HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2016-351 - 7/26/2016 - NA CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
CONTRACT NO.731
THIS PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR DOWNTOWN COPRUS CHRISTI
AGREEMENT("Agreement") is entered into by and between Walker Parking Consultants ("Contractor")
and the City of Corpus Christi,a Texas home-rule municipal corporation ("City"), as the agent of the
Corpus Christi Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone#3 ("TIRZ#3").
WHEREAS on December 16, 2008, the City Council of the City (the "City Council") approved Ordinance
027996,which established the TIRZ#3 in accordance with Texas Tax Code Chapter 311.TIRZ#3 promotes
economic development and stimulates business and commercial activity in its downtown Corpus Christi
area (the"Zone");
WHEREAS on August 25,2015,the City Council approved a Project and Financing Plan(the"Plan")for TIRZ
#3;
WHEREAS the Board of Directors of TIRZ#3 (the "Board") includes members of the City Council in a non-
public-official capacity, as well as a representative from each Nueces County and Del Mar College, who
have committed to contribute to TIRZ#3 through Interlocal Agreements created in 2009 and amended in
2012;
WHEREAS the Corpus Christi Downtown Management District ("DMD") assists the City with
administration of TIRZ#3, recommends projects and recommends a DMD representative to be appointed
to the Board through an Interlocal Agreement;
WHEREAS on November 10, 2015 the City Council approved Ordinance 030680, which amended
Ordinance 027996 and authorized the Board to approve agreements in this form, to be entered into by
the City, as the Board considers necessary or convenient to implement the Plan and achieve its purpose;
WHEREAS the Plan contained certain programs designed to improve conditions and increase commerce
within the Zone;
WHEREAS any reference to"City"or"City Staff," is entirely in agency capacity for TIRZ#3,and further the
City as a home-rule municipal corporation is not a party to this agreement;
WHEREAS, Contractor has proposed to provide a parking management study and strategic plan
for Downtown Corpus Christi in response to the City's Request for Proposals ("RFP Event No. 108") on
behalf of the TIRZ#3;
WHEREAS,the City has determined Contractor to be the best valued respondent;
NOW,THEREFORE,Contractor and City enter into this Agreement and agree as follows:
1. Services. Contractor will provide services in managing parking and making strategic parking
investments,which are vital in creating and maintaining a successful downtown.The Downtown Area
Development Plan has inventoried 13,000 parking spaces in downtown which is a foundation to
understanding our current parking supply. To ensure that parking is working for diverse users,
residents, businesses, and visitors, now and in the future, Contractor will provide more macro and
micro information and analysis of the Downtown parking situation. ("Services") in accordance with
RFP Event No. 108("Exhibit A"),which exhibit is incorporated by reference into this Agreement.
2016-351
7/26/16
Walker Parking Consultants
INDEXED
2. Term. This Agreement takes effect upon execution of the City Manager and continues until
December 31, 2016.
3. Compensation and Payment.The total amount to be paid under this agreement shall not exceed
$99,947.50. Fees will be paid after the completion of each task deliverable based on the percent
shown for each task outlined in the "Attachment Fee schedule" attached and incorporated by
Reference in this Agreement. Contractor shall submit invoices for all services rendered in accordance
with this agreement.Payment will be made to Contractor within(30)days of receipt of proper invoice.
4. Contract Administrator. The contract administrator designated by the City is responsible for
approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement including deductions for
non-performance and authorizations for payment. All of the Contractor's notices or communications
regarding this Agreement must be directed to the contract administrator, who is the City's Business
Liaison or her designee ("Contract Administrator").
5. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the Services as an independent contractor and
will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions
may any agent,servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City.
6.Insurance. Before activities can begin under this Agreement,the Contractor's insurance company,
or companies, must deliver a Certificate of Insurance, as proof of the required insurance coverages,
to the Contract Administrator and City's Risk Manager. Additionally,the Contract Administrator and
Risk Manager must be given at least 30 days' advance notice, by certified mail, of cancellation,
material change in the coverages or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named
as an Additional Insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 15
days of the City Manager's reasonable written request.
7. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement or of any right or interest contained in this
Agreement by the Contractor is effective unless the City first gives its written consent to such
assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this
Agreement, and the City's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion
of the City on any ground whatsoever.
8. Qualification. Consultant is fully capable and qualified to execute the services in this Agreement
and does not require any training from the City.
9. Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement, Exhibit A, or the
Consultant's response to RFP Event No. 108 ("Exhibit B"), which exhibit is incorporated into this
Agreement,waives any subsequent breach of the same.
10. Compliance with Laws. This Agreement is subject to all applicable federal, state and local laws.
The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of Texas and such
form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district,county or justice court in and for Nueces
County,Texas.
11. Subcontractors. The Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the Services to be
performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however,the Contractor must obtain
prior written approval from the Contract Administrator. In using subcontractors,the Contractor shall
be responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its
employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement
are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and
its employees had performed the Services.
12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only in writing and upon execution by
authorized representatives of both parties.
13. Termination.The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform
the Services specified in Exhibit A. Failure to keep all insurance policies in force for the entire term of
this Agreement is grounds for termination. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor
written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not
cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately
thereafter.
Alternatively,the City Manager may terminate this Agreement without cause upon 20 days' written
notice to the Contractor. In the event of termination, the Contractor will be compensated for its
services on all stages authorized based upon Contractor and City's estimate of the proportion of the
total services actually completed at the time of termination. However, the City may terminate this
Agreement upon three days'written notice to the Contractor for Contractor's failure to pay or provide
proof of payment of taxes,as set out in this Agreement.
14.Taxes.The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment
taxes and all other related taxes in accordance with Circular E, "Employer's Tax Guide", Publication
15,as it may be amended. Upon his request,the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of
one or more of these taxes within 15 days of such request.
15. Notice. Notice may be given by hand delivery or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is received
on the day faxed or hand-delivered and on the third day after deposit in the U.S. mail if sent certified
mail. Notice shall be sent as follows:
IF TO CITY:
City of Corpus Christi
Attention: Alyssa Michelle Barrera, Business Liaison
1201 Leopard Street
Corpus Christi,Texas 78401
IF TO CONTRACTOR:
Walker Parking Consultants
Attention:Casey Wagner,Senior Vice President
2525 Bay Area Blvd,Suite 400
Houston,TX 77058
16.Severability. Each provision of this Agreement shall be considered to be severable and if,for any
reason,any such provision or any part thereof,is determined to be invalid and contrary to any existing
or future applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of or affect those portions of
this Agreement that are valid, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as
if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part thereof had been omitted.
17.INDEMNIFICATION.Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi
and its officials, officers, agents, employees or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or
that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control
("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including
reasonable attorney fees and court costs,to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from
an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a
subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or
another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or
performance of the duties under this agreement.This indemnification does not apply to any liability
resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such
negligence.
Consultant shall defend Indemnitee,with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney,from and against
any and all claims,damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs,
if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by
Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of,fault of or breach of contract
by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion
to the Consultant's liability.
Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or
Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under this
Agreement.
SIGNED this 1/ day of J (L1 ,20 lb .
Contractor: Walker Parking Consultants
Name: r.,46(16
Title: 5'NIP - \Ia oz ENT
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Margie C. Rose Date
e City Manager
•
As an agent of the TIRZ#3 ATTEST' ► �� �' -e." ti
REB.CCA HUi=F9TA .
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM TV SECRETARY
°WALL INC61, -Au}
Aimee Alcorn-Reed Date
Assistant City Attorney
Attorney for TIRZ#3
Incorporated by Reference: I R,� AUIHOKILU
Exhibit A: RFP 14
Exhibit B: Proposer's Response :Y COUNCIL..
SECRETARY
Exhibit A: RFP
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
ADDENDUM
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
Request for Proposal No.: Event 108 Addendum No.: 1 April 28,2016
Prospective Proposers are hereby notified of the following modifications to Request for Proposal No.
Event 108. All terms, conditions and specifications of the original Request for Proposal not in conflict
with this addendum remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect.
I.
The Schedule of Events are revised as follows:
1.2 Schedule
Date Activity
April 11, 2016 Request for Proposal issued
April 21, 2016 Requests for Clarification from Proposers are due
April 28, 2016 Responses to Requests for Clarification will be posted via
May 5, 2016 Addendum in the City's Supplier Portal
May 9, 2016 DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS: Proposals due before 12:00 p.m.
May 23, 2016
Week fJune 1 0016 Finalists interviewed (tentative)
Week of June 20, 2016
Week of June 20, 2016 Recommended/selected (tentative)
Week of June 27, 2016
July, 2016 Projected Date Award of Contract (tentative)
"ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED"
Lydia Juarez
Procurement Officer
ADDENDUM NO. 2
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
ADDENDUM
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
Reauest for Proposal No.: Event 108 Addendum No.:2 May 5.2016
Proposers must acknowledge the receipt of this Addendum in its PROPOSAL. Failure of the Proposer
to acknowledge this Addendum may result in City's rejection for the Proposal for non-
responsiveness.
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION:
The following proposers' questions and the City's corresponding responses thereto:
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.1:
RFC 1: "Will the City be able to provide a current land use database that includes gross floor
area for all existing buildings?"
Response 1: Yes, in the form of a Shapefile, which can be opened with ArcMap.
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.2:
RFC 2: "What parking inventory information exists (on-street, off-street public, off-street- private)
and to what level of detail (regulations, rates, rates, etc.)?"
Response 2: The City of Corpus Christi inventory is designed for on-street public parking with
about 1100 meters located in in the downtown and uptown areas. The city also has two lots
maintained by three pay stations that covers 125 private spaces and 87 off-street spaces.
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.3:
RFC 3: "If parking inventory information exists, is it in GIS"
Response 3: It is not under the Geographic Information Systems.
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.4:
RFC 4: "What software or database is used for the city's current Parking Management System
(as referenced in Task2)?"
Response 4: The City of Corpus Christi Parking Control uses Parking Enterprise Management
System (PEMS) through CivicSmart's Parking Enterprise Management System"'Software.
Page 1 of 5
ADDENDUM NO.2
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.5:
RFC 5: "Is there a budget range for this project?"
Response 5: Yes
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.6:
RFC 6: "Does this contract require audited rates?"
Response 6: Proposers are to submit pricing that covers the entire Scope of Work
including each task.
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.7:
RFC 7: Do rates need to be based on raw direct pay rate times overhead?
Response 7: Proposers are to submit pricing that covers the entire Scope of Work including each
task.
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.8:
RFC 8: Can profit be applied to rate inclusive of overhead?
Response 8: Proposers are to submit pricing that covers the entire Scope of Work including each
task.
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.9:
RFC 9: "Please make the following change to Section 5. on page 16 of the RFP."
5. Insurance. Before activities can begin under this Agreement,
the Contractor's insurance company, or companies, must
deliver a Certificate of Insurance, as proof of the required
insurance coverages, to the Contract Administrator and City's
Risk Manager. Additionally, the Contract Administrator and Risk
Manager must be given at least 30 days' advance notice, by
certified mail, of cancellation,
coverages or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City
must be named as an Additional Insured. The City Attorney
must be given copies of all insurance policies within 15 days of
the City Manager's reasonable written request.
Page 2 of 5
. .... .............._....
ADDENDUM NO. 2
Response 9: The City is not able to change this requirement. Either the insurance carrier or
the Contractor is required to provide notice of cancellation, material change in the
coverages or intent not to renew.
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.10:
RFC 10: "Please make the following change to Section 9. on page 17 of the RFP."
9. Compliance with Laws. This Agreement is subject to all
applicable federal, state and local laws. All duties of the
ee - e- _-•e ---_ - -- - e e- - _ . The
applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this
Agreement is the law of Texas and such form and venue for
such disputes is the appropriate district, county or justice court
in and for Nueces County, Texas.
Response 10: "This change is acceptable." (See attachment 2- Sample Contract Revised
5.5.16)
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.11:
RFC 11: "Please make the following change to Section 12. on page 17 of the RFP."
12. Termination. The City Manager may terminate this
Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the Services
specified in Exhibit A. Failure to keep all insurance policies in
force for the entire term of this Agreement is grounds for
termination. The Contract Administrator must give the
Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a
reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured
within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this
Agreement immediately thereafter.
Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement
without cause upon 20 days' written notice to the Contractor.
Contractor will be compensated for services performed in
accordance with this Agreement prior to any such termination.
However, the City may terminate this Agreement upon three
days' written notice to the Contractor for Contractor's failure to
pay or provide proof of payment of taxes, as set out in this
Agreement.
