HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2006-503 - 8/30/2006 - NAj4
Qvc# 20~604948~
NO. OS-61753-4
1N CONDEMNATION
CITY 0F Ct~RPUS CHRISTI § 1N THE COUNTY COURT
§
VS. § AT LAW NO. 4
§
JOSE~H P. ~VENDT, JOSE~'H A. HANSLER, §
TOBffi~1 H~#NSLER AND ECKMAN §
INVE~TMEIMTTS, LTD. § NUECES COLINTY, TEXAS
JLT~GMENT IN ABSENCE OF OBJECTION
That, on the date below written, there came on to be heard and considered the Award of
Speci~tl Cornmissioners filed on the 19th day of October, 2005 with the Judge of said Court under
the above entitled and numbered cause, which is a condemnation proceeding in which the City of
Corp~ Christi is Plaintiff and Joseph P. Wendt, Joseph A. Hansler, Toben Hansler and Eckman
Inves~nents, Ltd. are Defendants.
lt ap~earing to the Court, and it is so found, that no objections to said Award were filed
within the time allowed by law nar as of the date hereof, and that said Award has been filed with
the C~rk of this Court;
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJLTDGED and DECREED by the Court as follows:
That said Award of Special Commissioners be, and the same is hereby confirmed
and adopted ~nd made the Judgment of this Court;
2. That the Clerk of this Court record this Judgment and the Award of Special
Comraissioners in the minutes of this Court;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~W ~~~ ~~ ~"_ , ,
~ --' U ~ ~--~ ~
j ~:~~ ~ ~~ ~~~s I~,~'
2Oi)9'~
2006-503 1 fi~'AT~Y ~~REZ, C'~__~;C7' CL ~-.;~.
~~~UE~ES .. . ~;~e~lTY
O8/30/06
W~ndt, JosepiE P., et al ~~p~~(ED
3. That by virtue of the Award of Special Commissioners, the Plaintiff, City of
Corp~s Chri~ti, is entitled t~ be vested with, and does hereby have Judgment against the above
named Def~~dants vesting in it those certain permanent and ternporary easements and easement
rights in Lo~ 23, Section ~ l, Flour Bluff and Encinal Fann and Garden Tracts, a subdivision of
Nueces County, Texas, as more particularly described in Plaintiff s Original Petition for
Cond~mnatio~ included and adopted as a part of the Award of Special Commissioners, a copy of
which Award of Special Commissioners is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "1." and adopted as a
part lyereof for all purposes;
4. That by virtue of the Award of Special Commissioners, the Defendant is entitled
to recover from the Plaintiff, City of Corpus Christi, the sum of Eleven Thousand Five Hundred
Dolla~s ($11,500.00) and does hereby have Judgment against the Plaintiff for said amount; and it
appeat~ing and it is so found that the amount of said Judgment has been paid into the registry of
the Court by City of Corpus Christi and withdrawn there from by the Defendants, Joseph P.
Wendt, Joseph A. Hansler, Toben Hansler and Eckman Investments, Ltd., that this Judgment is
enter~d fully satisfied; and
~. That the costs of these proceedings are assessed against the Plaintiff as provided
in the Award of Special Commissioners.
SIGNED this the ~ day of . 2006.
James Kl~er, Jyt~e, County Court at Law No. 4
Nueces ~ount{, exas
200975
~
L
NO. OS-61753-4
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDING
CITY OF C()RPUS CHRISTI § IN THE COUNTY COURT
§
V. §
~ AT LAW NO. FOUR
JOSEPH P. WENDT, JOS~PH A. HANSLER, §
TOB~1 HA~TSLER AND LCKMAN §
INVF.STME~1'TS, LTD. § NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
A~ARD OF SPECIAL CC?MMISSIUNERS
On the 19`~ day of October, 2005, in the City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, the
above cond~nation procealing came on to be heard before the undersigned, three disinterested
freehcc~ders of Nueces County, Texas, heretofore appointed as Special Commissioners by the Judge
of the Count}+ Court at Law No. Four, Nueces County, Texas, to assess the damages caused by the
conde~nnatian proceedings, and the Commissioners proceeded to hear evidence and argument, and
made t~e foll~wing findings:
I.
That on the 29`t' day of September, 2005, the CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, as Plaintiff,
filed a writtean petition with t~e District Clerk of Nueces County, Texas, wherein upon the facts and
for th~ purppses therein state~d, it sought judgment vesting in the CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
perma~ent ~ements and temporary easement for municipal purposes, in Nueces County, Texas, all
as de~eribed in Plaintiff's Original Petition for Condemnation attached hereto as Exhibit "I" and
incorp~rated herein for all purposes.
