HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2007-029 - 1/18/2007 - NAAMENDMENT N0.2
TO CONTRACT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The City of Corpus Christi, Texas hereinafter calted "CITY", and HDR ENGINEERING INC.,
hereir~after called "CONSULTANT", agree to #he following amendment to the Contract for
Professiona! Services for A~pllie Beattie Coastal Habitat Communitv Monitorina (Proiect No
51221 as authorized and administratively amended by~
- -- -- --- --_--
O~inal Small A/E Agreement , Au u9 st 12, 2003 Administrative Approval $25.000.00
Amendment No. 1 September 16, 2003 Motion No. M2003-332 $516,863.00
In the original contract, Section 2. SCOPE UF WORK shall be modified as follows and as
de.scribed in the attached Exhibit "A° Increase ir fses for ~Vlonitoring Year 5 to compensate for
increased costs.
~ Mon~prinq Year 5 - $4,169 00
In the original contract, Section 2. SCOPE C)F WORK shali be modified as follows and as
described in the attached Exhibit "A"
~ Additivnal surveying of elevations along previously surveyed transects A and B within the
Mollie Beattie Coastal Habitat Community. This methodology will be implemented once
during Year 3(fee of $4,500.00) and once during Year 5(fee of $4,950.00). Data from these
surveys will be included in Appendix C of the annual reports.
Schedule and Summary of Fees is amended as described in the attached Exhibit "A-1."
All other terms and conditions of the Contract and Amendments between the City and Consultant
will remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF CO~RPUS CHRISTI HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
4+C~~}~.-~v~.be..~ca.-r-. f 1~` U" _~ --- l
~ ~
Ronakd F. M~sey '. Date . Shiner, P.E. ate
Assist~tnt City Manager Senior Vice President
555 N. Carancahua, Suite 1650
RECQNNMEFiDED Corpus Christi, TX 78478-0010
(361) 857-2211 Office; (361) 857-7234 Fax
, ~;
,~-" ~ ;'
A . EsCObar, P.E. te ~'
rect~r of Engineering Services
ATTEST
~, ~
~ ,~'~'Y~.~; ~
Armar~do Chapa, City Se r ary
APPR~pVED AS TO FORM Project Number: 5122
~ Funding Source: 550950-3277-00000-140 0
~/ • : . ~ Y/~ ~ ~ ~ _
`- ~ ' ~ , ~ ; '~ Encumbrance Number: /
Assist8~nt City torney `Date ~
'007-029
Ol /l 81Q7
AMD. NO. 2
Pa e 1 of 1
H~R ~'~Il~+llleet'lll~ i~eryC°~annei~Mc~i~eBeatr.eW,mc No 2wmd No 2doc
1 ~ SHINER MOSEtEY
J~~ ` ' AND ASSOCIA~"ES, ~NC,
I~eeember 6, ?OOC~
?~1r_ Joe "[ rejo, P.F.
Dep~'tment of Engineering Services
City of Cor~us Christi
P.(7. Box 9277
C'or~s Chrtsti, Texas 78~69
R CEIVED ~
~
~DEC !1 7 ?006
~--_____. __
ENGiNEERING SERVICES
36492
RE: REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES - M~.LIE BEATTIE COASTAL HABIT T CO MUlvITY
MQAIITORING -CITY PROJECT NO. 5122 -~~(~~,L1~~~NQ• ~
Dear M r_ Trej o:
As you know, setbacks to the construction schedule for the opening of Packery Channel have
affected the Mollie Beattie monitoring ~chedule. Our existing contract requires us to provide
c~ne year of pre-construction (baseline) monitoring and four years of post-construction
monitoring. Dela~ s in the constructi~n of the Packery Channel project have resulted in the
accutnulation of` t~~~o years of baseline data. Meetings between the City, HDR~Shiner Moseley,
and the 'V~ollie Beattie `Vlanagement Team have resulted in the decision that two years of
hase~ine monitoring and 3 years of post-construction moni~toring will be acceptable. (See
attac~ed letter from Texas General Land Office)
Monitoring seasons for ~'ear 1('vov i)3-Mar. 04) and Year 2(Nov. 04-Mar. OS) have been
completed. '~he City, HDR~Shiner Moseley, and the Mollie Beattie Management Team have
agreed that due ta the delay in cc~nstruction of Packery Channel, no monitoring should occur
f`rom November ?005 to 'vlarch 2006. Monitoring has resumed in November 2006 with Year 3
(Nc7v. (}b-Mar. 0?> and ~~~ill end ~n March 2009 (Year 4 will be Nov. 07-Mar. 0$ and Year 5
~~~ill be ti~v. 08-Mar. ~9). We request that our contract with the City be amended to reflect this
revised project sehedule ( See Exhibit A-2).
