Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2010-024 - 2/16/2010 - ApprovedAmendment No. 1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (CITY) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee and JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP Inc., a Delaware Corporation, (ArchitectlEngineer - A/E), hereby agree to the following amendment to the contract approved by Motion 2009-289 on October 13, 2009 as follows: Section 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT -Planning and Architecture/Engineering Services for City of Corpus Christi -Corpus Christ International Airport is amended by the addition three (3) Projects authorized by this amendment: Exhibit "A-4" -Task Order 4 -Terminal Rehabilitation Design through Construction Phase Services -Federal Inspection Station Facility Renovation/Expansion; Exhibit "A-5" -Task Order 5 -Wildlife Hazard Analysis; and Exhibit "A-6" -Task Order 6 -Electrical Tunnel Structural Integrity Investigation. Section 2.ORDER OF SERVICES is amended to add the following paragraphs to address Exhibit "A-4", Exhibit "A-5" and Exhibit "A-6": 2. ORDER OF SERVICES The anticipated schedule of the Task Order 4, Task Order 5 and Task Order 6 is shown on Exhibit "A-4", Exhibit "A-5", and Exhibit "A-6". This schedule is not to be inclusive of all additional time that may be required for review by the CITY staff and may be amended by or with the concurrence of the Director of Aviation. $662,976.50 for a restated not to exceed fee of $738,376.50. Section 4. FEE is amended by the additional fees for Task Order 4, 5, and 6 as set forth: 4. FEE The amendment authorizes an additional fee not to exceed $662,976.50 for a restated total of $738,376.50. The additional fees authorized by this amendment are: For Task Order No. 4, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as described in Exhibit "A-4", for providing services authorized, a total lump sum amount of $300,355.00 for Basic Services and a Time and Materials, not to exceed amount of $184,168.00 (in words) for Additional Services. For Task Order No. 5, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as described in Exhibit "A-5", for providing services authorized, a total lump sum amount of $-0- for Basic Services and a Time and Materials, not to exceed amount of $133,453.50, (in words) for Additional Services. For Task Order No. 6, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as described in Exhibit "A-6", for providing services authorized, a total lump sum amount of $ -0-for Basic Services and a Time and Materials, not to exceed amount of $45,000.00, (in words) for Additional Services. 2010-024 M2010-036 02/16/10 Jacobs Engineering Group Contract for Engineering (A/E) Services INDEXED ,t r 13. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST A/E further agrees, in compliance with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112, to complete, as part of this contract, the Disclosure of Interests form attached hereto as Exhibit "C". All other terms and conditions of the October 13, 2009 contract, as amended, between the City and Consultant will remain in full force and effect. CITY OF ORPUS HRISTI Juan Perale , PE Date Assistant City Manager RECOMMEND D gY / c~ Pete Anaya, P. E., Date Director of Engineering Services sy ~- ~ ,~ ~h- l ~ Fernando Segun E Date Director of Aviation JACOBS EN E G GROUP INC. By 3 0 Kevin elson D to Vice President 777 Main Street Fort Worth, TX 76102 (817) 735-6000 Office (817) 735-6148 Fax 2010 - ~.3(v ~ AurHalzt,z~~ ~ c~~KClI ...~.;~-- ` [o ...'~- SECRETARY YJJ• ATTEST By Armando Chapa, City cretary Date APPROVED,AS T FORM By ~ ~ (~ City Attorney Date Contract for Engineering (A/E) Services Page 2 of 2 t' r~ . ~~ ~ EXHIBIT A-4 TASK ORDER 4 TASK LIST Terminal Rehabilitation Design through Construction Phase Services The City hereby requests and authorizes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ("Architect/Engineer- A/E") to perform the following Services under the contract executed between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and City dated October 14, 2009, (the "Agreement"). This Task Order is issued pursuant to this Agreement and the terms of the Agreement are incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order. To the extent of any conflicts between the terms and conditions of this Task Order and the Agreement, the Agreement shall control. The purpose of this amendment to the Contract is to provide design through construction administration and observation services for remodeling the existing FIS facility at the Corpus Christi International Airport. The existing FIS facility at the Airport currently processes approximately 50 passengers per hour through Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the TSA. The goal of remodeling the facility is to ultimately process between 200 and 250 passengers per hour. The primary objectives of the rehabilitation project are as follows: 1. Increase the number of processing stations to accommodate a minimum of 200 passengers per hour. 2. Install ADA compliant access to entrances and exits from the FIS facility. 3. Increase the size of the Arrivals Primary Processing Area. 4. Improve the downstream baggage claim. 5. Increase the size of the Secondary Bag Screening. 