Response 11: The City can add the following language in place of the suggested language:
"In the event of termination, the Contractor will be compensated for its services on all stages
authorized based upon Contractor and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services
Page 3 of 5
ADDENDUM NO.2
actually completed at the time of termination. (See attachment 2 - Sample Contract
Revised 5.5.16)
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.12:
RFC 12: "Please make the following changes to Section 16. on page 18 of the RFP."
16. INDEMNIFICATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY, HOLD
HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS
OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM
AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS,
SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE ON ACCOUNT
OF PERSONAL INJURIES, INCLUDING THOSE RESULTING IN
WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS OR DEATH, PROPERTY LOSS
OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF LOSS OR DAMAGE,
INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS,
ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR
ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF e ' • e • • e • • - -
AGREEMENT OR THE NEGLIGENT PERFORMANCE OF THIS
AGREEMENT AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES,
DEATH, LOSS, OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO
BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY
NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE
NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY
OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE,
INVESTIGATE ALL NOTICES, CLAIMS, AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO
THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS
BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO
THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS
AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING
FROM ANY OF SAID LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS,
OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF
CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR
EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
Response 12: The City is providing updated Indemnity language: "Consultant shall fully
indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents,
employees or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent,
employee or subconsultant,over which the City exercises control("Indemnitee")from and
against any and all claims,damages,liabilities or costs,including reasonable attorney fees
and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of
negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a
subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract
or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or
performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to
Page 4 of 5
ADDENDUM NO.2
any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to
the extent of such negligence.
Consultant shall defend Indemnitee,with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney,from and
against any and all claims,damages,liabilities or costs,including reasonable attorney fees
and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or
breach of contract by indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence
of, fault of or breach of contract by indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's
reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Consultant's liability.
Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City
or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under
this Agreement." (See attachment 2-Sample Contract Revised 5.5.16)
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION No.13:
RFC13: Please make the following addition to the sample agreement on page 18 of the
RFP.
17. Payment. Contractor will submit monthly invoices for
payment based on a percentage of the services completed.
City will pay all approved invoices within thirty (30) days.
Response 13: Compensation and Payment. The total amount to be paid under this
agreement shall not exceed $XX. Fees will be paid after the completion of each task
deliverable based on the percent shown for each task outlined in the "Attachment Fee
schedule" attached and incorporated by Reference in this Agreement. Contractor shall
submit invoices for all services rendered in accordance with this agreement. Payment will
be made to Contractor within (30) days of receipt of proper invoice. (See attachment 2-
Sample Contract Revised 5.5.16)
"ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED"
Lis J arez
Procurement Officer
Page 5 of 5
Attachment 2-Sample Contract Revised 5.5.16
PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR DOWNTOWN COPRUS
CHRISTI
Contract No. 731
THIS PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR DOWNTOWN
COPRUS CHRISTI ("Agreement") is entered into by and between Jinsert name of
comaanvl ("Contractor") and the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation ("City"), as the agent of the Corpus Christi Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone
#3 ("TIRZ#3").
WHEREAS on December 16, 2008, the City Council of the City (the "City Council")
approved Ordinance 027996,which established the TIRZ#3 in accordance with Texas Tax
Code Chapter 311. TIRZ #3 promotes economic development and stimulates business
and commercial activity in its downtown Corpus Christi area (the "Zone");
WHEREAS on August 25, 2015, the City Council approved a Project and Financing Plan
(the "Plan") for TIRZ#3;
WHEREAS the Board of Directors of TIRZ #3 (the "Board") includes members of the City
Council in a non-public-official capacity, as well as a representative from each Nueces
County and Del Mar College, who have committed to contribute to TIRZ #3 through
Interlocal Agreements created in 2009 and amended in 2012;
WHEREAS the Corpus Christi Downtown Management District ("DMD") assists the City with
administration of TIRZ#3, recommends projects and recommends a DMD representative
to be appointed to the Board through an Interlocal Agreement;
WHEREAS on November 10, 2015 the City Council approved Ordinance 030680, which
amended Ordinance 027996 and authorized the Board to approve agreements in this
form, to be entered into by the City, as the Board considers necessary or convenient to
implement the Plan and achieve its purpose;
WHEREAS the Plan contained certain programs designed to improve conditions and
increase commerce within the Zone;
WHEREAS any reference to "City" or "City Staff," is entirely in agency capacity for TIRZ#3,
and further the City as a home-rule municipal corporation is not a party to this agreement;
WHEREAS, Contractor has proposed to provide an assessment of the efficiency and
effectiveness of the Financial Services Department in response to the City's Request for
Proposals ("RFP Event No. 108") on behalf of the TIRZ #3;
WHEREAS, the City has determined Contractor to be the best valued respondent;
NOW, THEREFORE, Contractor and City enter into this Agreement and agree as follows:
15
1
1. Services. Contractor will provide services in managing parking and making
strategic parking investments,which are vital in creating and maintaining a successful
downtown. The Downtown Area Development Plan has inventoried 13,000 parking
spaces in downtown which is a foundation to understanding our current parking
supply. To ensure that parking is working for diverse users residents, businesses, and
visitors now and in the future, Contractor will provide more macro and micro
information and analysis of the Downtown parking situation. ("Services") in
accordance with RFP Event No. 108 ("Exhibit A"), which exhibit is incorporated by
reference into this Agreement.
2. Term. This Agreement takes effect upon execution of the City Manager and
continues until (TERM OF SERVICE IS MUTUALLY AGREED UPON).
3. Compensation and Payment. The total amount to be paid under this agreement
shall not exceed $XX. Fees will be paid after the completion of each task deliverable
based on the percent shown for each task outlined in the "Attachment Fee schedule"
attached and incorporated by Reference in this Agreement. Contractor shall submit
invoices for all services rendered in accordance with this agreement. Payment will be
made to Contractor within (30) days of receipt of proper invoice.
4. Contract Administrator. The contract administrator designated by the City is
responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this
Agreement including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for
payment. All of the Contractor's notices or communications regarding this
Agreement must be directed to the contract administrator, who is the City's Business
Liaison or her designee ("Contract Administrator").
5. Independent Contractor.Contractor will perform the Services as an independent
contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no
circumstances or conditions may any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor
be considered an employee of the City.
6. Insurance. Before activities can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor's
insurance company, or companies, must deliver a Certificate of Insurance, as proof
of the required insurance coverages, to the Contract Administrator and City's Risk
Manager. Additionally, the Contract Administrator and Risk Manager must be given
at least 30 days' advance notice, by certified mail, of cancellation, material change
in the coverages or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named
as an Additional Insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance
policies within 15 days of the City Manager's reasonable written request.
7. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement or of any right or interest contained
in this Agreement by the Contractor is effective unless the City first gives its written
consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor
is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City's right to withhold consent to such
assignment is within the sole discretion of the City on any ground whatsoever.
16
8. Qualification. Consultant is fully capable and qualified to execute the services in
this Agreement and does not require any training from the City.
9. Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement,
Exhibit A, or the Consultant's response to RFP Event No. 108 ("Exhibit B"), which exhibit
is incorporated into this Agreement, waives any subsequent breach of the same.
10. Compliance with Laws. This Agreement is subject to all applicable federal, state
and local laws. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement
is the law of Texas and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate
district, county or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas.
11. Subcontractors. The Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the
Services to be performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors,
however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract
Administrator. In using subcontractors, the Contractor shall be responsible for all their
acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were
employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement are
applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the
Contractor and its employees had performed the Services.
12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only in writing and upon
execution by authorized representatives of both parties.
13. Termination. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's
failure to perform the Services specified in Exhibit A. Failure to keep all insurance
policies in force for the entire term of this Agreement is grounds for termination. The
Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set
out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure
period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter.
Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement without cause upon 20
days' written notice to the Contractor. In the event of termination, the Contractor will i
be compensated for its services on all stages authorized based upon Contractor and
City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time
of termination. However, the City may terminate this Agreement upon three days'
written notice to the Contractor for Contractor's failure to pay or provide proof of
payment of taxes, as set out in this Agreement.
14. Taxes.The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes,
unemployment taxes and all other related taxes in accordance with Circular E,
"Employer's Tax Guide", Publication 15, as it may be amended. Upon his request, the
City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of one or more of these taxes within
15 days of such request.
-- 17
15. Notice. Notice may be given by hand delivery or certified mail, postage prepaid,
and is received on the day faxed or hand-delivered and on the third day after deposit
in the U.S. mail if sent certified mail. Notice shall be sent as follows:
IF TO CITY:
City of Corpus Christi
Attention: Alyssa Michelle Barrera, Business Liaison
1201 Leopard Street
Corpus Christi, Texas 78401
IF TO CONTRACTOR:
Contractor [insert contractor company name]
Contact [insert contractor contact name'
Address: [insert contractor street address]
City, State, [insert contractor city,
16.Severability. Each provision of this Agreement shall be considered to be severable
and if, for any reason, any such provision or any part thereof, is determined to be
invalid and contrary to any existing or future applicable law, such invalidity shall not
impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, and
this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or
unenforceable provision or part thereof had been omitted.
17. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless
the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees or
other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent,
employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control
("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities
or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent
that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence,
intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a
subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent,
Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant
exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the
duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any
liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its
employees, to the extent of such negligence.
Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City
Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or
costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is
L 18
not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of
contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the
negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the
Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in
proportion to the Consultant's liability.
Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or
demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or
arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement.
SIGNED this day of , 20
Contractor: 'insert company namel
Name:
Title:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Ron Olson Date
City Manager
As an agent of the TIRZ#3
Incorporated by Reference:
Exhibit A: RFP
Exhibit B: Proposer's Response
19
ADDENDUM NO. 3
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
ADDENDUM
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
Request for Proposal No.: Event 108 Addendum No.: 3 May 9, 2016
Proposers must acknowledge the receipt of this Addendum in its PROPOSAL. Failure of the Proposer
to acknowledge this Addendum may result in City's rejection for the Proposal for non-
responsiveness.
Section 3.2 Evaluation Criteria, letter C. Fee: Revised and now reads as follows:
C. Fee: Proposers are to submit pricing that covers the entire Scope of Work including each task in
a separate sealed envelope.
"ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED"
Lydia Juarez
Procurement Officer
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION
FOR
TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE # 3 (TIRZ #3)
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
("RFP")
PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN
RFP No. 108
Table of Contents
Section 1 Notice of Request for Proposal
Section 2 Scope of Work
Section 3 Proposal Evaluation
Section 4 Proposal Format and Organization
Section 5 Conditions Governing the Procurement
Attachments
ATTACHMENT 1 - TIRZ # 3 ZONE BOUNDARIES
ATTACHMENT 2 - SAMPLE SERVICE AGREEMENT (Contract)
ATTACHMENT 3 - DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
ATTACHMENT 4 - BUSINESS DESIGNATION FORM
Section 1
Notice of Request for Proposal
Date Issued: April 11, 2016
1.1 Request for Proposal
The City of Corpus Christi ("City") on the behalf of the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone
# 3 (TIRZ #3) seeks qualified professional firms (proposers/consultants) to develop a
Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan for Downtown Corpus Christi.
1.2 Schedule:
The following is the schedule for this procurement:
Date Activity
April 11, 2016 Request for Proposal issued
April 21, 2016 Requests for Clarification from Proposers are due
April 28, 2016 Responses to Requests for Clarification will be posted via
Addendum in the City's Supplier Portal
May 9, 2016 DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS: Proposals due before 12:00 p.m.
Week of June 13, 2016 Finalists interviewed (tentative)
Week of June 20, 2016 Recommended/selected (tentative)
July, 2016 Projected Date Award of Contract (tentative)
1.3 Delivery Address:
City of Corpus Christi (1 original & 7 copies)
Purchasing Division
4th Floor, City Hall
1201 Leopard St.
Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-2825
1.4 Procurement Officer
PROCUREMENT OFFICER: Lydia Juarez
Phone: (361) 826-3664
Fax: (361) 826-3174
lydiaj@cctexas.com
Section 2
Scope of Work
2.1 General/Background Information
In 2015, Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 (TIRZ #3, or Zone) adopted a Project &
Financing Plan that calls for a parking analysis to be conducted within the Zone's
boundaries. The need for this plan was identified through the Downtown Area
Development Plan (DADP) process, which is still underway. TIRZ #3 intends to hire a firm
to prepare a parking strategic plan that will create a long-term strategy for City's parking
operations and engage private sector parking supply to support the downtown residents,
businesses, and visitors; stimulate economic development; and integrate best
management practices.
The Zone is comprised of 4 neighborhoods; the SEA District, Uptown, Marina Arts District
(Downtown Management District) and Bayshore Park Neighborhood. The TIRZ # 3 Zone
Boundaries are shown in Attachment 1.
