HomeMy WebLinkAbout032048 ORD - 03/17/2020 Ordinance adopting a new London Area Development Plan, an element
of the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan; rescinding the former London Area
Development Plan adopted on August 17, 1987; and amending the Plan
CC Comprehensive Plan
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to City Council its reports
and recommendations concerning the adoption of the London Area Development
Plan.
WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on
Wednesday, February 5, 2020, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and
on Tuesday, February 25, 2020, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council
Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested
persons were allowed to appear and be heard;
WHEREAS, City Staff invited the public to workshops and public meetings that
were held on January 28, 2019, April 1, 2019, April 2, 2019, April 4, 2019, and
December 5, 2019 to give input to help develop a London Area Development Plan for
Corpus Christi, and to receive public feedback.
WHEREAS, an Advisory Committee provided guidance and assistance
throughout the process and staff coordinated with various community agencies.
WHEREAS, the City shall use the London Area Development Plan as a
guideline for urban growth, implementation of policy initiatives and public investments,
and to facilitate other plans that the city considers necessary for systematic growth
and development.
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that these amendments would
best serve public health, safety, necessity, convenience, and general welfare of the
City of Corpus Christi and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the London Area Development Plan, adopted by City Council
Ordinance#19975 on August 17, 1987, is hereby rescinded.
SECTION 2. That the London Area Development Plan, as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached and incorporated by reference, is adopted as an element of the Plan CC
Comprehensive Plan.
SECTION 3. To the extent that the amendment made by this ordinance represents a
deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to
conform to the amendment made by this ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan, as
032048 SCANNED
amended from time to time and except as changed by this ordinance, remains in full
force and effect.
SECTION 5. The City Council intends that every section, paragraph, subdivision,
clause, phrase, word or provision hereof shall be given full force and effect for its
purpose. Therefore, if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a
court of competent jurisdiction, that judgment shall not affect any other section,
paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance.
That the foregoing ordinance was refor the first time and passed to its second
reading on this the 'a,,4 day of r , 2020, by the following vote:
Joe McComb Michael Hunter ,
Roland Barrera Ab941t, Ben Molina VL
Rudy Garza
61'Q''Q' Everett Roy
Paulette M. Guajardo Greg Smith
__N,P„z_
Gil Hernandez —Ar*—
That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this
the ri\ day of Y`\a, Uf\ , 2020, by the following vote:
Joe McComb AlZ Michael HunterRoland Barrera Ben Molina ____N-,_
Rudy Garza Everett Roy ly
Paulette M. GuajardoAynn Greg Smith
Gil Hernandez �'(
PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 114\ day of Y` \e,,( ri , 2020.
ATTEST:
eACIL 0...,-.1" --t-kAiV112% __, 04 (--e--19-1,4----
Re ecca Huerta Ji cComb
City Secretary 1 b r
032048
Exhibit A
City of Corpus Christi
ti
Area Development Plan
-....•vu lei 10e-di •
OsAld1� • �'
ft 11111 0 4 -
• —�=- -
$ !!! . II
,""''" I t -v.� A __�
yr • _
y
Npgghbc
+1SI.
F
DRAFT JANUARY 28 2020 r`Ach9�J () [ undun
` .
AREA DEVELOPMENT PION
Lir •
ACKNOWLEDEGMENTS
CITY COUNCIL Sheldon Schroeder
Commission Member
Joe McComb Michael M. Miller
Mayor Commission Member
Rudy Garza Jr. Daniel M. Dibble
Council Member At-Large Commission Member
Paulette M. Guajardo Michael York
Council Member At-Large Commission Member
Michael T. Hunter Benjamin Polak
Council Member At-Large Navy Representative
Everett Roy
Council Member District 1
Ben Molina STUDENT ADVISORY
Council Member District 2 COMMITTEE
Roland Barrera
Council Member District 3 Ben Bueno
Greg Smith Harold T. Branch Academy
Council Member District 4 Estevan Gonzalez
Gil Hernandez London High School
Council Member District 5 Grace Hartridge
Veterans Memorial High School
PLANNING COMMISSION Sara London uHigh lSchool
Carl E. Crull Ciara Martinez
Chairman Richard King High School
Jeremy Baugh Katie Ngwyen
Vice Chairman Collegiate High School
Marsha Williams Damian Olvera
Commission Member Texas A&M Corpus Christi
Heidi Hovda Natasha Perez
Commission Member Del Mar College
Kamran Zarghouni Emily Salazar
Commission Member Mary Carroll High School
:rte
s�z
Kara
ADVISORY COMMITTEE Young Business Professionals of the Coastal
Charles Benavidez Bend
Texas Department of Transportation Gordon Robinson
Donna Byrom Corpus Christi Regional Transit Authority
London Resident Eloy Salazar
Marco Castillo United Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce
Southside Resident Steve Synovitz
Joseph Cortez Oso Creek I-Plan Coordination Committee
Corpus Christi Association of Realtors John Tamez
Carl Crull London Area Landowner
Planning Commission Judi Whitis
Rabbi Han Emanuel London ISD
Corpus Christi Clergy Alliance
D . Mark Escamilla CONSULTANT TEAM
Del Mar College
Gil Hernandez FREESE
Corpus Christi City, District 5
Dr. Roland Hernandez •, °NICHOLS
Corpus Christi ISD
Casandra Lorentson Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee 11200 Broadway Street, Offices West
Wayne Lundquist Suite 2320
London Area Landowner Pearland, TX 77584
Robert MacDonald
Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning
Organization
Moses Mostaghasi
Coastal Bend Homebuilders Association
Benjamin Polak
Naval Air Station Corpus Christi
Jay Reining
Oso Creek I-Plan Coordination Committee
HOLD FOR ORDINANCE
HOLD FOR ORDINANCE
HOLD FOR ORDINANCE
HOLD FOR ORDINANCE
.
-•a ,4 ,-may„ $ ce'- `
vi -"Cl? .. 4',, ...,.'74'...'-'''i"-Lt----4.-----'
c s*'� €^.fid♦
.`.."-4''' ''''';:,42‘''''''''_a .,y; � �' ' - s t.5n " .s'r 'M-- '"''''.',=.'---:":‘'.-"* `a' ., '
a* �. fi c. * < r" Z _ '%
f;
gsd►, ... , - - Q
•
! i ' '` �'` ' 7 •
. ,
it� •
r
..,. .
..,IN -
. ,
.z..-. .i .; ..
F
'
.60 _ �.
4.
....yr
lt, ,
J 14.at ....
`
It
V .
AIL .
---1 ,+. " � .. * I".. if.`,• ., • •.T
4 1 .t
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- - INTRODUCTION
321 FUTURE LAND USE MAP
18 VISION THEMES
26 POLICY INITIATIVES AND
IMPLEMENTATION
34 PUBLIC INVESTMENT INITIATIVES
INTRODUCTION
a
..
or, �..�
. li INT UC r
' ,, — i
�f,{aW'� .f , ; � .tip ¢4
a.
Ile
_ '+R
allehlit
iiiiirsirmaTh
B .111, _
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN
The London Area Development Plan (LADP) The LADP was created through a
is an element of the Plan CC Comprehensive comprehensive public engagement process
Plan. The LADP is intended to provide an that integrated the examination of the
analysis of the London Area and create existing conditions and the vision of the
strategic recommendations to guide future community.
development. With anticipated growth
in the London Area, the City should be An Advisory Committee was created to
prepared to balance the needs of existing assist in guiding the planning process and
and new development. New construction in provide a representation of the area's
the London Area occurring both inside and residents, business owners, students, and
outside of city limits will have an impact on stakeholders. The committee's participation
other areas of the City. The plan includes new was essential to the development of the
future land uses for the area, a vision of the final plan. Although the Advisory Committee
future based on public input, specific actions championed the process, the community
to achieve the vision, and infrastructure was involved throughout the process and
initiatives for the implementation of the participated in multiple engagement events
plan. This plan will serve as a guide for City and activities. Residents and stakeholders
leadership to make educated regulatory gave their input regarding the future of
and policy decisions. This plan will also help the London through online surveys and
prioritize infrastructure improvements to various community engagement events,
increase the quality of life for the community including a Community Open House and a
and ensure sustainable growth. four-day Community Think Tank. Many of the
recommendations identified in this plan are
The London Area is primarily located outside a direct result of the input received, resulting
of Corpus Christi city limits south of Oso in a community-driven plan.
Creek with some areas within the city limits.
The area extends south to County Road 18
and west to County Road 51. Development in
the London Area is mostly undeveloped with
some residential subdivisions.
tre
t: 3
,
TROOUCTION
DEMOGRAPHICS
POPULATION' =VIM
7.29% 0.99% 0.7% 5.0%
London Corpus Christi 9.8% 85+ 0-4
Average Annual Growth Rate 65 -84 14.7%
2000-2018 1,997 5 - 14
1,756
1,293 lip39.4 9.4%_
Median Age
15 - 19
464 16.6%
43.8% 20 34
35 -64
2000 2010 2018 2023*
*Projected Population
diroo
3.6%
Other Race
2.2%
Two or More Races
89.5% 10.5% 111% Alr
White Other Pacific 100
Islander
1.8%
2.4% Black
49.9% Asian 0.4%
Hispanic Origin American Indian/
of Any Race Alaska Native
f
4
SiiiiINTRODUCTI
COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHICS
The current demographics of the London Area provide a baseline for growth and diversity
in the area based on Census data and estimates.
HOUSING (2018)'
10
6.0%
5438 , 830 Vacant
Median Home Value 10.4%
86 . 4% Vacant
Owner Occupied
3 . 48 89.6% 94.0%
Occupied Occupied
$tt Citywide2 London
Average Household Size Occupied Housing Units
ED ATIONAL ATTAINMENT (201"
Some College Associate Degree
High School Graduate r 6.9%
19.2% 46.9%
I
No High School Diploma Bachelor's/Grad/Professional Degree
'Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1.Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023.
2Source:U.S.Census Bureau,2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
,_ 5
TRDDUCTIDN
001I
ENGAGEMENT PROCESS
•
..
I.
ii
,, . eilk
I _ -410
, mr
1 L...._- ._ c_
„......:341111 ,7_ 1i
Student Advisory
.
14- x The Advisory Committee met ate.! 111 Committee Meeting 1
�
the Oso Bay Wetlands Preserve and; = The Student Advisory o.,
Learning Center to identify issues N.0 Committee met to identify` - ,
and opportunities for the area. issues and opportunitie ` o
`D for the area. `n
ma
iii-
Ai Student Advisory n
Committee Meeting 4
lap`` 1-+ public input from April 1-4 N t
a p p o he four-day event involved 7
Community Think Tank and E a series of meetings and -�
provided feedback. ; presentations, input on 41frIv si
0.- AI future land uses, and draft o
nz ..
recommendations based on co
Advisory Committee community feedback.
d 410L
Meetin 3
The Advisory Committee -'V
met at City Hall to verify o
the Future Land Use Map r� 11111,f`' ,
II
Vision, and Key Elements; - -- "` __ � ��
•
t Advisory Committee oetro uest Survey
• launches
a
Cr
The Advisory Committee- °; An online survey was N -- N
met to review the draft plan — available to the publicr'''
Q,
and provide feedback before o allowing for input to .- o 0
received regarding th; o _
presenting it to the community C. draft plan. =
•
6
INTRODUCTI
ABOUT THE ADVISORY COMMITTEES
The Advisory Committees consisted of 31 community representatives including residents, business
owners, students, City Council, the Metropolitan Planning Organization, London and Corpus Christi
Independent School Districts, TXDOT, the Regional Transit Authority, environmental stakeholders,
Young Business Professionals, Del Mar College, Naval Air Station - Corpus Christi, and Nueces County.
!nine Survey LaunchedC13 CI3 Community Meeting 1
Ari ,.., x . ,., _r }, i„ c 2 s _' aa,ritsee . n:: c
to the public, allowing for in. - , , _ C13 community meeting at Kaffie
to be received regarding the — Middle to learn about the Area
current conditions and visio - -`_n Development Plan process and
for the area. o o give input related to the area's o r
DO future growth.
- ' _
g % der _
- ,. ` y oint Advisory Committee m Student Advisory ;TI toir
cr
Meeting 2 and Student Advisory s Committee Meeting 2Oi
‘. I I! II' " II . . ! I r'''° The Student Advisory • ^,
,4.t ;
The Advisory Committee met to be• f� Committee reviewed pubic input R �
o from the January 28 Community Na
drafting the Future Land Use Map. LimMeeting and provided feedback. E;";
.1 - pi 0,A •
Community Meeting 2 0
dvisory Committee
rated . Meeting 5cu
a if•
he draft plan was
Ilsr on
presented to the community, The Advisory Committee met ^,
'.Ilowin for feedback from Adoption Da
9 .- to recommend the draft plan
the public in an open house N move forward to be presented ` o
setting. to Planning Commission and '.'3
Al 411111111111b, r 'V
City Council
7
TRDDUCTION
odli
ONLINE SURVEY RESULTS
ABOUT THE SURVEY
365
Community members had an opportunity to participate in an
online survey available from December 5th, 2018 to February 15th, Total respondents
2019 to give their feedback on the future of the London Area. 365 129
people responded. Below is a snapshot of the results.
Live in London
WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE THING ABOUT THE LONDON AREA?
1>d 2 .42°x°
Safe neighborhoods 3 82% A
E
Selection of housing/
housing prices
OUT/I__
Convenient commute
to work
Convenient access
to shopping, dining,
and entertainment
ihok 11.15% '
Other
17.52%
No city taxes Schools
8
WHAT ARE WHAT'S MISSING IN LONDON?
THE TOP •'r''Other0
Nothing is missing
THREE £ parks &trails s.
ite
ISSUES 2 Single-Family
�� o A7 fop Homes
LONDON •8'0 <-1—. —, Apartments
IS FACING
535% Senior
TODAY? r*= °
° 13.74�o Housing
Manufacturing . Urban Living
%.))0/0 543 o
. ® p Entertainment 271.4'3 , Office
r� X99
120 e
votes "�
llelRestaurants Retail & Shopping
Lack of variety in
shopping, dining &
entertainment WHAT DOES THE LONDON AREA
LOOK LIKE IN 10-20 YEARS?
� 98I // A planned, aesthetically pleasing growth corridor with
. ,fogs continued high quality school system and increased options for
,�/ medium to high value single family residences with large lots,
�' ' M.& interspersed with quality retail and entertainment offerings
Water and sewer that would attract highly qualified business and industry leaders.//
infrastructure
//It's an upscale area with large lots and an amazing small school
district.Ii
//Integrated neighborhoods, with small retail businesses,
79 safe streets for autos, pedestrians, and cyclists, and plenty of
ilk parks, protected natural areas, and public spaces for play and
elk II. events.//
Flooding & 11 A development that contributes positive improvements to
water quality the overall cleanliness & usability of the Oso Creek and
watershed./I
9
O
F.
.1a''
N "- 01\ 2. a C-13
Quality of Life N n * 0 rt -o: o
o °- ao �--� = 0
Cr] a (t o 0
C/3 —1 r,- N rD b
7 7E_ Drainage Impacts o _ m ro = o
g. rr C/] r v 'o o C MI M C
= oa v 0 c3
c/. m
Economic Development z r= o o "a o m C "'
Cost impacts onIIW
ca ci = m m o '�" a
City Services -....„3 c — C -�
a _ w a �� a CA
MI a 0 rn
Transportation11)
. v -n ? y ro
Network Impacts .....3 rn a a
m -1
-4, Q. o o Q
Development of r a ten, a
Oso Creek Touri D � �' m v
m -11 i.-A. . rD ( m
V rn 23.
v ?
fp Public Safety Z m ° ro
p a o m
iltPreservation of " a _
Open Space = o ro cu m
rrt - _
▪ Impact on Oso z ro ro fi Q C
141 .P-
▪ Creek and Bay `� rD
o N 0* 0 C/3
Q. rn
AP4 I. •-r_, Tax Generation Q `.° o
rt, o
IV o a
���� Community ? E - v
� a
Aesthetics �, a
rD 0 -,
.. G .�
ff ro Other .--,. n ,o^ 'o
0
INTRODUCTI WHAT IS MISSING MOST IN LONDON?
28.1% 18.8% 17.2% 15 .B% 7.8% 4 , 73- 4.7% 3.1%
.•
* : iP *To 11■ • miff
Parks & Other Mixed-Use Shopping Entertainment Housing Restaurants Office
Trails
MY FAVORITE PART ABOUT LONDON IS... TO THRIVE,
44 . 8% Schools 10.2 Future potential AREAS NEED...
IIIIII
it N nif
U , Low Traffic :- -,.. 1_,:t:::,-
-...44, Oso Creek
•IParks & Trails �
N a =
o.
i m �
At N �,
issio A •2 0u.7% Rural Community
A
6.9% Safe Community
MY VISION FOR LONDON IS...
// London ISD with 11 Development with //Develop or improve
multiple campuses." accessible sidewalk roads"
// Urban village." connectivity to parks, //Master planned
schools, etc.//
community.//
//Improved drainage." //Access for recreation //Oso Creek
and nature.// preservation."
II
FUTURE LAND
USE MAP
i
!r v
aim
...,.... ill
, r_.. . _. .. ....
_ ..
`►
, ____ _ _ _
, IL ..,_______....
_ , _ __, _ ,fi. .;C2*. ta I -..-- -- - •,..--mik lit --
iMO '''' -'` " - - a ilk ' ' 11,At '11‘44,. . - M
iliwoot % ."---_____:::".e..-_,Z.;.,, .....7 -`,1.7 31.4_44,41,- -
111111111
,..------..s'''1111$:- ----...sik.
‘4;id I I iThi 1 I.:-.'N-P. lip& ,., , -
c,soa:
. ►- Qty .
� -
`op' a� _
ms X06 ` ,ma
4,.--t' 7:74.iiiill
d age l ��S��yQt��7' � y
-
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
ABOUT THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP
The Future Land Use Map serves as a guide for zoning regulations and influences new
development and redevelopment in the city limits. In the extraterritorial jurisdiction
(ETJ), the Future Land Use Map helps plan for future development and infrastructure. The
Future Land Use Map for the City was adopted with Plan CC and has been revised though
the LADP based on feedback from the community.
The most direct tool cities have to guide the detail about land uses and development
development in city limits is through zoning. patterns specific to the London planning
Zoning is the prescribed legal use of a parcel area. Through this process, the future land
of land based on city regulations. Although use designations for the London Area have
zoning is influenced by the designations been revised to reflect community input,
identified on the Future Land Use Map, anticipated development, and best practices.
zoning only applies to areas located within
city limits. Most of the London Area is located The London Future Land Use Map serves as
in the ETJ. While there is no zoning in the the guide for future development decisions
ETJ, the future land use designations can and provides a foundation to support the
help influence development patterns. vision and recommendations of the plan. This
is accomplished by setting a framework that
The Plan CC Comprehensive Plan identified influences regulatory mechanisms and policy
future land uses for the entire city and decisions that shape the built environment.
planning areas to provide guidelines for Each of the designations presented on the
development. The Area Development Plan London Future Land Use Map correlates with
process is intended to go into further the classifications identified in Plan CC.
13
TURE LAND USE MAP
FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES
AGRICULTURE/RURAL COMMERCIAL USES
ENTERPRISE Commercial land uses include retail, services,
hotel, and office uses that are typically
This category includes farms and other open to the public at large. High-density
enterprises that serve the rural population. residential uses, such as townhomes, cottage
housing, apartments, and condominiums are
considered compatible with commercial uses.
Other commercial uses, such as wholesale
RESIDENTIAL USES and distribution businesses, are included
in the light industry category because
The predominant residential land use in the they have similar impacts, such as high
City of Corpus Christi is the single-family volumes of trucking. Schools, churches, and
dwelling at a range of densities. All residential neighborhood-serving public uses can be
categories also include schools, churches, and included in commercial land use areas.
neighborhood-serving public uses.
Low-density residential: up to 3 units
per acre INDUSTRIAL USES
Medium-density residential: 4 to 13 units
per acre (including two-family dwellings) Most of the industrial uses within the city
limits of Corpus Christi are light industrial;
■ High-density residential: more than 13 heavy industry is generally located in the
units per acre industrial districts outside the city limits.
14 „ ..
FUTURE LAND USE M
MIXED-USE AREAS GOVERNMENT
Mixed-use centers include residential, retail, Government uses include federal, state,
hotel, and office uses. Mixed-use centers are county, regional and municipal government
pedestrian-friendly with buildings oriented facilities and installations, except for
towards the street. Residential uses are government-owned institutions.
generally of a higher density, including
apartments, condominiums, townhomes,
cottage housing, and small-lot single-family
residential. The mixture can be vertical, with PERMANENT OPEN SPACE
different uses on different floors of a building,
and horizontal, with different uses side by Parks and playgrounds, recreational fields and
side. Churches, schools and public uses are facilities, greenways, and other green areas
included in mixed-use areas. managed for public access and recreation.
INSTITUTIONAL FLOOD PLAIN
Hospitals, colleges, universities, schools, large CONSERVATION
churches, and similar institutions, whether
public or private, are designated as separate
land uses because of their campus-like Lands within the 100-year flood plain,
character, which requires special attention to preferably preserved for environmental
edges and relationships with adjacent areas. reasons.
Note:For more information about categories
TRANSPORTATION
included in the Future Land Use Map, please
refer to pages 55-57 of Plan CC.
Airports, railroads, highway and interstate
rights-of-way.
15
TURE LAND USE Mi:, -
of .. *"*7 i i 1 * - I
/ . 1.: .....- ,--.. . I. ..... 1..... IIIMIIM / .
( \ I
4INPINN.
ill*I
I 14.4VII, ‘11. I .
I
\,.... ...... J._WWI=
*3/444
r4 \.......
j.... - 1
L.
'841144 0110..",".41.15 ,
...., 4 Ili MEMO 001
' '-- ..•1.: ...'-'..-%.
FUTURE LAND I
. ._
...... ,...1 ......_.r......1... l@Da3 ----- -
USE MAP 1 1 1
, I
,01 , 1
........_......,..4,............4...
LAND USE ACRES PERCENTAGE 1 1 ) _
Mixed-Use 776 6.2% 1
el I I ti '
Agriculture/ WOW 11111111+11111•111111P 111 'AMIN! ABM! illint
Rural 5 0.0%
1 ) 1
Enterprise ' I
I lin I
Commercial
I
Government 323 2.6% 1
Institutional 1,015 8.1%
135
1.1% ..... +...,
I .. ....... OMR . .... 1
1 T
- -I -
1
Low-Density i ELI
1,783 14.2% — ''"I'm '"'" ' eand
Residential
Medium- I
Density 6,317 50.3% London Future Land Use
AMINO. ...... L ....... ir
Residential ' as Mixed-Use
Transportation 535 4.3% Agriculture/Rural Enterprise I
Permanent IM 650 5.2% Commercial
ml --- -
Open Space ' IIII Government
.."/
z Flood Plain MI Institutional
984 7.8% I
Conservation I= Heavy Industrial —4..
Water 48 0.4% , all Light Industrial -...@)StaPles @a
1111.111111111.111111111111111111111 Low-Density Residential it
Total 12,571 100.0% Medium-Density Residential
I
IIM High-Density Residential
ITransportation
gig Permanent Open Space I
m; Flood Plain Conservation
Water I I
Existing Roadway I
Proposed Roadway . ...7 ir. ..... T
_ London Boundary
i I
....
Corpus Christi City Limits
orn ONNIIN-ALL NM= +
Note:A comprehensive plan shall not
constitute zoning regulations or
establish zoning district boundaries.
I
16 1 i
Wiles lam imaiurrion UNII.M. .ir
I i I i
1
I I I I "1 1 i 'Ti' l -%.
\,,,.../
.....1 , e� wews .ws ,www i .rr..w... rare rw�ILwww o 111011/110a — . .�. rte■ " /i}MI M1 1
I I I I I I � °Rd '
: 1_LI.I _ J '47
; - p 1P I Ito *7:4 / 1._ ..� ,... co
..-.�M,. `,'�,!
I I .73
4,
.,..IL mews m wwr€o R d r °°a Clo'`,
1'
I I v N
Cocr
QCy
T, k
goi co —
.... ..... .... ....., ....... fi,"'; a
3 °X NNW k
• MOM 1.1111•1101111111M UMW i I I NO, dyers ..i.,.
o
r..... ..w.r wwww ww mom um r . Co Rd 43 .164 L. Q Co Rd(3`) r "'
1
I NJ
. j %%.4#0/
/�� ` A,
r ammo r w awe o.r : , G o R d G71YiJ 1 V'
\\ ,,
1Akt_ ,..\\>:. NOW" Wilen* 4P •Ar„..
4101
ww .wc■arrw =um mil wars ' 'Co 1 Rd 41 Ind k 401 ,
,...., i 4. . _.
, . _ , . dir, "„ N / ‘, ,
c. f
„.
44
1 rm.° 42. 111". mgmiL'4,, r.,- ' ,
\�\ Cdr
r , , . i
i
, r c
eq , . / ,
fir �'"'*4- ::', r ' 1 ,.. eS I `°
°'c' Snap/Q 4:°
000I . 43 0 4.0 illft 11''ff 4)
VISION THEMES
We
111
VISION THEM
I My for the London
VISION THEMES
Although development is generally impacted MY VISION IS...
by a variety of regulatory factors, market
influences, and budgetary availability; a
I.community with a clear vision can better 1. f _v.*..)
focus the goals for the future. The vision kAr6 h V Mk o e
for the community should be a high level
overarching idea of the future that maintains t {kQils
a singular path for the future. To achieve that
vision, the City must make an effort to direct X03\S.--C_ r V '
development and make improvements that
align with the vision. '
Through the public engagement process, ' '\\
. /-z--D
four themes began to emerge related to the
residents desires for the future. The following ,t'� Jin
are the vision themes identified: ,l.J `� '� V\), \ J
• Celebrate Our Community Character o \ ,r i ; r„
• Promote Sustainable Growth
DQ /Pse_,,+, ,..i pecnvm• rY.44,4. c./
• Promote the Oso Creek and Bay as a V ei,nwec4 +1 44. o+-+= SG4•4I.ac.
Community Amenity CRFF_K p�ESF�vRT.r
aR -rso134 AMS
34--f
ESS
",PRo Vg-N Ai macs e.
19
,.-'- ... .nay...-,>:.-ars.-r' S_'.4`.t . _ .,• .., _
__ , __.'°- 10"'• -.---'74:—__ _--- ""----A.':
� x.
_,T-..- ..-.--- -1.- - - - -°. - ,_-- .."7-:. --t-i '- • )1_ .' .;-4:-\,,n,.. _ '''' .„1, -!,,__' .11'!".. ..i
rte: ._1 .-- ret +. %
x t . -, . � - - t
- '
iii* '44ir ;414' -164— • -1.211116, WI .4 . _ .
CELEBRATE OUR COMMUNITY CHARACTER
The London Area has been characterized by having a tight-knit community character that
features large residential lots, low levels of development, and open spaces. Those living
in the London Area seek an area that does not have the hustle and bustle of the City. As
anticipated growth occurs, it is essential to ensure that the sense of community in the London
Area is maintained and enhanced. By encouraging low- and medium-density residential and
commercial development, incorporating unique design elements into the streetscape, and
integrating public trails, open spaces, and gathering areas throughout the London Area,
existing neighborhoods will blend seamlessly with future development.
20
.-. >��--r-.•.._ . "-%ter-�_ -•._.. __ .._
4 _ ..-Ai tra i rte`'
•
• tit" �k� fit -
4a
:^� r a ice: - . \+ . - -"�a - -101111a. - ,�
1
q
11,
a
lir
'fir ' a
` s
r �
• N. - ALSIN !
, It
- _
s
tti y > ,
r
1
:rte �'= - *• _ .
• Low- and medium-density residential The following community input supports the
development vision theme:
• Preserved open space along Oso Creek "Connectivity to parks, schools, etc."
• Low-density commercial development "Developed or improved roads"
• Storm water drainage infrastructure "Rural community"
"Large lots and homes"
"Master planned community"
21
r
0,4
SI . M S t
,r
•: •
� '.
r
''-" +. , • .4 ,� R 1'
1 j
( 3'7
Jri ) „,,,,,4,,,,,,,,,, ....„, .........,...., 4. .
—
41
- ft ,I- fie:•_ j'• Jt.i. ' - t =ivi�' a.
404.7414-.-'003 hi '' -..V. --:L- -•-ie ArVA 1.,/r/ed, .
.4' _, _ �s,
t , t
- - �I I /t =om }�
ik
:- Bei 1 ��( !'�,: s%` ...r91C7`�r'
rj t- �.. s.� �.• _�}, i' i=ls v � F � � �' r r¢ — .r rK.� _
• . –or,-le 1 .....– if 4 VA111 . 111111
,� ... .. , f ..— ..„-, i
004 . 0.4.w, -41( „ -;----.-:,.4,,g-_ . . - -- Ar.
rte! -..d�Ai-i
PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
Growth and development can be signs of a healthy community. The speed of growth must
not exceed the capacity of the City to provide necessary services and overwhelm the natural
environment. Development in the London Area should occur intentionally and sustainably
while following planned infrastructure and maintaining the desired low- to medium-density
of the area. Utilize planned infrastructure to create public spaces and amenities for the
community. Ensure that new development is built in concert with the environment to
preserve the natural landscape and protect adequate drainage areas and create a sustainable
community.
22
'
^ ` "-ft~ �� , . ��,`^ � ' ^ '
r.. . ` � ^ . '
� �� � .� ' '
_ t " _ ~ . '� .w. _ ^
- ~ . . � ~ •
��
` � ^~ ' ~� ,, ,^ ' 'i
. �t�^ .4' ' � A ` , � m, '
^� ' ��
` �� � ' ' , ' ,r ' a �
' ` � . ' ' ,� ,. . . ��. - " � � `
� � � �
`�� ~ "v ` � ithe '^ - � . �
' ^� y�' • ` ~� ` ' �' � ' ' - ���� �� ` •- ' '~�
2 .)L X '1, 2,4ik 11),,,lir 111141.......-a'0. ., 1114' ' 1: * ;i 111..
• ...'.....,.l'illj'4 1 a-"•... ,1111111411 tar - _ ... ''11--t'.."--1 All 'imi .1111
ill
a_ frik-a 41, •It,a ...1(11.11t-1-11:Cii. . di eill9111
, .. .,
, iip,.
/....
' .10°' J" - ' r fri ,:"1" .
• Drainage channel for new development The following community input supports the
vision theme:
• Trail located along drainage channel
"Access for nature recreation"
• Pocket prairie
"Parks and trai|s"
• Trail amenities
"Improved drainage"
• Workout equipment
"'
• Benches Drainagedesign",
• Educational signage
--
23
VISION THEMES
r-
F. .-
t` r- a Sr., rF ,F s
•
It T r r. 'kik . �' ‘ /' l.. _ +�' • M!TV' _ y .,.�
stip ,
y,
+nor• — _ _ _ _.
r, p r
iii. IFE‘41% -
•
♦ I
�) Y r p
Mk
�"" .
. .. 1.-- .. .4,' ii- ;0
, .
. .
ii,_ .. ,, , ,7
... 7 ...
,,f k _, _ :,,,,ilk k 1.-
_4 A '. i ' e'�' 'ma.. ( a i de f t
. fi..., , to ,:
lea\ir4)il "1404.4 . 1
11110i A-- \ ..,4;(4A-:81/4111\h:' I 1,),04111-.,.___ ' - .millr'°'7.'-----54111.11- ' * . '1" . 1 I. '
PROMOTE THE OSO CREEK AND BAY AS A COMMUNITY AMENITY
Oso Creek and Bay are a unique amenity for the City and especially for the London area.
With easy accessibility and opportunities to facilitate outdoor recreation, the Oso Creek and
Bay could be a unique destination for the entire community. Improvements to Oso Creek and
Bay, including improved water quality, the construction of a continuous trail, educational
features, and water access, will make this feature inviting to all ages. As London continues
to grow, special care will be taken to preserve and protect the Oso Creek and Bay from the
negative impacts of development. In the future, Oso Bay and Creek will serve as a resource for
education, recreation, and overall enhancement of the quality of life for residents.
24
VISI.Bi THEMEci
......... ... . ....,........,„--..arii, ,401.irl, ,-i.- - - 'i-e. . • f i:.4 . .
.1.,
ir .
y
�.
0. i iralbX_ ' .. - '''''t A 1'- '7''''
- .j9e.,4,4 4 t4't k--
f 3
1 v "'• _ -. --
.....,. .N.%,- Ot I tiliai. -
K rE t ,'*:'ed
t.`�a { `i r "! Mho
.ry# , _it • - - t
. ..
s J /� - ,•
Ile A
_ J ,
• Kayak launch The following community input supports the
vision theme:
• Hike and bike trail
"Access for nature recreation"
• Pier
• Restored riparian (native vegetation) areas "Oso Creek preservation and enhanced
riparian areas"
• Educational signage
"Better walking trails along Oso Creek"
• Trail head and access point
"Oso Creek kayak access and bike trail"
25
POLICY
INITIATIVES AND
IMPLEMENTATION
. _
-1 4 qtr"
.� P INI TIVES.miass y� LE i 40,-....
• 4 3. ' smeesseamirms. 0
{ � r' . o6M r�
N0r
i
i ,
tM1111.1111111.11"1111.111"111711MIL
.
r
1, ,_ P , _.
I.
POLICY INITIATIVES
To achieve the vision for the London Area, five policy initiatives were established that are
related to different aspects of development. Policy initiatives are not exclusive and may
further the goal of one or more vision themes. For each policy initiative, strategies are
identified to support the implementation of the efforts. These strategies are the actions taken
by the City that lead to the successful implementation of the plan.
VISION THEMES
PROMOTE THE
POLICY INITIATIVES CELEBRATE OUR PROMOTE OSO CREEK
COMMUNITY SUSTAINABLE AND BAY AS A
CHARACTER GROWTH COMMUNITY
AMENITY
1 Expand and improve infrastructure
and city facilities.
Promote land development that i
/
i
v/i
2 enhances the character and
opportunities in London.
3
Provide outdoor recreation 4l°'
_ ` /amenities. \-J Nit/
Utilize the Oso Creekand Bay
NNe i i
4 for sustainable recreation and
ecotourism.
5 /r---(''
Reduce and improve stormwater jf
runoff.
27
LICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION
11 EXPAND AND IMPROVE INFRASTRUCTURE
AND CITY FACILITIES
1.1. Coordinate with Nueces County to
encourage roadway standards and
designs that promote the safe and 1
la lit efficient movement of vehicles, bicycles, _ �=
i
and pedestrians. li46 * .
1.2. Ensure adequate utility infrastructure to ti =A lit
serve growing development .
a. Monitor the Greenwood Wastewater �$ t��
Treatment Plant's existing capacity I
and initiate expansion designs if .T '. :t �l
warranted.
1.3. Develop Master Wastewater, and -
Drainage Plans to encourage orderly
growth and minimize the effects of Example of Protected Bike Lane
future flooding.
., s
1.4 Plan for expanding police and fire
protection services with growing city
limits and population. -voi _�—
a. Identify appropriate sites for future r 1�
Fire Stations and Police Substations
and obtain property either through IX\
purchase or donation. �
b. Ensure adequate tax-base is in place
jy
� l
,
to support police and fire operations.
\\ ,
1.5 Investigate the possibility of
constructing a FEMA dome in the Aid 1 v.
London Area in partnership with London
0.t
ISD.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
.a
28
11 POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATI
PROMOTE LAND DEVELOPMENT THAT
ENHANCES THE CHARACTER AND
1 L ' ORTUNf1ES IN LONDON
2.1. Establish community nodes that 4 *-
reflect
reflect London's character to serve as
community gathering places. ? ' - '
2.2. Promote new commercial, retail, ***loot- .. '
/'!4
and residential development while - . l f=
; . •
maintaining a tight-knit community _-.�„
character. i+m_. _. .- `_ -
2.3. Encourage the development of small --- _. _
commercial nodes throughout the - -- - �`
London Area to help reduce vehicular - _
trips and to provide convenience to its _;,-...mor-- _
s,.
residents. ....,-----•--- - - "t:
2.4. Encourage residential street layouts that - - -
promote walkability and create ease of Example of Public Space with Character Enhancements
access to collector roads.
More Connectivity: Less Connectivity:
2.5. Encourage compatible and appropriate Traditional Grid Pattern Conventional Cul-De-Sac
land uses for long-term and sustainable io
growth patterns.
2.6. Encourage low-impact land uses along
Oso Creek and flood zones. III
2.7. Incorporate green spaces and trails
into master-planned residential
developments that provide connectivity
throughout the London Area.
Example Neighborhood Layouts
s'.
. a ' 29
t';7:
LICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION
PROVIDE OUTDOOR RECREATION
AMENITIES
3.1. Develop park and trail facilities.
3.2. Encourage pedestrian and bicycle • _
facilities that are naturally aligned with 4 _. _
drainage channels, floodways, and future .
stormwater drainage infrastructure. ,
3.3. Incorporate recreation features
to support activities for multiple
generations.
3.4. Strategically incorporate park elements -
that encourage arts and entertainment
for residents. `'; _`
Schanen Hike/Bike Trail
ahlo
r� A
Example of Pocket Park with Art and Recreational Amenities
30
111111
POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATI
UTILIZE THE DSO CREEK AND BAY
FOR SUSTAINABLE RECREATION AND
ECDTDURISM
4.1. Create recreational opportunities d. Create an ordinance to prevent
along Oso Creek and Bay through the mowing within a certain distance of
development of a network of parks, open Oso Creek and Bay.
space, trails, and access points. 4.3 Explore possible amendments to the
a. Develop a preferred alignment for Unified Development Code (UDC) that
the Oso hike/bike trail and design would preserve riparian corridors
standards for the path. and vegetated buffer strips, while
b. Incorporated marked pedestrian establishing setbacks along creeks and
crosswalks and bicycle paths at drainage channels in the Oso Bay and
gateways in trail design. Creek watershed.
c. Develop a unique logo and design
theme to promote and designate the
Oso Creek and Bay as a scenic and
recreational area.
4.2. Preserve and protect riparian habitat
along the Oso Creek and Bay.
a. Identify specific locations to
strategically preserve open space
and conservation zones along Oso
Creek and Bay.
b. Permit dedication of land and
hike/bike trail construction along
Oso Creek and Bay to fulfill park
dedication requirements.
c. Partner with or create an entity to
purchase property along the Oso
Creek and Bay for conservation,
protection, and trail development.
Oso Creek
31
LICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION
5 REDUCE AND IMPROVE STORM WATER
RUNOFF
5.1. Incorporate green infrastructure 5.6 Promote proper management of pet
elements in public projects where cost- waste.
effective. (Low-Impact Development) a. Provide more pet waste disposal
5.2. Educate interested stakeholders and the stations at parks and trails.
broader public about economic tools for b. Enhance the City's public information
reducing and treating stormwater runoff. campaign on proper pet waste
a. Continue to offer a rain barrel disposal.
program. 5.7 Work with partner organizations, such
5.3. Encourage xeriscape gardens requiring as Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, to
little to no irrigation. pursue grants that would offer free or
a. Educate residents on how xeriscape low-cost On Site Sewer Facilities (OSSF)
gardens can reduce runoff of evaluations and assist property owners
stormwater and irrigation water with addressing identified OSSF issues.
that carries topsoils, fertilizers, and
pesticides into lakes, rivers, and
streams while also reducing costs
and maintenance requirements for
homeowners. 1 '/
b. Explore incentives for developers
to install xeriscape gardens in new
•
developments.
5.4. Incorporate pocket prairies, where
appropriate, along hike and bike trails.
5.5. Develop retention ponds upstream
along Oso Creek and drainage channels
to capture stormwater to help reduce
downstream effects.
a. Investigate the use of parks as
Oso Wetlands Preserve Rainwater Cistern
stormwater detention/retention facilities.
32
14111 POLICY INITIATIVES AND IMPLEMENTATI
I
. A A..• --
s
ti'A , riv rJ
+pC-. t r i ;
..,...i.:1:::;1‘,7,:. f p y/'�
• 1 /,��
C Y
w t,, '34_:-;;-4,1'
- - cam•; , �'� _
L41111
ANN
�, L+.';
AW* _ ."
,- LOND,EIN AREA D;EVEL,DPMEN PIAN [ DRAFT ]
.v , 4 ;, Y . J.,,..✓ JANUARY 28 . 2020ill
r
PUBLIC
INVESTMENT
INITIATIVES
4
1
! ' • i
I
I
It ' I 7 “ il 1.111111111 Fli
d ,. ,
,__....= ! tit 6 ' ' - . 1 I .'
, — ILL-7—..-- _
. ........_..-AillWe
PUBLIC INVESTMENT INITIATIVES
The built environment is the physical Short-term projects can begin soon after
interpretation of the vision for the adoption. These projects are considered "low
community. The following public investment hanging fruit." They are more attainable and
projects represent improvements that do not require large amounts of funding.
directly support the implementation of the These projects are generally planned CIP
vision and goals. These projects should projects in the next five years.
inform the capital improvement program
(CIP) by prioritizing projects identified here Mid-term projects are not as attainable
for future CIP planning. Some identified within the first five years. They require
projects are currently planned capital planning or funding to prepare but should be
improvements by the City. Others are implemented in six to ten years.
proposed projects for implementation based Long-term projects may not currently have
on feedback from the community. The public an anticipated time frame for implementation
investment projects are divided into three or may require prerequisite planning before
time frames: implementation. Long-term projects should
• Short-Term (Next 5 Years) be revisited to assess the status of the
project and determine if implementation can
• Mid-Term (6-10 Years) be accomplished sooner.
• Long-Term (More Than 10 Years)
{
35
J
9'et �'k .'r :-w5� zp 4
.�,,. l j d Z °•f � '�
y
•
S L"' x
c„
:-._.--',::-.!'i„.:::.
; '„......'-', ,t7,?!..-, ;'e p Rd 26
s
its.
+ _ .
SHORT-TERM (1-5 YEARS) .'`r-
l'
PARKS AND TRAILS �,'
ki;:_,..,,.,,,...; Co'Rd 26
_ -...:-,.,, , i
Greenbelt/Storm Water Master Plan* ”"
,l,'l T . ',1 { j
FM •
2444 - Construct 5 Lane Curb and ,' z
Gutter Roadway (TxDOT)
South Oso Parkway Street
Improvements
County Road33 Street Improvements
,, , 1 I '
U1 SH 286 Water Line Replacement
U2 Greenwood Wastewater Treatment „
Plant Improvements w `' i
* Projects Not Mapped
@o611 ZS i —
Short-Term Projects
Health and Safety Improvements
Improvements
Y litit — — •Trail Improvements
StreParket ments
Utility/InfrastructureImproveImprovements
London Bound
�� Corpus Christi City Limits
1
I IMiles
3B
, ' " , ,, , „ —.. ,...._, ,..„
,ftigiwiwi
.jej
_
. .
:,-, . r I . t 4y
.
--- GoiRdr4744, , ., g-'• r I _ !
. , -,-, .
4. ,
„co . , •.„, _ .4, 1
.4-, ., ,,.... .. ... ...
_
., cu
. g.
, 1
„, 1. I
1 4/63
,i11; i Cir.‘' ', . ,,:,.•• it:,s:,,:-,',-,':_'_,<„'',_., ,,: , ,,, 1 0
40
i@Oa](3g . . -,...:•
. ,
, I
i ,Iii:e1;t,,-, . .,, ',. ''-4,F•;1''•,, 4,' ' ',,,,, .,, i
• •--4 . .' '.":',,,k.:; R .. „.,
-? s
* ' • - - . : le i ' ..-.1r- -- ,/:
,, . ,
?;43.,c,., •t•
0
, 1 ..,, • ,:: V 0 . .t
,
,. .
,.„
i -.....,,,
..,
Co Rd 41A
ig a mg Ng sioltryCA*Nr.3 iii team Et awn ita aft Ai eft-
_
It 1 1.
- ., -•'-.. - ;'
tail .4 awi .r ,_ _ Co Rd 43 '-' *. --- ,;,' li,••
,ir,----
1' t
1, .• i. . 41,1, , , i., , — 1
, .`
? i
..' . .
I. .
. ,......ye., -..
1'-. '' F.t.i7.'7 or ,Ii
;-•
Iiiii,9/1//1.-
,, ..
/1
• .,4, iiii...., ,
i
,P
10
,.
'Aves 04'4
t.
4-
ey,.... 4 4
—a %(..460, 1 f dz
.. &
ettj,,, 0 kl,
4,' opAt.
/ co
rt,
* 4;?Qi) ..
to
eb,
pfd 6r°mss _ :.
NIT
h-
MID—TERM (5-10 YEARS) s ;`
HEALTH AND SAFETY Co Rd 26 •
Fire Station #19 - Building and
Ambulance*
(Vicinity of SH 286 and FM 43)
P2
PARKS AND TRAILS
Drainage Channel Trail Development
Phase l**
Oso Creek Trail Phase l**
I
Oso Creek Trail Phase Il**
_11;;1311;
Crosstown Extension to FM 2444 14, .1
(TxDOT)
* Projects Not Mapped
** Oso Creek Trail and Drainage Channel
C�G�22
Trail projects are intended to show
general location and do not represent •
final alignment.
Mid-Term Projects
- Health and Safety Improvements
Parks Improvements
— — • Trail Improvements
- Street Improvements
Utility/Infrastructure Improvements
London Boundary
L"J- Corpus Christi City Limits
lab
I IMiles N
38
II i
Co '
'',„:.',6.•? ' . ,,,,.. . ,, ,. .! Po,4-,._ I-- ;11 93/„:1.,,,
•
:',:!,,,,;,' ...,,, •„: ,-.. ., '',2:' "4,:`,:'' -, .. ' "WA, ' ,.,, 1 •‘tr
- ----- ---.OOIRdr4a7 ,,,.. `g .', I
r. ,. i I*• i, ,, A A
. CO I
1. . I . ist 4010
. ,
. Ca
,
i 1,l,• '1'';,,S , ,..:i,::. .' :', -1
I N) ' . 1..J.4-',.*
Ab
4$
1 -.
o
i(RD GE eg /
t
- _. „.......-."
i 1 .
' )
,
, ,.... '
. ,
: -
.. . _..' ,•
cp,
<i)
.0.. • - .i,r• ........ - ,,,,,,i - . . , ..,...,...,„ ,
@ORd.43 vr' _- --r.r,_".,.• ,,' ,. 11 0,111POve,_ • ,
...v..,,,
-- - ... .....•., 0 .
'''' )42tri9*- ;, ' ':.-7...›."•
: ... ki;-.•-. ,._ ., '' '' '
.. . ,
'Co Rd 41A *-111k4
f ... .;
.. , _.
4/ .,. • ._.
_ .
11
4."WI c , i
A:4 i,4•''''''''.- . -, '
/ '' ' '1''''.-' :':''''''t,'6iil,'-''''''''''r ''''
, . 1' !.1 at,4 '..; . -
' -,.. 1,..-41' .1!14:ote
.,,,„„.
Il_TI :24!,. 444 rill,*
• ••." .'s: po
c'i ' :01 -•.,,,,,,,;..-...0..-tis,, 4..„,
,oit., 0
''.. :..
s_ ..%- '.-
I eke
_,4.69 co
t•ie"r 4._
P'les 4,
.t
o
t• Q1141
I
02 aF
1
F , 440110
e4,9 _,
eeth., .h-
,r
qd
c.o tto
41r
.‘)
-Aftillirir Nr-- ,
�„, : CoIRdt26
'''. s, k _ s-
� Avg ' � ;,,t,-�: � f -r �
LONG-TERM (10+ YEARS)
f
HEALTH AND SAFETY t
'� Co Rd 26
Fire Station #19 - New Fire Truck and -!-- -e., 0
Ladder Truck*
(Vicinity of SH 286 and FM 43) '; -,,,0. t!
Fire Station #20 - New Fire Station*
(Vicinity of SH 286 and FM 2444) i. ,� '
PARKS AND TRAILS
Oso Creek Trail Phase III** .1.:... S5
Drainage Channel Trail Development ,
-fit Phase II**
I I ''v I I Ti 1
FM 43 Street Improvements (Tx DOT)
* Projects Not Mapped
** Oso Creek Trail and Drainage Channel CGt1ffi
Trail projects are intended to show
general location and do not represent
final alignment.
Long-Term Projects
- Health and Safety Improvements
Parks Improvements
— — • Trail Improvements
- Street Improvements
Utility/Infrastructure Improvements
�J London Boundary
talint Corpus Christi City Limits
1
1 'Miles
40 „.
(s. 44
k,
I 0
k
4 /
et00
4Zr .7ectiti
8
49
1
;
pli
lir— rii, . ir
it im, re-nivoob
;mai e
wl y
, K....,-•-_.,,,ze-- '
„ i
i. •i
dp.mi,
N '
jil!is maw./ 1 i riiiiii-tkiet,
P5 k.,,
044cr
ir.....1 . ______
i ....
# g e 4:,
.., ,
RP Or
k
e -,acizty
..1
FLM 43 4,
N
' I
_ ....
. 4
i \
,3)
i )1 .,e
41
_ „Le
W ' t29,6.0„A_
__
. 1 .-.,-.:.„,t-7 . . .1p6 wooi ..,
--(iv
t am ,, _
/-
olf7.0
r gvna4p2,._
w . i
-4.......
, 0 I
,_......,.-__..
GiL 244
- ._ . .... _,, _ ,., . ;o-,. ,,a, ,m,.r,„...,..,t,-,..t...,Li.,,. .,•
/-
1,
4
cli)
*XI ,
.., _ ,, 0
, e -1,...a_a.-T, ri. 1:I
litf 1 _ _two.---:, !,:.?•4„..;
1 @ a I
8 ,...... ..,
_
, -
41