~s vou know, the Corps' contractor was delayed in finishing construction of the project. When
the time catne for the second year z~f monitoring. the Corps was not finished. We probably
should have stopped the process tu get clarification from the Management Team on whether to
_ _.~_. __ _ _~ .
proceed ti~ith Year ? or delay a year, b~rt because we had planned the work as five sequential
years, thi~ thought did not accur t~} us. We did Year ~ in sequence. Subsequently, this was
c~uestion~d, and~ it was realized that an agreemenr_ with the Management Team on whether or
not to pr«eeed with Y'ear ? should have been obtained.
We t~en worked tc~ get the aiter-the-fact concurrence of the Management Team for what was
done, The Year 2 monitoring was approved by the Team, and they welcomed it as additional
conf~nation of the baseline data. Skipping the next year to wait for the construction
AMD. NO. 2
~ICled :r: ~gp1e~~`tn,_ InC. ~~~ ~'~i a l Phone 1361) 857-2211 ~X~~B~~ i~~~e
t>50 ~I Fax 1361) 857-7234 ~
~ '.h ,+ '~.'i ~ $d7u ~: ~D . www.hdrinc.com Pa Q ~ Of 3
Mr. Joe l~rejc~ ~36492
i)ecember 5. 2006
Pae~ 2 c,f .
compleiicm was part of this ne~otiation. Our fees for the effort to wark this out with the Team
were on the arder ~~f $l 5,O00. These were absorbed by us without cost to the City.~ ~
~~'hen ~~~e developed our c~riginal ~roposal for the City, the costs were based upon doing each
} ear in >equence. An a1low~tnce was built in for escalation cost each year through the fifth year.
Our annual cost increases for salaries, insurance, rent, etc needed to be addressed. This was
f~etored into the price we agreed tr~ in the contract. We did not build in unknown additional
escal~tion cc~sts on the cl~ance that the project might be delayed. It was assumed that the
cantractor would meet his schedule and there would be no skipping of years. As a result, as the
last t~ee y~trs were all mc~ved back b~ a year, we are faced with an additional year of
esca,~i€#ion c~sts through no fau~t of our own.
In ]ooking back, if ~~re had stopped work before beginning Year 2 to obtain Management Team ~
concurrence on whether tc~ proceed~ we would have requested additional funding from the City
fi}r tl~ese ~Zegotiatic~ns. The effort ~~ould have been similar to what was expended to get the
after-~e-fact approval, or about $ i~,00C), We would ihen have requested that the escalated
c~sts be covered. but there would have been an extra year to be escalated. Because we spent
our own money to ~~rork ~~ith the ~~~cam <m concui•rence for skipping the year, ~the City was
saved tl~is $15,000 expense_ The e~;calation costs woutd have been requested in either case.
We submitted a request t~: amend tllis ~ontract on February 17. 2006 (enclosed). A proposal for
a~ditional fees resulting f~rom the ~~elaved project schedule was included in the February 2006
request. While an annual escalation rate was not formally identified in~ our contract, each year
was priced to accoun or~increasec~costs o~ing~iusiness. We are requeshng ath t the City
accept th~s proposal to i~~crease Iees tor Monitoring Years 3. 4, and 5 to compensate for
increased costs. ~r c>ur Feb 2006 ~roposal, we requested an additional $16,161 for Ye~ars 3, 4,
and 5. :~~ter speakin~ wi!h Mr. "I~,~m 1.ltter of the Ciry, we reluctantly agreed to reduce this to
an additional $I1.300. Vve are re~uesting that the City authorize an additional $11,300 for
Y`ears ~_ a. and 5. (See Summarv c~t~Fees in Exhihit A-2)
In additic~n, we have recently been asked to perform additional work that is outside of the
Scope c~f Services descrihed in this cc~ntract. In a July 0, 2006 meeting with Ms. Carolyn
Murphy and Dr. Terry Roberts of I.S. :~rmy Corps of Engineers, it was decided that additional
sur~~ey data should be collected a]ong two prev~ously surveyed transects. Tom Utter was in
attendance and asked HDR~Shiner Moseley to provide him with a proposal for the additional
sur~ eys ~ proposal for this work and ihe additional fees for project delays was submitted to
'~~r. Utter ,~n Augu,t 7. 2006 (encl~~sed). The surveys can be provided in Year 3 and Year 5 for
lump sum ~mounts of $4.500 and $4,950 respectively. We have incorporated fees far these
surveys into this request (5ee Summar~~ ~f Fees in Exhibit A-2) ~
P1easE aecept this request to amend our cont~act with the City to indicate~the changed project
schedule, scope, and fee~, An amended Scope of Services, Summary of Fees and Project
Schedule is attached.
