HomeMy WebLinkAboutC2017-019 - 1/17/2017 - Approved CSJ #0916-35-205
. District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction
CFDA No.20._
205
Not Research and Development
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TRAVIS §
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT
NON-CONSTRUCTION ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT
for a
Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model) Feasibility Study
"On system
THIS Local Project Advance Funding Agreement for Non-Construction (LPAFA) is made by
and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation
(State), and the City Of Corpus Christi (Local Government).
BACKGROUND
A Master Agreement between the Local Government and the State has been adopted and states
the general terms and conditions for transportation projects developed through this LPAFA.
Federal law establishes federally funded programs for transportation improvements to implement
its public purposes, including the Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model) Feasibility Study
program. Federal and state laws require local governments to meet certain contract standards
relating to the management and administration of federal and state funds. The Texas
Transportation Commission passed Minute Order Number 114585, which provides for
development of and funding for the Project identified in this LPAFA. The Governing Body of the
Local Government has approved entering into this LPAFA by resolution or ordinance dated
)ft\IOLVV) \1, 20n, which is attached to and made part of this LPAFA as Attachment A.
NOW THEREFORE, the State and the Local Government agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Period of the Agreement
This agreement becomes effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the
agreement fully executed. This agreement shall remain in effect until the close of ordinary
business on December 31, 2017.
2. Scope of Work
The scope of work is the Project as detailed in Attachment B, which is attached to and made
part of this LPAFA.
. ..___.__. .,id Uses of Funds
2017-019 >t of the Project is shown in Attachment C, which is attached and
1/17/17 :A. The State will pay for only those Project costs that have been
Ord. 031041
TxDOT Page 1 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
INDEXED
CSJ #0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction_
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
approved by the Texas Transportation Commission. The State and the Federal
Government will not reimburse the Local Government for any work performed before the
federal spending authority is formally obligated by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA). After federal funds have been obligated, the State will send to the Local
Government a copy of the formal documentation showing the obligation of funds including
federal award information. The Local Government is responsible for one hundred percent
(100%) of the cost of any work performed under its direction or control before the Federal
spending authority is formally obligated.
B. If the Local Government will perform any work under this contract for which
reimbursement will be provided by or through the State, the Local Government must
complete training before federal spending authority is obligated. Training is complete
when at least one individual who is working actively and directly on the Project
successfully completes and receives a certificate for the course entitled Local Government
Project Procedures and Qualification for the Texas Department of Transportation. The
Local Government shall provide the certificate of qualification to the State. The individual
who receives the training certificate may be an employee of the Local Government or an
employee of a firm that has been contracted by the Local Government to perform
oversight of the Project. The State in its discretion may deny reimbursement if the Local
Government has not designated a qualified individual to oversee the Project.
C. The State will be responsible for securing the Federal and State share of the funding
required for the Project. If the Local Government is due funds for expenses incurred,
these funds will be reimbursed to the Local Government on a cost basis.
D. The Local Government will be responsible for all non-federal and non-state participation
costs associated with the Project.
E. The State will not pay interest on any funds provided by the Local Government.
F. The Local Government is authorized to submit requests for reimbursement by submitting
the original of an itemized invoice in a form and containing all items required by the State
no more frequently than monthly, and no later than ninety (90) days after costs are
incurred. If the Local Government submits invoices more than ninety (90) days after the
costs are incurred, and if federal funding is reduced as a result, the State shall have no
responsibility to reimburse the Local Government for those costs.
G. Whenever funds are paid by the Local Government to the State under this LPAFA, the
Local Government shall remit a check or warrant made payable to the "Texas Department
of Transportation." The check or warrant shall be deposited by the State and managed by
the State. These funds may only be applied to the Project. Upon completion of the
Project, the State will perform an audit of the Project costs. Any funds due by the Local
Government, the State, or the Federal government will be promptly paid by the owing
party. After final Project accounting if excess funds remain, those funds may be applied
by the State to the Local Government's contractual obligations to the State under another
advance funding agreement with approval by appropriate personnel of the Local
Government.
