HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2013-129 - 4/23/2013 - ApprovedCITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
AMENDMENT NO.4
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Cit p y ",
The it o Corpus Christi, Texas hereinafter called "City", PIPELINE ANALYSIS, LLC , agree to the following _
amendments to the Contract for Engineering Services for Citywide Hydraulic Model - Sanitary Sewer Overflow
Initiative (SSOI) (Project No. E10015) as authorized and administratively amended by:
Original Contract
August 24, 2010
Motion No. M2010 -195
$96,101.00
Amendment No. 1
October 11, 2010
Administrative Approval
$48,548.00
Amendment No. 2
December 4, 2010
Administrative Approval
$29,176.00
Amendment No. 3
June 21, 2011
Motion No. M2011 -133
$1,989,103.00
EXHIBIT "A ", SECTION 1. SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES, shall be amended by the additional_ tasks as
described in Amendment No. 4. Exhibit "A ".
EXHIBIT "A ", SECTION 2. PROJECT SCHEDULE shall be amended as specified in the attached Amendment
No. 4 Exhibit "A", Schedule.
Exhibit "A ", SECTION 3. FEES shall be amended and is attached as Amendment No. 4 Exhibit "A" for a revised
fee not to exceed $179 (One Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Two Hundred Fiftv One Dollars and
Zero Cents) for a total restated fee not to exceed $2,342,179.00 (Two Million Three Hundred Forty -Two
Thousand One Hundred Seventy Nine Dollars and Zero Cents] Monthly invoices shall be submitted in
accordance with the attached Amendment No. 4 Exhibit "B ".
All other terms and conditions of August 24, 2010 contract between the City and Engineer will remain in full force
and effect.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
0?7 flV4�- °•
Oscar R. Martine l-, Date
Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED
Daniel Biles, P.E., ` DAte
Director of Engineering Services
Operating Department Date
APPROVED *S TP FORM
Office of Ma agement and Budget Date
Pipeline Analysis LLC
PIPELINE ANALYSIS, LLC
Ja es H. Forbes, Jr., P.E., �
Date
President
115 Main Street
Garland, Texas 75040
(800) 637 -0164 Office
13 I
. AU I Hb1r IL&..
€ "
2013 -129
4123113 AMEND. NO. 4
M2013 -071 Page 1 of 2
rER\E10015 CITYWIDE SS HYDRAULIC MODEMMENDMENT NO. 41CONTRACTICONTRACT.DOC
INDEXED
V� b< -1x- -11
Legal Department Date
ATTEST
Armando Chapa, City Secretary
Project No. E10015
Fund Source No. 550950 -4510- 00000- E10015
Fund Name: Wastewater Capital Reserves
Encumbrance No, _ 1 �D r ►4
MAR 1 9 2 013 1,
CQNTRAL; I MAMUER
311
AMEND. NO. 4
Page 2 of 2
MENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEUENNIFER4WASTEWATER \E10015 CITYWIDE SS HYDRAULIC MODELLAMENDMENT NO.4 \CONTRACTtCONTRACT.DOC
T
PIPELINE ANALYSIS"`
CWASTEWATER COLLECTION ENGWEERS
March 4, 2013
William J. Green, P.E.
Assistant Director of Engineering
Engineering Services
1201 Leopard Street
Corpus Christi, Texas 78401
(361) 826 -3598 - direct
(361) 816 -4916 - mobile
billg(a,cctexas. corn
1115 Main Sheet
Garland, Texas 75040
800- 637 -0164
RE: Contract Amendment No. 4
City -Wide Sanitary Sewer Hydraulic Model
Phase 2 Temporary Wet Weather Flow Monitoring
(Project No. E10015)
Dear Mr. Green,
The prime contract provided technical assistance necessary to prepare a SSO Initiative Plan for the Oso
service area and a city -wide CMOM (Capacity, Management, Operation & Maintenance) Self -audit to
meet TCEQ and proposed EPA regulations. The original contract included the development of a SSO
Initiative Plan for the Oso Service Area and Amendment No. l authorized Pipeline Analysis to incorporate
the Broadway and Greenwood Service Areas into the SSO Initiative program. Amendment No. 2, in
anticipation of future TCEQ actions, included the Allison, Whitecap and Laguna Madre Service Areas.
Amendment No. 3 provided for the development of a comprehensive city -wide hydraulic model of the
wastewater collection system which included city -wide flow monitoring. Phase 1 flow monitoring of
Broadway, Greenwood and Oso Service Areas was completed on schedule; however, Phase 2 flow
monitoring did not record sufficient rainfall for model calibration.
