HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 02/14/2006
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 14,2006
Corpus Christi
U-blerica CiIV
11 A5 A.M. - Proclamation declaring February 14,2006 as "I Love My Corpus Christi Day"
Proclamation declaring the week of February 12-18.2006 as "National Lulac Week"
Proclamation declaring the week of February 19-25, 2006 as "National Engineers Week"
Proclamation declaring the month of February as "The 1 09lh Anniversary of the Founding of the National
PTA"
Proclamation declaring the month of February as "National African American History Month"
Ceremonial Swearing-in for the Corpus Christi Black Chamber of Commerce Officers
AGENDA
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1201 LEOPARD
FEBRUARY 14, 2006
10:00 A.M.
PUBLIC NOTICE - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVA TED PAGERS ARE
PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 12:00 p.m. or at the end
of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name
and address. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your
subject, please present it to the City Secretary.
Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su ingles es limitado, habra un inter prete ingles-espanol en todas las juntas
del ConciNo para ayudarle.
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to
contact the City Secretary's office (at 361-826-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be
made.
A. Mayor Henry Garrett to call the meeting to order.
B. Invocation to be given by Deacon Adelfino Palacios, Jr., Corpus Christi Cathedral.
C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States.
D. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers.
Mayor Henry Garrett
Mayor Pro T em Bill Kelly
Council Members:
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
Rex Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
City Manager George K. Noe
City Attorney Mary Kay Fischer
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 14. 2006
Page 2
E. MINUTES:
Approval of Regular Meetings of January 17. 2006 and January
31,2006. (Attachment # 1)
F BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (Attachment # 2)
2
*
Coastal Bend Council of Governments
Commission on Children and Youth
Committee for Persons with Disabilities
Park and Recreation Advisory Committee
Weed and Seed Steering Committee
*
*
*
*
G. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION:
For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed
as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City
Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed; may
finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure
rather than a two reading ordinance; or may modify the action specified.
A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the
last regular, or a subsequent special meeting; such agendas are
incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered
item.
H.
CONSENT AGENDA
Notice to the Public
The following items are of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has
been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it
has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one
vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council
Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be
withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not
requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will
be adopted by one vote.
CONSENT MOTIONS. RESOLUTIONS. ORDINANCES AND ORDINANCES
FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
(At this point the Council will vote on all motions, resolutions and ordinances not
removed for individual consideration)
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 14. 2006
Page 3
3 Motion approving a supply agreement for approximately 118,000
pounds of drop-on type glass spheres, in accordance with Bid
Invitation No. BI-0070-06 from Swarco Reflex, Inc., of Mexia,
Texas, based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of
$31,388. This item will be used by Street Services. The term of
the contract is for twelve months with options to extend for up to
two additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of
the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have
been budgeted by the using department in FY 2005-2006.
(Attachment # 3)
4. a. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept
grant funding in the amount of $10,000 from the Texas
Department of Transportation for an Impaired Driving Mobilization
Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) grant for DWI
enforcement overtime pay within the Police Department and to
execute all related documents. (Attachment # 4)
4.b. Ordinance appropriating $10,000 from the Texas Department of
Transportation for funding of an Impaired Driving Mobilization
Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) grant for DWI
enforcement overtime within the Police Department in NO.1 061
Police Grants Fund. (Attachment # 4)
5.a. Resolution authorizing the City Manageror his designee to accept
a grant from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in the
amountof$69,000 in the No. 1058 Marina Grants Fund for Phase
#1 of the Corpus Christi Marina Boat Pump-out System for Dock
"E" Peoples Street T-Head, with $23,000 match from the No.
3233 Marina Development Capital Improvement Program Fund.
(Attachment # 5)
5.b. Ordinance appropriating a $69,000 grant from the Texas Parks
and Wildlife Department in the NO.1 058 Marina Grants Fund for
Phase #1 of the Corpus Christi Marina Boat Pump-out System for
Dock "E" Peoples Street T-Head grant. (Attachment # 5)
6. Ordinance transferring $3,000 from the NO.1 020 General Fund
Account No. 202965 to Account No. 13700; and appropriating the
$3.000 to pay expenses for "Celebrate Texas 2006". (Attachment
# 6)
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
~
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 14, 2006
Page 4
7 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to reallocate
Community Development Block Grant Program funds from the
FY2004 Corpus Christi Police Athletic League T. C. Ayers project
to the FY2005 Corpus Christi Police Athletic League Ben Garza
Project. (Attachment # 7)
8. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Amendment NO.6 to the Contract for Professional Services with
LNV Engineering, Inc., of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of
$866.302 for a total re-stated fee of $3,940,767 for the Water
System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis to include the
City-wide Water Distribution Master Plan Update. (Attachment
# 8)
9 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Change Order No. 3 to increase the Advanced Funding
Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation in the
amount of $28,864.57 for the Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill F.M. 70
Drainage Culverts. (Attachment # 9)
10. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
Change Order NO.2 to the construction contract with Zimmerman
Construction, of Burnet, Texas in the amount of $32,051 for the
Senior Center Improvements Project (CDBG). (Attachment # 10)
11 Motion approving the temporary closure of Mann Street from
Water Street to Shoreline Drive. beginning at 12 midnight, July
14, 2007 through 5:00 p.m. on July 18, 2007 and waiving the
associated occupancy fees of Section 53-195 and requirements
of Subsections 49-17 (a) and (b), for the 2007 Texas Pecan
Growers Annual Conference and Trade Show due to a finding
that the event will promote the City and provide sufficient publicity
and economic benefit to justify the waiver in accordance with
Section 49-17 ( r ) of the Code of Ordinances. (Attachment # 11)
12. Motion authorizing payment to American Electric Power in the
amount of $148,000 street light installation on Spur 3 between
Nile Drive and Ocean Drive. (Attachment # 12)
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
~
~
~
t
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 14. 2006
Page 5
13
Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a Deferment
Agreement with Value Place LLC, (Developer), in the amount of
$135.941.70 for public improvements including water,
wastewater, paving, and drainage improvements required to plat
Value Place Subdivision, located north of SH 358 (South Padre
Island Drive) and west of Friendship Drive at West Point Road, in
accordance with the Platting Ordinance Section V-Required
Improvements. Subsection A.3(b). (Attachment # 13)
14
Ordinance appropriating $2,700,000 from the Federal Aviation
Administration Grant No. 3-48-0051-37-2005 in the No. 3020
Airport Capital Improvement Fund for the Runway 13/31
Rehabilitation, Phase II; Runway 17/35 Shoulders and Blast
Pads; Airport Drainage Improvements Phase IV; Terminal Apron
at Corpus Christi International Airport. (Attachment # 14)
15. Second Reading Ordinance - Waiving the 60-day waiting period
and publication of legal notice; renaming the park at 3010
Sunnybrook from Southside Park to Mike Zepeda Park. (First
Reading 01/31/06) (Attachment # 15)
16. Second Reading Ordinance - Authorizing the City Manager or his
designee to execute Supplemental Agreement No.1 to Federal
Aviation Administration Lease No. DTFA07-04-L-00560
eliminating all references to the Visual Approach Slope Indicator
(V ASI) and add ing 0.15 acre of land for the Precision Approach
Path Indicator (PAPI) serving Runway 17. (First Reading
01/31/06) (Attachment # 16)
17 Second Reading Ordinance - Authorizing the City Manager or his
designee to execute Supplemental Agreement NO.1 to Federal
Aviation Administration Lease No. DTFA07-98-L-01123
eliminating all references to the Visual Approach Slope Indicator
(VASI) and adding 0.25 acre of land for the Precision Approach
Path Indicator (PAPI) serving Runway 13 and 0.64 acre for the
PAPI serving Runway 31. (First Reading 01/31/06) (Attachment
# 17)
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
~
~
~
~
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 14, 2006
Page 6
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
18.a. Public hearing to consider abandoning and vacating a 7,215-
square foot portion of the Eden Lane public right-of-way, out of
Lot 3.Ehlers Garden Tracts, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts, and
Lot 5, Ehlers Garden Tracts; located approximately 540-feet east
of the McBride Lane street right-of-way and north of IH 37.
(Attachment # 18)
18.b. First Reading Ordinance - Abandoning and vacating a 7,215-
square foot portion of the Eden Lane public right-of-way, out of
Lot 3, Ehlers Garden Tracts, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts, and
Lot 5, Ehlers Garden Tracts; located approximately 540-feet east
of the McBride Lane street right-of-way and north of IH 37;
subject to compliance with the specified conditions. (Attachment
# 18)
19.a. Public hearing in connection with the issuance by the Colorado
Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority of its tax exempt
obligation for the benefit of the Educational Media Foundation in
the aggregate principal amount of approximately $16,500,000.
(Attachment # 19)
19.b. Resolution of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas approving the
issuance of tax exempt obligation by the Colorado Educational
and Cultural Facilities Authority for the benefit of Educational
Media Foundation as required by Section 147 (f) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. (Attachment # 19)
ZONING CASES:
20. Case No. 0106-01. AI Development. Inc. : A change of zoning
from a "F-R" Farm Rural District to a "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling
District. The property is 47.87 acres out of Lots 3-6, Section 21,
Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located 900 feet
west of Airline Road along future Lipes Boulevard. (Attachment
# 20)
Planning Commission and Staffs Recommendation: Approval
of a "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District.
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 14, 2006
Page 7
ORDI NANCE
Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by AI
Development, Inc., by changing the zoning map in reference to
47.87 acres out of Lots 3 through 6, Section 21, Flour Bluff and
Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, from "F-R" Farm Rural District
to "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District; amending the
Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the
existing Comprehensive Plan.
J.
REGULAR AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS. RESOLUTIONS. AND ORDINANCES:
21 Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept
a grant from the Morris L. Lichtenstein Jr. Foundation in the
amount of $244,000 to establish a Spay and Neuter Program and
to authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute an
agreement with the Foundation for that purpose.
(Attachment # 21 )
K. PRESENTATIONS:
Public comment will not be solicited on Presentation items.
22. Results of 2005 Citizen Satisfaction Survey, Dr. Daniel J.
Jorgensen (Attachment # 22)
L. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS
NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT
APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. OR AT THE END OF THE
COUNCIL MEETING. WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. PLEASE
LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. IF YOU PLAN
TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURING THIS TIME PERIOD,
PLEASE SIGN THE FORM A T THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL
CHAMBER, GIVING YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND TOPIC. (A
recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone
located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition
or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City
Secretary.)
Si usted se dirige a la junta y cree que su ingles es /imitado, habra un interprete
ingles-espanol en la reuni6n de la junta para ayudarle.
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 14, 2006
Page 8
PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF
PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL
BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY
PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE
STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC A T ANY
COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO
RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into
executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss
any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of
the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code,
and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive
session on the following matters. In the event the Council elects to go
into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or
sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session
will be publicly announced by the presiding office
N. REPORTS:
The following reports include questions by Council to Staff regarding
City policies or activities; request by Council for information or reports
from Staff; reports of activities of individual Council members and Staff;
constituent concerns; current topics raised by media; follow-up on Staff
assignments; scheduling of future Council meetings and activities; and
other brief discussions regarding city-related matters.
23 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
*
Upcoming Items
24 MAYOR'S UPDATE
25. COUNCIL AND OTHER REPORTS
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
February 14. 2006
Page 9
O. ADJOURNMENT:
POSTING STATEMENT:
This agenda was posted on the City's official bulletin board at the front entrance
to City Hall. 1201 Leopard Street, at ,;)' 3'0 p.m., February 10. 2006.
~
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
NOTE:
The City Council Agenda can be found on the City's Home
Page at www.cctexas.com after 7:00 p.m. on the Friday
before regularly scheduled council meetings. If technical
problems occur, the agenda will be uploaded on the
Internet by Monday morning.
Symbols used to highlight action item that implement
council priority issues.
CITY COUNCIL
PRIORITY ISSUES
(Refer to legend at the end of the
agenda summary)
1
MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS
Regular Meeting
January 17, 2006 -10:00 a.m.
PRESENT
Mayor Henry Garrett
Mayor Pro Tern Bill Kelly
Council Members:
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
Rex Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
Citv Staff:
City Manager George K. Noe
City Attorney Mary Kay Fischer
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Mayor Garrett called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall.
The invocation was delivered by Reverend E. F. Bennett and the Pledge of Allegiance to
the United States flag was led by Council Member Chesney.
Mayor Garrett called for approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
January 10, 2006. A motion was made, seconded, and passed to approve the minutes as
presented
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett called for consideration of the consent agenda (Items 2-10). Mr. Abel
Alonzo, 1701 Thames, requested that Item 5 be pulled for individual consideration. Council
members requested that Items 3 and 7 be pulled for individual consideration. A motion was
made, seconded, and passed to approve Items 2 through 10. constituting the consent agenda,
except for Items 3, 5, and 7, which were pulled for individual consideration. City Secretary
Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
2. MOTION NO. 2006-005
Motion approving the purchase of one truck mounted excavator from Waukesha Pearce
Industries, of Corpus Christi, Texas in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0074-06,
based on only bid for the total amount of $248,840. This unit is purchased for the Storm
Water Department and is a replacement to the fleet. Funding is available in the Capital
Outlay Budget of the Maintenance Services Fund.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 2
4. RESOLUTION NO. 026606
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application to
the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in the amount of $30,000 to operate the
Community Outdoor Outreach Program (CO-OP). an outdoor recreation program for
youth participating in the City's summer program.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
6 MOTION NO. 2006-007
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 12 to
the Contract for Professional Services with Shiner Moseley, of Corpus Christi, Texas in
the amount of $390.700 subject to availability of funds, to the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill
for a Solid Waste Citizen Collection Center and Transfer Station at the J. C. Elliott
Landfill.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett.
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
8. MOTION NO. 2006-009
Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a Deferment Agreement with Peacock
Properties, (Developer), in the amount of $74.578.90 for the installation of 1.242 linear
feet of off-site, 8-inch PVC sanitary sewer collection line to serve Chris-Rae Addition.
Block 1, Lots 6 and 7, located south of SH 358 (South Padre Island Drive) and west of
Rodd Field Road, in accordance with the Platting Ordinance Section V-Required
Improvements, Subsection A.3.(b).
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney. Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
9_ MOTION NO. 2006-010
Motion approving the Developer/Owner Agreement with Brighton Park Baptist Church,
developer of Brighton Park Baptist Church Lot 1, Subdivision, located south of Brooke
Road and east of Airline Road to secure the construction of an a-inch and 12-inch water
line infrastructure requirement.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 3
10. ORDINANCE NO. 026609
Amending the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances, Chapter 57. Vehicles for Hire, Section
57 -254. Maximum Auto Wrecker Service and Storage fees, providing for fee increases.
changing the term "preservation fee" to "impoundment fee" and using "longer that 25
feet" as a trigger to charge large vehicle daily storage fees; all changes of which conform
to controlling state law; and providing for penalties. (First Reading 01/10/06)
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its second reading with the
following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper. Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez. Noyola, and
Scott. voting "Aye"
Mayor Garrett opened discussion on Item 5 regarding a grant to cover administrative
expenses for the Regional Health Awareness Board. Mr. Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames, thanked
the Port of Corpus Christi for contributing the grant funding, and he asked for the Council's
approval. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
5.a. RESOLUTION NO. 026607
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee on behalf of the Regional
Health Awareness Board, to accept a grant from Port Industries of Corpus Christi in the
amount of $26,250 for administrative expenses related to operation of the Board.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett.
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
5.b. ORDINANCE NO. 026608
Ordinance appropriating a grant on behalf of the Regional Health Awareness Board in
the amount of $26,250 from Port Industries of Corpus Christi in the No. 1066 Health
Grants Fund for administrative expenses related to operation of the Board.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia. Kelly. Kinnison, Marez,
Noyola. and Scott, voting "Aye".
Mayor Garrett opened discussion on Item 3 regarding supply agreements for a variety of
canned and frozen goods for the Senior Community Services' meal program. Mr. Noyola noted
that LaBatt Food Service and PFG. the two companies that were awarded the bids, appeared to
have bid for the same items. He asked why one company wasn't awarded the total bid. Mr.
Mike Barrera, procurement and general services manager, replied that six or seven companies
bid for the items, and the city was required by law to award to the lowest bidder. Consequently,
staff could not recommend award to one company. He explained that the bid tab had
approximately 200 lines, with each category of canned or frozen goods divided into many
subcategories. The canned fruit category, for example, was comprised of many subcategories,
such as canned pears, canned peaches). Subsequently LaBatt Food Service may have been
awarded some of the items in the subcategories, while PFG was awarded others; thus, they
were not awarded the same items. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as
follows.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 4
3 MOTION NO. 2006-006
Motion approving supply agreements with the following companies for the following
amounts in accordance with the Coastal Bend Council of Governments Bid Invitation No,
CBCOG-06-1 for food items which include canned and frozen fruit and vegetables.
meats and condiments for an estimated six-month expenditure of $100,959.33. The
terms of the contracts shall be for six months with an option to extend for up to three
additional months. subject to the approval of the Coastal Bend Council of Governments,
the suppliers and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have been requested by
Senior Community Services in FY 2005-2006.
LaBatt Food Service
Corpus Christi. TX
131 Items
$46,295.78
PFG
Victoria, TX
85 Items
$54.663.55
Grand Total: $100,959.33
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper. Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola. and Scott. voting "Aye".
Mayor Garrett opened discussion on Item 7 regarding the Corpus Christi Ship Channel
Water and Wastewater Utility Crossing project. Mr. Kelly commented that as the city searched
for a new wastewater treatment facility site, the Hillcrest neighborhood was requesting that the
city consider sites that were north of the channel. If the Council decided on a site north of the
channel, he felt the city could save money by consolidating the channel dredging with a
wastewater treatment facility moving water from south to north. He asked if this was a possible
option. City Engineer Angel Escobar replied negatively. explaining that the purpose of the ship
channel project was to increase the channel depth to accommodate the future dredging; to
install two wastewater lines moving wastewater from north to south; and to install two new water
lines. The size of the directional boring in the ship channel project would be insufficient for
wastewater lines moving water from south to north, which required two 30-inch diameter lines.
Mr. Kelly asked if the city decided to build north of the channel. would there be a need to bring
wastewater from the North Beach area to the south. Mr. Escobar answered affirmatively, but
pointed out that the existing lift station on Resaca and Sam Rankin could pump the water to the
treatment plant for that area more efficiently. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their
votes as follows:
7 MOTION NO. 2006-008
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order No. 3 to a
construction contract with Akerman Construction, of Purcell, Oklahoma in the amount of
$139,000 for the Corpus Christi Ship Channel Water and Wastewater Utility Crossing
Project Base Bid One for the relocation of the entry point.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper. Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott. voting "Aye".
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett deviated from the agenda, and opened discussion on Item 16 regarding
flexible-fuel plug-in hybrid vehicles. Mr. Juan Garza, general manager for Austin Energy,
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17,2006 - Page 5
briefed the Council on a City of Austin initiative encouraging automobile manufacturers to
produce and sell flexible-fuel plug-in hybrid vehicles to fleet operators and the public. The so-
called Austin initiative was being launched next week in Washington, D.C.
Mr. Garza discussed the importance of alternative-fuel vehicles as transportation options
because of economic, environmental, and national security concerns. He said electricity
seemed to be the most viable alternative to petroleum that was currently available,. The cost of
a "gallon" of electricity, for example, was approximately 25 cents, compared with $2.50 per
gallon of gasoline.
Mr. Garza noted that there were a number of gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles available
on the market today which both reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency in city driving such
as the Toyota Prius and the Honda Civic. Hybrid vehicles combined an internal combustion
engine followed by an electric motor powered by a battery system. The power inverter module
allowed the battery to recharge when the car slowed down or braked; thus, this type of vehicle
was more efficient for city driving as opposed to highway driving. The flexible-fuel plug-in hybrid
vehicle, however, could be plugged into a charging device when not in use, increasing the
available battery power. This would improve on emission reductions and fuel efficiency during
daily driving activities.
Mr. Garza said the goal was to engineer a vehicle with a battery that could run on 100
percent electricity for a minimum of 30 miles, noting that fifty percent of all daily work commutes
were less than thirty miles. On the other hand, if one wished to travel to San Antonio, the car
would convert automatically to gasoline-power.
Mr. Garza stated that currently, the automobile industry was not producing vehicles with
this advanced capability. Even though the technology was available. The upgrade would be
costly for most manufacturers, so they would need some indication that there was a market for
these vehicles. Consequently, he said the City of Austin established this program to obtain
endorsements from local governments and other fleet users in support of flexible-fuel plug-in
hybrid vehicles. Mr. Garza said Council's approval of the proposed resolution would support a
national campaign to encourage development and production of flexible-fuel plug-in hybrid
vehicles.
Mr Garza described the City of Austin's program in more detail. First, he said they
collected 10,000 signatures from residents in support of the initiative. Second, Austin Energy
was prepared to offer energy rebates to purchasers of flexible fuel plug-in hybrid vehicles.
Third, the City of Austin and other local government and businesses had joined forces to
promote the initiative. Finally, he said the City of Austin was attempting to obtain petitions and
endorsements from businesses. environmentalists, and other interested parties.
Mr Garza stated the City of Austin planned a kick-off campaign on January 24, 2006 in
the National Press Club. Washington D.C. He said supporters from cities, public utilities, and
private sector companies would join Austin Mayor Will Wynn at the event.
In response to Mayor Garrett's question, Mr. Garza stated that the public transportation
sector had requested a special plug-in that could fully charge a battery in an hour and a half.
Otherwise, the vehicle would charge overnight at any 120-volt outlet.
In response to Mr. Scott's question, Mr. Garza replied Austin Energy was a corporation
fully owned by the City of Austin that generated and sold electricity to city residents for a profit.
Mr. Scott asked why the proposed resolution was specifically endorsing flexible-fuel plug-in
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17. 2006 - Page 6
vehicles rather than hybrid vehicles in general. Mr. Garza replied that the national campaign
was focusing on the flexible-fuel plug-in vehicles because automakers were not currently
manufacturing them, and the City of Austin felt the plug-in vehicles were technologically superior
to the gasoline-electric hybrids in production. Mr. Scott felt that any type of hybrid vehicle
should be encouraged, and resisted the attempt to focus solely on flexible-fuel, plug-in hybrid
vehicles. He pointed out that vehicles were the major cause of pollution, so he felt the
governments should provide incentives to move toward all hybrid vehicles. City Manager Noe
replied that the city's Air Quality Committee, headed by Mr. Bill Hennings. was also investigating
alternative fuel initiatives, and he proposed scheduling a report for the Council. Mr. Scott spoke
In support of scheduling a report.
Mr. Garcia asked Mr. Garza if he planned to hold any orientations to inform the public
about the advantages of hybrid vehicles. Mr. Garza replied he could make those arrangements.
Mr. Garcia also pointed out the federal energy bill offered incentives for all hybrid vehicles.
Mayor Garrett asked for public comment. Mr. Abel Alonzo spoke in support of hybrid
vehicles. saying that electric wheelchairs had been using the technology for years. City
Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
16. RESOLUTION NO. 026615
Resolution directing the City Manager to develop a program to encourage the future
purchase of flexible-fuel plug-in hybrid vehicles for City fleet orders; commit the City to
support state, and federal policies that will promote flexible-fuel plug-in hybrid vehicles;
and work with other local governments, education, business. and the environmental
community to encourage the manufacture and purchase of flexible-fuel plug-in hybrid
vehicles.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett referred to Item 11, and a motion was made, seconded, and passed to
open the public hearing on the following zoning case:
Case No. 1205-01. Sharon Gilleland: A change of zoning from a "R-1 B" One-family
Dwelling District to an II AB" Professional Office District. The property is in the Del Monte
Subdivision, Block 5, Lot 13, located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Santa
Fe and Indiana Avenue.
City Secretary Chapa stated that the Planning Commission and staff recommended
denial of an "AB" Professional Office District and in lieu thereof, approval of a "R-2" Multiple
Dwelling District.
No one spoke in opposition to the zoning change. Mr. Garcia made a motion to close
the public hearing, seconded by Mr. Scott. and passed. City Secretary Chapa polled the
Council for their votes as follows:
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 7
11. ORDINANCE NO. 026610
Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by Sharon Gilleland by changing the
zoning map in reference to .14 acres out of Del Monte Subdivision, Block 5, Lot 13, from
"R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District to "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District; amending the
Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive
Plan.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett. Chesney, Cooper. Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez.
Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
Mayor Garrett referred to Item 12, and a motion was made, seconded. and passed to
open the public hearing on the following zoning case:
Case No. 1205-02, Yorktown Oso Joint Venture: A change in zoning from a "R-1 B" One-
family Dwelling District to a "R-1C" One-family Dwelling District. The property is in
Rancho Vista Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 2, Block 2, Lots 2-14, Block 3, Lots 1-14 and
Block 5, Lots 9-20, located south of Yorktown Boulevard and 1 ,550 feet east of Airline
Road extension and Rodd Field Road.
City Secretary Chapa said the Planning Commission recommended the approval of a
"R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District with a Special Permit on six (6) lots. Staff recommended the
approval of a "R-1C" One-family Dwelling District. Mr. Chapa said the ordinance reflected the
Planning Commission's recommendation.
Assistant Director of Development Services Michael Gunning explained that the
applicant was requesting a change in zoning from the original "R-1 B" zoning request that was
recently approved. The subdivision was developed under the "R-1B" standard. However. there
were six lots with home built at the 20-foot foot yard setback, similar to the homes zoned "R-1C"
to the north of the development. He noted that the 20-foot yard setback was the minimum front
yard set back for properties zoned "R-1 cn
Mr Gunning stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of the "R-1 Cot
district and in lieu thereof approval of the "R-1 B" district with a special permit on the six lots. He
said staff was recommending the "R-1C" zoning because it was consistent with the adjacent
zoning. In addition, his experience was that as this subdivision developed in the future, other
property owners in that same subdivision would also want the 20-foot front yard set back line.
Finally, he said there was an exception to the ordinance that actually allowed individuals to build
at a front yard setback based on the average set back for that particular block. Consequently,
many of the homeowners In residences zoned "R-1 B" could appeal and ask for administrative
approval to build a 20-foot front yard setback. In conclusion, Mr. Gunning stated that staff felt it
was best to zone the entire subdivision "R-1C".
In response to Mr. Scott's question, Mr. Gunning stated that the "R-1 B" zoning allowed a
25-foot setback.
Mayor Garrett asked for public comment. Mr. Bart Braselton, 7406 Lake Buchanan,
spoke in support of staff's recommendation.
Mr. Kinnison made a motion to amend the ordinance to reflect staffs recommendation,
seconded by Ms. Cooper, and passed.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 8
A motion was made, seconded, and passed to close the public hearing. City Secretary
Chapa polled the Council for their votes on the ordinance as amended as follows:
12. ORDINANCE NO. 026611
Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by Yorktown Oso Joint Venture by
changing the zoning map in reference to Rancho Vista Subdivision. Block 2. Lot 7, 11,
12 and 13; Block 3, Lot 1; and Block 5, Lot 5, from "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District to
"R-1C" One-family Dwelling District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for
any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan.
An emergency was declared. and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved as
amended with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kinnison, Marez,
Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye"; Kelly was absent.
Mayor Garrett referred to Item 13, and a motion was made. seconded, and passed to
open the public hearing on the following zoning case:
Case No. 1205-03. Patricia Hawn Wallace. Trustee #2: A change in zoning from a "F-R"
Farm-Rural District to a "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District. The property is 33.25 acres
out of Lots 22, 23, and 24, Section 25. Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts,
located on the south side of Yorktown Boulevard between Rodd Field Road and the
Cayo del Oso.
City Secretary Chapa stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
of a "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District.
No one spoke in opposition to the zoning change. Mr. Garcia made a motion to close
the public hearing, seconded by Ms. Cooper, and passed. City Secretary Chapa polled the
Council for their votes as follows:
13. ORDINANCE NO. 026612
Amending the Zoning Ordinance. upon application by Patricia Hawn Wallace, Trustee #2
by changing the zoning map in reference to 33.25 acres out of Lots 22, 23, and 24,
Section 25, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts. from "F_R" Farm-Rural
District to "R_1 B" One-family Dwelling District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to
account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kinnison. Marez, Noyola. and
Scott, voting "Aye"; Kelly was absent.
Mayor Garrett deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 15. and a motion was
made, seconded, and passed to open the public hearing on the following zoning case:
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 9
Case No. 1105-04. Scott Mandel: A change in zoning from a "F-R" Farm-Rural District to
a "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District on Tract 1, a "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District on
Tract 2 and a "B-1" Neighborhood Business District on Tract 3. The property is 40.02
acres out of Lots 1 0 and 18, Section 20 out of the Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and
Garden Tracts. located east of Cimarron Boulevard and 200 feet south of Brockhampton
Street
City Secretary Chapa stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
of a "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District on Tracts 1, 2, and 3.
No one spoke in opposition to the zoning change. A motion was made, seconded, and
passed to close the public hearing.
Mr. Kinnison asked if the applicant planned to submit an application for a Planned Unit
Development ("PUD") for the project site in the future. Mr. Gunning replied affirmatively. He
explained that the applicant preferred commercial and town home zoning on the Cimarron
frontage. but had requested "R-1 B" zoning at this time for the entire site due to infrastructure
Issues concerning proposed Drainage Ditch 27, and the need to prepare a subdivision plat with
a PUD district. In addition. the applicant has indicated that development of the commercial and
town home tracts would only occur after Cimarron Boulevard was improved. He anticipated that
the applicant would pursue a PUD district for the project site within the next two or three years.
In response to Mr. Kinnison's question, Mr. Gunning replied the applicant would have to submit
a new application for a PUD for the Planning Commission's review. City Secretary Chapa
polled the Council for their votes as follows:
15. ORDINANCE NO. 026614
Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by Scott Mandel, by changing the
zoning map in reference to 40.02 acres out of Lots 10 and 18. Section 20 out of the
Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, from "F-R" Farm-Rural District to "R-
1 B" One-family Dwelling District on Tracts 1, 2, and 3; amending the Comprehensive
Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and
Scott. voting "Aye"; Kelly was absent.
Mayor Garrett referred to Item 14, and a motion was made, seconded, and passed to
open the public hearing for the following zoning case:
Case No. 1105-07. Arriba Development A change of zoning from a "R-1 B" One-family
Dwelling District to a "B-4" General Business District The property is a vacant tract of
land located north of Up River Road and Interstate 37 at the intersection of Session
Road. (Tabled 12/20/05)
City Secretary Chapa said the Planning Commission recommended approval of a "B-4"
General Business District. Staff recommended denial of the "B-4" General Business District.
and in lieu thereof, approval of a "B-1" Neighborhood Business District. Mr. Chapa said the
ordinance before the Council today reflected the Planning Commission's recommendation.
Assistant Director of Development Services Michael Gunning stated the Council tabled
this case on December 20. 2005 to allow the applicant to meet with residents and the Tuloso
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 10
Midway School District to consider a lesser zoning district. He referred to a letter submitted by
the Tuloso-Midway ISD requesting a "B-1A" Neighborhood Business District rather than a "B-4"
General Business District because of the subject property's proximity to a church, preferring
non-residential development along the IH-37 frontage. Mr. Gunning stated that the Planning
Commission. on the other hand, felt the most appropriate zoning was the "B-4" district because
of the subject property's proximity to Sessions Road.
Mr. Gunning explained the subject property was located at the northwest corner of
Sessions Road and Up River Road. Up River Road at this location was also the frontage road
for IH-37. The property was vacant with existing low-density residential uses to the west and
vacant land on the north and east sides. The south property line was adjacent to Sessions
Road, a local (or rural) street that accesses a number of single-family developments. In
addition. the Future Land Use Plan designated this property for commercial uses along the
highway frontage with low-density land uses located to the north and behind the commercial
uses. Consequently, staff was recommending the denial of the "B-4" district and approval of the
"B-1" district because they felt it was most appropriate.
Mr. Gunning also pointed out that TxDOT felt that the intersection of a local street like
Sessions Road and the frontage road with a driveway from the subject property could create a
traffic hazard. TxDOT preferred that the driveway be located at the extreme western edge of
the subject property. The city's driveway ordinance would also prohibit any commercial
driveway access onto Sessions Road since it was a local street.
In conclusion, Mr. Gunning stated staff preferred the "B-1" district to the "B-1A" district
since there were no existing homes in the area that warranted the additional buffer the "B-1A"
provided.
Mr. Garcia commented that the city was not saying that the area could never be zoned a
"B-4" district; rather, staff's recommendation under the existing conditions was to zone the
property "B-1". Mr. Gunning replied affirmatively, saying the area could be zoned "B-4" in the
future. Approved uses in the "B-1" zoning district were grocery stores. retail uses, personal
service uses, offices, and apartments.
Mayor Garrett asked for public comment. Mr. Victor Gutierrez with Coym Rehmet &
Gutierrez Engineering, 5656 S. Staples, representing the applicant, stated that they met with the
Tuloso-Midway School District Board and superintendent per Mr. Kelly's request at the last
meeting. The school district was in favor of the "B-1A" zoning district, which differed from the
Planning Commission and staffs recommendations. The Planning Commission unanimously
recommended "B-4" zoning, and staff recommended "B-1". While the applicant preferred the
"B-4" zoning, Mr. Gutierrez said his client would accept a minimum of "B-1" zoning with a
Special Permit for a hotel/motel site. This proposal would protect the school district and the
residents from any objectionable uses. He noted that the Special Permit would expire in one
year, so his client would have to build the hotel within that timeframe or the property would
revert to "B-1" zoning uses
Mr. Noyola asked if the applicant also owned the land behind the subject property. Mr.
Gunning replied affirmatively, saying the applicant owned all the property zoned "R-1B" behind
the subject parcel. Mr. Noyola asked what the applicant's plans were for the surrounding
property. Mr. Ramirez, the applicant, replied that he owned the property behind the subject
parcel and across from it on Sessions Road. They planned to develop the property at least
partially for residential use; thus, they would not favor bar or auto shop uses.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 11
Dr Cornelio Gonzalez, superintendent of Tuloso-Midway Independent School District,
spoke against the "B-4" zoning district and in favor of the "B-1A" zoning if possible. The school
district was not opposed to commercial development in the area, however. except for
businesses allowing alcoholic beverage sales. In conclusion, he said the school district
accepted staffs recommendation to zone the property "B-1". If and when a developer emerged
with a proposal to build a hotel on the site, then the applicant could request a zoning change at
that time. Mr. Garcia agreed with Dr. Gonzalez.
Mr. Noyola asked for the distance between the closest Tuloso-Midway ISO school and
the subject property. Dr. Gonzalez replied the primary school was approximately a mile from
the subject property. Mr. Noyola asked Mr. Gunning what the minimum distance allowed by
ordinance between a school and a establishment selling alcoholic beverages. Mr. Gunning
replied the minimum distance was 300 feet. Mr. Noyola felt that since the subject property was
a mile from the nearest school, a business selling alcoholic beverages could be an acceptable
use. He pointed out that a hotel could sell alcoholic beverages to patrons. Dr. Gonzalez
reiterated the school district's position against alcoholic beverage sales in the area.
A motion was made, seconded, and passed to close the public hearing. Mr. Chesney
spoke in support of Mr. Gutierrez's suggestion to grant the applicant "B-1" zoning with a Special
Permit for a hotel with a one-year expiration date. Director of Development Services Barbara
Holly replied that this was clearly an option.
Mr Kinnison spoke on behalf of Mr. Kelly, who was temporarily unavailable. He said Mr.
Kelly was in favor of staffs recommendation for a "B-1" zoning district. Mr. Kinnison made the
motion to amend the ordinance to grant a "B-1" zoning district, and it was seconded by Ms.
Cooper. Mr. Chesney made a motion to amend Mr. Kinnison's motion to include a Special
Permit for one year to allow for hotel/motel development, seconded by Mr. Scott. Mr. Gunning
added that if the applicant failed to begin the hotel/motel development within a year, he had the
right to ask the Council for an extension
Mr. Kinnison restated his motion and made a motion to amend the ordinance to approve
a "B-1" zoning district with a Special Permit for one year to allow for hotel/motel development.
seconded by Ms. Cooper, and passed. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes
as follows
14. ORDINANCE NO. 026613
Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by Arriba Development by changing
the zoning map in reference to 2.5 acres out of B.S. & F. Survey 419, Abstract 570.
Nueces County, from "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District to "B-1" Neighborhood
Business District with a Special Permit for one year to allow for hotel/motel development;
amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing
Comprehensive Plan.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kinnison, Marez. Noyola, and
Scott, voting "Aye"; Kelly was absent.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett referred to the presentations on the day's agenda. The first presentation
was Item 17 on traffic management at the arena/convention center during multiple events. Mr.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17. 2006 - Page 12
Marc Solis, general manager for the American Bank Center, reviewed the history of the arena
traffic planning and development plans that SMG incorporated into their Traffic Master Plan.
Mr. Solis discussed SMG's Traffic Master Plan in more detail. He said the plan
addressed inbound and egress routes, and outlined the city's responsibilities and SMG's
responsibilities in managing the American Bank Center zone. In addition, the plan outlined the
Regional Transportation Authority's (RT A) role in managing certain high traffic events.
Regarding the inbound traffic flow, Mr. Solis reported that 75 percent of event attendees
used the IH-37/Chaparral corridor, 15 percent used Shoreline Boulevard, and 10 percent used
Port Avenue. Egress traffic flow used the following routes: IH-37/Chaparral - 10 percent;
Shoreline Boulevard - 30 percent; and Port Avenue - 20 percent. He pointed out that Port
Avenue was an underutilized route, and said SMG was planning to add more directional
signage to encourage use.
Mr. Solis displayed a map depicting the areas of city responsibility and shared
responsibility, and the areas of shared responsibility between the city and SMG. He said the
city managed the area near IH-37 and Chaparral, while SMG managed the arena zone,
stretching out over 25 parking lots.
Mr Solis displayed a chart providing an inventory of available arena parking, totaling 25
iots with 5,453 parking spaces. The city owned 15 of the lots. totaling 1,478 parking spaces.
and SMG managed four additional lots for a total of 775 parking spaces.
Mr. Solis discussed the SMG parking usage averages as follows: hockey - 776 vehicles
per game; basketball - 290 vehicles per game; football - 1,596 vehicles per game; concerts -
1,550 vehicles/event; and Selena Auditorium events - 562 vehicles/event. In total. he said an
average of 954.8 vehicles per event utilized parking. He concluded that there was more than
sufficient parking in the area.
Mr Solis reported on a paid parking program implemented in April 2005. ranging from $3
to $10 per space. He said 100 parking spaces in the parking garage were reserved for the
program. and they sold out within five minutes. Thus, SMG felt there was a market for
guaranteed parking. The revenues collected from this program would be used to maintain and
Improve parking lots and to reimburse the city for traffic management by the Police department.
In addition. he said the revenues would be used to make the traffic and parking program self-
funded
Mr Solis reported on the success of the RT A Bayfront Express. The RT A serviced 22
events last year at a charge of $1 to $2 per roundtrip. An average of 12.6 percent of event
attendees used the service. Although the service was convenient and modestly priced, Mr.
Solis said the public was underutilizing the service He theorized that the public utilized the
service only if there were multiple events being held in the area (e.g. baseball game, country
peddler show, graduation, etc.).
In conclusion, Mr. Solis stated the arena's first year in operation was successful and
customer satisfaction was met through a coordinated effort between the city, SMG, and the
Port. He said SMG would continue to make improvements to the program over time.
Mayor Garrett asked Mr. Solis to continue to encourage event attendees to use Port
Avenue for ingress and egress.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 13
Mr. Scott spoke in favor of pedestrian improvements to the arena. so people could have
an enjoyable experience as they walked to the arena from their parking spaces. He also asked
SMG to improve their efforts to manage traffic around the arena. Mr. Solis replied the arena
parking manager had erected new signage to direct patrons to designated parking lots. and also
planned to assign additional staff to improve traffic management.
Mr. Marez thanked SMG and staff for providing affordable and convenient parking for the
city's various venues. He also thanked SMG for bringing great entertainment to the city.
Mr Garcia commented that he would like to see signage distinguishing city lots from
private lots. He also stated that he would like streetlights placed on Port Avenue to guide
vehicles to the expressway entrance. He also suggested that SMG consider using public
transportation to transport citizens from outlying lots to the arena. Mr. Solis replied SMG staff
had held preliminary discussions with the Corpus Christi Hooks about running trams from their
parking lot to arena events. At this time, he said neither SMG nor the Hooks had the funds to
purchase a tram, so the idea was on hold. Mr. Garcia replied that an another option would be to
enhance the paid parking program by adding more spaces, and then use a portion of the
revenues to establish a shuttle system with the RT A.
City Manager Noe stated the city's discussions with the architects and designers on the
Sayfront Plan had also called for pedestrian improvements in the downtown entertainment
district to better integrate the venues. He also thanked the city's traffic cops, the Engineering
department, and the RTA for working cooperatively with SMG to manage traffic in the area.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett called for a brief recess to present proclamations.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett called for petitions from the audience. The following individuals spoke in
support of restricting the police chief search to internal candidates: Abel Alonzo; Cliff Harris,
1017 Antelope; and Gilbert Cortinas, 1826 Leopard. Mr. Cortinas submitted a petition in support
of his statement.
Mr. Carlos Torres, 6014 Ayers, spoke in favor of retaining the CPAT physical fitness
exam for firefighter candidates because he felt the program had more rigorous fitness standards
than the Cooper Institute Physical Fitness exam, which the city had recently adopted. He asked
the city to assign a staff member to work with the Firefighters Association and the Fire Chief
regarding the exam requirements.
Mr. Chesney referred to a written response from Ms. Cynthia Garcia, Human Resources
Director addressing Mr. Torres's concerns. He considered physical fitness to be a priority issue
during the next round of police and fire contract negotiations because it was a safety issue.
City Manager Noe clarified that staff was not opposed to the CPAT itself; rather, their
concerns were related to a number of legal issues raised in other communities about the test.
Until the legal issues were resolved, staff was discontinuing the use of the CPA T and
Implementing another test. Finally, he said staff fully supported collective bargaining regarding
issues related to physical fitness.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 14
Mr. Marez asked when the next fire academy was scheduled. Director of Human
Resources Cynthia Garcia replied that normally, the city held one fire academy a year. She
said it took approximately nine months to complete the recruitment process for firefighter
candidates. The next academy was scheduled to begin in January or February 2007.
Mr Noyola referred to a number of errors that appeared on the city's website regarding
the CPAT test. Ms. Garcia replied the Cooper Institute Physical Fitness was currently used for
the Police department, and errors were made when the information was transferred from the
Police website to the firefighter website. She apologized for the errors and said they were
corrected them as soon as they were discovered.
I n response to Mr. Noyola's question, Ms. Garcia said staff recommended changing from
the CPAT to the Cooper's test because of an EEOC ruling that the City of Austin's use of the
CPA T had an adverse effect on female candidates. As a result, the City of Austin's firefighter
recruitment process was cancelled. Since the City of Corpus Christi could not afford to cancel a
firefighter academy, staff had no choice but to discontinue the CPAT until the issue was
resolved. She noted, however, that staff had recommended that the CPAT continue to be
taught at the fire academy for training purposes.
Mr. Noyola understood that the Fire Chief, assistant chiefs, and the union chief were
unaware of a validation study for the tests. City Manager Noe replied that normally, issues
related to recruitment are not the purview of the union; rather, the civil service process
determined who was hired. He said he understood the Fire department staff was informed
about the process.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett announced the executive sessions, which were listed on the agenda as
follows:
20. Executive session under Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding fire
collective bargaining negotiation with possible discussion and action related thereto in
open session.
21. Executive session under Texas Government Code Sections 551.071 and 551.072
regarding legal and real estate transaction issues relating to the acquisition of property
for and permitting of a new wastewater treatment plant to replace the Broadway
Wastewater Treatment Plant, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open
session.
22. Executive session under Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding WiFi
network, with possible discussion and action related thereto in open session.