H. Attachment C will clearly state the approval funding structure under 43 TAC §15.52. If the
Local government is an Economically Disadvantaged County and if the State has
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 2 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
•
CSJ #0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction_
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
approved adjustments to the standard financing arrangement, Attachment C will reflect
those adjustments.
I. The state auditor may conduct an audit or investigation of any entity receiving funds from
the State directly under this contract or indirectly through a subcontract under this
contract. Acceptance of funds directly under this contract or indirectly through a
subcontract under this contract acts as acceptance of the authority of the state auditor,
under the direction of the legislative audit committee, to conduct an audit or investigation
in connection with those funds. An entity that is the subject of an audit or investigation
must provide the state auditor with access to any information the state auditor considers
relevant to the investigation or audit.
J. Payment under this contract beyond the end of the current fiscal biennium is subject to
availability of appropriated funds. If funds are not appropriated, this contract shall be
terminated immediately with no liability to either party.
4. Notices
All notices to either party shall be delivered personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail,
postage prepaid, addressed to that party at the following address:
Local Government: State:
City of Corpus Christi Director of Contract Services
Director of Capital Programs Texas Department of Transportation
Jeffery Edmonds 125 E. lith Street
1201 Leopard Street Austin, Texas 78701
Corpus Christi, TX 78401
All notices shall be deemed given on the date delivered in person or deposited in the mail,
unless otherwise provided by this agreement. Either party may change the above address by
sending written notice of the change to the other party. Either party may request in writing
that notices shall be delivered personally or by certified U.S. mail, and that request shall be
carried out by the other party.
5. Termination
Termination of this LPAFA shall be under the conditions as stated in the Master Agreement.
This LPAFA may be terminated by the State if the Project is inactive for thirty-six (36) months
or longer and no expenditures have been charged against federal funds.
6. Amendments
Amendments to this LPAFA shall be made as described in the Master Agreement, without
exception.
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 3 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
CSJ #0916-35-205 '
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning&
Construction
CFDA No.20._
205
Not Research and Development
7. Document and Information Exchange
The Local Government agrees to electronically deliver to the State all general notes,
specifications, contract provision requirements, and related documentation in a Microsoft®
Word or similar document. If requested by the State, the Local Government will use the
State's document template. The Local Government shall also provide a detailed project time
estimate including types of activities and month in which the activity will be completed in the
format required by the State. This requirement applies whether the Local Government
creates the documents with its own forces or by hiring a consultant or professional provider.
At the request of the State, the Local Government shall submit any information required by
the State in the format directed by the State.
8. Incorporation of Master Agreement Provisions
This LPAFA incorporates all of the governing provisions of the Master Agreement in effect on
the date of final execution of this LPAFA, unless an exception has been made in this
agreement.
9. Debarment Certification
The parties are prohibited from making any award at any tier to any party that is debarred or
suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal Assistance
Programs under Executive Order 12549, "Debarment and Suspension." By executing this
agreement, the Local Government certifies that it and its principals are not currently debarred,
suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal Assistance
Programs under Executive Order 12549 and further certifies that it will not do business with
any party, to include principals, that is currently debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded
from or ineligible for participation in Federal Assistance Programs under Executive Order
12549. The parties to this contract shall require any party to a subcontract or purchase order
awarded under this contract to certify its eligibility to receive federal funds and, when
requested by the State, to furnish a copy of the certification.
10. Cost Principles
In order to be reimbursed with federal funds, the parties shall comply with the Cost Principles
established in 2 CFR 200 that specify that all reimbursed costs are allowable, reasonable,
and allocable to the Project.
11. Civil Rights Compliance
A. Compliance with Regulations: The Local Government will comply with the Acts and the
Regulations relative to Nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S.
Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, as they may be
amended from time to time.
B. Nondiscrimination: The Local Government, with regard to the work performed by it during
the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in
the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and
leases of equipment. The Local Government will not participate directly or indirectly in the
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 4 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
CSJ#0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction
CFDA No.20._
205
Not Research and Development
discrimination prohibited by the Acts and the Regulations, including employment practices
when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 45
CFR Part 21.
C. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In all
solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Local Government for
work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of
equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Local
Government of the Local Government's obligations under this contract and the Acts and
Regulations relative to Nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.