Amendment No. 4 to this contract is necessary due to the lack of rainfall during the Phase 2 temporary
flow monitoring of the Allison, Laguna Madre and Whitecap service areas. Adequate rainfall data is
critical in the process of calibrating the hydraulic model. Inadequate rainfall during flow monitoring in
2012 has necessitated the need for additional flow monitoring in May — June, 2013. The hydraulic
wastewater system model will equip the wastewater department with the tools for analyzing system
conveyance capacities, bottlenecks, and potential overflow locations. The hydraulic model will facilitate
system analysis, aid in development of system improvements, produce informational maps /exhibits, and
will predict the system's response to future improvements. The hydraulic model will enable the City to
assess and predict potential capacity requirements and develop least cost strategies to optimize system
performance.
The major tasks included in the city -wide project scope for this Amendment No.4 are:
• Wastewater Flow Monitoring at 25 key locations within the Allison, Laguna Madre and
Whitecap Service Areas.
• Rainfall monitoring at 12 locations to establish stone event intensity and duration.
AMENB1. N0.4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1 of 15
The total amount of this Amendment is $179,251 as shown in the breakdown on Attachment "A ". The
man hour. and. fee analysis for this Amendment is shown in Attachment "B ". I have also attached the
project schedule for the work as shown in Attachment "C ".
If you have any questions or require additional information, please give me a call at (800) 637 -0164 or
email me at jforbes @pipehneanalysis.com.
Very truly yours,
PIPELINE ANALYSIS, LLC
James H. Forbes, Jr., P.E.
Attachments: Attachment "A"
Attachment "B"
Attachment "C"
AIUII =ND. NO. 4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 15
Attachment A
Project No. E10015
Professional Services Contract
City of Corpus Christi
Sanitary Sewer Overflow Reduction Program
Hydraulic Modeling
Scope of Services
Phase 2 Re -Flow Monitoring
Allison, Laguna Madre and Whitecap Service Areas
March 2013
PIPELINE ANALYSIS "`
N' n•S':it'q:E.PCC_�irt",X3x51T -ix.: '�'.•: �l'1r�4;
in association with
CoMR&W (OGutiam
L.P.
mum " RMEW9% €04
eru I ambtte-ru I contraaam
AMEND, NO.4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 3 of 15
1
Attachment A
SCOPE OF WORK
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW REDUCTION PROGRAM
WASTEWATER HYDRAULIC MODELING
Amendment No.4
Phase 2 Temporary Flow Monitoring
CITY PROJECT'E10015
BACKGROUND
The approach to the hydraulic modeling of the wastewater collection system is organized around the
City's objectives for this project:
■ Reduction in Sanitary Sewer Overflows
■ Cost controls and Least Cost Alternatives
■ Attainment of long -term Infiltration/Inflow solutions
■ Collection System Capacity Assurance
■ Regulatory compliance
■ Customer satisfaction
GENERAL INFORMATION
A hydraulic wastewater system model will equip the wastewater department with the tool for analyzing
system conveyance capacities, bottlenecks, and potential overflow locations. The hydraulic model is
calibrated to actual wastewater flows using temporary flow meters placed at key locations within the
collection system. Inadequate rainfall during Phase 2 in 2012 has resulted in the need to obtain additional
wastewater wet weather flow measurements in order to calibrate the hydraulic model.
OBJECTIVES
This project will address the following objectives:
1. Install approximately 25 temporary flow meters within the Allison, Laguna Madre and Whitecap
service areas and record dry and wet weather wastewater flows.
2. Install 12 temporary rainfall gauges to establish the rainfall intensity and duration.
3. Analyze the recorded data and update the Phase 2 Final Report to include this additional collected data.
PROJECT PHASING
Phase 2 will consist of the Allison, Laguna Madre, and the Whitecap WWTP basins. The earliest
historical optimum period to record wet weather flows is during May and June.
MODEL BENEFITS
• Flow Capacity Evaluation
• Overflow Management
• Infiltration/Inflow Modeling
• System Deficiency Identification
+ CIP Development
• New System Design
4 of 15
BASIC SERVICES — NIA
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The development of a hydraulic model for the six wastewater service areas ensures consistent assessment
of future growth, maintenance and system capital requirements for current and future conditions.
Furthermore, hydraulic modeling will provide the project team consultants with pertinent data to assess
system impacts to various wet weather events and will further enable the project team to test cost
effective repair strategies and alternatives. Modeling will allow the team to conduct a series of "what if"
scenarios that will help determine least cost solutions. These various scenarios take into account the City
of Corpus Christi maintenance and personnel needs, budget, planned growth, capacity issues and can be
used to more accurately design relief and/or replacement lines and optimize system rehabilitation. The
following tasks are anticipated with the hydraulic modeling effort:
1.6 Wastewater Flow and Rainfall Monitoring
Develop a 60 day wastewater flow monitoring plan to collect data that will be used for hydraulic
model calibration, establish magnitude of wet weather inflow and prioritize sub - basins for future
testing and rehabilitation.
Mobilize flow monitoring team and coordinate startup. Establish personnel assignments and
responsibilities. Inventory equipment needs and order expendable supplies. Perform meter pre -
calibration, prepare mounting rings for various pipe sizes, set -up meter database and project
information_ Delineate sub -basin boundaries based on current GIS mapping for each preliminary
site such that the linear footage of pipeline within each sub -basin can be determined.
