HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2015-300 - 10/7/2015 - NA T
SMALL A/E AGREEMENT
For
Professional Services
This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, "CITY", acting through its duly authorized City Manager or designee ("CITY"), and Barker
Rinker Seacat Architecture acting through its duly authorized representative who is Chuck Musgrave,AIA
("ARCHITECT"), which agree as follows:
1. DECLARATIONS. "CITY" desires to engage "ARCHITECT" to provide services in connection
with City's project, described as follows: Recreation Program Master Plan—Space Analysis and Facility
Plan ("PROJECT").
2. SCOPE OF WORK. "ARCHITECT" shall provide services for the "PROJECT" in accordance
with the accompanying Letter, Scope of Services, and Fee attached as"Exhibit A".
3. FEE. The "CITY" agrees to pay the "ARCHITECT" for services provided in accordance with
Exhibit "A", Scope of Services, and Fee under this AGREEMENT, a total fee not to exceed $48,612.00
(Forty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Twelve Dollars and Zero Cents. Invoices to be submitted monthly
in accordance with Exhibit"C"
4. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. The " ARCHITECT" agrees to indemnify, save
harmless and defend the"CITY", and it's agents, servants, and employees as more fully set forth in"Exhibit
B".
5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents including contract documents (plans and
specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data and submittal data will be the sole property of the
City and may not be used again by the NE without the express written consent of the Director of Capital
Programs. However, the NE may use standard details that are not specific to this project.
CITY OF = - ' I . •1- :T"'1 BARKER RINDER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
/r
• axi, ,I,zRon Olso Date Chuck Musg , AIA Date
City :--ger Principal-in-Charge
2457 Ringsby Court, Unit 200
Denver CO 80216
(303)455-1366
R` 0 ENDED
Gus G. zalez, P.E. , . Date
A •. GO ag:
i I 1 ojt) , g i (31/(4-M
V: :rie H. Gra .E. Date
E _. '•: a to 'ublicW
Mr . '0, ,C----
J.H Edmonds, P.E. Da e
DirectorLL — (/rof Capital__ Programs
/mssC ,- R,,, fitzl.fl�
Jay Ellington �U__ Date
Director of Parks and Recreation
2015-300
10/07/15
ecreation Program Master Plan\Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture\1 Small AE Agreement.docx
Barker Rinker Seacat Architectur INDEXED
APPROVED
Office of anagement and Budget Date
AP OVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
1(1167--2.7,15
egal Department 0 Date
Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No Amount
Parks O&M 1020-13005-142 530000 $23,612.00 /
Parks O&M 1020-12910-142 530000 $25,000.00 rrrAI cii5
d�
K:\Engineering DataExchange\Clarissa)\Parks\Recreation Program Master Plan\Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture\1 Small AE Agreement.docx
BARKER RINKER SEACAT
ARCHITECTURE
July 8, 2015
Ms.Stacie Talbert
Interim Director of Parks&Recreation
City of Corpus Christi
1201 Leopard Street,3rd Floor
Corpus Christi,TX 78401
Re: Proposal for Recreation Program and Facilities Needs Assessment and Recommendations
Dear Stacie and Members of the Selection Committee:
Community recreation facilities are often the image maker and heart of activity for the citizens of a
community;and Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture(BRS)is interested, motivated and excited to assist the
City of Corpus Christi in the Recreation Program and Facilities Needs Assessment and Recommendations
for the growing Corpus Christi population.
Winners of more than 50 design awards,BRS has completed recreation, park,active-aging and cultural arts
projects for more than 200 communities-more than any firm in the nation - in the planning and design of
their facilities.We have completed,or are currently working on projects in Grapevine,Southlake,Addison,
Watauga, Richardson, Richland Hills,The Woodlands, North Richland Hills and Plano.
Since 1975,designing"Activity Centers" -where people play,visit,learn,and work- have been the focus
of our practice.Our knowledge and experience have given us a national reputation in the design and
planning of community, multipurpose,and recreation facilities.We are strong believers in an interactive
process to guide our clients and engage the community.We encourage the participation of those who will
ultimately use the facility;we believe their input is crucial to the success of the final building project.
Seasoned professionals Chuck Musgrave and Steve Blackburn will lead the project as the Principal-in-
Charge and Consulting Design Principal, respectively.Mick Massey, BRS Texas Regional Director will assist
Chuck and Steve and will be your main point of contact with BRS.
Our promise:The BRS team will listen,respond and provide you with client service and design excellence,
the backbone of our practice.Ultimately,the selection of a consultant is a subjective decision. How well we
communicate is as important as the breadth of our experience.We encourage you to call our clients and
tour our facilities.They are the best testament to our commitment to service and design excellence.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide our qualifications and proposal,and for your kind consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
ktitmei
Chuck Musgrave,AIA Michael Massey, RLA
Principal in Charge Texas Regional Director
chuckmusugrave@brsarch.com mickmassey@brsarch.com
COLORADO TEXAS
3457 Ringsby Court,Unit 200 1000 Texan Trail
Denver,Colorado 80216 Grapevine,Texas 76051
303-455-1366 Fax 303-455-7457 817
Toll Free 866-646-1980 Tol
www.brsarch.com vvw EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT A
,014
City of Corpus Christi, Parks & Recreation Department
Master Plan & Feasibility Analysis - Phase One & Two
Project Description
1. Assess the existing Recreational&Cultural Programs for the Corpus Christi Parks and Recreation System.
2. Determine service gaps.
3. Recommend a plan for the recreational program based on current trends for the region,Texas,and the Nation,
4. Evaluate the existing recreation facilities based on the preferred program to identify deficits and opportunities
to support the new recreation program.
5. Provide a probable cost report for capital costs,operation costs,and probable revenue report.
6. Provide a summary of findings and recommendations in preparation for a 2016 or 2018 Bond program.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
July21,2015
Responsibility
(BK) Ballard King&Associates under separate Contract
(BRS) Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture
(CoCC) City of Corpus Christi
Phase One -Recreation Program Needs Assessment& Recommendations - 10 Weeks
Activity Scope Description
1.1 City Approves Selection of Consultant/Contract Approval(CoCC)
• Notification of Consultant and Teaming Strategy
*Contract negotiation and approval
*Schedule and timeline approval
1.2 Organize Masterplan Committee composed of:(CoCC)
1-2 Weeks *Staff&Leaders in planning,recreation,public works and development
*Key stakeholders or user groups
*Get commitment for duration of planning process
• Explore Additional Partnerships Strategies and Structures:(BK&CoCC)
*Identification of other potential partnerships including additional adjoining cities,wellness providers,
schools,etc.
*Meet with up to three other potential partners
"Determination of realistic partnering opportunities
1.3 Prosect Team Program Review,Research &Planning-Mission/Goals,Conceptual Program
2 Weeks • Planning and Research for the following:(BRS&BK)
*Project vision,goals and objectives of City of Corpus Christi&the Parks and Recreation Department
*Prepare preliminary program list to arrive at broad array of possible activities and programs to test at Public Meeting Number
One.
*Schedule and timeline approval
*Priorities and phasing options
*Review existing material and data including:surveys,programs.plans,traffic analysis or studies and other previous data
*Gather utility.zoning,adjacent neighborhood information needed for phase two
*Schedule,budget,and project delivery objectives
Prepare tools for Public Meeting Number One
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 6
Page 1 of 5
SCOPE OF SERVICES
July 21.2015
1.4 Kick Off Meeting -Mission/Goals,Conceptual Market Analysis&Program
3 Days • Conduct Team workshop:
*Introduce team and discuss conceptual programming process(BRS)
*Project vision,goals and objectives(Hopes and Fears round table discussion)(BRS&BK)
Freliminary prugra review dis ussion(Br()
Paoriti,,-;s and programming options(EKJ
*Discuss service gaps in Facilities(BRS)
*Current and future demands with the City of Corpus Christi.neighboring communities,and stakeholders BK)
• Facility Tours:
thru with staff to discuss current programming an sting gaps and opportunites(BK)
*Walk-thru with staff to discuss current facility service gaps and opportunities(BRS)
*Cultural Center,Gymnasiums,Pools,Recreation Centers,Senior Centers,Skate park.Sport Fields,
Tennis Centers,Juvenile Assessment Center and Watergarden
• Public Meeting Number One(BRS&BK)
*Introduce team and discuss conceptual plan process
*Project vision,goals and objectives
*Project introduction and site awareness and concerns
*Present PowerPoint show of potential programming elements for inclusion in project
*Have public participate in programming game or tool to gather input on functions and space needs
1.5 Work Period -Project Program,Market Analysis and Site Evaluation
3-4 Weeks • Draft mission statement and goals
• Review and Respond to Ballard King's work
1.6 Review End of Phase Report
1-2 Weeks *Review Ballard King's report and respond
1.7 Final Presentation-Programming,Operational Proforma Analysis,Teaming,&Funding Report(CoCC,BK&
BRS)
2 Days • Conduct Team workshop:
*Present work-to-date with staff and committees
*Present Operations and Revenue Projections
*Review Partnership Strategies
*Review Funding Opportunities
• Present to Park&Recreation Committees and or City Council the Phase One Report
*Present work-to-date with staff and committees
*Present Operations and Revenue Projections
*Review Partnership Strategies
*Review Funding Opportunities
1.8 End of Phase Deliverables:
*Assist Ballard King in creating the final report
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 3 of 6
Page 2 of 5
SCOPE OF SERVICES
July 21.2015
Phase Two -Recreation Facilities Needs Assessment&Recommendations -6 to 9 weeks
2.1 Phase Two Kick Off Workshop (concurrent with Task 1.8)
2 Days • Discuss deliverables listed below(DRS:
• Review facilities tour information from phase one and plan a detailed methodology to arrive at:
*Citywide phasing strategies to accomplish long term planning with short term goal in mind(CoCC,BRS&BK)
• Develop initial site and building program of elements to arrive at:
*Project budget goals(BRS)
recommended program of uses(BK)
*A recommended site and building plan(BRS)
*Identify facility phasing strategies to accomplish long term planning (CoCC.BRS&BK)
• Identify a list of sites to be analyzed to accomplish programming goals
*Tour sites(CoCC BBS&BK)
• Workshop to begin preliminary sketching out of several site plan options(CoCC,BRS&BK)
2.2 Work Period-Program Development,Planning Alternatives and Project Budget
2-3 Weeks • Organize information garnered from Phase One sessions and kick off workshop above
• Prepare site analysis if needed for any proposed site to include:
*Access to site,roads,bike,bus,pedestrian
*Adjacency/proximity to compatible or non compatible neighbors
*Internal traffic flow:vehicular and pedestrian circulation
*Environmental/sustainable criteria(solar access,topography,natural features,wetlands.etc.)
*Parking and service drive potentials
*Landscaping,plazas,walks,outdoor programming spaces opportunities
"Utilities,detention needs,maintenance issues
Update Ballard King's projac,t prografo of activitios s and space,for both building and site uses.(BK)
• Prepare up to three(3)conceptual plan alternatives showing variations for:
*Program based building blocking plans to scale test fitted to site
*Suggested development.utility,infrastructure impacts and plans.Site grading,quantity take offs,and
storm drainage design calculations are not included in this scope item.
*Access,roads,parking,pedestrian and service circulation layouts
*Landscaping.plazas,walks,outdoor programming spaces opportunities
*Diagrammatic plans showing principal programming elements for recreation center rooms
*Prepare initial massing model in 3d computer format showing building heights,vertical relationships,
and roof forms
• Prepare project budgets for development:
*Program based building construction budget
*Suggested development,utility,infrastructure cost variables for each budget
*Site&utility improvement/restoration/demolition budgets
*Contingencies
2.3 Work Period-Prepare Fully Developed Preferred Conceptual Planning(BRS)
2-3 Weeks • Prepare preferred planning documents to include:
Refinement into a fully developed preferred conceptual site and building concept plans.
*Prepare two exterior views rendered suitable for marketing purposes showing key materials,
fenestration,colors,and related site entourage.Renderings to demonstrate character and style of building.
*Update budget reflecting preferred conceptual site plan
Preliminary Operations Estimate(BK)
• Prepare Draft Phase Two Report and Recommendations for staff and committee review
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 4 of 6
Page 3 of 5
•
SCOPE OF SERVICES
July 21,2015
2.3 Continued • Work with Ballard King to Update the Operation and Revenue Projections with any modifications required based on
conceptual planning
2.4 Fully Developed Preferred Conceptual Planning
2 Days • Conduct GoTo Meeting to review preliminary draft of conceptual planning:(BRS)
*Present work-to-date with staff and committees
*Present preferred conceptual planning drawings in PowerPoint and wall mounted graphics
*Present updated budgets
*Present updated operations and revenue projections
2.5 Work Period-Prepare Final Master Plan and Feasibility Report(BRS&BK)
2 Weeks *Prepare Draft Phase Two Report and Recommendations for Staff and Committee review
*Combine phase reports into a final Master Plan and Feasibility Report
*Prepare PowerPoint Presentation of Master Plan and Feasibility Report for presentation to Staff
and Committee
2.6 Final Presentation-Facility Master Plan and Feasibility Report(CoCC,BRS&BK)
2 Days • Conduct workshop
*Present Recreation Center Master Plan and Feasibility Report and receive comments
'Presentation with PowerPoint showing all graphics
*Distribute Report
*Presentation Boards on display
• Present to City Council
*Present Facility Master Plan and Feasibility Report
*Presentation with PowerPoint showing all graphics
*Distribute Report
*Presentation Boards on display
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 5 of 6
Page 4 of 5
SCOPE OF SERVICES
July 21.2015
2.6 Continued Deliverables:
• Phase Two Report and Recommendations:
*Written narrative of process to date BRS,
*Project program of activities and space for both building and site uses.(BRS)
*Site analysis;BPS
*Site alternatives;8=S;
*Diagrammatic building plans and aerial massing of preferred alternative(BPS)
*Two eye level exterior renderings(BRS)
*Project budget model of recommended conceptual site plan(BRS�
, perathons and revenue projections(BK)
*Partnership strategies(BK)
*Fundings opportunities(BK)
*Agendas for all meetings(BRS)
*Meeting minutes(BRS)
*Recommendation for next steps(BRS)
• Master Plan and Feasibility Report(combines both Phase One and Two end of phase reports)(BRS)
*Provide 6 color bound books for Owner distribution or reproduction.
*Provide electronic copies of all deliverables in PDF format.
3.0 Available Additional Services(quote by request)
*Detailed 3d renderings in addition to above.Computer fly through animations suitable for marketing
or web page
*Traffic analysis
*Environmental analysis,hazmat studies,site surveys,soils reports.
Project Team
Mick Massey,ASLA
Steve Blackburn, Principal,Architect,LEER® AP
Chuck Musgrave,Principal,Architect
Stephen Berlin, Project Manager,Architect,LEED® AP
Barker Rinker Seacat
303 455-1366
mickmasser:Zt brsarch.com
steveblackbtun i brsarch-com
chuckmusgrave,i brsarch.com
stcphcnberliniii hrsarch.com
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 6 of 6
Page 5 of 5
Exhibit "B"
Mandatory Requirements
INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant shall fully indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of
Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees,
volunteers, directors and representatives ("Indemnitee") from and
against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including
reasonable attorney fees and defense costs, caused by or resulting
from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property
infringement, or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed
by Consultant or its agent, consultant under contract or another entity
over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights
or performance of the duties under this agreement. This
Indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the
negligent acts or omissions of the City of Corpus Christi or its
employees, to the extent of such negligence.
Consultant must, at City's option, defend Indemnitee and with counsel
satisfactory to the City Attorney.
Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or
demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or
arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement.
NE Professional Services Agreements Standard Form Language
Last revised 12/23/2014 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 1
Sample form for:
COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Payment Request
Revised 07/27/00
Project No. )(XXX
Invoice No. 12345
Invoice Date:
Total Amount Previous Total Percent
Basic Services: Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete
Preliminary Phase $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $1,000 100%
Design Phase 2,000 1,000 0 3,000 1,000 500 1,500 50%
Bid Phase 500 0 250 750 0 0 0 0%
Construction Phase 2,500 0 1,000 3,500 0 0 0 0%
Subtotal Basic Services $6,000 $1,000 $1,250 $8,250 $750 $1,500 $2,500 30%
Additional Services:
Permitting $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000 $500 $0 $500 25%
Warranty Phase 0 1,120 0 1,120 0 0 0 0%
Inspection 0 0 1,627 1,627 0 0 0 0%
Platting Survey TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0%
0& M Manuals TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0%
SCADA TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0%
Subtotal Additional Services $2,000 $1,120 $1,627 $4,747 $500 $0 $500 11%
Summary of Fees
Basic Services Fees $6,000 $1,000 $1,250 $8,250 $750 $1,500 $2,500 30%
Additional Services Fees 2,000 1,120 1,627 4,747 500 0 500 11%;
Total of Fees $8,000 $2,120 $2,877 $12,997 $1,250 $1,500 $3,000 23%
MIIMI
P
to _
0 W
0
-b c)
•
SUPPLIER NUMBER
TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY
PURCHASING DIVISION
City o CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
t; DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
Clm
City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business
with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is
not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and
definitions.
COMPANY NAME: Barker Rinker Seacat
P.O.BOX:
STREET ADDRESS: 3457 Ringsby Court,Unit 200 CITY: Denver ZIP: 80216
FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 2. Partnership 3. Sole Owner ❑
4. Association 5. Other _
DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS
If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.
1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm."
Name Job Title and City Department(if known)
N/A
2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"
constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm."
Name Title
N/A
3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest"
constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named"firm."
Name Board, Commission or Committee
N/A
4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who
worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest"
constituting 3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm."
Name Consultant
N/A
EXHIBIT "D"
Page 1 of 2
FILING REQUIREMENTS
If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an
economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action
will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof,you shall disclose that fact
in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter,
unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be
made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349(d)]
CERTIFICATION
I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not
knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be
promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi,Texas as changes occur.
Certifying Person: 4,)e� X4.4 J,3( G Title: f'2.. .t tt 7q-t_
(Type or Print)
Signature of Certifying Date:
Person: 1 l 2 ( .ig
///�����'� ��
DEFINITIONS
a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City
Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an
effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a
substantial segment thereof.
c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-
time basis, but not as an independent contractor.
d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and
whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities
operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint
stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are
treated as non-profit organizations.
e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager,
Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of
Corpus Christi,Texas.
f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a
firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity.
"Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or
special terms of venture or partnership agreements."
g. "Consultant."Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus
Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation.
EXHIBIT "D"
Page 2 of 2