter Of Nudnc "=n No, 3tot'm
Requmt for Quamlc,,Uma (RFQ) No. 2{302-01 (Skxm W~er Project,) wa. i..ued to 42
e~irmming flrme (29 local .m:l 14 out-oi'-4own), o~ whlch the ~ L.Ined Ctwmd
Flehabilt~llon and Bridge Fleh-r"b ":n ProJecl II Includld. On ~lA~,~t3~r 30, 2~004, ·
~ A/E A,Om~,~l.~ waa ~ ~ HDR Englrmering, Inc. In the a/nouN of
$24,m kx (kwek)plng plans and aped~ Io o3mpleke urg(a'diy ~ ~ !o
· Concr~e ~ Cttann~ ~ Vm Galen Pha~ 1
· Concrete Lined Ctmnnel ~: Cam~ We~t
· ~ Lined ~ nek-~: AkTxxt ~ 2
·
I
PlOl 2 og 3 I
corruomd mmv ~.k4G, ulld ~ I:dl:Ni nj'id ,,-I~--e ,,eni with
(XX'KX'I~ ~. I'la~-c,a, moflt of ~,(Tn Pil:NI8 Irx:iudel the k -' 'Ir'ch c~ 3 tYldC/~
mr~ gM:OpuA.~ Bicle worn ~ off Octoix~ 5, 2006 wflh Ilv~e (3) bidclem
aubmiffing p-.par'-. The ~ range fn3rn $91,500 to $125,399.71.
(:tmumatarx~.
· The total bid ~ DMB C, ofletmc:tk~ la $125,390.71, m (x3flq34md vdh the
cx:)rmb'tJctk)n eetime~ of $100,71g. The Jff¢~ncea in the bid ~ the eelirnate
13o ~ Io DM9 Ch)fitnJc:Uofl, I_1.~, In the amount og $12s,360.71.
I
Page 3 of 3 I
IL',;"r ...... - ~_ ql~ ' - '_ ~J
PIO~ 1c~ 1 J
GONC~ETE UNED GHANNEL REHABILITATION
GARROLL WEST DITGH
(Project No. 2213)
FUNDS AV~:
~ (D~m ~) ............................
Co,~~ (10%) ...................................................
~ h-~p~.-'~=n ~ .....................................
$170,167.71
$125,389.71
12,5~.00
22,522.00
2,280.00
8,646.00
791.00
$170,167.71
12
~,~q~ L~m (Proi~ No. 7~o~)
13nXKlWay Wa~r T~ ~ ~ ~
On:ler No. I to Jak:o, Inc. from Houaton, Texas In the amount ol' $367,720.76 for lhe
Area 36'148" W,.: ...d~.r Gravity Ini me.or Line.
F-oe~r Cmwell
Director ot Wa~tewalsr Sewtc~
/.
AQENDA BACKGROUND INFORblA'nON
~ Antdope Sheet and Sdt FletB Azea 36-1nch/4~nch Wutewater (3radty
InLe,~opbx Line (Projec~ No. 7302) - CHANQE ~ NO. 1
aroedwsy W-~t~.v:~er Treatmm'tt Pleu~ Dlvemk)fl Project
IrTNxOVOfTNN'dl and Broed~y Plant Lift Sl~]Jon
A~,~il~k,l:~ No. 3 to an ~ oewk:pel contract with (3ovkld & ).- - ~ :~ · B,
In~ lo the ~nount M $43,010 for In01rmldn0 lefldcol r~ioc' '-el with the Ahlxxl
In~ In the mTN~Unt Of ~IB~N)0 FOr e~0inledng IMvicoo ~-I ~ .... 1 with the AkTxxt
Gr_e.~/~cl PlenlfNuetxm FiNer ~ (Moilc~ N~ M2001-400)
)UTm(x:lment ~. 6 ~ u ~~ W~W ~ &)~l; ' 'Il,
Ir~ in the amount of $09,112 for m)gk)emtng eenAcM ~-I~ .... cl MIh the AkT)Mt
Amencirnent No. 11 to en ~ eefWm ~Mth (3ovind & ABBo~.I-~ :.
Ir~ in the emountof $639,621 forenOkN)Wlng een~ee---0~.' 'Jdwtth iheAJlTX)(1
6. I~cend~- 16. ~ - Motion ~ the Cflty MeneOer, oc hi~ dedonee, to
Tmme, for a tokai line rtot to e0a~od $39,044 fo~ a total reolalatd M o1' $1,376,811
II]0.111T'A" I
PIOIIM4
H"I' .- ' - ~. ., -- _ OIIINI I~IA~Ill- ' '1
profemiormi m ~ ~ i..~ F.q..'r~ndng I~. for a f[,e r.:X to mt:oed
Rim Ama 3~lnc~4~-Inc~ Wq,fl~,,,a~r Gt'a~y Imn:Ln,~c: I. Ir~. (MoUc~ No.
aoo -laO)
10.
Pllllof 4 I
'- -- '- -:, . O/IrNI fMllli- ' II
Treatment Plant he~l ~ The now 30-Inch h w~il = IH-37, ~ uW h ~
reduced.
in Juno 2006, an port of Chnflgo Ortk~ No. 10 to tho Hoill~ Nd-~N~e't ~ ~
I~ the ear~ eewer prolx)eed kx' reh~,Jnh,dlon wan (donned and ~,'ta;I to
k/de tho exieting pipe. The othe~ meth(xl Is co,.,,cx'dy mfeiTed Io as 'lCqpo-BuflUno'. lo
cormackx for the'rdpe-bur.ang" m
IO~t~l"l" 'A" I
FIIoI3 of 4
I~ .... ., _ IDI~NOL'I%~g~i: ' ' I
Il]O~rl'"A" I
Pl.14d4
' - ' .--, d .JIlIIIORII'N~. ~.*.~' - ' ~ I
ArJ~ SIr~ & 8d FI~B,4~e~ 38'/48' W.- I,,,-. ~.-43~ U- ~_.,3' rune-
P4blcl
Ch~r)l~e C~KkN' No. 1 (1C]~12~06') ..................................
Plge lo~ 1
'- -.. ' .,,~.~3~ _ nd--No-
LOCATION MAP
AN"IE i
CHRISTI
AVE
,' eme' er)l
VICINITY MAP
~TY ~ I~ ~0~ nor m ~
ANTELOPE STREET AND SALT FLA TS AREA
36-1~CH WASTEWA TER GRAVITY
INTERCEPTOR IJNE PROJECT
CITY OF CORPUS ~ TEX4S
PAGE: I 0t' I
13
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Rincon Bayou Dlvemlo~ (ProJect~ No. 8443)
Award of Conbact for Monltx~ng Servicee
Univm~ of Texaa Mark'm Sclencee IrmUtute, In an ammmt no~ to exceed $264,247 for
biological mo~ltodng ~ervicee aam3dated with the RJnccm Bayou D~emion Project 2005-
1~4JE: The Texas Ccmm'd~mion for Envlrm'~mental Que~ty (TCEQ) requlree biological
monllorlng to evaluating ltm effec~ of ttm Rlncon Bayc~ ~ ~ The~
In lhe project ar~l and nearby rrmr,Nllandl.
FUNDING: Funds for this conb'act is avaibd:ge in lyre Environmental Sb.~lee aciJvffies of
the Waker Department's FY2005--06 adopl~d Operating Budgef.
Exhi:~ A
~B'
~C:
Exhl~t D:.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Rlncgm Bayou Dlvemlo~ (Projects No. 8379 & 8416)
Award of Contract for Biological Mcmltorlng Sarvice~
PRIOfl COUNCIL ACTION: See Exhibit B.
The City haa worked ctosely wtl~ the Texaa ~ for ~rner~N Qua~ (TCEQ)
to clevelop a unified monitoring work program for the Rlncon Dlvendon Project. The
an a~nual aeaeaament.
inciucle~ requirmmmta to provtde fmehwetm' inflow to ltte Nuecee Eetuary that
dm~tnlsh the dependable water supply for the region. The City comph~d a two-
wasJew=~ effluents aa a means of e~hancing rite productivity of the Nuecee
system.
lienltca'ln,,; The biological and chemical eveluatlorm being conducted Mil
document the effects of h'm wa~ewat~ effluent and freshwater d~ to the
Rlncon Deita and Nueces Bay. The TCEQ requires that the effects of lYre discharge
of the Project be monitored for productMty by rneesudng changes In blmnass and
growth rates of plant and animal communities In the Project area end rmarby
wetlands.
CONSULTANT INFORMATION:
UTMSI baa conducted similar on-going blok)glcal and chemical monitoring In the Project
area for the City or oltter agertcies, such es the Corpus Christi Port Authority. Aa a result,
UTMSI is aJngularly qualfled to continue to provtde monitoring Rlncon Bayou Divendon
Project ~ ~ duration ofthe Prot~=t in accordance w~ the peramelem eetablbhed bythe
City and the TCEQ.
Plge lo~ 1
H ~A'r~ N.: :=_- _,~RY~r~WA ~
PRK~ ~L ~
1. ,Anril. 1991 and ,~ndl 1992. Approval of participation with Ihe Port Author/, Corpu~
Christi Board of Trade, and the Texas Wate~ Developrnent Board (Including perltal
funding) in the Nuecee Entuary Regional Wastewater Planning Study, Phaae I In
April, 1991 ($25,000 of $150,000) and Pha~e II In April, 1992 ($7g,000 of
$25~,000).
2. Jan,,~y. 1994. Approval of fl~e Capital ImprovementProgmmwhlchlnctudedan
Effkie~ Relum Flow~ Pilot ~ to evalual~ the ~ for meellng rite
requimme~t for water mlea=e~ li-~k~ the Bay Eskiarl~ using wal'mwa'mr diversion In
3. Mn~;h 1. 1994. Award ofaco, i~act ln the amo~nt of $117,50O to the Jo~ venture
of Urban Engineering and C-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-~4nd & ,n.,~ctatae for engineering a~,rvtcea ~
with the constnJctio~ of an Effluent Diversion Demorist~ Project (M94-051).
4. ~NX~nb~'26. 1995. Accet~nceofanea~mentfora28.10gacreeffiuent
dlverato~ al'm, ia 1.019 acre pil~lrm e-~c:,,c~ and a 25 foo~ wide tampomry
~ easement from Mr. O.S. Wyatt in cormectlon with the Effluent Divemlon
~ Project In rel~-n for l~"te cor~trucBo~ of a 2.5 Inch water pipeline
5. O<;k313er 15. 1~, Award of a contmct ln the arnount of $18,850 to the Conrad
Blucher Ir~titute and ~ Center ~ Cornel Studle~ at Texa~ A&M Unlwmity -
6. November19. 19g~. Awardofacorfli'actforcotmultlng~ervk~ewfltttt~Marlne
~ Irmtltute of lhe Unlvera~ of Texa~ at Austin for Biological Monitoring of the
Effect, of Waatewater Effluent Dtvemlorm o~ Primary and Secondary Praductlon In
the Rlncorl Delta am:l Nuecea Bay In the amourtt of $70,000 (Mg6-348).
7 AnrllS. 1998. Acc~nceofanAcc~aa~~at$15,000ftornMr. Jo~
S. ~ for access over 8 20-foot wtde road fo~ the purlx~ of ~ a~
ol3eratlng a dlapemal fac~t'y (M97-73).
8. Anrll6. 1998. Award ofcontract in the amount of $825,621 vv~ We~tOaka
Comtructom, Inc. for cormtruc~on of the Nil.on WWTP/Nuecea F_,tuary Effluent
9. November 24. 1996. Award of contmcln for comulting se~'tcee:
a. In tf~e amount of $52,500 vv~ the Ce,~ter for C, mm~l Studlee (CC, S) for
Eco~ogical/Bioi~lcal Monitoring of T~ Waate~,..,ter Dlvemlorm In the RJncon
Delta and Nuecee Bay (M98-398);
Page1 of 4
b. in the arno~Jnt of $90,500 v~th the Conrad BkJcher Irmfltute (CBI) for On-G~ng
S~ln~y Mon~k~g In bhe Rk'~on i and Nuecee Bay (M98-399); and
c. in fl~e amcxJnt of $84,500 v~th the Unhm~Nty of Texas Marine Sciences Effluent
Nuece~ Bay. Irmfitute (UTMSI) for Bk3k)gk=al Mon~:~tng of tfte Effec~ of
W~.~v..t~r (M98-400).
~0. ~a~nber~R. 1999. Award of Amendment No. 1 for cormuFdng ~ervtce,:
a. in the amount of $55,500 wtflh the Center for Coai~l Studk~ (CC8) for Ecok3gk3~1~ological Mo~odng of Treated Waa~vater Dhmmio~. In flhe
RJncon Delta and Nuecea Bay (M99-337);
b. in the amount of $85,784 wflh ~ Cor~rad ~ucher Inat~ute (CBI) for ~
c. in the amount of $g3,484 wflh the Unhmr~Jty of Texa~ Mmlne S~ncee Effluent
Dfver~orm o~ PHmary and Secondary Pmductk:~ In the Rlnco~t De~ and
Nuecea Bay. In~oJte (UTMSI) for Bk)k)gtcal Mo~odng of the Effec~ of
W~t ~.fa,,- (M99-339).
11.
October 10. ~.
a. Moron authoring the C~y Manager, or his deaigrme, to execu~ ~ No.
2 to the co. Eact for consu~ng ~ with the Cerf~r for Coe~ Studk~ k~ rite
amount of $53,672 for Ecolog~k~ M(mitodng of Treated Waatewater
I:)~er. lona in the Rlncon Delta and Nuece. Bay (M2000-3e0).
b. Motk~ authodz~g l~ C~ Manager, or h~ de~gnee, to exacule A4,~r~ d No.
2 to the contract for cormu~g ,ervtces wflh the Conrad Blucher InatY0Jte k~ the
c. Mot~n aulJ ~b~g the C~y Manager, or ht~ deeignee, to execute Amendmer~ No.
2 to tile corrbact for consulting aerv~cea w~ the Un fwralty of Tex~m Mark'te Sctencea
Irmtffute ~ the arrtount of $110,953 for Bk31ogk~ Mo~wtng of the Effecla of
Waatewater Effluent Dtveralorm o~ Pdrnary and Secondary Pmductk~n In the R~con
Derm a~ Nuecee Bay (M2000-362).
12
Motion eu~odz~g bhe C~y Manager, or h~ de~gnee, to execute a contzact for
consu~ng ~ervlcea wffh Akin PIt~nrner and Aaaoctal~m, Inc., of Au~n, Texa~,
Natural Reaource Cormewaflon Comrnt~Non d~ge permE related to the
Wastewater Effluent Dhmmk)rm in rite Rlnco~ De4ta and Nuecee Bay (M2000-~3).
~3. Merch 13.2001 -Motionautlx)fizi~flieC~yManag~',orh~deaignae, to execut~ an
engirmedng ~ervfl=~ cof,~,act ~ the amount of $40,000 wtth HDR Engineering for
cor~atmctk:~ of m p~3e~lne from the Catkin Reservoir to the Nuecea De~a for a prk~
14 Juh~ 17. 2001 - Motk)n autf~'~ng the C~y ldan~ger, or h~ cle~lgnee, to execute
Page 2 of 4
conatnx~ contnact In the amount o1' $74,300 with ~ Cormtmclk)n for the
RIr~:=n Divemion Project - Nueces Overl~3w Channel (M2001-273).
15
b )~. ;001 - MolJon authorizing ~ City Manager, or hi deelgnee, to
execute a cormulJng cor~e~ In the amount of $104,500 with AJan Plumm~
Aasocla'm., Inc., for Nuece~ Delta M(mltorlng Program, Program Coordination, and
Relxxt Integm~on Services (Rincon Bayou Dtveraiorm) (M2001-402).
16
November 13.2001 -
a. Motion aultx)riztng the City Manager, or hla deaignee, to execute Amendment No.
3 to the conbact fo~ cormulting m~:~e with the Center for Caeetai Studlea In the
amount of $71,170 for Ecological/Biological Monitoring of Treated Wa.k,/..d~-
DNemiorm In the Rlnc~ Detta ami Nuecae Bay (M2001-421).
b. Molk~ aulttodzlng the City Marmger, or hla deetgnee, to execu~ ~me~ No.
3 to the contract for cormulting aendcea with the Conrad Blucher Inetttute In the
amount of $87,470 fo~ On~ Salinity Monltodrtg In the Rlnco~ Delta and
Nuece. Bay (M200 -422).
d. Motion authortz~ the City Manager, or his deeignee, to execute Amendment No.
3 to the contract for cor~ultlng ~mY~ea wtlh the Unlv~ of Texaa Marine
Sctencea Irmlffute In the amount of $173,1~14 for Biological Monlloring of rite
Effects of Wz.,t../.atz.- Effluent DtvemionB on Prlmap/and ~ Pmductloe
In the Rlncon Delta and Nuece~ Bay (M2001-423).
17
June 25. 2002 - Motion authorizing t~e City Manager, or hl~ designee, to execute a
co,,l= act and to ratify services provided by the UnlveraJty of Texa~ Marine Sctencee
In~Ycul~, in .n .mount not to exceed $118,192 for biological monloring aen~ce~
· s eiated the Rincoe Bayou D vemlon Project (M2002-179).
18
November 19, 200~ - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or hla cleelgnee, to
execute Amendment No. 1 to · co,,[,.ct with the Univeralty of Texaa Marine
Sciences Institute, In an amount not to exceed $165,748 for biological rmmltoring
service, a~aoctated with the Rlncon Bayou Diveralon Project (M2002-398).
19. Seotember 30. 2003 -
a. Mo0o~ authorizing the City Manager, o~ hi~ deaignee, to execute · co. bact wtth tfte
Center for Coastal Studlee, Texas A&M Unlvemlty - Co~ua Christi not to e3~eed
$103,000 for Ammonia and Bk3k)gical M(mitorlng associated with Ihe Rlncoe Bayou
D mr on Project (M2003-352)
b. Mo6on authorizing the City Manager, or hi. dealgnee, to execute a contract vdlh the
Division of Neerahom Research, Texaa A&M Unlvef~ity- Corpua Chri.ti not to ex=eed
$104,550 for Salinity and Freahwa'mr Inflow Monitoring amaoclated wtlh the Rlnco~
Bayou Dlverak3e Project (M2003-353)
c. Motion authodzrng Itte City Manager, or hla dealgnee, to execute ,, contract w~h the
Nan Plumrner ~, Inc. of Auat~n, Texas notto exceed $139,710 foc
· Am~a'mnce with AJllaon Effluent Dtvemlo~ Demormtraflon Pr~ Studlea and
Retx)rm:
· Support of Rlncon Bayou Dlver. iorm Studiea;
Piige 3 of 4
H ATER'~ INCON~Yea,"~Y,~_. _-~ E,~, ~-_-_.
· Coordination of Studlee for the Effluent Diver·Joe Demonstration Project and rite
Rincon Bayou Dtveraioea Project; and
· Assistance with Nuece~ River Be·in FeaBIblflty Study (M2003-354).
2O
November 18. 2003 - Motion autflorizJ~ the City Manager, or hi· deMgnee, to
execute Amendment No. 2 to · contract with rite Unlveralty of Texaa Marine
Science~ InatYa.~, in an amount not to exceed $191,545 for biologlc~ moeltodng
aenn~ea aa·od·ted with fl'm Rincoe Bayou Diver·ion Project (M2003-415).
21
N<~,~rnber 9. 7004 -
a. Motion ·uthortzlng the C.,lty Manager, or hi· cle~gnee, to e:eect/m · co,iE.ct wflh
the Center for ~1Studlee, Texas A&M Unlvemlty - Corpt~ Chrlatl notto
exceed $111,000 for Amrnonla ·r~ Biological Moeltorktg ,mllz:~ b..d vtdth the
Rlnco~ I~/ou ~ Prc~ect 2004-2CX)5 (M2005-4~).
b. Motion autftodzing the City Manager, or hla deeignee, to executo a contract wflh
the ~ of Neamhom Rea·arch, Texas A&M Unlvemlty- ~B Chrlatl not
to exceed $104,550 for Salinity and Freshwater Inflow Mo~ltorktg aa·oct·ted
c Motion aubhorizing the City Manag~, or hb deaignee, to execute · contract wtlh
the UnlverNty of Texae Marine 8clencee Inatltute, in an amount no~ to e:a::eed
$228,296 for biological monltodng ~ervtce~ ~ vi(th ~ Rlncon Blyou
Divemlon Project 2004-2005 (M2004-408).