1.61 Preliminary Monitoring Locations —Previously completed
1.6.2 Finalize Flow Monitoring Locations —Previously completed
L6.3 Conduct Field Inspections —Previously completed
1.6.4 Conduct Flow Monitoring for 60 days (including Rainfall Gauges)
Temporary flow meters will be utilized to establish wastewater flows during dry (and wet)
weather conditions. Flow metering equipment will be capable of recording flow under
surcharged conditions and will be synchronized to the same clock used for rain gauges. The
duration of monitoring will be 60 days_ A total of 25 temporary flow meter sites and 12 rain
gauge sites are anticipated based on a preliminary evaluation. The following is a summary of
consultant provided equipment:
Service Area
Flow
Meters
Rainfall
Gauges
ALLISON -PH2
8
4
LAGUNA -PH2
10
4
WHITECAP -PH2
7
4
Phase 2 Sub -total
25
12
Pipeline Analysis staff will use sound engineering judgment in adjusting raw depth and velocity
data to account for debris, etc. and may use other analysis techniques, such as scatter graphs,
AMEND. NO.4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 5 of 15
multiple flow equations and hydrographs to review data integrity or further analyze the flow data.
Each meter will be field calibrated prior to installation. Calibration of each meter will consist of
an independent verification of the flow depth and velocity. The flow sensors will be secured to a
mounting band that fits snugly in the pipeline. The data logger for each site will then be installed
and secured in the top of each manhole and the meter will be activated at industry standard user
defined sampling intervals not to exceed 15 minutes.
Continuously recording rainfall gauges will be installed to obtain each storm event intensity and .
duration across the study area. Each rainfall gauge will be installed and calibrated to ensure
proper operation and recording. Rainfall gauges are of the tipping bucket type and accurately
record rainfall to 0.01 inches. Maintenance logs will be prepared by consultant for each weekly
site visit and will show as a minimum the date, time, operational check, verification of
recordings, and other applicable maintenance items. The frequency of site visits will be based on
the site history and will generally be weekly unless more frequent visits are required due to debris
of sensor fouling. Using the collection system maps in association with GIS and supplemented
by the City storm water rain gauges, a rainfall distribution analysis will be performed for each
major storm event. For each metered sub -area, the volume of rainfall that fell over the surface
will be determined using GIS spatial analysis and compared to the discrete wet weather
infiltration/inflow.
1. 6.5 Data Collection From Flow Meters
Routine maintenance and service will be undertaken to confirm normal operation. Written logs
of each site visit will be maintained and will be used to record date and time of visit, meter
velocity and depth reading, corresponding independent velocity and depth reading, maintenance
items such as battery voltage, etc. A tabular and graphical presentation of the final data will be
prepared. Peak, minimum and average flow depths and rates will be generated to assist in data
analysis and provided in hardcopy and electronic (MS Excel) formats.
1.6.6 Confirmation of Adequate Wet Weather Data
The proposed flow monitoring will be undertaken to obtain adequate hydraulic information for
dry (and wet) weather conditions. A review of the dry and wet weather data will establish the
number of storm events recorded and a determination if adequate data exists or if the metering
period needs to be extended. In general at least three (3) storm events, that cause a noticeable
system response, will be necessary to evaluate wet weather flows. The wet weather flow data
information will be used to establish rainfall derived infiltration/inflow (RDH). Both cumulative
and discrete flows will be evaluated.
Should rainfall not be adequate during the 60 day monitoring period then a determination will be
made to either extend the flow monitoring on a week by week basis or terminate the monitoring
based on forecasts for the area. The City project manager and consultant will review the data
collected, review the impact on the hydraulic model, review the National Weather Service long -
range precipitation forecast and make a decision on whether to extend the monitoring period. The
City project manager will have the final authorization to extend the flow monitoring or terminate
the flow monitoring at the end of the 60 day milestone.
1.6.7 Flow Data Analysis
PA will analyze the gathered data and develop tabular and graphical summaries. Comparisons
with any previous historical flow meter data from previous III Analysis, Sewer System Evaluation
Surveys will be summarized and evaluated. The impact of silt and debris will be evaluated.
AMEND. NO.4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 6of15
Information obtained during the monitoring period will be used to determine the following for
each meter site:
1. Dry weather average daily flow A typical dry weather week will be established that is
not impacted by rainfall. Velocity data will be compared to debris levels to analyze the
scouring velocity necessary to prevent deposition in the lines. Discrete flows from each
metered sub -basin will be calculated.
2. Dry weather peak flow — Peak flows during dry weather will be determined from the
recorded meter site data.
