HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2006-550 - 12/12/2006 - ApprovedAMENDMENT No. 7
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277,
Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized
City Manager or Designee (Director of Engineering Services) and Pierce Goodwin
Alex~nder and Linville (PGAL), Inc., a Texas corporation, 5555 Sam Felipe, Suite 1000,
Houston, Texas 77056, (Architect/Engineer - A/E), hereby agree to the amendment of
the Contract for Professional Services authorized by Motion No. 2004-224 on June 8, 2004
and September 13, 2005 and administratively amended February 16, 2006 and
administra#ively amended on April 18, 2006 and administratively amended on May 19,
2006 and by Motion No. 2006-272 on August 29, 2006 and administratively amended
September 11, 2006 as follows
Exhibit A, 1-Scope of Services, B-Additional Services, is amended by the addition of a
Bene#it Cost Analysis for Runway 13/31 Extension to read:
Benefit Cost Analysis - Runway 13/31 Extension - The Engineer will complete a Cost
Benefit Analysis for extending Runway 13/31 approximately 1,492-feet in a northerly
direc#ion The scope of work for the Benefit Cost Analysis will include:
• establishing objectives;
~ developing a base case and alternatives;
• deriving key Airport activity growth assumptions;
• analyzing capital/operating costs of selected alternatives over a 20-year asset
life;
• describing critical assumptions;
• gathering and analyzing data;
• drafting the report;
~ preparing sensitivity analyses; and
• coordinating with the FAA.
The detailed scope of services is attached as Exhibit A-7
Exhitfit A, Section C Summary of Fees, is amended by the authorize services an additional
total fee r~vt to exceed fee of $75,000.00 for Additional Services for the Benefit Cost
Analysis far Extending Runway 13/31.
The total Amendment No. 7 not to exceed fee inclusive of all expenses is $75,000.00.
PGAL will invoice the City for Amendment No. 7 based on the Engineer's estimate of the
percentage of the analysis completed. Invoices will be evidenced by a copy of title
comp~ny inyoices.
The restated total not to exceed fee inclusive of all expenses is $1,889,458.00. Section C
Summary of Fees is attached as Exhibit B-7.
All other terms and conditions of the June 8, 2004 contract, as amended, between the City
2006-550
12/12/06
M2006-399 Page 1 of 2
P~iAI 3-31\ExtensionCostBenefitlAEAmd7.doc
~. , ... .. ~ . _ e.... ._ r.....a . , _ .M,,
and Consultant will remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
~~~.
By~~•~..~2?~-
Ronald F. Massey, Date
Assistant City Manager
RE MIII~NDED
. .___, ~.. 1
BY .r-~- r~p~
el . Escobar, P. E. Da e
ATTEST
ay
Armando Chapa, Date
City Secretary
PGAL, INC.
e-
,' j • .
By ~ ii i.~ 4,,~
onsultant at
5555 San Felipe, Suite 1000
Houston, TX 77056
(713) 622-1444 Office
(713) 968-9333 Fax
~~1 jl~~,,,,. ~+U 1 ri~c.i~...
(.~ ~.~ ,
~t 12
~~ ~
..-~"'"~r~~~RY'Q~
APRROV~D AS TO FORM
~
gy-,~~; ~ ~ ~~~ ~~,~ ,r ~ •~ ,~ . f ~ -~,
Assistant City Attorney Date
~ c~ ~~~,~
~ ' /
Page 2 of 2
N ~HOME\KEVINSIGENIAIR_restored113-311E~ensionCostBenefitlAEAmd7.doc
Exhibit A-7
Detailed Scope
The Engineer will contract with a sub-consultant or the preparation of a Benefit-Cost Analysis
for the Extension of 13/31.
The Sub-Consultant contacts are:
Robert C. Arthur - Project Manager
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.
312 Elm Street, Suite 2500
Cincinna~i, OH 45202
(513) 639-2150
ArthurR(+~PBworld. com
Barbara Michael - Principal-in-Charge
Parsons BrinCkerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.