D. Information and Reports: The Local Government shall provide all information and reports
required by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto, and will
permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and facilities as
may be determined by the State or the Federal Highway Administration to be pertinent to
ascertain compliance with such Acts, Regulations or directives. Where any information
required of the Local Government is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or
refuses to furnish this information, the Local Government will so certify to the State or the
Federal Highway Administration, as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has
made to obtain the information.
E. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Local Government's noncompliance with
. the Nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the State will impose such contract
sanctions as it or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appropriate,
including, but not limited to:
a. withholding of payments to the Local Government under the contract until the Local
Government complies and/or
b. cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part.
F. Incorporation of Provisions: The Local Government will include the provisions of
paragraphs (A) through (E) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and
leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations and directives issued
pursuant thereto. The Local Government will take such action with respect to any
subcontract or procurement as the State or the Federal Highway Administration may direct
as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance provided,
however, that in the event an Local Government becomes involved in, or is threatened
with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Local
Government may request the Texas Department of Transportation to enter into such
litigation to protect the interests of the State; and, in addition, the Local Government may
request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United
States.
12. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program Requirements
A. The parties shall comply with the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program
requirements established in 49 CFR Part 26.
B. The Local Government shall adopt, in its totality, the State's federally approved DBE
program.
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 5 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
CSJ #0916-35-205
•
District#16
Code Chart 64 #09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction
CFDA No.207
205
Not Research and Development
C. The Local Government shall set an appropriate DBE goal consistent with the State's DBE
guidelines and in consideration of the local market, project size, and nature of the goods
or services to be acquired. The Local Government shall have final decision-making
authority regarding the DBE goal and shall be responsible for documenting its actions.
D. The Local Government shall follow all other parts of the State's DBE program referenced
in TxDOT Form 2395, Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the Adoption of the
Texas Department of Transportation's Federally-Approved Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise by Entity, and attachments found at web address
http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/bop/dbe/mou/mou attachments.pdf.
E. The Local Government shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or
sex in the award and performance of any U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)-
assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49
CFR Part 26. The Local Government shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under
49 CFR Part 26 to ensure non-discrimination in award and administration of DOT-assisted
contracts. The State's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by
DOT, is incorporated by reference in this LPAFA. Implementation of this program is a
legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this
LPAFA. Upon notification to the Local Government of its failure to carry out its approved
program, the State may impose sanctions as provided for under 49 CFR Part 26 and may,
in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.).
F. Each contract the Local Government signs with a contractor (and each subcontract the
prime contractor signs with a sub-contractor) must include the following assurance: The
contractor, sub-recipient, or sub-contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race,
color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry
out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-
assisted contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material
breach of this agreement, which may result in the termination of this agreement or such
other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate.
13. Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Requirements
A. Any recipient of funds under this agreement agrees to comply with the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) and implementing regulations at 2 CFR
Part 170, including Appendix A. This agreement is subject to the following award terms:
http://www.gpo.qov/fdsys/pkq/FR-2010-09-14/pdf/2010-22705.pdf and
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkq/FR-2010-09-14/pdf/2010-22706.pdf.
B. The Local Government agrees that it shall:
1. Obtain and provide to the State a System for Award Management (SAM) number
(Federal Acquisition Regulation, Part 4, Sub-part 4.11) if this award provides more
than $25,000 in Federal funding. The SAM number may be obtained by visiting the
SAM website whose address is: https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/
2. Obtain and provide to the State a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number,
a unique nine-character number that allows the federal government to track the
AFA-LPAFA NonConstruction Page 6 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
•
•
CSJ #0916-35-205
• District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
distribution of federal money. The DUNS number may be requested free of charge for
all businesses and entities required to do so by visiting the Dun & Bradstreet on-line
registration website http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform; and
3. Report the total compensation and names of its top five (5) executives to the State if:
i. More than 80% of annual gross revenues are from the Federal government, and
those revenues are greater than $25,000,000; and
ii. The compensation information is not already available through reporting to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.
14. Single Audit Report
A. The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-
502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in 2 CFR 200.