The Council went into executive session.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Council returned from executive session. Mayor Garrett referred to Items 18 and
19, presentations on the Americans with Disabilities Act transition plan and the first quarter
report on health benefits/risk management fund. City Manager Noe stated the Council had
been provided with materials regarding the items. If the Council had no objections, staff could
forgo the presentation and entertain questions. There were no questions.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 17, 2006 - Page 15
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett called for the City Manager's report. City Manager Noe reported that the
following items were scheduled for the Council's consideration next week: Convention and
Visitors Bureau quarterly report, including a report on the bowlers tournament; Tall Ships visit
presentation; and the city's depository contract.
Mayor Garrett called for Council reports. Mr. Scott asked staff to provide more advance
notice regarding neighborhood meetings. He said he had received just two days notice
regarding a Hamlin Neighborhood Advisory Council meeting organized by the direct patrol
officers to be held on January 19. He also reported that an old military vehicle was stuck in the
surf on the Island, and he asked the city to remove it as soon as possible since ii was a safety
hazard. He said he had spoken about the issue with Assistant City Manager Margie Rose, who
suggested placing some type of warning signage on the structure until it was removed. He also
stated that the city should not have to pay for removing the vehicle, asked staff to seek
reimbursement from the military or whatever entity He said six or seven companies bid for the
items, and the city was required by law to award to the lowest bidder. Consequently. staff could
not recommend award to one company. was responsible for placing it there.
Mr Marez announced that as a State employee, he was prohibited from accepting
compensation for his service as a Council member. He had decided, however, to donate his
monthly salary to a local non-profit organization(s). He asked any interested parties to contact
him through the City Secretary's Office. He planned to split his salary into two equal portions
for disbursement. He thanked staff for researching the issue for him.
Mr Garcia asked for a status report on the neighborhood meetings regarding drainage
issues in Brighton Village. City Engineer Angel Escobar answered two meetings were held, one
last Friday and one last night. Both meetings were well attended by property owners and
residents in the area. The majority of the individuals were in favor of the improvements. but
were concerned about access to their property during the construction. He said one more
meeting was scheduled tomorrow night at 6:00 p.m.
Mr Garcia also asked how the city was addressing concerns with speeding on Cimarron
Boulevard. Mr. Escobar replied the city was repairing and leveling the road to repair roughness
and it should be coming forward in the next two to three weeks. He said the Police department
was continuing their efforts to enforce the speed limit as well.
Mayor Garrett asked if the city had received a Clean Air Award. Mr. Noe responded
affirmatively. saying the City was recognized for its efforts to support decreasing activity during
ozone action days. Mayor Garrett also stated that citizens were reporting a problem with the
traffic light cycle at Staples Street and Saratoga Boulevard.
There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Garrett adjourned
the Council meeting at 2:10 p.m. on January 17, 2006.
MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Regular Meeting
January 31,2006 - 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT
Mayor Henry Garrett
Mayor Pro T em Bill Kelly
Council Members:
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
Rex Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
City Staff:
City Manager George K. Noe
City Attorney Mary Kay Fischer
City Secretary Armando Chapa
Mayor Garrett called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall.
The invocation was delivered by Reverend Keith Wyatt of First United Methodist Church
and the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States flag was led by Council Member Kinnison.
Mayor Garrett called for approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
January 24. 2006. A motion was made, seconded, and passed to approve the minutes as
presented
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett called for consideration of the consent agenda (Items 2-18). City
Secretary Chapa announced that Council Member Noyola would be abstaining from the vote
and discussion on Items 14. 15, and 16. City Manager Noe announced that Item 8 was being
withdrawn by staff.
Council members requested that Item 13 be pulled for individual consideration. There
were no comments from the public. A motion was made, seconded, and passed to approve
Items 2 through 18, constituting the consent agenda, except for Item 13, which was pulled for
individual consideration. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
2.a. MOTION NO. 2006-023
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept additional grant funding in
the amount of $8,350 from the Executive Office of the President. Office of National Drug
Control Policy, to support the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor
Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney. Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 2
2 b. ORDINANCE NO. 026624
Ordinance appropriating $8,350 in the No. 1061 Federal/State Grants Fund from the
Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy to support the
Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High
Intensity Drug Trafficking Area.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez,
Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
3.a. RESOLUTION NO. 026625
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept an amendment to a
grant from the Department of State Health Services in the amount of $88.174 for
personnel costs to provide essential public health services.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
3.b. ORDINANCE NO. 026626
Ordinance appropriating an amendment to a grant from the Department of State Health
Services in the amount of $88,174 in the No. 1066 Health Grants Fund for personnel
costs to provide essential public health services.
An emergency was declared. and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly. Kinnison, Marez.
Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
4.a. RESOLUTION NO. 026627
Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant from Texas
Parks and Wildlife Recreational Trails Program in the amount of $100,000 in the No.
1067 Parks and Recreation Grants Fund for construction and resurfacing of the
recreational trail at West Guth Park, with a $25,000 match from the Fund 4720
Community Enrichment Fund.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
4.b. ORDINANCE NO. 026628
Ordinance appropriating a $100,000 grant from Texas Parks and Wildlife Recreational
Trails Program in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grants Fund to fund construction
and resurfacing of the recreational trail at West Guth Park by August 31, 2008.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly. Kinnison, Marez.
Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31,2006 - Page 3
5 ORDINANCE NO. 026629
Ordinance appropriating $500 donation from Wal-Mart in the No. 1067 Parks and
Recreation Grants Fund to be used as a cash match for the Texas Parks and Wildlife
Recreational Trails Program.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia. Kelly. Kinnison, Marez,
Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
6. MOTION NO. 2006-024
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract
with Garrett Construction, of Ingleside, Texas in the amount of $879,943.90 for Base Bid
"A", Base Bid "B" and Alternate Bid 1 for the Mary Carroll Channel Drainage
Improvements, Phase 2.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez. Noyola. and Scott, voting "Aye".
7 MOTION NO. 2006-025
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract
with Australian Courtworks, Inc., of Brandon, Mississippi in the amount of $535,600 for
the HEB Tennis Center Improvement Project (Bond 2004) and the West Oso Tennis
Courts (CDBG).
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett.
Chesney, Cooper. Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
8.a. WITHDRAWN
Ordinance :lppropriating a payment in the amount of $16,171 from SOl Realty in the No.
3530 Street Capit:ll Improvement Project Fund for the de'/eloper's sh:lre of construction
of the Traffio Congestion M:ln:lgement project :It Airline RO:ld northbound right turn lane
:It SH 358 eastbound frontage rO:ld (Bond Issue 2004); amending C:lpital Budget
adopted by Ordin:lnce No. 026188 by increasing appropri:ltions by $46,474.
8.b. WITHDRAWN
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order No. 3 to a
construction contr:lct with King Isles, Inc., of Corpus Christi. Texas in the :lmount of
$188,215.35 for construotion of the Traffic Congestion M:ln:lgement project at ,^,irline
Road northbound right turn lane at SH 358 eastbound frontage road. (BOND ISSUE
2004)
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 4
9 RESOLUTION NO. 026630
Resolution recognizing the public necessity of acquiring street right-of-way easements
for the Rodd Field Village Public Improvement District. Projects 7243/8417, for street
improvements and other municipal purposes in connection with the project; and
authorizing acquisition by means of negotiations or eminent domain proceedings by the
City of Corpus Christi or its agents in acquiring said right-of-way.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola. and Scott, voting "Aye".
10. MOTION NO. 2006-026
Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a Bridge Construction Deferment
Agreement with The Lakes at King Estates, Inc.. (Developer). in the amount of
$28,783.91 for the Developer's share for future construction of a public bridge over a
drainage channel to serve The Coves at Lago Vista subdivision located south of FM
2444 (South Staples Street) and west of Oso Creek, in accordance with the Platting
Ordinance.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
11. MOTION NO. 2006-027
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1 to the
professional services contract with MAXIMUS, Inc., ERP Solutions Division, of Rancho
Cordova. California in the amount of $25.000 for a total re-stated fee not to exceed
$50,000 for additional project management, systems analysis and computer
programming services to maintain the PeopleSoft Financials module.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola. and Scott, voting "Aye".
12. ORDINANCE NO. 026631
Ordinance appropriating $51,226.53 from the Fund Balance Reserves in Municipal
Information Systems Fund No. 5210 provided by Intel Corporation for Digital City project
support; amending FY 2005-2006 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 026385
by increasing appropriations by $51,226.53.
An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved
with the following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez.
Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye".
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 5
14. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Supplemental Agreement NO.1
to Federal Aviation Administration Lease No. DTFA07-04-L-00560 eliminating all
references to the Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) and adding 0.15 acre of land
for the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) serving Runway 17.
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following
vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez. and Scott, voting "Aye";
Noyola abstained.
15. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 1
to Federal Aviation Administration Lease No. DTFA07-98-L-01123 eliminating all
references to the Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) and adding 0.25 acre of land
for the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) serving Runway 13 and 0.64 acre for
the PAPI serving Runway 31.
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following
vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, and Scott, voting "Aye";
Noyola abstained.
16. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Lease No. DTFASW-06-L-
00118 with the Federal Aviation Administration for 2.8747 acres of land located at the
Corpus Christi International Airport, for a term ending on September 30, 2025, for the
construction and operation of a Digital Airport Surveillance Radar (DSAR-11) site.
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following
vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez. and Scott, voting "Aye";
Noyola abstained.
17.a. ORDINANCE NO. 026632
Amending the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, Chapter 2 regarding Cable
Communications Commission. (First Reading 01/24/06)
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following
vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola. and Scott,
voting "Aye".
17.b. ORDINANCE NO. 026633
Amending the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, Chapter 55 regarding rules
and procedures for public access cablecasting. (First Reading 01/24/06)
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its second reading with the
following vote: Garrett. Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison. Marez. Noyola, and
Scott. voting "Aye"
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31,2006 - Page 6
18. ORDINANCE NO. 026634
Amending the 1961 Master Plan for Storm Drainage for the Area South and West of the
City of Corpus Christi. Texas to extend Master Channel 27 from Airline Road west to
Cimarron Boulevard and reconfigure Master Channel 27 drainage basin. (First Reading
01/24/06)
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its second reading with the
following vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez. Noyola. and
Scott, voting "Aye"
Mayor Garrett opened discussion on Item 13 regarding the renaming of Sunnybrook
Park to Mike Zepeda Park. Mayor Garrett asked Director of Parks and Recreation Sally Gavlik
to provide more information on the park. Ms. Gavlik reported the park was located at 3010
Sunnybrook; it was previously named South Side Park. She said the Corpus Christi Barrios
Association had requested that the park be renamed in honor of Mr. Mike Zepeda, a community
activist. The Park and Recreation Advisory Committee had approved the request. In addition,
notices were sent to area residents advising them of the request and signage was erected at the
park to see if there was any opposition. She stated that Ret. Lt. Commander Juan Garcia was
present on behalf of the Corpus Christi Barrios Association.
Mayor Garrett called for public comment. Ret. Lt. Commander Juan Garcia, 4913
Kerrville, representing the Corpus Christi Barrios Association, spoke in support of renaming
Sunnybrook Park in honor of Mr. Mike Zepeda, citing Mr. Zepeda's involvement in civil rights
Issues and his decorated military service.
Mayor Garrett, Mr. Noyola. Mr. Marez, and Mr. Garcia also spoke in support of renaming
the park in honor of Mr. Zepeda, citing his lifelong commitment to civil rights issues. Mr. Marez
and Mr. Garcia expressed concern, however, that Sunnybrook Park was in need of
Improvements, and asked staff to address the problems. City Secretary Chapa polled the
Council for their votes as follows:
13. FIRST READING ORDINANCE
Waiving the 60-day waiting period and publication of legal notice; renaming the park at
3010 Sunnybrook from Southside Park to Mike Zepeda Park.
The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following
vote: Garrett, Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison. Marez, Noyola, and Scott.
voting "Aye".
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett deviated from the agenda, and opened discussion on Item 22 regarding
the proposed location of the new Wastewater Treatment Plant at the Flint Hills Farm site. City
Engineer Angel Escobar introduced the team members who would be assisting him with the
presentation as follows: Assistant City Manager Ron Massey, Wastewater Superintendent
Foster Crowell, and Mr. Govind Nadkarni with MEI GovindlMaverick Engineering.
Mr. Escobar explained staff was finalizing the site selection process for the new
Wastewater Treatment Plant, and was seeking Council approval to continue with the land
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 7
acquisition for the recommended site. In addition, staff would provide an update on the
Broadway Diversion project.
Mr Escobar provided a brief history on the City's actions regarding the Broadway
Wastewater Treatment Plant from March 18. 1997 to June 28. 2005. He highlighted a Council
directive made on January 29, 2002 that amended the 1997 Implementation Plan to prohibit the
diversion of flows to the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant and to rule out the option of
constructing a new plant at the existing Broadway Plant Site (Site 12 in today's presentation). In
addition. staff considered a number of potential sites in the industrial area along the Ship
Channel as follows: Site 1 - PCCA Military Staging Site; Site 2 - Kerr McGee Property; Site 2A
- West Broadway at Sam Rankin; and Site 3 - CITGO Port Avenue Terminal. Of these sites,
staff selected the CITGO Port Avenue Terminal Site for further evaluation. He said Site 4. the
Flint Hills Resources Tank Farm Site, became available in November 2004.
Mr Escobar said the Council held two closed sessions regarding the site selection in
March and June 2005. Subsequently, staff made preliminary contact with Flint Hills in April
2005. Staff also met with the Hillcrest Area Residents between August and October 2005.
including a site visit to Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant on Padre Island. Consequently,
Mr. Escobar reported that the citizens submitted a petition with more than 400 signatures. The
Hillcrest Residents Association asked staff to review additional sites, and to review the
previously evaluated sites.
Mr. Escobar described the site selection process in more detail. In evaluating new plant
sites in the industrial area, staff used the following criteria: any available vacant land south of
the ship channel; any available sites north of the ship channel; a cost comparison of sites; and a
site selection matrix.
Mr. Escobar stated the following industrial sites were reviewed as follows: Site 1: PCCA
Military Staging Yard; Site 2: Kerr McGee Property; Site 2A: West Broadway at Sam Rankin;
Site 3: CITGO Port Avenue Terminal; Site 4: Flint Hills Resources Tank Farm; Site 5: PCCA
Property - North Side; Site 6: Texas LeHigh Cement Plant; Site 7: PCCA Property - West of
Nueces Bay PP; Site 8: Koch Pipeline Terminal - North Side; Site 9: CITGO - Palm Drive Site
South Side; Site 10: Citgo Oak Park Site; Site 11: Elementis Site - next to Tule Lake Lift Bridge;
and Site 12: Existing Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant Site. He displayed a map
depicting each of the evaluated sites.
Mr. Govind Nadkarni with MEI Govind discussed the process of elimination staff used to
create the final list of recommended sites. The following sites were eliminated from the list after
preliminary screening: Site 1: PCCA Military Staging Yard; Site 2: Kerr McGee Property; Site 9:
CITGO-Palm Drive South Side; Site 10: CITGO Oak Park Site; and Site 11: Elementis Site -
next to Tule Lake Lift Bridge. He reviewed the reasons why each site was removed from the
list.
Mr. Nadkarni said staff then conducted a detailed evaluation of the remaining eight sites
as follows: Site 2A, Site 3, Site 4, Site 5, Site 6, Site 7, Site 8, and Site 12. He displayed
detailed maps of the eight sites.
Mr Nadkarni reviewed a chart illustrating the estimated construction timelines for each
of the sites. He noted that the length of the construction timeline was dependent upon the
extent of the project. He noted, for example, that Site 3, the CITGO Port Ave. Terminal Project.
had a longer construction timeline because it required the demolition of tanks, piping, and
electrical power system plus the construction of a new tank, and also required wetland
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31,2006 - Page 8
mitigation prior to site cleaning and construction. Site 4. the Flint Hills Resources Tank Farm,
on the other hand, had a shorter timeline because the site was already cleaned and all the tanks
had been demolished.
Mr. Kelly asked why the site acquisition and environmental assessments were estimated
to take longer for Site 3 than for Site 4. Mr. Nadkarni replied that the site acquisition for Site 3:
CITGO was estimated to take longer because staff needed to negotiate the demolition and
subsequent relocation of the tanks. Site 3's environmental assessment was also estimated to
take longer because of the wetland mitigation required since the CITGO site was adjacent to the
salt flats.
Mr. Nadkarni reviewed a cost comparison chart for the eight remaining sites. He pointed
out that the cost estimates were comprised of the following items: site acquisition and rights-of-
way; modifications to Resaca Lift Station; 30" C905 DR 18 Force Main; directional drilling, steel
casing, and Insituform liner; access road construction; effluent outfall line construction and
easement; and 8.0 MGD ADF treatment plant construction cost. Mr. Escobar added that the
new wastewater plant would be designed for 8.0 MGD with a peaking factor of five during rain
events, providing a total capacity of 40 MGD per day, considerably more than the Broadway
Plant's existing capacity.
Mr Nadkarni also reviewed a cost comparison chart with a 20-year life cycle. The total
20-year life cycle cost was estimated using direct and indirect capital costs and annual
operation and maintenance (0 & M) costs. Mr. Kelly asked why the capital costs varied from
site to site if the plan was to build the same plant regardless of the location. Mr. Nadkarni
replied the cost of transporting the water from the Resaca Lift Station to the ship channel drove
the cost differences.
Mr. Kelly asked why the annual 0 & M costs for Sites 4 and 12 differed by $200,000
when both sites were located on the south side of the ship channel at relatively the same
distance from the Resaca Lift Station. Mr. Nadkarni replied that Site 4 was closer to the Resaca
lift Station than Site 12, thereby reducing the operating costs for the Resaca Lift Station. In
addition, he said the power costs alone were $195,000 for Site 12 and $105.000 for Site 4.
Mr. Kelly pointed out that according to the cost comparison chart, Site 3 CITGO was less
expensive to operate than Site 4 Flint Hills. Assistant City Manager Massey replied
affirmatively, noting the cost difference was $20,000 because Site 3 was slightly closer to the
Resaca Lift Station than Site 4.
Mr. Kelly stated that locating the new wastewater plant north of the ship channel was
significantly more expensive because it would require drilling under the ship channel. He noted
that the city was currently laying new pipe under the ship channel for another project, and asked
what the cost was to run pipe under the channel. Mr. Nadkarni stated the pipe being installed
for the ship channel project was a 16-inch pipe. He said the Broadway Plant was currently
treating 90 percent of the sewage from the south side of the ship channel and 10 percent from
the north side. If the city chose a location for the new wastewater treatment plant on the north
side, then two 30-inch lines would have to be installed to transfer the sewage to the south side.
Mr. Kelly replied that he understood the most expensive part of laying pipe was digging the
trench. Mr. Nadkarni replied the ship channel project involved directional drilling 80 feet below
the ship channel. Mr. Kelly asked if the city were to combine the ship channel project with the
new wastewater treatment plant site. then what type of cost savings could the city expect to see
on the cost of directional drilling to locate north of the channel. Mr. Escobar replied he would
provide the costs later.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31,2006 - Page 9
Mr. Chesney noted that the 20-year life cycle costs for Site 3 (CITGO) and Site 4 (Flint
Hills) were comparable, but Site 12 (New plant at Broadway Site) was significantly more
expensive than Site 4. He asked Mr. Escobar if the cost estimates were accurate. Mr. Nadkarni
replied Site 12's construction costs were higher because the existing plant had to remain
operational while the new construction was phased in, a much riskier and expensive process.
Mr. Chesney stated that while one could make an argument in favor of the CITGO site over the
Flint Hills site, he said the cost estimates for Site 12 (New plant at Broadway site) seemed to
eliminate it as a viable site
Mr. Noyola spoke in favor of the Site 12 location, saying that the City had successfully
completed the Airport improvements while maintaining operations. While the total project cost
was probably more expensive, Mr. Noyola felt Site 12 was the best choice.
Mr. Noyola asked how many homes were located within 500 feet of the Flint Hills site.
Mr. Nadkarni responded that one home was located approximately 515 feet from the site. but it
appeared to be unoccupied. Mr. Escobar added that the TCEQ required that the processing
units be at least 150 feet from the property line of the subject site. The city planned to ask the
TCEQ for a waiver, however. to place the treatment units at the far rear of the subject property,
increasing the distance from the residence to over 600 feet.
Mr. Chesney asked how far the units were from the heart of the Hillcrest neighborhood.
Mr. Escobar replied that if the TCEQ approved the waiver, the units would be an additional 120
feet from the residences.
Mr Garcia asked for the direction of the prevailing winds in the area. Mr. Escobar
replied the prevailing winds were to the east, away from the neighborhood.
Mr. Noyola asked for the distance between the CITGO site and the Hillcrest area. Mr.
Escobar replied the distance from the CITGO site to Hillcrest was approximately 1,400 feet.
Mr. Kinnison commented that upon reviewing the construction timeline, the Flint Hills site
seemed to be the most expedient to build. He asked staff to comment on the significance of this
advantage. Mr. Foster Crowell, wastewater superintendent, replied time was a tremendous
factor because the Broadway Plant was old and unpredictable. Construction delays could place
the city at risk for a TCEQ violation with an expensive fine. Mr. Massey added that because of
past overflow incidents, the TCEO had entered into a consent agreement with the city that
allowed for more discharges than permitted during heavy rains. The new plant could handle up
to 40 MGD; the current plant had a permit capacity of 20 MGD, but operationally could only
handle 18 MGD during a peak rain event. Repeated overflows could lead to a consent decree
In which the city would be forced to commit to replace the plant within a certain time dictated by
the TCEO Thus, Mr. Massey said the sooner the Broadway Plant was replaced, the better.
In summary, Mr. Noe identified three risks the city could face with construction delays.
First, the city could face costly repairs to the current facility that might be avoided by
replacement. Second, the city was at risk for TCEQ penalties for failing to meet operating
requirements. Third, the TCEQ could take control of the process, forcing the city to build on a
schedule that was not advantageous.
In response to Mr. Kelly's question, Mr. Escobar said the present cost of the two, 12-inch
wastewater lines going under the ship channel was $1.38 million. He said one line was already
installed, and the second line was bored and would be installed by the end of the week. Two
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 10
additional 16-inch water lines had not been bored yet. Mr. Kelly asked for the cost to install the
larger pipes needed for a wastewater plant. Mr. Escobar replied the amount would be the
difference between the $1.38 million and the $9 million to install 30-inch pipes. Mr. Kelly was
emphatic that if the city had combined the two projects, then the city would have realized a cost
savings. City Manager Noe replied that Mr. Escobar has consistently maintained that there
were no real savings from deferring this project.
Mr. Marez spoke against the Flint Hills site because it was too close to the Hillcrest area.
and he did not want to subject the residents to the sights and smells associated with a
wastewater treatment plant. He spoke in favor of the CITGO site because it was farther away.
Mr. Nadkarni replied that the Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant on Padre Island was an
example of a wastewater plant that was successfully located within close proximity to a
neighborhood. He said new plants had advanced technology that controlled odor problems and
other nuisances, and the plants were nicely landscaped so as not to detract from the
neighborhood. Mr. Scott asked how far the Whitecap Plant was from the nearest residence.
Mr. Escobar replied that the distance from the front gate of the plant to the corner of the first
home was 316 feet.
Mr. Nadkarni reviewed the site selection matrix that rated the sites on a scale of 1 to 5,5
being the most desirable. The sites were rated on a number of criteria. including the following:
land acquisition, land geometry, future expansion, social concerns. 0 & M cost, and
constructability.
Mr. Scott asked Mr. Nadkarni to discuss why the CITGO site was rated low for future
expansion while the Flint Hills site was rated much higher. Mr. Nadkarni replied the Flint Hills
site had more room for expansion because of its site configuration. The Flint Hills site was more
rectangular, while the CITGO site was more oddly shaped. In addition, the CITGO site had a
number of land acquisition issues, including a wetlands mitigation. that could delay a future
expansion. Mr. Kinnison asked how imminent an expansion was. Mr. Escobar replied that the
city had planned for 20 years, but if there was a large influx into the area or if the TCEQ
required a more stringent effluent standard, then the city might have to expand the plant sooner.
Mr. Kinnison asked how the $3.4 million cost difference between Site 3 and Site 4 would
translate into utility rate increases. Assistant City Manager Oscar Martinez replied that in the
wastewater fund, every additional $1 million in revenue would require a rate increase of 2.5
percent. He pointed out, however, that capital costs were incurred and paid out over a longer
period of time. Mr. Kinnison asked if the city was projecting 5.5 percent rate increases, then
what would the utility rate model generate to coup the $3.4 million. Mr. Martinez replied the
utility rate would increase to 8 percent. Mr. Noe pointed out that the costs were 20-year costs in
present value, and would translate into a $300,000 increase a year over 20 years. He said staff
would provide a more accurate number later.
Mr Escobar discussed the benefits of the Flint Hills site as follows: favorable property
acquisition; no change in permit requirements; potential effluent re-use; site preparation; asset
value existing site; TCEQ buffer of 150 feet from nearest treatment unit was met along site's
South property line; and the nearest residential lot was over 500 feet from the treatment units.
Consequently, staffs recommendation was to proceed with the purchase of Flint Hills Tank
Farm site (Site 4) for the new wastewater treatment plant site. If approved, staff would begin
assembling a team to assist with negotiations to purchase the property, and to address issues
specific to the land purchase.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 11
Mr. Noe reemphasized that the key issues driving staff's recommendation were the cost
difference and the risk in delaying the construction of a new plant.
In response to Mayor Garrett's question, Mr. Massey replied the difference between the
construction guidelines for the CITGO and Flint Hills sites was 15 months. The CITGO site was
estimated to take longer due to additional environmental work and relocation of the gas
facilities.
Mr. Noyola spoke strongly in favor the CITGO site because he felt it was a better choice
for the community. He asked if the timelines could be condensed if necessary. Mr. Escobar
answered affirmatively.
Mayor Garrett called for a brief recess to present proclamations.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett called for petitions from the audience. Sirfrederickvon U.S.A. King ih,
1510 Ramirez. asked if the city planned to attract two Mexican airlines that ceased operating in
DFW airport to the city's airport.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett reopened the discussion on Item 22 regarding the site selection for the
new wastewater treatment plant.
Mr. Andrew DuArte Sr., 203 Van Loan, presented a PowerPoint presentation on behalf
of the Hillcrest Residents Association. He said the residents preferred to locate the wastewater
treatment plant to the north of the ship channel, but if the site had to be south of the channel,
they strongly preferred the CITGO site to the Flint Hills site.
The following individuals spoke in favor of the CITGO site: Henry Williams, 2422
Summers Street; Jerome Bradford; Joel Mumphord; Lamont Taylor, 1701 Stillman; Carolyn
Moon, 4902 Calvin; Bill Martin; Daniel Pena, 2813 Holmgren; Arthur Lee Lane with the St.
Matthew Missionary Baptist Church, 1101 Waco; Danny Noyola, 4410 Acushnet; and Marvin
Leary, 105 Hawthorne.
Mr. Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames, commented that the Council needed to the decision that
would favor the majority of the community, and advised them not to be swayed by sentiment.
Mr Kelly spoke in favor of the CITGO site, and made a motion to direct the City
Manager to enter into negotiations with CITGO for the location of the new wastewater treatment
plant, seconded by Mr. Noyola.
In response to Mr. Scott's question, Mr. Escobar replied that both the CITGO and Flint
Hills sites would be affected by the 1 DO-year flood plain. The treatment plant units would be
placed on top of the earth with a current elevation of eight feet. He said the walls of the units
would be elevated to 26 feet, placing them above the flood plain.
Mr Scott asked questions about the wetlands mitigation, land acquisition issues, and
tank relocation related to the CITGO plant. He said he had not heard any complaints about the
Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant, which was in his district, and was much closer to
residences than the proposed plant.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 12
Mr. Chesney said he had too many unanswered questions regarding the CITGO site to
support it. He said he would like to narrow the choices to the CITGO site and the Flint Hills site,
but wanted staff to further examine the variables related to CITGO and then report to the
Council. Mr. Massey replied that staff was concerned about the uncertainties related to
rebuilding and removing the operational tanks and land acquisition issues for the CITGO site.
Mr. Noe added staff could obtain figures regarding these issues by negotiating with CITGO, but
he was reluctant to engage in this conversation unless the city was truly going to construct the
plant there. He noted that the CITGO site was part of their current operations. while the Flint
Hills site was open.
Mr Kinnison stated that upon reviewing the material, he was in favor of the Flint Hills
site. He asked, however, whether it was realistic to believe that staff could negotiate with
CITGO regarding the feasibility of the site and report in 30 days. Mr. Noe replied that it was not
realistic, especially regarding the wetlands issues. He said the Council could ask staff to pursue
the CITGO site and report on their progress in 60 or 90 days. but he could not guarantee that
they could obtain all the information by then.
Ms. Cooper expressed concern that the CITGO site would take 19 months longer to
construct than the Flint Hills site because it would expose the city to unnecessary risk. She was
also concerned about the environmental issues related to the CITGO project.
Mr. Chesney stated that if he had to vote today, he would vote in favor of the Flint Hills
site because there were too many uncertainties regarding the CITGO site. He was willing,
however, to delay the decision for 30 days to clarify the uncertainties. Mr. Massey stated that
staff could speak with CITGO again to try to obtain a better idea about the issues and to confirm
estimated timelines. He did not know, however, how quickly CITGO could obtain approval to
continue discussing the matter with the city.
Mr. Kelly made a motion to amend his previous motion as follows: Motion to direct the
City Manager to engage in preliminary discussions with CITGO and Flint Hills and any ancillary
entities and report to the Council in 30 days regarding the location of a wastewater treatment
plan on Site 3 or Site 4, eliminating as many variables as possible, seconded by Mr. Chesney.
Mr Garcia spoke In support of Mr. Kelly's motion. He said the additional information
would help the Council make a decision as soon as possible.
Mr. Marez spoke in support of the CITGO site, but said he did not wish to delay the
decision any longer because the Council had all the information it needed to make a decision.
He wanted to vote on the matter today.
Mr Kinnison asked for clarification that when staff reported back to the Council in 30
days, the Council would make a final decision. The Council concurred. City Secretary Chapa
polled the Council for their votes as follows:
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31,2006 - Page 13
22. MOTION NO. 2006-028
Motion to direct the City Manager to engage in preliminary negotiations with Flint Hills
and CITGO and any ancillary entities and report to the Council in 30 days regarding the
location of a new Wastewater Treatment Plan on Site 3 or Site 4, eliminating as many
variables as possible.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Cooper, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Noyola, and Scott. voting "Aye"; Marez voting
"No".
Mayor Garrett called for a brief recess.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett referred to Item 19, a quarterly report from the Corpus Christi Economic
Development Corporation. City Manager Noe replied the presentation was being withdrawn by
staff and would be rescheduled.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett referred to Item 20, a status report on the Bayfront Development Plan
Phase 1. Assistant City Manager Ron Massey introduced Mr. Raymond Gignac and his team.
who would be making the presentation.
Mr. Gignac briefly reviewed the status and schedule for the Phase 1 of the Bayfront
Development Project. The Council approved the Bayfront Master Plan in summer 2004, and the
voters approved the funding for Phase 1 of the project in the November 2004 bond issue.
Phase 1 extended from IH-37 to the arena and art museum. He said the city entered into a
contract with the design team in August 2005.
As part of their contract with the city. Mr. Gignac reported that the design team was
assigned the following tasks: provide updates to the Master Plan; develop SEA Town design
guidelines; complete Phase 1 preliminary design (April 2006); and complete Phase 1 contract
documents (2006).
Mr Gignac displayed a diagram of the 2004 Bayfront Master Plan programming.
composed of the South Waterfront, the Marina, Downtown, and the North Waterfront. The
North Waterfront Park was included in the Baytront Master Plan Phase 1.
Mr. Gignac reported on a number of recent developments that required adjustments to
the Master Plan. The Art Museum of South Texas expansion, commonly known as the
Legorreta building, was nearly complete, but it had encroached slightly into the original Master
Plan space. The design team studying how to incorporate the area into the other design
elements area, like the Water Gardens and museums, and how to provide public access and
parking to the area. In addition, Mr. Gignac stated that TxDOT was planning to replace and
realign the Harbor Bridge. He asked Mr. Alan Ward with Sasaki Associates, a design team
member, to elaborate. Mr. Ward introduced the rest of the design team as follows: Kevin St.
Jacques with Wilbur Smith; Kevin Gordon with TVS; and Tom Doolittle with Sasaki.
Mr. Ward stated that the proposed Harbor Bridge realignment would have a profound
effect on the North Bayfront, allowing for the potential expansion of street grid to the west and
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31 , 2006 - Page 14
creating new access. The eventual relocation of the Harbor Bridge could lead to a new
redevelopment in the area, including commercial and urban residential development.
Additionally, he said the realignment would improve the linkages to Whataburger Field and the
Ortiz Center.
Mr Ward discussed the incorporation of the SEA Town concept, a parallel planning
effort to create an overall identity for a collection of destination points in the downtown/North
Beach area. The design guidelines included streetscape, wayfinding. and signage to assist
visitors in finding the destinations. He said the design team met with the stakeholders this
morning, and they felt the Bayfront Master Plan area should be included in the larger SEA Town
vision. He also said that by extending the streetscapes and wayfinding efforts to the north, the
average 7,000 beachgoers could become more aware of the SEA Town attractions south of the
ship channel. such as the Art Museum and Heritage Park. Mr. Ward then showed samples of
the proposed SEA Town logo and directional signage. which would be expanded into a
comprehensive system with visitor information kiosks, and interpretative signage, modeled after
Baton Rouge.
Mr Ward discussed the Bayfront Park Phase 1 design in more detail. He emphasized
that the design team held extensive public meetings to gauge and refine the proposed features.
He said the public meetings yielded the following suggestions for programming: interactive
fountains, concessions/vendors, shade and wind shelter, entertainment venues, and
recreational uses. He said the public clearly wanted the park to be more than a beautification
project.
Mr Ward stated that the design team studied the Bayfront's microclimate, noting that the
winds came from different directions at different times of the year. He said the design
Incorporated wind screen zones where visitors could find shelter from the wind on most days.
Mr Ward displayed conceptual drawings of the Phase 1 Shoreline Boulevard re-
alignment. He noted that the present median remained in place from the Selena Auditorium to
IH-37 to provide good access and a drop-off area for the federal courthouse. From IH-37 to the
west, the lanes were combined and shifted westward. Moreover. he said adjustments were
made to the road by the barge docks while retaining curbside parking on both sides of
Shoreline. He discussed a number of improvements near the Sarge Dock and new Art Museum
drop-off, as well as a harbor edge promenade to the Ortiz Center. He also displayed conceptual
drawings of proposed landscaping in the arena, convention center, and art museum area.
Mr. Ward described plans for an interactive water feature located near the end of
Resaca Street and the arena. He said the water feature acted like a beach by allowing visitors,
especially children, to play in the water. A food and beverage kiosk and restrooms would be
located adjacent to the area on the right.
Mr. Ward described the planned performance space, located on Shoreline Drive near
the end of Fitzgerald Street. A raised stage off of Fitzgerald Street would face a large lawn area
that could be adapted for performance use, accommodating an audience of 2,000 to 2,500
people. By closing Shoreline Drive adjacent to the park, an even larger crowd of 3,500 people
could be accommodated.
Mr Ward displayed conceptual drawings for the Cafe Pavilion Gardens area, located
between the ends of Palo Alto and Power Streets along Shoreline Boulevard. The garden area
would include a series of windbreaks and an arbor to provide shelter, and a cafe for
refreshments.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31,2006 - Page 15
Finally, Mr. Ward discussed the final aspect of the Phase 1 plan, the IH-37 transition
zone where a potential "arrival icon" could announce the visitors' arrival to the waterfront. He
said this would be part of the next phase of study.
Mr Ward provided a somewhat limited list of suggested plant materials that could
survive along the waterfront, including trees, shrubs. and groundcover. He also briefly
described a night lighting scheme for the Bayfront Park area.
In conclusion, Mr. Ward stated the design team was at the midpoint of the preliminary
design phase, but had set in place the key elements of the plan at this point. He asked Mr.
Gignac to cover the roadway alignment plans for the Bayfront Park.
Mr. Gignac reported that the design team met with various stakeholders in the area
about the proposed Shoreline Boulevard road realignment. including the federal courthouse, city
traffic engineers, the police traffic division, and SMG. He referred to a conceptual drawing of
the existing roadway, comprised for a 41-foot roadway with six travel lanes, divided by an 80
foot median. The team was proposing to realign the road to create a 17-foot walkway, 102-foot
parkland area, a 14-foot parking lane with four 12-foot travel lanes (two traveling north, two
traveling south), and an 8-foot parking area.
Mr. Gignac stated the road could be realigned before a major event (approximately 12 a
year) to transform the parking lane into a bus lane, make three northward lanes. and one
southward lane. After a major event, the road could be realigned to allow three northward
lanes, one southward lane. and a one northward bus lane. Mr. Gignac also discussed the
proposed roadway realignment during a festival, noting that removing the median on Shoreline
made the area more flexible for outdoor festival planning.
In conclusion. Mr. Gignac stated the next steps in the Bayfront Park Phase 1 design
process were to obtain feedback from the Council, hold more public meetings, and complete the
design development. He also mentioned that every aspect of the park design would be
accessible to persons with disabilities.
Mayor Garrett asked for a project timeline. City Engineer Escobar stated that at this
point, the design team was holding public meetings with citizens and stakeholders. and was
also seeking the Council's comments today. The designers would incorporate any meaningful
suggestions and then begin the final project design. Mr. Gignac added that the design team
would like to complete the design by the end of April 2006. The team would work through bid
documents during the summer, and then go out for bids and begin construction in the fall.
Mr. Scott asked if the city had sufficient funding to complete Phase 1 of the project. Mr.
Gignac said the city had $10 million in bond funding available. He said the design team would
obtain an engineering survey and cost estimates for the entire North Waterfront Area. Once the
cost estimates were complete, the city would decide which of the plan elements to fund in
Phase 1. He said the design team would ask Sasaki Associates to research any alternate
funding through grants or philanthropy. Mr. Noe stated that the design team met with a number
of major property owners in the area to stimulate a discussion.
Mr. Marez spoke in support of plan, especially the planned landscaping around the
seawall and arena. He commended the team for getting the public to buy into the plan with the
extensive schedule of public meetings.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31.2006 - Page 16
Mr. Noyola spoke in support of the plan, but asked Mr. Gignac to hold the public
meetings at sites throughout the community, like schools, rather than only at City Hall. Mr.
Gignac said he would be happy to take the presentation to the road.
Ms Cooper spoke In support of the plan, saying the presentation was fantastic.
Mayor Garrett asked if the Bayfront Plan incorporated the marina improvements. Mr.
Gignac said the plan did not specifically incorporate the marina improvements, but the team
hoped the design would set the stage for other improvements.
*************
Mayor Garrett opened discussion on Item 21 regarding the formation of the CC Digital
Community Development Corporation. Mr. Ogilvie Gericke, director of Municipal Information
Systems (MIS) introduced the team members who would be making the presentation as follows:
Dr. Costis Toregas with PTI; Adrian Herbst with Baller Herbst Law Group; Jimmy Bray,
Attorney-at-Law; and Brian Anderson with Next Step Consulting.
Dr. Costis Toregas with PTI provided a brief overview of the WiFi project. He said as the
network capacity expands, the WiFi system would the city to provide more efficient
governmental services, promote economic development for the community, and heal the digital
divide by making Internet service more accessible to all. He discussed the private sector's
Important role as a partner. co-investor and technology provider. Moreover. he announced a
roundtable event to be held in February 2006 in which IBM and Intel would discuss international
and global perspectives for economic development in the city. Texas A&M University-Corpus
Christi and Del Mar College would also be asked to participate. In addition, Dr. Toregas
discussed the city's global leadership in WiFi effort, mentioning a number of awards received
from the Center for Digital Government, W21. and the United States Conference of Mayors.
Finally, he commended the city for their efforts to date, and encouraged the Council to approve
the new corporation.
Mr Adrian Herbst with the Baller Herbst Law Group provided an overview of the
municipal legalities involving WiFi. He briefly discussed the roles of local government in the
WiFi effort as a facilitator, regulator, and provider. In addition, he discussed federal legislation
regulating the WiFi effort, such as the Federal Cable Act and the Telecommunications Act of
1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 provided for continuing local authority, encouraged
competition and new entrants, and sought to remove barriers that would restrain new services
and competition.
Mr Herbst stated that recent changes, however, have erected barriers to entry. He said
access to programming was being protected through anti-competitive behavior from
Incumbents. Additionally, he said advanced services had not been defined, so it was uncertain
what entities regulated which services. Finally, he said federal and state barriers were being
explored in Congress and the Federal Communications Commission.
Mr Herbst mentioned that Texas and other states had discussed legislation to limit local
government regulations of wireless services. In addition, he said the FCC and Congress were
conducting a number of proceedings that could impact the municipal operation of WiFi,
positively or negatively. Consequently, he said the city needed to continue to monitor legislative
and other legal developments to preserve the community's needs and legal rights.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 17
Mr. Jimmy Bray, Attorney at Law, discussed the creation of the CC Digital Community
Development Corporation. a non-profit local government corporation. Staff was recommending
the creation of the corporation by resolution to carry out the public purposes of the network as
follows: improving delivery of city services at a reduced cost; and promoting economic
prosperity and jobs. The Council was also being asked to approve the corporation's articles.
bylaws, and amendments. He highlighted a section of the resolution that stated that the
participation of partners would multiply network benefits.
Mr Bray described the composition of the corporation's board of directors. The City
Council would appoint the five-member board of directors to four-year staggered terms. Each
director had to be a resident of the city, and would serve at the discretion of the Council. He
said temporary directors were named in the bylaws and would serve until permanent directors
were appointed in May 2006. Initially, city staff would serve as officers, including the City
Manager as the Chief Executive Officer. Under state law, he said the Council could assume the
powers and duties of the corporation at any time, or dissolve the corporation. Finally, Mr. Bray
stated that the Corporation was required to form an advisory committee of stakeholder groups to
obtain input in the design and operation of the network.
Mr Brian Anderson with Next Step Consulting spoke regarding the draft business plan.
He said the team took a conservative approach, developing a plan that would provide both
government services and commercial services. The plan made the following revenue
assumptions regarding government services. First, the corporation would repay $5.9 million in
mfrastructure capital investment. Second, the cost savings from wireless applications such as
the Automated Meter Reading and Automatic Vehicle Location were incorporated. Third. the
city planned a budget transfer of $2,751,000 annually for service support with no cost increases
over five years.
Mr. Anderson discussed the plan's revenue assumptions for commercial sales. They
anticipated that 80 percent of the revenues would come from the ISP service program. The
proposed ISP fee structure was as follows: $150,000 per annum for large providers (Earthlink,
AOL, Yahoo, etc.); $15,000 per annum for small providers (Awsomenet, etc.); and $5 per
subscriber per month. He said the household subscribers were projected to grow
conservatively from 5,000 to 22,042 over five years.
Mr. Anderson projected that 15 percent of the commercial sales revenues would come
from advertising. He said households view approximately 750 or more web pages per month.
Household members will "click" on an ad one percent of the time, and the ads will pay an
average of $0.25 per click
Mr. Anderson stated that 15 percent of commercial revenues would be obtained through
E-Commerce services. Businesses would pay a $250 monthly fee to access store and
marketplace application services. Subscriptions were anticipated to grow from 15 to 60 over
five years
Finally, Mr. Anderson said five percent of commercial revenue was projected to come
from other revenues such as E-Iearning, and was estimated to grow from $5,000 to $38,000
over five years.
In summary, Mr. Anderson listed a number of business development opportunities that
could exceed projections. He said that dial-up ISPs, online advertising, E-commerce revenue,
and the emergence of new video and music services would increase the demand for
broadband. He then displayed a five-year revenue projections chart. projecting $3.2 million in
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 18
Year 1 and $5 million in Year 5. In Year 1, the city was mainly subsidizing the program. but by
Year 5, the split was 50 percent government and 50 percent commercial. He noted that the
projections did not include any funding from other governmental entities that would use the
system, such as the school districts or Nueces County.
In conclusion, Mr. Gericke stated that the next steps in the process were to seek Council
approval during late February 2006 to enter into a contract with corporation and approval of the
business plan.