1951 Bi~op Lane
Louisville, KY 40218
(502) 479-9301
Michael(~PBworld. com
Project Desr.~ption:
The prc~ect to be evaluated by this Benefit Cost Analysis is the proposed extension of Runway
13-31. In orc~r to extend this runway 1,492 feet to the north, the following improvements are
required:
• Extend Runway 13-31;
• Extend Taxiway B;
• Reloeate MALSR;
• Relc~cate VASI;
• Relocate Runway 31 Loealizer:
• Relo~eate Runway 13 Glide Slope;
• Rela~ate Ftt~nway 13 Middle Marker;
• Extet~d HIRLs;
• Pain# Runway Markings;
• Extend Ta~iway B Lighting;
• Pain# Taxiway B Markings; and
• Extend Drainage Ditch Adjacent to Runway
The cos~# of these improvements projects is estimated to total $17.5 million. Based on eligibility
criteria, the FAA is expected to fund approximately 95 percent of this cost or approximately
$16.6 million. The remaining funds are paid by the Airport.
The sc~e of work for a Benefit Cost Analysis includes establishing objectives, developing a
base c~se and alternatives, deriving key Airport activity growth assumptions, analyzing capital
/ operating costs of selected alternatives over a 20-year asset life, describing critical
Exhibit A-7
Pa e 1 of 4
H 1HOMEtKEVINSIGENWIR_restored~20041mprovementsiAE-PGAL1AEAmd7ExhA-7.doc
, ~ ,..,~ _.~.. ,~ ,,.~. _ ,.,..,,,. . ,,,.
assumptions, gathering and analyzing data, drafting the report, preparing sensitivity analyses,
and coordinating with the FAA.
In December 1999, the FAA issued its Final Guidance Regarding Benefit Cost Analysis's on
Airport Capacity Projects for FAA Decisions on Airport Improvement Program (AIP)
Discretionary Grants and Letters of Intent (Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance). The Benefit Cost
Analysis Guidance requires that airport sponsors submit a Benefit Cost Analysis when
requesti~g AIP grants or Letters of Intent to be awarded for capacity projects at the discretion
of the FAA. Airport capacity projects are those projects which: (1) preserve infrastructure, (2)
improve upon existing infrastructure, or (3) create new infrastructure. Based upon the
requirements of the Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance, the following study process and outline
are:
A. STI~QY PROCESS
The Sub-consultant approach will be combined it with the FAA's "official" 11 step process for
Benefit Cost Analysis, which is presented later in this section, to complete this assignment.
The proposed approach to this project is:
1 The Sub-consultant will develop a full understanding the purpose of the proposed project
and the v~rk completed to date to analyze demand and need for the project. Existing
planning studies, environmentat analysis, as well as construction cost and time estimates
will also be reviewed and augmented, if necessary, by the Sub-consultant. The approach
will be presented to the Director of Aviation.
2. The Sub-consultant will commence analysis and report drafting to identify the issues,
altematives, and amount/type of analysis necessary. This is seen as an interactive process
between the Airport and PB to collect all relevant information and present it in a reasonable
manner. Further, cost and time estimates necessary to complete the study will be reduced
by a cooperative analysis effort with Aviation Department personnel. One draft report will
be provided the Director of Aviation, or his designee, for review, and one draft report will be
provided the FAA; after review by the FAA, a final report will be prepared.
3. The Sub-consultant will develop financial measures into Net Present Value tables, and
identify ncm-quantifiable costs and benefits. The Sub-consultant will prepare a matrix of
potential actions and potential results. The Sub-consultant will compile this information into
a draft report for review by the Director of Aviation.
4 The Sub-consultant will deliver the completed report to the Director of Aviation for review
and comment and then to the FAA. The Sub-consultant will modify the final report following
receipt of comments from the FAA Further coordination with the FAA at the regional and
national headquarters level is sometimes required; however, these meetings, if necessary,
are not included in the scope and budget.
B. STI~Y OUTLINE
The steps al~ve represent conceptual actions necessary to complete this assignment. The
report itself will be divided into eleven (11) sections to exactly mirror the requirements of the
Exhibit A-7
Pa e2of4
H ~HOMEIKEVINSIGENWIR_restored120041mprovementsWE-PGALWEAmd7ExhA-7.doc
.~ . ~ ,... ~- .. .,,.a, .,.~.,_,
FAA's Bene~# Cost Analysis Guidance. The eleven (11) sections are not of equal importance,
nor will they be of equal length in the final report; however, the 11 section format of the report
will permit e~sy verification that all the appropriate steps have been completed. A brief
descript~on of each step in the FAA Benefit Cost Analysis process follows:
• Sec~on 1- Define Project Objectives - This section will present the objectives of the
stud~r and tfie expected results to be achieved by the proposed project.
