HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2013-162 - 4/19/2013 - NAAMENDMENT NO. 7
TO CONTRACT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The City of Corpus Christi, Texas hereinafter called "CITY ", and Freese and Nichols, Inc. agree to the
following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Garwood Water Supply Project
Project No. 8424), as authorized and amended by:
Original A/E Agreement
October 28, 2003
Motion No. M2003 -394
$116,100.00
Amendment No. 1
October 19, 2004
Motion No. M2004 -387
$285,490.00
Amendment No. 2
December 18, 2007
Motion No. M2007 -334
$911,997.00
Amendment No. 3
March 11, 2009
Administrative Approval
$0.00
Amendment No. 4
March 9, 2010
Motion No. M2010 -051
$9,676,590.00
Amendment No. 5
November 30, 2011
Administrative Approval
$0.00
Amendment No. 6
January 14, 2012
Administrative Approval
$49,940.00
Amendment No. 7 revises the project scope for Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase 2 (Project No. E10008)
to the Garwood Water Supply Project as follows:
Exhibit "A ", Section I. Scope of Services. Part A. Basic Servicees, shall be modified to provide for a
study to assess the feasibility of a partnership between the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) and
the City of Corpus Christi as specified in Amendment No. 7 Exhibit "A ".
Exhibit "A ". Section II Schedule, shall be modified as specified in the attached Amendment No. 7
Exhibit "A ", Schedule.
Exhibit "A ". Section III. Fees, shall be modified as specified in Amendment No. 7 Exhibit "A" for a
revised fee not to exceed $49,822.00 (Forte -Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty -Two Dollars and
Zero Cents) for a total restated fee not to exceed $11,089,939.00 (Eleven Million Eighty -Nine
Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars and Zero Cents). Monthly invoices shall be submitted in
accordance with Amendment No. 7 Exhibit "B ".
All other terms and conditions of October 28, 20003 contract and amendments between the City and
Freese and Nichols, Inc. will remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
"/9 -,r.2
Oscar R. artinez (Date)
Assistant City Manager
RECOMENDED
t
Daniel Biles, P ate)
Director of gin erin e ices
Operating Dep rtment I (Date)
2013 -162
4/19/13
FREES AND NICHOLS, INC.
Ron Guzman, P.E., (Date)
Principal
800 North Shoreline Blvd., Suite 160ON
Corpus Christi; TX 78401
(361) 561 -6500 Office
(361) 561 -6501 Fax
ENTERED
b. ='R 0 2 2013 c may
L�,w, etinv I MAIL Auffl
AMEND. NO.7
Page 1 of 2
Freese and Nichols Inc. I NDIEEXED
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
4" &'& 4
Office f Man ement and Budg t (Date) t4 f (I"
/\, l
Legal 156partment (bate)
ATTEST
Armando Chapa, City Secreta
Project No: E10008
Fund Source No: 550950- 4091 - 00000- E10008
Fund Name: Water 2012B CIP Fd RvBd gf
Encumbrance No:
L ?ECEIVED
APR 0 9
AMEND. NO. 7
Page 2 of 2
804 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 160014 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 361- 561 -6500 fax 361- 561 -6501 + www.freese.com
March 21, 2013
i
e
Mr.. Dan Bit . P.M. P.
Director of gineering Services
City of Cor, us Christi
P. 0. Bo 9 777
Corp u Christi, TX 78469 -9272
Re: Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase Z
Project No. E10008
Contract Amendment Request
Dear Mr. Biles,
Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FN1) is respectfully submitting. Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase 2 Amendment No. 7
for your consideration. This amendment request provides for a study to assess the feasibility of a
partnership between the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) and the City of Corpus Christi by
exploring the.challenges /issues, benefits and economies of scale of developing and operating water .
supply facilities jointly in a coordinated manner:
Please feel free to contact me at 361.561.6500 should you have any questions. regarding this matter. .
Respectfully, .:
Freese and Nichols, Inc_
Ron Guzrna P.E.