Wet weather.average daily flow — Wet weather flows for each rainfall event will be
analyzed to determine the percentage of rainfall that enters the collections system (also
known as the leakiness factor). By comparing the storm event flow with the dry weather
flows will establish the Rainfall Derived Infiltration/Inflow (RDII). This value will vary
for each storm duration and intensity. The discrete RDII for each sub -basin will be
determined and will allow the ranking (prioritization) of each sub -basin by severity of
RDIL
4. Wet weather peak flow — Peak flow rates during wet weather are critical to the capacity
analysis. Peaking ratios (Peak flow rate to average dry weather flow) will be compared
for dry and wet weather.
5. Peak inflow rates — Peak inflow rates are calculated by observing peak flow during a wet
weather events.
6. Total I/I volume - The area under each storm event curve will be evaluated to establish
the volume of rainfall induced infiltration/inflow. These values can then be normalized
to establish the volume of RDII per inch of rainfall. Projections can then be made to
accurately determine the impact of RDII during a normal year.
During data analysis, the Manning and continuity equations may be plotted for flow. Under ideal
free flow hydraulic conditions the two separate equations for flow should provide similar results.
However, in a backwater or restrictive hydraulic situation, the Manning equation will over
quantify flows and diverge from the continuity equation. Such an occurrence will indicate to the
data analyst that a backwater condition was observed and a downstream restriction should be
investigated. The project team will use sound engineering judgment and experience in adjusting
raw depth and velocity data to account for debris levels. By obtaining accurate velocity and depth
data, the engineer can further isolate hydraulic problems within the collection system.
1.6.8 Ranking of Meter Sub - basins
A major result of the city -wide flow monitoring program will be the priority ranking of sub -
basins based on various factors such as RDII, SSOs, maintenance history, etc. This matrix
ranking will be used in a multi -year program to find and fix system defects. Using the rainfall
distribution analysis and recorded wet weather flow data, the gallons of rainfall dependent I./I
(RDII), per inch of rainfall, per linear feet of service area pipeline (gal/in/If) will be calculated.
By performing this matrix analysis, each sub -basin is compared, assessed and ranked on an equal
basis. Consultant will prepare a matrix for city review and approval.
1. 6.9 Preparation of SSES Phasing & Cost Estimates
Based on the matrix ranking of sub - basins, a phased Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES)
AMEND. NO.4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 7 of 15
program will be prepared along with estimated implementation cost estimates.
9.6.10 Review of Uf Study Report
PA will prepare three (3) copies of the 111 Analysis Pre - Submittal Final Report which summarizes
all findings, observed deficiencies, and recommendations with estimated costs. Review
comments will be incorporated into the Final Report and five (5) copies submitted to the City.
The final III Study Report will include the following:
•
Executive Summary
•
Dry Weather Flows
•
Wet Weather Flows
•
Rainfall Distribution Analysis
•
Distribution of RDII
•
Priority Ranking of Sub basins
•
Discussion and estimated cost of a Permanent Flow Monitoring Network
•
Recommended testing and rehabilitation schedule and cost estimates
•
Appendix with flow and rainfall data
•
Electronic spreadsheets, photographs, maps and report on CD included with
each report
Deliverables:
1.
Meter site locations. List of meter sites and location map(s) delineating the basin
boundaries will be prepared by Pipeline Analysis
2.
Completion of meter site location forms
3.
Map showing proposed meter and rain gauge site locations
4.
Velocity, depth, and flow data in tabular format
5.
Site photographs and site installations sheets
6.
Rainfall summary intensity and duration, rainfall volume, rainfall distribution
using GIS
7.
Matrix and final priority ranking of sub - basins
8.
Three (3) copies of Pre -Final Report
9.
Five (5) copies of Final Report
CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
CITY will provide ENGINEER at no cost:
L Access to sites for placement of equipment and personnel. Assistance (if requested)
for placement of rainfall gauges at secure locations such as fire stations, pu - rnp
stations, etc.
2. Review and authorization to extend flow and rainfall monitoring beyond 60 days (if
applicable)
3. Wastewater treatment plant flow records — average and peak wet weather
4. Meeting room for meetings
S. Provide Access
6 Arrange for access to, and make all provisions for, ENGINEER or ENGINEER'S
Sub consultants to perform services under this AGREEMENT.
AMEND. NQ. 4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 8 of 15
7. City Representative - CITY shall designate both a Wastewater Department and
Engineering Department representative to act as a contact persons on behalf of the
CITY.
SCHEDULE
The ENGINEER'S services shall be performed in a timely manner consistent with sound professional
practices. The ENGINEER will complete the work according to the following schedule:
Phase 1 - Broadway. Greenwood and Oso Service Areas
Major.
Tasks
Week No.