• Section 2- Specify Assumptions - This section will articulate future conditions as
defir~d in the current Airport Terminal Area Forecast and Master Plan. Any potential for
increase in passenger and aircraft operations as a result of the proposed project will be
noted.
• Sec~on 3- Identify the Base Case - This is the action that would occur if the proposed
actian is not initiated. By definition, however, it is not a"do nothing" alternative, but rather a
"no project" alternative, This "Base Case" becomes the reference point for comparing the
"Proposed Alternative".
• Sec~on 4- Identify and Screen Reasonable Investment Alternatives - This section will
pres~nt the airfield alternatives from the Master Plan.
• Sec~ion 5- Define Appropriate Evaluation Period - Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance
recommends limiting the analysis to a 20 year period; although other evaluation periods
may be considered and used if justified or augmented in the sensitivity analysis. This
project is expected to be based only on current construction costs to achieve equivalent
resu~ts; therefore. a finro to three year evaluation period is expected.
• Sec~n 6- Establish Reasonable Level of Effort - This involves an assessment with
regards to the amount and detail of analysis required.
• Secfi~on 7- Identify, Quantify, and Evaluate Benefits and Costs - This is the heart of
the study where the financial evaluation between alternatives is developed and presented.
In addition, the "difficult-to-quantify" and non-monetary benefit/cost considerations are
identified.
• Section 8- Measure Impact of Alternatives on Airport Use - Expanded use of the
Airpart, if any, caused by the Proposed Alternative is identified in this section.
• Sec~on 9- Compare Benefits and Costs of Alternatives - This is a summary of the
financial analysis that presents the Net Present Value calculation.
• Sect~on 10 - Perform Sensitivity Analysis - Uncertainties and the sensitivity of the
assumptions are tested to evaluate the potential for error.
~ Sec~on 11 - Provide a Recommendation - The most logical course of action to achieve
the desi~ed objective (as identified in Section 1) is presented here. The recommendation is
Exhibit A-7
Pa e3of4
H:~HOMEIKEVINSIGENIAIR_restored120041mprovementsWE-PGALWEAmd7ExhA-7 doc
~ . ~ . ,,,, ~,~.~
based on the calculated Net Present Value of the alternatives, as well as the difficult-to-
quantify and non-monetary benefits/costs.
It is assumed that a Base Case and Proposed Alternative will be evaluated. These two
scenarios are the only scenarios identified in the Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for
consideration.
C. PRt3JEGT SCHEDULE
The table below presents the estimated timeline for the completion of the Benefit Cost
Analysi~. The time to complete the Bene~t Cost Analysis depends on the degree of analysis
required and time necessary to obtain FAA approval. However, given typical circumstances
and pr~npt review by the Airport, the first draft report is anticipated for completion within
approximately 90 days after the notice to proceed is given as shown in the exhibit below.
Revisions of t#~e draft should be completed by Sub-consultant within 30 days for submission to
the FAA.
Time for final FAA approval can vary substantially; this schedule assumes prompt review of the
draft report. The Sub-consultant will work with the Airport to facilitate the approval process by
the FAA through answering all inquiries promptly and revising the draft documents to
incorporate one set of FAA requested modifications. Review and comment of draft reports by
the Airport and FAA is expected within two weeks of submittal.
Exhibit A-7
Pa e4of4
H ~HOME\KEVINS\C3ENWIR_restored120041mprovements~AE-PGAL1AEAmd7ExhA-7.doc
,,... _ ~ -« . ,,~„ ,,,,r,., „~,- _ n .~. ,. .. _ ~ _. ~ __.. ~ r _ a, ,, - .~ ,~
O
~
~
U
~
~
~
f4
C
O
~
~
~
Q
~
M
M
~
a
~
3
~
~
~
C
O
~
c
~
W
~
.~
A
c0
c
Q
W 0
~U
m ~
= C
~ m
W ,~
O
C
O
~
'~
f6
~
s
~
a
~
~
C
a~
~
.~
N
N
N
L1.
O Q
~ tl
~ c
~ 2
Cn q
U~E
o ~ ~
~~u
a~
~ L
~ ti ~ ~ ~
~ ~ O ~ N
O I~ O) O o0 .- O ~ O
~ N
~ r
l~ C'')
N N
O ~
N l(~
~ O
O ~
~ lf~
~
O ~ ~ ~- t~ CO Cfl M
H
~
69
r
H
O V)
U 'y ~
++ ~, i
~ `°
~ Q I
f
m
~
~
~ ~
Q p~ ~
C
N
Q
'
L I
a
i
,
,
~ n
~ Q p €
i
~~ o, 0 0 0 0 0
o
0
0
0
0
° ~'~~
Q. N ~ ~
I o o °o_
Q ~~'~ ° °o °o °o
; co co co
~ o o ~n o ~n
d~ C) (O N ~ N
N~, tn N G~ lC) N
o
0
0
0
~n
~ ~ v ~ O ~t O ~ ~ T
V ~
0 ~ i ~ ~ ~
J ~, I ~
~ M ~ ~ ~
~ G> CO
l!~ N
00
~ ~
Q) M
00 O
O O
O M
00
C N
~ N r- ~ M N Ln tf) I~
~ ~ N O
r N ~
~ ~ ~ CO
e-
Q a 6F?
~n o O u~ ~n O o O O O O
~~ O) CD ~ (D 00 N N O
M
L N ~
~
0 N , !~- tt N N f~
~- M i tn ln
~ ~ ~
~ ~,
c
a~
c~
~
~ ~
~
y
LL
3 °'
~ Q ~ m -°
~
~ ~ N N~~ ~~ p N
C U
'
~
a LL N
'
I N Q ~ ~
~ C O
j C
. V
L Ul
d i
~
~ G1
G~ _~
N Q~ ~~ N N•C ~ v
~ ~ d ~ . ~ ~ p •- C~ .~
..+
tl ~
~ ~ LL
N v
• u~ c a~ ~ ~,~ W~ w-
~ O ~ Q
(
j
~ ~ v ~ ~ O~`p ~ ~"a O~ C
V A N a~
~ N ~ ~ N p~ V Q
> Q~ N
+_' C .~- > ~ ~
~ C O
~
~ ,~ '
' d ~ ~4 ~ ~ 0 ~ V 'a O ~ ~
~ ~ ~ O
r
~
~ a
Z, ~
~~ ~
o
.~ ~
~ o~c~om a~
mo L
~ >' •`- a°-i ~
a~i cn Z' d n cn
~ ~~
~ =
~ a
~
~ ~ ~ v~i ~ eyo ~ ,
a`co~ _`~~~~ ~ a ~ a o
m ~
~ ~ L
~
~ ~
~ m Q ~-. N Q Q C~ ~ L~' Q LLJ ~ O~
v~cnvi
~ m ~
~ N ` ~ y
~ U
o ~ N
~ ~ `
w aV ~
~ c~
va
~~~H
~HZH o vi °~ ea
~ a ~!m U ~
d ~
~
a
~ +° o
F- ~ ~r ;a~
I,L
~
-
e-
N,`c'')
~t
V~
~
LL
°'
.-
~E- ~ N v~Q O
M
O
N
m
co
a.
0
~t QO O tl) ~ C~ O ~ ~
~ CO f~ ~ .- O O
~
M I~ f~ t0 N C~ O ~ t
t M ~ ~ ~ O 0
0
CO e't CO N ( !~ O tf') O Ch M CO ~ ~ ~ GO
I
, i ~' ~ a0 N e- ('7 e- f~ N
1 ~
;
i
i N N
E
!
I
~ {
i
~
!
i
~
i
f ~ 0 ~ r ~ ~ r r ~ ~
~ ~ O N ~A ~ O M ~ O O
~ ~ N Cfl O f~ tn M ~ ~ I~ O 00
~ ~ ~ ( f~ O ~ O M M CD ~ T ~ pp
f ~t ~ 00 N ~ N ~ f~ N
~ 0
O
~
~ O O
i
~ O
!
i
E
P
~ O O
"
6
~
~ 0 ~
i
~ ~
i
~
~
1 _ O ~
CO ~ Cfl N
~
I
~ N i
!
j
!
f ~
: ~ I
I I
; =
W ^ O
~ '
~ I
~ i ~ T i ~ ~ C
~ Q
~ '
( C l C m ~ Q
~ ~
~
'
~ ~
'V ~
(
Q ~ ~
i
=
O
C~
~
~
~ '
~
a
a ~
m
° ~ 3 a d
~ ~ 3
~ ~' ~
• ~
N ~ i
~ ~ O
~ N
V
~ ~
V
d vO-
~
.~L' i
N
~ ~
~0 ' ~
N ~
C •
~ N ~
~ d
d ~ ~
tn t~0
~ N
~ M Q ~ Q ~A ~
Q ~ f0
~ .
a m
~
~ LL
a~ (~
~ t
a
o
Z ' o »~ o o ci a~
~ o = m
~ a ~,
~n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~
u, ~
z p z ~ z ~ z ` p ~ ~, L o .a ~ ~ o s Z, ~ o
3 ~ c =~'' '~ ~ d ~
u, c.~ ~a ~a Q H- a ~° n ~
`~
m
E m
~
~ ~
E ~ v~
a~ o
~
E
m'- g
m
~E
rn
f0
a
~
n
m
a
Q .
ca
=
~~ -
rn c
o ~
~
'C '~ ~n
~ N ~ ~ ~ U 'C ~ ~ L tn C ~ L p ~ N a ~
U ~ „" ~ =
m N
~ N .~ ~ ~•~ C1 V~ L d ~ m U ~"' a' O
. ~ ~ m U
~ ~ N ~ ~ O Q N E ~ 0~ m . 7 C~ ~ L
Q a• Q ~ fn Q ~ U ~ O ~ Q ~~ LL ~ N M .
st f/~ LL ~ ~ ~ N M ~
M
w
O
N
N
~
~
~
~
~
~
cD
t.~
0
~
:~
~ w D N D ~ ~ u~
o ~ ~
~ ~
'..: ~
cu ~ ~ c
~
c
c~ ~
Q' ~
a'
~
~
=''
3 ~
~
3
~ co
a i
-
~
p n e~
~ ~,
~p ~
~
~ v
v
a pp
s~
~
~
y
o
s
o
~ ~
"
o
~~
a ~
V
01 c~
<D ~
~
~ ~
~ cn
~D
~D c~n 0 (
p
~ fn
~ ~
n.
cn ~ ~
~ ~~ N
~
3 y
~ ~p T
~
~
a p, ~
~ ~
D N
c~ ~ ~D
w
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
y ~
n
~ ~ v
~ \
~
~
~
N
~
~
W
69
~
O~
v
~
W
O
fi9
W
~
~~
N
CJi
{~
N
N N
N
O
O O
O
O O
W
~1 W
~1 _.
J~
-~ ~
N
d~ ~ O Cn Cn
(~T C~1t ~ N N
O O W 1 N
v
(n v
CJt
O
O O
O
O O
fi9
~
OD
O~
~ W ~ ~
~A
~ ~1
C11 N
N ~J
~ ~•
O ~
CJ1 N
CTi
O O (O O O O
O
O O
O O
O U1
O Ja
W N
~ N
N
City uf
CUT~?llS CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
_ - C112'1St] DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS
~.~~
City ~~f Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City
to provide the folfowing tnformation. Every q~estion must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with
"N/A'
FIRM N~RNIE: ~ ~ `~^ ~~ ~---
STREET: ~~S ~ ..=~f~N ~L~~ ~/~'~ ~ ~.~".`d~/ CITY: O ~J_3 ~D/l~ ZIP: /
FIRM is: ~ Corporation t.- ~- Partnership_ 3. Sole Owner 4. Association
=~. t.~ther
DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS
If additionai space is necessary please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.
1. State the names of each employee of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting
3% or more of th~ ownership in the above named firm.
Name ^ , ` Job Title and City Department (if known)
.a
/ "" ~
, ~_
2. State the names of each official of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting
3% or more of the ownersfiip in the above named firm.
Name Title
n~; :~
3. State the names of each board member of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named firm.
Name Board, Commission or Committee
h~ ~ ~~~
~ j ~
4. State the names of each employee or officer of a consultant for the City of Corpus Christi who worked
on any matter ~elated to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest constituting 3% or
more of the ownership in the above named firm.
Na+ne Consultant
,
( . s.
,~. ~- ' /t1 C.- /1~- C"~ ~..-.,
~ ~
CERTIFICATE
I certify that aIl information provided is tr~e and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly
withheld disclosure of any information requested: and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the
City c~f Corpus Christi, Tex~s as c ange~ qccur.
~ ~_ ~'. it~':P ~'~- /~i~//V C/~'~ C~
Certifying Person: ~ - - Title:
( ype or ~
Signature of Certifying Person: , ~ 1'`~ "' Date: ~~ /~,/ O6
- -T-----= _ ~ -- - -- --