Vice President /Principal
Enclosures
AMEND. NO. 7
. EXHIBIT "A'
Page ! of 11
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
MARY RHODES PIPELINE PHASE 2
JOINT CC/LCRA FEASIBILITY STUDY
(Project No. E10008)
Parent Project: Garwood Water Supply Project
(Project No. 8424)
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Basic Services
Task 1 - Administrative I Legal Requirements (CC/LCRA]
Task 1, FNI will provide technical assistance to CC legal staff and/or
consultants who will take the lead role to accomplish Task 1 items B, D, F, G,
H, I, and J. LCRA will be responsible for Task 1 items A, C, and E.
A. Develop confidentiality agreement. [LCRA]
B. Review CC Garwood Water Right for any requirements/conditions
placed upon the diversion point or other constraints which could
impede a joint project. [CC/LCRA]
C. Review and identify possible barriers with existing LCRA Gulf Coast
Division Operations (Assumes CC utilizes LCRA conveyance system).
[LCRA]
D. Review scheduled water needs and/or constraints of LCRA and CC.
[CC/LCRA]
E. Review limitations on LCRA's authority that might impact the most
efficient operations of the river and the City of Corpus Christi right.
[LCRA]
F. Identify what if any operational agreements needed between CC and
LCRA to implement the alternatives and any recommendations.
[CCILCRA]
G. Identify Ownership issues related to joint facilities [CC/LCRA]
H. Identify possible strategies /solutions to address all of the above.
[CC/LCRA]
I. Visit with TCEQ, other agencies to review alternatives, if needed.
[CC/LCRA]
J. Prepare Draft and Final Technical Memorandum documenting results
of Admin /Legal review [CC/LCRA]
AMEND. NO. 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 11
TASK 2 — Water Availability Analysis [LCRA]
Task 2, LCRA will be responsible for all services under this task. FNI will
provide information to LCRA pertaining to CC's diversion amounts and timing.
If needed, CC legal staff and or consultant will be responsible for assisting
LCRA with item 2.A.i.
A. Water availability investigation Using the LCRA WAM (daily
spreadsheet/RiverWare models with extended hydrology through
2011)
L Review efficiencies related to CC and LCRA Water Rights, water
delivery, considering legal and operational issues.
ii. Corpus Christi - Stand Alone Scenario
• Determine OCR storage capacity and diversion rate required to
firm up CC Run -of -River supplies ONLY
iii. LCRA - Stand Alone Scenario (if needed)
• Determine OCR storage capacity and diversion rate required to
meet LCRA's regulation needs ONLY
iv. Joint CC /LCRA
• Define release amounts and timing required for a CC /LCRA. joint
OCR.
• Determine OCR storage capacity and diversion rate to fulfill joint
CC/LCRA release schedule identified in above task.
B. Prepare Draft and Final Technical Memorandum documenting results
of Water Availability Analysis
TASK 3 — Conceptual Facilities - Technical, Environmental and Financial
Analysis [CC /LCRA]
FNI and LCRA will work jointly to accomplish all technical, environmental, and
financial analysis work associated with conceptual facilities. LCRA will.
provide input on subtasks B -E, provide existing data and analysis for tasks
3.D.ii, and assist with task 3.E.ii, and, cost estimates will be developed
utilizing the TWDB costing tool to the maximum extent possible. However,
upon prior agreement by both the LCRA and CC, engineering judgment may
be used on certain facilities if more detailed and/or reliable costs are available
or can be developed within the agreed budget.
A. Conduct site visit of intake and canals, and windshield survey of
alternative reservoir site. [CCILCRA]
B. River Intake /PS [CC /LCRA]
AMEND. No, 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 3 of 11
i. Identify planned CC PS and existing LCRA facility
improvements /modifications required to meet the needs of both
LCRA and CC.
ii. Prepare conceptual level Capital, Operations and Maintenance
cost estimates for proposed improvements.
