Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2011-003 - 1/11/2011 - Approved1 A f ~` Amendment No. 3 CITY OF CORPUS CHRIST! CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Carpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (CITY) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee and JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP Inc., a Delaware Corporation, (ArchitectlEngineer-AIE), hereby agree to the following amendment to the contract approved by Motion 2009-289 on October 13, 2009 as follows: Section 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT -Planning and ArchitecturelEngineering Services for City of Corpus Christi -Corpus Christ International Airport is amended by the addition one (1) Projects authorized by this amendment: Exhibit "A-8" -Task Order 8 -Runway Alternative Study. Section 2.ORDER OF SERVICES is amended to add the following paragraphs to address Exhibit "A-8"": 2. ORDER OF SERVICES ~ The anticipated schedule of the Task Order~,'is shown an Exhibit "A-8". This schedule is not to be inclusive of all additional time that may be required for review by the CITY staff and maybe amended by or with the concurrence of the Director of Aviation. d Section 4. FEE is amended by the additional fees far Task Order~7as set forth: 4. FEE The amendment authorizes an additional fee not to exceed $163,235.00 for a restated total of $974,665.50. The additional fees authorized by this amendment are: For Task Order No. 8, the CITY will pay the AIE a fee, as described in Exhibit "A-8", for providing services authorized, a total Pump sum amount of $157,250.D0 for Basic Services and a Reimbursable Allowance, not to exceed amount of $5,985.00, ~) for Additional Services. 13. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST AIE further agrees, in compliance with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No.17112, to complete, as part of this contract, the Disclosure of Interests form attached hereto as Exhibit "C". All other terms and conditions of the October 13, 2009 contract, as amended, between the City and Consultant will remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPU CHRISTI gy ~,rt, v~ / l ~ j~ Juan Peral s, PE Date Assistant City Manager RECOMMENDED ~,~, rPete Anaya, P. E., Director of Engineering Services By ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 - 2011-003 aE ate M2011-010 01/11/11 Jacobs Engineering Graup JACOB ING GROUP INC. gy ~~ ~~ 7~1~ Kevin Nelson Date Vice President 777 Main Street Fort Worth, TX 76102 (817} 735-6000 Office (817} 735-6148 Fax D r ~ 0 D ~u~~loszl~l:~ ~~ c~t~~ri~ ~ 1 r Contracl~ifi(ing~E) Services Page 1 of 2 ~. ,, ATTEST By Armando Chapa, City Secretary Date APPROVED AS TO FORM B /~w~ °/~ ity tt ney Date Contract for Engineering (AIE) Services Page 2 of 2 _, ~~~~ ~~ December 2, 2010 Attn: Mr. Fernando Segundo. A.A.E. Director of Aviation Corpus Christi International Airport 1000 International Drive Corpus Christi, Texas 78406 Subject: Scope of Work, Schedule & Fee Proposal Runway Alternative Study Carpus Christi International Airport Corpus Christi, Texas City Project No. E09046 Dear Mr. Segundo; I have enclosed one (1) copy of Exhibit A-8, Task Order $ -Runway Alternative Study for Corpus Christi International Airport. Exhibit A-8 contains a detailed scope of work, schedule and fee proposal for completing the Runway Alternative Study. I have revised the fee proposal based upon comments from Mr. Marcelino Sanchez, FAA Program Manager. Mr. Sanchez requested that we minimize the number of engineers working an the project. Based on that comment, we eliminated the Graduate Engineer and allocated that time to the Project Engineer. I am sure you are aware that on November 12, 2010 Mr. Compton resigned from Jacobs. However, Mr. Compton has agreed to stay on with Jacobs as a technical resource for our aviation practice and will be working on the Runway Alternative Study. I will assume the role as your Program Manager. I have added hOUrS to the fee proposal to account for my involvement in the project. The revised fee proposal is $163,235. I trust this revised fee proposal meets your requirements. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and the city of Corpus Christi. Please contact meat 817-735-7004 if you have any questions or require additional information. in r I , +f~ f J. Toner Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. enclosure: cc: Enrique Castillo, Assistant Director, CRP Grace Gonzales, PE, Airport Engineer, CRP Victor Gonzales, Project Coordinator, CRP Kevin Stowers, Assistant City Engineer. City of Corpus Christi File: 41x8 EXH A-S.LTR.RI 12022010 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ~ 777 Main Street ~ Fort Worth, Texas 76102-5304 ~ 817-735-6776 EXHIBIT A-8 TASK ORDER 8 TASK LIST RUNWAY ALTERNATIVE STUDY The City hereby requests and authorizes Jacobs Engineering Group inc. {"ArchitectlEngineer- A/E") to perform the following Services under the contract executed between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and City dated October 14, 2009, (the "Agreement). This Task Order Is issued pursuant to this Agreement and the terms of the Agreement are incorporated herein and farm an integral part of this Task Order. To the extent of any conflicts between the terms and conditions of this Task Order and the Agreement, the Agreement shall control. Introduction Over the past 2 years Corpus Christi International Airport (CCiA) has had several runway incursions near the approaches to Runway 31 and 35, which has prompted CCIA to find resolutions to mitigate these significant safety issues. CCIA, in conjunction with the FederaE Aviation Administration {FAA) has Implemented some initial safety mitigation (marking) in an attempt to heighten the awareness to pilots. CCIA has Implemented nonstandard marking (approved under a FAA modification to airport design standards), marking rehabi{nation, signage rehabilitation and pavement resurfacing. Additionally, the FAA's O#fice of Airports and Runway Safety have developed a "HOT Spot" alert diagram, to assist pilots and ground vehicle operators of a potential safety issue and location. To alleviate this HOT Spot and to enhance safety and operations at this location, CCiA has tasked Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Jacobs} to analyze, assess and develop a mitigation plan, through improved geometry, to minimize potential safety issues to an acceptable level. Jacobs will develop eight ($) alternatives for initial analysis and assessment which will then be narrowed to three (3) preferred alternatives for more detailed analysis and assessment. The three (3) detailed studies will produce a single recommended mitigation plan for final consideration and approval by CCIA and the FAA for implementation. Task 1 • Project Management During the course of this project, Jacobs will conduct all necessary project management tasks including: • Facilitation of the project kickoff meeting Facilitation of the monthly progress meetings • Investigational site visit Preparation of monthly status reports • Facilitation of the monthly telecom/webex meetings • Discussion of project scope, schedule and deliverables • Discussion of the invoice format • Development of a communication plan • Discussion of the roles and responsibilities of team members • Discussion of the roles and responsibilities of potential subconsultants + FAA coordination • Preparation of meeting minutes EXHIBIT "A-8" Page 1 of 5 J~cn~s t-nglxxae,irt~ G}~r~~~p tr;c. Deliverables to be included in this task: • Meeting minutes from kickoff and progress meetings • Work plan including: project schedule, list of deliverables, deliverable schedule, and communication plan Task 2 • Initial Alternatives Analysis Jacobs Engineering will identify eight ($) initial runway incursion safety mitigation alternatives. These proposed alternatives will be weighted and scored in a matrix utilizing a red, yellow, green, scheme for a comparative analysis. The alternatives weighting criteria will include: safety mitigation effectiveness, ability to comply with airport design standards, Terminal Instrument Procedure criteria, airport and aircraft operations impact, airfield geometry, human factors, development impacts, and order of magnitude costs. The assessment and analysis of the initial alternatives will result in the identification of the three (3} preferred alternatives. Deliverables to be included in this task: Technical memorandum depicting the initial eight ($} alternatives, explanation of the screening criteria and the identification of the three (3} preferred alternatives. Task 3 • Preferred Alternatives Analysis Upon completion of Task 2 and concurrence by CCIA, ~lacabs will further assess and analyze the three (3) preferred alternatives. More detailed and specific screening criteria will be utilized to identify a single recommended alternative which will yield an operational and growth plan for CCIA as well as an acceptable level of safety for airfield operations. For each alternative Jacobs will: Refine geometries: Utilizing Aeroturn 3.0 CADD software, taxiway fillets will be refined to provide adequate pavements for safe aircraft movements for each alternative. Phasing plans: Develop construction phasing for each alternative to evaluate operational impacts and construction constraints Airfield simulation: Animated aircraft movement simulations will provide necessary human factors assessment and analysis for each alternative. These simulations will additionally support the safety risk decision processes. Navigational Aids: Each of the three alternatives will be assessed for their impact on existing and planned navigational systems and services. The results of this analysis will provide proposed locations #ar all impacted navigational systems and services. Instrument procedures: The potential impact to runway thresholds may require the need to develop new instrument procedures. Our analysis will identify those impacts along with suggested mitigation and associated requirements far the development of those procedures. EXHIBIT "A-8" Page 2 of 5 J~c'c~bs Cncirreerirag (.7pUu1~ lr3C. Cost estimates: An Engineer's Opinion of Probably Construction Casts will be prepared for each alternative. Major items of work will be quantified and unit prices established far each item. Engineering, survey, geotechnical, and construction management costs will also be calculated for each alternative. Deliverables to be included in this task: Technical memorandum of the alternative analysis, graphics, estimates, and description of the recommended alternative. Task 4 • Implementation Plan Upon completion of Task 3 and CCIA concurrence, Jacobs will develop a final report compiling all previous tasks with an executive summary. The preferred alternative will be identified, along with supporting documentation. The report will also present an implementation p{an for completing the design of the preferred and recommended alternative including detailed scope of work for the design documents required to implement the recommended alternative. Deliverables to be included in this task: Final Report including preliminary engineering design schedule, detailed scope of work, detailed fee proposal, Overall Development Objective ODO update and engineer's opinion of probably construction cost. TASK ORDER NO. B SCHEDULE DAY DATE ACTIVITY Monday September 20, 2010 Client Meeting; Project Kick-Off Monday January 3, 2011 Approved Addendum & NTP Monday January 3, 2011 Begin Task 2 -Initial Alternative Development Wednesday February 2, 2011 Submit Task 2 -Draft Technical Memorandum Thursday February 10, 2011 Client Meeting: Review Task 2 Comments Thursday February 17, 2011 Submit Final Copy -Task 2 -Technical Memorandum Thursday February 17, 2011 Begin Task 3 -Preferred Alternatives Analysis Friday March 18, 2011 Submit Task 3 -Draft Technical Memorandum Thursday March 24, 2011 Client Meeting: Review Task 3 Comments Wednesday March 30, 2011 Submit Final Copy -Task 3 -Technical Memorandum Wednesday March 30, 2011 Begin Task 4 -Implementation Plan Wednesday April 20, 2011 Submit Task 4 -Draft Implementation Plan Wednesday April 27, 2011 Client Meeting: Review Task 4 Comments Friday May 6, 2011 Submit Final Copy of Task 4 -implementation Plan EXHIBIT "A-8" Page 3 of 5 Jacobs f~~ngi;zee,irrt~ Group fr,C. TASK ORDER NO. 8 FEES Fee for Basic Services -Lump Sum 1. Runwa Alternative Stud $157,250 2. Desi n Phase 3. Bid Phase 4. Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Fees (Lum Sum $157,250 Fee for Additional Services Allowance Not to Exceed 1. Permit Preparation (as Applicable) • Railroads • TXDOT • Wetlands Delineation and Permit • Temporary Discharge Permit • NPDES PermitlAmendments • TNRCC Nuesces County • Texas Historical Commission • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Texas Department of License and Regulation Total Permittin 0 2. ROW Ac uisition 5urve AUTHORIZED 0 3. To o ra hic Surve AUTHORIZED 0 4. Environmental Issues 0 5. Construction Observation Services 0 6. Start-u Services 0 7. Warrant Phase 0 8. Provide SCADA Documentation 0 10. Direct Ex enses $5,985 Sub-Total Additional Services Fees Authorized (Not $5,985 To Exceed To#al Authorized Fes $# 63,235 EXHIBIT "A-8" Page 4 of 5 Ja~'c~bs f:ngir~~;ir~~ CtiYOU.^ :rrc. For Task Order No.8, the CITY will pay the AIE a fee, as detailed above and in the attached fee proposal, for providing services authorized, a total lump sum amount of $157,250.00 {One Hundred Fifty-Seven Thousand, Two Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents) for Basic Services; a Time and Materials, not to exceed amount of $5,985.00 (Five Thousand, Nine Hundred Eighty-Five Dollars and No Cents) for Direct Expenses; for a total cost of $163,235.00 {One-Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars and No Cents). EXHEBIT "A-8" Page 5 of 5 J~c~bs #~sagineerk;c~ t.rou~ Irrc. AMEN©MENT NO. 3 Summary of Fees TASK N0.8 -RUNWAY ALTERNATIVE STUDY ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS AIP Project No.: City Project Na.: Jacobs Project No. DATE: 3-48-0051-XX-XXXX EXXXXXX W FiX 14108 2-Dec-10 Est Hourly Est Description Mrs Rate Cost Totals Work Hour Cost wlO~erhead Previous requeted Meetngs 1 BaacSeruj~es Principal 5 $252 $1,260 Sr. Project Manager 137 $192 $26,304 Senior Engineer 38 $165 $6,270 Senior Aeronautical Manager 368 $192 $70,656 Project Engineer 278 $139 $38,642 Graduate. Engineer 0 $125 $0 Technician 127 $60 $7,620 Project Controls 30 $89 $2,670 Clerical and Administrative 66 $58 $3,828 Subtotal: 1049 $157,250 2 laeimt3utsab#e Fees Reimbursables Nat To Exceed Amount $5,985 3 Total Lump Sum fee Grand Total $63,235 Federal Share (SS%) $155,073.00 Grantee Share (5%) $8,162.00 AMENDMENT N0.3 Estimated Work flours TASK N0. 8 -RUNWAY ALTERNATIVE STUDY ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS 2-Dec-iD Description Task 1 -Project Management Project Management Projeci Kickoff Meeting Progress Meetings (Monthly) Investigational Site Visits Slates Repnri (Mnnthly) TefeconlWehex Meetings (Manthly)~ Prepare Meeting Minutes Prepare Work Plan FAA Coordination Task 2 -Initial Alternative Development Current Operational Demand Forecast Analysis Operational Runway tengih Analysis Airport Design Standards Analysis Initial Alternative Development {8 EA) Preliminary TERP5 Impact Analysis (8 EA) Preliminary Operations Analysis (8 EA) Preliminary Graphic Development (8 EA) Technica! Memorandum Preparai'son Gomment Review Meeting {Conf. Call) Comment Incorporation Task 3 -Preferred Alternatives Analysis Detailed Alternative Development (3 EA) Deiailed TERP5 impact Analysis (3 EA} Deiailed Operations Analysis (3 EA) Simulation Development (3 EA) Preliminary Cansiruction Phasing Plan (3 EA) Navigation Systems Analysis (3 EA) Instrument Procedure Analysis (3 EA) Construciinn Cost Analysis (3 EA) Avigat'son Easement Analysis {3 EA} Land Acquisition Analysis (3 EA) Technical Memorandum Preparai'son Comment Review Meeting (Gonf. Call) Comment Incorporation Task 4 • Implementation Plan for Recommended Alternative nnio ~ ~^^^~1C~^ ;. ., (Deferred) Final DesignlConstruciion Fee Development Runway Project ODO Development AG1S 1 FAA Coordination Fnal Report ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~x~~~ PRiN 5PM SE SAM PE Tech PC ADMiN No. (hr) (hr) (hr} (hr) (hr) {hr) (hr) {hr) 5 6fl 0 0 0 0 30 10 1 0 0 0 9 0 D 0 0 8 0 D 0 27 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 D 0 9 0 0 0 6 0 fi D 6 0 D 0 6 6 0 12 6 12 8 0 0 6 13 0 13 0 D 0 0 D 13 1 D 3 0 3 0 4 0 3 1 0 0 D 25 8 0 0 0 5 94 6 82 25 D 4 30 38 0 o D D 1 D D D D p 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 D 1 9 3 0 D 0 8 0 2 2 18 4 0 0 D B D 0 1 18 9 18 D 0 8 0 0 1 18 18 0 0 D 8 0 D 1 $ 18 18 D 0 1 0 4 2 18 0 4 0 3 1 0 4 0 2 0 D 0 0 i 0 4 2 6 D 0 0 3 0 14 10 101 52 0 40 0 6 3 0 1 2 18 1$ 0 6 0 3 0 0 2 18 18 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 16 18 0 0 D 3 0 0 1 27 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 16 27 27 0 0 3 D 0 1 1$ 8 0 D 0 3 0 0 1 17 8 8 D 0 3 0 0 3 0 27 12 0 0 3 0 2 1 7 4 4 0 0 3 D 2 1 7 4 4 0 0 1 D 3 0 9 4 4 0 3 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 6 0 0 0 3 0 15 18 161 145 D 59 0 6 1 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 3 8 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 18 40 18 0 16 0 14 4 24 56 0 24 0 16 Su6tatalofHours 5 137 38 3S8 278 D 127 30 S6 1049 AMENDMENT NO. 3 Reimbursables TASK NO. 8 -RUNWAY ALTERNATIVE STUDY ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS AIP Project No.: City Project No.: Jacobs Project No. DATE: 3-4$-0451-XX-XXXX EXXXXXX W HXI410$ 2-Dec-10 Est f=ixed Descri lion Cost Fee Totals Reimbursable Expenses 0 Travel Expenses {7 Trips @ $6001Trip) 4,200 0 Printing 1,500 0 Design Ground Surveys (LNV -EST) 0 0 Irstimate Cost & Fixed Fee $5,700 $4 $5,704 Cost Allowance 5°/a $285 $0 $285 Subtotal $5,9$5 $0 $5,985 REIMBURSIBLES NOT TO EXCSi=D AMOUNT $5,985 ~~ SUPPLIER NUMBER ,1 'I'O BE ASSIGNED B II~- PURCHASING DIVISION ~-w City of CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI corpus DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Christi City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to pprovide the following information. Every qquestion must be answered. If the question is not ap~Gcable, answer with `NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: ~',~ G a S C- ,eJ o f /~V Br L>= ~CK'i ~~C P. O. SOX: STREET ADDRESS: 7~ 7 J~~®~/ ~ ~-~~ ~ ~ CITY: ~~a ~~' ZIP: '~~~~~ FIRM IS: 1. Corporation ~ 2. .Partnership 4. Association 5. Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS ^ 3. Sole Owner ^ If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this pa e.or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Jab Title and City Department (if known) S e-~ /~-T?~ M ~ 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title ~~~r /J-~T/}Gl d6-1 l~ 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee ~ ~ C 2'Ti~-C r~M C~a-~ ~} 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant SC-C~ /.f-~?/J-CIS ~'1 ~ ~ ~f' f p .. ~ i FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public m general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 {d}] a y CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the data of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christy, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: _ ~~~y r~ ~ rP~S.~cc..~ Title: _UPC~ ~~,Q~C (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Date: ~ ~ ~ ~-® Person: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect an members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of fiaxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. £ "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. ATTACHMENT s.A„ Question number 7. State fhe names of each "employee" of the Cify of Corpus Christi having an ownership interest constituting 3% or more of fhe ownership of the above named "firm". Jacobs and its subsidiaries form an organization that is comprised of approximately 125 operating companies and affiliates, having a total current employment complement of over 50,000 persons and revenues of approximately $10 billion. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a publicly traded Company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: JEC. Beneficial ownership of the Company's camman stock is not reported to Jacobs unless the holder exceeds 10% of the common stack. Question number 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership of the above named "firm." Jacobs and its subsidiaries form an organization that is comprised of approximately 125 operating companies and affiliates, having a total current employment complement of over 50,000 persons and revenues of approximately $10 billion. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a publicly traded Company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: JEC. Beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock is not reported to Jacobs unless the ownership exceeds 10% of the common stock. Question number 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3 % or more of the ownership of the above named `firm." Jacobs and its subsidiaries farm an organization that is comprised of approximately 125 operating companies and affiliates, having a total current employment complement of over 50,000 persons and revenues of approximately $10 billion. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a publicly traded Company and its camman stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: JEC. Beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock is not reported to Jacobs unless the ownership exceeds 10% of the common stock. Question number 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" far the City of Corpus Christi having an ownership interesf constituting 3% or mare of the ownership of the above named "firm." Jacobs and its subsidiaries form an organization that is comprised of approximately 125 operating companies and affiliates, having a total current employment complement of aver 50,000 persons and revenues of approximately $10 billion. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. is a publicly traded Company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: JEC. Beneficial ownership of the Company's common stack is not reported to Jacobs unless the ownership exceeds 10% of the common stock. Jacobs Engineering Group lnc.