11,
exceed $114,875 for Ammo·la and Biok~ical Monltodrtg ~BBOC, IMh..d with the
Rlncon Bayou Diversion Project 2005-2C)0Q.
to exceed $112,550 for Salinity end Fmahwata~ Irfftow Monltodng aaaocta'md
wtth fl~e Rlncon Bayou Diversion Project 2005-2006.
P~le 4 of 4
H'~'~ATER'~R I~Y~~.~
CONTRACT 8U II4.RY
SOC~B. il,~ol'/,l= ~_..hBi~nmefldedtomad: · RESEARCH PLAN AND METHOO8
S,~J*~ll, Scq~o~Sm'vk~ P . g:,, h Di~nmtdedb3rid:
D. ORDER OF SERVICE8
Section III. Fee~ Auihodzed. I~ ~ner[ded to mad:
Ill. FF~cn ,~li~'~HO~ ~
the orlgin. I caY~'~ct ~ In !~ a-lX~mt $11~. 192;
il fll ~l'.a~,~lrl~l,~l.l No1 1 kl Ihe imo~ ~'$t~5.748;
m fl~ ftc' A,,dxxh,d,..4 No. 2 In Itm nnxtnNt ol' $191,M~;
i fll fro' Ad,~_nd~,~.4 No. 3 [~ the amount of 228,29~, and
H:~ [ t=t~t'~RJlqlCON~~ -~--
[ [hJ, cI
I:~ 1of I
IH 3~
~' PROJECT L OCA TIONI
~'.M. 624
RINCON BA YOU DIVERSION PROJECT
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR
MONITORING SERVICES
PAGE: I of I
14
DATE: October 25, 2005
SUBJECT: Cefe Valenzuela Landfill - Project 5186
IVlotfl~ authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to apt=rove an aid to construction In
~e ~ F. ValmaC,, -ndf~ S~ Dev~opment Project.
18SUE: The ex~ermk~ of electrical power to Cefe F. Valenzuela landfill requlre~ I~e ~
to pay the electrical utility the cost of Inea~ling Ihe additional electrical linee.
r, P.E.
D/~Rof Engineering Servicee Director of Solid
Attachmer~:
n. ,N:ldllJonal I,~u~,,adJon
b. NEC Letter
c. Preliminary Budget
d Site Map
BACK(~ROUND:.
Three pha~e electrical sen~ce doe~ not ext~t in the vicinity of Cefe ValenaJela Landfi.
This mqulre~ the extenelon of t~ree phaee ~fkDe to ~ ~no'flM. F_xt~n~Jon ~ ~
A reallgnrnent of uUWty ~e~'vice areaa reautted in Cefe Valertzuela being ~rred to the
Nue~ea Electric Coope~'attve (NEC) ~ area. Thle la a~/~ntl~eo~ fort)he CRy In that
NEC has three phatm electrical .ervtce ckmer to the landfill than AEP.
The co~ of the ~ will be adJLm'md upon completion to ~ ~ ~ ~ of the
intl-llatlon. Thl~ will re~Jl~ In a reftmd or an additional charge. The NEC
stated ~at on thi~ size job he would expect the final bill to be wllhln $10,000.00 oi' the
estimate, ff any addRional cui~mem connect to the line in the next five yearn a portion of
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The most recent actions to Inil~be actual cons~ of Cefe Valenzuela landfill have
been:
July 15. 9003 - Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or hb deeignee, to axe<adc a
Local Pro~ Advanced Funding Agreement for Voluntary Tran~ Improvenm~
Pro,ct wttfl the Texas Det3mtrnent o~ Transportation (TxDOT) govemklg rite cor~tmclk)n
of a prolx)~ drainage culvert on FM 70 to serve ltm futura development of Cafe
Valenzuel, landfill In the amount of:
~ 21. 2004 - Motion autt.:)rizt~ the City Manager, or ht~ clemlgnee, to mmcute
Amer~ment No. 10 for engineering aervlcee wlb~ Shirred, Moeeley & ~, Inc. Inthe
amount of $222,000 for flqe flnal~l~ion of plane for Cefe F. Valenzuela Landffil.
Jm-tuarv 25. 2005 - Motio~ authorizing the City Manager, or hie deeignee, to Incmmm the
escrow funding with Itm Texa~ Department of Transportation (TxDOT) In the amount of
$157,482.45 for the construction of a proposed drainage culvert on FM 70 to ae~ve Cef~
Valertzuela Landfill.
March 29. 2005 - Approval of the FY2004 Capital BudgeL Ordinance No. 022188.
August 30. 20O5 -
a Mc~lon au'd'mr~ng tim City Manager, or ht~ demignee, to execute a construcUon
co~,b act In the arno~nt of $14,875,294.00 ~ Longhorn F_3ecavation, Inc., of Rlchnx)mi,
Texas for the Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Site Devek3txrmnt ProJect (M2005--308).
b. Mo6on a~ng the City Manager, o~ hi~ de~gnee, to execute a ~ ir~,
of Corpus Christi, Texas for t~e Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Site Devalel~,cnt Project
(M2005-309).
Page lof2
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION:
Award of contracts for Cefe Valenzuela Lar~HI Including:
· Award Enginemfltg Co~M]'uctk:m Pha~ Service (in rmgoflatlon);
· Award of ,,ny ~ry change ordem;
· Design and co~J]'uclion of futura dbi:K~sal cells.
PROJECT DF..~CRJ~TI~:
The project will conatruct apf~ox~ 3.96 mlle~ of new electrical aervtce lines. The
line vHI run east 1.1 mlle~ the~ turn aouth for an additional 1.7 mlle~. NEC w~l
con~a'uct an additional 1.16 mlle~ to four aervtce areaa within lhe
FUNDING: Funding Is available ;,urn the S~nltmy Landffi12004 ClP Fund.
H~~V~lmm, ,~.~lea AW~IBKG.EXA.~,~,
Page 2 of 2
Geal~e FrM:k )'
~ T~IZLW ti'
D~v~d RIfle
M ~lr ~"t
O~-~uber 12, 2005
city o~ co,z,u, ~
P.O. Box9277
Oral.ad & Undra ~.,~ad
T~I!
Plge 1ofl
C)cto~ 2~, 20Cm
FUNI~ AVAJ! ~
Pubic Health and Safety 2004 ClP Funds ........................
Pubic I.-kmlfl't and Safety 2005 CIP Fundm .....................
To~ .....................................................................
$ 2,000,000.00
$14.FrO-q. O00.O0
$16,625,000.00
Project Corlfl~ (5,7%) .........................................
Electrical 8ervk:e ~ ...................................
QA/QC Testing Co. huct. .............................................
Engineering Deeign/Permit (prevlol. mJy corltmctmd) .....
Survey (in NE corltmct) .............................................
Englneerlng Project Uailort .........................................
Incidei~al Expermem (P~, Adverthdng, elc.) .........
Va~
$14,875,294.00
$ 106,540.00
$ 283,C)59.50
$ -0-
$ TBN
$ -0-
$ oo,O00.O0
$ ~8.000.00
$16,249,~2~.ff0
$ 375,376.50
PROJECT # 5186
F~ 18
CEFE F. VALENZI. tB.A
I~UNICIPAL I. ANDFB.L
LOCATION MAP
CEFE F. VALENZUELA LANDFILL
SITE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
15
and Shouldem, PJrl~d Drainage ImlXoveme~ - Pha~e 4, and Rur~ 13/31 UghUng ~
Cil~e Rsrf- :B~,~ at Corp4JB Chrll~l Ir~:,,~U~.--' ~
b. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~, ~ ~ · C~ ~. 6In
T~,~ ~ ~n-' 18~0 ~r~ ~ ~, ~~~~
Im~-~ - ~ 4, ~ ~ 1~1 ~ ~ ~ R~a;_,,~ / ~
I8~UE: Relocation of the Loclllzer ~ Army and Idditlcmd grouting rriult be ~
prior to re-opening Runway 13/31. The oflly way to =3replete If~ m3rk and re-open the rtrtway
FUNDING: F~mdlng ia avakbie from Nqxxl Cap~ Improwm~ FLmdl and FAA ~l~l.
RECOMMENDATION: ,a~ of the mc~orla as i:x'ee(N'tted.
Exhi~ B. Change Ordem
F_xhl~ C. Lcx:lUon Mae
BACKGROUND INFORMA'nON
ADDITIONN. INFORMATION:
The C~y awarded a co~ k)r fl3e Rehid:)Hlbl'ce Runway 13/31, Phaae #, Runway 17/35
Shou~em and B~ Pad~, and A~po~ Drabage Imp~ Phase N Pro, c[ The
award waa based o~ rec~ of an FAA granL The pm~c~ created ~e necea~y ~
rxz)ject ~. The coat (~ ~e idd~or~ grouting ~ b~ed tm ffm un~ prk:e for gmu~g ~
u.m c~:xnp~y Ucl conb'~ct
I irwfl~ (PGAL), Inc. of Dall~, Texa~ In an amount not to exceed $1,375,025 for
mu~4e Nrpo~ Improvement ~ Indud~g Runway 13/31 ~,
Ovar~, B~ Pads, Shouk~m and Edge Ugh~g 0Wo~ct No. 10~2); Nr~d
DraYage b~provemea~ Ph. 3 (Pro~c~ No. 1093); Runway 13 ~
Re~x:aflon (Pro~c~ No. 1094); and t~e CClA Mamr F~n Update ~12004-224).
Auuu~ 31. 2004 - Mot~n authoring ~e C~y Manager, o~ hb de~gnee, ~ ~ a
geotechnk~l ~ co,,~ w~h P~al Serdcea InduaMee, Inc. ~SI) of
Corpus Chr~fl, Texas In an arnount no~ ~3 exceed $39,690.00 for fl3e Corp~
Chr~ Intema~onal Nrpo~ Runway 13/31 Reha~l~k)n, Overly, B~ Pads,
Shout, Edge L~hflng and Aaeoc~ed SEe Work ~34-338).
Anr~ 19. ~005 -
a Resolu~on au~or~ng ffm CEy Manager, or desigrme, to m:cept Feder~ i
Admint~e'ation Grant Numl:~r 3-48-0051-37-2~ In an amount not to
$7,788,088, for fl3e Runway 13/31 Reha~l~on, B~I~ Pads and 8houk~m,
Drainage Impmvemea~ - Phase 4, and Runway 13/31 Ughflng and Cab~
Replam at Corpus Chdstl International Airpod (Res. No. _026'~0).
o. Ordinance Appropr~d~g $5,088,088 from ffm Federal Aviation Admln~u~o~ Grar~
Number 3-48-0051-37-2005 in ~e No. 3020 AJrpo~ Cap,al Improverner~ Fund for
~e Runway 13/31 RehabllEaflon, B~ Pads and Shou~em, Nrfle~ D~nage
Improvemen~ - Pha~e 4, and Runway 13/31 Ughflng and Cab~
Corpu~ Chr~fl Imrnefloflal/~rpor~ Ameadlng FY 04-05 Cap~l Budg~ Adored by
Ordinance No 026188 b3 Increaae Appropr~ona by $5,088,088; and D~c~dng an
Erne~gency (Ord. No. 026221).
c. Ordh~ance Appropr~fing $498,575 in ~e Nrpoff Cap~ Reeerve Fund 4811;
Page lof2
Tran~erring end ~ $49,8,575 Into the Axport ~ Improvement
Program Fund - Ca.I:~al Reserve Fund 3020m for the Runway 13J'31 Re,~ai:,4K' "k:n,
Blamt Pad~ ,,nd Sho-ldm'm, AJrfleld DrmJr~ Improvernantm - Phmme 4, And Runway
by Ordinance No. 026188 to increase Approprl~orm by $498,575; and Declaring an
Emergency (Ord. No. 026222).
d. Mo6on au'~oriztng the City Manager, o~ his de~gnee, to execute a cormtruc~n
co,,[~=t in the amount of $8,963,579.50 with Berry Contractom L.P, dba Bay, Ltd. of
Corpus ChriS, Texa~, for the Runway 13/31 Rehablll'mUon, Bla~ Pads
Sho~ldem, Airfield Drainage Impmvemer~ - Phaae 4, and RLmway 13/31 Ughting
and Cable Ra~a~ment~ at Corpus Christi Ir~matlonal Airport (M2005-113).
CHANGE ORDERS:
Change Order No. 5 - Runway 13/31 Locelizer RelocaUo~ con~at~ of removing and
diacarding an ext~dng Locallzer Antenna Army and replacing It with a new Gowrnment-
Fumlahed--C~Y~actor-lr~talled Locallzer Antenna A,~af comple~ vHth a new
foundation, waJkway, driveway and related Locallzer Antenna Array cabang, wiring end
related appurl~nance~. Work aJ~o incaxlea relocating Pow~ circulta & ~ wirk~
~vtng the Medium Approach Llgl'ff~g Syatom (MALS) & Runway A~gnment Indicating
Ught~ (RAIL) Sy~em. /U~ Work ~ndud~ a~ labor, material, equipment, perm~rmi.
adJusl~nan'm, and final cleanup In accordance with the plane am:l a~..~.~J~k,~tlorm. The
Corpus Christi I¢,k~rnaUonal Airport Runway 13 LocMizer Relocalton Project (City
Pr~ ~1~1094) was a f~and-alone p~ cle~gned under a ~epara~ achedule to
accorrm'K~lm compliance with the Federal Aviation AdmlnMtmtlon (FAA) Memorandum
of AgreeiTmrtt and U~e local & regional review pf~xx)Bmee. Proceeding wflh a ch~
runway
Change Order No. 6 - Addition of 18,670 linear feet of crack routing, cteaning and
seating. Orlgtnal bid quantity provided for 5000 LF of grouting. The change order
results in a mvt~ed tut. l of 23,670 linear fe~ of grouting. It wm~ not IX~aEde to know
exiating runway pavement In prepmatlon for the ovmtay. The orlglnal contza~ Inctuded
5000 linear feet in the bid doc~Jmerds which secured a unit price 0~ which to base the
additional gro4Jting, routing and aeallng.
FUNDING: Funding is mmilable from the FAA Grants ~ AJrport CIP Funds.
BOARD/COMMI'I'I'EE REVIEW: The AJrport Board h~m r~w~wed b"m ctmnge ordem
and recommen~ approval.
Page 2 o1'2
H'~ ,.V. ¢ ~"~. ,",¥1kY~O~ ' ~ 'J~'' '~F'~A. ~,C
DEPAR'rMa~rr o~ E#emF..E~Ne 8ERVtCEa
OCTOBER 13, 2005
PROJECT:
CCIA Runway 13/31 Rehabir;;..~3f~, Oveday, Blest Pacl~ & StxxJIdem, Drainage ~ 3
Impro~men'm & Runway 13/31 Ughtlng Improvemer~
Project No. 1080,1092, & 1093
APPROVED: April 19, 2005
MoUon 2005-113
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT ......................
25% Limit Amount .........................................
4,029,931.50
1 ,OO7,482.87
Change Order No. 1 (07111/05) .....................
Change Order No. 2 (06/03/05) ....................
Change On,er No. 3 (0a/2~) ....................
Change Order No. 4 (08/28/05) ....................
Change Order No. 5 (10/10/05) ....................
Change Order No. e (10/10/05) ....................
4,050.1)0
0.00
0.00
(~24,400.00)
$188,538.00
$56,010.00
$2.2,196.00 = 00.6% < 26%
City o£ _~__~pus ~fmti, Tests
'Hg~4Gf OPDE~ NO: --5 PROJECT Nc:: 1_~9__2L.:0___9.3, 1094, 10B0 __CONTRACT TIME:
~.ras .z:: Dvpartment: Corpus Christi international Airart DATE: 10/10/05
200 CD
~ 13 L~KEH ~FJ~O~%.TX(~ consist ,ng of removing & discarding
tn .)xJ:,t~n~ Localizer ;tntenna Array and replacing at with a new
,;ov,~rT~ner:' - f'urnJ shed-Contractor-Insl al leo Localizer Antenna
Array .'emF. lete with a new fou~:dation, walkway, c[riveway & related
~o.:mlJ'{e: A~.tenLa Array cabling, wiring and related appurtenances.
Work a.sc i~cludes relocating Power circuits & control wiring serving
the Medium A~proach L~ghting System (MALS) & Runway A/ign~ent
[ndicating Lights (RAIL) System. All Work includes all labor,
mater~al, equipment, personnel, adjustments, and final cleanup in
acc:)r(/ancs with the plans and specifications. ~ ~,~
P~ ~ Lu~ ~m. ~
~1e6,536.00
Why was this change necessary? (If left off the plans and specifications, explaJ_n why)
The Corpus Christi International Airport Runway 1~ Localizsr Relocation Project (City Project
%1094) was ~ stand-alone project designed under a separate schedule to acc(~m~- date
~__o~plJanr~.with the Federal Aviation Ad~/nistratton IFAA) Memorandum of A~re~ent and the
:oca] ; r~ona] review processes.
game ~ : ! 'c e.:'t' Runway 13/31 Rehabilltatzon, O~erlay, Blast Pads & Shoulders, Airfield
9f~%gage Improv_e~ents ~Phase 3)
iontra:~ :: Bay LTD.
;{ow ca'~ ~m.lar changes be avoided ~l! the future? This change order was unavoidmblm since
P~o~:L ~lOq4 required ~e~arate local and regional FAA reviews.
~. ~ i~C~ ...................... $8,963,579.50
q. TOTAL ~ C~0)ER (in~. ourr~nt) ..... $ (33,814.00)
2. ~ ~ ~XCE ................. $8~929~765.50
.). ~S c~m~40~ ~ .................. ~_186~536.00
~. ~ ~ ~ (B/A) ............ (0.38)%
F. PI~EV'IOOB ADI~'L TI]~ AOT~O~X~ED ....... -0-
G. ~'L C~ T~ T~I~ (~ ~ -0-
H. TOT~LADi)ZTIOeI~L T~ ................. -0-
CITT OF COR~U~ c~/~TI, ~
.By:
By: ___
· ~-y E: gineer
Title:
F~ge 2 of 3
RA~JGE 9~ UE~ N.3:.6 PBOJECT NC: l_q9_~,_ .10__93.~ 1094~ .1080
CONTRACT TIME: 200 CD
· pa:at]r, ')r. pa:tnent: ('_or, us Christi International Airport DATE: 10/10/05
· .d~. 18, t . it.~az feet L:~ crack router, g, Jleaning
,nc: ~,:1. ,] ~r,glna! bid ~antity pr(,vi~ed for ',COO LF
'o~ a 'c' ;i )t 2~,670 a~. approved by CCIA staff. ~.56, 010. 00 ~
T~)TAL NET: $56,010.00
why was tki.~ change necessary? (If left off the plans and specifications, ez~lain why)
it was not possible to know the amount of crack routing and sealing that would be necessary
prior to milling the existing runway pavement in preparation for the overlay. Ne included
%000 linear feet in the bid documents in order to secure & unit price frem tbs contractor,
,.nowing..that sc~e routing an__d seali__n.g...may.be necessary.
~am,. ~. ~.rotect: Runway 13/31 Rehabilitation, Overlay, Blast Pads & Shoulders, Airfield
_D_ra__i_n_age Improvements (Phase 3), Runway 13/31 Lighting ~nd Cable Replacement
oi. ~sr't : :
4or ..~at~ .;m,lar .zhang~s be av.:.ideo Jn Lhe future? This change order was unavoidable since it
s :~oT ]~.;sstb~e to accurately estimate this item until the runway is milled.
A. ~ ~,ICE ........................ $8,963,579.50
~. TOTAL ~ ~ (~no. marr~l~t) ..... $ 22,196.00
· '. ~ C~U%CT ~ ................... $8,985,775.50
',. THIS ~ O~Z~R ..................... $ 56,010.00
0.240%
-0-
:ty ..............
'.~, ~ Enginee_'
Title:
~itai ~u~t
pi~e 3 o4'3
LOC4TIONM4P
SITE PI.4N
CiTY~TN~.
MULTIPLE ~T IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
K ; L I~_EI~ I~ilNWA Y f ?I~ alfOIILD~ AI~ ~LA~r PAi~ ~ROVE A~IOR1
~IPROt/~iT~AM~APRCWPAV~IBITRI~a~,~
EXHJ~rr ~CI
PAGE: I of I
16
CiTY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM:
An ordinance repealing G,d~uance No. 5347, ~lopted on Mny 6, 1959, and C,~d~tnce No. 5442,
adopted on July 29, 1959. nmcnding the rcstricfio~ r~la'dng to Block "A", Pm4tdale Shoppin~
18~JE:
Ordinances 5347 nmi 5442 restrict the tolal build.lc floor area pemfit0~___ in Pm'kdale Plaza. T'ne
restriction is untm:essa~ in that build ou~ of ~ ~ites arc rc-gulat~ by the z~ning
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTtON:
Approval of nh orditmnce mpenling Ordinance No. 5347 gnd C,~C~mnce No. 5442.
PREVKNJ8 COUNCIL ACTION:
! 959..Ordi~ace restrictive I~ild~le a'ea on Block 'A", Pm4tdnle Sboppin8 Center.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
currmtly zm~d "B-4' Gem:mi Busine~ it is the devoloper's inteut to mvimlizr the
Howev~, ~ uncovered i- the title ~w,h to the property show ~ to the ilile.
Specifically, the build~ble m~a r,.-quirem=~ set forth on the plat and by o~dimm~ ar~
re~rk~ve then current zoni~ rc~.l~ot~
tn ord=r tO ~cc.~'~.~_~dly r~develop the ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ this ~ the
re~trict~n'm placed in the 1959 orrli~m~.~ must be removed.
1'
': ',~RIZlII3 ~ r'll~J."Tllli THE CITY ~ TO
L"]ILF'~.,~I~-""J~5' OLrLI'~P~:R; IroR AND ffi IIE:}IALF CF 11'[ ClTY~
aA"j PAJ~DALE 9HOPPIN~ (~.NTERj A~ ~Lt"lOdN OF RECORO
IN VOLtM: ~9~, PA~E ~ Or 'nE. N~P ~¢ORO5 OF' I~r. CEa
COLI(TY; TEXAS; SO AS TO ITJt41T A BUlLOING NTr. A OF
2~LOOO ,5QUA~ FT. ET IN AOOITI~N lU IFe. L"jfU~ ~
IQUA~E FTrT, A~ ORIGINALLY Pl~TVIOCD ON SAI0 PLATI AAg
0CELARING AH DF, d~ENCY.
BE: I1' 0aO~INF. Z) BY TI( CIT~' ~ .~iL CF THE CITY OF CC~PUS
C~ISTI f TEXAS a
,elECTION 1. IT APPEARING TO THE CITT COUNCIL. TI~AT THE I~.iTRIC;TION
~ I# I:xISTrN¢r ~ {~L, OCK nAmj PARKDALE ~NOPPING (~r, ldl'ER,~ OF RECO~ IN VOL.,
19j P~4[ il~ or THE NAP RrCOROI OF' NU[C:[$ COUNTY~ TI:X'~I~Ir'~..KITRICTIN THe:
OUILDIN~ AKA ON laid BLOCK TO 2001CX~O SQUARE FEET VITH TM[ BALANCE Or
N~ED~D FOR TH~ IUILDI~I L~AT~O THER~z ~D THE Z~I~ AND
CMIIIION ~ THE CIT~ OF CoR~I CHRISTI HAYI~ REC~ENDED THi
or THC NEBTIICTI~ OH 8610 PL&T Io A8 TO PC~IT UP TO ~;~ iqUAR[ fEET
IN IUILDINO ARCAj iN &DDITIOH TO THC ~ I~A~ fEET ~T~RIZ[O BY
AUTH~IZCO ~O DIRECTED TO EXECUTE &NO DECIVER} FOR ANO ON BEHALF or
CITy; AN AMENDMENT TO BAlD REITRICTION; A COPY OF ~ICH II ATTACHED
~CTI~ 2. THE r,CT THAT IT Il TO THE INTEREBT ~ THE P~LIC
TO MAKE THC BEST UIE Or THE AREA DESIGNATED AS ~OCK HAP PA~DALC
~HOPPINQ CENTERj DY ~ENOING THC REITRICTIONB ON ~AID AREA CR[ATCI A
THC CHARTER ~L~ THAT NO oRDiNANCE oR REIOLUTION SH~L BE PASIEO FINALLY
ON THE DATE Or iTl INTRODUCTION AND THAT IUCH DRDINAN¢E ON R[I~LUTION
~MALL BE READ Al THREE ~EYERAL MEETIngS Or THE CITT C~KIL) ~O THE ~YOR
TH[ 8UIP[NIIO~ OIr lAID CHARTER RU/E AND THAT THll ORDINANCE IE PAllED
rlH&LLY OM THE DATE OF ITl INTRQOUCTION AND THAT THll ORDINANCE TAX[
Ell'ri'CT AND Ir IN FULL, rOI)er AND EFFECT FRU# AND AFTER ITl P~IIAOK. IT
APPRCh~D Aa TO ~ rOFId THIS
c,
~l'lf~ Ail ~ ,,. ,' '"
A ~. , (.'.'A~'.:. ~"JkiL'
~[CTlal I,, IT iI,Killll 11 TNt CITY CIMIL 'MT rNI[ ag-
itl IIIllW;~/lS41 d ~II~T H MI)IIIAMK M RKIM, IFTION IHALL BE II[AD AT
SLID CNAIFFI~ I~tr All) TI~T TIAIJ ~ml)J~&aCl DE PAINED rIWALLY ~N THr DATE OF
ITS INTI~II)~JCTION AND THAT 11418 ~)INAJIC[ TAY~ EFFECT AND IlK IN FULL FORCE
AND L~CCT rIlON AND ArT~q ITl PIGIAKi IT
Till ~ er ~ Nil ILIGi KlllilitCW LI Pddlllil ~ INl~VlPr, I IraN
M W lip PIIIINI ilKi Will tllJ
liilll I~1- _ _ ~ ' _ w~ I'
Fl I~PJlT ~ Ill t' MI IIIITIIIML J~lO00 W FIST ~1 · NIIIIATUIIK
~lr. Pl~ .... · TO S&Ii I~iTIICT,MIs · ~
IIINIITllll tlJ Illlliil K Jill I(W 11~~ VI.TI
REPEAl. BIG ORI)~IANCE NO. 5347, ADOPTED ON MAY e,
1g~8, AND ~ NO. 6442, ADOPTED ON JULY 29,
18~8, ~ THE s..,.f,l,.~l~18 RELATING TO BLOCK
°A' P~ 8HOPPII~ CENTER; AND I)ECLAR~IG AN
Nuec~ Coun(y, Te~s, on AprU 15, 1976, rernoW~ the ,,__l~lu0on~ ei~ddbhed
of City sffal~ ~ (2) suapends Ihe Charter rule Ihat requlr~ conalde,,dion of
and voting upon ordlnanc~ at two regular meadn~ .o that Ihla omlnance I~
TO ~ MEMBER~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL
~ C~rl~, T~
C:do~m~.~t-~-_:" ga~vj~mdak20O~ 1 ~347&..n442
17
CRY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORAN[XJM
~,g,,,c.~ o~he c='nrmm~ rndud~ busmn~, g~:~-_,.,,z~ and the germ~ populstkm. ,~r
FUNtNNG: Alqxxt Ol,~lk,g Fund 4810 F~d B~m~e
DImctor ~ ^MMion
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
~m~my fen ~k~ U~ bBcom~ ~, k~ w~ch ev~ ~ wi ~ ,~Fnr ,': ~i rmn~
worlh c~ ,,, k " ,il lnd en ~klJorlM $25,000 d~ng ~ ~ W ~ M ~. ~.~. Mmm~ wl
clol~r.
18
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Octol:~ 25, 2005
SUBJECT: Rincon Bayou Diversion Project - Pro)act No. 8416
AGENDA ITEM:
a. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction
contract with Ramos Industries, Inc. of Pasadena, Texas in the amount of
$7,223,581.00 for the Rincon Bayou Diversion Project Intake Pump Station, Div~rslon
Pipeline. and Discharge Structure Hondo Creek Bddge Repbu::ernent Project (Baae Bid
t~. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to mmcute a project
management/inspection conbuct with Anderson Group C~ Martag~ Inc.
of Corpus Christi. Texas in the amount of $65,490.00 for the Rtncon Bayou Diverskx~
Project I~iuke Pump Station. Diversion Pipeline, and D~ S1]'ucture Hondo Creek
Bddge Replacement Project
.. Motion authorizing the City Manager. or his designee, to execute a con~truclJon
materials engineering laboratory's inspection and materiais testing ~arvicee conbact
with Kleinfelder. Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $32,270.00 for the
Rincon Bayou Diversion Project Intake Pump Sta'don, Diversion Pipeline, and
Discharge Structure Hondo Creek Bridge Replacement Project.
FUNOINO: Funding is avaifl~ble from the Water CIP Fund (Commercial Paper Program).
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the mol~'m as rx'eaented.
Director of Engineering Servicea
,~fll~'lO~l INFORM6.TIg~
Exhibit A E~ckg~ Information
E:d~lblt B Bid Tabutatkm
Exhil~t C Contract Summaries
E~Ibit D Budge~
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
~'he protect consists of 10,200 linear feet of pipeline, a new pump station, a discharge
structure, and removal and replacement of a deteriorated 168 foot bridge on Hondo Cmc,v,.
i'he project is designed to enhance the environmental health and biological pn:x:luctivity of
the Rincon Delta. Nuecas and Corpus Chdsti Bays. The project Is required as part of the
revved reservoir operating plan approved by the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ) which reduced mandate, fy reservoir releases.
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1 J~rll.~u'v ~,0. 2001 - Motion authorizing Amendment No. 1 of the englneerlng contract
with HDR for the Re~ervoir Operating Plan for a fee not to exceed $130,000 to assist
City efforts on the PJncon Bayou Project (M2001-O46).
2 Jarluarv 30, ;~X)I- Motion to retain the services of the Kleberg Law Firm for land
acquisition services in connection with the Rincon Bayou Project atthe rate of $175 per
hour for principal att(xneys. $65 for paralegals, and $260 per day for landrnen plus
expeneee (estimated cost of $95,000 to $110,000) (M2001-047).
3 January 30, 2001-Motion to retain the services of attorney Tim Brown for legal services
in connection wtflq proceedings at the Texas Natural Re~ourcee Coneerveflon
Commission regarding the Rlncon Bayou Project and administrative agency,
~ntergovemmental and legislative matters affecting the City's water Intere~ at lfle ra~e
of $140 per hour plu~ expenses (ea&'~k,d coat of $40,000) (M2001-O48).
4 Marc, h 13,2001 -MotionauthorizingAmendrnent No. 2oftheengineering~w#h
HDR for the Reeervoir Operating Plan for a fee not to exceed $40,000 for design and
bid phase services for the Nueces River Overflow Channel of the Rincon Bayou Project
{M2001-046)
5 July 17. 2001 -Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his deelgnee, to execute a
construction contract in the amount of $74,300.00 wibL, Gallager Con~mJc~m of
Corpus Christi, Texas for the Rincon Bayou Diversion Project- Nueces River Overflow
Channel Site Improvements Project.
6 Auuu~t 21, 2001 - Motion authorizing Amendment No. 5 of the engineering contract
w;b% HDR for the Rincon Diversk~n Pipeline for a fee not to exceed $435,000 for design
and bid phase services for the Rincon Diversion Pipeline (M2001-320).
7 ~ 18. 2003 - Mo~lon authortzing the City Manager, or his dasignee, to e~a~cute
Ratification of Amendment No. 6 with HDR Engineering, Inc. for e total fee not to
exceed $181,0430 for the Raservo~r Oflerating Plan Update and Flood Release Model
Project (M2.003-418).
8 March 8, 2005 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, fo execute
Amendment No. 7 to the engineering services contract wi[h HDR Engineering, Inc. In
the amount of $292,840 for the Rincon Channel Pipeline Project. Motion authorizing
~he (;ity Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 7 to the engineering
Page1 of 3
serv,cea contract w~th HDR Engineering, hlc. ~n the amount of $292,840 for the Rirmon
Channe{ Pipeline Project.
March 29, 2005 - Ordinance adopting and appropriating the FY2005 Capital Budget
and Capital Improvement Guide - Ord #026188.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTIONS:
Additional Council actior~ may be required to address change orders that may arise.
BID INFORMATION: The project was bid as four alternate bids. Each base bid varied by
the type. of pipe and embedment method to allow the selection of the most cost effecth~e
ahernat~ve. The four b~dl~ w~re
Base Bid No 1 - steel pipe, class 100 PSI, wfth granular embedment;
· Base Bid No. 2 - steel pipe, class 100 PSI. ~ cement stabilized embedment;
Baas Bid No 3 - reinforced conc, m{e cyflnde~ pipe (RCCP), ~ 100 PSI with granular
embedment; and
BaseBIdNo 4-reinforcedconcretecylinderpipe(RCCP),ciassl0OPSIwtthcernent
stabilized embedment.
The contract provides for the pro~ect to be completed in 180 calendar days after the notice
~o proceed.
A total of six (6) proposals were received and opened on October 12, 2005, with proposals
ranging from $7,223,581.00 to $12,010,330.00 (see Exhibit B - Bid Tabulation). Each
bidder submitted bids for all four alternatives. Rarnos Indu~3'tes of Pasadena, Texas
submitted the Iow bid The third bidder (Laughlln-Thyesen) did not acknowledge one
addenda and the bid was deemed irregular. The determination that bid wa~ irregular was
made by the City Legal D~pafb~ent.
The engineer's estimate ranged from a Iow of $6,689,437 for base bid ~3 to a high of
$;7.697.437 for base bid ~2.
BID RECOI~IMENDATION: Ramos Industrie~ is an establl~'~:l company wflose pdnctpa~
and employees am experienced with projects of this nature. They have con'kok~ Nmiiar
pmje~.~ for the City and others. City ~aff and the City's consultant HEIR Engineering
recommend the award of Base Bid No. 3 be made Ramos Induatz'les for ~ total of
$;7.223,581.00.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT: HDR Engineering is the consulting engineer for
the project. Their con~. provides for project management and inspection In the amount
of $65,490.00. HDR was to act as project manager and inspector only If directed In writing
to undertake those tasks. The HDR employee that was to perform theee services had
military unit activated and currently serving in Iraq.
HDR Engineenng recommended lhat Andemon Group Con~m.K~on Management (AC-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.~)
perfo~'n the duties of project management and Inspection. AGCM has a #cemsed
IF. zhlblt 'A' I
Pege 2 of 3
professional engineer that oversaw the construction otthe Mary Rhodes Pipe#rte, ~ was
nstrumental in resolving issues associated with the pump stations, Emgineedng
concurred in th~s recommendation A copy of the contract summary is affached, See
IIAATERIALS INSPECTION AND LABORATORY TESTING CONTRACT: The
eml~wment of an materials inspection and laboratory testing firm Is r~ceseary to ensure
~hat compaction, embedrnent, backfill, base materials, and concrete meets spectflcatlons.
The contract fcc will be paid based on the actual tests, observations, and reports
performed. A copy of the contract summary is attached See Exhibit C.
Page 3 of 3
~ t ¥ 8 ......
.... i _' ...................
!~' ! ~ } I
. ~._ '-_ ......... ~ ~ ~ ~ ·
I I i. , Iii il
.l!,i. ,l~;tl;,,lll,,,lIl,Id,.,,l,,f ,,!!iii
i~ll,] '! ,il il I ! Ill I!
Ill .,. I. Ill- . I,i.
,,,,!I ]ll,,lll ],l, lh,,.,fi!Ib .i1., ],il,It il
,, ,.,r, -.-..- ,,,-,, .-.,-..-
~,.:. IIIj!ll~l]li J,,,: Iii ~ll?l~lllill: Ii~
CONTRACT SUMMARY
;Cll$1uacbon .~L,.~iValJO'i and P*o~ct IM~ru~3ement - Rm~n ~l~ Pm~, Pump ~, a~
H~o Cr~ ~ R~t
T~ C~su~ant ~ns~=n ~~ ~s ~ m~.
· ~d and ~t ~e CI~ E~mn~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ t~ ~,
C~ C~n~nt and o~ mn~res~ ~s.
· ~g and ~k ~r appr~l m~ls and ~su~ ~y p~ ~
~tr~ or r~ul~ ~ ~ ~ ~d~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
~n~or and e~re ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ o~ r~ ~ ~1 ~ ~~ ~
Crt¥ Er~gineer and the City's Dee~gn Engineer Consultant (the ¢onatmc~l~n contract
documents mil provKh~ for Itm contractor to pay I~e oo~t for m'ty apb'oval, matetia~ or ~
~ubm~l:els requinng m~e than two (2) reviews by the ~lt~nt). The Co~au~ml~m ~ o~
· provide ~nterpmtations and clarirmatlorm of tim ~ m~l If,~..d~ in ~ with
t~e C~ s Design E.~meer Consultant for the corfa'act~r and authorize rnirmo~ ~ which
do not affect the ccxYaactor's price ~ the durm~on of tim cx:m~ztmtkm oo~ffmct, mhd arm not
cofll~a~ to the general intemet of the Cib/under the oontrmct;
· r'~v~w and evaluate any change order ~la that may be neoea~ary dining the
of ~ work indudtng a recommendation to ac~ or reject.
· consult w~th the Crty Enginee~ and City's D~n Engineer Con~dta~ff and advl~e dur~g
· make necessary visits to the ~te(s) of the project, work in ---"~J"~r -Uon with the City Engineer
and City'a Deeign Engineer ~ll~nt and c~mlzmcl~ la obmer~ the genre'mi pragmem arid
c~nb"act documents and In accordance with ~ quantlt~m of ~ n..~m~l-tl t In ctm~lt
ccmfl'actor requests for payment Consultant site vlaYm wMI no~ car,~tJk~ or be a:)nftmed with
Con~ultant'a local engineering perm3nnel adll provk~ pmlodlc ~ ~ oki'lng
conmtru _ _eJ~m_ period:
· funcbcm aa mmident project manager and Insi3ector on mJte ai3proxJmmb~ N,~mb/(20) houm
per week for the duration of cormfl'uctlon; and
FOR ~ERVICE8 AU'FHORIZED
The City will pay t~ Co~mull~nt a ~ f~e r~ to exceed $~H5,490 for FXZ~ddln~ mi ~ mUlfmtZ%KI by
:he c~nl]'a<~. This fee v~ll be full and b3tj compemmMon for all mend~ pfl3vided m e~q~ Incurred.
-nade ~ upon a $105.(X) hourly rate for actual see4ce~ perlormed. The City ~ make prompt
· ~,ordl~y payers In reed3en~e to Cona4dll~nt's m~thly etmt~nts.
Tmblm 1 - ~ummary of Fro:
C)~3~rv~do n
..... ]_. -- .............. .: .....
AGREEAIENT
for
Co. traction Mata'bb Englnea'lng t. aborator~
In~pection and Mat~l=la Teetlng Servlcee
This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Chdsti, Text, a Texas
hon3e-rt~le municipal corporation. 'CITY", acting through its duly au'~3rized City Manager or
'lesignee ('City Engineer"), and Klelnfelder. a Texas corporation or partnership. 'LAB",
acting through its duly authorized represent~i~e who is
(Name~ ........ (Title), which agree as
follows-
1 DECLARATION8 'CITY" cleelree to engage 'LAB" to provide sewices
~n connection wtth Ci~s project, de~dbed as follows:
I~,~;~.,~:nt ~ No. 841tl) 'PROJECT'
2. 8CO!3~ OF WORK "LAB' shall provtde ~m~cee to the PROJECT In
accordance w~tl, the acoompanytng Scope of Serv~ and Fee Schedule attached as
"Ex, hlbit A" and the Tee'ns and Conditions to AGREEMENT attached aa "Exhibit B".
3 FEE The 'CITY" agreee to pay the "LAB" for aen~cas provtdecl ~
accordance with Exhibit "A". Scope of Services and Fee Schedule under this
AGREEMENT, · t~al fee not to exceed $,3~ 2/9.00 (tn flguras), ('ntlrtlt Two ~nl;I
4. CITY'8 DISCLOSAJRE OF HAZAR/)OU8 & TOXIC MATERJN.S ~
CONDITION8 AT THE PROJEGT SITE. 'CITY" warrants to 'LAB'.that to the beet of ~
m1~"~181 as defined by the ~ and regulations of the Federal govemmeat, the ~, and
city whlch exl~t at the PROJECT SITE are aa foaow~: ~ "CITY' a~xi'tewtedgee and
services described in this AGREEMENT.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
By: By:
Ronaid F. Maseey,
As~ant C~ Manager
Axrnando Chapa, City Secretary
APPROVE~ A~ TO FOR:M:
(Date) (SIGNATURE)
(oa )
(Date)
Com~ Christi. TX 78481~
361-864-4774 Fac 361-8544924
(Phor. ax No.;)
(Date)
~ KLEINFFLi) ER
St;fl, IF.( T:
Proposal for Matertn~ 'l'e~tlng Sera'ices
Rineon Bayoa l)iverMon eroj
No. 8416
Corpus ('krtstl, Texns
I)e,a~ Ms. Stower~:
In behalf of Klemfekler we arc ple.'t~ed to preset this proposal to the City of Coqn~ ChriS,
hu, e been pruviding gcol~hnical and mat~riuls cugiu~'ing and teetiu8 mrvioee for
pro.i~ts for over 60 veers in Texas. In addition, we lire the only labor~ory in Corpus Ctu'ilti
aecrediIed by the American A~a~iation of State Highway amd
(AASHTO}. Thrtmgh this accredilation, our clienls can know that we ~trive to l~ovide quality
~er,'icc.
Kleinfelder has 14 office locations in Te~a~ and 70 officen ~wide with over 2000
employees. Kleiufelder is committal to technical excellnme s~! cli~t ~ as 6mionatrat~
through their corpo~te goals. We trus~ yuu will fred ~at this proposal meets your de~r~ and
look forward to the opportunity lo serve you.
This proposal was developed bamed on the review of lime l:noje~t phu~ md
Klei.n. feld~' is commi_,_,,,d to pmvidi~ a level of service to it~ clie~a~, ~:nmnmmu'~te with tlmeir
m and uccC. If a poriion of this proposal do~s not meet ~ur needs, or if those ~ have
changed. K]einfeider will consider approp~ modifications, aubjeot to the mtmxlm~ of cate to
which we iid~m ~ F, wfcuionals. ' M~lif~?.slion~ such aa chang~ in
schod-Hn~ aud cout~ ici'ms may rc~{t hm ch~nses to the risks a~mmmod by
BACI((';ROUND INFORMATION
[he proposed project will involve the conslmction of nbout 10~200 LF of now 60-ine~ and 54-
inch pipeline with grmmlar embedment Also includ~l, are a ne~ Immp ~tafion, · discharSe
,aructu~ -and construction of n new 168- foot lon~ bridi~ on Hondo Cn~. l~h,g ~asmmlion,
,~ur proj,'ct managers cnn work closely with our mal~ritls stnffto help coondin~ om' mn~-s-ials
testing ~ervice~ with the contractor and design conmtlm~ mo flu, the dmi&u in/mt is mat.
[Exhn~ C~
P~,20,7 I
J ,r pi', '.'.-.S;,.lk,~ %LdlI'c,: I I1,~: ,~l, · I.:,~. 'dc I],.'ki :¥c]~alh J~:: dhd tcstilJg dunng conslrucl, ion bul
al..~ 'qt,:nd cOnSlrUelion rn"ogress mt~qJngs -,nd participah., in th~: n:solution of technical i~sues
I)'l.,; ;LIq', dLlliD~.' 'o]L,.Iru. Iltql
.~'01~ OF SERVIC~g DESCRIirFION
scope ol'~.n ices for ),our pmj~xt ~xil] include thc following:
( ¥,mlnwti,,n Text#t.~ ,f'Embethncnr Bac~til. &dt~w'ade and Bate Malerial
Kleinf'eid~ will prm4de a soil technician to implement an approla'iam field monitm'ing m3d
~estmgl~-ogrBm to check that materials arc properly placed m~l compacl~. This may include the
following as needed ~nd requested'
· Percent compaction ~nd soil moistme conte~rt requiremont8
· Testing frequency
Oblain sample(a) ofpr~x~xl m.fl..-ial for I~ evalualion;
Otnerve 8nd documem ~ placemem procedures;
Pea'fo,.,, appropriate field tes-ling to determine in-plac~ nmialm~den~ity conditions;
Document fi~! t~ loca~iona:
Reporl failin~ tm1 rmulta to the Proj~/Ma,.agm' and Contm~or's mpea4nt~d~t;:
Re-t~t areas of faillng moisture/density trot re~ulta Io document cmztp~ with project
Task2: Drilled Pier Foundation Observations
Althou~ mil bcn'inga pmvid~ a basis for fouodation deaign, each foundation ~~ ahoakl
be obaen'ed to confu'm adocluate foundation support and document the ~ Kleinf~ldm'
will pmx'ide a technician working undm' thc supervision of a C-e~ ~ ~
m'Wlenloal th~ servic.~ lisled below as r~uirod'
· Observe [md document foundation installation including l~arlug ~lmm
icle~flcalicm, pi= dismentr, total pi= ~ minforcemml, co.,,:.limlce with
installmion tol~.uces, and peaetnnion depth;
· Otmervc ~ clocumc~t reinforc:~nmt ~1 pl~.p'n,'~f;
6~
pr'. It~.. 4291 C',:~'l. nr. (I,~[i h ,.. ?Fd, .
Page 2 of 5
]Ex h~OtC-2
I:~ge 3 of 7 ]
· ( Ii'-', I~. .J. !"IL" ~ tv:"[ ;11:'.} .t,,~,':.P. tL'111 L. 'H. :", ':.' I,I,..t,, uHlCrll ii1
· I~.x.'ume~n! as-buih IbumlallOn co~dil~(,n
· ~;cut~-clm,c., c,,~izJ~cr.ol:i'~'ord ~:i pJ,,~,dc ,'u~:uIJiSZ,cJiduiiO'l~ for modifying
I'nun,latinn d~.'sibm shotlh! unslfitable ~uh~urfhcc conditions b~
· NOilly Proi,.'ct M:ut~,~,.', a,nt L'.,,rac!(,r re.,uardinr failing field and laboratory, loS1
r~.~tlhs
p._cv~w_ uroi~ ~,=cJfications and ru~ir~uenms ru~ardiug:
· t')~sign strength / id~ntificalion
· Testtng I~lucncy
· Placement requirc'm~nt~
Obscrvc and docum~n~ rcinl'orccm~nl sr,-el placemc'm;
Pm'form apim:q~s~,~ fiold
Observe and document ptlic~n(ml procedures;
I)octnnent field placemenl Iocalions;
Produce a~l tmnapml specified concrete tcsl cylinders for labomlory testing;
I abor~, cufinS and coa~.siv¢
Report re~flt~ of field mad I~oo~__,~y t~ d~m and plac~ne~ ~;
Notify Project Man.er ~nd ConU~ctor
! ~k 4' i'rujec~ Ma~gc~e. nt a~l Repo.
Kk'inrekler's Project Mam~gcr wiU provide gen~sl ove~ight, COOldination with field
approved by thc clic~l can bc iocluded in thc scope of wort: as an Additio~ Service. The
Project Manager will also be available to aaaiat with eagizeering consultation and resolution of
..,rohle~ns should lhey r~cc, r and as requ~c'd m~d approved by the client.
K]~u~{H~ ~d.]J aImo {:l~ovic~e ti:lo administrative aervicea m include project ~t~p, diapa~c~ and
mailin$ orr~po~ts. ~ file maintenanc._~, invoicing taxi collection~
rid '"'~., 'h :'. :1,1. , { 4.-74 ~,, ~-{.4~...I ~ax
Page 4 o~7
PR()JI- ("1
l i,e .fl'~vc-dc.,w~.hcd .~.'rvlce., x~ dl Iw ix'rG~rnlcd ,~o an h.url~ ;md unil nde
~,~i. ~ ~'tud c~l will d~ on ~e ~ o~wo~ ~ the couP's
,md polt~tiall} delays due {o wca~cr A ~e-hom mininmm c~c ~r Ifip will ~ly. ~r ~t~
.ir~ b~.d on a n,~mml 4~hotlr workweek An} costs incu~ by ov~ime, w~, or ~li~y
~i:uc will ~ cl~g~ at a rate of om- ~d one-half thc ~c pre~qd~ below, in ~iti~ to
,s~-nt,.d. A premium ~,f lift} I~'rccnl will ~. appli~ to I~orator, I~l~g ~ Off a l~l
%ds I~' lin* m~k~mmli,m or lime st'htMtfie should change, x~c will ~n~t ~u Io di~'uss
:ahusli~,g our lb; act',~nliaffl~
Invoic~ will be prepafol and ~hmilted on a monlhly basis. Pleasc note thzt invoices a~ due
ulmm rcc~ipl. The fees presented in this proposal arc based on prompt pwfmem for ~'vicez
pre~enled in our standm'd invoicing formsl. Additional chm'ges will be spplied fbi ~
in, oicing if backup documcmlalion is needed. These special services will be c, imrga:! on a time-
;ul, I expcn~ basis. Lab: I'~-~j ~.ill be charged ifpiyment is not rt~:-eived in accordanc~ with terms
,'ontained in the allached Professional Sc'rvice~ Agreement.
qI'IIEDULE AND UNIT FEES
Wc rcquewt that our dispalch office (361-8~~. ~.774) be contacted al lemst 24 hom~ in ~dvm~ce of
:mi, neck, sm-)' rcs-ts and t~aservations. Klcinfcldcr personnel wiU not direct, layout, or sut~
the construction opca'ations for thc project, nor will we alter o~ ~ tl~ l:m:Yj-'~-- ptms,
Sl~cifi~ or reports. In order for us to ~'compli~ our work scope~ we must rocoive one set
of the approved project pilLS and spocificafions prior to Iht stsrt of our services
AUTHORIZATION
You nmy m~horiz~ thi. work ~ by iuafing a City of Corp~ Chri~ conlmct.
LIMITATIONS
Con~ructioa testing and observation arc t~clmiques e~nployed to redm:e the ~ of p,~lemz
arising durin~ con~x~ction. Provision of the~ ~rvice~ by Kleinfokl~' is not imumm~, ~ do¢~
it cotustitu~ a wm~ty or gum'antee of =ny type. Byre with dilili~t comtru~ion tinting s~!
reta/n responm'bility ,"o~ the quality, of their work, for adhering to plans and spocific~ons, and for
~pairin~ defocts roffmxlle~ of whca they arc found. In thc abseax~ of continuon~ obscrvatiom
P~ 4 of 5
f,l:lit;4.4;'7.1 · .'l(.l:S54-4.q741ax
P 5 71
!'. }.h..,HL-kh.. l'cr-, mi~ dm;n3- :.il, ~.~rlhw,,k. ,~ ,,. :~,,I ,~l~l~ h~ cxpre~ ,in ~q~hlion rcg.',rding
iht. :~clequacy of site preptmtllon or overall Iill contposilinn or contpaclJon.
Ihlrl~lg thc' c¢..i, ilSC ,'I' thc ~'rlbrmance ,ff Kl¢]nfeldcr's ~'rvtc~..-.~ h~.urdous nmtcrials may be
d~scovered. Kleinfelder will assume no rcsptu~sibility or liability whatsoever l'or any claim, loss
of properly value, damage, tlr injuD' which results I'mm pre-exn, dng ha:nmlous materials being
mlcounlered or prescm on Ibc pn,jed silt', or from lh¢ discovery ,,Fsuch ba~zardou~ nmlerials.
Kl~inl~'ld~r ,al'IL'rs a range ol tc'Milm al,hi oh.~'r', al.. ,n sen ic,..~ ,,~ suit thc vm-yi. 'rig needs of our
'lsm~s AIIhout4s r, sk .'an ne,'cr bc clintilml~'d more detmled :md exlensive tesling and
obsenmtions yield more mlhrmatim:, winch n,a~ help understand and manage the degree o£fisk.
$in~: such de~ailed ~ tees invoh'e grealer expense, our clients pm'ticip~e in ciet~gmjnin$ the
level of sets'ice thru will provide adequate inl'ormutton fi~r Iheir purpos~'s ~1 an ~x::epl~ble level of
rk,~ Acceptane~ of this proposal will indicate, fl~,, the client h&s reviewed the ~ of service
and det~-,,uined thru it doe~ not need or w~nl more ~n-iccs than are be/rig proposal al this time.
Any exception.~ should be no, od and may result tn a change in fees.
Kleinfeld~' will p~form its services in a m~nner cor~i~,ent ~nth the ~ of c~re taxi ~idll
ordinarily exercised by members of the profession pr~ticing under simihlr eonditiorm in the
geogr~lfic vicinity and al the time Ihc ~'rviccs will be perforated. No w,,n,,nty or guarantee,
expt'e~ or impUud, is ~ovidocl ~ p~rt of the services offered by ~ propo~l. This propom]
neither rn~kes nor intends a warrantee or guarantee, express or in,plied, nor does it er~te a
fidu~i~'y, responsibility to Client by ConsulUmt.
iV,' simerely appn.'ci.',te ,he opportunity lo be ol ~.co.'tcc and Im'~k forward m working with you
on this project.
Sit~vr~ly,
KI~.F~ER
genior Geot~ghnical Engino~r
Fee Schedule
I"ec .~t'h cd u h.'
Rincon Bayou Dh'efllon Projt~
¢ iD' Project No. !]416
('orpu ('kri~ti, 'l'em
I,r, .:..
, M,,i~luru'.l~.'[~silx R.:lnli,,[:~,,l~ t.\~, I'M I) (,~N, M,,Js! I~msilv
tr'~ :~t.'Tt~.'~' I un[I., c.' .-MItN't~.~'y I [m[I.~
Malcrial Pasadn~ #2dO S~rve. ca Mint~ 200 ~,mly
Chloride. ¢onlenL ~.'~, t~lcrrides
Teclmici~ Time, IX"r ho~ Soil
$62.50
~28.00
Sf~.O0
's~.~
'r,-ip ch,.r~, ta vehicte C:h.ra~
~ntcmn. per
C,.mm'cle Trs't Cyl~tlers. ea t'onerel~Comp ......... Test '~- ......~
lid' H'~4 4'%1 '1111 1~.%4 4q'24 fa;
[UmNinlt C-~
Pi~ 7 of 7 [
Prumcl hc 8416
W~' (...~P Fund
PRELiMiNARY BUDGET
RINCON BAYOU PiPE.LiNE PROJECT
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXA8
Ock~er 25 2005
PRELIMINARY
8.389.781
Total
8,389,791
Construction C.o~bngm'~:ies (7 5%~
Lar~ and Land Rlght~
A.'E Design & Co~tstructx~n Phase (HDR)
P~ ~n~ (~M)
~n.
7,223,581
541,700
143,000
227,350
65,490
72.200
32,270
72,200
8,389,791
19
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATI~: Oc~ber 25, 2005
SUBJECT: .~-~uthsld~ W~ler Tran.~mi~sion Main Phn~,e 6
A~ENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing, the City Manager. or his designee, to execute
Ame(~lment No 4 to tile Contract for Profess~nal Services with Urban Englm~ng of
Corpus Chdati, Texas in rite amount of $1,411,580 for a total re-stated fee of $3,879,342
lot the Southslde Transmission Main Phase 6.
18SUE.' Additional wate~ ban~mlasion capacity is needed to serve proJecled grow~ ~n
Padre Island. Phase 6 of the Southaide Water Transmission Main will bring a 42' diameter
water lir~ from Whitley Road (terminus of Phase 5) across the Laguna Madm and along
Sea Pines Boulevard to an existing 8" waterline along Park Road 22 on fl'm eaet side. This
amendment will provide for the necessary design, bid, and constn.~n pha~e aervices to
,.'f}mpte~ this phase of the prolect.
FUNDt~(~: Funds for this project are available i~ the Wa~er CapIMI Improvement Program
Budget.
RFI~:~II~=NDAT1ON: Staff recommends approval of the rnof~n as presented.
P.E.,
Director of Water Services
Director of Enstneerlng Servic~
.e ~ m,~-,,,te1 Summer IMterhd;
E. xhB:~t 'A' Background Infon'nat~n
Exhibit 'B" Prior Co4Jncll Actk)n
Exhlt:)lt 'C" Conl]'act Summary
Exhib/t 'D' LocaUon Map
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Southside Water Transmission Main Phase G
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: See EXHIBIT 'B'
PRIOR ADMII~$TRATIVE ACTION:
1 l:ebr~mrv 20. 2002 - Distribution of Request Fo~ Quaiflcation~ (RFQ) No. 2002-
3
01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement PmJect~) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
~ 13. 2002 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Quellflcatlont (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, StreW, Water, Wastewak,r, Gas Impmvemeflt Projects) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
Mamh 15. 2002 - AddmxJum No. 2 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewa~r, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
March 26. 2002- Addendum No. 3 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Wa'mr, Wastewater, Gas Iml:.uvement I='m~K~) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-lown).
Mar;h 26, 2002 - Addendum No. 4 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement Pm~ecta) to 42
engtneedng ltl'rrm (28 local and 14 out-of-k:wm).
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of design amendment, construction contracts
and Mating agmeme, t. to cornl~e~e the project as required.
PROJECT BACKGROUND:
The Counc~ ~ f gg7 W~,r Dtaf:rfbu#on ~ Masi~ Ptan Upde~ ~
a new Souttmide Trmsmlm Main from the O.N. Stevens Wc=~r Treatment Plant
(ONSWTP) to a new pumping plant w~ asa:related large main Improvermm~ (Staples
presmJm problm'ns experienced during peak deffmnd periods r~ Premmre Zone 2, the area
essentially southeast of Everhart Road. Phase~ 1 ~rough 4 have been compiel~l,
providing a new Imge diameter transmission main from the ONSW-I'P to the 8~plee Street
;~umplng I:~ant south of town and (m to a co~nectlon of the bansmlmdon main to the
existing Hoily Road 36' b'ansmission main. Phase 5 will be completed by summm' 2006
and provides a new 42' dia. transmission main eastward along Yorld~w~ Bird from Rodd
;iek:l Road through Flour Bluff to the west edge of IJ'm Laguna Madre. The co~
tmnsmlaskm main has substantially Increased b"m hydraulic capedty of the delve~ syslm~
from the ONSWTP to southeast Corpus Christi.
Page lof7
PROJECT PHASES:
PI-IA~E 1: On June 115.1998, Council awan:led an engineeflng services con-,b-act to Ufl3an
E~glneering for the S~uthside Water Transmissk~l Main Project - Phase 1 from the ON
Stevens Water Treab'nent Plant to Clarkwond Road. C(xJnc# awarded a construction
oontract f~ this phase of the pro. ct to Pate & Pate Construction on December 12, 2000.
rhe co~atructl(m project for the Southeide Transmission Main Phase I from O.N. ~s
Water Treatment Plant to Clarkwond Road was completed and put li-~k~ service in May,
PHASE 2, 2a and 3: On Apd124. 2002, Counc;I awarded an erlgineedng co],bucl, to Urban
Engmc~,--rlng for the Southside Water Transmission Main Phases 2, 2a & 3 ;rum the
Intersection of Saratoga Boulevard and County Road 54 to the Staples Street Pun~ph3g
Plant, Including a connection to the existing 42" Holly Road main. O~ January 14, 2003, a
$15.844,698.58 for the Southslde Water Transmission Main, Phases 2, 2a & 3. Work has
been completed for th~,~ phase of the project
~ 4, 4a and 5: l'his project is being constructed In phases with Phaa~ 4 and 4a
oeing cortatructed under one contract and Phase 5 const~-ucted separately tn expadlte
completion of both conb'acts. A design contract was awarded Oecember 17, 2002 to
Urban Engineering in the amount of $1,824,742 for the SouthNde Wu~ Tmnsmlsston
Main Phases 4 4a. and 5. As part of that contract Council authorized the p~ and
design of a water line from the South Staples Slmat pump station to Flour Bluff, te,,,~'
at Whltley Road. A significant portiere of this line's capacity would go towards feeding a
new pipeline to Padre Island. On March 30, 2004, Cl{y Council awarded an arnendmant to
that co.i~uct for the Southside Tmnsmlsalon Main Phase 6 for permitting necessary to
cross the Leguna Ma(Ire wi[h a pipeline.
On July 13, 2004, a construction co,ii, act was awarded to LaughJin-Thysaen, Inc. of
t-toucan, Texas In the amount of $7.139,820 for the Southside Water Trar~nlesk3n Main
Phases 4 and 4a.
Currently there are 8 parcels remaining to be acquired for Phase 5. Upon compiat~
acquisition of the remaining parcels, Phase 5 will begin the bidding and award procees. It
Is anticipated that parcel acquisition will be cornl31ete by the end of the November 2005
and January 2006. Conduction Is scheduled to be comple~ by November 2007.
PI-I.al,SE 8: Padre Island currently ~ its water via a 24" pipeline Irtstalled In 1969.
Phaae 6 will be a continuation of Pha~e 5 from the end of Whlteley Drive and ecro~ the
Laguna Medm to west sale of Padre Island where the line wll extend from the Laguna
Madre eastward along Sea Pines Blvd. to a connection at the existing ~ at Park
Road 22. Additional work w~ll include pump upgrades to add two additional pumps to ~
South Staples Pumping Plant to increase flow and pressures.
Page 2 of 7
PHASE 7:
I h~ ex, ting siiK]le waker feed un Padre Island is a 24" ductile iron pipe over thirty years
ok:l The ne,x1 phase of the transmission main will tie the mainland phases of the Southatde
Water Transmission Main to Padre Island in order to upgrade and provide required TCEQ
~mn~mum pressures to the i~and. This phase will include Instal~tion of a 36' line along the
easl' aide o~ Park Road 22 and will terminate at the Padre lalend Pump Station near
oac. kery Channel Point Park.
PI-IASE 8:
With the lmprovement8 on Padre Island and new TCEQ regulations for elevated water
requirements, an elevated storage tank will be installed south of Sea Pinea Road. This
pheea will provide a 30' water main to aupp~ the elevatad tank and w#l be afl Irfl~gral part
of the Acqulf~' Storage Reeervolr (ASR) for the island.
ELEVATED STORAGE TANK:
To provide constant pressures on Padre Island and to meet required TCEQ regulations, an
elev~ storage tank is required. The elevatad tank will be approxlrnabdy 1,000,000
gallons in capecity and wil be designed to withstand 8dveme weather conditions. It w#l
also include cathodic pro~ecl~rm and coating to withad~nd deterioration.
PADRE 18LAND AQ4JIFER STORAGE REEERVOIR ~:
Aquifer Storage Reeawo~' (ASR) IS the storage of water in 8 suitable aquifer and recovee/
of the water fl~rough a ~ during times of need. ASR offem several advantages, which
unit vokJme of water stored. Imp~m'mntaflon of ASR wll ICN'ovtde the C, ity wtthe mtrategic
water ~L,rage system. The first Phase of ASR, a single ~ w#h a tm'get capacity of
approx]rnately 2.5 rngd, 18 curre, lly planned near Park Road 22, south of the meJortty of
futura development anticipated within the service area. AnUdpa~ed co~stmclion of this
project will take place In FY '07 - 08
AD[NTIONAL PROJECT BACKGROUND:
Padre Island 18 curre. Gy served potable water by a single 24" Pil:NMIne Installed acfl3as the
re,ability and ~ul~tantiait~ increase the water 8yatem hydraulic capacity to Pm laland
which wtl aid in the ma) demartd8 expected by devei0p~ oa the Islafxl.
Development 18 projectad to continue in pert due k3 the I=~ckery Channel project now being
cornple~. Phase 6 w~l be a continuation of Pheae 5 from the end of Whltaley Dftve and
across the Laguna Madre to west side of Padre Island where the line wtM extend ;'rum the
Laguna Madm eastward along Sea Pines Blvd. to a connec~ at the exisSng waterllrm at
Regulak:~ permitting for Phase 6 m previously authorized and a U.S./Vmy Coq)a of
Englneam permit Is expected in the near future. As a reault of ~ permitt[flg pmce88
ml'dgatk~ Is required due to minor impe~u on existing seagraaa in the area of the
proposed Phase 8 pipeline crossing. The recommended mrdgation plan Is to cormtruct tyro
Page 3 of 7
addilx)nal breakwaters at I. he ex~sting Shamrock Island project at a cost esUmata of
$500,000. A future h~rrkx~al a~lreernent with the Coaatai Bend Bays and EMuarles will be
: ,~(IL~irl~:~
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project consists of the installaUon of 42 inch
diameter waterline from the east end of Whiteley Dnve, across the I ~una Medre to Park
Ro~l 2'7 The proposed waterline wdl be co~nected to the e~d of the Phase 5 project o~
!he. wes~ side, cros~ the Laguna M~lre and extend along Sea Pines Boulevard to an
exisUng waterline along Park Road 22 on the east side. Due to regulatory requimrnents,
the location of the project and environmental sensitive issues additional effort Is required
for design of the project and to monitor' during conetruction. A b~ will visit the site to
,.~nflrm co~struction is within established comdors and that no natural resources are
~mpacted unnecessar#y Major project components are:
· 8.870 feet of 42-,nch diameter waterline installed by conventional trenching.
· 13.760 fee{ of 42-Inch diameter waterline installed by marine trenching.
· installing 4,050 feet of 42-inch diameter waterline by direc~ drfllfl~g under very
shallow portion between Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Padre Island shore.
· Addition of two pumping units to the South Staples Pumping plant.
Specific work on this contract will include:
BA~C SERVICES
pla=UMINARY PHASE
Meal w~fl~ Staff to identify project goals, Umetal~es, review pmpoeed route and
relevant Issues, for project implementation.
Develop an Inve~Lory of existing conditions, perform ttm required Investigations
to define specific areas of concern and review all available master plans.
Review and verify issues, indudlng hydraulics, provided in fl'm latest Water
Master Plan.
Develop and establish a temporary baseline of the selected route, IdenUfyfi~
easements.
Address design Issues es a result of the permltUng requirements.
Develop design requirements, Including design flow and prem~ures, for adding
two new pumpe at the Staples St. Purngirtg Plant. Review w~th ~sta~T pmsegt
pump station operation and devetop ~at of Improvements necessary to add
pumps. Discuss pump mamJfactum~s, pump types, pump arrangements.
elecb'ical co~trola, electrical panel manufacturer's, flow monlb:~ng and SC, ADA
w;[h staff to devek~ recommendations for engineering refx)rL
Page4 of 7
10
1I
Develop am:l evaluate liat of alternatives for pll)e materlal~, pipe Jo~nla and
corrosi,,)n protection I:or the I.aguna Madre crossing, discuss with City Staff and
provide recommendatio~ in engineering report.
Update preliminary estimate of probable cost based on re(x)mrnendatJon~ for
engir~c."ing report.
Prepare the er~gineering letter report for the final routing of Phase 6 identifying
issues, tentative design, material se~ec'don and other concerns.
Develop a Geotechnical Irwesflgatk)n Program lor preliminary design and submit
Io City for Tes~ng Laboral~ selecl~on.
Meet w~h City Staff 1o review preliminary issues, engineering lette~ report, right-
of-way issues and detalia as needed,
F'mall~,e report and obtain approval to IXoceed to easement acquisition and
design of Phase 6.
Attend bi-weekly meetings to update staff on project s;-~.
DESIGN ,N~ID CONSTRUCTION PHAS~
Meet witi, City Staff to review preliminary issues, engineering letter repo~ right-
of-way issues and de[ails as needed.
Develop deeign plana to the City's format and a~ docurnen'm
incorporating all issues with relevant solutions and Identlf~ to lite best of I~e
Engineer's know~Jge all potent~l conflicts and offer e01utlon~.
Develop a# special details for Laguna Madm crossing, cathodic IxobmtJ(m,
special tle4ns, surge analysis, tunneling, horizontal directional ddlllng and other
special conside,uUons,
Develop a b~T~c control I~an to be incorporated in the final cormtruc~n
drawtng~ to the City's format.
Develop technical specifications for the eh'dm project to Indude all relevant
Provk:le project control and quality review of senior staff to ~ project quality
Page 5of 7
Develop prolect cost esUmate, provide all submittals to the City and meet with
s~aff fo review draft submittals and final pta~s and make City requested
am,)ndmont.
Prepare addenda, attend bid opening, review bids and provide rec~nrne~ation
to City.
Attend i~e-c~)nslrucl,..m n~fing, review Contract Documa~is and respond to
Contractor's questions
I['.'
Provide project administration se~ dunng construction (perlodlo visits to lyre
project site) to insure compliance of Contractm with plans and spedflcattone
and, upon completion, make final inspections a~ well as an irmp(mtion alter one
I1
Attend bi-weekly meetings to update staff on project status.
AD[NTIONAL SERVICES
Prepare TxDOT permit fo~ b(mng under Park Road 22 and submit to the ag(racy
for revtew and approval. Prepare TPDES pe,~-=l for sto,,i~vater discharge from
co~s~ site and submit to TCEQ for review and approval.
Perform field survey to locate property rnonumentaUon for use in preparing
exhibits and field no~es for utility easements on two bec'ts.
Fly and produce new I~ac~ and white aerial photography along the proposed
mute of the waterline. Prepare I~an and profile sheets at a City ~,andard
hortzontal and vertical scale.
Perform hydrographic survey and prepare a base map.
Perform survey to confirm topographic Info~,,~ ~ from aerial
pho~graphy. Sat app~ 10 part~ pol~{~ for horiz~ and vertlc~
conbul for the Aerial Photography.
Pedorm a magneto~ side scan sonar survey to locu~ existing oll and
pipelines, olfter miscellaneous pipelines, and o~er ~ metallic objecl~ In
the general v~dnity of the proposed marine pipeline alignment.
A pre-construction and post~ction assessment wi# be comlucted and a
report wll be gene[a[ed and eabmltted regarding existing cae grass bede,
staking of the corrldom to provide the USACE and GLO wtlh baseline du:-.
Page 6of 7
10
I1
desc. nbing the pipeline i~stallation, and any imadvertent sea grass Impac~ that
may have occurred as a result of the in~'ualla'don
A biologist will perfo[[[, site visits on a dally basis for the first 10 days of the
project and then weekly dudng construction near or in aenNflve envlmnrnental
areas (I.e dr~x:lging in sea grasses, dredging in the GlWW, and drill pad
constn,ction)
P,ovide construction observation services by an Irtdividual specializing in marine
construction f(~' the madne portion of the proposed pipeline alignment.
Prepare U. S. Coast Guard permit for navigational eigns for ~e IX)trion of the
water line crosaktg under the GlWW.
E)O-IIBIT 'A'
Page 7 of 7
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT: SouthsideWatef Transmission Main
1
10
12
13
Seotember 9, 1997- Apprnval of a motion to amend Section 4 of the Master Water
Plan (M97-246)
Settember 9. 1997 - Approval of amendment of the City of Corpus Chdstl
Comprehensive Plan by amending the Idash~ Water Plan (Ordinance No. 023050).
~ 16. 1997- Approval of the FY97-98 Capital Budget (Ord. No. 023174).
June 16. 1998 - Award of an englrmedng sewices contract /', the -,mount of
$708,140 to U]l~an Er~neming k)r the ~ Transrni~don Main - O.N. Stevens
Plant t~ Clarltwo<xi Road (M98-208).
Seotember 29. 1898 - Approval of Anmr~ment No. I In the amount of $298,505
to the co,,i,-~ct w~h Urban Engineering expanding the scope of ertgtneedr~
sewices for the Southside Transmission Main - Stevens Plant to C.,larkwo(x]
Road project to include the Staples Street Pumping Plant - New Pumping Plant
and Storage Reservoir (M98-327).
_Se~e~ber 9, 1998 - Approval of a Testing Agreement In the amount of $32,8~'~.65
with Trinity Ertglneming Co. for testing services for Southalde Tmrmmtsak~ Idaln -
O.N. Stevens Plant to Cladtwo<x~ Road (M98-328).
November 10, 1998- Approval of ~e FY98-99 Capital Budget (Ord. No. 023474).
March 23, 1999 - Approval of site selection and auflNortzntlon to proceed with
acqubition (Mg9-078).
Mamh 23, 1999 - Amendmerft to the FY98-99 Capital Budget t~ revt~ the scope of
the Staples Street Pumping Plant project by accele,.,ting a p(wlJon o~ ff, e Sou~
Staptes 42' Southside TrmNsrnisa~n Main from the proposed St~.nles Street
Pumping Plant to Yorktown Road (Ord. No. 023592).
March 23. 1999 - Approval of Amer,:lmem No. 3 In fine amount of $55,250 ~ Ihe
conbuCt with Urban Engineering expanding the scope of engineering aendces for
· e Southuide Transmission Main (Stevens Plant to Clark'wood Road Project):
Staples St,,=,et Pumping Ptant - New Pumlt~3g Plant and Storage Reeervo4r to
Include related additional eflginemtng services for a 424nch watmine from the new
pumping Iflant at Sot~ Staples and County Road 43 to the existing 16-Inch
waterline near Country Creek (M99-07g).
May 18. 1999 - Award of purchasing co~tract ~3 A&H Enterprises for two horlzmfl~
Sl:dlt case cent]ifugai pumps for Staples Street Pumping I:'tant, Co~,uct 2 (M99-
142).
May 25. 1999 - Approval of condemnation proceedings for Pamel No. 1 (Re~.
M02:M~5).
June ~. 1999 - Award of conatructk)n cont, uct to Preq..oad, Inc. for Staplea Street
Pumping I:'tant, Contract 1 - 7.5 Million Galon Sb:M'ege Reaervoir (M99-189).
J~llv 20. 1999 - Approval of FY99-00 Capital Budget (Ord. No. 023703).
EX].IIBrr "B"
Page lof3
~5. E, eiXember 2~, 1999 - Award of construcbon contract to Garrtey Company, Inc. for
4?" Waterline from New Pumping Plant at So. Staples and County Road 43 to
ex,sl~ng 16" Waterline Near Country Creek fa Staples Street Pumping Plant,
C~)ni, uct 4 (M99-342).
t,~ _Oc1[];~.__1_9, 1999__ - Award of consb'uclion contract to Lambda Construcflcm for
Staples Street Pumping Plant. Contract 3- Pump S~al~m and Si~e Work (M99-361).
April 1..1_~ 2000 - Approval of acquisition of Parcel No. 21 for $16,535 In connection
w~th the Southside Transmission Main - Stevens Plant to Clarkwood Road project
(M2000-106).
~ .-~ A~ril 18, 2000 - Authorizing the condemnation of Parcels 19,24,28,29, and 30 In
connection ~ the Southside Transmission Main - Stevens Plant to Clarkwood
Road project. (Reaoluflon ~024014).
19 Segl~rnber 9. 2000 - Authorizing the condemnation of Parcels 8 and 9 in
connectl(m wffi~ the Southelde Transmission Main - Stevens Plant to C~rkwood
Road project. (Re~31utlon ~324213).
;~'1 Seol~mber 19.2000 - Approval of acquisition of Parcels No. 19,24,28,29 and 30 for
$55,000 in connection ~ the Southalde Transmission Main - Stevens Plant to
Clarkwood Road project (M2(N)0-332).
? ~ December 12.2000 - Award of co~struction contract to Pate & Pa~e Enteq)rtaee for
construction of the new 60" waterline In connection with the Southaide Transmission
Main - Stevens Plan{ to Clarkwood Road project for a fee no~ ID exceed
$8,805,411. (Motkm M2000-434).
?.2 De,ember 12. 2000 - Award of a testing agreement with Trin~ Engineering for
testing of the new 60' waterline In connection with the South~:le Tranamls~on Main
- Stevens Ptant to Clarkwood Road pro~ for a fee no~ to exceed $~13,560.
(Moeon M2000-435).
23 February 13. 2001 -- Approval of acquisition of Parce~ No. 31a and 31b for
$28,2911n co~necUon wflh the Soutttside Transmission Main - Stever~ Plant to
Clarkwood Road project (M2000-060).
74 Am'Il 17. 2001 - Motion authorizing the payment of the Special ~'
condemnation award of $7,604 for the acquisition of Parcels 8 and 9 located sou~
of Calllcc~ Estak~ Unit 4 in co~nec-tlon with the Southelde W~' Tmnsmlsaton
Main project, Phase 1 - O.N. Stevens Plant to Clarkwo(xl.
25 Am'Il ~4. 2001 - Mol~on authorizing the CEy Manager, or his deetgnee, ID e3(ecute
An engineering services co,[,~ct In the amount of $1,247,003.00 with Urban
E~gineertng for Sou~side Transmission Main, Phases 2, 2a & 3. (M2001-162)
26. June 25. 200'~ - Approval of Arnendrnerff No. 1 in the amount of $454,125 to the
contract wiU~ Urban Engineering for the Southaide Water Tran~nJ~on Ma~n,
Phase~ 2, 2a & 3 and the Southside Gas Transmission Main, Part B & C to
out~3urce the land nego6atfon and acquisition process to acquire the remaining 54
utility easement parcels for bo~ the South~de Water and Gaa Trar~Jsal~n Maine.
27 December 17. 2002 - Molion authorizing the City Manager, or hb deelgnee, to
execute an engineering senecas c~[~:t in the amount of $1,824,742.00 wflfl
Urban Er~glneerlng for Southslde Transmission Main, Pheaea 4, 4a & 5.
Page 2 of 3
28,
_M. amh 30, 2004 - Mol]on authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
an amendment to an engineering sewlces contract In the arno~nt of $615,245 w~th
brban Engineering for Southside Transmission Main. Phase 6 - La{luna Madm
Pipeline Crossing Permitting.
_J.uly 1:~, 2004 - Ordinance appropdatmg $2,005,124.02 hum the unappropriah~cl
fired balance, which includes interest, bond proceeds, and olher mlacellarteous
revenues, from Water CIP Fund 4080; and appropriating in Water ClP Fund 4080
I~,.)r the So~thskie Water Transmission Main Phases 4 and 4a; amending capital
budge{ adopted by Ordinance No. 025647 by increasing appropriations by
$2,605,124.62; and declaring an emergency.
JuN 13. 2004 - MolJon authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to award a
conatn.mtlon co~[mct to Laughlin-Thys~m, Inc. of I-Io~:~n, Texas In the amount of
$7,139.820 for the Southside Water Transmission Main Pheaea 4 and 4e.
EXHIBIT
Page 3 of 3
CONTRACT SUMMARY
AMENDMENT NO 4
~JONTI-U~CT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
~,~ C~ty :)1 Corp~,~ Christ~ Texas hermnaffer called -City', and ~ l=~lleerll~ hereinal~r
.a#b'd "E~neer ', a~ree I.u Ihe fo~ing amendments ~ Ihe Contract for Eng~ ServlcM
~u~ ~agh~de Tr-,t~mi~lon MMn ~ 4 (Prol~t I~. ~39~). 4A (PrMeot No, 8425} md5
(Pf~t NO. 83~1), as authorized and adminlsbafively amended by:
Amendment No. 1
F
'. Amemlment No. 2
December 17.2(X)2 ] Mot~3n No. M2002-419 [
.1
' '. $24,475.00
_ ~ 3oo.oo_1
A~,,~,-.~ll,~lnt No. 4 Ihal modify the ~ wlltt the m:kltlon of ~<m~hMde Wltm'
Tranami.~km Main Pltmm 6 (Project No. Itle2).
Exhlb# "A", ~ 1. SCOPE OF 8ERVICE8, .hall be modified by the Inclu~k~ of the
Exhibit "A", Section 2. SCHEDULE, shall be modified by the Inch~lon of tltl foHowlrlg:
Exhibit "A", Section 3. FEES, ~tall be modeled by the IncJuMon of the fo#owing:
SCHEDULE
~ROPCpu:n PI.UId~ 6 PIK),JF~r SCHFnUJ F
DAY DATE
Monday
Tuesday
Wedneeday
Tuesday
Marc~ 6, 2006
Ma(G, 27, 2006
May 22, 200~
June 5, 2006
June 21, 2006
June 26, 2006
Juh/~ ~, 20~
July ~5, 20~)6
September 13 2006
100% 8ubrmltal
Adverl~e For Bkl~
Receh~ Bids
Page 1 o~3
A. Fee for Bulc Services. The City will pay the A/E a fixed ~c for providing for
all 'Basic Services' authorized as per the table below. The fee~ for Basic
Se~'ices will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation
for all services outlined In Section I.A. 1-4 above, and for all expenses incun'ed in
performing these services For services provided in Sec~on I.A.1-4, A/E will
.,,ubmit monthly statements for basic services rendered. In Section I.A.1-3. the
~tatement will he based upon A/E's estimate (and City Concurrence) of the
proportion of ltm total services actually completed at the time of btlllng. For
services provided In Section I.A.4, the statement will be based upon the percent
payme~ in response to A/Es monthly ~aa)rnents
B. Fee for Additional Servlcea. For services authorized by ~ Director of
Engineering Services under Section I.B. ",N:lditionat Services" the City will pay
the AJE a not-to-exceed fee as per the table on the following page:
EXHIBIT 'C'
Page 2 0~3
N
I!
I
t
·
PADRE/S/AND
GULF OF
MEXICO
LOCATION WAP
SOUTHSlDE TRANSMISSION MAIN, PHASE 6
PAGE: I of 1
~TE: 09-21-2005
20
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE.' ~ 25, 20O5
SUBJECT: Corpus Christi Ship Channel Utility Crossing - Revised and ~ for Rebld
A~ENI:~ ITF-~: Motion subhorizing ~e City Manager, or his de~ignee, to award a
Construction Contract to Akerman Cor.~uction from Purcell, OldalxxTta in Ihs arm:xJnt of
$2.,883,568 for lite for Coq~s Christi Ship Channel Water and Wastewaler LItB~ Crossing
REVISED AND RE-BID for the Installation of a New UlJllty Crossing (Ba~e Bid One)
~ Due to the pending deepening of the Corpus Christi Ship Channel it has become
necessary to lower the exlsUng lines approxlrna~y 30-feet deeper lhan they pmsen~ are.
This contract will install new water and wastewater lines in the channel at Itm lower depE,.
FUNDING: Funds for this project am available in bhe Water and Waatewater Capazd
Improvement Program Budget
RI=COMMI=NDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion aa presented.
Foster Crowell
Director of Wastewater 8ervtces
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFO4;tMATION
SUBJECT: Corpus Christi Ship Channel Utility Crossing (Project #7170/8429)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
I~h 29.200_5.- Approval of the FY 2004-05 Capital Improvement Budget (Ordinance
No. 026811).
PRIOR AD&#NISTRATIVE ACTION:
1. ~'~:l~J~"V 20. 2002 - ~ of Request For Qualificat~rm (RFQ) No. 2002-01
(Aviation, Street, Water, Wa~ewater, Ga~ Improverrmnt ~)to 42 engineering
flrrrm (28 local and 14 out-of-towr0.
~. ~"~cfl 13. 2002 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Ck~lflcatlom~ (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42
er~neerlng firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
· ~ March 15, 2002 - Addendum No. 2 to the Request for QuallflcaUons (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Sb'eet, Wel~r, Was~ve'ater, Gas Improvement Project) to 42
e~neering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
4 March 26. 2002 - Addendum No. 3 to the Request for Qualiflcatlorm (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewatm', Gas Improvement Projects) to 42
e~glneering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
· '*; ~larch 28. 2002 - Addendum No. 4 to the Requeet for Quallflcaflona (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Waartewater, Gas Impmverne~ Projects) to 42
englneedng firms (28 kx~a~ ~nd 14 out-of-town)
Deoember 17, 2(X~ - Motion authorbdng the City Manager or his designee to
execute a ~ct for pr~emdonal servicee wi~ Shiner Mmmiey & Aeeociat,~ In the
amount of $262,700 for the Corpus Chri~d Ship Channel UUIIty CrmmJng.
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of a construction con[~act to remove the existing
hries.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: The City utilities crmlaing under the Corpue Chrleti Ship
Channel were originally instalk~l In 1960, across Port of Coqxm ~ pmpertyJu~ east of
water, waMewater, and gas service. Due to age and condition of the Ilne~, ttmy are near
the end of their service life. The frequency of repek'e ha~ In~ arid some of the Ilrme
~re currenUy unusable. Replacement of the water and wa~ewater Itnea is needed In order
Christi Beach area. The extstk~ gas line will not he r~daced, as oth~' means of gas
service have be(m developed for the ama. In additlon, due to the pending deepening of
rrm Corpus Christi Ship Channel, it has become necessary to lower the present Ilne~ to a
dept~ of approximai~ly ~irty feet
,..~4E~.,~N,WArF_3q,H42~..C:-.~,..,'ho~'~,aIC,~CalIml~~~,,'~',,-I~r'^'lPagelof2
I ne P()rt ot Corpus Christi an~l lhe U.S. Army Coq)s ol~ Englneem am rnov~ forward w~Lh
the planning e~xts required for de~3enlng of the CoqxJs Christi Ship Channel. Tht~ utitty
,;rossir~l replacement project will accommodate the plarmed deepening by installing the
lines by directional drilling at the proper depth to permit the required clearance below the
b~ttom of the d¢cpened channel A future p~oject will involve removing the existing utility
p~pelines.
l his pm~ect originally bid on August 17, 2005. At that time the bids received were
substantially over budget. ]-he contract documents, including the p[ans and sDectfical~k)ns,
were n,3dlfied and plans were reissued to rabid at a later date.
laROJ~=GT D~:~.,I~IPTION: This consb-ucfion contract deals exclusively with ~e
insb~lation of the new lines. A sepafaie construction contract for removal of the existing
contract consists of one (1) Base Bid'
BID INFORMATION: O~ October 12, 2005, the City received three (3) proposals for the
insb~llatlcm of the utility lines under the Corpus Chflati Ship Channel. The bid prices mnge, d
from $2,883,568 to $3.110,404. The Engineer's conatmctlon estimate la $3,139,500.00
which Indudea a 15% contingency.
City staff and t~ City's Engineering Consultant, Shiner Mmeley & As0ec~tae, ~
that based on Iow bid and satisfactory review of all required decume~ta~x~, thata
amount of $2,883,588 for l~e Corpus Christi Ship Chann~ Utlllty Crossing I:m3Ject Revlesd
and Issued for Re-bid.
The project should be complete wilhin 120 calendar day8 from the Notice to Proceed with
completion estimated at March 2006.
~ I~('~E'~.'. NQA..~'~3,1;N WATEF~29 C.C..~ ¢.h.u!lle,ICa13a~illgV. Jc~ln___~,c~:~_ A~.~--_ I EXHIBITpage 2 of 2
PROJECT BUDGET
C()RPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL UTILITY CROSSING
(Project No. 8429/7173)
October 25. 2005
FUNDS AVNLABLE:
Water CIP Program ............................................ $2.,159,163.00
Wa~uwater CIP Program ............................................. $1,415,455.00
$3,574,618.00
Contingencies ........................................................
Consultant (Shiner Mose~ & Asaoc) ............................
CostnJcUon Inspection .........................................
Engineering Reimbursame.i= ..................................
Finance Reimbursements ............................................
Mmc. (Pr~Ym'~g,/~NerUsi~, etc.) ................................
Total..
FUNDS REQUIRED:
Cortl~l'uctton (Akerman ConatrucUon) .............................. $2,883,568.00
282,700.00
25,000.00
5,000.00
.................................................. $3,574,618.00
EXHIBIT B
i
.eI
..t---.1
NUECES BAY
IHROJECT LOCATION
CORPUS
CHRISTI
BAY
FX ~4
CITY PROJECT NO.
7173/8429
LOCATION
Nor TO SCAI.£
(X)RPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL
UTILITY CROSSING
EXHIBIT ' D'
CITY COUNCIL EXHIBXT ~
P,N~: I of' I
21
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City. Co. nell Action Date: October 25, 2005
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion nathoriz~ng a contrm:t with HRH for Employee Dinhonesly inaurance covent~; MeG-riff'
.'~ihets & Williams for Commen:ial Property, Excess Windaorm and Excess Flood insurance; and
[-cxas Municipal League for Camntrophic Fleet. Airport Liability inmu~ Excem ~
insurance. Excess (ins Utility insurance, Excess Gas Utility aua:nnobile liability inmzmm~, TB Clinic
\ an automobile liability insaa'mv~ 'and Cam~al Liability insurance for the Columbus ~Oti.na/muaeum.
.Additionally, bccauae first level Windstorm, Hurricane and Hail covera~ ia only offered through
~he I'exas Windstorm Insarance Associatiort, and because first I¢v¢1 Flood inmmmco ia only offia'~
through ibc Nalional Flood Insurance Program, that coverage for throe two inam'am~ type~ be
acquired :hrough McGriff. Scihels & Williams. thc recommended provider of~ Wintlattmn
and Ex.,,~'-is Flood insarance'. The t~'m ol'th~ ~ents is November 4, 2005 throl~ Novelxlb~
x. 2t107 ~ ith two one-year m-ncw,'als.
ISSUE:
~-hc City of Corpus Chrisn contracts with outside carriers tbr Commercial Propeany;, Windstorm,
Humcanc & Hail: Excess Windstom~. Hurricane and Hail; Electronic Equipmenl; Boiler &
Machinery;, Flood and Excess Flood: Airport Liability and Excess Airport Liability;, Excess Gas
I .tilily Liability.; General Liability covcrage for the Columbus Ships~ Mns~mt; an A,mmg~il~ Policy
Ibr the City',~ Tuherculosis Clinic van: and Employee Dishonesty/Crime irmaauce. ~ term oftbe
cummt agreement for these coxcrages expirm on November 4, 2(IO5. In addition, the City desitin
,,o t,m~g~ covcragc for Catastrophic Flect InstLrance.
REQUIRED COUNCIl. ACTION:
('ouncil approval is n__,~d_ed authorizing the Ciw Manager to execute a two-yeah- contxnct with two
,me-year renewal options Io provide insurance coverage ns specified in this memot-mgfla=.
FUNDING:
I. unding :'or this contract has ~ included in the proposed b. rl~m~t for Fiscal Year 2005-2006.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
,',,raft r~commends approval ol'the motion authorizin8 a two-year contract with two one-y~u'
renewal options between the City of Corpus Christi, T~xns, and HRH for E, mploy~ Di~hon~y
:'ov~-ra~: McGriff, Seibels & Williams for Commercial Property, Excess Wh'glstorm, axxt
Excess Flood; and Texas Municipal I.caguc for Catnshophic Fleet, Airport Liability inmaaace,
CITY COUNCIl.
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
¢ it,~ ('ouncil Action Date: October 25, 2005
· x( ;I-'NIIA ITEM:
M~*ti,,n authorizing a contract ~ ith }IR}I Ibr Employee l)is~.mestv immm~ce coverage: M~ff,
~ci~ls & Williams for Comm~ial ~y. Execs Wi~m ~ Exc~ FI~ ~; ~
~cxas M~i~ I.~ I~ ('ams~phic FI~I. Ai~ Li~ii~ ~ ~ ~
mqura~e. F xc~q (lis [ ~tility ins~. I:x~ G~ I :~1~ a~le I~1~ ~, ~ Cl~c
~ .m automobile liabilit> inst~'c and (ie~ Liability im~e for ~ C~ ~~.
.X~itio~lly, ~a~ flint Ic~l Win~om. Hmx~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~
~ cx:,q Wind~t,nn Im~umnc[. As~iution. ~d ~au~ flint level FI~ i~ is ~y off~
t!n'ou~ thc Nutiomd I:1,~1 [nsumce Pmk. that cmcm~ for t~ t~ ~ ~ ~
.,,quimd ~rough McGfilr. Stills & Williams. ~ ~ommc~ ~x~ of~ W~ ~
t xccs~ I:lc.~d i~mnce. ~ ~ ofthe~ ~cmm is Novm~r 4. 2ffi5 ~ N~ 4,
.:t.I' wi~ Iwo ,mc-x'~r mnc~l~
IN,NI 'E:
The City of Corpus Christi contracts with outside camera for Comm~x:ial Propm'ty; W~
Hurricane & Hail: FLxces.~ Windslorm. Hm'ricane and Hail; Elecu'onk: Equipment; Boilrr &
MachineD: Flood and F. xce~s Flood: Airport Liability and Excess Airport LiabilitT, F~___ee-~ Oas
I 'sility 1 .iahility: General l.iabilit.~ coverage for thc Columbus Ships/Museum; an Automobile Policy
Iht the Cit>."s Tuberculosis Oh'dc van; and Employee Dishonesty/Crime imumm~. The {z, rm of the
c'urrent,~e~mcnl for these coverages expirem on November 4.2005. In addition, the City ~ to
~ng,~ge coverage tbr Cet~Tophic Flee~ Insurance.
RF. OUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
(.', ,uncil approval is needed authorizing the City Manager to ex,ute a two-year contract with two
,,n~vmr renewal options to Ixovide insurance coverage as spen:ifiod in thia rnemonmdum.
F'UNDIN(~:
I. andin~ fi,r this contract has berm includcd in the proposed ~ for Fiscal Year 2005-2006.
CONCI,t:SION AND RECOMMENDATION:
Marl ro.'ommends approval of thc motion authorizing a two-year cema'act with two one-yeaz
renewal options between thc City of Corpua Christi, Texas, and HRH for Employee ~
c..vcragc; MeGrill. Scibels & Williams fi~r Commercial Properly, Exc~s~ W~; and
I ~ccss F'le,.,d; and Texas Mtmicipal I.eaguc for Catastrophic Fleet. Airport Liability irmJmnce,
~ x,:¢.,,,, :xirlxm insurance, l'.xcc.~,, t.m~ I llhl.,, insumnt, c I.xc¢~ Ga.,, I. Itilit) automobile liability
· .:, m'.rw,. '1t ('!i'."~ V.in a:i:,,m.,hik' li:lbilitv ill~,unmcc and (icncnll Liability insurance for thc
· ,umb~ ,hip~mu..~um. AJ(lit],,nally. becau~ lir~t icvel Win(brunn. Hurricane and Hail
:, .. er, tge is .mir ofli'rexl Ihr,,ugh ~he -I'¢xa.~ Windsltmn In=uranc, Association. and beceusc firsl
.... l: h. ~c ;nsu[,m, .' ~, .hi..,ll;.';c,; ]hJ,)u~h thc 'q,l,,,m~l I IL}~]d ll~,UrallC¢ I'rogmm, blafl'
re,, ,mmtm. tlq lha! cox erage lbr Ihe.~ two insurance l.%'[x-,~ h~ acquired through Me(i-riff, Stib~ls &
\\ .lli.~m-.. Iht recommcnduxl prov~dur ol'Fxcess \¥indslorm trod I:xct.'.as Fltx'~ iflsumr~.
( '~ nthia ~ iarcia
I )ircclor of I luman Rcsoureea
Altachments:
B~k~t~tmd [nfommtion
ScheduJc A-Evaluation Criteria
~'hedule B-Summary Evaluation Matrix
BAC'KGROItND INFORMATION
I~ ..'~,c.~s I.,r P~oD,~ls ~¢L t~ucd lot pwl~n~ and relutcd
k~'~pm~'~ ~o Iht RFP ~cr~ ~cci~4 .n ~eplember 12.
,..m,ac~ ~ ah Ibc ~ c:~m p~.,x idcr s, ~11 exp~ Nux cnt~'r 4.
~cn ms~u~ ~m,gh '1 MI. lur pro~n), x~ mds~orm, ai~n ~ ~ li~jli~'. ~. sin~ 1~. Si~
that time. a ha~nin~ of thc market has mm~ it almo~ im~ible
~'l~c RFP ~css m 2~11 )'~clded no ~o~1~. a~ Iht m~
humr~m Ilexes I~me c,,m~,ie~ ~ff~ to ~' c~t RFP: '1'~ M~i~ ~ (~),
Mc(intl. ~ei~ls ~ Williams (~1~'~ a~ ililb. Rogal
while MSW p~v~ded quolcs for promn~, excess win&~. ~ms~ic
I IRIt ~.w~ quoles for pm~ny a~ employ~ dis~,~sty o~y.
EVALI.ATION
· \u c~ .luauon team compri...ed t,l' representatives frum Hmnan Resources, Risk Management,
P.rchasing and France evaluated the proposals mceivu'M. Pmposal~ w,=e u-valu~ed by tl~ team
using thc fiqlowin[~ criteria: { ! ) Risk 25%. t2) compliance with the RFP 30%. (3) technical solution
?o. and (4~ cost 40%. Thc specific criteria ate shown in Schedule A. I~ rmulilu8 rosa'ix prierilized
each vendor bas~ on th~ pOlm value a~igncd for each criterion comlxnm~t inthe m~lusfica m~-ix.
Insuranc~ types v~rc separat~ into fou~ groups based on the offerin~ in the l~'~x~lals. The
prop. set earning the highest score in each grouping of covem~ represents the best overall valu~ to
the { i~ o" Corpus Christi Vcndt,r rankings ba.~xl on this scoring melhodolo~' ate shown in
,~chrdule B
I~ thc process of evaluating the [n'oposals. the team kx.,ked not only at premiums, but at coverage
Icxels and L_lt~_uctibles. Scoring in Ctmt reflects all three compollenl~ T]m ~ mix of
coverages wiU b¢ at an estimatcd cost of $ !.707.601 This is a 4.7% inct,~se over the co~t of
premiums paid during Fiscal 2005. 'H~e 4.7% increa.~ mJcLq additional oovemge for ~ City in
Excess Windstorm insurance (increasing the coverage from a total of $ 71.4 Million to $200
Million); decrealaes I1~ ~:a;luctible for Employee Dishonesty and Cornmeal'iai Crime imumme fi~n
S I O0.000 v., $ ! 5.000: and adds ¢"ataslrophic Fl~'t insurance, an insurance that had ~ot pt~"vionsly
been held.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff mcomm~ls approval of thc motion authorizing a two-year contract with tw~ ol~-yesr
renewal options M'twecn tM, City of Corpu~ Christi. Texas, and HRH for Employee Diahozwsty
coverage; McGfiff, Seibels & Williams for Commercial Property, Excem Windatorm, ,mci
Excess Fl(y. xk and Texas Mtmicipal League for CmA~tn'q~ic Fleet,. Airport Liability iwunmce,
['.xce.~ Airport irtsurancc. Excess Gas I Itility insurance. Excess Gas UfiUty amomobile liability
insurance, l'B Clinic Van aulomobil¢ liability insurance and General Liability insurance for the
{. ':,lumbus ~hips.tmu.senm. ^dditi,nally. because first level Windstorm, Hurricane and Hill
,, ,,1 ', h,~ ~ll~Llrark'c i~ ,~nl) ,)A~m,t Lhr,~L~h thc Nali,~lml I'lLx~ h~sumncc ~mm. s~
~ i~li:,~, thc. ~mmended ~ ~'r <~f I:x~e~ Wi~l~ and Exc'~ FI~ in~e.
8c~,ldule B
3ru~.~'l~i4t~d I ,.~uran(:) a~ Lldb~lly I.lurln~e BI-O117.05
Summary Evalu,lt~:m I4IUi1.
OQIlil~.4q,~ ~ I 'r.,Mq,kM~Ml, TIkIMM I
22
II
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Action
oct. 25, 2o~
III
IILNUE: C~kiemtton of~mth Te~a Allr~ptkm Project'. int~t t~ load ~ei~ieal power needa bra I~-ymr periml.
REQUIRED COUN¢:II ACTION; Approval of Read~tioa.
PRE¥1OU~ (~)UN¢:ll ACTION: Approval of reao~tba a~tl~rizi~ 8~tk Texaa
~087. Aullit I !. ~
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staffr~ommemb appruvai orthe pt~MJa~d
r~ a~ ,~b=.
Iii,::, _ab:
Ambtaat City Maaapr
I I
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
l',~c ! cc:ti tioxcl-illnCrll (.'L~dc XXl~.,, ammldml m I,~t,J to provide for c~tion of~liti~l
..Nlix ~si.m cn~rations xx ilh all fl~c ~xx ~ oCl'cx;~ non-pmtit co~ion~ ~ ~f~ ~
,~' political su~ix ision c,~orati~ms is to a~'~tc Iht electric I~ or all m~ ~liQ~l
,u~ix ~sio~ m~ ~t, ~m~ct f~ ~xx cr on ~halfofall tn~. South Tcx~ A~a~ion ~j~
h< tS i'AP) of xx hich ~ City of Co.us ~i is a m~. w~ ~ in 2~1 ~ ~ ~
. I¢~'t tic d~ulation etT~t we J~u~' 1.2~2. Si~c ~ ~ STAP h~ ~v~ ~ a~ ~
'.n~ 2(~4 ~in~ ~ ~ w~n m~s~l ~i~t pn~ ~e City would ~c ~ if~ ~ ~
-la)t~ o~ the ~ulat~ pr;~ to ~t (~B) off~ bv incest ufilifi~ ~ ~t~ ~1
..l~.lfic provid~ { REPs)
Despite well-timed and cxeculed contracts ~hat have delivered significant aavinga offlhe
I' I'lL electricity custs have climbed steadily upward with adverse impact on city tmdgets. Prices
h:,x ~. increased b~m,qe of the volatility ol'natural ~.a~ prices and because all REPs baae ttu~ ~,utract
,,Ircra on NYMEX ga~ futures prices as ora particular time and date.
Without · proactive al·nd to secure sources of power that ~re not cagAusiv~.y dep~mdent upon
,,au,fsi gasu the m~ans for ealablishing price, the City can expect dramatic, costly and ~ie
: w,,~gs ir, ~ts electric bills o~er the next few years. Thc price of electricity tod~yi~ twico what STAP
members paid in 2004. If' thc City desires some electric price stability ~nd p~dictability, it ia
ne~emar3. to fix a set price over a long period { 10 y~u'a). If thc City ~ to mdm~ it~ el__nzLfi_'c bill
by shifting W afucl source leas costly than natural gas, the be~t 0t~oFtuni~ today i~ for STAP I~
· on,mit la the output front a specific coal plant in Texas. If STAP does not take ad,hint·ge of the
,,pportunity in the next sew~d month·, a similar opportumty ia not likely to mappmr f~ · ~ of
'- Cai .~,
Research by STAP has uncovered a unique oppoflunity to stabili~ more than on~-half of
--TAP',~ .~nnual energy cosla by contracting at a fixed pric~ with a ~nall egalltor, for · 10-year
period w:th the ownerofcoal-fired generation. STAP consultants have modeled theindicgtiv~ coal
gcnea'ation costs avail=hie m STAP and have co~ thc cost~ of moeting ~ STAP member's
bast, Icad needs with coal e..apacit~ and all residual needs with ~. IOmer~ion to 100~ rditmce on
:~?n assuming application of the mosl recent Department of Eneqo' long-term gas price foree~ in
boris cs~. The modeling demonstrates economic benefit for each member, above and beyond the
~vpe of saving· STAP has been able lo achieve in each of the ~ 3½ ymrs, from mtefing along-
~,..rn ~ supply contract ( I 0 .yearn } with S'FAP. whereby STAP secures coal ca. city to serve ba~ Icad
'rhe proposed financial agreeme~ between STAP and it· member cities lma been aplxoved by
Ibc ('cxa.~ Attorno' General. Furth~;xmorc. STAP aa a political subdivision corporation Iaaa Catutory
~,uthonty to enter into conlmcts on behalf of it· m¢.~bers.
\~,lj~ll. ll. ~,1 this ! uSt,jc~tlt. II tl~'u':..l~l ~,bii~Jlu' II~u' u'll) ~.'ljllll.'~lll.'llj.','. 11~ ~ulc conlri~.'l
,. '! Iw ~'n~t~xh! h I('k !(~ I1~' ¢'i!v tnt .~nprnvltl ~11 ,il,l~.. p,~inl in Iht' fulure
I t'. I~'~;~ OF IN I'I:NI '1'O EN'I'~ INTO NF~'I'~TION~ flOR
A ,',~PA('I'I'Y ('()NI'RA(~ WI'I'll THE ()WNE~ Off COA~
~IN~'I.I~DING I'I.~A~ I.I(~NI'I'E) ~EN~kKI'ION TO
1 i l~ B~I~ I ~.)AI ) EI.I~( "1 RI(' ~WER NE~
~AI'I'ROXIMAIEI.Y 55".~-~ OI. I'OI'AL ENERGY NEE~)
Flor S'lAi' MI~MI~I:RS ~)VER A I~h'l~AR PERIOD
~vIIEREAS. th~ C'~ty of (',,q~ ~'hristi v'Cit3"J i~ a n~ of~ T~
I'ml~t. Inc. ("SI'AP") ~d ~id m~n~ip h~ ~ull~ in av~ ~ ~
2~ ;, off,~fthc Public Utility Commi~it,n ("PLIC") ap~v~ p~ce ~ ~; ~
~:~EAS. fll ~l ~w~ bi~ from v~a R~l El~e P~
d~e~dal~ el~tdc ~ail [na~ have bc%~ di~tly link~ to ~1~ ~ f~ ~
~:HERE~S. ~uv~ g~ pfi~ have ~ exl~fly ~l~le ~ ~ ~
]nc~ m ~ ~ ofel~e~y prod by ~ Cily; ~d
~'HERE~, STA[' is in 1~ p~ of n~ati~ a I~ ~ty ~ly
tl~ ~ty's ~ I~ ~c n~ (~mxi~y 55% of ~ ~ty'a ~
lot ,t Iixc~ ~ fl~ ~uld pmx4de comid~lc ~o~ic ~efit ~ ~ ~
~ ore.son Io ~i~o~ ~ con~ ~ ~P~ ~
~:~REAS, ~al-~ ~acity in T~ avai~le ~ ~1 1~ ~ ~
situa6~ ~vi~ fi~ ~ ~- ~ter of Inter mfl~ a ~q~ ~ity for ~
mc~ ~n~ ~ ~uce cl~c price ~ilit~ ~
WI~REAS, t~ o~ of t~ ~ c~cily n~ a i~ of ~t ~
~t~ 2~5 a~ dmi~ ~l~on ofa ~t by ~u~ 31, 2~5.
TH~EFO~ BE ~' R~OLVED BY ~E C~ ~~ OF ~
t 'O~U8 CHEST! ~A l':
.... . .ql~,~:$ ,,I th- ",1 ~' I~,'.u.! '.....'curt ,:c,al ap;reity rot the City of ('orpu.~
('hriMl'. D;.L';L' I,':ld clecl:ic t.,p,l¢iI~ I~:'als ?or a !'~xed price flu' u IO-'¢ear period commencing
t~.,w,.c,, thc -I:~' ti,after ~,l'2(xs~ a~ld thc 'I''1 qu;trlcr t',l'20~h~ are ht. reby ratified.
11,¢ ('ltv ,,f t'-rpus ~.'hr~sti cndors.'cs Iht' STAP Hoard com~nitting to a lellcl' or
siS;Chi tt contrlstl fi, q co:ti s.'ilpacik~ ~i~l; Iht' uudcr~taudinla thai ti ~ STAP will provide proof of
cc,,n,,nnc ~..m'li~ o! coal Cap;tClI.V ;.Itl t~llC'l'g.x ht,n a coal and gas mix in t.~omparison Io
exclusn e reha~,:;, on energy priced on IIK)% gas t:¢ner, tion coupled with · conservative for~cam
,al' natmal gas prices; (21 the City of Corpus Christi will have an opportunity to r~vi~w and
approve or reject a lO-year contractual agrccment to supply all the city's powcr noeds; and (3)
S'I Al' will issue bonds t,, secure funding of amounts nccessm'y to prepay tho cspacity portion of
~hc coal supply contract.
,b~gned this .... chly of ... .
City Sec r~ra.,-y
day o!.
I he above resolution was passed by the following vote:
Henq/Gaffe[[
Brant Chesrmy
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcla
Bill Kelty
Rex A. Klnnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
23
ORDNANCE
PADRE BALLI PARK; EST~ A ~ ~ AREA;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AI~ PRO~DING A DELAYED
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREA~ the Padre Is~ld seawal is 4216.5 fee~ k:xtg;
WHI~I~4~, If~e City d Corpus Ctwtst~ owm 2.g a~a (12~,441.41 aquare fee~ of land
edjoinlng the ~ewdl, which Is adjeceot lo the pui~c beech;
· ~"II~=A~, the C3ty la c~mlrtx~Y~g a partdng Io~ that v~l acx,T~,.,,cd '- 310 cara;
~ Policy Statemeot ll.B.3 o~ the City d ~ O',t~, Texas.
and Be~ch ~ Platt, mck3p~:l c~ Februm~ 28, lgg'5, ~n eiomel~ c~ttm C~y'~
026526
WHEREAS, Ihe 74"' Texas Legislature recognized this plan when in 19~5 it adop~KI
~1.017(cX1XB) (:d the Texas Natural ~ Code, which In recognizing Ihe eeawal
for each 15 inear feet (:d the immvall;
{~:ma the c-k~ be~ u~ ~ fm an oveet, heln-l/]~gl~ .~l'elv can~m'c
3
BE IT ORDJdNED BY TI'E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTi,
'I'EXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. Seclion 10-73(fl, Ccx~ of On:inm'tc~, is repelled.
"Sec. 10.73. Vehlcul~' ~
*(f) V~I~ ""' bmT. D eh,"'l olXYIP.3 a~ ocie 'dray In ,. souttNM¥ ~_lion
Beullu~'d and I~a,'~h Ao33~ Reed # 4."
SECTION 2._Sectl~ 10-77(e), Code o~ OrdiMnrA~___. is MnMY:led to reid ~s fok:M~
9ECTION 3. Sa,:~)n 10-80(e). C. xx~ dO, dinanc,:, la repeded.
I'~:&l ~'"'.'1i ~ moy m'tly ~,i,~,~ in a oouti",(r4~-
ordlnm~ce cor~ttbjl~ an ~ ~ ~ ~ 1-6 c~ l~e C3ty C(3de c~
Ordlna,nces.
~ECTION 5. If for any rees~ any ~. pa-eiF'a~, a.~livial~, dauae, ~ wo~
~ i:)rov~i~ of this ordinance shatl be held inva~ or unc~stitutfl3r~ by ~ ~ M a
Coundl that every section, paragraph, subcivtslon, cMuse, phrase, w~x~l ~' provision of
thts o~dinance be given full force and e~ect for its purpose.
9EC'TION 7. Thia on:flnaoc~ kakee eWect on the IM~r of (a) the appt'oval of thMe d'mngee
I..~nd ~ ~' (b) the ~ ~ the cenaa~mtk3n am:l opening to the pubic M ~ ~
5
IV~c¢ly Cooper ~ Jesse Noyda (:~
.2005.
APPROV~: 18"~day of Oct3:3b~, 2005.
026526
ORDINANCE
SAFE AREA; ANO DECLARII~ AN EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, on October 18. 2005. City Co~ndl passed and approved Ordinance No.
026526 that proh~lted vehicular bu;;',c o~ the beach seaward of the Padre IMmld Seawal~
repealed the dimctlo~ of travel on the beach between Whitecap Boulevard and Padre Bali
=ark. a~l created a pedestrian safe area seaward of the Padre Island Seawall;
WHEREAS, five pe~doners, on October 18. 2005 (eoooer than the ter*h day eltra'
adol:~ion of Ordlrmnce No. 026526), filed a ~ul~,~,~t wtth the CAy Secmlary con-aTmnci~
WHERE.AS, Cily Council deems ,l in ~ public I~-~temst to reconsider re'gl repe~
Ordlr~mce No. 028528
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAJNED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CO~PU8 CHRI~I1, T-eXAm, THAT:
SECTION 1. ]hat Ordinance No. 026526, adopk~cl on October 18, 2005, elirnlnating
v~'ttcular trat~ on the beach seaward of the Padre Island Seawall and e~tabl~ a
h#o regular meetings so flint this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first mmJlng
as an ernergertcy measure fi'tls the 25th day of Oclobe~, 2005.
PASSED AND APPRO~/ED. th~s the
~TTES'I'
__ day ot ___
Secretary
APPROVED. 20e day of C~__ober, 2005.
~or C~V Att~'rmy
· .urpus ,Jhnsb. Texas
..day o'~ .... .2t"tO~
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Chris'u, Texas
Fo~ the masons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to conatdemtlon and
voting upon ordinance8 at two regular meetings: t/We. therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the dale It is Introduced, or
at the present mee~ng of the City Council.
City of Corpu~ Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance waa passed by the following vote:
Henry Gan'crt
Brent ~ey
John E. Marez
Melody Cooper
Jen'y Garcla
Rex A. Klnnleon
Jesee Noy~4a
Mark Scott
24
l~O ATTACHMENT FOR THIS ITEM
25
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PRESENTATION
AGENDA ITEM:
Corpus Christi Regional Economic Develo~ Co~Ho.~ ~j(:, r¥,- ~.ly I~
OUT~IDE PRESENTER(S):
Roland C. Mower, CEO/President, C.C. Reglo~tal Economic Development
Corpor~lon
ISSUE: Quarterty update to City Council regarding an ovewlew of the follow, lng:
· Recent Industrial Asset Management Council event hosted by EDC o~
October 7-12, 2005
· Prospect update
Memorandum of Understanding between CCREDC, 4(A) Board, and City
of Corpus ChrlstJ
· Economic Summit Update
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
No actlo~ required.
Additional Backgrour~
Exhibits
26
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PRESENTAT~N
AGENDA ITEM: Corpus Chdsti Convention and Vis~tors' Bureau Quarterly Preeenlatlon
OUTglDE PRESENT-eR(S):
Nlm~
Tom Galyon
President and CEO, Corl~ Chr~tl
Convention and Visltom' I~mau
ISSUE: This quarterly presentation will include a report on the CVB's new reporting
system. Dr. Jim Lee's Economic Impact Report on 2004-2005 conventiom, Ihe Fun
Refund promotion, the new minl-gulde, an update o~ the rescheduled Te~a~ Travel
Industry Association convention and an u~date on the USBC Bowling Congre~
BACKGROUND:None
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: No~e
Assistant City Manager
~ 0
~~0
Cc.,rl)tls Christi Col~vent~(.)~l & Vi.,..~t,)r,-. L$,.~,r;,t~
J I~rl(Jl'ltl bl~Jll'.tr,, ~, I,:',r'
Ill. vexinG P~r AvIII~I~ I~oom Iqlmport
~1o, dh P~dre 'T'lJX,ltr
(3;~2 13 2003 C3 Z(X)4 ICY ru. Ai.q]Ull:
I ;.3 C)O
4 LN30()
'.t: ~;
2~XX)
¥~l~or C~ntmr Tralfi~
~-.~J.(X)O
· ': r~)
.,~j
(½%.,th'. '.:, '~'~.,ll I~, [)al~.. F~,;I,~.,it
· -· ...~:~ Il,' ..l~.ll~.~j~'f..~l,'~llr.;.,,.':- . ,~1..~-. ..','~,l,.r. '~
~'.'~ ~ ~- =~ ~.- ..~
I Il .
From: Ii111~00~ To: 9130t2005 ..
CORPUS CHRISTI 2004~5 CONVENTIONS
AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPACT
~_~m;-e~ for
Corpus Christi Convention & V~bfl~m~ Burean
lira Lee, Ph.D David Yoskowltz,, Ph.D.
Texas A&M IJniversiw-Corpus Christi Texas A&M Outversity-Corpus C~
October 2005
Summary Sheet
12 ",81ecttd Conventions In Corlatm Christi
· e.i ,727 vliora Comam td~ to the me(n) arm~
· 23a,oa2 vt~ux',.de~ (evwaee a.3 de~ per t~p)
,,I, ~146,2 i:ml' vllior pm' day
> epe~nng by cat.orr: lodging (3'1%), em:eg & ck'eka~ (20'N,),
dxq:N:)ing OW,), ,~-:.~- ten & ef'aedalrm'mrtt (lO'N,)
). $10 rnllkN1 bi wlggll & IllildN
), 1,oeo Jobe
~, ~ ~ In I)udl'teee al#l (IL2~ of tOlal touriem)
> 2,'JOe Jobe
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1'his report first presents the profiles of participants in a select, on of major conve~tion
events in Corpus Christi as fa,'ilitated by the Corpus Christi Conve~Uon & Visttot~
Bureau. The majori .ty of the e~'ents were confert~ce meetinl~ wilt~ exhibIUons held
0etween October 2004 and June 2005. The crrganl2~.s are .,~oei.,~lon~ ~t t~he ~t~te to
national ~vei. ~ on survey dat~ this report al~o hi--tS visitors' travel
experiences and estimates ~or the economk- impact that theae ~ to Cotl:n~ Chti~
contribute to the tesion's economic activin, hou~hoki Income m~l emp~
· E~tznal~ ~ in ~ report am ba~ed on a ~le~ of stu-vey~ j0~ c~ducted
between October 2004 and Jtme 2t]05 by the Corpus C]-~I~ ~on and Vi~[to~
Bureau and Texa~ A&M University-Corpu~ ChrisU. The ~urvey~ g~'~.~! a total of
499 relu ms.
· Out ol the 48:2 re~pondem~, 411 w~econfemm:eat'ee~le~msd71we~eexlt[bilx~
With an average par~.- size of 3.3 persons, the surveys catmu~ n total c~ 1,653
· Ba~ed on the ~u rvey data, i~he 12 co~venttorta ~ 8~n~alx~! an e~lma~d tola]
of 8%727 viaitors aa~cl 2~,032 vi~or days, accounUn& 6~r 18~ of ~li viatto~ cemtz~
toCorpusChrlsti~rgroupzneetm~ The~evi~itotsq)ema~ ",,e..dtotalci~L%5
rrdJ~lon in Corp,~ O~r~ti, ~counting for 5% o~ local ~ q~ndtn& Vi~itoo
spem ee moat on hoee~ rix)ms ~), 6:~iowed ~ h0ept~ ~ (14~),
restaurants (11%) ~ ret~ ~ ~%),
million in bu~ness sa]es across the region. V~tx:~s' d.b~:~i ~ ia the metro
ama genemed secoedary impacta, which totaled ~ minion. The total volume
Vl~lk)r E . =,'lancee and
As part of the survey, respondents were asked about their experter~-es during
their visits I,~ Corpus C'hdstJ and their perreptions of the area. One question in fire
sur~v (#~ eskud responch,nts to rate, be~wc-,m 1 and 7, a list of statements concerning
the~c vis~ts lo the ~rea. A s~'ore ol I represents thai the respondent 'si~ongly agrees'
with th~ statement, and a score o~ 7 represents that ~he respondent "silently disagrees".
fdble 3 dLspldys the average rm~qgs o1:481 r~i'ums. The av~'age scores for the
statements am all below Z5. In particular, the surveys reveal that the majority cE
respondents did e~joy their visit to Corpus Christi. They ~ expressed Ihetr init. mst to
return to h~e area ei~ for busme~ or p~asum, or recommend the ama ID other people
for a v~slt.
T~b~e 3
~ E . :,'Kltca-: Awemg~ Rmtiet~
I:{/~am rmflg~ biv~ 1 C,{~mg~/,o.,,')md 7 {'/~3a~dy (I,agra4').
_~b~,_,foe:. Authom' cad~l~rm
Another quesaon in the survey 0~) asked respondents to rate ~ 1 and 7
about theCorpus Christi ama tn terms ofll attrtbute~ A score ~1 tndicatea that the
attrlbule 'describes comple'~y" the a,~, while a score of 7 tmtica~ ~ the attrltmte
"doesn't describe at all~ the ama.
Table 4 displays the avet'a~ rattngs of 481 returns. Other ~ the mh,~o~ ry c~
b,..~ng 'sophisticated" and "expenstv~, most ratt~ ate below ~ sm~n~ to the
obsereaflons In Table 3, I~e ratings overall refl~-f the p~'itl~ perce1:fl~lo~ at~cl
inl~lng t~uflat destination that is also a~forrl~hle.
YaK Fllm~
27
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PRE8ENTATION
AGENDA ITEM:
Pt~..~b~l~ of 4~ Ou~'W FY 2004-2005 Budge~re~om~n~ Rqx)rt.
STAFF PRESENTER(8):
O.Mr liertlnez ) l IIl~-~t City IlenleM' - AdminMbltlve 8MYlCei
Eddie Houllhln AM~int BIx~et Dhlc~
18SUE:
The 4~' Quarter Relxxt for the perkxl ended July 31, 2005 h~ been comple~]
and dlatrlbuted to the City Council ott Octoi=er 14, 2005. The report it now
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: No form.I ~ t. required at tN. time.
P(xv~ Point PrNentatio~X
Exhibits r-.]
28
CITY COUNCIL
AG~.NDA M]~tORANDUM
AGE~I~DA ITEM: ~on on Transfdo~ from l~_eo~gin,--,dng to City-wide
Progrnm.
Att~.hrm~: Copy
[] [] []
I I I I
D O O O
121 n
0 O 0
O
~11 I I
0
c~ ~
r,~ ~ o o o
29
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PRESENTATION
AGENDA ITEM: Fourth Quarter Report of the Health Beneflt/Rl~k Management
Fund
STAFF PRESENTER(S):
1. CynUtl~ C.
2.
3.
~ Dm~rlment
Director of Human Re~ourca~ Human Re~ou~
OUTSIDE PRESENTER(8):
'ilUe~oel~n
Or~ql~U,n
ISSUE: Became of the unpredictability and fluctuation of the aclMty In Health
Insurance, Workers Compensation, and Germral Uablllty, the Council has asked for
quarterly Ixeeenta~ma of Incurred costs, and amourfls paid In the Health Beneft~/
Risk Management Fund.
BACKGROUND: 8taft hu been making quarterly pr,an;ill tlorm to the Council
for three yearn, ~o that the Council can make ndJtmtmerCm to the Budget H
needed, and li~;o,,,,ed declalons regarding Irmurance premiums.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: None
A'I'rACHMENTS:
Quartedy Repot
Power Point Slides
C. Garcta
City of Corpus Chdsti
Risk Management Report
For the Pedod Ended
July 31, 2005
City of Corpus Chrbtl, Tens
Deptrtmmt of Huron Rmoarm
Rbk Msu~q~ t Fund
Report for Period F_~ded July 31, 2005
T-blt of Co~m=
Health Beu~fita ..................................................................................... 1
¢}~'al Liab~ties ................................................................................ 15
Appendix I- Work~' Com~ Monit~ Clsims A~tlvity ~ ........ I - 1
Aplx~ix Il - Wofla~' COmlXmSafion 5-Y~r New ~ I-IistJu,ry ............ 1I-1
Appeudix UI - ~ Lisbilimi~ Claims Ty~ ................................... m-1
Appendix IV - Vehiek Aecklent R~xtrts ....................................................... .IV'-]
Health Bemelilm
The H~alth Inmnmace plans for the City of Corpus Christi saw a 6.7% incax~e in the
number of claims filed be~we~ Fiscal Year 2004 mad Fis~l Year 200S (s~ Ormph H-1
and T~cde H-I below). The number of cl~:nJ filed for C/ltcm~ IM City'm civili,,n l:dmn,
increased by 6.4% while Fire's plan hsd mn incre~e of 11.5% in ~ mhd Public Ssfely
(the Police plan) incr.,ed its claim~ como by 1.9%.
Totml Cklmm Fkd
(by F~ YMO
Grmpk H-I
Table H-I
As Gnq~h H-2 and Table H-2 shown next d~znonstm~, total ~ claimJ costa
continue to grow At a double=digit n~te. ToUd medical claims ~ increased by 13.6%
between Fiscal Year 2004 and 2005. For Citicme, thia ~ was 19.4% while Fire
mcreucd by 18.1% and Public Safety actually cxpcrieEr,~ ~ decease in dollm~ ptid of
12.5%. Total Pharmacy claims com incn:ased 17.4%.
M~llcal Clalm~ Paid
by FMcal Y~r
(SI,0Q~)
11l
j - -',l'm~- -
Bmk: Ph~l~y
I1 F'Y03 m F'Y04 1 FY061
Graph H-2
116 I~ [11 l~ 114 ~
t~ I~l'~ '.~,gl I I~li2ll '4~11~1 l"l'210
I~1 l~ ' lA 1,4L,
Tabb H-2
Ch'~h H-3 ~:~w~ th~ month-to-mo~th ~mg~ co~ p~ medi~l elam for ~h of the l~
four yeml. This dftta is provided for each of ~he individual hz~h plato in {h~pha H-4
Total - Average Coet I~r C1~!1
~-,~
I $175.00--.
S170.~) -
$186.00
S180.00 --
Cll]c. re - Average Cost per Claim
8173.01
FYO~
FY04
Grapk H-4
~184.18
$155.00
$150.00 ....
$145.0D - ·
S13~G0 -
$130.00
FY03
FY03
Fire - Average Coet per Cl~m
$142.M
~ !-1.5
Poke -Average Co.t per Cl. lm
Gr. pk H~
8160.03
4
('ompm-i~ individual pta~, on · per-member basis, Citicmt~ medical co~s inun~sed by
20.17'/o. Fi~ inc~uased by 16.76% and Public Safety decru~sed by 4.74% (see Or-ph. H-
7). It ~uld be noted thai claitns activity for the Public Safety pith durin~ thc lnat 5
month~ of the year was d=lt~mut 6x~n the second half of Fiscal 2004 and tho ru~ half of
Fi.~.al 2005. In F'~I 2004, Public Safety has one stop loss case and a second ca~ nea~
the stop loss limit. I-Iow~'v~, for Fiscal Year 2005 there v~ no stop lo~s case~ but
ti'g~ W~ · ~gle ~ ~ the ~ lo~ limiL Aa,41'donally, thc medical claims paid out
for Public Snfety during the secood hnif of the year we-re lower than those for the snme
period the yem' befits. The actual perfomumce of the Citica,'e ~ ~ ns well in
that cinimt wcrc si?i~cnr~ly higher than for the year befog. 'l'hit rcflccts the impnct of
~ l~H' the ~ [4:)~ Iimi~ Fi~] Year 2005 had 6 stop lo~s cas~ with mx~cr case just
over $100,000 paid. For ail thr~ plan~ tegntdleas of how medical e_l~m, ~
inctea~J by 15.73% and Public Ss~-ty incn~gd by I S.60~
Actuarml analysis of Fiscal 2005 darn corrobont~ the data above. TI~ City's a~ttmry
itxiicat~ that over the past two yem's, health claims (Ci 'vdian, Fi~ and Public 9n~-ty)
looking -t i~-~n~! costs, the ~-'tuary re-ports that Citicarc's civilian plan incms~ 31.4%
in per member per month (PMPM) cost~ fix~n Fiscal Year 2004 to Fiscal Ye~ 2005. Tho
nctunl3' no~ an eficl~tional p~blem in thtt admits pe~ 1,000 for the civiUm~
about ] 5% ~ than th~ peer 8~m~p ~ by Humnna.
Worker~' Comp~nmtion
Fi~:a.I Yem' 2005 ~ ~ e~pe~ially good ~ for Workers' C~npe~nm~on ¢l~im~. A~ ~
WC-1 and T~.bl~ WC-I ~, c~ ~ V ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~
I~ ~. C~ ~ ~ Fi~ Y~ ~5 (~ ~ ~ W~2 ~ T~ WC-2) ~
si~ifl~ly~~~~. ~c~~~~~~a
c~~ of ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ of ~) ~ a ~c~ ~ ~)
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY06
Grsl~ WC-1
43 28 48 42
~ 61 81 4~
44 46 ~ 46
1,2fl6 1,~.~ 1,117 1,1170
Tabl~ WC-I
BM Other
BFIre
B I:'ok~
[~ SoM W~I~ 8ewic~
~ -1Q.34'~
210 10.5316
Year to ~ Incurred Co~t Comperbon
(Period Ended July 31)
BFIm
B Police
FY01 FY02 FY04 [] 8oM Wmts
Cmld, WC-2
T~b~ WC-2
Omph WC-3 sha~rn next cl~u the doll~m l~id by department as ofJuly 31'*ofmchy~ar. As
c~n be ~ the~ wa~ ,, d?ificant impmvemmt in F'm:al Year 2005 with le~ th~n SI million
being paid out for claims. As of yem'-emi, only aborn $353,000 w~ ~t to ~ o~ o~ claims
~ out ~t year ~ for Fiscal 2004 claim~.
Doll~m P.Id
Period Ended July 31
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY06
Gr.l~ we-3
WO~[~J! CO~11['~[~11~'~] ~l ~ Police Delmmm~ f~r example,
cl~ 10.~~~~~~~. ~~
si~ im~~ ~ a 43% ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ a 74%
c~. F~ c~ ~~ ~ 20.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
M~) ~w a 27% ~ ~ c~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~
~ m ~ n~ ofc~ ~ ~ ~ F~ 2~, ~ ~
51~. ~ ~~ ~ ~olv~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~m.~
As e~p~-;ned in p~vious ~-ports, the da~ provided -t year-end does not mieet the final stsms
r~ll~din~ the City's performance in th~ ~ of Workm' Co...p,.,a,th=~ Each ~ th~ City
make~ l~l. yments on claim, filed in previ~ .vets (Gm~ WC-4) as ~H as on ~ filed for
~ ~ ~[. ~[ ~' claims may ~ be adjusted either tzp~ll'ds or do~m.~
claims a~e closed, and closed claims can be reopened. AdditK,~dly, as claims r~,m-~, the
incuned nmoum can either in.ease or ~eevease depending on various
Dokru Paid In Current Year
for Prior Y~ara' Clnirrm
$168,107
PHor to F'~I F'Y02 FYC)3 FY04
FY2001*
Year of CIMm
G]lpk WC-4
Gt'aphs WC-5 and WC-6 togc"tl~r with Tables WC-3 and WC=4 re4]ect Iht c, tmngcs to F'ucal
Ycnr 2004 claims overthe ct~'se of'a y~a~'. Originally, 1,070 clahxts we~ ~tledby the end of
Suly, 2004. HoN~-v~, by July 31, 2005, thc claim cotmt Rx' Fiscal 2004 hnd grown to 1,0~6.
Th;, change c~ be nsaot~tcd with the ~min_= of Ix~b claim filings and claim input tn that e~tmr
f[o,d $1.9 mil~O~ It )~f-.gnd to ~2.5 milli~] nt )'l~t-~:ld F~?Ad 200~. ~]c]] [!1 ~ {n Dot
neces~trOy unexpected because injuries tony be (~ett~nJned ~ be won= than ~y ~
and complications can occur.
10
1200
1000-
Graph WC-5
~ w~ 8en~ 133 1~4 1
pc~e 319 ~7 18
FIm 164 183 -1
Pm-ke 63 ~ 3
~ ~ 47 1
~ ~ ~ 0
~ 1~ 1~ 2
T~ 1~0 1~
T~ W~3
0.7E~
6.84'/,
--0.~%
4.78%
2.17%
0.00~
2.04%
1.06%
11
$ ,C-:-] .OIX)
Gml~ WC-6
ktctwre,d Co.~ .. o1' Jul~ 11. ~04
$ 108,880.17 $ 134,393.88 $ 25,433.79
764,867.07 940,249.83 175,382.58
184,248.88 216,161.88 30,906.98
71,1~4.g8 234,383.76 163,248.79
48,818.38 80,881.07 41,782.72
15~,138.60 258,503.84 07,387.04
81,188.11 71,911.21 10,746.10
406,LD~__.31 549,898.83 144,184.52
$1,870,00~.07 $ 2,647,~13.80 $ 67~,707.62
Tlble WC-4
23.~4,%
22.93%
10.7'7%
229.49%
~.;~'r%
81.1816
-18.431,i,
17.5'711i,
~.17%
12
One can also see the impact of claim rn,m-'afioo in the number of sevez~ cases tha~ a:~ ~rted
for erich year. Table WC-5 report~ the number of clams with incurred cosl~ over S50,000 as of
the end of tach of the pest five fiscal yeah -, well as their totJl incurred ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
claim. Table WC-6 ~ the same d~;. as of July 31, 2005. Az can be ~ c. him8 o~,m~ution
can ha~¢ a si.owificent iml~ct on the ~-portcd number of sever~ case~.
Nunbnr of Cmes 5 4
~mof7/31 $ 276~139 $ 23~11 $
AVml~Pm'CII~ S 5~22~ S ~,IM S
lrVl5 ~ ~
6 6 1
417,~ S 4~__,_~_ $ ~S,140
69,639 S 81,.345 $ 55,140
Tal~ WC-S
Nm~n~ ~fCmm Ii 9 7 9 I
To~llm:w~d $ 8423-;8 S 864,~; S 534,S91 S ~36,770 S ~S,140
lncwrud per Osim ~ g6,011 ~ 104,046 55,140
Anoint Pdd 842,571 860,,645 518,g24 '~9,172 s,~7
Rmm'v~ Rmatntng 3,453 15,667 136,~97 49,433
Table WC-6
In gn~-viom report], s~ff diJcu~m:d the ~ignificant chans~ under wuy in Austin. T~ with
regards to Texas Wofl~e~' Compemation law. House Bill 7 took c~0ct off Sep~rmber 1, 2005,
but many of itl changes don't go into ~ ur~il new rolm 8t~ Mopt~l while olt~r dmq~ only
8t~ct injuries incun~ onor ftflcr Scptemlx:r 1,2005. Some ofth~known~ a~th~t HB 7
vn:rkm' compensation health neOM~k. Such a zm~k v~uld ~ct u a hmtth ca~ pmvid~
would ~ ~ ~ ~e ~ ~ 1305, ~Jurn~e Code, m~td the rules fu:kq~:~ by
thft injured employees would trove t~ choe~ a U~fff~ doctm' fwm within th~ ne~m~k nnd
13
14
Geaeral L~abiliti~
As with Workers' Compemalic~ G~ncml Linbility clalma p~a~rm~l ~ in Fiscal Year 2005.
Graph GL-l, shown below, clem~ thai ~ clams ~ signi~camly imp~uved over
Fiscal 2004, dropping by 150 ctaitns and reflecting the lowes~ count in the l~m 5 ymrs.
Alt]~o~o_.h Incurred Costs also decrensed (Grnph GL-2), they wc"r~n't quit~ ns low ~s Incurrui
Cos~ et the end of Fiscal Year 2002. l-Iowa-vet, both clnlms coont and ]ncurt~ Cos~ for Final
Year 2005 are down rou~o~ly 16% from Fiscal 2004.
Graph GL=I
IW~m'
L
Graph GL-2
15
cl,ims count~ ~ in lh~ S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S~ Warm' and
Wnn~.w~w~ _ ~m a:Pl~o~iy 25% cl~ctem~m.
i ~ 1~ '-- ~ 74 ~ 1~1~
lncun'ed costs varied g~afiy fm~n dapartmc~ to d~3m-tn~,a (Table GL-2). Fo~ ax- .m~e, Wste~
2004, ~y, the~ wu a sign~cant increase in th;. depnZtmr~', lncm'n:d Com.
.'~.hou~ thc Police l::)epa~ent hnd only · ] 7% ~ in clnim. ~ bu~ tha [ncut~d Co~
Cla~ns payments in FiscaJ Year 2005 ~ made primarily on Fis~l 2004 cla~Es (see Gntl~
(3L-3:), The City pa~d $329,000 in Fiscal 2005 for clain~ ~ in 2005, but l~d $1.043 miillon
fOr clsimm fil~d in Fi~cnl 2004, ~ O~ Police D~ clntm..
16
Gru~h GL-3
mm ~ severity of the claiz~s ftlect. ~ GL=4 and Table GL-3 show how tn~n'tud
Corn have ~ from i~'~.1 ~tr-cncl cio~rs to dotlnz~ n~ Of July 31, 2005 for claims ~
intn'venin8 y~r~; sometimes ~tificaz~tiy. Gtsph GL-5 (Table OL-4) shows th: dollar amoun~
paid for elslrn, t'tled durin8 Fiscal Yenrs 2001 Rtrom~. 2005 as of the end of Fiscal Year 2005.
17
i k~-~.~- · Clan. k ol P.J,d. ~iB~la~
II I
I II I II I II I -
Tabk~ GL-3
18
Grlph
FY01 F~ FYI3
Fire $ g6,701.30 I 21,~3.49 $ 128,86341
(~ 11t,78028 34,780.14 3~,916.16
~ Ii-'r/ , ,~4 ~3,446.~0 2~6,4g~.27 2,_&'~L_~.2~
Poic~ 1~16,740.46 2~,414.~8 417,830.M
8nnl;~lon 203,786.09 103,0~0.3~ 4g,g48.81
81Drm ~ 8,__~Y~_.81 1~,767.72 34,436.06
W. ' ~. '- 49,g11.89 ~2,863.42 106,445.18
Wm~r 180,186.87 23,t94.88 ~1 ,g93.11
3~,B'7~.a4 12,168.17
~10,2~00 67,067.~6
18,~.M 10,438.1~
208,018.80 89,8~0..24
$ 2..,246,868.46 $ 1,043,479.18 $ 1,216,20~.38 $1,43~,43~A1 $32~,~.79
T~ble GL-4
19
W~qar~' Compmmlk~ - ~ Y~m' ~
'! he foilowin8 table graphs provide a five=year history of workers' COmlX'~"'tlon clahns
and the nnmber of claim* per call rc~x)n~c for both the Police Dclm'tmcnt ~d Fi~
bcpertmeoL The table show~ total number of clahns Eied as oftl~ end of e~ch y~r w~&
number of clalms not [:mid on veram the number of claim! for which mo~ than $1.00 wan
WORKIBff COMPgNSA~
~-YEAR NI~W CLb~ HIBTO~Y
(lq~M Va~r Bmb - i~rk~ gm~d JMy 31)
Y~
Total snm~= of Clakna
Total lncarmd
Tom Paid
% of Total in~unud Paid Out
Nmnb~ of Chin~ Pakl > $1 ~0
Nmnb~ ot bdnmity r~-. Pdd On
Nmnbo' of MO Cae~ PaM On
1~65 1~20 1,117 1,070 1~09
$ 1,.S8~011 $ 2~(X26,164 $ 2,135,2SB S !~ S
$ 1,021,2~8 S 1,17B~87 $ ],220,310 S 1~F7~67 S ~
~9 5~ 711 ~ ~
~ I~ 117 117 ~
~7 ~ 5~ ~1 5~
716 ~1 ~ ~ ~
14.~ 17~ I~ 17~!% I I~
25,435 ~7.~B9 2%493 2~964
0.00~1 0.0070 O~ O~ 0~3
335 ~3 ~ 319
1~ 1~ 1~ 171~ 1~12
0~ 0.~ 0~ 0~19 0.~17
H- 1
I! _
I,I I!
Fbc~l Yeer- Pe(i~cl Ended .July :~1
domi~t¢ thc liability clainu. Noo-vehicul~ lxopcrty damase is the m:xt mo~ ~
~pe of liability claim filed. Incurr~ co~ by ~ ofcl~m for Fiscal Yc~r 2005 h~ abo
Types of Claims - Period Ended July 31
0
0 6,~.,~ ~
BW,' ~' bc]lnlgB..rdl~
BM CXher
C;ITY C~, C:CNtKIB m
Appendix IV
Vddde Acckl,-t R~ports
'Fhe foliowin~ ~ ]xx)vide infc~nmio~ o~ the performaa~ of City empIoy,~___
~ t~ vehicle Iccid~. The n-mbe~ of *__ _~dmt~ ~ ] 1% fix~m F'm:ll Y~Lr
2004 to Fis~l Year 2005. Th~ number of prLw~nmble iccicl~nt~ ~ chJ~ tim
~e time fi~m¢.
CITY VKHICLE ACCID~JTi~
IrlSCAL Y~ 1~1 ~ 2eeS
1993
19~4
1995
19~6
1997
1999
20OO
__~_ !
20O3
20O4
20O5
Aval~
Nmmbarof Nmmbe~M' % I~,., ' t'--mf
AeeMmm~* Pmv~taldm Tml
~ 145 49.15~
~7 I~ 52.~
~ 121
i~ M 47~1N
217 ~ 45.1~
~ I 13 42.~
~ 116 43.61~
~ W 37.~
~ 105 43.03~
~ 120 41.1~
~ 145 ~.~
323 129 39.~
-~.3~V~
140.00~
11.11%
37-q0%
-31.2.~
-21.4,~
-ll.O~
City Yehk:b Ac~:ldent~
W- 2
~unoo
~MIOG
E
tunoo
Oi ·
i'
· 0
--'
0
mm
~ 0