C. LCRA Canal
i. Review with LCRA staff experiences with canal losses and identify
existing LCRA canal improvements /modifications required to meet
the needs of both LCRA and CC. [CC]
fl. Evaluate sediment management with LCRA. [CC/LCRA]
iii. Prepare conceptual level Capital, Operations and Maintenance
cost estimates for proposed improvements. [CC]
D. New Lateral CanaI /Forebay /Booster /Relift PS
i. Develop conceptual design for new facilities required, including:
[CC]
• Lateral canal and forebay.
• Booster PSI Re -lift PS considering discharge header
configuration to either pump from lateral canal to OCR, or
lateral canal to Mary Rhodes Phase 2 Pipeline (use existing
design of Mary Rhodes Phase 2 Booster PS with a modified
discharge header and Pumps if needed)
• Outlet structure from OCR to lateral canallforebay.
ii. Perform desktop environmental constraints review utilizing aerial
imagery, specifically reviewing publically available information for
presence of USACE jurisdictional waters, endangered species,
cultural resources and/or other sensitive environmental features on
or in the vicinity of proposed facilities. [CCILCRA]
iii. Prepare conceptual level Capital, Operations and Maintenance
cost estimates for proposed new facilities, including mitigation
costs for environmental /cultural resources impacts. [CC]
E. Off - Channel Reservoir [CC/LCRA]
i. Develop conceptual reservoir configurations for three capacities
(i.e. 5,000, 10,000 and 15,000 acre -feet) assuming a nominal
depth of 35 feet for each scenario [CC]
• Review LCRA Markham Site Due Diligence Report. Assess
liner needs and recommend alternative options.
• Develop typical embankment height, width, and materials
considerations, including liner considerations, if needed.
ii. Perform desktop environmental constraints review utilizing aerial
imagery, specifically reviewing publically available information for
presence of USACE jurisdictional waters, endangered species,
AMEND. NQ. 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 4 of 11
cultural resources andlor other sensitive environmental features on
or in the vicinity of proposed facilities.[LCRA] On Markham site
use existing constraints complied during LCR;4 Due Diligence
study.
iii. Prepare conceptual level Capital, Operations and Maintenance
cost estimates for proposed new facilities, including mitigation
costs for environmental /cultural resources impacts. [CC]
F. Prepare Draft and Final. Technical Memorandum documenting results
of Conceptual Facilities — Technical, Environmental and Financial
Analysis [CC]
TASK 4 — CClLCRA Joint Reservoir Feasibility Study Summary Binder
[CC]
Task 4, FNI will be responsible for this task, with LCRA commenting on draft.
A. Compile and Bind Technical Memorandums prepared in Task 1 thru 3.
Prepare a Draft and Final Executive Summary summarizing the scope,
findings and costs of the Joint Reservoir Feasibility Study, documented
in. Tasks 1 thru 3. Submit six (6) copies of the Draft and Final
"Summary" to CC.
11. SCHEDULE
A. Tasks 1 thru 4 to be completed within 35 working days. Assuming: Freese and
Nichols has an executed work order by February 8, 2013, Tasks 1 thru 4 will
be completed by April 1, 2013 unless schedule modified by the City of Corpus
Christi.
Ill. FEES
A. Fee for Basic Services. The City will pay the AIE a fixed fee for providing
for all "Basic Services" authorized as per the table below. The fees for Basic
Services will not exceed those identified and will be full and total
compensation for all services outlined in Section 1.A.1 -4 above, and for all
expenses incurred in performing these services. For services provided in
Section 1.A.1 -4, AIE will submit monthly statements for basic services
rendered. In Section 1.A.1 -3, the statement will be based upon A/E's estimate
(and City concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually
completed at the time of billing. For services provided in Section 1.A.4, the
statement will be based upon the percent of completion of the construction
contract. City will make prompt monthly payments in response to AIE's
monthly statements.
AMEND. NO. 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 5 of 3 9
B. Fee for Additional Services. For services authorized by: the Director of
Engineering Services under Section 1.8. Additional Services" the City will
pay the AIE a not -to- exceed fee as per the table below:
C. Summary of Fees
TASK
Description
Fee
Original Contract - Phase 1
I.A.1
Screening Study of Delivery Options
$116,100.00
I.A.2
Detailed Study of Delivery Options
TBN
I.A.3
Pipeline Route Study
TBN
I.AA
Pipeline Surveying, Easement.Acquisition, and Permitting
TBN
I.A.5
Pipeline Topographic Survey and Preliminary Design
TBN
I.A.6
Final Design Phase
TBN
I.A.7
Bid, Award, and Construction
TBN
Original Contract Fee
$116,10010
Amendment No.