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A"
Pa e2of3
Mr Joe "~,rejo
Decsmber n, 2006
Fa~e 3 «;' _=
36492
'1~'han~c you for tl7e opportunity t~~ assist the Ciry with this project. Please do not hesitate to
conta~t us at (361 } 857_2^ 11 ruith any questions ~r comments. ~
~incere[y,
HDR F'NGINEER[NG, iNC.
,~~. ~
,
'~ /
~
~, ~?'~ ~~
i
~r" JOS~~1 ~/IOaICe
Envi~cinmental Biologist
,,` ~
~
~ r_,~ ,. .
James A. Shiner, P. ~ .
Senior Vice President
Attachments: Exhibit A-?
Exhibit B-:'_
Letter frorra TGLO io Cit~~ of Corpus ~Christi (1-26-06)
Enclosures: Request for Amendrnent t~-17-06)
Proposal t<~ Mr. Torn Utter (8-7-06)
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A"
Pa e3of3
MOLLIE BEATTIE COASTAL HABITAT COMMUNITY MONITORING
(Project No. 5122)
SUMMARY OF FEES
ORIGINAL
CONTRACT
PRELIMINARY SERVICES
$25,000.00
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TASKS
FEE BY YEAR
TOTAL
1
2
3
4
5
Develop QA/QC Plan
$3,562.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
3,562.00 -
Aerial Photographs
10,341.00
8,776.00
9,215.00
9,675.00
10,159.00
48,166.00
Initial Ground Truth
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Annual Field Work
26,050.00
27,353.00
28,720.00
30,156.00
31,664.00
143,943.00
Laboratory Analyses
36,000.00
38,010.00
39,911.00
41,906.00
44,001.00
199,828.00
Reporting
19,322.00
18,150.00
19,058.00
20,011.00
30,572.00
107,113.00
Agency Coordination
3,616.00
2,468.00
2,591.00
2,720.00
2,856.00
14,251.00
Amendment No. 1
$98,891.00
$94,757.00
$99,495.00
$104,468.00
$119,252.00
$516,863.00
REVISED TOTAL FEE
$541,863.00
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TASKS
FEE BY YEAR
TOTAL
Additional Fees
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,169.00
4,1 .004
Additional Surveys
0.00
0.00
4,500.00
0.00
4,950.00
9,450.00
Amendment No. 2
$0.00
$0.00
$4,500.00
$0.00
$9,119.00
$13,619.00
REVISED TOTAL FEE
$555,482.00
E;XHIBIT A-2
CIl'Y OE CORPUS CHRISTI
R~10LLIE BEATTIE COASTAL, HABITAT
COMMUNITY MONITORING
f. 5CC)PE OF SERVICF S
~. DEFINITI()NS
i. $aseline. ~ised to ~~5tablish baseline preconstruction conditions at both the
MBCHC and ~he reference~control site. Baseline to be conducted during the first
two (2) years, prior to c~~mpletion of channel dredging.
'. MBCHC Management Team. The Team consists of representatives from TGLO,
USFWS. TPW D, and the Natic~nal Audobon Society.
~. Monitoring. Vpon ~ompletion ~1f the channe] dredging, monitoring will
commence. Uuring years ? through 5, intensive monitoring will include avian
surveys, benth~c analyses, field inspections, aerial photographs, and tidal elevation
analyses at the MBCH( ` sitE. Year 3 is considered to be the first year after channel
dredgin~ is complete. '~'Ionitoring wi!1 consist of aerial photographs and tide gauge
analyses. unle~s significant changes are observed that warrant field work.
~. Packerti Chanuel Task Force. ~I'h~s consists of City, USACE, TGLO, and any
members of tht MBCH(' Manager~lent Team that the TGLO designates.
~. Project Site. This is ~jefined as the MBCHC which is an 1,110-acre site located
within the houndaries ot~ State Tracts ~~9 and 60_ See Figure I.A.
t,. ~teference Site. Whil~° not r~equired in the TGLO/City MOU, for the purpose of
this contract hetween !)le City and 5hiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. (Shiner
Moselevi, the referen~~~ sit~ is approxirnately 500-acres located along Corpus
Christi ?ass. ~ce Fi~ur~~ I.<~
~. Surve~' Year. This ~~-i1( be cletined as September through August.