Managing parking and making strategic parking investments is vital in creating and
maintaining a successful downtown. The DADP has inventoried 13,000 parking spaces in
downtown, which is a foundation to understanding our current parking supply. In order
to ensure that parking is working for diverse users residents, businesses, and visitors now
and in the future, macro and micro information and analysis is needed. The Parking
Management Study and Strategic Plan will analyze the opportunities and needs for
parking in Downtown Corpus Christi.
2.2 Scope of Work & Deliverables
The consultant will be required undertake the following tasks, which would each be
finalized by the deliverable identified or a mutually agreed upon equivalent. Due date
of each deliverable will be specified in Proposal.
Task 1- Conduct Public and Internal Stakeholder Outreach, through public meeting (or
an equally transparent method) and staff meetings, and assess best practices in
comparable markets as a baseline.
Deliverable 1- A report of information gathered from outreach and benchmarked
best practices for comparison.
Payment- 5% of cost will be allowed when report has been accepted.
Task 2- Develop Downtown Parking Supply Database with capabilities to interface with
current parking supply database (including overall supply by geographic clusters) and
produce the inventory in a GIS database to include:
(a) Number of public parking spaces
• metered, unmetered,
• parking lots and garages,
• loading zones, etc.
(b) Number of private parking spaces
3
• Lots
• Garages
(c) Rates (hourly, daily, monthly)
• Public
• Private
• Special Event
(d)Average occupancy (workday, evening, weekend)
• On- Street
• Off-Street
Deliverable 2 - GIS Database, which can interface with the current Parking
Management System and can be updated to maintain accuracy. Additional hard
copy Inventory Report and Map.
Payment - 20% of cost will be allowed when database is completed and report
accepted.
Task 3-Develop a Parking Demand Assessment to analyze users and address unmet and
future demand. Assessment will estimate the current unmet demand through interviews
with employers, office building managers and other stakeholders, as well as estimate
future demand based on projected build out by neighborhood. Specifically, this portion
shall include:
(a)Make up of occupancy
• Transient,
• Office Worker
• Resident
(b)Identify usage generators
• Office Centers,
• Housing,
• Special Event Venues
• Retail
• Government Centers
(c) Project Future Parking Demand based on planned development list.
Deliverable 3- Parking Demand Assessment Report.
Payment-15% of cost will be allowed when report is accepted.
Task 4- Develop a Strategic Implementation Plan
Specifically, the Implementation Plan should include the following recommendations:
(a) Code and policy changes
(b) Parking management strategy (for public) and promotion plan (for private)
(c) Strategic development of parking to aid development goals:
1. Unlocking the existing development potential of a site/sites
2. Public parking for retail or entertainment areas
3. District or area-based parking strategies (e.g. SEA District, Bayshore Park, and
Marina Arts District)
4. Parcels to acquire or preserve for parking or circulation
5. Recommendations for automated parking systems (what are the right
conditions to use them?)
4
(d) Organizational Recommendations
(e) Technology improvements
(f) Pilot projects, new programs and potential partnerships
(g) Marketing Strategies
(h) 10 Year Capital Improvement and Maintenance Plan
(i) 10 Year Parking Fund ProForma with Recommend Parking Rates
The Plan must be developed and reviewed with key City Staff, including a full day
workshop on the subject matter being recommended.
Deliverable 4 -Finalized plan, including 20 professionally produced copies and an
electronic version.
Payment-50%of cost will be allowed when Implementation Plan is completed and
accepted.
Task 5- Presentations of Final Products to the City and Prepare an Executive Summary of
Findings.
Deliverable 5-, At least 2 of presentations to Parking Advisory Committee and
delivery of the Executive Summary report to the TIRZ #3 Board.
Payment- 10% of cost will be allowed when all required meetings have occurred
and presentations completed.
5
Section 3
Proposal Evaluation
The City will conduct a comprehensive, fair and impartial evaluation of all proposals
received in response to this RFP. Each proposal will first be analyzed to determine overall
responsiveness and completeness as defined in the Proposal Format and Organization
Section, and the Evaluation Criteria Section of this RFP.
3.1 Evaluation Committee
An Evaluation Committee ("Committee") will be established to assist the City to select a
qualified Proposer. The Committee will be comprised of representatives from various City
departments.
3.2 Evaluation Criteria
Each cualified proposer will then be ranked on the basis of the following:
Criteria Description Criteria Weight
Compliance with Administrative Requirements Pass/Fail
Technical Proposal 60 Points
Understanding of Project Scope(30 points)
• Demonstrated understanding of scope of services,
Firms'Experience (15 points)
• Experience on projects of similar scope and complexity;
• Demonstrated capability of timely completion of comparable projects;
• Demonstrated capability of on-budget completion of comparable projects;
• Past Performance and References.
Team Identification(15 points)
• Team members with experience and qualifications;
Interview 15 Points
Timeline/Schedule of Work 15 Points
Fee 10 Points
C. FEE: Proposers are to submit the ALL PRICING and cost per phase of their plan for
accomplished Scope of Work with timeline, in a separately sealed envelope.
All costs, both direct and indirect, necessary to effect the work described herein shall be
included in the Proposer's proposal. Such costs include, but are not limited to: salaries,
supplies, the cost of the proposal itself, postage, travel, per diem, transportation costs,
etc. The proposer shall not invoice and City shall not pay any costs other than those set
out by the Proposer in its proposal and agreed to by the City.
D. The Proposer's failure to provide information relative to the above criteria may
result in the City deeming such proposal non-responsive and may, at the sole discretion
of the Committee, result in elimination of said proposal from further consideration. The
Committee reserves the right to conduct other evaluation and measurements of the
proposals as may be necessary to make an informed decision.
6
Section 4
Proposal Format and Organization
This section provides specific instructions on format and organization of the proposal to
be submitted by the Proposer. Each Proposer may submit only one proposal in a totally
self-supporting format without reference to any other proposal(s).
4.1 General Instructions
A. To provide for ease and uniformity and to aid in the evaluation of proposals, Proposers shall
comply with the sequence outlined herein. IN NUMBERING PROPOSALS, THE
PROPOSER SHALL USE THE SAME SECTION NUMBERS AND TITLES AND SHALL
PROVIDE ITS RESPONSES IN THE SAME ORDER AS EACH QUESTION IS
NUMBERED AND ORDERED HEREIN. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the
proposal. The proposal shall be completed in sections, which are described below.
B. Proposers should be aware that all technical and operational specifications, equipment
descriptions and marketing material submitted or made available will be incorporated by
reference into any contract(s). The City discourages the inclusion of general marketing
material or equipment manuals unless they are used to provide specific information or
specifically requested by the City.
C. The Proposer shall provide one electronic copy of the proposal not including the Fee Proposal,
via flash drive or compact disk, along with one original and seven (7) identical bound hard
copies of the proposal not including the fee proposal, before the DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS.
D. The Proposer shall provide the fee proposal with the one original hard copy response, in a
sealed envelope which will not be opened until the qualification stage has been met.
4.2 Proposal Format
A. This section outlines the minimum requirements for preparation and presentation of a
proposal.
B. The Proposer shall define the capabilities of their organization to supply and maintain the
services as requested in this RFP. The response should be specific and complete in every detail
and prepared in a simple and straightforward manner.
C. Proposers are expected to examine the entire RFP including all specifications, standard
provisions, instructions and attachments. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk.
Proposers should provide their best pricing for the services set out herein.
D. Proposals shall be in at least 1 1 pt. easily readable font and bound in a manner that allows
the proposals to be disassembled.
7
4.3 Proposal Contents
A. Proposal Cover letter
B. The transmittal letter shall be the first item in your proposal and shall indicate the
intention of the Proposer to adhere to the provisions described in the RFP. The
transmittal letter SHALL:
1 . Be presented on company letterhead;
2. Identify the submitting organization;
3. Acknowledge receipt of any addenda to this RFP
4. Identify, by name and title, and be signed by the person authorized by
the organization to obligate the organization contractually.
5. Statement indicating willingness to sign Service Agreement as written.
C. The second item in your proposal shall be a table of contents listing titles, sections and
major sub-sections. All pages shall have a unique identifier and be numbered
sequentially.
1 . Plan to accomplish Scope of Work with timeline and with any suggestions for
modifications of Scope.
2. Experience on projects of similar scope and complexity.
3. Demonstrated capability of timely completion of comparable projects.
4. Demonstrated capability of on-budget completion of comparable projects.
5. Past Performance and References
The below associated documents should be accompany after the Proposal as
Exhibits:
D. The third item in your proposal shall be the City of Corpus Christi's Disclosure of Interest.
E. The fourth item in your proposal shall be the City of Corpus Christi's Business
Designation Form.
F. The fifth item is your proposal shall be Form 1295. The form must be electronically filed with
the Texas Ethics Commission at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf info form 1295.htm.
The form must then be printed, signed, notarized and filed with the City. For more information,
please review the Texas Ethics Commission Rules at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/legal/ch46.html.
4.4 Service Agreement
A sample SERVICE AGREEMENT is attached to the RFP that the successful Proposer will be
required to sign a similar agreement. With the exception of certain terms and conditions
which may be modified by the City to conform the Contract prior to final execution of
the Contract.
8
Section 5
Conditions Governing the Procurement
5.1 Submission of Proposal
A. PROPOSER SHALL SUBMIT ITS PROPOSAL, AS INSTRUCTED HEREIN. All proposals must be
complete and accurate and in the City-approved format specified herein.
All inquiries or requests regarding this RFP must be submitted to the Procurement
Officer indicated above, or designee as specified in writing, in writing and online, via
the City's Supplier Portal (http://www.cctexas.com/business/supplierportal) using the
electronic question submission feature specific to this RFP. Such inquiries or requests
must be submitted by the due date and time provided in this RFP. Other employees
do not have the authority to respond for the City in writing and any attempt to
question other employees regarding this RFP may result in the City disqualifying that
Proposer. Only written responses from the Procurement Officer or designee will be
binding with regard to inquiries requesting clarification or additional information. The
Procurement Officer's written responses will be released simultaneously to all
prospective Proposers.
B. The City's Charter and the City's Procurement Policy require that all proposals
submitted be sealed, secret, unopened through the DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS
specified in this REP. Therefore, proposals submitted directly to the City by facsimile
machine, e-mail will be considered non-responsive and will be eliminated from
consideration.
C. Proposals will be received, before the date and time specified in this RFP. Without
exception, proposals received on or after this deadline are late, shall be deemed non-
responsive and shall not be considered.
5.2 RFP Procedural and Content Questions
A. Any Proposer requiring further clarification of the RFP procedures should submit
specific requests for clarification to the Procurement Officer as described in this RFP.
B. During a review of this RFP and preparation of the proposal, certain errors, omissions
or ambiguities may be discovered. If so, or if there are doubts or concerns about
the meaning of any part of this RFP, questions should be submitted to the
Procurement Officer as described in this RFP.
C. Addenda will be issued to address the questions and answers along with any
changes to the documents as a result of these clarifications.
9
5.3 Basis for Proposal
Only the information contained in this RFP, questions and answers, addenda hereto and
information supplied by the City in writing through the Procurement Officer should be
used in the preparation of the Proposer's proposal(s).
5.4 Proposal Terms and Conditions
With its proposal, the Proposer is committing to the terms and conditions proposed for
inclusion in the final Agreement. Any concerns over the terms and conditions must be
resolved during the proposal stage through the question and answer process.
5.5 Disclosure of Proposal Contents
Proposals will be opened in a manner that avoids disclosure of the contents to
competing Proposers and keeps the proposals secret during negotiations. All proposals
are open for public inspection after the contract(s) are awarded; however, trade secrets
and confidential information in the proposals are not open for public inspection. It is
specifically provided, however, that each Proposer must identify any information
contained in its proposal which it asserts is either a trade secret or confidential
information. Such material must be conspicuously identified by marking each page
containing such information as "confidential" or "proprietary". If such material is not
conspicuously identified, then by submitting its proposal, a Proposer agrees that such
material is considered public information.
5.6 Signing of Proposals
By submitting and signing a proposal, the Proposer indicates its intention to adhere to
the provisions described in this RFP. Proposals signed for a partnership shall be signed in
the Proposer's name by at least one general partner or in the Proposer's name by an
attorney-in-fact. If signed by an attorney-in-fact, there should be attached to the
proposal a Power-of-Attorney evidencing authority to sign proposals, dated the same
date as the proposal, and executed in accordance with the legal requirements of the
Proposer. Proposals signed for a corporation shall have the correct corporate name
thereon and shall bear the president's or vice president's original signature with the
name and title written below the corporate name. Any other signature must be
accompanied by a resolution of the board of directors authorizing such signature to
contract in the corporation's name. The title of the office held by the person signing for
the corporation shall appear below the signature of the officer.
5.7 Cost of Proposal
This RFP does not commit the City to pay any costs incurred by a Proposer for preparation
and submission of a proposal or for procuring or contracting for the items to be furnished
under this RFP. All costs directly or indirectly related to preparing and responding to this
RFP, including all costs incurred for supplementary documentation, shall be borne solely
by the Proposer.
5.8 Disclosure of Interest
The City of Corpus Christi's Code of Ordinances, Section 2-349, as amended, requires all
persons and Proposers seeking to do business with the City to provide the Disclosure of
Interest information on the City-supplied form included herewith. Every question must be
10
answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with N/A. Proposers are obligated to
provide updated information concerning the Disclosure of Interest, as warranted, for the
duration of time the proposals are under consideration.
5.9 Ownership of Proposals
All documents submitted in response to this RFP shall become the property of the City.
5.10 Disqualification or Rejection of Proposals
Proposers may be disqualified for any of the following reasons:
1 . There is reason to believe that collusion exists among the Proposers;
2. The Proposer is involved in any litigation against the City;
3. The Proposer is in arrears on an existing contract or has defaulted on previous
contracts with the City;
4. Lacks financial stability;
5. Has failed to perform under previous or present contracts with the City;
6. Has failed to use the City's approved forms;
7. Has failed to adhere to one or more of the provisions established in this RFP;
8. Has failed to submit its Proposal in the format specified herein;
9. Has failed to submit its Proposal before the deadline established herein;
10. Has failed to adhere to generally accepted ethical and professional principles
during the proposal process; or,
11 . Has failed to provide a detailed cost summary in the proposal if required.
5.11 Right to Waive Irregularities
Proposals shall be considered "irregular" if they show any admissions, alterations of form,
additions or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate proposals or irregularities of
any kind. The Procurement Officer reserves the right to waive minor irregularities and
mandatory requirements, provided that all responsive proposals failed to meet the same
mandatory requirements and the failure to do so does not otherwise materially affect the
procurement. This right shall be exercised at the sole discretion of the Procurement
Officer.
5.12 Withdrawal & Amendment of Proposals
Proposals may be withdrawn or amended prior to the exact hour and DUE DATE FOR
PROPOSALS.
5.13 Proposal Offer Firm
By submission of its proposal, the Proposer affirms that its proposal is firm for one hundred
eighty (180) days after the DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS and if awarded a contract the
proposal then remains firm for the duration of the contract.
5.14 Proposer's Qualifications
The City may make such investigations as necessary to determine the ability of the
Proposer to adhere to the requirements specified herein. The Procurement Officer will
reject the proposal of any Proposer who is not a responsible Proposer.
11
5.15 Exceptions to RFP Specifications
Although the specifications in the following sections represent the City's anticipated
needs, there may be instances in which it is in the City's best interest to permit exceptions
to specifications and evaluate alternatives. It is vital that the Proposer make very clear
where exceptions are taken to the specifications and how the Proposer will provide
alternatives.
Therefore, exceptions, conditions or qualifications to the provisions of the City's
specifications must be clearly identified as such, together with reasons for taking
exception and submitted as a request for clarification during the proposal process. If the
Proposer does not make clear that an exception is being taken, the City will assume the
Proposer is, in its proposal, responding to and will meet the specifications and
requirements of this RFP.
5.16 Clarification of Proposals
Should the City require clarification from the Proposer, the City shall contact the individual
named as the organization's contact person in the City's Supplier Portal. Evaluation of
the proposal is the first step in a series of evaluation steps that will be conducted by the
Committee. The City may elect to conduct post-submission reference checks, or best
and final offers with any Proposers that are not eliminated based on their proposal.
5.17 Termination of RFP
The City reserves the right to cancel this RFP at any time. The City reserves the right to
reject any or all proposals submitted in response to this RFP.
5.18 Order of Precedence
In case of a conflict in the contract documents, first precedence shall be given to the
fully executed Contract, as amended; second precedence will be given to the RFP,
including questions, answers and addenda; and third precedence will be given to the
proposal, including as may be clarified in writing.
5.19 No Obligation
In no manner does this RFP obligate the City or any of its agencies to the eventual services
offered until confirmed by an executed written Contract.
5.20 Award of Contract
The City reserves the right to withhold final action on proposals for a reasonable time not
to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days subsequent to the deadline for receipt of
proposals. The award of a Contract(s), if an award is made,will be to the most responsible
and responsive Proposer(s) that gives the City the "Best Value" and whose proposal
meets the requirements and criteria set forth in this RFP.
5.21 Execution of Contract
The City Manager shall authorize award of the Contract to the successful Proposer(s) and
shall designate the successful Proposer(s) ("Contractor") as the City's Provider(s). The City
will require the Contractor(s) to sign the documents necessary to enter into the required
Contract with the City and to provide the necessary evidence of insurance as required
12
in the Contract documents. No Contract for this project may be signed by the City
without the authorization of the City Manager and no Contract shall be binding on the
City unless and until it has been approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office and
executed by the City Manager or designee.
5.22 Disputes
In the case of any doubt or difference of opinion with regard to the items to be furnished
by a Proposer or the interpretation of the provisions of this RFP, the decisions of the City
shall be final and binding upon all parties.
5.23 Change in Proposer's Representative
The City reserves the right to require a change in Proposer's representatives if the assigned
representatives are not, in the sole opinion of the City, adequately meeting the needs of
the City.
5.24 Right to Publish
Throughout the duration of the procurement process and resulting Contract term,
Proposer must secure from the City written approval prior to the release of any
information that pertains to the potential work or activities covered by the RFP or the
resulting Contract. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification of
the Proposer's proposal or termination of the Contract.
5.25 Proposer's Ethical Behavior
By submission of its proposal, the Proposer promises that Proposer's officers, employees,
or agents will not attempt to lobby or influence a vote or recommendation related to the
Proposer's proposal submitted in response to this RFP, directly or indirectly, through any
contact with City Council members or other City officials between the date this RFP is
released to the public and the date a contract is awarded by the City Manager. Such
behavior will be cause for rejection of the Proposer's proposal at the discretion of the City
Manager or designee.
5.26 Use of Subcontractors
The Proposer may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this
Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, if not listed in the proposal at the time
of selection, the Proposer must obtain prior written approval from the Contract
Administrator. In using subcontractors, the Proposer is responsible for all their acts and
omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees
of the Proposer. All requirements set forth as part of the Contract are applicable to all
subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Proposer and its
employees had performed the services.
13
Attachment 1 - TIRZ # 3 Zone Boundaries
• TIRZ Boundary 1-1
------ • SEA District I 1
• Uptown 1
,$ • Marina Arts District (DMD)
4
• Bayshore Park
4
L.1
0
, 4 ,..,,
,,, ,,,,,,,,,#.„ i
„ ,,, \''3'! '1'.; \\\$\:::::,',`,,,-
s
f
{
A ''lifts-***4, a.Y k ,..-0:.
1
0
4
F
i
yy
4 - ., *,-,-.1"- V
14
Attachment 2 -Sample Contract
PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR DOWNTOWN COPRUS
CHRISTI
Contract No. 731
THIS PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR DOWNTOWN
COPRUS CHRISTI ("Agreement") is entered into by and between 'insert name of
company] ("Contractor") and the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation ("City"), as the agent of the Corpus Christi Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone
#3 ("TIRZ #3").
WHEREAS on December 16, 2008, the City Council of the City (the "City Council")
approved Ordinance 027996, which established the TIRZ#3 in accordance with Texas Tax
Code Chapter 311. TIRZ #3 promotes economic development and stimulates business
and commercial activity in its downtown Corpus Christi area (the "Zone");
WHEREAS on August 25, 2015, the City Council approved a Project and Financing Plan
(the "Plan") for TIRZ #3;
WHEREAS the Board of Directors of TIRZ #3 (the "Board") includes members of the City
Council in a non-public-official capacity, as well as a representative from each Nueces
County and Del Mar College, who have committed to contribute to TIRZ #3 through
Interlocal Agreements created in 2009 and amended in 2012;
WHEREAS the Corpus Christi Downtown Management District ("DMD") assists the City with
administration of TIRZ #3, recommends projects and recommends a DMD representative
to be appointed to the Board through an Interlocal Agreement;
WHEREAS on November 10, 2015 the City Council approved Ordinance 030680, which
amended Ordinance 027996 and authorized the Board to approve agreements in this
form, to be entered into by the City, as the Board considers necessary or convenient to
implement the Plan and achieve its purpose;
WHEREAS the Plan contained certain programs designed to improve conditions and
increase commerce within the Zone;
WHEREAS any reference to "City" or "City Staff," is entirely in agency capacity for TIRZ#3,
and further the City as a home-rule municipal corporation is not a party to this agreement;
WHEREAS, Contractor has proposed to provide an assessment of the efficiency and
effectiveness of the Financial Services Department in response to the City's Request for
Proposals ("RFP Event No. 108") on behalf of the TIRZ #3;
WHEREAS, the City has determined Contractor to be the best valued respondent;
NOW, THEREFORE, Contractor and City enter into this Agreement and agree as follows:
15
1. Services. Contractor will provide services in managing parking and making
strategic parking investments, which are vital in creating and maintaining a successful
downtown. The Downtown Area Development Plan has inventoried 13,000 parking
spaces in downtown which is a foundation to understanding our current parking
supply. To ensure that parking is working for diverse users residents, businesses, and
visitors now and in the future, Contractor will provide more macro and micro
information and analysis of the Downtown parking situation. ("Services") in
accordance with RFP Event No. 108 ("Exhibit A"), which exhibit is incorporated by
reference into this Agreement.
2. Term. This Agreement takes effect upon execution of the City Manager and
continues until (TERM OF SERVICE IS MUTUALLY AGREED UPON).
3. Contract Administrator. The contract administrator designated by the City is
responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this
Agreement including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for
payment. All of the Contractor's notices or communications regarding this
Agreement must be directed to the contract administrator, who is the City's Business
Liaison or her designee ("Contract Administrator").
4. Independent Contractor.Contractor will perform the Services as an independent
contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no
circumstances or conditions may any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor
be considered an employee of the City.
5. Insurance. Before activities can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor's
insurance company, or companies, must deliver a Certificate of Insurance, as proof
of the required insurance coverages, to the Contract Administrator and City's Risk
Manager. Additionally, the Contract Administrator and Risk Manager must be given
at least 30 days' advance notice, by certified mail, of cancellation, material change
in the coverages or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named
as an Additional Insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance
policies within 15 days of the City Manager's reasonable written request.
6. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement or of any right or interest contained
in this Agreement by the Contractor is effective unless the City first gives its written
consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor
is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City's right to withhold consent to such
assignment is within the sole discretion of the City on any ground whatsoever.
7. Qualification. Consultant is fully capable and qualified to execute the services in
this Agreement and does not require any training from the City.
8. Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement,
Exhibit A, or the Consultant's response to RFP Event No. 108 ("Exhibit B"), which exhibit
is incorporated into this Agreement, waives any subsequent breach of the same.
16
9. Compliance with Laws. This Agreement is subject to all applicable federal, state
and local laws. All duties of the parties will be performed in the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the
law of Texas and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district,
county or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas.
10. Subcontractors. The Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the
Services to be performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors,
however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract
Administrator. In using subcontractors, the Contractor shall be responsible for all their
acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were
employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement are
applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the
Contractor and its employees had performed the Services.
11. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only in writing and upon
execution by authorized representatives of both parties.
12. Termination. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for
Contractor's failure to perform the Services specified in Exhibit A. Failure to keep all
insurance policies in force for the entire term of this Agreement is grounds for
termination. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of
the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not
cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement
immediately thereafter.
Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement without cause upon 20
days' written notice to the Contractor. However, the City may terminate this
Agreement upon three days' written notice to the Contractor for Contractor's failure
to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes, as set out in this Agreement.
13. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes,
unemployment taxes and all other related taxes in accordance with Circular E,
"Employer's Tax Guide", Publication 15, as it may be amended. Upon his request, the
City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of one or more of these taxes within
15 days of such request.
14. Notice. Notice may be given by hand delivery or certified mail, postage prepaid,
and is received on the day faxed or hand-delivered and on the third day after deposit
in the U.S. mail if sent certified mail. Notice shall be sent as follows:
IF TO CITY:
City of Corpus Christi
Attention: Alyssa Michelle Barrera, Business Liaison
1201 Leopard Street
Corpus Christi, Texas 78401
17
IF TO CONTRACTOR:
Contractor finsert contractor company namel
15. Contact finsert contractor contact namel
Address: rinsed contractor street address]
City, State, !insert contractor city,
Severability. Each provision of this Agreement shall be considered to be severable
and if, for any reason, any such provision or any part thereof, is determined to be
invalid and contrary to any existing or future applicable law, such invalidity shall not
impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, and
this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or
unenforceable provision or part thereof had been omitted.
16. INDEMNIFICATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY, HOLD
HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS,
EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND
ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF
ANY NATURE ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES, INCLUDING THOSE
RESULTING IN WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS OR DEATH, PROPERTY
LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING
ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT
WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS
AGREEMENT AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH, LOSS, OR
DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE
CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES BUT NOT
IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF
ANY OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE,
INVESTIGATE ALL NOTICES, CLAIMS, AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR
SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON
WITH COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND
PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES
OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY OF SAID LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS,
DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF
CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER
TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
SIGNED this day of , 20 .
18
Contractor: !insert company namel
Name:
Title:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Ron Olson Date
City Manager
As an agent of the TIRZ #3
Incorporated by Reference:
Exhibit A: RFP
Exhibit B: Proposer's Response
19
ATTACHMENT 3 - DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
i;;2;iz
City of
Corpus
Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER
TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY
PURCHASING DIVISION
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
Corpus Christi Code§2-349,as amended,requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide
the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with"NA".
See next page for Filing Requirements,Certification and Definitions.
COMPANY NAME:
P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP: -
FIRM IS: 1. Corporation ❑ 2. Partnership ❑ 3. Sole Owner 0
4. Association 5. Other
DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS
If additional space is necessary,please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.
1. State the names of each"employee"of the City of Corpus Christi having an"ownership interest"constituting 3%
or more of the ownership in the above named `firm."
Name Job Title and City Department(if known)
2. State the names of each"official"of the City of Corpus Christi having an"ownership interest"constituting 3%or
more of the ownership in the above named `firm."
Name Title
3. State the names of each"board member"of the City of Corpus Christi having an"ownership interest"constituting
3%or more of the ownership in the above named`firm."
Name Board,Commission or Committee
4. State the names of each employee or officer of a"consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any
matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the
ownership in the above named"firm."
Name Consultant
20
FILING REQUIREMENTS
If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit
on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the
public in general or a substantial segment thereof,you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official,
employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter,unless the interest of the City official or employee in
the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics
Ordinance Section 2-349(d)]
CERTIFICATION
I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement,that I have not knowingly
withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to
the City of Corpus Christi,Texas as changes occur.
Certifying Person: Title:
(Type or Print)
Signature of Certifying Person: Date:
DEFINITIONS
a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee of the city, including the board of any
corporation created by the city.
b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that
interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof.
c. "Employee." Any person employed by the city, whether under civil service or not, including part-time
employees and employees of any corporation created by the city.
d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether
established to produce or deal with a product or service,including but not limited to,entities operated in the form
of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation,joint stock company, joint venture,
receivership or trust,and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations.
e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City
Managers,Department and Division Heads,and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi,Texas.
f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest,whether actually or constructively held,in a firm,including
when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to
holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership
agreements.
g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the
purpose of professional consultation and recommendation.
21
ATTACHMENT 4— BUSINESS DESIGNATION FORM
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
BUSINESS DESIGNATION FORM
ENSURE THIS FORM IS SUBMITTED WITH YOUR BID RESPONSE
PLEASE INDICATE WHETHER YOUR COMPANY IS ANY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
❑ YES ❑ NO - CERTIFIED HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS (HUB)
Select all that are appropriate:
❑ ASIAN PACIFIC
❑ BLACK
❑ HISPANIC
❑ NATIVE AMERICAN
❑ WOMAN
Please visit the following website for information on becoming a Texas Certified HUB: httn://www.window.state.tx.us/procurement/nroa/hub/
❑ YES ❑ NO - LOCAL SMALL BUSINESS (LSB)
A for-profit entity employing less than 49 employees located within the City limits of Corpus Christi,Texas
❑YES ❑NO OTHER(PLEASE SPECIFY):
❑ THIS COMPANY IS NOT A CERTIFIED HUB or LSB
THE INFORMATION REQUESTED IN THIS FORM IS FOR STATISTICAL REPORTING
PURPOSES ONLY AND WILL NOT INFLUENCE AWARD DECISIONS OR THE AMOUNT OF
MONIES EXPENDED WITH ANY GIVEN COMPANY.
EVENT NO: 108
Firm Name: Telephone: - - Ext.
Address: Fax: - -
City: State: Zip: - E-mail:
Date:
Signature of Person Authorized to Sign Form
Signer's Name: Title:
(Please print or type)
22
proP°se
r's Responsebit B:
Exhibit
Management
Parking
Chris Par
Corpus Chr
,,,,,,,....• ,'"--•''' i fr City of niAn
.. .
propos—d.-strategic -
cONSUL
Christi,
-...iir PARKING
City of C°
studY.31 Texas
_..„,,,„,,
016
May 23, ,-
a -,- ik- ' ''
....,
.
•.., . ••.:4.i.
. \ „
*4' '41
- ' .. , ,r ,v).'
...0: '1,t''' 1, . ''''''".',.'./411,.
,„ ,„, ,'`.,:-,-.`'E:,;:;',.:4::.tf.'":„,,..::;;;,.,'' '', 0,t'%,11'r,', .;.'S.1.',,.:',,,,;,; :.•'' ‘"..-,...,111,644. ...,71t1,,.:;,,-;‘ . •7.' '''' ' '"i : :. ' '''!;7'4'' 74'''':''''''''''''''' '''I',,1:7;;;;;E:;`,!:!'":;;:il
. ....
-
'...'',..7.,,•-'4
,,,,•••,,,.'`'4-..'- ' '' •,.,,!...:-'....,..7.-
4. •'•
. .
:,,i'21.:'.... °S1400 Alik... ''''.. ::...*41 .:.A ; 1 I ' ...4-•f''*.V.,
,,...,416..--..,0:1,.;; ;;',41:40 -1 „. 2,4,,it • -,wi*.,16. '''' '
i'lililc::::1:`,.::.1::,,i4,, ,,,,,,7,:t,r,„<.,7i,::7:1,Kft;,'„;17,,,,,t,,,...,,,..1,.,:;,.,,,.,„,1,4„,„,,:,,,,,,!,..,.,,, ,, ......,......4„.•,' - _ ' i '' 4. '., ' , ' I
<6...
'-,,,,,:',,-47,:,•.„;,,.,,,;,:... ,,,--.-„,i.1:.,:',.:1'.;•../":,;,-,',7'-.7-,:".,-,--:',:::',';„:',;;; ''''''''''', -,..f,,,.-,;( - .1,„----',_ '- --
,... . • - , xi,
0,....: -/ - --,.';',.'..4 -.." - ---.
..1
41,/4"..:: 11/4 ..
.7, ,,,t`-'
? ., •
A ^, ,."--'71/4
...
.. t
44, '
. .e
•• vs , i
,1
c ,
. .
•: 3 ,r
.4-
„ -
•,,,,,.•,” '.„`"---'
k.„.
,, ..
. ,„ . .
it
.iride -1
' .-.' ..
Proposal for City of Corpus Christi Parking Management
Study and Strategic Plan
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
May 23, 2016
WALKER Walker Parking Consultants 281.280.0068 Office
PARKING CONSULTANTS 2525 Bay Area Boulevard 281.280.0373-Fax
Suite 400 www.walkerparking.com
May 23, 2016 Houston,Texas 77058
Lydia Juarez
City of Corpus Christi
Purchasing Division
4th Floor, City Hall
1201 Leopard St.
Corpus Christi,Texas 78401-2825
Re: Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan
Corpus Christi, Texas
Dear Ms.Juarez:
Walker Parking Consultants ("Walker") is pleased to submit the following proposal for professional consulting services
for a Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan to the City of Corpus Christi.
Walker is a multi-disciplined consulting firm specializing in parking analysis, management, master planning, and facility
design. Walker's goal is to provide a quality service that will assure the goodwill and respect of our clients, enhance our
professional reputation,and provide our services in a manner whereby our clients recognize that we are one of the best
firms they have worked with. Our firm is your best choice for this project for the following reasons:
1. Experience of Team Members:The expertise required on parking studies is very specialized.It requires personnel
that have a thorough knowledge of not only architectural/engineering/construction elements, but also all the
factors impacting municipalities such as the City of Corpus Christi. The team we've put together for this project has
extensive experience in all areas of parking consulting.
2. Globally Recognized Expertise: We offer you dozens of the country's foremost experts in the parking industry.
As testimony to our expertise, members of our staff authored a textbook entitled PARKING STRUCTURES: Planning,
Design, Construction, Maintenance and Repair, first published by Van Nostrand Reinhold in 1989, with a Second
Edition in 1996 and a Third Edition in 2001. Many industry experts consider this book the single best source of
information on parking. This depth of expertise is why Walker Parking Consultants is internationally recognized as
the leader in our business. This expertise ensures you that our recommendations will be reliable, reasonable, and
cost effective.
3. Similar Experience: We have consulted on many parking study projects,over a thousand of those for city clients,
throughout the United States and all over the world, in the last 50 years. We highly encourage you to call upon our
references listed in our response to discuss Walker's performance as well as the results of our work.
Our goal is to provide a quality service and product that conforms to your requirements and specific needs; anything
less is unacceptable. This message is the directive for every Walker employee. The firm's high percentage of
repeat clients is a testimony to Walker's ability to meet and exceed our client's expectations. In summary, Walker is
well qualified to provide professional services for this project. We recognize receipt of all addenda and are willing
to sign the service agreement as written. We look forward to working with you on this exciting and challenging
project. The entire Walker team is committed and available to provide the services listed in the following response.
Sincerely,
Kenneth (Casey)Wagner, PE John Dorsett,AICP,CPP
Senior Vice President/Managing Principal Senior Vice President/Director of Consulting Resources
casey.wagner@walkerparking.com john.dorsett@walkerparking.com
281.384.5364-mobile 317.432.3755-mobile
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan -RFP#108
4itWALKER Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
PARKING CONSULTANTS
Table of Contents
—
— ».b,,,, _. rte,,.?A..._ ."' .�x �.. ,-..T i9 ST
�y l
., .... ,*
..,..
..,.! ..
..
....., ...ia,..„..,.„: ...
,„ 1 , _..
- .';‘-'171.- _,....)
F r■,s._. . r i
Photo Courtco alwww_r ttechriology.org
MAY 23, 2016
Transmittal Letter i
1. Project Approach 6
i. Scope of Work 6
ii. Relevant Experience 14
iii. Team Members 20
iv. References 25
2. City of Corpus Christi's Disclosure of Interest 27
3. City of Corpus Christi's Business Designation Form 30
4. Form 1295 32
1
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan-RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Scope of Work
Project Understanding
The City of Corpus Christi is in the midst of conducting their Downtown Area
Development Plan. To support this process, TIRZ #3 plans to hire a firm to
prepare a Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan for the City of Corpus
Christi. In an effort to support the downtown residents, business, and visitors,
a long-term strategy for the City's parking operations is needed. The purpose
of this study is to conduct stakeholder outreach, to develop a parking supply/
demand database, and to develop a strategic implementation plan. In its
50-year history, Walker Parking Consultants has successfully completed
thousands of parking supply and demand studies, many for municipalities, and
would bring this experience to bear on the City of Corpus Christi's project.
Methodologies to be Used
Walker will use a variety of methodologies to successfully complete this
project, including the following:
• We will perform field data collection using standard forms that we have
successfully used for hundreds of similar studies. These forms are used by
field data collectors to gather information regarding the existing parking
inventory including name and location of spaces, capacity, user restrictions,
and rates. Forms are also used to collect parking occupancy data. The field
data is first entered into an MS Excel spreadsheet for tabulation and analysis
and finally put into a GIS database by Coym,Rehmet&Gutierrez Engineering,
L.P.for the clients use.
• Best practices employed by other municipalities are considered when
developing a plan for Corpus Christi's growth.
• Walker will access various databases that we maintain for purposes of making
comparisons and projections. These databases include those relating to
parking generation rates and recommended parking demand ratios, among
others.
• The technical aspects of our work will be based on industry-accepted
standards that have withstood the tests of time. This includes our work
relating to parking supply/demand analysis and Coym, Rehmet&Gutierrez's
work in GIS database compilation.
Scope of Services Overview
Walker's proposed approach to this project is organized around the City's
objectives as outlined within this proposal and the scope of work section
presented within the City's RFP and also discussed herein.The objective of this
Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan is to analyze opportunities and
needs for parking in the downtown Corpus Christi area:
• Task 1-Conduct Public and Internal Stakeholder Outreach;
• Task 2-Develop Downtown Parking Supply Database;
• Task 3-Develop a Parking Demand Assessment;
• Task 4-Develop a Strategic Implementation Plan; and
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 6
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Scope of Work
• Task 5- Presentations of Final Products to the City and Prepare an
Executive Summary of Findings.
Task 1-Conduct Public and Internal Stakeholder Outreach
Due Date:End of Week 2
Objective:Conduct outreach with all vested stakeholders in order to understand
and prioritize current parking perceptions, needs and deficiencies.
Our methodology for community participation is guided by two principles.
First, a good study that is not accepted by stakeholders is of no use. In this age
of actively-involved citizenry and stakeholders, citizen and other stakeholder
participation and "buy in,"the study process is not only the right thing to do, it
is crucial in order to accomplish results.
Our experience is that parking is an emotional issue. For the public,we believe
that many parking policy solutions are counterintuitive and that many popular
policies result in unintended consequences.We therefore embark on a process
to educate the public in tandem with the public educating us. We take pride in
the results that we have achieved by deepening the public's understanding of
the issues and the solutions.
The stakeholders, interests, and constituencies related to parking policies are
significant because the potential impacts — and benefits — of parking policy
adjustments are significant as well. We envision and propose a process that
will create a two-way communication process, engage these stakeholders
and create buy-in and support for parking policy adjustments by listening and
responding to the needs of a broad base of constituents for the study.
Scope of Services
1. Work with the appropriate City staff to identify those
stakeholders who are affected by the current parking plan.
2. Develop for the city's distribution,a web-based questionnaire,
using SurveyMonkey,for the purposes of collecting
quantitative information regarding parking and transportation
habits and interests of stakeholders.
3. Conduct research related to codes and ordinances and review
relevant reports and data.
4. Attend 1-2 staff meetings with City staff to gauge interests of
City employee stakeholders.
5. Host one information gathering meeting with public
stakeholders to learn parking and transportation habits and
interests. Host an additional public stakeholder meeting once
strategic implementation plan has been agreed upon by Walker
and the City.
6. Report information on 5 benchmark city's as comparison
reference.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 7
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan-RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Scope of Work
7. Submit report to communicate projects findings,
recommendations and best practices of other comparable
downtown areas.
It is our experience that the aforementioned proactive stakeholder participation
and communications program is aimed at providing opportunities for public
input, education, and communication after policy changes are implemented.
Such a program promotes a community parking and transportation program
that meets the needs of its stakeholders.
Task 2-Develop Downtown Parking Supply Database
Due Date: End of Week 4
Objective: Before an effective parking plan can be formulated, a clear
understanding of current parking supply in the downtown Corpus Christi study
area is required.The Supply Analysis constitutes a needs assessment of current
parking conditions.
The parking information that will be documented, analyzed and presented by
Walker in this analysis provides a quantitative and qualitative assessment of
the parking characteristics within the defined study area. The foundation of
a parking supply and demand analysis is an inventory of the parking supply
creating a "snapshot" of current parking conditions. Walker staff will conduct
field research to ensure accuracy of the existing parking supply and categorize
the supply by type (on-street, off-street, structured, surface lot) and by
ownership(private or public).
Walker will confirm the existing parking supply and conduct additional occupancy
counts as needed. The collected information is used to develop a model of
the existing parking system in conjunction with the proposed developments.
Additional research is conducted to develop an existing baseline of mode shares
for trips to the Study Area. The goal of this "as is" parking system model is to
develop parking supply and demand ratios for each land use and block that is
specific to the transportation culture of Corpus Christi.
Scope of Services
1. Meet with City of Corpus Christi representatives to finalize project
parameters, review project background and obtain previous reports,
area maps, and other background information.
2. Obtain and review land use data within the study area, provided in
terms of square footage by land-use type (i.e. retail, restaurant, hotel,
office,etc.).
3. Conduct parking inventories of all on-and off-street parking within the
study area. Inventories will include hours of operation, space counts,
rates,and restrictions.
4. Conduct three parking occupancy counts for all on-street parking
spaces on a typical workday,typical evening,and typical weekend.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 8
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Scope of Work
5. Work in partnership with Coym,Rehmet&Gutierrez Engineering,L.P.to
input all collected supply data,including number of spaces for all public
and private parking supply, rates and occupancy into GIS database.
6. Submit hard copy inventory report and map to City of Corpus Christi.
Task 3-Develop a Parking Demand Assessment
Due Date:End of Week 8
Objective: Complete a parking demand assessment that addresses existing
unmet demand, as well as future demand by district. Create future demand
scenarios based off of current practices and future land use assumptions.
Occupancy counts will be conducted over a period of time to capture user
trends and enable Walker to clearly convey the trends of vehicle presence in
the study area. The occupancy counts will then be compared to the effective
parking supply (actual supply less 10% to 15%) to determine the estimated
parking adequacy on a block-by-block basis. Some of the questions that need
to be resolved include:
• What is the parking demand?
• Is there a surplus or deficit?
• What will parking conditions be like in the future?
• Is additional parking required? If so, how much?
• Who needs additional parking?
Parking is not an end in and of itself; rather it is a derivative of the demand for
other activities and the travel characteristics of the market area. The quantity
and type of activities within a market area most often determines the overall
need for parking, as well as unique demand characteristics that relate to time-
of-day, day-of-week and time-of-year variations. Therefore, Walker's approach
to projecting future parking demand will apply the knowledge we will have
gained from the supply analysis and will require input from stakeholders and
city planners in order to fully understand future changes in the study area.
Once the calculation of future parking demand is complete,it will be compared
to the existing parking supply to determine the future parking adequacy. The
parking adequacy in the study area is communicated in tabular and graphic
form and identifies the parking conditions on a block-by-block basis. In addition
to our own collections,Walker will utilize any relevant information provided by
the City of Corpus Christi.
The benefit of this approach is a parking plan based on your community values
and proactively designed to meet your future needs before they become
issues. Our recommendations are tailored to match your constituency's wants,
needs and desires for the parking system and the economic realities specific to
downtown Corpus Christi.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 9
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Scope of Work
Scope of Services
1. Create a parking demand model using Walker Parking Consultant's
shared parking model to project typical parking demand throughout
the different occupancy count time frames from Task II.
2. Customize heat maps that highlight district-based over and under
supply issues for the future.
3. Calibrate the demand model to reflect observed conditions, thus
calculating parking demand ratios for the land uses present.
4. Determine the surplus or shortfall within the area under current
conditions, and create tabular and graphic illustrations of the parking
system adequacy.
5. Include development plans for the downtown Corpus Christi area and
adjust the demand model to show future parking demand generated
by approved and/or proposed developments in the area.
Task 4-Develop a Strategic Implementation Plan
Due Date:End of Week 10
Objective: With the understanding gained from the completion of Task 1 - 3
above, Walker will develop solid, achievable recommendations for improving
the current parking conditions and meeting future parking demand efficiently
and cost-effectively.Some of the questions that will need to be resolved include:
• Can the parking system be made to function more efficiently,such that more
cars can be accommodated without building additional parking?
• If necessary, how can the parking capacity be increased?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the alternatives for increasing
parking capacity and how do they compare with each other?
• How much does each of the alternatives cost to implement?
• Where is the increased parking needed?
• Can the capacity of existing parking facilities be increased? If so, how?
• What phasing plan is recommended in order to provide adequate parking
when it is needed?
• Can the parking system be more efficient by implementing a district-wide
parking management strategy?
The first part of the analysis will focus on management of existing resources.
In addition to evaluating opportunities for lot reconfiguration and restriping
of spaces,we will analyze location of resources, utilization imbalances (if any),
time limits and/or rates, and enforcement practices, and determine whether
changes to the way the parking system is managed can free up parking in the
most congested locations.
The objective of the site planning analysis will be to determine the advantages
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 10
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Scope of Work
and disadvantages of constructing parking on various sites within the defined
study area and to recommend the most appropriate site(s). To that effect,
Walker will use the results of our supply and demand analysis to focus on -
localized areas with high parking demand projected to occur.
Scope of Services
1. Review inventory,utilization and turnover data collected in Task II&Ill.
2. If data suggests imbalances of usage, recommend management and
policy changes that could reduce congestion in affected areas,including
possible code and policy recommendations and parking management
strategies (wayfinding, parking apps,etc.).
3. Determine whether the number of spaces could be increased through
restriping and efficiency improvements in existing facilities/lots.
5. Determine whether any existing facilities/lots can be expanded to meet
area parking needs.
6. Identify potential locations for new parking facilities (surface and/or
structured). External variables that will be considered are desirable
density, phasing of construction, and incorporation of other uses(such
as retail) in any proposed facility.
7. Research and recommend technology improvements that are beneficial
to the operation and availability of parking spaces in the downtown
area.
8. Develop and recommend unified marketing strategies for both public
and private parking lots and garages.
9. Research and recommend partnerships, tools and funding sources
available as well as pilot programs/projects to incorporate suggested
changes to the current system.
10. Research and recommend, if applicable, automated parking systems
throughout the area.
11. Complete 10-year capital improvement and maintenance plan based
off of recommended changes to the system discussed in other task
items under Task IV.
12. Complete 10-year parking fund Proforma with recommended
parking rates founded on data collected during Task II, changes and
improvements recommended in Task IV and market research.
13. Host workshop to discuss Strategic Implementation Plan with key City
Staff. Finalize report and submit 20 copies to the City.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 11
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Scope of Work
Task 5 - Presentations of Final Products to the City and Prepare Executive
Summary of Findings
Due Date: End of Week 12
Objective: Once all four previous tasks have been completed the findings and
reports must be presented to the Parking Advisory Committee and the TIRZ#3
Board.
• Present findings and recommendations to Parking Advisory Committee
through face to face meetings, at least two.
• Once Parking Advisory Committee approves plan and report present
executive summary to TIRZ#3 Board.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 12
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Proposed Schedule
Capacity and Proposed Schedule
This project requires the proper mix of analysts, planners, parking operations
consultants,and support personnel.We have assessed the projected workload
for each of the team members assigned to this project to make sure that they
will have an appropriate amount of time to properly address your project
requirements. Therefore, all team members assigned to this project have
adequate availability from July 2016 through September 2016, our proposed
project schedule.
In all cases, our approach is to schedule team members that will remain with
their project from beginning to end. Additionally, due to the size of our team,
we have the ability to respond to unforeseen and unfortunate events,such as
serious illness or accidents that may remove key personnel from this project. If
such issues occur, we will be able to replace that team member with a person
of equal or greater expertise, skills, and experience. This will minimize the
downtime and allow your project and Walker to remain on schedule.
Task Week Week Week Week Week Week
1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12
Project Kick-Off X
Task 1: Stakeholder/Research X
Task 2: Inventory/Occupancy/GIS X X
Task 3: Future Demand/Addtl. Interview X X
Task 4: Management/Strategy Plan X X
Task 5: Workshop and Final Report X
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 13
.4itWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
City of New Orleans & New Orleans Downtown
Develox+meet Di rict (NODDD) Parking & Mobility Study
;New Orleans, Louisiana
Me:-call
, ' -
.° Treme i
,.4 1un pal
P ■w�
uperdom. � on a /ii �` �I4.1. a
111111111 "" ff {
1011111112m10111111 111111111 as aauaaiiaaa
Ims A ....dolor,, _..., .... 14.4 '
r ' �• 111 1.11 MI ad I_i Mangny /'
yr"—t 1P ."'moi: aaW�>i1a- a ii, ,, ►
. lAIP $110011014111 111111111111111111 .,
,,.. -.-ALLIMI.M.OW ii,r0Vg, ...'. '..- all opt,.....4.* •----.... . ' ..
\,
-'' 5 ^t` ! 4' . Lever,
NM
m @ s rs ,.r r J Algiers M
�
, �y^ x ¢'
Some
r..
q.,,�
fins OMR
*MO PIOSAbeteho.-.
,' 4 5 ;y
t,,.M s«' a ; ' n. �'s\ r
wog car.
: s ' i , eua An
wa
. a , --—Tomcat Route
'4.3
'02'.'024e.'" +fr, .
' f 0' ........ Stu*Awe•
f 0 - o.
• Began bicycle network
program
• Increased pedestrian signal/
safety
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOLUTION • Insalled new and updated
• 240 block parking and mobility • Identified areas where mobility existing on-street meters
study to aid in the recovery of enhancements are needed
rebuilding New Orleans and • Emphasized multi-modal support RESULT
updating the master plan for non-local trip requirements and
• Services included: preferences
- parking needs assessment • Recognized that pedestrian
-parking system operation mobility is the central
analysis transportation component
-alternatives analysis • Established a parking system audit
- preliminary financial program
analysis
-management improvement
study for both public and
private parking
-projection of parking
revenue income
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 14
iiiiWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan - RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
City of Oshkosh
Parkin: Stud
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
i
-. Wig. ,+
i ... .a
Is
.' • Management of parking
assests to best serve
Downtown customers and
„' r«. _ ` visitors
— ._ °= • The Downtown arkin
' a,
+ = plan created for Oshkosh
111 r____ focused on improving funding
° for public parking without
spending millions of dollars to
increase the supply
JPe
Photo Courtesy o www.visitoshkosh.com e`
RESULT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Community leaders concerned operational characteristics
• Recent Oshkosh Vision Survey that building more parking would • Recommended a plan to manage
regarding the future of Oshkosh create costly financial outcomes, parking demand by identifying
indicated an overwhelming while at the same time,they began short and long-term parking needs,
majority want to see better hearing concerns that employers
1 Y re-brand the public parking system
utilization of: waterfront, allocate were considering a move out with a consumer-friendly sign
more green space, create bicycle- of Downtown to accomodate package solution and developing a
friendly streets, and emphasize employee growth and additional financial model to sustain the City's
Downtown redevelopment parking needs parking operations
• Community members feel the need SOLUTION
of uniform rules and regulations • Met with community stakeholders
to eliminate confusion amongst to identify key components and
employees and visitors when
accessing Downtown determine priorities
• Conducted a field survey to
• Downtown business owners and quantify the parking supply and
retail merchants felt the need to typical utilization rates
build additional parking inventory
to accomodate individual demand • Analyzed the parking regulations,
areas throughout Downtown enforcement policies and
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 15
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan - RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
City of Cincinnati
Parkin: Stud,
Cincinnati, Ohio ,
�+
.7
"'1166
* ^ Iii (y�
ft
,tet ..
. 'ina, t 1 i
0.4,
vs,
...:. l' .
w
t.;''''''''.-:7' , via-7,3 %-• 1,....1 .„:/, ' i .::-)...J:",'s,411.17, , `"1", '' . 4;"11","
li
i;a4ist..4 -- .";;;,... , } \ + .isIs,
''.t. '''' . 4,.. - ./ 1,,,.. # _,
^. ...„,„,, ,.„ % .,., _ _ .. . , .:, , , , , .:
„..:„.„.„,,,„,„, ,,. ,,"„0, . ,. ., .., _, . _ I, i A .,.,, ,,,,
.L..„,,,,,,,,,, ,,4 ,,„,,,„,,,
,m, ...., .._ ,,,_, ,..„,„;,„,,,,,,,,„,. , ,,,„,„
_,. .„ ;,?+`. .pix
l
‘, ..,
+}/ ., a • Downtown parking rates
to be increased to support
1 1—
r l parking costs
• Parking garages to be
constructed to support
increased parking demands
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOLUTION RESULT
• Analyze various aspects of the • Suggested that the city-owned
city's parking environment and Broadway Parking Garage be
operating system, including the expanded by 300±spaces to
current and future adequacy of its support Procter and Gamble's
parking capacity recent announcement to move
• Provide alternatives for expanding 650±employees to downtown
parking capacity • Recommended that within the
• Create a plan for funding next five years a parking structure
improvements, existing parking be constructed on the site of the
rates, and on street parking existing city-owned Fifth and Race
operations Street parking lot
• Walker also found that between
five and 10 years from now, a three
to six story parking structure with
600 to 1,100 parking spaces should
be built on the northeast corner of
Sixth Street and Broadway
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 16
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
City of Kansas City
Parkdn: Stud
Kansas City, Missouri
" .�-_- ,,
1- ..-2 _t -ILO I 3;_yl
/r
t k 1, II i�
' I m ei m u l e ' , n I 1 l i ® 1 m III 11 �!_ *1-a ;Li
SI, yq..$..;:
of
�gy ff�� �q pp q� ,x���- � •
III J Er '] i 1 • „,,, t I s AL ' I �I�vemne .
_III_ m,,a . .
■ �j �p w- a� ,M
to ® ® ® 1 I i t '_7 1 s'7 1 , 1 I Convention 1
ISsi.1
S i ® t�l y MI 1 t 1 1 111. i tls'
y pA
ryI atr4. a1 s - { legend
-� I Expanded 122 Block NuM,a
y ( L F'� Area ,._ —Study Aea
} '1 122 slc..x Numb« (PAC - Sub UH71CU
®�) a_ 9 _._.Sub dyne 9mx d e, 1 vial EPaawa Supply
T- Total Ener rc Supph idal Occupancy
TCbti Occua•nCi
-icOal Adequacy
s Twa!Atlay.ury ter. ydKatea Deka
ba 4.a penalvilT
in
• Overall the city has adequate
parking and great care should
be taken to maintain this
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOLUTION RESULT
• Prepare a supply/demand analysis • Broke down the districts to verify
for the downtown loop area (151 which have the greatest demands
blocks) -Quality Hill, Garment,Tower,
• Evaluate current parking situation Federal Courthouse, Eastern, DST,
and quantify current parking Commercial Core, Government,
demand Convention, and KCPL
• Project future parking demand and • The count was 50,082 parking
adequacy spaces total, categorized as off-
street public, off-street private, and
on-street public
• Walker, working with T.J. Brown
and Associates, conducted
occupancy counts to compare with
supply/demand during both on and
off peak hours
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 17
AliWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Central Oklahoma Transportation & Parking Authority
. !' ,.,i •.4 + • A r .'arking Update
T
Oklahoma Cit Oklahom
r'
y '
J 1 ', e e 'Qt ;
a
e
`e-# ,-•..' _.--- ri
" 4
J ) ' . '''' ,,''',` 7—vi-vv.' ;d 4,1,' :', Ci ---''' '- "4, l ' '':i 1
' .::
J J :J j am. 1}C *! v`'1
..'',..-arz,-/t-,:i4.-'.--.-. ---it--____I t ' . , , .. .... :., . , ,. i.
1
,,, , - e ,, e r CD j! ,Z.;1 ' i.',?, -1":..'' ' 1 4. : '
J J J B1 s. r _t.-` .f3
9 Dean A McGee Avenue - ,t
--�� a�� v
'.:/ `% D (b 191174
J N
rtS Ker Avenue
(19 ' Park Aver.ue •
� J.,.) .r .t .t
'J IJ j
U Ma Si
J :J} i -J J '
Sher dan Averue -
T ,. - Legend-Study Area
�3r _
1 Northwest Zone
a
P GaifamleAe ue
rt;
-,1"--.
' � � ,,,,,_4,,,, ����� '� 7 �} Northeast Zone 1
L Re venue ., ` • Wayfinding improvements
were implemented
• Addition of on-street meters
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOLUTION RESULT
• Strategies for improvements • Identified parking shortages based
to their current parking system on future projections
(operations) • Suggested options for construction
• Alternatives to reduce the strain of new parking facilities in the
on areas in the Central Business future to meet the projected
District(150 blocks)where future parking shortages
projections indicate a shortage in
parking
• Inventory and analysis of current
parking supply, both public and
private
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 18
4/1k. WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Relevant Experience
Demonstrated Capability of Timely and On-Budget Completion of
Comparable Projects
Performing on time and within budget is a given at Walker. By delivering this
project on a lump sum fee basis,we are assuring the City that the project will
be delivered within budget. As a gesture to boost the City's confidence that
Walker will deliver the Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan on time,
we are willing to offer a liquidated damages clause in our contract,
effectively compensating the City for each day that the project is delivered
past the scheduled delivery date.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 19
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Project Team
Experience and Capabilities
Walker provides parking studies,traffic analyses and architectural,structural,
mechanical, electrical, plumbing,and restoration design services for parking.
As a multi-faceted consulting firm,we understand how all the components fit
together for a successful parking project. Coordination between disciplines
is greatly simplified.This has proven to be a great advantage over Walker's
competition as the number of construction change orders and RFIs is greatly
reduced due to our simplified and more direct coordination.
Two hundred and fifty people in sixteen offices across the country provide
professional services on parking related projects. Having been in business
since 1965 and provided professional services for over 12,000 projects,we
have the staff and experience that can address any design issue or construc-
tion concern.
As the nation's largest parking consultant, our firm is the leader in the industry
and develops standards used by the parking industry. Our staff has recog-
nized experts in every facet of the parking consulting services such as parking
planning,functional design, lighting,security,structural design, restoration,
etc.Senior staff author articles in professional and industry publications, make
presentations,and develop industry standards.
We have carefully assembled a team consisting of the following individuals:
John Dorsett,AICP,CPP, Director of Consulting Services
Jim Corbett,CAPP, Parking Consultant
Jaime Windfont,CAPP, Parking Consultant
On the following pages you will find detailed resumes for your Walker team
containing, biographies and representative projects.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 20
• WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
John Dorsett, AICP, CPP
Director of Consulting Services
■
( 'i 7'-..' -'.7
I
EDUCATION: As Senior Vice President and Director of Consulting Resources, John guides
Master of Business Administration, a parking consulting and study services group responsible for leadership in
Butler University functional design, operations consulting, planning and financial studies,
and parking access and revenue control systems consulting and design. He
Bachelor of Science, Business, provides leadership and the necessary resources to successfully deliver 250+
Indiana University engagements annually.John also heads up Walker's P3 practice.
AFFILIATIONS: As a working manager and a planner certified by the American Institute of
ACEC's Senior Executive Institute Certified Planners ("AICP"),John also from time-to-time consults on complex
American Institute of Certified parking and transportation consulting projects requiring specialized expertise.
Planners John's leadership and project consultation is based on his involvement with
National Parking Association hundreds of parking and transportation study engagements for architects,
American Planning Association airports, hospitals, municipalities, real estate developers, and universities
International Parking Institute located in all 50 U.S. states and several foreign countries.
National Association of College and In 1992, John was promoted to Department Head of the Parking Consulting
University Business Officers and Study Services Group. In 1996, he was promoted to Director of Study
Urban Land Institute Services and made a Principal of the firm. In 2000, he was promoted to Vice
President. In 2006,he was promoted to his current position. He has served as
a board member and maintains a significant firm-ownership interest.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS:
*Allegheny Conference City Development •City of Lafayette, IN Redevelopment Corp.,
on Community Corporation, Cincinnati, •City of Lansing, MI Cincinnati, OH
Development OH •City of Lima,OH •County of San Diego,CA
•Allentown Parking •City of Allentown, PA •City of Lincoln, NE •Hartford Parking
Authority •City of Austin,TX •City of Madison, WI Authority, Hartford, CT
•Birmingham Parking •City of Bloomington, IN •City of Martinsburg,WV •Lancaster Parking
Authority •City of Cheyenne,WY •City of Memphis,TN Authority, Lancaster, PA
•Borough of Red Lion, PA •City of Cincinnati, OH •City of Mesa,AZ •OKI Regional Council of
•Buncombe County, •City of Columbus, OH •City of Norfolk,VA Governments, Cincinnati,
Asheville, NC •City of Detroit, MI •City of Normal, IL OH
•Capitol South Community •City of Fort Worth,TX •City of Peoria, IL •Philadelphia Parking
Urban Redevelopment •City of Grand Junction, CO *City of Pueblo, CO Authority, Philadelphia,
Corp., Columbus,OH •City of Hermosa Beach, •City of Rockville, MD PA
•Central Oklahoma CA •City of Sacramento, CA •Public Parking Authority
Transportation and •City and County of •City of San Antonio,TX of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh,
Parking Authority Honolulu, HI •City of San Jose, CA PA
•Centre City Development •City of Houston,TX •City of Sarasota, FL •Reading Parking
Corporation,San Diego, Houston Convention •City of South Bend, IN Authority, Reading, PA
CA Center •City of Topeka, KS •Town of Easton, MD
•Chicago Parks District, •City of Huntington,WV •City of Valparaiso, IN
Chicago, IL •City of Indianapolis, IN •Clifton Heights
•Cincinnati Center •City of Kansas City, MO Community Urban
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 21
WALKER
PARKING ccNs1.,.rAN-s Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan-RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Jim Corbett, CAPP
project Manage >s
I
a =
■hY
EDUCATION: Jim is an innovative parking executive with twenty years of successful parking
Bachelor of Arts, Business operation leadership and fiscal governance. Jim joined Walker in 2015 after
a ten-year career as the Parking Division Manager with the City of Tampa
Psychology, Miami University,
Oxford, OH where he managed a 17 million dollar annual budget with one million dollars
of capital improvement designation per annum.
CERTIFICATIONS:
Jim has specialized experience managing municipal and private parking assets
Certified Administrator of Public including on-street parking, residential parking, concert arenas and sports
Parking (CAPP) stadiums, convention centers, hotels, office buildings and mixed-use surface
Certified FEMA Incident Command lot parking.
System—100, 200 and 700 level
Green Garage Certification REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS:
Workshop—IPI/Green Parking City of Homestead Pointe Harbour Island
Council Homestead, FL Tampa, FL
AFFILIATIONS: Supply/Demand/Shared Parking Planning Study/Operations Study
Analysis
International Parking Institute-
member since 2005 City of Clearwater Municipal Marina
Florida Parking Association City of Sarasota St.Armand's Circle Clearwater, FL
member since 2005, President, 2014 Sarasota, FL Planning Study
and Past President, 2015 Supply/Demand Study, Paid Parking
Revenue Projections
City of Daytona Beach
Breakers Park Garage
City of Dunedin Downtown Parking Tampa, FL
Dunedin, FL Planning Study
Parking Management Study and Paid
Parking Strategies
City of Fort Pierce
Fort Pierce, FL
City of Oshkosh Operations Study
Oshkosh,WI
Supply/Demand Study,Alternatives
Analysis, Policy Review and Financial Coral Gables Redevelopment
Plan Coral Gables, FL
Planning Study
Broward County Parking Study BCCC
Expansion Grand Resort
Fort Lauderdale, FL Ft. Myers Beach, FL
Planning Study Financial Study
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 22
ALKE
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan -RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Jaime Windfont, CAPP
e nsti.,ant
kvit-
1.1111
1.11111
_..
EDUCATION: Jaime is a parking consultant in Walker's Houston office, with a focus on
Bachelor of Arts, parking operations, implementation of procedures, policies, and budgets for
Speech Communications, parking facilities.
Texas A&M University With over 15 years of experience, Jaime is particularly adept at solving
REGISTRATIONS: operational challenges and skillfully projecting the financial outcomes.
Certified Administrator of Public In her previous position with Hines, she managed many garages in her tenure
Parking(CAPP) and worked to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the operations
department through improvements to business function and organizational
Accredited Parking Organization planning. She served as the Regional Vice President of Operations for Winpark,
(APO) Program Certification where she created and developed the accounting department.
AFFILIATIONS:
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS:
Texas Parking and Transportation
Association -Past Host Committee
City of Burleson 24th &Camelback*
International Parking Institute Old Town Phoenix,Arizona
-Past Host Committee Burleson,Texas 2,300 spaces, Garage Management
Parking Study and Development and Operations
Women In Parking- Past Host Strategies
Committee BishopArts District 300 Capitol Ma1l/400 Capitol Mall*
Sacramento, California
Urban Land Institute Dallas,Texas 1,600 spaces, Garage Management
Shared Parking, Feasibility Study, and Operations, Event Parking
PRESENTATIONS: 1,000 spaces
Williams Tower*
"Thriving in Life",2015 CAPP First United Methodist Church Houston,Texas
Graduating Class Speaker Fort Worth, Texas 3,071 spaces, Garage Management
Shared Parking, Feasibility Study, 600 and Operations, PARCS Installation
spaces and Implementation
City of San Antonio 1100 Smith*
San Antonio,Texas Houston,Texas
Market and Financial Feasibility 2,239 spaces, Garage Management
Analysis, 600 spaces and Operations, Event Parking
Chase Tower Dallas/Pearl Street* BG Group Place*
Dallas,Texas Houston,Texas
1,670 spaces, Garage Management 1,280 spaces, Garage Management
and Operations, PARCS Installation and Operations,Automated Facility
and Implementation Alley Theatre*
600 Travis/601 Travis* Houston,Texas
Houston,Texas 968 spaces, Garage Management
2,413 spaces, Garage Management and Operations, Event Parking
and Operations, PARCS Installation
and Implementation
Baylor Medical Facilities*
Houston,Texas
2,490 spaces, Garage Management *Denotes projects completed with
and Operations, Valet Management other firms
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 23
Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering, L.P. Team
Jeff Coym,P.E.,Principal/Project Manager
Mr. Coym has 12 years' experience in municipal infrastructure design and
project management, largely on City of Corpus Christi projects. He is
responsible for directing efforts of project teams, including the surveying and
mapping and CADD technicians,to successfully completing specific projects.
Mr. Coym's experience includes projects carried from preliminary investiga-
tions through design and construction phases to final job acceptance.
Ismael A. Rodarte Jr.,S.I.T.,Sr.Surveying Technician
Mr. Rodarte has over 18 years of experience in land surveying, engineering,
GIS mapping,and construction surveying work. His involvement with
engineering and surveying projects include utilizing the latest Autodesk,
Bentley,and ESRI software applications. His engineering and surveying
activities include boundary analysis and determination, plat preparation,
records research,working sketches,well location plats,construction staking,
aerial photography mapping, right-of-way alignments, horizontal/vertical
control,topographic surveys for engineering design, and QA/QC for projects
of all sorts.
Jerad Johnston,Sr. Engineering Technician
Mr.Johnston has ten years'experience in design and drafting of:water,
sanitary sewer,storm sewer, and irrigation lines,WWTP,grading,drainage,
airport development, roads,subdivisions, and athletic facilities.Also
developed topographic maps, aerials, exhibits, presentation data, and plan
sets for distribution. Multiple jobs completed simultaneously with AutoCAD,
using the most current version of Civil 3D 2014 as well as ArcGIS.Assisted field
crew and has experience using GPS and Total Station equipment working on
surveys, construction staking and deeds and boundaries. Mr.Johnston is also
proficient in Bentley's SewerGEMS Sanitary V8i hydraulic modeling software.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 24
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal for Parking Management Study and Strategic Plan- RFP#108
Prepared for City of Corpus Christi
References
Darryn Burich Steve Grassfield
City of Oshkosh City of Austin
215 Church Avenue 1111 Rio Grande Street
Oshkosh, WI 54903 Austin,Texas 78701
512.471.2692 512.974.1489
dburich@ci.oshkosh.wi.us steve.grassfield@ci.austin.tx.us
Robert Schroer Bruce Campbell
City of Cincinnati City of Kansas City
300 West 6th Street 414 East 12th Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 23rd Floor
513.352.1902 Kansas City, Missouri 64106
bob.schroer@cincinnati-oh.gov 816.513.2665
bruce_campbell@kcmo.org
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 25
2
ATTACHMENT 3 - DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
City of
Corpus
Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER #1486
TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY
PURCHASING DIVISION
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
Corpus Christi Code§2-349,as amended,requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide
the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with"NA".
See next page for Filing Requirements, Certification and Definitions.
COMPANY NAME: Walker Parking Consultants
P.O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 2525 Bay Area Blvd.,Ste.400
CITY: Houston STATE: TX
ZIP: 77058
FIRM IS: 1. Corporation X 2. Partnership 3. Sole Owner ❑
4. Association _ 5. Other
DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS
If additional space is necessary,please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet.
1. State the names of each"employee"of the City of Corpus Christi having an"ownership interest"constituting 3%
or more of the ownership in the above named `firm."
Name Job Title and City Department(if known)
N/A
2. State the names of each"official"of the City of Corpus Christi having an"ownership interest"constituting 3%or
more of the ownership in the above named `firm."
Name Title
N/A
3. State the names of each"board member"of the City of Corpus Christi having an"ownership interest"constituting
3%or more of the ownership in the above named"firm."
Name N/A Board, Commission or Committee
4. State the names of each employee or officer of a"consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any
matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the
ownership in the above named"firm."
Name N/A Consultant
20
FILING REQUIREMENTS
If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit
on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the
public in general or a substantial segment thereof,you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official,
employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in
the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics
Ordinance Section 2-349(d)]
CERTIFICATION
I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement,that I have not knowingly
withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to
the City of Corpus Christi,Texas as changes occur.
Certifying Person: Jaime Windfont Title: Parking Consultant
(Type or Print)
Signature of Certifying Person: Date: 4/29/2016
DEFINITIONS
•
a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee of the city, including the board of any
corporation created by the city.
b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that
interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof.
c. "Employee." Any person employed by the city, whether under civil service or not, including part-time
employees and employees of any corporation created by the city.
d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether
established to produce or deal with a product or service,including but not limited to,entities operated in the form
of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation,joint stock company, joint venture,
receivership or trust,and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations.
e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City
Managers,Department and Division Heads,and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas.
f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest,whether actually or constructively held,in a firm, including
when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to
holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership
agreements.
g. "Consultant."Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the
purpose of professional consultation and recommendation.
21
3
ATTACHMENT 4 — BUSINESS DESIGNATION FORM
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
PURCHASING DIVISION
BUSINESS DESIGNATION FORM
ENSURE THIS FORM IS SUBMITTED WITH YOUR BID RESPONSE
PLEASE INDICATE WHETHER YOUR COMPANY IS ANY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
❑YES X❑NO - CERTIFIED HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS (HUB)
Select all that are appropriate:
❑ ASIAN PACIFIC
❑ BLACK
❑ HISPANIC
❑ NATIVE AMERICAN
❑ WOMAN
Please visit the following website for information on becoming a Texas Certified HUB: htto://www.window.state.tx.us/procurement/proe/hub/
❑YES ❑X NO - LOCAL SMALL BUSINESS(LSB)
A for-profit entity employing less than 49 employees located within the City limits of Corpus Christi,Texas
YESX❑ NO OTHER(PLEASE SPECIFY):
X❑ THIS COMPANY IS NOT A CERTIFIED HUB or LSB
THE INFORMATION REQUESTED IN THIS FORM IS FOR STATISTICAL REPORTING
PURPOSES ONLY AND WILL NOT INFLUENCE AWARD DECISIONS OR THE AMOUNT OF
MONIES EXPENDED WITH ANY GIVEN COMPANY.
EVENT NO: 108
Firm Name: Walker Parking Consultants Telephone: 281-280-0068 Ext.
Address: 2525 Bay Area Blvd.,Ste.400 Fax: 281-280-0373
City: Houston State: TX Zip: 77058 - E-mail: jaime.windfont@walkerparking.com
Date: 4/29/2016
Signature of Person Authorized to Sign Form
Signer's Name: Jaime Windfont • Title: Parking Consultant
(Please print or type)
22
4
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES
FORM 1295
1 of 1
Complete Nos.1-4 and 6 if there are interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY
Complete Nos.1,2,3,5,and 6 if there are no interested parties, CERTIFICATION OF FILING
1 Name of business entity filing form,and the city,state and country of the business entity's place
of business.
Walker Parking Consultants
Houston,TX United States
2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is
being filed.
City of Corpus Christi
3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract,and provide a
description of the services,goods or other property to be provided under the contract
RFP#108
Parking Consulting Services
4 Nature of interestcheck
Name of Interested Party City,State,Country(place of business)
( applicable)
Controlling Intermediary
5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑
X
6 AFFIDAVIT I swear,or affirm,under penalty of perjury,that the above disclosure is true and correct.
SUSAN VEUmNDA DF,ALMEIDA
� My Comleslon Expires
April 07,2017
Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity
AFFIX NOTARY STAMP I SEAL ABOVE `, �- �1
Sworn to and subscribed before me,by the said 1.a+mU
tS E. ak. flc r ,this the 11 day of t4titi.1
20 1lp ,to certify which,witness my hand and seal of office.
it,y1AL. 13J..U1 �` �Q imt:tdsk (Act AcA.AD, Q(
Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer admingtering oath
Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021
www.walkerparking.com
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
June 30, 2016
Ms. Lydia Juarez
City of Corpus Christi
1201 Leopard St
Corpus Christi, TX 78401
Re: Pricing for City of Corpus Christi Parking proposal
Dear Ms. Juarez:
Walker Parking Consultants (Walker) is pleased to be selected as the consultant of
choice to perform the Corpus Christi parking study. We are excited about the
opportunity and look forward to working with you and the Parking Advisory Committee.
Please find below our revised pricing for the project. If you have any questions
regarding the attached please let me know and we can discuss. Again, thank you for
this opportunity.
Task Fee Expenses Total Cost
Task 1 $ 7,817.50 $ 783.33 $ 8,600.83
Task 2 $ 10,140.00 $ 1,233.33 $ 11,373.33
Task 3 $ 27,325.00 $ 783.33 $ 28,108.33
Task 4 $ 31,865.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 33,765.00
Task 5 $ 15,600.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 18,100.00
Total $ 92,747.50 $ 7,200.00 $ 99,947.50
Sincerely yours,
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
;4111 Vim\
Jim Corbett, CAPP Jaime Windfont, CAPP
Project Manager Parking Consultant