ERHIBIT "1"
200060
II.
That the Judge of th~ said Court did duly appoint Hollis Porcher, Thomas W. Stewart and
Willi~tm S. Minor, three disinterested freeholders of Nueces County, Texas, as Special
Cornt~issioners to assess the damages caused by the taking of said property.
III.
That thereafter said Special Commissioners duly qualified as such, each taking the oath
prescribed b~ law, which oaths are on file with the papers in this cause.
IV.
That after having so qualified, said Special Commissioners on the 3rd day of October, 2005,
by w~itten arder designated and appointed the 19`}' day of October, 2005, at 9:00 o'clock a.m. at the
Jury Room of County Court at Law No. Four, Nueces County Courthouse, Corpus Christi, Nueces
Coun~y, Tex~s, as the date, time, and place for hearing said petition and parties, said date being the
earlie~t practicable time and such place being in the county in which the land or a part thereof is
situatad.
V.
That on the 3rd day of October, 2005, said Special Commissioners issued written notice of the
date and plu;e of the hearing. Defendants Eckman Investments, Ltd., Joseph P. Wendt, Toben
Hans~er and ~oseph Hansler were duly served with notice and notified in the manner provided by law
of such hearing. T'he notices with written returns of service thereon being duly filed with the
Com~issio~~ers on the 19`h day of October, 2005.
2
200060
VI.
That on the 19`h day of October, 2005, said Special Commissioners did convene pursuant to
~se~ng at~td Plaintiff the CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, appeared by and through its attorney;
and Defendants Eckman Investments, Ltd., Joseph P. Wendt, Toben Hansler and Joseph A.
Ha21S~L7 ~/~'~b qJ ~~Oli{ .' ~6~'A~~/'n ~~l /I~t~l /H~f ~~i~'J/~~ `./~. EL~~74~
J7'-
~s.f~I~ I~, i/,~bf/~~- a rtr~rtl :h s t~~o~ • Joc~~ ~- 1~~.~~ G b~ 7v~if
/`~~I-f~tl-- d t ~ rlI ~ a ~'> !'~I~
Said Special Commissioners proceeded to hear evidence as to the damages that will be
sustai~ed by the owners and those claiming an interest in such land by reason of the taking of said
prope~ty and, after hearing at~d considering such evidence, said Special Commissioners did find and
deterisine ar~d, accordingly, assess damages to be paid by Plaintiff, the CITY OF CORPUS
CHR~STI, to the Defendants, jointly, in the total amount of ~ Ie ve ri - 1~ O U~ 4 R~
_ ~ w ~. I~..~ vY1 ~ Y ~ _AND ~ ~ /100 DOLLARS ($ 1 ~ . .5~~ - O 4 ).
The costs of this proeeeding are adjudged against the P~ at + n i~~
TH
SIG~ED on this the ( q day of October, 2005.
~ '
Hollis Porcher, Special Commissi er
,
Thomas W. Stewart, Special Commissioner
y~,,~~ ~~-'~,.'~ ~
William S. Minor, Special Commissioner
200060
The foregoing Award of Special Commissioners was filed with me this the day of
Octob~r, 20Q5. It is ORDEI~ED that each Special Commissioner receive the sum of l/r/~~'
as a reasonable fee for services in this proceeding. The Clerk is hereby informed of the decision by
the Sgecial Commissioners pursuant to §21.049 of~Texas Property
Judge J ~ ~~I~la~r ~ ~
County at L No. o, Nueces County, Texas
2oao6o 4
E%HIBg'Q' "I"
No. G ~ - ~ ~ 7.5~3 - ~
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDING
CITY OF CpRPUS CHRISTI § IN THE COUNTY COURT
V. §
§
§ AT LAW NO. ~_
JOSE~-H P. WENDT, JOSF.~'H A. HANSLER, §
TOBflI~i H~SLER AND ~KMAN §
INVE~TM~'TS, LTD. § NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
ORI~INAL PETITION FOR CONDEMAIATION
TO THE HQ~ORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
The CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, Plaintiff, exercising the power of eminent domain
conferRed upon it by Texas L,ocal Govemment Code Chapter 251, and by virtue of Texas
Proper~y Code, Chapter 21 a~d its City Charter and Ordinances, files this Original Petition for
Conde~enatia~ against JOSE~H P. WENDT, JOSEPH A. HANSLER, TOBEN HANSLER and
ECICIV~~1N IN'VESTMENTS, LTD., Defendants, and would respectfully show:
I
PARTIES
1.1 Plainq~' City of Corptts Christi, is a home-rule municipal corporation operating under a
home role-ch~ter in the City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, and having by law the
right of emir~t~t domain and power of condemnation, acting herein by and through its duly
elected ~nd a~orized City Council for and on behalf of the City of Corpus Christi.