B. B,<~SIC SF.RVICE'~
. Deternline Baseline ~onditio~is ~Year~ 1 and Year 2)
a. Develop Plan. Develop a QA; QC plan for both baseline and monitoring
efforts. Pr~~vide dralt copies to th~ PCTF to review and comment. Provide one
( l) l~~ard co~~y and ~~~e ( I- electron~c (PDF) copy.
b. Aerial Photographs.
(i} Depend~ng on tirne ~~f~ construction, aerial photographs may be taken twice
diirin, the haseline 4ear; m order io assess potential indirect impacts to the area.
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Pa e1of10
~The tirst photogra~~ll ~~~ll be taken near tlle end of July. Every effort will be
macic to s}~oot the ,~erial ~hoto~r,~pl~s on low wind, low tide, clear days. The
acr-ials wils be take~~ prior to conducUng the initial ground truthing to pinpoint
putential a~-eas ot~ ~~~mcerrl. Thc 'VIBCHC Management Team will be notified
pr-ior t~ c~~nductil~,~ fl~~overs. ~I~he City of Corpus Christi will be provided
cc~p:es oi~ ~~ach ae: ial photograph after they are taken. The City will then
~~ru~.~ide copies to thu Managemen~ Team shortly thereafter.
(ii 1~l~he }~hotography ~~~ill include all of State "I'racts 59 and 60. The
photographs at a scale c~f 1:4800. Tht color diapositives will be scanned to a 1-
foot pixel resolutio~~, geo-r-eferenced, and the imagery provided to the MBCHC
Management Tean~ As recommended by the MBCHC Management Team,
there will l~e a spat~al accuracy of less than 3 meters, and a thematic aceuracy of
8~`'., ~r better shotin on the digitized aerials. Further details will be outlined in
the ~';)A:~Q( Plan
(i~z) Groun~i Controls for aerial photographs: A sUrvey team will set markers at
botl~~ sides to aid i~~ rertifying tl~e photographs prior to conducting the aerial
flvoi er
(i~) ~irouncl Truthing: (;round truthing will take place immediately after the
aeriai phot~~graphs are developed and reviewed (weather permitring). Biologists
an~i sun~e}~~rs will conduct two transects across the MBCHC to cover all habitat
types pres~nt only after the hrst aenal is flown. (See Fig. 2 far proposed
transect lines.) Transects ~vill br~ conducted based on a change in the habitat
~ e1-sus bas~d on a pre-selected spacing interval. Change in habitat will be
ohstrved arid documentcd alon~ tl~e transect lines. Other features will be
icier~tafied t,~ aid in ~lie interpretati~m of future aerial photographs. Focus will be
on unique reatures and/oi~ varyin~ habitat types. Elevations will be taken along
the ~ransec? lines ~f~ereti~~r there ,s a~;hange in habitat, as well as at some pre-
selected tdrget site; where there might be a potential to see a shift in the
tc?~c7~raph~
(~~I Form~~t: .All ii:torniation wili be available as digital layers upon request.
~T~e ~infom~ation ~~~311 h~ availahle on the aerials via digitization. Digital
over-lays wtll be tased to indicate chall~es in shoreline, habitat, seagrasses, etc.
c. Field Work. Fiel~l work will be performed at the MBCHC site only and will
incla~ie the followirl:~:
(i) ,~vian Populat~~ns;~'Habitat. Avian surveys will be conducted twice per
t~~onth oveT~ a five month period fr~om November to March. Shore birds will be
id~l~tified to specie~, and counte~l eai-ly inorning. T'he avian surveys will be
con~iucted alon~ thk~ emer~ent sharelines for the Packery Channel and Newport
Pa~s ?idal compLex. ;lnd specificallv including the benthic study area.
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Pa e2of10
~ i i) Prese~ rceiAbse~~ce o t~ Seagrasse: Seagrasse can be verified with the aerial
pl~otograpl~s, but i~~ therc~ is uncertainty a site visit will be required to verify
pr-esence o3 ahsenc~~ Sea~rasse cun be observed during the bird surveys.
~iir) Benthic Anail~ses The be~lthic communities will be sampled once per
mu~lth dur;ng the same tive month period as the avian survey (November to
March)_ Shorebird~ will he identified to species at the time of benthic sampling
alor~~; the ~pecitic ~ransects. Tht methodology for collecting benthic samples
includes ~~ alkin~ t~~o transects (pre-selected), collecting five care samples at
~~arious le~ els of ir~iindation, and sending the samples to a lab for processing.