B. If threshold expenditures of $750,000 or more are met during the fiscal year, the Local
Government must submit a Single Audit Report and Management Letter (if applicable) to
TxDOT's Audit Office, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, TX 78701 or contact TxDOT's Audit
Office at http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/office/audit/contact.html.
C. If expenditures are less than the threshold during the Local Government's fiscal year, the
Local Government must submit a statement to TxDOT's Audit Office as follows: "We did
not meet the $ expenditure threshold and therefore, are not required to have a
single audit performed for FY
D. For each year the project remains open for federal funding expenditures, the Local
Government will be responsible for filing a report or statement as described above. The
required annual filing shall extend throughout the life of the agreement, unless otherwise
amended or the project has been formally closed out and no charges have been incurred
within the current fiscal year.
15. Non-Discrimination Provisions
A. Relocation Assistance: The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or
whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and
projects.
B. Disability:
a. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 et. Seq.), as
amended, prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability; and 49 CFR Part 27.
b. Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination
on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private
transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing
entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12189) as implemented by the Department of
Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38.
C. Age: The Age Discrimination Act of 1974, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et. Seq.),
prohibits discrimination on the basis of age.
D. Race, Creed, Color, National Origin, or Sex:
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 7 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
CSJ #0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction_
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
a. The Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 (49 U.S.C. § 4.71, Section
4.7123), as amended, prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national
origin, or sex.
b. The Federal Aviation Administration's Nondiscrimination state (4 U.S.C. § 47123)
prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex.
c. Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et. seq.), prohibits
discrimination on the basis of sex.
d. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, prohibits
discrimination because of sex in education program or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et.
seq.).
E. Civil Rights Restoration Act: The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (PL 100-209),
Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by
expanding the definition of the terms "programs and activities" to include all of the
programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether
such programs or activities are Federally funded or not.
F. Minority Populations: Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures non-
discrimination against minority and low-income populations by discouraging programs,
policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority and low-income populations.
G. Limited English Proficiency: Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for
Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin
discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To
ensure compliance with Title VI, the Engineer must take reasonable steps to ensure that
LEP persons have meaningful access to its programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100).
16. Signatory Warranty
Each signatory warrants that the signatory has necessary authority to execute this agreement
on behalf of the entity represented.
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 8 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
CSJ #0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64 #09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
THIS AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED by the State and the Local Government in duplicate.
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
ii'de 4t1
Margie C. Rose .
City Manager REBECCA HUERTA
CITY SECRETARY
Date
THE STA. OF TEXA ,
'da
Kenn-th
Director of Contract Service
Texas Department of Transportation
Clif.L.S.LL04-1
b1270 7// - AU I H
Date rf COMO. _..,...jI
FCRGTnn�-
a
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 9 of 9 Rev. 04/29/2016
CSJ#0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction_
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION OR ORDINANCE
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 1 of 1 Attachment A
vs
i
. I
r
�OIIPON/.�0 AGENDA MEMORANDUM
�M
1852 First Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 10, 2017
Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017
DATE: January 5, 2017
TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager
THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager
markvv@cctexas.com
(361) 826-3082
Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director, Public Works
valerieg@cctexas.com
(361) 826-3729
FROM: JeffreyH. Edmonds, P. E., Director, Engineering Services
qt2CC52-
\\1
9 9 �\�
jeffreye@cctexas.com
(361) 826-3851
Daniel McGinn, Assistant Director, Planning & Environmental/Strategic Initiatives
danielmc@cctexas.com
(361) 826-7011
Advance Funding Agreement (TxDOT) and Interlocal Agreement (RTA)
Strategic Integration (Traffic Demand Model) Feasibility Study
Bond 2014, Proposition 2 — Future TXDOT Participation
CAPTION:
Ordinance appropriating $368,000 of anticipated revenues from the Texas Department of
Transportation (TXDOT); authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Advance Funding
Agreement with TXDOT for the Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model) Feasibility Study with a
payment of $18,400 due to TXDOT for reimbursement of direct state costs, and to execute an
Interlocal Agreement with the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) for their participation ($55,200)
in this project. (Bond 2014, Proposition 2)
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this item is to take the necessary administrative actions to fund the development of a
traffic demand model for the City. The model will be a tool for planning future roadway capacity and
other transportation needs. The majority (80%) of the funding for this effort originates with a grant
from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The grant funds are passed through TXDOT to the
City in a process moderated by the regional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). TXDOT will
additionally seek reimbursement for their administrative costs ($18,400) from the City. The local
match (20%) for this grant is being shared equally between the City and the RTA.
This item will appropriate a receivable and execute an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with
TXDOT outlining project requirements and agreeing to reimburse TXDOT in the amount of $18,400
•
ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $368,000 OF ANTICIPATED
REVENUES FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (TXDOT); AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER,
OR DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE AN ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT
WITH TXDOT FOR THE STRATEGIC INTEGRATION (TRAVEL
DEMAND MODEL) FEASIBILITY STUDY WITH A PAYMENT OF
$18,400 DUE TO TXDOT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF DIRECT STATE
COSTS, AND TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (RTA) FOR THEIR
PARTICIPATION ($55,200) IN THIS PROJECT. (BOND 2014,
PROPOSITION 2)
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute an Advance
Funding Agreement (AFA) for the Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model)
Feasibility Study with the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT)with an initial
payment of the local share in the amount of$18,400 for State oversite of the project.
SECTION 2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute an Interlocal
Agreement for the for the Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model) Feasibility
Study with the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) that requires the RTA to pay
$55,200,which represents one-half of the required 20% local cost share, with the City
paying the remaining.
SECTION 3. The FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No.
030936 is amended to add a TxDOT receivable in the amount of 368,000 to Street
CIP Fund 3530 for 80% of the projected cost of the Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model)Feasibility Study, Project#T16356.
SECTION 4. The FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No.
030936 is amended to add an RTA Contribution in the amount of $55,200 to Street
CIP Fund 3530 for 1/2 of the anticipated local cost share for the Strategic Integration
(Travel Demand Model) Feasibility Study, Project#T16356.
SECTION 5. The FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No.
030936 is amended to increase revenues and expenditures in the amount of
$423,200.
SECTION 6. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all related
documents necessary to administer said AFA and Interlocal Agreement, including
minor amendments thereto.
031041
INDEXED
That the foregoing ordipanpe was read for the first time and passed to its second
reading on this the C I clay of , -(&„ k,L(J C lit .), 2017, by the following
vote: J
d'
Dan McQueen A A Ben Molina AL:
Rudy Garza IP S . ,! Lucy Rubio I A ,
Paulette Guajardo . !. C- Greg Smith L,
Michael Hunter It i
Carolyn Vaughn 1411,
Joe McComb ,r 4 L
4
That the foregoing ordinan e was read for the second time and passed finally on
this the t 1}` day of %,; C (..L.-'. , 2017, by the following vote:
II
Dan McQueen L • ' flL Ben Molina L •
Rudy Garza cu. cc, Lucy Rubio I i,i
Paulette Guajardo i- I Greg Smith 1 ,
Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn C
Joe McComb
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 17 day of
ra,2017.
ATTEST:
k)‹...L<.1-(4. c 141-Ai- t' -e--_ —:r,;:' 7/''----------
Rebecca Huerta Dan McQue
City Secretary Mayor
►31C4i
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
CERTIFICATION OF FUNDS
(City Charter Article IV, Sections 7& 8)
kr..
I, the Director of Financial Services of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (or his/her duly authorized
representative), hereby certify to the City Council and other appropriate officers that the money required
for the current fiscal year's portion of the contract, agreement, obligation or expenditure described
below is in the Treasury to the credit of the Fund specified below, from which it is to be drawn, and has
not been appropriated for any other purpose. Future payments are subject to annual appropriation
by the City Council.
City Council Action Date: January 17, 2017 Legistar Number: 16-1390
Agenda Item: Ordinance appropriating $368,000 of anticipated revenues from the Texas Department fi
of Transportation (TXDOT); authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Advance Funding .i
Agreement with TXDOT for the Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model) Feasibility Study with a
payment of $18,400 due to TXDOT for reimbursement of direct state costs, and to execute an Interlocal <;
Agreement with the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) for their participation ($55,200) in this r'
project. (Bond 2014, Proposition 2) y`
Amount Required: $ 423,200
Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Amount
Street CIP 3530 116020 368,000 ,aai
Street CIP 3530 116130 55,200
Total 423,200
❑ Certification Not Required
Director of Financial Services
Date: JAN 0 9 2017
i
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
CERTIFICATION OF FUNDS
(City Charter Article IV, Sections 7 & 8)
I, the Director of Financial Services of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (or his/her duly authorized
representative), hereby certify to the City Council and other appropriate officers that the money required
for the current fiscal year's portion of the contract, agreement, obligation or expenditure described
below is in the Treasury to the credit of the Fund specified below, from which it is to be drawn, and has
not been appropriated for any other purpose. Future payments are subject to annual appropriation
by the City Council.
City Council Action Date: January 17, 2017 Legistar Number: 16-1390
Agenda Item: Ordinance appropriating $368,000 of anticipated revenues from the Texas Department
of Transportation (TXDOT); authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Advance Funding
Agreement with TXDOT for the Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model) Feasibility Study with a
payment of$18,400 due to TXDOT for reimbursement of direct state costs, and to execute an Interlocal
Agreement with the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) for their participation ($55,200) in this
project. (Bond 2014, Proposition 2)
Amount Required: $ 18,400
Fund Name Accounting Unit 1 Account No. Activity No. Amount
Street CIP 3551-051 550950 T16356-01-3551-EXP 18,400
Total 18,400
❑ Certification Not Required
Director of Financial Services
Date: JAN 0 9 2017
4
CSJ #0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning&
Construction_
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
ATTACHMENT B
SCOPE OF WORK
Background:
The Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) utilizes the TxDOT Travel Demand
Model (TDM) process for the development of traffic projections on a periodic basis.
The City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority (CCRTA)would
benefit from those traffic projections if they could be integrated into their respective transportation
planning efforts. Specifically, the City Urban Transportation Plan under Mobility Corpus Christi, a
strategic framework for mobility. and Area Development Plans as well as the CCRTA's Long-range
Operations Plan, Transit Plan 20/20, would be integrated into the MPO — TDM process.
Context
The Corpus Christi MPO currently has a 2006 base year travel demand model with a 2040 forecast.
This model is a valuable tool in developing the region's long-range 2040 Metropolitan Transportation
Plan (MTP), and also provides Geographic Information System (GIS layers to visually display
demographic and network data.
The TDM is currently a standard tool with capabilities to project average annual daily traffic volumes
for future years with the current MTP projecting to 2040. That is, its traffic volume estimates for a
typical 24-hour period on a typical day. Enhancements of the TDM would enable a wider range of
analysis, including estimates of transit ridership and estimates of traffic based on alternative
demographic and network scenarios. It also will include land use patterns based on Plan Corpus
Christi — Corpus Christi Comprehensive Plan.
Further, the TDM may be considered as one element of a comprehensive forecasting system for a
range of capital infrastructure planning processes. Coordinating the long-range transportation
planning function with long-range planning for other infrastructure elements can contribute to
developing optimum choices for capital expenditures.
The next travel demand model for Corpus Christi will have a 2012 base year and a 2017 and 2045
forecast. TxDOT supports model enhancements and may use Corpus Christi as a pilot to implement
dynamic traffic assignment, time-of-day, intersection control, transit, and other advanced features in
its models.
Tasks
1. The Local Government shall review:
• Urban Transportation Plan
• Mobility CC
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 1 of 4 Attachment B
CSJ #0916-35-205
District#16
' Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction_
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
• Other city plans for consistency in their deficiency analysis, project generation, and
project evaluation criteria and procedures.
Deliverables: The Local Government will provide the following deliverables to the State:
• A technical memorandum that identifies the local plans that were reviewed as part
of this task, identifies which are to be integrated into the TDM as part of these projects,
and defines objectives for doing so. The timeframe for this project is expected to be 2
months from the start of the agreement
2. The Local Government shall:
• Perform an intensive review of the scope and precision of the 2006 travel demand model
and its existing 2040 forecast.
• Determine implications of TxPACK enhancements to the existing model and provide staff
training.
• Determine how to apply specific City and Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)
planning needs to the enhanced model and determine if the model has the accuracy and
the precision to support those additional data needs, particularly with regard to its
performance in high-growth areas, freight movement, recreational travel, and seasonal
travel.
• Determine the model structure and data needs to support enhancements to model
performance. Provide staff training and direction to maximize the use and benefits of the
enhanced model.
Deliverables: The Local Government will provide the following deliverables to the State within
5 months of the execution date of the agreement:
• A technical memorandum detailing the process, as refined during the review of the
2006 model, by which the existing TDM process will be enhanced through this TDM
development project.
• Direction and training of MPO, RTA and City staff to effectively utilize the features of the
TxPACK enhanced model.
3. The Local Government shall:
• Create scenario-based model input files for various combinations of years and
scenarios as required to support regional planning needs. This may include different
forecast land-use scenarios such as compact growth and urban centers.
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 2 of 4 Attachment 6
CSJ #0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction_
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
• Coordinate the scenario-based land development forecasts prepared for the travel
demand model to other capital improvement programs such as streets, trails, parks,
and utilities, and services such as schools, libraries, and fire stations.
Deliverables: The Local Government shall provide the following deliverables to the State
within 3 months of the date of execution of this agreement:
• Documentation of the defined alternative scenarios and description of the selection and
evaluation processes through the development of demographic input files for each
specified demographic scenario, formatted to run in the travel demand model as well as
ArcGIS shapefiles for each specified demographic scenario and Trans CAD formatted
network files for each specified network scenario.
4. The Local Government shall:
• Develop a transit component to the travel demand model to support the analysis of issues
such as Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT).
Deliverables: The Local Government will provide the following deliverables to the State within
2 months of the date of execution of this agreement.
• Parsed, edited, and formatted transit input data in the standard model file structure. sketch-
level transit model integrated into the travel demand model and re-validated travel demand
model.
• Edited, and formatted GIS layers for various city master plans and other long-range plans,
collated into a single geodatabase with analysis of overlapping geographic areas and
functional areas among the various plans as well as analysis of conflicts and opportunities
among the various plans. Model components and outputs must be in alignment with TOD
planning and New Start grant program requirements under the U.S. Department of
Transportation Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act or "FAST Act".
Deliverables The Local Government will provide the following deliverables to the State:
• Technical modeling and GIS files, supporting documentation, and presentations at the 60%
completion stage and upon completion of the project
• Documentation (in final report from presented in six hard copies and as a PDF file) of exiting
Goals and processes across all planning program
• An evaluation of the potential for coordination
• Documentation of existing goals and processes across all planning programs
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 3 of 4 Attachment B
' CSJ #0916-35-205
District#16
Code Chart 64#09800
Project: Strategic Integration (Travel
Demand Model (TDM) Feasibility Study
Federal Highway Administration
CFDA Title: Highway Planning &
Construction
CFDA No.20.205
Not Research and Development
ATTACHMENT C
PROJECT BUDGET
Costs will be allocated based on 80% Federal funding and 20% Local Government funding until the
federal funding reaches the maximum obligated amount. The Local Government will then be
responsible for 100% of the costs.
Strategic Integration (Travel Total Federal State Local
Demand Model) Feasibility Study Estimated Participation _Participation _Participation
Cost % Cost % Cost % Cost
•
Task I $115,000 80% $92,000 0% $0 20% $23,000
Task II $115,000 80% $92,000 0% $0 20% $23,000
•
Task III $115,000 80% $92,000 0% $0 20% $23,000
•
Task IV ▪$115,000 80% $92,000 0% $0 20% $23,000
Direct State Cost (4%) $ 18,400 0% $0 0% $0 20% $18,400
Indirect State Costs (6.38%) ▪$ 29,348 0% $0 100% $29,348 0% $0
TOTAL $507,748 $368,000 $29,348 $110,400
Initial payment by the Local Government to the State: $18,400.00
Estimated total payment by the Local Government to the State $18,400.00.
This is an estimate. The final amount of Local Government participation will be based on actual
costs.
AFA-LPAFA_NonConstruction Page 1 of 1 Attachment C