~
~ `I~ ~
1.2 Defendent Joseph P. Wendt, the owner of an interest in the subject property, is a re~erlt ~~.-"~~
cn r,:,:,: ,:;r~
of Nueaes Cc~ty, Texas up~n whom notice can be served at 5010 Cascade, Corpus C~ist~, ~ f~~ ~~~
~ : -- ~ _; =~ ~
Texas 7~413. ~ :
D ; -:;
I •`ir~,
.A ~ i,-~~..~-c~
~'J ?y R°N
,~ v ~
J ~
--<
1.3 Defendant Joseph A. Hansler, the owner of an interest in the subject property, is a
resident of Nueces County, Texas upon whom notice can be served at 1515 Caribbean Drive,
Corpu~ Chrieti, Texas 78418.
1.4 Defendant Toben Ha~nsler, the owner of an interest in the subject property, is a resident of
Nuecet County, Texas upon whom notice can be served at 810 Roseanne Street, Corpus Christi,
Texas 78418.
1.5 Eckr~~tn Investmentg, Ltd., the owner of an interest in the subject property, doing
busine,~s in I'~Iueces County, Texas whom notice can be served by serving its registered agent,
L,aurie N. Eclanan at 302 Ddphin Place, Corpus Christi, Texas 78411.
II
NRISDICTION
2. The County Court at Law has jurisdiction of this proceeding pursuant to Texas Property
Code S~ecrion 21.001.
III
PROPERTY TO BE CONDEMNED
3.1 Plain~~, through its governing body has determined it to be necessary in the public
interest to a~uire certain permanent and temporary easements on Defendants' property in
Nuece~ Cour~y, Texas. The ~,ermanent easements sought consist of a fifteen foot (15') wide and
six hu~idred t~irty seven ax~d 25/10(? foot (637.25') long Utility Easement and a ten foot
(10')wide and six hundred f~rty-two and 79/100 foot (642.79') long Right of Way Easement,
adjaceitt to ttYe north boundary line of the Utility Easement. The Utility Easement and Right of
Way Eaeemet~t contain a cor~ined area of three hundred sixty-five one thousandths (.365) acres
of land t~ore nc less. The ter~orarv easement sought consists of a fifty foot (50') wide and 628
and 96~100 ~ot (628.96') long Temporary Conshuction Easement adjacent to the south
199516 v2
bounc~ry of the Utility Easement and contains an area of six hundred eighty-two one
thousa~dths (.682) acres of land more or less.
3.2 The Defendants' property consists of eight and five hundred seventy-nine one
thousaitidths {8.579) acres af land located in Lot 23, Section 51, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm
and G~wrden Tracts, a subdivision of Nueces County, Texas.
3.3 The €~sements herei~ sought and Defendants' property are more particularly described
in Exltlibits "A" and "B" attached to this Petition and adopted by this reference as a part thereof
for all purp~es.
N
PURPOSE FOR CONDEMNATION
Plair~seeks the ri~t to use and will use the easements for the following purposes:
4.1 The permanent Util~iy Easement is to be used, &om time to time, for the municipal
purposle of f~e ingress, egrc~ss and regress to and for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas and its
franch~ees, to construct, lay, inspect, service, repair, maintain, operate, keep and remove
munici~al pui~ic utility lines and appurtenances within the easement herein described.
4.2 The paetmanent Rigl~t of Way Easement shall be used, &om time to time, for the
municipal puq~ose of free i~gress, egress and regress to and for the City of Corpus Christi and
its fra~hiseos, to construct, operate, repair and maintain streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters and
related appt~Eenances witt~n the easement described for the public use by foot, with
automtibiles, carts, carriage~ and all other vehicles and all other means of transportation
necessa~ry or c;onvenient at all times and in all seasons, on, over, under along and upon said
easema~t, as well as to lay, operate, inspect, replace, repair, service and maintain municipal
public ~ility ~nes, storm se~wers, and franchised utility lines in, on, over, under and along said
easem~t.
199516 v1
4.3 The temporary easement, referred to herein as the Temporary Construction Easement,
is to be us~ as an exclusive easement from time to time for the municipal purpose of the free
and u~tinterrr~ted use, liberty and privilege of going in, on, over, under, and along the easement
area, ~udjacent to the above described permanent Utility Easement to be used for working room
and to store materials and machinery during the construction of the initial water transmission line
within the p~nnanent Utility Easement and until completion and acceptance thereof by the city
Mana~r of the City of Corpus Christi; whereupon this temporary easement will terminate.
4.4 Plait~tiff shall have no right to fence the permanent easements. Plaintiff shall have no
right tc~ use ~y of Defend~nts' property outside the easements herein described. It shall be a
further expr~ limitation on the said easement, that Plaintiff shall, from time to time, after any
constr~ction, laying, servici~g, repairing, maintaining, replacing or removing public utility lines,
restore the stgface of the land within the easement areas as nearly as practicable to the same
condit~n as ~tisted prior to euch use.
4.5 The cig~hts of Plaintiff to be acquired are easement rights only, and there is reserved unto
DefendN~nts, t~eir heirs, executors, successors and assigns, the use and enjoyment of the
easema~ts s~~ject only to t~e dominant right of the Plaintiff to the full use and enjoyment
thereo~ with~t interference for the purpose for which the same ~e sought. Defendants can erect
no perntanent structures wittun the permanent easement other than those hereinafter stated; but it
is an e~ress l~nitation on Pl~intiff s rights sought herein that any pipelines installed by Plaintiff
or its fi~nchis~es shall be buried below ground except for necessary above ground appurtenances
and D~enda~ts shall have the right, subject to laws, ordinances and regulations existing at the
time, to crosa the permanent easement with roads, driveways, pipes and fences with gates for
199516 v2
Plaint~ff's easement use, so long as the same are installed so as not to unreasonably interfere with
safe o~eratic~n of utility lines constructed or laid under the terms of this easement.
V
OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY
5. The I'~aintiff has determined that the Defendants are the persons andlor entities who own
or cla~n sor~e interest in th~ property being condemned.
VI
UNABLE TO AGREE
6. Plairrtt"ff has been uuable to agree with Defendants on the damages to which they are
entitle~l for ~ch acquisition. Further negotiation would be futile. All conditions precedent to
filing ~is co~iemnation action have been satisfied.
WH~~EFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff prays that Special Commissioners
be appbintec~ Eo assess the a~-ount of damages to which the Defendants are entitled according to
law, a~td that a judgment be entered on the Award of Special Commissioners vesting in the
Plainti!#; City of Corpus Christi, title to the permanent easement sought on the subject property
and av~rarding compensatioa jointly to the Defendants or as otherwise as allowed by law,
