Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet City Council - 05/24/2011
1%110%1100111%ologlII AGENDA CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1201 LEOPARD ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 MAY 24, 2011 12:00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 4:00 p.m., or the end of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. !f you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject please present it to the City Secretary. Si Listed desea dirigirse al Concilio y tree que su ingles es limitado, habre un interprete ingles- espanol en Codas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office (at 361- 826 -3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Joe Adame to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Asst. Pastor Cindi Mutchler, Immanuel Fellowship Church. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States. D. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. Mayor Joe Adame Mayor Pro Tem Nelda Martinez Council Members: Chris N. Adler Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John Marez Mark Scott Linda Strong City Manager Ronald L. Olson City Attorney Carlos Valdez City Secretary Armando Chapa Agenda Regular Council Meeting May 24, 2011 Page 2 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) E. MINUTES: 1. Approval of Regular Meeting of May 17, 2011. (Attachment # 1) F. BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) G. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. if deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed; may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance; or may modify the action specified. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting; such agendas are incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. H. CONSENT AGENDA Notice to the Public The following items are of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and /or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. CONSENT MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES AND ORDINANCES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS: At this point the Council will vote on all motions, resolutions and ordinances not removed for individual consideration.) 2. Motion approving a service agreement with ByWater Solutions, of Santa Barbara, CA for Koha open source software installation of the Library integrated library system for acquisitions, cataloging, circulation and online catalog; based on best value, in accordance with Request for Proposal No. BI- 0105 -11 for a total amount of $59,600. Funding is budgeted in the operations budget of the Library Department. (Requires 2/3 vote) (Attachment # 2) Agenda Regular Council Meeting May 24, 2011 Page 3 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) 3. Motion approving the purchase of one (1) modular office building from Nortex Modular Space of Lewisville, Texas, in accordance with the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for a total amount of $130,595. This building will be used by the Police Department as the office for the vehicle impound facility. Funding is available in the FY 2010 -2011 Bond 2008 Fund. (BOND ISSUE 2008) (Requires 2/3 vote) (Attachment # 3) 4. a. Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to accept a grant in the amount of $70,031 from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to support the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. (Requires 2/3 vote) (Attachment # 4) b. Ordinance appropriating $70,031 in the No. 1061 Police Grants fund from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy to support the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. (Requires 2/3 vote) (Attachment # 4) 5. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to submit a grant application in the amount of $2,302,968.76 to the U. S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, for the COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) to hire 10 additional police officers within the Police Department and authorizing the City Manager or designee to apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. (Requires 2/3 vote) (Attachment # 5) 6. First Reading Ordinance -- Authorizing the conveyance of a tax foreclosure property described as Lot 2, Copps Subdivision, with street address of 1502 Tarlton Street, Corpus Christi (formerly Corpus Christi Osteopathic Hospital) to Del Mar College to promote a public purpose related to higher education and foregoing the City's share of property taxes due in the amount of $53,806.29 in addition to $11,112.22 in paving and demolition liens; authorizing the Nueces County Judge to execute a quit claim deed. (Attachment # 6) Agenda Regular Council Meeting May 24, 2011 Page 4 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary} 7. Second Reading Ordinance - Authorizing the City. Manager or designee to . execute a fifteen -year (15) lease with Del Mar College for the use of hangar, adjacent parking area, and office space located at the Corpus Christi International Airport for use in Del Mar College's Aviation Maintenance Technician Education Program, with an option to extend for an additional ten -year period; and providing for publication. (First Reading — 04/26/11) (Requires 2/3 vote) (Attachment # 7) 8. Second Reading Ordinance - Appropriating $600,000 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Passenger Facility Charge Fund No. 4621 to fund capital improvement projects at the Corpus Christi International Airport identified in the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Budget; changing the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 028995 to identify alternate funding sources for Airport projects. (First Reading — 05/17/11) (Requires 2/3 vote) (Attachment # 8) EXECUTIVE SESSION: (NONE) PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. In the event the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding office. J. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (NONE) K. REGULAR AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES: 9. Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a construction contract with Haas - Anderson Construction, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $6,259,588 for Bear Lane from SPID to Old Brownsville Road for the Base Bid Parts A, C, D, E, F, and G. (BOND ISSUE 2008) (Requires 2/3 vote) (Attachment # 9) Agenda Regular Council Meeting May 24, 2011 Page 5 10. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) a. Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring the results of the General Election held on May 14, 2011, in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas for the purpose of electing the Mayor, and eight Council Members. (Attachment # 10) b. Ordinance ordering a Runoff Election to be held on June 18, 2011 in the City of Corpus Christi for the election of Council Member District Three; designating polling plain locations. (Attachment # 10) L. PRESENTATIONS: Public comment will not be solicited on Presentation items. 11. Marina Market Days (Attachment # 11) 12. Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Study for Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (Attachment # 12). M. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 4:00 P.M., OR AT THE END OF THE COUNCIL MEETING, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. IF YOU PLAN TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURING THIS TIME PERIOD, PLEASE SIGN THE FORM AT THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, GIVING YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND TOPIC. (A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary.) PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT PROHIBITS THE CITY COUNCIL FROM RESPONDING AND DISCUSSING YOUR COMMENTS AT LENGTH. THE LAW ONLY AUTHORIZES THEM TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. MAKE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION. 2. RECITE AN EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. 3. ADVISE THE CITIZEN THAT THIS SUBJECT WILL BE PLACED ON AN AGENDA AT A LATER DATE. Agenda Regular Council Meeting May 24, 2011 Page 6 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. N. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ➢ Update on FY 2012 Budget Process 0. ADJOURNMENT: POSTING STATEMENT: This agenda was posted on the City's official bulleti board at the front entrance to City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, at :1S- p.m., on May 19, 2011. Armando Chapa City Secretary NOTE: The City Council Agenda can be found on the City's Home Page at www.cctexas.com on the Thursday before regularly scheduled council meetings. If technical problems occur, the agenda will be uploaded on the Internet by the Friday. Symbols used to highlight action items that implement council goals are on attached sheet. City Council Goals 2010 -2011 Bayfront and Downtown Initiatives Complete Utility Master Plans Conservation and Recycling Education Plan Comprehensive Economic Development Approach Street Improvement Plan Development Process Improvement Mary Rhodes Pipelins Phase II Water Plan Safe and Healthy Community Initiatives (Gang, Graffiti, and Physical Health Emphasis) Support Continued Military Presence 1 MINUTES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 - 12:00 p.m. PRESENT Mayor Joe Adame Mayor Pro Tem Nelda Martinez Council Members: Chris Adler Larry Elizondo, Sr. Priscilla Leal John Marez Mark Scott Linda Strong* ABSENT Kevin Kieschnick *Arrived at 12:15 p.m. City Staff: City Manager Ronald L. Olson City Attorney Carlos Valdez City Secretary Armando Chapa MayorAdame called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The invocation was delivered by Pastor Mike Fehlauer with The Summit Church and the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States flag was led by Council Member Marez. City Secretary Chapa called the roll and verified that the necessary quorum of the Council and the required charter officers were present to conduct the meeting. MayorAdame announced that Item 9 regarding the public hearing on Case No.0111 -01, Staples Development, LLC was withdrawn by the applicant. 9. WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT Mayor Adame called for approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of May 10, 2011. A motion was made and passed to approve the minutes as presented. * * * * * * * * * * ** Mayor Adame called for consideration of the consent agenda (Items 2 - 6). There were no comments from the public. Council Member Marez requested that Item 6 be pulled for individual consideration. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: —1— Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 — Page 2 2. MOTION NO. 2011-114 Motion approving the purchase of twelve (12) Chevrolet Tahoes from Caldwell Country Chevrolet, Caldwell, Texas, in accordance with the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for a total amount of $317,919.98. These units are replacements to the fleet and will be used by the Police Department. Funding is available in the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Outlay Budget of the Fleet Maintenance Fund. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Strong were absent. 3.a. MOTION NO. 2011-115 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept grant funding in the amount of $9,000 from the Texas Department of Transportation for the Click It or Ticket (CIOT) Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) for occupant protection enforcement overtime within the Police Department and to execute all related documents. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Strong were absent. 3.b. ORDINANCE NO. 029058 Ordinance appropriating $9,000 from the Texas Department of Transportation for funding of the Click It or Ticket (CIOT) Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP) within the Police Department in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scoff, voting "Aye"; Kieschnick and Strong were absent. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 029059 Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to submit a grant application in the amount of $175,000 to the U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of the Justice Program (OJP), National Institute of Justice (NIJ) for funding available under the Coverdell Forensic Sciences Improvement Grant Program to improve the quality and timeliness of forensic science and medical examiner services, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Strong were absent. 5. MOTION NO. 2011 -116 Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute Amendment No. 6 to a professional engineering services contract with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. of Fort Worth, Texas in an amount not to exceed $150,740 for a restated not to exceed total fee of $1,185,700.50 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Task 4 Corpus Christi International Airport Terminal Rehabilitation and Fede?l Inspection Station. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 — Page 3 The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Strong were absent. Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 6 regarding abandoning and vacating existing utility easements out of Parkdale Shopping Center. Council Member Marez asked staff to continue to keep the public updated on the timeline for work on Staples Street and Gollihar to alleviate traffic problems and improve the road. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 6.a. ORDINANCE NO. 029060 Ordinance abandoning and vacating a 6,548.51- square foot portion of art existing utility easement out of Parkdale Shopping Center, Block AR, Lot 2, located north of and adjacent to the Gollihar Road public street right -of -way, requiring the owner, Wal -Mart Stores, Inc., L.P., to comply with the specified conditions. (Attachment # 6) An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Strong were absent. 6.b. ORDINANCE NO. 029061 Ordinance abandoning and vacating a 467.53- square foot portion of an existing 10 -foot wide utility easement out of Parkdale Shopping Center, Block AR, Lot 2, located north of and adjacent to the Gollihar Road public street right -of -way; requiring the owner, Wal -Mart Stores, Inc., L.P., to comply with the specified conditions. (Attachment # 6) An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Strong were absent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Adame announced the executive sessions, which were listed on the agenda as follows: 7. Executive session under Texas Government Code Section 551.071 (1) to consult with attorney regarding litigation involving the rates charged by the city for ambulance services, with possible discussion and action in open session. 8. Executive session under Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding fire collective bargaining negotiations, with possible discussion and action in open session. The Council went into executive session. The Council returned from executive session. City Secretary Chapa read the motion for consideration as follows: Motion authorizing the City Attorney to settle the case style Cause No, 3- 10CV0233 -K The United States of American et al vs. The Cities of Addison et al, in the U,S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in accordance with the terms negotiated and agreed upon by the parties and further authorizing the City Attorney to pursue all available legal remedies in seeking damages from any party legally responsible for any Toss by the city. -3- Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 — Page 4 City Manager Olson explained that Item 7 is a legal settlement regarding the billing and collection of ambulance services. Mr. Olson reported that the federal government believes the City over - billed Medicaid therefore the City was over- reimbursed for services provided. Mr. Olson stated that through negotiations between the City and the federal government, a settlement of $300,000 was agreed upon and the motion authorizes the repayment to the federal government. Mr. Olson added that the motion also authorizes the City Attorney to seek legal action against the City's contracted billing company should the City suffer any loss. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 7. MOTION NO. 2011 -117 Motion authorizing the City Attorney to settle the case style Cause No, 3- 10CV0233 -K The United States of American et al vs. The Cities of Addison et al, in the U,S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in accordance with the terms negotiated and agreed upon by the parties and further authorizing the City Attorney to pursue all available legal remedies in seeking damages from any party legally responsible for any loss by the city. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Strong were absent. Mayor Adame announced that no action would be taken on Item 8 in open session. * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Adame referred to Item 10, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the public hearing on the following zoning case: Case No. 0411 -02, Rudy Sosa: A change of zoning from the "A -2" Apartment House District to the "AB" Professional Office District resulting in a change of future land use from a high density residential use to a professional office use. The property to be rezoned is Lawnview Annex, Block 4, Lot 15, located at the northeast corner of Marguerite Street and 18th Street, south of Agnes Street. Senior Planner Miguel Saldana referred to a powerpoint presentation including an aerial view; existing land use map; the future land use map; ownership map; and views of the subject property. Mr. Saldana stated that the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the applicant's request for a change in zoning from the "A -2" Apartment House District to the "AB" Professional Office District. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. Mr. Elizondo made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Mr. Scott, and passed. Mr. Chapa polled the Council fortheirvotes as follows: 10. ORDINANCE NO. 029062 Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by Rudy Sosa, by changing the Zoning Map in reference to Lawnview Annex, Block 4, Lot 15, located at the northeast corner of Marguerite Street and 18th Street, south of Agnes Street, from the "A -2" Apartment House District to the "AB" Professional Office District, resulting in a change of future land use from a high - density residential use to a professional office use; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan; providing a repealer clause; providing a penalty; providing for publication. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17,2011- - Page 5 An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, Scott, and Strong, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame referred to Item 11, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the public hearing on the following zoning case: Case No. 0411 -03, Jose G. Fernandez on behalf of Delia Fernandez: A change of zoning from the "B-4" General Business District to the "1 -2" Light Industrial District resulting in a change of future land use from a commercial use to a light industrial use. The property to be rezoned is Highway Village 2, Block 10, Lot 1, located at the southeast corner of Leopard Street and Robby Drive. Senior Planner Miguel Saldana referred to a powerpoint presentation including an aerial view; the existing land use map; the future land use map; ownership map; and views of the subject property. Mr. Saldana stated that the Planning Commission and staff recommended denial of the applicant's request for a change in zoning from the "B -4" General Business District to the "1 -2" Light Industrial District, and in lieu thereof, approval of the "B-4/SP" General Business District with a Special Permit and eight (8) conditions. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. Mr. Elizondo made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Ms. Leal, and passed. Mr. Chapa polled the Council fortheirvotes as follows: 11. ORDINANCE NO. 029063 Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by Jose G. Fernandez on behalf of Delia Fernandez (owner), by changing the Zoning Map in reference to Highway Village 2, Block 10, Lot 1, located at the southeast corner of Leopard Street and Robby Drive, from the "B-4" General Business District to the "B -4 /SP" General Business District with a Special Permit and eight- (8) conditions, not resulting in a change of future land use; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan; providing a repealer clause; providing a penalty; and providing for publication. An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, Scott, and Strong, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame referred to Item 12, and a motion was made, seconded and passed to open the public hearing on the following zoning case: Case No. 0411 -04, MBL Derby City Development, LLC on behalf of Mirabal Development Group, LC (Owner of Bass subdivision Block 28, Lots A and B), Morteza Shafinury(Owner of Bass Subdivision Block 28, Lots C and D), and Hazel Kay Frederick Monahan, in her capacity as trustee of the Frederick - Robertson Irrevocable Trust (Owner of Bass Subdivision, Block 29, Lots C, D and E): A change of zoning from the "R-1B" One - family Dwelling District to the "A -1" Apartment House District resulting in a change of future land use from a low- density residential use to medium - density residential use. The property to be rezoned is Bass Subdivision, Block 28, Lots A, B, C & D and Block 29, Lots C, D & E, located along the north side of Sandra Lane, east of Airline Road. -5- Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 — Page 6 Senior Planner Miguel Saldana referred to a powerpoint presentation including an aerial view; the existing land use map; the future land use map; an ownership map; views of the subject property; and site plan. Mr. Saldana stated that the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the applicant's request for a change of zoning from the "R -1 B" One family Dwelling District to the "A -1" Apartment House District. In response to Council Member Elizondo, Mr. Saldana reported that the apartment complex would have two (2) levels. No one appeared in opposition to the zoning change. Mr. Scott made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Mr. Elizondo, and passed. Mr. Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 12. ORDINANCE NO. 029064 Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by MBL Derby City Development, LLC, and Urban Engineering Representative, on behalf of Mirabal Development Group, LC (Owner of Bass Subdivision, Block 28, Lots A and B), Morteza Shafinury (Owner of Bass Subdivision, Block 28, Lots C and D) and Hazel Kay Frederick Monahan, in her capacity as trustee of the Frederick - Robertson Irrevocable Trust (Owner of Bass Subdivision, Block 29, Lots C, D and E), by changing the Zoning Map in reference to Bass Subdivision, Block 28, Lots A, B, C & D and Block 29, Lots C, D & E, located along the north side of Sandra Lane, east of Airline Road, from the "R-1B" One - family Dwelling District to the "A -1" Apartment House District, resulting in a change of future land use from a low - density residential use to a medium - density residential use; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan; providing a repealer clause; providing a penalty; and providing for publication. An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, Scott, and Strong, voting "Aye"; Kieschnick was absent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * MayorAdame opened discussion on Item 13 regarding Compressed Natural Gas. Director of Gas Operations Debbie Marroquin introduced the presentation team including Planner /Scheduler for Gas Department John Alexander and Assistant Director of Financial Services Michael Barrera. Ms. Marroquin referred to a powerpoint presentation including an overview; the history of CNG; grants; fleet; incentive pricing; photos of the gas stations; and the future of CNG. Mr. Barrera provided information on the RFP process for the service agreement. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: the advantages of CNG; whether FedEx and Coca -Cola have their own station or if the City is looking to market these companies; an explanation of the evaluation matrix criteria for resources, references, and certifications; local companies; licensing versus certification; and the length of the contract. MayorAdame called for comments from the audience. Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames, thanked staff and stated that CNG is the future and will be economical feasible and protect the environment. Mr. Alonzo also thanked the Council for continuing to put an emphasis on local preference. Fury Zaidi, Natural Gas Vehicles Texas, Inc., congratulated the City for moving in the direction of CNG and stated that Natural Gas Vehicles Texas will be a local company soon and looks forward to doing business in Corpus Christi. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: -6- Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 — Page 7 13.b. MOTION NO. 2011 -118 Motion approving a service agreement with Natural Gas Vehicles Texas, Inc. of Dallas, Texas for the conversion and up- fitting of vehicles from gasoline and diesel fuel to compressed natural gas in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0202 -10 based on best value for an estimated annual expenditure of $182,944.20 of which $45,736.05 will be expended in FY 2010 -2011. The term of the agreement will be for twelve months with options to extend for up to two additional twelve -month periods, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager, or designee. Funds are available in the Community Enrichment Grants Fund No. 1071. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, Scott, and Strong, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 14 regarding the City's self - funded employee health plan. Director of Human Resources Cynthia Garcia explained that this item is requesting authorization to enter into a contract with United Health Care (UHC) and Medco Solutions for third- party administration of the City's health and dental plan, for providing and administering a provider network, and stop -loss insurance and pharmacy benefit management. Ms. Garcia provided information on the terms of the contract with UHC and Medco; the current contract with Humana ending July 31st; the RFP process; the eight (8) proposals received; the evaluation team representation; the items evaluated; the unbundled approach; the finalists including Medco, Humana, BlueCross /Blue Shield (BCBS), and UHC and the assessments of best and final offers. Ms. Garcia reported that the evaluation team unanimously voted to recommended UHC and Medco to the Council with a cost of the contract over a two -year period estimated at $69,453,000. Ms. Garcia explained that the costs does not capture cost reductions that the committee and consultant feel certain will be gained by utilizing UHC's disease management program, Medco pharmacy management program, both vendors computer software systems, and UHC's network discount for facilities providing specialty services. Ms. Garcia introduced Randy McGraw with Crest Benefits Consulting; John Bass with UHC and Dan Milkin with Medco who were available to respond to questions. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: the estimated cost comparison of UHC proposal being $60,000 greater than Humana proposal; the cost to educate and train employees on a new program; the 3% reduction in total membership enrollment based on attrition; the cost of insurance premiums for city employees and whether there would be an increase based on the change; premiums based on utilization and plan design; the percentage of Medicare eligible retirees moving from the self- funded plan to fully insured plan; the term of the contract with Humana; if there are run -out charges associated with changing to a new program; run -out charges for Humana included in calculations for UHC and BCBS; whether there was a consensus of the evaluation team to make the change; whether charges will be incurred with the transition of providers; issues with physicians not taking new specific carrier patients; the significant savings with selection of Medco as pharmacy benefit manager; delaying the costs associated with run -off if there is no switch in providers; asking the City Manager to help Human Resources engage in conversations with Human to discuss improvement to the disease management program and achieve the necessary efficiencies should Council not support the change to UHC; real time information to help manage the plans; Humana's ability to provide real time data and the upgrade of the software system in June; the staff member that gathers real time data; whether both plans have account managers; employee concern with change; whether the Council could support Medco regardless which company is approved as health plan administrator; the time spent by the committee evaluating the RFP; examples of times where the City could have saved money with real time data; and the advantages of the UHC propoal. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 — Page 8 City Manager Olson expressed gratitude to the committee for their work and stated that the decision should not be made on the minimal costs difference but rather the ability to obtain real time information and the opportunity to manage the claims in a more effective manner. Mr. Olson added that should the Council decide to stay with Humana, there ought to be a provision that requests Humana to be able to provide real time data back to the City in a timely manner. Mr. Olson stated that staff is recommending UHC as the better choice. Mayor Adame called for comments from the audience. Andrew Grove, Large Group Practice Leader with Humana, thanked the Council for allowing Humana to service the City over the last seven (7) years. Mr. Grove provided information on the local Humana office, number of locations and employees. Mr. Grove added that the cost of changing includes the emotional anxiety to employees for changing insurance; more education by staff; and the internal work to implement a self - funded plan. Mr. Grove stated that the Humana's list of hospitals and physicians is the largest and there may be employees that could be disrupted with the change. Mr. Grove said that Humana has been a consistent partner with City and has held costs down. Mr. Grove also mentioned the national release of the new upgraded system. John Bass, UHC, stated that UHC is pleased to be part of the process and receive staffs recommendation. Mr. Bass reported that UHC is a stable national network and the business has changed from managing health care to preventing health care. Mr. Bass added that UHC has been providing real time data access for the last 10 years and staff would be able to access the data via the web. Mr. Bass provided information on the local office and references from local and other Texas cities. Mr. Bass stated that when comparing Humana and UHC costs over the five -year period without the run -out costs, the City would be saving $30,000 by selecting UHC. City Secretary Chapa announced that Council Member Strong would be abstaining from the discussion and vote on this item. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 14.a. FAILED The foregoing motion failed with the following vote: Adame and Martinez voting "Aye'; Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, and Scott, voting "No "; Strong abstained; Kieschnick was absent. 14.b. FAILED Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 -- Page 9 The foregoing motion failed with the following vote: Adame and Martinez voting "Aye "; Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, and Scott, voting "No"; Strong abstained; Kieschnick was absent. Mr. Scott made a motion to continue with Humana as third party administrator and Medco Health Solutions Inc. for pharmacy benefit management. The motion was seconded by Mr. Elizondo. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 14. MOTION NO. 2011 -119 Motion to continue with Humana as third party administrator of the City of Corpus Christi's self - funded employee health and dental plans, providing and administering a provider network, and provision of stop -loss insurance coverage and Medco Health Solutions, Inc. for the provision of the pharmacy benefit management portion of the City of Corpus Christi's self-funded employee health plan. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Strong abstained; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 14.1. regarding capital improvement projects at Corpus Christi International Airport. Director of Engineering Services Pete Anaya explained that this item is appropriating $600,000 and engage the professional engineering services contract with KSA Engineers for capital improvements at the Corpus Christi International Airport. Mr. Anaya referred to a powerpoint presentation including the consultant process and selection team; the project scope; issues to address; and project schedule. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: shifting the runway length and spending on the project prior to receipt of Federal Aviation Administration grants. There were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 14.1.a. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Appropriating $600,000 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Passenger Facility Charge Fund No. 4621 to fund capital improvement projects at the Corpus Christi International Airport identified in the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Budget; changing the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 028995 to identify alternate funding sources for Airport projects. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Scott, and Strong, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Martinez were absent. -9-- Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 — Page 10 14.1.b. MOTION NO. 2011-120 Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a professional engineering services contract with KSA Engineers, Inc., of Longview, Texas in an amount not to exceed $1,962,261 for the Corpus Christi International Airport for: • Task 1 Environmental Assessment for Relocation of Runways 17 -35 and 13 -31 • Task 2 Airport Geographic Information System. Analysis and Data Submittal /Upload • Task 3 Runway 17 -35 Extension /Displacement and Connection Taxiway Project • Task 4 Runway 13 -31 Extension /Displacement and Connection Taxiway Project • Task 5 Taxiway Utilization Study The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Scott, and Strong, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Martinez were absent. * * * * * * * * * * * ** Mayor Adame referred to the Item 15 regarding the Crime Control and Prevention District Quarterly Report. Police Administration Manager Pat Eldridge provided a brief overview of the continued focus on core programs; the assignment of 50 police officers; the FY2011 -2012 budget; and the budget calendar. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: concern with the elimination of the graffiti coordinator; the continued focus on graffiti; and how graffiti calls are reported. Mayor Adame referred to Item 16 regarding an overview of Parking Meter Program and proposed rate increases. Mark Denson, Parking Meter Supervisor, referred to a powerpoint presentation including a revenue comparison between the City of Corpus Christi and the City of Laredo; research; survey and comparison of other cities; primary model cities; photos of revitalization of Austin; three primary objectives; complete parking review; equipment; outstanding citation remedies; adjudication; the credit card meter trail; solutions; next steps; changes; the Parking Improvement Fund; the Parking Advisory Committee; and rate increases; the benefits of new program. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: Downtown Management Distract (DMD) support of the rate changes; benefit to expediting the program; plans to expand meters; concern with people not shopping downtown with the increase in rates; the number of outstanding citations and penalties; the creation of the Parking Advisory Committee; the effective date for the rates; whether there will be a mechanism in place to track the revitalization efforts; the directed parking program; whether additional employees will be needed; and the trial credit card meters. Council Member Scott requested that the DMD make a public comment supporting the proposal at the first or second reading of the ordinance. Council Member Scott requested a performa on a one (1) to three (3) year rollout of the program. * * * * * * * * * * * ** Mayor Adame called for petitions from the audience. Joan Veith, 5701 Cain Drive, commended City Secretary Chapa and staff for their work during the election and the accommodations made for election workers. Mark Cadena, 1049 Meadowbrook Drive, spoke —10— Minutes — Regular Council Meeting May 17, 2011 — Page 11 regarding the dangers on the beach with currents, riptides, and the undertow and the need for warning signs on the beach. * * * * * * * * * * * ** Mayor Adame referred to Item 17 regarding a status of the new Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant. Director of Engineering Services Pete Anaya introduced the presentation team including Director of Wastewater Operations Foster Crowell, Assistant Director of Engineering Dan Biles, Dan Leyendecker with LNV Engineering, and Rene Aguilar and William Causey with Carollo Engineering. Mr. Causey referred to a powerpoint presentation including project team; public involvement; milestones; phase 1 construction; headworks; aeration basins; secondary clarifiers; UV structure; aerated sludge basins; sludge dewatering building; schedule status; contractor behind schedule; schedule recovery plan; future milestones; and construction budget. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: language in the contract regarding the contractor behind schedule; whether the installation of a different pile design will affect the quality of the plant; inspections; and demolition of the old plant. * * * * * * * * * * * ** There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Adame adjourned the Council meeting at 4:27 p.m. on May 17, 2011. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 5/17/11 AGENDA ITEM: RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving a service agreement with ByWater Solutions, Santa Barbara, CA for KOHA open source software installation of the Library integrated library system for acquisitions, cataloging, circulation and online catalog; based on best value, in accordance with Request for Proposal No. BI- 0105 -11 for a total amount of $59,600. Funding is budgeted in the operations budget of the Library Department. ISSUE: The KOHA software will replace the existing automated software currently in use throughout the Library System which has become antiquated and cumbersome to maintain. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the motion. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of the contract as submitted. Michae '- arrera Assistant Director of Financial Services mikeb @cctexas.com 361- 826 -3169 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Background The City currently uses SirsiDynix Symphony automation software that is no longer functioning at the service levels required of the Library. The software is proprietary to the developer and has become expensive to maintain. KOHA open source automation software is a robust library system that is available through the Internet and can be downloaded free of charge. However, data migration, software implementation, configuration and system maintenance must be obtained from KOHA certified service providers. ByWater Solutions is a reputable KOHA service provider that has implemented many KOHA open source software solutions. Request for Proposal Process The City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) in March of 2011. The RFP solicited proposals from qualified companies capable of implementing the KOHA open source software. Three proposals were received and evaluated. An evaluation team comprised of employees of the Library and the Purchasing Division evaluated the proposals and scored them according to the responses received. The proposals were evaluated on cost, experience of the firm, experience of staff and compliance with the RFP requirements. The attached matrix reflects the scores associated with the evaluation of the proposals. As a result of the evaluation, the team has selected ByWater Solutions as the best valued provider for these services. ByWater Solutions received the highest overall score and is also the lowest cost provider. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER - Michael Barrera Request for Proposal No.:BI - 0105 -11 Implementation, Maintenance and Development of KOHA Open Source Software Evaluation Criteria Experience of Firm Experience of Staff Compliance with RFP Cost Total Score Maximum Score 15 25 10 50 100 ByWater Solutions, Santa Barbara, CA Equinox Software Inc., Norcross, GA LIBLIME, Bethesda, MD 13.25 22.92 9.67 50.00 95.84 11.65 13.50 20.00 19.58 8.97 7.50 46.67 31.34 87.29 71.92 Cost $59,600.00 $63,849.34 $95,083.00 ByWater Solutions CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This Contract for Services (this "Contract ") is made effective as of5 /16/2011, by and between the City of Corpus Christi Public Libraries of 805 Comanche St.Corpus Christi. TX 78401 ( "Client "), and ByWater Solutions LLC, of Santa Barbara, California 93109 ( "ByWater "). 1. TERM. This Contract shall be effective from 5/30, 2011 to 5.111, 2013 and shall automatically renew for two (2) successive two -year terms for a total possible term of six (6) years at the current, agreed -upon fee, unless either party notifies the other in writing within the last sixty (60) days of the then- current term of the intent not to allow this Contract to renew for a successive term and/or of their intention to modify the Contract. Upon renewal of this agreement, annual support fee increases will not exceed 5% per contract term. 2. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES. ByWater will provide the Client the following services (collectively, the "Services "): (a) Installation and Implementation of Koha Integrated Library System ( "Koha "), including migration of all data from legacy system to Koha. Training will be provided for a minimum of three (3) days after completion of the installation. Additional training will be provided upon request of Client. (b) (c) Terms regarding technical support for the Client are as follows: (1) Support will be available 24 hours. Support calls during hours in which the Client's facility is closed will be addressed by level of importance; i.e. system failure dictates immediate response time, training questions will be addressed within 24 hours. (2) The support package will also cover software updates and Koha enhancements that may be applicable to the Client 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES. In exchange for the Services the Client will pay ByWater according to the following schedule: (a) Installation/Data Migration: $37,Q00.00 payable in two equal installments as follows: 50% (18,500.00) payment due upon delivery oftestsystem, 50% (18,500.00) due upon completion and sign off of live system. (b) Annual support fee: $20,000.00, billed on or before 2Z1, of each year, beginning on 2L1, 2011. (c) Training: $2,600.00 for the first 3 days (24 hours) , $900.00 each subsequent day, due after the completion of each week in which the training takes place. 4. WORK PRODUCT OWNERSHIP. Any copyrightable works, ideas, discoveries, inventions, patents, products, or other information (collectively the "Work Product ") developed in whole or in part by ByWater solely in connection with the Services will be the exclusive property of the Client. Upon request, ByWater will execute all documents necessary to confirm or perfect the exclusive ownership of the Client to the Work Product. All such Work Product developed on behalf of the Client will be made available under the terms of the open source license in effect for Koha at the time the code is written (currently GPL v2). A copy of the code will be given to the Client even thoiigla the code may be hosted. A good faith effort will be made both by the Client, and by ByWater at the coding stage, to integrate all code into the public, kola- community ora code base, or wherever the public code base may subsequently be located. Upon expiration or termination of this Contract, ByWater will: (a) return to the Client all records, notes, documentation and other items owned by the Client that were used, created, or controlled by ByWater during the term of this Contract; and (b) assist Client in exporting data from ByWater's data cloud to Client, at no additional charge. 5. CONFIDENTIALITY. ByWater, and its employees, agents, or representatives will not at any time or in any manner, either directly or indirectly, use for the personal benefit of Bywater, or divulge, disclose, or communicate in any manner, any information that is proprietary to the Client, except (a) if and to the extent the information is already a matter of public knowledge; (b) such disclosures as may be required by ByWater's attorney or accountant (collectively, "Permitted Confidants "); or (c) such disclosures as are required by law or by any litigation between the parties hereto with respect to this Contract. ByWater shall also timely require each of its Permitted Confidants to keep that information confidential. Before making any disclosure required by law, ByWater, or the Permitted Confidant, as the case may be, shall give Client as 11. AMENDMENT. This Contract may only be changed, modified, amended or discharged by an agreement in writing executed by the parties hereto. 12. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. 13. NOTICE. Any notice or communication required or permitted under this Contract shall be sufficiently given if delivered in person or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address set forth in the opening paragraph or to such other address as one party may have furnished to the other in writing. 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Client may not assign or transfer this Contract without the prior written consent of ByWater. 15. BINDING EFFECT. This Contract shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties named herein and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PUBLIC LIBRARIES By: Herb Canales, Director BYWATER SOLUTIONS LLC By: Date: 5/5 /11 Approved as to form: -5- 9- zo ) r B L. $ Assistant rran Cfty Narvaez Attorney For City Attorney 7 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 05/2412011 Motion approving the purchase of one (1) modular office building from Nortex Modular Space of Lewisville, Texas in accordance with the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program for a total amount of $130,595. This building will be used by the Police Department as the office for the vehicle impound facility. Funding is available in the FY 2010 -2011 Bond 2008 Fund. (BOND ISSUE 2008) ISSUE: This modular office building will be used by the Police Department as the office for the vehicle impound facility. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Ali contracts exceeding $50,000 must be approved by City Council. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of the contract as submitted. Michael Barrera Assistant Director of Financial Services mikeb @cctexas.com 361 -826 -3169 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project Description: On November 4, 2008, voters approved Bond Issue 2008 Package, under Proposition No. 3, which provided for $2.7 million to construct a new vehicle impound lot. Phase! of that package was approved by City Council on July 20, 2010 with reference made to awarding a modular office building at a later date. This modular office building will be used by police personnel in the day -to -day operations of the vehicle impound lot. The modular office building is approximately 70' long by 30' wide, with four offices, 2 bathrooms and a secured teller area from which to conduct business with the general public. Award Basis: The modular office building will be purchased through the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program, which complies with all Texas statutes regarding competitive bidding requirements. State of Texas Multiple Award Schedules Contract Number TXMAS -4- 56060. Price Comparison: There is no previous buy history for a modular office building, thus, no price comparison can be made. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: PAUL_ PIERCE Item BID TABULATION BI- 01147 -11 MODULAR OFFICE BUILDING No. Description 1. Nortex Modular Office Building including Setup, Installation, Decks, Steps and Ramps TXMAS Contract Number TXMAS -4 -56060 TOTAL: LEAD TIME: Qty Unit 1 each Nortex Modular Space Lewisville, TX Unit Totaf Price Price $130,595.00 $130,595.00 6 -8 weeks Si 30,595.00 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 05124/2011 AGENDA ITEM: A. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant in the amount of $70,031 from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to support the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. B. Ordinance appropriating $70,031 in the No. 1061 Police Grants fund from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy to support the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: The Office of National Drug Control Policy provides funding each year for the City to participate in the Texas Coastal Corridor High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Initiative (HIDTA). REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Accepting the grant awards and appropriating the funds. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting the grant awards and appropriating the funds. Attachments: Grant award documents 7.) D. Troy Riggs Chief of Police troyr( cctexas.com 886 -2603 BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Corpus Christi Police Department is in the 15th year as a participant in the Texas Coastal Corridor High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Initiative created by the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy. The grant provides for the salary and benefits of a full -time program coordinator, one administrative assistant, overtime for 4 Corpus Christi Police Officers, and 4 lease vehicles. The program focuses on this specific geographic area because it serves as a conduit for narcotics into Corpus Christi and other metropolitan cities as well as a location for money launderers to conduct illegitimate businesses with a consumer base that affects the local population with residual crime. Other agencies participating are the Nueces County Sheriff, Texas Department of Public Safety, Drug Enforcement Administration, Internal Revenue Service, U. S. Customs, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. The initiative focuses on the identification and disruption of narcotics trafficking organizations operating in the counties of Aransas, San Patrick), Refugio, Nueces, Kleberg, Kenedy, Jim Wells, Brooks, and Victoria. It is anticipated that shipments of narcotics through this area will be disrupted and long entrenched families of narcotics traffickers will be apprehended. The profits from the sales of narcotics will be identified and seized and the intelligence gathered will be downloaded and shared with other Drug Trafficking Initiatives across the country. This grant award is for the time period 01/01/2011 — 12/31/2012. There are no matching funds required. There will be a second award within the next 60 days to bring the total budget to $166,740. This will also be brought before City Council for acceptance and appropriation. Executive Office of the President Office of National Drug Control Policy Grant Agreement Page 1 of 5 1. Recipient Name and Address Chief Bryan Smith D. TP0`{ Rt665 Corpus Christi Police Department 321 John Sartain Street Corpus Christi, TX 78403 4. Award Number: G11HN0008A 5. Grant Period: From 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 IA. Recipient IRS/Vendor No.: 1746000574A5 6. Date: 3/11/2011 Subrecipient Name and Address 8. Supplement Number 7. Action Initial Supplemental 2A. Subrecipient IRSNendor No.: 9. Previous Award Amount: 3. • Project Title Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative 10. Amount of This Award: $70,031 11. Total Award: $70,031 12. Consistent with Public Law 111 -322, the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, this document provides a total budget and spending ceiling as reflected in Block 10 of the Grant Award document, which represents funding at the rate of 42% of the fiscal year 2010 funding level. Accordingly, the sum of all budgets cannot exceed the award amount reflected in Block 10 of the Grant Award document. The Office of National Drug Control Policy acknowledges that the aforementioned funding level is below the stated budget requirements; however, additional funding cannot be made available until enacted through public law. 13. Statutory Authority for Grant: Public Law 111 -322 14. Typed Name and Title of Approving Official Michael K. Gottlieb Acting National HIDTA Director 15. Typed Name and Title of Authorized Official 1). e 3-; 665 Corpus Christi Police Department 16. Signature of Approving ONDCP Official 17, Signature of Authorized Recipient/Date 18. Accounting Classification Code DUNS: 069457786 EIN: 1746000574A5 19. HIDTA AWARD OND10B3SE1112 OND2000000 004101 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $70,031 IN THE NO. 1061 POLICE GRANTS FUND FROM THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY TO SUPPORT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S ROLE IN THE TEXAS COASTAL CORRIDOR INITIATIVE IN THE HOUSTON HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $70,031 is appropriated in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy to support the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council Members, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs; and, (2) suspends that Charter rule which requires an ordinance to be considered and voted upon at two regular meetings, so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect as an emergency measure upon its first reading, this the day of May, 2011. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa, City Secretary Joe Adame, Mayor Approved as to form: May 11, 2011 T. Tri a l ang Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Corpus Christi, Texas day of , 2011 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott Linda Strong 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 05/2412011 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application in the amount of $2,302,968.76 to the U. S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, for the COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) to hire 10 additional police officers within the Police Department and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. ISSUE: Funds are available through the Department of Justice for the hiring and rehiring of additional career Iaw enforcement officers. The grant application is due May 25 and requires City Council action prior to submission. BACKGROUND: The COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) is a competitive grant program designed to address the full -time sworn officer needs of state, local, and tribal Iaw enforcement agencies nationwide. CHRP provides funding directly to Iaw enforcement agencies to hire new and/or rehire career law enforcement officers in an effort to create and preserve jobs, and to increase their community policing capacity and crime- prevention efforts. • CHRP grants will provide 100 percent funding for approved entry -level salaries and fringe benefits of full -time officers for 36 months of grant funding. ■ There is no local match requirement for CHRP; however, grant funding requests must be based on the current full -time entry-level salary and fringe benefits package of an officer. • Grantees must retain all sworn officer positions awarded under the CHRP grant for a minimum of 12 months following the 36 -month grant period. The retained CHRP - funded position(s) should be added to the grantee's Iaw enforcement budget with state and /or local funds, over and above the number of locally-funded positions that would have existed in the absence of the grant. • Officers will be used to enhance our community policing capabilities. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval to submit the grant. FUNDING: There is no required local cash match. The grant will only pay for entry level salaries for officers and the City must pay for the academy costs estimated $264,424. The academy will begin August 2012 and the officers will graduate January 2013. The grant will pay 100% for 3 years with the City assuming funding in January 2016, estimated annual cost $816,970. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends submitting the grant. D. Troy Rig Chief of Police 886 -2603 Trovr@cctexas.com cctexas.com RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,302,968.76 TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, COPS OFFICE, FOR THE COPS HIRING RECOVERY PROGRAM (CHRP) TO HIRE 10 ADDITIONAL POLICE OFFICERS WITHIN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO APPLY FOR, ACCEPT, REJECT, ALTER OR TERMINATE THE GRANT. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. The City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to submit a grant application in the amount of $2,302,968.76 to the U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, for the COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) to hire 10 additional police officers within the Police Department. SECTION 2. The City Manager, or his designee, may apply for, accept, reject, agree to alter the terms and conditions, or terminate the grant, if the grant is awarded to the City. SECTION 3. In the event of the loss or misuse of the U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office funds, the City of Corpus Christi assures that the funds will be returned to the U.S. Department of Justice COPS Office in full. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved as to form: May 11, 2011 T. Tr - ► . ng Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2011 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott Linda Strong Resolution Vote Sheet —39— 1 6 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: May 24, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a Tax foreclosure property described as Lot 2, Copps Subdivision, with street address of 1502 Tarlton Street, Corpus Christi (formerly Corpus Christi Osteopathic Hospital) to Del Mar College to promote a public purpose related to higher education and foregoing the City's share of property taxes due in the amount of $53,806.29 in addition to $11,112.22 in paving and demolition liens; authorizing the Nueces County Judge to execute a Quit Claim Deed. ISSUE: The property located at 1502 Tarlton Street was foreclosed on for failure to pay ad valorem taxes. A public auction was held in February 2011 in which no bids were received. As a result, the property was struck off to the various taxing entities to be held in trust until a future sale is held. Del Mar College has expressed an interest in the property for use in expanding their educational programs. They have sent a request to all the taxing entities asking them to forego the taxes owed on the property and to convey their title and interest in the property to Del Mar College. Any sale of City property or conveyance of property rights requires approval by City Council. FUNDING: No funding is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. Pete Anaya, P.E. Director of Engineering 826 -3781 petean(a)cctexas.com Additional Support Material: Exhibit A Background Information Exhibit B Location Map Exhibit C Analysis of Bid Received for Tax Resale Property Exhibit D Ordinance H:IHOMEIEUSEBIOGIGEN Agenda Items\Saie of 1502 TarltonlAgenda Memorandum.doc BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: 1502 Tarlton Street, Corpus Christi, Texas Conveyance of Property Interest to Del Mar College BACKGROUND: The property located at 1502 Tarlton Street, Corpus Christi was foreclosed on by the Nueces County taxing entities for failure of the property owners to pay ad valorem taxes. A Tax Sale was held in February 2011 at the Nueces County Courthouse by the Sheriffs Department. No bids were received and the property was struck off to Nueces County, Trustee on behalf of Del Mar College, Nueces County, City of Corpus Christi, and Corpus Christi Independent School District, jointly. A Sheriffs Tax Deed has been issued to Nueces County, Trustee and recorded under Document No. 20111011490 in the Nueces County Deed Records. Del Mar College has expressed an interest in the property to develop it into an educational facility. The subject property is located one block west of their East Campus as shown on the attached Exhibit B. They have sent a request to the other three taxing entities asking that they convey theft title and interest in the property to the college and to relinquish or forego their share of the taxes owed. If all agree, Del Mar College would take sole title to the property. The property is currently vacant and in need of major repair. The concrete masonry building is approximately 48,760 square feet in area and is situated on 3/9 acres of land. This former site of the Corpus Christi Osteopathic Hospital is on the Nueces County Tax rolls at an assessed value of $215,000. On March 26, 2009, the Building Standards Board (BSB) met and ordered the demolition of the west wing of the building. Mr. Ronald A. Voss, Sr, co- owner, requested that the City Council hear and consider an appeal of the BSB's decision ordering the demolition. On June 23, 2009, a public hearing was held during the City Council session which resulted in a decision to enter into an agreement with the owners which would modify the BSB order and allow an extension of time to repair or demolish the west wing of the building. The agreement contained thirteen (13) conditions which were to be met by May 31, 2010. The conditions were not met and the west wing of the building remains in violation of the BSB order. Since the property has been struck off to Nueces County, Trustee, current maintenance of the property is the responsibility of all four taxing entities. The total amount due to the four taxing entities as of May 1, 2011 is $266,409.48 as shown on the attached Exhibit C. This total also includes $11,112.22 due to the City for paving/demo liens. The total amount due to the City alone as of May 1, 2011 is $64,918.51 of which $53,806.29 is for the tax portion and $11,112.22 is for the paving/demo lien portion. The City is being asked to forego this amount. EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 2 —44— City Council approval is requested to 1) convey the City's undivided interest in the property to Del Mar College by means of a Quitclaim Deed, 2) forego its share of property taxes and paving /demo liens, and 3) to allow the City Manager or his designee to execute any closing and/or transfer documents, as necessary. PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. April 121 2011 - Ordinance authorizing the resale of property located a 4602 Surfside Blvd. for $20,000 which was foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, of which the City shall receive $5,041.29; and declaring an emergency. (Ordinance No. 0289016). 2. March 29, 2011 — Ordinance authorizing the resale of eight (8) properties for $25,300 which were foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, of which the City shall receive $2,885.19, plus $1,476.35 for partial payment of City paving and demolition liens; and declaring an emergency. (Ordinance No. 029014) 3. June 23, 2009 - Public Hearing for City Council's consideration of an appeal by Ronald A. Voss, Sr., of the Building Standards Board decision to require demolition of the west wing of the structure located at Lot 2, Copps Addition, commonly known at 1502 Tarlton Street. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: None H:IHOME\EUSEBIOGIGENAAgenda Items\Sale of 1502 Tarlton\Background.doc EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 2 —45— File : \ Mproject \councilexhibits\exh3390C.dwg LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 1502 Tarlton Street City of Corpus Christi, Texas -4 6 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: 7 of 1 DATE: 4 -26 -2011 ANALYSIS OF BID RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY 02- 1091 -G; Nueces County vs. Dykeswill LTD, et al 1772- 0000 -0020; Lot 2, Copps Addition 1502 Tarlton St. - Corpus Christi Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Bid: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: Entity Name December 7, 2010 266,409.48 2,109.50 215,000.00 0.00% 0.00% Nueces County Nueces County Education District City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Independent School District Del Mar College City Paving & Demo Liens Amount Due Each Entity 50,439.15 _ 53, 806.29 131,242.48 19,809.34 11,112.22 Amount You Will Receive THIS IS THE SITE OF THE FORMER CORPUS CHRIST! OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL. THE LOT IS 290 FEET BY 540 FEET, AT THE CORNER OF TARLTON AND FIG ST. THE BUILDING IS ABOUT 49,000 SQ. FT., CONSTRUCTED OF MASONRY BLOCK ON SLAB FOUNDATION WITH A FLAT ROOF, IN EXTREMELY POOR CONDITION.. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS DEL MAR COLLEGE OF CORPUS CHRISTI EXHIBIT C —47— AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A TAX FORECLOSURE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, COPPS SUBDIVISION, WITH STREET ADDRESS OF 1502 TARLTON STREET, CORPUS CHRISTI (FORMERLY CORPUS CHRISTI OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL) TO DEL MAR COLLEGE TO PROMOTE A PUBLIC PURPOSE RELATED TO HIGHER EDUCATION AND FOREGOING THE CITY'S SHARE OF PROPERTY TAXES DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $53,806.29 IN ADDITION TO $11,112.22 IN PAVING AND DEMOLITION LIENS; AUTHORIZING THE NUECES COUNTY JUDGE TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED. WHEREAS, the taxing authorities hold in trust Lot 2, Copps Subdivision, with street address of 1502 Tarlton Street, Corpus Christi (formerly Corpus Christi Osteopathic Hospital) (the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Property is located one block from the East Campus of Del Mar College and Del Mar College desires to acquire the Property to promote a public purpose related to higher education; WHEREAS, the Building Standards Board ordered demolition of the west wing of the building located on the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the governing body of the City of Corpus Christi hereby authorizes the conveyance of the Property, described as Lot 2, Copps Subdivision, with street address of 1502 Tarlton Street, Corpus Christi (formerly Corpus Christi Osteopathic Hospital) to Del Mar College to promote a public purpose related to higher education and the foregoing of the City's share of property taxes due in the amount of $53,806.29 in addition to $11,112.22 in paving and demolition liens. SECTION 2. That the Nueces County Judge is authorized to execute a Quit Claim Deed for the Property. EXHIBIT D Page 1 of 2 —48— That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2011, by the following vote: Joe Adame John E. Marez Chris N. Adler Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick Linda Strong Priscilla Leal That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2011, by the following vote: Joe Adame John E. Marez Chris N. Adler Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick Linda Strong Priscilla Leal PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2011. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary Joe Adame Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: , 2011. By: Brian Narvaez Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney -49- EXHIBIT D Page 2 of 2 7 - - 1st Reading - 4/26/11 2nd Reading - 5/24/11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 04/26/2011 AGENDA ITEM: A. First Reading Ordinance - Authorizing the City Manager, or his Designee, to execute a 15 year lease with Del Mar College for the use of hangar, adjacent parking area, and offices space located at the Corpus Christi International Airport for use in Del Mar College's Aviation Maintenance Technician Education Program, with an option to extend for an additional ten year period; providing for severance; and providing for publication. B. First Reading Ordinance - Amending Project Description Sequence 11, Rehabilitation East General Aviation (GA) Apron, in the Airport CIP and Project 6 in the Airport Long - Range CIP of the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide, adopted on March 8, 2011 by Ordinance No. 028995 by revising the description of the East General Aviation (GA) Apron Project; and providing for severance. ISSUE: The Corpus Christi International Airport has reached an agreement with Del Mar College for a lease on Airport property to construct improvements for use in Del Mar College's Aviation Maintenance Education. Preliminary plans call for the rehabilitation of 14,000 square feet of hangar space, 2,440 square feet of office space and 26,000 square feet of parking lot and access Zane area. Additionally, approximately 600 Square feet of land adjacent to the hangar will be used to construct additional office space. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve as presented. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: N/A CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: in the meeting of April 20, 2011 the Airport Board recommended approval of the Business Terms & Conditions of the proposed Lease Agreement and improvements. Fred Segundo, A.A.E Director of Aviation freds @cctexas.com 361.289.0171 x1216 Attachments Lease Agreement wfExhibits A, B & C and Attachments 1 & 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. The Corpus Christi International Airport has reached an agreement with Del Mar College for a lease on airport property to construct improvements for use in Del Mar College's Aviation Maintenance Education. Preliminary plans call for the rehabilitation of 14,000 square feet of hangar space, 2,440 square feet of office space and 26,000 square feet of parking lot and access lane. Additionally, the lease will also include approximately 600 square feet of land adjacent to the hangar that will be used to construct additional office space. Estimated cost of improvements to the hangar, office space, parking lot/access lane, and additional office space and associated equipment, are approximately $941,270. Del Mar College has agreed to, but not limited to, the following: 1. To develop the Aviation Maintenance Technical Training Facility at the Corpus Christi International Airport which will house portions of the Aviation Maintenance Technician Training Program; 2. To invest at least $941,270 in the renovation of the hangar, including instructional equipment and furnishings; 3. Provide all appropriate insurance required for the facility and its operations; 4. At its own expense, be responsible for all utilities for the leased premises; 5. At its own expense, make all repairs and replacements necessary to keep premises in first class condition; 6. Agrees to sublease office and hangar space to the Civil Air Patrol and occasionally allow use of premises by non - profit education organizations for aviation education related activities; 7. Agrees to allow premises to be used for emergency air evacuation operations in the event of manmade or natural disasters. The Airport will cooperate and assist Del Mar College with final design and construction management of the improvements. Del Mar College will administer design and construction; bidding, awarding and construction management for the improvements. The primary infrastructures, including utilities, are already in place and will help expedite the construction timeline. The improvements are anticipated to begin July 2011 and be completed by December 2011. The leased premises are located on the east side of International Drive between East Glasson Road and the North General Aviation Ramp as depicted in Attachment 1 of the Lease Agreement. The hangar was built in 1967 by private investors and reverted back to the Airport in 1987. Since 1987, the Airport has owned and used the hangar as a vehicle and airfield maintenance facility until it was vacated in October 2010 when a new Airfield Maintenance facility was completed. The hangar is missing the hangar door and is in need of major repairs before it can be utilized for aeronautical activities. Although Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grant assurances require airports to maintain a fee and rental structure for facilities and services in order to make the airport as self - sustaining as possible, FAA Order 5190.6B, Airport Compliance Manual, Section 17.16, allows for nominal rents less than fair market value for aeronautical secondary and post secondary, education programs conducted by accredited institutions to the extent that civil aviation receives reasonable tangible or intangible benefits from such use. The education of students to perform FAA mandated maintenance on Commercial, General Aviation and Military Aircraft does result in tangible and intangible benefits to civil aviation. So long as Lessee uses the entire Premises solely for Lessee's Aviation Maintenance post- secondary education program, annual rent for the premises shall be $1.00 per year, the payment of which is due on January 1 of each year. Additionally, an on- airport facility housing the Aviation Maintenance Technician Training Program will help the airport market and attract potential future aviation maintenance related businesses and industries. B. Amendment of project description sequence 11, Rehabilitate East General Aviation (GA) Apron and Project 6 in the Airport Long Range CIP of FY 210- 2011Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide will revise Year 3 (FY 2012 -2013) and make clear that the North Ramp will be part of the overall rehabilitation of the Eastside Ramps. Although funding will not have to be appropriated until FY 2012 -2013, the intent is to design the rehabilitation of the North Ramp using FAA Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) funding at 95% and Airport funds at 5% in FY 2012 -2013 and FY2014. It is our intent to design the North Ramp with weight limits to accommodate narrow body aircraft (i.e.737 and MD -80 series) in case Del Mar College does acquire such aircraft for their Aviation Maintenance Technician Education Program or the airport is successful in attracting private industry to establish a Maintenance, Repair & Overhaul (MRO) facility adjacent to the North Ramp. Del Mar College will have non - exclusive use of the 450 feet x 200 feet public use aircraft ramp located adjacent to the hangar. Del Mar College understands that the airport has plans to rehabilitate the public ramp subject to FAA Airport Capital improvement Program (ACIP) funding. The rehabilitation will include strengthening of pavement, installing aircraft tie -downs and installing energy efficient LED apron lights. The rehabilitation of the public ramp is being undertaken to benefit existing and future tenants and users of the North Ramp. ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE A 15 YEAR LEASE WITH DEL MAR COLLEGE FOR THE USE OF HANGAR, ADJACENT PARKING AREA, AND OFFICES SPACE LOCATED AT THE CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FOR USE IN DEL MAR COLLEGES AVIATION MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN EDUCATION PROGRAM, WITH AN OPTION TO EXTEND FOR AN ADDITIONAL TEN YEAR PERIOD; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute a 15 year lease with Del Mar College for the use of hangar, adjacent parking area and office space located at the Corpus Christi International Airport for use in Del Mar College's Aviation Maintenance Technician Program, with an option to extend for an additional ten year term. A copy of the contract shall be filed with the City Secretary. SECTION 2. If, for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of the City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, phrase, word and provision hereof shall be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. This contract takes effect on the 61st day following City Council approval. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the ÷4" day of 197 ,(-KLL , 2011, by the following vote: Joe Adame John E. Marez P) Chris N. Adler Nelda Martinez /1-, Q....._ Elizondo Mark Scott Al) Kevin Kieschnick Linda Strong A‘.. q-- Priscilla G. Leal That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2011, by the following vote: Joe Adame John E. Marez Chris N. Adler Nelda Martinez Larry Elizondo Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick Linda Strong Priscilla G. Leal PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2011. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED as to form: April 14, 2011 By: Lisa Aguila7 ssistant City Attorney for the City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor 8 1st Reading — 5117111 2nd Reading -- 5/24/11 AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17, 2011 SUBJECT: Task Order 1 -5 Corpus Christi International Airport Runway Extension /Displacement, Taxiways & Related Tasks (Project Nos. E11045, E11046, E11047, E11048) AGENDA ITEM: a. Ordinance Appropriating $600,000 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Passenger Facility Charge Fund No. 4621 to Fund Capital Improvement Projects at Corpus Christi International Airport Identified in the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Budget; and Changing the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Budget Adopted by Ordinance No. 028995 to Identify Alternate Funding Sources for Airport Projects. b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a professional engineering services contract with KSA Engineers, Inc. of Longview, Texas in an amount not to exceed $.1,962,261.00 for the Corpus Christi International Airport for: Task 1 Environmental Assessment for Relocation of Runways 17 -35 and 13 -31 (E11045); Task 2 Airport Geographic Information System Analysis and Data Submittal /Upload (E11045); Task 3 Runway 17 -35 Extension /Displacement and Connection Taxiway Project (E11046); Task 4 Runway 13 -31 Extension /Displacement and Connection Taxiway Project (E11047); and Task 5 Taxiway Utilization Study (E11048). CONSULTANT SELECTIONIPROJECTS: The City selected KSA Engineers of Longview, Texas to provide Airport engineering services through a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) selection process for a multi -year service agreement. RFQ No. 2011 -01 Professional Services for Department of Engineering Services was distributed to 186 consultants (76 local, 110 non - local). FAA grant regulations do not permit the use of a local participation preference or requirement in the selection of consultants. KSA Engineers was selected as being the most qualified to firm with capacity to undertake the projects upcoming on the approved CCIA Airport Improvement Program. The KSA Engineers proposal included the utilization of LNV Engineering of Corpus Christi as a sub - consultant. FUNDING: Initial funding is being supplied on an interim basis by Aviation CIP Funds (Passenger Facility Charges) pending receipt of an FAA Grant. The City has received assurance of the future award of the grant from the FAA. Eligible local funding will be reimbursed by an FAA Grant upon receipt. The FAA Grant will provide 95% of the eligible expenses with Aviation CIP Funds funding 5 %. HAHDMEIKEVINSIGENWIR— restored12011Improvements .AEIAEContractMemo.doc —61— RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented. Fred Director of Aviation 361- 289 -0171 ext. 1213 freds @cctexas.com ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL Exhibit A. Background information Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Exhibit E. Prior Project Actions Contract Summary Project Budget Location Map fpPete Anaya, P.E. Director of Engineering Services 361 -826 -3761 petean@cctexas.com Fl AHOMEIKEVINSSGENSA1Riestored12D111mprovementslAEAEContractMemo .doc — 6 2— BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Task Order 1 -5 Corpus Christi International Airport Runway Extension /Displacement, Taxiways & Related Tasks (Project Nos. El 1 045, E11046, E11047, E11048) CONTRACT: The contract provides for five tasks associated with Runways 17 -35 and 13 -31, and Taxiway Utilization. The contract authorizes work is based on the future extension and/or displacement of Runway 17 -35 and Runway 13 -31. The contract provides for the following tasks: • Task 1 Environmental Assessment for Relocation of Runways 17 -35 and 13 -31; • Task 2 Airport Geographic Information System Analysis and Data Submittal /Upload; • Task 3 Runway 17 -35 Extension /Displacement and Connection Taxiway Project; • Task 4 Runway 13-31 Extension /Displacement and Connection Taxiway Project; • Task 5 Taxiway Utilization Study. TASK DESCRIPTION AND FEES: Task 1 Environmental Assessment for Relocation of Runways 17 -35 and 13 -31 — prepare and Environmental Assessment to fully evaluate the shifting of Runway 17 -35 approximately 600 feet to the -north and Runway 13 -31 not to exceed 1,600 feet to the north in conformance with the National Environmental Policy Act in conformance with the standards of the FAA as set forth in FAA Order 1050.1E. and Order 5050.4B — Fee: $161,649.00; Task 2 Airport Geographic Information System Analysis and Data Submittal/Upload — prepare the study for shifting of Runway 17 -35 approximately 600 feet to the north and Runway 13 -31 not to exceed 1,600 feet to the north including new color aerial photography, ground surveys, digital mapping, digital orthophoto rectification, and airspace analysis — Fee: $286,416.00; Task 3 Runway 17 -35 Extension /Displacement and Connection Taxiway Project — perform the basic engineering design and additional engineering functions for the construction of the extension of Runway 17 by 600 feet to the north displacing the threshold of Runway 35 by 600 feet to the north, taxiways, lighting, signage, navigation aids, and other improvements including study and reports, preliminary design, final design and bid phase services with additional services to include Safety Management System (SMS), topographic boundary survey, and geotechnical survey. The Task Order does not include basic engineering construction phase services or construction management/inspection services. Fee: $566,000.00; Task 4 Runway 13 -31 Extension /Displacement and Connection Taxiway Project - perform the basic engineering design and additional engineering functions for the construction of the extension of Runway 13 by up to 1,600 feet to the north displacing the threshold of Runway 13 by up to 1,600 feet to the north taxiways, lighting, signage, navigation aids, and other improvements including study and reports, preliminary design, final design and bid phase services with additional services to include Safety Management System (SMS), topographic boundary survey, and geotechnical survey. The Task Order does not include basic engineering Ht1H O M E 4KE V IN S1G E N 5 AIR_ restore d520111mp rov em a ntsIAE SA E Co ntr a c I B kg Exh A, d oc -63- Exhibit A Page 1 of 2 construction phase services or construction management/inspection services. Fee: $868,000.00; Task 5 Taxiway Utilization Study - fully study and evaluate taxiways to provide recommendations and guidance to improve efficiency and safety - Fee: $80,1 96.00, FUNDING: Initial funding is being supplied on an interim basis by Aviation CIP Funds (Passenger Facility Charges) pending receipt of an FAA Grant. The City has received assurance of the future award of the grant from the FAA. Eligible local funding will be reimbursed by an FM Grant upon receipt. The FAA Grant will provide 95% of the eligible expenses with Aviation CIP Funds funding 5 %. Appropriation of the Passenger Facility Charges (PFC's) for the Corpus Christi International Airport will serve as interim funding pending receipt and appropriation of the FAA grant. The use of the PFC's were approved by the Federal Aviation Administration, and provide funding of project expenses, debt service and related fees on bonds issued for authorized capital improvements. PFC revenue must be appropriated prior to any expenditure, BOARD /COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Airport Board has reviewed the item and recommends approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended Council approve the motion as presented. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTIONS: Council will be requested to approve: • Acceptance and appropriation of FM grants as received; • engineering amendments; • future construction contracts; and • any change orders that may require Council approval. H :IHOMEIKEV[NS GENIAIR_ restored12014improvementslAEIAECon tractBkgExh &doc -64- Exhibit A Page 2of2 PREVIOUS ACTIONS PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS: March 8, 2011 — Ordinance adopting the FY2011 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Guide (Ordinance No. 028995). PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS: January 18, 2011 — Request for Qualifications (RFQ) #2011 -01 released for various Airport, Wastewater and Storm Water projects. February 3, 2011 — Addenda No. 1 for RFQ #2011 -01 issued clarifying certain portions of the RFQ and answering questions received from prospective responding consulting firms. February 7, 2011 - Addenda No. 2 for RFQ #2011 -01 issued answering additional questions received from prospective firms. Exhibit B Pagelofl H:IHOMEIKEVINSIGENIAIR restored12411ImprovementslAEIAEContractPriorActionsExhB .doc • —65— CONTRACT SUMMARY 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES —AIE will provide planning, architectural, engineering and construction administration services (the "Services ") in support of the Planning and Architecture /Engineering Services for City of Corpus Christi — Corpus Christi International Airport (the "Project "). AIE shall provide such Services as authorized from time to time by written Task Order issued by CITY and accepted by AIE. AIE shall provide the Basic Services as described in Exhibit A for each Task Order, in addition to any Additional Services or other Services as may be mutually agreed upon by the Parties in each respective Task Order. 2. ORDER OF SERVICES - The A/E agrees to begin performance under this Agreement upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Director of Engineering Services. Work will not begin on any Task Order until written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. The anticipated schedule of the preliminary phase, design phase, and bid phase are shown on Exhibits "A -1 ", "A -2 ", "A -3 ", "A -4" and "A -5 ". A/E and City agree that the initial Task Orders shall be as follows: Exhibit "A -1" Task Order No. 1 Exhibit "A -2" Task Order No. 2 — Exhibit "A -3" Task Order No. 3 -- — Preparation of Environmental Assessment AGIS Airspace Analysis and Data Submittal /Upload Runway 17 -35 Extension /Displacement and Connecting Taxiway Project Runway 13 -31 Extension /Displacement and Connecting Taxiway Project Taxiway Utilization Study Exhibit "A -4" Task Order No. 4 — Exhibit "A -5" Task Order No. 5 - Each Task Order shall be subject to a not to exceed amount. The not to exceed amount for Task Orders Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are as follows: E. For Task Order No. 1, the CITY will pay the NE a fee, as described in Exhibit "A-1", for a total amount not to exceed $161,649 for Services authorized under This Agreement, inclusive of all Services, Time and Materials. II. For Task Order No. 2, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as described in Exhibit "A -2 ", for a total amount not to exceed $286,416 for Services authorized under This Agreement, inclusive of all Services, Time and Materials. III. For Task Order No. 3, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as described in Exhibit "A -3, for a total amount not to exceed $566,000 for Services authorized under This Agreement, inclusive of all Services, Time and Materials. IV. For Task Order No. 4, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as described in Exhibit "A -4, for a total amount not to exceed $868,000 for Services authorized under This Agreement, inclusive of all Services, Time and Materials. V. For Task Order No. 5, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as described in Exhibit "A -5" for a total amount not to exceed $80,196 for Services Authorized under this Agreement, inclusive of all Services, Time and Materials. Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RUNWAY 13 -31 AND 17 -75 EXTENSIONS/TAXIWAYAND RELATED PROJECTS (PROJECT NO. E11045, E11046, E11047 & E11048) PROJECT BUDGET May 17, 2011 FUNDS AVAILABLE: r Airport FAA Grants* Airport CIP Reserves Total FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Cost (AE estimate) Construction Contingencies (10 %) Land Acquisition A/E Consultants (KSA Engineers) (Basic Services = $1,398,000 or 5.7% of Construction) Construction Management/Inspection (not included in A/E contract) Material Inspection Testing & Laboratory Services Engineering Reimbursements Finance Reimbursements Incidental Expenses (Printing, Advertising, etc.) Total *Total project will be phased based on award/receipt of FAA Grants. ESTIMATED BUDGET $ 29,461,554.85 $ 1 ,550,608.15 $ 31,012,163.00 $ 24,554,667.00 2,455,466.00 170,000.00 1,962,261.00 1,396,769.00 253,000.00 75,000.00 110,000.00 35,000.00 $ 31,012,163.00 EXHIBIT "D" Page 1 of 1 File : \ Mproject\ councilexhibits \exhE70045- 46 -47 -48 FR. 624 AGNES CORPUS C9'(RzS'rf RAY LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE H W''i 44 1 �..., \CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL >,AIRPORT •_ACHES RD, EXTENSION SITE RUNWAY 17 -35 EXTENSION SITE RUNWAY 13 -31 CONNECTION TAXIWAYS kglOGLOIll ROAD L._ _ PROJECT #E10045- E10046- E10047- E10048 I ._a 4 BEAR LANE EXHIBIT "ER Task Order 1 -5 - Corpus Christi International Airport Runway Extension/Displacement, Taxiways & Related Tasks CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT ERM NT OF ENNE RING' S RV CEDPAT GI S PAGE: 1 of 1 DATE: 05-17-2011 - _ ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $600,000 FROM THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE IN PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE FUND NO. 4621 TO FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AT CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IDENTIFIED IN THE FY 2010 -2011 CAPITAL BUDGET; AND CHANGING THE FY 2010 -2011 CAPITAL BUDGET ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 028995 TO IDENTIFY ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCES FOR AIRPORT PROJECTS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $600,000 is appropriated from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Passenger Facility Charge Fund No. 4621 to fund capital improvement projects at the Corpus Christi international Airport identified in the Capital Budget. SECTION 2. That the FY 2010 -2011 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 028995 is changed to identify alternate funding sources for airport projects. 1-1:1LEG- DIR \Lisa12011 OrdinancelAirport PFC fundsv4.docx That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the , i --?'4-(,' day of (14,2_,.f,} , 2011, by the following vote: Joe Adame John E. Marez A9.3..._ Chris N. Adler Nelda Martinez R.L_;1=-- Larry Eiizondo -e_- Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick Ak.- Linda Strong 19}-(-3Q-- Priscilla G. Leal A-7 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2011, by the following vote: Joe Adame John E. Marez Chris N. Adler Nelda Martinez Larry Elizonda Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick Linda Strong Priscilla G. Leal PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2011. ATTEST: Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor APPROVED as to form: Yh t i, ?11 By: .► Lisa Agudai, Assistant City Attorney for the City Attorney H;ILEG- DIRILisa12011 OrdinancelAirport PFC fundsv4.docx 9 AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 24, 2011 SUBJECT: Bear Lane from SPID to Old Brownsville Road (BOND ISSUE 2008) Project No. 64631 CIP No. ST 15 AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Haas - Anderson Construction, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $6,259,588 for Bear Lane from SPID to Old Brownsville Road for the Base Bid Parts A, C, D, E, F, and G (BOND ISSUE 2008). ISSUE: The proposed project was approved November 4, 2008 in the Bond Issue 2008 Package under Proposition No. 1 Street Improvements. The contract has bid and City Council approval is required for the construction to commence. FUNDING: Funding is available from the Streets, Storm Water, Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement Budget FY 2010, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. Pete Anaya, P.E. Director of Engineering Services (361) 826 -3781 petean @cctexas.com Additional Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Support Material: Agenda Background Information Prior Project Actions Bid Tabulation Project Budget Consultant's Letter of Recommendation Location Map H:IHOME1VeImaPIGENISTREET16463 BEAR iANESCONSTRUCTIONI2 AGENDA ME ,doc AGENDA BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Bear Lane from SPID to Old Brownsville Road (BOND ISSUE 2008) Project No. 64631 CIP No. ST 15 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of the complete removal of an existing roadway and the construction of approximately 6,000 linear feet of flexible (asphalt) pavement with a concrete (rigid) pavement option for a new 3 -lane collector street (two 13.5 -feet back to back travel lanes and one 14 -foot continuous turning lane) with 8 -foot concrete sidewalks and associated pavement markings and signage improvements; along with 6,600 linear feet of storm water conduit improvements, 5,780 linear feet of waterline improvements, 960 linear feet of cured -in -place pipe sanitary sewer line rehabilitation, five (5) sanitary sewer manhole rehabilitations and two (2) new sanitary sewer manholes, together with all appurtenances. BID INFORMATION: On April 27, 2011, the City received proposals from four (4) bidders and the lowest three bidders and their respective bids are as follow: Contractor Base Bid (Flexible Asphalt) 1 PartsA,C,D,E,F,G Base Bid (Rigid Concrete) Parts B, C, D, E, F, G Haas - Anderson Construction, Ltd. $6,259,588.00 NO BID Bay, Ltd. $6,292,243.50 NO BID Reytec Construction NO BID $6,641,259.50 BID RECOMMENDATION: The City's consultant, Coym, Rehmet and Gutierrez Engineering, has reviewed the information submitted by the low bidder, Haas Anderson Construction, Ltd. (see Exhibit "E" Consultant's Letter of Recommendation). Coym, Rehmet and Gutierrez Engineering has verified the experience references provided by the contractor, which indicate the contractor has the ability to perform the work required to complete the project in a satisfactory manner. Additionally a life cycle cost analysis was conducted using the Federal Highway Administration's Real Cost Program to compare asphalt pavement to concrete pavement. The results showed that over the course of 40 years the present value cost to construct and maintain the road using asphalt is lower than concrete. Therefore, City staff and Coym, Rehmet and Gutierrez Engineering recommend that the construction contract be awarded to Haas Anderson Construction, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $6,259,588 for the Base Bid (Flexible Asphalt) including Part A (Street Flexible Pavement), Part C (Storm Water Improvements), Part D (Water Distribution Improvements), Part E (Sanitary Sewer Improvements), Part F (Gas Improvements), & Part G (ADA Pedestrian Improvements). H:4HQMEhVeIrnaFAGEMSTREET46463 BEAR LA NE4CONSTRUCTION43 AGENDA BACKGROUND.doc —74— EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 CONTRACT TERMS: The project is estimated to require 600 calendar days with completion anticipated in March 2013. PROJECT BACKGROUND: On Tuesday, November 4, 2008, the City of Corpus Christi held an election to consider a number of ballot propositions to fund major capital improvements for the community, Bond Issue 2008. The November 4, 2008 election was held jointly with Nueces County and coincided with the Presidential Election. The Bond issue 2008 package includes $153 million in projects to be funded from ad valorem property taxes (a General Obligation Bond Issue) in Street, Public Health and Safety, Public Facilities, Parks and Recreation, and Bayfront Master Plan projects. The proposed projects target the City's most immediate needs to improve existing physical facilities, provide for growth, and protect the City's investment in its infrastructure. EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 H:1HOMESVe &maP1GENSSTREET16463 BEAR LANEICONSTRUCTIONI3 AGENDA BACKGi5ROUND.doc -- EXHIBIT "B" I Page 1 of 1 PRIOR PROJECT ACTIONS SUBJECT: Bear Lane from SPID to OId Brownsville Road (BOND ISSUE 2008) Project No. 64631 CIP No. ST 15 PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. November 13, 2008 — Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring results of the Special Election held on November 4, 2008 in the City of Corpus Christi for the adoption of seven bond propositions and approval of a proposition to restrict vehicular access to and on the portion of the Gulf of Mexico Beach seaward of the concrete portion of the Padre Island Seawall. (Ordinance No. 027939) 2. November 18, 2008 - Resolution expressing official intent to reimburse costs of the 2008 Bond Capital Improvements Projects in an amount not to exceed $152,645,000 for improvements to Streets, Fire Department Facilities, Police Department Facilities, Libraries, Museums, Parks and Recreation Facilities, and Bayfront Development. (Resolution No. 027950) 3. December 16, 2008 — Ordinance approving the FY 2009 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide in the amount of $163,391,300 (Ordinance No. 028006). 4. September 15, 2009 — Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Contract for Professional Services with Coym, Rehmet and Gutierrez Engineering, L.P. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $1,070,830 for Bear Lane from SPID to OId Brownsville Road. (Motion No. M2009 -255) 5. March 8, 2011— Ordinance approving the FY 2011 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide in the amount of $173,982,100 (Ordinance No. 028995). PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. September 19, 2008 - Distribution of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2008 -05 Bond Issue 2008 and Other Projects to 206 engineering firms (86 local and 120 non - local). 2. October 14, 2008 — Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2008 -05 Bond Issue 2008 and Other Projects to 206 engineering firms (86 local and 120 non-local). 3. October 20, 2008 — Addendum No. 2 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2008 -05 Bond Issue 2008 and Other Projects to 206 engineering firms (86 local and 120 non - local). 4. December 9, 2009 — Administrative approval of Agreement for Geotechnical Engineering Testing Services with Rock Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $14,300 for Bear Lane from SPID to OId Brownsville Road. 5. March 16, 2011 — Amendment No. 1 to the Contract for Professional Services with Coym, Rehmet and Gutierrez Engineering, L.P. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amountof$10,620 for Bear Lane from SPID to Old Brownsville Road. HAHOMEWeImaP1GEMSTREET46463 BEAR LANEICONSTRUCTi0N44 PRIOR PROJECT AC710NS.doc TABULATION OF BIDS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TABULATED BY: Pete Anaya, P.E., Director of Engineering Services TIME OF COMPLETION: "600 Calendar Days DATE: April 27, 2011 - 2:00 pm Page 1 of 5 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: Asphalt Concrete V,143,985,04 V453,904,09 Haas -Anderson Bay, Ltd. BEAR LANE - S.P.I.D. TO OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD - BOND 2008 ConstructionLtd. PO Box 9906 PO Box 766 92 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 Corpus Christi, TX 78467 Reytec Construction P.O. Box 550079 Corpus Christi, Texas 77255 Texas Starring 20515 Fembush Houston, Texas 77073 ITEM OTY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE r,a :. #, i ;, r FI'.. ,. - - .,,..� -r r.".J:',...,_ v - h,, nr:h . � f ., -.,. '.a ,+......,......L.4-;,.... 7y, '%' -_ ._L,�.._... _. �, ., .:w1''- ,i $. 500,000.00 iI ,.r ..n ...: �... $ . 500,000.00 r.�-. a _ i.l_,. 7 � $ 400,000.00 --.� L. m- $V 400,000.0(1 �,A,� , �: ,?�. NO BID l r;,lr ,}� Ci, ,.'z NO BID :« (:tides.1 ,.. �l .� $ 300,000.00 i, !'•,e.,. L q „i All $ 300,000.08 Al 1 LS Mobilization A2 12 AC. Clear Right -Of -Way $ 5,810.80 $ 69,720.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 120,000.00 NO 810 NO BID $ 6,490.00 $ 77,880.00 A3 31,730 SY Street Excavation $ 7.20 $ 220,456.00 $ 7.95 $ 252,253.50 NO BID NO BIO $ 9.00 ',i °' l.':.'... .1.:. ' A4 3,410 CY Ditch Baokflli $ 12.65 5 43,136.50 $ 3.50 $ 11,935.00 NO BID NO BID $ 3.00 $ 10,230.00 A5 31,730 SY 12' Compacted Subgrade $ 1.30 $ 41,249.00 8 0.70 $ 22,211.00 NO BID NO 310 5 2.00 $ 63,460.00 A6 31,730 SY Geogrid (TX5) 9 3.90 $ 123,747.00 9 3.90 $ 123,747.00 NO BID NO BID $ 4.00 $ 126,920.00 A7 31,730 SY 13' Crushed Limestone Flexible Base (Type A, Gr. 1) $ 15.25 $ 483,882.50 $ 15.90 $ 504,507.00 NO BID NO BID $ 18.00 5 571,140.00 AB 4,110 GAL Prime Coat (0.15 GALISY) $ 4.45 $ 18,269.50 $ 4.50 $ 18,485.00 NO BID NO BID 9 4.00 $ 16,440.00 A9 27,240 5Y 2.5" H.M.A.C. Pavement (Type 8) Base Course $ 10.45 9 284,658.90 $ 9.60 $ 261,504.00 NO BIO NO BID 5 15.00 $ 408,600.00 A10 27,240 5Y 2" H.M.A.C. Pavement (Type B) Surface Course 9 9.50 $ 258,780.00 .$ 9.30 $ 253,332.00 NO BID NO 814 $ 12.00 S 326,880.00 A11 1,200 LF Concrete Sidewalk Retaining Curb (18" Max. Height) $ 26.20 5 31,440.00 $ 23.50 $ 26,206.05 NO BID NO BIO $ 20.00 $ 24,000.00 Al2 22,250 SF 6' Concrete Drivveways $' 6.00 $ 133,500.00 $ 5.70 5 126,825.00 NO BID NO BID 9 8.00 $ 178,000.00 A13 1,500 SF . Concrete Bus Pad $ 9.75 $ 14,625.00 $ 11.00 $ 16,500.00 NO BID NO BID $ 10.00 $ 15,000.00 A14 200 SF Unanticipated Concrete Driveway Removal $ 1.00 $ 200.00 $ 2.00 $ 400.00 NO BID 140 BID $ 6.00 $ 1,200.00 A15 2 EA Survey Monument 5 1,158.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 142.00 5 284.00 NO BID NO B1D $ 1,670.00 $ 3,340.00 A16 2 EA Ozone Day 9 1,150.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 115.00 $ 230.00 NO BID NO BID 5 250.00 $ 500.00 A17 100 IF Chain Link Fence Relocation• $ 34.50 $ 3,450.00 $ 20.70 $ 2,070.00 NO BID NO BID 5 9.00 $ 900.00 A10 36 EA Reflective Pavement Mrk. Types (W) ('Arrow") $ 92.00 $ 3,312.00 $ 92.00 $ 3,312.00 N01310 NO BID $ 89.00 $ 3,204.00 Al 9 3 EA Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (W) ('Only) 5 115.00 9 345.00 $ 114.00 $ 342.00 NO BED 140 BID $ 110.00 $ 330.00 A20 350 LF Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (W) 5" Solid $ 0.85 $ 297.50 $ 0.55 $ 297.511 140 BID NO BID $ 1.00 $ 350.09 A21 260 LF Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (W) 24" Solid . $ 11.50 5 2,990.00 $ 11.50 $ 2,990.00 NO BID NO B40 $ 11.00 $ 2,060.00 A22 75 LF Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (Y) 24' 5011cl $ 11.50 $ 862.50 $ 11.60 $ 870.00 140 BID 140 BID $ 11.00 $ 825.00 A23 10,800 LF Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type1 (Y) 4" Solid 8 0.55 $ 5,940.00 $ 0.55 $ 5,940.00 140 BID NO BID $ 1.00 $ 10800,00 A24 8,790 LF Relfectve Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (Y) 4' Brk. 5 0.55 $ 4,834.50 $ 0.55 $ 4,834.50 NO 910 NO BID $ 1.00 $ 8,790.00 A25 510 EA Raised Refl. Pvml. Mrk. (TYIR-A-A) Yellow $ 4.00 $ 2,040.00 $ 4.00 $ 2,040.00 NO BID NO BID $ 4.00 $ 2,040.00 A26 50 EA Raised Reg. Pvmt. Mrk. (TYII-C) White $ 5.20 $ 260.90 $ 5.20 $ 260.00 NO BID NO BID $ 5.00 $ 250.00 A27 20 EA Raised Refl. Pvmt. Mrk. (TYII.8-B) Blue $ 17.25 $ 345.00 $ 18.09 $ 369.00 NO BID NO BIP $ 17.00 $ 340.00 A28 12 EA Street Sign Assembly w19" Blades (Green) and Stop Sign $ 518.00 $ 6,216.00 $ 520.00 $ 6,249.00 NO BID NO BID $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 A292 EA Stop Sign (No Blades) $ 465.00 $ 930.00 $ 470.00 $ 940.00 NO BID NO BID $ 450.00 $ 900.00 A30 3 EA Speed Zone Sign $ 471.00 5 1,413.00 $ 470.00 $ 1,410.00 NO BID NO BID $ 460.00 $ 1,380.00 A313 EA Pedestrian Crossing Sign 9 518.00 $ 1,554.00 $ 520.00 $ 1,560.00 NO BID NO 810 $ 500.80 $ 1,500.90 A322 EA Advanced Warning School Zone Sign w/Flashers $ 8,705.00 $ 17,410.00 $ 8,600.00 $ 17,200.00 NO BID NO BID $ 2,230.00 $ 4,460.00 A33 11 EA Other Regulatory Signs $ 545.00 3 5,995.00 $ 550.00 $ 6,050.00 NO BID NO BID $ 530.00 $ 5,830.00 A342 EA Traffic Message Board $ 17,500.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 36,000.00 NO BID NO Br0 $ 1,730.80 $ 3,460.00 A35 3 EA Relocate Existing Signs $ 545.00 $ 1,635.00 $ 200.00 $ 600.00 140 BID NO BID $ 170.00 $ 510.00 A36 2 EA Mailbox Relocation $ 345.00 $ 690.00. $ 115.00 $ 230.00 NO BID NO BID $ 170.00 $ 340.00 A37 1 LS Traffic Control $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 71,000.00 $ 71,000.00 NO SID NO BID $ 60,330.00 9 60,330.00 A381 LS Exploratory Excavations . $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.0D 5 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 NO BID 140 BID $ 9,320.00 $ 9,320.00 A391 LS Allowance For Unanticl. ated Street -Related im • rovements $ 50,009.00 $ 50,000.00 § 2,499,393.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 2,384,969.50 NO BID NO 140510 BID $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 - SUBTOTAL PART 'A" STREET (FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) IMPROVEMENTS ITEMS A1 -A390 (1) Submitted Hid Proposal showed 910,239.00. Multiplication extension error. Corrected Total as shown is $ 285,570.00. (2) Submitted Bid Proposal showed 2,615,019.00. Addition error. Corrected Total is shown as $2,583,879.00. Co TABULATION OF BIDS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TABULATED BY: Pete Anaya, P.E., Director of Engineering Services TIME OF COMPLETION: 600 Calendar Days DATE: April 27, 2011 -2:00 pm Page 2 of 5 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: Asphalt Concrete $1,143,995,00 V,B59,a8U11 BEAR LANE-S.P.I.D. TO OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD - BOND 2008 Haas -Anderson .. Construction, Ltd, PO Box 7692 Corpus Christi, TX 784fiT .---------- Bay, Ltd. PO Box 9908 Cor us Christi, TX 78469 p _._.-- - - Reytec Construction P.O. Box 550079 Carpus Christi, Texas 77255 � - - -- _ Texas Sterling 20810 Fernbash Houston, Texas 77073 ITEM QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT - PRICE f- TOTAL UNIT PRICE L PRYaICE TOTAL PRICE ' .fi) Z ., -. .IN4 i,„tT...:rear'? "",- ;•14k_�N PRICE +".xAu't,a,„,: :-1".'��b-1'�n ro7 s .._,? «Ite"a:,-, �."mN'�a+an�`.h,!},11,'�kSzi4 61 1 LS Mobilization NO BID 140 BID NO BID NO BID $ 300,000.09 $ 300,008.00 $ 300,600.00 B2 12 AC. Clear Right -Of -Way NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BIO $ 3,000.00 $ 36,000.00 $ 6,490.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 77,880.00 B3 31,730 SY Street Excavation NO BID NO 01D NO 810 NO BID $ 7.00 $ 222,110.00 $ 8.00 $ 253,640.00 134 3,410 CY Ditch Backfill NO BID 140 BID NO BID NO BID $ 6.00 $ 20,460.00 $ 3.00 65 31,730 SY 12" Compacted Subgrede NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $ 2.00 5 63,460.00 $ 2.00 $ 10,230.00 $ 63,460.00 136 1,460 SY Geogdd (TX5) NO BID NO BID NO BID NO 610 $ 5.00 $ 7,300.00 $ 4.00 $ 5,840.00 137 1,460 SY 13" Crushed Limestone Flexible Base (Type A, Gr, 1) NO BID NO BID NO BID NO 810 $ 26.00 $ 37,950.00 $ 21.00 $ 30,660.00 Be 4,110 GAL Prime Coat (0-15 GAL/SY) , NO BID NO BID NO BID 140 BID $ 5.00 $ 20,550.00 $ 4.00 $ 16,440.00 B9 1,310 SY 2.5" H.MA.C. Pavement (Type B) Base Course NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $ 14.00 $ 16,340.00 $ 17.00 $ 22,270.00 610 1,310 SY Survey Monument N0 81D NO BID NO BID 140 610 $ 14.00 $ 18,340.00 5 14,00 $ 18,340.00 1311 29,750 SY 6' Cement Satbllized Caliche Base (3%) N0 61D NO 910 NO BID 140 BID $ 14.00 $ 416,500,00 $ 10.00 $ 297,500.00 012 29,750 SY 1' H.M.A.C. Pavement (Type 0) 10 610 NO BID NO BID 10 BID $ 7.00 $ 208,250.00 $ 6.00 $ 178,500.00 013 26,300 SY 7" Reinforced Concrete Rigid Pavement NO 810 NO BID NO BID NO BID 6. 36.00 $ 999,400.00 $ 36.00 $ 946,800.00 014 1,200 IF Concrete Sidewalk Retaining Curb (18" Max. Height) NO BID NO BID NO 810 140 610 $ 30.90 $ 36,000.00 $ 20.00 $ 24,000.00 B15 22,250 SF 6' Concrete Orivveways NO BID NO 1310 NO 81D NO BID $ 5.25 $ 116,812.50 $ 8.00 $ 178,000.00 B16 200 SF Unanticipated Concrete Driveway Removal 10 BID NO BID 140 010 NO BID $ 2.00 $ 400.00 $ 9.00 $ 1,800.00 B17 2 EA Survey Monument NO BID NO BID NO 81D NO BID $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.90 $ 1,670.00 $ 3,340.90 918 2 EA Ozone Day 140 BID NO 61D NO BID NO 81D $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 250.00 9 500.00 019 100 LF Chain Link Fence Relocation NO BID 140 810 NO BID NO BID $ 20.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 9-00 5 900.00 B20 36 EA Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (W) ("Arrow') NO BID NO BID NO BID NO Bio $ 160.00 $ 5,760.00 $ 140.00 9 5,940.00 621 3 EA Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (W) ("Only") NO 61D NO BID NO 610 NO 610 $ 210.09 $ 630.00 $ 170.00 $ 510.00 622 350 LF Reflective Pavement Mrit. Type 1 (W) 8" Solid NO BID 140 BIO NO BID NO 810 $ 2.00 5 700.00 $ 2.09 $ 700.00 B23 260 LF Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (W) 24" Solid NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $ 5.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 15.00 6 3,900.00 024 75 LF Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (Y) 24' Solid NO BID NO BIO NO BID NO BD 5 5.00 $ 375-00 9 15.00 $ 1,125.00 025 10,800 LF Reflective Pavement Mdc Type 1 (Y) 4' Solid NO 810 NO 910 NO BID N01310 $ 0.60 $ 6,480.00 $ 1.00 $ 10,600.00 B26 8,790 LF Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (Y) 4" Broken NO BID NO BOD NO 010 NO BID $ 0.60 $ 5,274.00 $ 1,00 $ 8,790.00 B27 510 EA Raised Refl. PvmL Mrk. (TYII-A-A) Yellow NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $ 4,00 $ 2,040.00 $ 4.00 $ 2,040.00 626 50 EA Raised Refl. Pvmt. Mrk. (TYI-C) White NO BID NO 810 NO BID 140 BID $ 4.00 $ 200.00 $ 5.00 $ 250.09 029 20 EA Raised Refl. Pvmt. Mrk. TMFB-B) Slue 140 BID NO BID 140 BID NO BID $ 7.00 $ 140.00 $ 17.00 $ 340.00 8311 12 EA Street Sign Assembly w/9" Blades (Green) and Stop Sign NO 810 NO BID NO 810 , NO BID $ 260.00 $ 3,120.00 $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 631 2 EA Stop Sign (No Blades) NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $ 230.00 $ 460.00 $ 450.00 $ 900.00 032 3 EA Speed Zone Sign NO BIO NO BID NO BID 10 BID $ 300.00 $ 900.00 $ 460.00 $ 1,380.00 633 3 EA Pedestrian Crossing Sign NO BID NO BID NO BID 140 610 $ 300.00 $ 900.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.117 834 2 EA Advanced Warning School Zane Sign wlFlashers NO 610 NO BID NO BID 140 BI0 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 2,230.00 $ 4,460.00 B35 11 EA Other Regulatory Signs 140 BID NO SID NO 610 NO 81D ' $ 350.00 $ 3,850.00 $ 530.00 $ 5,830.00 636 2 EA Traffic Message Board 140 BID 140810 140 BID NO BID $ 6,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 1,730.00 $ 3,460.00 637 3 EA Relocate Existing Signs 10 610 NO BID NO BID NO BFO $ 150.00 $ 450.00 $ 170.00 $ 510,001 B38 2 EA Mailbox Relocation NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BED $ 130.00 $ 260.00 $ 170.00 $ 340.00 13391 LS Traffic Control NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $ 60,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 60,330.00 $ 60,330.00 640 1 LS Exploratory Excavations NO BID NO 610 140 B10 NO BIO $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 4,660.00 $ 4,660.00 641 1 LS Allowance For Unan0ci• ated Street -Related Im •rovements NORM NO BID NO 910 NO O BID $ 50 000.00 $ 50 000.00 J $ 50 000.00 $ 50 000.00 SUBTOTAL PART "B" STREET RIGID PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS ( ) IPENS 61.841 NO BID NOBID _..., ` , ,F „ 4 41",, (3) Submitted Bid Proposer showed 52,634,305.00. Addition error. Corrected Total as shown is $2,603,165.00. Bid sould be considered non-responsive. TABULATION OF BIDS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TABULATED BY: Pete Anaya, P.E., Director of Engineering Services TIME OF COMPLETION: 600 Calendar Days DATE: April 27, 2011 - 2:00 pm Page 3 of 5 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: Asphalt Concrete 3T1143,955100 �T,�3514�4A0 BEAR LANE - S.P.I.D. BROWNSVILLE TO OLD ROAD - BOND 2008 Haas -Anderson Construction, Ltd. pp Box 7692 Corpus Christi, TX 78467 Bay, Ltd. PO Box 9908P.O.20610 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 Reyllec Construction Corpus Christi, Texas 77255 Texas Sterling rernhush Flouston, Texas 77013 ITEM ® UNIT DESCRIPTION - ...UNIT TOTALPRICE PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL UNITICE PRICE , Y,1qc.,� HN.S,.A--�..k. �.�'V}r' -4,.. 'i�`7:7 r�.i F.,I rfe.,..74'-4ge,r r N:14 ` 1.,.. Ck fi.. .,;. J5, ,, .-.:..,LiA.2,".Si AE '„�3.E..,r. 4L.i -ti _,J.u. ._ a,�!A6 5ASI.'„ .royw L. i.. 2.J. ..• .^-� 1l- �.i ..JL4PI et CI :' SY Bleck Sodding • •' $ 68,112.00 9 • 'r $ 61,920.0 $ 3.50 $ 54,180.00 $ 5.00 $ 77,400.00 'r SYSeeding +' 'r $ 3,000.00 $ 1.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2.00 $ 3,000.00 I LF18' Dia. RCP (Glass III) 83.0/1 ' +' s 93.00 $ 79,050.00 $ 92.00 $ 78,200.00 $ 100.00 $ 85,000.00 360 30" Dia. RCP (Class 81} 126.00 $ 45,360.00 $ 129.00 $ 150.90 $ 54,000.00 $ 110.00 $ 39,600.00 C5 1,050 LF36" Dia. RCP (Glass 81) $ 115.00 $ 126,750.00 • '.132.950.00 $ 128.00 $ 134,400.00 $ 120.00 $ 126,000.00 •' LF $ 129M0 $ 50,310.00 150,00 I : III I $ 130.60 $ 50,790.00 $ 150.00 $ 58,500.00 • + LF48" Dia. RCP (Class III} " $ 63,210.60 $ 173.06 $ 74,390.00$ 163.00 $ 70,090.00 $ 170.00 $ 73,100.00 ce 440 $ 1130.06$ 79.200 " " : + ' + r $ 196.00 $ 86,240.00 $ 230.00 $ 101,200.00 • ' LF6' x 2' Precast Concrete Box '' $ 11,1350.00 291.00 $ 14,550.00 $ 255.00 0 12,700.00 $ 370.00 $ 16,500.00 ' 1,330 LF6' x 4' Precast Concrete Bex 250M0 $ 332,500.00 290.00 $ 385,nono $ 275.00 $ 365,759.00 $ 340.00 $ 452,200.00 ,' LF $ 342.110 $ 465,121100 $ 380.00 $ 516,800.00 $ 322.00 $ 437,920.00 $ 439.00 $ 584,800.00 340 $ 366.00 ' I • + ' + • • " ' I $ 340.00 $ S 15,600.00 $ 480.00 $ 163,200.00 C13 1 EA $ 7,400.00 $ 7.400.00 S 490.90 '. 4,900.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 3,960.00 $ 3,960.00 C14 1 EA $ 5,300.00 $ 5,300.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 9 2,390.00 $ 2,390.00 C15 EA $ 1,900.0G 9 1,900.00 $ 2,200.0G $ 2,200.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 2,350.00 $ 2,350.00 C16 EA $ 575.00 $ 575.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 1.6011.011 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 I SY $ 435.00 $ 47,850M0 $ .46 I' $ 66,000M0 $ 450.00 $ 49,500.00 $ 370.00 $ 40,700.00 Ci El r Guard Rail For W! Enlerprize Reach Grossing (Type PR -1 ] 92M0 $ 9,649.00 190.00 1 :" " $ 70.09 $ 8,409.00 $ 140.00 $ 16,900.00 C19 4 EA $ 4.$60.00 $ 6,240.06 $ 1,100.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 3,150.00 $ 12,600.00 ' 27 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 67,500.00 $ 4,300.00 $ 146,100.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 81,090.00 $ 4,019.00 $ 108,270.00 C21 5 EA5' Curb inlet (Type 2} $ 4,500.00 $ 22,500.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 4,800.96 $ 24,000.00 $ 5,150.00 $ 25,750.00 C22 8 EA $ 3,300.00 $ 26,400,00 $ 5,600.00 $ 44,800.00 $ 5,500.90 $ 44,000.00 $ 7,290.00 $ 58,320.00 C23 3 EA $ 4,100.00 $ 12,360.00 6,400.00 ' ++ '+ $ 6,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 5,210.00 $ 15,630.00 C24 13 EA5' Inlet Extension 690.06 6;970.00 940 ..00 $ 12,224) _op $ 1,400.00 $ 18,200.00 $ 1,520.00 $ 19,760.00 C25 4 EA $ 2,200.00' :: + t I' + : " •' $ 3,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 18,490.00 C26 9 EAConcrete Storm Wafer Manhole {Type '0') " $ 55,215.00 $ 9,690.00 $ 86.400.06$ 7,000.00 $ 63,000.00 $ 6,320.00 $ 56,880.00 C27 6 EA $ 6,560.00 $ 39,360.00 9,900M0 ' +' +' $ 7,000.00 $ 42,099.00 $ 6,960.00 9 41,160.00 C29 2 EA $ 8,425,00 $ 16,850M0 $ 12,0110.00 24,000.00 $ 12,409.09 $ 24,800.00 $ 12,160.00 $ 24,320.00 C29 13 EA $ 1,520.00 $ 1%769.00 4.200.60 ,1' " $ 2,309.00 $ 29,900.00 $ 2,320.00 $ 30,160.00 I 2 EAConvert Existing Past Inlet Ta Type 2 Curb Inlet $ 1,550.00 S 3,100.00 $ 3M00.00 +" ' I $ 2,006.00 $ 4,090.00 $ 3,760.00 $ 7,520.00 C31 2 EAAdjust Existing Storm Water Manhole To Finished Grade 920.00 $ 1,540.06 $ 1,400-00 $ 2,600.00 $ 600-00 $ 1,200.00 $ 880.00 $ 1,760.00 Channel Excavation and Grading 'r "21.000.00 $ 6.00 $ 0,000.00 $ 12.00 $ 18,000.00 :.+r LF 4.20 $ 3,612M0 $ 3.60 $ 3,1196.00 $ _ 4.00 $ 3,440.00 $ 5.00 $ 4,300.00 t ' LF5" LF Concrete Rlprap For Drainage Channel$ 7.85 $ 13.06 $ 80,070.00 $ 145,860.00 $ 7.80 $ 15.00 $ 79,560.00 $ 5.00 $ 168,300.00 $ 15.00 $ 51.000.00 $ 168.300.00 $ 9.00 $ 18.00 $ 91,600.00 $ 201,960.00 ' Con+xete ValleyGutfer(5' Wide} 51.00 5.00$" 3,570.00 '+' " • "1,800.00 2,310.00 $ 30.00 $ 10.00 $ 2,100.00: $ 2,090.00 $ 75.005,250.00 $ 12.00 $ $ 2,400.00 I C38 200 .1 Silt Fence Far Storm Water P011ullon Prevention " 9,300.00 ' $ 10,85090 $ 2.00 $ 6,200.00 $ 3.00 1 9,300.00 .' • :' an LF12' LFRock Erosion Control Lag 9M0 $ 4,32fi00 j • 5.70 $ 2,736.00 $ 6.00 $ 2,680.00 $ 8.00 $ 3,840.00 Filter Pam Far Storm Water Pollullon Prevention "' + 8,000M0 38.00 ' •' " $ 50.00 $ 4,660.00 $ 110.00 ' $ 8,800.00 500 Pavement Re air P ' " $ 10,000.00 "+ $ 19,500.0 - $ 60.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 49.00 $ 24,500.00 Mallnin=1111MU011ty "' 10.00 $ 10k00.0 $ 35.00 $ 35k00.0 $ 57.00 $ 57,000-00 Relocation Far Storm Water$ SafetyfarStorm WaterConduits 20,000.00 $ 20,006.0 $ 20,000." $ 20,000.0 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 ' • :+ r+ tr . + 1r 1r $ 0.10 $ 660-00 $ 1.00 $ fi,600.00 Trench Safety Far Storm Weterstructure I' •+ ++ .'" $ 10.00 $ 210.00 $ 71.00 $ 1,491.00 Utrenth Traffic Control 62M00.00 62,000.09 3,500M03,500.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,005.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Storm Water Utilit Allowance 50 600.00 t 900.90 $ 00,000.00 ' "' "$ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50 000.00 $ 50 900.00 SUBTOTAL PART "C" STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS (ITEMS C1•C47 1 $ 2,313,820.00 r 1 (41 Submitted Bid Proposal Showed 92,784,371.00. Addition error. Corrected Total as shown is 92,786,471.00 Bid should be considered non-responsive. TABULATION OF BIDS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TABULATED BY: Pete Anaya, P.E., Director of Engineering Services TIME OF COMPLETION: 600 Calendar Days DATE: April 27, 2011-2:00' pm Page 4 of 5 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: Asphalt Concrete 17,143,995.00 $7459,04010 (5) Submitted Bid Proposal showed 5663,570.00. Addition error. Corrected Total as shown is $663,670.00. Bid should be considered non-responsive, BEAR LANE - 2.P.1 - - 9908 TX 70469 --- Texas 20810 Fembush Houston, Texas UNIT � �ux,fsPRICE x ._ .'.rdT..:..$ 0. TO OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD - BOND 2008 - -- Haas -Anderson 1Box 7692 r Box Corpus - UNIT TOTAL Sterling 77073 TOTAL ITEM QTY UNIT 1,-..i.A - DESCRIPTION _ UNIT TOTAL � y.� y�G "�+"• UNIT �( ET5 _ e.+[tC 11 a'S TOTAL m 7�� 42,1 L' ��"gyp Fi.3 yy�� iP]F e�.. 11Di y9 .. {�3 i.#_ �j o,,,,,� ' i, `EF f_l ? �i.', $ 8.00 1 LF ---hi',...� ,-.,'a K;.J 'ti,l4 '•s��,.. Temporary 2• (P.E.) SDR 9 (200 PSI Min.) '1',i'✓ti ' 'k el •, Fip , '_ =r,rl0.0 02 03 1 20 EA Connect Teporary 2" Bypass Line To Existing Water Meter $ 4,000.00 $ 22.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 9.00 $ 4,500.00 1460 +1• • ' $ 920.06 $ 920.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.003,150.00 1 , + 97_00 1 ,+ •.,,1 LF 6" C900 PVC {DR78) Waterline 6 38.00 $ 760.00 $ 76.00 $ 1,560.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,000,00 04 360 1.6 B" C900 PVC (DR18) Waterline $ 58.00 $ 22,040.00 $ 67.00 $ . 25,460.00 $ 95.00 $ 36,100.00 01 D5 5,380 IF 12" C900 (DR18) Waterline $ 50.00 $ 265,000,00 $ 44.00 $ 238,720.00 $ 87.00 5 360,460.00 3 51_00 $ 274,380.00 06 1 EA 6" Gate Valve and Valve Box $ 1,924.00 $ 1,024.00 $ 720.00 $ 720.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 1680.00 $ 07 7 EA 8' Gale Valve and Valve Box $ 1,500.00 $ 10,500.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 7,700.00 ! $ 1,100.00 $ 7,700-00 $ 1,480.00 1,0813.00 $ 10,380.00 08 16 EA 12" Gate Valve and Valve Bax $ 2,630.00 $ 42,080.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 30,400.00 $ 2,60600 S 41,606.00 09 1 EA 2" 90" Bend For Wafer Service Line $ 168.00 $ 168.00 $ 460.00 5 460.60 $ 400.00 5 400.06 $ 52060 $ 520.00 010 2 EA 6' 45' O.I. Bend 5 565.00 $ 1,130.00 $ 173.00 $ 346.00 $ 160.00 9 320.00 160.09 011 30 EA 6'45" D.I. Bend $ 765.00 5 22,950.00 $ 225.00 $ 6,750.60 5 210.00 $ 6,306.00 230.09 6,900.00 012 13 EA 12" 45" O.I. Bend $ 945.00 5 12,285.00 $ 420.60 $ 5,460.00 $ 419.00 $ 5,339.00 470.00 1 r 1 013 2 EA 12" 90" Bend $ 978.00 $ 1,956.00 $ 460.00 $ 920.00 $ 459.00 $ 900.00 $ 522.00$ 1,0 • •+ 1314 2 EA 6"Tie-In Connection $ 2,975.00 5 5,950.00 $ 850.60 S 1,700.00 $ 1,006.00 $ 2,000.00 .• 2,360.00 11+ 015 7 EA 8' Tie4n Connection $ 3,061.00 $ 21,427.00 $ 880.00 $ 6,160.00 1 1,300.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 2,3go.00 $ 16,730 1+ 016 2 EA 12" Tie -In Connection $ 3,282.00 $ 6,564.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 3,400.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,740.00 $ 9,480.013 D17 3 EA 12" Plug $ 575.00 $ 1,725.00 $ 250.00 $ 750.00 5 250.00 $ 750.00 .111 811, 0113 8 EA Replace Exist. Water Service wlNew Service Connection $ 1,506.00 $ 12,040.00 $ 1,130.90 $ 9640.00 $ 1,100.00 6 8,800.06 $ 2,140.00 $ 17,120.00 010 100 LF 2" PVC Water Service Line $ 22.50 $ 2,250.00 $ 27.30 $ 2,730.00 $ 20.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 37.00 $ 3,700.00 020 1 EA 12" x 12" x 12"Tapping Sleeve $ 6,784,00 $ 6,784.00 $ 5,600.00 5 5.600.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.60 $ 9,460.00 $ 9,460.00 021 1 EA 8" x 8" x 6" O.I. Tee $ 782.00 $ 782-00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 5 300,00 $ 300.00 $ 330.00 $ 330.00 022 1 EA 12" x 12" x 6" D.I. Tee $ 1,002.00 $ 1,002.00 $ 46020 $ 460.00 $ 450.00 $ 450.00 $ 520.00 1 1 + 1323 7 EA 12" x 12" x 8" DJ, Tee $ 1,090.00 $ 7,630.00 $ 560.00 $ 3,92020 5 550.00 5 3,850.00 650.00 1 , 1 024 i EA 12" x 12" x 12" D.1. Tee $ 1,181.00 $ 1,161.00 $ 650.00 $ 650.00 $ 650.00 $ 650.00 760.00 $ 760.00 025 1 EA 12" x 12" x 8" 0.1. Wye $ 1.363.00 $ 1,363.00 $ 820.00 $ 82060 $ 60020 5 800.00 960.00 960.00 1326 - 16 EA Fire Hydrant Assembly (AII Types) I, $ 5,250.00 $ 94,500.00 $ 3,700.00 --./' $ 66,600,06 $ 4,700.00 1 04,600.00 5,080.00 $ 91,440.00 1327 400 GY Cement Stabilized Sand 0aekfi6 L$ 63.00 $ 25,200.00 $ . 45.00 $ 18,000.00 3 45.60 $ 18,000.00 $ 57.130 $ 22,00060 028 500 SY Pavement Repair Far Water $ 61.00 $ 30,500.00 $ 45.00 $ 22,50020 _ $ 40.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 49.00 $ 24,500.00 029 100 LF Plowable Grout Fill and Abandon Exist. 12" AC Waterline $ 14.00 $ 1,400.00 5 42.00 5 4,206.00 $ 18.00 $ 1,800.00 10.00 029.0 100 LF Flowable grout Fill and Abandon Exist. 6" AC Waterline $ 17.06 $ 1,790.00 $ 34.00 $ 3,400.00 5 16.00 1 1,600.00 $ 10.00 $ 1,000.00 030 2 EA Adjust Exist. Water and Meter Boxes To Finish Grade $ 345.06 $ 690.00 $ 760.00 $ 1,520.00 $ 350.00 $ 700.00 $ • 210.00 420.00 D31 100 1.6 20" Steel Casing (Bored) With 12" PVC Waterline $ 520.00 $ 52,000.00 $ 730.00 $ 73,000.00 $ 280.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 250.00 $ 25,000.00 1332 5,780 LF Trench Safety For W ateriioe $ 1.15 $ 6,647-00 $ 1.70 $ 9,826.00 $ 0.10 $ 578.00 160 $ 5,780.00 033 1 LS Traffic Conant For Water $ 2,875.00 $ 2,875.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 1260100 12,000.00 034 1 LS Water Utility Allowance $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000-00 $ 30,000.00 8 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,0017.00 $ 30,000.00 +1 3060000 SUBTOTAL PART "0" WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS (ITEMS D1-034) $ 703,031.00 $ 598,472.00 5 692,136.06 • c r i (5) Submitted Bid Proposal showed 5663,570.00. Addition error. Corrected Total as shown is $663,670.00. Bid should be considered non-responsive, TABULATION OF BIDS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TABULATED BY: Pete Anaya, P.E., Director of Engineering Services TIME OF COMPLETION: 600 Calendar Days DATE: April 27, 2011 - 2:00 pm Page 5 of 5 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: Asphalt Concrete V ii4311%,99 IT,85944,11 BEAR LANE - S.P.I.D. TO OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD - BOND 2008 Haas -Anderson .--- Construction, Ltd. PO Bax 7692 Corpus Christi, TX 78467 Bay, Ltd. PO Box 9908 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 .` Reytec ConstrucUan P.O. Box 550075 Corpus Christi, Texas 77255 Texas Sterling 20810 Fernbush Houston, Texas 77073 r ITEM QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE PRICE TOTAL PRICE 717bb 61 -° ::y F 1 l EA a 3Fs # � Ld¢Pv' '4,t1. P! Adjust Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole To Finsihed Grade 1,Y'.�:.!: =4 $ 920.00 $ 020.00 4i1`'r'irs§'€. $ 1,500.00 x�i �Wg: $ 1,500.00 'tti'`,"R.`,4}3,!.:I $ 600.00 -111 M.e7 $ 600.00 $ 1,330.00 '5,,,y,Ati ;t ,r , $ 1,330.00 52 1 16 Mobilization & Demobilization For Cured -In -Place Pipe (CIPP) $ 5,750.00 $ 5,750.00 $ 6,000.00- $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 7,150.00 $ 7,15000 93 1 EA Set Up Charge For CIDP Installation - $ 1,725.00 $ 1,725.00 $ 1,1300.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 214.00 $ 214.00 E4 960 LF 8" Cured -In -Place Pipe (CIPP) (Including Cleaning Exist. Pipe) $ 34.50 $ 33,120.00 $ 35.00 $ 33,600.00 $ 36.00 $ 34,560.00 $ 43.00 $ 41,280.00 65 20 LF 8' PVc (SDR 26) Sanitary Sewer 20'-22' $ 316.00 $ 6,320.00 $ 330.00 $ 6,600.00 $ 800.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 240.00 $ 4,8110.00 E6 40 LF 18" PVC (30R 26) Sanitary Sewer 22'-24' $ 719.00 $ 26,760.00 $ 330.00 $ 13.200.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 44,000.00 $ 300.00 $ 12,000.50 E7 40 LF 16" PVC (SDR 26) Sanitary Sewer 24'-26' $ 748.50 $ 29,920.00 $ 330.00 $ 13,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 300.00 $ 12,000.00 E8 1 LS Install 8" Drop Connection On Existing Manhole (14'-22' Depth) $ 14,375.00 $ 14,375.00 $ 4,800.60 $ 4,800.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 3,150.00 $ 3,100.00 E9 1 LS Install 5' Drop Connection On Existing Manhole (20-24' Depth) $ 17,250.00 $ 17,250.00 $ 4,900.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 3,190.00 $ 3,190.00 510 t EA Remove and Replace Existing 5' Dia, Manhole (20'-24' Depth) $ 35,650.00 $ 35,650.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 47,940.00 $ 47,940.00 Ell 1 EA Remove and Replace Existing 5' Dia. Manhole (22'-24' Depth) $ 37,950.00 $ 37,950.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 34,000.00 $ ' 34,000.00 $ 51,710.00 $ 51,710.00 E12 1 EA Rehabilitate Existing 5' Dia. Manholes $ 10,050.00 $ 10,050.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 13,140.00 $ 13,140.00 E13 1 EA Rehabilitate Existing 5' Dia. Manholes (12'-14' Depth) $ 13,375.00 $ 13,375.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 13,580.00 $ 13,580.00 E14 1 EA Rehabilitate Existing 5' Dia. Manholes (20'-22' Depth) $ 17,185.00 $ 17,160.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 16,630.00 $ 10,630.00 E15 2 EA Rehabilitate Existing 5' Dia. Manholes (24'-26' Depth) $ 17,935.00 $ 35,870.00 $ 19,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 18,750.00 $ 37,500.00 E16 5 EA Adjust Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole 70 Finsihed Grade $ 5,25500 (Special) $ 26,275.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 40,005.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 4,820.00 $ 24,100.00 E17 100 LE Trench Safety Far Sanitary Sewer Conduits $ 66.00 $ 6,600.00 $ 25.00 $ 2,580.00 $ 20.00 5 2,000.00 $ 1.00 $ 100.90 E18 4 EA Trench Safely For Sanitary Sewer Structure $ 3,275.00 $ 13,100.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 71.00 $ 204.00 519 1 LS Dewatering Mobilization and Demobilization $ 7,475.00 $ 7,475.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 12,540.00 $ 12,540.00 E20 100 LF Dewatering Trench $ 90.00 $ 9,600.00 $- 190.00 $ 19,000.50 $ 250.00 $ 25,600.00 $ 100.00 $ 10,000.00 E21 1 LS Traffic Control $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,700.00 $ 3,700.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 522 1 LS Sanitary Sewer Utility Allowance $ 10,000.00 PART "E" SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (ITEMS 51.622 $ 10,000.00 $ 363,445.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00] $ 337,500.00 $ 10,000.00 S 10,000.00 $ 10 000.00 m '.„ .d, $ 415,160.00 ,„,.„,.4-,..a.- $ 10,000.00 , > 4 SUBTOTAL �we w V � \`f 4..��4_ - A. .i,� �Ic-?2"J� I Y �'' �..K� $ 460.00 � l p�rz $ 1,380.50 t�fii,k �.i.�. 5 560.00 i•.:-.. L� $ 1,660.00 �4rri�.r' - , i� $ 600.00 a L. _ $ 1,800.00 $ 1,270.00 _._ $ 3,810.00 F1 3 EA Adjust Existing Gas Valve To Finish Grade F2 30 LF Trench Work Associated With Gas Line Relocation (6'-B' Deep) $ 190.00 $ 5,700.00 $ 55.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 190.00 $ 5,700.00 $ 120.00 $ 3,600.00 F3 20 LF Trench Work Associated With Gas Line Relocation (8'-10' Deep) $ 240.90 $ 4,000.00 $ 55.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 220.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 150.00 $ 3,600.00 F4 100 LF Trench Work Associated With Gas Line Relocation (10'-12' Deep) $ 90.00 5 0,000.00 $ 66.05 $ 6,600.00 $ 220.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 160.00 $ 18,000.00 SUBTOTAL PART "F" GAS IMPROVEMENTS (ITEMS Fl -F4) $ 20,880.00 $ 11,030.00 $ 33,900.00 $ 29,010.00 :i9F:44F 'V" r '7 G1 83,500 `Td +? SF 4$.1 s3 ° rpt. rn' , M i e` ri n °.i ' . .I , .l.Z.41..kh' ? :tv. CZt`..1.5R,r,4 z% 'Al' ., .. .. #sf. , `'. 4" Concrete Sidewalk With 6' Bank Sand Bedding (8' Wide Typ.) 1 4.55 $ 379,925.00 $ 4.00 $ 334,000.00 $ 4.00 $ 334,0110.00 $ 6.00 $ 501,000.00 G2 3,620 5F Concrete Curb Ramp $' 10.00 $ 36,200.00 $ 14.00 $ 50,686.00 $ 28.00 $ 101,360.00 $ 16.00 $ 57,920.00 03 309 SF Unanticipated Concrete Sidewalk Removal $ 0.75 $ 225.00 $ 2.00 $ 600.00 5 2.00 $ 600.00 $ 12.00 $ 3,600.00 G4 600 LF Reflective Pavement Mrk. Type 1 (W) (Crosswalk) (10' Wide) $ 20.50 $ 12,000.00 $ 24.00 $ 14,400.00 $ 20.00 $ 12,000.110 $ 45.00 $ 27,000.00 05 630 SF Concrete Pedestrian Bus Pad - i 10.00 $ 6,300.00 $ 16.90 $ 11,340.00 $ 12.00 5 7,560.00 $ 21.00 $ 13 230.00 SUBTOTAL PART "G" A.D.A. IMPROVEMENTS (ITEMS G1 -G4) $ 434,650.00 $ 411,020.00 $ 455,520.00 $ 602,750.00 TOTAL BASE BID - FLEXIBLE (ASPHALT) PAVEMENT OPTION (PMTS.''$ 6,259,588.00 $ 6,292,243.50 NO 810 'R. TOTAL BASE BID - RIGID (CONCRETE) PAVEMENT OPTION (PARTS: NO BID NO BID $ 6,641,259.50 (6) Submitted Bid Proposal showed $331,804,00. Addition error. Corrected Total as ahown fs $329,878.00. Bid should be considered non-responsive. (7) Submitted Bid Proposal showed $7,026,524.00. Addition error. Corrected Total as shown is $6,995,658.00. Bid should be considered non-responsive. (8} Submitted Bid Proposal showed $7,045,810.00. Addition error. Corrected Total as shown is $ 7,014,944.00. Did should be considered non-responsive. PROJECT BUDGET BEAR LANE FROM SPED TO OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD (BOND ISSUE 2008) Project No. 6463 May 24, 2011 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Bond Issue 2008 CIP No. ST 15 $4,200,000.00 Storm Water 2,807,800.00 Water 2,730,200.00 Wastewater 216,200.00 Gas 113, 800.00 Total $10,068,000.00 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction (Haas - Anderson Construction, Ltd) . $6,259,588.00 Contingencies 625,958.80 Consultant Fees: Consultant - (Coym, Rehmet and Gutierrez Engineering, L.P.) 1,081,450.00 Testing - (Rock Engineering, Subsurface Investigation & Laboratory Testing)14,300.00 Testing - (construction and materials testing) (estimated) 125,191.76 Reimbursements: Contract Administration (Contract Preparation/ Award/ Admin) ......................... 172,138.67 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt/Traffic Mgt) . 219,085.58 Finance Issuance 78,244.85 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 31,297.94 Total $8,607,255.60 * Construction Observation Services is included in Consultant, Coym, Rehmet and Gutierrez Engineering's, contract in the amount of $242,625. Estimated Project Budget Balance $1,460,744.40 H:\HOMEWetmaP4GEN BTREETl6463 BEAR LANECONSTRUCTION16 AGENDA PROJECT BUDGET6 AGENDA PROJECT BUDGET -82- EXHIBIT "D" Page 1 of 1 Coym,Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering, L.P. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS May 10, 2011 Mr. Pete Anaya, P.E. Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469 -9277 5688 S. STAPLES, SURE 230 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78411 361 - 991.8550 FAX:381- 993 -7599 1220 N. TEXAS BLVD., SUITE 4 ALICE, TX 78332 361-664 -5821 FAX:381464 -0559 RE: Bear Lane SPID To Old Brownsville Road Bond 2008 City Project No. 6463 CRG Job No. 20212c Dear Mr. Anaya: Bids for the referenced project were opened at 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday April 27, 2011. Four bids were received for the project. The three lowest bidders and their respective bids for this project were: Contractor, Base Bid (Flexible Asphalt) Base Bid (Rigid Concrete) Parts A, C. D, E, F & G Parts B, C, D. E, F & G Haas - Anderson Construction, Ltd. $6,259,588.00 NO BID Bay, Ltd. $6,292,243.50 NO BID Reytec Construction NO BID $6,641,259.50 Following this letter is the detailed bid tabulation and summary Haas - Anderson, Ltd. headquartered in Corpus Christi, Texas has successfully completed numerous projects for the City of Corpus Christi. In our opinion, the firm is fully capable of accomplishing the work required in this important project. I have enclosed information for the company as required by Items A -28, A -29 and A -30 of the Special Provisions of the Contract. —83— EXHIBIT "E" Page 1 of 2 Mr. Pete Anaya, F.E. May 10, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Additionally a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was conducted using the Federal Highway Administration's Real Cost program to compare the merits of the competing construction design alternatives with the received bid amounts, in this case asphalt pavement versus concrete pavement. The program considers all relevant costs of the City and the public incurred during construction and throughout the projected service life of the roadway. The results showed that over the course of 40 years the present value cost to the City of asphalt pavement would be approximately 14% lower than concrete pavement. Furthermore the present value cost to the .public of asphalt pavement would be approximately 5% lower than concrete pavement. Therefore, it is CRG Engineering's recommendation that the City award the contract to Haas - Anderson, Ltd. in the total base bid for asphalt pavement amount of $6,259,588.00. If you have any questions, please give me a call at (361) 991 -8550 or email me at jcoym ©crgei.com. Very truly yours, COYM, REHMET & GUTIERREZ ENGINEERING, L.P. Jeffrey C.`Coym, P.E. Enclosures JCC /ar —84— EXHIBIT "E" Page 2 of 2 Mproject\councilexhibits\ exh6463. d wg PROJECT LOCATION Bear Lane from Old Brownsville Road to South Padre Island Drive BEAR LANE FROM OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD TO SOUTH PADRE ISLAND DRIVE CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: 1 of 1 DATE: 05-24-2011 MIR UM -- 10 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: May 24, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: a. Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring the results of the General Election held on May 14, 2011, in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas for the purpose of electing the Mayor, and eight Council Members. b. Ordinance ordering a Runoff Election to be held on June 18, 2011 in the City of Corpus Christi for the election of Council Member District Three; designating polling place locations. ISSUE: In order to canvass the results, the City Council must compare precinct reports provided to the Mayor by the precinct election judges to the tabulation reports provided by our office. The council has the option to review all precincts or randomly select a few. Once the council is satisfied that the results are accurate the canvass is completed. City Charter, Section 1, states that single member district members shall be elected by majority vote. A runoff election is necessary in the Single Member District 3 race. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the two ordinances as presented. Armando Chapa City Secretary (361) 826 -3105 armandoc(r cctexas. com AN ORDINANCE CANVASSING RETURNS AND DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL ELECTION HELD ON MAY 14, 2011, IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTING THE MAYOR, AND EIGHT COUNCIL MEMBERS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi ordered and called a General Election for the election of Mayor, and eight Council Members. WHEREAS, notice of said election was given as required by law; WHEREAS, said election was duly held on the 14th day of May, 2011, in conformity with the election laws of the State of Texas, and the results of said election have been certified and returned by the judges and clerks thereof; and WHEREAS, the Council has today canvassed the returns of said election; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the said election was in all respects lawfully held and that the City Secretary's tally and certification of results to the Council are correct: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The tally of votes cast in the regular election held on the 14th day of May, 2011 for Mayor, and eight Council Members be made and certified to by the City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, and the same is hereby adopted as the official tabulation of the votes cast at said election, for each candidate in each precinct and in sum, and that said tabulation be filed and recorded in the official records of the City of Corpus Christi as the official canvass of said election. SECTION 2. The results of such canvass are declared to be: That the following were duly elected: Mayor Council Member At Large Council Member At Large Council Member At Large Council Member District One Council Member District Two Council Member District Four Council Member District Five Joe Adame David Loeb Nelda Martinez Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick John Edward Marez Chris Adler Larry Elizondo, Sr. That the candidates who received the highest and second highest number of votes in the main election are hereby certified for placement in a Runoff Election as follows: Council Member, District Three Priscilla Leal Roland Barrera SECTION 3. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, work, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 4. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of May, 2011. ATTEST: The City of Corpus Christi Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved: ig day of May, 2011 Carlos Valdez City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas Day of , 2011 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I /we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame, Mayor City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott Linda Strong May 14, 2011' Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Page 1 of 107 Precinct 1 Registered Voters 1138 Election Day Voters 58 Early Voters 79 Total Number Voters 137 Total Precinct Turnout 12.04% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 11 15 26 20.31% Adame 38 54 92 71.88% Madrigal 5 5 10 7.81% Total Votes 54 74 128 100.00% At Large Menard 6 10 16 4.88% Scott 29 44 73 22.26% Salinas 3 11 14 4.27% Noyola 12 19 31 9.45% Martinez 38 42 80 24.39% Loeb 45 54 99 30.18% Gaona 7 8 15 4,57% Total Votes 140 188 328 100.00% District 2 Marez 25 24 49 38.58% Sloan 12 15 27 21.26% Lucio 18 33 51 40.16% Total Votes 55 72 127 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 583 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:01 PM Precinct 2 Page 2 of 107 Registered Voters 2334 Election Day Voters 129 Early Voters 10 Total Number Voters 237 Total Precinct Turnout 1015% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 26 24 50 21.65% Adame 92 73 165 71.43% Madrigal 9 7 16 6.93% Total Votes 127 104 231 100.00% At Large Menard 24 11 35 6.02% Scott 80 57 137 23.58% Salinas 20 19 39 6,71% Noyola 26 14 40 6.88% Martinez 76 72 148 25A7% Loeb 87 71 158 27.19% Gaona 13 11 24 4.13 % Total Votes 326 255 581 100.00% District 4 Adler 96 77 173 100.00% Total Votes 96 77 173 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 985 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 3 Registered Voters 3132 Election Day Voters 187 Early Voters 151 Total Number Voters 338 Total Precinct Turnout 10.79% Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 19, 2011 9:54:01 PM Page 3 of 107 Mayoral Moan 29 24 53 15.96% Adame 136 119 255 76.81% Madrigal 16 8 24 7.23% Total Votes 181 151 332 100.00% At Large Menard 28 15 43 5.14% Scott 105 81 186 22.22% Salinas 42 33 75 8.96% Noyola 50 35 85 10.16% Martinez 116 94 210 25.09% Loeb 118 96 214 25.57% Gaona 13 11 24 2.87% Total Votes 472 365 837 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. ' 136 106 242 100.00% Total Votes 136 106 242 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1411 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:01 PM Precinct 4 Page 4 of 107 Registered Voters 2268 Election Day Voters 161 Early Voters 113 Total Number Voters 274 Total Precinct Turnout 12.08% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 31 16 47 17.47% Adame 103 78 181 67.29% Madrigal 24 17 41 15.24% Total Votes 158 111 269 100.00% At Large Menard 17 9 26 4.06% Scott 84 46 130 20.28% Salinas 38 31 69 10.76% Noyola 42 44 86 13.42% Martinez 102 67 169 26.37% Loeb 76 58 134 20.90% Gaona 13 14 27 4.21% Total Votes 372 269 641 100.00% District 3 Leal 65 48 113 42.01% Soto 6 2 8 2.97% Barrera 88 60 148 55.02% Total Votes 159 110 269 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1179 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Precinct 5 Race May 14, 2011 9:54:01 PM Page 5 of 107 Registered Voters 725 Election Day Voters 66 Early Voters 33 Total Number Voters 99 Total Precinct Turnout 13.66% Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 7 3 10 10.42% Adame 46 26 72 75.00% Madrigal 10 4 14 14.58% Total Votes 63 33 96 100.00% At Large Menard 10 3 13 5.08% Scott 42 23 65 25.39% Salinas 12 6 18 7.03% Noyola 16 6 22 8.59% Martinez 44 23 67 26.17% Loeb 43 20 63 24.61% Gaona 6 2 8 3.13% Total Votes 173 83 256 100.00% District 4 Adler 52 28 80 100.00% Total Votes 52 28 80 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 432 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:01 PM Precinct 6 Page 6 of 107 Registered Voters 2804 Election Day Voters 86 Early Voters 84 Total Number Voters 170 Total Precinct Turnout 6.06% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 24 27 51 30.72% Adame 57 52 109 65.66% Madrigal 2 4 6 3.61% Total Votes 83 83 166 100.00% At Large Menard 26 28 54 12.89% Scott 45 48 93 22.20% Salinas 11 9 20 4.77% Noyola 15 18 33 7.88% Martinez 46 50 96 22.91% Loeb 53 58 111 26.49% Gaona 2 10 12 2.86% Total Votes 198 221 419 100.00% District 4 Adler 58 65 Total Votes 58 65 Total Precinct Votes 123 100.00% 123 100.00% 708 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Precinct 7 Registered Voters 800 Election Day Voters 23 Early Voters 18 Total Number Voters 41 Total Precinct Turnout 5.13% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 2011 9:54 :01 PM Page 7of107 Mayoral Moon 5 6 11 28.95% Adame 10 5 15 39.47% Madrigal 7 5 12 31.58% Total Votes 22 16 38 100.00% At Large Menard 2 1 3 2.97% Scott 11 3 14 13.86% Salinas 7 8 15 14.85% Noyola 3 5 8 7.92% Martinez 15 11 26 25.74% Loeb 18 5 23 22.77% Gaona 8 4 12 11.88% Total Votes 64 37 101 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 16 13 29 100.00% 16 13 29 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 168 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Reoort May 14, 2011 9:54:D1 PM Precinct 8 Page 8 of 107 Registered Voters 2791 Election Day Voters 80 Early Voters 85 Total Number Voters 165 Total Precinct Turnout 5.91 % Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes %p Mayoral Moon 16 19 35 21.74% Adame 60 56 116 72.05% Madrigal 2 8 10 6.21% Total Votes 78 83 161 100.00% Ai Large Menard 13 16 29 7.2396 Scott 49 38 87 21.70% Salinas 16 20 36 8.98% Noyola 18 15 33 8.23% Martinez 50 51 101 25.19% Loeb 47 52 99 24.69% Gaona 5 11 16 3.99 % Total Votes 198 203 401 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 59 65 124 100.00% Total Votes 59 65 124 100.00% Total Precinct Votes -100- 686 May 14, 2011 - Final Precinct Vote Detailed Revort 9:54:01 PM Page 9of107 Precinct 9 Registered Voters 1879 Election Day Voters 83 Early Voters .56 Total Number Voters 139 Total Precinct Turnout 7.40% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 14 17 31 23.13% Adame 61 32 93 69.40% Madrigal 5 5 10 7.46% Total Votes 80 54 134 100.00% At Large Menard 22 15 37 11.01% Scott 49 32 81 24.11% Salinas 7 9 16 4.76% Noyola 17 8 25 7.44% Martinez 38 30 68 20.24% Loeb 57 37 94 27.98% Gaona 8 7 15 4.46% Total Votes 198 138 336 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 62 48 110 100.00% 62 48 110 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 580 -101- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 15 Registered Voters 375 Election Day Voters 6 Early Voters 11 Total Number Voters 17 Total Precinct Turnout 4.53% Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 2011 9:54:01 PM Page 10 of 107 Mayoral Moon 2 3 5 29.41% Adame 3 5 8 47.06% Madrigal 1 3 4 23.53% Total Votes 6 11 17 100.0O% At Large Menard 1 1 2 6.25% Scott 3 4 7 21.88% Salinas 0 4 4 12.50% Noyola 0 1 1 3.13% Martinez 3 8 11 34.38% Loeb 4 2 6 18.75% Gaona 0 1 1 3.13% Total Votes 11 21 32 100.00% District 3 Leal Soto Sarrera 2 2 0 10 12 80.00% 1 3 20.00% 0 0 0 Total Votes 4 11 15 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 64 -102- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011• 9:54:01 PM Precinct 16 Page 11 of 107 Registered Voters 640 Election .Day Voters 98 Early Voters 60 Total Number Voters 158 Total Precinct Turnout 24.69% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 7 5 12 8.57% Adame 71 53 124 88.57% Madrigal 3 1 4 2.86% Total Votes 81 59 140 100.00 % At Large Menard 12 6 18 5.37% Scott 54 46 100 29.85% Salinas 15 10 25 7.46% Noyola 13 10 23 6.87% Martinez 42 35 77 22.99% Loeb 50 35 85 25.37% Gaona 2 5 7 2.09% Total Votes 188 147 335 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 63 46 109 100.00% Total Votes 63 46 109 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 584 -103- a May 14, 2011 �r Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Precinct 17 Page 12 of 107 Registered Voters 2563 Election Day Voters 65 Early Voters 81 Total Number Voters 146 Total Precinct Turnout 5.70% Race Electron Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 8 17 25 17.48% Adame 44 55 99 69.23% Madrigal 10 9 19 13.29% Total Votes 62 81 143 100.00% At Large Menard 11 16 27 7.50% Scott 31 36 67 18.616 Salinas 21 23 44 12.22% Noyola 17 20 37 10.28% Martinez 41 57 98 27.22% Loeb 32 44 76 21.11% Gaona 5 6 11 3.06% Total Votes 158 202 360 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 45 57 102 100.00% Total Votes 45 57 102 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 605 May 14, 2011• Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Precinct 18 Page 13 of 107 Registered Voters 2728 Election Day Voters 42 Early Voters 64 Total Number Voters 106 Total Precinct Turnout 3.89% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal Total Votes 15 25 40 38.10% 24 25 49 46.67% 3 13 16 15.24% 42 63 105 104.00% At Large Menard 9 18 27 10.51% Scott 21 20 41 15.95% Salinas 10 12 22 8.56% Noyola 11 16 27 30.51% Martinez 20 39 59 22.96% Loeb 26 40 66 25.68% Gaona 6 9 15 5.84% Total Votes 103 154 257 100.00 %n District 4 Adler Total Votes 28 43 71 100.40% 28 43 71 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 433 -105- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:01 PM Precinct 19 page 14 of 107 Registered Voters 113 Election Day Voters 2 Early Voters 7 Total Number Voters 9 Total Precinct Turnout 7.96% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes To Mayoral Moon 1 2 3 37.50% Adame 0 5 5 62.50% Madrigal 0 0 0 0 Total Votes 1 7 8 100.00% At Large Menard 0 1 1 4.76% Scott 1 5 6 28.57% Salinas 0 0 0 0 Noyola 0 2 2 9.52% Martinez 0 4 4 19.05% Loeb 1 6 7 33.33% Gaona 1 0 1 4.76% Total Votes 3 18 21 100.00% District 4 Adler 1 7 8 100.00% Total Votes 1 7 8 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 37 -106- May 14, 2011, Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Page 15 of 107 Precinct 20 Registered Voters 2396 Election Day Voters 116 Early Voters 83 Total Number Voters 199 Total Precinct Turnout 8.31% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon 18 12 30 15.31% Adame 75 53 128 65.31% Madrigal 20 18 38 19.39% Total Votes 113 83 196 100.00% At Large Menard 13 8 21 4.66% Scott 49 27 76 16.85% Salinas 37 30 67 14.86% Noyola 46 30 76 16.85% Martinez 59 57 116 25.72% Loeb 50 37 87 19.29% Gaona 3 5 8 1.77% Total Votes 257 194 451 100.00% District 3 Leal 35 31 66 33.85% Soto 4 2 6 3.08% Barrera 74 49 123 63.08% Total Votes 113 82 195 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 842 -107- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 21 Registered Voters 376 Election Day Voters 46 Early Voters 24 Total Number Voters 70 Total Precinct Turnout 18.62% Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 20I1 9:54:01 PM Page 16 of 107 Mayoral Moon 7 10 17 25.76% Adame 29 13 42 63.64% Madrigal 7 0 7 10.61% Total Votes 43 23 66 100.00% At Large Menard 11 6 17 9,77% Scott 31 9 40 22.99% Salinas 5 7 12 6.90% Noyola 7 4 11 6.32% Martinez 25 18 43 24.71% Loeb 29 16 45 25.86% Gaona 3 3 6 3.45% Total Votes 111 63 174 100.00% District 2 Marez 15 5 20 28.99% Sloan 26 14 40 57.97% Lucio 5 4 9 13.04% Total Votes 46 23 69 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 309 -108- May 14, 20116 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Page 17 of 107 Precinct 23 Registered Voters 26 Election Day Voters 3 Early Voters 0 Total Number Voters 3 Total Precinct Turnout 11.54% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 100.00% 0 0 0 0 Total Votes 3 0 3 100.00% At Large Menard 0 0 0 0 Scott 2 0 2 22.22% Salinas 0 0 0 0 Noyola . 1 0 1 11.11% Martinez 3 0 3 33.33% Loeb 3 0 3 33.33% Gaona 0 0 0 0 Total Votes 9 0 9 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 3 0 3 100.00% 3 0 3 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 15 -109-- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Revort 9:54:01 PM Precinct 24 Page 18 of 107 Registered Voters 683 Election Day Voters 7 Early Voters 3 Total Number Voters 10 Total Precinct Turnout 1.46% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 1 0 1 10.00% Adame 5 3 8 80.00% Madrigal 1 0 1 10.00% Total Votes 7 3 10 100.00% At Large Menard 0 0 0 0 Scott 1 0 1 5.88% Salinas 2 1 3 17.65% Noyola 2 0 2 11.76% Martinez 2 3 5 29.41% Loeb 2 0 2 11.76% Gaona 2 2 4 23.53% Total Votes 11 6 17 100.00% District 3 Leal Soto Barrera 3 1 2 3 6 66.67% 0 1 11.11% 0 2 22.22% Total Votes 6 3 9 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 36 -1 1 0- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Precinct 26 Page 19 of 107 Registered Voters 3212 Election Day Voters 214 Early Voters 183 Total Number Voters 397 Total Precinct Turnout 12.36% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 26 27 53 13.49% Adame 171 146 317 80.66% Madrigal 17 6 23 5.85% Total Votes 214 179 393 100.00% At Large Menard 33 29 62 6.25% Scott 136 102 238 23.99% Salinas 28 35 63 6.35% Noyola 61 48 109 10.99% 1 Martinez 142 106 248 25.00% Loeb 129 113 242 24.40% Gaona 19 11 30 3.02% Total Votes 548 444 992 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. Total Votes 175 149 324 100.00% 175 149 324 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1709 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9 :54:01 PM Precinct 29 Page 20 of 107 Registered Voters 2758 Election Day Voters 173 Early Voters 106 Total Number Voters 279 Total Precinct Turnout 10.12% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 19 22 41 15.02% Adame 137 78 215 78.75% Madrigal 12 5 17 6.23% Total Votes 168 105 273 100.00% At Large Menard 31 17 48 6.85% Scott 100 57 157 22.40% Salinas 39 22 61 8.70% Noyola 37 22 59 8.42% Martinez 103 65 168 23.97% Loeb 107 77 184 26.25% Gaona 16 8 24 3.42% Total Votes 433 268 701 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. Total Votes 131 86 217 100.00% 131 86 217 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1191 -1 1 2- May 14, 2011 - Final Precinct Vote Detailed Revort 9:54:01 PM Precinct 30 Page 21 of 207 Registered Voters 515 Election Day Voters 4 Early Voters 3 Total Number Voters 7 Total Precinct Turnout 1.36% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 1 2 3 42.86% Adanne 3 1 4 57.14% Madrigal 0 0 0 0 Total Votes 4 3 7 100.00% At Large Menard 0 0 0 0 Scott 1 1 2 22.22% 1 Salinas 1 0 1 11.11% Noyola 0 0 0 0 Martinez 2 1 3 33.33% Loeb 2 0 2 22.22% Gaona 0 1 1 11.11% Total Votes 6 3 9 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 2 2 4 100.00% 2 2 4 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 20 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct May 14, 2011' 9:54 :01 PM 31 Page 22 of 107 Registered Voters . 399 Election Day Voters 10 Early Voters 7 Total Number Voters 17 Total Precinct Turnout 4.26% Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 0 2 2 12.50% Aflame 7 4 11 68.75% Madrigal 2 1 3 18.75% Total Votes 9 7 16 100.00% At Large Menard 0 2 2 4.65% Scott 4 4 8 18.60% Salinas 2 3 5 11.63% Noyola 3 4 7 16.28% Martinez 8 2 10 23.26% Loeb 4 3 7 16.28% Gaona 2 2 4 9.30% Total Votes 23 20 43 100.00% District 2 Marez 5 Sloan 1 Lucia 4 4 1 2 9 52.94% 2 11.76% 6 35.29% Total Votes 10 7 17 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 76 -114- May 14, 2011' Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Precinct 32 Page 23 of 107 Registered Voters 1456 Election Day Voters 69 Early Voters 58 Total Number Voters 127 Total Precinct Turnout 8.72% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 12 4 16 12.90% Adame 51 50 101 81.45% Madrigal 4 3 7 5.65% Total Votes 67 57 124 100.00% At Large Menard 10 4 14 4.56% Scott 30 39 69 22.48% Salinas 16 13 29 9,45% Noyola 15 12 27 8.79% Martinez 34 46 80 26.06% Loeb 41 35 76 24.76% Gaona 8 4 12 3.91% Total Votes 154 153 307 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. Total Votes 49 44 93 100.00 %n 49 44 93 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 524 -115- May 14, 2011' Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report M9:54:01 PM Precinct 33 Page 24 of 107 Registered Voters 718 Election Day Voters 8 Early Voters 8 Total Number Voters 16 Total Precinct Turnout 2.23% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes °Io Mayoral Moon 1 1 2 12.50% Adame 6 7 13 81.25% Madrigal 1 0 1 6.25% Total Votes 8 8 16 100.00% At Large Menard 0 0 0 0 Scott 5 3 8 21.62% Salinas 2 2 4 10.81% Noyola 4 3 7 18.92% Martinez 6 6 12 32.43% Loeb 3 2 5 13.51% Crao na 0 1 1 2.70% Total Votes 20 17 37 100.00% District 2 Marez 2 5 7 46.67% Sloan 3 0 3 20.00% Lucio 2 3 5 3333% Total Votes 7 8 15 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 68 r TT .r May 14, 2011 - Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Page 25 of 107 Precinct 34 Registered Voters 97 Election Day Voters 6 Early Voters 1 Total Number Voters 7 Total Precinct Turnout 7.22% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 0 0 0 0 Adame 5 1 6 85.71% Madrigal 1 0 1 14.29% Total Votes 1 7 100.00% At Large Menard 0 0 0 0 Scott 3 1 4 26.67% Salinas 2 0 2 13.33% Noyola 3 0 3 20.00% Martinez 2 1 3 20.00% Loeb 2 1 3 20.00% Gaona 0 0 0 0 Total Votes 12 3 15 100.00% District 3 Leal 5 1 6 85.71% Soto 0 0 0 0 Barrera 1 0 1 14.29% Total Votes 6 1 7 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 29 -117- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011' 9:54;01 PM Precinct 38 Page 26 of 107 Registered Voters 842 Election Day Voters 9 Early Voters 7 Total Number Voters 16 Total Precinct Turnout 1.90% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal Total Votes 1 7 0 8 2 3 20.00% 4 11 73.33% 1 1 6.67% 7 15 100.00% At Large Menard Scott Salinas Noyola Martinez 1-oeb Gaona 0 1 1 2.50% 4 4 8 20.00% 0 2 2 5.00% 8 3 11 27.50% 5 5 10 25.00% 5 2 7 17.50% 1 0 1 2.50% Total Votes 23 17 40 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 8 5 Total Votes 8 5 Total Precinct Votes -118- 13 100.00% 13 100.00% 68 May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Precinct 39 Page 27 of 107 Registered Voters 611 Election Day Voters 26 Early Voters 28 Total Number Voters 54 Total Precinct Turnout 8.84% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes %a Mayoral Moon 5 3 8 15.09% Adame 16 20 36 67.92% Madrigal 5 4 9 16.98% Total Votes 26 27 53 100.00% At Large Menard 3 3 6 4.29% Scott 7 17 24 17.14% Salinas 6 4 10 7.14% Noyola 7 6 13 9.29% Martinez 20 20 40 28.57 % Loeb 16 23 39 27.86% Gaona 5 3 8 5.71% Total Votes 64 76 140 100.00% District 2 Marez 13 14 27 50.94% Sloan 7 7 14 26.42% Lucia 5 7. 12 22.64% Total Votes 25 28 53 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 246 -1 1 9- D May 14, 2011 Final TT D Precinct Vote etailed Reoort 9:54:01 PM Precinct 40 Page 2$ of 107 Registered Voters 3149 Election Day Voters 203 Early Voters 352 Total Number Voters 555 Total Precinct Turnout 17.62% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon 22 35 57 10.33% Adame 172 308 480 86.96% Madrigal 6 9 15 2.72% Total Votes 200 352 552 100.00% At Large Menard 20 27 47 3.20% Scott 145 279 424 28.82% Salinas 17 17 34 2.31% Noyola 33 52 85 5.78% Martinez 146 273 419 28.48% Loeb 154 291 445 30.25% Gaona 6 11 17 1.16% Total Votes 521 950 1471 100.00% District 4 Adler 171 313 484 100.00% Total Votes 171 313 484 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 2507 -120- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Precinct 41 Page 29 of 107 Registered Voters 506 Election Day Voters 9 Early Voters 11 Total Number Voters 20 Total Precinct Turnout 3.95% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes %n Mayoral Moon 1 1 2 10.00% Adame 4 7 11 55.00% Madrigal 4 3 7 35.00% Total Votes 9 11 20 100.00% At Large Menard 1 1 2 4.76% Scott 3 4 7 16.67% Salinas 2 2 4 9.52% Noyoia 2 5 7 16.67% Martinez 6 6 12 28.57% Loeb 4 4 8 19.05% Gaona 1 1 2 4.76% Total Votes 19 23 42 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 4 6 10 100.00 % 4 6 10 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 72 -121- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 20M' 9:54:D1 PM Precinct 42 Page 30 of 107 Registered Voters 353 Election Day Voters 52 Early Voters 38 Total Number Voters 90 Total Precinct Turnout 25.50% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 8 7 15 17.24% Aflame 37 29 66 75.86% Madrigal 5 1 6 6.90% Total Votes 50 37 87 100.00% At Large Menard 1 4 5 2.25% Scott 31 21 52 23.42% Salinas 6 5 11 4.95% Loyola 8 8 16 7.21% Martinez 41 23 64 28.83% Loeb 41 26 67 30.18% Gaona 0 7 7 3.15% Total Votes 128 94 222 W0.00% District 4 Adler Total Votes 39 35 74 100.00% 39 35 74 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 383 -122- May 14, 2011 - Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:01 PM Precinct 43 Page 31 of 107 Registered Voters 575 Election Day Voters 23 Early Voters 10 Total Number Voters 33 Total Precinct Turnout 5.74 % Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon 7 1 8 25.00% Adam 10 4 14 43.75% Madrigal 5 5 10 31.25% Total Votes 22 10 32 100.00% At Large Menard 2 0 2 2.99% Scott 7 4 11 16.42% Salinas 3 4 7 10.45% Noyola 6 4 10 14.93% Martinez 15 7 22 32.84% Loeb 7 2 9 13.43% Gaona 3 3 6 8.96% Total Votes 43 ' 24 67 100.00% District 2 Marez 16 6 22 68.75% Sloan 0 1 1 3.13% Lucio 7 2 9 28.13% Total Votes 23 9 32 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 131 -123- Final Precinct Vote Detailed .Report May 14, 2°M 9:54:02 PM Precinct 44 page 32 of 107 Registered Voters 1139 Election Day Voters 15 Early Voters 12 Total Number Voters 27 Total Precinct Turnout 2.37% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes To Mayoral Moon Aflame Madrigal Total Votes 0 2 2 7.41% 10 8 18 66.67% 5 2 7 25.93% 15 12 27 100.00% At Large Menard 1 0 1 1.61% Scott 6 4 10 16.13% Salinas 8 5 13 20.97% Noyola 5 4 9 14.52% Martinez 11 9 20 32.26% Loeb 6 1 7 11.29% Gaona 2 0 2 123% Total Votes 39 23 62 100.00% District 1 Kieschniclt 14 9 23 100.00% Total Votes 14 9 23 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 112 -124- May 14, 2011, Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Precinct 45 Page 33 of 107 Registered Voters 831 Election Day Voters 18 Early Voters 6 Total Number Voters 24 Total Precinct Turnout 2.89% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 2 2 4 18.18% Adame 9 3 12 54.55% Madrigal 5 1 6 27.27% Total Votes 16 6 22 100.00% At Large Menard 3 0 3 4.76% Scott 11 2 13 20.63% Salinas 6 3 9 14.29% Noyola 6 2 8 12.70% Martinez 9 5 14 22.22% Loeb 8 3 11 17.46% Gaona 2 3 5 7.94% Total Votes 45 18 63 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 14 5 19 100.00% 14 5 19 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 104 -125- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Precinct 46 Page 34 of 107 Registered Voters 388 Election Day Voters 4 Early Voters 9 Total Number Voters 13 Total Precinct Turnout 3.35% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 1 1 2 16.67% Maine 0 4 4 33.33% Madrigal 2 4 6 50.00% Total Votes 3 9 12 100.00% At Large Menard 0 1 1 3.45% Scott 0 2 2 6.90% Salinas 3 2 5 17.24% Noyola 3 5 8 2759% Martinez 2 8 10 34.45% Loeb 0 0 0 0 Gaona 2 1 3 10.34% Total Votes 10 19 29 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 2 5 7 100.0D% Total Votes 2 5 7 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 48 -126- May 14, 2011, Final Precinct Vote Detailed Revort 9:54:02 PM Page 35 of 107 Precinct 47 Registered Voters 548 Election Day Voters 3 Early Voters 7 Total Number Voters 10 Total Precinct Turnout 1.82% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 0 1 1 1i.11% Adame 1 4 5 55.56% Madrigal 2 1 3 33.33% Total Votes 3 6 9 100.00% At Large Menard 1 1 2 8.00% Scott 0 1 1 4.00% Salinas 2 5 7 28.00% Noyola 1 4 5 20.00% Martinez 2 4 6 24.00% Loeb 1 3 4 16.00% Gaona 0 0 0 0 Total Votes 7 18 25 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 1 5 6 100.00% Total Votes 1 5 6 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 40 Final Precinct 1' ote Detailed Report M 9: 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Precinct 48 Page 36 of 107 Registered Voters 1411 Election Day Voters 71 Early Voters 59 Total Number Voters 130 Total Precinct Turnout 9.21 % Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal Total Votes 13 45 9 9 37 11 22 17.74% 82 66.13% 20 16.13% 67 57 124 100.00% At Large Menard 8 6 14 4.68% Scott 40 26 66 22.07% Salinas 20 17 37 12.37% Noyola 19 13 32 10.70% Martinez 44 31 75 25.08% Loeb 31 29 60 20.07% Gaona 8 7 15 5.02% Total Votes 170 129 299 100.00% District 2 Marez 49 31 80 63.49% Sloan 7 9 16 12.70% Lucia 13 17 30 23.81% Total Votes 69 57 126 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 549 -128- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 49 Registered Voters 976 Election Day Voters 53 Early Voters 42 Total Number Voters 95 Total Precinct Turnout 9.73 % Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 2011. 9:54:02 PM Page 37 of 107 Mayoral Moon 12 9 21 22.58% Adame 35 27 62 66.67% Madrigal 6 4 10 10.75% Total Votes 53 40 93 100.00% At Large Menard 8 12 20 8.26% Scott 39 23 62 25.62% Salinas 9 8 17 7.02% Noyola 12 11 23 9.50% Martinez 23 24 47 19.42% Loeb 37 33 70 28.93% Gaona 2 1 3 1.24% Total Votes 130 112 242 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 43 33 76 100.00% Total Votes 43 33 76 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 411 -129- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 50 Registered Voters 499 Election Day Voters 59 Early Voters 15 Total Number Voters 74 Total Precinct Turnout 14.83% Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 2011' 9:54 :02 PM Page 38 of 107 Mayoral Moon 11 1 12 16.44% Adame 42 14 56 76.71% Madrigal 5 0 5 6.85% Total Votes 58 15 73 100.00% At Large Menard 11 2 13 6.84% Scott 31 10 41 21.58% Salinas 13 2 15 7.89% Noyola 13 6 19 10.00% Martinez 39 10 49 25.79% Loeb 39 10 49 25.79% Gaona 4 0 4 2.11% Total Votes 150 40 190 100.00% District 2 Marez 38 9 47 64.38% Sloan 3 0 3 4.11% Lucio 17 6 23 31.51% Total Votes 58 15 73 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 336 -130- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Precinct 51 Page 39 of 107 Registered Voters 1812 Election Day Voters 34 Early Voters 33 Total Number Voters 67 Total Precinct Turnout 3.70% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 5 7 12 18.18% Adame 24 26 50 75.76% Madrigal 4 0 4 6.06% Total Votes 33 33 66 100.00% At Large Menard 7 0 7 4.76% Scott 23 15 38 25.85% Salinas 5 6 11 7.48% Noyola 8 8 16 10.88% Martinez 21 20 41 27.89% Loeb 13 18 31 21.09% Gaona 3 0 3 2.04% Total Votes 80 67 147 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 22 29 51 100.00% 22 29 51 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 264 May 14, 201I Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Precinct 52 rage 40 of 107 Registered Voters 850 Election Day Voters 30 Early Voters 12 Total Number Voters 42 Total Precinct Turnout 4.94% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 10 0 10 25.00% Aflame 13 7 20 50.00% Madrigal 6 4 10 25.00% Total Votes 29 11 40 100.00% At Large Menard 4 1 5 4.76% Scott 11 5 16 15/4% Salinas 11 5 16 15.24% Noyola 12 7 19 18.10% Martinez 15 8 23 21.90% Loeb 11 6 17 16.19% Gaona 7 2 9 8.57% Total Votes 71 34 105 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 19 8 27 100.00% Total Votes 19 8 27 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 172 -132- May 14, 2011` Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Page 41 of 107 Precinct 53 Registered Voters 685 Election Day Voters 20 Early Voters 23 Total Number Voters 43 Total Precinct Turnout 6.28% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 3 3 6 13.95% Adame 13 16 29 67.44% Madrigal 4 4 8 18.60% Total Votes 20 23 43 100.00% At Large Menard 1 1 2 1.98% Scott 8 10 18 17.82% Salinas 6 6 12 11,88% Noyola 11 8 19 18.81% Martinez 12 12 24 23.76% Loeb 5 14 19 18.81% Gaona 2 5 7 6.93% Total Votes 45 56 101 100.00% District 2 Marez Sloan Lucia Total Votes 14 1 4 11 25 59.52% 3 4 9.52% 9 13 30.95% 19 23 42 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 186 -133- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011' 9:54 :OZ PM Precinct 56 Page 42 of 107 Registered Voters 1059 Election Day Voters 13 Early Voters 15 Total Number Voters 28 Total Precinct Turnout 2.64% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 1 4 5 17.86% Adame 10 6 16 57.14% Madrigal 2 5 7 25.00% Total Votes 13 15 28 100.00% At Large Menard 1 2 3 4.55% Scott 5 6 11 16.67% Salinas 2 7 9 13.64% Noyola 5 4 9 13.64% Martinez 9 8 17 25.76% Loeb 6 6 12 18.189 Gaona 2 3 5 7.58% Total Votes 30 36 66 100.00% District 2 Marez 9 4 13 46.43% Sloan 0 3 3 10.71% Lucio 4 8 12 42.86% Total Votes 13 15 28 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 122 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Precinct 57 Page 43 of 107 Registered Voters 733 Election Day Voters 24 Early Voters 25 Total Number Voters 49 Total Precinct Turnout 6.68% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moan 6 9 15 30.61% Aflame 12 11 23 46.94% Madrigal 6 5 11 22.45% Total Votes 24 25 49 100.00% At Large Menard 5 4 9 8.26% Scott 9 11 20 18.35% Salinas 10 5 15 13.76% Noyola 8 4 12 11.01% Martinez 12 12 24 22.02% Loeb 10 12 22 20.18% Gaona 3 4 7 6.42% Total Votes 57 52 109 100.00% District 2 Marez Sloan Lucia Total Votes 14 4 5 14 1 7 28 62.22% 5 11.11% 12 26.67% 23 22 45 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 203 -135- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011` 9:54:U2 PM Precinct 58 Page 44 of 107 Registered Voters 1194 Election Day Voters 141 Early Voters 71 Total Number Voters 212 Total Precinct Turnout 17.76% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 32 15 47 23.27% Adame 92 53 145 7138% Madrigal 8 2 10 4.95% Total Votes 132 70 202 100.00% At Large Menard 12 11 23 4.59% Scott 65 31 96 19.16% Salinas 23 14 37 7.39% Noyola 26 13 39 7.78% Martinez 92 52 144 28.74% Loeb 92 55 147 29.34% Gaona 9 6 15 2.99% Total Votes 319 182 501 100.00% District 2 Marez 60 34 94 46.77% Sloan 19 11 30 14.93% Lucio 55 22 77 38.31% Total Votes 134 67 201 100.0096 Total Precinct Votes 904 -136- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Precinct 59 Page 45 of 107 Registered Voters 1405 Election Day Voters 137 Early Voters 74 Total Number Voters 211 Total Precinct Turnout 15.02% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 28 24 52 25.24% Adame 99 41 140 67.96% Madrigal 8 6 14 6.80% Total Votes 135 71 206 100.00% At Large Menard 18 14 32 6.46% Scott 74 28 102 20.61% Salinas 25 16 41 8.28% Noyola 28 13 41 8.28% Martinez 94 40 134 27.07% Loeb 87 43 130 26.26% Gaona 8 7 15 3.03% Total Votes 334 161 495 100.00% District 2 Marez 90 33 123 59.42% Sloan 6 14 20 9.66% Lucio 38 26 64 30.92% Total Votes 134 73 207 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 908 -137- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 60 Registered Voters 1163 Election Day Voters 15 Early Voters 13 Total Number Voters 28 Total Precinct Turnout 2.41% Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 19, 2011' 9:54:02 PM Page 46 of 107 Mayoral Moon 4 1 5 17.86% Adame 8 10 18 64.29% Madrigal 3 2 5 17.86% Total Votes 15 13 28 100.00% At Large Menard 0 0 0 0 Scott 5 2 7 12.28% Salinas 1 6 7 12.28% Noyola 4 7 11 19.30% Martinez 8 9 17 29.82% Loeb 8 3 11 19.30% Gaona 0 4 4 7.02% Total Votes 26 31 57 100.00% District 3 Leal Soto Barrera 10 2 1 8 18 69.23% 0 2 7.69% 5 6 23.08% Total Votes 13 13 26 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 111 -138- May 14, 2011. Final Precinct Vote Detailed Revort 9:54:02 PM Page 47 of 107 Precinct 61 Registered Voters 890 Election Day Voters 16 Early Voters 8 Total Number Voters 24 Total Precinct Turnout 2.70% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 2 2 4 16.67% Adame 13 6 19 79.17% Madrigal 1 0 1 4.17% Total Votes 16 8 24 100.00% At Large Menard 1 0 1 2.22% Scott 6 3 9 20.00% Salinas 4 1 5 11.11% Noyola 4 4 8 17.78% Martinez 8 6 14 31.11% Loeb 3 4 7 15.56% Gaona 1 0 1 2.22% Total Votes 27 18 45 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 14 6 20 100.00% 14 6 20 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 89 -139- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Precinct 62 Page 48 of 107 Registered Voters 878 Election Day Voters 18 Early Voters 19 Total Number Voters 37 Total Precinct Turnout 4.21% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal Total Votes 3 9 5 7 10 27.78% 7 16 44.44% 5 10 27.78% 17 19 36 100.00% At Large Menard 2 2 4 5.19% Scott 3 8 11 14.29% Salinas 5 7 12 15.58% Noyola 7 5 12 15.58% Martinez 9 9 18 23.38% Loeb 6 10 16 20.78% Gaona 3 1 4 5.19% Total Votes 35 42 77 100.00% District 2 Marez 10 11 21 56.'76% SIoan 1 1 2 5.41% Lucio 7 7 14 37.84% Total Votes 18 19 37 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 150 -140- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 201 9:54:02 PM Precinct 63 Page 49 of 107 Registered Voters 2116 Election Day Voters 258 Early Voters 191 Total Number Voters 449 Total Precinct Turnout 21.22% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal 41 33 74 17.13% 191 140 331 76.62% 14 13 27 6.25% Total Votes 246 186 432 100.00% N Large Menard 30 20 50 4.62% Scott 144 109 253 23.36% Salinas 39 23 62 5.72% Noyola 33 29 62 5.72% Martinez 164 128 292 26.96% Loeb 189 141 330 30.47% Gaona 15 19 34 3.14% Total Votes 614 469 1083 100.00% District 4 Adler Total Votes 200 141 341 100.00% 200 141 341 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1856 -141- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54;D2 PM Precinct 64 Page SD of 107 Registered Voters 1549 Election Day Voters 214 Early Voters 123 Total Number Voters 337 Total Precinct Turnout 2L76% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 33 13 46 14.11% Adame 165 101 266 81.60% Madrigal 10 4 14 4.29% Total Votes 208 118 326 100.00% At Large Menard 20 16 36 4.29% Scott 143 67 210 25.00% Salinas 25 8 33 3.93% Noyala 21 29 50 5.95% Martinez 155 86 241 28.69% Loeb 163 95 258 30.71% Gaona 8 4 12 1.43% Total Votes 535 305 840 100.00% District 4 Adler 180 91 271 100.00% Total Votes 180 91 271 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1437 May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54 :02 PM Page 51 of 107 Precinct 65 Registered Voters 3063 Election Day Voters 283 Early Voters 190 Total Number Voters 473 Total Precinct Turnout 15.44% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 46 36 82 18.18% Adame 199 142 341 75.61% Madrigal 20 8 28 6.21% Total Votes 265 186 451 100.00% At Large Menard 32 24 56 4.95% Scott 143 111 254 22.46% Salinas 38 26 64 5.66% Noyola 52 35 87 7,69% Martinez 184 125 309 27.32% Loeb 206 130 336 29.71% Gaona 12 13 25 2.21% Total Votes 667 464 1131 100.00% District 4 Adler 229 146 375 100.00% Total Votes 229 146 375 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1957 -143- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 20M 9:54:02 PM Precinct 66 Page 52 of 147 Registered Voters 1287 Election Day Voters 83 Early Voters 47 Total Number Voters 130 Total Precinct Turnout 10.10% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 18 19 37 29.13% Adame 53 27 80 62.99% Madrigal 10 0 10 7.87% Total Votes 81 46 127 100.00% At Large Menard 13 9 22 6.75% Scott 45 20 65 19.94% Salinas 25 10 35 10.74% Noyola 20 14 34 10,43% Martinez 55 28 83 25.46% Loeb 46 33 79 24.23% Gaon 6 2 8 2.45% Total Votes 210 116 326 100.00% District 2 Marez 39 Sloan 9 Lucia 31 19 11 15 58 46.77% 20 16.13% 46 37.10% Total Votes 79 45 124 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 577 May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Page 53 of 107 Precinct 67 Registered Voters 2569 Election Day Voters 130 Early Voters 89 Total Number Voters 219 Total Precinct Turnout 8.52% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 25 22 47 22.07% Adame 95 59 154 72.30% Madrigal 5 7 12 5.63% Total Votes 125 88 213 100.00% At Large Menard 12 17 29 5.34% Scott 81 45 126 23.20% Salinas 26 20 46 8.47% Noyola 20 16 36 6.63% Martinez 86 57 143 26.34% Loeb 87 64 151 27.81% Craona 7 5 12 2.21% Total Votes 319 224 543 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 95 70 165 100.00% Total Votes 95 70 165 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 921 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Precinct 68 Page 54 of 107 Registered Voters 1053 Election Day Voters 33 Early Voters 27 Total Number Voters 60 Total Precinct Turnout 5.70% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 3 9 12 20.34% Adame 25 14 39 66.10% Madrigal 4 4 8 13.56% Total Votes 32 27 59 100.00% At Large Menard 2 3 5 3.36% Scott 17 10 27 18.12% Salinas 14 8 22 14.77% Noyola 12 11 23 15.44% Martinez 20 18 38 25.50% Loeb 16 9 25 16.78% Gaona 3 6 9 6.04% Total Votes 84 65 149 100.00% District 2 Marez 18 16 34 57.63% Sloan 3 4 7 11.86% Lucio 12 6 18 30.51% Total Votes 33 26 59 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 267 -146- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Precinct 69 page 55 of 107 Registered Voters 1816 Election Day Voters 90 Early Voters 67 Total Number Voters 157 Total Precinct Turnout 8.65% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 21 13 34 22.52% Adame 55 43 98 64.90% Madrigal 12 7 19 12.58% Total Votes 88 63 151 100.00% At Large Menard 10 11 21 5.77% Scott 45 20 65 17.86% Salinas 27 17 44 12.09% Noyola 14 16 30 8.24% Martinez 67 40 107 29.40% Loeb 55 29 84 23.08% Gaona 7 6 13 3.57% Total Votes 225 139 364 100.00% District 2 Marez 55 34 89 58.55% Sloan 16 7 23 15.13% Lucio 18 22 40 26.32% Total Votes 89 63 152 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 667 -147- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 20M. 9:54:02 PM Precinct 70 Page 56 of 107 Registered Voters 2491 Election Day Voters 70 Early Voters 65 Total Number Voters 135 Total Precinct Turnout 5.42% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 9 10 19 14.50% Adatne 40 39 79 60.31% Madrigal 18 15 33 25.19% Total Votes 67 64 131 100.00% At Large Menard 13 3 16 5.26% Scott 31 26 57 18.75% Salinas 27 20 47 15.46% Noyola 18 21 39 12.83% Martinez 35 32 67 22.04% Loeb 24 33 57 18.75% Gaona 7 14 21 6.91% Total Votes 155 149 304 100.00% District 3 Leal 27 34 61 46.92% Soto 6 6 12 9.23% Barrera 33 24 57 43.85% Total Votes 66 64 130 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 565 -148- r May 14, 2011, Final Precinct Vote ote Detai ed Report 9:54:02 PM Page 57 of 107 Precinct 71 Registered Voters 1566 Election Day Voters 76 Early Voters 54 Total Number Voters 130 Total Precinct Turnout 8.30% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 14 13 27 2L26% Adame 50 27 77 60.63% Madrigal 12 11 23 18.11% Total Votes 76 51 127 100.00% At Large Menard 4 8 12 4.51% Scott 26 20 46 17.29% Salinas 26 19 45 16.92% Noyola 20 9 29 10.90% Martinez 43 25 68 25.56% Loeb 25 17 42 15.79% Gaona 13 11 24 9.02% Total Votes 157 109 266 100.00% District 3 Leal 61 41 102 78.46% Soto 3 1 4 3.08% Barrera 12 12 24 18.46% Total Votes 76 54 130 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 523 -149- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2°11 9:54:02 PM Precinct 72 Page 58 of 107 Registered Voters 1503 Election Day Voters 49 Early Voters 35 Total Number Voters 84 Total Precinct Turnout 5.59% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 9 8 17 21.79% Adame 28 20 48 61.54% Madrigal 8 5 13 1667% Total Votes 45 33 78 100.00% At Large Menard 4 5 9 4.41% Scott 16 21 37 18.14% Salinas 19 9 28 13.73% Noyola 23 9 32 15.69% Martinez 31 23 54 26.47% Loeb 17 16 33 16.18% Gaona 3 8 11 5.39% Total Votes 113 91 204 100.00% District 2 Marez 27 22 49 60.49% Sloan 4 2 6 7.41% Lucio 17 9 26 32.10% Total Votes 48 33 81 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 363 -150- May 14, 2011, Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Precinct 73 Page 59 of 107 Registered Voters 1411 Election Day Voters 57 Early Voters 18 Total Number Voters 75 Total Precinct Turnout 5.32% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 17 4 21 28.77% Adame 30 11 41 56.16% Madrigal 8 3 11 15.07% Total Votes 55 18 73 100.00% At Large Menard 2 2 4 2.37% Scott 15 5 20 11.83% Salinas 32 6 38 22.49% Noyola 13 6 19 11.24% Martinez 33 15 48 28.40% Loeb 22 3 25 14.79% Gaona 10 5 15 8.88% Total Votes 127 42 169 100.00% District 2 Marez 41 9 50 67.57% Sloan 4 3 7 9.46% Lucio 11 6 17 22,97% Total Votes 56 18 74 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 316 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Precinct 74 Page 60 of 107 Registered Voters 1807 Election Day Voters 50 Early Voters 58 Total Number Voters 108 Total Precinct Turnout 598% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 7 11 18 17.14% Adame 31 34 65 61.90% Madrigal 11 11 22 20.95% Total Votes 49 56 105 100.00% At Large Menard 0 5 5 2.20% Scott 17 6 23 10.13% Salinas 13 27 40 17.62% Noyola 27 25 52 22.91% Martinez 28 33 61 26.87% Loeb 18 7 25 11.01% Gaona 5 16 21 9.25% Total Votes 108 119 227 100.00% District 3 Leal 25 36 61 57.55% Soto 2 5 7 6.60% Barrera 23 15 38 35.85% Total Votes 50 56 106 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 438 -152- May 14, 2011, Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Precinct 75 Page 61 of 107 Registered Voters 2351 Election Day Voters 44 Early Voters 47 Total Number Voters. 91 Total Precinct Turnout 3.87% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 10 9 19 21.35% Adame 21 27 48 53.93% Madrigal 11 11 22 24.72% Total Votes 42 47 89 100.00% At Large Menard 3 2 5 2.49% Scott 16 12 28 13.93% Salinas 14 17 31 15.42% Noyola 15 17 32 15.92% Martinez 28 31 59 29.35% Loeb 17 12 29 14.43% Gaona 10 7 17 8.46% Total Votes 103 98 201 100.00% District 2 Marez 28 21 49 55.06% Sloan 4 5 9 10.11% Lucio 12 19 31 34.83% Total Votes 44 45 89 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 379 -153- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9 :54:02 PM Precinct 76 Page 62 of ] 07 Registered Voters 855 Election Day Voters 20 Early Voters 6 Total Number Voters 26 Total Precinct Turnout 3.04% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 2 0 2 7.69% Adame 7 3 10 3$.46g'o Madrigal 11 3 14 53.85% Total Votes 20 6 26 100.00% At Large Menard 1 0 1 2.04% Scott 3 2 Salinas 5 10.20% 11 1 12 24.49% Noyola 8 1 9 18.37% Martinez 8 4 12 24.49% Loeb 4 2 6 1224% Gaona 3 1 4 8.16% Total Votes 38 11 49 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 10 5 15 100.00% 10 5 15 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 90 -154- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report M9:54:02 PM Precinct 77 Page 63 of 107 Registered Voters 362 Election Day Voters 4 Early Voters 1 Total Number Voters 5 Total Precinct Turnout 1.38% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 1 0 1 20.00% Adame 1 0 1 20.00% Madrigal 2 1 3 60.00% Total Votes 4 1 5 100.00% At Large Menard 0 0 0 0 Scott 1 0 1 9.09% Salinas 3 1 4 36.36% Noyola 2 1 3 27.27% Martinez 2 0 2 18.18% Loeb 0 0 0 0 Gaona 0 1 1 9.09% Total Votes 8 3 11 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 2 1 3 100.00% Total Votes 2 1 3 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 19 -155- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 78 Registered Voters 1701 Election Day Voters 48 Early Voters 51 Total Number Voters 99 Total Precinct Turnout 5.82% Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Page 64 of 107 Mayoral Moon 10 13 23 24.21% Adanle 31 26 57 60.00% Madrigal 7 8 15 15.79% Total Votes 48 47 95 100.00% At Large Menard 6 1 7 3.59% Scott 19 12 31 15.90% Salinas 14 15 29 14.87% Noyola 19 21 40 20.51% Martinez 32 20 52 26.67 % Loeb 14 13 27 13.85% Gaona 4 5 9 4.62% Total Votes 108 87 195 100.00% District 3 Leal 37 33 70 73.68% Soto 3 5 8 8.42% Barrera 6 11 17 17.89% Total Votes 46 49 95 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 385 -156- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Precinct 79 Page 65 of 107 Registered Voters 991 Election Day Voters 31 Early Voters 13 Total Number Voters 44 Total Precinct Turnout 4.44% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 6 2 8 18.60% Adam 17 9 26 60.47% Madrigal 7 2 9 20.93% Total Votes 30 13 43 100.00% At Large Menard 2 0 2 1.98% Scott 12 4 16 15.84% Salinas 11 5 16 15.84% Noyola 11 6 17 16.83% Martinez 16 10 26 25.74% Loeb 14 6 20 19.80% Gaona 2 2 4 3.96% Total Votes 68 33 101 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 20 8 28 100.00% 20 8 28 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 172 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2017' 9:54 ;02 PM Precinct 80 Page 66 of 107 Registered Voters 1 704 Election Day Voters 29 Early Voters 52 Total Number Voters 81 Total Precinct Turnout 4.75% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon 5 8 13 17.33% Adame 9 25 34 45.33% Madrigal 9 19 28 37.33% Total Votes 23 52 75 100.Q0% At Large Menard 1 1 2 1.30% Scott 6 6 12 7.79% Salinas 5 18 23 14.94% Noyola 18 36 54 35,06% Martinez 12 19 31 20.13% Loeb 8 12 20 12.99% Gaona 5 7 12 7.79% Total Votes 55 99 154 100.00% District 3 Leal 22 32 54 67.50% Soto 3 5 8 10.00% Barrera 3 15 18 22.50% Total Votes 28 52 80 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 309 - 158- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Page 67 of 107 Precinct 81 Registered Voters 3131 Election Day Voters 202 Early Voters 338 Total Number Voters 540 Total Precinct Turnout 17.25% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 30 28 58 11,03% Adame 153 295 448 85.17% Madrigal 11 9 20 3.80% Total Votes 194 332 526 100.00% At Large Menard 33 35 68 4.92% Scott 137 253 390 28.24% Salinas 19 22 41 2.97% Noyola 23 59 82 5.94% Martinez 137 227 364 26.36% Loeb 153 266 419 30.34% Gaona 8 9 17 1.23% Total Votes 510 871 1381 100.00% District 4 Adler 172 301 473 100.00% Total Votes 172 301 473 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 2380 -159- Final Precinct vote Detailed Report May 14, 201r 9:54:02 PM Precinct 82 Page 68 of 107 Registered Voters 733 Election Day Voters 9 Early Voters 9 Total Number Voters 18 Total Precinct Turnout 2.46% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal 3 6 2 5 27.78% 6 12 66.67% 1 1 5.56% Total Votes 9 9 18 100.00% At Large Menard 2 3 5 10.87% Scott 6 3 9 19.57% Salinas 4 4 8 17.39% Noyola 3 0 3 6.52% Martinez 6 6 12 26.09% Loeb 3 5 8 17.39% Gaona 0 1 a 2.17% Total Votes 24 22 46 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 7 7 14 100.00% 7 7 14 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 78 -160- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9.54:02 PM Page 69 of 107 Precinct 83 Registered Voters 1034 Election Day Voters 24 Early Voters 16 Total Number Voters 40 Total Precinct Turnout 3.87% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 3 3 6 1538 %a Adatne 18 8 26 66.67% Madrigal 3 4 7 17.95% Total Votes 24 15 39 100.00% At Large Menard 0 2 2 1.96% Scott 6 3 9 8.82% Salinas 11 9 20 19.61% Noyola 12 6 18 17.65% Martinez 17 10 27 26.47% Loeb 9 7 16 15.69% Gaona 4 6 10 9.80% Total Votes 59 43 102 100.00% District 2 Marez 17 10 27 69.23% Sloan 1 1 2 5.13% Lucia 6 4 10 25.64% Total Votes 24 15 39 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 180 -161- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 84 Registered Voters 770 Election Day Voters 33 Early Voters 27 Total Number Voters 60 Total Precinct Turnout 7.79% Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 2011 9:54:021 PM Page 70 of 107 Mayoral Moon 10 6 16 28.57% Adame 16 16 32 57.14% Madrigal 4 4 8 14.29% Total Votes 30 26 56 100.00% At Large Menard 8 3 11 9.09% Scott 8 8 16 13.22% Salinas 7 8 15 12.40% Noyola 8 7 15 12.40% Martinez 17 11 28 23.14% Loeb 20 11 31 25.62% Gaona 2 3 5 4.13% Total Votes 70 51 121 100.00% District 2 Marez 10 16 26 44.83% Sloan 12 5 17 29.31% Lucid 9 6 15 25.86% Total Votes 3i 27 58 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 235 -162- May 14, 2011, Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Page 71 of 107 Precinct 85 Registered Voters 536 Election Day Voters 10 Early Voters 11 Total Number Voters 21 Total Precinct Turnout 3.92% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal 3 5 2 3 6 28.57% 5 10 47.62% 3 5 23.81% Total Votes 10 11 21 100.00% At Large Menard 3 1 4 8.16% Scott 5 4 9 18.37% Salinas 3 4 7 14.29% Noyola 4 2 6 12.24% Martinez 6 7 13 26.53% Loeb 2 3 5 10.20% Gaona 3 2 5 10.20% Total Votes 26 23 49 100.00% District 2 Marez 5 7 12 57.14% Sloan 1 1 2 9.52% Lucio 4 3 7 33.33% Total Votes 10 11 21 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 91 -163- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Precinct _ 86 Page 72 of 107 Registered Voters 601 Election Day Voters 53 Early Voters 33 Total Number Voters 86 Total Precinct Turnout 14.31% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 13 6 19 22.35% Adame 36 25 61 71.76% Madrigal 3 2 5 5.88% Total Votes 52 33 85 100.00% At Large Menard 10 5 15 7.04% Scott 27 16 43 20.19% Salinas 8 7 15 7.04% Noyola 10 5 15 7.04% Martinez 33 21 54 25.35% Loeb 41 21 62 29.11% Gaona 7 2 9 4.23% Total Votes 136 77 213 100.00% District 4 Adler 35 26 61 100.00% Total Votes 35 26 61 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 359 -164- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 4 02 PM Page 73of107 Precinct 87 Registered Voters 1411 Election Day Voters 46 Early Voters 50 Total Number Voters 96 Total Precinct Turnout 6.80% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 11 12 23 25.27% Aflame 27 31 58 63.74% Madrigal 6 4 10 10.99% Total Votes 44 47 91 100.00% At Large Menard 11 7 18 8.22% Scott 21 23 44 20.09% Salinas 14 14 28 12.79% Noyola 9 8 17 7.76% Martinez 27 24 51 23.29% Loeb 16 29 45 20.55% Gaona 7 9 16 7.31% Total Votes 105 114 219 100.00% District 2 Marez 21 19 40 42.11% Sloan 7 10 17 17.89% Lucio 18 20 38 40.00% Total Votes 46 49 95 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 405 -165- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Re ort Precinct 88 Race Registered Voters 2133 Election Day Voters 102 Early Voters 68 Total Number Voters 170 Total Precinct Turnout 7.97% Election Dav Votes &dz. Votes Total Votes Mayoral M Large District 5 May 14, 2011 9:54:02 PM Page 74 of 107 Moon 9 11 Adams 20 12.12% 76 52 128 77.58% Madrigal 13 4 17 10.30% Total Votes 98 67 165 100.00% Menard 7 7 Scott 14 3.29% 49 37 86 20.24% Salinas 27 22 Noyola 49 11.53% 22 19 41 9.65% Martinez 75 44 Loeb 119 28.00 % 57 47 104 24.47% Gaona 6 6 12 2.82% Total Votes 243 182 425 100.00% Elizondo, Sr. 76 56 132 I00.00% Total Votes 76 56 132 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 722 -166- May14,2011. Final Precinct inct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:02 PM Page 75of107 Precinct 89 Registered Voters 622 Election Day Voters 13 Early Voters 26 Total Number Voters 39 Total Precinct Turnout 6.27% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 2 11 13 35.14% Adame 7 10 17 45.95% Madrigal 2 5 7 18.92% Total Votes 11 26 37 100.00% At Large Menard 0 4 4 4.26% Scott 1 14 15 15.96% Salinas 6 6 12 12.77% Noyola 6 3 9 9.57% Martinez 7 16 23 24.47% Loeb 9 19 28 29.79% Gaona 1 2 3 3.19% Total Votes 30 64 94 100.00% District 3 Leal 4 15 19 52.78% Soto 1 3 4 11.11% Barrera 7 6 13 36.11% Total Votes 12 24 36 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 167 -167- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011. 9 :54:03 PM Precinct 90 Page 76 of 107 Registered Voters 770 Election Day Voters 17 Early Voters 18 Total Number Voters 35 Total Precinct Turnout 4.55% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 3 6 9 25.71% Adame 11 11 22 52.86% Madrigal 3 1 4 11.43% Total Votes 17 18 35 100.00% At Large Menard 2 3 5 5.75% Scott 7 10 17 19.54% Salinas 7 4 11 12.64% Noyola 6 3 9 10.34% Martinez 9 15 24 27.59% Loeb 7 10 17 19.54% Gaona 3 1 4 4.60% Total Votes 41 46 87 100.00% District 4 Adler Total Votes 15 15 30 100.00% 15 15 30 10O.0Q% Total Precinct Votes 152 -168- May 14, 2011 . Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Page 77 of 107 Precinct 91 Registered Voters 2424 Election Day Voters 92 Early Voters 142 Total Number Voters 234 Total Precinct Turnout 9.65% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal Total Votes 18 62 7 32 95 11 50 22.22% 157 69.78% 18 8.00% 87 138 225 100.00% At Large Menard 13 27 40 7.35% Scott 43 66 109 20.04% Salinas 20 29 49 9.01% Noyola 11 22 33 6.07% Martinez 58 92 150 27.57% Loeb 62 88 150 27.57% Gaona 4 9 13 2.39% Total Votes 211 333 544 100.00% District 4 Adler 68 92 160 100.00% Total Votes 68 92 160 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 929 -169- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14.2011' 4:54:03 PM Precinct 92 Page 78 of 107 Registered Voters 1691 Election Day Voters 129 Early Voters 107 Total Number Voters 236 Total Precinct Turnout 13.96% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 27 16 43 18.70% Adame 93 84 177 76.96% Madrigal 6 4 10 4.35% Total Votes 126 104 230 100.00% At Large Menard 29 18 47 7.78% Scott 81 68 149 24.67% Salinas 25 16 41 6.79% Noyola 18 13 31 5.13% Martinez 84 71 155 25.66% Loeb 91 77 168 27.81% Gaona 6 7 13 2.15% Total Votes 334 270 604 100.00% District 4 Adler 106 80 186 100.00% Total Votes 106 80 186 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1020 May 14, 2411 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Page 79 of 107 Precinct 93 Registered Voters 2399 Election Day Voters 56 Early Voters 58 Total Number Voters 114 Total Precinct Turnout 4.75% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 4 9 13 11.71% Adame 35 37 72 64.86% Madrigal 15 11 26 23.42% Total Votes 54 57 111 100.00% At Large Menard 3 4 7 2.86% Scott 22 19 41 16.73% Salinas 20 19 39 15.92% Noyola 23 19 42 17.14% Martinez 31 34 65 2653% Loeb 18 21 39 15.92% Gaona 7 5 12 4.90% Total Votes 124 121 245 100.00% District 3 Leal 28 35 63 57.27% Soto 2 6 8 7.27% Barrera 24 15 39 35.45% Total Votes 54 56 110 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 466 -171- Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 94 Registered Voters 1870 Election Day Voters 88 Total Election Day Precinct Turnout 4.71% Election Dav Votes Mayoral Moon 24 27.27% Adame 54 61.36% Madrigal 10 11.36% Total Votes 88 100.00% At Large Menard 13 5.91% Scott 52 23.64% Salinas 21 9.55% Noyola 18 8.18% Martinez 53 24.09% Loeb 59 26.82% Gaona 4 1.82% Total Votes 220 100,00% District 2 Marez 48 55.81% Sloan 12 13.95% Lucio 26 30.23% Total Votes 86 100.00% -172- May 14, 2011' Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Page 81 of 107 Precinct 95 Registered Voters 752 Election Day Voters 23 Early Voters 19 Total Number Voters 42 Total Precinct Turnout 5.59% Race - Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes To Mayoral Moon 1 4 5 12.82% Adame 8 12 20 51.28% Madrigal 13 1 14 35.90% Total Votes 22 17 39 100.00% At Large Menard 0 1 1 0.98% Scott 8 11 19 18.63% Salinas 12 9 21 20.59% Noyola 13 7 20 19.61% Martinez 19 9 28 27.45% Loeb 3 7 10 9.80% Gaona 3 0 3 2.94% Total Votes 58 44 102 100.00% District 3 Leal 16 14 30 71.43% Sato 3 0 3 7.14% Barrera 4 5 9 21.43% Total Votes 23 19 42 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 183 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 20M' 9:54:03 PM Precinct 96 Page 82 of 107 Registered Voters 815 Election Day Voters 30 Early Voters 12 Total Number Voters 42 Total Precinct Turnout 5.15% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 10 1 11 26.19% Adame 15 8 23 54.76% Madrigal 5 3 8 19.05% Total Votes 30 12 42 100.00% At Large Menard 6 1 7 7.22% Scott 12 6 18 18.56% Salinas 6 5 I1 11.34% Noyola 11 3 14 14.43% Martinez 18 9 27 27.84% Loeb 12 5 17 17.53% Gaona 2 1 3 3.09% Total Votes 67 30 97 100.00% District 2 Marez 15 7 22 52.38% Sloan 5 2 7 16.67% Lucio 10 3 13 30.95% Total Votes 30 12 42 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 181 May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Reoort 9:54:03 PM Precinct 97 Page 83 of 107 Registered Voters 1110 Election Day Voters 31 Early Voters 21 Total Number Voters 52 Total Precinct Turnout 4.68% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes °Io Mayoral Moon 10 5 15 28.85% Adame 15 11 26 50.00% Madrigal 6 5 n 21.15% Total Votes 31 21 52 100.00% At Large Menard 3 4 7 6.14% Scott 10 12 22 19.30% Salinas 10 7 17 14.91% Noyola 11 5 16 14,04% Martinez 13 13 26 22.81% Loeb 9 11 20 17.54% Gaona 4 2 6 5.26% Total Votes 60 54 114 100.00% District 2 Marez 18 12 30 60.00% Sloan 2 3 5 10.00% Lucio 9 6 15 30.00% Total Votes 29 21 50 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 216 -175- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011` 9:54:03 PM Precinct 98 Page 84 of 107 Registered Voters 1828 Election Day Voters 60 Early Voters 57 Total Number Voters 117 Total Precinct Turnout 6.40% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon 10 11 21 18.58% Aflame 35 39 74 65.49% Madrigal 12 6 18 15.93% Total Votes 57 56 113 100.00% At Large Menard 1 4 5 1.88% Scott 16 22 38 14.29% Salinas 32 19 51 19.17% Noyola 42 20 62 23.31% Martinez 32 37 69 25.94% Loeb 16 15 31 1L65% Gaona 5 5 10 3.76% Total Votes 144 122 266 100.00% District 3 Leal 27 33 60 51.72% Soto 3 1 4 3.45% Barrera 30 22 52 44.83% Total Votes 60 56 116 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 495 May 14, 2011. Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Precinct 99 Page 85 of 107 Registered Voters 618 Election Day Voters 24 Early Voters 11 Total Number Voters 35 Total Precinct Turnout 5.66% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes °Io Mayoral Moon 5 3 8 23.53% Adame 14 3 17 50.00% Madrigal 5 4 9 26.47% Total Votes 24 10 34 100.00% At Large Menard 2 1 3 3.75% Scott 14 2 16 20.00% Salinas 8 6 14 17.50% Noyola 5 8 13 16.25% Martinez 16 4 20 25.00% Loeb 11 2 13 16.25% Gaona 1 0 1 1.25% Total Votes 57 23 80 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 19 4 23 100.00% 19 4 23 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 137 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54;03 PM Precinct 100 Page 86 of 107 Registered Voters 1218 Election Day Voters 21 Early Voters 22 Total Number Voters 43 Total Precinct Turnout 3.53% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon 6 5 11 26.83% Adame 13 14 27 65.85% Madrigal 1 2 3 7.32% Total Votes 20 21 41 100.00% At Large Menard 5 4 9 9.18% Scott 8 7 15 15.31% Salinas 5 8 13 13.27% Noyola 4 2 6 6.12% Martinez 11 12 23 23.47% Loeb 18 11 29 29.59% Gaona 0 3 3 3.06% Total Votes 51 47 98 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 17 16 33 100.00% 17 16 33 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 172 May 14, 201r Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Precinct 101 Page 87 of 107 Registered Voters 2711 Election Day Voters 53 Early Voters 80 Total Number Voters 133 Total Precinct Turnout 4.91% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 7 12 19 14.84% Aflame 40 51 91 71,09% Madrigal 4 14 18 14.06% Total Votes 51 77 128 100.00% At Large Menard 7 10 17 5.20% Scott 30 50 80 24.46% Salinas 14 18 32 9,79% Noyola 14 17 31 9.48% Martinez 34 49 83 25.38% Loeb 30 48 78 23.85% Gaona 3 3 6 1.83% Total Votes 132 195 327 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 42 73 115 100.00% Total Votes 42 73 115 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 570 -179- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:03 PM Precinct 103 Page 88 of 107 Registered Voters 1467 Election Day Voters 61 Early Voters 55 Total Number Voters 116 Total Precinct Turnout 7.91% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 6 13 19 16.81% Adame 47 40 87 76.99% Madrigal 7 0 7 6.19% Total Votes 60 53 113 100.00% At Large Menard 6 6 12 4.36% Scott 39 34 73 26.55% Salinas 9 7 16 5.82% Noyola 14 11 25 9.09% Martinez 32 32 64 23.27% Loeb 41 37 78 28.36% Gaona 4 3 7 2.55% Total Votes 145 130 275 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 54 44 98 100.00% Total Votes 54 44 98 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 486 -180- May 14, 2011- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Revort 9:54:03 PM Precinct 106 Page 89 of 107 Reg. egistered Voters 2222 Election Day Voters 160 Early Voters 135 Total Number Voters 295 Total Precinct Turnout 13.28% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 27 25 52 18.25% Adame 113 92 205 71.93% Madrigal 14 14 28 9.82% Total Votes 154 131 285 100.00% At Large Menard 21 19 40 5.80% Scott 80 52 132 19.13% Salinas 27 37 64 9,2$% Noyola 65 40 105 15.22% Martinez 94 86 180 26.09% Loeb 83 69 152 22.03% Gaona 8 9 17 2.46% Total Votes 378 312 690 100.00% District 3 Leal 58 52 110 38.06% Soto 4 3 7 2.42% Barrera 92 80 172 59.52% Total Votes 154 135 289 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1264 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 107 Registered Voters 2816 Election Day Voters 125 Early Voters 85 Total Number Voters 210 Total Precinct Turnout 7.46% Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total l Votes May 14, 2011 9:54:03 PM Page 90 of 107 Mayoral Moon 20 6 26 12.56% Adame 97 77 174 84.06% Madrigal 6 1 7 3.38% Total Votes 123 84 207 100.00% At Large Menard 22 8 30 5.66% Scott 84 60 144 27.17% Salinas 22 11 33 6.23% Noyola 30 26 56 10.57% Martinez 77 45 122 23.02% Loeb 74 64 138 26.04% Gaona 6 1 7 L32% Total Votes 315 215 530 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick Total Votes 102 79 181 100.00% 102 79 181 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 918 -182- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Precinct 109 Page 91 of 107 Registered Voters 501 Election Day Voters 35 Early Voters 34 Total Number Voters 69 Total Precinct Turnout 13.77% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon 8 13 21 31.34% Adame 24 18 42 62.69% Madrigal 1 3 4 5.97% Total Votes 33 34 67 100.00% At Large Menard 4 8 12 7.19% Scott 20 15 35 20.96% Salinas 5 10 15 8.98% Noyala 9 10 19 11.38% Martinez 26 18 44 26.35% Loeb 22 17 39 23.35% Gaona 3 0 3 1.80% Total Votes 89 78 167 100.00% District 2 Marez Sloan Lucio 15 8 11 11 26 38.81% 7 15 22.39% 15 26 38.81% Total Votes 34 33 67 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 301 -1 8 3- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Precinct 110 Registered Voters 1235 Election Day Voters 25 Early Voters 43 Total Number Voters 68 Total Precinct Turnout 5.51 % Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral At Large May 14, 2011 9:54:03 PM Page 92 of 107 Moon 8 12 20 30.30% Adame 12 27 39 59.09% Madrigal 5 2 7 10.61% Total Votes 25 41 66 100.00% District 1 Menard 6 9 Scott 16 8.62% 16 26 42 24.14% Salinas 3 4 Noyola 7 4.02 %a 6 12 18 10.34% Martinez 17 26 Loeb 43 24.71% 18 28 46 26.44% Gaona 1 2 3 L72% Total Votes 67 107 174 100.00% Kieschnick 19 34 53 100.00% Total Votes 19 34 53 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 293 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report M9ay 14, 2011 :54 03 PM Page 93 of 107 Precinct 111 Registered Voters 859 Election Day Voters 28 Early Voters 27 Total Number Voters 55 Total Precinct Turnout 6.40% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 4 9 13 23.64% Adam 23 17 40 72,73% Madrigal 1 1 2 3,64% Total Votes 28 27 55 100.00% At Large Menard 4 8 12 9.38% Scott 19 9 28 21,88% Salinas 7 4 11 8.59% Noyola 6 6 12 9.38% Martinez 16 12 28 21.88% Loeb 17 14 31 24.22% Gaona 1 5 6 4.69% Total Votes 70 58 128 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 24 20 44 100.00% Total Votes 24 20 44 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 227 -185- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 201]. 9:54 :03 PM Precinct 112 page 94 of 107 Registered Voters 2018 Election Day Voters 151 Early Voters 154 Total Number Voters 305 Total Precinct Turnout 15.11 % Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 23 Adame 114 Madrigal 11 20 119 11 43 14.43% 233 7819% 22 7.38% Total Votes 148 150 298 100.00% At Large Menard 21 12 33 4.35% Scott 72 83 155 20.45% Salinas 38 28 66 8.71% Noyola 51 41 92 12.14% Martinez 88 98 186 24.54% Loeb 94 112 206 27.18% Gaona 14 6 20 2.64% Total Votes 378 380 758 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 101 113 214 100.00% Total Votes 101 113 214 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1270 -186- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May i4° 2a11 9:54:03 PM Precinct 113 Page 45 of 107 Registered Voters 424 Election Day Voters 12 Early Voters 6 Total Number Voters 18 Total Precinct Turnout 4.25% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 0 0 0 0 Adame 8 4 12 70.59% Madrigal 3 2 5 29.41% Total Votes 11 6 17 100.00% At Large Menard 1 0 1 2.86% Scott 2 1 3 8.57% Salinas 4 3 7 20.00% Noyola 5 3 8 22.86% Martinez 5 4 9 25.71 % Loeb 4 1 5 14.29% Gaona 2 0 2 5.71% Total Votes 23 12 35 100.00% District 3 Leal 4 3 7 38.89% Soto 1 0 1 5.56% l3arrera 7 3 10 55.56% Total Votes 12 6 18 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 70 -187- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2PMs 9:54:03 PM Precinct - 114 Page 46 of 107 Registered Voters 633 Election Day Voters 2 Early Voters 3 Total Number Voters 5 Total Precinct Turnout 0.79% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 1 Adame 1 Madrigal 0 0 3 0 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 0 0 Total Votes 2 3 5 100.00% At 1..arge Menard 0 0 o p Scott 1 0 1 12.50% Salinas 0 1 1 12.50% Noyola 1 0 1 12.50% Martinez 2 2 4 50.00% Loeb 0 1 1 12.50% Gaona 0 0 0 0 Total Votes 4 4 8 100.00% District 3 Leal 1 3 4 80.00% Soto 0 0 0 0 Barrera 1 0 1 20.00% Total Votes 2 3 5 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 18 -188- May 14, 2 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report {i11 9:54:03 PM Precinct 115 Page 97 of 107 Registered Voters 1874 Election Day Voters 84 Early Voters 65 Total Number Voters 149 Total Precinct Turnout 7.95% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 7 7 14 9.46% Adame 64 54 118 79.73% Madrigal 12 4 16 10.81% Total Votes 83 65 148 100.00% At Large Menard 6 7 13 3.52% Scott 61 43 104 28.18% Salinas 20 5 25 6.78% Noyola 17 16 33 8.94% Martinez 51 42 93 25.20% Loeb 53 41 94 25.47% Gaona 3 4 7 L90% Total Votes 211 158 369 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 59 52 111 100.00% Total Votes 59 52 111 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 628 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011' 9:54:03 PM Precinct 116 Page 98 of 107 Registered Voters 3045 Election Day Voters 121 Early Voters 131 Total Number Voters 252 Total Precinct Turnout 8.28% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes To Mayoral Moon 26 22 48 19.20% Adame 82 96 178 71.20% Madrigal 11 13 24 9.60% Total Votes 119 131 250 100.00% At Large Menard 26 16 42 7.04% Scott 61 57 118 19.77% Salinas 25 35 60 10.05% Noyola 30 37 67 11.22% Martinez 71 77 148 24.79% Loeb 68 72 140 23.45% Gaona 13 9 22 3.69% Total Votes 294 303 597 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 94 97 191 100.00% Total Votes 94 97 191 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1038 -190- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 117 Registered Voters 2845 Election Day Voters 91 Early Voters 109 Total Number Voters 200 Total Precinct Turnout 7.03% Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 2011 9:54:03 PM Page 99 of 107 Mayoral At Large Moon 28 32 60 31.09% Adame 55 63 118 61.14% Madrigal 5 10 15 7.77% Total Votes 88 105 193 100.00% District 4 Menard 25 32 57 1.1.3$% Scott 49 43 92 18.36% Salinas 15 25 40 7.98 % Noyola 19 16 35 6.99% Martinez 53 63 116 23.15% Loeb 60 75 135 26.95% Gaona 7 19 26 5.19% Total Votes 228 273 501 100.00% Adler 76 $1 157 100.00% Total Votes 76 81 157 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 851 --191- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011' 9:54:03 PM Precinct _ 118 Page 100 of 107 Registered Voters 2355 Election Day Voters 114 Early Voters 87 Total Number Voters 201 Total Precinct Turnout 8.54% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 15 18 33 16.75% Adame 82 58 140 71.07% Madrigal 14 10 24 12.18% Total Votes 111 86 197 100.00% At Large Menard 9 11 20 4.10% Scott 48 46 94 19.26% Salinas 41 26 67 13.73% Noyola 42 25 67 13.73% Martinez 69 53 122 25.00% Loeb 51 46 97 19.88% Gaona 12 9 21 4.30% Total Votes 272 216 488 100.00% District 3 Leal 44 36 80 40.82% Soto 4 5 9 4.59% Barrera 61 46 107 54.59% Total Votes 109 87 196 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 881 -192 - Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14, 2011 9:54:D3 PM Precinct 119 gage 101 of 107 Registered Voters 2886 Election Day Voters 203 Early Voters 146 Total Number Voters 349 Total Precinct Turnout 12.09% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 21 17 38 11.14% Aflame 172 117 289 84.75% Madrigal 7 7 14 4.11% Total Votes 200 141 341 100.00% At Large Menard 19 10 29 3.31% Scott 142 88 230 26.26% Salinas 33 26 59 6.74% Noyola 29 21 50 5.71% Martinez 140 97 237 27.05% Loeb 140 115 255 2911% Gaona 11 5 16 1.83% Total Votes 514 362 876 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 157 114 271 100.00% Total Votes 157 114 271 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1488 -193- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report May 14° 2011 9:54:03 PM Page 102 of 107 Precinct 120 Registered Voters 1917 Election Day Voters 95 Early Voters 87 Total Number Voters 182 Total Precinct Turnout 9.49% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon 11 23 34 19.10% Adame 66 56 122 68.54% Madrigal 14 8 22 12.36% Total Votes 91 87 178 100.00% At Large Menard 15 21 36 8.31% Scott 46 49 95 21.94% Salinas 22 14 36 8.31% Noyola 20 12 32 7.39% Martinez 48 53 101 23.33% Loeb 65 52 117 27.02% Gaona 10 6 16 3.70% Total Votes 226 207 433 100.00% District 4 Adler 79 68 147 100.00 % Total Votes 79 68 147 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 758 -194- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 121 May 14, 2011, 9:54:03 PM Page 103 of 107 Registered Voters 1406 Election Day Voters 93 Early Voters 74 Total Number Voters 167 Total Precinct Turnout 11.88% Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes % Mayoral Moon Adame Madrigal Total Votes 25 12 37 22.70% 53 56 109 66.87% 15 2 17 10.43% 93 70 163 100.00% At Large Menard 14 9 23 5.69% Scott 53 32 85 21.04% Salinas 23 19 42 10.40% Noyola 25 20 45 11.14% Martinez 57 42 99 24.50% Loeb 44 46 90 22.28% Gaona 15 5 20 4.95% Total Votes 231 173 404 100.00% District 3 Leal 43 31 74 45.68% Soto 3 1 4 2.47% Barrera 43 41 84 51.85% Total Votes 89 73 162 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 729 -195- May 14, 2011 Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Precinct 122 Page 104 of 107 Registered Voters 2693 Election Day Voters 98 Early Voters 90 Total Number Voters 188 Total Precinct Turnout 6.98% Race Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 11 18 29 15.76% Adame 77 64 141 76.63% Madrigal 6 8 14 7.61% Total Votes 94 90 184 100.00% At Large Menard 20 23 43 9.43% Scott 66 50 116 25.44% Salinas 14 18 32 7.02% Noyola 10 14 24 5.26% Martinez 59 40 99 21.71 % Loeb 69 52 121 26.54% Gaona 3 18 21 4.61 % Total Votes 241 215 456 100.00% District 4 Adler 78 78 156 100.00% Total Votes 78 78 156 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 796 --19 6- May 14, 2011, Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Precinct 123 Page 105 of 107 Registered Voters 1952 Election Day Voters 51 Early Voters 47 Total Number Voters 98 Total Precinct Turnout 5.02% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 9 12 21 21.88% Adame 38 29 67 69.79% Madrigal 3 5 8 8.33% Total Votes 50 46 96 100.00% At Large Menard 7 12 19 8.02% Scott 33 23 56 23.63% Salinas 9 11 20 8.44% Noyola 10 16 26 10.97% Martinez 27 24 51 21.52% Loeb 29 29 58 24.47% Gaona 3 4 7 2.95% Total Votes 118 119 237 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 42 39 81 100.00 % Total Votes 42 39 81 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 414 -197- May 14,2011' Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report 9:54:03 PM Page 106 of 107 Precinct 124 Registered Voters 2498 Election Day Voters 105 Early Voters 66 Total Number Voters 171 Total Precinct Turnout 6.85% Race Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Mayoral Moon 15 12 27 16.07% Adame 77 48 125 74,40% Madrigal 10 6 16 9.52% Total Votes 102 66 168 100.00% At Large Menard 13 9 22 5.10% Scott 62 32 94 21.81% Salinas 26 16 42 9.74% Noyola 33 13 46 10.67% Martinez 72 45 117 27.15% Loeb 52 49 101 23.43% Gaona 6 3 9 2.09% Total Votes 264 167 431 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 82 56 138 100.00% Total Votes 82 56 138 100.00 % Total Precinct Votes 737 -198- Final Precinct Vote Detailed Report Race Precinct 125 Registered Voters 4002 Election Day Voters 150 Early Voters 188 Total Number Voters 338 Total Precinct Turnout 8.45% Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes May 14, 2011. 9:54:03 PM Page 107 of 107 Mayoral Moon 25 28 53 16.16% Adame 107 135 242 73.78% Madrigal 16 17 33 10.06% Total Votes 148 180 328 100.00% At Large Menard 16 26 42 5.32% Scott 77 104 181 22.91% Salinas 26 41 67 8.48% Noyola 32 34 66 8.35% Martinez 96 113 209 26.46% Loeb 91 112 203 25.70% Gaona 7 15 22 2.78% Total Votes 345 445 790 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. 122 151 273 100.00 %n Total Votes 122 151 273 100.00% Total Precinct Votes 1391 Total Number Registered 158,510 May 16, 2011 Total Number Voted 13,525 11 :49 :24 AM Percent Turnout 8.53 % Page 1 oft Summary 108 boxes of 108 including early vote Race Mayoral Election Day Votes Early Votes Total Votes Moon 1234 1152 2386 18.16% Adame 5017 4425 9442 71.88% Madrigal 739 569 1308 9.96% Total Votes in Race 6990 6146 13136 100.00% At Large Menard 957 834 1791 5.51% Scott 3873 3250 7123 21.90% Salinas 1540 1303 2843 8.74% Noyola 1728 1455 3183 9.79% Martinez 4462 3911 8373 25.74% Loeb 4265 3858 8123 24.98% Gaona 545 543 1088 3.35% Total Votes in Race 17370 15154 32524 100.00% District 1 Kieschnick 582 504 1086 100.00% Total Votes in Race 582 504 1086 100.00% District 2 Marez 717 445 1162 53.23% Sloan 178 154 332 15.21% Lucio 378 311 689 31.56% Total Votes in Race 1273 910 2183 100.00% District 3 Leal 517 499 1016 49.90% Soto 53 46 99 4.86% Barrera 512 409 921 45.24% Total Votes in Race 1082 954 2036 100.00% -200- Total Number Registered Total Number Voted Percent Turnout Summary 158,510 13,525 8.53 % May 16, 2011 11:49:24 AM Page 2 of 2 108 boxes of 108 including early vote Race District 4 Election Dav Votes Early Votes Total Votes Adler Total Votes in Race 1683 1687 3370 100.00% 1683 1687 3370 100.00% District 5 Elizondo, Sr. Total Votes in Race 1444 1262 2706 100.00% 1444 1262 2706 100.00% London ISD Pedraza Frazier Beach Bain Sendejar 42 56 69 48 58 36 78 15.95% 51 107 21.88% 55 124 25.36% 40 88 18.00% 34 92 18.81% Total Votes in Race 273 216 489 100.00% -201- AN ORDINANCE ORDERING A RUNOFF ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JUNE 18, 2011 IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI FOR THE ELECTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER DISTRICT THREE; DESIGNATING POLLING PLACE LOCATIONS, ENACTING PROVISIONS INCIDENT AND RELATING TO THE SUBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the official canvass of said election reveals that none of the candidates for the office of Council Member District Three, received the number of votes required for election; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 271 of the Texas Election Code, the runoff election has been scheduled for Saturday, June 18, 2011. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. A runoff election for the office of Council Member District Three in the City of Corpus Christi shall be held Saturday, June 18, 2011, with the names of the following candidates for the respective office(s) as follows: Council Member, District Three Priscilla Leal Roland Barrera SECTION 2. That at said election herein ordered, all the District Three qualified voters of the City of Corpus Christi eligible to vote in the runoff election shall be permitted to vote. SECTION 3. The names of candidates for said office shall be placed on said ballot in the manner and form prescribed by law. SECTION 4. The eSlate direct recording equipment shall be used at the election in accordance with Texas Election Code and the Election shall be held at the polling places in the regularly prescribed precincts of the City of Corpus Christi, as set forth on Attachment A hereto incorporated by reference and made part of this ordinance. The election shall be held in accordance with the election laws of the State of Texas. The polls shall be open from 7:00 am to 7:00 p.m. on the day of the Election. SECTION 5. The City Secretary shall conduct the Election as directed by ordinance of the City Council and by law. SECTION 6. Early voting in person at each of the temporary branch polling places shall be conducted from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm on June 6, 2011 through June 11, 2011; and 7:00 am to 7:00 pm on June 13 through June 14, 2011. The temporary branch polling places are hereby established as follows: Greenwood Senior Citizens Center 4040 Greenwood Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf 5151 McArdle Such early voting in person will also be conducted at the main early voting polling place located at City Hall, First Floor, 1201 Leopard on June 6, 2011 through June 11, 2011 from 8 :00 am through 5:00 pm; and on June 13, 2011 through June 14, 2011 from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm. The branch polling place and the main early voting polling place shall serve all election precincts in District Three. SECTION 7. The City Secretary is directed to post and publish such election notices as are required by the Election Laws of the State of Texas. The City Secretary is further appointed as the authority and officer responsible for the conduct of said election and is hereby authorized and directed to make all necessary arrangements for the holding of said election in accordance with and subject to the laws of this State including but not limited to coordinating the election process, tabulation equipment, and supplies in accordance with the joint election agreement to be executed with Nueces County. The City Secretary is authorized to approve all lawful changes and additions to the procedures provided herein in order to implement such agreement, including, but not limited to provisions for substations and mobile voting sites. SECTION 8. By approving and signing this ordinance, the Mayor officially confirms as his action alt matters recited in this ordinance which by law come within his jurisdiction. SECTION 9. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, work, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 10. The fact that it is necessary and essential that the governing body of the City of Corpus Christi order election pertaining to municipal affairs, that the notice of such election should be promptly posted and publish, that a City Runoff election shall be held on Saturday, June 18, 2011, and that the requirements of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 may be timely met, and immediate action is necessary for the efficient and effective administration of the city's affairs, creates a public emergency and an imperative public necessity requiring the suspension of the Charter rule that no ordinance shall be passed finally on the date of its introduction but that such ordinances shall be read at two meetings of the City Council, and the Mayor or five Council Members, copy attached, having Charter rule and that this ordinance be passed finally on the date of its introduction and take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage, the Council hereby finds that such emergency and necessity do exists, and IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, this the „ day of May, 2011. ATTEST: The City of Corpus Christi Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved: r g day of May, 2011 Carlos Valdez City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas Day of , 2011 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: Ilwe, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame, Mayor City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott Linda Strong City of Corpus Christi Runoff Election Polling Place List June 18, 2011 Polling Place and Address Kostoryz Elementary School (Music Room) 3602 Panama Drive People's Baptist Church 1355 FM 665 Galvan Elementary School 3126 Masterson Drive West Oso Jr. High School 5202 Bear Lane Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Mission 1080 Clarkwood Road See Precinct 24 Arrowsmith Apartments (Community Room) 5701 Williams Drive Lexington Elementary School (Cafeteria) 2901 McArdle Road Cunningham Middle School (Cafeteria) 4321 Prescott Street West Oso Elementary School 1526 Cliff Maus John F. Kennedy Elementary School 1102 Villarreal See Precinct 70 Water Utilities Building (Conference Room) 726 Holly Road See Precinct 95 Moody High School (Foyer Main Entrance) 1818 Trojan Drive Tom Brown Middle School (Cafeteria) 4301 Schanen Boulevard Garcia Elementary School (Cafeteria) 4401 Greenwood Drive See Precinct 93 Tabernacle of Praise Church 5918 Kostoryz Road Yeager Elementary School (Cafeteria) 5414 Tripoli Drive 11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM PRESENTATION DATE: 5/24/11 AGENDA ITEM: Marina Market Days STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name TitlelPosition Department 1. Peter Davidson Marina Superintendent Marina OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position Organization None. BACKGROUND: As an enterprise fund the Marina Staff came up with the idea of Marina Market Days once a month, year round to create additional revenue. Ground space leased to vendors selling market days type items located on the grassy area of the Lawrence Street T -Head including boat dockage space. Marina Market Days will have an additional twist including a simultaneous event such as the CVB idea of a Blue, Jazz and BBQ, or boat show, segway race, hot dog eating contest etc. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: None PowerPoint X Supplemental Information X Peter M. Davidson Marina Superintendent peterd @cctexas.com 361 -826 -3983 -209- fit ?st 1,4 • I III -r0 • la 41. r, „ q'vt 9111 (6.n - 2 12 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM PRESENTATION DATE: May 24, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Study for Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (NAS -CC) STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title /Position Department 1. None 2. 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name Title /Position Organization 1. Capt. Randy Pierson Commanding Officer NAS -CC 2. 3. BACKGROUND: Naval Air Station Corpus Christi will be making quarterly presentations to City Council on topics of community interest. This is their first presentation. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: None PowerPoint Supplemental Information Juan Perales, Jr., P.E. Assistant City Manager, Departments of Engineering & Development Services JohnnyP @cctexas.com 361 -826 -3828 -231- Naval Air Station Corpus Christi FACTSHEET Airfield Safety - What are APZs? Accident Potential Zones (APZs) are areas in the vicinity of airfield runways where an aircraft mishap is most likely to occur, IF one were to occur. While the likelihood of a mishap is remote, the Navy recommends that land uses within APZs be minimal or low density to ensure the maximum protection of public health and property. APZs are unique to military airfields. In the 1960s and 1970s, the military recognized the need to establish buffers around airfield runways. The military collected accident data from al! the military services to determine the areas of the runway where accidents. are most likely to occur. These areas are represented by the Clear Zone, APZ 1, and APZ 2. APZs for Airfield Runways: Clear Zone — The Clear Zone is a trapezoidal shape, measuring 3,000 feet beyond the end of the runway and begins at 1,500 feet wide, ending at 2,284 feet wide. APZ 1 — APZ 1 extends 5,000 feet beyond the Clear Zone and has a width of 3,000 feet. - APZ 1 is typically rectangular, although it may curve to conform to the curve of the predominant flight track. APZ 2 — APZ 2 extends 7,000 feet beyond APZ 1 and has a width of 3,000 feet.. This zone is typically rectangular, although it too may conform to the curve of the predominant flight track. These AICUZ requirements are derived from OPNAVINST 11010.36B — Air Installations Compatible Use Zones Program Typical APZs for Airfield Runways Land Use Compatibility Land Use With Clear Zone APZs APZ 1 APZ2 Single - Family Residential 0 0 4 Multi - Family Residential (1 or more dwellings per acre) o o o Public Rights -of -Way 4 • • Assembly Areas - Schools, Churches, Auditoriums p CP D Hospitals 0 0 0 Office, Retail 0 o. Manufacturinglindustrial. 0 4 4 Outdoor Parks and Recreation ° ! E • Compatible 4 Conditionally 0 Incompatible -232- For further information, Contort Don Zimmerman Community Plans and Liaison 361 961 -2248 1 Naval Air Station Corpus Christi FACTSHEET The AICUZ Program Encroachment All airports attract development. Housing is constructed for airport employees who want to live near by, and businesses are established to cater to the airport. As development encroaches upon the airfield, more people experience the noise and accident potential associated with aircraft operations. Incompatible development, a form of encroachment, has become commonplace on lands in the vicinity of military installations. The AICUZ Program In the early 1970s, the Department of Defense (DoD) established the Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Program in response to growing incompatible urban development (encroachment) around military airfields. Today, this Program provides land use guidelines for use by local governments. The goal is to achieve compatible civilian land use patterns and activities in the vicinity of a military installation. The AICUZ program promotes compatible land use through participation in local, regional, state and federal land use planning by: • Protecting the health, safety, and welfare of civilians and military personnel; • Protecting Navy and Marine Corps installation investment; ■ Reducing noise impacts caused by aircraft operations while meeting operational, training; and • informing the public about the AICUZ program and seeking cooperative efforts to minimize noise and aircraft accident potential impact. cal; The ' .goal `:of the AICUZ program ; is to protect the health, safety, and welfare of thpse.IMng.and worlkingOn.or near military installations while ensuring the •continued flight operations. The core of the AICUZ program is the AICUZ study, which is developed for each military air installation. The study includes recommended land uses for areas exposed to different levels of noise and accident potential, as well as height and obstruction criteria for flight safety. These recommendations indicate the areas (both on and off base) that are exposed to both high levels of noise and/or aircraft accident . potential. Noise Zones Noise is unwanted sound. The main sources of noise at airfields are flight operations, which include take -offs, landings, touch - and -go operations, and engine maintenance run -ups. The Navy considers how its operations impact the local community by calculating the day - night average sound level (DNL). Accident Potential Zones (APZs) APZs are areas where an aircraft accident is most likely to occur IF one is to occur. They do not reflect the probability of an accident. APZs follow departure, arrival, and pattern flight tracks and are based upon analysis of historical data. These AICUZ requirements are derived from OPNAVINST 11010.36E — Air Installations Compatible Use Zones Program. -233- For further information, contact Don Zimmerman Community Plans and Liaison 361 946 -6055 CAPT. R. F. Pierson, CO Don Zimmerman, CPLO Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Study for Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX 24 May 2011 1 010 r, eh eh 0, 0", The mission of Naval Air Station Corpus Christi, Texas, is to effectively support the training of U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Coast Guard and International student pilots. Additionally, NASCC is tasked with efficiently providing high quality installation facilities and operational se ' - to the U.S. Army, Department of Homeland Security and other go t and • tenant organizations. • r t Commands: — IAir lr — Natio — U. S. Coast Guard Sec — Marine Aviation Training — Naval Health Clinic, Corpus Christi — In all, there are 41 tenant commands and activities located on the installation p.at,.:14 14. At, Aft .;.• 4,10„t„sjat,t,g,,,,t, ,121,1,,,,g1,1014,1„t„t„,10„t„sjatiti,,,t, ,121,1,,,,gloot4,41,„t„to„t„sjatiti,,,t, ,121,1,1,,,,&1014,141,„t„,10„t„sjatitg,g, ,121,1,1,sygot4,14141,„to„t„sjatiti,,,t, ,121,1,1,,,,&1014,14141,„,10„t„&gattig," ammt. • Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) • Program & Impetus for amending previous studies • udy Overview • AICUZ Studies are prepared for all Naval facilities conducting air operations • AICUZ Studies Identify: — Clear Zones and Accident Potential Zones (APZs) — Noise Zones — Guidelines for compatible development • AICUZ Program Goals are: — To protect the health, safety and welfare of those living near these facilities — Preserve the military flying mission — Provide recommendations to support community development • 1978 — Original NAS AICUZ • 1986 — Updated noise contours and APZs • 2009: sition atipnsider flight mis D increased operations Guard 1 • National Air Security Operations Center, Corpus Christi • HM -15 BRAC relocation to Norfolk, VA • Areas where accidents most likely to occur IF they occur • NOT a predictor of accidents • APZs provide planners a tool to/use in determining co��,���R Iand4e 4s Runway111111111111111111/1 irn ft. ft. 0,0,0 ;Logs 6„sdet„1„,,,,* ao, 64„ aftetg...4 &a „tdet „t„i„*„44*„*„..adedle.4.4,46,66„sdau„t„t„gya„t„&gagt,g6,0,01,64.. A " • „ t . • • e, eh eh eh Comparison of Noise Contours 1986 AICUZ and 2009 AICUZ AA:dad, 14,44.4„,1,,,x,„4.1,„,1,4,46e0 4.4,40,0,1,10,,e4., „AA 40,,,,...0,14,110 ;ea as 4,4,:et„e„mmus aftet,Le Ated „4,4„440„*„2,„&fteccoase,e,„2,:atii„,141,„,gya„,1,„sjjat,44,421,,mak A " • Comparison of Noise Contours 1986 AICUZ and 2009 AICUZ „ t . • • e, eh eh eh .mzst .4.0,044.44titt.4 xdot.gAtt joz A.4.44.2m, kktttl“ gy.A, jot.4 kktttk.g: Jot.4 4,44.2m, kmot.gAgyg, t • Comparison of APZs 1986 AICUZ and 2009 AICUZ „ t . • • r, eh eh Other Issues Addressed in Safety Analysis: • Imaginary Surfaces • Bird/Animal Strike Hazard (BASH) • Lighting, Smoke, Dust, and Steam Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) 1 T 2_ 43 IIS' ABOVE AIRPSELD ELEVATION MT SLOPE RATIO WWIM — N 71 SLORATIO PE 011 SLOPE RATIO LEGEND A PASSIM SURFACE III CLEAR ZONE SURFACE C APROACH-DEPARTU E CLEARANCE SURFACE IELOPE1 D APPRCACHOEPARTURE CLEARANCE SURFACE p1ORIZONTALI E INNER HORIZONTAL &UREASE P CONICAL SURFACE O OUTER HOIIIZOPITAL >YYRI'ACG H TRANELTIONAL SURFACE 6 Too AEOVE AIRRELD ELEVATION P -- go, lode .4 mottctuss.,04,....t p413&.gAgg, zogg _mpg, zyjttccusttt.glebt.,z.mzst INA.Ittccustt _mpg, 14E • ... • rtip' ' "" r A r r — V AAA tv •440„t„sq.igt,t,,,Logr:„i,,,,ii,,Afjcl„t„t„tatAggati,44,66,,ksjik,„ti t„sq.kle hg,A,Atu„t„t„go„,....lair tgAgamt,soittA„t„t„tatAggati,,,magiAsjetA„t„t„tat„sq.k.igtiwogaglgk „b„403.144.4.,...***0„. • 1 V Highlighted areas of Compatibility Concerns - • • • . . 4 4 4 4-4 4.444.4,44044,44141,4 -„„44:444m4.4.444:4,441404.44141441,4444444,44, 4,- 44404 - :14 4:44444,444:44.4444. 444,4444141441,4 444,44m4.4444,44.n4141,44141441,44,4444444,4,444.44,44141,4414144144, 444,444444.4,440,444 • 1 V Highlighted areas of Compatibility Concerns 4,14,4410, te. 1 V Highlighted areas of Compatibility Concerns IV:OA& tt,t0.0.4 • Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Zoning — Unified Development Code, — Joint Land Use Study • Building Code • Real Estate Disclosure • Special Planning Districts - Adopt Local Government Code Chapter 241 • Engagement in the Local Planning Process • Encroachment Partnering > Goliad County Briefings > Brief Corpus Christi and Nueces Officials > Community / Business Open House > Brief Texas A & M Corpus Christi > Brief Planning Commission > Training/Information Session with City Planning, Development > Briefings with community groups > Work w/City and the Office of Economic Adjustment on Joint Land Use Study > Distribute AICUZ update maps & study Yesterday Today, Today, TBD Wednesday, TBD Wednesday, TBD Spring/Summer Spring/Summer Spring/Summer/Fall Ongoing effort > Brief City Officials > Community Open House, Flour Bluff HS > Brief Texas A & M Corpus Christi > Brief Planning Commission > Community / Business Open House > Training/Information Session with City Planning, Development > Briefings with community groups > Work w/City and the Office of Economic Adjustment on Joint Land Use Study > Distribute AICUZ update maps & study Today Today 6 p.m. — 8 p.m. Tomorrow TBD Tomorrow TBD Tomorrow TBD Spring/Summer Spring/Summer Spring/Summer/Fall Ongoing effort .444,,,Now tot ..tot, tot Act, p. teed ..tot, tot p. teed ..tot, 6. 6. tot Act, p. teed ..tot, 6. t, tot p. teed ..tot, 6. 6. tot p. tot ..tot, 6. 6. 284.