1 — Phase 2
2.A
Detailed Study of Delivery Option 5
$152,532
2.13
Detailed Study of Delivery Option 1
$64,328
2.0
Detailed Study of Delivery Option 6
$68,630
Amendment No. 1 Fee
$285,490
Amendment
No. 2 — Phase 2A
2A -0001
Field Studies
2A.1.A
— Ownership Mapping
$ 20,631
2A.1.6
—Risk Analysis
$
Prepare Risk Analysis
$ 5,853
Risk Analysis Workshop (in CC)
$ 4,533
2A.1.0
Field survey of West Mustang Creek
$ 46,922
2A.1.D
—West Mustang Creek Habitat Assessment
$ 34,272
2A.1.E
— Coordination Re- Calib. Of Gannado Gauging Station
$ 6,168
2A.1.F
- Summary
Prepare Task Summary
$ _
$ 19,650
Task Summary Workshop (in CC)
$ 8,383
Total Fee by Classification
$ 138,411
2A -0002
LCRA Agreement
2A.2.A
— Agreement Framework
$ _
Prepare Framework
$ 12,695
Submit Framework
$ 431.
Schedule Framework Meeting
$ 451
2A.2.6
— Framework Meeting (Garwood)
$ 7,235
2A.2.0
— Prepare Draft LCRA Agreement
$ 10,525
AMEND. NO: 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 6 of 11
2A.2.D
—Draft LCRA Agreement Workshop (Garwood)
$ 6,366
2A.2.E
Prepare Final Agreement
$ 8,740
2A.21
Task — Execute Agreement (1 meeting Austin, 1 meeting Corpus
Christi )
$ 8,151
2A.2.G
—Task 2 Summary
$ 14,675
Total Fee by Classification
$ 69,268
2A -0003
LNRA Agreement.
2A.3.A
Agreement Framework
$ _
Prepare Framework
$ 13,025
Submit Framework
$ 431
Schedule Framework Meeting
$ 451
2A.3.13
— Framework Meeting (Edna)
$ 7,191
2A.3.0
— Prepare Draft Agreement
$ 10,525
2A.3.D
—Draft LNRA Agreement Review Workshop (Edna)
$ 7,191
2A.3.E
-- Regulatory Coordination (2 meetings Austin)
$ 10,137
2A.3.F
— Prepare Final LNRA Agreement
$ 6,815
2A.3.G
— Execute Agreement (1 meeting Edna, 1 meeting Austin)
$ 11,360
2A.3.H
—Task 3 Summary
$ 14,125
Total Fee by Classification
$ 81,250
2A -0004
Permitting and Agency Coordination
2A.4.A
—Coord wl TPWD re: GSM Permit (2 meetings Austin)
$ 3,737
2A.4.13
—Coord wl TPWD re: LNRA Inflow /Release Agreement (3
meetings Austin )
$ 5,156
2A.4.0
—Coord wI TCEQ re: Bed and Banks Permit (3 meetings Austin)
$ 7,104
2AA.D
2A.4.E
—Coord w/ TGLO re: Bed and Banks Permit (3 meetings Austin)
— Coordination with TCEQ and TWDB re: Regional Water Planning
2 meetings Austin
$ 7,104
$ 1,437
2A.4.F
- Regional Water Planning Group Coordination (1 meeting Austin,
1 meeting Corpus Christi )
$ 2,979
2A.4.G
— Monitor LCRAISAWS Project (2 meetings Garwood)
$ 6,437.