assessi~tg the amount of cos~s, and granting such other relief to which the Plaintiff may show
itself t0 be e~ttitled.
Respectfully submitted,
WELDER, LESHIN & MAHAFFEY, L.L.P.
ATTORNEY F R pL IFF
By: ~"
Jos A. Cohn, Jr.
State Bar No. 04514000
800 N. Shoreline, Suite 300 North
Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-3709
Telephone: (361) 561-8000
Telecopier: (361) 561-8001
19951b v2
~ ~ Job No. 33760.A2.05
~~~~ Reviscd: Sapt mb~er 26, 2005
ENC3INEERINC~
(361)8b~3101 P,O. 80X 63b5 • CoRPU3 CHRI9TI, TE}(Ag 78q66_6366
FA~c ~361 ~a~4-bp01
~~
~ta o~' T~
Couaty of'~wcae
~r ~ 15.00 tbot~ utllity aau~t out o~ a~ 8.579 ~ore ttsot of 1~ out of Lot 23
~~.~. ,~ ~~ ~~b- t~ of wl~. L r~oo~d ~ Volmw M~p ~~oa~e+d~ of N~
' d~d $1 dNd ~+~coeded ~ Ctiaic'j F31e No. 1 A- ~ 41-43~ no~
~0~ Ca~tY, '~u; ai~! 9~~a, Oetci~l Pablio R~cords of
~Y e+~mamnt bN~ ~ d~ibed a~ touowa:
~t ~ poi~t op dte ~~y~, ol~atd t.379•~are tnoc Nu of Lot 23, S~tlcsv 31. Fvr th~ ~
coen~r ot dl~os of ~~] ~o ~ioelb ~otmt ota~W Lot Z3. bars NaA6 OO~Y2~46~+ Wat 11.43 &~ tbwa
Noed~ 61 31" a ~ 16osar Naik 2~'39'Z4 ~ a~oe of 40.00 ~et ~r,d ~ wblol~ Pdst
°~ ~ ~ ~i' ~t ~ed "~5-100" bew f~ialth 72°46'04" Wat 31~76~.E,9 tbet ~nd
anot~r N 9usv~- ma~nt~ut ~ped "SR-070" b~ Wocdi 61'~S'19" Weet 1~,735.22 b~
T~. ~ 61°25~3b" B.~, w~h me oart~ bo~o~ry ordfl. a..e~ea~, aam. be~ ~ ProDe~ed .ou~wesc
~ P~'~~ ~~ ~~ of s~id Yq~~to,~ ~~~~~ C~ U~bm lkaupa~Woa Ptan d~aQ M~e+oh 2003 ald
dY~moe vf 72S yo a Boaleva~d ~ad 3Q.00 ~et ~t t6e~a ~+~, ~ at rl~bt
of wliioh 4" a~~ ~~~~°tLot Z4-A. Flow~ Hh~tland S~cloal Fs~ ~ ~~atetq s
~aed~~C Vol~ ~7, p~e 43, M~p R#axd~ of Nwow Cvumy- T~. and da~tlbd ~a ~ a~P
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ CamtY~ Tex~, s~na bdn~ t!-~ ~~, ofas~d 8.~
?a°34'49" We~ ~ d~ of 15.00 ~t dpn~ tb~ pt~
~S ~ ~` " o~ ~a1d I~o! ?A-A, ~nr t5e aaath oornet of thie ~;~ of +aid a.S'79 aa~ tract, ume
Y~~ 61426•36" W~ wltb t~ ~out~we~t bptw~, ot~ ~~ wlqt dte vea/aa~e of sdd
i3.0Et b~t d~ t~e,r n'pm. menyr~d at rt~ ~~q ~~~ ~~ of 623.96 fait W eha wat
bo~ndlry ol~kl ~ ~a+e tr~eK, lior f~e w~ ootaae of d~b w~ •. .
~. ~ t ~. ~~n °~~ ~~'~°'°8 a~s no~twac boundsy ar.~w a.s~rs .an ~acc .aa t~ mrcu.veu botma,ry pt'
~~bi ~ a'0~ 9.~6•7~ iqu~e+e ~eet otl~od.
~~ B b~d ca CiPB beni~NAD~3, Texa Sw~th ~l.o~o~. I~I~daasl G~od~tla 3urr~ey monumonq "8R-070"
" ,1~,~.ss.1363 ooot+A~~~ I,3si,~.»b4) ~sd "33~-i00" p~
~ -1 ~rt wMi a aontrnl po~da f6r ~ °0ad~e s 17~ 127~61.3Z14
oa Te~ca S Pf~~. ~i b~t o~~ Cooedlnu~ ~t,aw~a are ~d
SY~. so+rth Zooe (NAD39):
URB~-N BNC3INEBR~NQ
G~
~ ~
~ ~
Ju~a 7. S~laa~r~ R.P.~,.S.
1.toe~e No. 4909
- ~ tw~.ea
~~26~ ER DR. . CO~U8 GMRf8Tl, TEX~RS 7d404
~N~bQMr1p,COR1 ,
~io~i
; ~. :; .
•. ~
,'
~:
~!
~
, ..~ , -: a~
-~ ~ ~yy, ~ ~ O~a~wn l~ecb
f~.oo~d~'~l~1~4~1-.~ ~ r
-a~ ..
~~~
.~'y ~ ~,~
y'~`,~ ~~
~'~dl- ~ ~
~ ~`y I
~,pp'i I
• I , ~
i
I
. ~1
~ ~ ~
I .. ~
i ~ .,
I
i
f ~
' ~
~
j 5::. I •
~
I
~
I
'
~ ~
~
~ f
, ~R~~ . ~
~ ~ ,
~ ~~
~ ~ , ~
~~ ~
Q i~~~ ~ ;
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
! ~
I ~
~ ~
I
~
I
I ~
-
.
~~~~
~ '
~
~
~
~~
~
i
!
f
I
I
I
~
~
~ ~
f ~Q`
' i
~ ~ )
'
'
I
'
I
~
~
~
1LZ6-i9~QL sexal `!~s!ay~ snd.~~~
'AIa MG?I11SIf1D~H aN1~l ~ J1.L213dO~ld
a~uuag fiuiaaaui6u3 ~o ~uaw}.~edaa
LLZ6 Xo8 'O 'd
i~siay~ sndao~ ~o ~~~~