The su~~ested metl7od f~ti~ collection is with a 2-inch PVC boring core with a
recc~mmen~ied dia~~ieter pfi 5.4 cm. The recommended depth within the
sediment f~~r pullin~~ core samples is approximately 5 cm. Benthic analyses will
con,ist ~f ~~aentifyi~~~; inv~rtebrates to Family, identifying insect larvae to Order,
an~i detern7inin~ sp~:cies diversit_y, abundance and biomass.
d. Tide Gauge Elevations. T'ide elevations will be retrieved from the Packery
('hannel ti~ie gauge information a~ia internet. The elevations selected will be
those taker~ directl~ off~ the Packery Channel internet site at the same time the
benthic cornmunity ~amples were being collected. In addition, while onsite for
the avian;'}~enthic ~~~onitoring, tu-o i~~easurements will be taken within the
benth~c stu~ly area. One ~~Ieasure~nent will be taken from the first stake of the
heiithic stu~iy area houndary to tlie waters edge, and the second measurement
w~;l be tak~~n from the f~urthest stake zo the waters edge. The stakes on either
en~i ~~t~the ~~reviousi,~ usecl benthic study area will be used to create a polygon of
a~~ailable s~arface a~-~a. This inti~rn~ation in conjunction with the tide gauge
elevatiorl i~iformatic~n ~~ill relate "a~~ailable surface area" to tide elevations.
~T'hi~ "available surtace ar~a" is ~; rough estimate. and will be used to tie the
presencc oi shorebir~is to ~~vailable benthos.
e. Baseline Reports. ,-~t the end of Year 1 and Year 2 a report (one (1) hard copy
and ~~ne (1 ) electronic c~~py) will be submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, and
the ~~itv ~~ ill in turn provide copies of the documents to the PCTF. The
Basetine Reporis wi I1 contain the tollowing:
(~`t Descr~ption of~rhe haseline c~mditions
(ii) Summarv of n~~eth~~dology
(iii 1 Results of the l~aseline monit~rin~
fi~'i Copie~ of apprc~priat~ aerials
("v1 [f appropriate. anv applicable recommendations for adjusting the
=~~onituring pra,rari~
(v~ p an a~~pendiY ~vith copies of all field data sheets, laboratory reporting
sheets and othcr appropriate eiata.
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Pa e3of10
'. Ongoin~Post-Construrtiori Monitorin~ Year 3-Year_~
a. Aerial Photographs. Aerial photographs will be obtained of the same area and
suh~ect to the sam~: specifications for each subsequent year as in Year 1 and
Year Z exccpt that n~ ground truthing will be required.
b. Field Work. This ~~~ill h~~ done in the same manner as in Year 1 and Year 2.
c. Tide Gauge Elevation. fhis will be done in the same manner as in Year 1 and
Yc~ar ?.
d. .4nnual Report (Years 3-4). An annual report will be prepared each year that
is similar tc~ the Firsi Year Report except in the foilowing ways:
(i ) A de~ailed description of baseline conditions will not be repeated;
(ii~ A11y habitat chan~es from th~ baseline year or any prior year will be
ident~fied, pictorially shown on the aerial photographs, described, and if
apprcipriate, ct~mments on their causes will be provided; and
(ili ) The ~`" Y"ear ~-~;port shall also serve as a"final" report that documents the
results of the ct~tire monitonng effort.
e. ~nnual Report (Year 5). The final report will summarize monitoring efforts
~nd data analysis o~ er the five year period.
Ii) Baseline conditions will be r~oted and potential changes will be discussed.
(ii i A sumn~ary u~ hab~tat charg~s will be presented over the five year period.
T'hesc changes. if anv, will be shown pictorially on aerial photographs.
I i i i) t'opi~~s of all appropriate aer~als will be provided.
(iv) [f appropriatc. ariv applicable recommendations for continuing the
monitorin~ prograri~ will be presented.
(~ i C'onciusior~s c7r gen~~ral obse-vations will be discussed.
(~~i) An appendix with copies uf all field data sheets, laboratory reporting
sheets, and otlier appropriate data will be included.
~. Reference Control Site
a. GeneraL
Vl='htl~ ther~~ is no ~-equirement in the letter from the General Land Office to
select a rei~:,rence s~~eicontrol similar to the Mollie Beattie area and monitor in
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Pa e4of10
,~ . .~ u ~,~ ,~~., ... . _ . .. . _ ~ .. ._ ~. ., _ . ~.
con~unctio~t wit}~ th~~ project site, ;t is highly recommended if such a site ean be
toiuid. lt weather anumalies o~~cur and impact the project site, it will be
beneticial ~o shov~ ho~~ the refcre»ce site/control was affected by the same
weather~ anoti~alies- ~[~}~e reference;~control site should also show ~whether
~otE~ntial nc;gative <~ccurrences at the Mollie Beattie Coastal Habitat Community
are the res~ilt of Packe~~ Channel project or naturally occurring changes. Any
data I~rom -he (_'~tv ~~roti~idcd refei~enced site (Figure 1.A.) may be used only if
acce~~table to the Tt~;LC~. i~~ its sol~~ discretion.
b. Mon~torins_ Pro~~isiui~s
(i) .4erial Photographs. Obtain comparable aerial photography at the same
timi; aerials are done of thE~ MBCHC site.
(ii) Using these aerials. Monitor any changes in habitat characteristics in a
mailner similar to how hahitat changes are estimated at the project site
usir~g comparablc ~erials.
(iii) Additional Field Work. No additional field work shall be required at
the referenct~ site
(iv) Reporting. I f the TG LO determines the information from the
preference ~~te fs acceptahle to the TGLO then incorporate it into the
hasc line and annual report~,.
~~'. :~DDITIONAL SE~RVICEti TO BE DETERMINED
T}~is section defines the scope f~~r additional services that may be included as part of
this eontract but the Engir~eer titi~ill not begin work on this section without specific
written approval by the Director of Engineenng Services. Fees for Additional Services
will be deterininecl at the time such serv~ces are authorized and will be negotiated by
thcs Director of~ Eiigineeri~~~ Ser~~ices as required. The Engineer will, with written
authorization by the Direct~~r of F.ngineerin~ Services, do the following:
Field Work. This n~~<<y ~onsist of any of the following: ground truthing or
surveyii~l~ alon~ the bascline transects, avian surveys, benthic sampling analyses, or
other similar itt~ms as n~~ay h~ authorired by the Director of Engineering Services.
_:. Port Hurricane Sur~e~. ~hould the area be stnick by a tropical storm or
hurricane, as sc>on as practic~l after th~~ event, a post-hurricane survey shall be done.
This wiil initially consi~~ of~~btaining aerial photographs comparable to those being
provided as par~t of the routine monit~~~ring. If the impact appears t~ be significant,
the City. at its ~ole disc~~etion may authorize additional work, namely a repeat of the
baseline ~~roun~i truthin:.~ ori~~nally dor~e as part of the Year 1 baseline survey.
~. Additional Meetings. ~~he contract hud~et allows for 32 meeting hours in year #l
and 3' ri~eetin~~ ho~irs i~l yc~~rs ?-5_ Should this number prove inadequate, theii
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Pa e5of10
subject to Ci2v appra~~aL additional hours will be approved at a cost to be
detern~i~~ed_
IL SCHF DUI.E
See ~i~;ure ILA. ior a summarv t>f thG Yeal- 1-Year 2 and the Year 3-Year 5 Activities.
Highl~ght~ include~ -
~. :~erial photographs shall nc~rmall_y be taken in ,Ianuary and July; except an additional
t~erial shall ?~e taken in Septemb~r 2003 sii~ce none was obtained in July 2003.
B. The baseline survev will be done as soon as practical after the initial aerial photographs
~ir~~ taken-
x'. :~~ ian Surv;,ys wil~ be dont twice monthlv during November through March.
!). Henthic samples ~~ i11 be dune u~ice per month during November throught March and
shali coinci~ie with one of the a~~ian surveys zach month.
~;. Elevation surveys will be perfoimed alang baseline transects during the monitoring
~e~~sons ('~I~vember- March) of Year ~ and Year 5.
~. Tl~e Annual Report due for eacl~ year shall he delivered in September and cover the
}~nor monitoring year (September - Au~ust).
I I I f~ E~: S
4. Fee for Basic Ser~-ices. ~Tl~e Cit~ will pav the Engineer a fixed fee for providing all
`°Basic Services" authorize~i as }~er the table below. The fees for Basic Services will not
exceed those identif~ed and will be full and total compensation for all services outlined
in Section I.B.1-3 above, and for all experises incurred in performing these services. In
Section 1.B ?-3, the statemcnt «~ill be bas~d upon Engineer's estimate of the proportion
±~f the total ~crvice; actuallv complete at the time ofbilling.
B. Fee for Additional Services. For sen-ices authorized by the Director of Engineering
Services under Section 1.~ ``Additional Services" the City will pay the Engineer an
amount t~ be determined at i.he time of authorization.
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Pa e6of10
~ ~'e~ ~ , . . .. N. ~ . 4t~~NNaNt~-rr:. -_ _ . _ ...-_. .
~ i:
~~~n a t~ ~ \ . _ ' ~
~~ :~ 57 : -
- .. . ` ~ . ,
, - ,
~ ~.. _ Rsfe~~nce Site ' : ~ , , ~:
~ ~ '~. - -~ ~ ,~
~: ~ ;_ gg 'ti~= ~ = _ ~`
~ ~
~+ ,. `
^ X .. l `f '* ~ ~;`
~. ~ ~~ r~. "~~~ -.,?
~~ =~~ 5~ ,. _. . "
• ~.:
~~ , ' ~ j;' ~ , :~ `s.
,: . ~
> , ~ • ~ '~ '-
. ~.
, , ~.! ~'~y
r :• -
-,3> •> ~ : .
#:.:~ ..~
` - .-~l . ~ ~ _.
~ , ,: ,
~ ~ j ,':
Mo~lio 8eattie ''~,,.r~' -
Y, a ; ~;.:`
Coastal Mabitat ~ =
:; •,
Coa~rnunity ,i' _ ~,9 ,~_. ~::
~ ~ ?:
~ Pro~ct Site „'' ,
. Y ,,~~ ._ !.ar ~. .
~ t ,~ ~
~c
~: -: `39 ' ~,j - ,.;.
~`~~ . ~~ . . /+ - ~ ~~,
~ ~ \
J ~
. '~~ .. ~ . ~ ~ . ~'
. . .. -. . ~ ~_~ . ` ~ 1 ~ . ..--T., ~~•~~
"'s :t" ~
~p . ~ ,,~ ~,~y.
~ , ~ ,~ r
~~ ~ .....~. } F, ~ ~
~ # ~'"' ~'~' • _ _ l ;~ ~ ~ :~<;
r, ; . ,
,, . ~ ~ ~ ~, e~ ~ .~-. ;
~
r~. ~` $ f ' f `~' ~, 9
.. ~
~ !~? ~ -~~
, ,~: , : ~S
-. t;~ ~: s F ;~~
? ~.h., ~.
`„*ry.. F x~ ~ ~` . y a;._ s~ a :~~!1~ y ~-
~ F 4r.
~ ' ~
~ ' : na,-~: ° ~ ~~ ,~~= ' ~
~ ~ , . : ~, r~~ n,~ - _ ,~
'ef4 ._ N ~ . . - .. '.
, ~,._ ,
~~ _~ x !, ~ .~r+t ~ ;3 _.__~ - -_ __ j ~
,' -
__ ~ t ~, - ~ 4 - --- y ~, ~~~-
A ~ ~ ~, . ~ ~ r!. l. ~r~ `~ ~f ti x r ;
_ ' s.~.. . -, . '~'r ~ C ~ c,G. ~ -~-t .
's~ ' _~ ' 1 r. ~ . v ~' ° pq~ ~
f ~y ~ y~ ~ 7$. ~ 2 -;.~,~
~ . . .
•^~e~l;~~~~~~! .; `~ ~ r r~
~ ~ ~) ~' ~. `f ~. FIGURE I.A
•'~ ~ ~ ~" ATTACHMENT TO EXHIBIT A-2
'~ y
~' e
~~ ~~j~ ~~--~ -%'-`' ~'~,;~ ~ '~ MOLLIE BEATTIE COASTAL HABITAT
~_':`~~, . COMMUNITY MONITORING
`~ ~ , Project Location 8 Reference Site
~~., t ~~ + , Location ~
~7 •.1~ _ _ ~ . .' . _ R ~'k~~ 4 ~ s~.: ~.~~.
;-oUrcr~ -SGS topc G~.adw Cr,ine Isiar~ci~ ~~Jv a;.~: y'dV
C~ecember .?0~
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Pa e7of10
-~..,~.. _ ~.~.. .~..,4.,~ ~ ---.e.
~~ ( SHINER MOSELEY
~ AND ASSOCIATES~ INC.
August 7, Zoo~ Zoa.6oo~~
c~t~ ofco~us cnrist~
Atm: Mr. Tom Utter
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, TX 7846~9-9277
RE: PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES/FEES = MOLLIE BEATTIE
COASTAL HABITAT COMMUNITY MONITORING, CITY PROJECT
5122
Dear Mr. Utter,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this proposal for additional services
associated with the Mollie Beattie Coastal Habitat Community (MBCHC) Monitoring
Project. This proposal is for the following:
x) Additional surveying of elevations along previously surveyed transects within
MBCHC.
?) Additional fees associated with changes to monitoring schedule.
SCOPE OF WORK
You have requested that we revisit transects established in Baseline Year 1 of the MBCHC
study to collect elevation data at each of the previously surveyed data points. ~-IDR~Shiner
Moseley will use global positioning system (GPS) equipment to navigate along the
previously surveyed transects (Transects A and B) within MBCHC. An elevation and a
GPS point will be taken at each of the data points that were surveyed during Baseline Year
l Elevations will be recorded in NAVD 88. GPS points will be taken using a state plene
coordinate system.
This methodology will be implemented once during 2006 (Year 3) and once during 2008
(~`ear 5). Data from these surveys will be irtcluded in Appendix C of the annual reports.
', 555 N Carancahua Phone 136t1859-221~ AMD. NO. 2
HDR Enpneering, lnc.
s~~ceis5o Fax(361)857-7234 EXHIBIT"A-2"
Gerpus Christi, TX 78478-0010 www.hdrinc.com pa e 9 of 10
,.~ ~ «~ , _
Mr. Tom Utter
August 7, 2006
Page 2 of 2
FEES
HDR~Shiner Nloseley can provide the Elevation Survey in 2006 ar~d 2008 for ~lump sum
amounts of $4,500 and $4,950 respectively. .
Delays in the North Padre Island Storm Damage and Environmental Restoration Project
have resulted in unanticipated changes to the scheduling of Years 3-5 of the MBCHC
Monitoring Project. We are requesting an additional $11,300 to compensate for increased
costs resulting from this unanticipated change.
REQUESTED ACTION
If you are in agreement with the above Scope of Work and Fees, please let us know. We
will then develop the appropriate contract paperwork in the City format. Please do not
hesitate to contact us at 361-857-2211.
Sincerely,
~ ENGINEE G, INC.
~
~ ~ ,~~ ~: ~~ ~~ ~:
~' •'Joseph Moake
Vf Envimnmental Biologist
A. Shiner
Senior Vice President
AMD. NO. 2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Pa e10of10 '
` City of
CO~US CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
C~11'1St1 DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS
~i~r.
City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 1?112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City
to provide tf~e following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with
.N/A„
F~M NAM~: I~DR Engineerinq, Inc.
STREET: 555 N. Carancahua, Suite 1650 CITY:_ Corpus Christi ZIP: 78478-0010
FlRM is: 1. Corporation_ X 2 Partnership__ 3 Sole Owner 4. Association
5. Other
DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS
If additional space is necessary. piease use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.
1. State the names of each employee of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting
3% oi more of the ownership in the above named firm.
Name Job Title and City Department (if known)
N1A
2. Statethe nar~nnes of each official of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting 3%
or mt~e of the ownership in the above named firm.
Name Title
N~A
3. State the names of each board member of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest
cons~ituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named firm.
Name Board, Commission or Committee
NtA
4. Statethe names of each emprloyee or officer of a consultant for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on
any r~tter r~ated to the sut~ect of this contract and has an ownership interest constituting 3% or more of
the ownershtp in the above named firm.
Name Consultant
N1A
CERTIFICATE
; certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have no kno ngly
withheld dis~closure of any informa#ion requested and that supplemental statements will be promptly sub itte o the
City of Corp~s Christi, Texas as changes occur
uertifying Person; James A. Shiner, P.E __ _ ~~ Title: Senior Vice Presid
~
Signature of Certifying Person:~ ^ ~~ ~""~~~'~-_-- ~-----, Date: ~/ ~'Z ~0'7
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 1 of 2
DEFINITIONS
a. Board Member. A member of any board, commissior! or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of
Corp~s Christi, Texas
b Emp~yee Any person empioyed by the C~ty of Corpus Christi, Texas, either on a full or part time basis, but not as
an independent contractor
e Firm. Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial and whether
estab~shed to produce or dea{ with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form
of soiE propri~torship, as self-emplo~ed person, partnership corporation, joint stock company, joint venture,
receivership or trust and entities whic for purposes of taxation, are treated as non-profit organizations.
~ Offici~l. The Mayor, members of the C~ty Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers,
Department and Division Heads and Municipal Courf Judges of the Cifjr of Corpus Christi, Texas.
e Ownership Interest. Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when
such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity. Constructively held refers to holding or
contrbl established through voting frusts. proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements.
Consctltant. Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the
purpose of professional consultation and recommendation.
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 2 of 2