Start
Duration
eeks : `
Week `
End:
ACTIVITY
1
1
31
32
Kick -.Off Meetigg 1 Workshop/Data Collection and Review
1.6
8
20
28
Wastewater Flow Monitori
2
16
28
44
Model Development
3
28
64
92
Model Calibration
4
80
12
92
E)dstinq System Analysis
5
80
12
1 92
Future System Anal is
6
80
12
92
Phase 1 Draft Report
7
4
28
32
Manhole Ins eclion
8
4
28
32
Topographic Suve
9
1
135
136
Model Purchase[Trainin
10
1
135
136
lSuppl emental/Conti en
11
1
3
4
1 Traffi c Control Plan
1
135
1 136
IPHASE 1 COMPLETE
Phnca 9 - 011innn I —m. KA.A— —A Whif.— Q—A— A—
Major .
Tasks
Week No.
Start .
Duration
(Weeks)
Week
End
ACTNfIY
1
40
28
68
Kick - Off Meeti ng 1 Workshop/Data Collection and Review
1.6
60
56
116
Wastewater Flow Monitoring with Extended Meteri
2
64
36
100
Model Development
3
76
44
1 120
Model Calibration
4
88
36
124
E)dsfinq System Ana is
5
88
40
128
Future Systern Analysis
6
116
16
132
Phase 2 Draft Report
7
36
16
52
Manhole Inspection
8
48
20
68
Topographic Suve
9
1
135
136
Model Purchase(Trainin
10
1
135
136
Suppi ementaUContin en
11
32
4
36
1
Traffic Control Plan
1
135
136
PHASE 2 COMPLETE
2 1 128 8 1 136 1 Combine Phase 1 & 2 Draft Reports into Final City-wide Re ort
The time limits set forth in the schedule shall include allowances for reasonable and expected review time
by the CITY and approval by authorities having jurisdiction over the PROJECT, and shah not be allowed
as cause for delay or adjustments to the schedule. Delays in the design critical path caused by review
times by the CITY or a permitting agency exceeding those anticipated by the ENGINEER'S schedule are
cause for adjustments in the schedule. Any adjustments made to the agreed upon schedule shall be made
in writing and acceptable to both parties.
The ENGINEER shall begin work within 10 days of receipt of the executed CONTRACT and written
Notice to Proceed. A schedule of completed work, including a bar graph schedule showing the
percentage complete of each of the items of the scope of work, will be submitted each month to the CITY.
AMEND. NO.4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 9 of 15
Attachment A
Contract Amendment No. 4
Sanitary Sewer Overflow Initiative Plan Development
and
Capacity, Management, Operation & Maintenance Self -audit
(Project No. E10015)
Amendment No. 4
City -Wide Sanitary Sewer Hydraulic Model
Phase 2 Temporary Flow Monitoring
Summary of Fees
Basic Services
Contract
Amd
No. 1
Amd
No. 2
Amd
No. 3
Amd'
No. 4
Total
Contract.
I. Preliminary Phase
$ 17,678.00
$ -
$
$ 17,678.00
2, CMOM Self -Audit Interviews
$ 59,553.00
$
$
$ 59,553.00
3. CMOM Pre -Final and Final Report
$ 8,963.00
$
$
$ 8,963.00
4. Oso SSO Pre -Final and Final Report
$ 9,907.00
$
$
$ 9,907.00
5. Greenwood SSOI Plan
$ 21,225.00
$
$ 21,225.00
6. Broadway SSOI Plan
$ 27,323.00
$
$ 27,323.00
7. Allison, Laguna and Whitecap SSOI Plan
$ 29,176.00
$ 29,176.00
8. City -Wide hydraulic Modeling
$ 1,989,103.00
$1,989,103.00
9. Phase 2 Temporary Flaw Monitoring
$179,251.00
$ 179,251.00
Total Basic Services
$ 96,101.00
$ 48,548.00
$29. 176.00
$ 1,989,103.00
$ 179,251.00
1 $ 2,342,179.00
AME=ND. NO.4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 10 of 15
Attachment A
Compensation Summary
Phase 2 - Allison, Laguna Madre and Whitecap Service Areas
Task
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Total
100
Re- mobilization
L.S.
L.S.
$2,860.00
200.
Temporary Flow Monitoring
a. Installation /Calibration - Flow Meters
25
$ 325-08
$ 8,125_00
b. Flow Montoring - 25 sites at 60 days =1500
1500
$ 88.00
$ 132,000.00
c. Installation /Calibration - Hain Gauges
12
$ 150.00
$ 1,800.00
d. Rain Monitoring -12 sites at 60 days =720
720
$ 18.00
$ 12,960.00
300
Adrrin.,Project Mgt.
L.S.
L.S_
$2,690.00
400
Data Analysis
L.S.
L.S_
$5,376.00
500
Final Report
L.S.
L.S.
$13,440.00
Total Not to Exceed
$179,251.00
ALLISON -Phase 2
$57,381.00
LAGUNA -Phase 2
$71,699.00
WHITECAP -Phase 2
$50,191.00
Total
$179,251.00
AMEND. NO. 4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 11 0115
v
CD Z Z
—000
N :q Z
ADO
CJf A
Quanti.€ ' Allison. Selvloe Area
Floury Meters 8 NWNHOUR AND FEE ANALYSIS AMENDMENT NO. d
1'lJ'fllNLr�NA11'Sl�i "` Rain Gag A CLIENT: CITY OFCORPUS.CHR15T1
PROJECT: WASTEWATER SYSTEM MODELING
DESCRIPTION
Sr.:6nylitoer
PROJECT
MGR
Project;
Engineer
81S Tech
Crew€.oador
Teahniclan
CLERICAL
SUB
CONTRACTOR
NON LABOR
TASK TOTAL
tlRITE
1r4
$112&0:
$107&0:
$81 &0
B4.O0
$32.00,
9AD
life.
Total
We.
Total
Hrs:
Total
Hrs.
Total
Hrs.
Total
Hm.
Total
firs.
Total
Expense
Exp ense
Total
ASK 14 Model Building
11 Project €Naosgemenl &Review
5
$770
6
$360
$247U
$4.200
1:2, 14c •OffP4eeln ahshap.,
0
80
$p
1
$0
1.1 Exisling Data Collection
$0
$
1;4. Exislind Data &3101brf &Val €dalion
$0
$p
1.8 wiistewalerflowvs
D
$p
$4
$D
1.6 Flow &RaWouMonitoting
4
$$ ?6
24
$26$8
40
$4;280
0
$0
Spa
86;4&0
1200
$6A0p
4
I SI16
$17,702
$38.2
1:7 Esl a ahllsh Rain Gau Locations
$D
$
ASK 2!; Population Pr jec€fars
$0
1 Exisiing Model Development
$p
$p
.2 AllncalaEi;islin WNFlows
$p
$
.3 lnf ilirallonllatloW Simulallut
$p
$p
.4 Infrastructure: Updale
0
$p
$ p
$
A5 Large W W Cuslarners &aNalion
$0
$
ASK21: Model Calibration
$
1 Caliliiallon
$p
so
2. SansitmitAnal is
$o
3 TaclWcallvfamcrandurn
t
$154
2
841107
$5,041
3. 4. Workshop'
2
$300
$2.540
$2,04
ASK d; ExistingSystemAnakmis
$p
$
ASh.i: Futures tean'Ana is
$p
1 Prcrpased F6turo pavelopment
0
$0
$p
$
,
,2 A :sate FAUYe Ftoyve $c Craale'$ enaYIP9
g
$n
;3 Future Srsler kol ui$
$p
$
.4 De�velopSystem livprov emontAternalives
$p
$
5 Project Workshop
D
$0
S0
S0
SK (I: rInal EnginoerlogRepnn
$p
.1 Final Repoli
4
$516
0
$D
$6,454
$707
2 Prel lAhary Planning Level Cos] Esihnalos
$p
8
,3' PrioHi2atiup Maps
$.
0
$p
4 Ca;pilaf lmprovament Program (CIP)
$ p
$
ASK 7:: Manholefnspodion
0
$0
0
$0
0
$0
0
$0
0
0
p
0
$0
SC
$
ASKV; Topolfraphle Snrvoy- Elevatlun Data
Sp
$
ASKfi; ClIkSlaffTralning
$
ASK f StrppfatnentalAssrslanco
W
$0
ASK111: TraffTc Control Plan AlIctmance
$p
$
16
$2,464
2D
.$3248
42
$4.280.
Q
$0
100
$6 &00
200
$SADD
4
5116
$16.751
$47,702
$57,361
E 3TIMATED TOTAL COST
$ST,3B1
a�
3 n
0
Cl) O CL
to -n o
C1 (D
> f-41
tG Z r+
a O M
!y �
rA
N
m
WD T_
— lA O
w �Z
ADO
Crr A
duaility= Laguna Madre Service Area
FloevM0lers 1 10 MAN HOUR AND MR ANALYSIS AMENDMENT NO:4
P1 VI ANAleY51ti`'' Rein6air os 1 4 CLIENT: CITY OF. CORPUS CHRISV
PROJECT. WASTEW TERSYSTEA MODELING
DE ROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Sr. Sr.Enginaer
-
MR:
Projoct,Erryinaar
131S:Teeh.
grewLeadx
'TC4hni4i an
CLERICAL
sue
COkTRACT6R
NONIABOR
TASKTOTAL
- RATE
t$104
192,00
$107.00
$61.00
- $84.00
532,00-
$29,00
Hrs
Total
Hrs
Total
Hrs
Total
Hrs
I Total
Hrs
Total
Hrs
Total
Hrs
Tatal.
Ex nso
Expense
Tahal
T ASK 9: >14odal Building
4a
11 Projed:ManagemeMF,ROriavv
4
$016
10
$1.702
8
95.760
:$8,188
T2
0
$0
1
$0
$0
11 Exi0ftg Data Colection
$0
$o
1, 4- Ex' r.: tingp.ajaEvaluziion$.Uai#datfon
$0
$p
15 Flave -
- 0
$0
$p
is Flow K: RainFallMardtorirtg
4
$610
30
"$3:368
48,
$5,130
6
$468-
120
$7,660
1240
$7,680
4
1 $116.
$410
$23,327
518,011
7 ewhijobRain Gauge Location9
$0
TASK 2: Population Pmleeticn
$p
1 Exi lingModol Developmcrrt
$p
Tp
2.2 AlO-We! EAsWgM Roy,%
W
$p
2,3' Whralion4n1ow Simulalion
101
g0
2.4 liyhaslrtitlureUpd4te.
0
V
$0
$0
2.5 Lorg0 Wtr Cuetom.4s; Evaluation
$0
TASK 3: Ododei Calihratlon
gp
.1. Calilir,0idn
$p
gip
12- Senaiiv4yY Awly" -
$
$p
.3 TechikalMemorandum
:.2.
$308
4
$3831
$4,139
3.4 blratkdtop
2.
$306
4
51 68
`$1,068
TASK 4, EArtingSyst ntAm"s
$p
$6
TASK 5: Future " emAnatyals
.$0
5,1 PropowdFutueeDevetaprnent
0
$0
$0
$0
.2: Allocale.FOture F. lows 8 Create Scenari6c
$0.
$p
3 Future System A mlysis
$p.
$t1
S.4 Develmp5yst m improvemem Alemplives
$0
$0
S Prolpd;WorkahoP.
TASK 0: FIMIEnginewingRep
-
$g
61 FirdReport
4
$610
2
$224
24-
$2,566
2
:$122
0
$0
Ko 83
: $8,593.
6.2 Prelimiwra PlanningLeoel Cost k0imates
$p
$0
.3: Priontr;taiion.Mops
$13
$0
.4 CapltallmprovemeMPr5ram(C1Py
$0
�0
TASK I. ffhnhofeln ecdcnj
- 0
.$0.
-a
$0 - .
0
-$0
a
- $0
. 13-
0
.0
.0.
.0'-
$0
'$0
$0
TASK 8- Topographic Surdey • Eleoation Dal*
$p
9n
TASK 9: City StafrTraining
$0
TASK 10 ' 6upplanentalAssistance.
$p
$p
TASK 19: TraillcCorrtroIFJanMJcmnco
-$0
$0
19:
.$2,464
48 1
.$5,376 1
00 1
$7,704
- 10 1
$'61D 1120
1
$7,680
240
$7,600
-4. $116'
:$.16;742'
$23,327-
$71,099
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST
$71,699
3 C a
p1 1,1 7
CL CL 0
ia CL 5=r
NmZ(D
2 iD Z
M �
ny
� N
D
o =z
,c�v
z
o a0
SSualjw Whitecap Service. Area
FlowMOIDrs 5 MARROUI ANO_FEEANALYSISAMENDMENTNOd
�� t 4li 1 N I15S5` "" F7airrC7au ea 5 CLIENT. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
r ` PROJECT: WASTEWATER.SYSTEM MODELING
GESCRIPTI01i
Sr.EnOfneer
PROJECT
MGR
project
Englecr
GIs Tech
Crew Leader
Technician
CLERICAL
sue
CONTRACTOR
KOMLA13OR
TASK TOTAL
RATE -
$134
:$412.00
-
107.00
$bin
.
69,00
92.110
20.00
lim
Total
Hrs
Total
Hrs.
Total
Hrs:
Total
Hrs.
total
Mrs
Total
Hrs
Total
Ex ensr,
Ex ensa
To tal
RSK1: MadelSUltding
$0:00
$
1.1 PfOJECIMOnagement &Review
1.21Cick•OlfMeelin orksho
I.2 Eksling Dete Colection
2
0
.$308
4
$448
2
$3,670.00
.$4,42
$
1.4 Existing Dala Evaluation '& Validation
$g,DO
S
.5 WastemerFlays.
0
50
so.OD
S
,6 Flaw& RainfaFl Moigioring
4
$016
24
$2,699
30
83,210
2
$l22
9G
$5,760
1'80
$5,760
.3:
$07
$150,00
$16,740
335;13
1.7 EstabOch Raln 0augeLecaitano
$0
$
ASK 2: PapulatfanProjections
$
.1 Cx4rg Model Deiebpmatt
$0.00
$
2 AIIDceteEilstir19MFlov%e
$0.08
$0
.3 InOlt ratio nAnluwSiml ,a W
$0,00
$
A infrastructure Update
0
$0
$0.00
$0
.5 L Wd
arge CuslomersEvalustlan
$0.00
50
kSit 3: Model Callhratlan
$
:f Calibration
$0,00
$
,2 Sendtj %y Anatyds
50.00
$
.3 Technleal Memorsndum
2
$3D0
2
$214
1
$61
$1503.00
$2A
9 Workshop
ASK41: Existing9yatemAnayraia,
ASKS: Pmure System Analysis
.i I'mposed Fulnre Developmeril
2
0
$3D$
10
4
$449
4
$420
1
$61
$1,210.04
$0.00
$D.OD
50.00
$2.46
$
$
S
'.2 MWCa10 Future Ham 8 Create'Saenorlos
$0.00
$
.3 Future System Arhnlyds
$0,00
5
4 Develop 5ystem.lmprovement Allemmiues
gp.p0
.5 Prolecl Workshop -
0
.$0
$0,00
ASR 6 : Pinal Engnaering Report
$0.00
A firialReporl'
4
'$610
4
$448
:24-
$2¢69'.