6. Develop a facility that provides a high level of customer service. Renovation and expansion of the FIS facility must be designed in accordance with the recommendations and requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Transportation Security Administration, and the Airport Administration. The building modifications, including structural, mechanical, plumbing, and electrical systems, will be designed in accordance with local and national building codes and to meet the operational needs within the remodeled area. Modifications to utilities such as water, sewer, power, communications and IT systems will be included as required for an operational facility. The overall Scope of Services for this project is as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. BASIC SERVICES shall consist of the following: 1. DESIGN MEETINGS a. Meetings during the design phases are limited to 4 meetings for the purposes of coordinating design criteria and are limited to a maximum of two (2) engineers. EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e 1 of 10 2. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE Architectural Schematic Design will be based on the accepted concept. The concept will be further refined through the development of the following exhibits: a. Site Plan -Identifies the vehicular/bus/future automated people mover access, ingress/egress, traffic flow in and around the site, landscape areas, edge conditions, service access and flow, visitor access and flow, fueling area, individual service site (if required), etc. b. Plans -Shows the relationship of the programmatic space requirements to scale and describes the functional requirements, such as, flow, wayfinding, building support areas, vertical cores, office areas, and public areas. c. Sections -Identifies the vertical relationships of the different levels in relation to the existing grades. d. Interior Concepts -Initial interior concepts will be developed with materials and color. e. Major Building Systems -The major building systems will be identified, analyzed, selected, and coordinated with the architectural drawings. The building systems will be structural engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, plumbing engineering, specialty engineering, etc. and will be coordinated through Jacobs. f. General Outline Specifications - A general outline specifications will be developed highlighting the major building divisions and identifying the general quality of the project. During the Schematic Phase the Engineer will: a. Survey of existing facilities and conditions. b. Review applicable codes. c. Compile design criteria and system descriptions upon review of Owner's preliminary information defining requirements d. Coordinate space requirements and weights for MEP systems. e. Prepare preliminary chase requirements. f. Prepare system flow charts and risers. g. Prepare a typical layout for: 1) HVAC 2) Lighting 3) Power 4) Plumbing 5) Fire Protection g. Begin utility company coordinations for telephone, power, water, sanitary and storm sewer, and fire main services. EXHIBIT ` A-4" Pa e2of10 3. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE Upon conclusion of the Schematic Design, the Airport, FIS Agencies, design team and consultants will have thoroughly reviewed the Schematic Design documents and have prepared a list of key design/coordination issues, cost issues, and Airport feedback issues. The major tasks arising out of the reviews will be to resolve and incorporate into the Project all agreed upon Schematic Design review comments and to establish a list of priorities and action items for the Design Development Phase. The Design Development documents will refine and further develop the design concepts and space planning established during the Schematic Design Phase. The main objective of the Design Development Phase will be to: a. Finalize major design decisions and fix and describe the architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing systems and building materials. b. Convey all key aspects of the design and building systems in order that the Owners' acceptance of the design can be obtained, and in addition, form the basis for a further developed and refined cost estimate. c. Serve as the basis for coordination among all team members to begin the Construction Documents Phase which will, in part, commence prior to completion of the Design Development Phase. During the Design Phase the Engineer will: a. Prepare preliminary specifications. b. Update drawings confirming space allocations for MEP systems. c. Review Owner-furnished information defining requirements. All Owner-furnished data must be received by Jacobs during the design development phase. d. Update chase requirements. e. Finalize utility company coordination. 4. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE Upon completion of the Design Development Document review period, the Airport, FIS Agencies, design team and consultants will have thoroughly reviewed the Design Development documents and have prepared a list of key design/coordination issues, cost issues, and Airport feedback issues. The major tasks arising out of the reviews will be to resolve and incorporate into the Project all agreed upon Design Development review comments and EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e3of10 to establish a list of priorities and action items for the Construction Document Phase. The design team will thoroughly review the Design Development cost estimate for budget compliance, and review and discuss all Design Development review comments. Specific direction on Design Development issues for each building and all disciplines will be critical to move into the Construction Document Phase. The Construction Document Phase is contingent on written approval of the Design Development package by the Client. During the Construction Document Phase the Engineer will: a. Finalize specifications. b. Finalize drawings including equipment space allocations and chases. c. Submit drawings to authorities having jurisdiction for approval other than permitting. d. Revise drawings as a result of final review. e. Finalize Estimates of Construction Cost. 5. BIDDING & NEGOTIATION PHASE a. Review bidder's list and make recommendations. b. Attend one (1) pre-bid meeting with the Contractors. c. Analyze bids and proposed substitutions. 6. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE a. Prepare change orders as required, except those affecting the design in excess of Jacobs' SCOPE OF SERVICES. b. Review Contractor's Applications for Payment. c. Review submittals for equipment and systems as required by the specifications. d. Weekly construction meetings. It is anticipated that the construction phase of this project will last approximately 6 months. Construction meetings will be attended by teleconference. e. Provide 12 site visits during construction and prepare field reports documenting conditions. These site visits will be coordinated with the monthly construction meetings to reduce travel time associated with these visits. Provide one site visit for substantial completion/punch list. g. Provide one site visit for final acceptance. EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e4of10 h. Review test reports as required by the specifications. i. Review Operation & Maintenance Manuals as required by the specifications. j. Review final Contractor prepared As-Built drawings. k. Exclusions to scope - When Jacobs is called upon to observe the work of City's construction contractor(s) for the detection of defects or deficiencies in such work, Jacobs will not bear any responsibility or liability for such defects or deficiencies or for the failure to so detect. Jacobs shall not make inspections or reviews of the safety programs or procedures of the construction contractor(s), and shall not review their work for the purpose of ensuring their compliance with safety standards. Exclusion to scope - If Jacobs is called upon to review submittals from construction contractors, Jacobs shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon construction contractor(s)' submittals such as shop drawings, product data and samples, but only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the contract documents. The Jacobs' action shall be taken with such reasonable promptness as to cause no delay in the work while allowing sufficient time in the Jacobs' professional judgment to permit adequate review. Review of such submittals will not be conducted for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other details such as dimensions and quantities. m. Exclusion to Scope -Jacobs shall not assume any responsibility or liability for performance of the construction services, or for the safety of persons and property during construction, or for compliance with federal, state and local statutes, rules, regulations and codes applicable to the conduct of the construction services. Jacobs shall have no influence over the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. Construction safety shall remain the sole responsibility of the construction contractor(s). B. BASIC SERVICES shall consist of preparing the Contract Documents, including drawings and specifications, for the following systems: EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e5of10 ARCHITECTURAL a. Dimensioned Floor Plans and Partition Type b. Exterior Building envelope or Addition c. Ceiling Plans d. Doors, Windows, and Frames e. Schedule of Finish Materials 2. MECHANICAL a. Heating. b. Ventilating. c. Air conditioning. d. Hydronic piping distribution. e. Ductwork sizing and layout. f. Connection to existing building management system for all HVAC control modifications. 3. PLUMBING a. Sanitary sewer and vent piping. b. Domestic hot and cold water piping. 4. FIRE PROTECTION a. It is assumed the main distribution layout including fire standpipe are adequate for the modifications to the areas within the scope of this project. b. Performance specifications for branch distribution. Note that sprinkler head layout is NOT included in BASIC SERVICES. 5. ELECTRICAL a. It is assumed that the Incoming service is adequate for the modifications to the areas within the scope of this project . b. Interior power distribution. c. Recessed fluorescent light fixture layouts. d. Fire alarm system. e. It is assumed that telecommunication design will not be required for this project. Telecommunications are NOT included as part of the basic services. 6. TERMINAL ELECTRICAL STUDY It is understood that recent additions and changes to equipment has resulted in a decreased ability to supply standby generation to support the terminal's operation in the event of a power outage. As part of this EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e6of10 project, The A/E will complete a study of the airport's existing electrical system for the terminal building. This study will include the following: a. Verification of normal and standby distribution system. This includes verification of the one-line from the utility to the 480 V distribution panel level b. Short circuit and load flow studies will be performed and a report of findings presented to the airport for consideration of possible modifications to the electrical distribution system under a future project task order. c. Prepare one line diagrams of the electrical distribution system based upon the existing diagrams and the site survey. d. Thirty day load monitoring data required for these studies will be required and is assumed to be provided by CRP personnel. e. Review the loading on the electrical distribution system. C. ADDITIONAL SERVICES include, but are not limited to, the following and shall be approved by the Client prior to commencement: GENERAL a. Assisting in the preparation of application for government grants or financing for the project. b. Environmental impact studies. c. Field verification of existing as-built drawings provided by the Client. d. Field verification of as-built conditions when as-built drawings are not available. e. Existing base building mechanical and electrical system reconfigurations or analysis. f. Capacity designs for future expansions. g. Revisions to previously performed work as a result of changes to the original design criteria. h. Preparation of Construction Documents for alternates. i. Overtime to achieve the design schedule. j. Estimates of Construction Cost or Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost. k. Review of substitutions to equipment and systems specified, as well as alterations to Construction Documents for substitutions. I. Preparation of documents or attendance in the capacity of an expert witness. m. Analyzing maintenance and operation costs. n. Preparation of record drawing documents utilizing Contractor EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e7of10 prepared red-lines. Preparation of final project report. 2. MECHANICAL a. Boiler plant. b. Combustion air and exhaust. c. Refrigeration system. d. Alternate HVAC system studies. e. Energy storage studies. f. Design of heat recovery systems. 3. PLUMBING a. Site sanitary, storm and domestic water layout. b. Site gas layout. c. Oil water separator. d. Compressed air system. e. Hydrant Fueling system. f. Kitchen equipment connections. g. Water softener system. h. Water treatment system. 4. FIRE PROTECTION a. Sprinkler head layout. b. FM-200 system. 5. ELECTRICAL a. Light fixture switch layouts. b. Aircraft Ramp lighting c. Building facade lighting. d. Landscape lighting. e. Programmable lighting control systems. f. Exterior parking lot lighting. g. Receptacle and telephone outlet layouts. h. Lightning protection. i. Emergency generator system modifications. II. DESIGN MEDIA A. This project shall be produced by Jacobs on the following Media: AutoCAD plots on bond. B. The Client shall provide Jacobs AutoCAD ,Release 2004 or higher, or such electronic base files as may be possessed by the City to to facilitate our design. EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e8of10 TASK ORDER NO. 4 SCHEDULE DAY DATE ACTIVITY Monday February 15, 2010 Begin Schematic Design Monday March 12, 2010 Begin Design Phase Monday April 12, 2010 Begin Construction Document Phase Monday May 17, 2010 Advertise project for Bids Monday July 19, 2010 NTP Construction - 180 Days TASK ORDER NO. 4 FEES Fee for Basic Services -Lump Sum 1. Schematic Design Phase (15%) $39,284 2. Design Development Phase (20%) $52,379 3. Construction Documents Phase (40%) $104,246 4. Bid Phase (5%) $13,095 5. Construction Administration (20%) $52,891 Subtotal Basic Services Fee - FIS - (Lump Sum) $261,895 6. Terminal Building Electrical Study $38,460 Subtotal Basic Services Fee -Electrical Study (Lump Sum) $38,460 Subtotal Basic Services Fees (Lump Sum) $300,355 Fee for Additional Services (Allowance) (Not to Exceed) 1. Permit Preparation (as applicable) Railroads TXDOT Wetlands Delineation and Permit Temporary Discharge Permit NPDES Permit/Amendments TNRCC Nueces County Texas Historical Commission U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Jacobss U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Texas Department of License and Regulation Total Permitting 0 2. ROW Acquisition Survey (AUTHORIZED) 0 EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e9of10 3. Topographic Survey (AUTHORIZED) 0 4. Environmentallssues 0 5. Construction Observation Services $105,944 6. Start-up Services 0 7. Warranty Phase $960 8. Provide SCADA Documentation 0 9. CBP Coordination $3,072 10. Construction Phase Additional Services $10,690 11. Direct Expenses $63,502 Sub-Total Additional Services Fees Authorized (Not to Exceed) $184,168 Total Authorized Fee $484,523 For Task Order No. 4, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as detailed above and in the attached fee proposal, for providing services authorized, a total lump sum amount of $300 355.00 (Three Hundred Thousand, Three Hundred and Fifty Five Dollars and No Cents for Basic Services and a Time and Materials, Not To Exceed amount of $184.168.00 (One Hundred and Eiahtv Four Thousand, and One Hundred and Sixty-Eight Dollars and No Cents), for Additional Services and Direct Expenses. EXHIBIT "A-4" Pa e10of10 EXHIBIT A-5 TASK ORDER NO. 5 Task List Wildlife Hazard Assessment The City hereby requests and authorizes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ("Architect/Engineer- A/E") to perform the following Services under the contract executed between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and City dated October 14, 2009, (the "Agreement"). This Task Order is issued pursuant to this Agreement and the terms of the Agreement are incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order. To the extent of any conflicts between the terms and conditions of this Task Order and the Agreement, the Agreement shall control. Corpus Christi International Airport (CRP) requires a wildlife hazard assessment pursuant to Title 14 CFR, Part 139.337. This regulation stipulates that a: Wildlife hazard assessment be conducted by a wildlife damage management biologist who has professional training and/or experience in wildlife hazard management at airports or an individual working under direct supervision of such an individual. The wildlife hazard assessment must contain at least the following: • An analysis of the events or circumstances that prompted the assessment. • Identification of the wildlife species observed and their numbers, locations, local movements, and daily and seasonal occurrences. • Identification and location of features on and near the airport that attract wildlife. • A description of wildlife hazards to air carrier operations. • Recommended actions for reducing identified wildlife hazards to air carrier operations. This section presents the proposed project approach (i.e., scope of the proposed services). All work to be conducted under this scope of services will be conducted by or under the supervision of a qualified airport wildlife biologist (as specified in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-36). The wildlife hazard assessment will be prepared in a manner to comply with all requirements found in Title 14 CFR, Part 139.337 as well as Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B; Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports as well as the Wildlife Hazard Management Manual prepared by the FAA. This project will be reimbursed under an FAA grant. Tasks to be completed, as an Additional Service, for this project include: EXHIBIT "A-5" Pa e 1 of 7 2.1. Field Surveys A) An initial site visit will be conducted to: • Determine the various habitat types and hazards on/near the airport so that they can be delineated in the office from aerial photography using ArcMap, a geographic information system (GIS). • Identify survey locations/routes for follow-up wildlife surveys. B) Monthly bird surveys: These surveys will take place in the form of two-day (i.e., two consecutive days) surveys once a month for a one year (12 month) period. The one year (12 month) period allows for both daily and seasonal observations of birds and other wildlife. Additionally, the two-day surveys will be broken down further into early morning and later afternoon surveys for each day. Observation points would be located at regular intervals throughout CRP on predefined route covering the AOA. The 3- minute surveys (at each point) will consist of visual/auditory observations of birds on/near the airport AOA at each of the observation points. Data to be taken during the surveys would include: species, time of observation, observation location, and general direction of movement. If available, the airport crash grid map (or similar) will be used to record the location. Use of crash grid type map will give a uniform frame of reference that both biologists and airport personnel can be familiar with. One nighttime bird and flying mammal survey per quarter may also be conducted during the two-day survey period, if deemed necessary. C) Small mammal survey: This survey will take place quarterly in the form of four, five consecutive day periods (at a minimum). Traps will be set the night prior to the first of the five consecutive days and will be checked each subsequent morning. Trapped small mammals will be recorded and identified as well as an evaluation of the habitat type they were trapped in. CRP shall provide access to restricted portions of the AOA to the extent practical, so as to not interfere with aircraft operations. Any fees and permits normally used for these access privileges would be waived. 2.2. Wildlife Hazard Assessment Report A.) Notes from each months surveys will be provided in the form of a technical memorandum. This will provide CRP with a monthly status report as well as data that could be useful in the period leading up to the submittal. B.) A draft wildlife hazard assessment report will be completed for the areas surveyed. The report will incorporate the habitat survey information, wildlife observations made during the field surveys and other wildlife hazard data collected within the AOA during the survey periods. The report will identify the resident wildlife populations and hazardous attractants within and near to the AOA, potential wildlife hazards to air carrier operations, and recommend wildlife management tools to reduce/minimize the potential wildlife hazards. Other information that will be included in the wildlife hazard assessment report will include maps prepared in a GIS. Hazardous attractants and other pertinent features will be mapped using the GIS. From the GIS, maps showing the EXHIBIT "A-5" Pa e2of7 hazardous attractants overlaid on aerial photographs of the airport and surrounding area shall be generated. Early versions of these maps will be checked for accuracy (i.e., ground-truthed) by wildlife biologists in the field during the wildlife survey periods. Reported wildlife strikes on airport property will be plotted within the GIS. Maps of the strikes overlaid with the hazardous attractants shall be generated. This strike data will be provided by CRP. C.) After receiving review comments from CRP, a final wildlife hazard assessment report will be submitted. 2.3. Wildlife Hazard Management Plan A.) Wildlife Hazard Management- Plan: A Wildlife Hazard Management Plan will be prepared for CRP according to 14 CFR Part 139.337. This regulation stipulates that a: When the Administrator determines that a wildlife hazard management plan is needed, the certificate holder must formulate and implement a plan using the wildlife hazard assessment as a basis. The plan must- • Provide measures to alleviate or eliminate wildlife hazards to air carrier operations; • Be submitted to, and approved by, the Administrator prior to implementation; • As authorized by the Administrator, become a part of the Airport Certification Manual. The plan must include at least the following: • A list of the individuals having authority and responsibility for implementing each aspect of the plan. • A list prioritizing the following actions identified in the wildlife hazard assessment and target dates for their initiation and completion: o Wildlife population management; o Habitat modification; o Land use changes. • Requirements for and, where applicable, copies of local, State, and Federal wildlife control permits. • Identification of resources that the certificate holder will provide fo implement the plan. • Procedures to be followed during air carrier operations that at a minimum includes- o Designation of personnel responsible for implementing the procedures; o Provisions to conduct physical inspections of the aircraft movement areas and other areas critical to successfully manage known wildlife hazards before air carrier operations begin; o Wildlife hazard control measures; EXHIBIT "A-5" Pa e3of7 o Ways to communicate effectively between personnel conducting wildlife control or observing wildlife hazards and the air traffic control tower. • Procedures to review and evaluate the wildlife hazard management plan every 12 consecutive months or following an event described in 14 CFR Part 139.337. • A training program conducted by a qualified wildlife damage management biologist to provide airport personnel with the knowledge and skills needed to successfully carry out the wildlife hazard management plan B.) Technical Assistance: A qualified airport wildlife biologist (as specified in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-36) would be available upon request by CRP, to provide technical assistance to CRP staff as it relates to wildlife hazard management, training, and other related wildlife issues. This assistance would be considered additional services and conducted at fees agreed to by CRP and Jacobs, if requested by CRP. 2.4. Schedule and Deliverables The general schedule for the project is described below. Precise dates for the surveys will be determined close to the actual survey periods to adjust for non-typical weather conditions, etc. Field Survey Schedule A.) Initial Site Visit: (1 day on-site -two biologists). This initial site visit will occur within 30 days of notice to proceed. B.) Monthly bird surveys: (24 days on-site -two biologists). This includes atwo-day survey every month for a one year (12 month) period. C.) Small mammal surveys: (20 days on-site -two biologists). This includes afive-day survey quarterly (at a minimum). Deliverables A.) Notes from each field survey period (monthly) will be provided to the airport. These notes will be summarized in a brief technical memorandum to be provided to CRP within 14 days of the completion of each monthly survey. B.) Draft wildlife hazard assessment and draft wildlife management plan: seven (7) copies (pdf will be emailed in-lieu of paper copies if preferred by CRP). C.) Final wildlife hazard assessment and draft wildlife management plan (if applicable): Seven (7) hard copies and two CD-ROMs containing Final Report, Exhibits, and GIS data will also be provided. EXHIBIT "A-5" Pa e4of7 TASK ORDER NO.5 SCHEDULE DATE ACTIVITY SUBMITTAL January, 2010 Conduct initial site Submit monthly memo assessment and bird survey February, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit monthly memo survey March, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit quarterly memo survey and quarterly small mammal trapping April, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit monthly memo surve May, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit monthly memo survey June, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit quarterly memo survey and quarterly small mammal tra in July, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit monthly memo survey August, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit monthly memo survey September, Conduct monthly bird Submit quarterly memo 2010 survey and quarterly small mammal trapping October, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit monthly memo survey November, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit monthly memo survey December, 2010 Conduct monthly bird Submit quarterly memo survey and quarterly small mammal trapping January, 2011 Draft Wildlife Assessment Submit draft WAR and WMP for Report (WAR) and comments and/or revisions Wildlife Management Plan (WMP) February, 2011 Revise WAR and WMP Submit Final WAR and WMP EXHIBIT "A-5" Pa e5of7 TASK ORDER NO. 5 FEES Fee for Basic Services -Lump Sum 1. Preliminary Phase $0 2. Design Phase 0 3. Bid Phase 0 4. Construction Phase 0 Subtotal Basic Services Fees (Lump Sum) 0 Fee for Additional Services (Allowance) (Not to Exceed) 1. Permit Preparation (as applicable) Railroads TXDOT Wetlands Delineation and Permit Temporary Discharge Permit NPDES Permit/Amendments TNRCC Nueces County Texas Historical Commission U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Texas Department of License and Regulation Total Permitting 0 2. ROW Acquisition Survey (AUTHORIZED) 0 3. Topographic Survey (AUTHORIZED) 0 4. Environmentallssues 0 5. Construction Observation Services 0 6. Start-up Services 0 7. Warranty Phase 0 8. Provide SCADA Documentation 0 9. Wildlife Assessment -Lump Sum 91,550.00 10. Direct Expenses 41,903.50 Sub-Total Additional Services Fees Authorized $133,453.50 (Not to Exceed) Total Authorized Fee $133,453.50 EXHIBIT "A-5" Pa e6of7 For Task Order No. 7, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as detailed in the attached fee proposal, for providing services authorized, a lump sum amount of $0.00 (Zero dollars and no Cents) for Basic Services, a lump sum amount of $91,550.00 (Ninety-One Thousand, Five Hundred and Fifty Five dollars and no cents) for Additional Services, and a Time and Materials not to exceed amount of $41,903.50.00 (Forty-One Thousand, Nine Hundred and Three Dollars and Fifty cents), for Direct Expenses. EXHIBIT "A-5" Pa e7of7 EXHIBIT A-6 TASK ORDER 6 Task List Electrical Tunnel Investigation The City hereby requests and authorizes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ("Architect/Engineer- A/E") to perform the following Services under the contract executed between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and City dated October 14, 2009, (the "Agreement"). This Task Order is issued pursuant to this Agreement and the terms of the Agreement are incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order. To the extent of any conflicts between the terms and conditions of this Task Order and the Agreement, the Agreement shall control. This project will consist of completing a structural integrity investigation of the existing electrical tunnel under the air carrier apron at the Corpus Christi International Airport in Corpus Christi, Texas. The existing tunnel was constructed in 1960. Currently, the electrical tunnel is experiencing substantial water infiltration through the conduit penetrations in the tunnel walls. There are cracks along the tunnel walls which also exhibit evidence of water infiltration. Finally, the apron pavement above the existing tunnel is failing along the longitudinal centerline of the tunnel. This study will determine the structural integrity of the existing tunnel, the expected remaining life and propose repairs to maintain the tunnel or replacement options for a failing tunnel. We anticipate that the study will include the following elements of work: A geotechnical investigation will be performed by the Geotechnical Engineer that will consist of drilling approximately nine (9) borings, approximately 20' deep, along the length of the tunnel, both through the tunnel (5 locations) and adjacent to it (4 locations). In addition to the borings, approximately six (6) concrete corings will be made at various locations through the tunnel walls, including at the locations of circumferential cracking. Geotechnical borings adjacent to the tunnel will be conducted first in order to assess the expected water table elevation. Based on the elevation of the water table found, dewatering may be required prior to coring the tunnel's structure. Samples of the soil will undergo a corrosivity analysis and the tunnel's concrete cylinders will undergo compressive and petrographic analysis. Segments of exposed reinforcement at the tunnel's entrance will be removed for analysis. Ground penetration radar testing will be performed on top of the apron above the tunnel and within the tunnel along its base. R-meter testing will be performed in order to determine the size and location of reinforcement within the tunnel's roof, walls, and base at random locations throughout the tunnel. During this work, the structural engineer will be present to observe the findings and make adjustments as needed. The results of this field and lab work will be used to determine the following: soil profile along length of tunnel, including the elevation of the water table thickness of the tunnel's roof, wall, and base EXHIBIT "A-6" Pa e 1 of 4 • tunnel's concrete compressive strength (f'c) • tunnel's reinforcement size, placement and yield strength (fy) • design parameters needed for conducting structural analysis, such as, lateral soil and surcharge loads, unit weight of soil, etc... • level of sulfates present within soil and their impact on the life of the concrete • makeup of tunnel's concrete and its anticipated life expectancy • recommendations for construction, such as, dewatering techniques, excavation, backfill material and compaction requirements, etc... 2. During the geotechnical investigation a visual assessment of the tunnel's interior will be performed to determine the locations and source of water intrusion and the location and type of any tunnel defects, such as spalling, cracking, deflections, etc... 3. A structural analysis of the tunnel will be performed using the results from the geotechnical investigation and supplementing with information from existing record drawings where needed to determine if the tunnel is capable of withstanding current and anticipated airport loading. 4. An evaluation of the concrete cylinders extracted from the tunnel's structure will be analyzed by the Geotechnical Engineer to make a determination of the tunnel's anticipated life expectancy. 5. Based on the findings from the field and geotechnical investigation and from the structural analysis, recommendations for improvements and their associated estimated construction costs will be prepared. At the conclusion of the study and analysis, a report will be prepared and presented to Client that will incorporate all items discussed above and provide recommendations for repair or replacement of the tunnel. Seven (7) copies) of the Report will be provided. Based on results of the initial four (4) borings to be taken alongside the tunnel, dewatering may be required to obtain the concrete cores of the existing tunnel. This scope of work does not include dewatering or the anticipated cost for dewatering. The schedule presented below does not include time required for dewatering prior to beginning destructive testing of the tunnel. EXHIBIT "A-6" Pa e2of4 TASK ORDER NO. 6 SCHEDULE DAY DATE ACTIVITY Monday January 18, 2010 NTP Study Phase Monday February 2, 2010 Geotechnical Investigation Begins -Non-destructive testing and soil borings Monday February 9, 2010 Destructive Testing of Tunnel Begins (Cores of Tunnel Walls, Slab and Top) Monday March 15, 2010 Geotechnical Report Complete Monday March 29, 2010 Draft Study Report Complete Monday April 12, 2010 Final Study Report Complete TASK ORDER NO.6 FEES Fee for Basic Services -Lump Sum 1. Preliminary Phase $0 2. Design Phase 0 3. Bid Phase 0 4. Construction Phase 0 Subtotal Basic Services Fees (Lump Sum) 0 Fee for Additional Services (Allowance) (Not to Exceed) 1. Permit Preparation (as applicable) Railroads TXDOT Wetlands Delineation and Permit Temporary Discharge Permit NPDES Permit/Amendments TNRCC Nueces County Texas Historical Commission U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Texas Department of License and Regulation Total Permitting 0 2. ROW Acquisition Survey (AUTHORIZED) 0 3. Topographic Survey (AUTHORIZED) 0 4. Environmentallssues 0 EXHIBIT "A-6" Pa e3of4 5. Construction Observation Services 0 6. Start-up Services 0 7. Warranty Phase 0 8. Provide SCADA Documentation 0 9. Electrical Tunnel Study $31,000 10. Direct Expenses $14,000 Sub-Total Additional Services Fees Authorized (Not to Exceed) $45,000 Total Authorized Fee $45,000 For Task Order No. 6, the CITY will pay the A/E a fee, as detailed above and in the attached fee proposal, for providing services authorized, a total lump sum amount of $-0- (Zero dollars and no cents) for Basic Services, and a Time and Materials, not to exceed amount of $45,000.00 (forty five thousand, four hundred dollars and no cents), for Additional Services and Direct Expenses. EXHIBIT "A-6" Pa e4of4 SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CIT~- PURCHASING DIVISION ~nti~ Co us city~of DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Christi. City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to pprovide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not a~~licable, answer with `NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and defimtlons. COMPANY NAME: °~.~8 S ~-~Jl6f~t1 CC-~Z~s ~-PG~D Z~G P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: s9~ 5 ~C~R~ I F ~~ CITY: /~`~ ~ ~ ZIP: ~~~ FIRM IS: 1. Corporation ~"' 2. Partnership ^ 3. Sole Owner ^ 4. Association ~j 5. Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this pa e or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) ~~ ` ~( 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title SG2~ i4'77/1G//~'~y7 .g-17ro-c/~/hG~v 9 ~- i T 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant ~~11Ga FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public m general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: kLG(f~~ ~ /IJkISc~J Title: V~CGs ~,~,~,i7'' (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Date: ~ /~ Person: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. ATTACHMENT «A„ Question number 1. State the names of each employee of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting 3% or more of the ownership of the above named firm. Jacobs and its subsidiaries form an organization that is comprised of approximately 125 operating companies and affiliates, having a total current employment complement of over 50,000 persons and revenues exceeding $11 billion. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a publicly traded Company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: JEC. Beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock is not reported to Jacobs unless the holder exceeds 10% of the common stock. Question number 2. State the names of each Official of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting 3% or more of the ownership of the above named firm. Jacobs and its subsidiaries form an organization that is comprised of approximately 125 operating companies and affiliates, having a total current employment complement of over 50,000 persons and revenues exceeding $11 billion. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a publicly traded Company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: JEC. Beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock is not reported to Jacobs unless the ownership exceeds 10% of the common stock. Question number 3 State the names of each board member of the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting 3% or more of the ownership of the above named firm. Jacobs and its subsidiaries form an organization that is comprised of approximately 125 operating companies and affiliates, having a total current employment complement of over 50,000 persons and revenues exceeding $11 billion. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a publicly traded Company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: JEC. Beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock is not reported to Jacobs unless the ownership exceeds 10% of the common stock. Question number 4 State the names of each employee or officer of a consultant for the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting 3% or more of the ownership of the above named firm. Jacobs and its subsidiaries form an organization that is comprised of approximately 125 operating companies and affiliates, having a total current employment complement of over 50,000 persons and revenues exceeding $11 billion. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a publicly traded Company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: JEC. Beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock is not reported to Jacobs unless the ownership exceeds 10% of the common stock.