2A.4.H
—USACE Coord (1 meeting Galveston)
$ 8,253
2A.4.1
—TPDES Coordination (1 meeting Austin)
$ 6,566
2A.4.J
— Landowner Issues and Communications (3 meetings Edna)
$ 20,785
2A.4.K
—Meet wl Environmental Groups
$ _
Prepare Exhibits
Meeting 1
$ 13,093
$ _
Plan
Schedule
Prepare for Meeting
Attend Meeting (Austin)
Meeting 2
$ 501
$ 471
$ 3,745
$ 2,376
$ _
AMEND. NO.7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 7 of 11
AMEND. NO.7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 8 of 11
Plan
$ 501
Schedule
$ 471
Prepare for Meeting
$ 3,745
Attend Meeting (Austin)
$ 2,376
Meeting 3
$ -
Plan
$ 501
Schedule
$ 471
Prepare for Meeting
$ 3,745
Attend Meeting (Edna)
$ 3,591
2A.4.L
—Task 4 Summary
$ 16,070
Total Fee by Classification
$ 121,216
2A -0005
Permitting Activities
2A.5.A
—Bed and Banks Permit Application
$ -
Prepare Permit
$ 20,655
Submit Permit
$ 6,360
Agency Review
$ 8,115
Permit Approval
$ 5,203
2A 5 B
- Prepare Amendment to TPWD/LNRA Inflow & Release
A reement
$ _
Develop Amendment Framework
$ 3,815
Meet with LNRA and TPWD to develop amendment outline
1 mtg Edna
$ 4,441
Develop Draft Amendment
$ 4,075
Meet with LNRA and TPWD to review Draft Amendment
1 mtg Edna
Prepare Final Amendment
$ 4,441
$ 3,735
2A.5.0
Obtain Written Approval (1 mtg Austin, 1 mtg Edna)
-Water Right Amendment Application
$ 6,540
$ -
Prepare Permit
Submit Permit
Agency Review
$ 10,815
$, 9 6 1
$ 4,210
Permit Approval
$ 1,023
2A.5.D
— Monitor Permit Application Status
$ 2,045
2A.5.E
2A.5.F
— Regulatory Agency Coord During Permit App Process
— Develop Supporting Info for Region N Amendment
$ 2,945
$ 5,130
2A.5.G
2A.5.H
— Coordinate Region N Amendment (2 meetings CC)
Amend Water Conservation /Drought Management Plan
$ 11,475
$ -
Prepare Draft Amendment
Plan Workshop (CC)
Submit Draft Amendment
City Review of Draft Amendment
$ 3,408
$ 4,533
$ 1,120
$ _
AMEND. NO.7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 8 of 11
AMEND. NO. 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 9 of 11
Review Workshop (CC)
$ 4,533
City Review Complete
$ _
Incorporate City Comments /Prepare Final Amendment
$ 3,535
City Council Approval of Final Amendment (CC)
$ 4,533
2A.5.F
—Task 5 Summary
$ 95,227
Total Fee by Classification
$ 142,870
2A -0006
Conceptual Facility Design
2A.6.A
—GIC Facility Requirement Workshop
$ 330
Schedule Workshop
$ 681
Conduct Workshop (Garwood)
$ 6,393
2A.6.13
- Concept Design of GIC Canal System Improvements
$ 4,800.