2
:$122
$2,320.80
dso
2:PueGminar Planriingl:t:velC.'Elln,,,es
3: Priarkixatian Maps
A Capital ImprovemenlPtogram Cfl
ASK 7: MonhoteInspection
ASKS: Topog Suraer •Elwatlan Oma
ASR 9; CMy aNTralning
ASK 10: SupplareetdalAmfstmea ASK #1: TrafficCarHrofPlanAllovance
0
$B
$2;150
D
X36
$0:
$4;032
0
62.
$0,
$(4;170
0
$
$O
.$306
0
90
.0
SS,ZOG
0
.180
0
.$5;240.
0
- 3 - :$B7
$0
SUZ
$0.08
$O,OB
$0,00
$H,870.00
$B
gp
$16,740
$
$g
Aw " ;I9,
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST
S n
m >
n w W
7 CL h
cna3 =
�• (D
a� Pm
0) (0)
Attachment C
Contract Amendment No. 4
City -Wide Sanitary Sewer Hydraulic Model
REVISED SCHEDULE: CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 4
AMEND. NO.4
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 15 of 15
Phase 1 - Broadway, Greenwood and Oso Service Areas
12 1 128 1 8 1 136 lCombine Phase 1 & 2 Draft Reports into Final Ci wide Report
X�
= m
z
O z
s C
Basic Services:
Preliminary Phase
Design Phase
Bid Phase
Construction Phase
Subtotal Basic Services
Additional Services:
Permitting
Warranty Phase
Inspection
Platting. Survey
O & M Manuals
SCADA
Subtotal Additional Services
Summary of Fees
Basic Services Fees
Additional Services Fees
Total of Fees
COMPLETE PROJECT NAME
Project No. XXXX
Invoice No. 12345
Invoice Date:
Sample form for:
Payment Request
Revised 07/27/00
Total Amount Previous Total Percent
Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete
$1,000
$0
$0
$1,000
$0
$1,000
$1,000
100%
2,000
1,000
0
3,000
1,000
500
1,500
50%
500
0
250
750
0
0
0
0%
2,500
0
1,000
3,500
0
0
0
0%
$6,000
$1,000
$1,250
$8,250
$750
$1,500
$2,500
30%
$2,000
$0
$0
$2,000
$500
$0
$500
25%
0
1,120
0
1,120
0
0
0
0 %
0
0
1,627
1,627
0
0
0
0 %
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0%
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0%
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0%
$2,000
$1,120
$1,627
$4,747
$500
$0
$500
11%
$6,000
$1,000
$1,250
$8,250
$750
$1,500
$2,500
30%
2,000
1,120
1,627
4,747
500
0
500
11
$8,000
$2,120
$2,877
$12,997
$1,250
$1,500
$3,000
23%
SUPPLIER NUMBER
i1 TO BE ASSIGNED BYCITT
PURCHASING DIVISION
City of CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Corpus DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
Christi
City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do
business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. .
If the question is not applicable, answer with `NA ". See reverse side for Filing Requirements,
Certifications and definitions.
COMPANY NAME: Pipeline Analysis, LLC
P. O. BOX:
STREET ADDRESS: 1115 Main Street
CITY: Garland. Texas ZIP: 750
FIRM IS: 1. Corporation ® 2. ' Partnership ❑ 3. Sole Owner ❑
4. Association 5. Other
DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS
If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.
1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership
interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm."
Name Job Title and City Department (if known)
N.A.
2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm."
Name Title
N.A.
3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership
interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm."
Name Board, Commission or Committee
N.A.
4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi
who worked on any matter related to the subiect of this contract and has an ownership
interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm."
Name Consultant
N.A.
FH_ NG REQUIREMENTS
If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an
economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the
action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall
disclose.that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been
requested to act .in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is .
apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary.
[Ethics Ordinance Section 2 - 349 (d )]
CERTIFICATION
I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I
have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental
statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur.
Certifying Person: James H. Forbes, Jr., P.E. Title: Pres ident
(Type or Print)
Signature of Certifying V�o Date: w f
Person: 8
DEFMTIONS
a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the
City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
b. "Economic benefit ". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to
have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public
in general or a substantial segment thereof.
c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or
part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor.
d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or
commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including
but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self - employed
person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and
entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non -profit organizations.
e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City
Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court
Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held,
in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding
entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts,
proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements."
g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of
Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation.