Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet City Council - 02/19/2013
Tuesday, February 19, 2013 Corpus Christi Meeting Agenda - Final City Council 11:30 AM 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 cctexas.com Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 12:00 p.m., or the end of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su ingles es limitado, habra un interprete ingles- espanol en todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office (at 361- 826 -3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Nelda Martinez to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Pastor David Kelly, Trinity Worship Church. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States. D. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. E. Proclamations / Commendations 1. 1- 000156 Swearing in of newly appointed Board, Commission and Committee members F. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 211512013 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final February 19, 2013 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT PROHIBITS THE CITY COUNCIL FROM RESPONDING AND DISCUSSING YOUR COMMENTS AT LENGTH. THE LAW ONLY AUTHORIZES THEM TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. MAKE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION. 2. RECITE AN EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. 3. ADVISE THE CITIZEN THAT THIS SUBJECT WILL BE PLACED ON AN AGENDA AT A LATER DATE. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOWANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. G. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (NONE) PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. In the event the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding office. H. MINUTES: 2. 13- 000157 Approval of Meeting Minutes - February 12, 2013. Attachments: Minutes - February 12, 2013 I. BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) J. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed; may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance, or may modify the action specified. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting, such agendas are incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. K. CONSENT AGENDA: (NONE) NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The following items are consent motions, resolutions, and ordinances of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and /or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. L. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (NONE) Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 211512013 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final February 19, 2013 M. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 3 - 5 The following items are motions, resolutions and ordinances that will be considered and voted on individually. 3. 13- 000166 Authorizing Volunteer Services Council to sell City flags and other items depicting the City flag Motion allowing Volunteer Services Council of the Corpus Christi State Supported Living Center (VSC) to authorize VSC to sell City Flags and other items depicting the City flag. Attachments: Agenda memo - VSC sale of City Flag 4. 13- 000154 Setting salary for Interim City Auditor and effective date Motion setting salary for Interim City Auditor Kimberly Houston to be effective on February 18, 2013. 5. 13- 000155 Appointing members to the Corpus Christi City Council Ad Hoc City Auditor Nomination Committee Motion appointing members to the Corpus Christi City Council Ad Hoc City Auditor Nominating Committee to perform duties as outlined in the City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 12%2, regarding nomination of candidates for City Auditor. Attachments: Agenda memo - Ad Hoc Committee for City Auditor N. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEM 6) 6. 13- 000137 First Reading Ordinance - Amending the City Code of Ordinances regarding Mayoral appointments to audit committee, period for audit reports follow -up, peer review effective date and process for filling City Auditor vacancy Ordinance amending Chapter 12 Y2 of the City Code of Ordinances regarding City Council Audit Committee, Audit follow -up reports, Peer review, and City Auditor vacancy and selection process. Attachments: Agenda memo - Amendment Auditor Ordinance O. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (NONE) The following items are for Council's informational purposes only. No action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. P. BRIEFINGS TO CITY COUNCIL: (ITEMS 7 -14) Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 211512013 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final February 19, 2013 The following items are for Council's informational purposes only. No action will be taken and no public 8. 13-000140 Street Design Standards Attachments: Agenda memo _- Design Standards - Streets Presentation - Street .Design Standards 9. 13-000121 Street Maintenance Fee Attachments: Agenda memo - Street Maintenance Fee Presentation Presentation - Street Maintenance Fee (2-19-13) 10. 13-000158 Proposed Revisions to Water Conservation Plan and Drought Contingency Plan Attachments: Agenda memo - WCP and DCP Presentation ,---,- Updates toWCP and DCP 2-19-13 Final 11. 13-000141 Plastic Bag and Litter Reduction Attachments: Agenda memo - Plastic Bag Feb 2013 Presentation - FINAL- plastic bag Feb 19 2013 13. 13-000131 Animal Care Division Attachments: Agenda memo - CCPD Animal Care Division Presentation - CCPD Animal Care Division 14. 13-000142 Fiscal Year 2012 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) Attachments: Agenda memo - 2012 CAFR Presentation - 2012 CAFR Q. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 211512013 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final February 19, 2013 * Update on City Operations R. ADJOURNMENT Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 211512013 ' AV/ a, 7 Tuesday, February 12, 2013 Corpus Christi Meeting Minutes - Final A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER. C. I] E IL1V10191A1I:0]L1 A City Council 11:30 AM Mayor Martinez called the meeting to order. 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 cctexas.com The invocation was delivered by Henry Williams, Elder, Corpus Christi Christian Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I :111]1 WWI Ia The Pledge of Allegiance was led by City Manager Ron Olson. Council Chambers City Secretary Armando Chapa verified that the necessary quorum of the Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Present: 9 - Council Member Kelley Allen,Council Member Priscilla Leal,Council Member David Loeb,Mayor Nelda Marti nez,Council Member Mark Scott,Council Member Chad Magill,Council Member Colleen Mclntyre,Council Member Lillian Riojas, and Council Member Rudy Garza Proclamations / Commendations 1. Proclamation declaring February 2013 as "Mission FitPossible Month" Proclamation declaring February 12, 2013 as "Leadership Corpus Christi Class 41 Day" Proclamation declaring February 17 - 23, 2013 as "National LULAC Week" Proclamation declaring February 17 - 23, 2013 as "National Engineers Week" Swearing in ceremony for newly appointed Municipal Court Judges Mayor Martinez read and presented the Proclamation(s) and conducted the swearing in for the newly appointed Municipal Court Judges. H. MINUTES: 5. Approval of Meeting Minutes - January 29, 2013. A motion was made by Council Member Magill, seconded by Council Member Leal to approve the minutes as presented and passed. Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 7 -13) Mayor Martinez referred to the Consent Agenda, Items 7 through 13. Mayor Martinez asked for council and public comment. There were no comments. The items were approved by one vote: 7. Agreement with State to contribute right -of -way funds for ramp reversal project on South Padre Island Drive (SPID) to alleviate congestion at eastbound off ramps between Nile Drive and Ayers Street Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Agreement to Contribute Right of Way Funds with the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) for the acquisition of certain rights of way and the relocating and adjusting of utilities within the project's scope of SH 358 (South Padre Island Drive) from Nile Drive to Ayers Street, with the City's participation in the amount of $950,000. (BOND 2012) The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 029739 8. Deferment Agreement for public wastewater and water improvements to the property located at the southside of State Highway 44, east of Heinsohn Road and west of North Padre Island Drive Motion finding reasonable cause exists to delay completion of public improvements in accordance with Section 8.1.10.B of the Unified Development Code and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a deferment agreement with 15T Investments LLC ( "Developer /Owner "), in the amount of $221,846.54 for public wastewater and water improvements to the property located at the Southside of State Highway 44 East of Heinsohn Road and West of North Padre Island Drive, contingent upon receipt of a letter of credit approved by the City prior to the filing of the final plat by the Developer. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2013 -027 Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 9. Amending Consulting Services Agreement with the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Amended Consulting Services Agreement ( "Agreement ") with the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau ( "CVB ") for a period ending July 31, 2015 The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2013 -028 10. Second Reading Ordinance - Lease Agreement for Arts and Education Center located at 2021 Agnes (1st Reading 1/8/13) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or his designee to execute a ten -year Lease Agreement with South Texas Institute for the Arts for the use of an approximately 1.37 acre tract including improvements located near intersection of Agnes Street at 18th Street, to be used to operate the Antonio E. Garcia Arts & Education Center; providing for severance; and providing for publication The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on second reading with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 029740 11. Cooperative Purchase Agreement for electronic archiving of construction blueprints Motion approving a contract for the electronic archiving of construction blueprints with MCCi, LLC of Tallahassee, Florida for a total expenditure of $76,779.70. The award is based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR). Funds are budgeted in the Development Services Fund for FY 2012 -2013. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 12. 13. Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2013 -029 Supply Agreements for food items for the Elderly Nutrition Program Motion approving supply agreements with the following companies for the following amounts in accordance with the Coastal Bend Council of Governments Bid Invitation No. CBCOG -13 -1 for food items which include canned and frozen fruit and vegetables; meats and condiments, for an estimated six month expenditure of $179,155.26. The terms of the contracts shall be for six months with options to extend for up to three additional months, subject to the approval of the Coastal Bend Council of Governments, the suppliers, and the City Manager or designee. Funds are available through the Meals on Wheels Grant. LaBatt Food Service Corpus Christi, Texas 144 Line Items $83,729.73 Grand Total: $179,155.26 Performance Food Group Victoria, Texas 108 Line Items $95,425.53 The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2013 -030 Municipal Lease Line of Credit to fund equipment and rolling stock replacement needs Motion approving a Municipal Lease Line of Credit with Frost Bank in accordance with Request for Proposal No. BI- 0040 -13 based on lowest responsible proposal for an estimated annual expenditure of $326,909.92. The term of the contract is for one year with options to extend for up to four additional one -year periods, subject to the approval of the contractor and the City Manager, or designee. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2013 -031 Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: 6. Advisory Committee on Community Pride Cable Communications Commission Committee for Persons with Disabilities Electrical Advisory Board Reinvestment Zone No. 3 Board Watershore and Beach Advisory Committee The following appointments were made to the City's boards, commissions, and committees: Advisory Committee on Community Pride: New Appointments - Jeff Craft and Angela Munselle -Woods Cable Communications Commission: New Appointments - Mary Ann Kelly and Yolanda Perez Committee for Persons with Disabilities: Reappointments - Carlos Vargas, Darren Bates, Sabrina Ramirez, and Alana Manrow; New Appointments - Judah Hoehne Electrical Advisory Board: Reappointments - Jesse Gatewood (Journeyman Electrician), Kevin Pitchford (Home Builder), and Steven Deases (Electrical Engineer); New Appointments -Robert Aguilar (Master Electrician), Alfred Tristan (Utility Power Distribution Representative), and Mary Lou Herrera (Not Connected to Electrical Industry) Reinvestment Zone No. 3: Mayor Nelda Martinez, and Council Members Kelley Allen, Rudy Garza, Priscilla Leal, David Loeb, Colleen McIntyre, Chad Magill, Lillian Riojas, and Mark Scott Water Shore Advisory Committee: Reappointments - Jennifer Pollack (Scientist), and Cody Bates (At Large); New Appointments - Carrie Robertson Meyer (At Large) Enactment No: F. PUBLIC COMMENT. Mayor Martinez referred to Public Comment. The following citizens spoke: Carolyn Moon spoke about the amount of fines assessed in Environmental Court; Jack Gordy spoke about the required permits for RTA and Cooper Advertising; Jerry Garcia spoke about the Destination Bayfront project and the funding for Youth Sports Complex; Howard Ludlow spoke in support of leveling the residential fee, and also spoke about the concept of apartment dwellers and commented on the multiplier used for calculation. L. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 14) Mayor Martinez referred to Item No. 14. Mark Van Vleck, Director of Development Services stated that the purpose for rezoning the property is to allow for multifamily uses. Mr. Van Vleck then referred to a presentation and discussed the preliminary development plan, existing and future land use, the drainage corridor (east along Brooke Road), and displayed a map depicting an aerial overview. He stated that the Planning Commission and Staff are recommending approval of the "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District. Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 A motion was made by Council Member Garza, seconded by Council Member Leal to open the public hearing and passed. The following citizens spoke in opposition to the rezoning: Jennifer Rock and Abel Alonzo. A motion was made by Council Member Garza, seconded by Council Member Magill to close the public hearing and passed. 14. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - A change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District, at 7201 Brooke Road Case No. 0113 -01 Brooke Tract, L.P.: A change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District, resulting in a change of future land use from low density residential to medium density residential. The property is described as 39.99 acres out of Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 28, 29, and 30, Section 26, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located on the southeast corner of Rodd Field Road and Brooke Road. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (January 16, 2013): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District Ordinance Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ( "UDC') upon application by Brooke Tract, L.P. ( "Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to 39.99 acres out of Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 28, 29, and 30, Section 26, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 G. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 2 - 4) Mayor Martinez referred to Executive Session Item Numbers 2, 3 and 4. The council returned from executive session. Mayor Martinez announced that no action would be taken on the executive session items. 2. Executive session pursuant to Section 551.087 of the Texas Government Code to deliberate regarding confidential commercial or financial information received from a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have locate, stay, or expand within the City and with Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 which the City is conducting economic development negotiations and to deliberate possible offers of financial or other incentives to said business prospect, with possible discussion and action in open session. This item was discussed in executive session. 3. Executive session pursuant to Section 551.071(1)(A) of the Texas Government Code to consult with attorneys regarding Cause No. 13 -10- 00272 -CV, styled San Patricio Municipal Water District and South Texas Water Authority vs. City of Corpus Christi, presently pending appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas with possible discussion and action in open session. This iltem was discussed in executive session. 4. Executive session pusuant to Section 551.071(1)(A) of the Texas Government Code to consult with attorneys regarding Cause No. S -11 -6088 CV -B styled City of Ingleside vs. City of Corpus Christi which is presently pending the 156th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas, with possible discussion and action in open session. This item was discussed in executive session. M. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 15 -16) 15. Interlocal agreement for extending waterline on County Road 52 for installation of fire hydrants Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Nueces County and the Nueces County Water Control and Improvement District No. 3 in an amount not to exceed $25,000, to extend the water line on County Road 52. The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 029741 16. Second Reading Ordinance - Ground lease for development of a facility for State and Federal departments to be located at the airport (1st Reading 1/8/13) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Ground Lease with FDL - CC, LLC to lease land from the City of Corpus Christi at the Corpus Christi International Airport ( "Airport ") for the development of a facility to be occupied initially by the Department of Homeland Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 Security, the United States Coast Guard (USCG), and Customs and Border Protection ( "Project "), to be located on land at the Airport, which Project will be subleased by FDL - CC, LLC to the General Services Administration ( "Government- Tenant "). Mayor Martinez referred to Item No. 16. Wes Pierson, Assistant City Manager stated that this item is for a lease agreement to build a facility for the United States Coast Guard (USGC) at the Corpus Christi International Airport. Mr. Pierson stated that the facility will include an office building, hangar, ground service equipment, repair facility and aircraft parking ramps. Mr. Pierson stated that an amendment to the lease would be necessary. He added that the amendment refers to the Buy Local section language in the lease, to include architectural and engineering services as part of the value of the construction cost that is used to meet the 80% goal. Mayor Martinez asked for comments from the audience. Abel Alonzo spoke in support of the project. A motion was made by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Leal to amend the Buy Local section language of the lease, to include architecural and engineering services as part of the value of the construction cost that is used to meet the 80% goal and passed. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on second reading as amended with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 029742 N. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 17 - 26) 17. First Reading Ordinance - Adopting the 2009 International Fire Code with local amendments Ordinance adopting the International Fire Code, 2009 Edition, with local amendments, as the Fire Code of the City of Corpus Christi; providing for penalties; providing for severance; and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 18. First Reading Ordinance - Amending the Capital Improvement Budget and ratifying Change Order No. 5 for improvements at the Airport Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 Ordinance amending the FY 2013 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 029565 to add Project No. E10075 Corpus Christi International Airport Communications Center, Perimeter Security, Standby Generator, and Commercial Aviation Lighting Upgrades; increasing expenditures in the amount of $170,404.21; and ratifying Change Order No. 5 to the Construction Contract with Beecroft Construction, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $170,404.21, for a total restated fee not to exceed $2,943,053.09, for the Corpus Christi International Airport Communications Center, Perimeter Security, Standby Generator and Commercial Aviation Lighting Upgrades. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 19. First Reading Ordinance - Amending lease agreement to exclude subsidiary from On- Airport Rental Car Consession and Lease for airport Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to ratify an amendment to the On- Airport Rental Car Concession and Lease Agreement with The Hertz Corporation for the operation of a car rental concession at the Corpus Christi International Airport ( "Airport ") to exclude former Hertz subsidiary Simply Wheelz, L.L.C. as a party. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 20. First Reading Ordinance - Amending rental car concession and lease agreements with each rental car agency located at the airport Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a First Amendment to the On- Airport Rental Car Concession and Lease Agreement with each 1) EAN Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Enterprise Holdings, Inc. dba Alamo Rent A Car and National Car Rental ( "Alamo /National "), 2) Coastal Bend Rent -A -Car Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 dba Avis Rent -A -Car ( "Avis "), 3) DTG Operations, Inc. dba Dollar Rent -A -Car and Thrifty Car Rental ( "Dollar /Thrifty "), 4) EAN Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Enterprise Holdings, Inc. dba Enterprise Rent -A -Car ( "Enterprise "), and 5) The Hertz Corporation ( "Hertz ") to lease space in the Quick Turn Around Facility ( "QTA ") located at the Corpus Christi International Airport ( "Airport "), in consideration of a base rent to be offset as applicable by revenues collected via a Customer Facility Charge, each for a term of five (5) years. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 21. First Reading Ordinance - Agreement for use of McGee Beach for music event Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an Agreement with Elizabeth Guarneri for use of McGee Beach for music event to be held on March 16, 2013 and March 17, 2013. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 22. First Reading Ordinance - Accepting and appropriating State grant funds and regional cash match funds for parking lot improvements at the Billings and Clems Boat Ramp; amending project agreement to increase federal grant funds and include lease as local match Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate funding in the amount of $25,000 from the Saltwater- fisheries Enhancement Association and $674,710 in additional federal funding for the Clem's and Billing's Boat Ramp renovations in the No. 1067 Park and Recreation Grants Fund; authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute Amendment to Project Agreement with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for Clem's and Billing's Boat Ramp renovations to increase federal grant funds $674,710 and include 25 year lease with Texas General Land Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 Office as local match; and amending the FY 12 -13 Capital Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 029565 by increasing proposed revenues by $699,710. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 23. First Reading Ordinance - Accepting and appropriating State grant and City matching funds for wildlife refuge improvements Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate a grant in the amount of $100,000 from the Texas General Land Office for Hans and Pat Suter Wildlife Refuge improvements in the No. 1067 Park and Recreation Grants Fund with City matching funds of $66,667.00 in the No. 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for total project amount of $166,667.00. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 24. First Reading Ordinance - Accepting and appropriating State grant for elderly nutrition home delivered meals Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate a $140,220.79 grant from the Texas Department of Agriculture Texans Feeding Texans Program in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grants Fund for the FY 2013 Senior Community Services, Elderly Nutrition Program. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 25. First Reading Ordinance - Amending City code to establish Tree Advisory Committee and list minimum standards for tree planting and management on public property Ordinance amending the City Code of Ordinances to establish the Tree Advisory Committee and include provision to address diseased trees. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Allen, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Absent: 1 - Council Member Leal Abstained: 0 26. First Reading Ordinance - Adopting a local amendment to the 2009 International Residential Code (I RC) that establishes a fire separation distance equal to the one that was required by the 2003 1 R Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14, "Development Services," Article II, "City of Corpus Christi Technical Construction Codes," Division 8, "Residential Code," Section 14 -291, "Residential construction code," by creating new subsection (6.1) pertaining to Section R302.1 of the International Residential Code for One- and Two - Family Dwellings, which relates to exterior walls and fire - resistant construction, in order to establish new exception language and include modifications to the applicable table. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on first reading with the following vote: Aye: 9- Council Member Allen, Council Member Leal, Council Member Loeb, Mayor Martinez, Council Member Scott, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Garza Abstained: 0 O. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 27 - 38) Mayor Martinez referred to the Future Agenda, Items 27 through 38 and stated that these items are for informational purposes only and that no action or public comment would be taken. Assistant City Manager Margie Rose announced that staff would provide a presentation on Items 27 and 28; Council Member Allen requested a presentation on Items 34 and 36; and Council Member Magill requested a presentation on Item 29. 27. Approving amendment no. 2 to professional services contract for water supply study to include gas line and Municipal Information Systems conduit from Laguna Shores Boulevard to Padre Island Drive Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Contract for Professional Services with Urban Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $182,976.00, for a total restated fee not to exceed $597,216.00, for the Padre Island Water Supply Study. This Motion was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 28. Construction Contract for removing ammonia from reclaimed water to meet Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) permit criteria for ammonia Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Construction Contract with CSA Construction of Houston, Texas in the amount of $3,461,025.00, for Oso Water Reclamation Plant Nutrient Removal Project (Ammonia) - Phase 1. This Motion was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 29. Supply Agreement for hot tap fittings for repairing or adding pressurized natural gas lines Motion approving a supply agreement with M.T. Deason Company, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama for hot tap fittings in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0052 -13 based on only bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $69,257.50, of which $40,400.21 is required for the remainder of FY 2012 -2013. The term of the agreement shall be for twelve (12) months with options to extend for up to two (2) additional twelve -month periods, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Gas Department in FY 2012- 2013. This Motion was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 30. Approving uniformed guard security services for specific City buildings Motion approving a service agreement with Eddie Garza Security & Investigations, of Corpus Christi, Texas for uniformed guard security services for City Hall, Frost Bank Building, Central Library, Ben F. McDonald Library, Janet F. Harte Library and the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0035 -13 based on lowest local bid for an estimated twelve month expenditure of $296,186.63 of which $123,411.10 is required for the remainder of FY 2012 -2013. The term of the agreements shall be for twelve months with options to extend for up to two additional twelve months periods, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or designee. Funds have been budgeted by the using departments in FY 2012-2013. Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 This Motion was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 31. Authorizing grant application submission to State for assisting victims of crime Resolution authorizing the submission of a grant application in the amount of $79,188.69 to the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division for funding available under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) fund for the Police Department's Family Violence Unit with a city match of $16,964.54 and $4,000 in -kind services, for a total project cost of $100,153.23; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to apply for, accept, reject, alter, or terminate the grant. This Resolution was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 32. Authorizing grant application submission to State for reducing and preventing violence against women Resolution authorizing the submission of a grant application in the amount of $47,351.74 to the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division. For funding available under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) fund for the Police Department's Family Violence Unit with a city match of $16,573.28 and $5,400 in -kind services, for a total project cost of $69,325.02; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to apply for, accept, reject, alter, or terminate the grant. This Resolution was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 33. Authorizing grant application submission to State for direct services to victims of crime Resolution authorizing the submission of a grant application in the amount of $67,660.55 to the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division. For funding available under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) fund for the Police Department's Family Violence Unit to establish a Victim Outreach Program with a city match of $13,533.07 and $3,000 in -kind services, for a total project cost of $84,193.62; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to apply for, accept, reject, alter, or terminate the grant. This Resolution was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 34. Resolutions supporting local affordable housing developments; acknowledging their applications for low income housing tax credits to State and local support for HOME funds (Related Items 34 - 36) Resolution of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas in support of the proposed affordable housing project known as Woodland Creek Apartments to be developed by TG 110, Inc. Corpus Christi Page 14 Printed on 211412013 City Council Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2013 This Resolution was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 35. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas in support of the proposed affordable housing project known as Lexington Manor Apartments to be developed by TG 110, Inc. This Resolution was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 36. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas in support of the proposed affordable housing project known as Riverstone Apartments to be developed by MDS Housing Corpus Christi, Ltd. This Resolution was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 37. Appointing Council Members to the Corpus Christi Housing and Finance Corporation and the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation Motion appointing Council Members Nelda Martinez, Kelley Allen, Rudy Garza, Priscilla Leal, David Loeb, Chad Magill, Colleen McIntyre, Lillian Riojas and Mark Scott as Board Members to the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation and the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation. This Motion was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. 38. Appointing Council Members to the Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation and the Coastal Bend Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation boards Motion appointing Council Members Nelda Martinez, Kelley Allen, Rudy Garza, Priscilla Leal, David Loeb, Chad Magill, Colleen McIntyre, Lillian Riojas and Mark Scott as Board Members to the Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation and the Coastal Bend Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation. This Motion was recommended by Staff to the Consent Agenda. P. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: * Update on City Operations Q. ADJOURNMENT There were no City Manager comments. There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Martinez declared the meeting adjourned at 4:25 pm. Corpus Christi Page 15 Printed on 211412013 to DATE: February 11, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Mayor Nelda Martinez neldam @cctexas.com (361) 826 -3100 CAPTION: AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 Action Item for the Council Meeting of February 26, 2013 Authorizing Volunteer Services Council to sell City Flags Motion allowing Volunteer Services Council of the Corpus Christi State Supported Living Center (VSC) to authorize VSC to sell City Flags and other items depicting the City Flag. PURPOSE- The Volunteer Services Council (VSC) of the Corpus Christi State Supported Living Center is a non - profit organization that raises money to fund projects related to The Living Center. This organization has asked to sell the Corpus Christi City Flag as a fundraiser for the VSC at events such as Market Days. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City Flag is city property under the City Charter, Article IX, Section 1 and is considered to be inalienable; provided, however that the City Council may grant approval to sell the City Flag. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve the item. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not Applicable. EMERGENCY / NON - EMERGENCY: Non - emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2011- 2012 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Motion. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: to DATE: February 11, 2013 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Armando Chapa, City Secretary armandoc@cctexas.com (361) 826 -3105 Setting Salary for Interim City Auditor CAPTION: Motion setting salary for Interim City Auditor Kimberly Houston to be effective on February 18, 2013. PURPOSE- Per City Charter Article II, Section 29(a), the City Council shall appoint a City Auditor. The former City Auditor's last day of employment was February 15, 2013. Per the City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 12%2, Section 8, at times when a vacancy occurs in the office of the City Auditor, the first principal assistant shall act in the capacity of City Auditor pending the appointment of a new City Auditor. Ms. Kimberly Houston was serving as the first principal auditor at the time of the vacancy in the office of the City Auditor. Chapter 12%2 of the City Code of Ordinances states that the City Auditor's compensation shall be fixed by the City Council. At its meeting on February 7, 2013, the City Council Audit Committee voted unanimously to recommend salary adjustment of $70,686.00 while Ms. Houston serves as Interim City Auditor, to be retroactive to February 18, 2013, which is the date the City Auditor position became vacant. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVES: Not Applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not Applicable. EMERGENCY / NON - EMERGENCY: Not Applicable. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal City Auditor FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2011- 2012 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: to DATE: February 11, 2013 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Armando Chapa, City Secretary armandoc@cctexas.com (361) 826 -3105 Appointing Members to the Corpus Christi City Council Ad Hoc City Auditor Nominating Committee CAPTION: Motion appointing members to the Corpus Christi City Council Ad Hoc City Auditor Nominating Committee to perform duties as outlined in the City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 12%2, regarding nomination of candidates for City Auditor. PURPOSE: Per City Charter Article II, Section 29(a), the City Council shall appoint a City Auditor. The former City Auditor's last day of employment was February 15, 2013. Per the City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 12%2, Section 8, the City Council shall appoint an Ad Hoc Nominating Committee to recommend to the City Council candidates for City Auditor. The Ad Hoc shall consist of five (5) members, including a Chair and a Vice -Chair selected by majority vote of the members, meeting the following qualifications: 1) Three members shall be members of the City Council nominated by the City Council Audit Committee. 2) One member shall be an at large City of Corpus Christi resident. 3) One member shall be the City Manager or his designee. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVES: Not Applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not Applicable. EMERGENCY / NON - EMERGENCY: Not Applicable. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal City Auditor FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2011- 2012 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: to DATE: 02/11/13 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First reading for the City Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 Second reading for the City Council Meeting of February 26, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Kimberly Houston, Senior Auditor kimberlyh @cctexas.com 826 -3657 Approval of Amendment to City Auditor Ordinance CAPTION: Ordinance amending Chapter 12 V2 of the City Code of Ordinances regarding City Council Audit Committee, Audit follow -up reports, Peer review, and City Auditor vacancy and selection process. PURPOSE: To obtain approval of amendments to City Auditor Ordinance regarding when Mayoral appointments to City Council Audit Committee can be made, the earliest and latest period to perform follow -ups to audit reports, effective date for which 3 -year Peer Review is measured by, and process for filling City Auditor vacancy. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On November 2, 2010, voters approved an amendment to the City Charter adding the position of City Auditor who shall be appointed by and report to the City Council. Article II, Section 29 (b) of the City Charter provides that the City Auditor shall report to the City Council and have such duties, responsibilities, and staff as determined by ordinance, including the responsibility to conduct, or cause to be conducted, financial, performance, investigative, and other audits following government auditing standards as promulgated by the Comptroller General of the United States. On July 20, 2011, City Council approved an amendment to the City Code of Ordinance adding Chapter 12 %2 City Auditor. On November 15, 2011, Chapter 12 %2 City Auditor Ordinance was amended to establish a Council Audit Committee. On February 7, 2013, Council Audit Committee agreed upon recommended amendments to Chapter 12 %2 City Auditor Ordinance regarding Mayoral appointments to Council Audit Committee, determining periods for follow -up audits, redefining the selection process of City Auditor, providing for appointment of interim City Auditor, and reformulating peer review requirements. ALTERNATIVES: NA OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: IN CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conformance with City Code of Ordinance Chapter 12 Y2 City Auditor EMERGENCY /NON- EMERGENCY: Non - Emergency one reading DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Council Audit Committee FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2011- 2012 Project to Date Expenditures CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Ordinance as presented LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Exhibit A — Ordinance Amending City Auditor Ordinance No. 029287 1 Ordinance amending Chapter 12 '/2 of the City Code of Ordinances regarding City Council Audit Committee, Audit follow -up reports, Peer review, and City Auditor vacancy and selection process. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. Chapter 12 1/ of the City Code of Ordinances regarding City Auditor is amended to read as follows: "Sec. 12'/2 -1. - Establishment of the office of City Auditor. (a) There is hereby established the Office of the City Auditor, which shall be directed by the City Auditor who shall be appointed by affirmative vote of a majority of the entire membership of the City Council. (b) The City Auditor must: (1) Be a person knowledgeable in performance and financial auditing, public administration, and public financial and fiscal practices; (2) Be licensed as a certified public accountant or certified internal auditor; and (3) Exercise due professional care in carrying out his or her responsibilities, and provide reasonable assurance that due professional care will be employed in conducting audits. The City Auditor will establish audit policies and procedures consistent with Government Auditing Standards, established by the Comptroller General of the United States, as well as applicable laws and regulations. (c) The City Auditor's compensation shall be fixed by the City Council (Ord. No. 029171, § 1, 8 -23 -2011; Ord. No. 029287, § 1, 11 -15 -2011) Sec. 12'/2 -2. - Independence, objectivity, and audit standards. (a) The organization and administration of the auditor's office shall be sufficiently independent to assure that no interference or influence shall adversely affect an independent and objective judgment of the auditor. (b) The Office shall be provided a discrete budget sufficient to carry out the responsibilities and functions established in this ordinance and to ensure appropriate professional development, continuing professional education, and compliance with applicable certification requirements. (c) The City Auditor shall establish an organizational structure appropriate to carrying out the responsibilities and functions of this chapter. (d) No person shall be appointed to the position of City Auditor who has been mayor, council member, or City Manager of the city during a period of five (5) years prior to the date of the City Auditor's appointment. In no case shall the City Auditor be related, by K affinity or consanguinity within the second degree, to the mayor, any council member or the City Manager. (e) The City Auditor shall not be actively involved in partisan political activities of the City of Corpus Christi. (f) Neither the City Auditor nor any member of the Office staff shall conduct or supervise an audit of an activity for which they were responsible or within which they were employed during the preceding two (2) years. (g) The City Auditor shall adhere to Government Auditing Standards, insofar as possible, when conducting the City Auditor's work and will be independent as defined by those standards. (h) The responsibility for selection of audit areas shall initiate with the City Auditor, with due consideration of the interests and concerns of the City Council and City Manager. To accomplish this: (1) No less than thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year the City Auditor shall submit an annual audit plan to the City Council through the Council Audit Committee for review and comment. The plan shall identify each audit to be conducted in terms of the department, organization, service, program, function, or policy to be audited and audit objectives to be addressed. The Council Audit Committee shall forward the plan to the City Council for City Council review and final approval. (2) The annual audit plan may be amended during the year, following notification of the Council Audit Committee and due provision for comment. Such amendments may be initiated by the City Auditor, or requested by the Council Audit Committee, or the City Manager, or City Manager's designee; any amendments to the annual plan must be reviewed by and approved by the Audit Committee, with written notice of such changes to the full City Council in a timely manner; (3) Results of special audits shall be distributed in the same manner as all other audit reports, as provided in section 12 -1/ -5, preparation and release of reports, of this chapter. (4) If the City Auditor determines that there is serious concern regarding fraud, abuse, or illegality, or that the scope of an audit in progress should be expanded as the result of any findings, the City Auditor is authorized to initiate spontaneously and conduct, or expand the scope of, an audit beyond that approved in the work program. The City Auditor shall notify the Council Audit Committee of the change. (5) Notwithstanding the calendar identified above in subsection (h)(1), the initial audit plan for remainder of the fiscal year ending July 31, 2012 shall be prepared by the City Auditor and submitted to Audit committee, for review and comments by Audit committee, on or before November 30, 2011. The initial audit plan shall then be submitted to City Council for its review and final approval. Q 1. To review and provide comments regarding the City Auditor's annual work program, to be formally reviewed and approved by City Council each year; 2. To monitor the city's internal controls through the results of external audits, and internal audits and other activities of the City Auditor; 3. To monitor audit results and follow -up activities of the City Auditor; and 4. To ensure that audit results include recommendations that serve to improve or enhance city operations. (c) The Audit Committee shall meet as needed to perform its duties. b t —oha4- � 1. A majority of the members of the Audit Committee shall constitute a quorum. 2. The minutes of each meeting are to be prepared and sent to the Committee _►.l members and approved at subsequent meetings 3. In compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, the Audit Committee will hold executive sessions with the City Auditor and external auditors as deemed appropriate. (d) The City Auditor shall have direct communication with the Council Audit Committee, and attend all Council Audit Committee meetings. (Ord. No. 029171, § 1, 8 -23 -2011; Ord. No. 029287, § 1, 11 -15 -2011) Sec. 12'/2 -4. - Access to records and property. All officers, employees, or agents of the City shall provide access to and furnish the City Auditor or employees in the Office of the City Auditor with any and all documents including but not limited to records, books, accounts, internal or external memoranda, writings and tapes, reports, vouchers, correspondence files, CDs, computer data, bank accounts, reports, funds, money, and other information or property in their custody. Also, such officers, employees, or agents shall fully cooperate with the Office of the City Auditor, and make full disclosure of all known information. In addition, they shall provide access for the City Auditor to inspect all property, equipment, and facilities within their custody and observe any operations for which they are responsible. (Ord. No. 029171, § 1, 8 -23 -2011; Ord. No. 029287, § 1, 11 -15 -2011) Sec. 12'/2 -5. - Preparation and release of reports. (a) Each audit shall result in a report which shall: (1) Be transmitted in draft to the City Manager, who will provide a written response to the City Auditor regarding the audit findings and recommendations within an agreed time frame. The response will indicate agreement or disagreement and reasons for any disagreements, and what actions, if any will be taken. The City Auditor will include the responses in the final report, unless they are not received within the established time frame; (2) Be submitted in final form to the City Council and the City Manager, and shall be retained in the City Auditor's office in accordance with the City's records management program; (3) Adhere to reporting standards for financial and performance audits as described in Governmental Audit Standards. (b) When appropriate, the City Auditor may issue other reports as needed which provide information when an audit is not required. These reports present work that is generally advisory in nature. (Ord. No. 029171, § 17 8 -23 -2011; Ord. No. 029287, § 17 11 -15 -2011) 6'1 Sec. 12'/2 -6. - Powers and duties. (a) The City Auditor shall systematically and continuously examine the works of all city operations to identify opportunities to reduce costs, increase efficiency, quality, and effectiveness, or otherwise improve management of city programs and services. (b) Scope of work. The City Auditor is empowered to conduct performance and other audit work to determine whether: (1) Activities and programs being implemented have been authorized by the council, or some other legal authority, and are being conducted in a manner contemplated to accomplish the objectives intended by the council or other authorizing authority; (2) The effectiveness of organizations, programs, activities, functions or policies, and the extent to which desired results or benefits are being achieved; (3) The audited entity is acquiring, protecting, and using its resources (such as personnel, property, and space) economically and efficiently, and the causes of inefficiencies or uneconomical practices; (4) The audited entity is in compliance with council or other legally imposed mandates regarding efficiency, economy, effectiveness, or expenditure of public funds; (5) Systems of administrative and accounting control have been established by management to effectively, economically, and efficiently carry on the city's operations; (6) Financial and performance reports are being provided that disclose fairly, accurately, and fully all information that is required by law or other established or state criteria that is necessary to ascertain the nature and scope of programs and activities, and that is necessary to establish a proper basis for evaluating the results of programs and activities. (c) Follow -up on audits. The City Auditor shall ensure accountability and implementation of a continuous improvement process by an annual status report of prior audit recommendations. Accordingly: (1) At least six (6) months but no longer than twelve (12) months after the transmittal of an audit report to the council, the City Auditor shall request a status report on actions taken by appropriate officials in response to the audit recommendations; (2) The City Auditor may request additional periodic status reports, and conduct follow -up review as needed; (d) Report of irregularities. If the City Auditor detects apparent violation of law, or apparent instances of misfeasance or nonfeasance by an officer or employee, or information that indicates derelictions may be reasonably anticipated, the auditor shall, A after consultation with and advice from the city attorney, immediately report the irregularities to the appropriate authority, including the City Manager. If the irregularity is criminal in nature, the auditor shall also notify the appropriate chief prosecuting attorney. (e) Contract auditors, consultants, and experts. Through appropriate procurement requirements and within the limits of the adopted budget, the auditor may obtain the services of certified or registered public accountants, qualified management consultants, or other professional experts necessary to perform the auditor's duties. (f) The City Auditor shall meet with the external auditors to discuss pertinent matters, review the financial statements, auditors' opinions, and management letters resulting from the annual financial audit. (Ord. No. 029171, § 1, 8 -23 -2011; Ord. No. 029287, § 1, 11 -15 -2011) Sec. 12'/2 -7. - Peer review. (a) Authority statement. The City Auditor's Office shall within three (3) years of date of the adoption of 94d44 PGe rOrdinance No. 0292874 be subject to peer review and thereafter not less than once every three (3) years by a professional, non - partisan, objective person or group, comprised of auditors and other professionals with appropriate government auditing expertise and experience. (b) Scope of peer review. The peer review shall determine compliance with Government Auditing Standards and the quality of audit effort and reporting, including: (1) General standards such as staff qualifications, due professional care, and quality assurance; (2) Fieldwork standards such as planning, supervision, and audit evidence; (3) Reporting standards such as report content, presentation, and timeliness (c) Reporting. A copy of the written report of the peer review shall be furnished to each member of the City Council after review and approval by the Council Audit Committee. (d) Cost. The cost of the peer review, including reasonable travel and living expenses, shall be paid from funds budgeted specifically in the City Auditor's budget. (Ord. No. 029171, § 1, 8 -23 -2011; Ord. No. 029287, § 1, 11 -15 -2011) Sec. 12'/2 -8. - City Auditor vacancy — Selection process. (a) At such times when a vacancy occurs in the Office of the City Auditor, the first principal assistant shall act in the capacity of City Auditor pending the appointment of a new City Auditor. Should the first rinci al assistant osition be vacant the Council Audit Committee shall appoint an interim City Auditor. (b) The council shall appoint an ad hoc nominating committee to recommend to the City Council candidates for City Auditor. The committee shall consist of five (5) rA members, including a chair and vice -chair selected by majority vote of members, meeting the following qualifications: (1) Three (3) members shall be members of the City Council nominated by the Council Audit Committee. (2) One (1) member shall be an at large City of Corpus Christi resident. (3) One (1) member shall be the City Manager or his or her designee. (Ord. No. 029171, § 1, 8 -23 -2011; Ord. No. 029287, § 1, 11 -15 -2011) SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Chad Magill Kelley Allen Colleen McIntyre Rudy Garza Lillian Riojas Priscilla Leal Mark Scott David Loeb That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Chad Magill Kelley Allen Colleen McIntyre Rudy Garza Lillian Riojas Priscilla Leal Mark Scott David Loeb PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor E:3 AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 DATE: February 7, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Daniel Biles, P. E., Director of Engineering Services daub _cctexas.com; 826 -3729 Michael Morris, Director of Parks and Recreation icaelmo cctexas.com, 826 -3464 STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Oscar Martinez 2. Daniel Biles, P.E. 3. Michael Morris OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): UPDATE TO CITY COUNCIL Destination Bayfront Titles /Pnci +inn Assistant City Manager Director Director Department Public Works Engineering Services Parks and Recreation 1. J.J. Hart Board Member Destination Bayfront 2. Trey McCampbell Board Member Destination Bayfront 3. Mary Margaret Jones President Hargreaves Associates 4. Lara Rose Senior Principal Hargreaves Associates BACKGROUND: Presenting the Destination Bayfront Master Implementation Plan and Schematic Design for City Council Review and Consideration. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Powerpoint Presentation Draft Resolution Master Implement Plan (separate cover) Resolution approving and adopting the Corpus Christi Bayfront Development Master Implementation Plan and Schematic Design, including the phasing plan outlined in the Schematic Design, prepared by Hargreaves Associates for the Destination Bayfront Project ( "Project "); directing staff to add a bond proposition for construction in the November 13, 2013 election; directing staff to prepare a contract amendment with Hargreaves Associates for Design Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The "Corpus Christi Bayfront Development Master Implementation Plan" prepared by Hargreaves Associates for the Destination Bayfront Project is approved and adopted. SECTION 2. The Schematic Design ( "Destination Bayfront 100% Schematic Design ") prepared by Hargreaves Associates for the Destination Bayfront Project, including the phasing plan outlined therein, is approved and adopted. SECTION 3. Staff is directed to add a bond proposition to the November 13, 2013 election for the construction of the Destination Bayfront Project. SECTION 4. Staff is directed to prepare a contract amendment with Hargreaves Associates for Design Development of the Destination Bayfront Project. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor KAEngineering DataExchange \Lynda \LEGISTAR \FY 13 \2 -Feb 19 \best Bayfron\Draft Resolution - Dest Bayfront. docx Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Kelley Allen Rudy Garza Priscilla Leal David Loeb Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Lillian Riojas Mark Scott KAEngineering DataExchange \Lynda \LEGISTAR \FY 13 \2 -Feb 19 \best Bayfron\Draft Resolution - Dest Bayfront. docx uj _C/) m O 70 70 O U m N O O E Q LL 70 .a) 0 70 U 70 m N a) U) 70 LL .m A, u U N a) 70 0) .E E O O Q Al 0) a) U) 0) LL 0 O .cn cn cn 0 .0) U O A, u Q 0 i U N V O .O .N V a CD CD N V 0 O U O co °o LO N co O Q) co L N 0 00 N CL i _m FL C 0 E Q E L c�a C m a� .N E s cn ca C U CD N V co z -c O U c O L � Q � U -� O � O o �p ,U cj 0 � o U W .� N co � O i cj�.co •� L Q U � L � co N z Zw06 co N cj ZZ .0 I — 4ftw co 0 co cj O co ,O co co U .,o lift L O L N � O CC3 O U � ca � L CC3 Q) L �O co Ocj U co co L 0 0 0 0 z O CO i N J N Q, 0. LU Q�u u 0 J J � Y wa W w0 Q z >! �a w LL O J Q U O N Y Q w aQ zCl) 0 2 Y Cr Q J vQ wz QO �LU LU J U Q Q w w w E W 2 WU 0 Q v � m w z LU 2 O w CL a. Q�u u 0 I L a) C/) >% a) a) 7""'' � > +-+ a=+ a--' U 70_ U � O O O_ 4 }' N O a) _0 U 0 (6 0 > cn 0 U 70 T 0 a� O E L m N 0 � 0 0 O U a) E � O (6 a) C cn 0- �, 0 0) .� N O a, N O N 0 •V � � � cn 0 (6 70 70 E > > a) O O O 0 N Q O O Q Q Q m E E U C) CL I O O O IQ CL LuO W w w C) �- o � CL LLJ z o � C• 0 0 o" U U O (B Lu.� � a 3 U � O �+ V = L ss O = V O O J J uj CL LU U. w Q� u u 0 41 I 4.9 CL L+t C✓P &aF sai Q" u u 0 `x G9 O �I N t O C J�l / J O i N E O O O N U 8G) uj uj s uj Q W Q Q J CL J J t W Y J Q 0 m .. i i r LU w 0 0 Z Q Z W Q 0 ■ r :1 W F- LU U Z O U Y J Q O m 0 z uj a z LIJ LLJ Cl) z LU a LLJ LU w CL a. Cl) z LU a LLJ LU w CL a. Cl) z LU a LLJ LU w CL a. a z 0 w 0 CL Cl) uj w 0 J_ 2 U W U a F- z W W uj F e e e e e L LU u u 0 LU Q Z W O w CL Y J Q m 0 0 N M 0 Cl) 0 z 0 0 LU CL L) uj m a uj LU uj CL uj u u uj m Cl) CL OL uj uj LU uj LU Q�u u 0 co TMI ti Lo 0 � o N .-. Z Q J U LL 9 H W 0 0 W Y a a 0 Z Y a Q J D 0 Z Q z LULJ 2 LULJ 0 w LULJ ca: LULJ 0 fcxo LULJ z :1 LLLU w 0 M (1) Lij CL e LUuj CL LU u u 0 N U L +� J � � N Q � N i N }' �O N � O O E U O U •� N U � cn o co 'IT co co U CO (f�D1 +Z L d: 2 O � 0 a) (D CDL O o U � N o C5 � N >0 O O O > U E ry co O uj Ml am TM uj IN C am uj u u 0 CCU z 0 uj Cl) z 0 U w uj a z uj U 0 U) � u u 0 ol tA ul C M 3 L I 0 LULJ Cy LULJ LULJ ccxD ITTM LULJ CLIL WO CIL u 0 T" LL Q 5 M M W) At LO LO O LO LO LO M O M SO cc L N �-- O CN LO Za- O Za- LO O U. LL uj CL IPl C✓P &aF u3 W Q" u u 0 `x G9 l 3/ • l I/ • • I • l � • • � I i l • lI /ll l� � j ill; • // l j • /� /� is •• • I • // l / j I I / •• I /I / /l / • fir' � • � ' •• • I/ //. jam,/ % • • • / • • ly /lllllll • I • 1 U. uj CL CL TM LLJ a. U. uj CL CL ow I u u U. uj uj CL CL LLI Q�u u 0 ca N O c� L O O O N c� L W Q Z w W J Q F- LU 0 CL LLI Q�u u 0 ca a� N L O O N i W z O N LL Y O z 0 U) LU 0 W w 2 h a� *r h 3 0 N � v �w V. O N O V =W 00 � o h � O LU LU z B z U- z LU :E LU CL z uj w CL Irm LU CL uj ad Q�u u 0 1 1. • 1 r i !; 0 .. 0 0 .. 1 l N Z) WIN c _ CU CU Cl) 0 cu 4-0 (u a ca U of w 2 N Z) Irm LU CL uj ad Q�u u 0 • r 0 !; • .. 0 .. l 0) c tm cn N E (a • = Q U 0 CU 0) O 0 a C: C: a U) � N w C (13 2 cu c N CD CL .� :\ .� : � } � � � .�_ � § � � � \ � 2� CD CL s Q�u u 0 N O U cu V- 0 T 0 N > N N 4-1 cn cn O O C E C: 70 N -0 U a N U N O � a) Q Ama I Lm Lm U Lm (u E O ® cn N `2 N cn cn Q Q cu U 'Fn U � N i (u X E N to N N O U cu V- 0 T 0 N > N N 4-1 cn cn O O C E C: 70 N -0 U a N U N O � a) Q TM uj a. LLJ ad Q�u u 0 X 1pi • O � © u� LL W ! C: O U CU N �E a a U CU =3 p C O a Q O U O LU 0 u u 0 IN , , , , m co , to , , , , , cX , , , , , 0. 9 � j to 6 , , , , m co , to , , , , , cX , , , , , 0. H j to cl V t�c3. LU U. U. LLJ i Q� u u 0 �c O O O O N "q" 00 N V N N W N E O U Z D c C N vs � •a a 0 V a i O V^^`` /W 3.L a V N a 3 a N W 3 W O N V N N N Q a �V Q N .T D a a 06 fie N V O N a i C3 pi CP C3 2 N t a �V O N a H w E C3 Q N D d u H i O V) LU U. U. LLJ CAII � � 2# � L M � \ 2# E �. �. � ice\ �: H A, RGREA'E SHERWOOD DESIGN ENGINEERS AGICM, INC. H R&A ADVISORS A S S 0 C I A T E S TABLE OF CONTENTS sxml \ «: HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN LAKE / FLATO Chaparral St, Historic Shopping Whataburger Aquarium/ Retail District District Field USS Lexington Cole Park Destination Marina Convention Center, Bayfront Arena, and Museums CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO The park is designed as a series of outdoor rooms along an enhanced Bayfront Promenade. Each "room" suppor of d remember large events and festivals, to educating visitors about Corpus Christi's military history and providing a place to reflell and past. through PLAY AREA A shaded grove of palms near Furman Avenue marks the entry to the southern end of the park, and begins a trail th - winds .a landscape betwe numerous play landforms, they find flexible and inventive playscapes with opportunities to run, climb, and slide ne colorful native gardens and shaded picnic areas. Gently sloped landforms provide overlooks to the beach and b�I- HARGREA `ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 5 LAKEIFLATI 9 1 - 2.1111IM-Iff-rP.Ifflil- W-WINHWANITIZIM-11 In ® heart of the park, the Family Area offers dynamic actives for visitors of 2;a1 -» with spaces for court sports 2, a: horseshoes and bocce, aerobics, z,-® circuit, and a sizable off-leash dog park. Sloped lawns frame the Family Area, forming areas for small performances. as access to the Zocalo, pier, beach, and children's play promise:a«».«« /« «4w on a daily basis. PIRI 51! ii , 1111111 11 11111:11 em Me rem Me 9-74 W- I CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO Parking Plaza North Great Lawn/ Festival Area Promenade Parking Plaza South Pier Zocalo Explorational Play Area Wi1affilamm, *Not included in current scope HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN LAKEIFLATO Future Shoreline Blvd, Service/ Emergency Access Only Service/ Emergency Access Only Future Shoreline Blvd, CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO Two-Way Bike Path Off-Street Recreational Bike Path Shared - Slow HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN LAKEIFLATO Recreational Bike 10 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO (D Food 0 Restrooms Park Office Retail Sports /Bike /Water Recreation / Rental HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN LAKEIFLATO Shaded Seating and Stage 300 people Medium Performance 1,36o people Large Performance 5,000 people Medium Performance 1,400 people Informal Events and Terraces Children's Performance Area Community Performance Area boo people 12 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATI Hardscape: 3AC Lawn: 7AC Beach: 2,5AC HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 13 LAKEIFLATO PLAY AREA LOOKI NG NORTH q! 113 MoMolffil '13,01116, 111011 11511,11111 ll��� PLAY AREA LANDFORM PROMSHADE BOARDWALK 14 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO Changing Rooms, Retail, Restrooms wj�� 0-5 Year Old Play Area HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 15 LAKEIFLATO BEACH CAFE IN FAM I LY AREA 16 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO 11115111101111119=1 Court Sports Area Children's Performance Area Large Dog Park Senior Fitness Area Community Stage Community Performance Area HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 17 LAKEIFLATO Z O AT PROMENADE Restaurant Retail Promenade Ramp and Beach and Pier Seawall Beyond CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO 11119112=1 Retail/Vending/Equipment Rental Retail/Vending/Equipment Rental Beach Terraces Retail/Vending/Equipment Rental Beach Cafe Retail/Vending/Equipment Rental Ornamental Grasses HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 19 LAKEIFLATO VIE WITH I N ZOCALO 20 I CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO PROMENADE LOOKING NORTH PROMENADE LOOKING SOUTH HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 21 LAKEIFLATO GREAT LAWN / FESTIVAL AREA 01,111 lillill ii �,ill 22 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO ---------- 40, 12, 19, LAWN/ LINEAR GARDENS TENT AREA PROMENADE BOARDWALK +V wweff 64vel 22 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO Festival and Event Lawn HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 23 LAKEIFLATO Fill I III ��� Firliffli I ON 7131 a "m MA I X kl,� I I' illffi-lilli wilaslim 24 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO Lawn Area and Possible Historic Artifacts Memorial Groves and Seating 300 Person Shaded Event Space Retail, Restrooms, Park Offices Parking and ADA access to Event Space HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 25 LAKEIFLATO SIDEWALK / 51 111 111 111 17' 18, PUBLIC ZONE ANGLED PARKING 26 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES LAKEIFLATO +/- 16' 12' TREES AND STREET FURNISHINGS WALKING AREA OUTDOOR SEATING HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 27 LAKEIFLATO HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 29 AGCM 30 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 31 AGCM EXISTING SITE 32 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM REDUCED PROJECT COST SUMMARY ITEM QUANTITY UOM COST PER UNIT "% OF CCL" TOTAL ORIGINAL COST SHERRILL PARK AND PARKING PLAZA 146,588 SF $43.95 12.5% $6,442,078 $6,442,078 GREAT LAWN 417,802 SF $17.76 14.4% $7,420,136 $7,929,941 FAM I LY AREA AN D PARKI NG PLAZA 163,922 SF $22.66 7.2% $4,440,972 $4,440,972 ZOCALO 17,406 SF $249.98 8.4% $4,351,173 $4,351,173 PLAY AREA 146,528 SF $53.13 15.1% $7,784,992 $8,453,162 PROMENADE 123,059 SF $104.59 24.9% $12,871,332 $12,871,332 MARINA BASIN 1 LS $1,659,956 3.2% $1,659,956 $1,680,576 PIER 15,840 SF $419.94 12.9% $6,651,797 $8,640,482 SHORELINE BLVD. N. DEMO 1 LS $800,000 1.5% $800,000 $800,000 MCGEE BEACH 435,600 SF $0 0% $0 $0 CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION (CCL)* $52,422,436 $55,679,763 PUBLIC ART (1.25% OF CCL, PER CITY PERCENTAGE) 1.25% $656,280 $695,997 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY 5.0% $2,621,122 $2,783,486 SOFT COSTS (20% OF CCL, PER CITY DEPT.OF ENGINEERING) 20.0% $10,484,487 $11,121,943 TOTAL PROJECT COST (TC) $66,183,325 $70,207,265 ADDITIONAL COST DUE TO TWO -PHASE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL PROJECT C• ST - TWO-PHASE C• • $2,780,9141 $2,797,941 1 k, • '' ' -Includes: Design Contingency at 20 %, FEMA Design Contingency at 2% (to cover potential requirements associated with revised flood insurance rate maps), Contractor General Conditions at 12.5 %, Contractor Overhead and Profit at 5.5 %, and 2 -year Escalation at 5% per year. Does not include Tenant Finish Out or Sustainability Alternates (solar, wind, greywater system). The above summary incorporates cost reductions discussed with members of the City Council Task Force to make the project more affordable. These cost reductions include: ® Removal of 2 Shade Canopies from the Pier ® Reduced width of Pier ® Replacement of granite paving at the interactive fountain with concrete paving Less reinforcement at the Great Lawn . .- y. . HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI E YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 33 AGCM Landscape I Buildings Family Area South Parking Plaza Zocalo ffi�- I 14 Sherrill Park Event Space 34 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM ITEM QUANTITY UOM COST PER UNIT TOTAL SHERRILL PARK 8,000 SF $228.46 $1,827,655 GREAT LAWN 417,802 SF $14.43 $6,028,387 FAMILYAREA 163,922 SF $27.09 $4,440,972 ZOCALO 17,406 SF $237.85 $4,139,996 PLAY AREA 146,528 SF $53.13 $7,784,992 PROMENADE 123,059 SF $103.88 $12,783,127 MARINA BASIN 0 EA - $0 PIER 7,920 SF $555.08 $4,396,238 SHORELINE BLVD. N. DEMO 1 LS - $800,000 MCGEE BEACH 435,600 SF $0.00 $0 CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION (CCL)* $42,201,367 PUBLIC ART (1.25% OF CCL, PER CITY PERCENTAGE) $527,517 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (5% OF CCL) $2,110,068 SOFT COSTS (20% OF CCL, PER CITY DEPT.OF ENGINEERING) $8,440,273 PHASE 1 PROBABLE COST $53,279,226 -Includes: Design Contingency at 20 %, FEMA Design Contingency at 2% (to cover potential requirements associated with revised flood insurance rate maps), Contractor General Conditions at 12.5 %, Contractor Overhead and Profit at 5.5 %, and 2 -year Escalation at 5% per year. Does not include Tenant Finish Out or Sustainability Alternates (solar, wind, greywater system). This estimate of Phase I is based on the reduced cost estimate summarized on page 33. Phase 1 costs were reduced from the original 100% SD estimate as follows: Reduced Width of Pier and Remaining 3 Shade Canopies- $1,170,000 Removal of 2 Shade Canopies from the Pier - $1,000,000 Less Reinforcement at the Great Lawn - $670,000 Surface Material Adjustments in the Play Area - $200,000 HARGREA `ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI EAYFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 35 AGCM 91 *1 Lin o I a ZEN I slam" LMIL44 it 36 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM ITEM QUANTITY UOM COST/ UNIT TOTAL SHERRILL PARK 138,588 SF $33.30 $4,614,423 GREAT LAWN 5,000 SF $278.35 $1,391,749 FAMILYAREA 0 SF $0.00 $0 ZOCALO 690 SF $306.05 $211,177 PLAY AREA 0 SF $0.00 $0 PROMENADE 260 SF $339.25 $88,204 MARINA BASIN 1 EA - $1,659,956 PIER 7,920 SF $284.79 $2,255,559 SHORELINE BLVD. N. DEMO 0 LS $0.00 $0 MCGEE BEACH 435,600 SF $0.00 $0 CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION (CCL)** $10,221,068 CCL W /ESCALATION TO 2018 $12,423,773 PUBLIC ART (1.25% OF CCL, PER CITY PERCENTAGE) $155,297 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (5% OF CCL) $621,189 SOFT COSTS (20% OF CCL, PER CITY DEPT.OF ENGINEERING) $2,484,755 PHASE 2 PROBABLE COST $15,685,013 *Includes: Design Contingency at 20 %, FEMA Design Contingency at 2% (to cover potential requirements associated with revised flood insurance rate maps), Contractor General Conditions at 12.5 %, Contractor Overhead and Profit at 5.5 %, and 2 -year Escalation at 5% per year. Does not include Tenant Finish Out or Sustainability Alternates (solar, wind, greywater system). Reduced width of Pier - $i,000,000 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 37 AGM 38 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 39 ETM ASSOCIATES 40 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Destination Bayfront is intended to be a highly programmed park with diverse special features that supports numerous activities and events. As such, its management needs are greater than that of a typical City park, and a strong operations and maintenance plan and clear governance structure will be important for its success. The following sections describe the various efforts that are required, followed by associated budgets. A vibrant program of activities may be the most important factor for the long -term success of Destination Bayfront. Trees, gardens and lawns are the backbone of the park, but people are its life- blood. Amenities and features will make the park experience great, but people will be drawn to the park because other people are there — Destination Bayfront will become a center of community. Successful programmingwill ensure that Destination Bayfront meets its primary goal of creating a regional destination and stimulating economic activity in Corpus Christi. Programming will celebrate the local community and culture, encourage people to be healthier, provide opportunities for children to learn and experience the outdoors, create lasting memories and connect people through shared experiences. Programming also: Attracts targeted audiences • Draws visitors at specific times • Makes news and generates awareness • Increases visitors • Earns revenue Park visitors make a vital contribution to the park's economic sustainability and programming provides more reasons for people to visit the park. Both large and small events are important. Special events can attract thousands of visitors for a one -time event. Frequent low- impact events will provide continuous attractions for visitors that will strengthen and support the park's overall mission. To compile an active programming schedule for a public space, strong programming infrastructure must be in place. This section addresses the key elements of that infrastructure. Mission Corpus Christi's community can provide a basis for developing an innovative and exciting park programming schedule in which all will take pride. A strong programming mission statement should be developed to guide the creation of a schedule that provides long term benefits to the community and to the park. Example: "Discovery Green is an urban park that serves as a village green, a source of health and happiness for citizens, and a window into the diverse arts and traditions that enrich life in Houston." Marketing Acomprehensive and dynamic marketing plan is essential to the success of the programming plan and to Destination Bayfront. Components of this plan should include: • Media sponsorship - print, television, internet, and radio in English and Spanish • A strong website with up -to -date information on all park events and features • E- newsletter with consistently growing subscriber list • Social media — Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, Pinterest, etc. • Printed collateral — programming guides, postcards, etc. HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 41 ETM ASSOCIATES Partners Public ownership of the space begins with participation and investment. Destination Bayfront has begun this process with town meetings to seek public input into the development of the site program and now the naming of the park. Programming partnerships will extend community ownership of the new park and should be sought with a wide variety of community organizations such as performing and visual arts, education, cultural identity, animal welfare, environmental awareness, literacy and literature, veterans, childhood development, senior citizens, fitness and healthy living, fishing and other outdoor activities, wilderness preservation, history, film, tourism and groups that work to study, celebrate, promote and improve Corpus Christi. Many of these organizations can provide or advise on programming at the park and promote the park to their constituency. WIN Ideally, programming should be self - supporting and can ultimately generate funds for the maintenance of the park. Programming generates revenue through sponsorship, underwriting, ticket sales, concession fees and venue license income. A successful program also generates traffic to support commercial rents and connections to the community that support philanthropic giving, both of which are important elements of the long -term economic viability of the park. The strongest programming plan addresses all elements. Direct Income Sources • Venue License Fees — paid by event producers for rental of park venues for events ranging from festivals and corporate events to small family gatherings • Venue License Services and Rentals — fees paid by licensees for rental of park -owned items or services provided by park personnel • Concession income — paid by vendors licensed to sell at single or multiple park events • Ticket revenue — from events or attractions such as carousels, model boat rentals, etc • Corporate Sponsorships — marketing dollars paid for associating a brand or product with a park event. To attract corporate sponsorships, it is important to develop strong marketing tools, such as the website, e -mail distribution list, social media, printed collateral, on -site signage, media sponsorship, media relations and advertising. Corporate sponsorship is based on a proven record of accomplishment, so it is important to develop a program fund to seed the first and second season while a track record is being developed. • Underwriting — Support by foundations and individuals for programs and events that demonstrate a value to the community • Permit fees — paid by a wide range of park users for photography, video, and other special uses of the park 2 ( CORPUS CHRISTI E YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Indirect Income Sources Successful programming connects the park with audiences that will support generation of other revenue such as: • Earned income from rents paid by long term tenants such as restaurants or retailers • Gala and other fund - raising events for the benefit of the park • Philanthropic support from foundations and individuals Naming opportunities beyond the capital phase, such as pavers and plaques Public fund drives to support park projects However, it should be noted that it will take time until the park is able to reach the point when its programs can be self - supporting and even generate funds. To meet its goals of attracting the public and increasing awareness of Destination Bayfront, programming must be reliable. The public must have complete confidence in the information disseminated by the organization and that events will take place as scheduled. The perception that "something is always happening" at Destination Bayfront is an asset to be built and protected. To ensure adequate time to demonstrate value to corporate sponsors, programming seed funding should be allocated in the capital fund - raising stage to supplement programming in the first two to three years of operation. Some corporate donors to the capital fund may wish to tag a percentage of their funds to provide marketing benefits in the first years of operation, a situation that provides benefits for the organization and sponsor. Special events can attract a larger crowd from a greater region for a one -time event. While these types of events are an important aspect of the park, other park activities should be developed to provide more balanced and continuous attractions to visitors, particularly those from the adjacent communities, and its future neighbors. These activities should help strengthen and support the park's connection to surrounding stakeholders, community organizations, and businesses. Destination Bayfront will host a variety of events that will be scheduled and conceived to attract a diverse range of Corpus Christi's citizens and visitors to the park. Un- Sponsored Events Un- sponsored events provide varied opportunities for non - sponsored, daily park use. Examples of these types of events include: • Walking/ jogging/ biking • Pick up sports such as bocce, beach volleyball, kayaking, Frisbee • Facilities usage • Dog walking/ dog park • Playground • Waterfront/ beachfront activities Food & beverages Picnicking Park Sponsored Events Park Sponsored Events are low impact events for adults, seniors, and children. Modest in scale and budget, these HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 43 ETM ASSOCIATES events may eventually attract sponsors or underwriters. Examples are: • Workshops • Small -scale music series • Lectures, classes • Exercise/ fitness classes: yoga, zumba, pilates, etc. • Social hours for adults • Children's performances and events • Children's education events, such as reading clubs or writing workshops Park Produced Events Park Produced Events are series and single events that will draw significant audiences and require additional resources to produce, either from sponsorship, underwriting or other revenue source. Examples of these events include: • Movies Art performances • Concerts • Holiday festivals and celebrations such as Halloween Costume contest, Easter Egg Hunt Art performances • Sand Castle competition • Community oriented music festivals • Cultural events Outside Event Sponsors Outside Event Sponsors pay fees to license areas of the park for production of public events. These fees are an important source of revenue to the park. There will be a special event process for permitting of all outside events and published rules that all producers must follow. Examples of these events include: • Community festivals • Promotional events • Large -scale concerts (free or paid admissions for "benefit performances" only) • Charitable runs and walks Private Functions Private Functions that are closed to the public can be held in certain areas of the park. Licensees will be required to pay fees and follow published rules. Examples of these events include: Private parties, weddings and other events • Corporate receptions AAnr6tc Markets help build community and provide opportunities for economic growth. Use of Destination Bayfront for farmers, holiday, seafood and arts and crafts markets will be encouraged. The Parking Plazas and the Promenade are suitable locations for many types of markets. A market operator can be found through an RFP process to organize and run these markets. As Destination Bayfront becomes established, management may wish to take on running the market directly as a source of revenue. 4 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES SPECIAL EVENTS Special events are important to a park's activity schedule and attract many visitors and can generate revenue for the park. Although large special events are important, they must be carefully planned, scheduled and operated. Despite the best efforts of park management and staff, special events can do a great deal of damage to the park landscape which must be quickly addressed to maintain park standards. For the purposes of this report, special events are defined as: • One -time or annual events whose primary purpose is to entertain • Primarily use the park as an event venue • Usually have little or no connection to the park beyond its use as an event venue • Can severely impact the park landscape SPECIAL EVENTS I LI Potential impact of large scale outside events on the park landscape Events must be managed carefully to prevent damage to the park. Large -scale outside events scheduled too frequently can damage lawns and landscape areas due to lack of adequate time for resting between events. Constant use of the lawns can place a heavy burden on the turf, particularly if events are back -to -back. The resulting overuse will result in compacted soil with spotty turf in place of a healthy stand of turf. Soil compaction is one of the first symptoms of overuse. The presence of vehicles on the lawns accelerates soil compaction. Compacted soil prevents the absorption of rainwater, deprives roots of oxygen, and limits root growth. As a result, turf surfaces lose their durability and anchoring capacity and become increasingly vulnerable to wear and tear. With continued overuse, the turf surfaces begin to wear thin, exposing the compacted subsoil underneath. Severe runoff can develop as rainwater erodes the exposed topsoil, eliminating any possibility of turf recovery. Damage also occurs during set -up and clean -up. Tractor- trailers, vans, and other vehicles involved in event set- up and removal of stages, sound systems, barricades, vendor tents, deliveries and other event support activities frequently drive off paved paths, adding to soil compaction and turf damage. Back -to -back events make it almost impossible to establish an adequate turf restoration plan. Lawns can't be regularly fertilized, irrigated, aerated, over seeded and rested. Special event guidelines for Destination Bayfront should be developed with these considerations in mind. These guidelines should address frequency of scheduling, sound levels, vehicle paths and crowd size. The venue license process must be managed carefully to allow adequate rest periods and to provide proper supervision of outside event producers to prevent damage to the park. The Programming Director and his /her staff will be responsible for ensuring that the guidelines are followed, before, during, and after events. Below are some important considerations for these Destination Bayfront Special Event Guidelines. Type and size No event shall be scheduled in an area if there are reasons to conclude that the event will attract an audience that will exceed the maximum capacity of that area. All event areas will have capacity based on the landscape and type of event. Figure 5 shows the specific park special event areas. Figure 6 shows the potential carrying capacities of designated special event areas. Scheduling Only one multiple day event that draws 6,000 or more people may be held in the same grass area within one calendar month. There should be at least one full week between each event. Spacing of events is required to allow recovery time for the turf. Heavily used lawns may be constructed using a reinforced fibrous additive that helps reduce soil compaction and improves drainage. This will help reduce compaction and permit more scheduled events. However, even reinforced turf lawns must be protected from overuse, particularly when lawns are wet and crowds are large. Event lawns will be scheduled a maximum of 35 weeks /year with one week off per month, except during the two busiest months (July and August). HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 45 ETM ASSOCIATES Time Limits All but large special events are limited to 3 -5 days, in and out, including setup and cleanup. Large special event load -in and takedown will be reviewed and approved by the Programming Director. Vehicles and Production Trailers Vehicle and production trailer requirements will be reviewed and determined on an event -by -event basis. All vehicles are to remain on paved surfaces unless some type of protection of the lawn is used, such as cribbing or plywood. Vehicles associated with an event must be permitted and will be limited to those directly associated with the event. No personal vehicles will be allowed on the event site except as designated in the parking areas. Weather Wet turf is particularly susceptible to damage and compaction. To prevent damage to lawns, the Destination Bayfront management may close a lawn area to recreation or for special event use in the event the grass is wet. In addition, park lawn areas may be closed for seasonal renovations. The new design creates areas for events of varying sizes while eliminating much of the existing asphalt surfaces. Figure 5 locates designated event spaces, and Figure 6 lists their estimated carrying capacities. Community Stage and Slope —Area 1 Located near the Interactive Fountain, in the Play Area, the Community Stage is a 500 sq. ft. concrete pad oriented to a 12,100 sq. ft. sloped lawn seating approximately 600, equipped with a pullbox. It is suitable for music and performing arts. Children's Stage and Slope — Area 2 This 450 sq. ft. concrete pad is oriented toward a 5,500 sq. ft. lawn seating 270 in the Family Area, equipped with a pullbox. It is suitable for music and performing arts. Informal Events and Terraces — Area 3 The beach area covers 109,000 sq. ft. Most of the surface is sand, with terraces that provide some elevated seating. The area can hold 8,100 people standing or 5,400 seated and is suitable for informal events and sports. Parking Plaza South — Area 4 This paved area of 18,000 sq. ft. area can accommodate 1,300 people standing or 50 parked cars. It is suitable for tents and public markets. The area is suitable for festivals and markets and is equipped with quad receptacles on light poles and extra potable water (hose bibs). Parking Plaza North —Area 4 This paved area of 16,000 sq. ft. area can accommodate 1,100 people standing or 50 parked cars. It is suitable for tents and public markets. The area is suitable for festivals and markets and is equipped with quad receptacles on light poles and extra potable water (hose bibs). Medium Performance 1 —Area 5 Located in the Great Lawn near the Marina, the Medium Performance area is a flat lawn with raised platform with overhead armature for medium sized performance that can accommodate 900 people seated or 1,400 standing. It is equipped with a pull box and extra amperage. It is suitable for music and performing arts. Area 5 shares the same stage as Area 6. 4E ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Figure 5: Event Spaces Figure 6: Event Spaces Key HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 47 ETM ASSOCIATES Large Performance Lawn —Area 6 At the center of the Great Lawn, a large concrete pad equipped with a pullbox for a temporary stage, 1,900 sq. ft. is oriented toward a large 100,000 sq. ft. lawn. The stage backs up to the Marina so the audience sits facing the water. Behind the stage, a 12' wide concrete path accommodates large trucks. The lawn seats 5,000. It is suitable for music and performing arts. Medium Performance 2 - Area 7 At the north end of the Great Lawn, the Medium Performance 2 space is a 27,000 sq. ft. reinforced lawn area that can seat 1,400 with a concrete pad and pullbox. It is adjacent to the north parking lot. It is suitable for music and performing arts. This area would only be utilized occasionally, for large festivals that require multiple performance areas. Shade Seating and Stage — Area 8 Located within Sherrill Park, this hardscape area of 5,000 sq. ft. can accommodate 300 people with additional spill- over space. The Veterans Stage includes an overhead armature, audio speakers, and a pullbox. Entire Promenade —Area 9 Running parallel to the beach, the 3,000 linear foot promenade can accommodate 200 15' x 10' tents. It is suitable for festival use, markets, races, walks, etc. Promenade between two parking lots —Area 10 The 1,000 linear foot central portion of the promenade, which is between the two parking lots, can accommodate 50 15' x 10' tents. It is suitable for festival use, markets, races, walks, smaller markets, etc. EVENT FEES A number of areas within Destination Bayfront will be available on a limited basis for rental to outside entities for performances, parties, receptions, catered dinners and other special events. Destination Bayfront management may establish the rental fees within the amenities easement on its own, and these rates are intended to help support ongoing operations within the park. See Figure 7 for these fees. The rental fee for the Large Performance Lawn and Stage is set at a high level to discourage frequent large events in this space, which will tend to disrupt the entire park and cause some damage to grass areas. 48 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Figure 7 provides preliminary rental fees for different areas of the park. Please note that higher fees will be required for events that occupy entire areas of the park because of their potential to disrupt daily activity within the park. This strategy is consistent with the management plan's focus on smaller daily activities rather than fewer very large events. The fees listed above are for venue rental only. There will be additional charges for equipment rental, A -V rental, and event clean -up. in addition, all events of more than fifty participants will be required to hire an off -duty police officer (or officers for larger events). The fees listed are higher than other rental venues in the City of Corpus Christi, which is supported by the features and amenities associated with the higher cost. Renters will be using a newly constructed park space with the waterfront as its backdrop. The built -in infrastructure and available facilities will provide easy set -up for any events of any size. All vendors providing equipment, A -V services, tents, furniture, catering and clean -up must be pre - qualified to work in the park to avoid damage to park features and to ensure safe operations and happy customers. There are exceptions to the fee schedule described in Figure 7: • Non -profit organizations will receive a discount. Management may extend discounts to key partners helping to achieve core objectives. Figure 8: Recommended Seasonal Activity Levels • Management will determine license fees for live music events with attendance projected at greater than 5,000 on a case -by -case basis. PROGRAMMING CALENDAR Destination Bayfront will see activity year- round. Designating programming periods of high activity and planning for periods of low programming activity will provide important benefits to the park and the people who manage it. To optimize park resources, it is recommended that Destination Bayfront plan its programming seasons as follows: • Spring —March through May • Summer — June through August • Fall —September through November • Winter — December through January Rest period — February Programming Resources Production of a full programming schedule can be managed by a small staffwith the proper equipment and extended team of contracted vendors providing essential skilled services. Programming equipment can be used by the park for its own sponsored and presented events and generate revenue by renting it to outside producers. A list of desirable equipment includes: • Sound and lighting system that is easily installed • Film projector, DVD player and inflatable screen that can be used in multiple events spaces • Portable sound system appropriate to amplify small events such as exercise classes • Sporting equipment and games to be lent to the public HAR REAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 49 ETM ASSOCIATES Portable fencing used for outside productions and restricting access to private events • Electrical equipment that allows access to pullboxes and three phase power • Marley floor for dance productions (assuming that at least one of the stages can be built to dancers requirements for sprung floors) Providing proper, accessible storage in the park's design is absolutely essential. The benefits of owning this equipment can be negated completely by inadequate storage that requires park staff to spend extra hours in transporting equipment to and from remote areas. The key members of the programming staff are as follows: Programming Director Event Coordinator • Administrative Assistant (contracting, scheduling, data management) • Operational field support • Development Director, or a staff who will can dedicate time to seeking sponsorships and philanthropic fund - raising • Marketing team — outsourced PR firm to manage marketing, website, public relations In addition, it will be important to develop a reliable team of event vendors who become familiar with the park's site, operations and processes. These vendors include: Audio/ visual company • Security force — off duty Corpus Christi Police officers as well as private security Rental company or companies • Clean up crew • Outside event producers and event planners PARK PROGRAMMING T ATE Working closely with Susanne Theis of Discovery Green, two park programming strategies were developed. The first strategy involves the park serving as a "venue" space, allowing third -party and outside producers to rent the park to run events and activities. The second strategy involves the park taking a more active role in producing and providing activities and events for park users. Venue and Rental Strategy Under the first strategy, the park will not be actively programmed. Few park- sponsored or park - produced activities and events will be available throughout the week. The park will primarily reach out to various organizations and groups to entice them to use the park as venue spaces. The park could work with local community and non -profit groups to offer them to free use of the park, but the local group would be responsible for all expenses. This strategy would help strengthen the park's relationship with the local community and attract visitors to the park. Additionally, the park could offer its venues to local businesses and corporations for retreats, or it could offer its venues to other for -profit operators for events, who would be responsible for the event, and pay the park a fee to use the space. This would allow the park to make a small profit and also draw visitors into the park. The revenue generated from large events would then be used to produce smaller events for the park. The downside to this strategy is that it is difficult to attract potential event producers or other corporate sponsors or corporate interests when the park has not established itself as a great venue space. With no precedent, outside producers are less likely to invest in the park. The newly built park would need an Event Coordinator, in additional to some administrative support, to fulfill this strategy. The Event Coordinator would invest a significant amount of his or her time in marketing and public outreach while balancing a schedule to coordinate /program events for the park. Additionally, the production of the smaller events will rely entirely on the attraction and success of the large events. Furthermore, local residents might feel disconnected from the park if it is constantly used by outside producers. 50 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Figure g: Sample Calendar with $1,500 Weekly Allowance $1,500/WEEK Woe- 2013 OUTSIDE ShTs 1T1IIDE. SPECIAL EVENT A: ENTERTAINMENT . COMMUNITY . EDUCATION) Figure io: Sample Calendar with $i, goo Weekly Allowance $1,800/WEEK lune 2013'h Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday G1RT WMLIK, f.1US1* 1'JA ID, ART 1'JAM , f.1'USIC 1'IALK KIDS WIR KIDS DAY n1/AI RKIET PET MOVIE 11tri I1I:�HC HOP WORKS MOVIE K /IDS D1�' MEMO NIGH M/�RKIET PIER n1/�P'.KIET . .: Y01 No CONCERT SCRE EN MEMEN, EEO ON THE C•�N THE K /IDS Dl�' WORKSHOP GREET' GREED n1/�RKIET ", PET �.2sy;TL • M$ft' ?IE DUB DA'' VO• RKSHOP .I'` ".ICIt NIGHT MARKIET RUtJ t JWLK n1/�RKIET 123 24 25 27 DIKE SCREEN OPEN L11C •" " CONCERT M/�RKIET REPAIR ON THE POETRY ON THE WORKSHOP GREEN READING GREEN M/�RKIET l FESTIVAL FESTIVAL FESTIVAL OUTSIDE ShTs 1T1IIDE. SPECIAL EVENT A: ENTERTAINMENT . COMMUNITY . EDUCATION) Figure io: Sample Calendar with $i, goo Weekly Allowance $1,800/WEEK lune 2013'h Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday G1RT WMLIK, f.1US1* 1'JA ID, KIDS WIR M/�RKIET PET MOVIE 11tri I1I:�HC HOP WORKS NIGHT K /IDS D1�' TANGO ON M/�RKIET PIER . Y01 No CONCERT WRITER EEO ON THE K /IDS Dl�' WORKSHOP GREET' M/�RKIET ", PET • ,h.I_ •," . MOVIE rIE DUB DA'' WORKSHOP CHARITY Ei; NIGHT MARKIET RUtJ t JWLK NUTRITION 123 24 25 DIKE SCREEN OPEN MIC • M/�RKIET REPAIR ON THE POETRY WORKSHOP GREEN READING FESTIVAL FESTIVAL FESTIVAL MENEEME. OUTSIDE 0j11T�Y 1T75DE . SPECIAL EVENT ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY . EDUCATION HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 51 ETM ASSOCIATES Park - Programmed Event Strategy In this strategy, the park will produce a number of small, but consistent, programs that will encourage visitors to return and participate in other events. The programming schedule will not be nearly as intense as that of some other urban parks, such as Discovery Green in Houston, but its intensity, at 800+ events per year, is not appropriate for Destination Bayfront. The park Programming Director will work with a limited weekly allowance to produce a number of smaller events that targeted at nearby residents. These events will encourage locals and residents to visit the park repeatedly. With a consistent schedule, the park will be able to build a baseline audience. This will enable the park to advertise itself as a well -used location in order to draw in sponsorship. This strategy will need a larger weekly program allowance and additional personnel to run the park programs than the first strategy. The Programming Director will require assistance from an Administrative Assistant, who would also take up the responsibility of outreach and marketing. Figure 9 and 10 show what a weekly $1,500 allowance in Phase 1, and $1,800 in Phase 2, can bring to the park. See the O &M Budgets for specific detail. Sample Event Calendar Assumptions: • Outside: Paid for and operated by outside producers, park is not responsible for any cost. • City -Wide: Events that take place throughout the city and use parts of the park as venues, park is not responsible for any cost. • Special Event: Larger and more intensive park program run by the park. Special events do not happen very often considering the associated cost and the extra manpower required. Screen on the Green is assumed to be $600 -1000. Concert on the Green is assumed to be $800 +. Healthy Living: Events that promote fitness, health, exercises, and better living. Each event is assumed to be $150. • Entertainment: Events with the goal to attract attendees from a wider region and provide fun for all age group. Events are generally ranged from $300 -500. • Community: Events that target at the local communities, families and children; and strengthen their relationship with the park. Each event is assumed to be $300. • Education: Learning opportunities offer to both youth and adults. Each event is assumed to be $250. During some weeks, the cost for the scheduled programs might exceed the budgeted $1,500 weekly allowance but will even out by the end of the month with weeks that have fewer programs. PRELIMINARY EVENT SCHEDULE A variety of programs, activities and events will attract a diverse range of park visitors. It is recommended that the Destination Bayfront sponsored and produced programs be organized into repeating series and park special events by categories as follows: • Entertainment Series — Popular music concerts, films, and other entertaining events • Art Series — Performing arts including dance, theater and film along with visual arts events Healthy Living— Fitness classes and sports activities, environmental events • Family— Performances geared toward young audiences and families • Special events — one off events that are larger in scale, import or impact Figure 11 shows a list of events that can take place in the park; and the likely audience for activities. 52 ( CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Figure ii: Event and Audience Types Jogging/ Walking All AM, lunch, PM All ages All Park -wide Dogs All AM, PM All ages Residents Family Area Picnics All Weekends Families Locals Great Lawn Volleyball All PM, weekends Young adults Locals McGee Beach Bocce All Weekends Adults Locals Family Area Putting (golf) All PM, weekends Adults All Family Area Pick -up Field Sports All PM, weekends Teens, adults Locals Great Lawn Kid's Play /Playground All PM, weekends Families Locals Play Area School /YMCA Sports All Weekday PM Teens, adults Locals 1, 2, Zocalo Bandstand Music SP, SU, F Sunday PM Families Families McGee Beach, Kayaking All Weekends Adults All Outdoor Painting Classes S 12 per year Adults Locals Pier Exercise Classes - 5 /week SP, SU, F, W Weekdays, PM Families Locals Great Lawn Toddler Time - weekly SP, SU, F, W Weekdays, PM Families Locals Play Area, 1 Friday Flicks SP, F, W Fridays All Locals & Family Area, Dog Canine Classes - weekly SP, F Saturdays AM Families Residents Residents Park Gardening Classes - SP, F Wednesdays Adults Pier, 8, 9 SP, F Saturdays Adults Locals Sherrill Park, 7 monthly Locals & Lunch Lectures SP, F Weekday Lunch Adults Nearby workers 1, 2, Zocalo Bandstand Music SP, SU, F Sunday PM Families Families 11 2, 4, 6 Sundown Locals & Outdoor Painting Classes S 12 per year Adults Locals Sherrill Park Thursdays Residents Young Performers Series F Saturdays Families Locals Poetry /Literature Readings SP, F Saturdays Adults Locals Lunchtime Concerts SP, F Weekday Lunch Adults Nearby workers 1, 2, 4, 6 Locals & Friday Flicks SP, F, W Fridays All 4, 5, 6 Residents Locals & Big Band Dances SP, F Wednesdays Adults Pier, 8, 9 Residents Locals & Jazz Music Series SP Thursdays Adults 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 Residents Locals & Weekend Evening Concerts SP, F 12 per year Adults Residents Major Art SP 1 per year All Locals &Regional Exhibit /Performance Shakespeare in the Park SP 1 per year All Locals Earth Day Festival SP 1 per year Families Locals Summer Outdoor Sports SI 1 per year All Locals Festival Canine Athletic SP 1 per year All Locals &Regional Competition Locals & Fall Plant Sale F 1 per year Adults Sherrill Park, 7 Residents Halloween Celebration F 1 per year Families Locals Winter Ice Sculpting W 1 per year All Locals & Regional Holiday Tree Lighting W 1 per year Families Locals Sand Castle Competition SP 1 per year Families Locals & Regional McGee Beach, 3 Mariachi Celebration F 1 per year Families Locals HARGREA `ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 53 ETM ASSOCIATES Figure ii: Event and Audience Types, continued Community Festivals SP, SU, F, W 6 per year Families Locals Locals & Farmers/ Seafood Market All Weekly All Residents Locals & Holiday Market F, W Weekly Families Residents Locals & Major Concerts SP, F 2 weekends Adults Residents Locals & Charitable Walks and Runs SP, SU, F, W 6 per year Young Adults Residents Locals & Buc Days SP, F 1 per year All Residents 4th of July Celebration SU 1 peryear All Locals & Regional Beach to Bay Relay SP 1 per year All Locals Marathon Conquer the Coast Bike F 1 per year Adults Locals &Regional Ride Crash the Coast Film F 1 per year Adults Locals &Regional Festival Dia de los Muertos F 1 per year All Locals February Triathalon/ FEB 1 per year All Locals Carnival Festival of the Arts SP, F 1 per year All Locals & Regional Harbor Lights Parade W 1 per year All Locals & Regional Locals & Corpus Christi Art Walk All 12 per year All Residents Locals & Saturday Market Days All 24 per year Families Residents Locals & Kid's Birthday Parties All 24 per year Families Residents Locals & Catered Parties All 18 per year Adults Residents Parkwide 8, 9, 10 8, 9, 10 4, 5, 6 Great Lawn, Promenade Great Lawn Parkwide Great Lawn 54 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 55 ETM ASSOCIATES 56 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES The goal of park maintenance is to provide the highest quality work to ensure that the park is clean, attractive, safe, and usable for visitors. The following principles should guide maintenance work in Destination Bayfront: Establish the Importance of Maintenance for Destination Bayfront High quality maintenance is essential to protecting the long -term capital investment. Establishing and continuing basic park maintenance skills with either in -house staff or contracted services will protect the City's investment for many years. Continued support by the City for core maintenance services will be vital to the park's long -term success. Develop and Implement Park -Wide Standards for Maintenance Destination Bayfront must develop solid standards for its maintenance, particularly horticultural maintenance, turf maintenance, and tree care. A park -wide set of standards and practices for particular maintenance areas should be implemented for the more sensitive and complex landscape areas, such as the Sherrill Park gardens and the landform plantings, water features and play areas. Three critical variables condition maintenance work: 1) The nature of the task 2) The skill levels of those performing the task 3) The physical setting Despite the complexity of itemizing park maintenance needs, a detailed understanding of tasks is essential. Park maintenance tasks should be clearly classified so that standards can be applied. A good classification system supports management decision - making such as the timing of treatments, deploying personnel and equipment, etc., and is based on an understanding of the nature of maintenance work. For example, cleaning a paved surface is different from horticultural work due to the type of equipment needed, the skills needed and in the time it takes to perform the work. HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 57 ETM ASSOCIATES The Seasons Should Be the Basic Organizing Structure for Park Maintenance Although most public organizations operate on the basis of a fiscal or calendar year broken down into four equal quarters, this structure is not particularly meaningful for park managers. Some of the most important factors shaping the pattern of work — use, growing conditions, and weather — are tied to the seasons. Seasons, moreover, do not necessarily fit into neat quarters; they are of unequal length. It is feasible to define seasons as clusters of months approximating the natural conditions. Park management should define "official" seasons as groups of months to structure park work. The following are the four - seasons and usage- seasons for Corpus Christi: Figure is Four Seasons Figure s: Usage Seasons LANDSCAPE TYPES Each area of the park has different landscape types, and each type needs a different set of tasks in order to maintain it correctly. Some landscape types will require more effort than others, such as more man hours, different equipment/ tools, different cleaning /maintenance frequency, and different set of skills. Landscape types include the following. Landforms Gardens Lawns 58 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGRE VES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES People will congregate in open lawn areas, meaning that they will be more heavily used and will require an intense schedule of maintenance. Lawns should be lush and well- manicured at all times. Lawns will be used for both passive and active recreation, as well as for special events, and may have to accommodate large audiences. Lawns will need to be regularly mowed, irrigated, fertilized, aerated, and thatched in order to sustain a healthy stand of turf. Occasionally, the lawn areas may need to be closed for resting and renovation, especially after a large event. Routine maintenance of the lawn areas includes: Event and Exercise lawns In Destination Bayfront Park, the Sports Lawn is a rectangular lawn located in the Family Area and used regularly for group exercise and sports activities. The Sports Lawn is expected to have similar maintenance protocols as regular lawn areas, but with a more intensive weekly routine due to its increased usage. landforms Landforms in the park have two faces, one towards the bay and the wind, and one towards the city. The side facing the bay will be planted with reinforced turf grass, for sitting, while the other side will be planted with perennials and grasses. Some faces of the landforms with turf have slopes of more than 15 %, which may require the use of a slope mower. A remote controlled mower is typically used for areas with slopes greater than 15 %. Inspection should be carried out to ensure the landform's lawn is not eroding or simply being overused. The structural system should be inspected and maintained on a regular basis to ensure it is intact. Routine maintenance of the landforms includes: • Inspection and maintenance of the MSE Systems • Irrigation maintenance Gardens Gardens should be closely monitored and maintained in order to ensure healthy plant communities and attractive features. The gardens will be defined beds made up of shrub, bulb and perennial plantings. Intensive maintenance will be needed from spring through fall, starting with spring clean -up and cut back, then continuing with regular weeding, trimming, debris removal, dead heading, mulching, and watering through the fall, especially during the summer months. Seasonal bulb plantings and perennials will need to be cut back to ensure optimal growth for next season. Fertilizers should be applied to ensure optimal growth. Pest control measures should be taken at the first indication of infestation. In areas where the gardens are planted on a slope, inspection should be carried to ensure there is no erosion, or that it will be controlled and repaired when identified. Routine maintenance includes: • Litter removal • Spring and fall cleanup and prep HAR REAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 5 ETM ASSOCIATES Paved Areas Paved surfaces include asphalt and concrete, which are used in heavy -use areas and will receive the bulk of both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Paved surfaces should be regularly cleared of litter and any wind blown debris. The surfaces will need to be power washed to remove accumulated debris or food stains near food and beverage concession areas. Routine maintenance includes: • Litter removal • Blow debris with backpack blower • Powerwashing • Hardscape maintenance Decomposed Granite Areas Throughout the year, the decomposed granite areas will require some maintenance. Minor renovation includes raking, leveling, and pushing back material that gets kicked into adjacent lawns or other areas. Additionally, topping up will be needed to maintain proper grades and avoid any tripping hazards. During dry periods, such as hot summer days, decomposed granite areas may need to be sprayed with a light mist of water to reduce dust. After a heavy event day, or storm, some areas may need re- grading and topping. Routine maintenance includes: • Litter removal • Wet down/ hose down during hot and dry days • Minor repair and maintenance: raking and spot leveling • Major renovation: filling, level, re- grading, and renovation Decomposed Granite Areas — Sports and Dog Runs The sports areas are located in the Family Area and will be used for some court sports, such as horseshoes and bocce. The sports areas are expected to have similar maintenance protocol as regular decomposed granite areas 6o I CORPUS CHRISTI E YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES but with a more intensive effort. Frequent maintenance is recommended, including raking and spot leveling five days a week. The same is true for the dog runs, which will require raking and hosing down. Deck Areas Similar to other hardscapes, the deck areas will need to be kept clean on a daily basis, with litter removal and surface cleaning. Occasional powerwashing will be needed to remove accumulated debris, food and beverage stains, and possible biological growth. Deck areas should also be regularly inspected to ensure they're structurally intact and safe. Routine maintenance includes: • Litter removal • Blow debris with backpack blower • Powerwashing • Maintenance: inspection, surface and structure maintenance, repair Play and Fitness Equipment Areas While the Play Area comprises an environment of landforms, various surfacing, and trees and planting, and play features, areas with play equipment are unique because they require special rubberized paving near play equipment to protect children from falls. Regular routine maintenance may include: • Litter and graffiti removal • Powerwashing • Play surface maintenance • Regular inspections of play equipment (checking for bolt and weld connections) • Maintenance and minor repairs Play areas and play equipment will require regular maintenance to ensure a safe environment. Specific maintenance needs will be identified in detail as the design develops. Structures Structures are defined as areas with shade structures, the park arrival building, retail shops, and cafe. Given the expected uses of these structures, keeping them and their immediate surroundings clean is particularly important. Structures and adjacent areas must be regularly cleaned, trash removed and paved surfaces regularly swept and power washed to remove food and beverage spills. Structures are expected to suffer some vandalism, such as graffiti, which should be removed within 24 hours of reporting. Structures will need to be checked and maintained regularly to ensure they're safe for public use. It is assumed that business operators will be responsible for maintaining the interior spaces and the infrastructure within the structures, such as plumbing and electrical. Site Furnishings Site furnishings include all site amenities, such as trash cans, recycling bins, signage, fences, railings, bike racks, drinking fountains, etc. Trash cans, along with recycling bins, will need to be emptied and replaced with a new liner on a daily basis. The frequency will need to be adjusted during the busiest seasons. The bins should be washed down at least once per month, along with routine maintenance, such as repainting, checking for damage, and repair as necessary. Other site furnishing will require regular cleaning, wiping down, and routine check for damage and tight connections (if applicable), repainting, and repair as necessary. Graffiti should be removed within 24 hours of reporting. The sooner graffiti is removed, the easier it is to remove and the less likelihood of shadows. It also discourages additional graffiti. Specific maintenance needs and services will be identified as the design progresses. HAR REAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 61 ETM ASSOCIATES Water Features and Fountains There are two CD water features proposed for Destination Bavfront: an interactive sprayground in the Play Area and a smaller garden fountain in Sherrill Park. [ornrnon maintenance needs include: Not all fountains in the park will have the same maintenance needs. Specific maintenance needs and services will be identified as the design progresses. Restrmorns There will be three 8> public restroorns in the park at Sherrill Park the Zoca|o' and Play Area. ETM recommends the following basic maintenance guideline: See Figure 3 for the landscape types that make up each park room. Figure 3: Landscape Types 62 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES This report assumes mid -level standards of maintenance. The actual frequency of tasks will vary depending on use and weather. Standards of care directly impact both the annual operating budget and the appearance of the park. A park with high standards can be costly. Alternatively, a park with low standards of maintenance where work is done to minimal standards, or on an as- needed basis, may reduce the operating budget but could be perceived by the public as poorly- maintained or unsafe. It is important to develop standards that not only take financial constraints into consideration, but provide the levels of maintenance that are required to attract visitors for a high quality visitor experience. ETM would not recommend a level of maintenance below what is shown in the task -hours sheets. Maintenance Assumptions Maintenance and operations are assumed to be done with a combination of in -house staff and contracted services. The in -house staff will primarily be responsible for basic maintenance services. ETM recommends that the basic maintenance services include: ETM recommends the contracted landscaping services include: i Maintenance of lawn areas HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 63 ETM ASSOCIATES • Soil testing • Fertilization • Irrigation • Erosion control ETM recommends that contracted trades services be responsible for: • Play equipment maintenance/ repair • Pest control • Major hardscape repair • Graffiti removal The Operations and Maintenance budgets specifically include contract trades to cover items that may need to be fixed, above and beyond day -to -day park maintenance. The allowance for contracted trades increases between Phase 1 and Phase 2 not so much because of additional park area in Phase 2, but because of additional repairs that may be necessary as time passes and the park receives more use. MAINTENANCE TASKS AND HOURS SHEETS The maintenance tasks and hours sheets list all of the tasks needed to maintain the park, an estimated quantity of each task, a time standard to perform the task, and an estimated annual frequency for each task resulting in an estimated number of hours needed annually for each task. Explanation Of Maintenance Task Hours Chart TASK — Maintenance task QTY — Total quantity of a task that needs to be done UNIT — Unit of measurement UNIT (MIN) —Time standard to complete one unit of the task in minutes ONCE (M IN) — Task quantity x time standard ONCE (HOURS) —Time in minutes converted to hours ANNUAL FREQUENCY — Number of times task is done annually TOTAL HOURS - Annual frequency x time in hours for doing it once The annual hours (TOTAL HOURS) for each maintenance task (TASK) is calculated by: Multiplying the quantity of a task (QTY) by the time standard to complete one unit of the tasks (UNIT MIN), then dividing it by60togetthe numberin hours,which isthen multiplied bythetotal numberoftimes annually (frequency) the task is estimated to be done, resulting in an estimated number of hours annually needed to complete the task. Each park area is estimated individually, for the ease of figuring out the total estimated hours for each construction phase, in case of changes in the phasing. 64 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES As of this report, Phase l is made up of the Promenade, Zoca|o' Family Area, Great Lawn, Play Area, and half ofthe Pier. The estimated hours for Phase l isl3'40D hours annually. Phase 2is the entire build-out of the park, and the estimated hours for the complete park is 15'673 hours. Figure 4 shows the summary of the breakdown of hours. Figure 4: Annual Man-Hours HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 65 ETM ASSOCIATES EE 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 67 ETM ASSOCIATES E 8 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Due to limited public resources, many successful urban parks these days are the result of public- private partnerships, in which the City and a non -profit organization share responsibility and oversight of the park. While the details of these public- private agreements differ from park to park, there are many standard advantages of a public - private partnership for urban parks. A public private partnership can access both public and private funding sources, benefits from the dedicated leadership and advocacy of the non -profit organization, and is not subject to election year cycles and political changes. We recommend that the City of Corpus Christi and Destination Bayfront create such a public - private partnership, and that Destination Bayfront form a 5010 in order to operate as a non -profit organization. The recommended division of responsibilities is as follows: The non -profit Destination Bayfront Conservancy will initially focus on finalizing schematic design and phasing strategies and should also establish a Conservancy Board that will provide overall leadership and coordinate private fund - raising efforts. The Board should include a cross section of individuals from the public and private sector such as corporations and civic organizations, whose individuals will bring a broad range of opportunities for fund- raising and public advocacy. The Destination Bayfront Advisory Committee will report directly to the Board, and will coordinate programming efforts during the park's design and phased construction. Once the park opens, the Conservancy will be responsible for maintenance, programing and administrative operations of the park. The City of Corpus Christi is expected to manage the park's design and construction and should lead the effort to secure public funding for the capital cost of design and construction. After the park opens, it is expected that the City will maintain existing levels of funding for some park maintenance and for utility costs that are normally borne by the City. The City should also continue to provide Police protection and security, while the City's Parks and Recreation Department will provide continued levels of O &M support, site maintenance, and some special event support. There is no additional City expenditure on site as a result of this project. HAR REAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( E ETM ASSOCIATES Organizational Staffing Plan — Design and Construction Initially, a Project Manager is needed to oversee all design and construction related issues and to coordinate with all associated City departments. Once the City secures initial funding for the project, the City should hire or fund a Project Director who can act as the primary client group representative, coordinate between the City and the Destination Bayfront Conservancy, and lead fund - raising and preliminary park programming efforts. This Project Director may work directly for the City or for Destination Bayfront, but ideally should be a full time, paid position whose costs are covered by the City, An administrative assistant will be needed to work with the Project Director and assist the Advisory Committee. A Programming Director should also be brought on board in the early phases of the project to work with the Parks Dept. and help kick -start events for the site and generate interest in the park during design and construction. See Figure 12 for the recommended organizational structure during design and construction. Figure 12: Initial Organizational Structure - Design and Construction PROJECT DIRECTOR I PT ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (also assist advisory committee) DESTINATION BAYFRONT CONSERVANCY BOARD PT PROGRAMMING DIRECTOR PT PROGRAMMING FIELD /SUPPORT STAFF (3 -4) ..... „...=7 Governance ..,.„.y.. Full Time Conservancy Staff Part Time Conservancy Staff Contracted Staff 70 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREA ES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Organizational Staffing Plan - Phase 1 A Maintenance and Security Director should be hired 6 -8 months prior to the completion of Phase 1 construction so that he or she is familiar with the park, and can begin the hiring and training process for grounds maintenance staff. A Park Administrator should be brought on board when construction begins to oversee the operations and learn the ins - and -outs of the partnership with the city and the park design. Once the park is completed, a dedicated part -time administrative assistant will be needed to support the Park Administrator. The Programming Director will be full -time, with a full -time administrative assistant who will be providing administrative support, in addition to working on contracting, scheduling, data management, and outreach. The bulk of daily maintenance will be done by in -house staff. A majority of the landscaping services will be contracted out, particularly for lawns, tree pruning, and garden maintenance. While it is recommended that the Corpus Christi Police Department continue to provide security services, additional contracted services may be brought in to increase coverage, particularly on weekends and during the peak season. See Figure 13 for the recommended organizational structure for the completion of Phase 1. Figure 13: Phase i Organizational Structure CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CCPD & CC PARKS & REC CURITY DEPARTMENT ERVICE I — — — —I — ADMINISTRATIVE I— ASSISTANT (also assist I advisory committee) I – PROJECT DIRECTOR (oversees all design and construction related issues) (not in annual operating budget) DESTINATION BAYFRONT CONSERVANCY BOARD DESTINATION BAYFRONT ADVISORY BOARD PARK ADMINISTRATOR (hired when construction begins) MAINTENANCE & SECURITY DIRECTOR (hired 6 -8 months before construction is completed CREW CHIEFS/ HANDYMAN MAINTENANCE & HORTICULTURAL STAFF PART -TIME OR SEASONAL STAFF CONTRACT MAINTENANCE SERVICE PROGRAMMING DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT PROGRAMMING FIELD/ SUPPORT STAFF :......=Governance [::= Full Time Conservancy Staff Part Time Conservancy Staff Contracted Staff HARGREA `ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 71 ETM ASSOCIATES Organizational Staffing Plan - Phase 2 The number of maintenance staff wiII increase as more of the park landscapes are completed and more maintenance is needed. As the park matures and use increases, an Event Coordinator should be brought on to work with outsider producers to bring larger and varied events to the park. More operational field support will be needed to for the increased park programming. A Development Director should be hired to assist with ongoing fund - raising needs, particularly sponsorships and philanthropic fund- raising. The Development Directorwill be responsible for doing the outreach tovarious community leaders, organizations, and seeking sponsorships from larger corporations. Additionally the Development Director will be responsible for developing new fund - raising ideas and securing grants. He /she will be the primary link to the philanthropic community not only in Corpus Christi, but nationally as well. A part -time Office Manager will oversee the day -to -day operations when the Park Administrator is unavailable. A part -time Workforce and Volunteer Coordinator will be responsible for ensuring contract compliance, as well as seeking opportunities to engage and encourage volunteer efforts in the park. Additionally, a Park Facility Manager will be responsible for directing the maintenance, repair and upkeep of all the park buildings and facilities. The Park Facility Manager will also develop short and long term planning and maintenance contracts for all park facilities. See Figure 14 for the recommended organizational structure for the completion of Phase 2. Figure 14: Phase 2 Organizational Structure CITY OF CORPUS - - - DESTINATION BAYFRONT CHRISTI CONSERVANCY BOARD DESTINATION BAYFRONT ADVISORY BOARD — — — — — — 7 — — — — I I I I I I I I I I I PROGRAMMING ADVISORY COMMITTEE I I ADMIN. I I PROGRAMMING I ASSISTANT DIRECTOR — — Governance = Full Time Conservancy Staff Part Time Conservancy Staff Contracted Staff ?z ( CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREA ES ASSOCIATES ETIVI ASSOCIATES HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 73 ETM ASSOCIATES 74 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES An estimated operating budget for Phase 1 of $1,010,392 is shown in Figure 15. The estimated operating budget for Phaseu'or the complete park, is $1,385,940, as shown in Figure 16. The budget is shown inun1udoUars'the number will need to be adjusted for inflation. The budgets reflect a phased construction implementation plan and a resulting phased organizational implementation to meet the needs of the park. HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 75 ETM ASSOCIATES The annual operating budget includes the following: Park Maintenance Park Security Personnel costs Materials and equipment costs Administrative 76 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Figure 15: Phase i Estimated Operating Budget Personnel Costs Maintenance & Security Director Maintenance Crew Chief/ Handyman Maintenance Staff $35,653,,.65 FTE, facility maintenance & park maintenance Working supervisor; 20% grounds maintenance, some horticultural $30,884t maintenance and repair $40,101,80% of grounds maintenance: litter removal, graffiti removal, etc. Horticultural maintenance, some lawns work and gardens Horticultural Staff $8,626 maintenance Seasons I Staff $12,030; ";April - September seasona Is Indirect Cost (22.45 %) $28,577; Maintenance Expenses Materials & Supplies Small tools, uniforms, equipment (hoses, paint, etc.), bench slats, $7,500; flights, trash bags, etc. Replacement Plants $6,500 Plants replacement costs Equipment Maintenance $6,750Includes equipment and vehicles Equipment Rental $6,250Rental of hi -boy, scissor lift, etc. Water Features Services $28,750Includes parts replacement, services, chemicals, filter baskets, etc. Facility Replacement Costs $10,000 Water Irrigation of planting areas, washing down of pavement, and water $30,000 features Electrical $70,000', Lighting, facilities, etc. Contracted Cleaning Services $13,195Includes restroom cleaning and graffiti removal Contracted Horticultural Services $33,800 Contracted Tree Services $8,750; Contracted Pest Control $6,738Are ants, bird, pest control Contracted Trades $45,000';; Electrical, plumbing, irrigation repair, etc., @ $90 /hr, 2 person crew Security Supervisor $10,860Night security supervisor, off duty CCPD officer Security Staff $27,375 Off duty CCPD officers Uniforms, Safety Gears, Radios, Bikes $7,500Initial purchasing cost Continued on next page HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CIATE ( CORPUS CHRISTI BAwYFPC3NT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 77 ETM ASSOCIATES Figure 15: Phase i Estimated Operating Budget, continued Programming Director $41,2500.75 FTE Event Coordinator $0�0 FTE ;Contracting, scheduling, data management, outreach, supporting the Administrative Assistant $32,000; Programming Director Operational Field Support $20,660'Assumed 2,000 hours Indirect Costs (22.45 %) $21,083k Development Misc. Expenses $5,625; Support of special events including materials, supplies, security, AV, Special Event Support $10,000"I"', vcleanup crew, etc. :Temporary rental of sound, lighting, etc. required for 4 -6 small to Rentals $10,000;, moderate size events annually Newsletter and Brochures $12,50T Miscellaneous visitor brochures and maps Materials & Supplies $9,250 Merchandise Costs $7,4005 Production cost for park merchandises, designs, etc. General Events /Programming by DBC ? $52,000'About $1,000 /week 'Paid by Bond budget. Director is to oversee design and construction Project Director related issues 'Park Administrator will spend 30% of time on admin, 20% on Park Administrator $110,000 programming, 30% on maintenance, and 20% on other park - related ''issues Development Director $0 Office Manager $0 Administrative Assistant $16,000'';.5 FTE, shared with Programming Workforce /Volunteer Coordinator $0 Park Facility Manager $0 Indirect costs (22.45 %) $28,287"" Materials & Supplies $6,500( Other Office Operations $15,000'�Copier service; ISP; computer network; small equipment, etc. Professional Fees $12,500�"`Legal, Accounting - tax prep, audit, etc. Insurance $125,500 ',Liability, property, D &O; (needs to be verified) The City is already providing $87,334 (see Appendix I) in maintenance services on the Destination Bayfront site. It is assumed that these in -kind services will continue, which effectively reduces the amount needed for 06ZM from new sources by that amount. $7,070,392 minus $87,334 is $929,058. 78 ( CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRC3NT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Figure 16: Phase s Estimated Operating Budget Personnel Costs Maintenance & Security Director $54,850 Facility maintenance & park maintenance Maintenance Crew Chief/ Handyman $37,080 Working supervisor; 20% grounds works and horticultural works Maintenance Staff $47,229 Grounds maintenance: litter removal, graffiti removal, etc., 80% Horticultural Staff $11,270 Horticultural maintenance, mowing ,etc.; 80% Seasonal Staff $14,443 April- September seasonals, 5 for 25 hours /week Indirect cost (22.45 %) $37,014 Maintenance Expenses Security supervisor $14,460 Night security supervisor, CCPD; 1/3 of security staff hours Security staff $36,500 1 person 4 -hours night shift, 7 days a week, 52 weeks per year; CCPD Uniforms, safety gear, radios, bikes $7,500 Continued on next page While the 06�m budget associated with Phase 2 reflects added park area and features, it also makes adjustments for additional 06�M needs as the park becomes more successful and more heavily used. Heavy usage of the site over time may demand an increase in specialized maintenance repair work, as well as an increase in park staffing and programming efforts. In other words, the Phase 2 06�M budget is driven somewhat by the passage of time and by the level of activity in the park. The park's success should help offset associated costs. HAFtGREA `ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION B YFE ?ONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 7 Small tools, uniforms, equipment (hoses, paint, etc.), bench slats, Materials &supplies $8,500 lights, trash bags, etc. Replacement plants $7,500 Plants replacement costs Equipment maintenance $8,500 Includes equipment and vehicles Equipment rental $7,500 Rental of hi -boy, scissor lift, etc. Waterfeatures services $32,500 Includes parts replacement, services, chemicals, filter baskets, etc. Facility replacement costs $10,000 Irrigation of planting areas, washing down of pavement, and water Water $35,000 features Electrical $75,000 Lighting, facilities, etc. Contracted cleaning services $13,480 Includes restroom cleaning and graffiti removal Priced by acre, 80% of lawn work and 50% of gardening; @ $3,750 Contracted horticultural services $38,850 per acre Contracted tree services $14,000 50% of tree work Contracted pest control $7,900 Fire ants, bird, pest control Contracted trades $85,000 Electrical, plumbing, irrigation repair, etc., @ $90 /hr, 2 person crew Security supervisor $14,460 Night security supervisor, CCPD; 1/3 of security staff hours Security staff $36,500 1 person 4 -hours night shift, 7 days a week, 52 weeks per year; CCPD Uniforms, safety gear, radios, bikes $7,500 Continued on next page While the 06�m budget associated with Phase 2 reflects added park area and features, it also makes adjustments for additional 06�M needs as the park becomes more successful and more heavily used. Heavy usage of the site over time may demand an increase in specialized maintenance repair work, as well as an increase in park staffing and programming efforts. In other words, the Phase 2 06�M budget is driven somewhat by the passage of time and by the level of activity in the park. The park's success should help offset associated costs. HAFtGREA `ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION B YFE ?ONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 7 Figure 16: Phase 2 Estimated Operating Budget, continued 8o I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES NONE= Programming Director $55:066 Event Coordinator $40,000 Administrative Assistant $32,000 Contracting, scheduling, data management Operational Field Support $24,792 Assumed 2,400 hours Indirect costs (22.45%) $34,077 Development Misc. Expenses $6,250 Special event support $12,500 Support of special events including materials, supplies, security, AV, cleanup crew, etc. Rentals $12,500 Temporary rental of sound, lighting, etc. required for 4-6 small to moderate size events annually Newsletter and Brochures $17,500 Miscellaneous visitor brochures and maps Materials & Supplies $12,500 Merchandise Costs $10,000 Production cost for park merchandises, designs, etc. About $1,800/week average; continue with exercise classes and General Events/programming by DBC $93,600 small events, bring on medium events when budget allows Park Administrator $110,000 Park Director will spend 30% of time on admin, 20% on ops contracts and other "big" issues Dedicated to sponsorships and philanthropic fundraising -- not Development Director included in budget Office Manager $22,500 0.5 FTE Administrative Assistant $40,000 Dedicate 50% to Park Administration; remaining time grant writing or assist in fundraising Workforce/Volunteer Coordinator $17,500 0.5 FTE, coordinates schedule with volunteers and community service providers Park facility manager $20,000 0.5 FTE Indirect costs (22.45%) $47,145 Materials & supplies $10,000 Other Office Operations $20,000 Copier service; ISP; computer network; small equipment, etc. Professional Fees $18,500 Legal, Accounting - tax prep, audit, etc. Insurance $125,500 Liability, property, D&O; (needs to be verified) 8o I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HR&A ADVISORS 82 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS The financing plan summarizes the proposed funding model for both the design and construction, and the ongoing maintenance, operation and programming, of the 34 -acre phased bayfront park designed by Hargreaves Associates. The proposed funding model is the product of the design and cost estimation process, of substantial discussion between key committee members, a task force of the city council, and stakeholders, and of analysis by HR &A Advisors with assistance of local real estate consultants and City of Corpus Christi staff, as well as background research conducted by H R &A on successful funding models for signature parks nationally. HAR REAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 83 HR&A ADVISORS R The funding for park capital costs and long -term operations and maintenance is envisioned as a public - private partnership in which private donations, sponsorship and earned income will fund the vast majority of operations and maintenance of the park, with no expected increase in the City's existing annual spending at the Destination Bayfront site today. Subject to this commitment, the City would fund most of the capital costs through issuance of General Obligation bonds. Capital Funding for Park Construction The estimated capital cost of building the park is $69 million with a $53.3 million Phase I and $15.7 million Phase 11. The sources available to support park capital costs in Phase I is $12.4 million, which is derived from existing public funds and supplementary funding sources. To fill the remaining gap in Phase 1, the City would need to issue a bond Of $40.9 million. Each $18 million of General Obligation Bond issuance requires a $o.o1 per $loo of taxable value increase in property taxes. The implication of a $40.9 million bond on the average tax payer would be such that it would require an increase of approximately $0.023 per $loo of a property's taxable value, or $23 per year for the average property owner of a $1oo,000 home. Funding for Park Operations and Maintenance The park's annual maintenance and operations budget in Phase I is projected to be approximately $1.o1 million, as indicated by ETM Associates' budget projections. This budget includes the City's in -kind contribution of $8o,000 to park operations and maintenance at the site today. HR &A has determined, through conversations with the City, local real estate professionals, and the leadership of Destination Bayfront that the majority of funding for the park's operations and maintenance would be derived from private fund - raising efforts and earned income, as well as the City's existing park maintenance contracts within the Destination Bayfront footprint. An additional source of income could be derived from establishing a Special Park Assessment District that would include residential and commercial properties south of the existing Downtown Management District (DMD) and west of the park, as well as add a small incremental assessment to properties within the DMD. HR &A has found that the district could constitute 15 percent of the park's annual operations and maintenance funds during Phase 1, as seen in Figure 1. Figure v Sources of Phase I Operations and Maintenance Funds Source: HRa�TA Analysis The funding model aims to: • Create a public- private funding partnership where municipal support leverages maximum levels of private funding and funding from non - municipal public sources, minimizing the necessary municipal funding commitment in a period of fiscal restraint and competing priorities; • Make funds available for sustained operation, maintenance and programming of the park, ensuring a quality of maintenance and of organized animation that guarantees the park will serve as a long term economic driver for Corpus Christi and its region; • To the extent possible, leverage existing sources of public funding prior to requesting additional 4 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS R authorized funding; and Derive sources of funds from sources of value — that is, create a structure in which funds are being derived from incremental economic activity in Corpus Christi, ranging from earned income generated from activity on the site, to proceeds from new real estate development and property value appreciation, to new business and leisure tourist activity associated with the park. •' ! - + MR0313MEM Uses of Funds Hargreaves Associates has generated preliminary cost estimates for design and construction of a park including 24 acres of parkland and 10 acres of beach built out in two phases. A two -phase park buildout would cost a total of $69 million and would introduce park features as follows: • Phase 1 includes the construction of the promenade, family area, play area, the Zocalo, the great lawn, half of the pier, and the beach, a total of about 20 acres of park and 10 acres of beach. The capital costs associated with this construction are estimated to be $53.3 million, which includes park construction, soft costs and construction contingency. • Phase 11 construction finishes the remaining4 acres of park by completingthe pier, introducing more parking, additional retail and a park office building and making improvements to Sherrill Park. Phase II capital costs are approximately $15.7 million, including construction cost escalation to 2o18. Sources of Funds Based on analysis of available funding sources and best practices in funding park design and construction, we recommend sourcing funds from four categories of value for capital purposes. Based on the objectives described above, the categories below are listed in order of priority for use. Existing Public Funding. The team has identified two potential sources of existing public funding that could be applied to park design and construction. Funds Authorized for Shoreline Boulevard Reconstruction. There is approximately $5.3 million in remaining bond proceeds for this improvement that could be used for Destination Bayfront. This assumption is based on the original $13 million dedicated tothe improvements, less the construction cost estimate for Shoreline Boulevard, soft costs, and construction contingency. This is based on information provided by Dan Biles, the City Director of Engineering Services. Utility Capital Budget for Storm water Improvements. The City will incorporate capital costs for on -site stormwater management into its Utility Capital Budget, an annual budget of the City's water utility fees. The team will provide City staff with design and cost estimates for all stormwater management capital items atthe conclusion of Schematic Design, and estimates $1 million following conversations with Dan Biles. This number will be refined during Design Development after completion of a utility survey and utility engineering plans for the park. We believe it is reasonable to assume the following order of magnitude funding potential for park construction: $5.3 million from remaining Shoreline Boulevard reconstruction funds and $1 million offsetting funds for stormwater improvements. In total, this yields $6.3 million for Phase I design and construction. Supplemental Funding Sources. While direct capital funding from federal and state sources for park construction have not been identified, the team has identified three potential sources of program funding that incorporate regional public and private sources. Destination Bayfront and the Hargreaves team have initiated discussions with these entities related to funding of the park: FI R PE VES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 85 FIF2<&A ADVISORS Sales Tax Proceeds for Seawall Maintenance and Improvements. We understand that there are approximately $20 million in Type A Sales Tax' bond proceeds remaining forth is purpose, $4 million of which is dedicated to smaller future projects. The Hargreaves team has assembled and submitted a package that includes several park capital items we believe are eligible for funding with technical descriptions and rationale for how these features support the long -term maintenance and protection of the Seawall, and has held preliminary discussions with the Type A board. Decisions related to the amount of funding available are dependent on the outcome of a current study conducted to examine flood conditions in downtown Corpus Christi, which is in process at FEMA and within the City's Engineering department. For now, the Hargreaves team estimates about $6.2 million might dedicated to park- contributed seawall improvements, of which we assume $5.2 million would be available for the first phase of construction, as seen in "Appendix E — Supplemental Funding Sources and Projects" and "Appendix F — Supplemental Funding Schedule ". The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) provides funding for mobility management through the Texas Metropolitan Mobility Plan, which includes development of pedestrian and bicycle routes, signage, and wayfinding elements, and provides $500,000 to $1 million per project. The MPO has included Destination Bayfront as a line item in its 2015 -2016 budget. The design team has preliminarily asked that the MPO allocate $9oo,000 for eligible capital items under its 2015 -2o16 budget to support Phase I park construction, as seen in Appendices A and B. The Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries Program obtains federal, state, and municipal funds for large projects that implement water quality improvements, wetland maintenance or construction, improved access to the water, and other similar environmental improvements. Ongoing dialogue with the Program's staff indicates the range of eligible capital projects planned for Destination Bayfront to be up to $1oo,000 for Phase I park elements. This estimate does not include funds dedicated to possible breakwater improvements, which could be as much as $2.3 million in Phase II. We believe it is reasonable to assume these three sources could produce $6.1 million for design and construction of Phase I park elements, and $3.3 million for Phase II park features. Figure 2: Sources of Capital Funds, Two -Phase Park Buildout 2008 Shoreline Re- Alignment Bond Surplus $5.3 M TBD Utility Capital Budget $1.0 M TBD Subtotal $6.3M TBD Type A Sales Tax Proceeds: Seawall* $5.20 M $1.00 M Metropolitan Planning Organization* $0.90 M TBD Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program* 2.30 M Subtotal $6.1 $3.3+ ource: H See Appendix E for Summary of Items Eligible for Supplemental Funding. While the supplemental funding sources described above have been vetted with these funding boards and agencies, the Design Team has also outlined two approaches to accommodate potential shortcomings in supplemental funding or future adjustments to eligible project cost. First, the Design Team has identified $2.4 million in alternates that can be deducted from the $52.4 million project if needed. Appendix F includes a breakdown of this Contingency Plan. In the unlikely event that no supplemental funding is available for Destination Bayfront, Phase 1 capital funding would fall short by $6.1 million. This gap cannot be filled by deduct alternates, and Phase 1 construction would Refers to Section 4A of the Texas Development Corporation Act of 1979, referred to as Type A as of 2007. 6 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES FIF2<&A ADVISORS require a reduced park area. In this scenario, the precise area would be determined at a later stage in the design process. New Spending and Property Value. The team continues to discuss and analyze the appropriate approach to authorization by the public ofGeneral Obligation (GO) Bond funding ofthe remaining park capital cost. As has been observed previously, in the absence of substantial short -term incremental revenue that could secure a revenue bond or other dedicated funding source for park design and construction, GO bond funding will be critical to achieving the goals associated with creating a Destination Bayfront park in this location. HR &A's current analysis of incremental economic activity likely to result from an improved bayfront and downtown suggests new tax sources for the City of Corpus Christi that could amount to between $2.5 and $3.75 million per year, seen in "Appendix H — Economic Benefits ", based on the assumption of additional tourist, worker and resident activity downtown associated primarily with the park's creation and the assumption that 2.5% of new spending would be captured as �3municipal tax revenue. If these funds were used as the basis of municipal debt financing for capital expenditures, they could support between $3o and $50 million in bond proceeds. A likely condition of any bond issuance would be that private funds raised through donations and sponsorships will be placed in an endowment to support ongoing park operations and maintenance, discussed further below. The following figures summarize HR &A's analysis of the capital funding available by source of value, as seen in Figure 2, and indicate the scale of funds for which a public bond issue fills the remaining gap for design and construction of a two -phase park, as seen in Figure 3, with an emphasis on identifying capital sources for Phase I. Figure 3: First Phase GO Bond Issuance Required, Two -Phase Buildout ($53.3 M Phase I) 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 (millions) Source: I-I Ra�TA Analysis A two -phase buildout scenario, assuming public and supplementary capital funding sources of $12.4M, would require a General Obligation bond issuance of $ $4o.9 million to support design and construction of a $53.3 million Phase 1 park. Uses of Funds Providing a high quality of maintenance for the park and offering a robust program of public events and activities will be critical to creating a destination on the bayfront. It is increasingly the quality of public space and the number and variety of activities available that sets a typical park apart from a true destination, as evidenced by the signature parks that have been studied by the team during the concept design phase. ETM Associates has provided an estimate for park operation, maintenance and programming at a cost of nearly $1.4 million per year for a fully constructed park. The table below indicates funds dedicated to maintenance expenses and services, administration, park programming and security at full park buildout in Phase 11. In the near term, Phase I operations will cost approximately $1.o million per year. 2 Dean Runyan Associates. The Economic Impact of Travel on Texas 1990 -2010. Texas Economic Development & Tourism May 2011. 3 Assumes 20 year bond issuance at 4.50% interest rate based on recent Corpus Christi financings. HAR REAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 87 HR&A ADVISORS R Figure 4: Uses of Operations, Maintenance, and Programming Funds [Per Annum] Personnel, Expenses & Contracted Services $429,000 Administration $314,000 Programming $221,000 Security $46,000 Source: Hargreaves Associates, ETM Associates, 1--I Ra�TA Analysis $546,000 $431,000 $351,000 $58,000 The City currently contributes $80,00o in -kind to maintenance of the site within the Destination Bayfront footprint. Assuming the City maintains the same annual contribution, $930,00o in operations and maintenance funding are identified by source in the following section. Sources of Funds The team has identified four sources of value for ongoing funding for the park, earned income, existing public funding, a special assessment, and private endowments, which may include the following: Earned Income. The operator of the park will raise funds from a variety of activities on the site, including potentially: Event, activity, and rental proceeds. If a variety of activity types are offered, some are likely to produce revenue for the park operator, which may offset or exceed the cost of hosting such events in the park. Buc Days alone generates nearly $50,000 in revenue for the City, but much of the positive net income is directed to charity and the remaining revenue is dedicated to compensating event security and maintenance staff, so there is little available net income from the event4. At Heritage Park, however, rental fees are directed towards maintenance and repair of old homes in the park rather than accruing to the General Fund, an arrangement that could be applied to Destination Bayfront in which net proceeds from events and activities are directed toward capital maintenance. While subject to analysis by the Parks Department, a study conducted by ETM Associates found that revenue generated from events, rentals, and other activity on site could generate $60,00o annually in Phase I and $75,00o annually by Phase 115. Many of the event types would be free, such as un- sponsored events or park sponsored /produced events, to generate activity on site. Net rents from lease of commercial spaces forfood and beverage and retail activities. The current program for the park includes 4,265 square feet of uses at full buildout. HR &A's high level market assessment suggests a reasonable rent estimate of $17 per SF during the early phases of the park's operation, rising to potentially $25 per SF during later phases. Net of an allowance for landlord operating cost, this could produce total net income of approximately $50,000 in Phase I of a two -phase scenario, in which Phase I provides 3,290 SF of retail and restaurant. At full buildout in Phase 11, this could produce $100,000 if $25 per SF rents are achieved for future restaurant and retail totaling 4,265 SF. Proceeds from parking. Surface parking adjacent to and on the site could generate parking revenue, particularly during periods of peak use such as on weekends. To calculate the annual parking revenue by Phase, H R&A made several assumptions about the cost of parking and the average length of stay, days of operation, and occupancy per space. Parking spaces accounted for in this analysis include spaces within the parking plaza and parking spaces along the east side (park side) of Shoreline Blvd. These assumptions are as follows: 4 While the net income from the event is positive, the City dedicates a large share of its profits to scholarships for high - performing high school seniors. 5 ETM Associates. "Programming Plan." Destination Bayfront Master Implementation Plan. December 2012 S ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS R • Based on comparable costs downtown of $0.75 per hour and a Texas statewide city average Of $1.25 per hour, HR &A believes it is reasonable to assume a cost of $1.0o per hour at the Destination Bayfront site. • A study conducted of San Diego's Old Town neighborhood, a tourist neighborhood adjacent to Mission Bay Park, found that the average length of stay for on- street parking in the neighborhood was 2.6 hours. Given similarities in character to the City and to the nature of the neighborhood, and by comparison to an estimate from a San Antonio parking study that found the average length of parking duration in the City to be 3.5 hours, HR &A felt it was reasonable to assume a length of stay of 2.6 hours. • Given the tourist season in Corpus Christi, H R&A assumed that parking meters at Destination Bayfront would operate 7 days per week from Memorial Day to Labor Day and 6 days per week the remaining 38 weeks of the year. • A study conducted by the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy identified the commonly accepted target for parking space occupancy for cities, which is 85 %. This target was also cited in the San Antonio parking management study, as well as other studies on parking in U.S. cities. HR &A therefore assumed 85% annual occupancy per space for the Destination Bayfront site. HR &A has determined that for the 124 parking spaces provided in Phase I, parking revenues could total $90,000 based on these assumptions. In Phase 11, the total 174 parking spaces could generate $125,000 of revenue to contribute towards park maintenance. Current City Funding. The City of Corpus Christi reports costs of approximately $120,000 per year on maintenance for the Destination Bayfront site, of which approximately $40,000 is a direct expenditure for mowing /landscape contracts and the remainder is the cost of labor and materials by the Parks Department, as seen in "Appendix I — Corpus Christi Parks Department Annual Budget for Destination Bayfront Footprint." A stable base of public funds is critical to leveraging additional non - municipal funds for the ongoing cost of operating a great park, and it is therefore reasonable to assume that the City continue to provide $40,000 per year as contracted maintenance funds, and that the $80,000 of in -kind donation is credited against the annual operations and maintenance budget previously described. We assume the City's net contribution is $40,000 per year towards maintenance and mowing contracts. Note that the total existing funding at the Destination Bayfront site (inclusive of in -kind contribution) represents approximately $4,000 per acre of the new park, well short of O &M funding requirement ($14,400 per acre in Phase I and $16,200 per acre in Phase 11). Private Endowment. The Destination Bayfront Committee has suggested a fund - raising goal of $15 million. Annual proceeds from an endowment would be approximately $525,000 per year at 3.5% interest. Special Park Assessment. The Bayfront Park has economic development potential both for the City as a whole and for the downtown and immediately adjacent parcels. The downtown area has a substantial tax base which will continue to expand in the future and can provide dedicated proceeds in exchange for the benefit of a downtown - serving park. In addition, HR &A and Hargreaves have analyzed the adjacent parcels and made a series of recommendations to City staff on harnessing this growth potential to create a Bayfront District, which could contain both residential and commercial development, referenced in the section on TIRZ proceeds to support park capital costs6. Corpus Christi has a Downtown Management District (DMD) that generates a special assessment of $0.30 per $loo of assessed value for land and $0.07 per $loo of assessed value for improvements. DMD leadership is currently considering an increase of this assessment to $0.35 per $loo of assessed value for land and the existing rate for improvements when the district is renewed in mid 20137. This assessment district is indicated as Area 1 in Figure 5. In the current boundary, the DMD performs public realm maintenance and event functions for the Downtown. A case could be made for the following: 6 Appendix G % Corpus Christi Downtown Management District staff HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 89 HR&A ADVISORS R Downtown property should support the ongoing operation of the bayfront park since it will provide substantial benefit to downtown property owners. The district immediately adjacent to Destination Bayfront and south of the DMD (Area 2 seen in Figure 5), which is not currently in the assessment district, benefits most substantially and therefore could be assessed to support ongoing activities within the park. Figure 5: Park Assessment District S..— G-9i, Mo ,i City of Corpus Clr,r&, HRBA Advisors City staff and HR &A collaborated to project the potential to provide funds for the park from a special assessment in a new park district south of the current DMD adjacent to the bayfront, as well as an incremental assessment in the current DMD area. These funds would be available immediately upon creation of the district, though the funds available from them would likely increase faster than the rate of inflation over time as a result of new development downtown and adjacent to the bayfront in particular. HR &A met with the DMD and discussed the impact if an incremental assessment of 20% were placed on the projected 2013 DMD rate, increased by $.07 per $loo of assessed value for land and $o.o1 per $loo of assessed value for improvements to $0.42 per $loo of assessed value for land and $o.o8 per $loo of assessed value for improvements. The different areas indicated in Figure 5 would contribute different shares of the total accrued assessment to park operations and maintenance and DMD maintenance tasks, per these preliminary discussions. Figure 6 indicates the order -of- magnitude estimates for accrued funds within the current DMD boundary, in the new park assessment area, Area 2, and in the Bayfront District within the near term as a result of an assessment o I CORPUS CHRISTI EAYFF:ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS at $0.42 per $100 of assessed value for land and $0.08 per $100 of assessed value for improvements. HR &A found that properties within Area 7, the existing DMD, could contribute $60,00o to the park operations and maintenance annually assuming the contribution were solely 20% increment, which represents 17% of the new total area assessment. This assumes that the remaining accrued funds, those accrued at potential 2013 DMD rates, in Area 1 would be directed towards DMD operations. If the properties in Area 2were to be assessed at the new rates ($0.42/$0.08), it would accrue $111,000. Of this total, go% could be directed to the park, or $100,000, and the remaining share, $11,000 (10% of total), would be directed to DMD operations. Furthermore, based on conversations with local developers, H R &A has determined the contribution of planned residential and commercial development in the Bayfront District adjacent to the park, which includes 150 units of market rate multifamily housing and 30,000 square feet of retail space. HR &A assumes that 70% of this development would occur within Area 2, the new park assessment area. If the new assessment rate were applied to these properties and go percent of the revenue generated only in Area 2 were given to park operations and maintenance, it could provide about $6,00o to park operations and maintenance. In the long term, assuming full buildout of the Bayfront District assessed in Appendix G, the portion of the district in Area 2, as seen in Figure 5, could contribute nearly $60,00o to the park annually. Figure 6: Special Park Assessment Contribution to Operations & Maintenance (Current DMD) Area 2 (New Park Assessment Area 79,000 Bayfront District (New Development in Area $766,000 $32,000 Assumes assessment rates of $0.42 per $ioo of AV for land and $o. 08 per $ioo of AV for improvements. Source: Conversations with DMD; Corpus Christi Planning Department; HRa�TA Analysis Figure 7: Potential Sources of Ongoing Funds [Per Annum] Proceeds from Endowment Interest $525,000 $525,000 Special Park Assessment $165,000 $218,000 Source: HRaTA Comparing Figure 4, annual O &M budget, with Figure 7, annual O &M funding sources, would indicate a shortfall Of 17% in Phase II, for which additional funding sources are to be determined. HAR REAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 91 HR&A ADVISORS R Figure 8: Annual Phase I and Phase II Oa�M Funding by Source of Value Phase I Phase PI Source: HRa�TA Analysis The City of Corpus Christi has established a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) in the City (seen in "Appendix G — Downtown TIRZ "), which accrues property tax proceeds from new development that occurs within it. While minimal funds have accrued in the TIRZ to date, additional funds will accrue as new development occurs and as existing property appreciates in value. On the other hand, these funds are likely to accrue over a longer term, since it is likely that the City will seek to provide exemptions, abatements and /or rebate grants to new development to encourage additional density in the downtown. The accrued TIRZ funds could be used toward park capital or operations and maintenance costs: Park Capital Funding: TIRZ Bonds HR &A reviewed two scenarios in which we assumed a baseline appreciation of 1% from 2012 to 2017, as indicated by market and economic feasibility study of the proposed Tax Increment Finance District (seen in Appendix G) conducted by CDS Spillette in 2oo88, as well as an additional 1% growth in the value of downtown property over and above anticipated appreciation, a conservative increment based on appreciation of park- adjacent property in other jurisdictions. If that incremental revenue, approximately $8o,000 in 2017, were capitalized into a bond it would provide an additional $3 million over 20 years, as seen in the TIRZ analysis at the end of the following section. HR &A's conservative assumption of a 1% increase in growth over and above baseline growth downtown would require only 35% buildout of the residential units recommended forthe Bayfront District, representing approximately 550 multifamily units9. However, development of the Bayfront District may produce incremental taxes more slowly due to potential tax abatements (as incentives for development), and for the purpose of building a conservative estimation of capital funding sources, TIRZ bond proceeds are not an assumed contribution to Phase I. Park Operations and Maintenance Funding: Annual TIRZ Contribution Similarly, if the accrued (1%) incremental tax revenue within the TIRZ were contributed to park operations and maintenance annually, it could provide an additional $20,000 in the near term (2014) and as much as $150,000 by 2020, assuming constant annual 2% growth in tax revenue. This can be seen in the "Incremental Revenue" column in the TIRZ analysis at the end of the following section. CDS Spillette. "Market and Economic Feasibility Study: Tax Increment Finance District #3 Corpus Christi, Texas." City of Corpus Christi Economic Development Office. August 2008. 9 An HR &A Analysis of the adjacent Bayfront District found that there is 2.3 million square feet of buildable area, of which there might be 1,200 to 1,800 residential units and 150,000 to 450,000 of commercial development and public uses, and can be seen in Appendix G. 92 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION B YFE ?ONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 93 HR&A ADVISORS 94 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS Park Construction, Soft Costs and Construction Contigency Existing Public Funding Supplemental Funding Personnel, Expenses & Contracted Services Programming, Security 8. Administration Less Current City tAciintenance, Budget Earned Income Current City Funding Proceeds from Private Endowment ($15M) Interest Special Park Assessment Note= •emoWnq funds to be Identified for Phase 11 $53,300,000 $15,700,000 $69,000,000 $6,300,000 TBD $6,300,000 $6,100,000 $3,3()0,000 $9,400,000 $429,000 $546,000 $581,0()o $840,000 ($80,000) ($80,000) $200,000 $300,000 $40,000 $40,000 $525,000 $525,000 $165,000 $218,000 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 95 HR&A ADVISORS msi= conzlru bon Co If by powk zone k rowided to &e nearest $0rl miffien and imclu&s design conhhnqojicy of 20%, conh-ocfrr oyerhoodandprofil of 15%, and 2 -your errolobon of 59'`6 per year. S ft-a and —rhn-fi- —fingencyi-lud- 20% per Chy E119keem-iog and 5% per ALCM d-- er,6.1ale Existing Public Funning Phase I Phase 11 Sound 2008 Shoreline Re- Alignment Bond Surplus $5,300,000 TED Remaining funds available through Slhorefine Boulevard re4ignnient. Jillity Capital sydgw $ 1 QQQ.QQQ TBD Conversations with City Engineer. subloki] $6,300,000 TBD _jFppl--flal Funding Phase I Phase 11 Source Type A Sales Tax Proceeds: Seawall $5,200,000 $1,000,000 Convetiaflorts with City EnglneLr and Type A board Convet --wlions rag rang available ftmids for eligible projects; Submission fee Motropolitan, Planning Organization $900,000 TBD 2015/201,6 funding. C*astal Bond Bays & Estuaries Program/ Emintallo bared on conversations wnh Coastal Bend Bays and Esluofl&s Pf"rom Other Federal Environmental Grants 1-0 $2,300,000 "o,ding capitol Item eligibRity. subloki] $6,100,000 $3,300,000 Arthe ally were to t e area revemre associated wA propertyvafue qwreckhm as a r*ph off& park wdhm & emis1mgDownftwo Tairlwar*nwo Remve*neo Zane (TWZ) ifiI6 a 6" it "LQ jW&WIJ& ot d"Ohal $3 ",w 20 yvtwt, at jr&#n In A& RRZ Abdfytk� Typ. A Sales T— h—& chdituted bG the S .... B are app.Hiancd to b.Ah A— f —d 9t_ /Tarot* —ffib.6— acrd sp—rd, p fund, gi— to fho purr's ---y -H be pi—.d k an to pp—f park p—h— 9 ..Ante— GO Rahn! irwohoo fifit cii-lbokmq slop WY *her jukhfificd fx,tiog P.Wic and 5.Ppc"&rfrd Fun4mq 96 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS Personnel, Expenses & Contracted Services $429,000 $546,000 ETM Estimate - Minimum Operating Budget Moi13kmt'1Pcv CoA Pow Acre $14,435 $1•,192 Administration $314,000 $431,000 ETM Estimate - Mlnirnurn Operating Budget Programming $221,000 $351,000 ETM Estimate - Minimum Operating Budget Secu r1L J46,000 58,000 ETM Estimate . Minimum Operating Budget Subtofall $581, Appendly, I — Corpus Christi Parks Department Annuol Budget for Deoinotion Annual City /Aalintenance, Budget (m),000) �$8()'000) Boyfront Footpdnt Park Acres Compfele by Phaser 30 Acres 34 Acres Hargreaves dissociates HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 97 HR&A ADVISORS Events, Rentals, etc. $60,000 $75"000 ETM Associates Esfirnote Parking Revenue $9(),000 $125,000 HR&A Parking Revenue Study Retail, Restaurant Net Income J50,000 11 ()01 010)01 HR&A Rota H/Restau ra ni Market Study Subtotal $200,000 $30010" Appendix I — Corpus Christi Parks Department Annual Budget far Desination Royfrant Annual tAowinq/Landscape Contract $40,000 $40,000 Footprint Proceeds from Endowment Interest $525,000 $525,000 Desffnotlon Bayfront Committee projection HR&A and Corpus ChrWi city staff onalysi5 of Special Park Assessment $165,000 $218,000 property data Total Parking Spaces 124 174 Hargreaves Associates 3,2907 4,265 Hiose 11 adds 7,5 retail boxes. Rent PSF HR&A Estimate from existing Downtovan Corus Christi Cost (pet hour) $1.00 $1.00 parking meter rates Net Income PSF $14,50 $22,50 Wilbur Smith Associates, San Diego Old Town Vl&itor Average Length of Stay (hours) 2.6 2.6 Oriented Parking Focififies Study Days of Operation (per year) 326 326 HR&A Estimate Institute for TrampQrtation and Developrnerrt Policy, U.S. % Occupied (per year) 85% 85% Porting Polioes: An Overview of Manage rent Strofegms Parking Revenue $90,000 $125,000 Annual Events, Rentals net income $60,000 $75,000 ETM Associates Estimate Events, Rentals Net Income $60,000 $75,000 98 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS Hmg�eave;; Phow I 1ncluces, headi oolk and 6 retail b*xer, Total SF 3,2907 4,265 Hiose 11 adds 7,5 retail boxes. Rent PSF $17.00 $25.00 interview with Terry MimTtesi, developer of Lo 'afinera Mall OpEx PSF $2,50 $2,50 HR&A Estimate Net Income PSF $14,50 $22,50 Assumes net Income Is rent less $2.50 OpEx Retail, Restaurant Net Income $50,000 $100,000 Annual Events, Rentals net income $60,000 $75,000 ETM Associates Estimate Events, Rentals Net Income $60,000 $75,000 98 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS Services for Trash Collection, Site Maintenance, Irrigation ,Appendix I —Corpus Christi Parks Department Annual and Special Events $81,335 Budget for Destination Sayfront Footprint Appendix I — Corpus Christi Parks Deportment Annual Mowling/Landscape Services $38,850 Budget for Destination Sayfront Footprint Assumes private funds raised for an endowment will direct proceeds frorn accrued interest to park operations & maintenance- Destination Baryfront Committee Funds raised for endowment $15,000,000 Fundraising Target interest rote INIM HR&A Assurn HARGREA`ES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 99 HR&A ADVISORS W A 0 A ams.11 I Park Assessment C*ntrilsuflam Summorv. . Short Term (Phase Area I (Curreryt DM D) $042 $181,000 $008 $166,000 $347,000 17% $59,000 Area 2 (Fork Assestrrseni Area) $0,42 $79,000 $0,08 $32,000 $111,000 90% $100,000 Sayfront Disfriict - New Development $042 $3,000 $008 $4,000 $7,000 90% $6,000 TOW 126,3.000 ,$202,000 $46-5,000, $1165,1000 -Air 1 .—ft h— been rounded to the t fl —sund_ Assessmefar Rate wwmez o20 'A ma"so of p*%-noof 20t3 DMD wsossosvmo rotes, from $0" pox $100 of AV for Loncil ood$0,07per $too of AV far @sr;v*,amows, Caneribfi of .--f fp—k jthDMD; Area I represents . Hhli— of H. f.H 20% i-r-0 ptestiuf 2013 DMD assessmeaaT rotes. N 9.yft—1 Di,Hd ."u—s 0. co-h—h— of 150 units of rend-hat 9J.g (1,000 SF per —3) ond 30,000 SF of scsmrrrarciad sp— od a property ...—d —I.. of $3 0 for L—d and $70 for Wprovewscafs psi, dacounled by 50% as a cw3,4,vaHc es hmole, 701/6 of On cky0apmew k propt0ed i* oc*wr withm Area 2, and tea portion of Hre ramcwhig 3096 occurring in Area I has b",s mclded in Ofic Y*Yai accrued atsommssi for Ow expanded district Park Assessment Contribution Summary - Lona Tenn Area I (Current DMD) $0-42' $181,000 $008 $166,000 $347,0001 17% $59,000 Area 2 (Park Assessment Area) $0,42 $79,000 $0-08 S32,000 $1111,000 90% $100,000 Sayfrorn DkWict - New Development $042 $27,000 $008 $37,000 $65,000 90% $59,000 TWO $2,87,P01D 42 4000' $'n3'0001 Alt assessment arroqnfi horo been rovodd to the rg-oresO Yhoysomd. AueurxvxffR*$t wsunres a 20% increase of poleni" 2013 DMD on,,mmoO ro*s, from $OAS per $ 100 of V for Land acrd $0,07 per $ 100 of AV for rrrspro,emewv. Cookibh., of --f to p—k per.si—s —d—inkno-e refle l --sahons widh DMD, Area I repres-Is a msskibuh of H fuH 20"16 0 on potenfid 203 3 DMD --s-1 rapes_ New Bayfrool Dj'z Hd assusoes Hw consiruchor, of 1,500 —ifs of sid.Wiuf hunnq f3,000 SF per und:) and 300,000 SF of —mrool spoce at a property asse—d YuJue of $ TO for Lmd —d $70 for he p e—nss psf, which @.s been dir�iud by 50% m a ,vaifve esti'mofe. 70% of — obyefopneW is prqeclLd To occur whihin Area 2, —d a par fin of The re—n.inq 30% 0=0ring i's Woo 3 has been included in aw 00.l accrued ouessmew for the expanded jsyrk�' 100 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS nis analysis reviews nio potential conto,ibufion of on Incremental I % growth in assessed value for properties within this axartinq downtown TIRL An analysis by the C "y OF Corpus Chi kti(CDS Spillette, 2008) projected 1% growth within this TI R2 boundary. HR&A assumed an scremishral 1% growth attributable to the pork, Milhcould co"StIture generalized growth OF a 6ulildout of 35% of the "Boyfront District' area, although the loner may produce Incremental taxes more slowly due to potential tax abaieflrants. Sim 1w ly, the annual incracnantol revenue indicated hore, could be contributed to Park Operations and Malintanarce, Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Tax Revenue within TIRZ, Baseline 1% Growth $1,923,442 $1,942,677 $1,962,104 $1,981,725 $2,001,642 $2,021,557 S2,041,773 $2,062,191 $2,082,812 $2,103,641 $2,124,677 $2,145,924 $2,167,383 $2,189,057 $2,210,947 $2,233,057 $2,255,387 $2,277,941 $2,300,721 $2,323,728 $2,346,965 $2,370,435 Tax Revenue within TIRZ Ir 2% Growth $1,923,442 $1,942,677 $1,961,530 $2,021,161 $2,061,584 $2,102, 616 $2,144,672 $2,187,770 $2,231,525 $2,276,155 $2,321,679 $2,368,112 $2,415,474 $2,463,784 $2,513,060 $2,563,321 $2,614,587 $2,666,679 $2,720,216 $2,774,621 $2,630,113 $2,886,715 Mole: The Current Ti RZ boundary is defined in Appendix G - Down to" Th?Z s M M 0,91 0.9�1 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 10, HR&A ADVISORS 102 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 103 LIST OF APPENDICES A: CONTRACT DELIVERABLES ill W� 1: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND PLANNING STUDIES 11-3 C: PROGRAMMING STAFF JOB DESCRIPTIONS 12■ liq SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING SOURCES AND PROJECTS 137 SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING SCHEDULE & CONTINGENCY PLAN 140 141 142 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 151 io6 I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES Z � ! ■ The following work has been performed as part of the Bayfront Development Plan Phase 3 Contract. The items below were included in presentations made to the Destination Bayfront Executive Committee, City Staff, and the Community over the course of 2012, and have all contributed to the development of the final Schematic Design and Master Implementation Plan. All presentations and interim documents have been delivered to the City in PDF form. • Site Analysis — Urban Context, Environment, Economic Redevelopment Opportunities (key items also attached here, as Appendix A) • Shoreline Boulevard Coordination and Design Input (key items also attached here, in Design Summary) • South Central Development Plan Coordination • Central Business District Plan Coordination • Programming Precedent Studies; validation and prioritization of PPS "Placemaking at Destination Bayfront" • Park Naming Plan • Preliminary Operations & Maintenance Budgets • Preliminary Order of Magnitude Cost Estimates and 50% Schematic Design Cost Estimate • Preliminary Capital Funding and Revenue Plans • Preliminary Coordination with Army Corps of Engineers Meetings with Focus Groups, Stakeholders, City Departments, City Officials, Public Agencies and the Community The following final contract deliverables are included in this book: • Project Narrative • Illustrative Concept Design Site Plan • Perspective Renderings of Park Areas, Buildings and Special Features • Construction Cost Estimate • Phasing Plan • Programming Plan • Maintenance Plan Governance / Organizational Plan Operations and Maintenance Budgets Financing Plan (Funding and Revenue Plans) The following final contract deliverables have been provided to the City under separate cover: • ioo %Schematic Design Drawings • ioo %Schematic Design Technical Narratives (Site Engineering and Permitting, Building Engineering, and Sustainable Opportunities Assessment) • i00% Schematic Design Cost Estimate (also attached as an Appendix) • Fly- through Animation HARGREA `ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION B YFE ?ONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 107 icy g I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ■ ■ 0 W Area within 20 Chaparral St, Historic Shopping Whataburger Aquarium/ minute walk Retail District District Field USS Lexington Cole Park Destination Marina Convention Center and Arena/ Bayfront Museums HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 109 Existing Harbor Ferry Route Potential Marina Possible Future Route Connection to Destination Bayfront 110 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES Bus Connections to Southern Residential Area.- Bus Connections to Convention Center and Museums to Texas A&M and Staples Street 20 Minute Walk Possible Future Route Naval Air Station Bus Depot from Site to Port Aransas HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I III 137: San Antonio (2hrs) Austin (3.5hrs) Houston (3.5hrs) 181: Residents from Portland and Ingleside Realigned Shoreline Boulevard 112 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES 2 Minute Walk to Bay Vista Apartments 15 Minute Walk to Chaparral St, Retail District io Minute Walk 20 Minute Walk 30-40 Minute Walk to Cole Park from Site to Convention Center and Museums HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 113 m raritwaad Wi"U—s @ F-d g..i5y I play harbar WN - marina anus is f pgrfmmamo 8� —d --f- (@ 0 'D rt) (D) 11 4 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES q'—p— b—h parking rt.+-fturs, 0k,.va8 = privatoownersNp = festaurants 1111 mmsfing access link HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 115 116 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES l: ! ! 0, 51 1 IN III UUJM[1 111 _11*91 IN 12 JUNO Events in the Park will be overseen by a Programming Director with support from an Events Coordinator position. The Programming Director will oversee events and programming in the Park. The Programming Director will report to the Park Director and to a Programming Committee. Destination Bayfront will contract with outside producers for larger events and programs and develop and implement smaller and ongoing programs in- house. This plan assumes that Destination Bayfront will be contract with an outside public relations firm for marketing services. The Programming Director will supervise the Events Coordinator and will have access to an Administrative Assistant. Project Director The role of the Project Director is to coordinate all design and construction projects of the Destination Bayfront Capital Improvements (Project) for the city of Corpus Christi and the non -profit Destination Bayfront, ensuring that is the Project or each phase of the Project is delivered on time, within the budget and that it meets the requirements of the approved scope and all federal, county and city regulatory agency requirements. The Project Director may work directly for the City, or Destination Bayfront, depending on the desired focus of the position. S /he will report directly to the Client Group, including City staff and leaders of Destination Bayfront. S /he will ensure effective communication between, and coordination of the Client Group, consultants, construction manager and all key stakeholders throughout all design, procurement and implementation stages to completion and project closeout. S /he will manage the project presenting project designs with estimated cost options and recommendations for approval focusing on time, cost, risks, value for money and on -going management, maintenance and operations implications. The Project Director will manage all aspects of capital projects including design review, consultant coordination, cost estimating, and construction coordination /oversight. The Project Director may also work with a City- appointed Project Manager who covers the day -to -day tasks associated with the effort. Essential Functions: Project Direction Project Management — Planning and Design HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 117 ETM ASSOCIATES ° Perform other duties as required in the scope of the job as designated by the Client Group. Attends meetings and presents project updates as needed. ProjectMonagement — BidondConstnucdon The Programming Director will report to the Park Director and to the Programming Committee, which includes representatives of Destination Bayfront Board, the park's vendors, Development, Marketing team and stakeholders from surrounding communities. The Programming Director will oversee contracted outside producers for larger events and programs and handle smaller and ongoing programs in'house. The goal is a creative mix of programming that encourages daily use of the park and highlights Corpus Christi's recreational and arts talent. The range of programming and events that Destination 8avfrontis exploring includes: ° Smal|'sca|edailyorweeklyactividesorpnzgmms(nsreatona[ardsdcormusicahtanreted10 nearby esiden1s, workeo, convention/sports visitors and families generally to be overseen directly by Destination 8avfron1. ° Concerts at the outdoor stage (audience capacity is 5.000 max sitting on grass) primarily produced n� � CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES 6w outside entities ~ Markets produced by an outside market manager ° Unique sporting events ° Seasonal community festivals ° Visual and performing arts programs focused on local art talent ° Venue rentals for private parties, ece[tions, weddings and other events Essential Functions: The Conservancy staff viUbesmal| and ente pre neuhai The Program min g Director viU oversee the work ofanEvent Coordinator and will have access toan Administrative Assistant. There will be set-up assistance on-site from the Conservancy's small field staff. ° College degree. ° Minimum of five to eight years experience with events and programming ofoutdoor spaces. preferably inan urban or downtown environment ° Experience managing staff and a program ming/even1budget ° Experience identifying and contracting with event vendors and producers Desired Experience Primary Responsibilities HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 119 ETM ASSOCIATES Skills Event Coordinator The Event Coordinator wiU report 1othe Program min g Director. The Event Coordinator *iU focus onoverseeing contracted outside producers for larger events and programs and assist the Programming Director on handling smaller and ongoing programs in'house. The goal is a creative mix of programming that encourages daily use of the park and highlights Corpus Christi's recreational and arts talent. The range of programming and events that Destination Bavfron1isexploring Essential Functions: The Conservancy staff will be small and entrepreneurial. The Event Coordinator will have access toan Administrative Assistant. There will be set-up assistance on-site from the Conservancy's small field staff. ° Minimum of three tofive years experience with events and programming of outdoor spaces, preferably inan urban or downtown environment ° Experience with sound. lighting, and event logistics ° Experiencevvi1hsitesupemisionofbothin'houseandou1sideeven1sponsors.vendorsand producers Desired Experience 120 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Primary Responsibilities Skills HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ETM ASSOCIATES 122 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES APPENDIX a ESTI MATED MAI NTENANCE AN D TASK HOU RS BY PARK AREA Remove litter z msf - i8 o.3 X04 32 Weed/ invasive species control, removal i msf 60 67 i.i iz i3 and monitor 4 40 Tree fertilizer application 3o each - Seasonal cleanup &prep 6 msf 0 739 X2.3 2 25 Garden maintenance 3 msf 6o i85 3, �6 49 Plant replacement i msf 3oo 336 5.6 i 6 Soil Testing 3 msf 3o 92 � 5 2 3 Fert i liter Application 6 msf 45 277 4.6 2 9 Top dress soil and /or mulch 6 msf go 554 9.2 2 i8 Erosion control /repair allow - Inspection i msf 3o 34 o.6 i6 g Irrigation maintenance allow 7 Tree pruning: hand 3o each 3o goo i5.0 z 3o Tree Pruning: aerial buckettruck allow 25 Tree spot watering - each - 0 2.0 - 20 Tree inspection 3o each 20 600 —o 4 40 Tree fertilizer application 3o each - 3oo 5.0 i 5 Remove litter 7 msf 3 22 0 4 365 X32 Blow debris w /backpack blower 4 msf 5 22 04 52 �9 Powerwashing - msf 3o 366 6.i - 73 Hardscape maintenance 4 msf 6o 266 4 4 2 9 -%of an acre; includes repairand renovationwhen necessary HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 123 ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter 10 msf 3 30 0.5 365 183 i5% of an acre; daily Blow debris w /backpack blower 6 msf 5 31 0.5 52 27 10 % of an acre Powerwashing 17 msf 30 508 8.5 26 zzo 25% of an acre; biweekly Deck maintenance 6 msf 60 370 6.2 26 16o so% of an acre, includes regular inspection, deck maintenance, and structural maintenance Remove litter allow 13 Includes litter removal from metal screens Powerwashing 3 msf 30 96 1.6 18 29 25 %ofan acre; biweeklyduring March, May- October, monthly rest of the year Structure maintenance allow 9 0 Empty Trashcans z can 3 6 0.1 365 37 Daily Trashcan maintenance 1 can 30 30 0.5 12 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Empty Recycle Bins z can 3 6 0.1 365 37 Daily Recycle Bins maintenance 1 can 30 30 0.5 12 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Drinking fountains cleaning 3 each 3 9 0.2 52 8 Weeklycleaning Drinking fountains maintenance 3 each i5 45 0.8 12 9 Monthly checkup, maintenance, and repair Assumes 4 basins per acre. Tasks include: regular inspection to Catch basin inspection and maintenance 11 basin zo 226 3.8 12 45 keep drain grates clear of debris; This taskcan be integrated Routine) into cleanup following mowing /raking /and trimming activities Catch basin inspection and maintenance Assumes z basins per acre. Semi - annual inspections and 6 basin 60 340 5.7 z 11 cleaning to remove debris and sediment, will occur in the (Semi - Annual) spring and fall and possibly after a large storm event Assumes 6 signs per acre; includes installation, cleaning, Temporary signage 17 each 10 170 2.8 10 28 maintenance, and removal Temporary fence mlf 10 0 0.0 24 0 Install /maintain temporary fencing, assume 2,000 if /acre. Applicable in Lawns and Landforms areas only. Fence maintenance clf zo 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Repair, paint, maintenance, etc. Handrail cleaning o.6 clf 10 6 0.1 26 3 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Handrail maintenance 0.4 clf zo 8 0.1 12 z 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. Guardrail cleaning o.6 clf 15 9 0.2 26 4 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Guardrail maintenance 0.4 clf 30 12 0.2 12 z 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. 15 %. Biweekly; includes: powerwashing, graffiti and gum Retaining wall /curbs /edging cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 removal Retaining wall /curbs /edging maintenance clf 45 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Monthly; includes: repair, resealing, etc. Lighting cleaning 11 each 15 165 2.8 26 72 15 %. Includes: cleaning, removing debris trapped under cover, wiping down lens covers Lighting maintenance 7 each 30 210 3.5 12 42 so %. Includes: inspection, replacement, repairs Furnishing cleaning z each 15 30 0.5 26 13 15 %. Biweekly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages Furnishing inspection, maintenance, and 1 each 30 30 0.5 12 6 10%. Monthly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages minor repair Linear bench cleaning 1.5 clf 15 23 0.4 26 10 zoo; biweekly Linear bench maintenance 0.7 clf 30 21 0.4 12 4 10 %; monthly Graffiti removal allow 5o Includesgum and graffit removal Artwork scheduled cleaning allow 25 Annual cleaningand routine maintenance Rodent, bird and pest control 7 msf 15 101 1.7 52 88 5% of an acre Inspection and restocking 1 each 5 5 0.1 730 61 zx /day, in addition to cleaning Clean and maintain restroom 1 each 45 45 0.8 610 45g zx /day during peak season,zx /day during shoulder season, 1x /day during off -pea k seaso n Structure maintenance allow 5o Includes plumbing, lighting, structure, etc. maintenance and repairs 124 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter allow 16 Includes litter removalfrom metal screens Powerwashing 4 msf 30 119 2.0 18 36 25 %of an acre; biweeklyduring March, May- October, monthly rest of the year Structure maintenance allow 11 0 Empty Trashcans can 3 0 0.0 365 o Daily Trashcan maintenance can 30 0 0.0 12 o Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Empty Recycle Bins can 3 0 0.0 365 o Daily Recycle Bins maintenance can 30 0 0.0 12 o Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Drinking fountains cleaning each 3 0 0.0 52 o Weeklycleaning Drinking fountains maintenance each 15 0 0.0 12 o Monthly checkup, maintenance, and repair Assumes 4 basins per acre. Tasks include: regular inspection to Catch basin inspection and maintenance (Routine) 1 basin zo zg o.5 12 6 keep drain grates clear of debris; This task can be integrated into cleanup following mowing /raking /and trimming activities Catch basin inspection and maintenance Assumes z basins per acre. Semi - annual inspections and 1 basin 60 43 0.7 z 1 cleaningto remove debris and sediment, will occur in the (Semi - Annual) spring and fall and possibly after a large storm event Temporary signage z each 10 zz 0.4 10 4 Assumes 6 signs per acre; includes installation, cleaning, maintenance, and removal Temporary fence mlf 10 0 0.0 24 0 Install /maintain temporary fencing, assume 2,000 if /acre. Applicable in Lawns and Landforms areas only. Fence maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Repair, paint, maintenance, etc. Handrail cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Handrail maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. Guardrail cleaning clf 15 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Guardrail maintenance clf 30 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. 15 %. Biweekly; includes: powerwashing, graffiti and gum Retaining wall /curbs /edging cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 removal Retaining wall /curbs /edging maintenance clf 45 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Monthly; includes: repair, resealing, etc. Lighting cleaning each 15 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Includes: cleaning, removing debris trapped under cover, wiping down lens covers Lighting maintenance each 30 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Includes: inspection, replacement, repairs Furnishing cleaning each 15 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages Furnishing inspection, maintenance, and each 30 0 0.0 12 o 10%. Monthly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages minor repair Linear bench cleaning clf 15 0 0.0 26 o zol; biweekly Linear bench maintenance clf 30 0 0.0 12 o 10l; monthly Graffiti removal allow 25 Includesgum and graffit removal Artwork scheduled cleaning allow 15 Annual cleaning and routine maintenance Rodent, bird and pest control 1 msf 15 11 0.2 52 g 5% of an acre Inspection and restocking 1 each 5 5 0.1 730 61 zx /day, in addition to cleaning Clean and maintain restroom 1 each 45 45 0.8 610 458 zx /dayduring peak season,zx /day during shoulder season, 1x /day during off -peak season Structure Includes plumbing, lighting, structure, etc. maintenance and maintenance allow 5o repairs HARE EA `ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 125 ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter 3 msf 3 8 o.i z6o 36 io%of an acre; 5x /week Blow debris w /backpack blower 3 msf 5 a4 0.2 52 a2 -% of areas;- /week Mowturf(open area) 26 msf 3 78 3 38 49 Toro Groundmaster, 85% of an acre Mowwalking /trim 5 msf 9 4i 0.7 38 26 20" push mower ortrimmer, i5% of an acre Top dress soil and /or mulch a5 msf 30 462 7.7 a 8 50% of an acre Soil Test /Evaluation 5 msf 20 9i i.5 i z i5% of an acre, done priorto fertilization Turf fertilization i5 msf 30 462 7.7 z i5 50% of an acre Seasonal turf renovation i5 msf 30 462 7.7 i 8 50% ofan acre, thatch, aerate, seed; in spring Monthly and twice a month during heavy growing season, io% Weed control 3 msf i5 42 07 i8 �3 of an acre Fall leaf removal 8 msf a5 u6 a.g 6 a2 25% of an acre Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow i8 Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedulesfor each zone; Winterize /spring start up, -o% of planted areas -o% of an acre; weekly maintenance. Includes weekly Maintenance 7 msf i50 990 i6.5 52 858 mowing, aerations (3 -44 grooming, cleaning /litter removal, weed control, renovation, etc. Remove litter® z msf 3 5 — 260 - -% of an acre; 5x /week Blow debris w /backpack blower z msf 5 8 — 52 7 -% of areas;- /week Enhanced landscapeturf mowing i5 msf 5 74 — 38 47 Slope Mower, 85% ofan acre Mowwalking /trim 3 msf 9 23 0.4 38 i5 20" push mowerortrimmer, i5% ofan acre Topdress soil and /or mulch a3 msf 30 396 6.6 a 7 75% of an acre Soil Test /Evaluation 3 msf 20 52 o.g i i i5% of an acre, done priorto fertilization Turf fertilization 4 msf 3o i32 2.2 2 4 25% of an acre Seasonal turf renovation 4 msf 3o i32 2.2 i z 25% of a n acre, thatch, aerate, seed Monthly and twice a month during heavy growing season, -% Weed control z msf i5 24 0.4 i8 7 of an acre Fall leaf removal 3 msf a5 39 0.7 z a a5% of an acre Includes removal of sediment from adjacent pathways after Erosion control /repair allow 3o storm event Includes inspection/ repair of soil structural support system i.e. Inspect and maintain MSE Systems allow 40 wire baskets, geotextiles or wall- facing panels Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow - Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedulesfor each zone; Winterize /spring start up, -o% of planted areas Remove litter z msf io 23 04 X04 39 i5% of an acre, 2x /week Weed/ invasive species control, removal i msf 60 84 i.4 iz i7 io°rfi of an acre and monitor Seasonal cleanup &prep 8 msf 0 924 X54 z 3i 50% ofan acre; includes: major pruning, seasonal cutbacks, removing seasonal debris; done in spring and fall 25% ofan acre. Including: deadheading, minor pruning, bulbs Garden maintenance 4 msf 60 23i 3.9 i6 62 cutback, spot watering; biweeklyfrom April to October Plant replacement a msf Soo 420 7.0 a 7 -% of an acre; done in spring Soil Testing 4 msf 3o -6 i.g z 4 25% ofan acre, done priorto fertilizing Fertilizer Application 8 msf 45 347 5.8 2 - 50% ofan acre, z applications: spring, fall Top dress soil and /or mulch 8 msf go 693 -.6 z 23 50% ofan acre; done in spring and fall Includes removal of sediment from adjacent pathways after Erosion control /repair allow 26 storm event; only applicableto Landforms and Dune Grasses Inspection i msf 30 42 0.7 i6 - -% of an acre, biweekly from April to October Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow 9 Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedulesfor each zone; Winterize /spring start up, -o% of planted areas 25% oftotal trees by hand with extension pole pruners and Tree pruning: hand 63 each 3o i,890 3i 5 2 63 saws Upper branches on largertreesthat requirean aerial bucket Tree Pruning: aerial bucket truck allow 50 truck Tree spot watering 25 each - 250 4.2 - 42 -% of total trees Tree inspection 63 each 20 i,26o -.0 4 84 25% oftotal trees Tree fertilizer application 63 each - 63o -5 i - 25% oftotal trees, i application in spring Remove litter 7 msf 3 22 04 365 i36 i5% of an acre; daily Blow debris w /backpack blower 5 msf 5 23 04 52 20 -% of an acre; weekly Powerwashing i3 msf 30 380 6.3 - 76 25% ofan acre; monthly Hardscape maintenance 5 msf 60 276 4.6 z 9 -% of an acre; includes repair and renovation when necessary Remove litter 3 msf 3 9 — 260 37 -% of an acre; 5x /week DG wet down/ hose down i6 msf io i56 z.6 8 zi 50% of an acre; light misting of water over decomposed granite areas, as needed from June to August DG minor repair /maintenance 3 msf 20 57 o.g - - -% of an acre; occasional raking and spot leveling DG major renovation 8 msf go 703 -7 i - 25% ofan acre, filling, leveling, and renovation 126 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 127 ETM ASSOCIATES i00%ofan acre; daily. Maintenance includes: cleaning /litter removal, raking and spot leveling, occasional minor repair and Maintenance z msf 30 53 o.g 26o 229 major renovation, and wet down during hot days. Done 5x /week: M, W, F, Sa, Su. Remove litter 0.7 msf 3 z o.0 365 �3 i5% ofan acre; daily Blowdebris w /backpack blower 0.4 msf 5 z o.0 52 z % an acre Powerwashing - msf 30 36 0.6 26 i6 25% of an acre; biweekly Deck maintenance 0.4 msf 6o 26 0.4 26 - % acre, includes regular inspection, deck maintenance, and structural maintenance Remove litter msf 3 0 0.o 26o o i5%ofan acre; 5x /week Play area cleaning msf 0 0.o - o 25% of an acre. Includes: play surface, fences, play equipment, 30 etc. Play area inspection and maintenance msf 0 0.o - o �5%ofan acre. Includes: play surface, fences, play equipment, go etc. Play equipment inspection and Additional hours for maintenance and repairs; includes adult maintenance allow 5 o exercise equipment Remove litter allow i4 Includes litter removal from metal screens Powerwashing msf ioz i.7 i8 25% of an acre; biweekly during March, May- October, monthly 3 3o 3i rest of the year Structure maintenance allow g o Empty Trashcans z can 3 6 - 365 37 Daily Trashcan maintenance i can 30 30 0.5 - 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Empty Recycle Bins z can 3 6 - 365 37 Daily Recycle Bins maintenance i can 30 30 0.5 - 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Drinking fountains cleaning i each 3 3 - 52 3 Weeklycleaning Drinking fountains maintenance i each i5 �5 0.3 - 3 Monthly checkup, maintenance, and repair Assumes 4 basins per acre. Tasks include: regular inspection to Catch basin inspection and maintenance (Routine) i5 basin zo 3- 5.o iz 6o keep drain grates clear of debris; This task can be integrated into cleanup following mowing /raking /and trimming activities Catch basin inspection and maintenance Assumes z basins peracre. Semi - annual inspections and 8 basin 60 45� 75 z �5 cleaning to remove debris and sediment, will occur in the spring (Semi - Annual) and fall and possibly after a large storm event Temporary signage 23 each - 226 3.8 - 38 Assumes 6 signs per acre; includes installation, cleaning, maintenance, and removal Temporary fence 3 mlf - 25 0.4 24 10 Install /maintain temporary fencing, assume 2,000 if /acre. Applicable in Lawns and Landforms areas only. Fence maintenance 1 clf 20 20 0.3 - 4 %. Repair, paint, maintenance, etc. Handrail cleaning clf - 0 0.o 26 o i5%. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Handrail maintenance clf 20 0 0.o - o %. Monthly; check forconnection, repaint, etc. Guardrail cleaning clf i5 0 0.o 26 o i5%. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Guardrail maintenance clf 30 0 0.o - o %. Monthly; check forconnection, repaint, etc. i5%. Biweekly; includes: powerwashing, graffiti and gum Retaining wall /curbs /edging cleaning o.6 clf io 6 o.i 26 3 removal Retaining wall /curbs /edging maintenance 0.4 clf 45 i8 0.3 - 4 %. Monthly; includes: repair, resealing, etc. Lighting cleaning 8 each i5 0 2.0 26 i5% Includes: cleaning, removing debristrapped undercover, 52 wiping down lens covers Lighting maintenance 5 each 3o i50 z.5 - 3o %. Includes: inspection, replacement, repairs Furnishing cleaning 3 each �5 45 0.8 26 20 i5%. Biweekly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages Furnishing inspection, maintenance, and z each 30 6o i.o iz iz io°rfi. Monthly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages minor repair Linear bench cleaning clf i5 0 0.o 26 o z0%; biweekly Linear bench maintenance clf 30 0 0.o - o %; monthly Graffiti removal allow 50 Includes gum and graffit removal Artwork scheduled cleaning allow 25 Annual cleaning and routine maintenance Rodent, bird and pest control 8 msf �5 -3 9 52 98 5% of an acre Basic cleaning 08 1 Wall allow - Includes cleaning filter, basket strainers, etc. Includes inspections, refilling chemicals, draining, refilling, Maintenance allow 50 changing out UV bulbs, pump replacement, etc. Daily monitor allow - Daily monitoring and logging Seasonal maintenance allow 50 0 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 127 ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter 25 msf 3 75 1.3 260 327 10% of an acre; 5x /week Blow debris w /backpack blower 25 msf 5 126 2.1 52 log 10 % of areas; lx /week Mow turf (open area) 233 msf 3 698 11.6 38 442 Toro Groundmaster, 85% of an acre Mowwalking /trim 41 msf 9 368 6.1 38 233 20" push mower or trimmer, l5% of an acre Top dress soil and /or mulch 138 msf 30 4,151 69.2 1 69 50% of an acre Soil Test /Evaluation 41 msf 20 818 13.6 1 14 15 % of an acre, done priorto fertilization Turf fertilization 138 msf 30 4,151 69.2 2 138 So %of an acre Seasonal turf renovation 138 msf 30 4,151 69.2 1 69 50% of an acre, thatch, aerate, seed; in spring Weed control 25 msf i5 6.3 18 113 Monthly and twice a month during heavy growing season,lo% 377 of an acre Fall leaf removal 69 msf 15 1,038 17.3 6 104 25% of an acre Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow 157 Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedules for each zone; Winterize /spring start up, 100% of planted areas Remove litter e 4 msf 3 11 0.2 260 49 10% of an acre; 5x /week Blow debris w /backpack blower 4 msf 5 19 0.3 52 16 10 % of areas; lx /week Enhanced landscape turf mowing 35 msf 5 174 2.9 38 110 Slope Mower, 85% of an acre Mowwalking /trim 6 msf 9 55 0.9 38 35 20" push mower or trimmer, l5% of an acre Top dress soil and /or mulch 31 msf 30 931 15.5 1 16 75% of an acre Soil Test /Evaluation 6 msf 20 122 2.0 1 z 15 % of an acre, done priorto fertilization Turf fertilization 10 msf 30 310 5.2 z 10 25% of an acre Seasonal turf renovation 10 msf 30 310 5.2 1 5 25% of an acre, thatch, aerate, seed Monthly and twice a month during heavy growing season, 10% Weed control 4 msf 15 56 o g 18 17 of an acre Fall leaf removal 6 msf i5 92 1.5 2 3 15% of an acre Includes removal of sediment from adjacent pathways after Erosion control /repair allow 71 storm event Includes inspection/ repair of soil structural support system i.e. Inspect and maintain MSE Systems allow 94 wire baskets, geotextiles orwall- facing panels Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow 24 Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedules for each zone; Winterize /spring start up, 100% of planted areas Remove litter 6 msf 10 58 1.0 104 100 15% of an acre, 2x /week Weed/ invasive species control, removal and monitor 4 msf 60 214 3.6 12 43 10% of an acre Seasonal cleanup &prep zo msf 1zo z,35o 3g.z z 7g So% of an acre; includes: major pruning, seasonal cutbacks, removing seasonal debris; done in spring and fall 25% of an acre. Including: deadheading, minor pruning, bulbs Garden maintenance 10 msf 60 587 9.8 16 157 cutback, spot watering; biweekly from April to October Plant replacement 4 msf 300 1,068 17.8 1 18 10% of an acre; done in spring Soil Testing 10 msf 30 294 4.9 z 10 25% of an acre, done prior to fertilizing Fertilizer Application 20 msf 45 881 14.7 2 29 50% of an acre, z applications: spring, fall Top dress soil and /or mulch 20 msf go 1,762 29.4 2 59 So% of an acre; done in spring and fall Includes removal of sediment from adjacent pathways after Erosion control /repair allow 67 storm event; only applicable to Landforms and Dune Grasses Inspection 4 msf 30 107 1.8 16 28 10% of an acre, biweeklyfrom April to October Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow 22 Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedules for each zone; Winterize /spring start up, 100% of planted areas 25% of total trees by hand with extension pole pruners and Tree pruning: hand 5o each 30 1,500 25.0 2 50 saws Upper branches on largertrees that require an aerial bucket Tree Pruning: aerial bucket truck allow �5 truck Tree spot watering 20 each 10 zoo 3.3 10 33 1o% of total trees Tree inspection 5o each 20 1,000 16.7 4 67 25% oftotal trees Tree fertilizer application 5o each 10 Soo 8.3 1 8 25% oftotal trees, l application in spring Remove litter 5 msf 3 14 0.2 365 83 15% of an acre; daily Blow debris w /backpack blower 3 msf 5 14 0.2 52 12 1o% of an acre; weekly Powerwashing 8 msf 30 231 3.g 12 46 25% of an acre; monthly Hardscape maintenance 3 msf 60 168 2.8 z 6 10% of an acre; includes repairand renovationwhen necessary 128 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter 3 msf 3 8 0.1 260 34 10% of an acre; 5x /week DG wet down/ hose down 14 msf 10 143 2.4 8 19 So %of an acre; light misting of water over decomposed granite areas, as needed from June to August DG minor repair /maintenance 3 msf 20 52 o.g 12 10 10% of an acre; occasional raking and spot leveling DG major renovation 7 msf go 644 10.7 1 11 25% of an acre, filling, leveling, and renovation Remove litter 1 msf 3 3 0.1 365 19 15% of an acre; daily Blow debris w /backpack blower 1 msf 5 3 0.1 52 3 10 % of an acre Powerwashing z msf 30 53 o.g 26 23 25% of an acre; biweekly Deck maintenance 1 msf 60 38 0.6 26 17 so% of an acre, includes regular inspection, deck maintenance, and structural maintenance Remove litter allow 11 Includes litter removal from metal screens 25 %of an acre; biweeklyduring March, May- October, monthly Powerwashing 3 msf 30 7g 1.3 18 z4 rest of the year Structure maintenance allow 7 0 Empty Trashcans z can 3 6 0.1 365 37 Daily Trashcan maintenance 1 can 30 30 0.5 12 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Empty Recycle Bins z can 3 6 0.1 365 37 Daily Recycle Bins maintenance 1 can 30 30 0.5 12 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Drinking fountains cleaning each 3 0 0.0 52 o Weeklycleaning Drinking fountains maintenance each 15 0 0.0 12 o Monthly checkup, maintenance, and repair Assumes 4 basins per acre. Tasks include: regular inspection to Catch basin inspection and maintenance 38 basin 20 767 12.8 12 153 keep drain grates clear of debris; This taskcan be integrated (Routine) into cleanup following mowing /raking /and trimming activities Catch basin inspection and maintenance Assumes z basins per acre. Semi - annual inspections and 19 basin 60 1,151 19.2 z 38 cleaning to remove debris and sediment, will occur in the (Semi - Annual) spring and fall and possibly after a large storm event Temporary signage 58 each 10 575 9.6 10 g6 Assumes 6 signs per acre; includes installation, cleaning, maintenance, and removal Temporary fence 14 mlf 10 145 24 24 58 Install /maintain temporary fencing, assume 2,000 if /acre. Applicable in Lawns and Landforms areas only. Fence maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 0 10 %. Repair, paint, maintenance, etc. Handrail cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Handrail maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 0 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. Guardrail cleaning clf 15 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Guardrail maintenance clf 30 0 0.0 12 0 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. 15 %. Biweekly; includes: powerwashing, graffiti and gum Retaining wall /curbs /edging cleaning 1.4 clf 10 14 0.2 26 6 removal Retaining wall /curbs /edging maintenance 1 clf 45 45 0.8 12 9 10 %. Monthly; includes: repair, resealing, etc. Lighting cleaning 6 each 15 90 1.5 26 39 15 %. Includes: cleaning, removing debristrapped under cover, wiping down lens covers Lighting maintenance 4 each 30 120 2.0 12 24 10 %. Includes: inspection, replacement, repairs Furnishing cleaning 4 each 15 60 1.0 26 26 15 %. Biweekly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages Furnishing inspection, maintenance, and z each 30 60 1.0 12 12 10%. Monthly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages minor repair Linear bench cleaning clf 15 0 0.0 26 0 20O/o; biweekly Linear bench maintenance clf 30 0 0.0 12 0 10 %; monthly Graffiti removal allow 25 Includes gum and graffit removal Artwork scheduled cleaning allow 25 Annual cleaningand routine maintenance Rodent, bird and pest control 19 msf 15 288 48 52 249 5% of an acre HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 129 ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter 4 msf 3 11 0.2 26o 46 10% of an acre; 5x /week Blow debris w /backpack blower 4 msf 5 18 0.3 52 i5 10 % of areas; lx /week Enhanced landscape turf mowing 33 msf 5 163 2.7 38 103 Slope Mower, 85% of an acre Mowwalking /trim 6 msf 9 51 o.g 38 33 20" push mower or trimmer, l5% of an acre Top dress soil and /or mulch zg msf 30 871 14.5 1 i5 75% of an acre Soil Test /Evaluation 6 msf 20 114 1.9 1 z 15 % of an acre, done priorto fertilization Turf fertilization 10 msf 30 290 4.8 z 10 25% of an acre Seasonal turf renovation 10 msf 30 zgo 4.8 1 5 25% of an acre, thatch, aerate, seed Weed Monthly and twice a month during heavy growing season,lo% control 4 msf i5 53 o.g 18 16 of an acre Fall leaf removal 6 msf 15 86 1.4 z 3 15% of an acre Includes removal of sediment from adjacent pathways after Erosion control /repair allow 66 storm event Includes inspection/ repair of soil structural support system i.e. Inspect and maintain MSE Systems allow 88 wire baskets, geotextiles orwall- facing panels Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow zz Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedules for each zone; Winterize /spring start up, 100% of planted areas Remove litter 5 msf 10 54 0.9 104 94 15% of an acre, zx /week Weed/ invasive species control, removal and monitor 3 msf 60 199 3.3 12 40 10% of an acre Seasonal cleanup &prep 18 msf 1zo z,1g1 36.5 z 73 50% of an acre; includes: major pruning, seasonal cutbacks, removing seasonal debris; done in spring and fall 25% of an acre. Including: deadheading, minor pruning, bulbs Garden maintenance 9 msf 60 548 9.1 16 146 cutback, spot watering; biweekly from April to October Plant replacement 3 msf 300 996 16.6 1 17 10 % of an acre; done in spring Soil Testing 9 msf 30 274 4.6 z 9 25% of an acre, done prior to fertilizing Fertilizer Application 18 msf 45 822 137 z 27 50% of an acre, z applications: spring, fall Top dress soil and /or mulch 18 msf go 1,643 27 4 z 55 So% of an acre; done in spring and fall Includes removal of sedimentfrom adjacent pathways after Erosion control /repair allow o storm event; only applicable to Landforms and Dune Grasses Inspection 3 msf 30 100 1.7 16 27 10% of an acre, biweeklyfrom April to October Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow 21 Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedules for each zone; Winterize /spring start up, 100% of planted areas 25% of total trees by hand with extension pole pruners and Tree pruning: hand 28 each 30 840 14.0 z 28 saws Upper branches on largertrees that require an aerial bucket Tree Pruning: aerial bucket truck allow i5 truck Tree spot watering 11 each 10 110 1.8 10 18 1o% of total trees Tree inspection 28 each 20 560 9.3 4 37 z5 %oft0tal trees Tree fertilizer application 28 each 10 280 4.7 1 5 25% oftotal trees, lapplication in spring Remove litter 6 msf 3 17 0 3 365 104 15% of an acre; daily Blow debris w /backpack blower 4 msf 5 18 0.3 52 i5 1o% of an acre; weekly Powerwashing 10 msf 30 zgo 4.8 12 58 25% of an acre; monthly Hardscape maintenance 4 msf 6o 211 3.5 z 7 10% of an acre; includes repairand renovationwhen necessary 130 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter 3 msf 3 9 0.2 26o 41 10% of an acre; 5x /week DG wet down/ hose down 17 msf 10 i74 2.g g �3 5o %of an acre; light misting ofwater over decomposed granite areas, as needed from June to August DG minor repair /maintenance 3 msf 20 63 1.1 12 13 10% of an acre; occasional raking and spot leveling DG major renovation 9 msf go 782 13.0 1 13 25% of an acre, filling, leveling, and renovation Remove litter 1 msf 3 y 0.1 260 16 15% of an acre; 5x /week Play area cleaning z msf 63 1.0 1z 13 25 %of an acre. Includes: play surface, fences, play equipment, 30 etc. Play area inspection and maintenance 1 msf 111 1.9 12 22 15% of an acre. Includes: play surface, fences, play equipment, go etc. Play equipment inspection and Additional hours for maintenance and repairs; includes adult maintenance allow 125 exercise equipment Remove litter allow 13 Includes litter removal from metal screens 25% of an acre; biweekly during March, May- October, monthly Powerwashing 3 msf 30 96 1.6 18 29 rest of the year Structure maintenance allow 9 0 Empty Trashcans z can 3 6 0.1 365 37 Daily Trashcan maintenance 1 can 30 30 0.5 12 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Empty Recycle Bins z can 3 6 0.1 365 37 Daily Recycle Bins maintenance 1 can 30 30 0.5 12 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Drinking fountains cleaning 1 each 3 3 0.1 52 3 Weeklycleaning Drinking fountains maintenance 1 each i5 i5 0.3 12 3 Monthlycheckup, maintenance, and repair Assumes y basins per acre. Tasks include: regular inspection to Catch basin inspection and maintenance 13 basin 20 269 45 12 54 keep drain grates clear of debris; Thistask can be integrated (Routine) into cleanup following mowing /raking /and trimming activities Catch basin inspection and maintenance Assumes z basins per acre. Semi - annual inspections and 7 basin 6o 403 6.7 z 13 cleaning to remove debris and sediment, will occur in the (Semi - Annual) spring and fall and possibly after a large storm event Assumes 6 signs per acre; includes installation, cleaning, Temporary signage zo each 10 zoz 3.y 10 34 maintenance, and removal Temporary fence 1 mlf 10 13 0.2 2y 5 Install /maintain temporary fencing, assume 2,000 if /acre. Applicable in Lawns and Landforms areas only. Fence maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 0 10 %. Repair, paint, maintenance, etc. Handrail cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Handrail maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 0 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. Guardrail cleaning clf 15 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Guardrail maintenance clf 30 0 0.0 12 0 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. 15 %. Biweekly; includes: powerwashing, graffiti and gum Retaining wall /curbs /edging cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 removal Retaining wall /curbs /edging maintenance clf 45 0 0.0 12 0 10 %. Monthly; includes: repair, resealing, etc. Lighting cleaning each 15 135 z.3 z6 59 15 %. Includes: cleaning, removing debristrapped under cover, g wiping down lens covers Lighting maintenance 6 each 30 180 3.0 12 36 10 %. Includes: inspection, replacement, repairs Furnishing cleaning 3 each i5 45 0.8 26 20 15 %. Biweekly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages Furnishing inspection, maintenance, and z each 30 60 1.0 12 12 10%. Monthly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages minor repair Linear bench cleaning clf 15 0 0.0 26 0 20O/o; biweekly Linear bench maintenance clf 30 0 0.0 12 0 10 %; monthly Graffiti removal allow 5o Includes gum and graffit removal Artwork scheduled cleaning allow 25 Annual cleaning and routine maintenance Rodent, bird and pest control 7 msf 15 -- 101 1.7 52 87 5% of an acre Basic cleaning liffiEN1100111011MEM allow 100 Includes cleaning filter, basket strainers, etc. Maintenance Includes inspections, refilling chemicals, draining, refilling, allow 5o changing out UV bulbs, pump replacement, etc. Daily monitor allow 100 Daily monitoring and logging Seasonal maintenance allow 50 0 Inspection and restocking 1 each 5 5 0.1 730 61 2x /day, in addition to cleaning Clean and maintain restroom 1 each 45 45 0.8 610 458 2x /day during peakseason ,2x /day during shoulder season, 1x /day during off -peak season Structure Includes plumbing, lighting, structure, etc. maintenance and maintenance allow 5o repairs HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 13, ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter 1 msf 3 z 0.0 260 10 10% of an acre; 5x /week Blow debris w /backpack blower 1 msf 5 4 0.1 52 3 10 % of areas; lx /week Mow turf (open area) 7 msf 3 21 0.4 38 13 Toro Groundmaster, 85% of an acre Mowwalking /trim 1 msf 9 11 0.2 38 7 20" push mower or trimmer, l5% of an acre Top dress soil and /or mulch 4 msf 30 125 2.1 1 z 50% of an acre Soil Test /Evaluation 1 msf 20 25 0.4 1 0 15 % of an acre, done priorto fertilization Turf fertilization 4 msf 30 125 2.1 2 4 So %of an acre Seasonal turf renovation 4 msf 30 125 2.1 1 2 50% of an acre, thatch, aerate, seed; in spring Weed Monthly and twice a month during heavy growing season,lo% control 1 msf 15 11 0.2 18 3 of an acre Fall leaf removal 2 msf i5 31 0.5 6 3 25% of an acre Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow 5 Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedules for each zone; Winterize /spring start up, 100% of planted areas Remove litter 9 msf 10 92 1.5 104 160 15% of an acre, 2x /week Weed/ invasive species control, removal and monitor 6 msf 60 341 57 12 68 10% of an acre Seasonal cleanup re P prep 3 1 msf 120 3,749 62. 5 2 1z 5 So% of an acre; includes: major pruning, seasonal cutbacks, removing seasonal debris; done in spring and fall 25% of an acre. Including: deadheading, minor pruning, bulbs Garden maintenance 16 msf 60 937 15.6 16 250 cutback, spot watering; biweekly from April to October Plant replacement 6 msf 300 1,704 28.4 1 28 10% of an acre; done in spring Soil Testing 16 msf 30 469 7.8 2 16 25% of an acre, done prior to fertilizing Fertilizer Application 31 msf 45 1,406 234 2 47 So% of an acre, 2 applications: spring, fall Top dress soil and /or mulch 31 msf go 2,812 46.9 2 94 50% of an acre; done in spring and fall Includes removal of sediment from adjacent pathways after Erosion control /repair allow 107 storm event; only applicable to Landforms and Dune Grasses Inspection 6 msf 30 170 2.8 16 45 10% of an acre, biweeklyfrom April to October Inspect /repair /replace quick couplers /drip irrigation. Irrigation maintenance allow 36 Drain /clean/ maintain /adjust schedules for each zone; Winterize /spring start up, 100% of planted areas 25% of total trees by hand with extension pole pruners and Tree pruning: hand 42 each 30 1,260 21.0 2 42 saws Upper branches on largertrees that require an aerial bucket Tree Pruning: aerial bucket truck allow 35 truck Tree spot watering 17 each 10 170 2.8 10 28 1o% of total trees Tree inspection 42 each 20 840 14.0 4 56 25 %oft0tal trees Tree fertilizer application 42 each 10 420 7.0 1 7 25% oftotal trees, lapplication in spring Remove litter 5 msf 3 16 0.3 365 96 15% of an acre; daily Blow debris w /backpack blower 3 msf 5 16 0.3 52 14 1o% of an acre; weekly Powerwashing 9 msf 30 267 4.5 12 53 25% of an acre; monthly Hardscape maintenance 3 msf 60 194 3.2 2 6 10% of an acre; includes repairand renovationwhen necessary 732 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter 4 msf 3 11 0.2 26o 48 10% of an acre; 5x /week DG wet down/ hose down zo msf 10 zoz 3.4 g �7 5o % of an acre; light misting ofwaterover decomposed granite areas, as needed from June to August DG minor repair /maintenance 4 msf 20 74 1.2 12 15 10% of an acre; occasional raking and spot leveling DG major renovation 10 msf go 911 15.2 1 15 z5% of an acre, filling, leveling, and renovation Remove litter 0.7 msf 3 z 0.0 365 12 15% of an acre; daily Blow debris w /backpack blower 0.4 msf 5 z 0.0 52 z 10 %of an acre Powerwashing 1.1 msf 30 33 0.6 26 14 25% of an acre; biweekly Deck 6o so% of an acre, includes regular inspection, deck maintenance, maintenance 0.4 msf 24 0.4 26 10 and structural maintenance Remove litter allow 11 Includes litter removal from metal screens 25 %of an acre; biweeklyduring March, May- October, monthly Powerwashing 3 msf 30 83 1.4 18 25 rest of the year Structure maintenance allow 8 0 Empty Trashcans z can 3 6 0.1 365 37 Daily Trashcan maintenance 1 can 30 30 0.5 12 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Empty Recycle Bins z can 3 6 0.1 365 37 Daily Recycle Bins maintenance 1 can 30 30 0.5 12 6 Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Drinking fountains cleaning 1 each 3 3 0.1 52 3 Weeklycleaning Drinking fountains maintenance 1 each i5 i5 0.3 12 3 Monthly checkup, maintenance, and repair Assumes 4 basins per acre. Tasks include: regular inspection to Catch basin inspection and maintenance 13 basin 20 270 45 12 54 keep drain grates clear of debris; This taskcan be integrated (Routine) into cleanup following mowing /raking /and trimming activities Catch basin inspection and maintenance Assumes z basins per acre. Semi - annual inspections and 7 basin 60 404 6.7 z 13 cleaning to remove debris and sediment, will occur in the (Semi - Annual) spring and fall and possibly after a large storm event Temporary signage zo each 10 zoz 3.4 10 34 Assumes 6 signs per acre; includes installation, cleaning, maintenance, and removal Temporary fence mlf 10 0 0.0 24 0 Install /maintain temporary fencing, assume 2,000 if /acre. Applicable in Lawns and Landforms areas only. Fence maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Repair, paint, maintenance, etc. Handrail cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Handrail maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. Guardrail cleaning clf 15 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Guardrail maintenance clf 30 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. 15 %. Biweekly; includes: powerwashing, graffiti and gum Retaining wall /curbs /edging cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 removal Retaining wall /curbs /edging maintenance clf 45 0 0.0 12 o 10 %. Monthly; includes: repair, resealing, etc. Lighting cleaning 16 each 15 zoo 4.o z6 toy 15 %. Includes: cleaning, removing debristrapped under cover, wiping down lens covers Lighting maintenance 11 each 30 330 5 5 12 66 10 %. Includes: inspection, replacement, repairs Furnishing cleaning 8 each 15 120 2.0 26 52 15 %. Biweekly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages Furnishing inspection, maintenance, and 6 each 30 180 3.0 12 36 10%. Monthly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages minor repair Linear bench cleaning o.16 clf 15 z 0.0 26 1 zoo; biweekly Linear bench maintenance o.08 clf 30 z 0.0 12 o 10 %; monthly Graffiti removal allow 25 Includes gum and graffit removal Artwork scheduled cleaning allow 15 Annual cleaningand routine maintenance Rodent, bird and pest control 7 msf 15 101 1.7 52 88 5% of an acre HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 133 ETM ASSOCIATES Remove litter z msf 3 7 0.1 365 43 i5% of an acre; daily Blow debris w /backpack blower 1 msf 5 7 0.1 52 6 so %of an acre Powerwashing 4 msf 30 119 2.0 26 51 25% of an acre; biweekly Deck maintenance 1 msf 60 86 1.4 z6 37 so% of an acre, includes regular inspection, deck maintenance, and structural maintenance Remove litter allow 9 Includes litter removal from metal screens Powerwashing z msf 30 63 1.0 18 19 25% of an acre; biweeklyduring March, May- October, monthly rest of the year Structure maintenance allow 6 0 Empty Trashcans can 3 0 0.0 365 o Daily Trashcan maintenance can 30 0 0.0 12 o Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Empty Recycle Bins can 3 0 0.0 365 o Daily Recycle Bins maintenance can 30 0 0.0 12 o Wash down, repaint, routine checkups; monthly Drinking fountains cleaning each 3 0 0.0 52 o Weeklycleaning Drinking fountains maintenance each 15 0 0.0 12 o Monthly checkup, maintenance, and repair Assumes 4 basins per acre. Tasks include: regular inspection to Catch basin inspection and maintenance basin 20 0 0.0 12 o keep drain grates clear of debris; This taskcan be integrated Routine) into cleanup following mowing /raking /and trimming activities Catch basin inspection and maintenance Assumes z basins per acre. Semi - annual inspections and basin 60 0 0.0 z o cleaning to remove debris and sediment, will occur in the (Semi - Annual) spring and fall and possibly after a large storm event Assumes 6 signs per acre; includes installation, cleaning, Temporary signage z each so zz o.4 so 4 maintenance, and removal Temporary fence mlf 10 0 0.0 24 0 Install /maintain temporary fencing, assume 2,000 if /acre. Applicable in Lawns and Landforms areas only. Fence maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 o so %. Repair, paint, maintenance, etc. Handrail cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Handrail maintenance clf 20 0 0.0 12 o so %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. Guardrail cleaning 1 clf 15 15 0.3 26 7 15 %. Biweekly; wipe down, gum /graffiti removal, etc. Guardrail maintenance 0.5 clf 30 15 0.3 12 3 so %. Monthly; check for connection, repaint, etc. 15 %. Biweekly; includes: powerwashing, graffiti and gum Retaining wall /curbs /edging cleaning clf 10 0 0.0 26 0 removal Retaining wall /curbs /edging maintenance clf 45 0 0.0 12 o so %. Monthly; includes: repair, resealing, etc. Lighting cleaning 1 each 15 15 0.3 z6 7 15 %. Includes: cleaning, removing debris trapped under cover, wiping down lens covers Lighting maintenance 1 each 30 30 0.5 12 6 so %. Includes: inspection, replacement, repairs Furnishing cleaning each 15 0 0.0 26 0 15 %. Biweekly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages Furnishing inspection, maintenance, and each 30 0 0.0 12 o so %. Monthly; includes: benches, bike racks, signages minor repair Linear bench cleaning z clf 15 30 0.5 26 13 zoo; biweekly Linear bench maintenance 1 clf 30 30 0.5 12 6 so %; monthly Graffiti removal allow 25 Includes gum and graffit removal Artwork scheduled cleaning allow 15 Annual cleaningand routine maintenance Rodent, bird and pest control 1 msf 15 11 0.2 52 9 5% of an acre 134 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ETM ASSOCIATES APPENDIX E SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING SOURCES AND PROJECTS SE '144 N ITEM COST 1 Site Fill and ' (or Bel ow Gra d e Stru ctu re at Decks/ Prom en a d e to Ra i se Cra d e I' a bove n ew 100 Yea r $3,800,000 Flood Line 2. Bulkhead Wall at Pier / Marina Breakwater Improvements $2,400,000 TOTAL $6,200,000 Item is currently deemed high priority for the City and this amount is assumed in the funding model. Item 2 is currently deemed second priority though valuable for the city. Because it must be constructed concurrently with the pier, this project is also assumed in the funding model. HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 135 MPO POTENTIAL FUNDING ITEMS XM Rll� TOTAL $1,340,000 *Other multi-modal transportation projects include Stmetecape Bicycle and Pedestrian Furnishings, (2)Parking Plaza Trolley and Tram Connections, and (3)A Pilot Bike Share System, These project could potentially receive other sources uf funding (nTAorpedeol). Item is currently assumed in the funding model. While Item 2 could also be funded by the VIPO it has not been included in the funding model in order to limit presumed K8PDfunding. 136 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES None of these projects is assumed in the Phase i funding model. HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 137 138 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES .:. ■ ■ 0 k11J:J:J 4:4 The following table represents a preliminary schedule for obtaining available supplemental funding to support Phase I park capital costs. December 2012 Destination Bayfront Design Team and City Engineering have made preliminary recommendations for two seawall and flood projection projects totalling $6.2M at Destination Bayfront the Park to selected Type A Board members. Both projects were deemed suitable for Type A funding, pending more detailed engineering proposals and analysis. Destination Bayfront Design Team and City Engineering have made preliminary presentations of recommended Seawall projects at the Park to selected MPO representatives. Bike lanes and related infrastructure were deemed most applicable for MPO funding. The MPO is currently holding a $1.7M budget for City -wide multi -modal transportation work in 2015 and 2016. Spring 2013 Design and Engineer Team to develop Design Team to provide detailed recommended projects, seawall benefit descriptions of projects to City (and assessment and cost estimates during Design MPO) for planning purposes. Development City's consultants to finalize other FIRM map - related studies Summer 2013 City Engineering to prioritize all recommended seawall maintenance and flood protection projects, including those formerly recommended by HDR in 2009. Type A Board to approve funding. Winter 2014 MPO requires shovel ready projects in order to approve funding, and could potentially fund projects by this time once park construction documents are complete. City may be able to pre -fund MPO projects if needed, depending on timing of park construction. Spring 2014 Phase 1 Construction Start Date HAPCPEA ES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI EAYFF:C3NT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I 139 HR&A ADVISORS 140 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS 9 9 0 IMMOYMMUNN Market and Economic - Feasibility' Study —Tax In crement District #3 Corpus Christi, Texas Exhibit 5 — Proposed ❑owntownTIF District CDS I Spillette 13 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 14, HR&A ADVISORS 142 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS APPENDIX H Westination Bayf ront- part of making the downtown a.. " I Total Park Visitation vs. Annual Resident + Visitor Population Destination Boyfront, Comporoble City Parks, and Downtown Corpus Christi .Attractions [8•0] U.0 0 00 4.0 E 3.0 2.0 1.0 o Z+ 011 J, eQ .e Id" + e NA 0 cN -Ia� 'Ile ce IdN- \;0 Tt. I Park V,sit.fi— ■An-1 Park Visff.fi— as v. P—t.g. a# Tt.1 MSA R—Jd—f + V,s4— Ppd.fl- Tn Lrmg Cmxs'C---,,r,,,-)m,P, & v u5 lvjt, HF&A 4 m 5i T�c,,5 pr,nr&, Tj;r,fm - ',' r 1� 1, 16% .0 1 A 0/b sa 121/10 0 0 100/0 ca SING 0 0-/c, + 4° /a 2 > "/b 0% c < < HARG PEA VES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 143 HR&A ADVISORS IRWIN III III 1111 11 f .28111 tourist destination in Texas U.S.S. Lexington 300,000 visitors per year, 32nd tourist destination i ® TP.Y a s American Bank Center 300-400 events per year Annual attendance of 600,000-700,000 Visitor growth can be achieved through enhanced attractions om M M S40 IE Total Economic Impact per Visitor Day, 2010 Corpus Christ! San Antonio Austin E Visitor Spend per Day — Multiplier Ill 144 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HIR&A ADVISORS HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 145 HR&A ADVISORS P" IN # Corpus Christi vs. Select Cities v 10 TP, 20,10 Net growth has been minimal Net CBD Residentia I Population Growth, 1990-2010 Corpus Christi vs. Comparable Cities 11,275 1\0 01 A <10 C3D defin�' -1 i3 � fmle rr - o' T , mc idws of CeMerjocm" C BE) Corp,)5 ChHOKCSDrepreseit. the Etc mito,,n 7jR,7 J 146 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS EaKe: NEZIE FW 2,004 r- 1,501: D • BE 1,004 Alt Total Permitted Units in Corpus Christi, 2001 -201 1 5+Mulfifamfly Unit Structures vs. Other Structures III � I i I IF I I III I I 9�=11111111 m Units in S+ Unit Multifamily Structures m Units in Single-Family, 2-,3-, and 4-unit Structures Sources: VS D - _7 r#maqi of 14ousmg ord 06-bon N,ei,Dpm of 20 12 IIIIIIII III IIIIIII I I IRIF IIII _1� I I III III Following decline from 1994, to 200iO, downtown residenfial is growing: —300 units added since the recession in 2008 MITI �6 '! 7 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 147 HR&A ADVISORS Bayfront District development could add up to 2.3 million square feet of residential, commercial, and public uses. PAWN ff "-Iffid� 150,000 — 450,000 SF retail, hot-T commercial uses 11 ME= 800 units with retail and hospitality by 2020 in response to Destination Bayfrol 148 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES HR&A ADVISORS Total Spending Growth Potential 2:012-2020 C � Incremental spending and real estate development catalyzed by Destination Bayf ront provides revenues to the City. spending catalyzed by the Bayf ront Revenuefrorn new d' evelopment in the Bayfront District, by 2020 Annual incremental revenue to the City -Rurces- 7e xc' , I, n I ic " I,, & T I u, �sm 20 7 O� r4R &A r.!OfyS s', fit $2.5 - $3.75 minion lio n A� ^ Aft A- Mi Pau = $dv.25 minior HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 149 HR&A ADVISORS Bayfront Increment $2,000 (10% increase from Moderate Growth') $1,600 $100-5150 M Moderate Growth $1,200 (35% increase from 2012-2020) 0 �0- a y(201 2) V) $800 C, �2 $400 .............. $0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2012 2020 C � Incremental spending and real estate development catalyzed by Destination Bayf ront provides revenues to the City. spending catalyzed by the Bayf ront Revenuefrorn new d' evelopment in the Bayfront District, by 2020 Annual incremental revenue to the City -Rurces- 7e xc' , I, n I ic " I,, & T I u, �sm 20 7 O� r4R &A r.!OfyS s', fit $2.5 - $3.75 minion lio n A� ^ Aft A- Mi Pau = $dv.25 minior HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 149 HR&A ADVISORS 150 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES APPENDIX I CORPUS CHRISTI PARKS DEPARTMENT ANNUAL BUDGET FOR DESTINATION BAYFRONT FOOTPRINT F&MM As Needed tion: Semi-annual inspection of irrigation heads, direeicin of spray patterns, valves & control boxes. of broken tines mainly due to tent spikes and ground movement shrink/swell. Irrigation work in the area HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 151 CORPUS CHRISTI DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION 152 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION APPENDIX J REDUCED PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Destination Bayfront 100% Schematic Design Reduced Project Cost Cost Estimate (Revision 02) Prepared by HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 153 AGCM • : ! J , ,.: 1. Sales and use taxes have not been included in the estimate. 2. Traffic Control is assumed not required and is excluded from the estimate, with exception of the intersection of Shoreline Southbound at Kinney and Shoreline Southbound at Park. Demolition of these crossover streets is included in the estimate, along with demolition of Shoreline Blvd North. 3. All utilities running adjacent Shoreline Blvd, both northbound and southbound are assumed to remain undisturbed or Not In Contract. The estimate excludes work related to relocation, demolition, disconnection, etc. of these utilities and transformers. 4. The base estimate assumes the project will be awarded as one contract, to one General Contractor, via a Competitive Bid. 5. FEMA is scheduled to release new floodplain maps. The revised maps may indicate that the existing site elevations fall below the 100 year floodplain. This may require a substantial amount of fill material and grading work for the site. We have included an additional 2% allowance in the Design Contingency in the event raising the site grades is required. This Contingency may not cover new flood protection structures that require certification. 6. The existing McGee Beach is included in the estimate as an existing feature to remain. Although no work is being performed on the beach itself, its acreage has been included in the total Park Area because it is integral to some of the other features being proposed - in particular, the Beach Ramp and Terraces, the Pier and its buildings. 7. For all other assumptions, please see the detailed line items within the cost estimate. 154 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AG CM HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CIATE ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 155 ALCM LF Linear Feet CY Cubic Yards LCY Loose Cubic Yards BCY Bank Cubic Yards LS Lump Sum EA Each Summary Sheet Percent Item Quantity UOM Cost Per Unit of CCL Total Sherrill Park and Parking Plaza 146,588 SF $43.95 12.3% $6,442,078 Great Lawn 417,802 SF $17.76 14.2% $7,420,136 Family Area and Parking Plaza 163,922 SF $27.09 8.5% $4,440,972 Zocalo 17,406 SF $249.98 8.3% $4,351,173 Play Area 146,528 SF $53.13 14.9% $7,784,992 Promenade 123,059 SF $104.59 24.6% $12,871,332 Marina Basin 1 LS $1,659,956 3.2% $1,659,956 Pier 15,840 SF $419.94 12.7% $6,651,797 Shoreline Blvd. N. Demo 1 LS $800,000.00 1.5% $800,000 McGee Beach 435,600 SF $0.00 0.0% $0 Construction Cost Limitation (CCL) 1,466,747 5F $35.74 $52,422,436 Public Art (1.25% of CCL, per City Percentage) 1.25% $655,280 Construction Contingency 5.0% $2,621,122 Soft Costs (20% of CCL, per City Dept.of Engineering) 20.0% $10,484,487 Total Project Cost (TPC) - Base Bid $66,183,325 Two Phase Construction $2,780,914 Total Project Cost (TPC) - Two Phase Construction $68,964,239 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CIATE ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 155 ALCM Phasing i - Phase 1 Start Year 2014 Cost Per Item Quantity UOM Unit Total Sherrill Park 8,000 SF $228.46 $1,827,655 Great Lawn 417,802 SF $14.43 $6,028,387 Family Area 163,922 SF $27.09 $4,440,972 Zocalo 17,406 SF $237.85 $4,139,996 Play Area 146,528 SF $53.13 $7,784,992 Promenade 123,059 SF $103.88 $12,783,127 Marina Basin 0 LS - $0 Pier 7,920 SF $555.08 $4,396,238 Shoreline Blvd. N. Demo 1 LS - $800,000 McGee Beach 435,600 SF $0.00 0.0% Construction Cost Limitation (CCL) $42,201,367 Public Art (1.25% of CCL, per City Percentage) 1.25% $527,517 Construction Contingency 5.0% $2,110,068 Soft Costs (20% of CCL, per City Dept.of Engineering) 20.0% $8,440,273 Phase 1 Probable Project Cost $53,279,226 156 ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AG CM Phasing Option - Phase 2 - Start Year 2016 Item Quantity UOM Cost Per Unit Total Sherrill Park 138,588 SF $33.30 $4,614,423 Great Lawn 5,000 SF $278.35 $1,391,749 Family Area 0 SF $0.00 $0 Zocalo 690 SF $306.05 $211,177 Play Area 0 SF $0.00 $0 Promenade 260 SF $339.25 $88,204 Marina Basin 1 EA - $1,659,956 Pier 7,920 SF $284.79 $2,255,559 Shoreline Blvd N Demo 0 LS $0.00 $0 McGee Beach 0 SF $0.00 $0 Construction Cost Limitation (CCL) CCL with Escalation to 2018 $10,221,068 $12,423,773 Public Art (1.25% of CCL, per City Percentage) $155,297 Construction Contingency (5% of CCL) $621,189 Soft Costs (20% of CCL, per City Dept.of Engineering) $2,484,755 Phase 2 Probable Project Cost $15,685,013 Probable Total Project Cost if Phased $68,964,239 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES ( CORPUS CHRISTI B YFE ?ONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ( 157 AG CM Cost Per Percent Item Qua Unit of CCL Total Total Projec! Coo - Phased Construction $68,964,239 Alternate 1 - 10CkVVV0nd Generators (Northern Power Alternate 3a.. 12,000 Gallon Above Ground Rainwater Collection Cistern aryJ System, Fiberglass 12.000 GAL $3. 65 $43350 Alternate 3b, - 30,000 Gallon Above Ground Rahwaler Collection Cistern and 2y2Le , �Fber �Iass — 3000 GAL $2.81 $64,675 li- MR, MUM 158 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM Destination Bayfront 100% schematic Design - Reduced Cost Item Multiplier % of CCL Total Contractors General Conditions wl B& 1 9.125 6,76% $-,3,545,702 Design Contingency at 20114 + FEMA Contingency at. 2% 0.220 13.39% $7,020,489 E-scalabon to 2014 0.100 7.43% $3,893,180 con"mrsOverhead and Profit 0,055 449% $2,355,374 km HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AG CM 32.08% $16,814,745 I CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 159 ma: m3m, a 16o I CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNITI UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 1. Sdework and Utilities a. Demcdbon 4 6. 58 8 SF �$F 1�1.86 . .......... . . 1, LaWn and Gardens(Clear and Grub) 100 231 _I K08 � - �18 $8,018 2, MaN red Palm Tgoes, (Remove) 43 EA $35000 $15,050 3 Concrete (Mesh Reinforced) 46,357 SF $0.67 $31,265 4 Kinneil, Street 15,640 SF 130.29 $4,362 Precast Light Standards (Bases to Remain, 5, Sahage, Owner to Load and Haul) 57 EA $210.83 S1,054 6, Gas Pole Twit (Valve, Cap, Abandon Line) I EA $770,$3 $771 Elod 6cal Motor and Switchbowd Assrnb y (De- 7 Energize Supply) I LS $1.225,00 $1,225 8 Water Fountain (Valve,Cap,, ndon Line) I LS 51,225.00 $1,225 S Brick Seebwall and Steps 300 LF 54.38 $1,314 10, Waste Receptacles and Benches 8 FA $6500 $520 Trellis Vvuctures (includes 26 Concrete Cclumns, 11, Fouridatlowo Remain) 1,60 SF $6.10 $9163 12. Fill i Abandon M place S1 orm Calchbasin 1 EA $16500 $165 13 Relocate Memorials and Flag Pole 10 FA U,000.00 $50,000 14 Relocate Pavers (Sand, Set, Concrete Cwt) 12,500 SF S.Z.25 5103,156 15, Load, Haul and Dispose of 7cpszil & Debris 171 LOAD $23122 S39,521 16, Sts eal Repair Allwance I L-4 $5.00040 $5,00 b, Rough Grade, Sile 146j588 SF i $0,41 00 Backffil Memorial Ph� Compact (Assurnes 500 CY - - --- ----- 1 d onshe soils) Soo CY $2,618 $1,340 2. Grade to Rough Subgades -1- 10% 146,588 SF $0.40 $58,635 c!. Damage 1, Area Drains and Piping 44 FA $50000 $22,000 2, Slot Diem 65 LF $5"77.00 $3,250 3, French Drain 141 LF $25,00 $3,525 a ird'"tion 46,227 SF �6;115 1 Lawn � Spray W�gafion 6,254 SF 1�0.95 $5,941 2. Gardens � Drip Irrigation 39, 73 SF 51.62 $64,756 3, Tree Babblers 224 FA $45-18 $10,120 e, U16litles (From Realigned Snoeiin o to East of Park) 146,%li SF $014 1, DcmMic Wa1w Supply and Motor 375 LF` $55,00 $20,625 150Amp Electrical Secondary N3 &,tritcfigeag, Meter Housing (Primary, Mcler and Xfrnw By Utility 2 Co. 375 LF $92718 534,568 3 Sanitary Sewer 3775 LF $6500 S24,ai 5 4, Nabiral Gas, Meter" 375 LF $78,00 $29,250 f. E'vvnt infrestruclure IIOV/,24)A'Vqeat "rproo(RecepEaciesern 1 pedesials 4 EA $136,00 $540 2 N3 Panel. Feeder and Breakers I LS J0 $4,000.()0o $4,000 3. Undergraind Branch Circuits LF $15,00 ----7-00 2. Softscape ='Sp3�000 a„ Goodens (Includes 24- Planting Soil and Filter Fabric) 39.973 SF $6.841 16o I CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM ;--j ; = 11: Im W. "1* 1: m 3 ' a E M HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 16, AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 1 Prorrienade Garden 5 gal. 318 SF S6.89 $2,101 2, Swales 5 gal. 2,3445 SF $1016 $23,a56 3, Tropical Golden 5 or, 7,551 $F K95 $40241 4, Add Carden 5 gal, 14,513 SF $7.82 $113,492 5 Do & Butlarly Gandw 5 gal 15,213 SF $5,94 $90,589 E. Sod (includes 12' Planting Scil) 6,254 S SF 52.98 $18,637 c:. Trees (Includes Planting Mix) 166 EA $1,692.41 1, Large Palm Tree 34Y M. at EA $1,800.00 5145,800 2, hale urn Palm Tree 20 Ht' 20 EA $1.30040 $26,000 3, Shade Tree 4'& 51 Cal, 7 EA $1,800VO 5I2.600 4. Ggove Tree 4" Cal 58 EA $1,550,00 $89,900 5 Guying 166 EA $40.00 $6,640 3. Hardscape a. Stabilized Decomposed Grande 39,9311 SF W.53 1, ExcavaUon slie BOY 56.32 S6,234 2, 4" L Granhe, 15% Shrinkage see LCY $14227 $80,570 3 Wood Baivier Fabric 4437 SY $tM W$28 4 6" Pea Gravel, 51% Shrinkage 776 ---4,437 LCY $133.22 S103,440 5 Connpacfion SY $7386 $17,126 6, Edging 5,013 LF $6.81 $34.139 7 Haul Spoils, 18% Swell 1�164 LCY $10,51 $12,234 b, conercle pmhs 11,361 SF $4.47 1. Excavahon 386 3CY 56.32 52,439 2. CoMacted Sub grade ' _2 --Y62 L SY - 1,53.86 $4,873 3 4" Aggregate Base, 25% Shrinkage 175 LCY $31.17 S5,459 4, 2" Sand Cushion 70 CY $2712 $1,906 5, Eoge Forms 1,718 LF 52,33 64,003 6, Bar Reinforcing, #3 at,1W OC 3 TON $1,200,00 $3,845 7. 5" Concrew UPS!. 5% wasm = 1= IM cy $120,00 $22,109 8 Expansion Joints 344 LF $3.22 S101 S Striping 900 LF $0.24 $2116 Haul Spoils 18% Swell 4:1�1 L'-'Y LCY LCY $10.51 $4,7a5 C� Bike Paths 4,156 'I $4.75 1 Excavafim 141 BfIly $6.32 $892 2-. CoMaded Subgrade 462 SY $180 $1,782 3 4" Aggregate Base, 25% Shrinkage 64 LCY $3117 $1,997 4 2" Sand Cushion - 26 CY EFI 2 56x97 5, Edge Forms 960 LF V2.33 -- 6, Sat Reinforcing, #3 at 16r OC I TON $1.240,00 --$2,237' 61406 T 511 Concrete, UPS, 5% WaalC, 67 CY $12000 $8,088 B Expansion ,f aims 240 LF $3,22 $773 9 ShVing 500 LF $0.24 $120 10 Haul Spoils, 18% Swell 167 L7UY $10.51 $1,751 d. Fountain Plaza 3,000 SF $3104 1, Excavatton 148 BOY 56.32 $936 2, Cwnpaded Subgrade 333 SY 5180 $1,287 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 16, AGCM �--jj-=Jwmv- mj: m3 m, a 162 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST PROJECT I TOTAL 3 4" Aggregate Base, 25% Shrinkage 46 LCY $31.17 $1,442 4 2" Sand Cushion 19 '9 CY Cy - li2 3 5, Edge Forris �186 �LF �1;12�7 S2�33 $438 6, Nr Reinforcing, #3 at1W OC I $1,200,00 $1,015 7 4" Concoew 3kPSI, 5% Wawe - 39 C�ON cy Y $120,00 $4,662 8 2" Thick Granite Pavers on Pedestals 3,000 SF SF $217 00 $81,000 9 Haul Spoils, 18% Swell 175 LCY $10.511 $1,837 e. Parking Plaza 16,727 SF $17.93 1, Exca valion 465 Billy $6.32 $2,937 1 0" Lime StaNizzed Subgrade, Compael 1,659 SY $16,715 530;7-59 3. Eogo Forms 672 LF $2,33 $9 ,566 4. Bar Reinforcing, #4 at 12' OC 11 TON S1,200.00 $13,449 5 6" Concrete, 3k PSI, 5% Waste 325 EY $12000 5-19,030 6, Expansion Jdnts 351 LF $3.22 $2,869 7, 2" Sand Bed 103 CY $27,12 S2,806 8, 311 Thiihi Pavers 10,727 SF $12-00 $200 724 9. Haul "Is, 16% %,ell 50 LCY $10,61 $6.762 4. Speval Features Linear Fountains, Sn-m 11 Jets in Ground, Purnp, Rm a. (Allowance Per Design Team} I LS 0., 00 U100,000 5, LWAng 8. Path Lighfing 52 EA 54 :149,32 13' Pedestrian Light 12° Fide, Stainless steel 1 "Bega" or "Hess' Fxtr 52 EA $3,500.00 S11 82,030 2, Fide Base 52 FA $35000 $18,2100 3, uG Wench Circuit 1,040 LF $11,12 S11,565 4, Electrical Goan, Parw1bowd I EA S4,000,00 $4,000 b, Uplights atSpecinrants and Trees 184 EA $76517 1 "L5° Fixture 184 EA $500.00 --'$1061 $92,000 2 UG Branch arcuit 4,232 LF $44,902 3, Eledrical Gear, Panelboard I FA $4,000.00 1!i4,000 c. Standard Padilng Lol Lighls 12 EA S7,931304 1, 40' Poles, Fixture 12 EA $6,670,00 580,040 2. P Base 12 EA $500,00 $6,000 3 Quad Reseoacle, Weatherproc 12 FA $20000 52,400 4 UG Branch Circuit 350 LF $10-63-- $3,721 5, Electrical Gene, Panelboard I EA $3,000.00 $3,000 6. Furnishings a. Benches, Trash 1. Go rden Boric h - Twe 133 25 EA S2,000,00 550,000 2 Flag Pte Assernt#y I EA S5,000.00 $5,0430 3 2' Wide, Concrete Seawall 8f, LF $904.00 $7,200 4, Waste Receptacles 4 EA $1,000.00 $4,000 5, Drinking Fountain I EA $2,000,00 $2,000 7. Widigs - ftase 1 1 a, Covered EvvN Space Canopy I Shade Structure 7,332 SF $150,00 $1,099,"3 162 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM lestination Bayfront 100% Schematic: Design - Reduced Cost ;--immiumv. mm m=,jaEM HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 163 AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL b. Upgrade Canopyl Shade Structure Lighting to LED 7,3322 SF S6.50 $47,658 8- Park &gnage a, Allowance per Hargrtmovs I LS 520,000.00 $20,000 sumotal 14 50 SF F 527,69 6-2 784 4.634 Contractor's General Conditions wiB&I 146,588 ---146,588 SF 545 7.85% �505,567 DesignContingencyat20% * FEMAContingencyat2% SF $68-1 54% $1,001,072 Escalation to 2014 146,588 SF 53.79 8.62% X555,112 1 CoNractor's Overhead and Profs 140,SU SF 52,29 5,21% S336A43 [Total 146,588 SF $4395 ioo-00% $8,"2,078 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 163 AGCM 141M7"F7 = 164 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNITI UNITCOST PROJECT I TOTAL 1. 8dework and Utilities a. Dernalbon 417.802 SF W.57 1, LaWn and Gardens, (Clear arid Gfub) '2103killi SF $x.08 2, Matured Paim Trues (Remove) 54 EA $35000 $18,000 3 Concrete (Mesh Reinforced) 39,275 SF $0.67 $26,489 4 Asphalt (Base to Remain) 175,438 SF 56.29 $51,657 Precast Light Standards (Bases to Remain, 5, Sahage, Owner to Load and Haul) 5 EA $210.83 $1,054 AJuminum Light Slandards (Bases to Remaln C, Salvage, ONnef W Load and Haul) 8 EA $347,67 $2,763 7. Utility "aids (Decornnni"w, Fill, Abandon) 2 EA $1,22500 $2,450 8 Water Fountain (Valve, Cap, Aba ndon Line) I LSj $1,225.00 51,225 9 Waste Receptacles and Benches 6 EA $65.00 $390 Picnic Table Structure (Dismantle, Salvage, Owner to Load acid Hakj€) 2 EA $500,00 S1,000 Gazebo Structure (Dismantle, Salvage, Owner to 11. Load and Haul) I EA $1,200,00 $1,200 Ray Equipn-want (Dismantle, Salvage, Crwner to 12 Load and Haul) I LS $2,500.00 $2,500 13, Load, Haul and Dispose of Topsoil & Deans 465 LOAD $213 1 = $107,513 14, SlheM Repair Allawarice I . L6 S5,000,00 $5,000 b. Rough Grace Silo 417402 SF l' $0.40 1. Goa de to Rough SulhWades I 'Yk 417402 SF $13.40 $1!67 121 c:. Dwainage 1 French Drain 2,120 LF $,25 00 '0 $53,200 2, Swale wi French Drain 2,057 SF $3000 $61,710 d, krigation 225J60 SF $1.24 1: Lawn - Spray Irrigaficri 172 606 SF $11.95 $163 976 2. Garderis - Drlp Irrigation 52,554 SF $1.62 585,137 3 Tree Bubblers 472 EA $ 633�1 - 00 529,736 e. Ublities (From Rea ligned Sha. isin e t o East of Park) 417,802 SF SO.22 1, Domesficilifater Supply and Meter 400 LF $8500 $34,000 I San tary Sewer 400 LF $65,00 $20X0 3, Naturai Gas, Mom 400 LF $78,00 $31,2930 1 General Fill 5,796 LCY $1&00 '$104,328 g. Event Inftastructure Allowance for 150, 200 and 400A Cam-Lock. 111t?va7 A VVP Recap; Feeders and Branch 1: CirouNs 417402 SF $0.11 $45,000 2, scape a. Reinforced Sod 120.782 SF $4.68 $505,25? a. Sod 120,782 SF $2.98 $359.929 b. Gardens (includes 24' Planting SiAl and Fitter Fabric) 52,554 SF $6.75 1, Promnade Gaidan 5 gal, 10,813 SF S11.89 $74,502 2, %,ales 5 gal. 17,363 SF $10,16 $176 408 164 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM WM7"W7 = HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 165 AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 3 Landiform Garden 5 gal. 24,378 SF W.518 r.09' 1' 63 c. Sod Oncludes 12® Planting Sdl) 5-1�,2=4 SF �EASI,06&64 S2 98 544aC a Trees (includes Planting Mix) 2 36 1,068 64 1, Lagge Palm Tree W Ht, 103 EA 1 $1,800,00 $1852400 2. medum Pon Tree 24' lit, 67 EA 1 $,1,300,00 S$7,100 3 Smmall Palm Tree 10' Ht. 7 FA $6,5000 54,550 4 Shade Tree 4!& 5® cal. 54 EA S1,800.00 $97,240 5, Ggove Tree 4" cal. 5 EA $1,550.00 57,750 6, 04 y1po 236 EA $40,00 $9,440 3, Hard- - ape 8. Stabilized Decomposed Gganite 28,224 SF 1 Excamalion 597 BOY 132 S4,497 2 4" coed Granite, 15% Shrinkage _ 400 LOY $14127 $142 7 S56,553 3, Weed Barder Fabric 3,136 SY 1�1.54 4 ' 1�4,826 4, C�11 Pea Gravel, 56/4 Shrinkage 549 LCY $133,22 5$133 �22 573,113 5, cwvacb" 3,136 'Sy sma $12,105 6 Edging 1,652 LF $6.81 $11 7 Haul Spoils 18% Swell 823 LCY $10.51 $8,647 b. Promenade Extension Hardh,00d IPE 5A x 6 Deck on 12" Centered :2x10 joists,,vt Concrete Periml or ftemrr Wing, Approx, 6" AF G 4,592 SF $31,05 $145 337 c. Concralra Pall s ('Ahlcular) 18,574 SF W53 1 Excamati i 88 BOY] $6.32 54,34-B 2 6" Lime Stabilized Subgrade, Compact 2,0&4 SY �S $1655 $34,156 3, 6" Aggregate Base, 25% Shrinkage 430 LCY $3117 �F$2,3 $13,402 4, E Forms 1,657 L 3 $4,328 5, Bar Reinforcing, #4 at I? C 8 TON 5,1.20 +3,00 $0,952 6 0" Concrete, UP% 6% mate 301 CY $120,00 $0339 7 Expansion Joints 929 LF 53.22 52,990 8 S"ing 1,000 LF $0.24 $240 9, Haul Spoils, 1870 Swell 812 LCY $10.51 $8,532 d, Me Paths - 11"706 SF $4,28 1 ExcavalioYl 398 BOY $C32 $2.513 2. Cvroaded Sotillfade 1':01 SY SIM 55,021 3 4" Aggregate Base, 25% Shrinkage 180 LCY $3117 $5,625 4 2" Sand Cushion - 72 7 Y --- i27.12 S1,964- 5, Edge Forms 1,016 LF $2.33 S2,367 6, Bar Relpforeing, #3 at 1&'OC 3 TON 51'204,00 $3,961 7, 5" Cwcvole, UPSI, 5% Male 190 CY $12000 $22,780 8 Expansion joims 254 LF 5122 $818 S Sniping 525 LF 50.24 $126 10 Haul Spoils7,178% Swell Haul 777Ze. 469 :: LCY $10.51 54,931 R7ais7ed-�t7ag7ew7fConc-r7ete7E:Idge7(H7ai7dw7ood7) HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 165 AGCM Destination Bayfront 100% Schematic: Design - Reduced Cost 141r; MW7 mil 166 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL Hardwood IPE 514 x 6 Deck cn 12" Centered 2x10 Joists w/ Concrete Perimeter B-earnlFoofing, I, rox, 35 " AF 1,8W SF $36,50 $05,700 4, 00ting 8. Path Lighting 57 EA S4142,58 �LY Pedestrian Light IZ Rote, Stainless Steel 1, Bega" of "Hess' Fxtr 57 EA $3,500.00 S1199,500 2 pdo Base 57 EA $350,00 $wsso 3, UG Wench Omit 11,140 LF $11,12 512,377 4. Elodrical Goa%. Panelbooid I EA $4,000,00 $4,000 5. Furnishings a. Benches, Trash 1, Waste Receptacles 4 EA $1,000.00 S4,000 6, Swilcirigs - Phase 2 a, Great Lawn N Cart. opy l Shade Structure 3-&,A SF $135,00 $4755500 t), Arrival Office and Catering Kilchen 1�815 1 '515 SF $17056 $320,450 o. Storage 150 SF $232.27 $34,e,41 e. Upgrade Canopy I Shade Structure Lighting to LE67— 3,804 SF S6.50 $24,726 g. Lightning Protection Building Stnictures and Canopy 3,8N SF 52.50 $9,510 h. ElectflcM C&ar, Partelboard I EA $5,000,00 55,000 I WG French Circuit 250 LF $15,40 $3,750 7, Park 849nage E0 a. AdIcAmance per Hargreaves I LS 1$2�1, 0 0 0. 0 0 $io 000 S20,000 Subtotal 417,902 J' - S S F $'1'1. €5 62.78% $4,658,58S Contractor's General Conditions wi B&I 417, 02 $1.39 7,85% $582j324 Design Contingency at 201.4 + FEMA Coritingency at 211A 417,602 SF $1,,7 15,64% $1,153,001 Esoawoorr to 2014 41740=2#SF St53 AG 8,62% 1 $639.391 Contractor's Overhead and Prolt 417,902 SF $O.93 521% 166 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM I T7 M11 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 167 AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 1° Sdewcfk and Utilities a. Demlidbon 163:�,922 S �F$WO. 5 9 1 • Lawn and Garden s (Clear and grub) 52,200 SF K08 $4,1 76 2, MaNred Paint Tgoas (Remove) 38 EA $35000 $13,300 3 Concrete (Mesh Reinforced) 11,000 SF $0.67 $7,419 4 Asphalt (Base to Rerna in) 70,500 SF S0.29 $20,758 5 Park meet 14,940 SF x.29 E4,304 Adurninurn Light Standards (Bases to Remain, 6, Salvage, OWnW I,o Load and Haul) 7 EA] $347 V $2,435 T Load, Haul and Dispose of Tripscd & Deleft 107 L CA 0 $231,22 1538,574 8. Sineel Repair Aloiwar,,ini I LS I:ji$WO. t) f, $5,000,00 '0 ------ F-s5,-6&T- �O b. Rough Grade Site 163,922 SF 4 1 Cade to Rough Sub gvtides �/- 10% 163,922 SF $0.40 $65,569 0. Drainage Freocn Drain 594 LF $25,00 $14,850 2, 9aale wi French Drain 1,248 SF $30,00 $37,440 3 Area Drams and Piping 8 EA $500,00 $4,000 4. Slat Dwain --- 166 LF $50.00 $8,300 d. Irrigation 7533,015 2, 222 4 SF E1.45 17:777- I , Lawn - Spray Inigation SF W 95 $31,364 2, (�ardons - Drip irrigatit 19'2"J9 $F $i.02 $31.119 -3, Tree Dubblers------ 304 EA $45,18 $13,735 a. Utilities (From Realigned Shoetiln o to East of Park) 103$22 SF $0.56 1 Domesfic Watef, Supply and Meter 400 LF $8500 $34,000 2. Sdnirary Sewer 400 LF $65.00 $26,000 3, Natural Gas, Meter 400 LF $78.00 f. Earthwork I • Urioral RK 3,403 LCY $18,00 $61 9, Event InWastruclure 119V,i20A Weatherproof Receptacles on 1 Pedestals 4 $135.00 S540 I N3 Panel, Feeder and Breakers I -EA LS $65000 $650 3, UndwWowid &anch Circulls 300 LF $1500 $4,500 2, S*Nscapa - --1 1- --- a. Reinforced Sod 16 A4 5 SF �$4. 6 8 b. Sod (includes 12' Planting Sal) 10,328 SF S2.98 $30,7Y 7 c. Gardens 19,209 SF !36.49 1, Promenade Garden 5 gal. 5,045 SF S6.89 $34,760 2, wales 5 gal. 4,279 SF $10,16 $43,475 3, Landf(XM lo'arden,5 gat, 9'"5 SF $8.5li $84,513 c, Lawn Sports Area 6,642 SF $4,47 1 Excavation 308 BOY 53.22 S id 2 Compaded Subgrade 738 SY E2.87 $2,119 3, 3" Gravel Drainage Lwyer 62 LOY $36,37 E2,237 4, 12' R" Zone wt F tax, 25% Mfinkago 308 LCYJ $4835 $14,W8 5, H001 "Is, Iii% Swell 363 LCY 1 $1051 63,M4 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 167 AGCM I T7 M11 168 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AG CM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNITI UNITCOST PROJECT I TOTAL 6 Sodding 738 SY $0.54 $395 7, Concrete Flush Curb 420 LF 5, $12.50 X5,250 0 Trees 152 EA 51,005J92 1, 59 _ + E EA $1,800,00 $106,200 2. medum Palm Tree 20' Ht, 54 EA 51,300,00 $70,200 3 Accent Tree 4cal- 10 j EA S1,55101.1010 $15,500 4 Shade Tree 4!& 5' cal. 29 EA 0() 0_ S1,800.00 552,200 5, Guyng 152 EA 140.00 $6,080 3, Hardscape $0 a. Stawlized Decornpowd GU'anlle 30,665 SF $6.04 1. Excavahon 702 6 56.32 $x4:819 2 4" Dec used Granite, 15% Shrinkage 438 LCY $142.27 $62,282 3 Weed Barner Fabric 3,4229 SY 51.54 55,278 4, 6" Pea Gravel, 5% Shrinkage 600 LCY $13322 $79,955 5, corripaction 3.429 SY S1$6 WZ8 6, Edging 1,655 L F $11,271 7. Haul SpoOs, I$% %,ell 900 LCY $10,61 $9,4%, b. Concrete Paths 31,707 SF 54.48 1 Excwmfion 1,077 RY jiK 2, Compacted Subgrade 3,5223 SY 53.86 3, 41 AQgregate Base, 25% Shrinkage 489 LCY $31,17 515'M 4, 2" Sand Cushion 196 CY $27,12 $6,319 5. Eoge Forms 4,876 LF VM 511,361 S. Bar Reinforcing, #3 at 1 O 9 TON $1,200.00 $10,7330 7 5" Con aefe, 3k PSI, 5% We ste 514 6Y 5120.00 $61,702 8, Expansion Joints, 1,219 LF $3.22 fk3,925 9, Haul Spoils, 18% Dwell 1 ,271 LCY 510.51 $13,355 c. Bike Paths 3,460 SF $5.50 1. Excavvfion 11$ BOY] $C32 $743 2 Compacted Subgrade 384 SY $186 S1_484 3 4" Aggregate Base, 25% Shrinkage 53 LCY $3117 $1663 4, 2" Sand Cushion 21 $27.12 '5580 5, Eoge Forms I'M -CY LF $2,33 $3,728 C, Bat Reinforcing, 03 at W CC I TON $1.:200:00 $1,171 7 5" Cwcrelei UPSI, 5% Waste so CY 5120.00 $0,M, 8 Expansion Joints, 400 LF...1 X3.22 $1,258 SIniping 800 LF SEA $102 --9 - 10, Haul Spoils, 18% Swell 139 LCY $10.51 51,457 0, Scum Nuking Plan - Phase 1 16327 SF , $15'" 1: Excavafian 413 BOY S&32 $2,612 2. 0" Unte Stabilized bgrade, Compact 1,659 SY $16,66 $30.759 3 Edge Forms 732 LF $21.33 51,706 4. Bar Reinforcing, #4 at 12° CC 11 TON 51,200 Of, $13,449 5: 6" Concrete, 3kPSI, 5% Waste 325 CC�Yj 2000 $39,030 6, ExpanSIOR joins 891 LF $3.22 1 $2.869 7 , 2',Sa rid Bed 103 ICY 1 $27,12 $2,806 168 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AG CM #11r,VrW#T,m I W7 mil HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 169 AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST PROJECT TOTAL 3. 2" Thick Pavers 16,727 SF $10.00 S167,270 0, Haul Spoils, 18% Swell 488 LCY $1051 55,125 e, Dec* Hardwood WE W4 x 6 Dock on 1211 Centered WO Jolstswi Concrete Perimaler Soam*Wing, 1 Approx. 6" AFG 4,500 --7457 SF $3165 511 42.425 f. Fountain Raze SF $W.89 1, Excavation 72 BCY 56.32 $455 2, Conscaered Sutillfede 162 SY $lile $625 3, 4",%gregale Base 25 % Shrinkage 22 LCY $31,17 $700 4. 211 Sand Cushion 9 CY $27,12 $244 5 Bar Reinforcing, #3 at 16"' OC 0 TON $1,200.00 54 3 6 4" Conciete, 3kPSI, 5% Waste 19 6—y -0" J7 52,264 7, 2" Thick Granite Ravers, on Pedestals 1,457 SF 7$1220.00 $2700 $2700 $ $39,339 Haul SP00S5 18% %wolk 85 LCY $1051 U92 Raised Stage 11 -1--- 1. Concrete Paving 500 SF $4.0 $2,240 h. Paved Sports 1,574 SF�$LW�231221�� 1 Excwation 46 BCY W.32 $293 2, 4" Decomposed Granite, 15% Shrinkage 27 LCY $142.27 $3,786 3, Weed Berner Fabric 208 SY 111.54 5321 4, 0" Pee Gravae. 5114 Shrinkage 36 LCY $133,22 $060 5. comachom 208 ISY S186 $805 Edging 180 LF $6.81 S`,226 7 Haul Spoils, 18% Swell 55 LOY $1051 W5 4- Special Features a. Fountain MEP, Mist Screen, Rain Curtain (AJ1cwan&e —try I I LS $500,0W 00 Woiwlo Adult i Senior Exercise Equipmefit, 6 Pieces by D. Kompmm. or Landscape 9mchues HeaAboat 0 EA $5,000,00 $30.000 5- Lighting a. Path Lighting 36 FA 54,183.51 13* Pedestrian Light 12, Pcft, Stainless Steel 1, 118"all w "Hess" Fxtr 36 EA $3.500V0 1 000 2 P Base 36 EA $35000 3 UG Elfanch Circuit 720 LF $11.12 S8,0W 4 Electrical Gear, Panelboard I EA 54,000.00 54,000 b. Standard Parking Lot Lights • Phase 1 10 FA 797627 1, 40' Pales. Fiftre 10 EA W670,00 565,700 2, Pdo Base 10 EA $500,00 55,000 3 Gonad Recapacle. Weatherproof 10 EA $200,00 $2,00) 4 UG Branch Circuit 290 LF $1063 53,083 5 Electrical Gear, Panelbowd I EA 53,000.00 S3,000 6. Furnishings a. Benches, Trash 1, 12'x V Picnic Tables - T�Te 82 15 EA 53-000,00 $45,000 2. (iarden Bom h - Type B3 4 EA $2.000,00 W000 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 169 AGCM Destination Bayfront 100% Schematic: Design - Reduced Cost I T M11 170 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 3 Dog Run Fence, Powdercoated. SS Steel 1,0w LF $125.110 $125,000 4 Waste Rereptacles 474 FA J() 6�lr j $1,00 qj::::::::::� �1�4,000 5, DrInXing F ounw in I EA` S2,000io 62.'600� 7, Park &Uriage I a, Allowance per Hargrea,,*S 1 LS $20,00 .001 $20,000 suttotal 163922 -SF $17�01 Y'01T-7,:::1 62.78% $2,788,1719, Contractor's General Condifions wi B&I —M —16 9 SF $2.13 7Y 7i 5% 5% 522 $348,522 F Dev,gri Cowingency at 20% + FEMA Contingency at 2'1,4 163 � 92�2 $F $4.21 1$ 54% $690A74 Escalaban 10 2014 163i922 SF $133 862% $382A Corrifactor's Overhead arid Profil 103,922 SF $1.41 5,21% $231 i520 Ifow 11x3,922 SF $27.09 IV) 000% 170 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM a W* M, no HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 17, AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNITJ UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 1. Sdewcfk and Utilities a. Ufilftie & (From Realigned Shoredge to East of Park) 17,406 SF $15695 4i1 Electrical Secondary, N3 Switchgear, (deter Housing (Primety, Maier and Xfmf By Utility Co. 375 LF $150,00 $56.250 2, Swildogs - Phase I a. Beach Restaurant and Me=.anine Seating 1,725 SF $16667 $287,513 b. Mezzanine Ba6cony tor Building Above 525 F $166.67 $87,502 c. 3 Retail i Vendrig Shops, Reclaimed Shipping Container' 690 SF $18750 $129,375 di, Resvoorns a od Storage - 'Village. 12 Raxltj re Cnt 600 SF $232,27 $1W362 e,, Canruiy IShadeStructure 13, 66 SF $125,00 $1333250 f. Upgrade Canopy Shade Structure Lighting to LED 13,866 SF $6.50 $90J29 g. Upgrade Retail )Vending Shops Lighting to LED 2,940 SF $4.65 S13'e71 h. Electrical Gear, Panelboard I EA $5,000.00 $5,0 CO k UkG Branch ciecull 250 LF 1 $15,00 $3.750 j. Lighining Prot ectim Building Slrudiovs and Canopy 13. M SF $2,50 $34,665 k, Communications Un Conduit, 2- 2' PIVC Coridu IN 375 LF W 00 $18,750 3, Buildings - Phase 2 a. 3 retail f Vending Shops, Reciaimed Shipping Container 690 SF $187.50 $129,375 - b. Upgrade Resell � Vertdiog Stops Lightmg to LED 690 SF $4.65 $3,200 sutmotal 17,406 SF $156,95 62 7811A Contractor's General Condifirms wi Bit 17,406 SF $1962 -1,85% �$2,731,600 41 47 S341 i475 Design Contingency at 20% FEW. Contingency at 2% 17,406 SF $3984 15.541%X, '61 120 Escalation to 2014 17,406 SF $21.54 8.62% $674, 4rJ Contractor's Overhead and Profit 17,406 SF $1303 5.21 1226,838 0 17,406 SF 246--98 $ - 100 --DIM $A: tj 11 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 17, AGCM wm= 172 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNITJ UNITCOST PROJECT I TOTAL 1. 8dework and Utilities a. Dernii1bon 1' 146,528 SF SF W.89 1, Lama nd Gardens (Clear arw rubs '�4628 .4 1 .4 F $F SN98 K08 $10.994 2, MaWred Pearn Trees (Remove) 110 EA $35000 S38,54)0 3 Concrete (Mesh Reinforced) 23,35$ SF $0.67 $15,754 Precast Light Standards (Bases to Remain, 4 Salvage, 0urei to Lewd and Haul) 5 EA $210.83 $1,054 5, Utility VauKs (Decornmisgon, Fill, Abandon) 2 EA $1,225.00 S2,450 6, Water Fouplair, (Valve, Cap, radon Line) I LS $1,225,00 51,225 7, We-%e Receptacles and 8mches 10 EA $6500 5650 Aoni Table ftucture (Dismantle, Salvage, Owrier v` "' "W"or 8 to Load and Haul) 2-1 EA $500.00 $1,000 Gazebo Structure (EN.smanfie, Salvage, Owner to 9, Load and Haul) I EA $1,200.00 $1,200 Play Equipff*rq (Dismantle, Salvage, 0whor to 10, Load and Haul) I LS S3,000,00 53,000 11. Aircrafl Baw i Mew nt (Foundation to Remain) I LS I-52,500,00 $2,500 Eledrica I Meter and &,vitchboard Assrnbly (De- 12 Energize Supply) I LS 51,225.00 $1,225, 13, Load, Haul and Dispose of Topsoil & Debris 197 LOAD $231.22 $45,625 14, Su ecl Repair Qlawarrae I LS $5,000,00 $5,000 t). Rough Grade Si(e 146528 SF SO A0 1 Ckade to Rough Sub tides +I- Ift. 146i528 SF SOA0 c:. Damage French Drain 295 LF 2500 $ 7,375 -1 2, Swale %,i French Drain 2,33 SF $3000 S70,0BO 3, Slot Dtain 278 LF $5(1.00 $13,930 d irrigation 70,889 SF 51,49 1. Ls,,,%rn - Spray IM90on 3A,728 SF SO,95 S $32, '992 _ 2 Gardens � Drip Irrigation 36,161 SF F $1.62 $1 60 �$45� $, $58,581 3 Tree Bubblers 312 7EA 18 $14,096 e. Ufilftia & (From Realigned Shoreline to East of Park) 146,528 SF $0 W.39 39 1, Dirmoslic Waler Sup and Meter 250 LF $8300 $21,250 2, San lafy Gower 250 LF $65,00-- $16,250 I Natural Gas, Wei 250 LF $7800 519,500 f. Earth-,mxk 1 General Fib 59913 LCY $1800 15107,974 2. Softscape a. Reinforced Sod 25,171 SF $4.68 5117,800 t). Sod lincludes 12° Planling Sod) 9,557 SF $2li.480 c. Gardens 29,276 SF W38 1 Pron-�--nade Garden 5 gal. 2,x73 _S SF W.8i9 $19,795 2 Swaues5 gal. 5,476 SF WA6 $55,636 3, Children Garden 3 & 5 gal. 20,927 SF $a.12 $169,027 c. Trots 150 EA 51,63814 1, Lasge Nairn Tree 30 Ht 51 EA $1.800,00 $91.800 172 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 173 AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 2. Medum Palm Tree 20'M. 33 EA $1,300.00 $42,W0 3, Accent Tree 4'cal- 35 FA 5 5 () �()j $1,550.001 $54,250 4: Shade Tree. 4�,k,,S* Cal, 37 SIAKOO S 'j, 80000 $66.600 5, Tree Gulmg 156 EA $40,00 $6,240 3, Hardscape a. Stabilized Decomposed Co.anite 34,548 SF T- $5.70 1 Excavabon 853 BCY $6.32 $5,394 2, 4" Decomposed Granite, 15% Shrinkage 490 LCY $142.27 $69,714 3, Weed Butter Fabric 3,439 SY $1.54 wqw 4: 0" Pee Gravel. 6% shrinkage 672 LCY $133,22 $69.495 5. comachon 3,839 SY SI Be $14,817 6 Edging 1_ 171 '1 ---1 LF S6.81 S6 $1,165 7. Haul Spoils, 1870 Swell 1,007 LY �,S $1"- 51 $10,584 b. Interpretive Concrete Paths 24,645 �Fw. $6.31 1, ExcavaUon $37 BOY $6,32 S5,2W 2, Corr ailed Ubgrade 2,738 SY VIM $10,570 3 4" Aqgrogale ease 254 ilhek kage 380 LCY $31.17 511,643 4 2" Sand Cushion 152 CY $27.12 $4,134- 5. Edge Forms 8,384 LF $2.33 $14,875 6, Bar Reinforcing, 4#3 at 16r OC 7 TON $1,200.00 $8,340 7: 5" Conctelei 3kPSI, 5% Wdaiile 400 CY $12000 $47:959 8, Expansion joints 1,1596, LF S122 $5,139 S. Special Markings Ailowance 24A45 SF 51,50 $36,968 10 Haul Spoils, 18% Swell 988 LOY - $10.51 $10,381 c:. Bike Paths 8,383 i- F $4.64 1: Excwmfion 285 BCY W.32 $1,799 1 Cov%padsd &Abllfade 931 SY SIM 63,595 3, 4" Aggregate Sasoj 25% Shriqkage 129 LCY $31,17 $4,028 4. 2" Sand Cushiori --62 SY $27,12 $1,406 5 Edge Forms 1,774 LF $2.33 54,133 6 Bar Reintbrcing, 4t3 at I e'OC 2 700 51,200.00 $2,837 5" Concrete, 3kPS1, 5% Waste 136 -Cy $120.00 $18,313 Expansion Jonas 444 LF $122 $1,426 Striping 900 LF 59.24 $216 10. Haul Spolls, 18% Swell 336 LCY $10,51 $3,531 d. Play Surface 12,500 SF $1314 1 Exca vabon 407 3CY $6.32 $2.572 2, Compacted Subgrade 1,331 SY SIM 55,138 3, 0" gregale Base, 25% Shhr�kage 277 LCY $31,17 66-634 4 , 3" AsOall 221 TON $6317 $13,961 5 Urethane Suffacing SF $10,00 $0 6 Haul Spoils, 18% Swell 700 LCY $1051 $7,357 e. Fountain Plaza � Floured Concrete SF $6.00 532,658 ----5,443 4- Concrete Cowele Sendies:, 1611 High x 24" Deep Seatwalls W1 f0fE =S200-000 0'. skate 00twants 1,000 LF $V10 00 '000 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 173 AGCM wm= 174 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM QUANTITY JUNIT� UNIT COST PROJECT I TOTAL b. Concrete Slides, Custom Precast Polished C 336 SF $150.00 $50,400 5- Masonry 0imbing 'Nalij LknesloneDad Block wi 01frbing 8. Hhindhodds,'175'XW 1<050 SF $10000 $105A00 6, SMial Features Fyintain MEP, Interacfive Wayground (AJIowanoe per a. Design Team) I LS $1,000,000 $1,000,000 4 Small Pieces of Ray Equipment (Allawance per b. Design Team) 4 EA $7,000,00 Cu sim Rubber Waves Climiling Bars (Allowance pw c. Design Toam) I LS $2VOWC 00 $20,000 d,. Tree Platforms (AAawance per Design Team) I LS M,000.00 e. Cu storn Net (Allowance per Design Team) I L& $"2'40, 0W.00 S136,000 f. Custom Monkey Bars (Allowance per Design Team) I LS $100., 00 $136,000 9. Climbing Blocks (Allowance per Design Team) I LS S30:00D.00 530SW15 h Slide (Allowarice per Doslqn Team) I LS $10,000.00 T doting a. Path Lighting 45 EA 54,161.29 13' Pedestrian Light 12' Pate, Stainless. Steel 1, "Behall rx "Hose Fxtr 4b EA 53,600,00 $157,500 Pao Base 45 EA $350,00 $15,750 3. UG Branch Circuit goo LF $11.12 $10,008 4 Electrical Gew, Panelboard I EA $4,000.00 54,000 b. Uplights at Spec imens and Trees al EA $973.06 1, 15' Fixture al EA $500.00 $15,500 1 UG Branch Circuit 713 1. F $1061 5 ,565 3, Electrical Clew, Paoelbowd I EA $4,000,00 $4,000 ii, Furnishings a. Benches, Trash 1 12'x 5° Remo Tables -Type 62 13 EA E3,000 00 $39,000 21 Garden Bench - Type B3 I E $2,000.00 $22,000 3, Waste Receptacles EA S1,00040 $4.000 4, Drinking F irunW In 1 EA $2,040,00 $2,000 9, suddrigs - Phase I a. Play Area North Village Canopy! Shade Structure 4,721 8F $125.00 S590,125 b. Play Area South Mllage- Canopy f Shade Structure 2,254 SF $125,00 r.81,750 c. Upgrade Canopyl Shade Structure Lighting to LED 6,975 SF $9.50 $45,31-8 i d. Retail I ",rending al Soil h Village 130 SF $20834 $27,084 a, Changing Sholor at North Village 635 SF $121,53 $77,172 f Rrst Aid I 0M00 at North Village so SF $' 2108,34 WiW g. Retail I Vending at North 'Allege 60 SF $20834 $12,500 h. Restoorn and Storage at North Village 600 8F $232.27 5139,362 I Upgrade Retail Vanding Shops Lighting to LED 1,485 SF $4.65 $0,905 1 1 Lightning Prolmhan Building Sliuctonos and Canopy 8,460 SF $2,50 $21.150 k, Communications UIG Conduit, 2- 2' PIX Con oZits 375 LF $5000 $18,750 10, Polk Sigpaqe 174 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM lestination Bayfront 100% Schematic: Design - Reduced Cost HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 175 AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL a. Adlawance per Hargreaws I L& $20,000.nn x20,4 9 sutAotal 146528 F i.SS £2,7£s �$4WI A57: Cordfactor's Gweral Condihoeis W B&I 140,528 SF $417 7,85% $610,957 De%p Cowin gooey at 20,1/o + FENIACorilingweyat21% 146528 SF J�,UO 15,64% $1. 2",695 a w to 2014 146,528 --746,528 SF S4.58 8.62% 7G 9'2 LEs,-alafion Contractor's Overhead and Profit -F 52.777, 5.21%, $405,853 Total $5313 10000% $7,M4,992 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 175 AGCM to I a TON", - =17 M 176 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AG CM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNITJ UNITCOST PROJECT TOTAL 1. Sdewcfk and Utilities Assumes Damolifion of Surficial Elements and Abandonment of UG Utilities, Does Not Provide for Amy 8. sell"vallilywil 1235059 SF $2,25 b, Rough Grade Silo 12309 SF $0.40 1 Grande to Rough Sulbgadeswl- 101K, 123,059 SF SO.40 $49,224 c:. Drainage 1, Trench Drain Concealed 2,963 LF $20.00 $59,264 a, irrigation 6,279 SF $130 1, Garderis - Drip Irrigsatit in 6,279 SF 61 , (il'- 1 1 510,172 2. Tree 94ibblers 234 EA $45,1"8 $10,572 or e. Utilities (From Realigned Shoreline to East of Park) 123,059 9 SF S $097 1 Domestic Watef. Supply, Ouick Couplers 60 EA S11,250.00 250110 $75,000 2, SanitarySewer 100 LF $65,00 5 $6,500 3, Nritwai Ges, Now 100 LF '0 $78.00 S7,800 4, Eledincal 100 LF $300,00 $30,000 f EPS �r �077 1 Geefoam Blocks 51 ,051 7 5 C CIF $3.07 $3 'Ill 56,953 2. Structural Work a. Concrete Terraces 8,777 SF $R5_00 '$7'46,045 b� concrete Slairs at Ends of Terraces 1,330 $F $6500 $86.450 c. W Thick Concrete Wells Blineallh Parr ip Over Saawadl 280 LF $35,00 S9,8( D a. Shem Filing 520 VC-F]-50 00 $26,000 b. 36" x 18" Con crate Beams at Ramp Terraces 840 LF 00 li 001 $11 26,000 c:. 12" Diameter Timber Piles at PForrienade 600 EA $500.00 c. 12" Diameter Timber Piles at Ramp 40 EA $500.00 S20,WO 3, Hardscape a. Boafdwallh 02,300 SF $3612 $2,2W-276 b. Ramp Deck 5,040 SF $16,50 $83,160 o. Concrete Paths (Vehicular) 29,236 SF $6.85 1 Excavation I.M BCY S6.32 S6,843 2, 6" Lime Stabilized Subgrade, Compact 3,248 SY $1655 $53,762 3, 0, Aggregate Use, 25% Shonkage 677 LCY $31,17 $21.095 4, E Forms 4,TU LF $2,33 $11,030 5. Bar Reiriforoing, #4 at I Ir 0C 13 TON $11 200VO $15.665 6 6" Conciete, 3kPSI, 5';r Waste 568 CY $120.00 $68,217 7 Expansion Joints 2,955 LF $3.22 $9,527 8, Striping 2,5W LF 16.24 M4 that 9, u� Spoils, 18% Swell 1�278 LCY $10,51 $13,429 4, Sof scape a. Gardens 6,279 SF 58.58 1 Land.form Garden 5 gal. 6,279 SF 108.58 $53.874 b. Trees 1, Large Palm Tree 39 Ht. 117 EA $1,800.00 $214,64x4 5, Lighting a. Poe Lights 45 EA $7,008,19 176 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AG CM HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 177 AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 1 11'20'Floles, Fixture 45 EA 1 $6,000.00 r.70,000 2, Rde Base 45 EA$400 00 $$18;000 3, 0xied Recepirrele. W oolnerproof 4, 46 D EA $200,00 $9.000 4, UG Branch Circuit 1,26D LF $10,01 $13,369 5. Eledilcal Gear 'P Panelboar 1 EA $5,000,00 WOO b. Mast Lights ao FA $11,874.40 1 "L2'40' Pales, Fixture 30 EA $10,500.00 $315,000 2, Pete Base 30 EA $650.00 S19,500 3, (wad Receoacte. Woolnerproof 30 EA $200,00 $6.000 4, UG Branch Ckrcuft. 1,2W LF $10,61 SI2,732 5. Eledirical Goar I P&rWboatd 1 EA $3,000,00 6. Furnishings, a. Benches, Trash 1, 16' He rdwood Benches Handmade- Type BI 512 LF $622500 $320,000 2, MsW Receptacles 4 EA $1.00040 $4,.007 3, Drinking Fountain 3 EA S2,000,00 $0,000 7, Metal Fabdoalions a. Guarckad at Ramp 412 LF $500.00 S206,000 8- &dding; - Phase I a. Sherrill Park Canopy I Shade Structure 4,200 SF $125,00 S525,000 b, Play Area Smth Wage Canopy Y Shade Silructum 2,755 SF $12500 $344,375 o, Play Area North Village Canopy! Shade S4 rodute 2,705 SF $125,00 _$125.00 $34076 _$525ADO d ZmWir Canopy 9 ShadeStrudure 4,X0 sT-T a. Resiroorns and Storage • Sherrill, 12 Fixture Cnt 600 SF J $232.27 $139,362 f. Upgrade Canopy 1 Shade Structure Lighting to L E 13,910 I SF $6.5�0 $90,415 g. Lightning Protection at C anop , y I Shade SlYucture 13,910 :7,F — 8 2.50 Z2 50 $34,775 9, Miliangs - Phase 2 7 a. Retail 1 Vending at Sherrill Park Vila go 260 SF $20834 $54,155 b. Upgrade Relall 7 Vending She" Lightmll to LED 260 SF $4.65 $1,209 11 Park Signalgle a. Allowance per Hargreaves I LS 210,000.00 $20,000 Subtotal 123.059 SF $65,07 62 78% $8,081,016 Coptractor's General Condifims wi B&I 123,065) . .. ......... SF $8.21 7,86% $1,010,127 De%gn Conlingetroy at 2011% + FEMA Cowingoricy at 2110 123,559 SF $16,26 1554% $2.00002 Escalation to 2014 123,059 SF 919.01 8.62% $1,109,119 Contractor's Overhead and Profit 123,059 SF $5.45 5.217n 5671,017 TO I 123,05�1�IF]_ , �104 lg 10000% $12,871,33-2 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 177 AGCM JA Fri Mi. -- ,t . . ....... ..... utital I LS PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNITJ UNITCOST PROJECT I TOTAL 1. Sdewcfk and Utilities $130.2'7'1 De&gnContingencyat20% * FEPAA Contingency at2% I LS Stofrnwater Filters Upstream at 42 Locations iAJlowance 1E.54% $257,K7 Escalation to 2014 1 a, per Design Team) I LS $420,000,00 $420,000 b. Haul Sand, Dredge ftom Madne Ns4i, Relocate 9,680 CY $36,00 $348j480 2, 84tuctural Work I L& 1 $1 659,S56 I 1W.00% Breakwater, Remc,,�e Existing, Install Box Culverts, New a. Material Concrete Walk, From Barge 50 LF S5,000.00 1 Li sting a. Lightrrig Allowance 3 EA $7. $7 1, %1'20'Poles, Fixture 3 EA $6,000VO $18.000 2 Ede Base 3 EA $40000 $1,200 3 Quad Receptacle, Weatherproof 3 EA $200.00 'woo 4 UG Branch Circuit F L� $10.01 $, Electrica I Gear I Panelboard —�a4L I I EA 53,000.00 —,SB91 $3,000 . . ....... ..... utital I LS $1 042,171 Contractor's General Conditions wiB&I I LS 1�130,127141 �5cV, 7.85% $130.2'7'1 De&gnContingencyat20% * FEPAA Contingency at2% I LS $2a7,937 -18 1E.54% $257,K7 Escalation to 2014 1 LS 5143,038.00 8.62% S143,038 contractor's Overhead and Prolt 1 LS W537.90 5,121% S80,538 !Total I L& 1 $1 659,S56 I 1W.00% 51,659, 9W 178 1 CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM I =- HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 179 AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM I QUANTITY JUNIT� UNITCOST I PROJECT TOTAL 1. Sdewcfk and Utilities a. Demcdftion 15,840 SF $11 01 1, Beach Cali 1,2w SF $10,00 5120090 2, Cwcrete Deck 5,0W EA 56.50 S32;500 I Hancicap Ramp 1.":; SF SC50 $7.800 4 Elevated Concrete Walk-way 1,140 FA 56.50 57,410 5 Load, Haul and Dispose of Debris 474 LOAD $231.22 5109,701 6, Street Repairfidlowance I L& $6,000.00 $5,000 tx . U I filitles (From Realigned Swisine) 15,440 SF $11,31 1. Digreshc Wanas Supply and lihetor 400 LF $55,00 S22X0 N36witchgearj N101v 2 Housing (Primary, Meter and Xfhy By Utility Co. 400 LF $25000 100 Wo 1�1 00;W0 3 SanitarySewer 400 LF $6500 :$$7266,0W70077] 4, Naturat Gas, Meter 400 LF $78 00 531'200 2, 89nuctural Work 0, Bulwhead wall I" LF $500,00 1,39% $92,500 b, Pier Deck and Structure - Phase 1 6;7 -W SF $160,00 18,18% $1 c. Pies Dec k and Structure • Phase 2 7,W SF $18000 _0 :10.78% $1,382,400 I Lighting a. Poe Lights 3 FA $6,891.67 I 20' Poles, Flin ure 3 EA $4,000V0 512,000 2, Pdo Base 3 EA $40000 $1,200 I Quad Receoade, weamerproof 3 EA $200,00 V1�40 4 UG Branch Circuit 250 LF $1750 1 4,375 5 Electrical Gene /Panelboard I EA r., 5007 00 52,500 b. Mast Lights I EA $12,945.75 1 L2'40 boles. Fixtufo I EA $10500,00 510,500 2 e Base I EA $650,00 $650 �o 3 Quad R"a0acle, Wealmirprod I EA $20000 Q. 4. UG Ellfanch Circuit 75 LF $10.61 5796 5 Electrical Gear/ Panelboard I EA $800.00 4, Furnishings a. WHard-wood Benches Handmade 48 LF $625.00 $30,000 D. Gangway or Ramp to fOarina Basin 550 LF $625,00 S543 750 5- Buildings - Phase I a. Canopyl Shade Structure 4,623 SF $12500 8.69% $677,875 ti, Upgrade Canopyl Shade Struclure, Lighting to LED 4.523 SF 56.50 0,45% 530,050 0, 4 Retail � Vendrig Shops, Shipping Cootainers 520 SF $160,67 1,30% slio'668 b, Upgrade Relall i Vordipp Shop$ Lighting to LED 520 SF $4.05 0,04% $2,418 6- EjAdIngs • Phase 2 a. 2 Recreation Equipment Rental, Shipping Container 260 8F $125.00 0.49% $32,500 b. Upgrade Relak i 'Vending Shops Lighting 10 LED 260 SF $4,05 0,02% 51 „209 HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 179 AGCM Destination Bayfront 100% Schematic Design - Reduced Cost 1 I CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM PERCENT OF ITEM QUANTITY UNIT I UNIT COST I PROJECT TOTAL ---- SUblotal .......... . ............. . ...... . ............. — ------------------------------------------------------ 15,840 SF ---- - ------- $263-65 --------- ---------- 62.78% $4,176,202 o Cptraotor's General Conditions w/ B&I 15,� SF Design Contingency at 20% + FEMA Contingency at 2% 15,840 SF $65,25 15,54% $1,033 610 Escalation to 2014 15,840 SF $36.19 8-62-A $573,184 Contractor's Overhead and Profit 15,840 j SF $21,89 5-21% $346,776 ATOW 15,840 8F $419.94 J. 100-00-A $6,661,7i7 1 I CORPUS CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES AGCM HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 181 182 1 CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION BAYFRONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES The design team would like to thank the following groups and individuals who have contributed to the Destination Bayfront planning process thus far: DESTINATION BAYFRONT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Dan Biles Director of Engineering Services Toby Futrell Destination Bayfront JJ Hart Destination Bayfront Trey McCampbell Destination Bayfront Oscar Martinez Assistant City Managerfor Public Works and Utilities Michael Morris Director of Parks and Recreation Stacie Talbert Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation DESIGN TEAM SELECTION COMMITTEE Dan Biles Director Engineering Services Marco Castillo Coordinating Officer, The f ohn G and Marie Stella Kennedy Memorial Foundation Bonnie Conner Retired Vice President of San Antonio Parks Foundation Toby Futrell Retired City Manager of Austin, Texas Gabe Guerra Executive Vice President Kleberg Bank, President Westside Business Association Gloria Hicks CPA Ed Hicks Imports of South Texas and Community Volunteer Oscar Martinez Assistant City Managerfor Public Works and Utilities Stacie Talbert Assistant Director of Parks a� Recreation Bob Wallace Attorney and Chairman, Coastal Bend Bays a� Estuaries Program Trey McCampbell, JJ Hart, David Loeb, Chad Magill, Crystal Mead, Will Pettus, Travis Ralls, Paulette Kluge, Philip Ramirez, Mark Minutaglio, Derwood Anderson, George B. Clower, Art Granado, Joe Hilliard, Ron Benavides, Toby Futrell, Bonnie Conner, Jaime Nodarse, Stephen Rybak, John Segrest + � + 10 llj 0 I Art Center of Corpus Christi, Bayfest, Beach to Bay, Buc Days, Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries Program, Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce, Corpus Christi Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Corpus Christi First / First Friday Artwalk, Corpus Christi Yacht Club, Corpus Christi Marina, Episcopal Church of the Good Shepherd and St. James Episcopal School, Festival of the Arts, First United Methodist Church, Harbor Lights Festival, Jazz Festival, Metropolitan Planning Organization, Regional Transportation Authority, Type A Board, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Veterans Committee SPECIAL THANKS TO: Mayor Joe Adame Mayor Nelda Martinez City Council Destination Bayfront Task Force HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I CORPUS CHRISTI DESTINATION B YFE ?ONT MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 183 AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 DATE: February 7, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Daniel Biles, P.E., Director of Engineering Services an cctexas.com; 826 -3729 STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Daniel Biles, P.E. 2. Mark Van Vleck, P.E. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): None BACKGROUND: UPDATE TO CITY COUNCIL Design Standards - Streets Title /Position Director Director Department Engineering Services Development Services This presentation will review the recommended street design standards, criteria, and requirements for a 30- year level of service. This will provide background and discussion for a future proposed Ordinance to amend the Unified Development Code (UDC) and existing street design standards. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Powerpoint Presentation . O -I� � O 4� N � V U w F L'o I w a--+ ct cn .0 4--j U 4� 4� 4� V) .ct 4--+ r� W U • lul ffm U � o C`7 cn ct �Q U ct ct wo a N .r-4 DWI . . cn 4--j O O U 4� 4--+ 4� 4� V) ct 4--j • 7*4 J Pi LJ Ur-, U � � U y ct cn C U ca =_ CL E p U N U Co cn C� �Q O cv o 1' # # n 00 4-J v t .ct 0 r� �- 4 O V L a-J O O� C) P1 C 4-4 'l::� O �h --I11 .,� C) C) Q Q •bio O C) C) O 4-j Mc O O O O r- 1 i O O ct =. cn Ct o � ct U v� i bA 4-1 ct r-� w 0 O ct 4-1 ct ct 4.1 �1 Q� n W 4-1 � bio ct o �; 0 OA N r-I C� O 0 "D " C � M •� O C 00 �O AW O O 00 0 � O 00 I O 6 O O N W � O O tj N N � O Vi N M 0O0 N .� .v � � N U' ••" va O � O N •� r-L O O O O ON cz cz cz H 0 a H as cq am O co U O U 0 0 U r—I O G U U •O � O O LO v� U .0 O 3 � O U U �w w � co r L'o I w ►� U ate-+ O � ct t,%n V 1-" cn � o ct U P-1 Q W. N I—! w � ct 1--1 U � ct cn . rl U Q cp U rl co bio ct Ir —4 U 1� IF32 Design of Pavement QI w ��Ort A- O e 0 A t•i 4- C- N a� cz M cz 4^^ cz N cz rl cz I I O y �h�O U O H CL rA C� U n, LUy V C) •? y� (� s m ��R Ua Q -N M N 4 rH 4-j bjO $ N O � 0 r - U 1!s "wanln W lue!I!s°d ~~ S--i I!o5 Ps9P N °M109113 M a N a] I '4-j v 1 � •� n n C E + L o b , N � JaJ (cuolll!w) °i 'tuolJoo!IddV '°IMV pool 916olg Ju °Ian! 43 dlV'91 10101 POWW1123 14-4 10 a u ro 30 � o N s. 00 t4-4 W a �o,S ate+ r--I R ( %)!i 'All►!Goll *W QI w ��Ort A- O e 0 A t•i 4- C- N a� cz M cz 4^^ cz N cz rl cz I I L'o I w 7*4 J 3 J • L J ct U i ct cn N U Q U E U Lr ct I co a� ct CA CA o + a� Q� + N pp ct O O O ct \ + ct bA O N •� ct cn II �,• • n F L'o I w rt--1 C� r� r� a-; V) cn C) r--.4 ct cc z Elm O cn O A` u 00 N O O 6, u O O co co t W O O O ct W ct 3 w O� O� O W , t W cn ct U O •U cn U U C� U U O U U ct co cn ct -�-j rc� o � aA a� a �rc� O N ct m ol r to DATE: February 7, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Valerie H. Gray, P.E. ValerieG@cctexas.com 361- 826 -1875 STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Oscar Martinez 2. 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name 1. 2. 3. AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of 02/19/13 UPDATE TO CITY COUNCIL Street Maintenance Fee Title /Position Department Assistant City Manager Title /Position Organization BACKGROUND: On January 15, 2013, at the City Council Work Session, City staff presented information regarding Street Maintenance Fee rate design policies. Additional work has been done since that time and staff will present the results at the February 19, 2013 City Council Work Session. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Power Point Presentation r Z J W T LU U Q Z LU H LU Q W w W H Z LU Q Q O J W 0 Q Q J W O i 00 0 O txQ 00 cr� N 06 Q) 00 M Z�, en 0 O CO (TJ IT O � � 7i Ln T-4 O Q vi cB O en If, O � 00 en m 0 rq co m Q) o 00 a� � 06 00 Ln m � OV a O Q) kD Q) 00 ci al (� N Q Lo cB � N � Q) O 70 Q) U r O i O Q) Z�, O CO (TJ O � � O Q cB O O � Q) o � o � OV O Q) Q) Q) (� N Q Lo cB � N � Q) O 70 Q) U c-- O — O �_ U N (T3 3. Q> C: O .� o Q) Q) O O T O O 0 O i co Q) Q) w Q) Q) .r- EE O Q) � N w cT3 (13 a .Q O , O O N l W Uj cj_ O Z CV Cl) c* Lo (0 D,� 0 1 1 1 1 i o 1 At'i' 1 I 1 1 1 I 0 I k ) J m = mmmff&l 1111 Immo 11 = =rt M111111=1 °E AF 11 -0- • -0- LL I L .,3rm mr--Ilm OhlowEllm I IIIIIIII I IN • CL L- ai a) E L- ai 0- 0 U m LL CL X r4r LU X ai 4-j cc LL ai U 4-) C: cc 2t 4-J aj 4-J 1, 4 N in LM N if 71 .2 w 79 w • CL L- ai a) E L- ai 0- 0 U m LL CL X r4r LU X ai 4-j cc LL ai U 4-) C: cc 2t 4-J aj 4-J AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 DATE: February 111, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Gustavo Gonzalez, P-E GustavoGo@cctexas. com 826-1874 UPDATE TO CITY COUNCIL STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position Department 1. Gustavo Gonzalez, P.E. Director Water 2. Brent Clayton (alternate) Water Resource Planner Water BACKGROUND: Because of the ongoing drought, the Water Department is Plan in order to minimize demand on dwindling supplies. A variety of both short- and long-term measures is being advocated. pool ■ PowerPoint Dresentatiort, IQ slide s two O LM 0 c� a O m LM a) i O V LM 4) m a m a V i 4� two O V w Ak wi Sk 9 J 0 O N W U ^L O O cn c 0 +� _0 i .O �--� E LM m c 0 (1) 0 (1) (A V -0 C� u 0 O 0 e+--i m +-i u a) a� (1) > two Q > 0 -C: ._ a--� 4 4-J w 4-J O V 4-J i E Q � O MO 4-J CL >) OM J 0 O N C/) m x a) C� C) C) IN- 0 4-0 .a .5 (D L- n • 0 cn CD = M M �r er S J z 0 IL m ui O-Q) co U) 0 CN a) vs E CL 0 C: L) 0 0 A--+ L. LJ Q L. O U c L A--+ ��� U O 2 O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O (saq:)ui) uoilelidi:)aad lenuud N r-I O N r-I r-I O N O r-I O N Q) buo a H O .O L a O J m J E L L O t cn 00 0) 00 O � O Ln Oqt O O O O r1 (euexal guipnl:)xa) All:)ede:) Ilnj jo 9Selu9:)a9d w KA 10 Ln m N r-I 0 M V--1 O N O m N t i cO G O L E Z c .O m i N O V O O U buo O O -J a U (� N ca +.+ }, O rl _ ca ca 0 ca ca a _� C: E E cn 0 Q E L •C: M O 0 Zi j. O a-+ � ca � • — 0 Q LL c .O m i N O V 0 N O U ca U I • U O O U C: O O -J a O ca }, O rl _ ca ca 0 ca ca a _� C: E cn 0 Q 0 N O U ca U I • U ca C: O O -J a O cr ca ca C 0 N O U ca U I • U CL +-a lD (3) CL O � ca E co O LM O b-0 0 Q) }, . r-I ca E O Q O ca LM O O (3) O E }' c buo •� O O oc z z I I I I I {!� }�( {�( � } q� O q¥ \� }} +\ � \( r §� ;} � \ � � ( � � } � \ � � � \ L fthL� L� m 1 I L cn � fB �LL- a 0 Q fB _0 � O O 2 i V fB Q G Q o N � U w I I I 13- I to DATE: February 7, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Oscar Martinez OscarM @cctexas.com (361) 826 -3235 STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Oscar Martinez 2. Lawrence Mikolajczyk 3. Angela Gonzalez OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name 1. 2. 3. BACKGROUND: AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 UPDATE TO CITY COUNCIL Plastic Bag Presentation IV Title /Position Assistant City Manager Director Clean City Coordinator Title /Position Department Public Works & Utilities Solid Waste Operations Solid Waste Operations Organization This will be the fourth Plastic Bag presentation to City Council. This presentation outlines City Staff efforts to reduce plastic bag and litter. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Powerpoint CL am s 1 4 I ;o Nis I d¥ NN 0 r14 0) I c 0 '.P M CL o m V) U C) U C) b�c C) U r U -4 C) � C) � ;-4 . V) 4-J 14C. tD bD Ct ct 4-1 4M > V) p u C) u V3 V3 C) o m a wA i 110-11 jgrg p loi m M.a m WIN I I 0 4 � \ I 40 i� x i 9 AD lb 41 so so M cq t ys C/I In a i 9 cq ys m : � \ � .� � � 4 40 � � ¥� sk � � � � �# 4 w .� �^ w� w � � � � ?� � � � � .� ## I »� � T � � � .� � s � w� � � m � � � w � : � � s � � � � � �� � �# � \ / \ } /\ \} ys /\ \j In v) AdW u cn COD IN= u C.) r. U 14C., ca rl I CO2 W V) ;-4 blo u 4-j mirm O O tz z C4 C) — cz C.) E bn Q) CDZ C) O Z bA ca 14C.' 4-j C) to m 0 u bn cz 4-J E 1 4-J ;-4 U ;-4 E 4-j CL4 E. u- u u C) V) V) CZ tluo 0 p 4 LM > > o m jWl I cq of t ca In 0 0 "o o 1 o o f -,3^ °' Ln ui ui o • o o cy i 6 Ln o 0 • N o o Ln 0 o LO o t-I o • w •' Ln ° o w v: 1.>. co rn N • •w 0 r; ! o • •' o CD o Q o cv • m Ln ♦ • w • CD CD CD C) � 0 0 "o o 1 o o f -,3^ °' Ln 0 6 00 ui o 14 o o cy i 6 Ln o 0 N o o Ln 0 o LO o t-I o C) Ln ° o co rn N 0 0 0 o co o CD o Q o cv m Ln CD CD CD C) � o r" d� o o; o o ° o Ln N '. oC) rl -I N Ln 0 0 C3'+ rl O o of O O N M 0 4 o O d" Ln o o o 114 c-1 Ln o 00 o M o N LO N m -- dl d" Ln Wit" It It Ln Ln Ln It ' co a Ca o o � U c° ca cl 0 Fl fa .2 0 ti • ci 114 TI, rt CL u IN as :4 �-4 ti 66 '14 as 9 qd ma 41 41 14 dy o n n rt CL u IN as :4 �-4 ti 66 '14 as 9 qd ma cl o c a U V) V--r C� • r-a r-m Q} 4n r•r 4 r 4-1 P-4 Q) .P-4 U cl o c a U 4 A RM Im cq t ca ys C/I m w m I U, I CLI I I I I I I ol I a I Ui' I o C/I In r4 O CCS P-4 � P-4 P--4 4 CU P--4 14- C 0 4 r O 0 P-4 P-4 C) O • • • o C/I In AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of 02 -19 -2013 DATE: January 8, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Pete Anaya, Director, Planning and Environmental Services PeteAn@cctexas.com 826 -3781 UPDATE TO CITY COUNCIL Presentation of the Annual Assessment of Ozone Monitoring Data and Analysis for the Corpus Christi Urban Air shed by the Corpus Christi Air Quality Group. OUTSIDE PRESENTERM: Name Title /Position Gretchen Arnold Chair BACKGROUND: Organization Corpus Christi Air Quality Group Nueces County and San Patricio County contain a large urbanized area with a number of industrial point sources of air emissions and a concentration of mobile sources. The two counties are home to the nation's fifth busiest deep -water port with access to the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, a large industrial and petrochemical complex, two major military bases, and a network of highways including the Interstate Highway System, railroads, and air routes that facilitates commerce and a thriving tourism industry. Control of ambient air quality requires a strategy that considers sources of air emissions in both counties. The Corpus Christi Air Quality Group is a partnership within the urban air shed of Nueces County and San Patricio County. Local entities, including the City of Corpus Christi, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and industry stakeholders are working together to plan and implement voluntary actions appropriate to community needs to improve air quality. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Powerpoint Presentation: Corpus Christi Ozone Status and Path Forward Document: Letter of Intent to EPA regarding Participation in Ozone Advance Document: Current and Potential Compliance with Ozone Standards for the City of Corpus Christi. . (A a--) L f6 r U 0 N O Lo . (A a--) L r U Q 0 U G O Q a � Q N O 0) U r-I c N � m G J a U o (.D 00 0) W buo n� bN `W7 a c co �hWo • � n2 W O N W N r-I O N r-I r-I O N O r-I O N Ql O O N 00 O O N n O O N O O N H 0 O O N L N M O O N N O O N December 21, 2012 Ozone Advance c/o Laura Bunte U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, C304 -01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Dear Ms. Bunte: The Corpus Christi Air Quality Group would like to participate in Ozone Advance with respect to the Corpus Christi Urban Air Shed. We wish to join this partnership with EPA to preserve or improve the air quality in the Corpus Christi Urban Air Shed, and we meet the program eligibility criteria, i.e.: (1) The Corpus Christi Urban Air Shed is not currently a nonattainment area for either the 1997 8 -hour or the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), (2) The Corpus Christi Urban Air Shed consists of Nueces and San Patricio counties in the Texas Coastal Bend Region. (US EPA Region 6) (3) The following air monitor(s) reflect the air quality in the Corpus Christi Urban Air Shed: CAMS 4 and CAMS 21, and (4) Existing emissions inventory reporting requirements have been met. We understand that our efforts under Ozone Advance may benefit the Corpus Christi Urban Air Shed by potentially: • Reducing air pollution in terms of ozone as well as other air pollutants, • Ensuring continued healthy ozone levels, • Maintaining the ozone NAAQS, • Helping avoid violations of the ozone NAAQS that could lead to a future nonattainment designation, • Increasing public awareness about ground -level ozone as an air pollutant, and • Targeting limited resources toward actions to address ozone problems quickly. Our goal is to continue current programs that have demonstrated significant ozone reductions. Through modeling or other research, new programs may be implemented that could even further lower ozone in the Corpus Christi Urban Air Shed in the near term. We agree that it is in our best interest to work together and in coordination with stakeholders and the public to proactively pursue this goal. r Attached, please find resolutions from stakeholders City of Corpus Christi, San Patricio County, Port of Corpus Christi Authority, Regional Transportation Authority, and Metropolitan Planning Organization. J can be reachad at 361-829-3D70 and by e-mail gretotaan.arrnold@tamuec.edu. Sincerely, Gret:-,hen Arnold Chair: Corpus Christi Air Quallty Group cc: Carrie Paige, U S EPA Region 5 Ron 01'sm, City Manager. City of Garpus Christi Judge Terry Simpson, San Patricia County Mike Carrell, Chair, Port of Corpus Chrisfi Authority Commission Tom Niskela, DiradDr, Corpus Christi Metropoibn Planning Organization 3cott Neel&y, DirecWr, Corpus ChfttJ Regional Transportation Authority Attachments-- CO of Corpus Christi Resolution San Patrlcio County Resolution Port of Corpus Cbria Authority Resolution MetrQpDlkan Planning Organizatiwi Resolution Regional TranspodHItion Authority Rascflutiori r F11*6CMUtion by IM Cft Couddill c5f the C4 Gurpuip "ri0i ijupporUng *a Corpus ChrIwd Air Quallfty eriouga parliGipafion in the EPA Ozmm Advance Program to prumcrW local acHohm to reds uzone pmourwmv In the owmiunity and continue try rnaintatin National Amblent Air QUIlity SUndanft FUF OZOVIA- Whafeas, the Ofty of Corpus Chdoll NM foam a rtaF90bulder is the Carpus Christi Urbaribad Area air reduffm agreernerrIm, and Whereas, the 'Air Shad" stakeholders and endllw represented In the Corptw Chri5ri Air Quality Group, the Tffkm Gummi"ian w Frivironmerital Qwft CTCEQ), and the U.S. EilAronmenal Prot, on Agency (EPA) In" vm&*(:1 together W pJEw and imoernerkt volurdary adjons appropriate to-owrnu* neecs to improve air qualify through 1.mmm sarism stmtegi� phut rOor;L #Ns vmathar, ddvN habU wd wor[Grny or the mgion; and VVINmesial the CorpU5 Christi Air Quality Group proposed a vakun(ary iespan4e to ffio federal pallet aLftharL21ng an a Maur (M FLEX pnxffnrn,;Ond Whereas, An 5 Muni 05FIox agreement for Nuem end San Patriclo Counties was developed hy the CGrpug Christi Air Quality Group, and was 4p"ed by all P;@rtie!) on October 23, 200: arbd Wrw.oas, the 13 Hoar WFLFX agreernwd wpiros at tt,,a and of 201 Z: end Wlweas. the Divropmental Protection Agsncy is rqjtawig fie 8 Fkxi r Ck3FLF-X agreement Mh as naw voluntary program call Oxon A4,nmael NOW, THEREFORE, 8t I HLREBY RESOLVED: That, the Cft Couricit of the City Comm Chri9d marts the Corpus Christi Air Qjjalfllg GrDup's participati— in ffm EPA Ozone Advance ProgFgrn to promote t l adi�ons to mduos ozono precum&O in the wrnrnunity and mntines in maintain NaWnal ArFibierill Air QuaRy Sl!Andar[k for woo. ATTEST: Armando Chqm City secretory [�"AL* IJK%l ilill f-7114.Tt7 -1 i' Mayor (I ? 9 f; 6 F) 1101@1 THAT STATE OF TEXAS RIIWEDI.., � W 14FftFAS, San Patricio County has been a stakeholder roller Corpus Christi area air emissions roductions agreements,; and WHEREAS, the "Air Shed" stakeholders and emities represented in the Corpus Christi Air Quality Group, the Texas Commission on Fnvitonmentat Quality (I'CEQX and the U.S. Environments[ Protection Agency (EPA) have worked together to p Ian and implement voluntary actions appropriate to community needs to improve air quality through common sense strategies that reflect the weather, driving habits, and economy of the regkm, and WHERE A% the 0orpus Christi Air Quality Group proposed a voluntary response to the federal policy authorizing an 8 Hour 03FLEX program; and WHEREAS, An 9 Hour 03FLEX Agreement forNueces and San Patricio Counties was developed by Elie Corpus Christi Air Quality Group, and was approved by all parties on October 23, 2007; and WHE REAS, the 8 hour 03PLEX Agreement expires at the end of 2012; and WHEREAS, the Envirounivnta I Protection Agency is replacing the 8 hour 03 FLEX Agreement with a now voluntary program called 07A)ne Advance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED- Tice San PatrizioCoanty Commissioners supports the Corpus Christi Air Quality Group's continuing successful efforts to collaborate with the U S EPA while identifying local initiatives that reduce air emissions and to seek- to maintain Corpus Christi's attainment status of air quality standards. set forth by the 0 S EPA IIASSED and ADOPTF D this the 16' day of July, 2012. Q Alma V o or, ct� 4 3 o r, Per. 43 Jim oe tut cry Pet 44 Gracie Alam2 GonzaI C:Ianl, IkwAk A MufffiNTM 13M Mv I 14OLI IN THE OZONE ADVANCE PROGRLAM WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Urban Airshed consists of two adjoining counties, nieces and San Patricio Counties, and contains a large urbanized area with a number of industrial point sources for air emissions and a concentration of mobile sources; and WHEREAS, the two county region is home to Port Corpus Christi, fifth largest port in the US, a large industrial and petrochemical complex, a major military base, and a network of highways, railroads, and air routes that facilitate commerce and tourism; and WHEREAS, in 1995 a Regional Air Quality Committee was established to review ozone attainment issues for the Corpus Christi Urban Airshed as the area was not in attainment of the one-hour and proposed 8-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone and collaborate on voluntary measures and programs to improve air quality through flexible agreements; and WHEREAS, the Port of Corpus Christi Authority was a signatory to the 1996 Flexible Attainment Region Memorandum, the 2002 03 FLEX Memorandum of Agreement, and the 2007 Corpus Christi Area 8-hour 03 Flex Agreement which expires in October 2012; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has indicated that the ozone flexible agreements will be replaced with the Ozone Advance Program instead and that there is under consideration modification to the current 8-hour ozone NAAQSI- and WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Urban Airshed is currently in attainment of the NAAQS for ozone; and WHEREAS, if the 8-hour ozone NAAQS is lowered the Corpus Christi Urban Airshed is in jeopardy of non-attainment of a revised standard; and WHEREAS, regional collaboration has been successful since 1995 in our area for maintaining attainment of the ozone NAAQS; and NOFY, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Port Commission of the Port of Corpus Christi Authority hereby supports the Port Authority's participation in The Ozone Advance Program after the expiration of the 20,07 Corpus Christi Area 8-hour 03 Flex Agreement in October 2012; and r BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Port Commission that the Port of Corpus Christi Authority is hereby authorized and directed to participate in the development of an Ozone Advance Program work plan for the Corpus Christi Urban Airshed. ADOPTED the I 1'°' day of September, 2012, by the Board of Port Commissioners of the Port of Corpus Christi Authority. Mike Carrell Chairmen r SUPPORT OF THE CORPUS CHRISTt AiR QUALITY GROUP OZONE ADVANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Transportation Poficy Committee is designated as the Metropolitan Planning Organization ;iv PO) serving as the policy and decision making forum fof otf-ie Corpus Christi Urbanized Area, and WHEREAS, he Air Shed" stakeholders and entifies represer-aed in the Corpus Christi Air Quality Grofjp, the Toxas Commission on Envir-unrrent I QuaRy (TCEQ,, and 'in,,. U.-S, Envirorimenlal Protection Agency (EPA) have, worked togethor to plan and implement vV infary actions appnolgdate to comn-funity needs to improve @if quality Brought common sense straegies that reriect the v,,e,,-,Mher, driving habits, and econorny of the region and WHEREAS, the Corpus Chnsti Air Quality Group proposed a vrilonlary respon'se. to the 4p,derM onlicy authon7ing ari 8 Hour 03F X lb oyirarn-1 and WHEREA. , An 8 Hour 03FLEX Agreement for Nun,, es and San Pauicio Counties was developed by the Corpus Christi Xr Ouatty Group, and was approved by al' parties on October 23, 2007: and WHEREAS, the 8 Hour 03FLEX Agreeropt"it eXpire-s at the end of 201, 3: WHEREAS, the Environmental Prr)teclion Aiqoncy is rcp acing the 8 Hour 03FLEX Agreement with a new voluntary prlograrn call Ozone Advanc-;e, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED: That ?fie Corpus Christi Transportation Policy Committee, sup pons u- 'e Corpus Chrisli Air Quafty Group'F confi nu.ng successful efforts through calfaboration with the U, S, Environmenta! Protection Agency, (EPA,,,. These effons have ,d(,rifified local iriit iatives ihal re(,juce, air &,,nnissiens, and maintain the, Corpus ChrislO atlairiment ,Laius of air qual4 Vandards se, forth by the JS EPA, vVe wRl further those efforts, by developing a vokintary program that meets ',be panarneters of he, Ozone Advance drogran-i- August 2: 2012 Judge Terry Sin-iloson, Char4:"erson Transportation Policy Cornmittee AIIII WHEREAS, Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority has been a stakeholder in the Corpus Christi area air emissions reductions agreementsl and 41 WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Air Quality Group proposed a voluntary response to the: federal policy authorizing an 8 Hour 03FLEX prograrn� and I October 23, 20;07: and WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency is replacing the 8 hour 03FLEX Agreement with a new voluntary program called Ozone Advanice� L"I :4 ZLI mm - 1 Z4 &-Ion Zj =Eej[#j Z rim I ZU 0&j:L*j Z4111 jj*3,1 JF�Jlj 9; 101-�A I WAF-132#1 It 'I RESOLVED, that the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority Board of Directors fully supports the Corpus Christi Air Quality Group's continuing successful efforts to collaborate with the United States EPA, while identifying local initiatives that reduce air emissions and to seek to maintain Corpus Christi's attainment status of air quality standards set forth by the United States EPA. Id Jj6hn VhIls doap-/Chairman CURRENT AND POTENTIAL COMPLIACE WITH OZONE STANDARDS FOR CORPUS CHRISTI Corpus Christi's air quality is considered to be "near non - attainment" for ozone. In order for an area to remain in attainment for ozone, the area's rolling 3 -year average must not exceed 75 parts per billion (ppb). This is determined by recording the 4th highest ozone level recorded at a regulatory monitoring site during the period of a year. This 4th high ozone number will be the representative ozone number for that monitor for that year. The 75 ppb standard should remain as the accepted standard until US EPA is required to re- consider the ozone standard in 2013. The table below depicts Corpus Christi's ozone average data (ppb) ending in 2012 Monitor 4th high in 2010 4th high in 2011 4th high in 2012 Current 3 year average CAMS 4 74 75 69 73 902 Airport Blvd. CAMS 21 72 78 65 72 Tuloso 9860 LaBranch In order for Corpus Christi to continue in attainment at a level of less than 75 ppb for 2013, CAMS 4 must experience a 4th high ozone level of 79 ppb or less, and CAMS 21 must experience a 4th high ozone level of 80 ppb or less for the year 2013. In order for Corpus Christi to continue in attainment at a level of less than 70 ppb for 2013, CAMS 4 must experience a 4th high ozone level of 65 ppb or less, and CAMS 21 must experience a 4th high ozone level of 66 ppb or less for the year 2013. to DATE: February 6, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Floyd Simpson, Chief of Police Floys(_cctexas.com 361- 886 -2603 STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Floyd Simpson 2. Todd Green 3. Mark Schauer OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name 1. 2. 3. BACKGROUND: AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of February 19, 2013 UPDATE TO CITY COUNCIL Animal Control Division Title /Position Chief of Police Commander Assistant Chief Title /Position City Council requested an update on the Animal Control Division. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Power Point Department Police Police Police Organization c ca a� D C: O V 0 L Q �U o •L ca U U 'C: V �Q r1 Cf) -- O w , W W 0 '"aw, +� CCU C� c a) U a) 7 . _ E O Z3 W N O N O O N E O L 0 V♦ .O CZ O L E O -*--a cn =3 C: C6 _ O D L E u 0 O 0) -0 U) AN 4k W W 0 '"aw, +� CCU C� c a) U a) 7 . _ E O Z3 W N O N O O N E O L 0 V♦ .O CZ O sn c Q T 0 7 0 Z T +-" Q U r Q co r+ CL Q N T - � C 0 ■ � N CYS 7 CL 0 LO (� m CL L s L N co LL i C/) ■ 4-4 a) E • cn c� Q E CL C: cu E mo 7 c� Z� 0 0 a) cu •— c:_ E CU ~� 0 0. 0 0 0 • U 0 0 U c E 0 �C z cu cn m .C: L CL • W. CD 'O Z3 0 cn a) cz 0 C: 0 4. 0 C: cn 0) C: cr C- C/) a) S' L 0 0 > cn E 0 L a) x cn ' E V, a) V/ 4-4 n "' S O m cn c Q Q CL 0 a) i a) • v CL C/) . . x a) z� E zo C: i W • V, E L Q 42 Uj ■ 0-) ::3` cn C L' C: M a) cu Q C: Q a) c_ C: C: .� s 1 N :7 N C N Jc (a U C: O O p N o �� o N ca C: a) Jc 0 cu Q U 0. U) Q V, E O O O � L .0 cn C6 a a) �) (� cn =3 C6 Jc: Jc: L 0 C: -+ -+ 0 4- \ > (n p 0 — C6 0 0 0 cn Q L � � , �--' CU ` O } to p • � cm -1-a O Jc: cm � .— a) v 0 �e V a) L. cu u cn cn 0 4--a WIMMO cu p p p •- p 0 Cl. c M T3 O p O N 0 a) a) V -�-j Z3 :3 •- m -0 > O Cu (� 0 cn N cu o cn {n L CD L V -,--A x :3 a) 0 a. CU ui 0 0� Z — Q > 0 DATE: February 19, 2013 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Constance P. Sanchez, Director of Financial Services constancep @cctexas.com (361) 826 -3227 BRIEFING ON FISCAL YEAR 2012 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Constance P. Sanchez 2. 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name 1. 2. 3. BACKGROUND: Title /Position Director Title /Position Department Financial Services Oraanization Local Government Code, Title 4 "Finance ", Subtitle A "Municipal Finances ", Chapter 103 "Audit of Municipal Finances ", Section 103.003 "Filing; Public Record" requires a municipality's annual financial statement, including the auditor's opinion on the statement, to be filed in the office of the municipal secretary or clerk within 180 days after the last day of municipality's fiscal year. Since the City of Corpus Christi's fiscal year end is July 31St, 180 days or 6 months after the fiscal year end is January 31St. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2012 was submitted to the City Secretary's office and was posted on -line on the City's website on January 31St. This presentation will feature highlights from the FY 2012 CAFR. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Powerpoint AS u� 07 • ! • o # # o f •> ! , # -0 !' 0 co ! s ! •D a Ln # # ! r; • # ! # s # l 0 f 4-J Ln #' f !' # • #' #' r s 0 Ln 4-J 0 # # # —J E ru # 0 #` # # • 07 ® Ln h a B a h un tA 4-j B s B v v o 0 tA o x boo LJJ °� v ro ra ro l ! 0 • �m s Lo 4i 1 Q.. M •� Q • • • s �m v r K L pv�' 4 ! �m s, • �m 23