2A.6.0
— Concept Design of West Mustang Creek Div. Structure
$ 4,800
2A.6.D
— Design Review Workshop
$ _
Schedule Workshop
$ 681
Conduct Workshop (Garwood)
$ 6,393
2A_6.E
—W. Mustang Creek Gauging Facility Workshop
$ 6,900
Schedule Workshop
$ 681
Conduct Workshop (Edna)
$ 4,193
2A.6.F
— Concept Design, W. Mustang Creek Gauging Facility
$ 3,960
2A.6.G
—W. Mustang Creek Gauging Facility Workshop
$ _
Schedule Workshop
$ 681
Conduct Workshop (Edna)
$ 6,393
2A.6.H
—Task Summary
$ 10,275
Total Fee by Classification
$ 57,164
2A -0007
Mary Rhodes Pipeline Assessment
2A.7.A
—Data Collection and Review
$ 8,648
2A.7.13
— Facilities Site Visit
$ 23,266
2A.7.0
—Task Kickoff Workshop (Corpus Christi)
$ 8,605
2A.7.D
—Pump Station Assessment
$ 17,008
2A.7.E
—SCADA System Assessment
$ 11,840
2A.7.F
— Operational Integration of Garwood Water
$ 6,200
2A.7.G
Alternatives Identification and Screening
$ 27,613
2A.7.H
Alternative Control Strategies
$ 11,335
2A.7.1
— Recommended Mary Rhodes Pipeline Improvements
$ 6
2A.7.J
—Task 7 Summary
$ _
Prepare Summary
$ 16,200
Attend Workshop
$ 5,768
Total Fee by Classification
$ 142,686
2A -0008
Task 8 -- Phase 2A Report
2A.8.A
— Prepare Draft Report
_
AMEND. NO. 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 9 of 11
AMEND. NO. 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 10 of 11
Prepare Report
$ 25,656
Submit Draft Report to City for Review
$ 1,292
City Review of Draft Report
$ -
City Review Complete
$ -
2A.8.B
— Prepare Draft Report Presentation
$ 7,112
2A.8.0
—Draft Report Workshop (Corpus Christi)
$ 9,169
2A.8.1)
—Draft Report Comments Meeting (Corpus Christi)
$ 9,169
2A.8.E
— Prepare Final Report
$ 10,321
2A.8.F
—Final Report Presentation (up to 3 meetings in Corpus Christi),
$ 34,669
Total Fee by Classification
$ 97,388
2A -0009
Project Management
2A.9.AOBC1
Task 9.A— Project Schedule
$ 10,060
2A,9.130BC2
Task 9.6— Progress Reports and Invoices
$ 23,342
2A.9.COBC3
Task 9. Phase 3 Scoping
$ 28,343
Total Fee by Classification
$ 61,744
Amendment No. 2 Fee
$ 911,997
Amendment No.
3
2A -0005
Task 5 - Permitting Activities (Deleted in its Entirety)
$ - 142,870
2A -0008
Task 8 — Phase 2A Report (Deleted in its Entirety)
$ - 97,388
3 -00010
Task 10 - Garwood Alignment Study Scope of Work
3- 0010.1
Data Collection
$ 49,709
3- 0010.2
Preliminary Hydraulic Study
$ 21,975
3- 0010.3
Preliminary Environmental Review
$ 60,294
3- 0010.4
Preliminary Route Analysis
$ 45,384
3- 0010.5.
Final Route Analysis
$ 62,916
Amendment No. 3 Fee
$ 0
Amendment No.
4
1
Study Phase
$ 0
2
Preliminary Phase
$ 1,514,814
3
Design Phase
$ 3,068,522
4
Bid Phase
$ 102,000
5
Construction Phase
$ 1,200,000
A -1
Permitting
$ 267,414.
A-2
ROW Acquisition Survey
350,000
A-3
Topographic Survey
$ 891,165
A-4
Subsurface Utility Exploration
$ 286,000
A-5
Aerial Photography
$ 23,750
A-6
Corrosion Engineering
$ 122,768
A-7
Surge Analysis
$ 104,181
AMEND. NO. 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 10 of 11
A-8
Geotechnical Investigation
$ 312,737
A -9
Archeological Investigation
$ 184,650
A— 10
Hydraulic Modeling
$ 37,398
A -11
ROW.Acquisition
1,060,601
A— 12
Construction Observation Services
$ TBD
A— 13
Start -Up Services
$ TBD
A _ 14
O &M Services
$ 150,590
A— 15
Warranty Phase
$ TBD
A— 16
Provide SCADA Documentation
$ TBD
Amendment No. 4 Fee
$ 9,676,590
Amendment No.
5
2
Preliminary Phase
$ 0
3
Design Phase
$ 183,179
4
Bid Phase
$ 82,814
A - 1
Permitting
$ 53,696
A-3
Topographic Survey
$ 37,035
A-4
Subsurface Utility Exploration
$ - 121,045
A-8
Geotechnical Investigation
$ 18,749
A-9
Archeological Investigation
$ - 87,808
A-10
Hydraulic Modeling
$ 36,102
A-11
ROW Acquisition
$ - 202,722
Amendment No. 5 Fee
$ 0
Total Fee
$10,990,177
Amendment No.
6
2
Preliminary Phase — Coordination effort associated with
Archeological access compensation
$ 2,340
A— 11
ROW Acquisition — Archeological access :compensation
$ 47,600
Amendment No. 6 Fee
$ 49,940
Total Fee
$11,040,117
Amendment No.
7 — Joint City of Corpus Christi and LCRA Feasibility Study
Study Phase
$ 49,822
Amendment No. 7 Fee
Total Fee
$ 49,822
$11,089,939
AMEND_ NO. 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 11 of 11
Mx�
= m
@ z
o -
o
y
Basic Services:
Preliminary Phase
Design Phase
Bid Phase
Construction Phase
Subtotal Basic Services
Additional Services:
Permitting
Warranty Phase
Inspection
Platting Survey
O & M Manuals
SCADA
Subtotal Additional Services
Summary of Fees
Basic Services Fees
Additional Services Fees
Total of Fees
COMPLETE PROJECT NAME
Project No. XXXX
Invoice No. 12345
Invoice Date:
Sample form for:
Payment Request
Revised 07/27/00
Total Amount Previous Total Percent
f'.nnfracf Amd Nn 1 Omel Nn_ 2 Cnnfract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Comulete
$1,000
$0
$0
$1,000
$0
$1,000
$1,000
100%
2,000
1,000
0
3,000
1,000
500
1,500
50%
500
0
250
750
0
0
0
0%
2,500
0
1,000
3,500
0
0
0
0%
$6,000
$1,000
$1,250
$8,250
$750
$1,500
$2,500
30%
$2,000
$0
$0
$2,000
$500
$0
$500
25%
0
1,120
0
1,120
0
0
0
0%
0
0
1,627
1,627
0
0
0
0%
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0%
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0%
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0%
$2,000
$1,120
$1,627
$4,747
$500
$0
$500
11%
$6,000
$1,000
$1,250
$8,250
$750
$1
$2,500
30%
2,000
1,120
1,627
4,747
500
0
500
11%
$8,000
$2,120
$2,877
$12,997
$1,250
$1,500
$3,000
23%
SUPPLIER NUMBCR
TO BE ASSIGNED BY='
PURCHASING DIVISION
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Chnsti
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
Ciry of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business
with the City to provide the following information. Fvp7 question must be answered. If the question is
not applicable, answer with "NA ". See reverse side or Filing. Requirements, Certifications and
definitions.
COMPANY NAME: Freese and Nichols, Inc.
P. O. BOX:
STREET ADDRESS: 800 N- Shoreline Blvd., Suite 160ON CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78401
FIRM IS: I. Corporation ® 2. Partnership ❑ 3. Sole Owner ❑
4. Association 5. Other
DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS
If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.
1. State the names of each employee of the City of Corpus Christi having an `ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm."
Name Job Title and City Department (if known)
NIA N/A
2. State the names of each `official' of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named " f rm."
Name Title
N/A NIA
3. State the names of each "board member' of the City of Corpus Christi having an `ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm."
Name BNIA' Commission or Committee
NIA
4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who
worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm."
Name Consultant
NIA N/A
9
FILING REQUIREMENTS
If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an
economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action
will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact
in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter,
unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be
made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2 -349 (d)]
CERTIFICATION
I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that 1 have not
knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be
promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur.
Certifying Person: Ron Guzman, P.E. Title: Principal
(Typt nr Print)
Signature of Certifying Date:
Person: IS 3
DEFINITIONS
a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City
Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
b. "Economic benefit ". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an
effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a
substantial segment thereof.
c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part -
time basis, but not as an independent contractor.
d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and
whether established. to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities
operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self - employed person, partnership, corporation, joint
stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are
treated as non-profit organizations.
e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager,
Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas.
E "Ownership interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a
firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity.
"Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or
special terms of venture or partnership agreements."
g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus
Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation.