HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2005-025 - 1/12/2005 - NA CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
AMENDMENT NO.1
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The City of Corpus Christi, Texas hereinafter called "CITY" and HDR Engineering, Inc.
hereinafter called 'Engineer" agree to the following amendments to the Contract for
Engineering Services for Wood River Lift Station and Force Main Ul~qrade as authorized
by
Original Contract I October 21,2003 I Motion No. 2003-375 I $236,332.00 I
Changes in project scope as outlined in the attached Exhibit A have resulted in the need to
adjust the fees for professional services accordingly. The revised fees are as summarized
on the attached Exhibit B.
All other terms and conditions of the October 21, 2003 contract between the City and
Engineer, and any amendments to that contract, which are net specifically addressed
herein, shall remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Ronald F. Massey, g~te
Assistant City Manager
ED
~l'el R. Escobar, P.E. Date
Director of Engineering Services
HDR EN~INEEBING, INC.
Carl E. Crull, P.E. Date
Vice President
5151 Flynn Parkway, Suite 314
Corpus Christi, TX 78411
(361) 857-2216 Office
(361) 857-0509 Fax
A'I-rES~ L/~/2
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM
As i~tant City Atlome~
Date
Project Number: 7148
Funding Source:
Encumbrance Number:
2005-025
01/12/05
HDR Engineering
November 5, 2004
Mr. Joe Trejo, P.E.
Assistant Director of Engineering Services
City of Corpus Chdsti
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Chdsti, TX 78469-9277
Re: Wood River Lift Station Upgrades and Force Main Extensions
City Project No. 7148
Dear Mr. Trejo;
On October 15, 2004, HDR Engineering submitted the final Design Memorandum for
the Wood River Lift Station Upgrades and Force Main Extensions. During our review
meeting of November 1,2004, you indicated that a request tO proceed with the design
was needed. This letter is to request that formal approval be given to proceed with the
design phase of this project.
We have discussed the recommended route and surveying requirements with our
surveying subconsultant. They advise that 'it will take 60 days to complete the
topographic and boundary surveys for the force main. We are also requesting that the
City provide dght of entry permission from the affected land owners to perform the
surveying. Attached is a list of the property owners from the appraisal distdct record s.
Our letter of August 13, 2004 to Mr. Escobar ouUined several changes to the scope of
the project from what was initially contemplated. These changes warrant a review of the
scope and fee for the project. We request that the contract be amended to increase the
fee for these changes. These changes are reiterated below.
The Design Memorandum submitted in March 2004 included four altemate
routes. These routes were discussed dudng pdor scoping meetings. In the final
rewew meeting, a fifth alternate route was requested. This route was included in
the Design Memorandum and resubmitted SubsequenUy a sixth route was
requested. These additional routes have resulted in additional effort on our part
both m preparation of the altemates and additional rewew meetings. We have
expended approximately $4,500 in this effort
There have been several additions to the lift station portion of the work; an
emergency generator and odor control facilities. Neither of these was discussed
in the initial scoping meeting. The estimated construction cost of these items is
$110,000. We propose an increase in the fee for basic services of $8,250 for
design services associated with these items.
AMD. NO. 1
EXHIBIT "A"
5,s~ r~,~,~'~ov ~:l~,~Page I of 3
HDR Engiae~riao, Inc.
Mr. Joe Tmjo, P.E.
November 5, 2004
P~ge 2 of 3
3. The altemate route six (6) is approximately 4,300 feet longer than alternate route
. four (4). This will result in the need for-3 or 4 additional plan/profile sheets. We
estimate that the cost to prepare these additional sheets at $4,000.
The initial routes considered were entirely within the City Limits where utility and
right of way records are easily accessible. The proposed route outside the .City
limits will entail more effort in identifying and addressing potential utility conflicts.
Construction within the. dght of way will also entail coordination with the county
which was not initially envisioned. We estimate that the cost of the additional
utility coordination and coordination with Nueces County and Nueces County
Water Control and Improvement Distdct No 3 to be $4,500_
=
In our contract, we included $15,494 under Special Services for permitting. This
· was to be used primarily for the preparation of Traffic Control Plans to address
the construction along F.M 624 and satisfy all the TXDOT requirements. With
the new route, the traffic control component will be much reduced. The TXDOT
involvement will be limited to crossing FM 624 at County Road 69 and crossing
US 77. We estimate that the traffic control plan preparation and permitting with
TXDOT to be $7,500. This would result in a reduction in this item of $7,994.
Based on our conversation on Monday, it appears that there will be an additional
change in the scope. TXDOT is proposing a location for the casing under U.S. 77
about 600' south of where it was initially proposed. The cost of an additional
1200' of line may be equivalent to the cost to bore under U.S. 77 at a location
closer to the initial location. It is our understanding that the City now desires to
include the crossing under U.S. 77 in this contract. The design of the crossing of
U,S 77 will necessitate an additional plan sheet and additional specifications as
well as coordination with TXDOT and affected utilities. We estimate the cost of
this work to be $5,650.
The longer route and the addition of the bodng under U.S. 77 will increase the
construction time frame as well as our involvement in the construction phase
services. We estimate the additional effort dudng the construction phase to be
$2,200
In summary the changes in fees for the various phases of the work are
Preliminary Phase + $ 4,500
Design Phase + $ 22,400
Construction Phase + $ 2,200
Special Services - $ 7,994
TOTAL + $ 21,106
HDR Enolaoerlag, Inc.
AMD. NO. 1
EXHIBIT "'A'
Page 2 of 3
M~ Joe Trejo, P,E.
November 5, 2004
Pa~Te 3 of 3
The changes in fee are shown on the attached table which shows the current fee and
the amended fee. Your favorable review of this amendment to the contract is
appreciated.
We have taken the liberty of preparing an amendment to the contract for your review.
We are requesting authorization to proceed with the design phase of this project. We
have not authorized any survey work until the route was approved. Our first step will be
to complete the negotiations of the surveying fee with Pyle and Associates so they can
proceed with that part of the work.
Should you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely;
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Cad E. Crull, P.E.
Vice President
Attachments
AMD. NO. 1
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 3 of 3
WOOD RIVER LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAIN UPGRADE
(Project No. 714.8)
SUMMARY OF FEES
I
BASIC SERVICES
PreliminapJ Phase
2 Design Phase
3 Bid Phase
4 Construction Phase
Subtotal Basic Services
I
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Permit Preparation
2 ROW Acquisition Survey
3 Topographic Survey
4 Construction Observation Services
5 Start-up Services
6 Warranty Phase
Subtotal Additional Services
I
TOTAL
ORIGINAL AMENDMT.
CONTRACT NO. 1
$21,288.00 $4,500.00
66,888.00 22,400.00
7,196.00 0.00
22,136.00 2,200.00
117,508.00 29,100.00
15,494.00 (7,994.00)
22,000.00 0.00
22,250.00 0.00
50,490.00 0.00
2,494.00 0.00
6,096.00 0.00
118,824.00 (7,994.00)
$236,332.00 $21,106.00
TOTAL
$25,788.0O
89,288.00
7,196.00
24,336.00
146,608.00
7,500.00
22,000.00
22,250.00
50,490.00
2,494.00
6,096.00
110,830.00
$257,438.00
AMD. NO. '1
EXHIBIT "B"
Page I of 1