Ms. Cooper spoke in support of the proposed plan. She asked the team not to sacrifice
the community's needs to seek economic gains. While it was impossible to predict the effects
on any future legislation on the city's ability to generate revenues, she emphasized the
Importance of developing local partnerships with businesses and the citizenry.
Mr. Kinnison asked when the roundtable discussion would be held. Mr. Noe replied the
roundtable was scheduled to take place on February 22 at Texas A&M University-Corpus
Christi. He said the Council would be invited to the event.
Mr. Kinnison noted that the resolution included the appointment of temporary directors.
He said he preferred to see city staff appointed to these positions initially until the Council could
appoint the permanent directors, preferably before May. He said he would like to see a more
diverse group of representatives from the business and technology communities. City Manager
Noe explained the board of directors were subject to Open Meetings Act requirements, which
could present a problem if staff members were appointed to the board. If three staff members
happened to be in a room together, for example, it would constitute a quorum of the board and
may lead to a violation. Thus, staff felt it was more prudent to recommend a group of temporary
directors who were involved in economic development. Mr. Kinnison was still opposed to staff's
recommendations for temporary directors because he did not feel they were the most qualified
to plan the WiFi marketing plan. He asked the Council to postpone the appointments if
possible.
Mr. Kinnison also asked if staff could prepare a detailed analysis of the $2.75 million
budget transfer for the next WiFi discussion. City Manager Noe answered affirmatively. He
also asked for more details on the ISPs.
Mr. Garcia concurred with Ms. Cooper's statement that staff should put the community's
needs first, not economics. He also asked Mr. Herbst for a brief update on current legislation
regulating local control over cable and Internet.
Mayor Garrett called for public comment, and there was none. City Secretary Chapa
polled the Council for their votes as follows:
21. RESOLUTION NO. 026635
Resolution approving formation of the CC Digital Community Development Corporation,
and approving its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.
The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez. Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper was
absent.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 19
Mayor Garrett opened discussion on Item 23 regarding the proposed re-use of the
Memorial Coliseum. Assistant City Manager Oscar Martinez reported that the Council had
identified downtown revitalization as one of their priority areas during the May Council retreat.
Specifically, the Council directed staff to identify a re-use development plan for the coliseum by
the end of the year. In July 2005. staff mailed 56 Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to local and
nationwide developers. He stated that seven companies responded, but of these three
companies, Busch Entertainment, Glenn Lyons, and Captain Jack Little, declined to submit a
Request for Proposal (RFP). Subsequently. the remaining four companies were eligible to
continue with the RFP process as follows: LandLord Resources, NRP Group, TRT
Development Company, and Wisznia Associates.
Mr. Martinez discussed the RFP requirements in more detail. He said the proposers
were asked to describe their core competency; provide a general description of the project
concept, encourage economic development; address community needs and encourage re-
development of the surrounding area; describe how they would memorialize the heritage of the
building and plaque; and explain the estimated cost and projected revenues for the project,
among many other requirements. By contrast, he emphasized that the RFP did not pre-
determine the type of project to be submitted.
Mr. Martinez reported on the four proposals that were submitted. First. LandLord
Resources did not submit a proposal; rather, they suggested that the City provide them an
opportunity to facilitate and manage the process.
Second, the NRP Group proposed the construction of Vista de la Bahia, a 231 multi-
family community adjacent to a newly adapted re-use of the Memorial Coliseum. They
proposed deconstructing the coliseum, removing the roofing, walls, interior, floor slabs, seating
and a portion of the frame to transform the area into an outdoor public venue. They proposed to
re-use the plaque and place it in a prominent place. The estimated project cost was $33 million.
The NRP Group was requesting tax abatements for the term of the lease.
Third, the TRT Development Company proposed a "Boardwalk by the Bay" family
entertainment center, including a 1 DO-foot Ferris wheel designed to draw visitors to the Bayfront.
The entertainment center would include state-of-the-art rides, attractions, restaurant,
concession, and retail facilities. An amphitheater with seating and an open space for small
concerts and performances was also planned. Finally. TRT proposed memorializing the plaque
in an amphitheater, or offered to provide the City with $25,000 to relocate the plaque in an
appropriate site adjacent to the project. The estimated project cost was $30 million. Mr.
Martinez said TRT was fully funding the project, and the city would share 50/50 in the cash flow
from the project once they had recaptured their costs. In addition, they requested the City's
assistance in applying for an Enterprise zone. Finally, they anticipated completing the project in
21 months.
Fourth, Wisznia Associates proposed a "Paseo del Mar" development, a mixed-use
concept retaining the coliseum structure for use as a gourmet grocery store, with a 4,000
square-foot nightclub. They also proposed constructing an additional 65,000 square-feet of
retail in four building blocks paralleling the waterfront with 60 apartments, averaging 900
square-feet each, above the retail space. Other features included an axis wind turbine and a
boardwalk. Wisznia Associates offered to memorialize the heritage of the building by retaining
the coliseum. The estimated project cost was $30 to $36 million.
Mr. Martinez stated that the RFP evaluation process consisted of a four-tiered review,
Including an administrative review conducted by the Purchasing department to ensure that
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 20
proposals met the RFP requirements for timeliness, content and format. A second review was
conducted using the design team for the Bayfront Master Plan (Phase 1) to determine if the
projects were consistent with the goals and objectives. PFK Consulting conducted a third
assessment of the proposals, focusing on the technical aspects. Finally. the city team,
comprised of representatives from key departments, made the fourth assessment.
Mr. Martinez reported that PKF ranked the TRT Development as the top proposal
because of their financial strength and the project's potential to attract business and to establish
the city as a convention and leisure destination. They ranked NRP second, and Wisznia lowest.
The Bayfront Master Plan design team ranked the TRT's Boardwalk by the Bay as the
top proposal because it will serve as a draw to the area and create spin-off opportunities for
pedestrian-focused development. They commented that the housing-based proposals bring
smaller quantities of visitors, and are less flexible to respond to changing market conditions.
Finally. Mr. Martinez said the city team reviewed the proposals, considering the input
from the consultants and ranked the proposals highest to lowest. They considered a number of
key factors in their decision as follows: consistency with the Bayfront Master Plan and the South
Central Area Development Plan; public use/memorialization of veterans; opportunity for
economic growth; flexibility in adjusting elements of the plans; the current market; and the
proposer's financial strength. Consequently, the city team recommended that the Council
authorize the City Manager to enter into negotiations with TRT Development group for the re-
use of the Memorial Coliseum area. Mr. Martinez displayed a composite scoring matrix
Including the scores of the design team, city team, and PKF.
Ms. Cooper was strongly opposed to the TRT proposal because it was too similar to the
Landry's proposal that had caused such a public outcry several years ago. She pointed out that
the Ferris wheel in the Landry's proposal was especially controversial. and she could never
support the TRT proposal as it stood. She chastised staff for ranking the TRT proposal as the
top proposal based on this past experience. She ranked the Wisznia Associates proposal as
the top proposal. Mr. Martinez replied the goal of the RFP process was to identify the objectives
to be achieved, not the uses. He said staff was asking for an opportunity to negotiate with TRT
to se if their proposal can become acceptable to the Council. Ms. Cooper answered that she
could not see how staff could make the proposal acceptable to the public, and she found this
recommendation very disturbing. Mr. Martinez pointed out that the TRT proposal's lease terms
were much more favorable to the city than Landry's proposal. Ms. Cooper stated that her
concern was with the aesthetics of the project, not the financials.
Mr. Chesney stated that it was unfair to compare the TRT proposal to the Landry's
project. He said TRT was offering to spend $30 million of its own funding for the project, and he
felt it was a phenomenal plan. While he was unsure about the Ferris wheel. he thought the
planned festival site and entertainment were worthy of consideration. He also suggested that
an ice skating rink could be added to the plan. He thanked staff and the rest of the evaluation
team for their efforts, and he agreed with their ran kings. He felt the Wisznia plan did not have
strong financials.
Mr. Scott commented that during the Landry's controversy, the city was criticized
because it did not have a master plan for the Bayfront area. Now, the city did have a Bayfront
Master Plan, and the plan included a festival site. He thanked TRT for offering to spending $30
million of its own money for the project. He acknowledged. however, that the plan was similar to
the Landry's proposal, especially the Ferris wheel. He said other landowners in the area would
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 21
have a view of the Ferris wheel. Thus, he asked that the Ferris wheel be removed from the plan
if at all possible.
Mr Kinnison thanked staff for carrying out the stated purpose of the RFP. He felt the
Wisznia proposal was not economically feasible, and did not really memorialize the area. He
asked staff to meet with the Council before engaging in negotiations to find out what the issues
were before making a deal In conclusion, he concurred with staff's recommendations.
Mr. Noyola spoke in support of promoting housing developments in the downtown area.
While he liked TRT's financial strength, he was uncertain whether their proposal truly
memorialized the coliseum. He also thought the city should seek public input on their proposal
before pursuing it. He preferred to keep the coliseum intact rather than tear it down in case it
was needed, and spoke in support of repairing the facility.
Mr Garcia spoke In support of staff's recommendations. He asked Mr. Raymond
Gignac, a design team member. for his thoughts regarding the TRT project. Mr. Gignac replied
that while the TRT proposal was not exactly what they had envisioned for the Bayfront, they felt
nevertheless that the proposal promoted a public use and that it was in the spirit of the Bayfront
Plan. Mr. Garcia stated that all three proposals were excellent, but he felt that the TRT proposal
was a good starting point for negotiations.
Mr. Marez spoke in favor of obtaining more public input on the proposals. He said the
public had expressed concern about how the city planned to memorialize the coliseum and area
veterans. He spoke in favor of retaining the coliseum building, and possibly moving the plaque
to Sherrill Park.
Ms. Cooper stated that she appreciated TRT's desire to invest in our community, but felt
It was premature for the city to enter into negotiations today without seeking public input. She
wanted TRT to provide more information on what they meant by an entertainment park, and she
wanted them to omit features she found offensive, like the Ferris wheel.
Mayor Garrett stated that the Bayfront Master Plan had included an extensive public
mput period. Although he did not feel the community would support a Ferris wheel, he
understood from staff that the aspects of the plan were negotiable. He spoke in support of
obtaining public input on the proposals. He said he would like to see quality retail shops and
entertainment, and an appropriate memorial. He spoke in support of the TRT proposal,
emphasizing that he did not want the decision to drag out for months.
A discussion ensued about the nature of the negotiations. Mr. Kinnison asked if a
closed session could be held on the issue before staff began negotiations. City Attorney
Fischer answered affirmatively. Mayor Garrett wished to minimize any closed sessions on the
Issue because he wanted the process to be as transparent as possible. Mr. Noe replied that
from business standpoint, the RFP process rendered the negotiations as straightforward as
possible.
Mayor Garrett asked for public comment. Mr. Peter Kending with Air Czar, a Bayfront
helicopter operator, asked for an extension to his contract so he could continue to use the
Memorial Coliseum grounds as a landing spot during the negotiation period. Mr. Noe replied
that staff would discuss the matter with him.
Minutes - Regular Council Meeting
January 31, 2006 - Page 22
An unidentified gentleman, representing the Buena Vista project being developed
between Water Street and Shoreline Boulevard, stated an amusement park development would
kill his project. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows:
23. MOTION NO. 2006-029
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into contract negotiations
with the selected proposer regarding the proposed re-use of the Memorial Coliseum.
The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Garrett,
Chesney, Garcia, Kelly, Kinnison, Marez, Noyola, and Scott, voting "Aye"; Cooper voting
UNo"
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Garrett called for the City Manager's report. City Manager Noe announced that
the City Hall in the Mall event would be taking place this Saturday.
Mayor Garrett asked staff to revisit the city's liveaboards policy.
Mr. Noyola asked staff to inform the West Oso ISD superintendent and athletic director
about the status of the West Oso tennis court repairs. He also asked for information how the
city fines citizens for brush pick-up violations.
Mr Kinnison asked for a hotel/motel tax revenue report structured like the sales tax
revenue month by month report. He also asked if the city was still using tippers despite the
Implementation of the automated trucks. Mr. Noe replied the city still used tippers in some
neighborhoods if appropriate or if an automated truck was in disrepair.
There being no further business to come before the Council. Mayor Garrett adjourned
the Council meeting at 4:45 p.m. on January 31, 2006.
2
a. COASTAL BEND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS - Two (2) vacancies with terms to 4-30-07.
DUTIES: Shall prepare and recommend to participating local governments, urban metropolitan, and
rural area plans, looking to the present and future needs of the Region. Such plans may include
recommendations for land use, traffic circulation, major streets and highways, general location of public
works, the development of major educational facilities, and related problems of development.
COMPOSITION: City shall appoint nine (9) members for two-years (but terms shall be at the complete
discretion of the City Council), at least four (4) being elected officials.
MEMBERS
Mayor Henry Garrett
Council Member Bill Kelly
Council Member Jerry Garcia
Council Member Mark Scott
George K. Noe, City Manager
Ed Garaiia, Water Superintendent
***ClifMoss
Ron Massey, Assistant City Manager
Margie Rose, Assistant City Manager
TERM
4-30-07
4-30-07
4-30-07
4-30-07
4-30-07
4-30-07
4-30-07
4-30-07
4-30-07
ALTERNATES
Annando Chapa, City Secretary
Tom Utter, Special Assistant to the City Manager
Oscar Martinez, Assistant City Manager
Yvonne Haag, Director of Neighborhood Services
***J.1. Adame, Fire Chief
Angel Escobar, Director of Engineering
Ogilvie Gericke, Director of MIS
***Resigned
(Note: Staffis recommending Oscar Martinez, Assistant City Manager, to replace Clif Moss and
Richard Hooks, Acting Fire Chief, to replace alternate J.J. Adame.)
b COMMISSION ON CHILDREN AND YOUTH - One (1) vacancy with term to 5-01-07 representing
the category of Sheriff s Office.
DUTIES: To support a comprehensive system of services and advance policies to meet the needs of
Corpus Christi's children, youth and their families.
COMPOSITION: The commission shall consist of 14 members appointed by the City Council. One
member shall be representative of each of the following fields: Health, Social Service, Religion, Legal,
Law Enforcement, Education, Business, Youth Services, Sheriffs Office, and the District Attorney's
Office. One member shall be a youth representative from 16 to 21 years of age at time of appointment.
Each appointee shall have demonstrated interest in the welfare of children or youth through occupation or
through association with community-based organizations. (On 10-10-95, Council approved the addition
of a Police Officer to serve as an Advisory Member to be appointed by the Police Chief.)
MEMBERS
Vicky Alexander (Health), Vice Chair
Miles Toren (At Large)
Amanda Stukenberg (At Large)
George "G" Johnson (Social Services)
Sheri Phillabaum (Religion)
Laura Spear Smith (Business)
Guy Nickelson (Youth Services)
Drew Reining (Education)
Liana Gonzales (At Large)
Penny Grochow (Law Enforcement)
Lauren Ranly (Legal)
Caitlin Martin (Youth Rep.)
Coretta Graham (D.A. 's Office)
***Lt. Martin Arnold (Sheriffs Office)
Capt. Tim Wilson (Police Off.)
Dr. Philip Rhoades
TERMS
5-01-06
5-01-06
5-01-07
5-01-08
5-01-07
5-01-08
5-01-06
5-01-07
5-01-08
5-01-08
5-01-06
5-01-07
5-01-06
5-01-07
Advisory
Advisory
ORIGINAL
APPTD.DATES
2-12-02
9-20-05
6-08-04
5-17-05
5-17-05
5-17-05
11-08-05
2-12-02
6-11-02
7 -09-02
3-19-02
1-10-06
5-17-05
5-17-05
12-06-95
8-16-94
***Resigned
(Note: The Sheriff's Office is recommending the new appointment of Captain Vidal De La Cerda to
fill the Sheriffs Office position.)
Capt. Vidal De La Cerda
Captain - Field Operations Section, Nueces County Sheriff's
Department. Holds a permanent crime prevention inspector
license, Master Peace Officer License, Texas Commission
on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education
instructor license. Current member of Operation Clean
Sweep and Local Emergency Planning Committee.
(Sheriff's Office) (2-07-06)
c COMMITTEE FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES - Four (4) vacancies with two-year terms to
2-01-08
DUTIES: To carry on a program to encourage, assist and enable persons with disabilities to participate
III the social and economic life of the city; to achieve maximum personal independence; to become
gainfully employed; and to enjoy fully and use all public and private facilities available within the
community.
COMPOSITION: Nine (9) residents of the city who shall be appointed by the City Council. The
membership of the committee shall be composed of individuals with disabilities and representatives of
agencies and organizations functioning within the committee's area who are interested in the provision of
services to persons with disabilities and others who are interested in the abilities and specific needs of
persons with disabilities, subject to Council approvaL The city's Director of Human Relations, Director
of Park and Recreation, and Building Official shall serve as ex-officio non-voting members. The
chairperson of the Committee for Persons with Disabilities shall serve as an ex-officio voting member of
the Human Relations Commission.
MEMBERS
*Linda Fallwell-Stover, Chairperson
* Abel Alonzo
Mary J. Saenz
Brian Watson
Roberto M. Flores
*James M. Duerr
*Toni Padilla
Eloy Soza
David Walker
Park & Recreation Director
Human Relations Director
Building Official
*Seeking reappointment
TERM
2-01-06
2-01-06
2-01-07
2-01-07
2-01-07
2-01-06
2-01-06
2-01-07
2-01-07
Ex-officio
Ex-officio
Ex-officio
ORIGINAL
APPTD.DATE
2-27-01
7-12-05
8-21-01
11-11-03
2-27-01
8-23-05
2-27-01
2-27-01
2-15-05
ATTENDANCE RECORD OF MEMBERS SEEKING REAPPOINTMENT
NAME
Linda Fallwell-Stover
Abel Alonzo
James M. Duerr
Toni Padilla
NO. OF MTGS.
THIS TERM
12
5
3
12
NO.
PRESENT
11
3 (2 excused)
3
9 (3 excused)
% OF ATTENDANCE
LAST TERM YEAR
92%
60%
100%
75%
OTHER INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST
Thomas E. Dreyer
Received M.A in Psychology. Member of the Veterans
Band of Corpus Christi. (8-04-05)
"l'orma Jean Franklin
Student in Computer Sciences, Texas A & M University -
Corpus Christi. Attempting to relearn computer skills to
teach people with computer devices-service. (2-28-05)
Dwight Jolliffe
Retired. Attended community college for Liberal Arts.
President of the Blind Leaders, Past President of the Bridge
over Darkness and Christian Tape Ministry. (7-21-05)
Michelle Jones
Independent Living Specialist-Relocation, Accessible
Communities-Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living.
Licensed as a Registered Nurse. Graduated from the
Coastal bend Advocacy Training and Partners in Policy.
Current Secretary of Accessible Communities of the Coastal
Bend. (1-27-05)
Larry Rast
Owner, Marathon Mortgage. Received B.A in Sociology
from Texas Tech University and M.A. in Community
Counseling from Stephen F. Austin State University.
Activities include: Special Olympics volunteer, Ronald
McDonald House, and Member of the Housing and Urban
Development Families Self-Sufficiency Advisory
Committee. (11-14-04)
Russell Stowers
Director Physical Therapist Assistant Program, Del Mar
College. Received AA.S. in Physical Therapy, B.S. in
Community Health, M.S. in Education Technology and
Ed.D. Graduate 2006. Activities include: American
Physical Therapy Association, Texas State Guard/Texas
Medical Rangers. Received Leadership and Teaching
Excellence Award and 2005 Outstanding Academic
Advisor. (1-22-06)
Rosa M. Valdez
Marketing/Sales, TIBH Industries, Inc. Received RA. in
Liberal Arts from Texas A & M University - Corpus
Christi. Activities include: Parent volunteer of National
Hispanic Institute, c.c. Business & Professional Women's
Club, Leadership Corpus Christi Class and Steering
Committee and the Del Mar College TACHE Organization.
(J -13-05)
d. PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE - One (1) vacancy with term to 8-23-06.
DUTIES: To provide advice on City parks and buildings therein, public outdoor recreation areas and
centers and other grounds under its purview by the City Manager.
COMPOSITION: Eleven (11) members appointed by the City Council, who are residents of the City
and serve without compensation for a two-year term beginning August 23, or until their successor is
appointed. The Board elects its Chairman.
MEMBERS
Sandra Billish, Chairperson
Rome Gregorio, Vice-Chairperson
***Davie Cissna
Teresa Carrillo
Dorrinda Garza
Mari Whitworth
Jamie Pyle
Hunter Young
Carl Suding
Buddy Sparks
Gregory T. Perkes
TERM
8-23-06
8-23-06
8-23-06
8-23-07
8-23-06
8-23-07
8-23-07
8-23-07
8-23-07
8-23-06
8-23-07
ORIGINAL
APPTD. DATE
9-14-99
8-22-00
8-20-02
8-23-05
8-20-02
1-18-05
1-18-05
5-18-04
8-17-04
5-10-05
4-22-03
***Resigned
(Note: The Park and Recreation Advisory Committee is recommending the new appointment of
Russell Stowers.)
INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST
Garrett Dorsey, III
Purchasing Manager, Hogan Homes Inc. Attended Stephen
F. Austin College. Current President of the Padre Island
Little League. (7-19-05)
Jamie Duff
Government Intern, CorpusBeat Magazine. Received B.A.
in English at Texas A & M University and currently
pursuing M.A. from Texas A & M University - Corpus
Christi. Activities include: Corpus Christi Focus and
Church of the Good Shepherd Bell Choir. (1-06-06)
Michael A. Garcia
General Manager, Pete's Chicken-N-More. Received B.S.
in Electrical Engineering. Activities include: National
Restaurant Association and Texas Restaurant Association.
(6-10-05)
Rene R Gutierrez
Juvenile Probation Officer, Nueces County Juvenile
Probation Department. Received AA, B.S. in Criminal
Justice and M.A in Public Administration Management.
Activities include: Leadership Corpus Christi XXXIII,
Mentor, and Youth Continuation Care Coalition. (4-19-05)
Judy E. McNamera
Administrator, Caring Senior Service. Received B.S. from
Texas A & M University - Kingsville. Activities include:
member of the STSWS and TRACM. (4-29-05)
Russell Stowers
Director Physical Therapist Assistant Program, Del Mar
College. Received A.AS. in Physical Therapy, B.S. in
Community Health, M.S. in Education Technology and
Ed.D. Graduate 2006. Activities include: American
Physical Therapy Association, Texas State Guard/Texas
Medical Rangers. Received Leadership and Teaching
Excellence Award and 2005 Outstanding Academic
Advisor. (1-22-06)
e. WEED AND SEED STEERING COMMITTEE - One (1) vacancy with two-year term to 11-01-07
representing Site 2. (Note: Site 1 member is no longer part of the Weed and Seed program.)
DUTIES: Provide program oversight and make recommendations to City Council.
COMPOSITION: A total of nine committee members. The City Council shall appoint two (2)
residents each from Site 1 (North) and Site 2 (West). There is no longer a requirement for the Site 1
representatives. One representative shall be appointed by each of the following entities: Corpus Christi
Police Department, West Oso lSD, Corpus Christi lSD, Housing Authority, County Attorney's office,
District Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney's office. A Weed and Seed Program staff member and
the Park and Recreation Department Program Director shall serve as ex-officio, non-voting members.
rhe u.s. Attorney representative will serve as Chairperson of the Committee. The Chairperson votes
only in the event of a tie and becomes the tiebreaker This committee will expire on August 31, 2006,
unless funds for the program end sooner
MEMBERS
Debra Hoble (U.S. Atty.), Chairperson
Juan Meave Jr. (Site 2)
*****Lucio Garcia (Site 2)
Cmdr. JV Garcia (CCPD)
Georg Johnson (CCISD)
Richard Franco (Housing Authority)
Laura Garza Jimenez (County Atty.)
Dr. Maurice Portis (West Oso ISD)
Gail Gleimer (District Attorney's Office)
George Hodge (Weed and Seed)
Sally Gavlik (Park and Recreation)
TERM
Ex-officio, nonvoting
11-01-06
11-01-05
Ex-officio, voting
Ex-officio, voting
Ex-officio, voting
Ex-officio, voting
Ex-officio, voting
Ex-officio, voting
Ex-officio, nonvoting
Ex-officio, nonvoting
ORIGINAL
APPT. DATE
11-12-02
11-09-99
*****Has met the six-year limitation allowed by ordinance
INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST
ReceptionisuRecreation Advisor, Fighting to Rid Gangs in
America. Assist as a volunteer at local schools. (Site 2) (2-
02-06)
Linda L. DeLeon
Retired. Active member of the AARP - Community
Action Agency. Helps at Senior Centers and local
churches. Received the AARP Andrus Award. (Site 2) (1-
12-06)
Frances E. Garza
3
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving a supply agreement for approximately 118,000 lbs. of drop-
on type glass spheres, in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI-0070-06 from Swarco Reflex, Inc.,
Mexia, Texas, based on low bid for an estimated annual expenditure of$31,388.00. This item will be used
by Street Services. The term of the contract is for twelve months with options to extend for up to two
additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager, or his
designee. Foods have been budgeted by the using department in FY 05-06.
..........*...**...........**............*.*.*........*..*.*..*......*...........*.........
Purpose:
This item will be used by Street Services to mix with traffic marking paint
to make the paint reflective.
Previous Contract:
The option to extend the previous contract was not exercised due to the
vendor's inability to maintain current pricing.
Bid Invitations Issued:
Nine
Bids Received:
Two
Price Analysis:
Pricing has increased 17% since the last contract of November, 2004.
According to the vendor, this is partially due to the rising cost of raw
materials and transportation.
Award Basis:
Low bid.
Funding:
Street Services - 520130-1020- 12430
$31,388.00
Michael B era,
Procurement & General Services Manager
BID INVITATION NO: BI-0070-06
GLASS SPHERES
QUANTITY: 118,000 LBS
BUYER: Maria Garza
Date: 12/21/05
DESCRIPTION
QTY
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
BID TABULATION
MEXIA, TX.
UNIT EXTENDED
PRICE PRICE
ROADRUNNER
TRAFFIC SUPPLY. INC.
FORTH WORTH. TX
UNIT EXTENDED
PRICE PRICE
0.266
531.388.00
0.50 $59.000.00
DROP-ON TYPE
GLASS SPHERES,
STANDARD
118.000 Ibs.
4
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: 0211412006
AGENDA ITEM:
A. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept additional
grant funding in the amount of $10,000 from the Texas Department of
Transportation for an Impaired Driving Mobilization Selective Traffic
Enforcement Project (STEP) grant for DWI enforcement overtime within the
Police Department and to execute all related documents.
B. Ordinance appropriating $10,000 from the Texas Department of Transportation
for additional funding of an Impaired Driving Mobilization Selective Traffic
Enforcement Project (STEP) grant for DWI enforcement overtime within the
Police Department in No. 1061 Police Grants Fund; and declaring an
emergency.
ISSUE: Because the state of Texas continues to lead the nation in the number of OWl
deaths, injuries and alcohol related crashes, funds are available to conduct a special
Impaired Driving Mobilization overtime enforcement program.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The State of Texas, Department of Transportation is
providing additional funding for Impaired Driving Mobilization STEP for the period of
February 1, 2006 through - June 30,2006. The grant places overtime officers across
the City with various hours of operation.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Accepting the grant and appropriating funds.
FUNDING: Officers will be working on an overtime basis with the State providing 100%
of the salary and retirement. The City provides mileage costs at $2,030 from the FY
05/06 Police Uniform budget.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting the grant and
appropriating the funds.
Attachments:
TXDOT Amendment Number 1
Misc. Contract Number. 585XXF6178-02
Charge Number: 06-02-02-BI-AU
p~: 17460005741000
Amendment Number!
THE STATE OF TEXAS
THE COUNTY OF TRAVIS
The Department and the Subgrantee executed a grant agreement on 06/24/05 to conduct a traffic safety
project with the project title of STEP - hnpaired Driving Mobilization ODM 163).
The undersigned parties of the above numbered Grant Agreement mutually understand and agree to amend
said Grant as noted below (check all that apply):
[81 Revised Grant Period
[81 Revised Approved Project Description
[81 Revised Action Plan
t8] Revised Maximum Amount Eligible for
Reimbursement
t8] Revised Approved Project Budget
o Other (describe below)
Brief description of revision(s): Subgrantee will extend the proiect thmneh June 30. 2006: Subgrantee will
increase the proiect budget by $10.000.00: Subgrantee will increase enforcement and PI&E numbers on
ap,proved PTQject description in relation to the increase budget amount: The following revised grant
aUac1unents are attached to this amendment: Form 2075-LE (Grant Agreement). Form 2077-LE (Project
Budget). Form 2076-LE (Traffic Safety Project Description). and Form 1851-LE (Action Plan)'
Attach revised Grant Attachments to this amendment document if necessary.
This Amendment shall become effective when fully executed by both parties. All other terms and
conditions of the Approved Grant Agreement not hereby amended remain in full force and effect.
SUBGRANTEE: City of Corpus Christi
By:___________
(signature)
Date:
Typed or Printed Name and Title: George K. Noe. City Manager
STATE OF TEXAS: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
Date:
(signature of District Engineer or designated alternate)
Typed or Printed Name and Title:
By:
Date:
(signature of Director, Traffic Operations Division)
Traffic Safety Grant AfQ"eement Amendment
Paf,!e 1 of I
TxDOT Form 2078 (rev. 3/18/2004)
TxOOT Form 2077-LE (rev. 7119120(4)
Page 2 of 2
Attachment E
Prqect TIle: STEP - ImpUed 0rMng Mobiization (10M 163)
Subgrartee: CIty << Corpus Christi
Fiscal Year: 2005-2006
[81 Check here if this is a revised budget.
Date Revised: 2/14106
Budget Category n - Other Direct Costs
(300) Travel*
Reimbursements will be in accordance with Subgmntee's travel
policy. Subgrantee must bill for actual travel expenses - not to
exceed the limits reimbursable under state law.
A Travel and Per Diem (includes conferences, training
workshops, and other non-enforcement travel) .............
B. Subgraotee Enforcement Vehicle Mileage:
Rates used only for budget estimate. Reimbursement will be
made according to the approved subgraotee's average cost per
mile to operate patrol vehicles, not to exceed the applicable
state mileage reimbursement rate as established by the
Legislature in the travel provisions of the General
Appropriations Act. Documentation of cost per mile is
required prior to reimbtmemenl.
3.500.00 miles @ ~ per mile ........ .............
Total TraveL.............. ..... ........ ..........-...
(400) Equipment*..... ............................. ...............
(500) Supplies*.. ..... ..... ...... ........ ...................-...........
(600) Contractual Services* ...........-.............-...............-..
(700) Other MisceIlaneous*
A Registration fees (training, workshops, cooferences, etc.) ........ -.
R Public information & education (pI&E) materials .......
1. Educational items = $_
(eg.: brochures, bumper stickers, posters, fliers, etc.)
2. Promotional items = $_
(eg.: key chains, magnets, pencils, pens, mugs, etc.)
C. Other*.......................-....... ....-.......... . ................ .
Total OtherMisceUaneoos......... .......... . ................
IL Total Other Direct Costs (300 + 400 + 500 + 600 + 7(0) .
Budget Category m - Indirect Costs
(800) Indirect Cost Rate* (at _ %) -..... -.
Summary:
Total LaOOr Costs ......................................................................
Total Other Direct Costs.._.......................................................
Total Indirect Costs ....... ............................................................
Gra.nd Total (I+ll+llI) ....................................................
Fund Sources (percent Share) .....................................................
(Round figures to nearest dollar)
Otherl
TxDOT StateILocal TOTAL
o
o
o
0 2,030 2,030
0 2,030 2,030
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
---~._-
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2,030 2,030
0 0 0
33,985 0 33,985
0 2,030 2,030
0 0 0
33,985 2,030 36,015
94.360/0 5.64%
* Badget Detail Required: As an attachment to the budget, a justification and a detailed cost breakdown is required
for all costs included for Fringe Benefits (200), Travel and Per Diem (300), Equipment (400), Supplies (500),
Contractual Services (600), Other Miscellaneous (700), and Indirect Cost Rate (800)
o ~ V
....... 0 .......
0...- cd
;::l ~ a -=
<n -:-::bfr ~
o 0-0..", =
o ::;. 0;... ~
N .J:: ;> V V '-
VI 1::;>,_ > ~
;... 0 cd OIl v (Il
v E ...c E.E ~ =
...c "E '" 0 . 0
E a; 0'"2 C'd...c-D;
(!) o..Scdvi'--::'cd=
0,1" >=---- '" (!)-,.D ~
(!) 0 0 ~ ....... '" ~ 0
C/) ; .t: '.;::...c ~ ~ u - 0
A' \C cd 0Il._ c-o,..:.::
I - = ;...._ ~;::l u _
~~=~c ~ ~~ ~_
"Cl . -,-.... 15-" ~ ,"0.0.. N '"
<:>" CO" -; ~ 0'- ~ '" -0 ~ .
.,. ~ In ~ ....... 0 ~.I ~e = 1:: ....... "5 .- - E " '<:t 0
~ ~~~OCv," ~~N~t~u~ ~N",
~ ... ~ ~ ~ .8 .0 "I!l '2 E ii ~ 8. ~ .g ;; Noo~ '"2 '"2 ~ s:
-< -. ~ u ,.Q13 ~ :B "Cl <t: I is g.8 6 e .; " 'll '" N ~ ~ . -0
1",... ~-O~""'<~_u~ .0.... _" N"r-- 5
.... =. "u~.o E ~ I <2 ~N oc::,u... 'N-o-NN~ '"
"'. -0 ., " - 'C ~ r.l C ~ <'-< ~ " ~ N. E . . -0 N N
~- a = " e= 1i E ~ ~ " ~ -i:: "" .0 .... _ '" '" _ "'" _
.~.o_""~X-OO~E~. O-oN~-N~~.
1.". ., == I C C -0 U .. - 0. - " - 0 ~ ~ "''' ~ . ~ ~ N N _
....,..-: - ""-~~"";>c "~E" .~"oo~~ .~_~
~ 1'""\ Q 0'\ (!) E ;... tEl 0 " - 0 ~ - ~ .0. _ _ ~. r--
"" ~ '" ls ~ :,s 1) @ C,'ll- ;::- ~ ~ E 2 ~ ~ N -0. E r-- ~ E ;. ~ :=: _. N C
~ ~.c.... ~.... 1i ,,~, ~ ;; ~ u E ~ ~.8 ~ -g:: ~ li >0 ~ a ~...c :! '" _~
~ <="" = is " ~ "" 0';; ., - 1i ~ ~ ~ 'iii ~ ~ ~ "'-0 z ;< ;:! Q) P _ N 0\
O 0 U .0 0 C ~ ! - ~ "" u ~ ~ ~;; "" cO _ ~ _ <'-< &l.c ~ "
.- ~ ~ ~.9"" "':!i "c""" ~" '"... ~ "" ~~"
.... - " , ~ ~ - -I - -"" 0 ~ - MO. 0 .. .. ~ .. ,<; ~ "" 0
t..... '" - ~ '" .g ! ~ ,,_ 1f.J" N 0 -;: .;; ~ -< v, ..:g:g .. ", .. ~ ,<; ~
r-- N ~~, '" ~ ~ "._ 0 00-000\0.. ..
~ . - >= j.....j "Cl : U d;.... cd 13 .- ;::l .. 0 <n N N 0 0 \0 ..0 \0
--:::u "~'" 00 ~ &- ~~~NO ONOOOO
:0.... 20 sl -0 "o~ !l"..g~:;::~~N~NOOO
o 0 C E -"!! 6.5" > _ ~N.o ~.o.o <:-~",,~NN
~ ~" ffi,.g, "1 u= jii ~ il :;; g '" ~ J5 ~ ~ ~ 1i ~li 10' ~
~ Ol)u .gE~; E 8.s ~;;':5batl6 ~ ~ "::.-<::.~
0<=.; ~"" "" ~ .0." 0 "0. zo......~
.- " ".... u; ;;;: ::: u ~ e ~ -< ~
;> - ...c ;... '"
~ .- = F- 0
~ l-< = ~
~ Q~
r~' "'d :s
~ (l) r.r;
r.,.... l-<-..
~.- 0
< ~~
rJ), S ~
-z
U\D
~o
~;:n
~o
~G:
~
~
--
c
Qj
S
.c
~
eo:
--
-
~
;>,
.<;:::
~
.E
----
...c
'"
cd
;...
U
"0
~ E
" cd
.ie ~
I I ~.
.C =0"0 8
o.-..r:: '';::
~ t: 8 C'd
~.- - g
~ -a cd_
~.- ..r::
'- OIl
~ :s.-
~ .,..r::
.-. ~
001 0
1::
~
t.i-<
V
'"
;::l
uLo
~
'-"'
\0
N
0\
-
00
-
-
;>)
-
~
J3
i
I
I
I
_J
.-
V3
cd
;...
U
"0
~ (!)
,,~
.~ ~ lfJ
= - ~
o ...8 .9
.. 0 ~
t: u cd
.-........ ()
" cd 0
'" -
.C ~
:s.-
.,...c
~
o
1:::
~
t.i-<
Il)
rjJ
;::l
u
o
C
:;::
~
""lei::
~~
Oi :;::
~ .g
~ l::
~ ~
......0
f----
~
~
.-
....
.-
>
.-
....
u
<
'-
=
=
=
.-
....
.-
a-
u
~
~
Q
~ u
.- ta
8 en
";1 ~
e.!!
o~
... .-
t:.~
~.a
Uas
c-::
u tV
~ S-
u.-
"'" >>
t.S..c:
ij ~
u-o
oS a
9 ~
"'" 0
o..c:
.C r-
o.~
__ u
u..c:
; ~
~d"
~ u
en..c:
~ ~
~"~
"",:0
o =='
~ 0.
"~ ~
~ ...
u:=:
.s B
en
~
tn c::
o
o
..
=
~
c::>
~
CJ
=
..
u
=
=
r-
c::>
~
=
~
c..-.
o
"'"
u
.c
8
E
u
..c:
...
00
c::
"u
=='
-0
u
....
-0
a
u
ta
en
~
~~
c::c
'S; N
'c ;:
-0 Co
as-<
" !:: -=
tV OIl
0.=
8 =
.- ""
>>-:
..c:t:
~ =
.~ t:
- ~
-g'2
0.=
u..
..c:.
.....~
- =
43 ~
..... ~
0-=
.........
-0=
0....
'5 =
o.e
c.-:::
u a
8 a
u =
e C,I
t.S~
c::-=
u....
u ~
..c: .t!
..... ~
00.
c::-=
._ Co
tn ~ e
oo~
o - ~
N-=
t.S ~
~ >>~
I 43 .
~ c::
\0 __ 0
"-0 .-
.....u~
Vl e"~
e:-:::
.- .c
= u 0
~ "'" E
Ei F;! u
o..c:
~ ~~
"",uo
=tV~
r-l .- -
-oF;!
"" u u
~8"",
--.u
-<_..c:
-.....
~ -0
~ a
1::0.....
r-loa
r-l .g '[
~ 0 8
~u._
~
o
"'"
o
.g
....:l
u
..c:
.....
~
'C
=='
-0
00
c::
"S;
'C
-0
-0
u
"'"
.;
0.
8
~
Cl
c::
o
00
c::
-fii
B
t.S
e
~
u
>>
....
"S
~
e
o
u
--
-
-
u
c::
o
.S
u(i)
~o
0.0
'u N
.~~
0.0.
-o~
C::VJ
tV I
SN
"- -
~oo
l:l ::$
u<
(/) -
~~
-.0
- -0
-..!:od
u ~
c:: "'"
Ou
o~
.g-o
c::::.=
o 0
u::c
..
..
r-
IfE
~
..
=
aJ
El
~
CJ
r-
eS
=
~
1-4
~
"CS
~
=
.-
=
..
r#.l
=
rIJ.
\0
o
o
N
o
M
a.~
=-
a-g
.. 0.
=
= u
~.s
--
..c:Q)
..... .....
s ~
E-
..c:Q)
~ ~
u ~
l:l
e@
8~
~ u
u 00
c::
0'-
..... u
"",.0
o u
'C a
0.
,,-...{/)
~]
- 00
u c::
""'.-
(/).~
~-o
C::-o
"'" ~
O.!::
::> tV
~o.
._ 8
~.-
u >>
l:l..c: .
.- ~ ~
f:{/)-oO
~ C::'-
U td ~
c:: ~ U
~ 0 0.
8..c: 0
ijGi~
~ "'" ""'.-
>c12ue
~ C::-S 0
o ... u
o ~ 0.
(/) c:: =='
::>UCot-<
~..c: 0
c:: ~ (/)
. o-a
t: U._ 0
= 0:0 00
.. ~ ~ ~
= ... p., ..c:
r-l- ....
rn~-o
'2 o.s c::
= 0._ Ci;S
.. ~ ~ (/)
. .... 1:::
~.!:! en t9
-ol:l<+-<
4) u u
"" 8 ~ ~
.. =-.tV.9
-.- ;;.-
~ -0 ~
c:: u "'"
l::o::E~
r-lo 0
~,,-:...{/)
r-l-oc.=:
c:: ...-4 F;!
~8'C~
-
'C
<
I
tn
o
o
N
-
=
'C
~
VJ
u
.!::
l:l
~
~
....
~
'C
.g
00
c::
'S;
'C
-0
-0
~
.!::
tV
0.
e
~
Cl
c::
o
00
c::
.-
en
B
t.S
en
e
~
;>
u
>>
.....
'S
=='
e
8
8 .
,,-...
,,-...\0
NO
-0
oN
~ o~
....M
.S 1:
~3'
~'"'"
0.1
'u tn
-- 0
lao
o.Nn
-0-
;~
fI.l~
c::-
0-0
".;:; 0
tIS'l::
l:l Q)
~ 0.
~l:l
"'" ~
0.8
~~
-2
""'&3
~ c::
&3 ~
"t':'-O
v ~
.g -;
S~
u ~
N
l::::
.s
;gQ..
~c;
-. ~
~<::
~
~~
.....a
Attachment E
~. Traffic Safety Project Budget
~= ~;r2LE (rev. 7/19120(4) (for Law Enforcement Projects)
Projed Tide: STEP -Imoeired Orivina Mobilization (10M 163)
Name of Subgraotee: City of Corpus Christi
Fiscal Year: 2005-2006
IZI Check here if this is a revised budget.
Date Revised: 2/14106
Budget Category I - Labor Costs
(180) Salaries
r8I Overtime or 0 Regular Time
Salary rates are e.oillUlted for budget pmposes only.
Reimbursements will be based on actual costs per employee in
accordance with Subgrantee's payroll policy and salary rate.
List details:
A. Enforcement (overtime)
1. OfficerslDeputies: l21J!Q hrs. @ $35.00 per hr.
2. Sergeants: _ hrs. @ $_ per hr.
3. Lieutenants: _ hrs. @ $_ per hr.
B. PI&E Activities (overtime)
See Grant Instructions
_ hrs. @ $_ per hr.
e. Other (i.e., overtime stan: supervisory support, conducting
swveys)
See Grant Instructions
Specify: administrative DaDerWOrk
37.00 hrs. @ $35.00 per hr.
Total Salaries ................... ......... .... .... ......... ..................... ..........
<_) Friaae Benefits*
Specify fringe rates:
A. Overtime: 21.68%
B. Part-Time:_%
e. Regular Time: _%
Total Fringe Benefits.. ..... .... ........................ .... .............. ..........
L Total Labor Costs (100 + 2(0)....................................................
(Round figures to nearest dollar)
Otherl
TIDOT St.teJLocal TOTAL
26,635
26,635
o
o
o
1,295
27,930
1,295
27,930
o
6,055
6,055
o
o
6,055
33,985
6,055
33,985
o
o
. Bu4Iget Detail Required: As an attaclnnent to the budget, a justification and a detailed cost breakdown is required
for all costs included for Fringe Benefits (200), Travel and Per Diem (300), Equipment (400), Supplies (500),
Contmctual Services (600), Other Miscellaneous (700), and Indirect Cost Rate (800)
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR THE CITY MANAGER'S
DESIGNEE, TO ACCEPT GRANT FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000
FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR AN
IMPAIRED DRIVING MOBILIZATION SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
PROJECT (STEP) GRANT FOR DWI ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME PAY
WITHIN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED
DOCUMENTS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS THAT:
SECTION 1. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, is authorized to
accept grant funding in the amount of $10,000 from the Texas Department of
Transportation for an Impaired Driving Mobilization Selective Traffic Enforcement
Project (STEP) Grant for OWl enforcement overtime within the police department
and for overtime to execute all related documents for the time period of February
1, 2006 through June 30, 2006.
SECTION 2. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, may accept,
reject, agree to alter the terms and conditions, or terminate the grant, if said grant
is awarded to the City.
SECTION 3. In the event of the loss or misuse of these funds, the City of Corpus
Christi assures that the funds will be returned, in full, to the Texas Department of
Transportation.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa Henry Garrett
City Secretary Mayor
/
Approved as to form f ('t;v7/0 g I 2006
~(~
JosephH rney ~ ()
Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
Corpus Christi, Texas
of
,2006
The above resolution was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $10,000 FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR FUNDING OF AN IMPAIRED DRIVING MOBILIZATION
SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROJECT (STEP) GRANT FOR OWl
ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME WITHIN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE NO.
1061 POLICE GRANTS FUND; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That $10,000 from the Texas Department of Transportation is
appropriated in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund for funding of an Impaired Driving
Mobilization Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) Grant for DWI enforcement
overtime for the time period of February 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006 in the No.
1061 Police Grants Fund; and declaring an emergency.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council Members, the
City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate
action for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs; and, (2) suspends
that Charter rule which requires an ordinance to be considered and voted upon at two
regular meetings, so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect as an emergency
measure upon its first reading, this, the 14th day of February, 2006.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa, City Secretary Henry Garrett, Mayor
Approved as to form ,h~~ t I 2006
JOSephH~ Ih(S/
Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi. Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency ctause of the attached ordinance, an
emergency exists requiring suspension of that Charter rule which requires an
ordinance to be considered and voted upon at two regular meetings. Therefore, l!we
request that you suspend said Charter rule and finally pass this ordinance on the date
of its introduction, or at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Henry Garrett
Mayor, City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
Jerry Garcia
John E. Marez
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Melody Cooper
Jesse Noyola
Mark: Scott
5
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: January 31. 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
A. Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to accept a grant from the
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department in the amount of $69,000 for Phase #1 of the Corpus
Christi Marina Boat Pump-out System for Dock HE" Peoples Street T-Head. with $23.000
match from the No. 3233 Marina Development CIP Fund.
B. Ordinance appropriating $69,000 grant from the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department in
the NO.1 058 Marina Grants Fund for Phase #1 of the Corpus Christi Marina Boat Pump-
out System for Dock "E" Peoples Street T-Head grant; and declaring an emergency.
ISSUE: The City of Corpus Christi has been awarded a $69,000 grant from the Texas
Parks & Wildlife Department. The Corpus Christi Marina is demonstrating its concern for
providing the public with "Clean Vessel Act Program" facilities.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Council action is required to authorize the City Manager
or his designee to accept and appropriate these funds.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None.
FUNDING: Grant award requires a twenty five percent commitment of funds or in-kind
contributions from the City. This commitment comes from budgeted amounts within the
No. 3233 Marina Development CIP Fund.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution
and ordinance
Attachment: Background Information
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Federal funds through the Clean Vessel Act of 1992 allow private marinas and local
governments to receive grants to install boat sewage pump-out stations in Texas. As
evidenced by being the first Marina in the State of Texas to receive the Certificate of
Designation for the "Clean Texas Marina Program," which is a joint project of the Marina
Association of Texas, Texas General Land Office, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, and the Texas Sea Grant College Program, the Corpus Christi Marina has
environmental protection set as a top priority.
At the Corpus Christi Marina, whether boaters are tenants or just visiting, they all enjoy
clean water which increases the Marina's occupancy. This pump-out station will help the
Marina reach its goal of live-aboards and remain a 21 sl Century Marina. The Marina's new
docks on Peoples Street T -Head are designed with a vacuum sewage system incorporated
into the docks. The new Boaters' Facility has bathrooms, and new larger boat slips are
going to be added as part of the Marina expansion on the Peoples Street T-Head. The
City will be able to offer live-aboard status. The Corpus Christi Marina will be the only
Marina in Texas to offer a vacuum sewage system incorporated into the docks, which
illustrates that even the City's Marina is technologically advanced, environmentally friendly.
and will be held as an example for other Marinas to follow. In addition, concern regarding
clean water is that the General Land Office monitors the quality of Marina's water on a
monthly basis.
CORPUS CHRISTI MUNICIPAL MARINA "COASTAL PUMP.OUT GRANT"
Phase'1 Work to begin December 2005
V!SIting Tmn:5!ent Ves:5e'~ Dock "E" Peoples Street T-He~d, New Dock Construction
Curb, Gutter and A5phalt Work
Cost
Central Vacuum Pump-Out System
Cost
Sanitary Sewer Piping
Cost
Trench Work
Cost
TOTAL COST PHASE "1
$ 21,735.00
34.980.00
19,757.00
15.52600
$ 92,DOO.00
/'
'~:OMMjSSIONE RS
JC'SE:PH B,C, FITZSIMONS
CHAIRMAN
SAN ANTONIO
ALVIN L HENRY
VtCE-CHAIRMAN
HOUSTON
ROBERT BROWN
EL PASO
T. DAN FRIEDKIN
HOUSTON
NED S. HOLMES
HOUSTON
PETER M HOLT
SA.N ANTONIO
PHILIP MONTGOMERY
DALLAS
....:)HN 0 PARt<.ER
LUFKIN
DONATO D. RAMOS
LAREDO
LEE M. BASS
,= HAIRMAN.EMERlTUS
FORT WORTH
ROBERT L, COOK
E XE:CUTIVE DIRECTOR
r:-tq
o~
Take a kid
hunting or fishing
. . .
Visit a .tate park
or historic site
4200 SMITH SCHOOL ROAD
AUSTIN. TEXAS 78744-3291
512389.4800
tPW(j state.txJ:-'
RECEIVED
JAN 1 2 2006
c.c. MARINA
January L), 2U06
Mr. Peter Davidson
Corpus Christi Marina
PO Box 9277
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277
Re:
Corpus Christi Marina Boat Sanitary Pump-out System for Dock "E" Peoples
Street T -Head
Project Number V-7-D-(D)
Dear Peter:
We have received the clearance from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service for your pump-out
grant The total cost of the approved project is $92,000 of which $69,000 (75% Federal
share) is to be reimbursed to you by the Department.
Two copies of the Construction Agreement are enclosed. Please have both copies of the
agreement signed and dated, keep one for your records and return one to the Department.
Please address all correspondence to Recreation Grants Branch and include the project
name and number on all submissions.
If you have any questions, please call me at 512/912-7128. Your efforts to provide public
Clean Vesse! Act Program facilities are conunendable, and we look forward to working
with you on this project.
Sincerely and Happy New Year,
Go~
Andy Goldbloom
Recreation Grants Branch
Enclosure
To malta~{' and consene the natural at/d mllum{ resources of Te.ms and to provide hurtling, fishing
alld outdoor recreation ofil)(lrtllnities fin' the liSt' at/d enjo)'ment o/present and fllttwe generations.
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO ACCEPT A
GRANT FROM THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $69,000 IN THE NO. 1058 MARINA GRANTS FUND
FOR PHASE #1 OF THE CORPUS CHRISTI MARINA BOAT PUMP-
OUT SYSTEM FOR DOCK "E" PEOPLES STREET T-HEAD, WITH
$23,000 MATCH FROM THE NO. 3233 MARINA DEVELOPMENT CIP
FUND.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The City Manager. or designee. is authorized to accept a grant from the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in the amount of $69,000 in the No.1 058 Marina
Grants Fund for Phase #1 of the Corpus Christi Marina boat Pump-out System for Dock
"E" Peoples Street T-Head, with $23,000 match from No. 3233 Marina Development
CIP Fund.
ATTEST:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Henry Garrett
Mayor
APPROVED: 24 January 2006
~~
Doyle Curtis
Chief, Administrative Law Section
Senior Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
H :\LEG-DIR\OlgaR\Doyle\Resolu.tion\06.0127 DC Acpt $69K. T xP&W .Phase#1 .CCMarina.BoatPump. OutDock.E.Res.doc
Page 2 of 2
Corpus Christi, Texas
_ day of , 2006
The above resolution was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett.
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
William Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
H '\lEG-DIR\OlgaR\Doyle\Resolu.tion\06.0127DC .Acpt.$69K TxP&W .Phase#1 .CCMarina.BoatPump. OutDock. E. Res. doc
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING A $69,000 GRANT FROM THE TEXAS PARKS &
WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT IN THE NO. 1058 MARINA GRANTS FUND
FOR PHASE #1 OF THE CORPUS CHRISTI MARINA BOAT
PUMP-OUT SYSTEM FOR DOCK "E" PEOPLES STREET T-HEAD
GRANT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That a $69,000 grant from the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department is
appropriated in the No. 1058 Marina Grants Fund for Phase #1 of the Corpus Christi
Marina Boat Pump-out System for Dock "E" Peoples Street T -Head Grant.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon
ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect
upon first reading as an emergency measure this the _day of .2006.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Approved 27 January 2006
Henry Garrett.
Mayor
!2sc-
Doyle D. Curtis
Chief, Administrative Law Section
Senior Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
C:\DOCUME -1 \olgarlLOCALS-1 \ T emp\06. 0 127DC.Approp.$69K. T xP&W. Phase#1 .CCMarina.BoatPump.OutDock. E. Ord.doc
Page 2 of 2
Corpus Christi. Texas
day of
,2006.
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Henry Garrett, Mayor
The City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
William Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
C:\DOCUME -1 lolgarlLOCALS-1 ITemp106. 0 127DC .Approp,$69K. T xP&W. Phase#1.CCMarina. BoatPump. OutDock. E. Ord.doc
6
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: February 14.2006
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance TRANSFERRING $3.000 FROM THE NO. 1020 GENERAL
FUND ACCOUNT NO. 202965 TO ACCOUNT NO. 13700; AND APPROPRIATING THE
$3,000 TO PAY EXPENSES FOR "CELEBRATE TEXAS 2006"; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
ISSUE: This Agenda Item is needed to Fund the costs of entertainment, sound and staging
for the cultural festival, "Celebrate Texas" held March 4-5, 2006 at Heritage Park. This
event will be sponsored by the City Parks and Recreation Department, Cultural Services
Center with support from Andrews Distributing. Redding Communication, Clear Channel
and Texas Radio.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: $3,000 needs to be appropriated for the fiscal year 2005-
2006 to fund "Celebrate Texas".
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Last year, fiscal year 2004-2005 Council appropriated
$2,000 for this event then named ''Texas Independence Day Celebration", Ordinance
026289.
FUNDING: Funds in this account were originally received from grant moneys and vendor
fees for the purpose of funding, when needed, special event programs for the City of
Corpus Christi, Parks and Recreation Department.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council
approve this Motion. Funds in this account were originally received from grant moneys and
vendor fees for the purpose of funding, when needed, special event programs for the City
of Corpus Christi, Parks and Recreation Department.
Attachments: Background Information
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
"Celebrate Texas" is the new name for the "Texas Independence Day Celebration" which
was started to celebrate the historical background of the beginning of Texas. However, the
Committee of community volunteers decided to enlarge our vision and "Celebrate" all
things Texas which included a variety of music, cultural, dance and food.
For the first time this year we will be expanding the program to include more of the
Hispanic genre of music, dance and food. In addition, we will be bringing in more of the
historical re-enactors who add lots of color and give the event a historical base. In addition
we want to bring in storytellers and demonstrators with a decidedly Texas flavor. Kinky
Freedman is one of our goals. We're thinking "big as Texas" and hoping to build this event
into a must see and experience for all Texans.
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE
TRANSFERRING $3,000 FROM THE NO.1 020 GENERAL FUND
ACCOUNT NO. 202965 TO ACCOUNT NO. 13700; AND
APPROPRIATING THE $3,000 TO PAY EXPENSES FOR "CELEBRATE
TEXAS 2006"; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. $3,000 in the No. 1020 General Fund Account No. 202965 is hereby
transferred to Account No. 13700 and is appropriated to pay expenses for "Celebrate
Texas 2006".
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an
emergency measure on this _ day of , 2006.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Henry Garrett
Mayor
APPROVED 8 February 2006
~~.
Doyle D. Curtis
Chief, Administrative Law Section
Senior Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
H.\lEG-DIR\0IgaRIDoyleIOrdinanceI06 .0208 DC. Celebrate2006. transfr.approp. $3000 .ord.doc
Page 2 of 2
Corpus Christi, Texas
day of
.2006.
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi. Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I/we, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully I
Henry Garrett, Mayor
The City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
William Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
H. \LEG-DIRIOlgaR\DoyleIOrdinance\06. 0208DC. Celebrat.e2006. transfr.approp .$3000 .ord.doc
7
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Date: 02/14/06
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to reallocate CDBG Program funds
from the FY2004 Corpus Christi Police Athletic League T.C. Ayers project to the FY05
Corpus Christi Police Athletic League Ben Garza project.
ISSUE: Amending scope of work in an approved Consolidated Annual Action Plan (CMP) funded
projects requires City Council action and approval.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: 1) On April 27, 2004, the City Council adopted its FY2004
Consolidated Annual Action Plan for Community Planning and Development Programs (Resolution
No. 025738), which included the funding allocation for the FY2004 Corpus Christi Police Athletic
League T.C. Ayers project for $87,000. 2) On April 26, 2005, the City Council adopted its FY2005
Consolidated Annual Action Plan for Community Planning and Development Programs (Resolution
No. 026237), which included the funding allocation for the FY2005 Corpus Christi Police Athletic
League Ben Garza project for $75,000.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize the City Manager or his designee to reallocate CDBG
Program funds from the FY2004 Corpus Christi Police Athletic League T.C. Ayers project to the
FY05 Corpus Christi Police Athletic League Ben Garza project.
FUNDING: FY2004 and FY2005 CDBG funds.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
fZ~~{)~
CD Administrator
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
Background Information ~
--- ---~
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
-- -- - --- -~~--~- --
--
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION
· On April 27, 2004, the City Council adopted its FY2004 Consolidated Annual Action Plan for
Community Planning and Development Programs (Resolution No. 025738). Included was
the approval of the Corpus Christi Police Athletic League Project.
· On April 26. 2005, the City Council adopted its FY2005 Consolidated Annual Action Plan for
Community Planning and Development Programs (Resolution No. 026237). Included was
the approval of the Corpus Christi Police Athletic League Project.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Oriainal Scope
In FY2004, the Corpus Christi Police Athletic League was allocated $87,000 of CDBG funds to
"provide lighting and refurbishing of the baseball fields at T.C. Ayers fields to allow more hours for
after school athletic activities and provide additional safety for the two areas."
Due to unforeseen problems this project was expected to cost much more than what was available
in terms offunding. After careful consideration, the Corpus Christi Police Athletic League Board of
Directors' is requesting to reallocate these funds towards the Ben Garza project.
Proposed Revised Scope
The proposed revised scope of work entails the following scope of work at the Ben Garza Park:
This includes developing "three baseball fields including backstops, fencing, bleachers, and lighting;
a concession facility with restrooms, press boxes, public address system, security systems and
storage: a playground area. walking exercise trail with lights, and off street parking facilities."
8
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: February 14, 2006
SUBJECT: Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis (Project No. 8487)
AMENDMENT NO.6
AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 6 to the Contract for Professional Services with LNV Engineering of
Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $866.302 for a total re-stated fee of $3,940,767 for
the Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis to include the City-wide Water
Distribution Master Plan Update.
ISSUE: The Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis Project is being
amended to include a City-wide Water Distribution Master Plan Update. The City last
updated its Water Distribution System Maser Plan in 1997. In the intervening years,
development of coastal areas outside of Texas has proceeded, leaving the Coastal Bend
as one of the few remaining parts of the nation with undeveloped coastal areas.
FUNDING: Funds for this project are available from the FY 2004-2005 Water Capital
I mprovement Budget.
ATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
r
Eduardo Garana. P.E.
Director of Water Services
ngel R. Escobar, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "A" Background Information
Exhibit "B" Contract Summary
Exhibit "C" Location Map
H:\USERS2IHOMEIVELMAPIGEN\WATERI8487\AMENDMENT NO 6\AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis (Project No. 8487)
AMENDMENT NO.6
PROJECT BACKGROUND: The original contract provided for preliminary phase
services for the Interactive Hydraulic Model. Council was advised that approval of a
City-wide Interactive Hydraulic Model would be necessary to complete the project.
AMENDMENT NO.6:
Background: The City last updated its Water Distribution System Master Plan in
1997. The actual growth of the City has been in excess of that projected in the
1997 Master Plan, and there is now a need to update the Master Plan to better
reflect actual growth on the City's south side and in the Flour Bluff and North
Padre Island areas. As an example, the 2005 observed Maximum Day demand
on the Island was in excess of 10 mgd, which exceeds the 1997 Master Plan
projected Maximum Day Demand for 2005 by a factor of 2.
The City has also initiated changes in its development review process. As part of
the new process, the Water Department needs to have the tools to efficiently and
effectively evaluate the impacts of proposed development on the City's existing
and planned water distribution system facilities. The 1997 Master Plan is not
structured to facilitate this type of review.
The proposed Amendment NO.6 will provide a City-wide Water Distribution
Master Plan Update. It will provide the City with a recommended set of capital
improvements to accommodate projected growth, and will also provide City staff
with the tools needed to proactively work with the development community.
Proposed Amendment No.6: Amendment NO.6 consists of three (3) projects:
. Project l' City-wide Water Distribution Master Plan
. Project 2: System-wide SCADA Assessment
. Project 3: Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis
Y:\HOME\l YNDAS\GEN\WATER\8487 - Water Syslem Hydraulic ModellAGENDA BACKGROUND.doc
PROJECT ONE: City-wide Water Distribution Master Plan
Project One Total: $76Q.052
Task 10 Long-Term Service Projections - Data Collection/Demand
Prolections
The objective of this task is to determine the City of Corpus Christi's long-term
water service projections. In order to determine the long-term water service
projections the Consultant will obtain existing long term planning information to
evaluate future land use, population projections, future service area, economic
development, potential customers, and water resource strategies. Once the
planning data is collected and future development analyzed Long Term Water
Demand Projections will be developed for the City of Corpus Christi's Water
service area. Based on these projected demands Long Term Water Delivery
Strategies and System Performance Criteria will be developed.
Task 11 Modeling Analyses of Distribution System Expansion (5-20 Years)
The objective of this task is to use the Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model
to analyze the Water Delivery Strategies developed in Task 10 to define the
recommended System Configurations and system performance criteria. The
modeling analyses will focus on the system expansion for the next 5-20 year
horizon. The Consultant will also define where possible pressure/service zone
areas need to be developed, together with a plan for implementing the new
zones. Then the Consultant will develop five intermediate modeling scenarios to
assist in defining the infrastructure required to meet demand/growth for each 4
year planning period over the next 20 year study period (total of 5 periods).
Task 12 Long Term Service Development
The objective of this task is to develop a phased plan for the water system
beyond the 5-20 year horizon analyzed in the Task 11. The phased plan will
describe the production facilities including possible ASR wells and other
sources/storage options, pumping (booster stations), transmission, and storage
required to meet the system demands in the long term (beyond 20 years). The
Consultant will use the results from previous tasks to develop 5 Long Term Water
System Alternatives and then perform model analysis and coordinate with the
City to determine the recommended strategy for the Water System Phasing Plan.
Task 13 Cost Methodology
The objective of this task is to develop cost estimate models for the Capital
Improvement Program for the next five years that will comply with City practices
and will be prepared for general planning purposes. Development of the cost
models will be based on several sources, including the City's cost estimates,
costs from recently completed water system studies, and data developed from
Means Facilities Construction Cost Data. These cost models will be used to
estimate individual items associated with each system configuration strategy, and
will provide the City with an updateable tool to reassess CIP costs over time as
unit costs change.
H:\HOME\L YNDASIGEN\WATER\8487 Wale: Syslem Hydraulic ModellAGENDA BACKGROUND.doc
Task 14 Distribution System Capital Improvement Proaram Development
This task covers development of a near-term (5-year planning horizon)
Distribution System Capital Improvement Program (DSCIP), and a Long-term
(beyond 5-year planning horizon) DSCIP, both based on the anticipated
development and results of the infrastructure planning. The near-term and long-
term DSCIPs developed as part of this task cover recommended capital
improvements to the Owner's water transmission and distribution system,
including in-system pumping and storage facilities. The near-term and long-term
DSCIP excludes recommended improvements related to raw water facilities,
treatment facilities, and high service pumping facilities, as these items are
outside of the general scope of this work.
Task 25 Proiect Coordination
This item consists of gathering information and coordinating with City
representatives and other project team members by the following:
. Data Collection Interviews
. Monthly Progress Reports
. Project Team Coordination
Task 27 Proiect Deliverables
This item consists of delivering the following information to City representatives:
. Task Results Summary Documents
. Draft & Final Reports
. Executive Summary
. Project CD-RaM's
. Long Term Plan System Map
PROJECT TWO: Svstem-wide SCADA Assessment
Project Two Total: $30,~57
Task 42 Svstem-wide SCADA Assessment
The objective of this task is to provide an assessment of the City's existing Supervisory
Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) Top-End System, communication system
hardware infrastructure and strategy (excluding communication media assessment), and
assess its ability for growth. This task also includes the effort required to investigate,
research, analyze, and develop an interim cost effective solution related to existing
issues associated with the Sand Dollar Ave Pump Station. There is a Workshop
included in this task for reviewing the draft letter report to obtain comments and finalize.
H\HOME\L YNDAS\GENIWATER\8487 - Water System Hydraulic ModellAGENDA BACKGRDUND.doc
PROJECT THREE: Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis
Project Three Total: $75.993
Task 16 Model Trainina
The Consultant will provide a two-day training course for two (2) City
representatives covering application of the Corpus Christi water model to overall
system analyses and system planning.
Task 47 Water Department Capital Improvement Plan Update
The purpose of this task is to integrate and summarize all currently programmed
and/or recommended capital improvement projects, develop phasing
alternatives, and assist the Water Department in prioritizing the projects based
on need and fiscal considerations. There are two (2) Workshops included in this
task, one to update the 2005-2006 CIP and the second to update the Water CIP
when the Distribution System CIP from the Master Plan is incorporated.
TOTAL AMENDMENT NO.6: $866.302.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: Amendments to the original contract are as follows:
. Amendment No.1 consisted of an updated interactive hydraulic model and analysis
that will be used to update the 1995 Water Master Plan and includes field verification
of the City's distribution system; inventory/analysis of valve system; review of water
delivery system; provide steady state/extended period simulation analysis; all
deliverables to be compatible with the City's GIS and all databases generated will be
compatible with various water system modeling software.
. Amendment NO.2 provided for the development of Phase 1 of contingency planning
with federal and state agencies for the Oso Bay 30-lnch Pipeline Crossing.
Contingency planning is necessary to allow the development of pre-negotiated
responses with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), resource agencies, and
the U.S. Naval Air Station of Corpus Christi.
. Amendment NO.3 was a zero-cost amendment that extended the time of the
Extended Period Simulation (EPS) Model Development. The consultant undertook a
new task to collect, evaluate, and incorporate this data in the EPS Model Calibration.
With the additional work begin undertaken and the resulting delay, the consultant
anticipated needing a 90-day extension to complete this portion of the work.
. Amendment NO.4 provided for the rehabilitation, replacement or re-routing of
approximately 4,100 linear feet of 20-inch water line from near Dona Street to
approximately 1.000 feet east of Navigation.
HIHOME\LYNDASIGENIWA TERI8487 Wale' System Hydraulic ModellAGENDA BACKGROUND.doc
· Amendment NO.5 consists of the following three (3) elements:
1. SOUTHSIDE TRANSMISSION MAIN, PHASE 7, PROJECT NO. 8393
Consists of the design of the recommended 36" transmission main from the end of
Phase 6 located at Sea Pines Street to Sand Dollar Pump Station. This project shall
include approximately 17,000 linear feet of 36" transmission main, tie-ins at Sea
Pines Street and Sand Dollar Pump Station, and street crossings at Hwy 361,
Whitecap Road, and Park Road 5.
This project is required due to the existing single water feed on Padre Island being a
24" ductile iron pipe, which is over 30 years old. This project will tie the mainland
Phases 1 through 6 of the Southside Water Transmission Main to Padre Island in
order to upgrade and provide required TCEQ minimum flows to the Island. This
project will include installation of a 36" line along the east side of Park Road 22 that
will terminate at the Sand Dollar Pump Station. Design of this transmission main will
be coordinated with the 2.5 MGD Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (ASR)
(under separate contract) to meet projected demands and provide reliable water
supplies for Padre Island.
2. SOUTHSIDE TRANSMISSION MAIN. PHASE 8, PROJECT NO. 8552
Consists of the design of the recommended 30" transmission main from Sand Dollar
Ave. Pump Station to the proposed elevated storage tank on Padre Island. This
project shall include approximately 26,000 linear feet of 30" transmission main, tie-in
at Sand Dollar Pump Station, street crossings at Hwy 361, Whitecap Road, and Park
Road 5. Also included in this project are the tie-ins of major transmission mains at
Highway 361 and Whitecap Boulevard.
This project is required due to the improvements on Padre Island and new TCEQ
regulations for elevated storage requirements, an elevated storage tank will be
installed on at the end of this main. This project will provide a 30" transmission main
to supply the elevated tank and will be an integral part of the ASR for the Island.
3. PADRE ISLAND ELEVATED STORAGE TANK (1.0 MG), PROJECT NO. 8551
Consists of the design of the recommended 1.0 MG elevated storage tank south of
the Kleberg County line. The elevated storage tank shall be designed to withstand
severe coastal environmental conditions and will include cathodic protection and
coatings. The elevated storage tank is required to alleviate pressure fluctuations on
the Island due to demand spikes and electrical outages. It is also required to comply
with TCEQ regulations since there is currently no elevated storage in the new
pressure zone created by the Sand Dollar Pump Station Improvements. Design of
the elevated storage tank will be coordinated with the 2.5 MGD Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Facility (ASR) (under separate contract) to provide adequate storage for
projected demands on the Island.
H\HOMEIL YND~SIGEN\WATER\8487 - Water Syslem Hydraulic ModellAGENDA BACKGROUND.doc
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1 November 18. 2003 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to
execute a Contract For Professional Services with LNV Engineering of Corpus
Christi, Texas for a total fee not to exceed $507,157 for the Water System
Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis Project (Motion No. M2003-420).
2. June 8. 2004 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 1 to the Contract For Professional Services with LNV
Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas for a total fee not to exceed $361,816 for
the Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis Project (Motion No.
M2004-221 ).
3. September 24. 2004 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to
execute Amendment No.2 to the Contract For Professional Services with LNV
Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas for a total fee not to exceed $111,246 for
the Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis Project (Motion No.
M2004-361 ).
4. June 28, 2005 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
Amendment No. 4 to the Contract For Professional Services with LNV
Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas for a total fee not to exceed $199,431 for
the Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis Project (Motion No.
2005-205).
5. December 20, 2005 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to
execute Amendment No.5 to the Contract For Professional Services with LNV
Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas for a total fee not to exceed $1,894,815 for
the Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis Project (Motion No.
2005-444 ).
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
1. February 20, 2002 - Distribution of Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2002-
01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
2. March 13. 2002 - Addendum NO.1 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
3. March 15, 2002- Addendum NO.2 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
4. March 26. 2002 - Addendum NO.3 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
5. March 28, 2002 - Addendum NO.4 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.
2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42
engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
6. April 11, 2003 - Letter Of Notification No. 1 to the Request for Qualifications
(RFQ) No. 2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement
Projects) to 42 engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
H:IHOME\lYNDASIGEN\WATERIB4B7 Wale' System Hydrauilc ModellAGENDA BACKGROllND.doc
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION (continued):
7 April 17. 2003 - Addendum No. 1 to the Letter Of Notification No. 1 to the
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water,
Wastewater, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42 engineering firms (28 local and 14
out-of-town ).
8. April 25. 2003 - Addendum No. 2 to the Letter Of Notification No. 1 to the
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water,
Wastewater, Gas Improvement Projects) to 42 engineering firms (28 local and 14
out-of-town ).
9. August 4. 2003 - Letter Of Notification NO.2 to the Request for Qualifications
(RFQ) No. 2002-01 (Aviation, Street, Water, Wastewater, Gas Improvement
Projects) to 42 engineering firms (28 local and 14 out-of-town).
10. December 22. 2004 - Administrative approval of Amendment No.3 to the
Contract For Professional Services with LNV Engineering of Corpus Christi,
Texas for a total fee not to exceed $0 for the Water System Interactive Hydraulic
Model and Analysis Project.
CONTRACT SUMMARY/FEE: A schedule and summary of fees is attached as
Exhibit "B".
H\HOMEIL YNDAS\GEMWATERI8487 . Water Syslem Hydraulic ModellAGENDA BACKGROUND.doc
CONTRACT SUMMARY
CITY -WIDE WATER DISTRIBUTION MASTER PLAN
(Project No. 8555)
SYSTEM-WIDE SCADA ASSESSMENT
(Project No. 8556)
WATER SYSTEM INTERACTIVE HYDRAULIC MODEL AND ANALYSIS
(Project No. 8487)
SCOPE:
Amend Contract as follows under Additional Services:
ADD:
City-wide Water Distribution Master Plan (Proiect No. 8555)
10.0 Long-Term Service Projections - Data Collection I Demand Projections
10.1 Obtain and Evaluate Long-Term Planning Information
10.1 .1 Land Use & Long Term General Plan. Meet with City representatives and obtain current and
historic land use plans and long-term general plan{s). Determine the intermediate planning
periods and long-term planning horizon that will frame the overall master plan.
1 0.1 .2 Long- Term Population Projections. Obtain long-term population and growth projection from
representatives of the City. Utilize this information in conjunction with other census data and
area population projections to develop water supply and demand projections.
10.1.3 Determine Long-Term Service Area. In meeting with City representatives, determine long-
term service area boundaries.
10.1.4 Define Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ET J) and other water customers. Identify in coordination
with City representatives existing and future water delivery obligations to ET Js and other
adjacent water users
10.1 .5 Economic Development. In coordination with other City representatives, determine future
economic development as it would affect water demand projections (timing and magnitude).
10.1.6 GIS Data. Coordinate with the IT Department to obtain current GIS coverages such as land
use, parcel coverage. aerial photographs, streets, census tracks, zoning, and other pertinent
coverages.
10.1.7 Wholesale Customers. Obtain from the City the current status of the wholesale customers
and projections of their future demands
10.1.8 Other Long Term Local Water Resource Strategies. Identify and coordinate with other City
water resource strategies as they may affect/offset future potable water system demands.
Other water resource strategies may include but not be limited to the following:
. Aquifer Storage and Recovery
. Groundwater Pumping
. Desalinization
. Re-use / Reclamation
.; USERS2\HOME\V1'l MAPIGEN\WA TER\8487\AMENDMENT NO 6\CONTRACT SUMMARY
10.2 Develop Long-Term Demand Projections
102.1 Utilizing the City's existing GIS, parcel data. and 2004 customer billing records, generate unit
demand rates per land use category per pressure zone.
10.2.2 Develop per capita unit demands using 2004 water use and estimated population.
10.2.3 Compare land use vs. population demand projections, resolve differences. and select
appropriate demand projection methodology.
10.2.4 Develop long-term projections for LVUs (industry). Separate LVU demand projections from
per capita demand projection methodology.
10.2.5 Determine lost and unaccounted for water.
10.2.6 Develop strategy for future Demand Allocation.
10.2.7 Determine appropriate peaking factors for long-term planning.
10.2.8 In conjunction with City staff, determine percent build-out and anticipated growth curves for
the 20-year, Long-Term Planning period.
10.2.9 In conjunction with City staff, determine Long-Term Planning period land use.
10.2.10 Using the results of Tasks 10.2.1 through 10.2.8, develop demand projections per land use
per pressure zone for the Long-Term Planning period.
10.2.11 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (see Task 27.1) and attend Workshop NO.3.
Incorporate City comments into the minutes for the Workshop and into the Project Report
(see Task 27.2).
10.3 Identify/Develop System Performance Criteria and Design Standards
10.3.1 Obtain and review City and TCEQ design requirements and standards.
10.3.2 Develop criteria for transmission and distribution piping with respect to system pressure and
velocity criteria.
10.3.3 Develop booster pump station criteria; define firm yield.
10.3.4 Develop storage criteria for diurnal, fire, and emergency uses.
10.3.5 Together with City staff, define infrastructure redundancy and reliability criteria.
10.3.6 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (See Task 27.1) and attend Workshop NO.1.
Incorporate City comments into the minutes for the Workshop and into the Project Report
(See Task 27.2).
10.4 Analyze Infrastructure Capability to Serve "Infill" Development
The work associated with the Infill analysis is to determine if the existing infrastructure can sustain the
increased water demands until the year 2025. This work element is to be completed as a priority item
and contains portions of:
a. Task 10.1 Obtain and Evaluate Long-Term Planning Information
b. Task 10.2 Develop Long-Term Demand Projection
c. Task 12.0 Long-Term Service Development
f'ILSERS2\HOMEIVELMAP\GENIWATERI8487\AMENDMENT NO. 61CONTRACT SUMMARY
The analysis is to be performed on the water system that is presently in place with the exception that
the water model will include the committed improvements to serve Padre Island. The demand model
will use maximum per capita day demands
The period of time for this analysis will be limited to the year 2025 and as such will become a single part
of the Long-Term Service Development as described in Task 12.0.
10.4.1 Obtain and Evaluate Data. Obtain current land use planning maps for the current service
area of the City to determine the nature of infill in each service pressure zone. Obtain recent
aerial photographs of the City to determine the current extent of development in each service
pressure zone.
10.4.2 Perform Infill Analysis. Utilizing the current land use planning maps, determine the extent of
fill-in until the year 2025. Using aerial photography, conduct a "roof top count" and on the
ground survey to determine if current development is consistent with the current land use
plan. Using conservative growth rates that are applicable for the current economic condition
of the City's service area, project the increase in housing. commercial. and industrial units
that may occur by the year 2025. The analysis will include build out of Zone 2 and 4 and total
infill between Holly Road and Cayo East Oso. These projections should be consistent with
the City's current land use plan and not assume changes in land use.
Where information may be lacking, assume that adjacent unused property will develop in a
similar nature to those adjacent properties with development currently in place.
10.4.3 Large Volume Users. Simulate the addition of two additional large volume users in the vicinity
of Equistar refinery The volume and rate of consumption will mimic that which has been
established by similar facilities
10.4.4 Demand Generation for Infill Analysis. Once sub-tasks 10.4.1 through 10.4.3 are complete.
simulate demand patterns consistent with the land use plan and infill analysis. This demand
analysis will incorporate a per capita demand consistent with the City's historical records. In
addition, the infill demand model will also utilize gpm per acre analysis consistent with the
City's historical records.
This demand model will utilize maximum day demands to determine water system
component capability from the perspective of treatment, transmission, storage and pumping
to meet these 2025 infill demands.
10.4.5 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (see Task 27.1) and attend Workshop NO.2. The
Task Results Summary will describe the evaluation process that was completed for the infill
analYSIS. This Summary will include the assumptions made in determining the infill to the year
2025 and the effect on water demand in each of the City's existing service zones.
The findings of the water system components (treatment, transmission, storage and
pumping facilities) will be presented as in each components apparent capability to meet the
infill demands. If a component is not capable of meeting the demand, the reason for
apparent failure will be clearly presented. If a component appears to have excess capacity.
this estimate of excess capacity will be clearly presented. Incorporate City comments into the
minutes for the Workshop and into the project Report (see Task 27.2).
10.5 Develop Long-Term Water Delivery Strategy
10.5.1 Develop up to 5 long-term water delivery strategies that define long-term water sources,
WTP capacity requirements. major transmission piping configuration, and storage
capacity/location.
10.5.2 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (see Task 27.1) and attend Workshop NO.4.
Incorporate City comments into the minutes for the Workshop and into the project Report
(see Task 27.2)
~ '''.'SERS2IHOME.VEl MAPIGENIW A fER ,8467\AMF NDMENT NO 3,COtHRACT SUMMAR,
10.6 Existing System Evaluation
10.6.1 Evaluate existing distribution system. Conduct an evaluation of the existing water distribution
system using the current models developed under the Basic Services and Amendment NO.1
of this Contract.
10.6.2 Assess existing system deficiencies. Using the current models, conduct additional
assessments of the distribution system capabilities, for example fire flows, and assess
existing system deficiencies.
10.6.3 Evaluate Age and Condition of Infrastructure. Utilizing information provided by the City,
establish an age/condition database of the infrastructure facilities. Incorporate the information
contained in the City's CMMS "Maximo" system, where possible. Include all pump stations,
storage facilities, and pipelines 12 inches and larger in diameter.
10.6.4 Maintenance and Repair History. Utilizing information provided by the City, establish a
maintenance and repair history database on those facilities included in Task 1 0.6.3.
1 0.6.5 Power Supply Assessment. Evaluate power supply redundancy and frequency, and duration
of outages for those facilities listed under Task 10.6.3.
10.6.6 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (see Task 27.1) and attend Workshop NO.2.
Incorporate City comments into the minutes for the Workshop and into the project Report
(see Task 27.2).
10.7 Technical Conferences
Engineer intends to organize and attend Technical Conferences with the City from time to time as a
means of conveying project information, soliciting input and comments from the City, and reporting on
project status and budget. A Kickoff Technical Conference will be held concurrent with Technical
Conference NO.1 which will define the project schedule, coordination issues, data needs, staffing plan,
and project milestones
We plan to conduct six (6) Technical Conferences throughout this task.
10.8 Technical Seminars
Engineer will prepare materials for and conduct Technical Seminars No. 1-4. Topics to be covered in
these Technical Seminars are described in Tasks 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, and 10.6. Engineer will
prepare Technical Seminar minutes that record all comments from the City.
11.0 Modeling Analyses of Distribution System Expansion (5-20 Years)
11.1 Once the long-term water delivery strategy is defined, including the location of possible ASR wells,
other future sources/storage options and future demands, then long-term system configurations will be
analyzed to define the recommended pumping, transmission, and storage facilities to meet demands
and system performance criteria. These system configurations will be based on the results of Task
10.5. The modeling analyses will focus on the system expansion for the next 5-20 year horizon.
11.2 The Engineer's modeling analysis will define where possible pressure/service zone breaks need to
occur, together with a plan for implementing the zone break. Particular attention will be paid to valve
locations, PRVs. elevated storage requirements, and supply/production facilities to serve closed
zone(s ).
11.3 The Engineer will develop five intermediate modeling scenarios to assist in defining the infrastructure
required to meet demand/growth for the 4-5 year planning periods during the 20 years of the long-term
study period.
i-'\l!SERS2\HOME'VEl MAP\GEN\WA TER\8487\AMENDMENT NO. 6\CONTRACT SUMMARY
11.4 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (see Task 27.1) and incorporate City comments into project
Report (see Task 27.2)
11.5 Technical Conferences
Engineer Intends to organize and attend Technical Conferences with the City from time to time as a
means of conveying project information, soliciting input and comments from the City, and reporting on
project status and budget.
We plan to conduct one (1) Project Meeting throughout this task.
116 Technical Seminars
Engineer will prepare materials for and conduct Technical Seminar NO.5 to review Task Results
Summary document. Engineer will prepare Technical Seminar minutes that record all comments from
the City for Tasks 12.8.13.6, and 14.6.
12.0 long-Term Service Development
12.1 Using the long-term supply strategy developed under Task 10.5, together with projected long-term
demands and land use, develop up to five long-term water system alternatives. The long-term
alternatives will take into account planning requirements, demands, and redundancy/reliability criteria.
12.2 The Engineer will conduct modeling analyses of the selected alternatives to assess the ability of the
systems to meet demands and system performance criteria.
12.3 Develop Recommended Long-Term Water System Strategy. Based on the results of the previous
tasks, the Engineer will evaluate the alternatives, and together with Water Department input, a
recommended strategy will be developed. This process will be facilitated in a Workshop with the City
staff.
12.4 Based on the results of the previous tasks, the Engineer will develop a phased plan for the water
system. The phased plan will describe the production facilities (including possible ASR wells and other
sources/storage options), pumping (booster stations), transmission, and storage required to meet the
system demands
12.5 These facilities Will be tabulated as well as displayed on system plan mapping. Particular attention will
be paid to the supply and reliability assessment, which will include multiple production sources, potential
major facility outages, and transmission/distribution looping.
12.6 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (see Task 27.1) and incorporate City comments into the
project Report (see Task 27 .2).
12 .7 Technical Conferences
Engineer intends to organize and attend Technical Conferences with the City from time to time as a
means of conveying project information, soliciting input and comments from the City, and reporting on
project status and budget.
We plan to conduct five (5) Technical Conferences throughout this task.
12.8 Technical Seminars
Engineer will prepare materials for and conduct Technical Seminar NO.6 to review Task Results
Summary document. Engineer will prepare Technical Seminar minutes that record all comments from
the City for Tasks 12.8,13.6, and 14.6.
H 'I! 'SERS2\HOME\VElMAP\GEN\WATER\8487\AME~mMEN'1 NO S\CONTRACT SUMMARY
13.0 Cost Methodology
3.1 The cost estimate methodology for the Capital Improvement Program for the next five years will comply
with City practices and will be prepared for general planning purposes. Development of the cost
estimates will be based on several sources, including the City's cost estimates, cost from recently
completed water system studies, and data developed from Means Facilities Construction Cost Data.
, 3.2 Estimated unit costs of pipelines will be based on the pipes' material cost in addition to installation cost,
pavement replacement, railroad and freeway crossings, mobilization and demobilization, and
Contractor overhead and profit The cost will be expressed in dollars per linear foot of pipe.
< 3.3 Other Infrastructure such as production facilities, storage reservoirs, and booster pump stations will be
estimated as a lump sum. The infrastructure costs will be suitable for serving as basis for budgeting
purposes and bond program development.
13.4 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (see Task 27.1) and incorporate City comments into the
project Report (see Task 27.2).
13.5 Technical Conferences
13.6 Engineer intends to organize and attend Technical Conferences with the City from time to time as a
means of conveying project information, soliciting input and comments from the City, and reporting on
project status and budget.
13.7 We plan to conduct one (1) Technical Conferences throughout this task.
13.8 Technical Seminars
Engineer will prepare materials for and conduct review and discussion of this task as part of Technical
Seminar NO.2. Engineer will prepare Technical Seminar minutes that record all comments from the
City for Tasks 128, 13.6, and 14.6.
14.0 Distribution System Capital Improvement Program Development
14.1 Task Objective: This task covers development of a near-term (5-year planning horizon) Distribution
System Capital Improvement Program (DSCIP), and a Long-term DSCIP, both based on the
anticipated development and results of the infrastructure planning. The near-term and long-term
DSCIPs developed as part of this task cover recommended capital improvements to the City's water
transmission and distribution system, including in-system pumping and storage facilities. The near-term
and long-term DSCIP excludes recommended improvements related to raw water facilities, treatment
facilities, and high service pumping facilities, as these items are outside of the general scope of this
work. This task also specifically excludes development of a Capital Improvement Plan as defined by
Texas Local Government Code 395.014
14.2 Near-Term DSCIP: The Engineer will develop a 5-Year DSCIP based on the anticipated development
and results of the infrastructure planning. For the purposes of this task, the DSCIP refers to
recommended capital improvements to the City's water transmission and distribution system, including
In-system pumping and storage facilities. The near-term DSCIP excludes recommended improvements
related to raw water facilities, treatment facilities, and high service pumping facilities. The 5-Year
DSCIP will include the size and location of the infrastructure development, year of development, and
the associated cost. The project costs will include an allowance for engineering (10%), construction
management (10%), and a contingency (10%). This task specifically excludes development of a Capital
Improvement Plan as defined by Texas Local Government Code 395.014.
14.3 Long-Term DSCIP: The Engineer will develop a Long-Term DSCIP based on the Long-Term system
development plan, which will include a phasing and implementation plan. Cost estimates will be based
on planning level estimates similar to those developed in Task 14.2. This task specifically excludes
recommended improvements related to raw water facilities, treatment facilities, and high service
H \I!SERS2\HOMEIVElMAP\GEN\WATER\8487\AMEfJDMENT NO. 6\CONTRACT SUMMARY
pumping facilities and the development of a Capital Improvement Plan as defined by Texas Local
Government Code 395.014.
144 Prepare Task Results Summary Document (see Task 27.1) and incorporate City comments into the
project Report (see Task 27.2)
145 Technical Conferences
Engineer Intends to organize and attend Technical Conferences with the City from time to time as a
means of conveying project information, soliciting input and comments from the City, and reporting on
project status and budget
We plan to conduct one (1) Technical Conferences throughout this task.
146 Technical Seminars
Engineer will prepare materials for and conduct Technical Seminars NO.7. Engineer will prepare
Technical Seminars minutes that record all comments from the City for Tasks 12.8, 13.6, and 14.6.
25.0 Project Coordination
251 Data Collection Interviews
As part of our data collection activities, The Engineer intends to interview key City staff to compliment
our understanding of system operations and specific problems to be addressed by this project.
25.2 Progress Reports
The Engineer will prepare monthly progress reports summarizing the work activities undertaken for the
month, together with the status of task percent complete.
253 Project Team Coordination
The Engineer will coordinate with the City and sub-consultants to disperse information and incorporate
review comments, schedule interviews, meetings, workshops, and distribute deliverables.
270 Project Oeliverables
27 1 Task Results Summary Documents
Unless indicated otherwise in individual task descriptions, Engineer will prepare Task Results
Summaries to document the results of Tasks 10.2.11, 10.3.6, 10.4.5, 10.5.2, 10.6.6, 11.4, 12.6, 13.4,
and 14.4. These documents will serve as a mechanism to convey information and study results, solicit
comments from the City staff, and to gain consensus with the conclusions and recommendations.
Engineer will deliver ten hard copies and one PDF electronic file of each Task Results Summary to the
City one week before Workshops scheduled to discuss these deliverables.
Following the Workshop, Engineer will prepare Workshop minutes that record all comments from the
City. These comments will not be incorporated into revised versions of the Task Results Summary
documents, but will be incorporated into the Draft and Final Reports described in Task 27.2.
27 2 Draft and Final Reports
The Engineer will prepare an outline of the Long-Range Plan Development report for approval by the
City prior to publishing the draft and final report. The report will be based on, and incorporate, the
content of previously reviewed Task Results Summary documents described in Task 27.1. Previously
reviewed materials will be reorganized and rewritten in a format consistent with the approved outline.
H. ISERS2IHOME\VE' MAP\GEN\WATER\8487'AMFNDMENT NO 6'.CONTRfI('T SUMMARY
The draft and final documents will contain color graphs, charts, and maps explaining the planning
process and conclusions
The Long-Range Plan Development report will be prepared in a separate, stand-alone volume, 3-ring
binder with tabs, Including supporting appendix material as appropriate.
The Engineer will deliver 10 3-ring bound copies and one PDF electronic copy of the draft Report to the
City for review and comment.
Following incorporation of the City's comments, the Engineer will deliver 10 3-ring bound copies and
one PDF electronic copy of the Final Report to the City.
The Engineer will provide a system map that will include all improvements shown in the long-term CIP
plan.
27.3 Executive Summary
An Executive Summary will be presented in a format that will allow it to be bound as a separate report.
Engineer will deliver ten hard copies and one PDF electronic copy of the Draft Executive Summary to
City
Following incorporation of City's comments, Engineer will deliver ten hard copies and one PDF
electronic copy of the Final Executive Summary to City.
27.4 Project CD-ROMs
The Engineer will provide the final report and executive summary on CD-ROM for the City's use in
printing additional copies, and posting on the City's web page. The Long-Range Plan Development
report and associated output analysis reports will be provided on CD-ROM.
27.5 The Engineer will provide a system map that will include all improvements shown in the long-term CIP
plan.
System-wide SCADA Assessment (Project No. 8555)
42..0 System-wide SCADA Assessment
42.1 Background and Purpose
The City has recently placed several new pumping facilities (Staples, Navigation, and Sand Dollar) in
service, and is contemplating additional monitoring and control facilities within the water system at
existing and proposed elevated storage facilities and at revenue meters for several of the City's large-
volume water customers. The City is concerned that existing SCADA infrastructure may not have the
capacity to adequately handle these existing and planned facilities.
The objective of this task is to provide an assessment of the City's existing SCADA Top-End System,
communication system hardware infrastructure and strategy (excluding communication media
assessment), and assess its ability for growth. Communication media assessment and evaluation shall
be performed under the System-Wide SCADA Master Plan task 48.0. However, this task also includes
the effort required to investigate, research, analyze, and develop an interim cost effective solution
related to existing issues associated with the Padre Island Pumping Station.
42.2 Facilities Reconnaissance
The project team will review available plans, specifications and operations and maintenance information
and conduct various site visits at existing WDCS Remote Operations Center (Top-End at O. N. Stevens
Water Treatment Plant) and the Padre Island Pump Station to gain an understanding of the City's
existing SCADA infrastructure and communication methodology.
H \IJSERS2\HOME\VELMAP\GEN\WATER\8487\AMENDMENT NO. 6\CONTRACT SUMMARY
423 Assessment of Existing SCADA System
The project team will assess the capabilities of the existing SCADA system Top-End Hardware and
software that is directly associated with the remote site City-Wide WDCS. Assessment will be executed
with respect to the goals, objectives, and performance criteria identified in the previous task, excluding
assessment and evaluation of the communication media and associated alternatives, which shall be
performed under the System-Wide SCADA Master Plan task 48.0. A WDCS SCADA Top-End
Workshop will be conducted with the City to review existing and desired method of operation, existing
and reported issues (if any) with the system, future objectives and desired WDCS protocol.
The project team will commence a cursory review of the existing historical records, interview operating
personnel an observe operations methodology at the Top-End level.
42.4 Identify Interim SCADA System Improvements
Where feasible, recommend Interim SCADA upgrades to improve system performance for the Sand
Dollar Pump Station. Provide conceptual-level cost estimates for these interim improvements.
Upgrades are limited to improving the data transmission rate for the pumping and storage facilities
directly serving Padre Island until the recommended improvements from the SCADA master plan are
Implemented.
42.5 Draft and Final Letter Report
Prepare a draft letter report summarizing results of the SCADA system assessment and recommended
approach for Master Plan Scope. Incorporate City comments into a final letter report.
Water System Interactive Hydraulic Model and Analysis (Project No. 8487)
16.0 Model Training
161 The Engineer will provide a two-day training course for two (2) City representatives covering application
of the Corpus Christi water model to overall system analyses and system planning. The training will
include hands-on training on applications of the model utilizing the City's H20MAP software licenses.
47.0 Water Department Capital Improvement Plan Update
47 1 Purpose
The purpose of this task is to integrate and summarize all currently programmed and/or recommended
capital improvement projects, develop phasing alternatives, and assist the Water Department in
prioritizing the projects based on need and fiscal considerations. Deliverables will be in the City's
standard C I.P. format
472 Prepare Initial CIP Overview (Ratification)
Engineer will prepare an initial tabulation of capital projects. (Engineer completed this task prior to CIP
Workshop No.1 with the City)
473 CIP Workshop NO.1 with City (Ratification)
Engineer will meet with City staff and review initial CIP Overview prepared as part of Task 47.2.
Engineer will provide input during this workshop regarding addition or deletion of projects, changes in
recommended schedule, changes in estimated construction cost, design cost, etc. Engineer will
prepare workshop agenda and minutes. (Engineer completed this task on October 12 and 13, 2005)
j "SERS2\HOME\VEI MAP\GEN\WATER\8487\AMENDMEm NO E.'CONTRACT SUMMARY
47.4 Revise CIP Tabulation (Ratification)
Engineer will revise CIP Tabulation based on input received at CIP Workshop NO.1. Engineer will
deliver revised CIP Tabulation to City.
47.5 Incorporate DSCIP Recommendations into CIP Update
Following completion of Task 14, Engineer will revise the CIP Tabulation to incorporate DSCIP
Recommendations prepared in Task 14. Engineer will deliver revised CIP Tabulation to City in
City's standard C I.P. format.
47.6 CIP Workshop NO.2 with City
Engineer will meet with City staff and review the revised CIP Tabulation developed in Task 47.5.
Engineer will prepare workshop agenda and minutes.
47.7 Deliver Final CIP Analysis
Engineer will revise CIP Tabulation to incorporation input from CIP Workshop NO.2 with City. Engineer
will deliver Final CIP Tabulation to City in City's standard C.I.P. format.
SCHEDULE:
Time IS of the essence. All work in this Amendment NO.6 shall be completed by the Engineer on or before the dates
listed in the following table. Should Notice to Proceed be issued on a date different from date indicated, then Engineer
shall complete all work within the number of days following Notice to Proceed listed in the table.
---~.
Scheduled Completion
-~_._-'-
Task Calendar Days following Notice
to Proceed
Notice to Proceed (Assumed) 0
Task Results Summary Documents
Task 10.2: Demand Projections 103
I Task 10.3: Performance Criteria 14
,
i Task 10.4: Infill Analysis 84
: Task 10.5: Long Term Water Delivery 137
i Task 10.6: Exist. Water System Evaluation 75
Task 11: Modeling Analysis 223
: Task 12. Long Term Service Development 281
i Task 13: Cost Methodology 77
i Task 14: Distribution System Capital Improvement Program
I Development 341
, Task 42 System Wide SCADA Assessment 311
i
Task 47: Water Department Improvements Plan Update 371
Scheduled Workshops
Workshop No. 1/project Kickoff Meeting 38
, Task 10.3: Performance Criteria
Workshop No.2 92
Task 10.4: Infill Analysis
! Task 10.6: Existing System Evaluation
I
i Task 13: Cost Methodology
I EXHIBIT "B" I
Page 10 of 12
H \liSERS2\HOME\VELMAP\GEN\WATER\8487\AMENDMENT NO 6\CONTRACT SUMMARY
Task
r- ------...-~-"-.--
! Workshop No. 3_____
i Task 102: Demand Projections
I
, Workshop No.4
I Task 105: Long Term Water Delivery
f-
I
I Workshop No.5
I Task 11 4: Modeling AnalysIs
! Workshop No.6
Task 126: Long Term Service Development
i
I Workshop No. 7
!
Task 14 Distribution System Capital Improvement Program
I Development
!
Workshop
! Task 42: System Wide SCAOA Assessment
i
I Workshop
i Task 47 Water Department Capital Improvements Plan Update
I Draft and Final Reports
i Submit Draft to City
t Submit Final
1--
i Executive Summary
i Submit Draft to City
Submit Final
f ",SERS2IHOME\VElMAP\GENIWATER\8487\AMENDMENT NO 6\CONTRA,CT SUMMARY
Scheduled Completion
Calendar Days following Notice
to Proceed
113
146
232
289
349
311
378
420
455
427
462
WATER SYSTEM INTERACTIVE HYDRAULIC MODEL AND ANALYSIS
(Project No. 8487)
SUMMARY OF FEES
~t= AMENDMENT. NO.6
-..,--
Pro). No. 8555 Pro). No. 8556 Pro). No. 8487
City-wide Water Water System TOTAL OF
I System-wide SCADA AMENDMENT NO.6
I Dlstrtbutlon Master Interactive Hydraulic
i Plan Assessment Model and Analysis
~-
BASIC SERVICES
1.0 Preliminary Phase $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
2.0 Design Phase 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.0 Bid Phase 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.0 Construction Phase 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Subtotal Basic Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
i ;
fADDITIONAl. SERVICES ~-
-~
I 'Long-Term Service ProJections. Data CollectionlDemand
10.0 Projections 230,364.00 0.00 0.00 230,364.00
! - --
I Modeling Analyses of Distribution System Expansion (5-20
11.0 Years) 56,835.00 0.00 0.00 56,835.00
12.0 Long Term Service Development 160,757.00 0.00 0.00 160,757.00
13.0 Cost Methodology 30,614.00 0.00 0.00 30,614.00
"----
14.0 CIP Development 82,075.00 0.00 0.00 82,075.00
16.0 EPS Training 0.00 0.00 26,969.00 26,969.00
~--
25.0 Project Administration 57,910.00 0.00 0.00 57,910.00
27.0 Project Deliverables 141.497.00 0.00 0.00 141,497.00
42.0 System-wide SCADA Assessment 0.00 30,257.00 0.00 30,257.00
47.0 Water Department Capital Improvement Plan Update 0.00 0.00 49,024.00 49,024.00
Subtotal Additional Services 760,052.00 30,257.00 75,993.00 866,302.00
_.._--
,
TOTAL AUTHORIZED FEE $760,052.00 $30,257.00 $75,993.00 $866,302.00
RIGINAL CONTRACT 111-18-2003) M2003-420 $507,157.00
ENDMENT NO~ 1 (06-08-2004J M2004-221 361,816.00
M2004-361 111,246.
ENDMENT NO. 3112-22-2004J Admin Apprv
ENDMENT NO.4 (06-28-2005J M2005-205
ENDMENT NO.5 [12-20-2005J M2005-444 1,894,815.00
ENDMENT NO.6 [02-14-2006] M2006- - 866,302.00
OTAL RESTATED FEE $3,940,767.00
"i\USERS2IHOMEIVELMAPlGEN\WATER\8487\AMENDMENT NO 6\FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT NO 6
,MpiOJec'~'UnL!/e^nl[o IS \exn84d dwg
~
N
~-
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
NOTE: CITY WIDE PROGRAM
GULF OF
MEXICO
PROJECT No. 8487
LOCA T/ON MAP
Nor TO SCALE
EXHIBIT "C"
WA TER SYSTEM INTERACTIVE HYDRAULIC
MODEL AND ANAL YSIS
CITY-WIDE WATER DISTRIBUTION MASTER
PLAN UPDA TE (Amendment #6)
CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE: 1 of 1
DATE: 02/14/2006
~
--
- -
- -
~-
9
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 14,2006
SUBJECT: F. M 70 Culverts - Cefe Valenzuela Landfill- Project No. 5173
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Change Order NO.3 to
increase the Advanced Funding Agreement in the amount of $28,864.57 with the Texas
Department of Transportation for the Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill F.M. 70 Drainage
Culverts
ISSUE: Additional stone rip-rap and concrete was required to ensure the culverts would
not be undermined. The change order is necessary to authorize the additional work.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented.
/
~:e ~~ .y~6
An . Escobar, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
Je~~ ~~ .
Director of Solid Waste/Street Services
Attachments:
a. Additional Information
b. TXDOT Letter/Change Order
c. Site Map
H:\HOMEIKEVINS\GEN\LANDFILL IValenzuela\DRAINAGE\C03TxDOTMemo. doc
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
BACKGROUND:
The drainage channel serving Cefe Valenzuela Landfill crosses F.M. 70. Plans for the
crossing were prepared and submitted to TXDOT. This resulted in an advanced funding
agreement with the City paying TXDOT to construct the culverts across their right-of-way.
The causes for the change order are:
concrete rip-rap for safety end treatment was specified on the plan sheets, without a
contract item to pay for the work;
grouted stone rip-rap for the upstream and downstream ends of the box culverts were
shown on the plan sheets, without a contract item to authorize payment;
rip-rap thickness was not specified, when the thickness was clarified it increased the
specified quantity;
work zone tabs were left off the original estimate; and
barricade maintenance expenses are due to the contractor during days that work was
suspended due to the location of an AT&T data line and removal of an abandoned
pipeline.
TXDOT has requested the City to execute Change Order NO.3 to allow them to have their
contractor perform the work and authorize payment. TXDOT estimates that the escrow
funds are adequate to complete the work without receipt of an additional payment.
However, the change order as prepared does not take credit for unused funds. The result
is to require Council approval as the change order represents an increase in spending
authorization greater than $25,000.00.
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Julv 22. 2003 - Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a
Local Project Advanced Funding Agreement for Voluntary Transportation Improvement
Project with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) governing the construction
of a proposed drainage culvert on FM 70 to serve the future development of Cefe
Valenzuela Landfill in the amount of:
· $16,000.000 for preliminary engineering; and
· $900,000.00 for construction
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
February 18. 2005 - Award of construction contract for the FM 70 AT&T Data Cable
Adjustment in the amount of $19,350.00 to B & H Maintenance and
Construction, Inc.
April 22,2005 - Award of construction contract in the amount of $9,500.00 for Removal
and Disposal of Abandoned Pipelines at FM 70 to Plant and Pipeline
Specialties, Inc.
Mav 2, 2005 - Award of Change Order No.1 in the amount of $1,600.00 for disposal of
product from Abandoned Pipeline at FM 70 to Plant and Pipeline Specialties,
Inc.
H:\HOM E\KEVI NS\GEN\LANDFILL \Valenzuela\DRAI NAGE\C03TxDotBkgExhA.dDC
Exhibit l'A"
Page 1 of 2
July 11, 2005 - Award of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $4,837.00 for two
additional mobilizations associated with FM 70 A T& T Data Cable Adjustment to
B & H Maintenance and Construction, Inc.
July 19. 2005 - TXDOT approved Change Order No. 1 (no cost) which added nine (9)
days to the project.
November 9, 2005 - TXDOT approved Change Order NO.2 (no cost) which added
fourteen (14) days to the project
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION:
No additional Council actions to complete the culvert crossing are anticipated.
FUNDING: Funding is available from the Sanitary Landfill 2004 CIP Fund.
H :\HOME\KEVI NS\GEN\LANDFILL \Valenzuela\DRAINAGE\C03TxDotBkgExhA.doc
Exhibit "A"
Page 2 of 2
...*
I r~1fo?!o/?o~f'c~~~'!!.';!!!9~~(!~!!8-~!l!/!f1':o~~~~
January 23, 2006
Mr. Angel R. Escobar, P.E.
Director of Engineer Services
City of Corpus Christi
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277
RECEIVED
JAN 3 0 2006
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RE: Project:
Control:
Highway:
County:
Subject:
CC 1558-3-23
1558-03-023
FM 70
Nueces
Change Order NO.3 - Additional stone and concrete riprap
Mr. Escobar:
Enclosed is an amended Third Party Funding document for your signature and date.
.1/. Disregard the Third Pa Fundin document that was sent ou on Janua 23, 2006.
Please return the amen ed original to this office. You will be furnished with a copy of
the executed change order.
This change order was requested by the City of Corpus Christi per the City's project
consultant, Shiner-Moseley and Associates, Inc.
This change order will be financed one hundred percent by the City of Corpus Christi.
Currently, escrow funds are available to pay for this work. This change order will result
in a deduction from the project escrow funds in the amount of $28,864.57.
If you find any discrepancies or errors in these documents or have any questions,
please contact me at (361) 808-2294.
Sincerely,
DftoS ~
rcos Ybarra
C rpus Christi Area Office
Nueces County
Attachments
cc: City funding file
An Equal Opportunity Employer
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 03
Advance Funding Agreement (Third Party Funding) Information
This form is used when the subject change order involves funding by a source other than TxDOT/U.S. DOT.
Outside funding provided by.
[] Existing
o Amended
o New
CCSJ: 1553-03-023
Project: CC 1558-3-23
Highway: FM10
County: NUECES
District: CRP
Contract
Number: 01053244
City of Corpus Christi
(Outside Entity's Legal Name)
2. Type of outside funding agreement for this change: [Check one]
3. Indicate the type and amount of funding:
[] Fixed Price (Lump Su (Estimated Amount:
[1 Actual Cost
(b) E&C'
(a) x 14.50% [enter %]=
$3,655.72
$0.00
Use as needed:
I hereby approve the modifications covered
by Form CO for this Change Order and agree
to finance the additional costs, if any, as
reflected by this form.
(a) Contract Items (Bid Items)
$25,211.85
(c) Indirect Cost'. (a+b) x 0.00% [enter %J=
Advance Funding Date
By
TOTAL
$28,867.57
Type/Printed Name
Typed/Printed Title
The percentage (%) for E&C (Engineering and Contingencies) charges varies from project to project from approximately 6%
to 11 % depending on the contract amount of the project. Projects with higher contract amount will have the lower rate of
E&C charge. For a specific project, E&C rate (%) can be derived from the cost of 'Engineering and Contingencies" in the
"Estimated Cost" of the project.
Use the statewide district rate as established by Finance Division each year. This line 3(c) is for Service Project only, unless
otherwise specified in the Advance Funding Agreement. See Stand Alone Manual Notice 98-2 for instructions.
Advance Funding for this Change Order has been arranged:
District Engineer
Date
Typed/Printed Name:
nmOT Form CO-AFA 5-98R
Project: CC 1558-3-23
CSJ: 1558-03-023
Highway: FM 70
County: Nueces
C.O. No.: 3
1. Who prepared the plans: Shiner-Moseley and Associates, Inc.
2. Reason for the change: The concrete riprap for the safety end treatment had
been specified on a plan sheet but no contract item had been established to
pay for the work. The grouted stone riprap for the upstream and downstream
ends of the box culverts was also specified on plan sheets but no contract
item had been established. Also, a thickness for the stone riprap had not
been specified in the plan sheets. When a thickness of the stone riprap was
provided by Shiner-Moseley it tripled the specified quantity. The work zone
tabs were left off of the original estimate and the additional months of
barricades are for barricade maintenance during days of time suspension.
3. Status of work: The work has not been performed.
4. Price justification for newly added items: The prices for the stone riprap and
work zone tabs were deemed fair and reasonable. The concrete riprap for
the safety end treatment and the mobilization item will be paid by certified
correct invoices.
5. District and statewide average bid prices for newly added items: The stone
riprap and work zone tabs are comparable to state average bid prices.
6. Environmental clearance for added roadway: No added roadway.
...1prc'J; "CLuri'_. ie,- ",f:.)if:i ,t'x') JIA
I
I 1
~ €>€>~
I u ~~J u ..!c"
~ ~~: . /'-.1-'
.../ "i r/
L .. .n= r- F.,. "
'"-,
i 1
F.M. 665
~ <D
Cl 0
0:: 0::
o 0
u u,
---+----1
i
!
......
'"
o
0::
o
U
,.,
I
Ol
on
<:>
0::
o
U
/
) .
'~'
~~
. c IRONII.A ~ )
CR[[I( l~,
PROJECT # 5173
".,
oD
......
~
FM 24H
CO RO 16
CO RO 14
CO RO 12
/<v
s..f.
';J~
~~
\J,-\J/<
~
'-.
<0
CX)
N
r-
~
o
a::::
o
u
::c
Vl
~
N
PROJECT LOCA TION
SITE LOCA TION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT .C.
CEFE F. VALENZUELA LANDFILL-
F. M. 70 CUL VERTS
CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT ~
CITY OF CORPUS CHRIST/, TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE: 1 of 1
DATE: 02/17/2006 ~
10
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: February 14, 2006
SUBJECT: Senior Center Improvements 2004-2005 (CDBG)
(Project No. 3283)
AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Change
Order No. 2 with to the construction contract with Zimmerman Construction of Burnet,
Texas, in the amount of $32,051 for the Senior Center Improvements Project (CDBG).
ISSUE: Additional work was identified after the start of construction. This included roof
repairs, asbestos and mold remediation, drainage improvements, chain link fence repairs,
and painting new gutters being installed.
FUNDING: Funding is available from the FY 2005 Community Development Block Grant
Program
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
I
twl,e ~~ 2/ P/t;~
lVfgi R~ ~'scobar, P.E. '
Director of Engineering Services
Additional Support Material:
Exhibit "An Background Information
Exhibit "B" Change Order Summary
Exhibit "C" Location Map
H :\HOME\KEVI N S\GENIP ARKS\3283SrCtrs2004-05C DBG\C02AgendaMemo. doc
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Senior Center Improvements 2004-2005 (CDBG)
(Project No. 3283)
PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:
1 April 26. 2005 - Resolution adopting the FY2005 Consolidated Annual Action Plan
(CAAP), which includes the Community Development Block Grant, Emergency Shelter
Grant, and HOME Investments Partnership Programs; authorizing the City Manager or
his designee to submit the CAAP to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD); and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to make
changes in the CAAP if required by HUD. (Resolution No. 026237)
2. AUQust 23. 2005 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to award a
construction contract to Zimmerman Construction of Burnet, Texas, in the amount of
$171,000 for the Senior Center Improvements Project 2005-2005 (CDBG).
PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION:
1. January 20, 2005 - Administrative approval of a small agreement for architect/engineer
consultant services with Chuck Anastos Associates Inc. in the amount of $20,000 for
the Senior Center Improvements 2004-2005 (CDBG).
2. AUQust 1, 2005 - Administrative approval of a small agreement for consultant services
with All Points Environmental, LLC, in the amount of $2,676 for the Senior Center
Improvements 2004-2005 (CDBG) - Limited Asbestos Survey.
3. December 9, 2005 - Award of Amendment NO.1 in the amount $1,218 to All Points
Environmental for additional Asbestos and Mold Testing for the Senior Center
Improvements Project (CDBG) project.
4. February 1, 2006 - Award of Change Order NO.1 to Zimmermann Construction in the
amount of $6,922.00 for additional excavation, waterproofing and flooring modifications
for the Senior Center Improvements Project 2004-2005 (CDBG) project.
5. February 2. 2006 - Ratification of Amendment NO.2 in the amount of $657.00 to All
Points Environmental for additional testing for the Senior Center Improvements Project
2004-2005 (CDBG) - Limited Asbestos & Mold Survey.
6. February 2, 2006 - Award of Amendment NO.3 to All Points Environmental in the
amount of $4,840.00 for Asbestos and Mold Abatement Monitoring for the Senior
Center Improvements Project 2004-2005 (CDBG).
CHANGE ORDER: Change Order NO.2 includes the following modifications;
· Ethel Eyerly - paint new gutters;
. Greenwood - drainage improvements and asbestos and mold remediation;
Lindale - roof repairs and asbestos/mold remediation; and
· Zavala - chain link fence and roof repairs.
ASBESTOS/MOLD REMEDIATION: The architect and contractor identified additional
problems at various Centers as the project progressed. Although a limited asbestos survey
had been undertaken prior to starting work, the contractor requested additional testing on
. i IHOME\KEVINS\GEN\P ARKS\3283SrCtrs20D4-05C DB G\C02AgendaBkg. doc
sheetrock that commonly contains asbestos. Two walls that were to be repaired at
Greenwood and Lindale Senior Centers were found to contain asbestos and contaminated
with mold. Tests indicated that the mold type could produce illness in persons with
cardiopulmonary disease or impaired immunity. The areas have been closed to the public
until remediation is completed.
All asbestos and mold remediation will be undertaken by a properly licensed subcontractor.
All Points Environmental will monitor the remediation, conduct required air sampling, and
prepare the remediation report.
H' IHOME\KEVIN S\GE N\P AR KS\32 83SrCtrs20Q4-0SC DBG\C 02Agenda Bkg. doc
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY SHEET
FEBRUARY 14, 2006
PROJECT: Senior Citizens Improvement Project 2004-2005 (CDBG)
Project No. 3283
APPROVED: MOTION No. 2005-266 APPROVED 08/23/05
CONTRACTOR: Zimmermann Construction Co., Inc.
P. O. Box 366
Burnet, TX 78611
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOU NT ............. ........
25% Limit Amount................................. ........
171,000.00
42,750.00
Change Order No.1 (02/01/06) ....................
Change Order NO.2 (02/14/06) ....................
Total....... ...-.... -.................................... ........
6,922.00
32,051.00
38,973.00= 22.79% < 25%
CHANGE ORDER
Department of Eaginecrilll Servkes
City or Corpus Christi. Texas
CHANGE ORDER NO: 02
FUNDING SOURCE
CONTRACT TIME:
150
Operating Department: MULTIPLE
DATE:
13-Jan-06
Name of Project:
SENIOR CENTER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, 2005-2005 CDSO
Contractor'
ZIMMERMAN CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC.
CHANGE
GREENWOOD-DRAINAGE BOX
ZA V ALA CHAIN LlNK FENCE
GREENWOOD-MOLD & ASBESTOS REMEDIATION
LINDALE-MOLD & ASBESTOS REMEDIATION
ETHEL EYERLY -PAlNT NEW GUTTERS
ZA V ALA-ROOF WORK
LlNDALE: ROOF WORK
TOTAL
Mm
DEDUCT
748.00
178.00
13098.00
13111.00
661.00
3421.00
834.00
32051.00
0.00
WIlY". _ "lICe IlCeeSSI.ry? (If left off the plans and specifications, explain why? The existing elevations at
have made itdiflkult to I release tile rain water. This drain will vide an oudet for r nm-offhel in elim'
reoccuring drainage problems at tbis site. lavala-the additional fence will allow the catch basin to be more secure ftom
How can silllilar changes be avoided in tile future?
A.
B
C
D
E
F.
G
H
CONTRACT PRICE S
TOT J\L CHANGE ORDER (inc. current) S
NEW CONTRACT PRICE. S
THIS CHANGE ORDER $
PERCENT TOTAL CHANGE (BJA)
PREVIOUS TIME AUTHORIZED $
ADDN'L CONTRACT TIME THIS CHANGE ORDER
TOTAL ADDITIONAL TIME
171,000.00
38,973.00
209,973.00
32.051.00
22.79%
74
105
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS
By
Director of Engineering Services
By:
Title:
APPROVED:
Operatinl Department
Oil". or Mao.plltMlt &. Bad..
Lepl D~partm~nt
\MproJect \ councilexhlb/ls \ exh3283.dwg
OVEAL WILLIAMS
SENIOR CENTER
~
N
r" 62.
NORTHWEST SENIOR
CENTER
ZAVALA SENIOR
CENTER
L1NDALE SENIOR
CENTER
GIJU- C'F
L1E.'
LOCA TION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT No. 3283
EXHIBIT .C.
(C. o. # 2)
CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE: 1 of 1
DATE: 02/06/2006
~
--
- -
- -
........~
SENIOR CENTER IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT 2004-2005 (CDBG)
11
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Date: February 14, 2006
SUBJECT: Texas Pecan Growers Association
AGENDA ITEM Motion authorizing the temporary closure of Mann Street from Water Street to
Shoreline Drive, beginning at 12 midnight July 14, 2007 through 5:00 p.m. on July 18, 2007 and waiving
the associated occupancy fees of section 53-195 and requirements of subsections 49-17 (a) and (b), for
the 2007 Texas Pecan Growers Annual Conference and Trade Show due to a finding that the event will
promote the City and provide sufficient publicity and economic benefit to justify the waiver in
accordance with Sec. 49-17(r) of the Code of Ordinances.
ISSUES:
1.) The request to close Mann Street from Ocean Drive to Water Street will make it possible to
accommodate and exhibit large equipment such as harvesters, rakes, sweepers, sprayers, tractors
and cherry pickers.
2.) Waive the requirements of subsections 49-17 (a) and (b), which require that all events shall be
open to the publiC and admissions shall be free and all profits derived from the event shall be used
for charitable purposes.
3.) Waive the requirements of section 53-195 that requires the sponsor to pay the same occupancy
charges that would be required for a contractor occupying public right of way during erection,
construction or repair of a building.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Street closure permits for large events require City Council
approval.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None
FUNDING: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented.
...
Additional Support Material
1. Exhibit "A" Background Information
2. Exhibit "B" Site Map
3. Exhibit "C" Permit Request from Texas Pecan Growers Association
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Background:
The Texas Pecan Growers Association, in association with the Omni Hotel, will be hosting
the Texas Pecan Growers Annual Conference and Trade Show, July 15 through July 18,
2007 at the Omni Hotel, 900 North Shoreline Boulevard.
The request to close Mann Street from Ocean Drive to Water Street will make it possible to
accommodate and exhibit large equipment such as harvesters, rakes, sweepers, sprayers,
tractors and cherry pickers. Equipment will not be turned on or moved once in place and
the necessary security officers will be provided to insure public safety for the duration of
the conference. This request Is being made at this time to allow the required lead time
necessary for the Texas Pecan Growers Association to coordinate all promotions and
arrangements with the trade show attendees and vendors to host a successful convention.
The City Council by motion may authorize temporary closure of Mann Street for an event
which will promote the city. In addition to the application fee required by section 49-16,
before the permit is issued the sponsor shall pay the same occupancy charges that would
be required by Section 53-195 for a contractor occupying public right of way during
erection, construction or repair of a building. Furthermore, Section 49-17 of the City Code
of Ordinances, requires, as a condition of the street closure, (a) that all events shall be
open to the public and admissions shall be free; (b) all profits derived from the event shall
be used for charitable purposes. Staff recommends conditions (a) and (b) of Section 49-17
above and the occupancy charges outlined in Section 53-195 be waived on the basis that
conducting the event in the city will promote the city and provide sufficient favorable
publicity and economic benefits to justify waiver.
The conference will bring approximately 600 participants and possibly their families to our
City for about four days. They will stay in our hotels and eat and shOp in the local shops
and restaurants. This plus the added exposure for OUf City will more than offset the value
of the waiver of fees for the use of Mann Street right of way for approximately four days.
All adjacent property owners have been notified of the proposed temporary closure and
responded in writing with no objection to the event. All necessary barricades and traffic
control signage will be in place prior to the placement of any equipment within the Mann
Street right of way on midnight July 14, 2007. All barricades and equipment will be
removed no later than 5:00 pm Wednesday July 18, 2007, returning the street to its
original condition. Closure of this section of Mann Street will have no adverse impact on
traffic patterns for the duration of the convention.
Required insurance will be provided prior to the event permit being issued in the Spring of
2007. This will be the first time and hopefully not the last time the Texas Pecan Growers
Association brings their annual conference to our great City.
Exhibit "A"
~
--
- -
- -
~
EXHIBIT "B"
SUBJECT: MANN ST. TEMPORARY CLOSURE
-SITE PLAN-
Traffic Engineering Div.
Engineering Services Dept.
AD.lI.VIU\i'-;t-N/2006/4 GUZMANfMAN-Cl_OSLlRi.. 1wg
1:'. 15 2005 1i III FAX 361 886 3565
OMNI CC HOTEL BAYFRONT Ig] 002
FROt'1 : TRAFFIC ENGlt-EIRING
FAX NO. : 36100B3545 Dec. 12 20e5 11: 44RM P2
TftAFPIC ENCINEERINCl DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
1.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISn, TEXAS
Afa/C;A TlON,f..1JR P~FfAfIT TO ldaPSE
STREET ~OR PU8UC E'[gJITS
Name of Org .nizatiOl1 Sponsoring E""'nt: ~ S ~ fLt IA &rl lI.!)':\ fk Ss l^- .
NameofProposedEvent:~~1 U~~(L ~T(Mf 6~
l\.lc ~--19 t-OO
Lv ~ s:e.--
2
3.
",.
Date of Planr led Event:
_..J...:.1.':
4.
Key Contact ndivlduat:
5. S.. et(s) Rec uested for Closure, Dates and TImes of Day - DESCRIBE:
Iv 6'V'^- F
-- 5' P
6. Purpose of ElIsnt and Detailed Description of Activit s Planned:
=-~~ {,-ell E'f!/cI'(Il1ev::t -+D be ~~ :k-
7
8.
9.
.- '( -to
.--t L.t ,t U I r ('D ?1 1\..1 tcv ,,,"- rr e, A, e I
Attach a diagram Illustrating in Ge!ail the location of booths, stages, restroqrr's, fl t..aid $tation::.-l-
etc, , that wilt be included In the event. L>V?xh/~ ---rvl~-e~ . ~\lf il/ltV-{
CJJlj V\ J ,
Enclose a chack or money order for $200 to cover administrative costs of ha ling application,
payable to th! City of Corpus Christi (City Ordinance tn0483, 9120/86).
Attach an off clalletter of transmittal requesting approval of the event.
10.
'1
Exh i bit "e"
,2 : 2111.15 1 ~ 1.12 FAX .361 flSt> 3565
OliN! CC HOTEL BAYFRONT
141003
""ROt . "fRqFF I C ENG I NEI :R 1 NG
FAX I'MJ. : 3618800S45
Dec. 12 2605 11:44AM P3
Pttrrnit 10 C~ Street
for PUblic 5:vl!Inl s
2:
" In considerat on of obtaining a permIt to close a City street for a public event, the applicant or
sponsoring 0 '9-.nization agrees to comply with the following applicable conditions:
A. Admlt1ance to said event shall be free;
B. All prorltS derived from the event shall be for charitable oauses;
C Pay theCityfour-peroent (4%) ofthe gross receipts darived from event, or reimburse the
City fe r ell costs incurred by the City in support of said event. Accurate flnanclal records
shalll e maintained and payment shall be made to the aity within sixty (SO) days after the
event !:lnds.
D.'" Provide and maintain an Insurance policy with the limits and requirements shown on the
attaoh ~d exhibit "A",
E." Comp,atlan of Indemnification Agreement;
F Provison of a traffic control plan for event, to be coordinated with the Traffic Engineering
DiVisic n and Police Department The city shall be reimbursed for its installation of all traffic
signa~ e and banicading determined by the Ctty to be necessary for safe control of the
event.
G.'" Wrlttel' approval for the temporary street closure must be obtained from (I) one hundred
(100) Jercent of the managing tenants or. If the p,roptytv is vacant. man~gln9 p-r:op~rtY
o,<<oer s of the crgperiy abutting that oortion of the street to be closed to vehicular traffic:
and (I) for the Downtown MEloaaement Dlstriot only_ lbPunged by Lower a [ol:ld.IMay.
In.t.ar:s1~te 37. Shoreline BoUle~1.J1 (Includingtb9 mBrilJB areas. and Klnnev street)j ninety
(90% l.percent of t/1e managing tenantS. or. if the procerty is vacant. managing orooeffiL
owner ~ of the prcmerty abuttina that portion of th~ street to be closed to vehigular traffic.
H Provide adequate number ofrestroom facilities to accommodate the anticipated public;
I ... Obtair the appropriatEl alcohol and food permits required by State and Local authorities.
at lea! ,t two (2) weeks prior 10 the event;
J All see urity other than perimeter traffic control sh~1l be provided by sponsor; security shall
consist of off-duty City PoUce officers. or other type seourity officially approved by the City.
K All cOfstruction of booths, stages, displays, electrical services and plumbing :shall comply
with C ty Codes, The flnallayout of booths shall be approved by the Director of Parks and
Reers atian;
L. Provid e for potable water within the event site:
M, ProVid e first..ald stations;
N. Provida continuous cleaning of the site during the event and return It to pre--event condition
after e vent ends;
O. Resto'e any damaged City property promptly after event ends;
P Coordnate all phases of event with appropriate City departments to insure a safe and
succe: le10l event;
Q. Vehlcl:us shall be prohibited from parking on grass areas within the street right-of-way;
R. No ob iteration or defacing of the st:rget surfaoe or sidewalk; except by ehalk markings;
S. AU Cit, Noise Abatement Ordinances shall be complied with;
T. Allow lor the free passage of emergency vehlo/es Into event area In case of emergency;
U. Camh aI-type rides will not be permitted.
V. Bulldirlg ana Electrical permits for a temporary promotional event, associated construction
and C ~rttficate of Occupancy are required
l~ J"1 2005 1i 02 FAX 361 886 3565
i='ROi'" TRAFF I C ENG I I'-EE 'R I NG
OAINI CC HOTEL BAYFRONT
FRX NO. :3618833545
I4l 004
Dec. 12 2BB5 11:44RM P4
Permit to CIQS8 : itreet
for Public Event!
:;
..
Evldenoe that these conditions have been meet must be presented to the City Traffic
Engine er prior to the request being submitted to the City Council for final approval.
Signed:
-- I) (\
JX reUUA-or(/\A1&1 1k ~
Sponsoring Organization
Date 5ubm~: -VeL ' j ~ ,7f)05
,-.
iU- ~~ ~'lt~~.~~~~
~r CAfej ~\ ~. /Jp (j
vb Zoo 1. Cu1~--iU1VfL
~ClO~))'1 ~
i2illL2005 17:0~ fAX )Gl IllJll 3585 OIlNI CC HOTEL JMYFRONT @007
FRll'I :TRFFFIC &GllEI RIH:J FAX 1'1). ;361lP354S I2c. 12 aE5 11: 45f=tl P7
INDI!MNm AGREEMENT
THE STATE (IF TEXAS
COUN1Y OF ~UECES
~
i
KNOW AL.L MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
WHEREAS, Sec:l:ion Iii of said standards, entftJed Procedure and Permit Requirements.
requires a Cl mb'actDr for a permit to close or b10dc any pert of a roadway to file a
~ "" ith the DiredDr of engineering SerIia5 Traffic Engineering Division
Indemnl1\tlng In the dty iQatnst all dalms or causes of adton by reason Of or ariSing from
the dOsing O' blocking of the roadwav pursuant to a permit iSSued by !tie City.
Now, t herelcre, in consIdenltlon far the I55uance ~ it permit to Ule undersigned by
the CIty of Cc rvus O1r11tt, for the purpose of ban1cadIng, blocking or cIoang a street, alley
or other publl c r1g~ In Aid Cty, said pennlt BPPllc:lnt IllteeS Q:J Indemnify and safe
harmless and defended the CIty or carpus omsti, Its aga005 and employees from any and
all dalms, 1atflSUft5, cfsnands, liabilities, losses or expeI"I!IeS, Induding court costs and
reasonable at tomey's fees, for or on account tllInY injury to any person, or any death at
any time res'lltIng from suc:h Injury, or any damages to any property which artse or may
be alleged to haw arlSEln directiy or Indlredly, as a te5Ult of the granting ~thlS pennlt.
The Cltntnld:cr, dUl1ng U'Ie term or operl!ll:lons spedfled In this Public Right-of-Way
Blocxage Pet mlt, will pmyicle and maintain at the COntractor expense, Comprehenslve
General Liability Insurance coverage wtth 8 Conttac:tlml Uablllty endorsement and wIth
minimum Iirrlits of $1,.000,000 cambined Single Limit for Bodily InjUry and
PRJ1)8rty Dllm_ or as required by the Risk Manager of the CIty of Corpus Chrl$tl
pursuant tll C )rdinance #19277. The City of Corpus C1r1st1 will be named as AddItional
''''''f1!d on . 'he policy. EvIdence of required Insurance c;overage with be a Certificate of
Insurance ful nlshed to the Director of' Engineering 5ervk:es Traffic Engineering OMslcn
prior to the p rtJPCSSd bl0ck3ge under t.Ns pennIt.
~5~(~)ha~(5)_~ofir~~6 ~,
(1, A:;r~~
~Name
OMNIeHOTELS"
November 30, 2005
Mr. Ricardo Guzman
Traffic Manager, City of Corpus Christi
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, TX. 78469-9277
Dear Mr. Guzman,
My name is Caleb DuBose and I am the Senior Sales Manager for the Omni Corpus Christi Hotel. I have
been working with the Texas Pecan Growers Association to try and secure their 2007 Annual Conference
to come to Corpus Christi. We have finalized most all of the details and they are ready to commit to a
contract and come to our city. This Conference will bring,600 people to our city and it will be the first
time the Association has ever had their Conference here.
The only challenge that we face is the exhibit hall. They will need to exhibit large equipment such as
harvesters, rakes, sweepers, sprayers, tractors and cherry pickers. In the past there have been groups who
have used the 200 block of Mann Street as their exhibit area. This is the small stretch of road right next to
the hotel. This area would be perfect for the exhibit area and it would seal the deal for the conference to
commit to coming.
None of the equipment would be turned or moved once it is put in place. All of the equipment would be
fully insured and the group would have a professional security company on a 24 hour basis watch over the
equipment. There would be no food or beverage served outside ofthe hotel. This equipment would simply
sit and be observed from the attendees of the Conference.
My request is that the city allows the group to use this stretch of road from 12pm Sunday, July 15,
2007 -12pm Wednesday, July 18,2007 for the above mentioned reason. If the city were to approve the
closure of the 200 block of Mann Street for this time frame it would be playing an integral part in the
success of bring another Conference to our great city.
If you can respond to me by Wednesday December 7, 2005 as to the likelihood of this happening I can
then let the Texas Pecan Growers Association know that we can accommodate them.
Thank you.
Caleh-Vu8O$et
Caleb DuBose
Senior Sales Manager
Omni Corpus Christi Hotel
900 North Shoreline Blvd. . Corpus Christi, TX . 78401
(361) 887-1600
www.omnihotels.com
W..L:. 1jates Company, Inc.
Real Estate - In:vestments
901 N. Carancahua Street
PO Box 909
Corpus Christi, Texas 78403
Tel: (361) 883-6541 Fax: (361)883-8396
www.wlbatesco.com
<> Since 194'7 <>
January 19,2006
City of Corpus Christi - City Hall
C/O Ricardo Guzman - Traffic Manager
1201 Leopard Street
Corpus Christi, Texas 78401
RE: Block 10, Water Beach Subdivision
Dear Mr. Guzman,
Please consider this letter as permission from the owners of Block 10, Water Beach
Subdivision, to close Mann Street from 12:00 PM Sunday, July 15,2007 until 12:00 PM
Wednesday July 18,2007. P N Development Company, Inc. owns the property. Please
call me if you have any questions.
lJj~.~ .
Richard A. Dupriest, r.
President
RADlkpt
cc: Caleb Dubose
RECEIVED
JAN 2 3 2006
Traffic Engineering DivisIon
.
Individual Memberships
12
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 14, 2006
SUBJECT: Street Lighting - Spur 3 - Nile Drive to Ocean Drive - Project No. 6062
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion authorizing payment to AEP in the amount of $148,000 for street light installation
on Spur 3 between Nile Drive and Ocean Drive.
ISSUE: Installation of street lights along this section of Spur 3 is necessary to comply with
urban arterial illumination standards.
FUNDING: Funding is available from the Street Capital Improvement Fund.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
r
Date
~r/~~
,
"Angel . scobar, P.E.
Direc or - Engineering Services
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Additional Information
Exhibit B - Location Map
Exhibit C - AEP Cost Estimate Letter
Additional Information
BACKGROUND: Spur 3 was constructed by TxDOT with City participation. Installation of
continuous illumination is a City responsibility. Installation of street lights is one of the last
improvements installed on street projects. Spur 3 between Nile Drive and Ocean Drive
will be completed in about one month and is ready for street light installation.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of the installation of fifty-two (52) new
27,500 lumen high pressure sodium vapor street light fixtures. The fixtures will be
installed on concrete and wood poles using overhead and underground circuits.
CONTACT INFORMATION: Street lights are installed and maintained by AEP/Central
Power and Light on a cost-sharing basis. The City pays a not to exceed installation cost
and operating costs. AEP/Central Power and Light retains ownership of the equipment
and is responsible for maintenance. AEP/Central Power and Light has agreed to
complete the installation for an estimated cost of $148,000.00. See Exhibit "C"
FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: None Anticipated.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented.
,.
Exhibit "A"
Page 1 of 1
',~.AVr. 4 ,t L;l)Lb.;
'- \, ,J~vg
J,PUS iI.'?/STI BAY
~
N
,:{
~
, "
'~ '''"
~ "
S" """,
()( /";'""
'. / N '. '';q;~'f.,~.
'0='<" ~~,"" /
/\-... ~. " ~"- /
~(A" ~
>/vo " ~
/~"~
~
(~.
,/
G \
0" I.v / \
;y~~ ~ / '" \
''Y4~ / Lz- \
\~ ~0 \ ,
, O~ \
/1/("" '0 \
~
-:z..
\
\
SPUR J
PROJECT LOCA nON
~1/
"'::</ -i~ /C'
, :- 0-<
"
"
-.;
j'
,:t.
~
/-.........,. .---'---
-"".-... '
--------------
0Y:-
e-.<<
/~
'.J.,j
<-
'"
"'''-
"
CA YO DEL 050
:JJ
~
. t:J
~,
"
'"
i
~/
-P/
,/
?
<::).
~. ;v/
~~
'7"
S). ,
f)/ "'.
~/
i
f
LOCATION MAP
~-
tJ()! TO SCALE
CITY PROJECT No. 6062
EXHIBIT IIBII
SPUR 3, PHASE 2
ENNIS JOSLIN FROM
NILE DRIVE TO OCEAN DRIVE
CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE: 1 of 1
~
--
- -
- -
~
CITY OF i.ORPUS CHRISTI
DATE 02-14-2006
American Electric Powel
PO &Ol't2.1;j:t
co~w ChWti IX 78403.2121
W'\:JW.Sl!p.oo~~
a
I/IIIfIK
JIOWD
February 6,2005
City of Corpus Christi
Traffic Engineering Division
AUn: Ricardo Guzman
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277
Subject: SPUR 3 PHASE 2 (ENNIS JOSLIN ROAD)
This letter is in response to your revised streetlights drawing dated 01/03/06 for the
Spur 3 phase 2 street Hghting project, Ennis Joslin Rd. from Ocean Dr. to Nile DR. and
request for the city's aid-to-construction cost above the AEP allowance provide by the
state tariff. This project scope will consist of installing 52 new 250 Watt HPS streetlights,
with eight mounted on existing/new wood poles with 14 ft. brackets, 42 on new concrete
poles w;th single 6 ft, brackets and two lights mounted on a double 6 ft. bracket on one
concrete pole. Five of the 43 concrete poles will be installed in decorative brick that will
need to be saw-cut and replaced. The project work zone starts at Ocean Dr. and ends
at Nile Dr. There will be additional costs were estimated for traffic control and barriers
at each pole location. TXDOT still has an additional punch list of items before
construction can be started (Splice box lids not identified as electrical lighting, splice
boxes need backfill and one splice box will need to be installed).
The City's aid-to-construction cost estimate for this portion of the Spur 3 Phase 2
project is $148,000.00.
Note: This estimate cost will be void after 90 days from this issue date.
Please send me a City Letter of Authorization at your earliest convenience if you want
me to finalize the AEP design and issue this project to construction.
If you have any questions, please call Ryan Powell at 361-881-5643.
tZ---
Ryan Powell
De6igner II
. CC Artis Kamei, AEP
Ken Griffin, AEP
AEP: tAmerlCa's Etlergy Parlfurr(i!)
EXHIBIT II ell
13
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 14, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a Deferment Agreement with Value
Place LLC, (Developer), in the amount of $135,941.70 for public improvements
including water, wastewater, paving, and drainage improvements required to plat
Value Place Subdivision, located north of SH 358 (South Padre Island Drive) and
west of Friendship Drive at West point Road, in accordance with the Platting
Ordinance section V-Required Improvements, Subsection A.3 (b).
ISSUE: Mr. Carlos Garza, on behalf of Value Place LLC, developer of Value Place
Subdivision, submitted deferment agreement documentation to defer construction of public
improvements including water, wastewater, paving, and drainage improvements required
of Value Place Subdivision in accordance with the platting Ordinance, Section V-Required
Improvements, Subsection A.3.b).
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Council authorization for the City Manager to enter into
a deferment agreement with Value Place LLC, (Developer).
CONDITION: Developer must post a cash bond or equally liquid negotiable security with
the City in the amount of 110% of the cost of the project, and comply with all other
requirements of the deferment agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented.
.I.C.P.
evelopment Services
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Background Information
Location Map
Public Improvements Exhibits
Cost Estimate
Deferment Agreement
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
BACKGROUND: The development time schedule and the platting of Value Place
Subdivision (Exhibit B) required the developer to construct public improvements for Value
Place Subdivision. The public improvements deferred will include the construction of
water, wastewater, paving, and drainage improvements (Exhibit C).
Construction plans for the public improvements have been submitted and are pending
approval by the Development Services Department.
The Planning Commission, at its February 8,2006 meeting, recommended the execution
of the Deferment Agreement and found reasonable cause to delay the required public
improvements to expedite the recordation of the plat.
The Developer agreed to deposit $135,941.70 in the form of a cashier's check. This
amount is 110% of the estimated cost of constructing the required improvements, (Exhibit
D) in compliance with the Platting Ordinance Section V- Required Improvements,
Subsection A.3.b).
A deferment agreement, (Exhibit E) between the City of Corpus Christi and Value Place
LLC will allow the Developer to defer the construction of required improvements including
construction of water, wastewater, paving, and drainage improvements for a period of up
to one (1) year from the date the deferment agreement is signed and approved. The
deferment of improvements will allow the Developer to expedite the recording of the plat
and obtain building permits to develop Value Place Subdivision.
Exhib
'vlEST POINT
-...--------..-- -"--'-~ ,----- .---- --..-
"
~
~
M
~
'*
A'
,~<J~
",' ~
~~S&,.,
"'~
~.~<~,
.~\.
'. '0
'~',
site
"
HOE tJE
I
I, LOUT A
I
\ IYjEl',1 DO:= A
-:. [] L Ii E " ~ T E I--~
T'~
,.:lVLi-
,I'-'~'
_ ",'JeT
"
2
<1
L \l~\_, '_\,~~~ I, \
I i--l I, .r- U (::l ,
...JIW Q:: Q::
~I (~,<r 0
\=, g Ie,
I 0\
Q::I
\
Location Map
(NTS)
s!
! \ \
\ = rdl~ lET'
, \ \
LO gllt'1C1
1=' (\ 1- ~.
vI
<1 N<1
Q:: <1 <1 <1 WO
W ~ Q::. Z o~
Ct:. w w 0
Q:: 1..J > Vl 2: -1-1
<1 Z -1 0 <1 <10
CD <[ W -J Q::. >>-
NA TIDNAL
END-
- 1 KS
1St..
-41\1.0 -
/f&~
~\ /ri;;~~(~V('
/ Office
/
/
. i
/j;q :
~.q /
I"-' 11'~/
. /
~os Encln1s
....... F'od-< /
i Exhibit B i
Page 1 of 1
I
!
o
<(
~ \
z ,
i; \
~ \
..
Q,I
> ~
,rI'l
)t>
~i
=
rI'l
W
>
Q..
.c
u
c:
.-
~
~
...;:l
C\
GO
I ~
~ ~
"
. ..
'W dIHSON3RU
,
/
~
Q)
E
~
e/
Q.
E
,-
, (.)
/ .-
, -
, .c
/ ~
0-
~
.!
CO
~
...
tn
~
"C
C
CO
~
.s
CO
~
\
,
1-1-
,
\
\
I.
/~ /"
o "
~~'- /
b<J,,/
...~<:', /
,~' '
b(e, ,
qq,;, .
~~"
C:Jo" /
/
/
3
l!'
.
~
a
j:!
S
, /-~ /
'\ /-' /''.
\1.~"iC~1
\ ..'?~'
'..... .'-,,/,.'
II Exhibit C 1\
Page 1 of 2
~
..___/3!!!!Ji;tIi~~)-----
>:
,
.tJO
dIHSON3IH.:l
--&
\ I
1 I
.-1 I I
;e~ I I oc
I Ir--lL
I <(
;::?~ \ e~
<(0 1
~z I ~5
o<(~ I
'-0) I ~8
Q:;Q:;t-l I
~3~ \ I
'-'0 I I
<z \ " I
0::_ I I
1-1-0:: I
Z(f)o I I
8BVi' I I j
J .J,l ;
-
F=
/ I l!
00
z'>'
<(0
(f)~
WW
->0::
~~~
Q:;O<
~I-g
O(f)-'
n.ZW
00::
~Vigj
i=o-"""'"
(f)<(0
xOz
wn:c(
!:>-
:_I~~
1 on t- '<^7
I n:J~
\OCJ~~
I r-- W
,_xl/ll/l
,0 (/') <(
,l"lWW
I ~
\
I
0-
W
-'
Z
z-
OO
o::W
~~~
0::
Ow <.:I
WI-
(f)WO
on:z
a..U::>
OZO
o::on:
a..U<(
01-
W::J
~u
a..m
On:
0::::>
a..u
.~
~c
~.
~<::) //,
~'. -<-'?>/ //,
.. / / ~
Cl / / / / ,,<-:J
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /'
/ /'
/ /
/ /
/' /
/ /'
/ /
,/ ./
!)
C
CI)
E
~
Q.
E
-
CJ
.-
:s
~
Q.
Q)
C)
ca
c
.-
f.!
c
"C
c:
ca
C)
c:
.-
>
('0
Q.
II Exhibit C l
Paqe 2 of 2
Fonn Revised: '
~
~1'JGINEER'S ESIIMA TE-QUANTITY.EQ~_
V ALUE PLACE SUBDIVISION
P~S:E~l'-J0
Ac:~Ai3.28
EN!IT~ Corpus Christi
LOTS:_}_
WATER SUPPLIER: City of Co~us Christi
--.-, ------ - -- --",,--
WATER IMPROVEMENTS: On site
^-+-~.._---------------- ._"----
1. 's" PYC C900 SDRI8
2. _ : S" Gate valve wlbox
3~~ire hY~3!1~",,/.6~'valve
4. is'' Tapping tee & valve
5 16" Fire line S"x6" Tap tee
6. 1F-Water service line with
---- ........-...+--... ----_._--~---
j saddle connection ____
7. i8" 45 degree elbow
8. -1g.;- 90 degree elbow
9. ~r"~asin~~DR26 PYC (if app/ical1~___
10. i Water valve (box assembly)
-'T'-- ---..-----. .-. 7
- -..-- -------------..-
Io~I W~ter II!!E!'~~_'!l~l!ts: .__
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS:
1.
2.
3
j~8'-; PYC SDR26 (O'-6Cllt)" ---
- ....--._----~.._-- _.__._~. .~_.__._.. .-
~ole (0'-6' cut)
IS" ~ervice connection Hne (~~;;~~f-- --
-l~ - --------- ------ n__._._
Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements:
----,-~-~------ --
,
______-L- ___~_____
EROSION CONTROL:
-..-1-------
I.
2
3
1 Silt fence (erosion contrOl)
]Inlet~ale~<__e~osi?n cont!()12
I I~mJ><Jr(l!}l ~()~struc!ion ~l1tr(l~(;e
------
Total Erosion Control:
189.00 LF $ 24.00 $
2.00 EA $ 2,200.00 $
68.00 ILF ,$ 18.00 , $
-~-~-~r=~='-._----j
!
-~- -+~-----
-.~--+ . ----1- ----~
.---. ~ ----j
1;668-:00 'LF-JJ_. --4.6rt4= 7,756.20
__3.0.9.EA .1 $_ ...~~_ 324.00
.-.J-,-Q.O+I:~__-+L . 2,000.00, $ 2,000.00
,
; ... n ~___ .----------L-
j !______+$.._ 10,080.20
I
. ~--r~-
x
NO DESIGN COMPLETED
l PRELIMINARY DESIGN
, FINAL DES-ION
Quantity i Unit. Unit Price
- ------------+... .....-------+-------.
330.00 ! $
330.00 $
25.00 $
2,000.00 $
-.-~t .. --~-----
--- -+
1 of 2
1/31/2006
ltem Total
27,214.00
I,SOO.OO
9,000.00
4,600.00
1,300.00
1,040.00
990.00
660.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
! $ 50,104.00
4,536.00
4,400.00
1,224.00
$
10,160.00
- -.-. -
&.I'
I MISCELLANEOUS-II\/fPROVEMENTS:'
l'
I --
II Performance & Payment Bonds
Total Miscellaneous Improvements:
TOT AL UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
1.50 %
$
70,344.20 $
1,055.16
$
1,055.16
'$
71,399.36
__ _n___________
PA.YING IMP~Q~MENTS (\\iestPoint Rmld(s()u!11 b!llfonly) 25' ):
2
.- - "_.~
_1 Exc~vation & grading. __
: 5% ~im~ treat~d subgrade _
_~~ompacted_~':ll_sll.-~ caliche
_ base.w/prime coat _____
1 ] /2" Hot mix asphaltic concrete
--l~tack coat~~__=_- ~-
118" Curb & gutter--
-16' Valley gutter __=---
1~"x5' ~id~ <;(mc)"ete sidewalks
3
4.
5.
6.
7_
8.
9.
948.001SY
-~-
948.00 1 SY
948.00 iSY
-' -827.0oTSY
i
326001'
--I --~ ----
+ u_ -1,4~:~~ ~-~
-_._,------.--- ._.~
1 $
-J~f-
! ~-
___00- ___ ____
Total~~ving~mproV'~Il1~!I_ts(\:Ve~oint R~~Ei~~~~ hal!~)~ly) 25'):
___----.L__ _ ___.___~_______-l--
MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS:
] . i Performance & Payment Bonds
2 - ---roerT;olition =~~isposalof b~h. _._
_ IbuiI d!ngs &_irrigati~.!I struc~e.s_
Total MiscellaneousJ.Jl!EI"~vements:_
TOTAL PAVING IMPROVEMENTS:
OTHER FEES:
---
] . EngineeJ"i:I1g&:~n~st~in1',
2 Contm.ge!1c~
I
ITO~I2!her Fees:
TOT AL IMPROVEMENTS:
DefermeDt Amount
~ol%
---------4
].OOLS
$
$
$
-~
1.90 ! $
--~
4.001$
13.00 $
] ,801.20
3,792.00
]2,324.00
$
m i
10.00 I $
--1
11.00 $
28.00 $
3.00 i $
3,586.00
1,232.00
4,416.00
8,270.00
----~
-nr----...--------
$ 35,421.20
I
I
$ 35,421.20 $
$ _2-,500.00 I $
531.32
2,500.00
$ 3,031.32
$ 38,452.52
----
% $ 109,851.88 $ 8,238.89
$ 109,851.88 $ 5,492.59
$ 13,731.49
_~h 123,583.37
I
110.00 1% '$ 123,583.37 $ 135,941.70
2 of 2
I Exhibit 0 I
DEFERMENT AGREEMENT
STATE OF TEXAS ~
~
COUNTY OF NUECES ~
This Agreement is entered into between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas
home rule municipality, (hereinafter "City") and Value Place Brownsville LLC, a foreign
limited liability corporation authorized to do business in Texas, (hereinafter
"Developer"), and pertains to deferral of the required completion of certain
improvements required prior to filing the final plat of Value Place Subdivision (the "plat"),
which was approved by the Planning Commission on November 2, 2005. A copy of the
plat is attached and incorporated as Exhibit 1.
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated under Section III, Paragraph H, Subparagraph
5, of the Platting Ordinance to construct seventy-five percent (75%) of the required
improvements, before the final plat is endorsed by the City's Director of Engineering
Services. Detail construction drawings must be provided by the Developer and
approved by the City's Departments of Development Services and Engineering prior to
the start of construction;
WHEREAS, the Developer is seeking to defer, for a period up to one year, the
construction of the water, wastewater, paving, and drainage improvements (hereinafter
the "deferred improvements"), as shown in Exhibit 2, as required by the City's Platting
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, the Developer is seeking to have the plat filed immediately with the County
Clerk of Nueces County, Texas, before completion of seventy-five percent (75%) of the
required improvements as required by Section III, Paragraph H, Subparagraph 5, of the
Platting Ordinance;
WHEREAS, the Developer will deposit, with the City of Corpus Christi, a cashier's
check in the amount of One Hundred and Thirty-Five Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-
One Dollars and 70/100 ($135,941.70), representing 110% of the estimated cost of
constructing the deferred improvements, all as shown on the attached cost estimate,
which is attached and incorporated as Exhibit 3;
WHEREAS, the City Attorney and Director of Finance have approved this transaction;
WHEREAS, the Developer has satisfied all other subdivision requirements, park
dedications, park dedication deferment agreements, and maintenance agreements and
all special covenants have been completed;
WHEREAS, the Developer is entering into this Deferment Agreement as required by
Section V, Paragraph A, Subparagraph 3.b) of the Platting Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, for the consideration set forth hereinafter, the City and Developer
agree as follows: I I
Exhibit E
Page 1 of 6
1. The City shall waive the requirement that construction of the water, wastewater,
paving, and drainage public improvements be completed before the final plat is
endorsed by the City's Director of Engineering Services and filed for record with
the County Clerk of Nueces County and further agrees to allow the Developer to
defer construction of the water, wastewater, paving, and drainage public
improvements as shown in Exhibit 2, for up to one (1) year from the date of this
Deferment Agreement
2 The Developer shall deposit, with the City of Corpus Christi, a cashier's check in
the amount of One Hundred and Thirty-Five Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-One
Dollars and 70/100 ($135,941.70), before the Agreement is approved by Council,
for 110% of the estimated cost of constructing the deferred improvements.
3 The Developer shall construct the deferred improvements, in accordance with the
City's engineering standards in effect at the time of construction.
4. The City shall place the One Hundred and Thirty-Five Thousand Nine Hundred
Forty-One Dollars and 70/100 ($135,941.70) in an interest-bearing account.
Both principal and interest, shall be made available to the Developer in such
amounts and on such dates as may be mutually agreed upon by both parties, by
and through their designated representatives, for use by the Developer solely for
the construction of the deferred improvements hereunder. Such funds shall not
be used for any other purpose whatsoever.
5. Upon completion of the deferred improvements within one (1) year from the date
of this Agreement, or later time as may be mutually agreed upon, in writing, by
both parties, and upon acceptance of the deferred improvements by the City
Engineer and upon compliance by the Developer with the remaining terms of the
Deferment Agreement, the City Engineer shall:
a. Immediately release Developer from the obligations to construct the deferred
improvements by mailing a Release Letter to:
Value Place Brownsville LLC
8621 E. 21st Street North, Suite 250
Wichita, Kansas 67206
b. Return to the Developer within sixty (60) days of the completion of the
construction of the deferred improvements and settlement of the
construction costs, any balance remaining of all monies received by the
City from the Developer, including any interest earned.
6. If the deferred improvements have not been completed within one (1) year from
the date of this Agreement, or if the Developer fails to deposit any increased
security as set out below, after notice to the Developer and opportunity to cure as
Page 2 of 6
stated in Paragraph 8 below, the City will transfer the money received, including
any interest earned, to the appropriate City fund and the City may begin
completion of the construction of the deferred improvements with any monies
received from the Developer, both principal and interest, remaining after
completion of construction being refunded by the City to the Developer. If City
constructs all or any part of the required improvements, the Developer shall
reimburse the City for any additional cost of the deferred improvements, if the
sum of money and interest prove inadequate to complete deferred improvements
within thirty (30) days after City completes the required improvements and bills
the Developer.
7 The City and Developer agree that if the Developer formally vacates the current
plat, with approval of the Planning Commission, prior to the deadline for
completion of the construction of the deferred improvements, any money
received by the City from the Developer remaining on deposit, plus interest
earned, will be released and immediately returned to the Developer.
8. If Developer defaults in any of its covenants or obligations under this Deferment
Agreement, the City Engineer will send the Developer and the Project Engineer
written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, advising Developer of
the default and giving Developer thirty (30) days from date of receipt of the letter
to cure the default. If the Developer fails to cure the default after receipt of the
notice and opportunity to cure, the City Engineer may transfer any monies
received and interest earned to the appropriate fund of the City to complete the
deferred improvements. In the event there are any monies received by the City
from the Developer, plus interest earned, remaining after the City has completed
construction of the deferred improvements, the excess monies, both principal
and interest, shall be refunded to the Developer, within sixty (60) days of the
completion of construction of the water, wastewater, paving, and drainage public
improvements and settlement of construction contracts.
9 The City reserves the right not to issue Certificates of Occupancy for this
development until the deferred improvements are installed and accepted by the
Director of Engineering Services Department.
10. The Developer agrees that the City, after notice in writing to the Developer and
Project Engineer, may accelerate payment or performance or require additional
security when the City Engineer determines that the prospect of payment or
performance is questionable.
11. The Developer covenants to construct the deferred improvements, and that this
covenant shall be a covenant running with the land.
12. The City's Director of Engineering Services, at Developer's expense, shall file of
record this Deferment Agreement in the records of Nueces County.
Page 3 of 6
13. No party may assign this Deferment Agreement or any rights under this
Agreement without the prior written approval of the other party.
14. Unless otherwise stated herein, any notice required or permitted to be given
hereunder shall be in writing and may be given by personal delivery, by fax, or by
certified mail, and if given personally, by fax or by certified mail, shall be deemed
sufficiently given if addressed to the appropriate party at the address noted
above the signature of the party. Any party may, by notice to the other in accord
with the provisions of this paragraph, specify a different address or addressee for
notice purposes.
15. This Agreement shall be construed under and in accord with the laws of the State
of Texas and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in
Nueces County, Texas, and all lawsuits pursuant hereto shall be brought in
Nueces County
16. The Developer further agrees, in compliance with the City of Corpus Christi
Ordinance No. 17113, to complete, as part of this Agreement, the Disclosure of
Ownership interests form attached to this Agreement as Exhibit 4.
17. This Agreement shall be executed in triplicate, all original copies of which shall
be considered one instrument. When all original copies have been executed by
the City, and at least two original copies have been executed by the Developer,
this Agreement shall become effective and binding upon and shall inure to the
benefits of the parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns.
Page 4 of 6
EXECUTED in triplicate this 7~aYOf nhrqq rl ,2006.
Value Plac Brownsville LLC
8621 E. 21st Street North, Suite 250
. ita, Kansas 7206
By:
THE STATE OF Kansas S
S
COUNTY OF Sedgwick S
This instrument was acknowledged before me on M"-'O 7 ,2006, by
Randy Shaffer, of Value Place Brownsville LLC.
1Jz
Notary Pu
c~
-,,;
Page 5of6
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ("City")
P. O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469
Telephone: (361) 880-3500
Facsimile: (361) 880-3501
ATTEST:
By: __
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
By:
George K. Noe
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM: This 1~ day of r-ehr~d""'1
, 2006.
~t~Assistant City Attorney
For the City Attorney
THE STATE OF TEXAS S
S
COUNTY OF NUECES S
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _ day of , 2006,
by George K. Noe, City Manager, for the City Of Corpus Christi, a Texas municipal
corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public, State Of Texas
Page 6 of6
......
""'"
<'~
"f'-;:
~
!.~
~;;J. ~
~ I!
~~ ~ !~
. ~ t~
=
~
w i
...J
<( :'
G
(h ,~
U
:2 l5~
0.. ~S
<( .
0::
'-'
i p.,
,
)
.ff
<
~
4.J
--J
U
>--1.1)
...~
_I-:::
Z"'"
....~
u
1"
i'
,I
if
q
I~
ib i I~ I
~~~ j,..jf
~! ili i !' ;
i~ :ii I~~
l
,-
~..~
:v
-'
-
J;
L~.---'"
:>
(1 V'1d SIHl ),8 .S;
NOtl't':JKJ3(J l:l3U'V
~O~~ ~~~_
\~ I
t!~ \
i I
I \
I
\! I
:': \W f"J 00
IZ :'0
I~ : ?
, <0
l~ ' '<t'
~ 1ii3~
IZ'~ '*
is
o
n
.
z ~~~
~~ I!u~
.t': ~fiVl
~~ ~~~
G-t;: io~
;.~i;\- ~
'1.;' ~;'
~') "
,.- ,
,'''.j Vl
~ "
---k-_cr b
____ ~ 0
t-~~
.-: ,..---,
I.-..J <D UJ
,W ~
.~,
.99H~ /'fe"~ '._SLOON
'0,
-~. ~f
:;' ~~,
Z
v.
Ol)
'--k.0 t
~'" 0
~6
c-"'-'ll.()
_ ,._j-<:t_
\U ..--
I
I
"
Wf.><
~-O..
00
~'-<oa::
:?~ ;-t :..?
0> u.
"C\!
-Z
~~~::'
'~1
::0;.",.,
7~~~
. ,"
x"'.
E;i~
l~i'
ll~!
lW
!
o
o
.
.
; i
..
~~ i!
~~ ;\
~E o.;i
~~ ~;
~i.;
fE'"
<.n!
l~-.
l.i!
~!d
IIi.1
,I,
Ji!i
!tl~~
Efi
8 . t..
.~ I
eq~l~'
~" ~i I j
~~ Wli
:0... _-.. i..5
.9Z'Ot.
ji
,i
i~
,.<
ii
v;
~
v.
;1
\i
"
.- .
. ~~
ri 0",
a~ 'i
~~ :~
~~ H
~~ ~~
g
\
I
,
i
I
.~
)!o
U.L
i~i I
~U
~U;l
I~~~~
",<i;I
..,
/ ..:;~,.~
\:; 0'
~~
Q~&
"..;;,.<:1 ....fl'
~~~~C:J
<:J'<:~'"
<('" '"
'"
'~/
i t
.. ~'.t'
. ~
~ i~
i ~~
i H
~ ~ ~~i
~ ~ ~~
! to- ~ ~ =g
i r r ~~
~ 4 i ;~
~ ~ ~ ~~
.0. CI
..- .._ .~_, M(..i.....IO(W~. b."\..c,:..~.>C.~'" j ".,,j ]"-,.,,...- .'l~ .~,..
~i
~
o
~.
Ai
jl
ji I
ol g
\ I \
~ ~ ~
. . .
o 0 0
~
~ '
; ~ ~
I ~ ~
o ~ k
. wi
,! ;,t
~I .I!
! ..
w
~
.1 :i
~l
i. 1 I: -:
:i .. 1-5 'i
t' ~ ., I
1 ~ tl ~
1 il 1 ~ i H II
: i~ ; i ~ . E . I
I =.!
i .1 ' i' .
i; i · .l'
~ ~l ~ . L' i
; ~ !: i ~i 1 ~
:1il~ i ~ n 1 :
1- ~ E ~l (
!}'l .
. . - f ! ~
~ Ii i I I . i I I
/ III III t it i:.ll
. . 1 1
.~ ~ ..' !l .. ,
~~. ~i:" ~~. ;i i ..
~~ i 1. i l :~ i liP
"'~. 11 i
~s! h. ~ d: IU 1
o to--
~i:~
"-j;
:11,
r ~
,I ~
, ,
1 ;y
',-
n! g
I"
iil
:.~s
I!'
.,
h ::
~_i '"
1.'1! :;:. ~
1" t " ./
i1:: .. ;:
~~ ~~~
"Ci . ....!.~ ~~~
~i ~4~ ~~
~;;; II
!;.: Exhibit 1
~~ ~::.l 0
",i ,1i! -
~g tthi ~ ~~v
Page 1 of 1
~iJ
a
0- ~
~uo-o
~ is
: .s;
~ !~
i!
a
\
~I i ~,
: \
I ~
~
,
\
~
'.
z
o
~
if]
~
>-N'~'
~ '-=- ~
,-... '0Cl(
~ ~--J~
Q:l~~\j V)
'-. cc <: :":
~ C3 ~ ~~
U]'-'~~\Q~
. l.... '92 '< )...:
~:;r~,(J. "'~;:\~
'_ c:;(,.5.....,~
" r , t::: ~ ~ ,~ ::s
''. '--' " I....... "<::l
cr.-'l \)~, ~\j
~12~'''~Y1
...... "" C;) ,l..j
~ ~...., ~ \.) ~
~ ,,~S ~
l.l;) ~'" <:
r~'''l;t:~
-""il-::
;:J
~
~
>-
Ii
i:!
J~!
...~J
~h ~
ill ~
.
q
A.
Ii !!~ Ii
,,1; m 1;
~ . ~
_ ~1r!~~J J
~ i iJia~.! jl; ~ "
i ~. h ~~ al" 1 !
; l~;!
J~ ~ ...~~ i I
~/i _~; l:ultf~ ~ ~
i~ I~ 1~I~ii~n. i -
~ ~~ Ii~ l'i:l~ill.il;~ i
t .~IIG i~'iiI ij!
l,~ 19 r.',!Ji, ~ I
; ijlUr"tl~~l fi;1 ~I ~
~...: .... .-l .
"lJ(] dHSON3&H..:l
/
.!B'
c
G>
,f ~ .
I'/e/
' Q.
,/ E
/ ~
~ ,,/ ~
~
a..
...
S
;
~
co
~
"C
r::
co
...
Q)
.....
co
~
\
11
\ \
0\-
< ,
! ~ I I
I z: , .
'~ I '
\' :
t; 'I ;
:~
/
,
,
..~
f,
j/
~ /
, e /
~j/
b<J"
A.~/
S,v ,/
,t::i /
~e~,
q~~'/
~/
~~.
C:J~,/
/
/
,
,
... ~./-:'O.-......, "
, ~.9. I
\1 ~,'
'\ .'J,~ ./
/
/
j:.>
'i
I Exhibit 2 I
Page 1 of 2
~
g
..
't10 dIHSON31t1.:1
-,...,~
ot-
;~~\
VO
1-'-<
<a
~z
O<V\
I-co<ll
ooOOH
~GW;
Uo
~~
1-'-....
ZVlO
OXI-\
UwVl
" I
~
\ I
: I: ~
I I I a:
I\-CL
I 1(<
I I ew
I I~::'
I \ b: a:
I I e~
I I itS
I I I
I I I
\ I I
\ I I
I I I
I I I
\~__~_J d:~= co.
_1- ____/ I ~
I
" l:!
, ~ '\." W"1K'-olO,'fK:-:Jl
'-wi \ ,
t, ~ ,
o~
z>
<0
Vl~
w~
c5wo
Q...m~
000<
~....g
OVl--'
ll.l5li!
~in~
;:::a"
Vl<a
xoz
woo<
I'
I
I \
: \ >-w
I I I- ~
I, -
I l{) I--
1 r<1 ::> r5
\ CO ~~
IT"- W
"X(f)Vl
,Q(f)<(
lr<1wW
<->
I <->
\
I
\
I
I
I-'-
'"
--'
~
z e.-
m 00
00'" 0....
. o..~ w::>
N<oo ~u
awO
WI-'- ll.CO
VlwO OD::
oooz 0:::>
Q.U::l <L0
OZO
a:oa:
,,-U<
~c
~,
.~'V ,/'/,
"-''/ ,/
~ -\''/ ,/ ,
.. / / ..
() ,/,/ ,/,/ ",'0
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/
,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/
, ,/
,/
s
c
4)
E
Q)
~
~
Q.
E
-
C.)
I-
E
~
Q..
Q)
0)
CV
r::
.-
~
C
'0
r::
CV
C)
r:
'S;
C'\'J
a..
Exhibit 2 ~
Page 2 of 2
Fonn Revised:
l/3112006
,
i
I
_~_ I _
PHASE N/A
---~._-- . -~----
ACRE 3.28
~~~: ;O~S~i~ti
WATER SUPPLIER: Cit}' _off_()rp~Christi
1 -~-~-- -- ~ ____n ---
__ I ___L___________ ____ ______ --------~-
ENG~Ng~_~~ ESTIMATE-QUANTITY FO~__~__ __~~___
V ALUE PLACE SUBDMSION
-'-~-'-~"'--1-' -----..-T----- -
'.. I
I NO DESIGN COMPLETED -
f PRELIMINARY DESIGN
t--.--.----~---~ .------
I FINAL DESIGN
! --l~-~
I
I
- .-----.-- _....._.-----~-- ._~,.. ...-----..- ---
WATER IMPROVEMENTS: On site
--
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8" PVC C900 SDR18
--_._-~~'----
8" Gate valve wlbox
Fire hydrant w/6" valve
8" Tapping tee & valve _
6" Fire line 8"x6" Tap tee
3" Water service line with
Jsaddle connec~~n_=
~8" 45 degree elbow
~~" 90 degree elbow_____ .___ _ _-+__
---+ 16" casing SDR26 PVC (if appEc~~_
_ J WateI'~a!"e(!xJx~sem1:>l)'t . .~
7.
8.
9.
10_
To~1 '!!. aler ~r~~e_l!1en~:
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS:
-1---~~ ---- --- --- ----
1. _+8" PVC SDR26 (0'-6' cU!)_
2. : Manhole (0'-6' cut) I
3.-- j 8"_~!"ic~_~J!llectio~ liI!.e~c~ss)l
To~I_Sanitary Se~_eL~provemeJ]ts:
_ ______..------L.___._~.__._.__ '_m'_ ______
EROSION CONTROL:
1. _iSilt fence (erosion control2~_
2. _.~et bale~~rosioncontr_o}l__ _
3. __ .Temporary construction entral!.c~
--
Total Erosion Control:
x
i
-I --
- ----- f
Quantity _ i Unit
Unit Price
1,237.00 LF
-- ----
2.00 EA
3.00 EA
2.00 EA
130.00 LF
130.00 LF
22.00 $
900.00 $
3,000.00 $
2,300.00 $
10.00 $
8.00 $
$
$
$
$
$
~-_._-_._._--.
$
3.00 EA
- --~-- -_.---------
2.00 EA
60.00 LF
- ---~~~. .--~
1.00 LS
r
I
$ 330.00 $
$ 330.00 $
$ 25.00 $
$ 2,000.00 $
i ~
. ~~~:: I~J~~;2~:: :
68.00 lLF . $ 18.00 $
-1,668'oolLF~~ $ 4.65 $
.._3.QO+-:E,A. L~-~. 108.00 $
.__~U)O lE,A._+_~____.~,OOO.oo $
1 of 2
Item Total
27,214.00
1,800.00
9,000.00
4,600.00
1,300.00
1,040.00
990.00
660.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
$
50,104.00
4,536.00
4,400.00
1,224.00
$ 10,160.00
7,756.20
324.00
2,000.00
$ 10,080.20
I Exhibit 3 I
__-.l.___
--~ t - ~. --
I -
____--=~I50 ~ _-~- $ =-701-344.20 $
I
r I
-~
MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS:
}erro~C~~-PaYm:iBOOd;
Total Miscellaneous Improvements:
-----[----- --- --- ___u_ -1-
'!()T At UTI~!!Y~~ROVEMENTS: t-~-- -~
1.
- ____ _________________,_,__,__ __ ____j____~_____J_
PAVING IMPROVEMENTS {WestPoint Road (soutb balfonly) 25'):
-:======--==----- -r-=---- ===-===~ -
I Excavation & gradin~_ ____ ___ 948.00 SY,__, J______ 1.90
2. 5% Lime treated subgrade 948.00. SY $ 4.00
3. 8" Com cted crushed caliche 948.00 SY $ 13.00
4.__~base w/prime coat-- - ----
5. __p 1/2" Hot mix asphaltic concrete 827.00 SY $
~:l~~~~~~ --tter-- -+ 326.00 LF $
8. 6' Valley tter____, _ --1 44.00 LF $
9. 4"x5' wi<!~~n.~ete side'!V'~ ,__ _~__ 1,472.00. SL $
______ _ __ _____H________.L _~__ 1.._1._
Total Paving Improvements (WestPoint Road (south half only) 25' ):
--------r --- -- ~ 'I
MI~ELLANEQ!!'S }MPRO~MEN!S: = ~- : -- -t ====
I I
I=1penonnance&payxnent BondS== J-----l~ % $---35~421.20 $
2. ---l Demolition &, diSPO,sal", of,brus,h, '" 1_, _ , ,1,.00 L,.L_ $ 2,500.00 $
.J buildings & irrigation str\J~es - -j' -- I
::::::: =~::-=:~f---l=-
10.00
11.00
28.00
3.00
I
OTHER FEES:
------- +-
I
I ----- ~-
. I
=->:I<t~:::;:::: :
1. Engineering & cons. staking _
2'_--jContingency___~
-~----------
____-------.l__~~___~
Total Other Fees:
L
TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS:
-------:~--_.~-------
Deferment Amount
1,055.16
$_..h0_55.16
$_ 7l,3~.36
$ 1,801.20
$ 3,792.00
$ 12,324.00
$ 8,270.00
$ 3,586.00
$ 1,232.00
$ 4,416.00
$ 35,421.20
531.32
2,500.00
$
3,031.32
$
38,452.52
8,238.89
5,492.59
$ 13,731.49
$ 123,583.37
110.00 %
$ 123,583.37 $ 135,941.70
20f2
II Exhibit 3 II
~
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS
City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the
City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable,
answer with "NA", I 1/ d r II
FIRM NAME cI~ Ice €-- ZtZ c ~ D ;-Oc.,...)v(,;,. (/(' jc<. ?-I-~
STREET: ~(P2.t G. :4 \ ~;1)>.... i 2.&i Y: ) f-.>
;;/ ./
FIRM is 1. Corporation ___ 2 Partnership 3. Sole Owner
J-.L/'
ZIP: ~ 7 ~ {;J f:,
4. Association
5
Other
DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS
If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.
1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm".
Name A 1 Job Title and City Department (if known)
IUd r1 ~.
2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm".
Name Title
NO.-1e
3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm".
Name II 7 Board, Commission or Committee
C!!!/!~
4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked
on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or
more of the ownership in the above named "firm".
Name
JJ tJ '^ 0-/
Consultant
CERTIFICATE
I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly
withheld disclosure of any inform~i~~a~uested; and tha~p emental statements will be promptly submitted to
the City of Corpus Christi. T e;:;i:'~ es 0'3 h _
Certifying Person: Y C\ Title: C! rtJ .
I
(Type or Pnnt) /l
Signature of Certifying Person: L~/~
f ~ Date
(
p-bb
,
II Exhibit 4 II
14
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 14, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Ordinance Appropriating $2,700,000 from Federal Aviation Administration Grant No. 3-48-
0051-37-2005 in the No. 3020 Airport Capital Improvement Fund for the Runway 13/31
Rehabilitation, Phase II; Runway 17/35 Shoulders and Blast Pads; Airport Drainage
Improvements Phase IV; Terminal Apron Project at Corpus Christi International Airport;
and Declaring an Emergency.
ISSUE: The Federal Aviation Administration has previously awarded Grant 37 to the City of
Corpus Christi in an amount not to exceed $7,788,088 for the rehabilitation of Runways
13/31 and 17/35 and various other improvements including new shoulders, drainage
improvements and lighting improvements. The Grant is a multi-year grant with the FY05
amount of $5,088,088 previously awarded and appropriated and the balance of $2,700,000
now available in the FY06 Grant Year. The Airport will match the grant with Airport Capital
Reserve funds.
FUNDING: Funding is available from FAA Grant 37.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Ordinance as presented.
/
L .,}
/;/ ~
Dave amnck
Director of Aviation
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
Additional Background Information
Ordinance
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The City has been awarded FAA Grant # 3-48-0051-37-2005 in an amount not to exceed
$7,788,088.00 for the Rehabilitate Runway 13/31, Phase II, Runway 17/35 Shoulders and
Blast Pads, and Airport Drainage Improvements Phase IV Project. This is a multi-year
Grant offer of which $5,088,088.00 was for federal FY 2005 and the remainder is for
federal FY 2006. This grant money will be combined with prior grant monies to complete
federal participation in the amount of 95% of the project(s) costs respectively.
Appropriation of the grant proceeds is necessary to proceed with the project.
PRIOR COUNCIUADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS:
April 19, 2005-
Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to accept Federal Aviation Administration
Grant Number 3-48-0051-37-2005 in an amount not to exceed $7,788,088 for the Runway 13/31
Rehabilitation, Blast Pads and Shoulders, Airfield Drainage Improvements - Phase 4, and Runway
13/31 Lighting and Cable Replacements at Corpus Christi International Airport.
Ordinance Appropriating $5,088,088 from the Federal Aviation Administration Grant No. 3-48-0051-
37 -2005 in the No. 3020 Airport Capital Improvement Fund for the Runway 13/31 Rehabilitation, Blast
Pads and Shoulders, Airfield Drainage Improvements - Phase 4, and Runway 13/31 Lighting and
Cable Replacements at Corpus Christi International Airport; and Declaring an Emergency.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project consists of the completion of the rehabilitation of Runway 13/31 with pavement
milling and overlay, installation of new twenty-five (25) foot wide shoulders, blast pads,
drainage improvements including pipe culverts, underdrains and other structures; new high
intensity runway lighting including conduit, cables, transformers and signage
improvements; new top soil, seeding, and sodding; the relocation of the Runway 13
localizer; and the design work for the Runway 17/35 lighting replacement, shoulder and
blast pad project and tenninal apron work. The project has required closure of Runway
17/35 which is the primary runway during prevailing wind conditions. The airlines have
been advised of this project and will take appropriate measures to insure continuity of safe
operations.
ORDINANCE
APPROPRIATING $2,700,000 FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION
ADMINISTRATION GRANT NO. 3-48-0051-37-2005 IN THE NO. 3020
AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE RUNWAY 13/31
REHABILITATION, PHASE II; RUNWAY 17/35 SHOULDERS AND
BLAST PADS; AIRPORT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE IV;
TERMINAL APRON AT CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Appropriating $2,700,000 from the Federal Aviation Administration Grant
No. 3-48-0051-37-2005 in the No. 3020 Airport Capital Improvement Fund for the
Runway 13/31 Rehabilitation, Phase II; Runway 17/35 Shoulders and Blast Pads;
Airport Drainage Improvements Phase IV; Terminal Apron at Corpus Christi
International Airport.
SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon
ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect
upon first reading as an emergency measure this the _ day of February, 2006.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Henry Garrett
Mayor
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
APPROVED: February 8th, 2006
J n P. Burke, Jr.
Senior Assistant City Attorn y
For City Attorney
ORD Appro 4 Runway] 3 3] lIa
Corpus Christi I Texas
Day of
,2005
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Henry Garrett, Mayor
City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
ORD Appro 4 Runway 13 31.11a
15
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: January 31,2006
AGENDA ITEM: First reading ordinance waiving the 6O-day waiting period and publication
of legal notice; renaming the park at 3010 Sunnybrook from Southside Park to Mike
Zepeda Park; and providing for severance.
ISSUE: The City has established a formal policy for naming parks and recreation
facilities. The City has received a renaming request from the Park and Recreation Advisory
Committee for Southside Park located at 3010 Sunnybrook.
BOARD/COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee voted
unanimously at their January 11, 2006, meeting to recommend that the City Council
consider waiving the 6O-day waiting period and the newspaper publication for this
renaming request related to Souths ide Park. The Committee is also asking the City Council
to approve the requested renaming of the park as Mike Zepeda Park.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council must approve the naming of all City
facilities, parks, and recreation facilities and that process is finalized by the adoption of an
ordinance.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the renaming of
Southside Park as Mike Zepeda Park be approved and the waivers granted as requested.
Attachments:
Copy. Request for Naming of Parks and Facilities
Copy - Council Policy Infonnation
Biographical Information
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Southside Park is 1.96 acres located on 3101 Sunnybrook and was dedicated in 1950.
The Park has always been named Southside Park. Most likely was called that, because
in 1950 that was about as far south as the City went.
A similar ordinance and waiver was approved by the City Council, requested by the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, in February 2002 in the renaming of Gypsy
Park as Don and Sandy Sillish Park. Similarly, in December of 2003, Meadowbrook
Park was renamed Dan Whitworth Park, February 22, 2005 Seagull Park was renamed
Ullberg Park and June 28,2005, Midway Park was renamed Nancy Todd Garrett
Memorial Park.
Mr. Zepeda served in the U.S. Army from 1942- 1945, assisting in the liberation of the
Philippine Islands and earning an honorable discharge; beginning in 1951, Mr. Zepeda
made numerous significant contributions to his community. He was a founder of Mexican
American Democrats and Tejano Democrats; he was elected Democrat precinct
Chairman in District 2 in the late 1950's and served for decades; he also served as a
National Democratic delegate in 1984 in San Francisco. In 1997 he was inducted into the
Nueces County Democratic Hall of Fame. In May of 2005, the 79th Texas Legislature paid
tribute to the life of Miguel "Mike" Zepeda and extended their sincere sympathy to the
members of his family.
5.
6.
'7
i.
REQUEST FOR THE NAMING 3~-tdv(::]~1c
OF PARKS AND FACILITIES
.
1.
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
CITY OF C'ORPUS CHRISTI, 'IEXAS
Type of area or facili~building, pool, etc.) pAt! I~
2.
Location <.. )u/J/1'f ~ CI tJ t~
Suggested N~e M I b; ZEPl37J!1 p;;,ek
3.
4.
Please describe why you feel this name to be appropriate:
/lJtlc ~~. u?-3 /l 104/ c,i-// - /2';..5/4' &~
JI, Jt-rve:;/ 11.) ~rr4':c.(' C/,~.(J /~ "X'5 OISh'i'.. 2 ~ ~
I
I/o 1'::>' & IvfV f0~ I~/v h-c 7'FY/-J.5" - ~fL-Ct'~~( ~
7C.e) cf Ot..., h-/' '" ~~ P <' t/E c.; - P~c.s,:" FrJ ptf n<ir ~~
/i/cs.' 'J/fYr.dJ #SSvCA,<ff7~/l. . S("7(/c/ fi; [~/h41tA-?/' /5 /'f ~
fA ~ frme. I S/ ~- I I-f.i-,(~ / /'hi'" S/~~ l-t-9J (4Y'Y;;>-;{ (/0 1h~/vA.~
i(ame and address of person maKing ~~est: -
Name 5;;;/V?14t/iO /lB?4//f~6-/&-jq./J-/!'7 ~.-:r
Address ;;;6/3 ;DDZJ/~/Uc:7/t/ / V@r(Z ~~;~-g;-
/
Phone J2J/-09 m ~ ,~~C. 7lC 7qt5 . _
. o5J-IS/~/ j- 91J--S-l/72
Do you represent an organization with reSpect to this request? Y ~ C6PI
If ''yes", which organization (hrzpv! Ql-l!iJr/~l2J 4JfcP0472cJJ
Date of this request
Request:
FOR OFFlCE USE ONLY:
Approved
Rejected
Tabled
Date of Committee Action
Date of Council Action
Legal Notice . Newspaper
Notice to Appropriate Co1UKi1m.ember
PubHc Notice - Neighborhood
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
P ARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
POLICY /PROCEDURE NUMBER Rec-95-12
SUBJECT: Criteria for Naming Park and Recreation Facilities
APPLICABLE TO: All Park and Recreation Facilities administered by the City of
Corpus Christi
EFFECTIVE DATE:
I. PURPOSE
To establish the format and criteria for naming facilities which are under the
jurisdiction of the Park and Recreation Department and are consistent with City
Resolutions 18545 and 19938.
II.
SCOPE
-1
This policy applies to facilities situated on City owned or administered property.
It is understood that due to the diversity of City operations, varying factors may
apply to specific facilities. Based on this, the following CLASSIFICATIONS
section provides a breakdown by CLASS of the variables to be considered in
naming facilities.
III.
CLASSIFICA nON
CLASS A:
Facilities built and operated by the City.
CLASS B:
Facilities built and operated by independent organizations.
Naming of facilities in this category will be submitted by
the current year Organization President with approval by
the Board of Directors of the respective organization.
CLASS C:
Facilities built and operated by independent organizations
on City owned or administered properties. The naming is
the sole responsibility of the organization.
IV. NAMING PROCEDURE
Where the naming of a Class A or B park or park facility is proposed, the
following steps shall be taken; as per city Resolution and departmental policy
requirements:
Persons, groups, or organizations proposing naming of Park and
Recreation facilities shall fill out a Naming Facilities Form and submit
the request to the staff of the Park and Recreation Department for
review and consultation with the requesting entity.
2 Naming request shall be submitted to the Park and Recreation
('ommittee. No action may be taken by the Committee for a minimum
(' f 60 days after receipt of the proposal.
") I luring the 60-day waiting period, legal notice shall be published twice
in a newspaper of general circulation giving notice of the proposed
naming. [n addition, a sign noting that a name change request is being
c\msidered along with the Park and Recreation Department telephone
number will be posted at the park. Written comments or historical
data are to be submitted to the Park and Recreation Committee and
interested individuals are invited to come before the Committee to
address the issue.
4 A t the first meeting after the 60-day waiting period, the Park and
Recreation Committee will take one of the following actions:
---1
a. Approve the request;
b. Reject the request; or
c. Table the request for future action or additional information.
In the event the request is rejected by the Committee, the
requesting entity may appeal the rejection to the City Council.
5, The Council shall consider the request and either approve or reject the
request. The Council, at its option, can waive all provisions herein
provided in commemorating or memorializing an individual or act.
Costs associated with naming ceremonies and the provision of marker,
plaques, or memorials shall be borne by the entity proposing the name.
Dan Whitworth, Director
Park and Recreation Department
ADOPTED: December 6, 1995
REVISED: September 11, 2002
In Memorial of
Mike Zepeda
He served in the United Armed Forces, 1942-1945, Assisted in the Liberation of the
Philippine Islands, and was Honorably Discharged.
Mike Worked for Reynolds Metal Co., 1951, became Member of the United Steelworkers of
America and served in several leadership positions and elected President of Local
4813. Mike Zepeda, during his long labor career as an organizer and fi~hter of Civil
Rights, had dedicated his life to justice in the education and political fields.
He served as trustee, Vice President of the Coastal Bend Labor Council, continued as a
delegate.
Past member of NAACP, LULAC, and American GI Forum.
Founder MAD and Tejano Democrats. Participated in all Presidential
elections. Had worked for the Democratic Party with distinction,
he was elected Precinct Chairman, delegate to County and State democratic convention
for many years and as a delegate to the National Democratic Convention. Inducted
into the Nueces County Democratic Hall of Fame.
Hired by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, as
Union organizer, the City Employees and the support group of C.C.I.S.D. and Nueces
County Employees, Mike Zepeda succeeded through his leadership to secure Civil Service
for County Employees. Mike was a Plaintiff in 3 Suits for Hispanic advancement; Cisneros vs.
C.C.I.S.D. which resulted in the desegregation of the C.C.I.S.D. school system and served
29 years on the Advisory Committee. The case that had nationwide impact.
Suit against City of Corpus Christi and C.C.I.S.D. for the lack of Hispanic representation in the
City Council and Board of Trustees, which resulted in a mix single member
district and an At Large System.
Elected State President of LCLAA and President of the Corpus Christi LCLAA
Chapter. The following programs
were organized by Mike; Voter Registration Drive, Adopt A School,Scholarship
Program through Texas A&M University, Work by promoting two buses loaded
with union members in protest of NAFTA in Austin AFL-CIO Rally, a continuous
legislative LOBBY program every two years while the Texas legislators are in
session, instituted Pilot Program to recruit high school government class students
for trips to visit the capitol and state officials to learn how state government works,
provided money to buy shoes for needy students at Lamar Elementary school,
Board of Director at WBA for many years, participated il1 Bringing Cheer to Children
of the westside during Christmas (sacking and distributing thousands of Goodie Bags
to all children), organized bus travel to Washington D.C. for the inauguration of
Bill Clinton (1993-1997), appointed and served as Texas AFL-CIO State Scholarship
Committee representative and State Retiree Coordinator.
SI
SE
PVEDE
,
.
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE
WAIVING THE 60-DAYWAITING PERIOD AND PUBLICATION OF
LEGAL NOTICE; RENAMING THE PARK AT 3010 SUNNYBROOK
FROM SOUTHSIDE PARK TO MIKE ZEPEDA PARK; AND PROVIDING
FOR SEVERANCE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. Under Policy NO.6 of Council Policies, Resolution No. 21901, adopted
March 22, 1994, upon unanimous recommendation of the Park and Recreation Advisory
Committee, the City Council waives the 60-day waiting period and publication of legal
notice.
SECTION 2. Southside Park at 3010 Sunnybrook is hereby renamed Mike Zepeda
Park.
SECTION 3. It is the definite intent of the City Council that every section, paragraph,
subdivision, phrase, word and provision hereof shall be given full force and effect for its
purpose. Therefore, if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a
court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph,
subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance.
C :\(Doyle.03.05\ORD2003 05\Ordinanc.es\Rename. Park\06. 0 116DC. Rename.South.side.As .Zepeda. Park.doc
Page 2' of 2
The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on
this the 31st day of January, 2006, by the following vote:
Henry Garrett Rex A. Kinnison ;
Brent Chesney John E. Marez
Melody Cooper i= Jesse Noyola ~
Jerry Garcia Mark Scott
William Kelly
The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the
14th day of February, 2006, by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jerry Garcia
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
William Kelly
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 14th day of February, 2006
ATTEST:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Henry Garrett
Mayor
~:: 16 January 2006
Doyle D. Curtis
Chief, Administrative Law Section
Senior Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
C:\(Doyle.03.05\ORD2003.05\Ordinanc.es\Rename. Park\06.0116DC.Rename.South.side.As.Zepeda. Park.doc
16
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: 1/31/06
AGENDA ITEM:
Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to
FAA Lease No. DTFAP7-04-L-00560 eliminating all references to the Visual Approach Slope Indicator
(V ASI) and adding 0.15 acre of land for the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) serving Runway
17
ISSUE:
The FAA is in the process of replacing the Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) system with a
Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) system for Runway 17. The lease needs to be amended to
reflect the additional acreage is for new access roads, easements and turnarounds.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
Council approval is required on all property leases.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
On 5111n8 Council approved original lease. Subsequent extensions and amendments to the lease
are: 6/25180 Ordinan~No. 15606,8/22/81 Ordinance No. 16471,7/26/84 Ordinance No. 18356,
4/29/86 Ordinance No. 19284,7/5/88 Ordinance No. 20364, 3/9/93 Ordinance No. 021578, and
10/01/97 Ordinance No. 023236.
FUNDING:
None
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Airport Board recommended approval of this Supplemental Amendment during their meeting on
Jan. 18, 2006 Staff recommends approval of this Supplemental Amendment.
IQLL~ 4a~
Department Head Signature
Attachments:
X Ordinance
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) maintains approach and navigational aids at the airport to
assist aircraft arriving, departing and transiting the area. The standard tease with the FAA is a "no cost"
lease in return for providing the services. The current VASt system is out dated and the FAA is
replacing the VASl's with PAPI's. The new system will require access roads and turn around areas.
ORDINANCE
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO
EXECUTE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 TO FAA
LEASE NO. DTFA07-04-L-00560 ELIMINATING ALL
REFERENCES TO THE VISUAL APPROACH SLOPE
INDICATOR (V ASI) AND ADDING 0.15 ACRE OF LAND FOR
THE PRECISION APPROACH PATH INDICATOR (PAPI)
SERVING RUNWAY 17; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the City Manager, or his Designee is authorized to execute
Supplemental Agreement NO.1 to FAA Lease No. DTFA07-04-1-00560
eliminating all references to the Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VAS I) and
adding 0.15 acre of land for the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) serving
Runway 17. All other terms of said Lease remain the same.
SECTION 2. Publication will be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Henry Garrett
Mayor
APPROVED: January ;l.6"" , 2006
~p~
J n P. Burke, Jr.
emor Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
That the foregoing ordinance w~~. ~~.t~e first time and passed to its second
reading on this the 3/"" day of ~' 2006, by the following vote:
Henry Garrell~ Bill Kelly ~
Brent Chesney .~ Rex A. Kinnison ~
John E. Marez ~ Jesse Noyola ~
Melody Cooper ~ Mark Scott ~
~ ---r-
Jerry Garcia
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on
this the day of ,2006, by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Brent Chesney
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Melody Cooper
Mark Scott
Jerry Garcia
APPROVED AND PASSED on this
2006.
day of
ATTEST:
Armando Chapa, City Secretary
Henry Garrett, Mayor
17
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: 1/31/06
AGENDA ITEM:
Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Supplemental Agreement NO.1 to
FAA Lease No. DTFA07-98-L-01123 eliminating all references to the Visual Approach Slope Indicator
(V ASI) and adding 0.25 acre of land for the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) serving Runway
13 and 0.64 acre for the PAPI serving Runway 31.
ISSUE:
The FAA is in the process of replacing the Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) system with a
Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) system for Runway 13/31. The lease needs to be amended
to reflect the additional acreage for new access roads, easements and turnarounds.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION:
Council approval is required on all property leases.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
On Feb. 24, 1998 Council approved the current lease with the FAA for the VASI sites.
FUNDING:
None
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Airport Board recommended approval of this Supplemental Amendment during their meeting on
Jan. 18, 2006. Staff recommends approval of this Supplemental Amendment.
/~~ ~'
Oepa ment ead Signature
Attachments:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) maintains approach and navigational aids at the airport to
assist aircraft arriving, departing and transiting the area. The standard lease with the FAA is a "no cost"
lease in return for providing the services. The current VASI system is out dated and the FAA is
replacing the VASl's with PAPI's. The new system will require easements, access roads and turn
around areas.
ORDINANCE
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO
EXECUTE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 TO FAA
LEASE NO. DTFA07-98-L-01123 ELIMINATING ALL
REFERENCES TO THE VISUAL APPROACH SLOPE
INDICATOR (V ASI) AND ADDING 0.25 ACRE OF LAND FOR
THE PRECISION APPROACH PATH INDICATOR (PAPI)
SERVING RUNWAY 13 AND 0.64 ACRE FOR THE PAPI
SERVING RUNWAY 31; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the City Manager, or his Designee is authorized to execute
Supplemental Agreement NO.1 to FAA Lease No. DTFA07-98-L-01123
eliminating all references to the Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) and
adding 0.25 acre of land for the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) serving
Runway 13 and 0.64 acre for the PAPI serving Runway 31. All other terms of
said Lease remain the same.
SECTION 2. Publication will be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Henry Garrett
Mayor
APPROVED: January ~S- , 2006
~ P. ~\L.
o P. Burke, Jr. rr-
nior Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
That the foregoing ordi.!},ance was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading on this the .2P'CJay of ~11~, 2006, by the following vote:
Henry Garrett ~ Bill Kelly ~
Brent Chesney ~Q Rex A. Kinnison ~
oi: ^ A ~ J1...:
~ Jesse Noyola ~
.~ Mark Scott ~
~
John E. Marez
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on
this the day of ,2006, by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
John E. Marez
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
APPROVED AND PASSED on this
2006.
ATTEST:
day of
Armando Chapa, City Secretary
Henry Garrett, Mayor
18
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 14, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
a. Public hearing to consider abandoning and vacating a 7,215-square foot portion of the Eden
Lane public right-of-way, out of Lot 3, Ehlers Garden Tracts, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts,
and Lot 5, Ehlers Garden Tracts; located approximately 540-feet east of the McBride Lane
street right-of-way, and north of IH 37.
b Ordinance abandoning and vacating a 7,215-square foot portion of the Eden Lane public
right-of-way, out of Lot 3, Ehlers Garden Tracts, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts, and Lot 5,
Ehlers Garden Tracts; located approximately 540-feet east of the McBride Lane street right-
of-way and north of IH 37; subject to compliance with the specified conditions.
ISSUE: Javelina Refinery is requesting to abandon and vacate the public street right-of-way for a
private dnveway and vehicular turn-around for the loading and unloading of their refinery trucks.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: City Charter requires Council approval to abandon and vacate any
portion of street rights-of-way. City Code requires a public hearing prior to the vacating and
abandonment of any street rights-of-way.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented.
elopment Services
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Background Information
Exhibit B - Ordinance
Exhibit C - Site Location Map
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
BACKGROUND:
Javelina Refinery, is requesting the abandonment and vacation of the 7 ,215-square foot portion of
the Eden Lane public right-of-way, out of Lot 3, Ehlers Garden Tracts, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts,
and Lot 5, Ehlers Garden Tracts. The dedicated ROW to be abandoned and vacated is located in a
"1-2" Light Industrial District.
The dedicated public ROW is located approximately 540-feet east of the McBride Lane street right
of-way, and north of IH 37. The said portion of public right-of-way is being abandoned and vacated
to allow for the construction of a private driveway and the loading and unloading of their trucks and a
possible turn-around for their company vehicles.
Javelina Refinery constructed an entrance/exist driveway on the IH 37 right-of-way for their 18-
Wheeler Tractor Trucks, removing any additional vehicular traffic from Eden Lane. Javelina
Refinery will not be using the Eden Lane right-of-way for any vehicular company truck traffic, but will
have a chain-linked fenced with gate and a sign, with a 24 hour emergency number across the
street right-of-way to allow public and private utility companies access to the utilities within the right-
of-way for maintenance repairs and as an emergency entrance. Javelina Refinery is required to
construct a turn-around for public vehicle traffic on Eden Lane, adjacent to and east ofthe proposed
fenced gate.
All public and franchised utilities were contacted regarding this closure request. The City Water
Department requires that the owner retain a 15-foot utility easement at owner's expense, for an
existing 2-inch waterline. Gas Department has an existing 2-inch gas line, on the northern portion of
the Eden Lane right-of-way, and requires that the owner retain a utility easement at their expense.
sse has an aerial cable on joint use poles within the easement and is asking that the owner retain a
utility easement for the existing cable. Javelina Refinery will be retaining the entire 7,215-square
feet of the Eden Lane public right-of-way as a utility easement.
Staff recommends that the Owner pay the fair market value of $5,415.00 for the abandonment and
vacation of a 7 ,215-square foot portion of the Eden Lane street right-of-way. The owner has been
advised of and concurs with the conditions of the right-of-way abandonment.
EXHIBIT A
FROM:
B. A Holly, AICP, Director of Development Services
DATE:
February 8, 2005
TO THE CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI:
ORDINANCE REQUEST
DATE RECOMMENDED FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Februarv 14,2006
ORDINANCE CAPTION:
Public hearing to consider abandoning and vacating a 7 ,215-square foot portion of the Eden Lane public right-ot-
way, out of Lot 3, Ehlers Garden Tracts, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts, and Lot 5, Ehlers Garden Tracts; located
approximately 540-feet east of the McBride Lane street right-of-way, and north of IH 37.
t Ordinance abandoning and vacating a 7 ,215-square foot portion of the Eden Lane public right-of-way, out of Lot
3, Ehlers Garden Tracts, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts, and Lot 5, Ehlers Garden Tracts; located approximately
540-feet east of the McBride Lane street right-of-way and north of IH 37; subject to compliance with the specified
conditions.
OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN ORDINANCE:
Plat IS recorded in Volume 6, Page 33, Volume 47, Page 181, and Volume 31 Page 69 of the Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas.
SPECIFIED CONDITIONS AS PART OF CLOSURE:
1 ) Staff recommends that the Owner pay the fair market value of $5.415.00 for the abandonment and
vacation of a 7,215-square foot portion of the Eden Lane street right-of-way.
2: Owner must retain the entire 7 ,215-square foot portion of the Eden Lane street right-of-way proposed for
closure as a utility easement for the continuous maintenance of all existing public and private utilities
within the right-of-way, by the appropriate private and public utility companies.
3, No additional vehicular traffic by refinery trucks will be allowed on the Eden Lane right-of-way, only for
utility maintenance purposes or as an emergency entrance or exist.
4) Owner will be allowed to construct a chain-linked fence with gate across the right-of-way with a sign and
24 hour emergency number for utility maintenance access.
5) Owner is required to construct a turn-around for public vehicular traffic on Eden Lane, adjacent to and
east of the proposed fenced gate.
6) Any relocation requires of any existing utilities will be done at owners expense.
7l Upon approval from Council and ordinance issued, all grants of street closures must be recorded in the
real property Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the property is located. Prior to Building
Permit approval of construction, an up-to-date survey, abstracted for all easements and items of record,
must be submitted to the Director of Development Services.
REQUESTED B .
e lopment Services
DATE: d-C{ 0(0
l\pproved:
Date:
EXHIBIT B
AN ORDINANCE
ABANDONING AND VACATING A 7,215-SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF
EDEN LANE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, OUT OF LOT 3, EHLERS
GARDEN TRACTS, LOT 3D EHLERS GARDEN TRACTS, AND LOT 5
EHLERS GARDEN TRACTS; LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 540 FEET
EAST OF THE MCBRIDE LANE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AND NORTH
OF IH 37; SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED
CONDITIONS.
WHEREAS, there is a 7,215-square foot portion of the Eden Lane right-at-way out of
Lot 3, Ehlers Garden Tracts, plat recorded in volume 6, Page 33, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts, plat recorded in Volume 47,
Page 181, Map Records, Nueces County, Texas, and Lot 5, Ehlers Garden Tracts, plat
recorded in Volume 31, Page 69, Map Records, Nueces County, Texas, located
approximately 540 teet east of the McBride Street right-at-way and north of Interstate
Highway 37, that Javelina Refinery is requesting to have abandoned and vacated as a
street right-at-way to allow for the construction of a private driveway and the loading and
unloading at its trucks and a possible turn-around for its company vehicles; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City of
Corpus Christi to abandon and vacate said portion at the right-at-way for street
purposes, subject to the provisions below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. That the 7,215-square foot portion of the Eden Lane right-of-way out of
Lot 3, Ehlers Garden Tracts plat recorded in volume 6, Page 33, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas, Lot 3D, Ehlers Garden Tracts, plat recorded in Volume 47,
Page 181, Map Records, Nueces County, Texas, and Lot 5, Ehlers Garden Tracts, plat
recorded in Volume 31, Page 69, Map Records, Nueces County, Texas, located
approximately 540 feet east at the McBride Street right-at-way and north at Interstate
Highway 37, is abandoned and vacated for public use as a right-at-way, subject to
Javelina Refinery's compliance with the following specified conditions as part of the
abandonment and vacation:
1) Javelina Refinery shall pay the fair market value of $5,415 for the
abandonment and vacation of a 7,215-square foot portion of the Eden
Lane street right-of-way.
2) Javelina Refinery must retain the entire 7,215-square foot portion of the
Eden Lane street right-of-way closed hereby as a utility easement for the
continuous maintenance of all existing public and private utilities within the
right-of-way, by the appropriate private and public utility companies.
3) No additional vehicular traffic by refinery trucks will be allowed on the
H: Leg/garyws/agenda/2006/02-14/EdenLaneabandon
Eden Lane right-ot-way, only tor utility maintenance purposes or as an
emergency entrance or exit.
4) Javelina Refinery will be allowed to construct a chain-linked fence with
gate across the right-ot-way with a sign and 24 hour emergency number
for utility maintenance access.
5) Javelina Refinery is required to construct a turn-around for public vehicular
traffic on Eden Lane, adjacent to and east of the proposed fenced gate.
6) Any relocation required of any existing utility will be done at Javelina
Refinery's expense.
7) Upon approval from City Council and ordinance issued, all grants of street
closures must be recorded in the real property Map Records of Nueces
County, Texas, in which the property is located. Prior to building pennit
approval of construction, an up-to-date survey, abstracted for all
easements and items of record, must be submitted to the Director of
Development Services.
H: Leg/ garyws/ agenda! 2006/02 -14/EdenLaneabandon
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading on this the ___ day of
,2006, by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Rex A. Kinnison
Brent Chesney
John Marez
Melody Cooper
Jesse Noyola
Jerry Garcia
Mark Scott
Bill Kelly
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this
the
day of
,2006 by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Rex A. Kinnison
Brent Chesney
John Marez
Melody Cooper
Jesse Noyola
Jerry Garcia
Mark Scott
Bill Kelly
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the
day of
,2006.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Henry Garrett
Mayor
Approved: February 9, 2006
By: ~i/AJ
G . Smith
Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
H :Leg/garyws/agendal2006/02-] 4/Edenlaneabandon
LOTS
EHLERS GARDEN TRACTS
VOL 31, PAGE 69
M.R.N.C.r.
/ LOT 3
/ EHLERS GARDEN TRACTS
. VOL. 6, PAGE 33
M.R.N.C. T.
(JAVELINA COMPANY)
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
/
I
/
/
/
I
~/
:&/.
. ....
~~
c;/ /
I I
PEPPOSED I EDEN LANE
yTREET CILOSURE AND
I UTILITY I EASEMENT
I (7,2 ~5 Sq. Ft.)
/ Wf'lLAN TRACT
il (JA..(uINA COMPANY)
,l /7
'5/ ~ I
~/ ~ / COASTAL JAVEUNA ADDmON
I t:f'/ 45 I VOL. 54, PAGE 51
/~/ iJ I M.R.N.C.T.
h/ I /
I c:::l
~i//I
---------
CALLED 1.0 ACRES
VOL 2182. PAGES 761-764
D.R.N.C.r.
(JA VEUNA COMPANY)
S 17"30 'OO"W
8.73'
S?8:.?200'F
! s,. -#7'
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
/
/
I
/
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
i
/
/ f
/ CALLED 0.5 ACRES /
~L 2314. PAGE 521 '
. DR.N.C.T. f
/
/
f
~
N"
~(J'
~~.
~Q:'
U t:)'
~
~
"i
&".
~(J.
Q.:~,
!:>Q:'
f.'j t:)'
ri
.:s:
/
/
LOT <:
LOT 3-D
EHLERS GARDEN TRACTS
VOL. 47, PAGE 181
M.R.N.C. T.
THIS MAP WAS COMPILED FROM
AVAILABLE RECORDS AND DOes
NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY MADE
UPON THE GROUND.
RA~:t~
5061
o
1 "-60' I
60'
~
N
~
120'
I
e.
PROPOSED EDEN ~E
STREET CLOSURE AND U11UTY E'ASMENT
EXHIBIT
GOLDSTON ENGINEERING. INC.
lJ.J
ERIN (9
~
SA V AGE -=:{
HAMPSHIRE C/)
--.l
<{ ~
z (Y
HALL '2 I (Y C)
0::: C) <( ~
w I l-
I- (f) z
LEOPARD ~
w W f-'
0 CD ~
(Y 0.- W
CD 2: CD
~\ <( z
u
u =:J
2: c,/)
-
-+---~
~=::::::- UNION
e.
p~C\f\C
NEff
o
c
z
z
MARGARET
THOMAS
~
N
,
PROPOSED EDEN LANE
STREET CLOSURE AND UTIUTY EASEMENT
SITE MAP
GOLDSTON ENGINEERING, INC.
CALLED 1. 0 ACRES
VOL. 2182, PAGES 761-764
D.R.N.C.T.
(JA VELINA COMPANY)
S17"30'OO"W
8.73'
S78"22'oo_
154.47' F
LOT 5
EHLERS GARDEN TRACTS
VOL. 31, PAGE 69
M. R.N. C. T
,'.r ,'" ,:-.. ;-~)
L /", L C,K" .~)
(JA VEL/NA COMPANY)
S78'22'00.E
----~~~'
EDEN l.of
L./-fN E
tjJ
~
N~
~C.i
~~
'<\,Q:'
t> c::s
&
! CALLED 0.5 ACRES j
/VOL. 2314, PAGE 52rt
D.R.N.C.T. /
!
/
i
Lor <;
L__
---
JAVe:L1NA
LOT 3-D
EHLERS GARDEN TRACTS
VOL. 47, PAGE 181
M.R.N.C. T.
THIS MAP WAS COMPILED FROM
AVAILABLE RECORDS AND DOES
NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY MADE
UPON THE GROUND.
~&~
5061
-~
0-
LOT 3
GAROE/\ TRACTS
6, PAGE 33
M.R N. C
/
/
/
/
i
/
/
/
/
i
/
/
/
/
/
/
^' ~. /
t;/ /
I /
pkOPOSED/EDEN LANE
STREET CILOSURE AND
! UTILITY / EASEMENT
/ (7,2 ~5 Sq. Ft.)
/
/ W1ELAN TRACT
/
11 (JA~L1NA COMPANY)
~/ //
~/ I ./
r~/ ~ /
ilJ/ ~ /
~/ ~
/~ .~ / COASTAL JAVELINA ADDmON
I.' <<J / VOL. 54, PAGE 51
/f2/ /J / M.R.N.C.T.
f/".,! 1
/' i
/L/q I
I
!
t/J
R
/J #..:
~C.i
Q:~
~Q:'
~t:::J'
rf
.s:
o
1 "-60' I
60'
~
N
i
120'
I
PROPOSED EDEN LANE
STREET CLOSURE AND UTIUlY EASMENT
EXHIBIT
GOLDSTON ENGINEERING, INC.
19
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
February 14, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
A. Public hearing in connection with the issuance by the Colorado Educational and
Cultural Facilities Authority of its tax exempt obligation for the benefit of the
Educational Media Foundation in the aggregate principal amount of approximately
$16,500,000,
B. Resolution of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas approving the issuance of tax
exempt obligation by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority for the
benefit of Educational Media Foundation as required by Section 147 (f) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
ISSUE: The Educational Media Foundation has requested that the City of Corpus
Christi authorize a resolution approving the issuance of tax-exempt obligation in
the amount of $16,500,000 by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities
Authority for the benefit of Educational Media Foundation. Section 147(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code requires, as a condition to receiving tax-exempt treatment
on the obligation, that each governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in
which any facility with respect to which financing is to be provided from the net
proceeds of an issue is located, approve the issue after a public hearing following
reasonable public notice. Approximately $350,000 of the proceeds will be used
for the benefit of local non-commercial radio station KKLM-FM which is operated
by Educational Media Foundation. Approval of this issuance is done solely for
the purpose of complying with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code
pertaining to tax-exempt status of the issuance, and in no way obligates, or
creates or establishes any liability on the part of the city of Corpus Christi with
respect to the facility or the obligation.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the Resolution as presented.
FUNDING: None
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Resolution.
Attachments: Letter from law firm of Peck, Shaffer & Williams, bond counsel, Resolution
approving issuance.
9~, J~ W' lr~ 119
~~~
SUITE 845
"'t: EPHONE ::303 296 3996
555 1 7't'< STREET
DENVER, COLOR....DO aC2C2
1877--296-0333
FAX 303-295 0344
WWW.f'ECK-SHAFFER.COM
December 16, 2005
Corpus Christi, Texas
City Hall - Council Chambers
1201 Leopard
Corpus Christi, Texas
Attention: Lisa Aguilar, Assistant City Attorney
Email:lisaa@cctexas.com
Re: Educational Media Foundation
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Our firm is acting as bond counsel in connection with the proposed issuance ofa tax-exempt
obligation (the "Obligation") by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority, an
independent public body public and corporate of the State of Colorado (the "Authority") for the
benefit of Educational Media Foundation, a California non profit corporation (the "Borrower")
which operates a non-commercial radio station (KKLM-FM) that is licensed to operate in your
City. This letter is in response to the request for some background information on the role of
City in the transaction.
The proceeds of the Obligation will be used for the purposes of: (a) refInancing the cost of
acquiring an FCC non-comrnerciallicense to operate a radio station that offers contemporary
Christian music, public affairs programming, public service announcements and personal
counseling by phone to listeners, (b) equipping the radio station which the Borrower will operate,
and (c) paying certain costs of issuance of the Obligation, (collectively, the "Project").
You requested we provide a discussion regarding the power of the Authority to issue the
Obligation. The Borrower operates nine non-commercial radio stations located in Colorado.
The Borrower is an organization described in Section 50l(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code,
based on its educational mission. The Authority is empowered to issue the Obligation for the
Project pursuant to c.R.S. 23-15-101 et seq (2004) (the "Act") and specifIcally is empowered
under 21-15-103 (7)(b) to issue the Obligation for the benefit of an educational institution for
projects located outside the state, if the Borrower operates educational facilities (as defIned in the
Act) in Colorado. Since the Borrower is an educational institution (within the meaning of the
Act) that operates nine Colorado stations, the Authority can fInance a project located outside of
Colorado. The Authority. therefore, has the power to issue the Obligation for the Project.
Federal lax law also plays a large role in any tax-exempt financing, including this one for the
;,.~ICA,GO. LL >l015
CINClt"N.A,1,DHIU COLUMBUS, OHIO
COVIN13TON, KENTUCKY
LOUISVIL.LE, KENTUCKY
#684v!
~~d. ~ gc ~~ .Le
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
December 13,2005
Page 2
Borrower. The Borrower needs the assistance of the City to meet one of the tax law
requirements. Section 147(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code")
requires that a public hearing for bonds issued for the benefit of non-profit corporations be held
in the local area where the project being fmanced with tax-exempt obligation is located, after the
publication of notice in accordance with the Code requirements. Further, the Code requires that
a public body like the City Council formally approve the issuance of the Obligation. Thus, the
Borrower requests the City to cause the notice to be published, hold a public hearing and pass a
resolution approving the Obligation. The public hearing mandated by the Code only requires the
City to give interested parties the right to make statements about the Project or the Obligation,
and does not require the City to conduct a debate or make a determination on the merits of the
Project. The approval given by the City is to merely meet the Code requirements. Further, such
actions by the City Council do not obligate the City to make any payments with respect to the
Obligation, nor will the Obligation become the indebtedness of the City.
We will provide the form of the public notice and the City Council resolution are included with
this letter.
You asked me to comment on what would occur if Corpus Christi did not hold the hearing. If
Corpus Christi does not hold the hearing, the financing costs for EMF will remain at a higher,
taxable rate which will limit the Company's ability to provide educational programming to the
City.
Thank you for your assistance and we are available to answer any questions you might have. We
look forward to completing this with you.
Very truly yours, I'
J I
~ (,L-.
Mary L. Groves
MLG:lrw
II 572 v2
9ed, J~ gc y~ JJ9
~d'c~
SUITE 645 555 SEVENTEENTH STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202-5402
TELEPHONE 303-296 39915 677-296'0333 FAX 303-2915-0344 WWW.F'ECK-SHAFFER.CCM
February 9, 2006
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
City Hall - Council Chambers
120 I Leopard
Corpus Christi, Texas
Attention: Lisa Aguilar, Assistant City Attorney
Email: lisaa@cctexas.com
Re: Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority Tax-Exempt Obligation
(Educational Media Foundation)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as bond counsel with respect to the above-captioned Obligation and have
rendered our unqualified opinion as bond counsel of even date herewith. You may rely on such
opinion as if it were addressed to you.
Very truly yours,
'~~/'J\~/~
ATLANT" GA
IIns ,!
CHJCAGCJ, IL
CINCINNATI, OH COL-UMSUS, OH CDV'NGTCN, KY LOUISVILLE. KY
DRAFT
01/06/06
Suite 845
Telephone 303.296 0344
555 17th Street
1.877-296-0333
Denver, Colorado 80202
Fax 720-904 9149 www.peck-shaffer.com
February
,2006
Colorado Educational and Cultural
Facilities Authority
1981 Blake Street
Denver, CO 80202
Re' Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority Tax-Exempt Obligation
(Educational Media Foundation)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as bond counsel in connection with the issuance by the Colorado Educational and
Cultural Facilities Authority (the "Issuer") of its Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities
Authority Tax-Exempt Obligation, in the principal amount of$ (the "Obligation").
We have examined the law and such certified proceedings and other papers as deemed necessary
to render this opinion.
As to questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon representations of the Issuer
and of Educational Media Foundation, a California nonprofit corporation (the "Corporation"),
contained in the Master Financing Agreement described below, the Issuer's certified proceedings
and other certifications of its officials furnished to us, and certifications by the Corporation
(including certifications as to the use of Obligation proceeds which are material to the paragraph
numbered 4 below), without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. We
have also relied on continued compliance by the Issuer and the Corporation with their respective
covenants contained in the Master Financing Agreement described below relating to the issuance
of the Obligation and pertaining to those sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code") that affect the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Obligation
for Federal and Colorado income tax purposes, Our examination was necessarily limited to the
foregoing as they exist or are in effect as of the date hereof.
The Obligation is issued pursuant to Article 15, Title 23 of the Colorado Revised Statutes and the
Supplemental Public Securities Act, Part 2, Article 57, Title 11 of the Colorado Revised Statutes,
a Master Financing Agreement (the "Agreement") between the Issuer, the Corporation and OE
Capital Public Finance, Inc. (the "Lender"), and a resolution of the Issuer authorizing the
execution and delivery of the Obligation (the "Obligation Resolution"). Proceeds of the
Obligation are to be loaned to the Corporation pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement.
Atlanta, GA
;l'17-i \"1
Chicago IL
CinCinnati OH
Columbus, OH
Covington. KY
Louisville, KY
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority
Februar) , 2006
Page :2
Operation of the assets financed with proceeds of the Obligation will be subject to certain
covenants contained in the Agreement. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Corporation has agreed
to make payments sufficient to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Obligation. The
rights of the Issuer under the Agreement (except certain rights to indemnification,
reimbursements, administrative fees and notices and the right to perform certain discretionary
acts) are pledged and assigned by the Issuer to the Lender as security for the Obligation. The
Obligation is payable solely from such revenues and funds as are pledged and assigned to the
payment thereof pursuant to the Agreement.
The Obligation bears interest at the rates and matures on the date set forth in the Agreement.
The OblIgation is subject to prepayment upon certain circumstances, terms and conditions
described in the Agreement.
Based OIl our examination described above and in reliance upon the opinion referred to below,
we are of the opinion as follows:
1 The Issuer is duly created and validly existing as a public body corporate and
politic and instrumentality of the State of Colorado, with the power to enter into and perform its
Obligation under the Agreement and to issue the Obligation.
The Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Issuer
and is the valid and binding obligation of the Issuer enforceable against the Issuer.
--- '[he Obligation has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Issuer
and is the valid, binding, enforceable, special, limited obligation ofthe Issuer, payable solely
from the revenues pledged and assigned to the payment thereof pursuant to the Agreement.
4. Interest on the Obligation is excludable from gross income for federal income tax
purposes under existing law. The Obligation is a "qualified SOl(c)(3) Obligation" within the
meaning of the Code, and interest on the Obligation is not subject to the alternative minimum tax
on individuals and corporations, except that interest on the Obligation will be included in the
"adjusted current earnings" of a corporation (other than any S corporation, regulated investment
company. REIT. REMIC or F ASIT) for purposes of computing its alternative minimum tax. The
opinion set forth above is subject to the condition that the Corporation comply with all
requirements of the Code that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance ofthe Obligation in
order that interests thereon be (or continue to be) excluded from gross income for Federal
income tax purposes. The Corporation has covenanted to comply with all such requirements.
Failure to comply with certain of such requirements could cause the interest on the Obligation to
~77,~ '. ;
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority
Februar)~. 2006
Page 3
be included in gross income retroactive to the date of issuance of the Obligation. We express no
opinion regarding other Federal tax consequences arising with respect to the Obligation.
5 Interest on the Obligation is excludable from taxable income for Colorado income
tax purposes and from Colorado alternative minimum taxable income under existing law.
6. The Obligation and the interest thereon shall never constitute a general obligation,
debt or indebtedness of the Issuer within the meaning of any provision or limitation of the
Constitution or statutes of the State of Colorado and shall not constitute or give rise to a
pecuniary liability of the Issuer or charge against its general credit or taxing powers, but are
payable solely from the revenues pledged and assigned to the payment thereof.
In providing such opinions, we have relied on representations of the Issuer, the Corporation, and
Coughlin and Company, Inc. (the "Underwriter") with respect to matters solely within the
knowledge ofthe Issuer, the Corporation and the Underwriter, respectively, which we have not
mdependently verified, and have assumed continuing compliance with the covenants in the
Agreement pertaining to those sections of the Code that affect the exclusion from gross income
of interest on the Obligation for federal income tax purposes. We have further relied on the
opinion of The Law Offices of David E. Frank, Auburn, California, counsel to the Corporation,
to the effect that the Corporation is exempt from tax pursuant to section 501(a) of the Code by
virtue of being an organization described in section 501 (c )(3) of the Code. If such
representations are determined to be inaccurate or incomplete, or the Issuer or the Corporation
fails to comply with the foregoing covenants of the Agreement, interest on the Obligation could
become includable in gross income from the date of its original delivery, regardless of the date
on which the event causing such inclusion occurs.
Certain requirements and procedures contained or referred to in the Agreement and other
relevant documents may be changed and certain actions may be taken or omitted under the
circumstances and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in such documents, upon the
advice or with an approving opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel. No opinion is
expressed herein as to the Obligation or the interest thereon on or after such change that occurs
or action that is taken or omitted upon the advice or approval of counsel other than ourselves.
Except as stated above, we express no opinion as to any federal, state or local tax consequences
resulting from the receipt or accrual of interest on, or acquisition, ownership or disposition of,
the Obligation.
#7~ 4 vJ
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority
February ,2006
Page 4
Owners of the Obligation should be aware that the ownership of tax-exempt bond may result in
collateral federal income tax consequences to financial institutions, life insurance and property
and casualty insurance companies, certain S corporations with Subchapter C earnings and profits,
individual recipients of Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits, taxpayers who may be
deemed to have incurred or continued indebtedness to purchase or carry tax-exempt bonds,
taxpayers owning an interest in a F ASIT that holds tax-exempt bonds and individuals otherwise
qualifying for the earned mcome credit. In addition, certain foreign corporations doing business
m the United States may be subject to the "branch profits tax" on their effectively-connected
earnings and profits (including tax-exempt interest such as interest on the Obligation).
We express no opinion as to the status of the Obligation under the "Blue Sky" or legal
investment laws of any state jurisdiction, or as to any information prepared in connection with
the offer or sale of the Obligation
It is to be understood that the rights of the holders of the Obligation and the enforceability of the
Obligation and the Agreement may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,
moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors' rights heretofore or hereafter enacted to
the extent constitutionally applicable, and that their enforcement may be subject to the exercise
of judicial discretion in accordance with general principles of equity, and may be limited by the
reasonable exercise of the police power of the State of Colorado and by the exercise ofthe
powers delegated to the Ilnited States of America by the Federal Constitution.
The opinions set forth above are based on existing law, which is subject to change. Such
opinions are further based on our knowledge of facts as of the date hereof. We assume no duty
to update or supplement these opinions to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter
come to our attention or to reflect any changes in any law that may hereafter occur or become
effective
Very truly yours,
#7, ~ y I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATION BY
THE COLORADO EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL FACILITIES
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF EDUCATIONAL MEDIA
FOUNDA TION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 147 (F) OF THE
INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, AS AMENDED.
WHEREAS, Educational Media Foundation, a California nonprofit corporation which
operates a non-commercial radio station (KKLM-FM) located at 410 S. Padre Island Drive, Suite
207, Corpus Christi, Texas (the "Borrower") has requested the Colorado Educational and
Cultural Facilities Authority (the "Issuer") to issue its Tax-Exempt Obligation for the benefit of
the Borrower, in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $16,500,000 (the
"Obligation"); and
WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Obligation will be used for the purposes of:
(a) refinancing the cost of acquiring an FCC non-commercial license to operate a radio station
assigned to Corpus Christi, Texas by the FCC that offers contemporary Christian music, public
affairs programming, public service announcements and personal counseling by phone to
listeners. (b) equipping the radio station which the Borrower will operate, and (c) paying certain
costs of issuance of the Obligation.
WHEREAS, in order to achieve interest savings, the Borrower desires that the Obligation
be issued in compliance with the requirement of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code") so that interest on the Obligation will be excludable from the gross income of the
holders; and
WHEREAS, SectIOn 147 (f) of the Code requires, as a condition to receiving tax-exempt
treatment of the interest on the Obligation, that an authorized, elected representative approve the
Obligation and the City Council of Corpus Christi (the "Council") constitutes such an authorized,
elected representative: and
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable that this Resolution be adopted; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRlSTI AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. The issuance of the Obligation by the Issuer in an aggregate amount not to
exceed $ ] 6,500.000 is hereby approved.
Section 2 Such approval shall be solely for the purposes of Section 147 (t) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall have no liabilities
for the payment of the Obligation nor shall any of its assets be pledged to the payment of the
Obligation
Section 3: In providing this approval, the City makes no representations with respect to
any of the projects to he financed with the proceeds of the Bonds, specifically, but not by way of
01,85 '.
limitation. with respect hl any projects outside the City of Corpus Christi which are to be
financed with approximately $16.150,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds, of which the City has no
knowledge.
Section 4: fhis Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately after its
adoption by the Council
THIS RESOLUTION HAVING BEEN DULY CONSIDERED AND VOTED UPON
WAS PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DA Y OF , 2006.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
A TIES'l
By:
, Mayor
~___' City Clerk
APPROVED: February 9, 2006
~ ' ~
By vC. ...A/~-L h~ -C'-,j
Lisa Aguilar " "
'--./
Assistant City Attorney
for City Attorney
")
~
"68<
Corpus Christi, Texas
of
,2006
The above resolution was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Henry Garrett
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
.68' v2
"l
j
20
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PUBLI(' HEARING- ZONING (City Council ActIOn Date: 2/14/06)
Case No. Ol06-01-AI Development, Inc.: A change of zoning from a "F-R" Farm Rural District to a
"R-IB" One-Family Dwelling District. The property IS 47.87 acres out of Lots 3-6, Section 21, Flour Bluff
and Encmal Farm & Garden Tracts. located 900 feet west of Airline Road along future Lipes Boulevard.
Planninl! Commission and Staff's Recommendation 0/11/06): Approval ofa "R-1B" One-Family
Dwelling District.
Requested Council Action: Approval of a "R-l B" One-Family Dwelling District.
Purpose of Request: Proposed 214 single-family lots subdivision.
Summan:
. Existing Land Use: The subject property is vacant land.
. Density: Mimmum lot area permitted in the "F-R" District is five (5) acres and in the "R-IB" District
provldes for a minimum lot area of 6.000 square feet and minimum lot width of 50 feet with a front
yard setback of 25 feet
. Transportation:
. I Ipes Boulevard h proposed In the Urban Transportation Plan as a four lane collector with a
capacity of 8,250 trips per day.
. The proposed 214 lots \vould generate 2,140 average daily trips along the future Lipes Boulevard
extension (County Road 26),
. Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility. The proposed subdivision is consistent with
the Future Land Use Plan and the Southside Area Development Plan.
Recommendation: Approval of the "R-1 B" One-Family Dwelling District.
Applicant's Position: The applicant is in agreement with the staffs recommendation.
Agenda Memorandum
Case No 1106-01 (AI Development, Inci
Page 2
Notification: Of the eleven (11) notIces mailed to the surrounding property owners, none were returned
m favor or opposition. The 20% rule is not invoked. This case is considered noncontroversial.
Mi~.t{~~P~
Assistant Director of Development Services
MGIFGM/als
Attachments:
1 ) Zoning Report
2) Planning CommiSSIOn Mmutes (1/11/06)
3) Ordinance
H\P[,N-OlR\SHARED\GAIL\ WORD AGENDMEM\2006''January\01 06-0 1 AGENDAMEMO,doc
CITY COUNCIL
ZONING REPORT
Case No. 0106-01
Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 11,2006
~
~
CI.; =
..J e
~;
c.
... ..
= ...
= (J
(J ~
.. Cl.I
c..Q
c.
-<
!
I Applicant: Al Development, Inc.
I Owner: Same as applicant
i Agent: Naismith Engineering, Inc.
I
I Property Address/Area: 47.87 acres out of Lots 3 through 6, Section 21, Flour Bluff
I and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located 900 feet west of Airline Road and along the
i south side of the future Lipes Boulevard extension (County Road 26).
!
I
, From: "FR" Farm Rural
...
~
Cl.I
=
I:r
CI.;
c:.::
~
=
'j:;
e
N
To: "R-I B" One- family Dwelling District
Area: 47.87 acres
Purpose of Request: Proposed 214 single-family lots subdivision.
Existing Land Use Future Land Use
Vacant Low-density residential
Vacant Low-density residential
----.-,.-
Vacant Low-density residential
and Commercial
-"--~~---
Vacant Low-density residential,
Medium density residential
and Commercial
-~.._". "-"~--".
Vacant Low-density residential,
I Medium density residential
I
_..._.~ ----~- ..--
~
Cl.I
~
;J
'0
=
=
..J
'0
=
e=
~
=
'j:;
e
N
~
=
..
...
~
..
~
~
Zoning
Site "FR" District
North "R-l B" District
....-t:-'_...._'-
South "F-R" District
)..---- -----_.,-~-,.._---
'East i "F-R" District
, ---~------
West I "F-R" District
~ '"
c.=
e= e
:g~
~]
Q>
-<
Area Development Plan: Southside ADP - The "R-IB" District is consistent with the adopted
Southslde Area Development Plan land use map.
Map: 042031
Zoning Violations: None
Lomng Report
Case No. 0106-01 (AI Development. Inc)
Page 2
· Existing Land Use: The subject property is vacant land.
.
Density: Minimum lot area pennitted in the "F-R" District is five (5) acres and in the
"R-l B" District provides for a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet and minimum
lot width of 50 feet with a front yard setback of 25 feet.
c
~
c
c
=
r:rJ
<Il
ti::
~
....
rJj
.
Transportation:
.
Lipes Boulevard is proposed in the Urban Transportation Plan as a four lane
collector with a capacity of 8,250 trips per day.
· The proposed 214 lots would generate 2,140 average daily trips along the future
Lipes Boulevard extension (County Road 26).
. Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Compatibility. The proposed subdivision is
consistent with the Future Land Use Plan and the Southside Area Development Plan.
~
o
~
Street Type
Paved Section
Volume
2001
Not Available
i Future Lipes Boulevard Collector
i extension (County Road 26)
50' R.O.W. wi 20' Bk to Bk
I paved section
I (Planned 70' ROW wi 48' Bk to
Bk avin)
....
~
~
1000
-
r:rJ
<Il
~.s
ii':-5
VJ
i Subject property has not been platted. Platting will be required prior to development.
I
I
-= <Il I
~....
C ~
.... c
a c
c.o
~u
i
I No comments
!
Zomng Report
Case No 0106-01 (AI Development.lnc)
Page 3
c
,S
...
C':l
1::;
C':l (Ii
... E
rJj E
o
~
(Ii
~
Approval of the '-R-I So, One-Family Dwellmg District.
=
o
= '':
O!l ,9 oS
= r.I) ...
.- r.I) =
= ,- (Ii,
= ~ ~:
== 0 0'
U ~ i
(Ii
0::'
Approval of the "R-IB" One-Family Dwelling District.
fotl
"'-e
= (Ii
(Ii ...
E 'Ci:i
E ~
o (Ii
uO::
Number of Notices Mailed: 11
Favor 0
Opposition 0
(As of)
Attachments: Zoning Map
H:.PIN "DII~" SHAREf).(iA II . \VOl< D\ZONRPTS\2006\January\0 I 06-0 I CCREPORTdoc
F-R
Y()~1r
'" ~o~
. I\t 131.
~~
R-18
ALXI-KC-j HI
t:~R F..rm Rural District
RE Residential Estate Dist,icl
RA One FamUy Dw.lUng District
R.1A One Family Dwelling Oistrict
R.1B One Family Dwelling District
R-le One Family Owelin1l District
City of Corpus Christl, TX
~'-
; ',- - ,~ ,: ~ I
I '; :~ I ~ II ,~ _
., "",.... ....,.
~..' .
DelMrtmeftl of o.velopmenl Serwie_s
R-1B
F-R
........
F-R
26
'0
~
Wi
$1
.~<(i
I '
I
I /~.
L /'Qf!
--Q /
'-Ii
. SIl'
I ~ /
.,)9 !
'''I
!O~,/
/ /,
CASE ZQ;tlQe~Q~
I NOTECB .4.1
P. TH Townhouse Dwelling District
B-1 Neighborhood Business District
B.1A Neighborhood Business District
B-2A Barrier Island Business District
';.2 Multiple Owellin~ District
1.1A Tra'llel Trailer Park District
T .18 Manufactured Home Park District
B-2 Bayfront Business District
SO Corpus Christi Beach aesign District
~ .1e Manufactured Home Subdivision District
A-1 Apartment HOUH District
A~1A Apartment House District
A-2 Apartmenl House District
8-3 Business District
B~ General Business District
8-5 Primary Business District
AT Apartment-Tourist District
8-6 Primary Busineu Cor. District
1-1 Limited Industrial District
A8 Professfona' Office District
1-2 Light Industrial District
1-3 Heavy Industrial District
SP Special Permit
PUO Planned Unit Development
He Historical..cultural landmark Preservation
N
~
w~I'.~:.>11 ..I~E
L "::"-_,
....
s
o
250
500 Feel
I
MINUTES
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Council Chambers- City Hall
Wednesday - January 11, 2006
a 0 1 06-0 1
Al Development, Inc: "F-R" Farm ~Rural District to a "R-IB" One-family_Dwelling
District
47.87 acres out Lots 3-6. Section 21, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm & Garden Tracts
located 900' west of Airline Road along future Lipes Boulevard,
Adriana Trujillo presented the subject property with a powerpoint presentation describing the
property location with an area of 47.87 acres and existing land use shown being primarily vacant land
with a "R-lE" One-family District on the north side. The property is 900 feet on the west side of Airline
and is conslstent with the future land use plan.
The subject property has not been platted and platting will be required prior to development. Staff
recommends approval of the "R-l B" One-family Dwelling District.
In answer to Commissioner Zamora's question, Ms. Teniente stated that as part ofthe platting
process the applicant would have to provide adequate access. Future Lipes Road is due for completion is
solely up to the developers to extend that area.
Public heanng was opened,
There was no one in favor or opposition.
Public hearing was closed.
Motion for approval was made by Commissioner Braselton and seconded by Commissioner
Skrobarczyk. Motion passed unanimously with Chairman Stone being absent.
H:\PIN.nIJ< SHARED",CiAIL'.WOR[)\ACiE'IDMEM\2006\January\OI 06-01 Minutes Fxcerpt.doc
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION
BY AL DEVELOPMENT, INC., BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN
REFERENCE TO 47.87 ACRES OUT OF LOTS 3 THROUGH 6,
SECTION 21, FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND GARDEN
TRACTS, FROM "F-R" FARM RURAL DISTRICT TO "R-1B" ONE-
FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and
recommendations concerning the application of AI Development, Inc., for amendment to
the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday,
January 11, 2006, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday,
February 14, 2006 during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at
City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed
to appear and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve
public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus
Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended by changing the zoning on 47.87 acres out of lots 3 through 6, Section 21,
Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located 900 feet west of Airline Road
and along the south side of the future Lipes Boulevard extension (County Road 26) from
"F-R" Farm Rural District to "R-1 B" One-family Dwelling District. (Map 042031) (Exhibit
Metes/Bounds)
SECTION 2. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is
amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time,
except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date,
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is
amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance.
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance
are hereby expressly repealed.
SECTION 6. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of
Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi.
SECTION 7. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy
attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for
immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs
and (2) suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at
two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and shall take effect upon first
reading as an emergency measure on this 14th day of February, 2006.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Henry Garrett.
Mayor, City of Corpus Christi
APPROVED February 8, 2006.
~~
Assistant City Attorney
For City Attorney
H\LE G-DIR\garyws\garyws\agenda\2006\02-14\01 06-01 RegularZoning AI Develop.doc
Page 3 of 3
Corpus Christi, Texas
day of
,2006
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi , Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an
emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and
voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. IIwe, therefore, request that you
suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or
at the present meeting of the City Council.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Henry Garrett
Mayor, The City of Corpus Christi
Council Members
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
John Marez
Jerry Garcia
William Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
Melody Cooper
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
H:\lE G-DIR\garyws\garyws\agenda\2006\02-14\01 06-01 RegularZoning AI Develop.doc
21
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City Council Action Date: February 14. 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
A resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant from The
Morris L. Lichtenstein, Jr., Foundation in the amount of $244,000 to establish a Spay and
Neuter Program and to authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute an
agreement with the Foundation for that purpose
ISSUE:
I n an effort to reduce pet overpopulation, the Lichtenstein Foundation is awarding this grant
to the City of Corpus Christi to allow dogs and cats owned by Corpus Christi citizens to be
soayed or neutered at minimal cost.
Steady progress is being made in ordinance enforcement and education of the public on
responsible pet ownership. This Lichtenstein Foundation grant will give the City an
opportunity for an affordable spay and neuter program accessible to the general public.
This program will have a major effect on the animal population and on' the health and
welfare of the citizens of Corpus Christi.
Literature supports the fact that a vaccinated and spayed or neutered dog or cat is a
healthier, socially better adjusted animal. These animals are less likely to stray, display
aggressive behavior, bite, or scratch and to be abandoned by its owner.
REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Acceptance of the grant funds and authorization to
execute an agreement.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None.
FUNDING: There IS no match funding required,
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Recommend City Council to acceptthe grant
from The Morris L. Lichtenstein, Jr., Foundation in the amount of $244,000 to establish a
Spay and Neuter Program and to authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute an
agreement for that purpose,
dJ ' )
/JLr.u#:'. 1;, "i'~ ... _ . M )'11-
Annette RodrigueZ! M~.H.
Acting Director of Public Health
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Due to pet overpopulation in Texas, over half a million animals are euthanized
annually at a cost of over $20 million dollars. These figures do not include animals
that are abandoned and die from starvation, disease or trauma. Stray animals
represent public health threats through a variety of diseases such as rabies,
toxoplasmosis, plague, and parasitic infections. Failure to surgically sterilize (spay
or neuter) pets is irrefutably a major cause of pet overpopulation. The cost of the
surgery is prohibitive for many pet owners. As a response to these problems,
the Morris L. Lichtenstein, Jr., Foundation desires to make available to
the City of Corpus Christi grant funds for start-up costs and staffing
support for a one (1) year period.
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO ACCEPT
A GRANT FROM THE MORRIS L. LICHTENSTEIN, JR., FOUNDATION
IN THE AMOUNT OF $244,000 TO ESTABLISH A SPAY AND NEUTER
PROGRAM AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS
DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE FOUNDATION
FOR THAT PURPOSE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to accept a grant from
The Morris L. lichtenstein, Jr., Foundation, in the amount of $244,000 to establish a
Spay and Neuter Program and to authorize the City Manager or his designee to exe-
cute an agreement with the Foundation for that purpose.
ATTEST:
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Armando Chapa
City Secretary
Henry Garrett
Mayor
APPROVED: February 8,2006
h R. Hundley
Assi nt City Attorney
for the City Attorney
EHres176 doc
Corpus Christi, Texas
,2006
The above resolution was passed by the following vote:
Henry Garrett
Brent Chesney
Melody Cooper
Jerry Garcia
Bill Kelly
Rex A. Kinnison
John E. Marez
Jesse Noyola
Mark Scott
22
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PRESENTATION
AGENDA ITEM: Results of the 2005 Citizen Satisfaction Survey
STAFF PRESENTER(S):
Name
George K. Noe
Title/Position
City Manager
Department
City of Corpus Christi
OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S):
Name
Title/Position
Organization
Daniel J. Jorgensen, Ph.D.
Asst. Professor
of Public Administration
TAMU-CC
ISSUE: The City's annual citizens' survey has been completed and the results are
ready to be released. The purpose of the survey is to allow the citizens of Corpus
Christi the opportunity to confidentially report their attitudes toward city performance
in key areas.
BACKGROUND: This is the fourth consecutive year that the City has conducted the
Citizen Satisfaction Survey. The survey rates citizens' attitudes and perceptions
toward 41 service and quality of life issues ranging from police and fire protection to
keeping citizens informed about matters that affect them. New to this year's results
are scores that were translated to a 100 point scale to make comparison with the
National Citizens Survey (ICMA, 2005) and other jurisdictions more meaningful. To
arrive at the scale, responses were weighted on a 100 point basis. This year's
results show that 76% of the residents of Corpus Christi rated the overall quality of
services as good to excellent. This rating is up nearly 10 percentage points from last
year's survey results
The City contracted with Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi to perform the survey.
The complete results are under separate cover.
4~~
Ge6rge K. Noe, City Manager
Iii:}
--
......,
(/)
--
'- '-
Q)..c
1::U
Q) (/)
~ >u ::]
- - Q) ..c c...
E2:uQ
U::]'-U
Vl co I
Ul Q)~
::J C ID--
c.. Q) ~ Ul
Q-~ Qj
U~Q)>
U u--
"I- CC
OLnQJ:::>
~ 8 -0 ::E
-- N Vl ciS
U ro<e
--
u Ul
o ro
Vlx
Q)
~
>-
Q)
>
L..
:J
(f)
'-I-
o
Q)
If)
o
c..
I.-
:::J
a..
OJ
..c
..a-.J
U)
-c
~
ro
~
o
..a-.J
(J)
OJ
-c
::J
..a-.J
B
ro
. .
~b
OJ OJ
· !::::! u
:t=c
Uro
t:E
~o
~QJ
00..
I-
c
o
--
.;a...I
CO
Q)
L-
Cu ..cQ)
>-..Q ~ ~ .~
..w~ ros...
Q)19-o Q)Q)
'm 5 C Cl:I: Vl
(/) c.. ro .s u-
u (/) (/) (/) == _!2
== C~ :J.c u
.c ro ro 0 :::J,~
~ ~ a..:I: a.. UJ
U)
QJ
U
.-
c:
QJ
(J)
\l-
e
~
- c
~ iI)
0. c ~
i': ,!:;: g ~
~~(9W
IDo.o
.-
co
::l
0'
co
L..
QJ
>
o
>-
.....
.0
c
.s:::.
.....
C1>
>-
.n
"tJ
C1>
.....
.s:::.
Ol
'0)
:i:
r./J
C1>
r./J
co
o
,----
i
OJ I L.()
0
E '1 0
N
-- '1
l- i
I
-q-
0
L- a
N
OJ
> M
0 0
0
N
fJ)
OJ N ....
0 co
-C 0 ~
N
::::J
......,
-- ~
~ 0
0
N
<(
OJ co
- CJ)
0)
.c ~
CO -q-
~ CJ)
0 CJ)
-:::e. -:::e. -:::e. -:::e. -:::e. ~
> 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
CO co CD ~ N
LL 81QeJOAe.:l 0/0
-oJ:
<1>-
N ~
::: e
~<-'
c
c
<{
-0
OJ
.........
co
~
>-
-
.0
co
L-
a
> (/)
co OJ
LLU
--
\.i- >
o W
~(f)
--
-t=
co
:J
0'
L-
a;
c..
c..
:::>
<I>
-
to
a:::
J:
~
e
<-'
~ ~
lIltV :!2..
to. 0
...J> .q-
<I> C()
....
to C'0
0:::
\I-
o
~
<U_
.c U)
e"
::I c:
c: CD
_"'C
c:
c: 0
o Q,
;; U)
en CD
<U ~
::I
a
';!2.
; 0
<I> C'0
> ("')
-
1Il i"Y)
tV
..J
N 0
o C()
o
N
(W') co
o co
o
N
~ 0
o Q)
o
N
It) ('t')
o Q)
o
N
~
o
co
(j)
...--
~
o
co
CD
i..O
<.0
co
Q)
co
C()
co
('t')
Q)
-.
N
Q)
('t')
---
-.
.q-
."..-
.q-
---
co
(1)
~
co
CJ)
(1)
()
~
(1)
CJ)
co
()
"C
(1)
E
>-
()
e
(1)
C)
~
(1)
E
w
~
::::J
o
>-
e
e
o
......
()
(1)
......
o
~
Q.
(1)
~
LL
.0
6'
.q-
co
co
;!2.
o
CD
co
ex)
<.0
<0
<0
co
."..-
Q)
-.
("f')
<0
("f')
---
CJ)
(1)
()
~
(1)
CJ)
t
o
Q.
~
<!:
'::!2.
o
."..-
Q)
o
'::!2.
o
("')
("')
N
I
."..-
co
.q-
co
Q)
f'..
co
co
-.
f'..
<0
N
--
Q)
()
~
(1)
CJ)
CJ)
co
C)
C)
e
"C
>
o
~
0...
'::!2.
o
o
<.0
o
I
'::!2.
o
(j)
'o:::t
<.D
'o:::t
co
.q-
co
co
co
f'..
f'..
.q-
co
N
co
-.
LO
N
.q-
--
e
o
......
()
Q)
o
()
Q)
C)
co
..c
~
co
<.9
'::!2.
o
("f')
<.0
o
#-
CD
Q)
o
~
Q)
f'..
~
co
('t')
f'..
~
co
-.
."..-
N
.q-
--
-.
~
(1)
~
(1)
CJ)
--
~
Q)
......
co
~-
Q)N
......~
CJ)v
co--
~ ~
C)()
e .-
.- ~
:OQ)
> CJ)
o
~
0...
CJ)
Q)
()
~
(1)
CJ)
~
Q)
......
co
~
C)
e
"C
>
o
~
0...
#-
LO
~
'o:::t
#-
co
o
('t')
N
ex:>
<0
o
........
LO
co
o
co
co
......
e_
Q)LO
"C N
CJ)V
(1)-
~ CJ)
'to- "C
o 0
~o
~.r::.
- ~
co 0
::::J..c
0"' .r::.
- C)
ro Q)
~ c
Q)
>
o
-:J2.
o
ex>
v
LO
-:J2.
o
-r-
~
C"t')
-:J2.
o
LO
co
<.0
~
o
co
ex:>
~
N
(")
co
0)
<0
ex:>
<0
........
........
('t')
f'..
~
<0
ex:>
........
ex:>
........
-
........
Q)
("f')
-
-
N
ex>
(")
-
co
(1)
~
cu
~
::::J
o
>-
c
.-
CJ)
Q)
()
.-
~
Q)
CJ)
~
co
~
..c
--I
C)
e
()
~
()
Q)
0:::
C>> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
('(l to ('f) C'0 I"- a -q' 00 00 N a 00
~ Q) I"- C'0 N 0 ~ 0 co co 0 Q)
.c: >- 0
~ - <0 C'0 l"- I.{) ~ M ~ ~ 00 <0
t/) ('f) C") N N N N N N ~ ~
0 :a
... ...J
"
N ~ L{) co L{) <.D co Q) ~ co Q)
0 ~ N I.{) ~ L() <.D <.D I.{) (") (")
M
o
N
I.{)
~
C'0
co
~
L()
~
~
<0
o
r-
r-
r-
o
r-
0)
~
co
~
~
o
0)
~
C'0
C'0
~
~
~
~
00
I.{)
L{)
<.D
~
<.D
L{)
L{)
o
I.{)
(")
I.{)
It)
o
I"-
<.D
~
~
<0
L()
L{)
L()
N
r-
o
co
co
r-
r-
(0
0)
I.{)
N
<0
>. -..
L N -.. -..
~ r- eo
In Q) ~ ~ co
0 0. -- en M (")
a "'0 "'0 - -
C) -.. L- a
co 0. Q) a c: en
N LO c: E ..c: 0 E
(") L- L- ~ co
~ -- co ~ a ::s L-
~ +-' ..c - 0)
0 c: c: ..c: -.. a a
a .- .- r-
LL. co CJ) 0. L-
L- CI) 0) a. -..
,-. 0) E 0)
CU a c Q) (") E c I.{)
..q- a Q) c -
- a a a (")
..., t/) ('f) +-' +-' N co L- -
~ - -- en +-' co Q) "+- +-'
c: L- en u L- ~ co 0)
CD C Q) L- +-' co Q) c
~ a Q) c a..
~ en Q) L-
c: C L- a. u a..
.c 0 +-' a 3: 0. "C ::s ~ E
Q. C 0. -.. Q) a ::s
~ fn Q) I.{) a Q) en en ::s
! > E Q) ~ Q)
N ~ ~ L- "'0
Q) Q) ~ L- C Q) +-'
e '0 L- - L ~ "+- +-' co co
0. CJ) Q) ~ a en co ::s
... c: Q) 0. () Q) ~ c- O)
~ .8 Q) .- 0) a ~ u Q) Q)
E +-' co Q) +oJ "+-
E en L- "C -
- ~ a
:s L- Ox C 0. ..c: co co 0)
C) 0- +oJ ::s
c: U Q) co CJ) Q) c CJ) c
- L- - c- en a
.... Q) c - .-
c: CJ) "'0 Q) ~ c:
.C - ~ 0- -
0 .- c 3: - U "C 0
a. ~ c E ::s -.. co -.. Q) L-
Q) 0. 3: L-I.{) co > +oJ
fn L- c-~ +oJ C
~ CD > a Q)N L- e e
:s ::s Q) +oJ Q)~ a >~ ..c 0
a -, I C/) o:::~ I 0_ ..J 0- 0- ()
fJ) Q)
ro
-
.Q
-0 m
I- L() <D L() M N 0 t--. <D 00 <D
OJ 0 r-- <D <D <D <D <D L() an ~ ~
>
......, ~
ro c
~ :::)
~
0
fJ)
OJ OJ
u -
..0
--
~ ~
ro ..,
L- c::
OJ en :1
0 Q) E
(.)
l/) > c:: E ~
co 0
Q) ~ c:: (.) f!> 0
.- ...
"C Q) Q) en C)
- ... .s::: (.) Q)
-- C 0 .., c:: (J Q) 0
~ "C 0 CO c:: CJ ..,
:::> - .., c:: CO c:: en
.- c:: CO ...
:1 en .-
ro "C .- c:: ~
.c ... "C
~ ... Q) c::
0 ... .., 0
::J .., 0 c:: 0
c:: -
0 "C .- Q.
CO ... .- ..,
a - Q) Q) co (.) E
(.) Q. Q) .., E :1
C'G E ~ .., t.- el)
> .-
f!> Q) - "C ..,
1- ..... c:: ..... ..... c:: f!> C) C)
0 ~ 0 0 c:: c:: c:: -
OJ OJ 0 co 0 .- .- 0
u .., .- Q) .., ...., .., Q. ...
c:: .., c:: c:: ... CJ f!> ....
~ .- .- c:: .- Q) c::
~ Q) "C Q) Q) co .... >< Q)
E c:: C) E E Q. Q) Q) ~ 0
cu 0 c Q) Q) (J
0 U') Q) CJ .- Q) Q) ... ... C) f!> -
CJ .., (J CJ .... C co
(J .., f!> ..,
-I ... "C ... ... Q) .- Q) E
0 co 0 0 ~ Q.
..... co ... ..... ..... e - Q) .-
c:: 0 .., c:: c:: Q) Q) ... c
.., .., ....
w a:: c:( w w en z J: en c:(
Q) .... ';:/:2 ~ ~ ~ ~
.... ro 0 0 0 0 0
ro .... (j) CO 0 C\I
a: tn CD ~
.c ro> L{) N N 0 C\I
....
~ ..J . . 0 0 0
0 0 ~ L() L() C\I
'-
<-' N ~
N (") t"- OO (") ~
~ ~ ("') (") ~
0
~ <0 N t"- O
M L{) ~ ~ (\") L()
0
t"- ~ CO 0 L()
~ ~ C") ~ ~
~
0
It') I'- CO 0 N <0
0 L{) ~ ~ ~ ~
If)
Q)
-0 .....-...
(j) .....-...
0>
:::J 0 N
~ ~
-I-J '-'" .....-...
L() ~
-- C ~
~ 'I- 0 N .....-...
0 0- ~ 00 0
+-' ~ - .....-...
<( L- a (j) \f- 00
c: CI) ::J C C") "'C 0
s.... 0
.c .--.-. +-' ~ c: ~
(J) .-
1--1 Q) E!! +-' c co ~
c a 0
> J c: 0 (1) 0- (J) 0
.J:: c: CI) a - +-' - s....
- a co
-- 0 +-'
-I-J -I-J "'-" -c +-' u Q) c: c:
c: c: (1) - C) 0
~ CO -
0 0 (1) (1) 0 .- u
C. s.... C) a (J)
Cl -- +-' -
0 ... U) (J) co ..c: a co
U)
L- Q) CI) CI) ~ .c (J) ~ E
'- s.... :J co 0-
19 Z J (1) co s.... s.... c:
a z <.9 co I- <(
u
c
co
<J)
>
.-
+-I
.-
CJ)
o
a..
+-I
c
CO
u
ij::
.-
c
en
.-
(f)
..c
+-I
.-
s
fJ)
Q)
........,
CO
.-
1-
CO
>
o
u
CJ)
+-I
U
<J)
tt::: i f
UJ
<J) '~"i" · .;., ,
>
.- ~
+-I i.,
I ['" Hi;
CO l,~,
CJ')
OJ
Z
o
T'""
L()
o
~~OIDmmc~oucc
~, , , , , , , ,~OOOOOOCO 9EC-t=~m
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~uC E
~~~~80 g~~.~ g
Q) -o...u I >
CE LU L..
'-0 Q)
OJ: :5
o
Vl
:::J
a.
s...
o
U
c:
.-
~
OJ .-
~......,
(/)
CO .-
(J)L..
..c:
'-I-U
o
c:
o
.-
......,
a.
OJ
U
L..
OJ
c..
-&-J
C U')
__ c
--
Q) co
E Cl
__ co
~
u U')
\i- (J)
o E.
.C ~
.~ u m
tJ =>
._ CO -&-J
> -0 U)
CO OJ 12
Cl -eE
.~ $< 0
OJ '-'- ~
..0 ~ \i-
-0 >~
OJ ~ OJ 0
-l-lco..c\D
~ ",
o\.&.l.+-J>
0..>-0..0
OJ .+-J · - 0..
a=~~::s
~ 0.. 0 E
o OJ 0'
f"'-.,..r:. (V') Q)
,...... -1-1 0\:5
. .
en V) I -------
a.. , ~
,
C I <U
::J I ~ (/)
I- I cu :>,
~ 0 i (j) Q.) Q)i
! C ..... ~
I ~ ~ <U <U
I '- (/)
- :I: c <U Q)
fa (j) -0 ~ C
ill C 0 <U Q)
> :J ~ (1) >
~ ..., 0 . 0 0 0
.c
~ en '::R.
0
0
0
I- T""
-
~ >-
fa '::R.
fa 0
0
c CO
U)
'II- V) '::R.
0
0 fa 0
CO
- CU
CU a..
> C
CU ~
-I
.-
-C U
CU
C
> >. >.
<U >.
.- 0 <U <U
.- 0 0
CU +-'
CU () () -0
.C & 0
+-,
U en - 0
C i:5 ~ -E
I- m 0
0 CO a.. .0
..s::
CU 0)
- 'Q5
D- C z
Vt
g' 5
.- 0
~:J:
; ~
~E
~.c
fa .2'
~z
'I- Vt
o fa
- eu
eu I.
> III(
~~
-c .-
eu u
> C
.- .-
~ cu
I. c
:'.2
III(
r-~-' ._- --- - - .- ------.----,----
I
I
~
co
~ (f)
co >.
(/) <D
C ~
::) ~ ~
2:- co Q)
(/) -0 ~
Q) c 0 co
> ::) ~ (/)
0 . 0 0
~
eu
(/)
2:-
Q)
>
0'
~
0
~ ~ '"0 0
0
eu eu 0
0 0 -E
....... (.) 0 ~
u & .L) ~
"L: .r:::.
.......
(/) - 0)
is .:::tt. <D
L-
eu Z
((l a..
';:!2.
o
o
o
~
';:!2.
o
o
co
';:!2.
o
o
co
~
o
o
-.:::t
';:!2.
o
o
N
~
.-
u
"-
o
U)
c U)
o cu
.- cu
=~
cu_
I-a.
o.E
Ew
1-1
ra
...
cu
>
o
f/)
.-
tn
CI)
CI)
>.
o
-
Q.
E
CI)
>.
-
o
\t-
O
c:
o
.-
f/)
f/)
CI)
...
Q.
E
-
-
~
...
CI)
>
o
>.
:!:
o ;=,
g .ill
_~ U (j)
fu.~ 8 ~
> l.L (') w
111:30.
~
"<::5
c
.c
+-'
W
>.
.0
1:l
.$
.c
.2>
(l)
~
C/)
(l)
C/)
ro
o
I-~'~ I T
I
i
> OJ I
OJ ,
I I
I g en I ~ -:f2. ::$2
Ie rn I~
~.- I 0 0
Vl "(f) 0 !.,....-i 0'\ ~
(]J --- -----+-:-----
I
(]J OJ I
OJ
>- ~
Ol -:S2. ~ ~
0 ro
If) 0 0 0
.-
0 N v- I"-
e.. OJ
E ~
ro -:S2. -:S2. ::$2
~
OJ
LU -0 0 0 0
0 Lon M N
:E ,...... ,...... ,......
~
0 OJ ~ -:S2. ~
OJ 0 0 0
Vl L- Lon ,...... ~
Ol
c: <( N M N
0 >-
-
.- OlOJ -:S2. -:S2. ~
Vl c OJ 0 0 0
o ~ I"- M (V)
Vl ~Ol
V)<( V V Lon
(]J
---,~., -
~ OJ
e.. -
..c
E ro OJ
OJ U)
01 >
....... .- :J
""0 U) 0
OJ C
- 0 OJ
~ -t=
ro c..
OJ 0 U) :J
1- C OJ 0
<( ~ a:: u
""_',do'"
-c
Q)
-c
Q)
Q)
C '0
Q)
'0
Q)
1--1 CJ)
c:
......., +J
~
co J:
~
...c: +J
0
~ C)
.......,
0
Cl
1--1
Q,
~)
0) '-,
ru (j)
(/) ....
0:
"D (j; (j) m
~(j)ro >.
g'(nQ)(j)g'
oro"O~o
~ .~ 0 0)';;
cn02<!(J)
..0.0
~
~
:Q
c
..c
-
W
>-
.c
"C
Q)
-
..c
.2>
Q)
~
en
Q)
en
ro
U
(J)
OJ
U
--
.....,
u
co
i-
c..
(J)
(J)
OJ
c:
--
(J)
::J
co
~
--
u
---r'~-'~-i
Q) i -:R 1# ~ ~ ~
I
~ 1-", i 0 0 0 0
0 ::J 1T-4 T-4 T-4 N T"'"'I
Z lJ) 1M M M M N
I
.--- ---+ -"- ._.~.__._.,._- -~--,...--._-
OJ I
OJ I
I
1- I
CJ) -:!< I '::f< '::f< '::f< ~
CO
(/) 0 0 0 0 0
.- N ~ T-4 T"'"'I Ln
0 M T"'"'I N M M
Q)
Q) '::f< '::f< ~ ~ ~
1- 0 0 0 0 0
en '" L.f") 00 '" ~
<C M L.f") V" M V"
,.a...J
.-
OJ
, -E:A- E
I .-
X +-J >-
i
i CO (JJ Ul - (/) C
I L- C
I +-J ..c Q) .- OJ
i U ~ OJ
I 1- +-J N
S .- N
CO C: .-
..c .- ,.a...J
OJ ,.a...J OJ +-J .- ......,
OJ .- U
1- 'Q) .- - U c
<C ~ c..
I::J Ul U) OJ
(/) ,- L- a a OJ E
co "'0 OJ ......,
U) S E
OJ > OJ c.. (/) OJ
.- C 0 >
C "'0 ~ (/) ......,
U) co OJ u -
.- a Q) 0
Ul .- -
,.a...J ~ OJ ,.a...J OJ
::J a co co 1- (J) ~ >
19 t- .- c
c:c Cf) ~
+-J .-
Vl
C
o
.-
-1-1
CO
-
OJ
~
-
co
-1-1
C
OJ
E
c
L-
OJ
>
o
en
L-
Q)
+-J
C
........
~
--
u
~-~ ! I
I I
I
......., Q) I ~ -;R ~ ~
1-10 0 0 0
0 ::J N ,.....-I N 0
I~~ lJ)t~ rV- ~ U1
I EI
ro Q)
-
..0 -;R -;R ~ ~
-I-J
0 0 0 0 0
0 1- 00 (V') ~ N
Z 0- N N (V') (V')
l.1
I
:; -I-J I
ro
E
!
I
Q) I
- I
..0 ~ -;R ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0
1- 0 \D ~ 00
0- N (V') N ..-4
-
(/)
~ Q)
Ul -I-J --
-I-J
CO C U --
-- U
X :J 1-
C Q) +-'
0 (/) CO
0 ~ U -- (])
-- 0 1-
-I-J ~
U 0 (/) - CO
-- (]) 0
-0 1-
(/) Q) U 0 (])
.- -I-J (]) ..c ..c
1- CO
:J -I-J :J U +-'
~ CJ) Z CJ) 0
Ul
Q)
::J
Ul
Ul
.......
>-
U
--
o
c..
u
--
..0
::J
c..
1
(])I~
-0 :; I ~
Z(f)IN
I
-- . ---.i
I
E '
ra~
+-,..0 ;:R
o e ~
Zo..~
-. ---- -..
u
.-
-1-1
CO i
E I
(]J I
-
..c ;:R
o 0
1- (V')
a.. N
(]J
:::J
(/)
(/)
~
>-
U
.-
-
o
a..
(]J
-
..0
CO
-0
1-
~
CO
z-g
:.= · Vi
CO :::s
:::s 0
O..c
~
o
\.0
,......
~
o
~
\0
~
o
~
,......
..c
-I-J
~
o
1-
en
..c
u
:::s
E
o
o
I-
-::f2.
o
Ln
(V')
~
o
,......
(V')
~
o
~
M
..c
-I-J
~
o
1-
en
OJ
-
~
.-
-
o
o
I-
-::f2.
o
V
,......
~
o
o
,......
~
o
\0
'"
U)
en
c
.-
-0
-
.- C
~~
-I-JO
fij"E:
u ~
CO 0
>-0
OJ
C1
ro
CJ')
:::::>
-I-J
OJ
C
~
OJ
-I-J
C
~
~
.-
U
r--~ I~
:~I~
010 0 0
zl\O (J\ """
I N f'-. (J\
. ~-_...- r-r ~- -" .~----
~
V') I;:RI~
o 0 0
QJ ~ M \0
>- f'-. N
--
1-
QJ
I >
0
~
.-
U
QJ (]J E
E
..c QJ
0 +-J +-J
..c ..c (/)
>-
E +-J (/)
.-
~ .-
0 LL
1- V') I
\.l- V') .-
c $
0 V') (]J
.- V') C
......, Q) .- ~
(/) U (/)
(]J :::J .-
U U
:::J CO ..0
a +-J +-J ......, QJ
(/) (]) u (]) ..c
c:: :J c:: ......,
(/)
(]J ~ -0 ~ -0
U (]) c:: OJ (])
+-J +-J
U c:: 0 c:: (/)
<( .....-t U .....-t :::>
~~
>.-
.a; u
u ~
~.c
~-I-I
U)-I-I
-1-1::1
C 0
~.Q
-ace
c c
o 0
Q..-
U)-I-I
~ fa
~E
~.e
o c
::J:....
o
~D
1..0
~
~D
N
o
~I, I I I
i
~d
Ni . . I
i
~: . I i ': I I
I
, m I:' ! "I 'e I I
co
;~l,:,':"::: : eel ~
'~l : " I I I ~
I?f?.
'~
I"'-
L()
- j- i 1
cf2.cf2.cf2.cf2.cf2.cf2.'#.cf2.cf2.'#.'#.
00000000000
00000000000
. . . . . . . . . . .
00000000000
OO')OOt-c.oL()-.::tC0N~
~
Jue:>J9d
......~
~O
9'~
~
~0
\S' -It.
",
<?10
~
0
.~
~
~~
"..( CI.)
......Q ~
~ c:
CI.)
~ ~
", c:
0
-1..( +:i
n:s
Vv E
.g
c:
~O
.~
.~
~
~
~
.~
~
~
......Q
~Q
"-1t
~
q~
~~
~O
~
GJ
>
.-
GJ
U
cu
~
o
....
a..
~
cu
a..
A-
en
....
c
cu
-c
c
o
D-
en
cu
~
~
o
:c
~
.-
u
cu
.c
.....
.....
~
o
.Q
C
C
o
.-
....
fa
E
a..
~
C
.....
~
o
~
F"-
<<:::t
N
'Cf!-
~ I.;~:;:,.~
7
:::S2
o
~
~I
CO
N
'Cf!-
Ci")
~
_",.. c ~ ~.,.j
, ,~, ~
~. - "" -,}t.:,. ~
~ ~ ~'T "'" , .. a
<<:::t
F"-
:::S2
o
t-
t-
O
C") i
, ~' ,< ;
1> ~!i.-1"1 '~~"'kI!
"' ..It'~ ,~~,,4
~ _. .-......
~'
o'
L.()
.'_I.'t'" "~~<,:l\! "'.,..
~:iiii~~\~.;."" ," #,J.!;';'JlI
~
~'
CO
-::!2..
o '
F"-I
~I
CO i
L.()
'::!2. '::!2. -;::R '::!2. -;::R -;::R -;::R -;::R -;::R -;::R -;::R
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 m CO F"- <0 L.() ~ C") N ~
9c))
~
~
.~
$'..",
~
~10
~
0,..
.~~
<Y
1;-~
".(
""Q
~
~
-If c))
~
-1.(
""
IS' ..",
~
~O
.~
.~
~
~
~
~9.
.~
~-1;
~~
'@
..y
IS'~
~
~
d' ..",
~
q~
:y~
~O
".(
....
CD U)
.. CD
c:
--
CD ..
--
o c:
(".- ~ co
C,/) (J E
c .... ~
0 CO:I:
Q)
--
........ U)-c
C,/) CD c:
ClJ ~ CO
:::J Q) U)
CY (J~
C:<(
Q) "-
--
u 0
en CD
- C)
CO
CD
--
u=
0 0
eno
:.~
"~...',4
I..
....",/
......
,,'It""""
."
$-Ai'i-.1llfi
-
:~
~
,
,.....
4f....,
"""""
~:..) ;:-
\ "-
~' (f)
,~ l.-
... ......
..I, Q)
::>-
1) --
> c
.. .....-I
c:.::::J
, -0
~
c:
~CO
~-
(f)
,;" _C:
~r-
l'
t'i :
t~
,
.,J
<:1)